Skip to main content
Frontiers in Psychiatry logoLink to Frontiers in Psychiatry
. 2026 Jan 20;16:1707837. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1707837

Identification of a Chinese patient with MTSS2-causing intellectual disability by WES reanalysis: a case report

Duan Li 1,†, Wen Zhang 1,†,‡, Huifen Mei 1, Xiaodan Chen 1, Zhikun Lu 1, Pengfei Wu 1, Li Liu 1,*,‡, Yunting Lin 1,*,‡
PMCID: PMC12866891  PMID: 41641084

Abstract

Intellectual developmental disorder with ocular anomalies and distinctive facial features (IDDOF) is an extremely rare disease caused by a heterozygous pathogenic variant in the MTSS2 gene with an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern. To date, only 10 patients with IDDOF and one pathogenic variant in the MTSS2 gene have been reported. Here, we present a new Chinese patient with IDDOF, who is the 11th patient worldwide and the second case in China. The proband presented with relative microcephaly, distinctive facial features of bitemporal narrowing and ptosis, ophthalmological and auditory findings, hypotonia, psychomotor developmental delay, intellectual disability, and emotional and behavioral problems. Whole exome sequencing (WES) initially did not find a phenotype-contributing variant in 2021, whereas reanalysis of WES data in 2024 revealed that the de novo c.2011C>T(p.Arg671Trp) heterozygous variant of the MTSS2 gene in the patient turned out to be pathogenic, which had been reported to cause IDDOF in 2022. Our study reports an additional patient and new phenotypes for IDDOF and suggests the c.2011C>T(p.Arg671Trp) variant in the MTSS2 gene as a hotspot. Our work shares our diagnostic experience and indicates the potential of WES reanalysis in negative cases to improve diagnostic yield, particularly in rediscovering previously unknown gene–disease associations.

Keywords: intellectual disability, MTSS2 gene, MTSS1L gene, whole exome sequencing, WES reanalysis

1. Introduction

Intellectual disability (ID) is one of the most prevalent neurodevelopmental disorders affecting 1%-3% of the general population (1). To date, more than 2,000 genes have been implicated in ID with high genetic heterogeneity and phenotypic variability. Therein, de novo variants with autosomal dominant trait are prominent contributors to ID in non-consanguineous families (2).

The MTSS2 gene (OMIM * 615951), formerly known as MTSS1L gene, encodes MTSS I-BAR domain-containing protein 2, which is mainly expressed in the central nervous system (3). In 2022, a recurrent de novo c.2011C>T(p.Arg671Trp) variant in the MTSS2 gene (NM_138383.3) was revealed to cause a novel ID syndrome in five unrelated individuals through a dominant-negative mechanism (4). This associated disorder is now named “Intellectual developmental disorder with ocular anomalies and distinctive facial features (IDDOF)” (OMIM # 620086) in the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) database. Subsequently, an additional case of IDDOF was reported in 2023 (5). Recently, four new cases have been added to the literature (6). However, the mutational spectrum of this disorder has not expanded, since all 10 reported patients share the same MTSS2 c.2011C>T(p.Arg671Trp) variant.

Here, we present a new Chinese boy with IDDOF, who is the 11th patient worldwide and the second case in China, and describe his diagnostic process.

2. Case presentation

The proband (II1) is the first child of the non-consanguineous healthy parents (I1 and I2) (Figure 1A). He was delivered naturally at term with a normal length of 51 cm (0.3 SD) and weight of 3.6 kg (0.7 SD) (7). There was no history of prenatal issues or birth injury. After birth, the proband was noticed to have ptosis and hypotonia and gradually developed psychomotor delay. He achieved head control at 4 months of age, could turn over at 8 months of age, started walking independently at 1 year and 10 months of age, and enabled to speak until 2 years and 7 months of age. His brain magnetic resonance imaging at 7 months of age and electroencephalogram at 2 years and 2 months of age had no obvious abnormality. His skeletal X-ray at 1 year and 6 months of age indicated spina bifida occulta of the fifth lumbar vertebra, and auditory evoked potential at 2 years and 3 months of age showed a slight increase of bilateral hearing thresholds.

Figure 1.

Diagram showing three panels: (A) Pedigree chart with individuals I1, I2, and II1. (B) DNA sequencing chromatograms for MTSS2 gene showing c.2011C>T variant in the proband with a red arrow indicating the mutation, absent in father and mother. (C) Workflow chart indicating whole exome sequencing (WES) in 2021 showed no suspicious variant, while WES reanalysis in 2024 identified MTSS2 c.2011C>T mutation.

The family pedigree and molecular findings of the enrolled family. (A) The family pedigree. (B) Sanger sequencing chromatograms of the enrolled family. The red arrow indicates the variant. (C) The molecular diagnostic process of the proband.

The proband first presented to our clinic at 2 years and 7 months of age in 2021 because of ID, speech delay, and motor incoordination. He presented with distinctive facial features of bitemporal narrowing and ptosis. He had a normal height of 93.2 cm (−0.2 SD) and a weight of 14.5 kg (0.4 SD) but relative microcephaly with an occipitofrontal circumference of 47.5 cm (−1.4 SD) and chest circumference of 51 cm (0.1 SD) (7, 8). Physical examination found a small cafe-au-lait spot on his left thigh and an enlargement of his left scrotum. Ophthalmological examination revealed astigmatism and myopia. Furthermore, the proband suffered from emotional and behavioral problems, such as bad temper, irritability, and automatic speaking. No abnormality was found in his biochemical and metabolic profiles, karyotype analysis, and chromosomal microarray analysis.

To identify the phenotype-producing variant, whole exome sequencing (WES) of the proband–parent trio was performed. The analysis identified several variants: a de novo variant in the MTSS1L gene; two hemizygous variants in the BCORL1 and IGSF1 genes, both inherited from the mother; and a compound heterozygous variant in the AHNAK2 gene, inherited from each parent (Table 1). Among them, only BCORL1 and IGSF1 were known disease-causing genes, but the identified variants in these two genes were predicted to be tolerated by in silico analyses (Table 2). Therefore, none of the identified variants could explain the proband’s phenotypes.

Table 1.

Identified variants of the proband based on family model in 2021.

Family model Gene Chr Transcript Variant Allele Inheritance OMIM-disease
Dominant MTSS1L 16 NM_138383 c.2011C>T(p.Arg671Trp) Het De novo –
Recessive BCORL1 X NM_021946 c.3422G>A(p.Arg1141Gln) Hem Maternal Shukla-Vernon syndrome (XLR)
Recessive IGSF1 X NM_001170961 c.1793A>T(p.Glu598Val) Hem Maternal Hypothyroidism, central, and testicular enlargement (XLR)
Compound heterozygous AHNAK2 14 NM_138420 c.5531C>T(p.Ala1844Val)
c.9850A>C(p.Lys3284Gln)
Het
Het
Paternal
Maternal
–

Chr, chromosome; Het, heterozygous; Hem, hemizygous; XLR, X-linked recessive; -, none.

Table 2.

In silico analyses of the BCORL1 and IGSF1 variants.

Variant PROVEAN SIFT PolyPhen-2 Mutation taster FATHMM
BCORL1: c.3422G>A(p.Arg1141Gln) Neutral Tolerated Possibly damaging/benign Benign Tolerated
IGSF1: c.1793A>T(p.Glu598Val) Neutral Tolerated Possibly damaging/possibly damaging Benign Tolerated

The proband was then lost to follow-up until 5 years and 3 months of age when he revisited our clinic for further examination. He remained with a normal height and weight, and relative microcephaly with an occipitofrontal circumference of 49 cm (−1.7 SD) and chest circumference of 55 cm (−0.4 SD) (8). There was no significant improvement for his neurological phenotypes of ID, speech delay, and motor incoordination.

To further investigate if there is an underlying molecular basis, WES data were reanalyzed in 2024. Surprisingly, the de novo c.2011C>T(p.Arg671Trp) heterozygous variant of the MTSS1L gene, now known as MTSS2 gene, in the proband turned out to be a known pathogenic variant of IDDOF. Sanger sequencing subsequently confirmed the de novo status of this variant with presence in the proband and absence in his unaffected parents (Figure 1B).

3. Discussion

IDDOF is an extremely rare disease caused by a heterozygous deleterious variant in the MTSS2 gene with an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern. To date, only 10 patients with IDDOF and one pathogenic variant in the MTSS2 gene have been reported (4–6). Our case shared similar facial appearances and neurologic features, and the same c.2011C>T(p.Arg671Trp) heterozygous variant in the MTSS2 gene with these previous patients (Table 3), which further supports the MTSS2 gene as the cause of IDDOF and suggests the c.2011C>T(p.Arg671Trp) variant in the MTSS2 gene as a hotspot. Thus, our patient could be diagnosed as IDDOF clinically and genetically.

Table 3.

Clinical and genetic features of 11 patients with IDDOF.

Patient P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 Mean ± SD or percentage
Reference Huang Y et al. (3) Corona-Rivera JR et al. (6) Dominicis A et al. (7) This study /
Gender Male Female Male Male Male Male Male Female Male Male Male Male:female = 9:2
Ethnicity European UK Dutch European Chinese Mexican European European European European Chinese /
Age (years) 8 42 15 1.17 1.75 7 10 21 7.67 12 5.25 8.8 ± 5.7
Growth retardation − − Unknown − − + − + − − − 20.0%(2/10)
Facial dysmorphism + + + + Unknown + + + + + + 100.0%(10/10)
Microcephaly or relative microcephaly + + + + + + + + + + + 100.0%(11/11)
Ophthalmological anomalies + + + + + + + − + − + 81.8%(9/11)
Hearing impairment + + Unknown − − Unknown − + − − + 44.4%(4/9)
ID + + + + + + + + + + + 100.0%(11/11)
Autism spectrum disorder + − + Not applicable Not applicable + − − − − − 33.3%(3/9)
Seizures − + − − − + + + − − − 36.7%(4/11)
Gene variant MTSS2: c.2011C>T(p.Arg671Trp) heterozygous variant /
Inheritance De novo De novo De novo De novo De novo Unknown (absence in his co-twin and mother) De novo De novo De novo Unknown De novo /

However, the confirmation of IDDOF did not change the supportive rehabilitation interventions for our patient, as there is no effective treatment for this disease. For his parents, prenatal diagnosis was suggested for future pregnancies because gonadal mosaicism could not be ruled out, even though the pathogenic MTSS2 variant was not detected in their blood samples.

In addition to the classical symptoms of IDDOF, our patient exhibited previously unreported phenotypes, including spina bifida occulta of fifth lumbar vertebra, an enlarged scrotum, and astigmatism. Among the 10 previously reported IDDOF patients, some showed ophthalmological manifestations such as foveal hypoplasia, progressive optic nerve atrophy, iris cysts, and myopia, while the patient from Mexico had bilateral inguinal hernias and bilateral cryptorchidism (5–7). Moreover, recent studies have implicated the MTSS2 protein in cell migration and spinogenesis (9) and have suggested that variants in the MTSS2 gene may contribute to the etiopathogenesis of spina bifida (10). Therefore, these findings collectively suggest that spina bifida and ophthalmological and genitourinary abnormalities are specific features of IDDOF.

In this study, our initial WES analysis in 2021 did not find the phenotype-causing variant in the proband, whereas the reanalysis in 2024 successfully identified it (Figure 1C). That is because the MTSS2 gene was first described to cause IDDOF in 2022 (4). Our initial WES analysis based on OMIM in 2021 could not recognize this novel causative gene uncovered later. This study is very similar to our previous report on Marbach–Rustad progeroid syndrome resulting from the de novo c.1436C>T(p.Ser479Phe) heterozygous variant in the LEMD2 gene (11). Our experience indicates that WES reanalysis of negative cases could improve diagnostic yield, particularly when there are previously unknown gene–disease associations.

Actually, our initial identification of the de novo c.2011C>T(p.Arg671Trp) variant in the MTSS2 gene in 2021 was earlier than the first gene-disease report in 2022. However, the lack of resources for further functional studies, coupled with limited access to genomic matchmaking platforms and inter-institutional collaboration, prevented us from identifying this new disease-causing gene.

In addition, although only the c.2011C>T(p.Arg671Trp) variant in the MTSS2 gene has been confirmed as the cause of IDDOF, 18 different variants in the MTSS2 gene have been documented in the Human Gene Mutation Database (Professional 2025.2). Among them, 13 variants are annotated with presence in patients having neurodevelopment disorders.

In fact, the MTSS2 gene was first described as a novel candidate gene for human neurogenetic disorders in 2015 as the c.1790C>T(p.Thr597Met) missense variant was found in two siblings presenting ID and segregated in their family with an autosomal recessive inheritance pattern (12). However, the clinical significance of this c.1790C>T(p.Thr597Met) variant needs to be further evaluated due to a high frequency of 1.6% recorded in the Kinh Vietnamese genetic variation database (13). Thereafter, several variants in the MTSS2 gene were found in patients affected by developmental disorder or autism, but their clinical significances were undefined (14–17). More studies are needed to determine whether there are novel inheritance pattern and more pathogenic variants for IDDOF.

4. Conclusions

Our study adds a new patient with IDDOF, who is the 11th case worldwide and the second case in China, and provides additional phenotypes to expand the phenotypic spectrum of this disease. Our finding supports the MTSS2 gene as the cause of IDDOF and indicates the c.2011C>T(p.Arg671Trp) variant in the MTSS2 gene as a hotspot. Our experience also underlines the potential of WES reanalysis to improve diagnostic efficiency, particularly in rediscovering previously unknown gene–disease associations.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the enrolled family for participation in this study.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported by the Guangzhou Health Science and Technology Project (20211A011029).

Footnotes

Edited by: Miriam Kessi, Central South University, China

Reviewed by: Yun-Yan He, Qingdao University, China

Christy LaFlamme, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, United States

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Institutional Review Board of Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article. Written informed consent was obtained from the participant/patient(s) for the publication of this case report.

Author contributions

DL: Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Funding acquisition. WZ: Formal analysis, Validation, Writing – original draft, Resources. HM: Resources, Writing – review & editing. XC: Validation, Writing – review & editing. ZL: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. PW: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. LL: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. YL: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1. Marrus N, Hall L. Intellectual disability and language disorder. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. (2017) 26:539–54. doi:  10.1016/j.chc.2017.03.001, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Li C, Wang Y, Zeng C, Huang B, Chen Y, Xue C, et al. Trio-whole exome sequencing reveals the importance of de novo variants in children with intellectual disability and developmental delay. Sci Rep. (2024) 14:27590. doi:  10.1038/s41598-024-79431-x, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Chatzi C, Westbrook GL. Revisiting I-BAR proteins at central synapses. Front Neural Circuits. (2021) 15:787436. doi:  10.3389/fncir.2021.787436, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Huang Y, Lemire G, Briere LC, Liu F, Wessels MW, Wang X, et al. The recurrent de novo c.2011C>T missense variant in MTSS2 causes syndromic intellectual disability. Am J Hum Genet. (2022) 109:1923–31. doi:  10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.08.011, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Corona-Rivera JR, Zenteno JC, Ordoñez-Labastida V, Cruz-Cruz JP, Cortés-Pastrana RC, Peña-Padilla C, et al. MTSS2-related neurodevelopmental disorder: Further delineation of the phenotype. Eur J Med Genet. (2023) 66:104826. doi:  10.1016/j.ejmg.2023.104826, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Dominicis A, Sparascio FP, Stregapede F, Terracciano A, Verrigni D, Lepri FR, et al. MTSS2-related disorder: refining the phenotype in four new cases and literature review. Am J Med Genet A. (2025) 19:e64010. doi:  10.1002/ajmg.a.64010, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Li H, Ji CY, Zong XN, Zhang YQ. Height and weight standardized growth charts for Chinese children and adolescents aged 0 to 18 years. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. (2009) 47:487–92., PMID: [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Coordinating Study Group of Nine Cities on Physical Growth and Development of Children, and Capital Institute of Pediatrics . A national survey on growth of children under 7 years of age in nine cities of China, 2005. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. (2007) 5:609–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Jabeen A, Khanal P, Toissalo E, Lahti L, Minkeviciene R, Kramm A, et al. Expression, subcellular localization, and mechanistic analysis of intellectual disability syndrome protein ABBA. Mol Neurobiol. (2025) 63:271. doi:  10.1007/s12035-025-05475-3, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Sharma J, Sharma M, Kumar S, Kaushik H, Pandey H, Lal D, et al. Genetic markers of spina bifida: enrichment of pathogenic variants and variants of uncertain significance. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. (2025) 30:163–9. doi:  10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_193_24, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Lu Z, Zhang W, Mao X, Li D, Chen X, Liu L, et al. The third case of Marbach-Rustad progeroid syndrome caused by a de novo LEMD2 variant. Clin Genet. (2024) 105:209–13. doi:  10.1111/cge.14441, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Alazami AM, Patel N, Shamseldin HE, Anazi S, Al-Dosari MS, Alzahrani F, et al. Accelerating novel candidate gene discovery in neurogenetic disorders via whole-exome sequencing of prescreened multiplex consanguineous families. Cell Rep. (2015) 10:148–61. doi:  10.1016/j.celrep.2014.12.015, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Le VS, Tran KT, Bui HTP, Le HTT, Nguyen CD, Do DH, et al. A Vietnamese human genetic variation database. Hum Mutat. (2019) 40:1664–75. doi:  10.1002/humu.23835, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Takata A, Nakashima M, Saitsu H, Mizuguchi T, Mitsuhashi S, Takahashi Y, et al. Comprehensive analysis of coding variants highlights genetic complexity in developmental and epileptic encephalopathy. Nat Commun. (2019) 10:2506. doi:  10.1038/s41467-019-10482-9, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Kaplanis J, Samocha KE, Wiel L, Zhang Z, Arvai KJ, Eberhardt RY, et al. Evidence for 28 genetic disorders discovered by combining healthcare and research data. Nature. (2020) 586:757–62. doi:  10.1038/s41586-020-2832-5, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Zhou X, Feliciano P, Shu C, Wang T, Astrovskaya I, Hall JB, et al. Integrating de novo and inherited variants in 42,607 autism cases identifies mutations in new moderate-risk genes. Nat Genet. (2022) 54:1305–19. doi:  10.1038/s41588-022-01148-2, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Fu JM, Satterstrom FK, Peng M, Brand H, Collins RL, Dong S, et al. Rare coding variation provides insight into the genetic architecture and phenotypic context of autism. Nat Genet. (2022) 54:1320–31. doi:  10.1038/s41588-022-01104-0, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Frontiers in Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES