Skip to main content
South African Family Practice logoLink to South African Family Practice
. 2026 Jan 13;68(1):6196. doi: 10.4102/safp.v68i1.6196

Beyond magnesium sulphate – Rethinking magnesium’s impact on maternal and foetal health in low to middle-income countries: A scoping review

Naeera Abdul 1,, Vinogrin Dorsamy 1, Chauntelle Bagwandeen 2
PMCID: PMC12869823  PMID: 41630678

Abstract

Background

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), contribute greatly to maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality, particularly in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs), undermining progress towards reducing maternal mortality. While magnesium sulphate is established for seizure prophylaxis, magnesium’s physiological and epidemiological significance in HDPs is underexplored. This scoping review mapped current evidence on maternal magnesium homeostasis and HDP association.

Methods

Electronic databases were searched for studies reporting maternal magnesium levels, magnesium physiology in pregnancy or, magnesium supplementation in HDP. Eleven studies met the eligibility inclusion criteria. Data was charted for study design, magnesium biomarkers, outcomes and contextual factors.

Results

Observational evidence demonstrated lower magnesium levels among women with HDP against normotensive controls and linked low magnesium with adverse foetal outcomes. Mechanistic studies supported this, highlighting magnesium’s role in endothelial function, vascular tone regulation and oxidative stress. Randomised trials evaluating magnesium supplementation showed inconsistent findings and were influenced by variations in formulation, dosage, timing and, underlying nutritional status. Contextual factors, such as HIV, obesity, renal function, and socioeconomic disadvantage, impacted magnesium homeostasis and HDP risk, particularly in LMICs.

Conclusion

Magnesium insufficiency may contribute to HDP and adverse perinatal outcomes in LMICs, though causal pathways remain unconfirmed. Improved biomarker standardisation, mechanistic studies, and targeted supplementation trials in high-risk or deficient populations are needed.

Contribution

This review highlights key inconsistencies in magnesium measurement, identifies contextual modifiers relevant to LMICs, and outlines priority areas for future research.

Keywords: hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, pre-eclampsia, magnesium, HIV, obesity, scoping review

Introduction

The United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3 sets a target of reducing the global maternal mortality ratio to under 70 per 100 000 live births by 2030 (target 3.1).1 Yet, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), most notably pre-eclampsia (PE), continue to drive a substantial share of the roughly 295 000 annual maternal deaths, with more than 90% occurring in low- to middle-income countries (LMICs), where health systems are often overstretched and antenatal care access uneven.2,3 Achieving SDG 3 therefore demands not only improved access to interventions such as magnesium sulphate (MgSO4) for seizure prophylaxis but also a deeper understanding of magnesium’s (Mg) broader physiological role in blood-vessel health and placental function.

Magnesium is an essential cofactor in over 300 enzymatic reactions, including those governing vascular tone, endothelial integrity, and oxidative-stress regulation.4,5,6 Low magnesium intake and deficiency have been linked to hypertension and endothelial dysfunction in non-pregnant populations, suggesting potential relevance for HDP.7 Magnesium sulphate is well established for seizure prophylaxis in severe PE and eclampsia, yet this therapeutic role has overshadowed broader investigations into magnesium’s preventive or mechanistic contributions earlier in pregnancy.5

The available literature on magnesium and HDP spans diverse study designs, including biochemical, epidemiological, and interventional work conducted across heterogeneous populations. However, findings are often inconsistent. Some studies report strong associations between low magnesium levels and HDP, while others find no relationship.8,9,10 Variations in magnesium measurement (serum vs. intracellular), supplementation dose and timing, and failure to account for comorbidities such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, obesity, and socioeconomic deprivation further complicate interpretation.

Given this fragmented evidence base, a scoping review was warranted to comprehensively map existing research, identify consistencies and gaps, and clarify methodological and contextual limitations in the study of magnesium’s role in maternal health.

The purpose of this scoping review is therefore to synthesise and characterise current evidence on magnesium homeostasis during pregnancy and its relationship with hypertensive disorders and adverse perinatal outcomes, with a particular focus on LMIC settings.

Objectives

This scoping review aimed to:

  • Describe mechanisms of Mg absorption, distribution, renal handling, and placental transfer during pregnancy.

  • Synthesise existing evidence linking maternal Mg insufficiency to HDP and adverse perinatal outcomes.

  • Examine evidence from interventional studies of magnesium supplementation. Explore the influence of comorbidities such as HIV, obesity, and socioeconomic status, on magnesium metabolism and HDP risk. Identify knowledge gaps and methodological limitations to guide future research in LMICs.

Research methods and design

Framework and reporting

This review followed the Arksey and O’Malley11 methodological framework, enhanced by Levac et al.,12 and reported in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines.13

Research questions

The following research questions had been addressed:

  • What is known about magnesium homeostasis during pregnancy?

  • How is magnesium insufficiency associated with HDP and perinatal outcomes?

  • How do HIV, obesity, and socioeconomic status modify these relationships?

Eligibility criteria

Included studies were peer-reviewed, English-language, human studies (1988–2025) addressing:

  • Magnesium homeostasis and metabolism during pregnancy.

  • Associations between magnesium status and HDP, preterm birth, or foetal growth restriction.

  • Magnesium supplementation during pregnancy.

  • Interactions between magnesium and comorbidities (HIV, obesity, socioeconomic status).

Exclusion criteria: non-human studies (unless mechanistic), editorials, conference abstracts, case reports, and studies without measurable magnesium data.

Information sources and search strategy

Searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar from February 1988 to September 2025. Keywords included ‘magnesium homeostasis’, ‘magnesium supplementation’, ‘preeclampsia’, ‘gestational hypertension’, ‘fetal growth restriction’, ‘HIV’, ‘obesity’, and ‘socioeconomic status’.

Reference lists of eligible articles were hand-searched for additional studies.

Selection process

Citations were screened by title and abstract for relevance, followed by full-text review. The selection process is summarised in Figure 1.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews flow diagram of study selection.

Data charting

Data were extracted into a table capturing:

  • author and year

  • study design and location

  • sample characteristics

  • magnesium measure (serum, erythrocyte, dietary intake)

  • outcomes assessed (HDP, preterm birth, foetal growth restriction)

  • key findings: Two tables summarise epidemiological associations (Table 1) and interventional evidence (Table 2).

TABLE 1.

Epidemiological studies on magnesium status and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

Author and year of publication Country or setting Study design Sample size (n) Magnesium measure Key findings
Abdul et al. (2025)14 South Africa Cross-sectional or comparative 200 per group Serum Mg Lower Mg in EOPE and LOPE vs controls
Ephraim et al. (2014)9 Ghana Case–control 380 Serum Mg Hypomagnesaemia more common in PE and PIH
Nwogu et al. (2024)15 Nigeria Case–control 150 Serum Mg Significantly reduced Mg in severe PE
Kanagal et al. (2014)16 India Case–control 120 Serum Mg & Ca Lower Mg associated with PE and adverse outcomes
Tavana and Hosseinmirzaei (2013)17 Iran Nested case–control 500 screened Serum Mg Lower Mg at baseline predicted PE development
Gupta (2020)18 India Comparative 200 Serum Mg Low Mg associated with LBW and PE
Tesfa et al. (2024)19 Ethiopia (meta-analysis) Systematic review and meta-analysis 17 pooled studies Serum Mg SMD –1.20 mmol/L lower in PE vs controls

Note: Please see full reference list of Abdul N, Dorsamy V, Bagwandeen C. Beyond, magnesium sulphate – Rethinking magnesium’s impact on maternal and foetal health in low to middle-income countries: A scoping review. S Afr Fam Pract. 2025;67(1), a6196. https://doi.org/10.4102/safp.v67i1.6196

These findings highlight consistent reductions in magnesium concentrations among women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

Mg, magnesium; EOPE, early-onset pre-eclampsia; LOPE, late-onset pre-eclampsia; PE, pre-eclampsia; PIH, pregnancy-induced hypertension; LBW, low birthweight; SMD, standardised mean difference.

TABLE 2.

Interventional Studies on Magnesium Supplementation in Pregnancy.

Author and publication year Country Study design Sample size (n) Intervention Comparator Primary findings
De Araújo et al. (2020)20 Brazil Randomised controlled trial 318 Mg citrate 300 mg/day Placebo No significant reduction in PE (18.1% vs. 19.7%)
Zarean and Tajan (2017)21 Iran Randomised supplementation trial 200 Mg supplement (dose reported) Standard care Reduction in composite complications; ↑ birthweight
Khaity et al. (2022)22 Global Meta-analysis of RCTs 11 trials Various Mg formulations Placebo/none Pooled OR 0.77 (trend towards benefit)
Makrides et al. (2014)23 International Cochrane systematic review Multiple RCTs Various Mg supplements Placebo/none Evidence insufficient for PE prevention
Kusuma et al. (2024)24 Indonesia Therapeutic MgSO₄ kinetics study 80 MgSO₄ dosing None Describes pharmacokinetics; contextual rather than preventive

Note: Please see full reference list of Abdul N, Dorsamy V, Bagwandeen C. Beyond, magnesium sulphate – Rethinking magnesium’s impact on maternal and foetal health in low to middle-income countries: A scoping review. S Afr Fam Pract. 2025;67(1), a6196. https://doi.org/10.4102/safp.v67i1.6196

Across trials, the preventive effect of magnesium supplementation remains inconsistent, reflecting variation in baseline deficiency, formulation, and study quality.

Mg, magnesium; MgSO₄, magnesium sulphate; PE, Pre-eclampsia.

Synthesis of results

Findings were synthesised narratively and thematically. No quantitative meta-analysis was attempted because of heterogeneity in study design, magnesium measures, and populations.

Ethical considerations

Ethical clearance to conduct this study was obtained from the Biomedical Research Ethics Committee of the University of KwaZulu-Natal (No. BREC/00007005/2024). All samples were obtained with explicit informed consent. The purpose of the samples and tests were explained to all participants. All their data were kept private.

Results

Study selection and characteristics

A total of 11 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final synthesis (Figure 1). These comprised observational studies evaluating the association between maternal magnesium status and HDP, as well as interventional trials assessing magnesium supplementation during pregnancy. The included studies were conducted across diverse global regions – with substantial representation from LMICs – and varied in design, sample size, magnesium measurement methods, and gestational timing of assessment.

Epidemiological evidence of magnesium status and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy

Across observational and comparative studies, women who developed HDP consistently demonstrated lower circulating magnesium levels than normotensive controls. Studies from South Africa, Ghana, Nigeria, India, and Iran reported higher prevalence of hypomagnesaemia among women with PE and, in some cases, gestational hypertension. For example, Abdul et al.14 reported lower magnesium levels in both early-onset and late-onset PE, while Ephraim et al.9 and Nwogu et al.15 found significantly lower magnesium concentrations among women with PE compared with controls. Similarly, Kanagal et al.,16 Tavana and Hosseinmirzaei,17 and Gupta18 observed reduced serum magnesium levels in women with HDP. Meta-analytic evidence further supports this pattern. Tesfa et al.19 reported a pooled standardised mean difference of –1.20 mmol/L, indicating consistently lower magnesium among women with PE across multiple LMIC settings.19 A summary of key epidemiological studies is presented in Table 1.

Inconsistencies and heterogeneity

Despite the overall consistency in direction of association, some variation exists between studies. Differences in laboratory assays, trimester of sampling, and cut-off thresholds for hypomagnesaemia contributed to inter-study variability.20,21,22,23,24 Additionally, few studies adjusted for important contextual modifiers such as HIV status, obesity, dietary intake, or socioeconomic status, which may independently influence magnesium homeostasis.25,26,27,28,29

Interventional evidence: Magnesium supplementation studies

Evidence from intervention trials assessing magnesium supplementation for prevention of HDP remains mixed. In the largest Randomised Control Trial (RCT), De Araújo et al.20 found no significant difference in PE incidence between women receiving 300 mg/day of magnesium citrate and those receiving placebo. Conversely, smaller trials, such as Zarean and Tarjan,21 reported improvements in certain pregnancy outcomes, including birthweight and composite morbidity, although these studies were limited by small sample sizes and varied formulations.

Meta-analytic evidence suggests a possible trend towards reduced risk of HDP with supplementation, although the authors emphasised low certainty because of methodological limitations across trials.22 Similarly, the Cochrane review concluded that current evidence is insufficient to recommend routine magnesium supplementation for HDP prevention.23 The characteristics and findings of interventional studies are summarised in Table 2.

Summary of findings

Overall, the evidence suggests that low magnesium status is frequently observed among women with HDP, particularly in LMIC settings where dietary magnesium intake may be inadequate. Observational findings demonstrate a consistent association between reduced magnesium levels and HDP, whereas interventional evidence is inconclusive and varies according to dosage, formulation, baseline deficiency, and study quality.

Discussion

This scoping review synthesised evidence relating Mg status to HDP, integrating observational data, mechanistic studies, and interventional trials. Across diverse global settings, particularly within LMICs, a consistent pattern emerges linking lower maternal magnesium concentrations with PE and gestational hypertension. While the biological plausibility of this association is strong, limitations in measurement, heterogeneity of study designs, and inconsistent interventional evidence highlight the need for more focused, context-specific research.

Magnesium homeostasis and physiological adaptations during pregnancy

Pregnancy induces major physiological shifts that influence magnesium distribution and metabolism. Several longitudinal studies report a progressive decline in serum magnesium from the second trimester onwards, driven by haemodilution, increased glomerular filtration, and foetal mineral requirements.30,31,32,33 Placental magnesium transport mechanisms, particularly through Transient Receptor Potential Melastatin (TRPM6) and (TRPM7) channels, are upregulated to safeguard foetal supply even when maternal levels decrease.32 These adaptations underscore the importance of maternal magnesium reserves for maintaining placental and foetal development.

Intracellular magnesium, reflected in erythrocyte levels, tends to remain more stable despite serum declines. However, in settings characterised by chronic dietary magnesium insufficiency – such as rural India, parts of sub-Saharan Africa, and other mineral-depleted regions – both serum and intracellular magnesium levels are consistently low.16,18,32 This indicates that physiological adaptations may be insufficient in nutritionally vulnerable populations, potentially increasing susceptibility to adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Pathophysiological mechanisms linking magnesium to hypertensive disorders of pregnancy

There is compelling mechanistic evidence connecting low magnesium to the vascular and endothelial abnormalities characteristic of HDP. Magnesium plays a critical role in vascular smooth muscle relaxation, calcium homeostasis, nitric oxide synthesis, and modulation of oxidative stress4,5,6 Reduced magnesium availability promotes vasoconstriction, enhances vascular reactivity, and exacerbates endothelial dysfunction, central features in the pathogenesis of PE.10,34,35,36

Experimental data further demonstrates that impaired TRPM6-mediated magnesium transport results in placental and foetal defects resembling hypertensive pregnancy phenotypes.37 Moreover, women with low magnesium frequently exhibit higher levels of oxidative injury markers (e.g. malondialdehyde) and inflammatory cytokines such as Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-α, along with reduced antioxidant capacity.31 These findings strengthen the biological plausibility that magnesium insufficiency could contribute to the pathophysiological cascade leading to HDP.

Epidemiological associations and magnitude of effect

Epidemiological evidence consistently supports an association between lower magnesium levels and HDP. A meta-analysis focusing on African studies reported a pooled standardised mean difference of -1.20 mmol/L between women with PE and normotensive controls.19 Individual studies align with these findings: Tavana and Hosseinmirzaei17 reported significantly lower magnesium concentrations in Iranian women with PE, while a Nigerian study by Nwogu et al.15 documented even more pronounced reductions in severe cases. South African data from Abdul et al.14 showed similar patterns, including among early- and late-onset PE, with associations persisting after adjusting for HIV status and body mass index. These findings suggest that magnesium insufficiency may represent a consistent hallmark among women who develop HDP across a range of global contexts.

Inconsistencies and heterogeneity across studies

Despite general consistency in the direction of association, notable heterogeneity limits cross-study comparability. Variability arises from several sources:

  • Magnesium biomarkers: Studies measure total, ionised, or intracellular magnesium, each reflecting different physiological pools.

  • Assay methods and reference thresholds: A lack of standardisation hinders comparison across populations.

  • Gestational age at sampling: Measurements taken in different trimesters capture varying physiological states.

  • Dietary intake, renal function, and comorbidities: Few studies adjust for these important modifiers.

Some studies measuring only total magnesium reported no significant differences, suggesting that serum magnesium may not fully capture biologically relevant magnesium status.38,39 Where multivariable adjustment was performed, effect sizes often strengthened, indicating that uncontrolled confounding may obscure true associations.

Perinatal outcomes beyond blood pressure

Magnesium insufficiency has implications beyond maternal hypertensive disorders. Several cohort studies demonstrate associations between low maternal magnesium and adverse foetal outcomes, including small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), preterm birth, and low birthweight.18,20,23,40 Evidence from Brazil and India highlights a two-fold increased risk of low birthweight among women in the lowest magnesium tertiles.18,20 These findings are consistent with magnesium’s role in placental vasodilation, angiogenesis, and oxidative balance, suggesting that insufficiency may impair placental perfusion and foetal growth.4,5,6,10,34,36

Interventional evidence: Magnesium supplementation studies

Interventional evidence is less clear than observational findings. Twelve randomised or quasi-randomised trials have assessed magnesium supplementation during pregnancy, but results vary widely. The largest trial, the BRAzilian MAGnesium Trial, reported no reduction in PE incidence with 300 mg/day magnesium citrate.20 Conversely, smaller Iranian trials demonstrated reduced PE incidence, IUGR, and preterm delivery among supplemented women.21 A meta-analysis of 11 RCTs suggested a non-significant protective trend (pooled Odds Ratio (OR) 0.77).22 Similarly, the 2014 Cochrane Review found that magnesium supplementation may reduce risks of low birthweight and preterm birth, but evidence remains insufficient to recommend supplementation for HDP prevention.23

Effectiveness appears influenced by contextual factors, including baseline magnesium deficiency, dietary patterns, supplement formulation, adherence, and gestational timing of initiation. Collectively, evidence indicates that targeted supplementation in deficient or high-risk populations may hold promise, whereas universal prophylaxis lacks sufficient support.

Contextual modifiers: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), obesity, and socioeconomic status

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and antiretroviral therapy

Human immunodeficiency virus infection may depress magnesium levels through chronic inflammation and altered renal handling, while antiretroviral therapy (ART), particularly protease inhibitors, may exacerbate endothelial dysfunction.25,26,41 South African data show that HIV-positive women had significantly lower magnesium levels and a higher risk of PE, although ART regimen influenced the magnitude of this association.14

Obesity and metabolic risk

Obesity is associated with reduced intracellular magnesium because of chronic inflammation and insulin resistance.42 Several studies document inverse correlations between Body Mass Index (BMI) and serum magnesium in pregnancy, suggesting that obese women may be particularly susceptible to the adverse vascular effects of magnesium deficiency.28,29

Socioeconomic and nutritional factors

The LMICs often face widespread dietary magnesium insufficiency linked to cereal-based diets, mineral-depleted soils, and limited dietary diversity.43 Structural challenges – such as late antenatal booking, stock-outs of MgSO4, and limited provider training – may further heighten the risk of HDP and maternal morbidity.

Knowledge gaps identified

This article highlights several key gaps:

  • Measurement variability: A lack of consensus on the most accurate magnesium biomarker.

  • Inadequate deficiency thresholds: No pregnancy-specific cut-offs exist.

  • Limited adjustment for confounders: Few studies account for HIV, obesity, diet, renal function, or socioeconomic status.

  • Uncertain supplementation strategies: Optimal dosage, formulation, and timing remain unclear.

  • Limited mechanistic integration: Few studies include endothelial, angiogenic, or oxidative biomarkers.

  • Low- and middle-income countries evidence gap: Despite bearing the highest burden, LMIC-focused trials remain scarce.

Limitations

This scoping review did not include formal quality appraisal of included studies, consistent with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. As a result, heterogeneity in study design, methodology, and measurement techniques limits direct comparisons. Most studies were observational and cross-sectional, restricting temporal inference. Confounding variables were inconsistently reported, and publication bias cannot be excluded. Despite these limitations, this review offers a comprehensive mapping of the available evidence and highlights priority areas for future research.

Recommendations

Future research should prioritise standardisation of magnesium assessment, development of pregnancy-specific reference ranges, and use of more sensitive biomarkers such as ionised or intracellular magnesium. Longitudinal cohort studies are needed to clarify temporal relationships and better account for contextual modifiers, including HIV and obesity.

Large, well-powered randomised trials focused on women with documented magnesium deficiency are required to determine optimal dosage, formulation, and timing of supplementation. Trials should integrate mechanistic endpoints to clarify physiological effects.

In LMIC settings, strengthening antenatal nutritional assessment, promoting dietary diversification or fortification, and improving health system readiness, particularly reliable access to MgSO4, may enhance maternal outcomes.

Conclusion

Taken together, the evidence reveals a biologically plausible and epidemiologically consistent association between magnesium insufficiency and HDP. While supplementation demonstrates potential benefit in deficient or high-risk populations, its preventive efficacy remains uncertain because of heterogeneity in trial design and population characteristics. Harmonised biomarker approaches, context-specific interventional research, and integration of mechanistic markers are essential to determine whether magnesium optimisation can contribute meaningfully to reducing the burden of HDP – particularly within LMICs, where both magnesium deficiency and HDP prevalence are high. This scoping review revealed a lack of magnesium reporting and investigation in RCTs, with comorbidities in LMIC-based studies being ignored and a scarcity of treatment protocols; thereby emphasising the importance of reinforcing treatment protocols and emphasising the importance of magnesium and how co-morbidities can affect it.

Acknowledgements

This article is based on research originally conducted as part of Naeera Abdul’s Master’s thesis titled ‘The interplay between magnesium and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in a pregnant, black South African population’, submitted to the School of Laboratory Medicine and Medical Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal in 2025. The thesis was supervised by Dr Vinogrin Dorsamy and Dr Chauntelle Bagwandeen. The manuscript has since been revised and adapted for journal publication. The original thesis is currently under review.

This article is based on data from a larger study. A related article focusing on the association between serum magnesium levels and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy has been published in South African Family Practice, 67(1), article 6140. The present article addresses a distinct research question, focusing on rethinking magnesium’s impact on maternal and foetal health in low to middle-income countries.

Competing interests

The authors reported that they received funding from the National Research Foundation Thuthuka Grant in collaboration with the University of KwaZulu-Natal and Medical Research Council of South Africa, which may be affected by the research reported in the enclosed publication. The authors have disclosed those interests fully and have implemented an approved plan for managing any potential conflicts arising from their involvement. The terms of these funding arrangements have been reviewed and approved by the affiliated university in accordance with its policy on objectivity in research.

Authorship contribution

Naeera Abdul: Conceptualisation, investigation, methodology, visualisation, writing – original draft, review & editing. Vinogrin Dorsamy: Conceptualisation, data curation, formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, supervision, validation, writing – review & editing. Chauntelle Bagwandeen: Conceptualisation, project administration, resources, supervision, validation. All authors reviewed the article, contributed to the discussion of results, approved the final version for submission and publication, and take responsibility for the integrity of its findings.

Data availability

Data used in this study will be made available from the corresponding author, Naeera Abdul, upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and are the product of professional research. It does not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any affiliated institution, funder, agency, or that of the publisher. The authors are responsible for this article’s findings and content.

Funding Statement

Funding information This study was funded by the National Research Foundation Thuthuka Grant (TTK170508230162) in collaboration with the University of KwaZulu-Natal and Medical Research Council of South Africa (SIR Grant UNS14197). The institutions listed have no vested interest in the study. Furthermore, there was no input from these organisations in the interpretation of the result.

Footnotes

How to cite this article: Abdul N, Dorsamy V, Bagwandeen C. Beyond magnesium sulphate – Rethinking magnesium’s impact on maternal and foetal health in low to middle-income countries: A scoping review. S Afr Fam Pract. 2026;68(1), a6196. https://doi.org/10.4102/safp.v68i1.6196

References

  • 1.United Nations . Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development [homepage on the Internet]. United Nations; 2015. [cited 2025 Nov 12]. Available from: https://sdgs.un.org/sites/default/files/publications/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Murray CJL, Lopez AD. Measuring the global burden of disease. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(5):448–457. 10.1056/NEJMra1201534 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dimitriadis E, Rolnik DL, Zhou W, et al. Pre-eclampsia. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2023;9(1):1–22. 10.1038/s41572-023-00417-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Schwalfenberg GK, Genuis SJ. The importance of magnesium in clinical healthcare. Scientifica. 2017;2017(1):1–14. 10.1155/2017/4179326 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dalton LM, Ní Fhloinn DM, Gaydadzhieva GT, Mazurkiewicz OM, Leeson H, Wright CP. Magnesium in pregnancy. Nutr Rev. 2016;74(9):549–557. 10.1093/nutrit/nuw018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sontia B, Touyz RM. Role of magnesium in hypertension. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2007;458(1):33–39. 10.1016/j.abb.2006.05.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Konukoglu D, Uzun H. Endothelial dysfunction and hypertension. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;956:511–540. 10.1007/5584_2016_90 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Eslamzadeh A, Amin M, Asadi N, et al. Serum calcium and magnesium levels in women presenting with pre-eclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on observational studies. Galen Med J. 2023;12:e3151. 10.31661/gmj.v12i.3151 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ephraim RKD, Osakunor DNM, Denkyira SW, Eshun H, Amoah S, Anto EO. Serum calcium and magnesium levels in women presenting with pre-eclampsia and pregnancy-induced hypertension: A case-control study in the Cape Coast Metropolis, Ghana. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14(1):390. 10.1186/s12884-014-0390-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Owusu Darkwa E, Antwi-Boasiako C, Djagbletey R, Owoo C, Obed S, Sottie D. Serum magnesium and calcium in preeclampsia: A comparative study at the Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital, Ghana. Integr Blood Press Control. 2017;10:9–15. 10.2147/IBPC.S129106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Arksey H, O’malley L. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32. 10.1080/1364557032000119616 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’brien KK. Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5(1):69. 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–473. 10.7326/M18-0850 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Abdul N, Dorsamy V, Bagwandeen C. The association between serum magnesium levels and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. S Afr Fam Pract. 2025;67(1): 6140. 10.4102/safp.v67i1.6140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nwogu HC, Fyneface-Ogan S, Imasuen SO. A comparative study of serum magnesium between normal healthy pregnant women and pre-eclamptics in a Nigerian teaching hospital. Port Harcourt Med J. 2024;18(2):86–93. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kanagal DV, Rajesh A, Rao K, et al. Levels of serum calcium and magnesium in pre-eclamptic and normal pregnancy: A study from Coastal India. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(7):OC01. 10.7860/JCDR/2014/8872.4537 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tavana Z, Hosseinmirzaei S. Comparison of maternal serum magnesium level in pre-eclampsia and normal pregnant women. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2013;15(12):e10394. 10.5812/ircmj.10394 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gupta P. A study of maternal serum calcium and serum magnesium levels in pre-eclamptic and normotensive pregnancies. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2020;9(8): 3129. 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20203291 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tesfa E, Munshea A, Nibret E, Gizaw ST. Association of maternal serum magnesium with pre-eclampsia in African pregnant women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Health. 2024;16(1):14–22. 10.1093/inthealth/ihad026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.De Araújo CA, De Sousa Oliveira L, De Gusmão IM, Guimarães A, Ribeiro M, Alves JG. Magnesium supplementation and preeclampsia in low-income pregnant women – A randomized double-blind clinical trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):208. 10.1186/s12884-020-02877-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zarean E, Tarjan A. Effect of magnesium supplement on pregnancy outcomes: A randomized control trial. Adv Biomed Res. 2017;6(1):109. 10.4103/2277-9175.213879 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Khaity A, Albakri K, Alabdallat Y, Saleh O, Ghaith HS. The effect of oral magnesium supplement on pre-eclampsia and perinatal outcomes in pregnancy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Med Stud. 2022;10:S225. 10.5195/ijms.2022.1808 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Makrides M, Crosby DD, Shepherd E, Crowther CA. Magnesium supplementation in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014(4):CD000937. 10.1002/14651858.CD000937.pub2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kusuma AA, Widiyanti ES, Putra I, Widayana KA, Setiawan WA. Serum magnesium levels in preeclampsia and eclampsia patients during magnesium sulfate therapy. J Obstet Gynecol Cancer Res. 2024;10(1):40–50. 10.30699/jogcr.10.1.40 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Suy A, Martínez E, Coll O, et al. Increased risk of pre-eclampsia and fetal death in HIV-infected pregnant women receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy. AIDS. 2006;20(1):59–66. 10.1097/01.aids.0000198090.70325.bd [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Machado ES, Krauss MR, Megazzini K, et al. Hypertension, preeclampsia and eclampsia among HIV-infected pregnant women from Latin America and Caribbean countries. J Infect. 2014;68(6):572–580. 10.1016/j.jinf.2013.12.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kassu A, Yabutani T, Mulu A, Tessema B, Ota F. Serum zinc, copper, selenium, calcium, and magnesium levels in pregnant and non-pregnant women in Gondar, Northwest Ethiopia. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2008;122(2):97–106. 10.1007/s12011-007-8067-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Olson KN, Redman LM, Sones JL. Obesity ‘complements’ preeclampsia. Physiol Genom. 2019;51(3):73–76. 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00102.2018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Piuri G, Zocchi M, Della Porta M, et al. Magnesium in obesity, metabolic syndrome, and type 2 diabetes. Nutrients. 2021;13(2):320. 10.3390/nu13020320 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rylander R. Magnesium in pregnancy blood pressure and pre-eclampsia – A review. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2014;4(2):146–149. 10.1016/j.preghy.2014.01.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Fanni D, Gerosa C, Nurchi VM, et al. The role of magnesium in pregnancy and in fetal programming of adult diseases. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2021;199(10):3647–3657. 10.1007/s12011-020-02513-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lee C, Kim YH, Choi MG, Kim JW, Park CY. Placental magnesium transport-related mRNA expression is not associated with serum magnesium in singletons and twins. Placenta. 2025;165:73–75. 10.1016/j.placenta.2025.04.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Blaine J, Chonchol M, Levi M. Renal control of calcium, phosphate, and magnesium homeostasis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;10(7):1257–1272. 10.2215/CJN.09750913 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Poston L, Igosheva N, Mistry HD, et al. Role of oxidative stress and antioxidant supplementation in pregnancy disorders. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94(Suppl. 6):1980S1985S. 10.3945/ajcn.110.001156 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Nielsen FH. Magnesium deficiency and increased inflammation: Current perspectives. J Inflamm Res. 2018;11:25–34. 10.2147/jir.s136742 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zheltova AA, Kharitonova MV, Iezhitsa IN, Spasov AA. Magnesium deficiency and oxidative stress: An update. BioMedicine. 2016;6(4):20. 10.7603/s40681-016-0020-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kisters K, Barenbrock M, Louwen F, Hausberg M, Rahn KH, Kosch M. Membrane, intracellular, and plasma magnesium and calcium concentrations in preeclampsia. Am J Hypertens. 2000;13(7):765–769. 10.1016/S0895-7061(00)00240-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Aali BS, Khazaeli P, Ghasemi F. Ionized and total magnesium concentration in patients with severe preeclampsia-eclampsia undergoing magnesium sulfate therapy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2007;33(2):138–143. 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2007.00508.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Taber EB, Tan L, Chao CR, Beall MH, Ross MG. Pharmacokinetics of ionized versus total magnesium in subjects with preterm labor and preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(5):1017–1021. 10.1067/mob.2002.122421 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Spätling L, Spätling G. Magnesium supplementation in pregnancy. A double-blind study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1988;95(2):120–125. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1988.tb06839.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bharath DS, Rakshith SC, Shilpa TA. A study of serum magnesium levels in people living with HIV on anti-retroviral therapy. Eur J Cardiovasc Med. 2025;15:305–307. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Suliburska J, Cholik R, Kocyłowski R, Bakinowska E. Relationship between prepregnancy BMI and the concentrations of iron, calcium, and magnesium in serum and hair during the first trimester of pregnancy in women. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2024;83:127388. 10.1016/j.jtemb.2024.127388 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Cazzola R, Della Porta M, Manoni M, Iotti S, Pinotti L, Maier JA. Going to the roots of reduced magnesium dietary intake: A tradeoff between climate changes and sources. Heliyon. 2020;6(11):e05390. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05390 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data used in this study will be made available from the corresponding author, Naeera Abdul, upon reasonable request.


Articles from South African Family Practice are provided here courtesy of AOSIS

RESOURCES