Abstract
Background
A pregnant woman was found to have a left tubal pregnancy on transabdominal ultrasound (9 weeks 5 days by CRL). However, she refused any treatment and left the hospital. Nearly 3 months later, this woman was admitted to the emergency room due to severe abdominal pain. The emergent ultrasound scan revealed an abdominal ectopic pregnancy at 22 weeks’ gestation. The placenta covered the left abdominal wall and was implanted into the omentum, intestinal wall, and bladder wall. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed the diagnosis. The location and relationship of the placenta to its adjacent organs were delineated on the abdominal surface based on ultrasound findings. On the third day of admission, a laparotomy was performed and the fetus was delivered (Apgar score 3). The placenta was detached and removed without any complications.
Case presentation
Advanced abdominal pregnancy (AAP) is rare and severe ectopic pregnancy, defined as intraperitoneal pregnancy excluding tubal, ovarian, or intraligamentous pregnancy, progressing beyond 20 weeks of gestation. Monitoring the whole development process from a tubal pregnancy to AAP, with a viable fetus, is much rarer. Therefore, we present this case, review the literature on AAP, and summarize its characteristics as well as management.
Conclusions
Ultrasound and MRI are vital for improving outcomes in AAP, which remains a potentially life-threatening condition. Ultrasound and MRI should be used to confirm the location of the gestational sac in relation to the endometrial cavity and the placenta in relation to abdominal organs. Accurate diagnosis and appropriate multidisciplinary team (MDT) management can lead to favorable outcomes.
Keywords: Advanced Abdominal pregnancy, Tubal pregnancy, Ultrasonography, MRI, Pathophysiology, Management
Background
Abdominal pregnancy is a rare and serious form of ectopic pregnancy, defined as an intraperitoneal pregnancy excluding tubal, ovarian, or intraligamentary implantation, first reported in 1708 as an autopsy finding. Advanced abdominal pregnancy (AAP) is generally defined as a pregnancy that progresses beyond 20 weeks of gestation with a viable, growing, and developing fetus [1].
The incidence of abdominal pregnancy ranges from 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 30,000 births according to different references [2]. Ectopic pregnancies have a high risk of mortality accounting for 6–13% of all pregnancy-related deaths [3]. The non-tubal ectopic pregnancies have a 7 to 8 times higher risk of maternal mortality compared to tubal pregnancies [4]. According to the original implantation site, abdominal pregnancy can be classified into two types: primary and secondary. Secondary abdominal pregnancy is secondary to tubal embryo implantation or uterine scar rupture, mostly accompanied by hemoperitoneum.
Here, we report a rare case of an AAP secondary to a left tubal pregnancy diagnosed by ultrasound at 9 weeks of gestation, confirmed with both ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 22 weeks. The ultrasound played a main role in establishing a definitive diagnosis, monitoring the progression of pregnancy, and guiding surgical intervention.
This case study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Huazhong University of Science and Technology Graduate School and Faculty, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Case presentation
A 38-year-old pregnant woman with gestational hypertension, hyperthyroidism, a heart rate of 150 bpm, and an upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) was found to have an abdominal pregnancy due to sudden abdominal pain for one day. The patient, who had 30 days of amenorrhea, self-tested positive for urine hCG. Ultrasonography at approximately 40 days’ gestation demonstrated a left adnexal hypoechoic mass suggestive of ectopic pregnancy, with an embryonic pole and primitive cardiac activity visualized. The patient was asymptomatic (no vaginal bleeding or abdominal pain) and declined further management. At 9 weeks' gestation, the ultrasound confirmed a viable singleton left tubal ectopic pregnancy. The physician recommended hospitalization; however, the patient declined. The patient had two subsequent presentations for febrile cough. Laboratory testing confirmed an infection, after which the patient declined therapeutic intervention, with eventual spontaneous resolution of symptoms.
Nearly three months later, this woman was admitted to the emergency room with severe abdominal pain that had lasted for several hours. The emergent ultrasound scan revealed an abdominal ectopic pregnancy at 22 weeks’ gestation with a head circumference of 208 mm. The uterus was found in the right flank, adjacent to the bladder, with thickened endometrium and an empty cavity. The placenta covered the left abdominal wall and measured up to 59.5 mm in maximum thickness. Twisted communicating vessels were observed between the placenta and the omentum and intestinal wall, as well as between the placenta and the bladder wall (Fig. 1). The ultrasound confirmed the diagnosis of abdominal pregnancy. Blood pressure was documented at 138/121 mmHg, with no cardiorespiratory symptoms or vaginal bleeding. Given the patient’s history of salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy three years prior and two documented episodes of febrile cough during the early and mid-trimester, secondary implantation may have been facilitated by postoperative peritoneal adhesions in conjunction with transient surges of intra-abdominal pressure induced by coughing.
Fig. 1.
Ultrasound revealed a left tubal pregnancy at 12 weeks and an AAP at 22 weeks. A The fetus is 9 weeks and 5 days measured by CRL. B CDFI: Color blood flow signal. C Normal uterine morphology, thickened endometrium, and empty uterus. D,E,F The twisted communicating branches were found between the placenta and the intestinal wall, as well as between the placenta and the bladder wall. G The spectrum of the umbilical artery can be detected in the twisted communicating branches. H The fetal were found in abdomen, outside the large and empty uterus. I The fetal heart was examined by M-mode echocardiography P, placenta; BL, bladder; UA, uterine artery; U, uterus; F, fetus; IN, intestine
MRI scan confirmed that the fetus and placenta were seen in the left adnexal area. The placenta was mainly located in the left omentum and anterior abdominal wall. The uterus was enlarged and compressed toward the right (Fig. 2). The blood supply of the placenta was derived from the arteries of the omentum and intestinal wall, as confirmed by both ultrasound and MRI imaging.We conducted a thorough preoperative evaluation and prepared for potential intraoperative situations, including significant intraoperative bleeding, maternal DIC, and fetal survival, and other possible complications.
Fig. 2.
MRI scan confirmed an ectopic pregnancy in the left side of the abdomen. A The placenta was mainly located in the left anterior wall. B The fetus and placenta were found in the left adnexal area. And the uterus, with thickened endometrium, was enlarged and compressed to the right. Am, amniotic fluid; P, placenta; H, head; U, uterus; B, bladder
On the 3rd day of admission, the laparotomy was performed, and the fetus was delivered. The placenta was split into three fragments, with noted thrombus and infarction, as well as trophoblastic invasion of the omentum and intestinal wall (Fig. 3). Blood loss was estimated at 2000 ml. she received autologous blood transfusion and 4 units of PRBC during and after the surgery. The fetus was born in poor condition (Apgar score 3) and unfortunately died in 30 min.
Fig. 3.
The laparotomy was performed and the fetus was delivered. A The location and relationship of the placenta to its adjacent organs were delineated on the abdominal surface according to ultrasound. B The twisted communicating branches were ligated, between the placenta and the intestinal wall, as well as between the placenta and the bladder wall. C After the delivery of the fetus, the placenta was found to have split into three fragments, with evidence of thrombi and infarction, as well as trophoblastic invasion of the omentum and intestinal wall
The histopathological examination proved the abnormal adipose tissue attached to the chorionic plate, associated with villous cell necrosis and infarcted lesions (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4.
The histopathological examination of this AAP (× 200). A The abnormal adipose tissue is attached to the chorionic plate. B The villi cells necrosis and infarcted lesion of placenta
The patient received 3 days of intensive care postoperatively before transfer to the general obstetric ward. On postoperative day 3, she requested discharge. She was instructed to continue wound management at local hospitals until complete healing and to seek immediate re-evaluation for symptoms including abdominal pain, rectal tenesmus, or abnormal vaginal bleeding. Serial serum β-hCG monitoring at 1 month postoperatively showed no abnormal fluctuations. Three-month follow-up pelvic ultrasound demonstrated progressively decreasing fluid volume with residual patchy hyperechoic areas and fine septations.
Discussion
Abdominal pregnancy is a kind of serosal pregnancy in ectopic pregnancy. According to the implantation site, abdominal pregnancy can be divided into intraperitoneal implantation and retroperitoneal implantation. Intraperitoneal implantation sites include all locations on the uterine serosa, the uterine ligaments, the liver, spleen, and bowel, including the mesentery and the peritoneum of the pelvic wall, the diaphragm and the inguinal canal. Retroperitoneal implantation sites include the large arteries, in the area of the pancreas and the kidneys, in rectovaginal and paravesical spaces and in the obturator foramen [3].
According to the original implantation site, abdominal pregnancy can be divided into two types: primary and secondary. Primary abdominal pregnancy is rare and the cause of its occurrence is unclear. The peritoneal epithelium may transform into the paramesonephric duct epithelium, especially in the presence of ectopic endometrium in the peritoneal cavity or pelvic cavity, which can lead to the implantation of the zygote and the development of primary peritoneal pregnancy.
There are several theories about the pathophysiology of secondary abdominal pregnancy. First, vascular and lymphatic metastasis has been proposed [5–7]. In the studies of Persson et al. [8] and Liang C et al. [9], the lymphatic tissues were found together with the ectopic mass. In addition, the classic signs of the inflammatory response along the gonadal vessels, believed to be a result of obstructed lymphatics due to embryo migration, were observed using CT reconstruction techniques. Second, abdominal metastasis may occur due to a fistulous tract or uterine perforation [10]. Iwama et al. [11] observed an adhesion at one of the tubal ends during salpingectomy and speculated about a fistula. Arora et al. [12] supposed that ectopic pregnancy occurring immediately after hysterectomy was likely due to a fertilization in the tubes during hysterectomy. It was also considered a consequence of a fistula between the vagina and prolapsed fallopian tube or peritoneum [13]. Third, direct implantation. After other ectopic pregnancies, such as the abortion of ovarian pregnancy or rupture of tubal pregnancy/uterine horn pregnancy [14], the active fetal villi were implanted directly on the peritoneal surface, or extruded to the posterior peritoneum by intestinal peristalsis [15, 16]. Wang et al. [17] presented a case involving the spontaneous rupture of a tubal pregnancy at 15 weeks and 3 days of gestation diagnosed during surgery. Moreover, retrograde menstrual flow could reverse the course of a fertilized ovum in the tubal course. Fourth, assisted reproduction. The zygote may enter the abdomen through uterine perforation caused by egg retrieval.
The clinical symptoms of abdominal pregnancy without complications are nonspecific [4]. Typical clinical symptoms of a ruptured ectopic pregnancy include progressive pain in the lower abdomen, sometimes with intraabdominal or vaginal bleeding, even hemorrhagic shock, dizziness, faintness, and nausea. The most common signs are pronounced peritonism, malpresentation, and failure of induction of labor due to non-responsiveness of the uterus to oxytocin, fetal growth restriction, and low amniotic fluid volume. However, abdominal pregnancy is often misdiagnosed until late pregnancy, evolving into abortion, embolism, or rarely live birth by cesarean section as in this case. With a positive pregnancy test, typical clinical presentations coupled with ultrasonography and MRI can help confirm the diagnosis.
Ultrasound is the preferred diagnostic modality for abdominal pregnancy. The typical sonographic features of AAP include fetal localization within the abdominal cavity, absence of the uterine myometrial layer between the bladder wall and the fetus, unilateral displacement of an enlarged uterus, and an empty uterine cavity. An abnormal fetal position and oligohydramnios are frequently observed. Abdominal pregnancies are commonly associated with placental implantation, and tortuous vascular connections may be identified between the placenta and adjacent organs or tissues, such as the intestinal wall, omentum, and so on. It is crucial to accurately determine the precise site of placental implantation through ultrasound imaging prior to management.
MRI contributes to making a definitive diagnosis of abdominal pregnancy as well as to determining the location and relationship of the placenta to adjacent organs [1, 18]. Furthermore, other diagnostic methods include laparoscopic exploration, laparotomy, arteriography, biopsy, and so on.
Moreover, there are some pitfalls in the diagnosis of AAP, such as anterior uterine leiomyoma, retroflexed uterus, false-negative diagnosis of intrauterine pregnancy, and false-positive diagnosis with a bicornuate uterus [13].
Because of the rapid progression of hemorrhagic shock due to heavy bleeding, AAP is a serious obstetric emergency. The management includes surgical therapy (laparotomy and laparoscopy), medical injection therapy (intramuscular or intralesional methotrexate and/or intracardiac KCl), and a combination of medical and surgical management [13].
We conducted a literature review of 36 articles on AAP published between 2016 and 2025, using electronic searches in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science. This review was limited to human studies published in English and included case reports, case series, and systematic reviews. Descriptive statistics are provided to illustrate the clinical characteristics, diagnostic methods, and management strategies of abdominal pregnancy (Table 1).
Table 1.
The reported cases and available data
| Authors | The number of case | GA at admission (weeks) | GA at delivery (weeks) | average period (days) | Symptoms | Risk factors | Amniotic fluid | Diagnostic Tool | Misdiagnosis | Placenta | AAP management | blood transfusion | medicine | Maternal outcome | fetal outcome | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Implantation site | Feeding arteries | management | |||||||||||||||
| Yacouba MC et al. (2025) [19] | 1 | 32 | 32 | 0 | abdominal pain | / | / | US | no | right ovary and greater ligament | / | removed | surgery | no | / | discharged | neonatal death |
| Pradyta E et al.(2025) [20] | 1 | 31 | 31 | 0 | abdominal pain | history of laparotomy | / | / | yes | omentum | / | left in-situ | surgery | no | / | discharged | stillbirths |
| Claudio RE et al. (2025) [21] | 1 | 30 | 30 | 0 | abdominal pain | ectopic pregnancies and left salpingectomy | / | US&CT | no | abdominal wall | / | removed | surgery | yes | / | discharged | stillbirths |
| El Hajjar C et al. (2024) [22] | 1 | 26 | 26 | 0 | severe abdominal pain, fever and chills | curettage procedure | / | US | yes | posterior uterine wall (Douglas pouch) | / | removed | surgery | no | broad-spectrum antibiotics | discharged | stillbirths |
| Gupta K. et al.(2024) [23] | 1 | 34 | 34 | 0 | abdominal pain | / | no measurable pools | US/MRI | no | fundus of uterus,mesentry | enlarged mesenteric vessels and left external iliac artery | removed | surgery | no | discharged | neonatal death | |
| Alwafai Z. et al.(2024) [24] | 1 | 33 | 33 | 0 | severe abdominal pain | / | / | US | yes | serosa of anterior uterine wall as well as broad ligament | external iliac artery | removed | surgery | yes | antibiotics | discharged | stillbirths |
| Joshi RR. et al.(2024) [25] | 1 | 36 | 36 | 0 | no | tubal ligation and recanalization | / | US | no | right adnexa, ovary, and fallopian tube | / | removed | surgery | yes | / | discharged | stillbirths |
| Joshi RR. et al. (2024) [25] | 1 | 24 | 24 | 0 | abdominal pain, vaginal bleeding | cesarean section | / | US | yes | right iliac fossa | / | removed | surgery | yes | / | discharged | stillbirths |
| Joshi RR. et al.(2024) [25] | 1 | 20 | 20 | 0 | severe anemia and septic shock | / | / | US | yes | back of uterus, bowel, and omentum | / | removed | surgery | yes | / | death | stillbirths |
| Magezi J. et al. (2024) [26] | 1 | 38 | 38 | 0 | no | / | oligohydramnios | US | no | omentum | ovarian, mesenteric, and uterine vessels | removed | surgery | yes | / | discharged | live |
| Ramphal S. et al. (2023) [27] | 46 | 28 | 32 | 27 (12–57) | abdominal pain (46/46, severe 4/46), vaginal bleeding (8/46) | inflammatory disease (4/46), laparotomy for a previous ectopic pregnancy (1/46), HIV infection (30/46) | normal (17/46), oligohydramnios(12/46), no measurable pools (17/46), absent (0/46) | US (46/46) | no (46/46) | Douglas pouch, the posterior wall of the uterus, and both posterior broad ligaments and the rectum, and so on | / | left in-situ (2/46), removed (44/46) | expectation (46/46) | blood transfusion (40/46) | Steroid mature at 30 weeks of gestation (46/46) | discharged (46/46) | stillbirths (2/46), neonatal death (11/46), live (33/46) |
| Harries S. et al.(2023)[28] | 17 | 31 | 31 | 0 | / | smoking (2/17), abdominal surgery (5/17) (4 caesarean sections and 1 ectopic pregnancy) | / | US (16/17),US & MRI (1/17) | no (17/17) | 4 omentum, 3 sigmoid colon, 3 rectum, 2 posterior uterine surface, 2 posterior cul-de-sac, 1 transverse colon, 1 small bowel, 1 pelvic side wall, 1 left ureter, 1 bowel, 1 appendix | / | removed (15/17), left in-situ partially (2/17) | surgery (17/17) | blood transfusion (14/17) | Steroid mature (5/17) | Death (2/17), discharged (15/17) | stillbirths (6/17), neonatal death (2/17), live (9/17) |
| Legesse, T. K. et al. (2023) [29] | 1 | 37 | 37 | 0 | abdominal pain | / | oligohydramnios | US | no | broad ligament and right adnexa, right ovary | the tubal branch of the uterine artery | removed | surgery | yes | / | discharged | live |
| Iovenitti P. et al. (2023) [30] | 1 | 39 | 39 | 0 | no | / | / | US | no | epiploon, left ovary and salpinx | / | removed | surgery | yes | / | discharged | neonatal death |
| Utalo T. et al. (2022) [31] | 1 | 38 | 38 | 0 | abdominal pain | / | oligohydramnios | US | yes | left broad ligament, left ovary, small bowel mesentery, and posterior wall of uterus | / | removed | surgery | no | / | discharged | neonatal death |
| Tegene D. et al. (2022) [32] | 1 | 36 | 36 | 0 | vaginal bleeding | / | / | US | no | cecum and mesentery of gastrointestinal tract | / | removed | surgery | no | / | discharged | stillbirths |
| Chan A. et al. (2022) [33] | 1 | 23 | 23 | 0 | abdominal pain | / | / | US&CE-MDCT | no | uterine fundus and adjacent bowel | right uterine artery | left in-situ | surgery (bilateral uterine artery coil embolization before laparotomy) | no | methotrexate | discharged | stillbirths |
| Momtahan M. et al. (2021) [34] | 1 | 36 | 36 | 0 | no | / | / | US | yes | right adnexa, cecum and pelvic cavity right side | / | removed | surgery | yes | / | discharged | live |
| Soewondo W. et al. (2021) [18] | 1 | 30 | 30 | 0 | no | / | / | US&MRI | no | urinary veins, uterus, omentum, and descending colon | / | left in-situ | surgery | NO | / | discharged | live |
| Muroni M. et al. (2021) [35] | 1 | 37 | 37 | 0 | abdominal pain | left tubal pregnancy | oligohydramnios | US | no | Douglas pouch | unidentifiable | removed | surgery | yes | / | discharged | Infant death |
| Hofmeyr GJ. et al. (2021) [36] | 1 | 37 | 37 | 0 | abdominal pain | / | oligohydramnios | US | yes | entire pelvis | posterior wall of the pelvis | removed | surgery (Foley catheter tourniquet hemostasis) | yes | / | discharged | live |
| Paluku JL. et al.(2020) [2] | 1 | 33 | 33 | 0 | severe abdominal pain | / | oligohydramnios | US | yes (acute peritonitis) | greater omentum and on small bowel mesentery | / | left in-situ | surgery | yes | antibiotics, analgesic | discharged | live |
| Chun PC. et al. (2019) [37] | 1 | 38 | 38 | 0 | abdominal pain | right ectopic pregnancy | / | TUS | YES | right adnexa, terminal ileum, proximal caecum, and appendix | / | left in-situ partially | surgery | yes | tranexamic acid | discharged | live |
| Odelola OI. et al. (2019) [38] | 1 | 9 | 33 | 171 | severe abdominal pain, vaginal bleeding | / | normal | TUS | NO | a broad stalk to left infundibulopelvic ligament, broad ligament, and also left tube | removed | expectation | yes | discharged | live | ||
| Shurie S. et al. (2018) [39] | 1 | 35 | 35 | 0 | vaginal bleeding | / | / | US | no | anterior abdominal wall and mesentery posteriorly | / | removed | surgery | no | misoprostol | discharged | stillbirths |
| Mforteh AA. et al. (2018) [40] | 1 | 39 | 39 | 0 | reduced fetal movements | / | / | US | yes | ascending colon and mesocolon | / | left in-situ | surgery | no | misoprostol, ampicillin, gentamycin, metronidazole, methotrexate | discharged | stillbirths |
| Rohilla M. et al. (2018) [1] | 1 | 40 | 40 | 0 | no | / | / | US | yes | fallopian tube wall | / | left in-situ partially | surgery | yes | / | discharged | live |
| Marcelin C. et al. (2018) [41] | 1 | 27 | 28 | 0 | no | / | oligohydramnios | US&MRI&CT | no | upper side of uterus | the left uterine and sigmoid arteries from the inferior mesenteric artery | left in-situ with embolization, and removed 45 days later | surgery | no | / | discharged | live |
| Maciel N. et al. (2017) [42] | 1 | 37 | 37 | 0 | no | / | oligohydramnios | US | yes | left broad ligament and closely apposed to left infundibulopelvic ligament | / | removed | surgery | no | / | discharged | stillbirths |
| Hailu FG. et al. (2017) [4] | 1 | 37 | 37 | 0 | abdominal pain | sever preeclampsia | no measurable pools | US | YES | posterior aspect of uterus and right broad ligament | / | removed | surgery | yes | Ceftriaxone and metronidazol | discharged | live |
| Tolefac PN. et al. (2017) [43] | 1 | 25 | 25 | 0 | nonspecific abdominal distension | / | oligohydramnios | TUS, TVS | YES | fundus and posteriorly to large intestine | / | left in-situ | surgery | no | misoprostol | discharged | neonatal death |
| Oppenheimer A. et al. (2017) [44] | 1 | 31 | 32 | 2 | abdominal pain | dilatation and curettage abortion | oligohydramnios | TUS/MRI | NO | peritoneum and omentum | large branch from the anterior wall of the right iliac vessels | removed | surgery | No significant bleeding occurred | corticosteroid therapy | discharged | live |
| Abdelrahman S. et al. (2017) [44] | 1 | 35 | 34 | 0 | abdominal pain | / | / | US | YES | fundus and left cornual region of uterus, small bowel mesentery and left lateral abdominal wall | / | left in-situ partially | surgery | yes | antibiotic therapy | discharged | live |
| Udigwe GO. et al. (2016) [45] | 1 | 27 | 34 | 49 | abdominal pain, vomiting, constipation | / | / | US & Plain abdominal X-ray | no | gut | / | removed | expectation | yes | omeprazole, amoxicillin-clavulanic, metronidazole, analgesics due to acute intestinal obstruction secondary to AAP | discharged | live |
| Harirah HM. et al. (2016) [46] | 1 | 28 | 29 | 6 | no | infertility and left hydrosalpinx | oligohydramnios | MRI&US&Enhanced MRI | NO | majority of omentum and small bowel mesentery | / | left in-situ partially | surgery | yes | / | discharged | live |
| Harirah HM. et al. (2016) [46] | 1 | 23 | 30 | 49 | abdominal pain | genital chlamydia trachomatis infection | oligohydramnios | TUS, TVS&MRI | NO | anterior aspect of dome of uterus, rectosigmoid junction, sigmoid colon, and right ovary | / | left in-situ | expectation | no | betametha-sone, magnesiumsulfate | discharged | live |
| El-Agwany AS. et al. (2016) [47] | 1 | 24 | 24 | 0 | abdominal pain | hysterectomy specimen revealed thinning near the fundus | / | TUS | no | fundus of uterus | / | left in-situ partially | surgery | yes | / | discharged | neonatal death |
| Nassali MN. et al. (2016) [48] | 1 | 41 | 41 | 0 | no | HIV infection | / | TUS | yes | omentum, ileal mesentery and extending to pouch of Douglas | / | removed | surgery | yes | / | discharged | neonatal death |
| Aliyu I. et al. (2016) [49] | 1 | 36 | 36 | 0 | abdominal pain, vaginal bleeding | / | / | US | no | the omentum | / | removed | surgery | yes | ceftriaxone, metronidazole | discharged | live |
CE-MDCT contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography, CT Computed Tomography, HIV human immunodeficiency virus, MRI Magnetic Resonance imaging, TUS Transabdominal ultrasound, US Ultrasound
AAP is often missed in early pregnancy or due to a lack of antenatal care. Currently, the management of abdominal pregnancy includes expectant management or surgical management. If ultrasound indicates normal fetal development and amniotic fluid [27], expectant management may be continued until 34 weeks of gestation or until the week when a newborn can survive. All cases (49/49) that underwent expectant management were selected for delivery at 30 weeks or later [27, 38, 45, 46]. However, surgical treatment is the most common approach, with laparotomy being the preferred option.
Among the 100 fetuses with AAP described in the 36 articles, only 17 cases (17.0%) were missed before surgery, indicating improved diagnostic accuracy over the past decade. A total of 49 cases (49.0%) received expectant management, of which 18 exhibited normal amniotic fluid volume (36.7%). Among these 49 cases, 2 maternal deaths (4.1%) occurred, with fetal outcomes including 2 stillbirths (4.2%), 11 neonatal deaths (22.4%), and 36 live births (73.5%). Fifty-one cases underwent surgical treatment, with 1 maternal death (2.0%). Fetal outcomes in this group included 18 stillbirths (35.3%), 10 neonatal deaths (19.6%), and live births 23 (45.1%). Overall, the maternal mortality rate associated with AAP is approximately 3.0%, based on data from 100 reported cases, whereas the fetal mortality rate reaches as high as 41.0%. However, because some cases of abdominal pregnancy with sudden onset and maternal death, which resulted in incomplete clinical data, have not been published, our data may underestimate the mortality rate.
Therefore, standardized prenatal examinations are essential. In cases where a pregnant woman declines medical intervention, healthcare providers should clearly communicate the potential risks associated with adverse perinatal outcomes and establish regular telephone follow-up protocols to support improved maternal health outcomes. Other factors may have contributed to the reduction in maternal and fetal mortality rates over time, such as advanced imaging modalities, increased awareness among pregnant women and obstetricians, improvements in surgical techniques and treatment strategies, greater availability of blood products and medications, and enhanced access to tertiary care centers.
The key to surgical management lies in placental management. Complete removal of the placenta is recommended if it is not implanted in vital organs and has minimal adhesion to surrounding tissues. If the feeding vessel is unclear or dissection may cause significant tissue damage, leaving the placenta in situ is recommended. The placenta was completely removed in 84 cases, including one case in which severe infection developed after uterine artery embolization, requiring its removal 45 days later. Among the 16 cases in which the placenta was left in situ, nine cases involved partial removal due to massive bleeding and the inability to achieve complete dissection.
The use of methotrexate at AAP is debatable, as it works best on rapidly dividing cells and is less likely to help in case of a mature placenta [30, 46]. Most studies recommend avoiding chemotherapy and allowing spontaneous resorption to prevent severe intra-abdominal infection caused by rapid placental necrosis from potent drugs. However, some scholars suggest that residual placenta after surgery may still require medical treatment, with low-dose systemic methotrexate administered postoperatively, accompanied by close monitoring of hCG levels and ultrasound. Reoperation to remove the placenta may be necessary after 2–3 months if indicated [4, 18, 40]. This approach is not recommended in cases of uterine or tubal rupture [50].
Preoperative embolization of placental feeding vessels can reduce perioperative bleeding and transfusion requirements [32], however, uterine artery embolization may lead to reduced postoperative menstrual flow and decreased pregnancy rates. Prophylactic abdominal aortic balloon occlusion may reduce intraoperative bleeding. In addition, severe postpartum hemorrhage may occur in AAP, so adequate intraoperative blood supply must be ensured for resuscitation [25]. Eighty-five cases (85.0%) required blood transfusion.
Postoperative management of abdominal pregnancy surgery is crucial. Due to the extensive surgical field and potential intestinal injury, the risk of postoperative infection is high. Antimicrobial agents targeting intestinal flora are recommended [2, 22, 44].
Conclusion
Abdominal pregnancy is a rare and serious form of ectopic pregnancy, especially when monitoring the whole development process from a tubal pregnancy to AAP with an alive fetus. The recognition of suspicious symptoms, the use of ultrasound and MRI, and appropriate surgical and/or drug treatment are indispensable for AAP management. In addition, ultrasound and MRI are necessary and reliable tools for preoperative localization and postoperative follow-up. Therefore, early diagnosis and ensuring an excellent prognosis are still our major challenges.
Acknowledgements
We extend our sincere appreciation to the patient and her family members for their invaluable contribution to this study.
Abbreviations
- AAP
Advanced abdominal pregnancy
- CE-MDCT
Contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography
- CT
Computed Tomography
- HIV
Human immunodeficiency virus
- MDT
Multidisciplinary team
- MRI
Magnetic Resonance imaging
- TUS
Transabdominal ultrasound
- URTI
Upper respiratory tract infection
- US
Ultrasound
Authors’ contributions
LC wrote the main manuscript text. HG operated on the patient. HC and MX designed the study. LH was involved in the ultrasound diagnosis, reviewed and edited the manuscript. JM conducted pathological sampling and sectioning of the specimens, and prepared Fig. 4. JL, JS, and YZ prepared Figs. 1, 2 and 3 and collected materials for the preparation of the publication. All authors read and approved final manuscript.
Funding
This study was supported by the National NaturalScience Foundation of China (grants 82202194, 82230066, and 82302230), and the Joint Fund Project for Innovation and Development of Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (grants 2025AFD874).
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are not openly available due to reasons of sensitivity and are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This case study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Huazhong University of Science and Technology Graduate School and Faculty and the case provided with written informed consent.
Consent for publication
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication. There are no identifying images or other personal or clinical details of the patient that compromise their anonymity in this manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Li Cui, Hui Gao, Jing Ma and Haiyan Cao contributed equally to this work.
Contributor Information
Liu Hong, Email: hongliu0826@hust.edu.cn.
Mingxing Xie, Email: xiemx@hust.edu.cn.
References
- 1.Rohilla M, Joshi B, Jain V, Neetimala, Gainder S. Advanced abdominal pregnancy: a search for consensus. Review of literature along with case report. Archives Gynecol Obstet. 2018;298:1–8. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 2.Paluku JL, Kalole BK, Furaha CM, Kamabu EM, Bartels SA. Late abdominal pregnancy in a post-conflict context: case of a mistaken acute abdomen - a case report. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Eisner SM, Ebert AD, David M. Rare ectopic pregnancies – a literature review for the period 2007–2019 on locations outside the uterus and fallopian tubes. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2020;80(7):686–701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hailu FG, Yihunie GT, Essa AA, Tsega WK. Advanced abdominal pregnancy, with live fetus and severe preeclampsia, case report. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dmowski WP, Rana N, Ding J, Wu WT. Retroperitoneal subpancreatic ectopic pregnancy following in vitro fertilization in a patient with previous bilateral salpingectomy: how did it get there? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2002;19(2):90–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hall JSE, Harris M, Levy RC, Walrond ER. Retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 1973;80:92–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Le MT, Huynh MH, Cao CH, Hoang YM, Le KC, et al. Retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy after in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer in patient with previous bilateral salpingectomy: a case report. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020;150(3):418–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Persson J, Reynisson P, Måsbäck A, Epstein E, Saldeen P. Histopathology indicates lymphatic spread of a pelvic retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy removed by robot-assisted laparoscopy with temporary occlusion of the blood supply. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;89(6):835–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhao L. Demonstration of the route of embryo migration in retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy using contrast-enhanced computed tomography. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014;40(3):849–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hruban L, Jouzova A, Janku P, Weinberger V, Seidlova D, et al. Conservative management of complete fetal expulsion into the abdominal cavity after silent uterine rupture - case report. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23(1):500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Iwama H. A case of retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy following IVF-ET in a patient with previous bilateral salpingectomy. Am J Perinatol. 2008;25(1):33–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Arora VK. Abdominal pregnancy following total hysterectomy. Int Surg. 1983;68(3):253. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Poole A, Haas D, Magann EF. Early abdominal ectopic pregnancies: a systematic review of the literature. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2012;74(4):249–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zheng X, Zhou Y, Sun Z, Yan T, Yang Y, et al. Abdominal pregnancy secondary to uterine horn pregnancy: a case report. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23(1):412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Huang X, Rui ZM, Tan X, Zeng L, Jiang K, et al. Conservative management of retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy by computed tomographic–guided methotrexate injection in the gestational sac: 2 case reports and literature review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019;26(6):1187–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ferland RJ, Chadwick DA, O’Brien JA, Granai CO. An ectopic pregnancy in the upper retroperitoneum following in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;78(3 Pt 2):544–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wang Z, Zhang C. Rupture of fetal membrane in ectopic tubal pregnancy: a case report and literature review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024;103(38):e39713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Soewondo W, Kusumaningrum S, Putro PS, Indriyani I, Yuliantara EE. The use of FIESTA sequence MRI in successful management of abdominal pregnancy. Clin Imaging. 2021;77(1):117–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yacouba MC, Diouaga HS, Oumara M, Garba MR, Nayama M. Advanced abdominal pregnancy complicated by uterine prolapse: a case report at the Issaka Gazoby Maternity of Niamey (Niger). BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025;25(1):604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pradyta E, Wulanhandarini T, Pascawardhana M. Magnetic resonance imaging after laparotomy of fetal evacuation in advanced abdominal pregnancy. Radiol Case Rep. 2025;20(3):1435–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Claudio RE, Fredericks T, Sharma S, Hernandez M, Kumar S. A Rare Case of a Third Trimester Intra-abdominal Pregnancy En Caul Delivered via Cesarean Section. Cureus. 2025;17(4):e82582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.El Hajjar C, Mohamad H, Siblini M, Demachkie K, Yared G, et al. Advanced abdominal pregnancy complicated by pelvic inflammatory disease: a compelling case report. SAGE Open Med Case Rep. 2024;12:2050313X241288432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gupta K, Agrawal S, Mital M. Ultrasound and MRI diagnosis of clinically unsuspected advanced abdominal pregnancy- a rare case. Int J Life Sci Biotechnol Pharma Res. 2024;13(10):191–3.
- 24.Alwafai Z, Kolbe C, Kruse-Wieczorek J, Khanji MN, Zygmunt M. Challenging diagnosis of late abdominal pregnancy: a case study of misdiagnosis and fetal death in the third trimester. Am J Case Rep. 2024;25:e943625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Joshi RR. Experience of secondary abdominal pregnancy reported at a rural tertiary care center of western India: a case series. Cureus. 2024;16(3):e55663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Magezi J, Wacha J, Pebalo PF. Chronicles of an uncommon term abdominal pregnancy with successful outcome: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2024;18(1):61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ramphal S, Khaliq OP, Abel T, Moodley J. Expectant management of advanced abdominal pregnancies: is it justifiable? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023;281:99–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Harries S, Tooke L, Imbeault J-C, Matjila M, Pillay S. Advanced abdominal pregnancy at a tertiary hospital in South Africa: a case series. AJOG Glob Rep. 2025. 10.1016/j.xagr.2025.100500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Legesse TK, Ayana BA, Issa SA. Surviving fetus from a full term abdominal pregnancy. Int Med Case Rep J. 2023;16:173–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Iovenitti P, Galiano V, Finco A, Tiberio F, Gerard O, et al. Asymptomatic 39 weeks abdominal pregnancy - video report of a case occurred in ivory coast resulting in a live birth. J Mother Child. 2023;27(1):30–2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Utalo T, Getu J. A unique case of coexisting intrauterine and abdominal pregnancy which progress to term with a positive birth outcome. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1):243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Tegene D, Nesha S, Gizaw B, Befikadu T. Laparotomy for advanced abdominal ectopic pregnancy. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2022;2022:3177810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Chan A, Rampersad FS, Ramsundar A, Boodram A, Rampersad R. The use of contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography imaging in advanced abdominal pregnancy. Cureus. 2022;14(2):e22542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Momtahan M, Kasraeean M, Faraji A, Moradi-Alamdarloo S, Moosaie M. Term spontaneous heterotopic pregnancy (abdominal and intrauterine): a case report. Bull Emerg Trauma. 2021;9(4):201–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Muroni M, Butoyi JMV, Shimirimana M, Mulemangabo M, Nkurunziza J, et al. Hemoperitoneum during removal of the placenta in advanced abdominal pregnancy with live fetus delivered at 37 weeks of gestation. A case report in a low-resource setting and literature review. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2021;80:105694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hofmeyr GJ, Majeke BD, Nassali MN. Foley catheter tourniquet for uncontrollable extra-uterine placental hemorrhage: description of a novel surgical technique. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2021;86(6):549–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Chun PC, Chua KH, Shahul Hameed MS, Mathur M, Lee WKR. Undiagnosed abdominal term pregnancy with good neonatal outcome. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2019;2019:2460485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Odelola OI, Akadri AA, Agaga LA, Dada SA. Abdominal pregnancy: a case report of a viable nondysmorphic fetus. Niger Med J. 2019;60(1):43–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Shurie S, Ogot J, Poli P, Were E. Diagnosis of abdominal pregnancy still a challenge in low resource settings: a case report on advanced abdominal pregnancy at a tertiary facility in Western Kenya. Pan Afr Med J. 2018;31:239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Mforteh AA, Tchakounte C, Sama CB, Eteme-Messi S, Djiognouo W, et al. Induction of labour in advanced abdominal pregnancy with fetal demise due to cord round neck: a case report of a missed diagnosis. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2018;2018:4171604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Marcelin C, Kouchner P, Bintner M, Linard M, Boukerrou M, et al. Placenta embolization of advanced abdominal pregnancy. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2018;99(4):265–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Maciel N, Lima AF, Cruz R, Ponte C. Advanced abdominal pregnancy in a spontaneous heterotopic pregnancy. BMJ Case Rep. 2017. 10.1136/bcr-2017-222098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Tolefac PN, Abanda MH, Minkande JZ, Priso EB. The challenge in the diagnosis and management of an advanced abdominal pregnancy in a resource-low setting: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2017;11(1):199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Abdelrahman S, Deeter M, Muthusami A, Peterson TG, Wackenier L. A live term intra-abdominal pregnancy in a Field Hospital: a case report. J Surg Case Rep. 2017;2017(3):rjx062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Udigwe GO, Eleje GU, Ihekwoaba EC, Udegbunam OI, Egeonu RO, et al. Acute intestinal obstruction complicating abdominal pregnancy: conservative management and successful outcome. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2016;2016:2576280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Harirah HM, Smith JM, Dixon CL, Hankins GD. Conservative management and planned surgery for periviable advanced extrauterine abdominal pregnancy with favorable outcome: report of two cases. AJP Rep. 2016;6(3):e301–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.El-Agwany AS, El-Badawy elS, El-Habashy A, El-Gammal H, Abdelnaby M. Secondary advanced abdominal pregnancy after suspected ruptured cornual pregnancy with good maternal outcome: a case with unusual gangrenous fetal toes and ultrasound diagnoses managed by hysterectomy. Clin Med Insights Womens Health. 2016;9:1–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Nassali MN, Benti TM, Bandani-Ntsabele M, Musinguzi E. A case report of an asymptomatic late term abdominal pregnancy with a live birth at 41 weeks of gestation. BMC Res Notes. 2016;9:31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Aliyu I, Ashimi A. Hydrocephalic newborn in a missed advanced abdominal pregnancy - diagnostic challenges in a rural setting: a case report. J Mahatma Gandhi Inst Med Sci. 2016. 10.4103/0971-9903.178105. [Google Scholar]
- 50.National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: Guidelines. In: Ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage: diagnosis and initial management. edn. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Copyright © NICE 2023.; 2023. [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are not openly available due to reasons of sensitivity and are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.




