Abstract
Background:
Maternal diet during pregnancy may shape the child’s immune system and gut microbiota maturation, potentially influencing the risk of developing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Therefore, we examined maternal a posteriori dietary patterns during pregnancy and their associations with pediatric-onset IBD risk in offspring.
Methods:
The study comprised mother-child pairs from the Danish National Birth Cohort, which is a nationwide cohort of Danish pregnant mothers and their children, enrolled in 1996-2002 and followed prospectively through national health registers. Maternal dietary patterns during pregnancy were identified using k-means cluster analysis of 37 food group intakes, assessed with a food frequency questionnaire in gestational week 25 (second trimester). Pediatric-onset IBD cases (diagnosed at ≤18 years) were identified in Danish health registers. Cox regression explored associations between maternal dietary patterns during pregnancy and risk of pediatric-onset IBD in offspring, using the most common dietary pattern as reference.
Results:
Based on analysis of 56,097 mother-child pairs, of which 161 (0.29%) offspring developed pediatric-onset IBD, we identify five distinct maternal dietary patterns: diverse (n = 8388), non-recommended (n = 14,110), Mediterranean (n = 14,700), animal-based (n = 3808), and Western (n = 15,091). Notably, a diverse dietary pattern, characterized by high intakes of most food groups, is associated with 45% lower risk of pediatric-onset IBD in offspring compared to a Western pattern (hazard ratio: 0.55; 95% confidence interval: 0.31–0.97). No significant associations are observed for the other patterns.
Conclusions:
This large prospective cohort study shows that maternal adherence to a diverse dietary pattern during pregnancy may contribute to lower risk of pediatric-onset IBD in offspring.
Subject terms: Inflammatory bowel disease, Inflammatory bowel disease, Epidemiology, Paediatric research, Disease prevention
Anneberg et al. investigate associations between data-driven maternal dietary patterns during pregnancy and offspring’s risk of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Based on 56,097 mother-child pairs followed over 18 years, they show that a diverse dietary pattern may protect offspring against IBD development compared to a Western dietary pattern.
Plain language summary
This study investigates whether mothers’ diets during pregnancy are linked to the risk of their children developing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We analyzed the diets of more than 56,000 pregnant mothers from Denmark and grouped them based on similarities in their eating patterns. Then, we retrieved medical information from national health registers about their children to identify who developed IBD. We found that children whose mothers followed a diverse diet during pregnancy, characterized by high intakes of various food groups (meat, fish, vegetables, legumes, fruits, potatoes, desserts), had lower risk of developing IBD than children of mothers with a typical Western-style diet. These results suggest that eating a diverse diet during pregnancy could have lasting benefits for children’s health.
Introduction
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), is estimated to affect around 7 million people worldwide1. The disease typically begins in early adulthood, but recently, an increasing number of children are being diagnosed2. This concerning trend toward earlier disease onset underscores the need for early prevention, as IBD with pediatric onset is often more severe3 and may result in linear growth failure, delayed puberty, and impaired psychosocial functioning4,5. Meanwhile, the prevalence of both pediatric- and adult-onset IBD has steadily been rising on a global perspective, particularly in newly industrialized countries2,6, suggesting that a Western lifestyle contributes to the disease development7,8, possibly with influence already in early life9.
According to the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease theory, early life exposures have a significant impact on long-term health10,11. This concept was first proposed by Barker et al. in 1989 after observing a link between low birth weight and death from coronary heart disease12, which led to the hypothesis that in-utero undernutrition affects disease susceptibility later in life through its influence on fetal growth13. Since then, a growing body of evidence suggests a role of maternal diet during pregnancy in offspring’s disease development, including cardiovascular disease, cancer, and allergies14,15. Likewise, maternal diet during pregnancy may contribute to offspring’s IBD risk by inducing pathological changes similar to those observed in the preclinical phase of the disease16, as shown by experimental studies with pregnant mice and their offspring17. For instance, maternal high-fat diets have consistently been found to increase offspring’s intestinal inflammation and permeability, with release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, gut microbiota dysbiosis, and enhanced susceptibility to experimental colitis18–21. In contrast, the opposite effects have been observed with maternal high-fiber diets22–24. Furthermore, a high-sugar/high-fat diet, mimicking a classical Western diet, increased offspring’s susceptibility to CD-like colitis characterized by severe intestinal inflammation and higher histopathological scores25. However, human studies confirming these findings are scarce26,27.
Because the human diet is inherently more complex, focusing only on individual nutrients or foods has some conceptual limitations. People do not consume nutrients in isolation, but rather meals composed of different foods with diverse nutritional profiles, which may interact and influence health outcomes synergistically28. Dietary pattern analysis addresses this complexity by capturing overall intake, thereby accounting for the collinearity between dietary components and providing a more realistic depiction of habitual eating patterns28. Several dietary pattern analysis methods exist, usually divided into a priori (hypothesis-driven), a posteriori (data-driven), and hybrid approaches. Cluster analysis is an a posteriori approach that empirically derives dietary patterns by separating the study population into clusters based on similarities in their diets29. Thus, naturally occurring dietary patterns in the data can be identified and compared regarding offspring’s disease risk, which may lay the foundation for future research exploring the specific food groups that drive these associations.
Therefore, the present study aim to characterize maternal a posteriori dietary patterns during pregnancy using k-means cluster analysis and to explore their associations with pediatric-onset IBD risk in the offspring. Utilizing data from the unique large-scale nationwide Danish National Birth Cohort (DNBC), we link detailed maternal dietary information collected in the second trimester of pregnancy with long-term data on their children obtained from the Danish National Patient Registry. Among the 56,097 mother-child pairs analyzed, we identify five distinct maternal dietary patterns during pregnancy: diverse, non-recommended, Mediterranean, animal-based, and Western. In this study, we show that compared to a Western dietary pattern, maternal adherence to a diverse dietary pattern during pregnancy is associated with a lower risk of pediatric-onset IBD in offspring, whereas no significant associations are observed for the remaining dietary patterns.
Methods
Study design and population
This prospective cohort study encompasses data from the DNBC, an ongoing study of early life exposures and their long-term effects on disease susceptibility30. Between January 1996 and October 2002, general practitioners across Denmark invited mothers to enroll in the DNBC at their first pregnancy visit, which usually takes place around gestational weeks 6 to 1230. All Danish-speaking mothers in Denmark, who became pregnant during the recruitment period and wished to carry to term, were eligible for inclusion30.
Methods for data collection in the DNBC have been previously described30,31. In short, information on maternal and offspring exposures was collected through computer-assisted telephone interviews in gestational weeks 12 and 30, as well as 6 and 18 months post-delivery. In addition, a validated semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire was mailed to the mothers in gestational week 25 to assess their diets during the previous four weeks32,33. This time frame was chosen because maternal dietary habits are more stable in the second trimester compared to earlier in the pregnancy period31.
By October 2002, the DNBC had enrolled 101,042 mothers, corresponding to approximately 60% of those who were invited30. The enrolled mothers and their children were then followed long-term by linkage with the Danish National Patient Registry through their civil registration numbers. Our study included all singleton mother-child pairs from the DNBC, where the mother fully responded to the food frequency questionnaire with realistic self-reported energy intakes (>2500 kJ/day to <25,000 kJ/day). Mother-child pairs, where the child’s information was missing from the patient registry, were excluded.
Dietary pattern analysis
The food frequency questionnaire assessed the maternal frequency of consumption for ~360 food items. Reported frequencies were converted into times/day and multiplied by standard portion sizes to estimate daily food intakes (servings/day)31. Energy intake was previously calculated by combining estimated food intakes with national food composition tables34, accounting for loss of fat, water, vitamins, and minerals during food preparation31. Furthermore, food intakes were translated into the intake of 37 food groups using standard classifications34 (Supplementary Table 1) and scaled by z-score normalization to make them comparable.
Maternal dietary patterns derived from the scaled food group intakes with k-means cluster analysis using the R-package ‘cluster’35. This method grouped mother-child pairs into n mutually exclusive clusters based on maternal intake of the 37 food groups, where n = the optimal number of clusters. The optimal number of clusters was determined using the Elbow method, which identified the point where additional clusters no longer improved the within-cluster homogeneity36. Clusters were internally validated by re-running the algorithm with a different number of initial seeds, showing consistently produced stable cluster centroids.
Thereby, each mother-child pair was assigned to a single cluster based on maternal dietary patterns. For each cluster, the mean scaled food group intakes (cluster centroids) were visualized in a spider plot to identify and name the dietary pattern that defined the mothers belonging to the specific cluster. Dietary patterns were named based on the predominant food groups consumed within each cluster, aiming to use terminology consistent with previous studies to facilitate comparison and communication of the results37–39.
Outcome
Children with pediatric-onset IBD, defined as ≤18 years of age at the time of their diagnosis40, were identified by linkage with medical data in the National Patient Registry through their civil registration numbers. Positive cases were defined as at least two IBD hospital contacts within two years, consisting of inpatient contacts only or a combination of inpatient and outpatient contacts41. The date of diagnosis was defined as the date of the first contact. Danish versions of ICD-10 codes associated with the contacts determined the disease subtype (CD ICD-10 code: DK50; UC ICD-10 code: DK51). If both CD and UC were recorded, the disease subtype was classified as CD41.
Covariates
To describe the study population, we retrieved information on maternal, paternal, and child characteristics from DNBC telephone interviews and the National Patient Registry. The following variables were assessed in the telephone interviews: maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index (kg/m2), maternal alcohol intake in second trimester (yes/no), maternal smoking in second trimester (yes/no), maternal nutritional supplement use in second trimester (yes/no), child’s exclusive breastfeeding duration and any breastfeeding duration (days, truncated at 180 days), and maternal educational level (primary/secondary or post-secondary/tertiary). Maternal educational level follows definitions by the International Standard Classification of Education42, where levels 0–2 reflect primary education, levels 3–4 reflect secondary and post-secondary education, and levels 5–8 reflect tertiary education. The following variables were retrieved from the National Patient Registry: maternal age at childbirth (years), maternal or paternal IBD diagnosis (yes/no), maternal antibiotics use in pregnancy (0 courses/1–2 courses/≥3 courses), child’s antibiotics use in the first year of life (yes/no), child’s sex (boy/girl), delivery mode (vaginal/cesarean), and preterm delivery (yes/no). In addition, we also evaluated maternal diet quality during pregnancy using the Healthy Eating Index, which was previously developed within the DNBC based on maternal adherence to Danish official dietary recommendations43.
Statistical analyses
R was used for all statistical analyses with a significance level of p<0.05. Characteristics of mothers and their children were described according to clusters of maternal dietary patterns. Data with fewer than 10 observations were presented as <10 to comply with General Data Protection Regulation guidelines and protect individual privacy. Continuous variables were expressed as medians and interquartile range (IQR), and categorical variables were expressed as counts with corresponding percentages. Depending on the data type, Kruskal-Wallis or X2 tests compared the maternal and offspring characteristics across the clusters of maternal dietary patterns.
Pediatric-onset IBD was ascertained from the date of birth to the date of diagnosis, death, emigration, or 18th birthday, whichever occurred first. Cox proportional hazards model estimated the offspring’s risk of pediatric-onset IBD associated with maternal dietary patterns, using the most common pattern as reference. Furthermore, associations were explored separately for the two IBD subtypes, CD and UC. The proportional hazards assumption was tested for violation using the Schoenfeld residuals test, and none of the analyses violated this assumption (all p>0.05).
Results were presented as hazard ratios with corresponding 95% confidence intervals before and after adjusting for covariates. The adjusted analyses included the following covariates, which were selected a priori based on knowledge about diet-related risk factors for IBD: maternal educational level, pre-pregnancy body mass index, smoking during pregnancy, nutritional supplement use during pregnancy, antibiotic use during pregnancy, energy intake during pregnancy, and parental IBD diagnosis. Another model further adjusted for offspring’s antibiotics use during the first life year. Those with missing covariate data were excluded, and their proportion was reported in the results section (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1. Flow diagram of the study population selection.

‘Incomplete food data’ refers to incomplete responses to the food frequency questionnaire. DNBC Danish National Birth Cohort, GP general practitioner, IBD inflammatory bowel disease, NPR National Patient Registry.
Ethical approval
The DNBC was approved by the National Committee on Health Research Ethics in Denmark (ref. no. [KF] 01-471/94) and conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants gave written informed consent at enrollment on behalf of themselves and their unborn child, thereby giving permission for researchers to use their information in medical records and registers for long-term follow-up. The register data are protected by the Danish Act on Processing of Personal Data and are accessed through application to and approval from the Danish Data Protection Agency and the Danish Health Data Authority. The Center for Molecular Prediction of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (PREDICT) has got ethical approval to work on the data by The Danish Council on Ethics (H-20048987). No new ethical approval was needed to conduct the current study, but authorization to use the DNBC data was sought and approved by the DNBC Reference Group.
Patient and public involvement
This study was based on historical data. However, the Danish Colitis-Crohn Association (CCF) was consulted regarding the relevance of the study. They found it to be highly relevant and have expressed their support for the project.
Results
Mother–child pairs
The DNBC enrolled 96,817 liveborn mother-child pairs, of which 40,720 were excluded from our analyses for reasons detailed in Fig. 1. Baseline characteristics of the included and excluded populations are presented in Supplementary Table 2. Accordingly, the final study population consisted of 56,097 mother–child pairs. By the age of 18 years, 161 children (0.29%) had developed pediatric-onset IBD, with a median (IQR) age at diagnosis of 15.0 (13.0–17.0) years. Among these, 89 children (0.16%) were diagnosed with pediatric-onset CD, and 72 (0.13%) with pediatric-onset UC. Kaplan-Meier curves illustrating cumulative incidence rates are presented in Supplementary Fig. 1.
Table 1 outlines the study population’s characteristics. At childbirth, the mothers had a median (IQR) age of 30.0 (27.0–33.0) years. Their median (IQR) diet quality score was 22.2 (17.8–27.1), and their median (IQR) daily energy intake was 9831 (8277–11,616) kJ/day. Regarding educational attainment, 48.6% had tertiary education. During pregnancy, 50.7% drank alcohol, 15.9% smoked, 97.9% used nutritional supplements, and 29.9% used antibiotics at least once. Among the children, 3.6% were born preterm, 41.4% received at least one course of antibiotics during the first year of life, and 1.2% had a parent diagnosed with IBD.
Table 1.
Characteristics of the study population according to maternal dietary patterns during pregnancya
| Total (n = 56,097) | Diverse dietary pattern (n = 8388) | Non-recommended dietary pattern (n = 14,110) | Mediterranean dietary pattern (n = 14,700) | Animal-based dietary pattern (n = 3808) | Western dietary pattern (n = 15,091) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maternal age at birth, years | ||||||
| Median (IQR) | 30.0 (27.0–33.0) | 31.0 (28.0–34.0) | 29.0 (26.0–32.0) | 31.0 (28.0–34.0) | 30.0 (27.0–33.0) | 29.0 (26.0–32.0) |
| Maternal educational level | ||||||
| Primary, n (%) | 6820 (12.2%) | 844 (10.1%) | 2253 (16.0%) | 1067 (7.3%) | 497 (13.1%) | 2159 (14.3%) |
| Secondary or post-secondary, n (%) | 22021 (39.3%) | 3034 (36.2%) | 6339 (44.9%) | 4224 (28.7%) | 1492 (39.2%) | 6932 (45.9%) |
| Tertiary, n (%) | 27256 (48.6%) | 4510 (53.8%) | 5518 (39.1%) | 9409 (64.0%) | 1819 (47.8%) | 6000 (39.8%) |
| Maternal pre-pregnancy BMI, kg/m2 | ||||||
| Median (IQR) | 22.65 (20.69–25.35) | 22.41 (20.57–24.91) | 23.18 (21.01–26.40) | 22.05 (20.42–24.30) | 22.31 (20.48–24.80) | 23.03 (20.83–25.91) |
| Maternal alcohol intake in 2nd trimester | ||||||
| Yes, n (%) | 28424 (50.7%) | 5408 (64.5%) | 5129 (36.4%) | 8652 (58.9%) | 1911 (50.2%) | 7324 (48.5%) |
| No, n (%) | 27673 (49.3%) | 2980 (35.5%) | 8981 (63.6%) | 6048 (41.1%) | 1897 (49.8%) | 7767 (51.5%) |
| Maternal smoking in 2nd trimester | ||||||
| Yes, n (%) | 8915 (15.9%) | 1302 (15.5%) | 2559 (18.1%) | 1247 (8.5%) | 734 (19.3%) | 3073 (20.4%) |
| No, n (%) | 47182 (84.1%) | 7086 (84.5%) | 11551 (81.9%) | 13453 (91.5%) | 3074 (80.7%) | 12018 (79.6%) |
| Maternal diet quality in 2nd trimester | ||||||
| Median (IQR) | 22.2 (17.8–27.1) | 24.8 (21.2–28.4) | 20.4 (16.1–25.6) | 26.3 (22.1–31.1) | 22.0 (17.7–27.0) | 18.7 (15.4–22.3) |
| Maternal nutritional supplement use in 2nd trimester | ||||||
| Yes, n (%) | 54919 (97.9%) | 8223 (98.0%) | 13759 (97.5%) | 14482 (98.5%) | 3720 (97.7%) | 14735 (97.6%) |
| No, n (%) | 1178 (2.1%) | 165 (2.0%) | 351 (2.5%) | 218 (1.5%) | 88 (2.3%) | 356 (2.4%) |
| Maternal antibiotics use in pregnancy | ||||||
| 0 courses, n (%) | 39316 (70.1%) | 5827 (69.5%) | 9728 (68.9%) | 10791 (73.4%) | 2626 (69.0%) | 10344 (68.5%) |
| 12 courses, n (%) | 13092 (23.3%) | 1976 (23.6%) | 3416 (24.2%) | 2967 (20.2%) | 931 (24.4%) | 3802 (25.2%) |
| ≥3 courses, n (%) | 3689 (6.6%) | 585 (7.0%) | 966 (6.8%) | 942 (6.4%) | 251 (6.6%) | 945 (6.3%) |
| Child’s sex | ||||||
| Girl, n (%) | 27284 (48.6%) | 4166 (49.7%) | 6809 (48.3%) | 7158 (48.7%) | 1811 (47.6%) | 7340 (48.6%) |
| Boy, n (%) | 28813 (51.4%) | 4222 (50.3%) | 7301 (51.7%) | 7542 (51.3%) | 1997 (52.4%) | 7751 (51.4%) |
| Parental IBD diagnosis | ||||||
| Yes, n (%) | 653 (1.2%) | 103 (1.2%) | 182 (1.3%) | 176 (1.2%) | 34 (0.9%) | 158 (1.0%) |
| No, n (%) | 55444 (98.8%) | 8285 (98.8%) | 13928 (98.7%) | 14524 (98.8%) | 3774 (99.1%) | 14933 (99.0%) |
| Preterm delivery | ||||||
| Yes (<37 weeks), n (%) | 2026 (3.6%) | 304 (3.6%) | 531 (3.8%) | 499 (3.4%) | 105 (2.8%) | 587 (3.9%) |
| No (≥37 weeks), n (%) | 53355 (95.1%) | 7963 (94.9%) | 13458 (95.4%) | 13934 (94.8%) | 3628 (95.3%) | 14372 (95.2%) |
| Data missing, n (%) | 716 (1.3%) | 121 (1.4%) | 121 (0.9%) | 267 (1.8%) | 75 (2.0%) | 132 (0.9%) |
| Child’s antibiotics use in first year of life | ||||||
| Yes, n (%) | 23208 (41.4%) | 3363 (40.1%) | 6142 (43.5%) | 5320 (36.2%) | 1598 (42.0%) | 6785 (45.0%) |
| No, n (%) | 32889 (58.6%) | 5025 (59.9%) | 7968 (56.5%) | 9380 (63.8%) | 2210 (58.0%) | 8306 (55.0%) |
| Any breastfeeding duration,b days | ||||||
| Median (IQR) | 180 (134–180) | 180 (164–180) | 180 (120–180) | 180 (180–180) | 180 (150–180) | 180 (120–180) |
| Data missing, n (%) | 10634 (19.0%) | 1467 (17.5%) | 2368 (16.8%) | 2540 (17.3%) | 1886 (49.5%) | 2373 (15.7%) |
| Exclusive breastfeeding duration,b days | ||||||
| Median (IQR) | 120 (90–150) | 120 (104–150) | 120 (74–132) | 120 (120–150) | 0 (0–7) | 120 (87–134) |
| Data missing, n (%) | 21372 (38.1%) | 2724 (32.5%) | 4830 (34.2%) | 4947 (33.7%) | 3803 (99.9%) | 5068 (33.6%) |
| Mode of delivery | ||||||
| Vaginal, n (%) | 47827 (85.3%) | 7132 (85.0%) | 11902 (84.4%) | 12532 (85.3%) | 3344 (87.8%) | 12917 (85.6%) |
| Cesarean, n (%) | 8252 (14.7%) | 1252 (14.9%) | 2204 (15.6%) | 2164 (14.7%) | 462 (12.1%) | 2170 (14.4%) |
BMI body mass index, IBD inflammatory bowel disease.
aData are expressed as median (Q1–Q3) for continuous variables and counts (%) for categorical variables.
bTruncated at 180 days.
Maternal dietary patterns during pregnancy
K-means cluster analysis identified five different clusters of maternal dietary patterns during pregnancy (Fig. 2, Supplementary Table 3). Cluster 1 (n = 8388) had a diverse dietary pattern with high intakes of most food groups, including meat, fish, vegetables, legumes, fruits, potatoes, and desserts. Cluster 2 (n = 14,110) had a non-recommended dietary pattern with below-average intakes of most food groups. Cluster 3 (n = 14,700) was characterized as following a Mediterranean dietary pattern due to their above-average intakes of whole grain products, cheese, fermented dairy, fruits, vegetables, and fish. Cluster 4 (n = 3808) had an animal-based dietary pattern composed of most animal-based foods, although they also consumed other food groups, such as whole grain products and soft drinks with sugar. Cluster 5 (n = 15,091) was characterized as following a Western dietary pattern with high intakes of processed meat, refined grain products, snacks, candies, chocolate, potatoes, pizzas, burgers, and sugar-free soft drinks. This dietary pattern was also the most common and was therefore used as the reference in further analyses.
Fig. 2. Spider plot of the five maternal dietary patterns identified with k-means cluster analysis (Diverse = 8388; Non-recommended = 14,110; Mediterranean = 14,700; Animal-based = 3808; Western = 15,091).
The values represent z-score normalized daily intakes of 37 food groups across the five clusters.
Compared to mothers with a Western dietary pattern (Table 1), those following diverse, Mediterranean, or animal-based dietary patterns were older at childbirth, had a higher educational level, higher diet quality, and lower body mass index. Mothers with a Mediterranean dietary pattern also smoked less (8.5% versus 20.4%) and their children had a lower antibiotic use during early life (36.2% versus 45.0%) compared to mothers with a Western dietary pattern. Mothers with a diverse dietary pattern had the highest intake of all macronutrients, except added sugar, compared to mothers with other dietary patterns. Conversely, mothers with a non-recommended dietary pattern had the lowest intake of energy and all macronutrients compared to mothers with other dietary patterns (Table 2).
Table 2.
Macronutrient intake according to maternal dietary patterns during pregnancya
| Total (n = 56,097) | Diverse dietary pattern (n = 8388) | Non-recommended dietary pattern (n = 14,110) | Mediterranean dietary pattern (n = 14,700) | Animal-based dietary pattern (n = 3808) | Western dietary pattern (n = 15,091) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Energy (kJ/day) | 9831 (8277–11616) | 11924 (10414–13724) | 8274 (7009–9727) | 9498 (8253–10914) | 9427 (7974–11008) | 10670 (9244–12360) |
| Protein (g/day) | 90.3 (75.7–106.6) | 111.0 (97.0–127.9) | 75.8 (63.4–89.7) | 90.6 (78.3–104.1) | 86.2 (72.5–101.2) | 93.7 (81.0–108.4) |
| Fat (g/day) | 78.9 (62.2–100.6) | 97.9 (81.7–120.7) | 65.3 (51.7–83.1) | 70.3 (58.1–86.1) | 72.7 (57.7–91.1) | 92.0 (75.6–113.7) |
| Saturated fat (g/day) | 31.8 (24.1–42.1) | 38.8 (31.0–49.4) | 27.0 (20.5–36.0) | 27.2 (21.5–35.0) | 28.5 (21.7–37.5) | 38.2 (30.2–48.9) |
| Monounsaturated fat (g/day) | 24.7 (19.4–31.8) | 31.2 (25.9–38.5) | 20.3 (16.1–25.9) | 21.9 (18.0–27.0) | 22.3 (17.5–28.3) | 29.2 (23.9–36.0) |
| Polyunsaturated fat (g/day) | 11.8 (9.5–14.6) | 14.9 (12.7–17.8) | 9.3 (7.5–11.5) | 11.4 (9.5–13.5) | 11.9 (9.5–14.7) | 12.9 (10.7–15.5) |
| Omega-3 polyunsaturated fat (g/day) | 0.6 (0.5–0.8) | 0.9 (0.7–1.1) | 0.5 (0.4–0.6) | 0.7 (0.5–0.8) | 0.6 (0.5–0.8) | 0.7 (0.5–0.8) |
| Omega-6 polyunsaturated fat (g/day) | 2.5 (1.9–3.2) | 3.1 (2.5–3.8) | 2.1 (1.6–2.7) | 2.2 (1.8–2.9) | 2.3 (1.7–2.9) | 2.9 (2.3–3.5) |
| Carbohydrate (g/day) | 323.9 (269.6–384.3) | 384.6 (330.5–447.3) | 274.4 (228.8–325.8) | 322.5 (274.1–375.6) | 317.4 (267.4–372.6) | 341.1 (290.9–397.8) |
| Added sugar (g/day) | 40.7 (27.3–61.7) | 49.2 (34.9–70.4) | 33.9 (22.5–52.1) | 34.4 (23.8–48.9) | 37.4 (24.1–61.7) | 51.4 (35.9–76.1) |
| Dietary fiber (g/day) | 26.6 (20.7–33.1) | 31 (26.1–38.1) | 21.6 (16.3–27.7) | 28.9 (23.3–35.3) | 26.1 (20.7–32.4) | 25.9 (20.7–32.0) |
aData are expressed as median (Q1–Q3) according to maternal dietary patterns.
Maternal dietary patterns and offspring’s risk of pediatric-onset inflammatory bowel disease
A maternal diverse dietary pattern during pregnancy was associated with a 45% lower risk of pediatric-onset IBD in offspring compared to a Western dietary pattern (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.55; 95% confidence interval: 0.31–0.97). Analyzing the two IBD subtypes separately showed a non-significant lower risk of both pediatric-onset CD (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.67; 95% confidence interval: 0.31–1.45) and pediatric-onset UC (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.44; 95% confidence interval: 0.19–1.03). Furthermore, compared to a Western dietary pattern, the other three dietary patterns showed no significant association with the risk of pediatric-onset IBD in offspring, including separate analyses for CD and UC (Table 3). Additionally adjusting for offspring’s antibiotics use during the first year of life had no impact on the results (Supplementary Table 4).
Table 3.
Maternal dietary patterns during pregnancy and risk of pediatric-onset inflammatory bowel disease in the offspringa
| Diverse dietary pattern (n = 8388) | Non-recommended dietary pattern (n = 14,110) | Mediterranean dietary pattern (n = 14,700) | Animal-based dietary pattern (n = 3808) | Western dietary pattern (n = 15,091) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inflammatory bowel disease | |||||
| Cases | 16 | 46 | 39 | 9 | 51 |
| Unadjusted HR (95% CI) | 0.58 (0.33–1.01) | 0.97 (0.65–1.45) | 0.81 (0.53–1.23) | 0.72 (0.35–1.45) | Reference |
| Adjusted HR (95% CI)b | 0.55 (0.31–0.97) | 1.08 (0.70–1.66) | 0.87 (0.56–1.35) | 0.76 (0.37–1.56) | Reference |
| Crohn’s disease | |||||
| Cases | <10c | 31 | 23 | <10c | 24 |
| Unadjusted HR (95% CI) | 0.69 (0.32–1.48) | 1.40 (0.82–2.38) | 1.02 (0.57–1.80) | 0.34 (0.08–1.43) | Reference |
| Adjusted HR (95% CI)b | 0.67 (0.31–1.45) | 1.41 (0.79–2.53) | 0.98 (0.54–1.78) | 0.34 (0.08–1.44) | Reference |
| Ulcerative colitis | |||||
| Cases | <10c | 15 | 16 | <10c | 27 |
| Unadjusted HR (95% CI) | 0.48 (0.21–1.10) | 0.60 (0.32–1.13) | 0.63 (0.34–1.17) | 1.05 (0.46–2.42) | Reference |
| Adjusted HR (95% CI)b | 0.44 (0.19–1.03) | 0.73 (0.37–1.44) | 0.77 (0.40–1.48) | 1.20 (0.52–2.80) | Reference |
CI confidence interval, HR hazard ratio.
aHRs refer to offspring’s disease risk associated with the specific dietary pattern relative to the Western dietary pattern.
bAdjusted for maternal educational level, pre-pregnancy body mass index, smoking during pregnancy, nutritional supplement use during pregnancy, energy intake during pregnancy, antibiotics use during pregnancy, and parental inflammatory bowel disease diagnosis.
cData presented as <10 to comply with General Data Protection Regulation guidelines and protect individual privacy.
Discussion
In this extensive nationwide prospective cohort study of 56,097 mother-child pairs followed over 18 years, we demonstrated that a maternal diverse dietary pattern, compared to a Western dietary pattern, during pregnancy was associated with a 45% lower risk of pediatric-onset IBD in the offspring. This association was found for both pediatric-onset CD and UC when analyzing these disease subtypes separately, but neither were statistically significant. Other dietary patterns (Mediterranean, animal-based, and non-recommended) during pregnancy did not show significant associations with offspring’s risk of pediatric-onset IBD, CD, or UC compared to a Western dietary pattern.
Our findings support previous results from animal studies suggesting that maternal diet during pregnancy may influence offspring’s IBD susceptibility through effects on intestinal development, microbiota, permeability, and inflammatory response17–25. A recent birth cohort study from Norway similarly reported that higher diet diversity scores during pregnancy were associated with a reduced UC risk in offspring26. However, the Norwegian study quantified maternal dietary patterns a priori based on the variety in intakes of grains, fruits, vegetables, and animal-based products26, whereas our empirically derived maternal dietary patterns are not necessarily indicative of diet diversity, although we also see a lower risk in the group characterized by high intakes across most food groups. Thus, while not directly comparable, both studies underscore a potential protective effect of consuming a variety of food groups during pregnancy.
Adherence to a diverse dietary pattern is the most widely recognized dietary recommendation for achieving overall health44. Incorporating various food groups into the diet ensures adequate intake of essential nutrients45, which is particularly crucial during pregnancy due to their important roles in offspring’s early development and long-term health46,47. In contrast, animal models suggest that a Western-style diet may persistently program the fetal immune system toward a proinflammatory state48. Hence, the protective association observed for the diverse dietary pattern, compared to the Western dietary pattern, may reflect a mitigation of these adverse immune effects.
Moreover, a diverse dietary pattern promotes gut microbiota diversity49, which could contribute to IBD prevention, as individuals with IBD commonly exhibit reduced microbial diversity50,51. This influence may extend to the offspring, as the maternal microbiota shapes the infant’s gut microbiota establishment52–54. A potential mechanism is through the vertical transfer of maternal microbes at delivery, with the delivery method being a key factor55. Indeed, a birth cohort study from the United States found that associations between maternal diet and infant gut microbiota differed for vaginally versus cesarean-delivered infants, indicating that delivery method could modify the microbiota-mediated effects of maternal diet on offspring IBD risk56. Nonetheless, delivery method was not adjusted for in our analyses because there is no evidence that it is directly linked to maternal dietary patterns during pregnancy, making confounding unlikely.
The observed association between a diverse maternal dietary pattern during pregnancy and offspring’s IBD risk may not be solely explained by in-utero exposures. The offspring’s own dietary pattern during childhood also likely plays a role, potentially formed by maternal dietary patterns during pregnancy. Another study from the DNBC found that maternal diet quality during pregnancy predicts offspring’s diet quality at age 1443, and more broadly, research shows that children’s dietary habits often mirror those of their parents57,58. Therefore, the dietary patterns identified among the mothers may have been adopted by their children, thereby indirectly influencing IBD risk through postnatal exposures. This also aligns with prior studies in children showing an association between various elements of childhood diet and lower IBD risk, including high intakes of fruits, vegetables, and fish, and low intakes of sugar-sweetened beverages and fatty foods59. Likewise, breastfeeding and infant feeding practices could also mediate part of the observed association, mainly if maternal dietary patterns persisted postpartum. Maternal dietary patterns influence the maternal breast milk composition60,61, which in turn might shape offspring’s immune development and gut microbiota colonization via breastfeeding62,63. However, this is less expected to explain our findings, as previous results from the DNBC showed no association between breastfeeding and offspring’s IBD risk64.
Our study has several strengths. First, its prospective design, large sample size, and long follow-up period collectively capture the longitudinal impact of maternal dietary patterns on offspring’s disease development. Second, clustering maternal food intake into dietary patterns mitigates type I error from multiple comparisons that would have arisen if all 37 food groups were analyzed independently. Third, unlike predefined indices or scores, empirically derived dietary patterns are less affected by a priori assumptions about diet and health29. Although principal component analysis is more commonly employed to derive such patterns65, we applied k-means cluster analysis, which has the advantage of identifying mutually exclusive dietary patterns for comparison regarding offspring’s disease risk. Notably, previous studies show that dietary patterns derived from cluster and principal component analyses are largely comparable66,67, suggesting that both methods capture substantial variation in dietary behaviors. Fourth, dietary pattern analysis provides a more holistic perspective on maternal diet by considering the complex interrelationships among food groups. Compared to single food or nutrient-based analyses, dietary patterns are more strongly associated with gut microbiota variations68, a potential key player in IBD pathogenesis69–71 that is thought to mediate the relationship between diet and IBD72. Lastly, dietary pattern-based recommendations may seem easier to implement than nutrient-specific advice, which often requires a deeper understanding of food composition.
This study also has some potential limitations. Residual confounding cannot be ruled out due to its observational design, despite adjusting for multiple relevant covariates. The small number IBD cases may have limited statistical power and could partly explain the non-significant associations observed in subtype-specific analyses of CD and UC. Selection bias may also exist from the low participation rates, although a previous study from the DNBC suggested that non-participation had minimal impact on different exposure-outcome associations73. Furthermore, dietary pattern analysis involves multiple subjective decisions, such as choosing the number of food groups for cluster analysis and naming the identified patterns. To minimize observer bias, we used standard food group classifications34 for objectivity and transparency. Because the dietary patterns are based on z-scores unadjusted for total energy intake, they may reflect absolute intake levels; however, we adjusted for energy intake in the Cox regression models to account for this. Another limitation is that maternal diet was assessed only in the second trimester, although its impact on fetal development may vary across trimesters74. Still, this is unlikely to affect the study’s validity, as dietary patterns remain relatively stable over time75 and show minimal variation from pre-conception through pregnancy despite some changes in intakes of specific food groups76–78. Since our study focused on dietary patterns, the additional information gained from repeated assessments may therefore not outweigh the burden to participants and investigators. Finally, dietary pattern analysis remains complementary to analyses of single foods and nutrients, which are key to understanding the biological mechanisms behind the observed associations28. Thus, our findings might reflect differences in intakes of specific foods or nutrients among mothers adhering to a diverse compared to a Western dietary pattern, but further investigation is needed to clarify this.
Conclusion
This nationwide prospective cohort study demonstrates that a maternal diverse dietary pattern, compared to a Western dietary pattern, during pregnancy is associated with a reduced risk of pediatric-onset IBD in the offspring. In contrast, a Mediterranean, animal-based, or non-recommended dietary pattern during pregnancy showed no association with offspring’s disease risk compared to a Western dietary pattern.
These findings offer insights into the role of maternal a posteriori dietary patterns in the etiology of pediatric-onset IBD, underscoring their significance for future generations’ health. Given the limited research in the area, however, further studies are needed to identify specific diets that may influence IBD development in offspring. This includes studying maternal diet from other perspectives to clarify whether the observed associations are driven by elements unique to each of the five identified dietary patterns.
Supplementary information
Description of Additional Supplementary files
Acknowledgements
The work was financially supported by the Danish National Research Foundation to TJ (DNRF148) and The European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation as part of the D-ECCO research grant to MBF (D-grant/ECCO). The DNBC was established with a significant grant from the Danish National Research Foundation. Additional support was obtained from the Danish Regional Committees, the Pharmacy Foundation, the Egmont Foundation, and other minor grants. March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation (6-FY-96-0240, 6-FY97-0553, 6-FY97-0521, 6-FY00-407), the European Union (QLK1-2000-00083), the Danish Medical Research Foundation (9601842 and 22-03-0536), the Health Foundation (11/263-96), and the Heart Foundation (96-2-4-83-22450) supported the collection, development, and elaboration of the dietary data. The study funders had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, writing of the report, or decision to submit the paper for publication.
Author contributions
OMA, MBF, MJ, and TJ were responsible for conceptualization, resources, and funding acquisition. SFO, AAB, and TIH were responsible for data curation. OMA was responsible for planning, methodology, and visualization. OMA and AVH were responsible for formal analysis. MBF and TJ were responsible for project administration and supervision. OMA was responsible for writing the original draft, and all authors contributed equally to revising the final draft. All authors had full access to the data and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication. The corresponding author attests that all listed authors meet authorship criteria and that no others meeting the criteria have been omitted.
Peer review
Peer review information
Communications Medicine thanks Stephanie P Gilley and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Data availability
The datasets analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to privacy protection of participants in the DNBC. Researchers who wish to access the data can apply through the DNBC Secretariat. Detailed information on the application process, including conditions of use and data access agreements, is available at the DNBC webpage (https://www.dnbc.dk/access-to-dnbc-data). The numerical results underlying Fig. 2 are presented in Supplementary Table 3.
Competing interests
MJ has received consulting/advisory board fees from Ferring, Takeda, AbbVie, PharmaCosmos and Tillots Pharma; speaker’s fees from Tillotts Pharma, MSD, Ferring and Takeda. TJ has received consultancy fees from Ferring and Pfizer. MJ has received research grants for other investigator-driven studies from Takeda, and the Novo Nordisk Foundation (NNF23Oc0081717). All other authors declare no competing interests. The authors declare that there are no other financial or non-financial relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s43856-025-01338-z.
References
- 1.Solitano, V. et al. Shaping the future of inflammatory bowel disease: a global research agenda for better management and public health response. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.22, 438–452 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wang, Y. et al. Global Epidemiology and Geographic Variations of Pediatric-Onset Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 1990 to 2019. Inflamm. Bowel Dis.31, 376–385 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Malham, M. et al. Paediatric onset inflammatory bowel disease is a distinct and aggressive phenotype—a comparative population-based study. GastroHep1, 266–273 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 4.Brusco De Freitas, M., Poulsen, G. J. & Jess, T. Anthropometric Trajectories in Children Prior to Development of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. JAMA Netw. Open8, e2455158 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.MacKner, L. M. et al. Psychosocial issues in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease: Report of the north american society for pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology, and nutrition. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr.56, 449–458 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wang, R., Li, Z., Liu, S. & Zhang, D. Global, regional and national burden of inflammatory bowel disease in 204 countries and territories from 1990 to 2019: a systematic analysis based on the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. BMJ Open13, e065186 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Christensen, C. et al. Diet, Food, and Nutritional Exposures and Inflammatory Bowel Disease or Progression of Disease: an Umbrella Review. Advances in Nutrition15, (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 8.Li, T. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis: Association of a pre-illness Western dietary pattern with the risk of developing inflammatory bowel disease. J. Dig. Dis.21, 362–371 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Agrawal, M. et al. Early life exposures and the risk of inflammatory bowel disease: Systematic review and meta-analyses. EClinicalMedicine36, (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 10.Barker, D. J. P. The origins of the developmental origins theory. J. Intern Med261, 412–417 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wadhwa, P. D., Buss, C., Entringer, S. & Swanson, J. M. Developmental origins of health and disease: Brief history of the approach and current focus on epigenetic mechanisms. Semin Reprod. Med27, 358–368 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Barker, D. J. P., Winter, P. D., Osmond, C., Margetts, B. & Simmonds, S. J. Weight in infancy and death from ischaemic heart disease. Lancet2, 577–580 (1989). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Barker, D. J. P. The fetal origins of coronary heart disease. Acta Paediatrica Suppl.86, 78–82 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Feng, H. et al. Association of nutrients intake during pregnancy with the risk of allergic disease in offspring: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness12, 711–719 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pullar, J. et al. The impact of maternal nutrition on offspring’s risk of non-communicable diseases in adulthood: a systematic review. J Glob Health9, (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 16.Rudbaek, J. J. et al. Deciphering the different phases of preclinical inflammatory bowel disease. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.21, 86–100 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Karaivazoglou, K., Triantos, C. & Aggeletopoulou, I. The Role of Maternal and Early-Life Diet in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Nutrients16, (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 18.Xie, R. et al. Maternal high fat diet alters gut microbiota of offspring and exacerbates dss-induced colitis in adulthood. Front Immunol9, (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 19.Gruber, L. et al. Maternal high-fat diet accelerates development of Crohn’s disease-like ileitis in TNF ΔaRE/WT offspring. Inflamm. Bowel Dis.21, 2016–2025 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gulhane, M. et al. High Fat Diets Induce Colonic Epithelial Cell Stress and Inflammation that is Reversed by IL-22. Sci Rep6, (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 21.Bibi, S., Kang, Y., Du, M. & Zhu, M. J. Maternal high-fat diet consumption enhances offspring susceptibility to DSS-induced colitis in mice. Obesity25, 901–908 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cheng, C. et al. Maternal Soluble Fiber Diet during Pregnancy Changes the Intestinal Microbiota, Improves Growth Performance, and Reduces Intestinal Permeability in Piglets. Applied and Envriomental Microbiology84, e0104718 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 23.He, Y. et al. Effects of maternal fiber intake on intestinal morphology, bacterial profile and proteome of newborns using pig as model. Nutrients13, 1–22 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Li, Y. et al. Maternal dietary fiber composition during gestation induces changes in offspring antioxidative capacity, inflammatory response, and gut microbiota in a sow model. Int J Mol Sci21, (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 25.Huang, C. et al. Maternal Western diet mediates susceptibility of offspring to Crohn’s-like colitis by deoxycholate generation. Microbiome11, (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 26.Guo, A. et al. Maternal diet in pregnancy and the risk of inflammatory bowel disease in the offspring: a prospective cohort study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr.121, 32–39 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Anneberg, O. M. et al. Impact of maternal organic food consumption and diet quality during pregnancy on offspring’s risk of inflammatory bowel disease: findings from a Danish National Birth Cohort Study. Front Nutr12, (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 28.Hu, F. B. Dietary pattern analysis: a new direction in nutritional epidemiology. Curr. Opin. Lipido.13, 3–9 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zhao, J. et al. A review of statistical methods for dietary pattern analysis. Nutr J20, (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 30.Olsen, J. et al. The Danish National Birth Cohort ± its background, structure and aim. Scand. J. Public Health29, 300–307 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Olsen, S. F. et al. Data collected on maternal dietary exposures in the Danish National Birth Cohort. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol.21, 76–86 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mikkelsen, T. B., Osler, M. & Olsen, S. F. Validity of protein, retinol, folic acid and n–3 fatty acid intakes estimated from the food-frequency questionnaire used in the Danish National Birth Cohort. Public Health Nutr.9, 771–778 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Mikkelsen, T. B., Olsen, S. F., Rasmussen, S. E. & Osler, M. Relative validity of fruit and vegetable intake estimated by the food frequency questionnaire used in the Danish National Birth Cohort. Scand. J. Public Health35, 172–179 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Fødevareinstituttet. Frida Fødevaredata Version 5.2. https://frida.fooddata.dk/ (2024).
- 35.Maechler, M., Rousseeuw, P., Struyf, A., Hubert, M. & Hornik, K. Cluster: Cluster Analysis Basics and Extensions. Version 2.1.4 [R package]. CRAN: Contributed Packages (2022) 10.32614/CRAN.package.cluster.
- 36.Syakur, M. A., Khotimah, B. K., Rochman, E. M. S. & Satoto, B. D. Integration K-Means Clustering Method and Elbow Method For Identification of The Best Customer Profile Cluster. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng.336, 012017 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mikkelsen, T. B. et al. Association between a Mediterranean-type diet and risk of preterm birth among Danish women: A prospective cohort study. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand.87, 325–330 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Horner, D. et al. A western dietary pattern during pregnancy is associated with neurodevelopmental disorders in childhood and adolescence. Nat. Metab.7, 586–601 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Rasmussen, M. A., Maslova, E., Halldorsson, T. I. & Olsen, S. F. Characterization of Dietary Patterns in the Danish National Birth Cohort in Relation to Preterm Birth. PLoS One9, e93644 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Strouse, P. J., Trout, A. T. & Offiah, A. C. Editors’ notebook: what is ‘pediatric’?. Pediatr. Radio.52, 2241–2242 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Agrawal, M. et al. The Rising Burden of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Denmark Over Two Decades: A Nationwide Cohort Study. Gastroenterology163, 1547–1554.e5 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Van Der Pol, H. International Standard Classification of Education: ISCED 2011. (2012).
- 43.Bjerregaard, A. A., Halldorsson, T. I., Tetens, I. & Olsen, S. F. Mother’s dietary quality during pregnancy and offspring’s dietary quality in adolescence: Follow-up from a national birth cohort study of 19,582 mother-offspring pairs. PLoS Med16, (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 44.Herforth, A. et al. A global review of food-based dietary guidelines. Adv. Nutr.10, 590–605 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ministry of Food Agriculture and Fisheries of Denmark. The Official Dietary Guidelines. https://foedevarestyrelsen.dk/Media/638198073401130807/Danish_Official_Dietary_Guidelines_Good_for_Health_and_climate_2021_SCRE.pdf (2021).
- 46.Wilkins, E. et al. Maternal nutrition and its intergenerational links to non-communicable disease metabolic risk factors: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. J. Health Popul Nutr.40, 20 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Tareke, A. A., Melak, E. G., Mengistu, B. K., Hussen, J. & Molla, A. Association between maternal dietary diversity during pregnancy and birth outcomes: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Nutr10, (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 48.Nash, M. J. et al. Maternal diet alters long-term innate immune cell memory in fetal and juvenile hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells in nonhuman primate offspring. Cell Rep42, (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 49.Huang, X. et al. Dietary variety relates to gut microbiota diversity and abundance in humans. Eur. J. Nutr.61, 3915–3928 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Pittayanon, R. et al. Differences in Gut Microbiota in Patients With vs Without Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Systematic Review. Gastroenterology158, 930–946.e1 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zhuang, X. et al. Gut microbiota profile in pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review. Front Pediatr9, (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 52.Murphy, K. M., Le, S. M., Wilson, A. E. & Warner, D. A. The microbiome as a maternal effect: a systematic review on vertical transmission of microbiota. Integr. Comp. Biol.63, 597–609 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Maher, S. E. et al. The association between the maternal diet and the maternal and infant gut microbiome: A systematic review. Br. J. Nutr.129, 1491–1499 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Peng, L. H., Tan, Y. & Bajinka, O. The influence of maternal diet on offspring’s gut microbiota in early life. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet.309, 1183–1190 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Rutayisire, E., Huang, K., Liu, Y. & Tao, F. The mode of delivery affects the diversity and colonization pattern of the gut microbiota during the first year of infants’ life: a systematic review. BMC Gastroenterol.16, 86 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Lundgren, S. N. et al. Maternal diet during pregnancy is related with the infant stool microbiome in a delivery mode-dependent manner. Microbiome6, (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 57.Kueppers, J., Stein, K. F., Groth, S. & Fernandez, I. D. Maternal and child dietary intake: The role of maternal healthy-eater self-schema. Appetite125, 527–536 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Ventura, A. K., Phelan, S. & Silva Garcia, K. Maternal diet during pregnancy and lactation and child food preferences, dietary patterns, and weight outcomes: a review of recent research. Curr. Nutr. Rep.10, 413–426 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Penagini, F. et al. Nutrition in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease: From etiology to treatment. A systematic review. Nutrients8, (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 60.Petersohn, I. et al. Maternal diet and human milk composition: an updated systematic review. Front Nutr10, (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 61.Seferovic, M. D. et al. Maternal diet alters human milk oligosaccharide composition with implications for the milk metagenome. Sci Rep10, (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 62.Rogier, E. W. et al. Lessons from mother: Long-term impact of antibodies in breast milk on the gut microbiota and intestinal immune system of breastfed offspring. Gut Microbes5, 663–668 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Taylor, R., Keane, D., Borrego, P. & Arcaro, K. Effect of Maternal Diet on Maternal Milk and Breastfed Infant Gut Microbiomes: A Scoping Review. Nutrients15, 1420 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Agrawal, M. et al. Breastfeeding Duration Is Not Associated With Offspring Inflammatory Bowel Disease Risk in Three Population-Based Birth Cohorts. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.22, 2459–2467.e16 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Wingrove, K., Lawrence, M. A. & McNaughton, S. A. A Systematic Review of the Methods Used to Assess and Report Dietary Patterns. Front Nutr9, (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 66.Ma, T., Tu, K., Ou, Q., Fang, Y. & Zhang, C. Comparing the Associations of Dietary Patterns Identified through Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis with Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Large Case–Control Study in China. Nutrients16, (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 67.Reedy, J. et al. Comparing 3 dietary pattern methods-cluster analysis, factor analysis, and index analysis-with colorectal cancer risk. Am. J. Epidemiol.171, 479–487 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Cotillard, A. et al. A posteriori dietary patterns better explain variations of the gut microbiome than individual markers in the American Gut Project. Am. J. Clin. Nutr.115, 432–443 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Qiu, P. et al. The Gut Microbiota in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Front Cell Infect Microbiol12, (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 70.Aldars-García, L., Chaparro, M. & Gisbert, J. P. Systematic review: the gut microbiome and its potential clinical application in inflammatory bowel disease. Microorganisms9, 977 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Vestergaard, M. V. et al. Gut microbiota signatures in inflammatory bowel disease. U. Eur. Gastroenterol. J.12, 22–33 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Nieva, C. et al. The impact of dietary interventions on the microbiota in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review. J. Crohns Colitis18, 920–942 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Nohr, E. A., Frydenberg, M., Henriksen, T. B. & Olsen, J. Does low participation in cohort studies induce bias?. Epidemiology17, 413–418 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Sly, P., Blake, T. & Islam, Z. Impact of prenatal and early life environmental exposures on normal human development. Paediatr. Respir. Rev.40, 10–14 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Edefonti, V. et al. Reproducibility of a posteriori dietary patterns across time and studies: a scoping review. Adv. Nutr.11, 1255–1281 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Cucó, G. et al. Dietary patterns and associated lifestyles in preconception, pregnancy and postpartum. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr.60, 364–371 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Crozier, S. R., Robinson, S. M., Godfrey, K. M., Cooper, C. & Inskip, H. M. Women’s dietary patterns change little from before to during pregnancy. J. Nutr.139, 1956–1963 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Rifas-Shiman, S. L. et al. Changes in dietary intake from the first to the second trimester of pregnancy. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol.20, 35–42 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Description of Additional Supplementary files
Data Availability Statement
The datasets analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to privacy protection of participants in the DNBC. Researchers who wish to access the data can apply through the DNBC Secretariat. Detailed information on the application process, including conditions of use and data access agreements, is available at the DNBC webpage (https://www.dnbc.dk/access-to-dnbc-data). The numerical results underlying Fig. 2 are presented in Supplementary Table 3.

