Skip to main content
Scientific Data logoLink to Scientific Data
. 2026 Feb 4;13:175. doi: 10.1038/s41597-026-06679-5

Genome sequencing, de novo assembly and annotation of the commercially important bamboo, Bambusa tulda Roxb

Sutrisha Kundu 1, Oliver Rupp 2, Sonali Dey 1, Mridushree Basak 1, Sudeshna Bera 1, Annette Becker 3,✉, Malay Das 1,✉
PMCID: PMC12873296  PMID: 41639127

Abstract

Bambusa tulda Roxb., a member of the Bambusoideae subfamily, is an ecologically and commercially important plant resource widely distributed in the Indian subcontinent. Our study reports long-read PacBio HiFi sequencing and genome assembly of B. tulda. The de novo haploid genome assembly of B. tulda predicted 43 contigs, distributed across three subgenomes, with a total sequenced length of 1.37 Gb, contig N50 of 35.69 Mb, and BUSCO score 99%. Repetitive elements constitute 63.31% of the genome. Functional annotation predicted 56,890 protein-coding genes, constituting 19.44% of the genome. This genome sequence will serve as an invaluable resource for future studies on the life history traits, phylogenomic analysis, comparative genomics, and targeted genome modification for important trait improvement of B. tulda.

Subject terms: Plant sciences, Computational biology and bioinformatics

Background & Summary

Bamboos are among the fastest growing, non-timber, renewable plant resources and are widely distributed throughout the tropics and subtropics1,2. They comprise the Bambusoideae subfamily of the monocotyledonous grass family Poaceae, and have significant ecological and economical value3,4. The Bambusoideae subfamily is classified into two clades: herbaceous bamboos and woody bamboos5. Herbaceous bamboos possess weakly developed rhizomes, lower lignocellulosic biomass, and exhibit annual or seasonal flowering cycles6. In contrast, the woody bamboos demonstrate rapid culm growth, high accumulation of lignocellulosic biomass, and delayed flowering subsequent upon lengthy vegetative phases upto 120 years1,7–9. Although, the first bamboo genome Phyllostachys heterocycla ( = P. edulis) was sequenced more than a decade ago10, major progress in bamboo genome sequencing was achieved more recently due to the introduction of long-read sequencing technologies and advancement in algorithms for genome assembly and annotation11. Twelve species from the Bambusoideae subfamily, with diverse worldwide distribution, have been sequenced and their chromosome-level assemblies have been published (Fig. 1a)2,5.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

(a) Worldwide native distribution of sequenced bamboo genomes, alongwith B. tulda. The map was drawn based on information obtained from World Flora Online (WFO 2024), Kew (POWO, 2025), and Guadua Bamboo (https://www.guaduabamboo.com/). (b) Bambusa tulda plant in native habitat, (c) leaf, (d) emerging culm, and (e) spikelet inflorescence.

Bambusa tulda, also known as the Bengal bamboo, is a paleotropical woody bamboo, native to the Indian subcontinent, and certain parts of southeast Asia (Fig. 1). It is putatively aneuploid (70–72 chromosomes)12 in nature, and possesses highly lignified culms. Its tentative flowering time is ~50 years13 and exhibits both sporadic and gregarious flowering14. In addition to their conventional use as construction wood in rural housing in south and southeast Asia, the plant draws renewed attention due to their potential use in the paper-pulp industry15 and bio-energy sector9. In vitro micropropagation method have also been optimized for B. tulda, providing opportunity for genetic intervention16. Until now, some flowering-associated genes were identified for functional studies in B. tulda flowering17–20. However, in the absence of a good quality, whole genome sequence, comparative evolutionary studies and genetic manipulation for trait improvement remain challenging.

This study aimed to sequence, assemble, and annotate the B. tulda genome to provide a genomic resource for this valuable species. Long-read, PacBio high-fidelity (HiFi) sequencing was performed to obtain a genome assembly of B. tulda. The diploid genome size estimated by flow cytometry and k-mer analyses were ~3 Gb and ~2.34 Gb, respectively (Table 1, Fig. 2). Approximately 116.38  Gb raw PacBio HiFi data and 76.80 Gb transcriptome data were obtained (Tables 2, 3). The primary contig assembly, generated through HiFiasm, produced 752 contigs with the contig N50 value 31.02 Mb (Table 4). Two haplotypes were obtained from a haplotype-resolved assembly, with haplotype 1 containing 827 and haplotype 2 containing 326 contigs (Table 4). Further refinement and mapping of the primary assembly with other sequenced bamboo genomes produced a final haploid genome assembly of 43 contigs with contig N50 value 35.69 Mb (Table 5). Genome assembly quality confirmed a BUSCO score of ~99% (Fig. 3). Genome annotation identified 56,890 protein-coding genes, constituting 19.44% of the genome (Table 6). Repetitive sequences constituted major part (63.31%) of the B. tulda genome (Table 7). Additionally, 1,355 rRNA and 1,019 tRNA genes were identified (Table 8).

Table 1.

Estimation of genome size using flow cytometry analyses.

Sample Reference G1 Peak Mean Position of Reference G1 Peak Mean Position of Sample Ratio Diploid Genome Size (Gb)
Bambusa tulda Solanum lycopersicum 15,557 24,567 1.58 3.01
Bambusa tulda Zea mays 42,980 24,328 0.57 3.02

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Genome size estimation of Bambusa tulda. (a) Flow cytometry based estimation of genome size from fluorescence intensity histograms showing mean peak positions of B. tulda, Solanum lycopersicum, and Zea mays. The estimated diploid genome size of B. tulda was 3.01 Gb and 3.02 Gb on the basis of the two reference plants S. lycopersicum and Z. mays, respectively. (b) Genome size estimation based on k-mer size of 25 using Jellyfish-2 and Genomescope 2.0. The estimated haploid genome size was ~1.17 Gb. Thus, the estimated diploid genome size of B. tulda was ~2.34 Gb. The analysis also reveals unique sequences, with both homozygous and heterozygous distribution.

Table 2.

Sequencing statistics of Bambusa tulda genome.

DNA1 DNA2 DNA1 DNA2 DNA3 Total
Sequencing Platform Pacio Revio PacBio Revio PacBio Sequel IIe PacBio Sequel IIe PacBio Sequel IIe
Reads 54,80,695 18,73,037 11,02,778 7,34,918 10,72,867 1,02,64,295
Size 54.99 gb 24.64 gb 13.75 gb 9.20 gb 13.80 gb 116.38 gb
Maximum 40.10 kb 43.91 kb 35.37 kb 38.96 kb 38.55 kb 43.91 kb
Mean 10.03 kb 13.16 kb 12.47 kb 12.52 kb 12.86 kb 11.34 kb
Median 10.21 kb 12.72 kb 12.10 kb 12.46 kb 12.37 kb 11.38 kb
Minimum 111.00 bp 89.00 bp 102.00 bp 97.00 bp 138.00 bp 89.00 bp
N50 10.67 kb 13.06 kb 12.51 kb 12.91 kb 12.77 kb 11.87 kb

Table 3.

Sequencing statistics of Bambusa tulda transcriptome.

Sequencing Platform Illumina NovaSeq 600 PE150
Raw Reads 51,17,96,852
Raw Data 76.80 Gb
Effective Reads 99.52%
Base Error Rate 0.03%
Q20 97.41%
Q30 93.08%
GC Content 53.02%

Table 4.

Assembly statistics of the primary and haplotype-resolved Bambusa tulda genome.

Primary Assembly Haplotype 1 Haplotype 2
Contigs 752 827 326
Size 1.85 Mb 1.38 Gb 1.40 Gb
Maximum 63.43 Mb 57.40 Mb 63.43 Mb
Mean 2.46 Mb 1.67 Mb 4.30 Mb
Median 30.58 kb 30.15 kb 49.41 kb
Minimum 4.40 kb 4.40 kb 15.70 kb
N50 31.02 Mb 26.77 Mb 28.84 Mb
L50 22 19 18
N90 15.11 Mb 8.87 Mb 10.98 Mb
L90 52 50 47

Table 5.

Assembly statistics of the final genome of Bambusa tulda.

Final assembly
Contigs 43
Size 1.37 Gb
Maximum 63.43 Mb
Mean 31.77 Mb
Median 30.48 Mb
Minimum 10.51 Mb
N50 35.69 Mb
L50 15
GC Content 44.61%

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Evaluation of genome assembly completeness of Bambusa tulda against the Embryophyte (n = 425) and Viridiplantae (n = 1614) lineage using BUSCO analysis, demonstrating the complete, fragmented, and missing BUSCO groups.

Table 6.

Statistics of gene prediction in Bambusa tulda genome.

Property Value
Total Gene Length 26,55,70,276 bp
Total Gene Number 56,890
Genes Percentage of Genome 19.44%
Total Exon Length 17,70,27,591 bp
Average Exons per Gene 5.88
Exon Percentage of Genome 12.96%
Total CDS Length 11,64,29,828 bp
Total CDS Number 89,479
CDS Percentage of Genome 8.52%
Average Gene Length 4,668.14 bp
Average Exon Length 336.63 bp
Average CDS Length 240.03 bp

Table 7.

Statistics of repeat elements in Bambusa tulda genome.

Type of Repeat Element Number Length occupied (bp) Percentage of sequence used
Retroelements 4,70,206 37,08,35,520 27.15%
SINEs 2,229 6,56,608 0.05%
Penelope 544 1,42,470 0.01%
LINEs 19,403 1,14,94,431 0.84%
CRE/SLACS 0 0 0.00%
L2/CR1/Rex 0 0 0.00%
R1/LOA/Jockey 0 0 0.00%
R2/R4/NeSL 0 0 0.00%
RTE/Bov-B 3,393 18,96,413 0.14%
L1/CIN4 16,010 95,98,018 0.70%
LTR Elements 4,48,574 35,86,84,481 26.26%
BEL/Pao 0 0 0.00%
Ty1/Copia 1,57,741 15,30,30,961 11.20%
Gypsy/DIRS1 1,78,327 16,66,69,779 12.20%
Retroviral 1,591 3,54,427 0.03%
DNA Transposons 1,35,412 8,44,57,392 6.18%
Hobo-Activator 29,216 1,30,12,505 0.95%
Tc1-IS630-Pogo 0 0 0.00%
En-Spm 0 0 0.00%
MULE-MuDR 3,55,055 2,29,17,028 1.68%
PiggyBac 0 0 0.00%
Tourist/Harbinger 7,219 30,90,101 0.23%
Other (Mirage, P-element, Transib) 0 0 0.00%
Rolling-circles 6,674 47,62,233 0.35%
Unclassified 14,18,434 40,94,03,385 29.97%
Total Interspersed Repeats 86,48,38,767 63.31%
Small RNA 2,052 5,83,211 0.04%
Satellites 790 2,11,000 0.02%
Simple Repeats 1,65,904 86,65,086 0.63%
Low Complexity 22,659 13,53,496 0.10%

Table 8.

Statistics of non-coding rRNA and tRNA prediction in Bambusa tulda genome.

Type of ncRNA Count Total Length (bp) Average Length (bp) Percentage of Genome
18S rRNA 15 19,703 1,313.53 0.001442%
28S rRNA 17 31,624 1,860.24 0.002315%
5.8S rRNA 8 1,223 152.88 0.000090%
5S rRNA 1,315 1,51,008 114.83 0.011054%
tRNA 1,019 77,003 75.57 0.005637%

B. tulda shows interesting life history traits but the genetic regulation of flowering time delay and how rapid vegetative growth is promoted remains unclear. Moreover, with this genome sequence, comparative genomics can uncover the polyploidization history of B. tulda, resolve major gene family expansions/contractions and repeat element evolution in the bamboo lineages.

Materials and Methods

Sample collection

Tissues were collected from a natural, flowering population of B. tulda, located at Rahuta, Shyamnagar (22.83°N, 88.40°E), West Bengal, India. Fresh young leaves collected were used for genome size estimation and whole genome sequencing, while for transcriptome sequencing, emerging culm was used (Fig. 1b–d). All the collected tissues were quickly flash-frozen in dry ice, and subsequently stored at −80 °C.

Genome size estimation by flow cytometry analysis

For genome size estimation, two plants with known genome sizes: Solanum lycopersicum L. Stupicke´ polnı´ rane´ (1.96 pg/2 C DNA) and Zea mays L. ‘CE-777’ (5.43 pg/2 C DNA) were used as internal references. Isolation of nuclei was carried out by following the nuclei-isolation protocol of Dolezel21. In brief, 40 mg fresh young leaf tissue from both the reference plants and B. tulda were finely chopped in 1 ml ice-cold nuclei isolation Galbraith buffer. The homogenate was filtered through a 40 μm nylon mesh. The filtrate was treated simultaneously with 50 μg/ml RNase A and 50 μg/ml propidium iodide. After incubation in the dark for 30 mins, the suspension of stained nuclei was introduced into flow cytometer (S3e Cell Sorter, Bio-Rad), using argon-ion laser of 488 nm. Live gating was set around the fluorescence area signal (FL3-A) to obtain cell cycle histograms. Based on the fluorescence histograms, the nuclear DNA content was calculated. The estimated diploid genome size of B. tulda was 3.01 Gb and 3.02 Gb on the basis of the two reference plants S. lycopersicum and Z. mays, respectively (Fig. 2a, Table 1).

Genome and transcriptome sequencing

High molecular weight (HMW) genomic DNA was extracted from the young leaves using the NucleoBond® HMW DNA kit (Macherey-Nagel, Germany), following the manufacturer’s protocol. The extracted HMW genomic DNA was fragmented to obtain Single-Molecule Real-Time (SMRT) bell libraries. The SMRTbell libraries were then sequenced in the PacBio Sequel IIe (3 libraries) and PacBio Revio (2 libraries) platform (Novogene, Genomics Singapore Pte. Ltd) (Fig. S1, S2). The raw reads obtained by sequencing 5 libraries were pooled together and subjected to quality control. Genome sequencing in the PacBio Sequel IIe platform yielded 36.75 Gb data with N50 value of 12.73 kb and mean read length 12.62 kb (Table 2). Similarly, genome sequencing in the PacBio Revio platform yielded 79.63 Gb data with N50 value of 11.87 kb and mean read length 11.60 kb and (Table 2). From the two sequencing platforms, a total of 1,02,64,295 PacBio SMRT reads corresponding to 116.38 Gb data was obtained (Table 2).

For accurate annotation of the B. tulda genome, transcriptome sequencing was performed in the Illumina Novaseq. 6000 platform. Total RNA was extracted from tissues using the RNeasy® Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen), following the manufacturer’s protocol. The integrity of isolated RNAs was examined in the Agilent 5400 Bioanalyzer, and sample with RNA integrity value > 8 were used for library construction. The library was subjected to the Illumina NovaSeq. 6000 PE150 platform for sequencing. Transcriptome sequencing yielded a total raw data output of 76.80 Gb with a Q30 value of 93.08% (Table 3).

Estimation of genome characteristics

Following genome sequencing, k-mer analysis was performed to estimate the genome size, heterozygosity rate, and proportion of repetitive sequences of B. tulda. The distribution of k-mer frequency from the raw PacBio HiFi reads was performed in Jellyfish (v2.3.0)22 software. The k-mer spectrum obtained for “-k 25”, ploidy = 2 was then analyzed using the GenomeScope 2.023 web tool. The predicted haploid genome size was ~1.17 Gb, with a substantial proportion of repetitive sequences (44.80%), heterozygosity rate 3.85%, and sequencing error rate 0.14% (Fig. 2b). Smaller peaks at 3x and 4x coverage indicated possible genome duplication. Thus, the estimated diploid genome size of B. tulda from this analysis was ~2.34 Gb. The estimated genome size using k = 25 was smaller than that obtained by flow cytometry due to the challenge of assembling the high portion of repetitive fraction of the genome, and can also be affected by heterozygosity, polyploidy, and possibly genome duplication.

De novo genome assembly

The clean PacBio HiFi reads were assembled de novo into a haplotype-resolved assembly and a primary contig assembly (a combination of both haplotypes) using Hifiasm v0.16.1-R34124 tool. The primary contig assembly produced a total of 752 contigs equivalent to 1.85 Gb of data with the N50 value 31.02 Mb (Table 4, Fig. S3a). Size of the two haplotype assemblies were 1.38 Gb for Haplotype 1 and 1.40 Gb for Haplotype 2 (Table 4, Fig. S3b).

The 752 contigs from the raw primary assembly were filtered to remove duplicated contigs and contigs from chloroplast and mitochondrial genome. Finally, 43 contigs were obtained which represent the assembled haploid genome sequence of B. tulda (Fig. 4a). Among them, 38 contigs were named and divided into three distinct (A, B, and C) subgenomes based on their mapping and homology to genome assemblies of other bamboo species. The remaining five contigs were not named yet. The final haploid genome assembly containing 43 contigs was 1.37 Gb in size, with contig N50 value being 35.69 Mb, mean contig length 31.77 Mb, and GC content was 44.61% (Table 5).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Genomic features for the 43 contigs of the Bambusa tulda genome. (a) Circos plot representing the different genome features of the B. tulda genome assembly. The outer to inner tracks represent different contigs, GC content, transposable element density, and collinear blocks. Green, orange, and blue blocks represent contigs of subgenome A, subgenome B, and subgenome C, respectively. Purple blocks represent unidentified contigs. The plot was visualized using Accusyn software53. (b) Dot plot representing the subgenome syntenic relationship of B. tulda based on the annotated coding genes.

Annotation of repetitive elements

To annotate repetitive elements in B. tulda genome, a combination of de novo and homology-based prediction was used. For de novo prediction, RepeatModeler25,26 was used, which in turn uses two ab initio repeat sequence prediction softwares: RECON (v1.0.8)27 and RepeatScout (v1.0.6)28. LTR_FINDER29 was used specifically for de novo prediction of LTR elements. Homology-based method to identify the transposable elements involved using the RepeatMasker30,31 software against Repbase database.

Approximately, 63.31% of the total B. tulda genome was annotated as repeat elements. The identified transposable elements were further classified into two broad categories: Class I retrotransposons and Class II DNA transposons. They represented 27.15% (370 MB) and 6.18% (84 MB) of repetitive sequences, respectively, while 29.97% repeat elements remained unclassified (Table 7, Fig. 4a).

Gene prediction and functional annotation

For predicting protein-coding genes, a combination of three different methods were applied together: de novo, homology-based, and transcriptome-assisted. The de novo prediction was done using RNA-Seq and protein evidence data, allowing BRAKER332 to perform automated genome annotation. GeMOMa v1.733 was used for homology-based prediction, by mapping the previously sequenced bamboo gene models5. The transcriptome guided genome annotation was conducted using Trinity (v2.1.1)34,35, HISAT2 (v2.2.1)36, and StringTie (v1.3.3)37,38. The transcriptome data was mapped to the genome using HISAT2 to generate BAM files, which were then used as input for genome-guided transcriptome assembly in StringTie. Also, unigene assemblies were generated by de novo assembly of transcriptome data using Trinity and rnaSPADES39. The genes predicted from all three above methods were consolidated together using Evidence Modeler (EVM) v2.1.040 and PASA41,42 to finally obtain non-redundant protein-coding gene structures. In total, 56,890 protein-coding genes constituting 19.44% of the B. tulda genome were identified (Table 6). The predicted genes of B. tulda were mapped back to the B. tulda genome using GeMoMa, with the “synteny checker” module enabled. The dot plot was created with the “synplot.r” script (k = 3) included in GeMoMa on the reference gene table created by the GeMoMa run (Fig. 4b).

For functional annotation, homology-based annotation was done using SwissProt and TrEMBL databases. The predicted protein-coding sequences were aligned against these two databases through BLASTP43 analysis with e-value ≤ 1e−5. The functional domains of the proteins were identified using InterProScan44.

Annotation of rRNA and tRNA

Among the non-coding RNA genes, rRNAs and tRNAs were predicted using the B. tulda genome. The rRNA genes were predicted using Barrnap v0.945, while the tRNA genes were predicted using tRNAscan-SE46,47. From this prediction, 1,355 rRNA and 1,019 tRNA genes were identified successfully (Table 8, Fig. 5).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

RIdeogram plot to visualize genome-wide gene density, tRNA position, and rRNA position across the 43 assembled contigs of Bambusa tulda. The RIdeogram software was used for visualizing the genome features54.

Data Records

The raw PacBio genome sequencing data and raw Illumina RNA-Seq data were deposited in the EMBL-EBI European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) database under BioProject accession number ERP17459148. The genome assembly, containing 43 contigs and annotation were submitted in GenBank under the accession number GCA_96564386549. The genome annotation file in GFF format alongwith the CDS and protein sequences are also available in the Figshare database (10.6084/m9.figshare.31037047)50.

Data Overview

Phylogenetic analysis

To determine the evolutionary relationship of B. tulda with other monocots, the genomes of twelve bamboo species (Ampelocalamus luodianensis, Bonia amplexicaulis, Dendrocalamus latiflorus, D. sinicus, Guadua angustifolia, Hsuehochloa calcarean, Melocanna baccifera, Olyra latifolia, Otatea glauca, P. edulis, Raddia guianensis, and Rhipidocladum racemiflorum) along with Z. mays and Musa acuminata (banana), were used to construct a species tree. OrthoFinder51 was used to calculate phylogeny reconstructions using the protein sequences of B. tulda, the twelve sequenced bamboos, and the two outgroups, Z. mays and M. acuminata as input data. 202 orthogroups were identified using OrthoFinder, which were used to construct the species tree (Fig. 6). The phylogeny reconstruction confirms that B. tulda is member of the hexaploidy paleotropic woody bamboos, which form a monophyletic group.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Species tree of Bambusa tulda and other sequenced bamboos, with Zea mays and Musa acuminata used as outgroups.

Technical Validation

Quality assessment of high molecular weight genomic DNA, libraries and sequence data

HMW genomic DNA was extracted to subject it for sequencing in the PacBio platform. The quantity and quality of the extracted DNA was examined by qubit fluorometer, and agarose gel (1%) electrophoresis (Fig. S1a). After ensuring required quality, three SMRTbell libraries were constructed from the genomic DNA, with relative fluorescence units (RFU) peaks obtained at 12,567 bp (DNA1), 11,447 bp (DNA2), and 11,307 bp (DNA3) (Fig. S1b–d). Each of these 3 libraries were sequenced in the PacBio Sequel IIe platform, while libraries DNA1 and DNA2 were also sequenced in the PacBio Revio platform. The mean read lengths obtained in the Sequel IIe platform were 12,472 bp (DNA1), 12,524 bp (DNA2), and 12,864 bp (DNA3), while in the Revio platform were 10,033 bp (DNA1) and 13,155 bp (DNA2) (Fig. S2).

Assessment of genome assembly and annotation completeness

The completeness of the assembled genome was examined in BUSCO v5.8.052 against the Embryophyte (n = 425) and Viridiplantae (n = 1,614) datasets. BUSCO analysis demonstrated 99.0% complete BUSCO groups against both Embryophyte, and Viridiplantae (Fig. 3).

Supplementary information

Supplementary Figures (405.8KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

The research results reported in this paper are funded by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, Germany through ‘Research Group Linkage Program’. SK and SB acknowledge JRF fellowships from UGC, India, with NTA Ref. no.: 231610225668 and 211610047259 respectively. SD acknowledges CSIR Project (Grant no.: 38(1493)/19/EMR-II). We thank Prof. J. Dolezel for providing us the seeds of internal reference plants for genome size estimation. We thank Subhayan Paul, Institute of Health Sciences, Presidency University and Rajesh Saha, Bio-Rad Laboratories for providing technical support in operating the flow cytometer machine.

Author contributions

M.D. and A.B. conceived the study, acquired funding and designed experimental plan. S.K., S.D., M.B. and S.B. were involved in collection of plant samples, performing FACS experiments for genome size estimation, and isolating high molecular weight genomic DNA for high-throughput sequencing. S.K. and O.R. conducted all in silico experiments on genome data analysis. S.K. wrote the manuscript, and M.D., A.B. and O.R. edited it. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Data availability

The complete dataset for B. tulda whole genome sequencing and assembly are available in the EMBL-EBI ENA database. The raw PacBio genome sequencing data and raw Illumina RNA-Seq data are available under BioProject accession number ERP174591, while the genome assembly and annotation are available at GenBank under accession GCA_965643865. The genome annotation files of Bambusa tulda are also available in the Figshare database (10.6084/m9.figshare.31037047).

Code availability

All softwares and pipeline utilized in this study for data analyses were implemented in full compliance with the manuals and protocols described by the respective published bioinformatics tools. Details on the software versions and parameters are outlined in the Methods section. In cases where specific parameters are not specified, default settings were applied. No custom programming or coding was employed.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Annette Becker, Email: annette.becker@bot1.bio.uni-giessen.de.

Malay Das, Email: malay.dbs@presiuniv.ac.in.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41597-026-06679-5.

References

  • 1.Basak, M. et al. Genomic insights into growth and development of bamboos: what have we learnt and what more to discover? Trees35, 1771–1791, 10.1007/s00468-021-02197-6 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zheng, Y. et al. Allele‐aware chromosome‐scale assembly of the allopolyploid genome of hexaploid Ma Bamboo (Dendrocalamus latiflorus Munro). J. Integr. Plant Biol.64(3), 649–670, 10.1111/jipb.13217 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kellogg, E. A. & Kellogg, E. A. Description of the Family, Vegetative Morphology and Anatomy: Poaceae (R. Br.) Barnh (1895). Gramineae Juss.(1789). Flowering Plants. Monocots: Poaceae. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 3–23, 10.1007/978-3-319-15332-2_1 (2015).
  • 4.Zhao, H. et al Bamboo and rattan: Nature-based solutions for sustainable development. The Innovation, 3(6), 10.1016/j.xinn.2022.100337 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 5.Ma, P. F. et al. Genome assemblies of 11 bamboo species highlight diversification induced by dynamic subgenome dominance. Nat. Genet.56(4), 710–720, 10.1038/s41588-024-01683-0 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Li, W. et al. Draft genome of the herbaceous bamboo Raddia distichophylla. G3: Genes|Gnomes|Genetics11(2), jkaa049, 10.1093/g3journal/jkaa049 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Janzen, D. H. Why bamboos wait so long to flower. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Sys. 347–391, 10.1146/annurev.es.07.110176.002023 (1976).
  • 8.Chakraborty, S. et al. Studies on reproductive development and breeding habit of the commercially important bamboo Bambusa tulda Roxb. Plants10(11), 2375, 10.3390/plants10112375 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Biswas, S. et al. Cellulose and lignin profiling in seven, economically important bamboo species of India by anatomical, biochemical, FTIR spectroscopy and thermogravimetric analysis. Biomass and Bioenergy158, 106362, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2022.106362 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Peng, Z. et al. The draft genome of the fast-growing non-timber forest species moso bamboo (Phyllostachys heterocycla). Nat. Genet.45(4), 456–461, 10.1038/ng.2569 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Espinosa, E., Bautista, R., Larrosa, R. & Plata, O. Advancements in long-read genome sequencing technologies and algorithms. Genomics, 110842, 10.1016/j.ygeno.2024.110842 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 12.Kumar, P. P., Turner, I. M., Nagaraja Rao, A. & Arumuganathan, K. Estimation of nuclear DNA content of various bamboo and rattan species. Plant Biotechnol. Rep.5, 317–322, 10.1007/s11816-011-0185-0 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ram, H. M. & Gopal, B. H. Some observations on the flowering of bamboos in Mizoram. Curr. Sci., 708–710 (1981).
  • 14.Bhattacharya, S., Das, M., Bar, R. & Pal, A. Morphological and molecular characterization of Bambusa tulda with a note on flowering. Ann. Bot.98(3), 529–535, 10.1093/aob/mcl143 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Das, M. & Bhattacharya, S. & Pal, A. Generation and characterization of SCARs by cloning and sequencing of RAPD products: a strategy for species-specific marker development in bamboo. Ann. Bot.95(5), 835–841, 10.1093/aob/mci088 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Das, M. & Pal, A. Clonal propagation and production of genetically uniform regenerants from axillary meristems of adult bamboo. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol.14, 185–188, 10.1007/BF03355956 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Biswas, P., Chakraborty, S., Dutta, S., Pal, A. & Das, M. Bamboo flowering from the perspective of comparative genomics and transcriptomics. Front. Plant Sci.7, 1900, 10.3389/fpls.2016.01900 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dutta, S. et al. Identification, characterization and gene expression analyses of important flowering genes related to photoperiodic pathway in bamboo. BMC Genomics19, 1–19, 10.1186/s12864-018-4571-7 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dutta, S. et al. Identification and functional characterization of two bamboo FD gene homologs having contrasting effects on shoot growth and flowering. Sci. Rep.11(1), 7849, 10.1038/s41598-021-87491-6 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Basak, M., Chakraborty, S., Kundu, S., Dey, S. & Das, M. Identification, expression analyses of APETALA1 gene homologs in Bambusa tulda and heterologous validation of BtMADS14 in Arabidopsis thaliana. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants, 1–16, 10.1007/s12298-025-01569-3 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 21.Doležel, J., Greilhuber, J. & Suda, J. Estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants using flow cytometry. Nat. Protoc.2(9), 2233–2244, 10.1038/nprot.2007.310 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Marçais, G. & Kingsford, C. A fast, lock-free approach for efficient parallel counting of occurrences of k-mers. Bioinformatics27(6), 764–770, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr011 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ranallo-Benavidez, T. R., Jaron, K. S. & Schatz, M. C. GenomeScope 2.0 and Smudgeplot for reference-free profiling of polyploid genomes. Nat. Commun.11(1), 1432, 10.1038/s41467-020-14998-3 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cheng, H., Concepcion, G. T., Feng, X., Zhang, H. & Li, H. Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly using phased assembly graphs with hifiasm. Nat. Methods18(2), 170–175, 10.1038/s41467-020-14998-3 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Smit, A. & Hubley, R. RepeatModeler Open-1.0. Available online at: https://www.repeatmasker.org (2015).
  • 26.Flynn, J. M. et al. RepeatModeler2 for automated genomic discovery of transposable element families. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA117(17), 9451–9457, 10.1073/pnas.1921046117 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bao, Z. & Eddy, S. R. Automated de novo identification of repeat sequence families in sequenced genomes. Genome Res.12(8), 1269–1276, http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.88502 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Price, A. L., Jones, N. C. & Pevzner, P. A. De novo identification of repeat families in large genomes. Bioinformatics21(suppl_1), i351–i358, 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti1018 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Xu, Z. & Wang, H. LTR_FINDER: an efficient tool for the prediction of full-length LTR retrotransposons. Nucleic Acids Res.35(suppl_2), W265–W268, 10.1093/nar/gkm286 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tarailo-Graovac, M. & Chen, N. Using RepeatMasker to identify repetitive elements in genomic sequences. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics, Chapter 4, 4.10. 1–4.10. 14, 10.1002/0471250953.bi0410s05 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 31.Smit, A. F. A., Hubley, R. & Green, P. RepeatMasker Open-4.0. Available online at: https://www.repeatmasker.org (2013-2015).
  • 32.Gabriel, L. et al. BRAKER3: Fully automated genome annotation using RNA-seq and protein evidence with GeneMark-ETP, AUGUSTUS, and TSEBRA. Genome Res.34(5), 769–777, https://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.278090.123 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Keilwagen, J., Hartung, F. & Grau, J. GeMoMa: homology-based gene prediction utilizing intron position conservation and RNA-seq data. Gene prediction:Methods in Mol. Biol. 1962, Humana, New York, NY, 161–177, 10.1007/978-1-4939-9173-0_9 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 34.Grabherr, M. G. et al. Trinity: reconstructing a full-length transcriptome without a genome from RNA-Seq data. Nat. Biotechnol.29(7), 644, 10.1038/nbt.1883 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Haas, B. J. et al. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. Nat. Protoc.8(8), 1494–1512, 10.1038/nprot.2013.084 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kim, D., Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat. Methods12(4), 357–360, 10.1038/nmeth.3317 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Pertea, M. et al. StringTie enables improved reconstruction of a transcriptome from RNA-seq reads. Nat. Biotechnol.33(3), 290–295, 10.1038/nbt.3122 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kovaka, S. et al. Transcriptome assembly from long-read RNA-seq alignments with StringTie2. Genome Biol.20, 1–13, 10.1186/s13059-019-1910-1 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bushmanova, E., Antipov, D., Lapidus, A. & Prjibelski, A. D. rnaSPAdes: a de novo transcriptome assembler and its application to RNA-Seq data. GigaScience8(9), giz100, 10.1093/gigascience/giz100 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Haas, B. J. et al. Automated eukaryotic gene structure annotation using EVidenceModeler and the Program to Assemble Spliced Alignments. Genome Biol.9, 1–22, 10.1186/gb-2008-9-1-r7 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Haas, B. J. et al. Improving the Arabidopsis genome annotation using maximal transcript alignment assemblies. Nucleic Acids Res.31(19), 5654–5666, 10.1093/nar/gkg770 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Campbell, M. A., Haas, B. J., Hamilton, J. P., Mount, S. M. & Buell, C. R. Comprehensive analysis of alternative splicing in rice and comparative analyses with Arabidopsis. BMC Genomics7, 1–17, 10.1186/1471-2164-7-327 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Altschul, S. F. et al. & Lipman, D. J. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res.25(17), 3389–3402, 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 (1997). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Jones, P. et al. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics30(9), 1236–1240, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu031 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Seemann, T. barrnap 0.9: rapid ribosomal RNA prediction. Google Scholar, 792. Available online at https://github.com/tseemann/barrnap (2013).
  • 46.Chan, P. P. & Lowe, T. M. tRNAscan-SE: searching for tRNA genes in genomic sequences. Gene prediction:Methods in Mol. Biol., 1962, Humana, New York, NY, 161–177, 10.1007/978-1-4939-9173-0_1 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 47.Chan, P. P., Lin, B. Y., Mak, A. J. & Lowe, T. M. tRNAscan-SE 2.0: improved detection and functional classification of transfer RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res.49(16), 9077–9096, 10.1093/nar/gkab688 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.European Nucleotide Archivehttps://identifiers.org/insdc.sra:ERP174591 (2025).
  • 49.NCBI GenBankhttps://identifiers.org/insdc.gca:GCA_965643865 (2025).
  • 50.Rupp, O., Kundu, S., Becker, A. & Das, M. Genome annotation files of Bambusa tulda. Figshare10.6084/m9.figshare.31037047 (2025).
  • 51.Emms, D. M. & Kelly, S. OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics., 20, 1–14. 10.1186/s13059-019-1832-y (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 52.Simão, F. A., Waterhouse, R. M., Ioannidis, P., Kriventseva, E. V. & Zdobnov, E. M. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics31(19), 3210–3212, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Siri, J. N., Neufeld, E., Parkin, I. & Sharpe, A. Using Simulated Annealing to Declutter Genome Visualizations. In FLAIRS (pp. 201–204). Available online at https://github.com/jorgenunezsiri/accusyn (2020, May).
  • 54.Hao, Z. et al. RIdeogram: drawing SVG graphics to visualize and map genome-wide data on the idiograms. PeerJ Comput. Sci.6, e251, 10.7717/peerj-cs.251 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Citations

  1. European Nucleotide Archivehttps://identifiers.org/insdc.sra:ERP174591 (2025).
  2. NCBI GenBankhttps://identifiers.org/insdc.gca:GCA_965643865 (2025).
  3. Rupp, O., Kundu, S., Becker, A. & Das, M. Genome annotation files of Bambusa tulda. Figshare10.6084/m9.figshare.31037047 (2025).

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figures (405.8KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The complete dataset for B. tulda whole genome sequencing and assembly are available in the EMBL-EBI ENA database. The raw PacBio genome sequencing data and raw Illumina RNA-Seq data are available under BioProject accession number ERP174591, while the genome assembly and annotation are available at GenBank under accession GCA_965643865. The genome annotation files of Bambusa tulda are also available in the Figshare database (10.6084/m9.figshare.31037047).

All softwares and pipeline utilized in this study for data analyses were implemented in full compliance with the manuals and protocols described by the respective published bioinformatics tools. Details on the software versions and parameters are outlined in the Methods section. In cases where specific parameters are not specified, default settings were applied. No custom programming or coding was employed.


Articles from Scientific Data are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES