Abstract
Simien Mountains National Park, a UNESCO World Heritage Site, supports fragile Afromontane ecosystems, yet detailed information on its vegetation ecology remains limited. This study employed 139 stratified systematic sampling plots to characterize plant communities and examine relationships between vegetation and selected environmental variables. Plant communities were classified using hierarchical cluster analysis and plant–environment relationships were explored through ordination techniques. A total of 354 vascular plant taxa, representing 91 families, were recorded. Herbs constituted the dominant growth form (61.86%). Species richness was highest in Asteraceae (16%). Endemism was notable (12.2%), including seven species restricted to SMNP, underscoring the park’s national conservation importance. Cluster analysis identified four plant communities distributed along an elevational gradient of 2244–3150 m a.s.l. All communities exhibited relatively high diversity (Shannon index: 4.03–4.50; Fisher’s α: 25.4–35.1) and moderate compositional turnover (Jaccard similarity: 0.28–0.64), indicating substantial ecological heterogeneity. Canonical correspondence analysis showed altitude was the strongest environmental variable responsible for patterns of plant community formation, followed by soil properties, slope, and pH. Results demonstrate that SMNP supports rich species composition, endemism, and with spatial variation in vegetation composition. These findings provide a quantitative ecological baseline that can inform site-specific conservation planning and future monitoring.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-025-34916-1.
Keywords: Afromontane vegetation, Altitude, Disturbance, Simien mountains national park, Plant community
Subject terms: Ecology, Ecology
Introduction
Ethiopia is renowned for its remarkable topographic diversity, which encompasses lofty mountains, flat-topped plateaus, deep gorges, river valleys, and plains1. This diverse relief makes the country unique in Africa. The altitude spans from the highest summit of Ras Dejen (4,550 m a.s.l) in Gondar to the Danakil depression (110 m a. s.l.)2,3. The highlands, above 1,500 m, constitute approximately half of the country’s total area4. The heterogeneous nature of land resources creates varied ecological conditions that support diverse ecosystems and a wide range of biodiversity2. The abundance of flora and fauna in Ethiopia is largely attributed to its diverse ecological settings, climate, and topography.
The flora of Ethiopia is highly heterogeneous and comprises approximately 6027 species of higher plants, of which approximately 10% are endemic5. However, biodiversity is under severe threat from anthropogenic pressures6. Many endemic species are critically endangered7. Conservation efforts by various organizations have achieved some success8; for example, the Walia ibex in the SMNP has improved from critically endangered to endangered, and site-specific enclosures have facilitated vegetation recovery. Such success demonstrates that active conservation can revive biodiversity; however, these measures alone remain insufficient against ongoing threats6,8.
The Simien Mountains National Park (SMNP), located on the northern edge of the Simien Mountains massif, was inscribed as a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 1978 because of its exceptional biophysical features and rich biodiversity9. Understanding vegetation ecology is essential for biodiversity conservation; although numerous studies have examined the park10–16, information on biodiversity metrics and how environmental variables shape plant community formation and species distribution remains limited.
The park faces anthropogenic pressures, including land degradation and habitat fragmentation, leading to reduced forest cover, mainly in inaccessible areas17. Sub-Afroalpine and Afroalpine vegetation has lost much of its natural structure and ecological function, affecting wildlife habitats such as those of the red fox9. Previous studies18,19 have been largely descriptive, focusing on species inventories without quantifying diversity metrics or analyzing soil-vegetation interactions, leaving a clear research gap. Therefore, this study aimed to (i) quantify plant community structure using established biodiversity indices, (ii) analyze how soil variables influence vegetation patterns, and (iii) provide evidence to guide site-specific conservation strategies. These objectives directly address the knowledge gap by moving from descriptive inventories to analytical ecological assessments.
Materials and methods
Descriptions of the study area
The study was conducted in SMNP, located on the northern periphery of the Simien Mountains massif in northern Ethiopia. The park lies approximately 857 km north of Addis Ababa and 120 km northeast of Gondar city, within the Amhara Regional State. SMNP was established in 1966 and currently covers an area of approximately 412 km²20. It lies within five districts, namely Debark, Adiarkay, Janamora, Beyeda, and Tellemit, and shares borders with 42 kebeles, stretching from 13 °06’ 44.09’’ to 13⁰ 23’ 07.85’’ N latitude and from 37⁰ 51’ 26.36’’ to 38⁰ 29’ 27.59’’ E longitude (Fig. 1). The Simien Mountains constitute the highest regions of the Ethiopian Plateau (4,550 m a.s.l.)18,19. The park’s unique landscapes and high biodiversity, with endemic species, led to its designation as a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 1978 (SMNP Office report, 2020).
Fig. 1.
Map of the study area showing study sites and plots by Getinet.
(source: ArcGIS version 10.8; URL: http://my.esri.com/).
The mountain range topography resulted from uplift and basaltic lava extrusions during the late Mesozoic to early Tertiary, followed by erosion, creating cliffs, canyons, gorges, and rugged peaks (Fig. 2). Climate varies with altitude; analyses from the Debark (1964–2023) and Chenek (2007–2023) stations indicate a unimodal rainfall pattern, with 75% of the annual precipitation occurring between June and August (Fig. 3). Temperatures ranged from 6.3 to 22.7 °C in Debark and 2.3–16.8 °C in Chenek.
Fig. 2.
Major landform types of the Simien Mountains by Getinet Masresha.
(source: ArcGIS version 10.8; URL: http://my.esri.com/).
Fig. 3.
SMNP climate diagrams for Debark and Chenek stations.
Vegetation is classified into four zones: Afroalpine, ericaceous belt, Afromontane, and woodland (Fig. 4). The Afromontane zone (2,000–3,000 m a.s.l.) represents less steep escarpments and contains remnant forest patches dominated by Prunus africana, Apodytes dimidiata, Olea europaea subsp. cuspidata, and Pittosporum viridiflorum, with a sparse herb layer due to grazing and human disturbance18.
Fig. 4.
Vertical zonation of Simien Mountain’s vegetation by Getinet Masresha.
(source: ArcGIS version 10.8; URL: http://my.esri.com/).
Study design and sampling
After a reconnaissance survey, a stratified systematic sampling design was applied to account for the heterogeneity in vegetation across the study area. Sampling intensity was proportional to local floristic diversity: areas with higher diversity and rapid changes in cover received more plots, while homogeneous areas received fewer plots21. A total of 139 main plots (20 × 20 m) were distributed across four representative Afromontane forest patches (Adarmaz, Muchila, Limalimo, and Debir-Sankaber). Within each main plot, five 2 × 2 m subplots (four corners and one center) were established to capture fine-scale herbaceous and juvenile woody species data. Species identity and percentage cover of adult woody plants were recorded in main plots. The cover of herbaceous species recorded in subplots was extrapolated to the main plot by multiplying subplot cover values by the proportion of subplot area to main plot area, and then standardized using Braun-Blanquet scales (1–9)22. This allows integration of fine-scale vegetation into plot-level analyses.
All plant specimens were collected with vernacular names and codes, identified at the National Herbarium of Ethiopia (ETH) following standard herbarium protocols using the Flora of Ethiopia and Eritrea (FEE) and cross-referenced with authenticated ETH specimens. Scientific names were verified using the World Flora Online database (https://wfoplantlist.org/), and voucher specimens were curated at ETH.
From each subplot, five soil cores (0–30 cm depth, three 10 cm layers) were composited into one representative sample per main plot. Soil variables were selected for their influence on nutrient availability, water retention, and plant growth, which are key determinants of vegetation patterns. Soil analyses included pH, texture, organic matter, total nitrogen, available phosphorus, exchangeable potassium, electrical conductivity, and cation exchange capacity, following standard procedures23. Terrain variables (altitude, slope, aspect, and coordinates) were measured at plot centers using GPS, clinometer, and compass. Aspect values were codified for software integration (N = 0, NE = 1, E = 2, SE = 3, S = 4, SW = 3.3, W = 2.5, NW = 1.3)24.
Data analyses
Florestic composition and plant community classification
Floristic composition was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Hierarchical cluster analysis (R 4.3.3) with similarity ratio and Ward’s method identified distinct plant communities. The optimal number of clusters was determined using the Elbow method25. Synoptic tables summarized species occurrences, with synoptic-cover abundance values calculated as the product of species frequency and mean cover26.
Diversity indices
Species diversity was quantified using Shannon–Wiener (H′) for species richness and relative abundance, while Pielou’s evenness (J) measured species distribution uniformity, allowing meaningful comparisons among communities.
![]() |
Where S = total number of species, Pi = proportion of individuals of species i, ln stands for the natural logarithm, and Hmax′ = maximum diversity. Shannon-Wiener was preferred for its robustness to sample size and ability to weight rare and common species.
Species richness Estimation
Non-parametric species richness estimators (ACE, Chao1, Chao2, Jackknife 1, Jackknife 2, and Bootstrap) were applied to quadrat-based data to estimate total species richness, as they do not rely on parametric abundance models27,28. Species richness was computed in EstimateS v 9.1.029, with sample order randomized 100 times to obtain mean estimates across accumulation levels.
Comparisons of species composition among communities
Jaccard’s Similarity Index and β-diversity quantified floristic similarity and turnover between communities30,31.
![]() |
Ordination of vegetation environmental data
Preliminary DCA indicated a gradient length of 4.6, supporting a unimodal model22,32. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) was then performed to examine relationships between vegetation composition and environmental variables. Nine significant environmental variables were selected using Monte Carlo permutation tests and the Adonis function. The variation explained by the first four CCA axes was considered in subsequent analyses.
Results
Floristic composition
The floristic analyses of the entire study area yielded a total of 354 species distributed across 255 genera and 91 families. Three hundred fifty-one plant specimens were identified at the species level, while the remaining three were identified at the subspecies level. This total included eight pteridophytes, one gymnosperm, and 82 angiosperms (15 monocotyledons and 67 dicotyledons) families. In the study area, 10 ferns, 1 gymnosperm, 292 dicot, and 51 monocot species were recorded (Supplementary material).
The most species-rich families were Asteraceae (16%; 33 genera, 56 species), Poaceae (6%; 16 genera, 23 species), Fabaceae (6%; 17 genera, 22 species), Lamiaceae (5%; 10 genera, 18 species), and Rubiaceae (4%; 9 genera, 15 species) (Fig. 5). Collectively, these five families accounted for 37% of the total recorded species. Nine additional families contained between 7 and 10 species each, while the remaining 77 families were species-poor, each contributing 1–6 species and together accounting for 41% of the flora. This pattern indicates a floristic structure characterized by dominance of a few species-rich families and a large number of families with low species representation.
Fig. 5.
Percent species contribution of families.
Regarding growth forms, herbs dominated 61.86% (219 species), followed by woody species 38.14% (135 species: 50 trees, 56 shrubs, 29 lianas). Among the herbs, 14 were ferns and two epiphytic species. Notably, 13 species were new records for the Gondar floristic region (1 tree, 4 shrubs, 8 herbs; Table 1), reflecting gaps in previous floristic documentation rather than recent colonization.
Table 1.
New vascular plants recorded from the Gondar floristic region in the FEE.
| No | Species | Family | Habit |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Acanthopale aethio-germanica | Acanthaceae | Shrub |
| 2 | Achyrospermum schimperi | Lamiaceae | Herb |
| 3 | Acmella caulirhiza | Asteraceae | Herb |
| 4 | Commelina benghalensis | Commelinaceae | Herb |
| 5 | Conyza spinosa | Asteraceae | Shrub |
| 6 | Erica trimera | Ericaceae | Tree |
| 7 | Gomphocarpus fruticosus | Asclepiadaceae | Shrub |
| 8 | Isoglossa punctata | Acanthaceae | Herb |
| 9 | Misopates orontium | Scrophulariaceae | Herb |
| 10 | Momordica pterocarpa | Cucurbitaceae | Herb |
| 11 | Oplismenus burmannii | Poaceae | Herb |
| 12 | Pilea tetraphylla | Urticaceae | Herb |
| 13 | Psychotria orophila | Rubiaceae | Shrub |
Endemism and conservation status showed that 45 species (12.71%) were endemic to Ethiopia, seven of which were strictly endemic to SMNP (Table 2). Endemic species were predominantly herbs (62.22%), followed by shrubs (26.67%), lianas (6.67%), and trees (4.44%), with Asteraceae accounting for 40% of endemic taxa.
Table 2.
List of endemic species in the Afromontane portion of SMNP vegetation.
| No | Species | Family | Habit | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Argyrolobium schimperianum | Fabaceae | Shrub | EN |
| 2 | Bidens pachyloma | Asteraceae | Herb | LC |
| 3 | Carduus macracanthus | Asteraceae | Herb | LC |
| 4 | Centrus nanus | Poaceae | Herb | VU |
| 5 | Ceropegia sobolifera* | Asclepiadaceae | Climber | CR |
| 6 | Chiliocephalum schimperi | Asteraceae | Herb | NT |
| 7 | Clematis longicauda | Ranunculaceae | Climber | LC |
| 8 | Conyza spinosa | Asteraceae | Shrub | VU |
| 9 | Crassocephalum macropappum | Asteraceae | Herb | LC |
| 10 | Crepis tenerrima | Asteraceae | Herb | EN |
| 11 | Crepis xylorrhiza * | Asteraceae | Herb | CR |
| 12 | Cussonia ostinii | Araliaceae | Tree | NT |
| 13 | Cynoglossum zeylanicum | Boraginaceae | Herb | LC |
| 14 | Echinops longisetus | Asteraceae | Shrub | LC |
| 15 | Festuca macrophylla | Poaceae | Herb | VU |
| 16 | Gymnanthemum myrianthum | Asteraceae | Shrub | VU |
| 17 | Habenaria platyanthera * | Orchidaceae | Herb | CR |
| 18 | Herniaria abyssinica | Caryophylaceae | Herb | EN |
| 19 | Impatiens tinctoria | Balsaminaceae | Herb | LC |
| 20 | Laggera tomentosa | Asteraceae | Herb | LC |
| 21 | Leucas stachydiformis | Lamiaceae | Shrub | NT |
| 22 | Mikaniopsis clematoides | Asteraceae | Climber | LC |
| 23 | Millettia ferruginea | Fabaceae | Tree | LC |
| 24 | Otostegia tomentosa subsp. steudneri | Lamiaceae | Shrub | VU |
| 25 | Pentameris trisetoides | Poaceae | Herb | NT |
| 26 | Peucedanum petitianum | Apiaceae | Herb | LC |
| 27 | Phragmanthera macrosolen | Loranthaceae | Shrub | LC |
| 28 | Pimpinella pimpinelloides * | Apiaceae | Herb | CR |
| 29 | Plectranthus garckeanus | Lamiaceae | Herb | LC |
| 30 | Pseudognaphalium melanosphaerum | Asteraceae | Herb | VU |
| 31 | Sagina abyssinica subsp. abyssinica | Caryophylaceae | Herb | NT |
| 32 | Saxifraga hederifolia | Saxifragaceae | Herb | LC |
| 33 | Senecio farinaceous | Asteraceae | Herb | EN |
| 34 | Senecio fresenii | Asteraceae | Herb | NT |
| 35 | Senecio myriocephalus | Asteraceae | Shrub | LC |
| 36 | Senecio unionis | Asteraceae | Herb | VU |
| 37 | Snowdenia mutica * | Poaceae | Herb | CR |
| 38 | Solanecio gigas | Asteraceae | Shrub | LC |
| 39 | Solanum macracanthum | Solanaceae | Shrub | LC |
| 40 | Solanum hirtulum | Solanaceae | Herb | LC |
| 41 | Solanum marginatum* | Solanaceae | Shrub | LC |
| 42 | Sonchus melanolepis | Asteraceae | Herb | VU |
| 43 | Thalictrum minus subsp. maxwellii | Ranunculaceae | Herb | NT |
| 44 | Verbascum benthamianum * | Scrophulariaceae | Shrub | LC |
| 45 | Verbascum stelurum | Scrophulariaceae | Herb | VU |
Taxa endemic to SMNP are indicated by asterisk (*). EN = Endangered, LC = Least concerned, NT = Near threatened, VU = Vulnerable, CR = Critically endangered.
Overall, the results indicate a relatively high floristic richness with a notable contribution of endemic species; however, these findings are limited to the sampled plots and may not fully capture the entire floristic variability of SMNP.
Community types in the Afromontane vegetation
Cluster analysis of 139 plots containing 354 species identified four distinct plant communities, as determined by the elbow method (Fig. 6) and validated through hierarchical clustering (Fig. 7). The communities varied in size, ranging from 12 to 40 plots (Table 3), and were named according to their dominant species (Table 4).
Fig. 6.
Optimal number of clusters by elbow method.
Fig. 7.
Hierarchical cluster analysis for Afromontane vegetation in SMNP.
Table 3.
Altitudinal range and plots of each community type.
| Community type | Altitudinal range | Number of plots | Plots in the community |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adarmaz | 2244–2758 | 37 | 1–4, 6, 7, 9, 10, 14–19, 21–32, 34–40, 46, 70, 89, 134 |
| Muchila | 2469–3065 | 40 | 11,13, 41–43, 47–69, 71, 73, 75–80, 84, 85, 113, 133 |
| Limalimo | 2658–2905 | 27 | 81–83, 86–88, 90–95, 97–99, 101–105, 108, 109, 112, 120, 135–138 |
| Sankaber | 2895–3150 | 12 | 114–117, 119, 124, 127–132 |
Table 4.
Synoptic abundance value for a species having a value of ≥ 1 in at least one community type and values in bold refer to dominant species.
| Species | Adarmaz | Muchila | Limalimo | Debir-Sankaber |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Euphorbia ampliphylla | 3.89 | 0.53 | 0.14 | 0 |
| Olea capensis subsp. macrocarpa | 3.81 | 0.53 | 0.11 | 0 |
| Calpurnia aurea | 3.14 | 0.33 | 0.39 | 0 |
| Hypoestes forskaolii | 3.03 | 1.28 | 0.86 | 0 |
| Clausena anisata | 2.46 | 1.2 | 0.14 | 0 |
| Clutia abyssinica | 2.41 | 1.65 | 0.39 | 0.17 |
| Olea europaea subsp.cuspidata | 2.27 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.17 |
| Apodytes dimidiata | 2.16 | 0.78 | 1.71 | 0 |
| Impatiens hochstetteri | 2.14 | 0.25 | 0.11 | 0 |
| Achyrospermum schimperi | 1.76 | 0.03 | 0.14 | 0 |
| Girardinia bullosa | 1.46 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Carissa spinarum | 1.41 | 0.15 | 0.36 | 0 |
| Myrsine melanophloeos | 0.16 | 4.10 | 0.57 | 0.92 |
| Myrica salicifolia | 2.54 | 3.50 | 1.96 | 0 |
| Myrsine africana | 3.16 | 3.46 | 3.05 | 0.53 |
| Jasminum abyssinicum | 2.57 | 3.44 | 1.11 | 3.22 |
| Clematis simensis | 2.6 | 3.41 | 2.37 | 1.74 |
| Selaginella goudotiana | 2.91 | 3.41 | 2.71 | 0 |
| Cyperus fischerianus | 0.57 | 3.11 | 0 | 0.17 |
| Nuxia congesta | 1.51 | 2.88 | 1.43 | 0 |
| Geranium arabicum | 0.89 | 2.88 | 2.54 | 2.75 |
| Koordersiochoa longiarista | 1.3 | 2.60 | 1.82 | 0.17 |
| Adiantum poiretii | 1.43 | 2.48 | 1.64 | 0.17 |
| Asparagus africanus | 0.16 | 2.43 | 1.11 | 1.08 |
| Alchemilla cryptantha | 0.97 | 2.25 | 0.82 | 1.75 |
| Osyris lanceolata | 1.14 | 2.20 | 1.21 | 0.08 |
| Bersama abyssinica | 2.05 | 2.13 | 1.29 | 0 |
| Rosa abyssinica | 0.49 | 2.08 | 1.21 | 0.83 |
| Erica trimera | 0.19 | 1.75 | 0.43 | 0 |
| Galium spurium | 0.3 | 1.58 | 0.07 | 0.17 |
| Hypoestes triflora | 1.22 | 1.45 | 1.36 | 0 |
| Veronica abyssinica | 0.03 | 1.33 | 0.36 | 0.58 |
| Crassocephalum macropappum | 0.35 | 1.23 | 0.64 | 1.5 |
| Gymnosporia arbutifolia | 2.73 | 2.23 | 3.64 | 1.5 |
| Pittosporum viridiflorum | 0.43 | 2.78 | 3.07 | 0.17 |
| Pavetta abyssinica | 3.15 | 3.41 | 3.06 | 0.26 |
| Justicia ladanoides | 0.7 | 0.65 | 2.82 | 0.25 |
| Vernonia rueppellii | 1.65 | 1.63 | 2.25 | 0 |
| Dombeya torrida | 1.65 | 1.7 | 1.96 | 0 |
| Dovyalis abyssinica | 1.03 | 1.4 | 1.96 | 0 |
| Brucea antidysenterica | 1.41 | 0.4 | 1.79 | 0 |
| Allophylus abyssinicus | 0.51 | 0.4 | 1.79 | 0 |
| Galiniera saxifraga | 0.19 | 1.13 | 1.54 | 0 |
| Mikaniopsis clematoides | 0.11 | 0.45 | 1.5 | 0.17 |
| Sanicula elata | 0.27 | 0.4 | 1.5 | 0.17 |
| Achyranthes aspera | 0.57 | 1.25 | 1.36 | 1.33 |
| Scepocarpus hypselodendron | 0.95 | 1.15 | 1.32 | 0.08 |
| Tacazzea conferta | 0 | 0 | 1.25 | 0 |
| Trifolium semipilosum | 0.57 | 0.3 | 1.11 | 0.92 |
| Erica trimera | 0 | 0.75 | 0.11 | 3.81 |
| Cynoglossum amplifolium | 0.03 | 0.9 | 0.64 | 3.67 |
| Tenaxia subulata | 0 | 0 | 0.07 | 2.75 |
| Anthriscus sylvestris | 0 | 0 | 0.18 | 2.67 |
| Rumex nepalensis | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.43 | 2.5 |
| Zehneria scabra | 0.22 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 1.92 |
| Cerastium lanceolatum | 0.14 | 0.28 | 0.57 | 1.83 |
| Cynoglossum zeylanicum | 0.27 | 0.45 | 0.54 | 1.75 |
| Pentameris trisetoides | 0 | 0 | 0.04 | 1.67 |
| Lactuca inermis | 0.03 | 0.15 | 0.07 | 1.58 |
| Arabis alpina | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.58 |
| Andropogon lima | 0 | 0 | 0.18 | 1.50 |
| Senecio myriocephalus | 0 | 0.1 | 0.04 | 1.33 |
| Micromeria imbricata | 0.14 | 0.05 | 0.54 | 1.25 |
| Thymus schimperi | 0 | 0.18 | 0.07 | 1.17 |
| Andropogon amethystinus | 0 | 0 | 0.18 | 1.08 |
| Pterocephalus frutescens | 0 | 0 | 0.04 | 1.08 |
Euphorbia ampliphylla – Olea capensis subsp. macrocarpa: 37 plots, 142 species, altitude 2244–2758 m, steep northeast-facing slopes (avg. 27.8%). Dominant trees/shrubs: Myrica salicifolia, Clausena anisata, Olea europaea subsp. cuspidata; dominant herbs: Hypoestes forskaolii, Selaginella goudotiana.
Myrsine melanophloeos – Myrica salicifolia: 40 plots, 165 species, altitude 2469–3065 m, steep slopes (avg. 33.3%). Dominant trees/shrubs: Myrsine africana, Pavetta abyssinica, Nuxia congesta; ground flora: Selaginella goudotiana, Cyperus fischerianus.
Gymnosporia arbutifolia – Pittosporum viridiflorum: 27 plots, 148 species, altitude 2658–2905 m, medium slopes (avg. 20.9%). Dominant trees: Gymnosporia arbutifolia, Pittosporum viridiflorum; dominant herbs: Justicia ladanoides.
Erica trimera – Cynoglossum amplifolium: 12 plots, 92 species, altitude 2895–3150 m, gentle to medium slopes (avg. 20.1%). Dominant tree/shrub: Myrsine melanophloeos; herbaceous layer: Cynoglossum amplifolium, Geranium arabicum.
In conclusion, these communities represent distinct assemblages along altitudinal and topographic gradients, although some species overlap occurs among community types.
Comparisons of species diversity among communities in Afromontane vegetation
Diversity indices varied among communities (Table 5). Fisher’s α was lowest in Debir-Sankaber (25.4) and highest in Muchila (35.1). Shannon diversity ranged from 4.03 (Debir-Sankaber) to 4.50 (Muchila), and evenness from 0.87 (Adarmaz) to 0.89 (Debir-Sankaber).
Table 5.
Shannon-Wiener diversity, fisher α diversity and richness of the communities.
| Diversity indices | Adarmaz | Muchila | Limalimo | Debir- Sankaber |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shannon | 4.32 | 4.50 | 4.38 | 4.03 |
| Evenness | 0.87 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.89 |
| Fisher α | 30.7 | 35.1 | 35.0 | 25.4 |
| Richness | 142 | 165 | 148 | 92 |
| Rarefaction | 169 | 203 | 187 | 120 |
In conclusion, the relatively small variation in diversity and evenness values suggests broadly comparable species distribution patterns among communities, despite differences in richness and environmental conditions.
Species richness Estimation
Nonparametric species richness estimators’ analyses revealed the total species richness and sampling effort (Table 6). Jackknife 2 yielded the highest estimates (168.6–203.3), while ACE provided the lowest (100.7–173.8). Observed species represented 79–96.9% of estimated richness, indicating substantial sampling completeness.
Table 6.
Number of samples, observed species and estimated species richness based on different estimators at the four forest patches.
| Characteristics | Adarmaz | Muchila | Limalimo | Debir-Sankaber |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No of samples | 37 | 40 | 28 | 12 |
| Sobs | 142 | 165 | 148 | 92 |
| ACE | 148.5 | 173.8 | 155.2 | 100.7 |
| Chao1 | 151.1 | 171.6 | 152.8 | 96.3 |
| Chao2 | 154.5 | 184.3 | 166.5 | 104.4 |
| Jacknife1 | 163.4 | 194.3 | 181.7 | 116.8 |
| Jacknife2 | 168.6 | 203.3 | 187.4 | 120.3 |
| Bootstrap | 152.9 | 179.4 | 164.9 | 104.7 |
| Species collection degree | 84.2–94.0% | 81.2–96.2% | 79–96.9.9% | 76.5–95.5% |
In conclusion, these results suggest that sampling effort was generally adequate, although additional sampling could reveal further species, particularly in less-sampled communities such as Debir-Sankaber.
Comparisons of species composition similarity among communities
Jaccard similarity and β-diversity analyses revealed moderate to low floristic similarity among the Afromontane plant communities, with Jaccard similarity indices ranging from 0.28 to 0.64 and corresponding β-diversity values ranging from 0.22 to 0.39 (Table 7). The lowest similarity was observed between the Adarmaz and Debir-Sankaber communities (J = 0.28), indicating pronounced species turnover, whereas the highest similarity occurred between Adarmaz and Muchila (J = 0.64), reflecting a greater overlap in species composition. Overall, lower similarity values were consistently associated with higher β-diversity, highlighting substantial species turnover along environmental gradients across the study area.
Table 7.
Comparisons of floristic composition among afromontane communities.
| Community | Adarmaz | Muchila | Limalimo | Debir-Sankaber |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adarmaz | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.58 | 0.28 |
| Muchila | 0.22 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 038 |
| Limalimo | 0.26 | 0.22 | 1.00 | 0.44 |
| Debir-Sankaber | 0.57 | 0.46 | 0.39 | 1.00 |
*Values in bold indicate Jaccard (J) similarity index and values in italics indicate β-diversity index.
Ordination of vegetation and environmental variables
Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) revealed the environmental gradients shaping plant distribution in SMNP’s Afromontane vegetation. Detrended Correspondence Analysis (DCA) indicated high β-diversity (axis length = 4.6426), reflecting substantial heterogeneity among communities (Table 8).
Table 8.
DCA result showing the heterogeneity of vegetation composition.
| DCA axes | DCA1 | DCA2 | DCA3 | DCA4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eigenvalues | 0.5017 | 0.2434 | 0.1806 | 0.1538 |
| Decorana values | 0.5292 | 0.2360 | 0.1729 | 0.1575 |
| Axis lengths | 4.6426 | 2.6252 | 2.4527 | 3.6305 |
Nine environmental variables significantly influenced species distribution (Table 9). Based on CCA (Table 10), altitude was the primary driver, strongly correlated with axis 1 (0.977), followed by pH (−0.580), phosphorus (AP, −0.176), total nitrogen (−0.295), and electrical conductivity (−0.364). Axis-1 explained 41% of variation, axis-2 (16%), axis-3 (10%), and axis-4 (8.8%), with the cumulative variation explained by the first four axes being 75.8%. Axis-1 captured most variation in species composition, primarily influenced by altitude and soil chemistry, whereas axis-2 was mainly affected by organic matter and slope.
Table 9.
Result of function adonis test of environmental variables.
| Variable | Df | Sum of Squares | Mean of Squares | F.Model | R 2 | Pr (> F) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Altitude | 1 | 3.8288 | 3.8288 | 18.9955 | 0.15795 | 0.01 ** |
| Slope | 1 | 0.9100 | 0.9100 | 4.5147 | 0.03754 | 0.01 ** |
| AP | 1 | 0.5439 | 0.5439 | 2.6986 | 0.02244 | 0.01 ** |
| CEC | 1 | 1.2449 | 1.2449 | 6.1765 | 0.05136 | 0.01 ** |
| K | 1 | 0.5318 | 0.5318 | 2.6384 | 0.02194 | 0.02 * |
| OM | 1 | 0.4491 | 0.4491 | 2.2282 | 0.01853 | 0.01 ** |
| pH | 1 | 0.5699 | 0.5699 | 2.8274 | 0.02351 | 0.01 ** |
| EC | 1 | 0.4403 | 0.4403 | 2.1845 | 0.01817 | 0.03 * |
| Clay | 1 | 0.2208 | 0.2208 | 1.0956 | 0.00911 | 0.29 |
| Sand | 1 | 0.2809 | 0.2809 | 1.3938 | 0.01159 | 0.12 |
| TN | 1 | 0.6286 | 0.6286 | 3.1189 | 0.02593 | 0.02 * |
| Aspect | 1 | 0.2795 | 0.2795 | 1.3868 | 0.01153 | 0.11 |
| Residuals | 71 | 14.3109 | 0.2016 | 0.59039 | ||
| Total | 83 | 24.2395 | 1.00000 |
Significant environmental variables are indicated by asterix at their P-value, DF = degree of freedom, Pr = probability, F. = F test model, R2 = Coefficient of determination.
Table 10.
Biplot scores for constraining variables and their correlation with the CCA axes,.
| Factor | CCA1 | CCA2 | CCA3 | CCA4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Altitude | 0.977 | 0.10 | 0.107 | 0.091 |
| Slope | −0.047 | 0.40 | −0.754 | 0.365 |
| AP | −0.176 | −0.45 | −0.019 | 0.290 |
| K | −0.168 | 0.15 | 0.478 | 0.212 |
| OM | 0.185 | −0.82 | −0.116 | 0.180 |
| EC | −0.364 | −0.39 | −0.406 | −0.315 |
| CEC | −0.060 | −0.33 | −0.300 | 0.366 |
| TN | −0.295 | −0.42 | −0.377 | 0.017 |
| pH | −0.580 | 0.22 | 0.017 | 0.415 |
| Eigenvalue | 0.47 | 0.18 | 0.12 | 0.089 |
| Prop. explained | 0.41 | 0.16 | 0.10 | 0.088 |
| Cumulative Percentage | 0.41 | 0.57 | 0.67 | 0.758 |
The CCA ordination diagram (Fig. 8) illustrates the spatial segregation of forest patches: Muchila plots cluster in Quadrant I, Limalimo in Quadrant II, Adarmaz in Quadrant III, and Debir-Sankaber in Quadrant IV. Environmental gradients such as phosphorus, organic matter, total nitrogen, electrical conductivity, and cation exchange capacity strongly influenced species distribution in Adarmaz. Slope and altitude shaped the composition in Muchila, while pH, slope, altitude, and potassium affected Limalimo. Debir-Sankaber species distribution was primarily driven by altitude and organic matter.
Fig. 8.
CCA Ordination diagram of plots with environmental variables biplot.
Overall, altitude emerged as the strongest environmental correlate of species composition within the sampled plots, while soil chemical properties and slope also contributed to community differentiation.
Discussion
Floristic composition
This study documented 354 vascular plant species in the Afromontane vegetation of SMNP, confirming the region’s high floristic richness. This diversity reflects the park’s complex topography deep gorges escarpments, ridges and plateaus which generates a mosaic of microhabitats supporting diverse species assemblages4. Compared with other Ethiopian highlands, SMNP is richer than Abune Yosef (199 species)32 and Arsi Mountains National Park (191 species)33, but less diverse than the more extensive Bale Mountains (1321 species)34 and Mount Kilimanjaro (1200 species)35. These contrasts likely arise from differences in elevation range, geographic area, biogeographic history and survey intensity36.
Asteraceae, Poaceae and Fabaceae were the most species-rich families, consistent with patterns from other Ethiopian highlands32,33 and previous studies in SMNP17,36. Their success is attributable to ecological adaptability and dispersal mechanisms; for example, many Asteraceae and Poaceae possess wind-dispersed diaspores suited to colonizing isolated montane habitats, while Fabaceae benefit from nitrogen-fixing associations and allelopathic traits that enhance establishment in nutrient-poor soils37–41.
Herbs dominated the flora, as commonly observed in Afromontane systems where herbaceous species exhibit traits that enable survival under variable climatic conditions37. Thirteen taxa recorded in this survey are new to the Gondar floristic region, adding to the 19 previously reported17, and underscoring that remote, topographically challenging areas of SMNP remain under-sampled17,35.
Sampling limitations include difficult terrain, single-season sampling, and human disturbances, which likely led to underrepresentation of rare, cryptic, or seasonally ephemeral species and underscore the need for multi-season surveys in remote areas. Despite these constraints, the high species richness and new records highlight the conservation importance of the Simien Mountains, where protecting vulnerable habitats and integrating floristic data into management plans are essential to prevent local extinctions.
Species Diversity, distribution and endemism
Four distinct plant community types were identified; each structured by topography and disturbance gradients. Community 2 (Muchila patch) exhibited the highest species richness and diversity, likely due to intermediate disturbance, broad altitudinal range and moisture-retaining north-facing slopes36. Community 3 (Limalimo forest patch) ranked second, reflecting improved protection following the park’s expansion. Community 1 (Adarmaz patch) appeared to represent a later successional stage with relatively lower diversity42. Community 4 (Debir–Sankaber), located near the ericaceous belt at the highest elevations, had the lowest richness, consistent with the well-documented decline of diversity at higher altitudes43.
Beta diversity was greatest between the lowest (Adarmaz) and highest (Debir–Sankaber) communities, highlighting the strong influence of altitude on species turnover. Muchila, spanning the widest altitudinal range, shared the most species with other communities.
Endemism accounted for 12.2% (45 taxa) of the flora, including seven species restricted to the Afromontane portion of SMNP. This level is comparable to other Ethiopian highlands (10–15%)17,44–46 and reflects the role of the Simiens’ isolated plateaus and escarpments in promoting speciation47,48. Many endemic species are herbaceous and therefore vulnerable to grazing and trampling, underscoring the need for targeted conservation of these microhabitats.
Environmental drivers of vegetation patterns
Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) revealed that altitude is the dominant environmental gradient shaping species distribution, strongly correlating with the first axis. Altitude integrates changes in temperature, moisture and soil conditions, all of which influence plant establishment and growth49–51. Slope aspect and angle also played significant roles, with north- and northwest-facing slopes supporting richer vegetation due to greater moisture retention [36]. Steeper slopes influence soil formation, erosion and microclimate, contributing to variation in community composition52–54.
A key result is the clear imprint of historical human disturbance on present vegetation. Forest patches are now largely confined to inaccessible escarpments and gorges, indicating extensive past fragmentation. The absence of characteristic dry Afromontane trees such as Juniperus procera from forest stands now found mainly in churchyards further reflects historical deforestation and vegetation replacement. Although anthropogenic pressure has decreased since the area’s designation as a national park, ongoing disturbances such as controlled grazing, beekeeping and edge effects continue to influence vegetation structure and species turnover55–58.
Management implications
SMNP supports substantial Afromontane biodiversity with high levels of endemism. The protection regime implemented after 1991, limiting agricultural expansion and large-scale logging, has likely contributed to observed recovery and enhanced plant diversity in many areas59,60. Nevertheless, several management priorities emerge from this study:
Protection of inaccessible habitats: Remaining forest patches on cliffs and in deep gorges serve as natural refugia. Any development increasing access to these areas should be carefully evaluated to avoid unintended degradation.
Targeted conservation of endemics: Endemic and rare herbaceous species are particularly vulnerable to grazing and localized disturbances. Microhabitats supporting these taxa may require enhanced protection or complementary ex-situ measures.
Managing disturbance regimes: Intermediate disturbance appears to promote diversity in some areas. Management should maintain a mosaic of disturbance levels, ensuring strict protection of core refugia (e.g., Walia ibex habitats) while allowing sustainable traditional practices in buffer zones.
Addressing knowledge gaps: Continued discovery of previously unrecorded taxa highlights the need for further botanical exploration, especially in rugged, under-sampled terrain. Establishing long-term monitoring plots is recommended to track vegetation change under climate and management pressures.
Conclusions and recommendations
The Afromontane vegetation of SMNP exhibits substantial floristic richness, with 354 recorded species across 91 families, including 45 Ethiopian endemic species, seven of which are restricted to the park. This diversity is associated with pronounced altitudinal variation, topographic complexity, and heterogeneity in environmental conditions within the sampled plots, as reflected by the observed community differentiation and high species turnover.
This study quantified plant community composition and diversity patterns and examined their relationships with selected environmental variables, revealing that altitude, together with soil properties and slope, was strongly correlated with variation in species composition. The high β-diversity observed among communities indicates considerable spatial heterogeneity in species assemblages across forest patches. However, these patterns represent correlations based on the sampled data and do not imply direct causal relationships.
Despite evidence of past deforestation and ongoing anthropogenic pressures reported in previous studies, the results indicate that SMNP continues to support important reservoirs of Afromontane plant diversity, including endemic and conservation-priority taxa. Nevertheless, the findings are constrained by plot-based sampling and may not capture the full floristic variability of the park, particularly in less accessible areas.
From a management perspective, conservation efforts may benefit from prioritizing habitats that support high endemic richness and distinct community assemblages, particularly along altitudinal gradients. Continued botanical surveys, expanded spatial coverage, and long-term vegetation monitoring are recommended to improve understanding of temporal dynamics and disturbance responses. Integrating ecological information into site-specific management and conservation planning, together with stakeholder and community engagement, could contribute to the sustained conservation of SMNP’s plant biodiversity.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
We honor the memory of Professor Ensermu Kelbessa, whose guidance and expertise greatly enriched this work. We also thank the Ethiopian Meteorological Agency for providing climate data and the Simien Mountains National Park Office and the Ethiopian Wildlife Conservation Authority for granting research permission, access to vegetation maps, and overall support.
Author contributions
G.M: Conceptualization, Field Data Collection, Data Analysis, Investigation, Laboratory Work, Manuscript Drafting; T.S: Supervision, Reviewing and Editing; M.W: Supervision, Reviewing and Editing, M.A: Conceptualization, Methodological Design, and Editing; and D.T: Reviewing and Editing; and W.M: Conceptualization and Editing and Prepared the Reference and Citation Following the Journal Style.
Data availability
Data is provided within the manuscript or Supplementary Materia.
Declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Asefa, M. et al. Ethiopian vegetation types, climate and topography. Plant. Divers.42 (4), 302–311 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Woldu, Z. et al. Forests in the vegetation types of Ethiopia and their status in the geographical context (1999).
- 3.ANRS. Simien Mountains National Park General Management Plan. Amhara National Regional State Parks Development and Protection Authority, Bahir Dar (2009a).
- 4.Bekele, T. Phytosociology and ecology of a humid Afromontane forest on the central plateau of Ethiopia. J. Veg. Sci.5 (1), 87–98 (1994). [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kelbessa, E. & Demissew, S. Diversity of vascular plant taxa of the flora of Ethiopia and Eritrea. Ethiop. J. Biol. Sci.13 (1), 37–45 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bishaw, B. Deforestation and land degradation in the Ethiopian highlands: a strategy for physical recovery. Northeast Afr. Stud.8, 7–25 (2001).
- 7.Vivero, J. L., Kelbessa, E. & Demissew, S. The Red List of Endemic Trees and Shrubs of Ethiopia and Eritrea (Fauna and Flora International, 2005).
- 8.EBI (Ethiopian Biodiversity Institute). Ethiopia’s Fifth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. (2014).
- 9.Debonnet, G., Melamari, L. & Bomhard, B. Reactive monitoring mission to Simien Mountains National Park. Joint World Heritage Center-IUCN monitoring mission to Simien Mountains National Park World Heritage property, France (2014). (2006).
- 10.Yihune, M., Bekele, A. & Tefera, Z. Human–gelada baboon conflict in and around the simien mountains National Park, Ethiopia. Afr. J. Ecol.47 (3), 276–282 (2009). [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ejigu, D. & Bekele, A. Population structure and group size of Geladas (Theropithecus gelada) at Chenek, simien mountains National Park, Ethiopia. Afr. J. Ecol.55 (4), 564–572 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ejigu, D., Bekele, A. & Powell, L. Walia Ibex have increased in number and shifted their habitat range within simien mountains National Park, Ethiopia. J. Mountain Ecol.10, 27–44 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- 13.Melese, G. T., Tsegay, B. A. & Kassa, G. M. Effects of environmental variables on the patterns of plant community distribution in the afro-alpine vegetation of simien mountains National park, Ethiopia. J. Biotech. Int.10 (1), 8–21 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tassew, G., Abraha, B., Masresha, G. & Kuratie, G. B. Patterns of plant community formation and vegetation structure in the afro-alpine vegetation of simien mountains National Park, Ethiopia. Int. J. Biotechnol.7 (1), 31–43 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- 15.Masresha, G. Study on Temporal alterations in land cover types in simien mountain National Park, Northwest Ethiopia. Int. J. Sustain. Agric. Res.6 (3), 125–136 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wassie, A., Teketay, D. & Flora-Morphology Soil seed banks in church forests of northern Ethiopia: implications for the conservation of woody plants. Distribution Funct. Ecol. Plants, 201(1), 32–43 (2006). [Google Scholar]
- 17.Puff, C. & Nemomissa, S. The Simen mountains (Ethiopia): comments on plant biodiversity, endemism, phytogeographical affinities and historical aspects. Syst Geogr. Plants71, 975–991 (2001).
- 18.Wondie, M., Schneider, W., Melesse, A. M. & Teketay, D. Spatial and Temporal land cover changes in the Simen mountains National Park, a world heritage site in Northwestern Ethiopia. Remote Sens.3 (4), 752–766 (2011). [Google Scholar]
- 19.UNESCO. State of Conservation Report of the World Natural Heritage Site, Simien Mountains National Park (Ethiopia). (2017).
- 20.Smartt, P. F. M. Sampling for vegetation survey: a flexible systematic model for sample location. J. Biogeogr.5, 43–56 (1978).
- 21.Kent, M. Vegetation Description and Data Analysis: a Practical Approach (Wiley, 2011).
- 22.Allen, S. E. Chemical Analysis of Ecological Materials 2nd edn, 1–368 (Blackwell Scientific, 1989). [Google Scholar]
- 23.Woldu, Z., Feoli, E. & Nigatu, L. Partitioning an elevation gradient of vegetation from southeastern Ethiopia by probabilistic methods. Numer Synt.81, 189–198 (1989).
- 24.Woldu, Z. Environmental and Ecological Data analyses. Basics, Concepts and Methods p1–408 (Lamberet Acadamic Publishing, 2012).
- 25.Van der Maarel, E., Espejel, I. & Moreno-Casasola, P. Two-step vegetation analysis based on very large data sets. Vegetatio68, 139–143 (1987). [Google Scholar]
- 26.Heltshe, J. F. & Forrester, N. E. Estimating species richness using the jackknife procedure. Biometrics. 39, 1–11 (1983). [PubMed]
- 27.Magurran, A. E. Measuring Biological Diversity. Blackwell Publishing 1-256 Oxford, (2004).
- 28.Colwell, R. K. EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples, version 8. purl. oclc. org/estimates (2006).
- 29.Hammer, Ø. & Harper, D. A. Past: paleontological statistics software package for educaton and data Anlysis. Palaeontol. Electron.4 (1), 1 (2001). [Google Scholar]
- 30.Whittaker, R. H. Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon21 (2–3), 213–251 (1972). [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lepš, J. & Šmilauer, P. Multivariate Methods of Ecological Data Analysis Using CANOCO 1–283 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003).
- 32.Gebrehiwot, K. et al. Elevational changes in vascular plants richness, diversity, and distribution pattern in abune Yosef mountain range, Northern Ethiopia. Plant. Divers.41 (4), 220–228 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Girma, Z. et al. Vascular plant species composition, relative abundance, distribution, and threats in Arsi mountains National Park, Ethiopia. Mt. Res. Dev.38 (2), 143–152 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bale Mountains National Park (BMNP) (2007). Bale Mountains National Park General Management Plan 2007–2017 (2007).
- 35.Hemp, A. Vegetation of kilimanjaro: hidden endemics and missing bamboo. Afr. J. Ecol.44 (3), 305–328 (2006). [Google Scholar]
- 36.Puff, C. & Nemomissa, S. Plants of the simen: a flora of the Simen Mountains and surroundings, northern Ethiopia 37, 1-258 (National Botanic Garden, 2005). (2005).
- 37.Masresha, G. Composition and endemicity of plant species in simien mountains National park Flora, North Gondar, Northwestern Ethiopia. Ethiop. J. Nat. Comput. Sci.2 (1), 301–310 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hedberg, O. Features of Afroalpine plat ecology. Acta Phytogeogr Suec. 49, 1–144 (1964). [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hedberg, O. Evolution of Afroalpine flora. Biotropica2 (1), 16–23 (1970). [Google Scholar]
- 40.Waheed, M. & Arshad, F. Adaptive convergence and divergence underpin the diversity of Asteraceae in a semi-arid lowland region. Flora317, 1–17 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 41.Hedberg, I. Flora of Ethiopia and eritrea. In The Biodiversity of African Plants: Proceedings XIVth AETFAT Congress 22–27 August 1994, Wageningen, The Netherlands (pp. 802–804). Springer Netherlands (1996).
- 42.Bazzaz, F. Plant species diversity in old-field successional ecosystems in Southern Illinois. Ecol56 (2), 485–488 (1975). [Google Scholar]
- 43.Soromessa, T. & Kelbessa, E. Diversity and endemicity of Chilimo forest, central Ethiopia. Biosci. Discov. 4 (1), 1–4 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 44.Getaneh, Z. A. et al. Determinants of plant community along environmental gradients in Geramo forest, the Western escarpment of the rift Valley of Ethiopia. PLoS ONE. 18 (11), 1–15 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Demissew, D., Wondafrash, M. & Dellegne, Y. Ethiopia’s natural base. In: Solomon Tilahun, Edwards, S. and Tewolde Berhan Gebre Egziabher (eds.). Important Bird Areas of Ethiopia: A First Inventory Wildlife and Natural History Society 35–36 (Addis Ababa, 1996). (1996).
- 46.Friis, I. et al. Diversity and endemism in the flora of Ethiopia and Eritrea–what do the published flora volumes tell Us. Biol. Skr. 54, 173–193 (2001). [Google Scholar]
- 47.Gurmessa, F., Soromessa, T. & Kelbessa, E. Floristic composition and community analysis of Komto Afromontane moist forest, East Wollega Zone, West Ethiopia. Sci. Tech Arts Res. J. 2 (2), 58–69 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 48.Grytnes, J. A. & Vetaas, O. R. Species richness and altitude: a comparison between null models and interpolated plant species richness along the Himalayan altitudinal gradient, Nepal. Am. Nat.159 (3), 294–304 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.O’Brien, E. M., Field, R. & Whittaker, R. J. Climatic gradients in Woody plant (tree and shrub) diversity: water-energy dynamics, residual variation, and topography. Oikos89 (3), 588–600 (2000). [Google Scholar]
- 50.Masresha, G., Soromessa, T. & Kelbessa, E. Status and species diversity of Alemsaga forest, Northwestern Ethiopia. Adv Life Sci. Technol.34, 87–99 (2015). [Google Scholar]
- 51.Rahman, A. U. et al. Ecological assessment of plant communities and associated edaphic and topographic variables in the Peochar Valley of the Hindu Kush mountains. Mt. Res. Dev.6 (3), 332–341 (2016). [Google Scholar]
- 52.Wang, L. Drivers of plant diversification along an altitudinal gradient in the alpine desert grassland, Northern Tibetan plateau. Glob Ecol. Conserv.53, 1–13 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 53.Egziabher, T. B. Vegetation and environment of the mountains of ethiopia: implications for utilization and conservation. Mt. Res. Dev.8 (2), 211–216 (1988). [Google Scholar]
- 54.Zu, Y. et al. Distribution pattern of plant species diversity in the mountainous region of Ili river Valley, Xinjiang. Monit. Assess.177, 681–694 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Darbyshire, I., Lamb, H. & Umer, M. Forest clearance and regrowth in northern Ethiopia during the last 3000 years. Holocene13 (4), 537–546 (2003). [Google Scholar]
- 56.Dilnessa, G. et al. Impacts of environmental conditions on Woody plant diversity, structure and regeneration in forest patches of Guna mountain: este District, South Gondar Zone, Ethiopia. J. Mt. Sci.20 (7), 1940–1953 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 57.Tadese, S., Soromessa, T. & Gebeyehu, G. Effects of environmental and disturbance factors on plant community distribution in tropical moist Afromontane Forests, South-West Ethiopia. Int. J. Res.2023, 1–17 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 58.Yinebeb, M., Lulekal, E. & Bekele, T. Ecological determinants in plant community structure across dry Afromontane forest patches of Northwestern Ethiopia. BMC Ecol. Evol.23 (1), 1–13 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Connell, J. H. Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs: high diversity of trees and corals is maintained only in a nonequilibrium state. Scie199 (4335), 1302–1310 (1978). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Shea, K., Roxburgh, S. H. & Rauschert, E. S. Moving from pattern to process: coexistence mechanisms under intermediate disturbance regimes. Ecol. Lett.7 (6), 491–508 (2004). [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data is provided within the manuscript or Supplementary Materia.










