Skip to main content
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 2026 Feb 5;54(4):gkag082. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkag082

Anticodon-edited transfer RNAs (ACE-tRNAs) encoded as therapeutic nonviral minimal DNA vectors

Joseph J Porter 1,b, Wooree Ko 2,b, Emily G Sorensen 3, Zachary Cheung 4, Kari Thrasher 5, Tyler Couch 6, Jeffrey T Gabell 7, Victoria Shwe 8, Julia Hyatt 9, Jennasea B Licata 10, Luke K Peterson 11, David A Dean 12, John D Lueck 13,14,15,
PMCID: PMC12873608  PMID: 41641696

Abstract

Nonsense mutations, resulting from a premature termination codon (PTC), make up ∼11% of all genetic lesions causing disease, affecting millions of people worldwide. Nonsense suppressor anticodon-edited transfer RNAs (ACE-tRNAs) have emerged as a therapeutic modality for the rescue of PTCs. Delivery of ACE-tRNAs in vivo has been achieved by adeno-associated viral vector and RNA-lipid nanoparticle; however, due to drawbacks associated with these approaches, DNA delivery remains an attractive approach. DNA-based approaches afford ease of manufacturing at a relatively low cost and exhibit improved therapeutic durability and safety as compared to viral vector- or RNA-based approaches. Due to the small size of human tRNA genes employed as ACE-tRNAs, in principle, DNA vectors <200 base pairs (bp) in size (minivectors) could be utilized for delivery of actively transcribed ACE-tRNAs. Here, we demonstrate that linear DNA ACE-tRNA vectors as small as 200 bp effectively suppress several nonsense mutations in CFTR and REP1, and that ACE-tRNA minivectors, when tested in cell or ex vivo models, display significantly improved bioavailability, reduced innate immune burden, and superior biostability as compared to conventional plasmid DNA vectors.

Graphical Abstract

Graphical Abstract.

Graphical Abstract

Introduction

Nonsense mutations result from single-nucleotide DNA variants that convert an amino-acid-encoding codon to one of the three stop codons (UAA, UAG, UGA). Due to the presence of a stop codon within the protein-coding region of messenger RNA (mRNA) transcripts, these mutations are also referred to as premature termination codons (PTCs). Introduction of a PTC results in little-to-no full-length protein production from the affected gene, often with deleterious cellular effects. To that end, mutations resulting in PTCs lead to >700 human diseases [1], accounting for ∼10% of all incidences of genetic disease [2], with development of viable therapeutic approaches giving the potential for treatment to millions of people worldwide. Loss-of-protein results both from premature translation termination, leading to production of truncated protein products, and from loss of PTC-containing mRNA transcript due to the action of the nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) quality control pathway [3].

Although PTCs present a unifying mechanism of genetic disease, upon which considerable efforts have been focused, to date no specific therapy for PTCs has reached widespread clinical use. Therapeutic approaches under development for rescue of PTCs include CRISPR/Cas approaches [4], mRNA pseudouridylation [5], antisense oligo [6], small-molecule translational readthrough-inducing drugs [7], and nonsense-suppressor transfer RNAs (sup-tRNAs) also known as anticodon-edited tRNAs (ACE-tRNAs) [810]. The ACE-tRNA approach has long been envisioned for the clinical rescue of PTCs [11], with development of this approach enjoying a resurgence in enthusiasm following the demonstration of safety and efficacy in cell and mouse models of PTC-associated diseases [1214]. While the primary safety concern for therapeutic application of ACE-tRNAs has been readthrough of natural termination codons (NTCs), all investigations to date have demonstrated significant suppression of PTCs with minimal NTC readthrough [1214].

The ACE-tRNA as a therapeutic modality has been delivered using several different approaches (Supplementary Fig. S1A), including direct RNA delivery [12, 14, 15], expression from a DNA vector [12, 1521], expression from viral vectors [13, 16, 22], and installation via genome editing [23]. Direct delivery of the ACE-tRNA as RNA in lipid nanoparticle formulations has demonstrated safety and efficacy in a mouse model of cystic fibrosis (CF) [14]; however, the RNA has been demonstrated to possess a half-life on the order of hours to days [14, 15], with frequent redosing potentially causing cytotoxicity due to accumulated application of the nanoparticle carrier lipid or polymer [24]. Adeno-associated viral vectors (AAVs) have achieved clinical success with U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) approved total gene replacement therapies for lebers congenital amaurosis [25], spinal muscular atrophy [26], and Duchenne muscular dystrophy [27]. Viral vectors have evolved effective cell entry, endosomal escape, intracellular trafficking, and nuclear entry capabilities unmatched by current human-engineered nucleotide delivery efforts [28, 29]. However, interest in AAVs as a therapeutic vector is somewhat tempered by issues related to cost of manufacturing, the ∼5 kb upper limit of transgene packaging capacity, uncertain duration of effect, inability for redosing, and the existence of patient populations with pre-existing immunity to therapeutic AAVs [28, 3033]. Expression of ACE-tRNAs from plasmid-based DNA vectors has demonstrated efficacy in both human cell culture and mouse models [12, 1521].

Therapeutic plasmid DNA (pDNA) vectors are composed of a region containing a therapeutic cargo, generally a gene expression cassette, and the plasmid backbone containing a bacterial origin of replication and antibiotic resistance marker for selection (Supplementary Fig. S1B). While the DNA backbone components are indispensable for pDNA replication in bacteria, the pDNA backbone elements lead to silencing of the therapeutic cargo, and, in the case of ACE-tRNAs, occupy a dramatically larger portion of the DNA vector than the therapeutic cargo (Supplementary Fig. S1B). Due to drawbacks associated with the use of DNA plasmids as therapeutic vectors, several DNA “minivector” production approaches have been developed [3436].

Here, we demonstrate that ACE-tRNA minivectors of varying DNA size and shape can be produced and are competent to rescue clinically relevant levels of several PTC-containing genes in cell culture for proteins associated with human diseases, including CF and choroideremia (CHM). We demonstrate that DNA vectors as small as 200 bp support effective ACE-tRNA transcription (Supplementary Fig. S1C), resulting in PTC rescue, while also displaying better ex vivo bioavailability and stability than pDNA therapeutic vectors. Functional rescue of PTCs with ACE-tRNA minivectors opens up new potential avenues for the development of therapeutic approaches for the rescue of PTC-containing protein expression associated with many genetic diseases.

Methods

Unless otherwise noted, all oligonucleotides were obtained from Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT), and all molecular biology reagents were obtained from New England Biolabs (NEB). All pDNA was prepared by the Nucleobond Xtra Midi EF kit (Macherey-Nagel).

Expression and purification of Pfu-Sso7d polymerase

NiCo(DE3) cells (NEB) containing a plasmid expressing Pfu-Sso7d polymerase [37] were grown overnight in ZYM-505 media [38], induced with 1 mM IPTG, grown at 37°C for 4 h, and the resulting protein was purified from the Escherichia coli lysate by Ni-NTA IMAC. For more detailed protein purification and storage conditions, see the supplemental information.

Expression and purification of T4 DNA ligase

A DNA fragment containing the T4 DNA ligase sequence from Addgene plasmid #87742 [39] was cloned into a pET21a vector (see supplemental information for pDNA sequence) by Gibson assembly (NEBuilder HiFi mix). Protein from the resulting expression vector was expressed and purified as outlined above for the Pfu-Sso7d polymerase. For more detailed protein purification and storage conditions, see the supplemental information.

Expression and purification of TFAM

The DNA binding domain from transcription factor A, mitochondrial (TFAM), was synthesized (Genscript) and expressed from a pET28a(+) vector (see supplemental information for pDNA sequence) and purified as outlined above (Supplementary Fig. S2). For more detailed protein purification and storage conditions, see the supplemental information.

Expression and purification of TelN

The protelomerase from phage N15 (TelN) was amplified from the pJAZZ-OK plasmid (Lucigen) and was cloned into a pET21a vector (see supplemental information for pDNA sequence) by Gibson assembly (NEBuilder HiFi mix). TelN was expressed and purified as outlined above (Supplementary Fig. S4). An additional cation exchange purification step was added to the TelN purification scheme. For more detailed protein purification and storage conditions, see the supplemental information.

Expression and purification of ALFA Nb-Nluc

The ALFA tag nanobody [40] with an N-terminal pelB signal sequence and a C-terminal Nluc-6×His was ordered as a gBlock (IDT) and cloned into a pBAD vector (see supplemental information for pDNA sequence) by Gibson assembly (NEBuilder HiFi mix). NiCo(DE3) cells (NEB) containing the pBAD pelB-ALFA Nb-Nluc-6×His were grown overnight in 1 l of ZYM-505 media [38]. After 16 h of growth, 20 ml of 1 M NaOH was added to each culture, the protein expression was induced with the addition of 2.5 ml of 20% arabinose, and the cultures were grown at 37°C for 4 h. Following expression the ALFA Nb-Nluc protein was purified by periplasmic protein prep. For more detailed protein purification and storage conditions, see the supplemental information.

Production of ACE-tRNA PCR fragments for production of minicircles by T4 ligase-dependent in vitro covalent closure

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) fragments for in vitro production of ACE-tRNA were obtained by amplifying the 1 kb ACE-tRNAArgUGA or 1 kb ACE-tRNALeuUGA vector (see supplemental file for pDNA sequences) with either 200 bp bluntF 5P (5′-/5Phos/GGCTTGATGGAGCAGTTATACTCTAAGCGC-3′) and 200 bp bluntR 5P (5′-/5Phos/CTTAGAATCACAGACTGGCATCCACCC-3′) for production of 200 bp MC or 400 bp bluntF 5P (5′-/5Phos/CAGCAGAGCTTGAACTGACTAGTTGGAC-3′) and 400 bp bluntR 5P (5′-/5Phos/GCTAGTTAGAAAGGCTCATCTTTGGCTAG-3′) for production of 400 bp MC. A typical PCR reaction mix contained 32.5 μl MQ-H2O, 10 μl 5× buffer [150 mM Tris–HCl, pH 10, 200 mM K2SO4, 5 mM (NH4)2SO4, 10 mM MgSO4, 0.5% Triton X-100], 1 μl dNTPs (10 mM each dNTP), 2.5 μl forward primer, 2.5 μl reverse primer, 1 μl plasmid template DNA (10 ng/μl), and 1 μl of the Pfu-Sso7d polymerase stock. The PCR cycle utilized was 98°C for 30 s, (98°C for 10 s, 65°C for 10 s, and 72°C for 20 s), the previous section in brackets was repeated 30 times, a final extension cycle at 72°C for 2 min was conducted, and the product was held in the thermocyclers at 12°C. The resulting PCR product was pooled and purified by anion exchange chromatography, typically at midiprep (per 50 ml PCR reaction volume) scale (Macherey-Nagel). For a 200 bp minicircle assembly, a small-scale 400 μl ligation reaction was composed of 299 μl MQ H2O, 4 μg purified PCR product, 40 μl 10× T4 DNA ligase buffer (500 mM Tris–HCl and 100 mM MgCl2), 40 μl ATP (10 mM stock), 4 μl dithiothreitol (DTT; freshly prepared 1 M stock), 12 μl TFAM (50 μM stock), and 1 μl T4 DNA ligase (∼400 units/μl). For a 400 bp minicircle assembly, a small-scale 200 μl reaction was composed of 147 μl MQ H2O, 4 μg purified PCR product, 20 μl 10× T4 DNA ligase buffer (500 mM Tris–HCl and 100 mM MgCl2), 20 μl ATP (10 mM stock), 2 μl DTT (freshly prepared 1 M stock), 6 μl TFAM (50 μM stock), and 1 μl T4 DNA ligase (∼400 units/μl). The components were added to the reactions in the order listed, and the ligation reactions were allowed to proceed overnight in the dark at ambient room temperature. Residual unreacted MC PCR product was removed by addition of T5 exonuclease (NEB, M0663S) with ∼20 μl of 10 unit/μl T5 exonuclease added per 50 ml MC ligation reaction. The reaction containing the T5 exonuclease was allowed to proceed at 37°C for 4 h. The intact ACE-tRNA MC DNA was purified from the rest of the reaction by anion exchange column as outlined above for purification of the PCR product. For a more detailed minicircle production protocol, see the supplemental information.

Production of ACE-tRNA minicircles by in vivo recombination

The pMC.CMV-GFP-SV40PolyA parental minicircle positive control plasmid vector (System Biosciences) was digested with XmaI/BstEII, and the resulting linearized backbone was purified by agarose gel electrophoresis and gel purification kit (NEB, Monarch DNA gel extraction kit). A CmR/ccdB selection cassette was amplified from an Addgene plasmid #62176 [41] flanked by BbsI restriction sites for Golden Gate assembly of multiple ACE-tRNA copies. The pMC producer plasmids containing ACE-tRNAs were transformed into the ZYCY10P3S2T producer bacterial strain. Transformed bacterial cultures were grown for 8 h in 2 ml starter cultures containing kanamycin before inoculating 500 ml of ZYM-505 [38] media containing kanamycin, which were grown overnight at 37°C, 230 rpm in a baffled 2.8 l Fernbach flask. After growing overnight, the culture was supplemented with 500 ml fresh LB media, 20 ml of 1 M NaOH, and 500 μl 20% l-arabinose. The induced culture was maintained at 32°C, 230 rpm for 5 h. For large-scale minicircle DNA purification, a maxiprep kit (Macherey-Nagel) was used with some modifications. Sequences of the minicircles resulting from recombinase-based production are reported in Supplementary Table S1. For a more detailed in vivo recombination-based minicircle production protocol, see the supplemental information.

Production of ACE-tRNA PCR fragments for production of CEDTs by TelN-dependent in vitro reaction

A pUC57 Kan plasmid containing two telRL sites flanking a Golden Gate site was synthesized (Genscript). A CmR/ccdB selection cassette flanked by BbsI restriction sites was cloned between the telRL sites by Gibson assembly (NEBuilder HiFi master mix). Different length stretches of DNA containing either ACE-tRNAArgUGA or ACE-tRNALeuUGA were amplified by PCR (Q5 polymerase, NEB) and cloned by Golden Gate assembly into the pUC57 Kan 2xtelRL plasmid (see supplemental information for pDNA sequences). For production of ACE-tRNA CEDTs, the ACE-tRNA telRL pDNA served as a template for PCR amplification, which was carried out as outlined above for the MC PCR. In this case the primers used were CEDTprodF (5′-GTTGTAAAACGACGGCCAGAGAATTC-3′) and CEDTprodR (5′- CAGCTATGACCATGATTACACCAAGC-3′), which anneal to the 2× telRL pUC57 plasmid just outside of the telRL sites. The CEDT PCR products were purified as outlined above for the MC PCR product. Addition of concentrated TelN directly to concentrated DNA solutions was noted to result in precipitate formation, so a dilute solution of TelN in reaction buffer was mixed with a dilute solution of ACE-tRNA telRL DNA. A typical 5 ml DNA mixture was composed of 100 ng/μl ACE-tRNA telRL DNA in 1× buffer [20 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.8, 10 mM (NH4)2SO4, 10 mM KCl, 2 mM MgSO4, 0.1% Triton X-100]. A typical 5 ml TelN mixture was composed of the appropriate amount of TelN for the number of telRL sites possessed by the ACE-tRNA substrate in question in 1× buffer. The dilute DNA and TelN solutions were mixed, gently inverted several times, and the reaction was allowed to proceed at 30°C for 2 h. The resulting digested DNA mixture was purified by anion exchange maxiprep column as outlined above for purification of PCR product, the residual undigested fragments and cleaved open-ended fragments were removed by T5 exonuclease digest, and the final product was purified by anion exchange midiprep column as outlined above for the PCR product. For a more detailed CEDT production protocol, see the supplemental information.

Production of supercoiled ACE-tRNA minicircles

Supercoiled 200 and 400 bp ACE-tRNA minicircles were produced by adapting previously outlined methods [42]. Open circle minicircles were digested with the nicking endonuclease Nt.AlwI, supercoiling was induced with application of 6 μg/ml ethidium bromide, and the nicked DNA was sealed with T4 DNA ligase, with residual nicked DNA removed with T5 exonuclease. Supercoiled minicircles were resolved by agarose gel electrophoresis and purified by gel purification kit (NEB, Monarch DNA gel extraction kit).

Transfection of ACE-tRNA minivectors and pDNA

HEK293T cells were cultured and transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 as previously described [16]. Lipofectamine 2000 was chosen so as not to provide bias for nuclear delivery of DNA vectors, which the PLUS reagent in Lipofectamine 3000 or LTX may provide. ACE-tRNA minivectors and pDNA were transfected at equal mass with the pNanoRePorter plasmid, with the PTC suppression assay conducted using the Nano-Glo Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega) as previously described [16] and as shown in the supplemental information (Supplementary Fig. S5A–C).

Selection of the 16HBE14o- Stop-Go-Glow cell line

The Stop-Go-Glow (SGG) reporter used here was composed of an EF1a-promoter-driven cassette expressing a PTC-interrupted Nluc reporter [12], a T2A ribosomal shutter element, and a downstream mScarlet-I (Supplementary Fig. S5D), which, along with a puromycin resistance cassette, was cloned between piggyBac ITRs [15] for selection of a 16HBE14o- stable cell line as described previously [22].

Transfection of the 16HBE14o- Stop-Go-Glow cell line for Nluc assay in 96-well format

The 16HBE14o- SGG stable cell line was transfected (Lipofectamine LTX, Thermo Fisher Scientific) with ACE-tRNA minivectors and pDNA. For transfection of the minivectors for the Nluc assay, the 16HBE14o- SGG cells were trypsinized (TrypLE Express, Gibco), the cells were counted according to manufacturer instructions (Countess 3 Automated Cell Counter, Thermo Fisher Scientific), and diluted to 3 × 105 cells/ml. To each well of a fibronectin coated (as described previously [15]) cell-culture treated, black, flat-bottom 96-well plate (Greiner Bio-One), 100 μl of the diluted cells were added and the plate was placed in a 37°C/5% CO2 incubator. The minivector or pDNA was transfected as per the Lipofectamine LTX kit instructions. The transfected cells were replaced in the 37°C/5% CO2 incubator for 24 h before PTC-suppression was assayed using the Nano-Glo Luciferase Assay System (Promega) (Supplementary Fig. S5D and E). The suppression ratio is calculated from the equation ([Nluc luminescence value (+ACE-tRNA MV or pDNA well)]/[Nluc luminescence value (+scrambled negative control ACE-tRNA MV or pDNA well)]) (Supplementary Fig. S5F). For more detailed LTX transfection and Nano-Glo Luciferase assay protocols, see the supplemental information.

Nucleofection of the 16HBE14o- Stop-Go-Glow cell line for Nluc assay in 96-well format

To each well of a fibronectin coated (as described previously [15]) cell-culture treated, black, flat-bottom 96-well plate (Greiner Bio-One), 100 μl of the cell culture media was added and the plate was placed in a 37°C/5% CO2 incubator. For each sample being nucleofected, 2 × 105 cells were centrifuged at 90 rcf for 10 min, resuspended in 20 μl of SG 4D-Nucleofector X solution containing Supplement 1 (Amaxa SG cell line 4D-Nucleofector X Kit S, Lonza Bioscience), and 1 μg of each minivector or pDNA was added to the solution. A 20 μl total volume of the cell/DNA mixture was transferred to each well of a Nucleocuvette Strip. The cells were nucleofected by placing the Nucleocuvette Strip into the 4D-Nucleofector X Unit and running the CM-137 Nucleofector program from the 4D-Nucleofector Core Unit. The cells were incubated at room temperature for 10 min before being resuspended in 80 μl of pre-warmed cell culture media. The 96-well plate containing pre-warmed media had 15 μl of the nucleofection mix added to each well and was maintained in a 37°C/5% CO2 incubator for 24 h. The Nluc assay was conducted as described above for the Lipofectamine LTX transfection.

Transfection of the 16HBE14o- Stop-Go-Glow cell line for flow cytometry in 12-well format

The 16HBE14o- SGG stable cell line was transfected (Lipofectamine LTX, Thermo Fisher Scientific) with ACE-tRNA minivectors and pDNA as described above in a 96-well format but with the following modifications for 12-well format. The trypsinized cells were diluted to 3 × 105 cells/ml, and 1 ml of cell suspension was added to each well of the 12-well plate. The DNA was diluted to 200 ng/μl and 5 μl was used to transfect each well of cells. The minivector or pDNA was transfected as per the Lipofectamine LTX kit instructions. The cells were then replaced in a 37°C/5% CO2 incubator for 24 h before conducting the flow cytometry assay. For a more detailed LTX 12-well plate transfection protocol, see the supplemental information.

Nucleofection of the 16HBE14o- Stop-Go-Glow cell line for flow cytometry in 12-well format

Nucleofection of the ACE-tRNA minivector and pDNA was conducted as outlined above for the Nluc 96-well format with the following modifications. After nucleofection the 20 μl of nucleofected cells were resuspended in 80 μl of pre-warmed cell culture media. A total of 100 μl of the resuspended cells were transferred to each well of the 12-well plate, which contained 1 ml of pre-warmed cell culture media. The cells were then replaced in a 37°C/5% CO2 incubator for 24 h before conducting the flow cytometry assay.

Preparation of SGG cell samples for flow cytometry and flow cytometry conditions

After cells were treated with ACE-tRNA minivectors and pDNA as described earlier, flow cytometry was conducted using the SGG mScarlet-I as a fluorescent marker. To prepare the cell samples, the media was aspirated, 300 μl of TrypLE Express (Gibco) was added to each well containing cells, the plate was placed in a 37°C/5% CO2 incubator for 10 min, and the reaction in each well was quenched with 1 ml of FACS buffer [Dulbecco's Phosphate-Buffered Saline (DPBS; Gibco, Cat. #14190144) containing 0.3% cell culture grade bovine serum albumin (Gibco, Cat. #15260-037) and 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)]. The trypsinized cells were pipetted up and down several times to dislodge the cells before being transferred to flow cytometry tubes containing 2 ml of FACS buffer. The cells were centrifuged at 200 rcf for 5 min, the FACS buffer was aspirated, and the cells were resuspended in 250 μl of fresh FACS buffer. The cell samples were run on a BD LSR Fortessa flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) flow cytometer collecting over 20 000 events. mScarlet-I was excited with a yellow–green (561 nm, 50 mW) laser and detected between 600 and 620 nm. Data were analyzed with FCS Express 7 (De Novo Software) with gating for single cells accomplished using forward and side scatter area, height, and width parameters. A gate for mScarlet-I positive cells in samples was established such that ∼1% of events were positive for cells transfected or nucleofected respectively with pUC57 pDNA without an insert. Independent mScarlet-I fluorescence gates were established for samples that were either transfected or nucleofected as the level of background autofluorescence was noted to be different for each method of DNA delivery. The percent mScarlet-I positive cells and median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of the positive population for each ACE-tRNA minivector and pDNA treated cell sample was calculated based on the gate statistical analysis in FCS Express 7.

PTC-Rep1-Nluc and PTC-CFTR-Nluc expression and in-gel luminescence

CFTR and Rep-1 complementary DNA (cDNA) with a C-terminal Nluc fusion was cloned via Gibson assembly downstream of a short ubiquitin C (UbC) promoter in pUC57 mini. PTCs were introduced into the Rep-1 and CFTR cDNA construct using PCR-based site-directed mutagenesis. The Rep-1 and CFTR expression plasmids were co-transfected along with ACE-tRNA minivector or pDNA into HEK293T cells using Lipofectamine LTX (Thermo Fisher). For all transfections 750 ng of Rep-1-Nluc or CFTR-Nluc plasmid was used, while 750 ng of ACE-tRNA minivector or pDNA was used in the DNA mix. HEK293T cells were counted and diluted to 6 × 105 cells per ml with 1 ml added per well of a six-well plate. For each well, the DNA mix had 150 μl of OptiMEM containing 3 μl of PLUS reagent (Thermo Fisher) added to and mixed with the DNA, followed by 150 μl of OptiMEM containing 9 μl of LTX reagent (Thermo Fisher). The DNA/Lipofectamine mixture was incubated for ∼7.5 min at room temperature before 250 μl of the mixture was delivered dropwise to each well of cells. All transfections were performed in triplicate. The preparation of samples and in-gel luminescence assay was performed as described previously [16].

Comparison of PTC suppression efficiency of 200 bp CEDT ACE-tRNAArgUGA and optimized ACE-tRNAArgUGA

Two hundred base pairs ACE-tRNAArgUGA and OptACE-tRNAArgUGA CEDTs were produced by PCR and TelN digest as described earlier. The resulting CEDTs were diluted to both 150 and 100 ng/μl and mixed at equal volume with pNanoRePorter plasmid at a concentration of 50 ng/μl. A two-fold serial dilution was then conducted with each of the starting DNA stocks to provide the DNA amounts shown (Fig. 4B). The DNA mix for the serial dilution was composed of pNanoRePorter plasmid at 50 ng/μl mixed at equal volume with 150 ng/μl pUC57 pDNA without insert used as inert carrier DNA. Transfections into HEK293T and Nano-Glo Dual-Luciferase reporter assays were carried out as indicated above (section labeled “Transfection of ACE-tRNA minivectors and pDNA”).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Optimized ACE-tRNAs encoded as DNA minivectors can rescue expression of Rep-1 p.R253X in a DNA concentration-dependent fashion. (A) Constructs used for this experiment. 200 bp CEDTs containing either ACE-tRNAArgUGA or optimized ACE-tRNAArgUGA expression cassettes [16] and a construct containing a UbC-promoter-driven Rep-1-R253X-ALFA tag expression cassette. (B) Various concentrations of each of the two CEDTs shown in panel (A) were transfected along with the dual-luciferase PTC reporter plasmid (as shown in Fig. 2A) in HEK293T cells. The data shown is the average of nine independent transfections with the error bars depicting the SEM and fits according to the equation outlined in Supplementary Fig. S11. (C) Representative western blot image showing Rep-1–253X rescue following co-transfection (n = 4). All CEDTs used in this experiment were 200 bp in size, while the MC were 850 bp in size. (D) Quantified band densitometry data for the Rep-1-ALFA tag western blots with data shown as the percent of WT band intensity normalized to the beta-actin loading control. Abbreviations: Minicircles, MC; Closed End DNA Threads, CEDT; Plasmid DNA, P; Scrambled ACE-tRNA Control, S*. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM with significance determined by one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test, where **** P < .0001, and ns denotes not significantly different (P value shown for each ns).

Rep-1 western blot

The Rep-1 cDNA with C-terminal ALFA tag was synthesized as a gBlock (IDT) and cloned into a pUC57 mini vector containing a short UbC promoter and SV40 polyA signal by Gibson assembly (NEBuilder HiFi master mix). The p.R253X variant (CGA > TGA) was inserted by site-directed mutagenesis with primers containing the desired DNA mutation (Q5 master mix, NEB). All DNA vectors were diluted to 100 ng/μl, with a typical DNA transfection mixture composed of 30 μl Rep-1 pDNA mixed with 10 μl ACE-tRNA minivector or pDNA. In cases where less ACE-tRNA minivector was transfected, the total DNA mass was balanced with pUC57 pDNA without insert, which was used as inert carrier DNA. The HEK293T cells were diluted to 6 × 105 cells/ml, and 1 ml was added to each well of a six-well plate. The DNA was transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 as per manufacturer instructions. The transfected HEK293T cells were maintained in a 37°C/5% CO2 incubator for 24 h before the media was aspirated, the cells washed with DPBS, and lysed in RIPA buffer (Invitrogen) containing protease inhibitors (Medchem Express). Insoluble cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 20k rcf for 30 min at 4°C, total protein was quantified by BCA assay (Pierce), and 10 μg of protein was resolved on a 10%–20% Novex WedgeWell sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS–PAGE) gel (Invitrogen). The protein was transferred from the gel to 0.45 μm Immobilon-FL PVDF membrane (Merck Millipore). After transfer, the membrane was blocked for 1 h with rocking in EveryBlot Blocking Buffer (Biorad). The membrane was then probed with ALFA Nb-Nluc (purification outlined above) at 1:1k and mouse (monoclonal AC-15) anti-beta-actin (Fisher, AM4302) at 1:50k. For detection of the anti-beta-actin, the membrane was then probed with IRDye 800CW goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L) antibody (Licor Bio) at 1:10k. The membrane was incubated for 5 min with rocking in DPBS supplemented with 1 mM DTT and 1:500 Nano-Glo substrate (Promega). The resulting luminescence was imaged on a ChemiDoc Imaging System (Biorad) with an exposure time of 1400 sec typically used. Quantification of Rep-1-ALFA and beta-actin band intensity was determined using Image Lab software version 6.1.0 (Biorad). For a more detailed Rep-1 western blot protocol, see the supplemental information.

Nucleofection of ACE-tRNA minivectors and pDNA into 16HBEge W1282X cells

ACE-tRNA minivectors and pDNA were delivered to 16HBEge W1282X cells by nucleofection for assessment of PTC-containing CFTR mRNA and protein rescue. 16HBEge W1282X cells were trypsinized and counted as outlined above. For each nucleofection, 1.5 × 107 cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 90 rcf for 10 min. The cells were then gently resuspended in 100 μl of SG 4D-Nucleofector X solution containing Supplement 1 (Amaxa SG cell line 4D-Nucleofector X Kit L, Lonza Bioscience). Each tube of resuspended cells had 10 μg (∼1% of the total volume of the solution) of ACE-tRNA minivector or pDNA added, and the solution was mixed gently twice. One hundred microliters of the resuspended cell and DNA solution was transferred to the Nucleocuvette, which was placed into the 4D-Nucleofector X Unit with the CM-137 protocol subsequently run on the 4D-Nucleofector Core Unit. The cells were incubated at room temperature for 10 min before being resuspended in 550 μl of pre-warmed cell culture media. The nucleofected cells were then transferred to one well of a fibronectin-coated six-well plate containing 1 ml of pre-warmed cell media and maintained in a 37°C/5% CO2 incubator. After 16 h the media was aspirated and replaced with fresh media. After 48 h the cells were either trypsinized for mRNA isolation or lysed in RIPA buffer (Invitrogen) containing protease inhibitors (Medchem Express) for western blot analysis. The nucleofection was performed three independent times.

Quantification of CFTR PTC-containing mRNA by RT-qPCR from 16HBEge W1282X cells treated with ACE-tRNA minivectors and pDNA

ACE-tRNA minivectors and pDNA were delivered to 16HBEge W1282X cells by nucleofection as described above. Trypsinized cells were pelleted by centrifugation and stored at −80°C before total RNA was isolated (Monarch Total RNA Miniprep Kit, NEB). PTC-containing CFTR mRNA transcript from three independent nucleofections was quantified by RT-qPCR, which was conducted as described previously [15].

Quantification of CFTR PTC-containing protein from 16HBEge W1282X cells treated with ACE-tRNA minivectors and pDNA

ACE-tRNA minivectors and pDNA were delivered to 16HBEge W1282X cells by nucleofection as described earlier. Cells for western blot analysis were washed with DPBS and lysed in RIPA buffer (Invitrogen) containing protease inhibitors (Medchem Express). Insoluble cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 20k rcf for 30 min at 4°C, total protein was quantified by BCA assay (Pierce), and 10 or 30 μg of total protein was resolved on 4%–12% Novex WedgeWell SDS–PAGE gels (Invitrogen). The protein was transferred from the gel to 0.22 μm supported nitrocellulose membrane (GVS North America, Ref 1 212 721). After transfer, the membrane was blocked in EveryBlot Blocking Buffer (Biorad). The membrane was then probed with anti-CFTR antibody (University of North Carolina CFTR antibody 596) at 1:5k and rabbit (monoclonal ST0533) anti-sodium potassium ATPase antibody (Thermo Fisher, MA5-32184) at 1:5k. The membrane was incubated for 16 h at 4°C with rocking in the buffer containing the antibodies. For detection of the anti-CFTR, the membrane was then probed with stabilized peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse (H + L) antibody (Invitrogen, 32430) at 1:5k and for detection of the anti-sodium potassium ATPase, the membrane was simultaneously probed with IRDye 680RD donkey anti-rabbit (Licor Bio) at 1:10k. To image the anti-CFTR secondary antibody with conjugated peroxidase, the membrane was incubated in ECL substrate (Supersignal West Femto Maximum Sensitivity, Thermo Scientific) for 3 min before being imaged on a ChemiDoc Imaging System (Biorad). The anti-sodium potassium ATPase secondary antibody conjugated with IRDye680 was subsequently imaged on the ChemiDoc Imaging System (Biorad). Quantification of CFTR and sodium potassium ATPase band intensity was determined using Image Lab software version 6.1.0 (Biorad). For a more detailed CFTR western blot protocol, see the supplemental information.

Treatment of 16HBE14o- cells with the anti-mitotic agent aphidicolin for the determination of ACE-tRNA minivector and pDNA function in mitotically arrested cells

16HBE14o- cells containing the genomically encoded SGG PTC reporter were trypsinized, counted, and plated at 2.5 × 105 cells/ml (+aphidicolin) or 1 × 105 cells/ml (+vehicle), 100 μl per well in 96-well format as described earlier. The different cell concentrations were used to account for arrested cell division in the cells treated with aphidicolin. Cells treated with aphidicolin were maintained in complete cell media containing 5 μg/ml aphidicolin (MilliporeSigma, 1782731MG) for 16 h before transfection, while control cells were maintained in complete cell media containing vehicle (DMSO). The cells were transfected with ACE-tRNA minivectors or pDNA using Lipofectamine 2000 as previously described [16]. Lipofectamine 2000 was chosen so as not to provide bias for nuclear delivery of DNA vectors, which the PLUS reagent in Lipofectamine 3000 or LTX may provide. After 24 h post-transfection, the Nluc-PTC assay was conducted as described earlier (section labeled “Transfection of the 16HBE14o- SGG cell line for Nluc assay in 96-well format”).

Determination of cGAMP production in HeLa cells treated with ACE-tRNA minivectors or pDNA by competitive ELISA

HeLa cells (ATCC) were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% penicillin–streptomycin, and 2 mM L-glutamine (Thermo Fisher). Cells were seeded in a six-well plate at 2.5 × 105 cells/ml, with 2 ml of cell solution added to each well and maintained in a 37°C/5% CO2 incubator for 24 h. At a timepoint of 30–60 min before transfection, the media was aspirated and exchanged for 1 ml of fresh cell culture media. For transfection of ACE-tRNA minivector or pDNA, 1.5 μg of DNA was diluted in 60 μl of OptiMEM, with 60 μl of Lipofectamine 2000/OptiMEM (3 μl Lipofectamine 2000 per 57 μl OptiMEM) mix added to each DNA solution. The Lipofectamine 2000/DNA mix was incubated at room temperature for 5 min before 120 μl was added dropwise to each well of cells. Three independent transfections were performed for each ACE-tRNA minivector or pDNA sample. The transfected cells were replaced in the 37°C/5% CO2 incubator for 6 h, before the media was aspirated, the cells washed with DPBS, and the cells lifted by cell scraper in 200 μl lysis buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.2, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA) before being transferred to microcentrifuge tubes. The cells were lysed by sonication, heated to 95°C for 5 min, cooled on ice for 10 min, and the insoluble cell debris was pelleted by centrifugation at 20k rcf for 30 min. The total protein in the supernatant was quantified by BCA assay (Pierce), and the 2′–5′/3′–5′ cyclic-GMP-AMP (cGAMP) levels were assessed by competitive ELISA according to manufacturer instructions (Invitrogen, Ref EIAGAMP).

Determination of ACE-tRNA minivector or pDNA stability in human

Pooled human serum off the clot, female and male mix (Innovative Research, ISERFM100ML), was further clarified by centrifugation at 20k rcf, 4°C, for 30 min, filtered through a bottle top filter (Thermo Scientific 0.45 μm SFCA membrane), and then aliquoted and stored at −80°C. For stability assays, 2 μg of each ACE-tRNA minivector or pDNA was incubated in 200 μl of the human serum. At the timepoint indicated (Fig. 6C), the serum nucleases were quenched with the addition of 4 μl of 20 mg/ml proteinase k (NEB) and 7 μl 30% SDS before being incubated at 60°C for 2 h. The zero timepoint had the serum pretreated with proteinase k and SDS. The samples were then extracted with phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1), saturated with pH 8 100 mM Tris–EDTA (Thermo Scientific). The DNA was precipitated by the addition of ice-cold ethanol and 3 M sodium acetate (pH 5.2) and resuspended in 20 μl TE. The resulting DNA was resolved by agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized by subsequent ethidium bromide staining and imaging with a ChemiDoc Imaging System (Biorad). Quantification of ACE-tRNA minivector and pDNA band intensity was determined using Image Lab software version 6.1.0 (Biorad). The data was fit to a one-phase decay using least squares (GraphPad Prism 10.5.0). For more detailed minivector extraction and agarose gel electrophoresis protocols, see the supplemental information.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

ACE-tRNA DNA minivectors exhibit better bioavailability, lower innate immune response induction, and better biostability as compared to pDNA. (A) 16HBE14o- cells containing the genomically encoded SGG PTC reporter were cultured and transfected either in the presence of the antimitotic agent aphidicolin or the DMSO vehicle with ACE-tRNA CEDT or pDNA (n = 3). NLuc-PTC suppression was used to demonstrate levels of PTC rescue for the various vectors. (B) HeLa cells were transfected with ACE-tRNA MC, CEDT, or pDNA and after 6 h in culture were lysed and assayed for cGAMP levels by competitive ELISA (n = 5). The level of cGAMP present demonstrates activation of the cGAS–STING innate immune response pathway. (C) ACE-tRNAs encoded as either MC, CEDT, or pDNA (P) were subjected to incubation in human blood serum at 37°C for the times indicated. After treatment, vector DNA was purified by phenol/chloroform extraction, precipitated, and the amount of residual intact DNA was assessed by agarose gel electrophoresis and band densitometry (n = 3). Band densitometry data were fit to a one phase decay using non-linear regression, which is shown on the graph. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM with significance determined by one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test, where ** **P < .01 and **** P < .0001.

Results

Production of ACE-tRNA minivectors

Production of ACE-tRNA minivectors followed several previously established approaches with some modifications. Variable-size, single-copy ACE-tRNA minicircles were produced by PCR rather than solid-phase oligonucleotide synthesis [43]. This PCR approach allows for a range of minivector sizes to be produced from the same template depending on the primers used for amplification. Primers containing 5′ phosphates were used for PCR amplification, as this allows for blunt-end ligation saving further enzymatic processing and purification steps. Depending on the sequence of the DNA, sequences shorter than 1000 bp are increasingly difficult to bend into a circle due to the inherent DNA rigidity [44]. As such, a ligase-mediated, bending protein-assisted circularization reaction was utilized to produce small, single-copy ACE-tRNA minicircles. The DNA bending protein used in this study was transcription factor A mitochondrial, TFAM, also known as ARS binding factor 2 protein, Abf2p (purification shown in Supplementary Fig. S2). ACE-tRNA minicircles produced in this manner exhibit covalent closure as demonstrated by resistance to T5 exonuclease degradation, unless first linearized by an endonuclease (Fig. 1A and Supplementary Fig. S3A).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

ACE-tRNAs can be encoded in minimal DNA vectors (minivectors). (A) Circular double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) minivectors (minicircles) containing a single copy of an ACE-tRNA expression cassette were produced from blunt-end ligation of ACE-tRNA-containing PCR products. Primers containing a 5′-phosphate were utilized to allow for ligation with T4 DNA ligase and the nonspecific DNA-binding/bending activity of the protein TFAM was used to ensure efficient circularization of minicircle product [43]. Production of T5 exonuclease-resistant product in the absence of specific endonuclease activity (Bsu36I) indicates the covalent closure of the minicircles. (B) Circular dsDNA minivectors containing multiple copies of an ACE-tRNA expression cassette were produced using a commercially available minivector production system, which allows for plasmid vector backbone removal based on the activity of PhiC31 integrase and I-SceI homing endonuclease in the ZYCY10P3S2T E. coli strain (described in [45]). (C) Linear dsDNA minivectors with covalently closed DNA ends (CEDTs), containing either a single or multiple ACE-tRNA expression cassette(s), were produced from PCR products containing 54 bp telRL sites, which are recognized by the cleaving/joining enzyme TelN [48]. Production of T5 exonuclease-resistant product in the absence of specific endonuclease activity (Bsu36I) indicates the covalent closure of the CEDT ends.

Comparatively larger ACE-tRNA minicircles were produced using a commercially available minicircle parent plasmid and E. coli strain for production (System Biosciences and described in [45]). This system allows for production of minicircles in a manner similar to production of pDNA with multiple copies of ACE-tRNA present per minicircle. Minicircles produced in this manner demonstrate T5 exonuclease resistance and DNA supercoiling (Fig. 1B and Supplementary Fig. S3B).

While circular DNA is perhaps the conventional DNA structure envisioned for a DNA vector, linear DNA vectors with covalently closed ends have also shown the potential for utility as DNA therapeutics [36, 46, 47]. Protelomerase from the N15 temperate phage (TelN) has been shown to recognize a 56 bp inverted repeat telRL DNA sequence and possess cleaving-joining activity. Functionally this means that a single telRL site is processed by TelN to separate DNA molecules containing telR and telL ends covalently closed by phosphodiester bonds [48, 49]. To produce closed-end DNA threads (CEDT) minivectors using TelN, ACE-tRNA expression cassettes were cloned between telRL sites in a pUC57 Kan vector. TelN DNA substrate was produced by PCR with primers designed to flank the telRL sites such that the PCR product contains the telRL recognition sites for TelN. TelN was produced by recombinant expression and purified by Ni-NTA and CEX chromatography (Supplementary Fig. S4). To decrease the TelN dependence of ACE-tRNA CEDT production, especially for the smaller 200 bp CEDTs, the ACE-tRNA expression cassettes were cloned back-to-back, sharing a common telRL site between the two cassettes (Fig. 1C). After generation via TelN reaction and further purification, as for the other minivectors, ACE-tRNA CEDTs exhibit exonuclease resistance (Fig. 1C and Supplementary Fig. S3C).

ACE-tRNA minivectors exhibit efficient PTC suppression in the HEK293T cells

To obtain a baseline understanding of the PTC suppression activity of the ACE-tRNA minivectors, both ACE-tRNAArgUGA and ACE-tRNALeuUGA expressing minivectors were tested, as the Arg CGA > UGA is the most common disease-causing PTC across all genetic diseases [50], and ACE-tRNALeuUGA was shown to efficiently suppress and recover channel function in excess of the therapeutic threshold for the four most common CF-causing CFTR PTCs [22]. ACE-tRNA minivectors of several different sizes, ranging from 200 bp minivectors to 5000 bp plasmids, and consisting of several different DNA structures, including circular and linear, were co-transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 along with a previously described PTC reporter [16] into HEK293T cells (Fig. 2A and Supplementary Fig. S5A–C), and the PTC suppression efficiency of each was determined by dual-luciferase assay (Fig. 2B and Supplementary Fig. S6). A scrambled ACE-tRNA cassette (S*) was used as a negative control, which should not be transcribed as it does not possess A- and B-boxes for type 2 Pol III transcription [51] as opposed to the active ACE-tRNA expression cassettes employed here. As we are ultimately interested in these minivectors as therapeutic vectors, we assessed their function on a per-mass basis, as the implementation of most therapeutic DNA delivery modalities is determined by mass of DNA delivered, not moles of active DNA cargo. The majority of ACE-tRNA minivectors tested displayed efficient PTC suppression following delivery, with the exception of the 200 bp minicircles and several annealed single-stranded minivectors, which did not display significantly more PTC suppression than the scrambled control vectors (Fig. 2B and Supplementary Fig. S6). While both nicked and supercoiled 200 bp minicircles demonstrated significantly more efficient PTC suppression than the open circle minicircle (Supplementary Fig. S7), they were still ∼15-fold less efficient at PTC suppression than the 400 bp minicircle. In contrast, however, the 200 bp CEDTs did promote efficient PTC suppression, making these vectors, to our knowledge, the smallest functional expression vectors ever produced. To demonstrate that ACE-tRNA minivectors are competent to rescue PTCs in therapeutic target proteins, rescue of full-length protein expression for both Rep-1-R253X-Nluc (Fig. 2C and Supplementary Fig. S8) and CFTR-W1282X-Nluc (Fig. 2D and Supplementary Fig. S8) was assessed by in-gel luminescence. The 850 bp 4× ACE-tRNAArgUGA and 4× ACE-tRNALeuUGA minivectors were co-transfected along with the Rep-1 or CFTR expression vectors in HEK293T cells. Total protein was resolved by SDS–PAGE, and the Nluc tag luminescence was imaged with rescued protein amounts determined by band densitometry. Significant rescue of PTC-containing protein was apparent for both Rep-1 R253X (78 ± 3% of WT) and fully glycosylated CFTR W1282X C-band (84 ± 5% of WT).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

ACE-tRNAs encoded as DNA minivectors can rescue expression of PTC-containing proteins. (A) Function of ACE-tRNA minivectors was screened by co-transfecting the respective minivectors along with a plasmid containing a PTC-interrupted nanoluciferase (Nluc-UGA) expression cassette and a firefly luciferase (Fluc) expression cassette, which serves as a transfection control [16]. (B) Results of dual luciferase assays (n = 6) for each minivector. Minivectors containing either ACE-tRNAArgUGA or ACE-tRNALeuUGA, with the size and DNA structure noted, were tested. The normalized suppression ratio shown here is calculated from the equation (PTC-NanoLuciferase luminescence [+ACE-tRNA]/Firefly luminescence)/(PTC-Nanoluciferase luminescence [no ACE-tRNA]/Firefly luminescence). S* denotes a minivector or plasmid containing a scrambled ACE-tRNA, which serves as a negative control. (C) 850 bp 4× ACE-tRNAArgUGA minicircle demonstrates significant rescue of Rep-1 p.R253X, the most common PTC that causes choroideremia. A Rep-1 construct containing the p.R253X variant and a C-terminal Nluc fusion tag was co-transfected (n = 3) along with a 4× ACE-tRNAArgUGA minicircle in the HEK293T cell line. SDS–PAGE in-gel Nluc luminescence band densitometry was used to assay for production of full-length Rep-1 with subsequent Coomassie staining serving as a loading control. (D) 850 bp 4× ACE-tRNALeuUGA minicircle demonstrates significant rescue of CFTR p.W1282X, a common PTC that causes CF. As shown above, a CFTR construct containing the p.W1282X variant and a C-terminal Nluc fusion tag was co-transfected (n = 3) along with a 4× ACE-tRNALeuUGA minicircle in the HEK293T cell line. SDS–PAGE in-gel Nluc luminescence band densitometry was used to assay for production of full-length fully glycosylated (C-band) CFTR with subsequent Coomassie staining serving as a loading control. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM with significance determined by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s post-hoc test, where ****P < .0001, and ns denotes not significantly different (P value shown for each ns).

ACE-tRNAs encoded as minivectors display efficient delivery to human bronchial epithelial cells

To determine a summary of the impact of ACE-tRNA minivector DNA size and structure on PTC-suppression efficiency, we transfected (Lipofectamine 2000) and nucleofected (Lonza Nucleofector) the minivectors that had demonstrated function (Fig. 2B) into the well-characterized, immortalized, isogenic human bronchial epithelial cell line (16HBE14o-) containing a stably-expressing SGG PTC-suppression reporter (Fig. 3A and Supplementary Fig. S5D–F). The 16HBE14o- cell line was selected for this assay, as it serves as an epithelial cell culture model and has several daughter cell lines containing genomically encoded CFTR PTCs [52]. This PTC reporter cassette allows for high-throughput determination of PTC-suppression efficiency via a PTC-interrupted nanoluciferase [12, 15, 16] and cell-by-cell analysis (e.g. by flow cytometry) of PTC-suppression via a downstream mScarlet fluorescent reporter (Supplementary Fig. S9). In all cases, the ACE-tRNAArgUGA and ACE-tRNALeuUGA minivectors displayed significantly higher PTC suppression efficiency by Nluc assay as compared to the respective scrambled controls (Fig. 3B). The 850 bp 4× ACE-tRNA minicircles when nucleofected set the upper limit for average PTC suppression efficiency with significantly (adjusted P value < .0001) higher PTC suppression than all other conditions tested.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

ACE-tRNAs encoded as DNA minivectors can support efficient PTC rescue when delivered by Lipofectamine-mediated transfection and by nucleofection to human bronchial epithelial cells. (A) The SGG PTC reporter containing a PTC-interrupted nanoluciferase (Nluc-UGA) and a downstream mScarlet separated by a 2A element, was stably integrated into 16HBE14o- cells using the piggyBac transposon system as described previously [15]. The PTC suppression activities of ACE-tRNAArgUGA and ACE-tRNALeuUGA minivectors were determined by NanoLuciferase luminescence via plate reader assay (B and D, respectively) and mScarlet flow cytometry (C and E, respectively). S* denotes a minivector or plasmid containing a scrambled ACE-tRNA, which serves as a negative control. The suppression ratio shown here is calculated from the equation (PTC-NanoLuciferase luminescence [+ACE-tRNA])/(PTC-Nanoluciferase luminescence [no ACE-tRNA]). Data are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 3) with significance determined by one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test, where *P < .05, **P < .01, ***P < .001, ****P < .0001, and ns denotes not significantly different with P values shown for these cases.

We have previously established an upper limit to the transfection efficiency of pDNA into 16HBE14o- cells as ∼40% [15]. Here we show that the minivectors tested exhibit delivery efficiencies of up to ∼60%, as demonstrated by the mScarlet positive cell population (Fig. 3C and E). While minivectors demonstrate a larger mScarlet-positive cell population as compared to pDNA, the MFIs do not show a marked difference (Supplementary Fig. S10). This indicates that while a greater percentage of the cell population is receiving minivector as compared to pDNA, the level of PTC suppression is not markedly higher.

Optimized ACE-tRNA cassettes encoded as DNA minivectors display lower DNA-dependence for efficient PTC suppression

During preparation of this manuscript, a screening effort in the lab for multiple ACE-tRNA functional elements resulted in several optimized ACE-tRNA expression cassettes with improved PTC suppression efficiency [16]. In principle, these improved expression cassettes should impart similar favorable characteristics when encoded as ACE-tRNA minivectors. To that end, the optimized (Opt) ACE-tRNAArgUGA expression cassette was encoded as a 200 bp CEDT (Fig. 4A), and the PTC suppression efficiency was compared with the original ACE-tRNAArgUGA at a series of DNA concentrations when co-transfected with the dual-luciferase PTC reporter (Fig. 2A). As expected, the OptACE-tRNAArgUGA resulted in ∼2-fold higher peak PTC suppression (Supmax 1500 ± 200 a.u.) as compared to the original ACE-tRNAArgUGA (Supmax 760 ± 125 a.u.) (Fig. 4B and Supplementary Fig. S11) and ∼4-fold lower DNA delivery amount to reach the same normalized suppression ratio (630 a.u. = 18.75 ng Opt versus 75 ng original).

Optimized ACE-tRNA cassettes encoded as DNA minivectors efficiently rescue the Rep-1 R253X PTC

The decreased DNA delivery dependence and higher peak suppression efficiency for the 200 bp CEDT OptACE-tRNAArgUGA carried over when assessing Rep-1 R253X PTC rescue. Rep-1 constructs (Fig. 4A) with C-terminal ALFA tag [40] were co-transfected into HEK293T cells along with variable amounts of ACE-tRNA minivector, and the amount of Rep-1 expressed was determined by western blot (Fig. 4C and DSupplementary Fig. S12). OptACE-tRNAArgUGA, when delivered at a four-fold lower amount rescued the same amount of Rep-1 R253X as compared to the original cassette, and when comparing the same amount of DNA delivered, both 850 bp 4× ACE-tRNAArgUGA and 200 bp OptACE-tRNAArgUGA rescued the same amount of Rep-1 R253X (85 ± 5%, Fig. 4D), while 4× ACE-tRNAArgUGA pDNA displayed a diminished but still significant level of Rep-1 R253X rescue (45 ± 5%, Fig. 4D), with all ACE-tRNA-treated samples well above the therapeutic threshold for Rep-1 rescue of <10%, as CHM is predominately caused by a complete lack of the affected Rep-1 protein [53].

ACE-tRNA cassettes encoded as DNA minivectors efficiently rescue mRNA and protein expression for an endogenously encoded CFTR W1282X PTC

The CFTR transcripts in p.W1282X-CFTR 16HBEge cells harboring this PTC in the genuine genomic locus (Fig. 5A) are sensitive to degradation through the NMD quality control pathway [54], which we and others have shown to be rescued by the action of ACE-tRNA-mediated PTC suppression [1316, 22]. Previous work by ourselves and others has indicated that the W1282L variant of CFTR possesses near-WT channel activity [15, 22, 55], while ACE-tRNALeuUGA possesses more potent PTC suppression activity than ACE-tRNATrpUGA [12]. To that end, we set out to determine the level of NMD inhibition exhibited by ACE-tRNA minivectors. We nucleofected ACE-tRNALeuUGA minivectors into W1282X-CFTR 16HBEge cells and assessed the level of CFTR mRNA by real-time qRT-PCR as described previously [15] (Fig. 5B). Both minivectors tested displayed significant rescue of W1282X-containing CFTR mRNA transcript as compared to the scrambled control, with the 850 bp 4× ACE-tRNALeuUGA minicircle displaying WT-levels of CFTR mRNA (Fig. 5B). When assessed by western blot, the 4 × 850 bp ACE-tRNALeuUGA minicircle rescued near-WT levels of CFTR C-band (83 ± 6%), while the 200 bp ACE-tRNALeuUGA CEDT displayed significant rescue of CFTR C-band (20 ± 6%), which, while relatively modest, in combination with CFTR modulators [22], is well above the therapeutic threshold for CFTR rescue (Fig. 5C and D; Supplementary Fig. S13).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

ACE-tRNAs encoded as DNA minivectors can rescue expression of the genomically encoded CFTR p.W1282X variant in 16HBEge cells. (A) Diagram of experimental setup with ACE-tRNA vectors delivered by nucleofection into 16HBEge cells containing the CFTR p.W1282X variant. (B) RT-qPCR analysis of relative CFTR expression in 16HBEge cells nucleofected (n = 3) with the indicated ACE-tRNA vector. (C) Representative western blot image showing CFTR p.W1282X rescue following co-transfection with the indicated ACE-tRNA vector. WT indicates that the parental 16HBE14o- cell line was used. (D) Quantified band densitometry data for the CFTR western blots (n = 3) with data shown as the percent of WT C-band (fully glycosylated form of CFTR) intensity normalized to the Na+/K+-ATPase loading control. Abbreviations: Minicircles, MC; Closed End DNA Threads, T; Plasmid DNA, P; Scrambled ACE-tRNA Control, S*. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM with significance determined by one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test, where ****P < .0001, and ns denotes not significantly different (P value shown for each ns and *).

ACE-tRNA DNA minivectors display favorable bioavailability and biostability characteristics as compared to pDNA

Actively dividing cell lines like the ones employed in this study are mitotically active with each cell division resulting in the breakdown and re-formation of the nuclear membrane, allowing for DNA vectors to reach the nucleoplasm [56, 57]. In contrast, many of the targeted cell types for PTC-associated disorders are post-mitotic, meaning the DNA cargo must be able to reach the nucleoplasm independent of nuclear breakdown. To test the function of ACE-tRNA minivectors in a system similar to a post-mitotic cell, we treated 16HBE14o- cells containing the SGG transgene with the antimitotic drug aphidicolin, which has been shown to arrest mitosis without affecting transcription or translation [58]. While pretreatment with aphidicolin decreased the PTC suppression efficiency of pDNA by ∼14-fold, the efficiency of 200 bp CEDT DNA was only decreased by ∼1.5-fold, with 400 bp and 900 bp CEDT displaying intermediate effects, with efficiency being decreased by ∼2.5 and ∼3.5, respectively (Fig. 6A). The minimal impact of cell cycle arrest on the 200 bp CEDT ACE-tRNA function may reflect previous findings that DNA fragments as small as 200 bp can freely diffuse in the cytoplasm [59] and enter nuclear pores [57, 60], meaning that nuclear breakdown would not be expected to be necessary for entry into the nucleoplasm.

DNA vectors face further challenges as therapeutic cargo, as the cGAMP synthase–stimulator of interferon genes (cGAS–STING) innate immune response pathway can respond to introduction of cytoplasmic dsDNA resulting in expression of inflammatory genes [61, 62]. The cytosolic cGAS enzyme has evolved to detect >45 bp-long (in humans) stretches of cytosolic DNA and catalyze production of the second messenger 2′–5′/3′–5′ cGAMP, which activates the receptor STING, ultimately leading to activation of type I interferon signaling [63]. While this system is targeted to sense pathogen replication and abnormal cytosolic self-DNA, it would also be predicted to be activated in response to intracellular delivery of therapeutic vector DNA. To test the impact of vector DNA size on cGAS activation, we measured production of cGAMP in response to transfection of DNA vectors into HeLa cells, which have previously been demonstrated to possess a robust cGAS response [64]. All minivectors tested here demonstrated a significantly lower level of cGAMP production than pDNA (Fig. 6B), with 200 bp CEDT and 200 bp minicircle each displaying a ∼2-fold lower and ∼9-fold lower cGAMP production than pDNA, respectively. The discrepancy in cGAS activation despite similar polymer sizes between the two vectors may be related to DNA structure, as these minivectors also display discrepancies in PTC suppression efficiency, which is presumed to be related to different efficiencies of transcription of the ACE-tRNA cargo from each of these vectors (Fig. 2B). It should also be noted that even when employing pDNA as a therapeutic cargo, cGAS–STING activation has not limited the application of DNA vectors for clinical development [65, 66]. Given the significantly lower activation of cGAS by minivector DNA as compared to pDNA, it would be expected that this particular innate immune response to ACE-tRNA therapeutic minivectors would not be cause for safety concerns.

While the cGAS–STING pathway is a general cytoplasmic DNA sensor, DNA derived from viral or bacterial sources can stimulate other specific cytoplasmic DNA sensors. The result of stimulation of these sensors is induction of inflammatory cytokines and type I interferons [67]. In the context of gene therapy, these immune responses can result in loss of the therapeutic vector or treated cells [6872]. Canonical plasmids containing sequences of bacterial origin (i.e. antibiotic resistance markers or origins of replication) are rich in hypomethylated CpG sequences [69, 7375], which are recognized by several DNA sensors, including toll-like receptor 9 [7678]. It has also been demonstrated that immune responses may be potentiated by the use of lipid vehicles for DNA delivery, with responses dependent on the complexity of both the lipid and the DNA cargo [72, 7982], while DNA or lipid delivered alone had little effect [83, 84]. Transfection of pDNA depleted of 80% of the originally present CpG motifs into immunocompetent mice resulted in considerably fewer changes in blood parameters, lower levels of inflammatory cytokines, and less liver damage than in mice transfected with the original pDNA [80]. Further studies have noted that the use of minicircle DNA minimizes the presence of CpG motifs, which has been shown to reduce the numbers of neutrophils, lung macrophages, and pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-12, IFN-γ, and TNF-α in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, following airway gene delivery in mice [8587]. The use of minimal DNA vectors for the delivery of ACE-tRNAs, as described here, will inherently limit the presence of immunostimulatory CpG motifs. However, further animal studies will need to be conducted to determine the impact of delivery of ACE-tRNA minivectors in combination with the delivery agent on innate immune responses.

In the absence of polycation carriers, therapeutic vector DNA must overcome enzymatic degradation in the bloodstream for effective delivery to affected tissue in the body [28]. To that end, we tested the stability of ACE-tRNA minivector and pDNA in human serum. Samples of DNA vectors were incubated at 37°C in 100% human serum, and at time points indicated (Fig. 6C and Supplementary Fig. S13), samples were removed and the DNA purified by phenol/chloroform extraction. Residual DNA was resolved by agarose gel electrophoresis, and the amount of vector remaining was determined by band densitometry. While ACE-tRNA minivector DNA displayed a half-life of 45–60 min in the assay, no residual supercoiled ACE-tRNA pDNA remained after 10 min of treatment, with the supercoiled pDNA displaying a half-life of ∼2 min (Fig. 6C). While ex vivo serum inactivation studies as shown here are not entirely predictive of what happens in a living mammal, they do provide some information on the relative stability of these vectors. The longer lifetime of minivector DNA in human serum has been shown previously [88], with the longer relative lifetime expected to increase effective delivery to affected tissues.

Further, delivery of the therapeutic ACE-tRNA could have an impact on cell viability, growth, or result in cytotoxicity. With this in mind, we transfected ACE-tRNA minivectors and pDNA into HEK293T cells using Lipofectamine 2000 and measured the cell titer (CellTiter-Glo 2.0 Assay, Promega) and induction of apoptosis (Caspase-Glo 3/7 Assay, Promega) 24 h post-transfection. No significant loss of cell titer or caspase-3 or -7 induction was observed following transfection of the ACE-tRNA minivectors, with only a minor but statistically significant induction of caspase 3/7 activity observed in the cells transfected with ACE-tRNA pDNA (Supplementary Fig. S15).

Taken together, these findings indicate that ACE-tRNA minivectors possess favorable characteristics as therapeutic DNA vectors as compared to conventional pDNA vectors.

Discussion

The burgeoning field of sup-tRNA therapeutics has been led by the development of RNA and AAV viral-vector-based delivery approaches [13, 14]. Due to potential therapeutic hurdles related to frequent redosing of RNA therapeutics and immune responses limiting the use of AAV viral vectors, we wanted to broaden the portfolio of ACE-tRNA therapeutic vectors to include minimal, non-viral DNA vectors. Functional ACE-tRNA expression cassettes can be composed of DNA sequences as short as 125 bp [8]. DNA vectors this small, possessing transcriptional activity, have not been investigated previously, and as such we wanted to probe the limits of DNA size and shape for functional expression of ACE-tRNAs, as these minimal DNA vectors could potentially possess improved attributes related to therapeutic delivery or function.

Non-viral DNA vectors must overcome several extracellular and intracellular barriers before efficient expression of their therapeutic cargo can be carried out [28, 56, 8991]. The DNA vector must survive the extracellular environment long enough for cellular association and uptake to take place [92, 93], it must then undergo endosomal escape [94, 95] in a spatiotemporally controlled manner [96], undergo proper intracellular trafficking [97102], and dissociate from any polycation carrier, undergo nuclear import [103105], and incorporate into active chromatin for sustained transcription [106, 107]. Of these steps, diffusion in the cytosol and nuclear import are believed to be rate-limiting determinants of transgene delivery [108, 109]. Here we demonstrate that ACE-tRNA minivectors are able to effectively transit all of these steps when delivered either by the “gold standard” of lipoplexes (Lipofectamine 2000) [110] or by an orthogonal gene delivery approach, electroporation. Even in mitotically arrested cells, which do not go through nuclear membrane breakdown, 200 bp CEDT ACE-tRNAs are able to effectively transit the cell and enter the nucleus (Fig. 6A). Given the somewhat unique physical characteristics of ACE-tRNA minivectors, existing delivery modalities may need to be heavily adapted for optimal delivery of ACE-tRNA minivectors, as has been previously demonstrated for delivery of other small nucleotide cargos [56]. Nonetheless, given that both lipofection and electroporation worked for ACE-tRNA minivector delivery, it is highly likely that the wide range of previously developed DNA delivery modalities can be adapted for use with ACE-tRNA minivectors.

Strikingly, while the 200 bp CEDT supported expression of a functional ACE-tRNA, the 200 bp minicircle did not. These results likely reflect differences in DNA structure, with the 200 bp circle experiencing steric strain [111], which the linear vector does not experience. Structural characterization of the RNA pol III transcriptional machinery assembled on target DNA demonstrates a bend in the modeled DNA backbone (Supplementary Fig. S1C) [112], which may be incompatible with effective transcription from the 200 bp ACE-tRNA minicircle. This could also potentially be due to less room to distribute topological tension resulting from unwinding to enable transcription [113], or while unlikely, could be related to differences in cell entry or trafficking.

Previous work has shown that linear minivectors (also referred to as MIDGE vectors) generally demonstrate higher levels of transgene expression [36, 114]. Here we report similar or slightly lower levels of ACE-tRNA expression from linear vectors (CEDTs), even at higher molar quantities of transgene delivered. This discrepancy could reflect differences in transcription factor scanning or the efficiency of transcription initiation or termination [115, 116] on the particularly small DNA vectors employed here. The efficiency of vector delivery by electroporation has been shown to be independent of vector length for vectors between ∼400 and 4500 bp; however, smaller vectors did display lower function per mole [113], which is consistent with our findings here.

While tRNA genes are among the smallest eukaryotic expression cassettes known, some small RNAs possess expression cassettes composed of several hundred base pairs, which would be amenable to some of the medium-to-larger minivectors tested here. In terms of potential therapeutic cargoes fitting these criteria, they include small RNAs like siRNA/shRNA or other catalytic or regulatory RNAs [117].

The 850 bp 4× ACE-tRNA minicircles demonstrated the highest nonsense suppression efficiency of all vectors tested (Figs 2 and 3), which may reflect the higher transfection efficiency of supercoiled DNA vectors [47, 118] or the influence of supercoiling on transcription factor binding and transcription initiation in the promoter region [119]. The current system for production of minicircle DNA in the producer E. coli strain has overcome many of the limitations of early minicircle production systems [45]. Indeed, minicircle yields for the control GFP minicircle in this strain reach similar levels to that of routine plasmid preparation (Supplementary Fig. S16). However, in our hands, production of the 850 bp 4× ACE-tRNA minicircles using this system resulted in ∼12% as much minicircle as compared to parent plasmid purified under similar conditions (Supplementary Fig. S16). The lower yield for the 850 bp 4× ACE-tRNA minicircle DNA may result from the smaller size of the therapeutic cargo, the DNA sequence of the cargo, or other factors not yet characterized. Ultimately, both of the in vitro methods (Fig. 1A and C) resulted in higher yields of minivector DNA with yields on the order of 1 mg of minivector product per 100 ml of PCR product produced. While the methods employed here were sufficient to produce adequate amounts of minivector for in vitro investigations in PTC-containing cell models, cGMP production will likely require establishing a more streamlined process for large-scale production of therapeutic ACE-tRNA minivectors.

DNA minivectors have been demonstrated to possess a number of attractive qualities in vivo, and while ACE-tRNA minivectors have not yet been tested in this manner, it would be anticipated that they will share many of the same qualities. Previous studies have demonstrated enhanced transgene expression from minicircle as compared to pDNA in liver [120122], heart [123, 124], skeletal muscle [124], and lung [125]. While pDNA initially supports expression of high levels of transgene product, this effect quickly diminishes over a period of days [71, 120, 126129]. This effect appears to be a result of silencing of transcription from the pDNA vectors [130132]. In contrast, minivector DNA supports long-term expression of the target transgene for periods of up to 56 days in mouse lung [130] and >115 days in mouse liver [120]. Indeed, in quiescent tissue such as the muscle, heart, or liver it is likely that a single treatment of minivector DNA would persist life-long, assuming no transgene toxicity, as episomal DNA has demonstrated durable expression out to decades [133135]. In other tissues with higher cellular turnover rates, such as the cells of the lung epithelium, it would be expected that ACE-tRNA minivector persistence would instead be controlled by cellular turnover similar to any episomal vector system. As minivector administration is typically less immunogenic than delivery of viral vectors [136, 137], repeat administration is allowed, a critical feature as gene therapies for lung diseases will likely required repeat dosing several times per year for the lifetime of the patient [125]. Beyond the improved nuclease resistance of the ACE-tRNA minivectors demonstrated here (Fig. 6C), minivectors have demonstrated better mechanical stability, allowing for increased delivery of intact vector by physical methods such as nebulization for delivery to the lungs [138, 139].

Beyond the minivectors themselves, the ACE-tRNA cargo has demonstrated considerable advantages as a gene therapy modality. While for any monogenetic disorder, total gene replacement represents a mutation-agnostic approach, every disorder will require development of an independent therapeutic cargo. In contrast to total gene replacement, ACE-tRNAs are gene agnostic, with the only dependence being upon the PTC identity (UAA, UAG, or UGA) and the amino acid encoded. Our group, along with others, has further demonstrated the potential of an amino acid agnostic ACE-tRNA platform approach providing therapeutic coverage for a broad swath of PTC sites and genetic diseases like CF [22, 23]. If conditions for effective delivery of ACE-tRNA minivectors to affected lungs for the treatment of CF can be ascertained, it is likely that PTC-associated disorders in similar cell types like primary ciliary dyskinesia will be amenable to treatment using very similar or identical methods. Further, ACE-tRNAs maintain native regulation of the PTC-containing gene [15], important for diseases like CDKL5 deficiency disorder [18], for which overexpression of the target protein can lead to deleterious effects.

While NTC readthrough has been a reasonable concern when employing ACE-tRNAs as a therapeutic approach, all available data indicate that while ACE-tRNAs display efficacious readthrough at PTCs, they are considerably less efficient at NTC readthrough [1214, 23]. While the mechanisms involved are complicated, these findings likely reflect that NTCs simply have evolved for efficient translation termination, while PTCs have not. The safeguards in place to deal with spurious NTC readthrough include in-frame downstream stop codons [140, 141], the stop codon nucleotide influence on readthrough [142, 143], the distance to the polyA binding protein [144, 145], polyLys tracts leading to ubiquitination and degradation [146], non-stop decay [147], and readthrough of only a single stop codon (UAA, UAG, or UGA) by ACE-tRNAs [12]. With these cellular safeguards in place, it has become clear that a therapeutic window should exist for delivery of ACE-tRNAs consistent with both the efficacy and the safety of this approach.

While non-viral DNA vector delivery approaches have demonstrated lower levels of transduction in airways, lack cell type specific targeting, and have shown an inability to transfect nondividing cells when compared with viral vectors [148], ACE-tRNA minivectors display favorable characteristics when compared to pDNA. Minivectors have demonstrated improved transfer efficiency when delivered by polyplex [149] or electroporation [113, 150], and while the delivery methods employed here were optimized for pDNA delivery, future improvements could include delivery modalities tailored to the ACE-tRNA minivectors themselves [56, 151]. Further, one could envision altering the in vitro production methods to incorporate cellular or intracellular targeting moieties into the ACE-tRNA minivector to improve delivery efficiency. Receptor-mediated targeting, nuclear targeting, and improved endosomal escape could all be targeted to bridge the gap between the efficacy of viral and non-viral approaches for ACE-tRNA delivery in vivo.

Here we report that ACE-tRNA minivectors as small as 200 bp can efficiently suppress PTCs in several genes related to PTC-associated monogenetic diseases. Further, we demonstrate that in cell or ex vivo models, ACE-tRNA minivectors display improved transfer efficiency, better bioavailability, a lower innate immune burden, and better biostability as compared to conventional pDNA vectors. With these favorable characteristics, ACE-tRNA minivectors broaden the scope of potential therapeutic approaches available for delivery of sup-tRNA delivery for treating human diseases.

Supplementary Material

gkag082_Supplemental_Files

Acknowledgements

We thank members of the Lueck laboratory for reading and editing the manuscript, and for constructive discussion throughout the study. We would like to thank Dr. Charles Thornton for early discussions surrounding the generation of linear DNA vectors. We would like to thank the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Therapeutics Lab and Dr. Hillary Valley for providing the 16HBE14ge cell lines used in this study.

Author contributions: Joseph J. Porter (Conceptualization [lead], Data curation [lead], Formal analysis [lead], Funding acquisition [supporting], Investigation [equal], Methodology [lead], Project administration [equal], Validation [lead], Writing – original draft [lead], Writing – review & editing [lead]), Wooree Ko (Investigation [supporting], Project administration [supporting]), Emily G. Sorensen (Investigation [supporting]), Zachary Cheung (Investigation [supporting]), Kari Thrasher (Funding acquisition [supporting], Investigation [supporting], Methodology [supporting], Writing – review & editing [supporting]), Tyler Couch (Formal analysis [supporting], Investigation [supporting]), Jeffrey T. Gabell (Investigation [supporting]), Victoria Shwe (Investigation [supporting]), Julia Hyatt (Investigation [supporting]), Jennasea B. Licata (Investigation [supporting]), Luke K. Peterson (Investigation [supporting]), and David A. Dean (Conceptualization [supporting], Methodology [supporting], Writing – review & editing [supporting]), John D. Lueck (Conceptualization [lead], Formal analysis [lead], Funding acquisition [lead], Investigation [supporting], Methodology [lead], Project administration [lead], Validation [lead], Writing – original draft [lead], Writing – review & editing [lead])

Contributor Information

Joseph J Porter, Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY 14642, United States.

Wooree Ko, Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY 14642, United States.

Emily G Sorensen, Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY 14642, United States.

Zachary Cheung, Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY 14642, United States.

Kari Thrasher, Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY 14642, United States.

Tyler Couch, Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY 14642, United States.

Jeffrey T Gabell, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY 14642, United States.

Victoria Shwe, Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY 14642, United States.

Julia Hyatt, Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY 14642, United States.

Jennasea B Licata, Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY 14642, United States.

Luke K Peterson, Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY 14642, United States.

David A Dean, Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY 14642, United States.

John D Lueck, Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY 14642, United States; Department of Neurology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY 14642, United States; Center for RNA Biology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY 14642, United States.

Supplementary data

Supplementary data is available at NAR online.

Conflict of interest

J.D.L. is a co-inventor of a technology presented in this study and receives royalty payments related to the licensing of the technology from the University of Iowa. PCT/US2018/059065, Methods of rescuing stop codons via genetic reassignment with ACE-tRNA; inventors—University of Iowa, inventors J.D.L. and Christopher A. Ahern—pertains to tRNA sequences used in this study. J.D.L. and J.J.P. are co-inventors of technologies presented in this study that pertains to the optimized ACE-tRNA sequences and minivectors. D.A.D. serves as a member of the Scientific Advisory Board of Seawolf Therapeutics and has equity interest in the company.

Funding

This work was supported by the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Postdoctoral Fellowship (PORTER20F0) and the Throssell and Hillier Families, and Choroideremia Research Foundation Research Award to J.J.P., the NIH T32 Multidisciplinary Training in Lung Biology and Pulmonary Medicine program postdoctoral fellowship (T32HL171029) to K.T., the NIH grant (GM151450) to D.A.D., and the NIH grant (HL153988) and Vertex Innovation Cystic Fibrosis Research Award to J.D.L. Funding to pay the Open Access publication charges for this article was provided by the National Institutes of Health (R01HL153988).

Data availability

The data underlying this article are available in the article and in its online supplementary material.

References

  • 1. Keeling  KM, Xue  X, Gunn  G  et al.  Therapeutics based on stop codon readthrough. Annu Rev Genom Hum Genet. 2014;15:371–94. 10.1146/annurev-genom-091212-153527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Mort  M, Ivanov  D, Cooper  DN  et al.  A meta-analysis of nonsense mutations causing human genetic disease. Hum Mutat. 2008;29:1037–47. 10.1002/humu.20763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Kurosaki  T, Popp  MW, Maquat  LE. Quality and quantity control of gene expression by nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019;20:406–20. 10.1038/s41580-019-0126-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Pacesa  M, Pelea  O, Jinek  M. Past, present, and future of CRISPR genome editing technologies. Cell. 2024;187:1076–100. 10.1016/j.cell.2024.01.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Adachi  H, Pan  Y, He  X  et al.  Targeted pseudouridylation: an approach for suppressing nonsense mutations in disease genes. Mol Cell. 2023;83:637–51. 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.01.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Lauffer  MC, van Roon-Mom  W, Aartsma-Rus  A  et al.  Possibilities and limitations of antisense oligonucleotide therapies for the treatment of monogenic disorders. Commun Med. 2024;4:6. 10.1038/s43856-023-00419-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Spelier  S, van Doorn  EPM, van der Ent  CK  et al.  Readthrough compounds for nonsense mutations: bridging the translational gap. Trends Mol Med. 2023;29:297–314. 10.1016/j.molmed.2023.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Porter  JJ, Heil  CS, Lueck  JD. Therapeutic promise of engineered nonsense suppressor tRNAs. WIREs RNA. 2021;12:e1641. 10.1002/wrna.1641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Anastassiadis  T, Kohrer  C. Ushering in the era of tRNA medicines. J Biol Chem. 2023;299:105246. 10.1016/j.jbc.2023.105246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Coller  J, Ignatova  Z. tRNA therapeutics for genetic diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2024;23:108–25. 10.1038/s41573-023-00829-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Chang  JC, Kan  YW. beta 0 thalassemia, a nonsense mutation in man. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1979;76:2886–9. 10.1073/pnas.76.6.2886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Lueck  JD, Yoon  JS, Perales-Puchalt  A  Jr  et al.  Engineered transfer RNAs for suppression of premature termination codons. Nat Commun. 2019;10:822. 10.1038/s41467-019-08329-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Wang  J, Zhang  Y, Mendonca  CA  et al.  AAV-delivered suppressor tRNA overcomes a nonsense mutation in mice. Nature. 2022;604:343–8. 10.1038/s41586-022-04533-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Albers  S, Allen  EC, Bharti  N  et al.  Engineered tRNAs suppress nonsense mutations in cells and in vivo. Nature. 2023;618:842–8. 10.1038/s41586-023-06133-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Ko  W, Porter  JJ, Sipple  MT  et al.  Efficient suppression of endogenous CFTR nonsense mutations using anticodon-engineered transfer RNAs. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2022;28:685–701. 10.1016/j.omtn.2022.04.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Porter  JJ, Ko  W, Sorensen  EG  et al.  Optimization of ACE-tRNAs function in translation for suppression of nonsense mutations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024;52:14112–32. 10.1093/nar/gkae1112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Awawdeh  A, Tapia  A, Alshawi  SA  et al.  Efficient suppression of premature termination codons with alanine by engineered chimeric pyrrolysine tRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024;52:14244–59. 10.1093/nar/gkae1048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Pezzini  S, Mustaccia  A, Aboa  P  et al.  Engineered tRNAs efficiently suppress CDKL5 premature termination codons. Sci Rep. 2024;14:31791. 10.1038/s41598-024-82766-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Blomquist  VG, Niu  J, Choudhury  P  et al.  Transfer RNA-mediated restoration of potassium current and electrical correction in premature termination long-QT syndrome hERG mutants. Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids. 2023;34:102032. 10.1016/j.omtn.2023.102032 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Specht  C, Tapia  A, Penrod  S  et al.  An engineered glutamic acid tRNA for efficient suppression of pathogenic nonsense mutations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2025;53:gkaf532. 10.1093/nar/gkaf532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Beharry  A, Ward  C, Moore  H  et al.  High-fidelity and differential nonsense suppression in live cells and a frontotemporal dementia allele with human transfer RNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2025;53:gkaf730. 10.1093/nar/gkaf730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Ko  W, Porter  JJ, Spelier  S  et al.  ACE-tRNAs are a platform technology for suppressing nonsense mutations that cause cystic fibrosis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2025;53:gkaf675. 10.1093/nar/gkaf675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Pierce  SE, Erwood  S, Oye  K  et al.  Prime editing-installed suppressor tRNAs for disease-agnostic genome editing. Nature. 2025;648:191–202. 10.1038/s41586-025-09732-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Jones  CH, Chen  CK, Ravikrishnan  A  et al.  Overcoming nonviral gene delivery barriers: perspective and future. Mol Pharm. 2013;10:4082–98. 10.1021/mp400467x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Russell  S, Bennett  J, Wellman  JA  et al.  Efficacy and safety of voretigene neparvovec (AAV2-hRPE65v2) in patients with RPE65-mediated inherited retinal dystrophy: a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017;390:849–60. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31868-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Day  JW, Finkel  RS, Chiriboga  CA  et al.  Onasemnogene abeparvovec gene therapy for symptomatic infantile-onset spinal muscular atrophy in patients with two copies of SMN2 (STR1VE): an open-label, single-arm, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20:284–93. 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00001-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Mendell  JR, Muntoni  F, McDonald  CM  et al.  AAV gene therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy: the EMBARK phase 3 randomized trial. Nat Med. 2025;31:332–41. 10.1038/s41591-024-03304-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Honrath  S, Burger  M, Leroux  JC. Hurdles to healing: overcoming cellular barriers for viral and nonviral gene therapy. Int J Pharm. 2025;674:125470. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2025.125470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Smith  AE, Helenius  A. How viruses enter animal cells. Science. 2004;304:237–42. 10.1126/science.1094823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Kay  MA. State-of-the-art gene-based therapies: the road ahead. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12:316–28. 10.1038/nrg2971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Hamilton  BA, Wright  JF. Challenges posed by immune responses to AAV vectors: addressing root causes. Front Immunol. 2021;12:675897. 10.3389/fimmu.2021.675897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Jiang  Z, Dalby  PA. Challenges in scaling up AAV-based gene therapy manufacturing. Trends Biotechnol. 2023;41:1268–81. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2023.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Mendell  JR, Connolly  AM, Lehman  KJ  et al.  Testing preexisting antibodies prior to AAV gene transfer therapy: rationale, lessons and future considerations. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2022;25:74–83. 10.1016/j.omtm.2022.02.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Arévalo-Soliz  LM, Hardee  CL, Fogg  JM  et al.  Improving therapeutic potential of non-viral minimized DNA vectors. Cell Gene Therapy Insights. 2020;6:1489–505. 10.18609/cgti.2020.163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Darquet  AM, Cameron  B, Wils  P  et al.  A new DNA vehicle for nonviral gene delivery: supercoiled minicircle. Gene Ther. 1997;4:1341–9. 10.1038/sj.gt.3300540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Schakowski  F, Gorschlüter  M, Junghans  C  et al.  A novel minimal-size vector (MIDGE) improves transgene expression in colon carcinoma cells and avoids transfection of undesired DNA. Mol Ther. 2001;3:793–800. 10.1006/mthe.2001.0322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Wang  Y, Prosen  DE, Mei  L  et al.  A novel strategy to engineer DNA polymerases for enhanced processivity and improved performance in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:1197–207. 10.1093/nar/gkh271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Studier  FW. Protein production by auto-induction in high density shaking cultures. Protein Expression Purif. 2005;41:207–34. 10.1016/j.pep.2005.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Wilson  RH, Morton  SK, Deiderick  H  et al.  Engineered DNA ligases with improved activities in vitro. Protein Eng Des Sel. 2013;26:471–8. 10.1093/protein/gzt024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Gotzke  H, Kilisch  M, Martinez-Carranza  M  et al.  The ALFA-tag is a highly versatile tool for nanobody-based bioscience applications. Nat Commun. 2019;10:4403. 10.1038/s41467-019-12301-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Albers  J, Danzer  C, Rechsteiner  M  et al.  A versatile modular vector system for rapid combinatorial mammalian genetics. J Clin Invest. 2015;125:1603–19. 10.1172/JCI79743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Fogg  JM, Kolmakova  N, Rees  I  et al.  Exploring writhe in supercoiled minicircle DNA. J Phys Condens Matter. 2006;18:S145–59. 10.1088/0953-8984/18/14/S01. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Thibault  T, Degrouard  J, Baril  P  et al.  Production of DNA minicircles less than 250 base pairs through a novel concentrated DNA circularization assay enabling minicircle design with NF-kappaB inhibition activity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:e26. 10.1093/nar/gkw1034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Cloutier  TE, Widom  J. Spontaneous sharp bending of double-stranded DNA. Mol Cell. 2004;14:355–62. 10.1016/S1097-2765(04)00210-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Kay  MA, He  CY, Chen  ZY. A robust system for production of minicircle DNA vectors. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28:1287–9. 10.1038/nbt.1708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Moreno  S, López-Fuertes  L, Vila-Coro  AJ  et al.  DNA immunisation with minimalistic expression constructs. Vaccine. 2004;22:1709–16. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2003.09.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Scott  VL, Patel  A, Villarreal  DO  et al.  Novel synthetic plasmid and Doggybone DNA vaccines induce neutralizing antibodies and provide protection from lethal influenza challenge in mice. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2015;11:1972–82. 10.1080/21645515.2015.1022008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Deneke  J, Ziegelin  G, Lurz  R  et al.  The protelomerase of temperate Escherichia coli phage N15 has cleaving-joining activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:7721–6. 10.1073/pnas.97.14.7721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Ravin  NV. N15: the linear phage-plasmid. Plasmid. 2011;65:102–9. 10.1016/j.plasmid.2010.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Landrum  MJ, Lee  JM, Benson  M  et al.  ClinVar: improving access to variant interpretations and supporting evidence. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:D1062–7. 10.1093/nar/gkx1153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Dieci  G, Fiorino  G, Castelnuovo  M  et al.  The expanding RNA polymerase III transcriptome. Trends Genet. 2007;23:614–22. 10.1016/j.tig.2007.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Valley  HC, Bukis  KM, Bell  A  et al.  Isogenic cell models of cystic fibrosis-causing variants in natively expressing pulmonary epithelial cells. J Cyst Fibros. 2019;18:476–83. 10.1016/j.jcf.2018.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Barnard  AR, Groppe  M, MacLaren  RE. Gene therapy for choroideremia using an adeno-associated viral (AAV) vector. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2014;5:a017293. 10.1101/cshperspect.a017293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. McMahon  M, Maquat  LE. Exploring the therapeutic potential of modulating nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. RNA. 2025;31:333–48. 10.1261/rna.080334.124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Xue  X, Mutyam  V, Thakerar  A  et al.  Identification of the amino acids inserted during suppression of CFTR nonsense mutations and determination of their functional consequences. Hum Mol Genet. 2017;26:3116–29. 10.1093/hmg/ddx196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Scholz  C, Wagner  E. Therapeutic plasmid DNA versus siRNA delivery: common and different tasks for synthetic carriers. J Controlled Release. 2012;161:554–65. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Akita  H, Kurihara  D, Schmeer  M  et al.  Effect of the compaction and the size of DNA on the nuclear transfer efficiency after microinjection in synchronized cells. Pharmaceutics. 2015;7:64–73. 10.3390/pharmaceutics7020064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Mortimer  I, Tam  P, MacLachlan  I  et al.  Cationic lipid-mediated transfection of cells in culture requires mitotic activity. Gene Ther. 1999;6:403–11. 10.1038/sj.gt.3300837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Lukacs  GL, Haggie  P, Seksek  O  et al.  Size-dependent DNA mobility in cytoplasm and nucleus. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:1625–9. 10.1074/jbc.275.3.1625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Melchior  F, Gerace  L. Mechanisms of nuclear protein import. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1995;7:310–8. 10.1016/0955-0674(95)80084-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Sun  L, Wu  J, Du  F  et al.  Cyclic GMP-AMP synthase is a cytosolic DNA sensor that activates the type I interferon pathway. Science. 2013;339:786–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Wu  J, Sun  L, Chen  X  et al.  Cyclic GMP-AMP is an endogenous second messenger in innate immune signaling by cytosolic DNA. Science. 2013;339:826–30. 10.1126/science.1229963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Zhou  W, Whiteley  AT, de Oliveira Mann  CC  et al.  Structure of the human cGAS-DNA complex reveals enhanced control of immune surveillance. Cell. 2018;174:300–11. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Basit  A, Cho  MG, Kim  EY  et al.  The cGAS/STING/TBK1/IRF3 innate immunity pathway maintains chromosomal stability through regulation of p21 levels. Exp Mol Med. 2020;52:643–57. 10.1038/s12276-020-0416-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Alton  E, Armstrong  DK, Ashby  D  et al.  Repeated nebulisation of non-viral CFTR gene therapy in patients with cystic fibrosis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2015;3:684–91. 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00245-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Henshaw  JW, Yuan  F. Field distribution and DNA transport in solid tumors during electric field-mediated gene delivery. J Pharm Sci. 2008;97:691–711. 10.1002/jps.21000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Barber  GN. Cytoplasmic DNA innate immune pathways. Immunol Rev. 2011;243:99–108. 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2011.01051.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Tan  Y, Li  S, Pitt  BR  et al.  The inhibitory role of CpG immunostimulatory motifs in cationic lipid vector-mediated transgene expression in vivo. Hum Gene Ther. 1999;10:2153–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Yew  NS, Wang  KX, Przybylska  M  et al.  Contribution of plasmid DNA to inflammation in the lung after administration of cationic lipid:pDNA complexes. Hum Gene Ther. 1999;10:223–34. 10.1089/10430349950019011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Yew  NS, Cheng  SH. Reducing the immunostimulatory activity of CpG-containing plasmid DNA vectors for non-viral gene therapy. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2004;1:115–25. 10.1517/17425247.1.1.115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Chen  ZY, He  CY, Meuse  L  et al.  Silencing of episomal transgene expression by plasmid bacterial DNA elements in vivo. Gene Ther. 2004;11:856–64. 10.1038/sj.gt.3302231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Chen  ZY, Riu  E, He  CY  et al.  Silencing of episomal transgene expression in liver by plasmid bacterial backbone DNA is independent of CpG methylation. Mol Ther. 2008;16:548–56. 10.1038/sj.mt.6300399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Krieg  AM. Lymphocyte activation by CpG dinucleotide motifs in prokaryotic DNA. Trends Microbiol. 1996;4:73–7. 10.1016/0966-842X(96)81515-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Yamamoto  S, Yamamoto  T, Kataoka  T  et al.  Unique palindromic sequences in synthetic oligonucleotides are required to induce IFN [correction of INF] and augment IFN-mediated [correction of INF] natural killer activity. J Immunol. 1992;148:4072–6. 10.4049/jimmunol.148.12.4072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. McMahon  JM, Wells  KE, Bamfo  JE  et al.  Inflammatory responses following direct injection of plasmid DNA into skeletal muscle. Gene Ther. 1998;5:1283–90. 10.1038/sj.gt.3300718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Krieg  AM. Direct immunologic activities of CpG DNA and implications for gene therapy. J Gene Med. 1999;1:56–63. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. McLachlan  G, Stevenson  BJ, Davidson  DJ  et al.  Bacterial DNA is implicated in the inflammatory response to delivery of DNA/DOTAP to mouse lungs. Gene Ther. 2000;7:384–92. 10.1038/sj.gt.3301097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Hemmi  H, Takeuchi  O, Kawai  T  et al.  A Toll-like receptor recognizes bacterial DNA. Nature. 2000;408:740–5. 10.1038/35047123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Song  YK, Liu  F, Chu  S  et al.  Characterization of cationic liposome-mediated gene transfer in vivo by intravenous administration. Hum Gene Ther. 1997;8:1585–94. 10.1089/hum.1997.8.13-1585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Yew  NS, Zhao  H, Przybylska  M  et al.  CpG-depleted plasmid DNA vectors with enhanced safety and long-term gene expression in vivo. Mol Ther. 2002;5:731–8. 10.1006/mthe.2002.0598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Yew  NS, Scheule  RK. Toxicity of cationic lipid-DNA complexes. Adv Genet. 2005;53:189–214. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Zhao  H, Hemmi  H, Akira  S  et al.  Contribution of Toll-like receptor 9 signaling to the acute inflammatory response to nonviral vectors. Mol Ther. 2004;9:241–8. 10.1016/j.ymthe.2003.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Tan  Y, Liu  F, Li  Z  et al.  Sequential injection of cationic liposome and plasmid DNA effectively transfects the lung with minimal inflammatory toxicity. Mol Ther. 2001;3:673–82. 10.1006/mthe.2001.0311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Zhang  JS, Liu  F, Huang  L. Implications of pharmacokinetic behavior of lipoplex for its inflammatory toxicity. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005;57:689–98. 10.1016/j.addr.2004.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Lesina  E, Dames  P, Flemmer  A  et al.  CpG-free plasmid DNA prevents deterioration of pulmonary function in mice. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2010;74:427–34. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2009.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Lesina  E, Dames  P, Rudolph  C. The effect of CpG motifs on gene expression and clearance kinetics of aerosol administered polyethylenimine (PEI)-plasmid DNA complexes in the lung. J Control Release. 2010;143:243–50. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Hyde  SC, Pringle  IA, Abdullah  S  et al.  CpG-free plasmids confer reduced inflammation and sustained pulmonary gene expression. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26:549–51. 10.1038/nbt1399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Zhao  N, Fogg  JM, Zechiedrich  L  et al.  Transfection of shRNA-encoding minivector DNA of a few hundred base pairs to regulate gene expression in lymphoma cells. Gene Ther. 2011;18:220–4. 10.1038/gt.2010.123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Khalil  IA, Kogure  K, Akita  H  et al.  Uptake pathways and subsequent intracellular trafficking in nonviral gene delivery. Pharmacol Rev. 2006;58:32–45. 10.1124/pr.58.1.8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Escoffre  JM, Teissié  J, Rols  MP. Gene transfer: how can the biological barriers be overcome?. J Membrane Biol. 2010;236:61–74. 10.1007/s00232-010-9275-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Cervia  LD, Yuan  F. Current progress in electrotransfection as a nonviral method for gene delivery. Mol Pharmaceutics. 2018;15:3617–24. 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.8b00207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Kobelt  D, Schleef  M, Schmeer  M  et al.  Performance of high quality minicircle DNA for in vitro and in vivo gene transfer. Mol Biotechnol. 2013;53:80–9. 10.1007/s12033-012-9535-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Rosazza  C, Escoffre  JM, Zumbusch  A  et al.  The actin cytoskeleton has an active role in the electrotransfer of plasmid DNA in mammalian cells. Mol Ther. 2011;19:913–21. 10.1038/mt.2010.303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Dinh  AT, Pangarkar  C, Theofanous  T  et al.  Understanding intracellular transport processes pertinent to synthetic gene delivery via stochastic simulations and sensitivity analyses. Biophys J. 2007;92:831–46. 10.1529/biophysj.106.095521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Zhou  J, Yockman  JW, Kim  SW  et al.  Intracellular kinetics of non-viral gene delivery using polyethylenimine carriers. Pharm Res. 2007;24:1079–87. 10.1007/s11095-006-9229-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Cervia  LD, Chang  CC, Wang  L  et al.  Distinct effects of endosomal escape and inhibition of endosomal trafficking on gene delivery via electrotransfection. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0171699. 10.1371/journal.pone.0171699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Grandinetti  G, Reineke  TM. Exploring the mechanism of plasmid DNA nuclear internalization with polymer-based vehicles. Mol Pharmaceutics. 2012;9:2256–67. 10.1021/mp300142d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Akita  H, Enoto  K, Masuda  T  et al.  Particle tracking of intracellular trafficking of octaarginine-modified liposomes: a comparative study with adenovirus. Mol Ther. 2010;18:955–64. 10.1038/mt.2010.33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Badding  MA, Dean  DA. Highly acetylated tubulin permits enhanced interactions with and trafficking of plasmids along microtubules. Gene Ther. 2013;20:616–24. 10.1038/gt.2012.77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Suh  J, Wirtz  D, Hanes  J. Efficient active transport of gene nanocarriers to the cell nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:3878–82. 10.1073/pnas.0636277100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Vaughan  EE, Dean  DA. Intracellular trafficking of plasmids during transfection is mediated by microtubules. Mol Ther. 2006;13:422–8. 10.1016/j.ymthe.2005.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Farina  F, Pierobon  P, Delevoye  C  et al.  Kinesin KIFC1 actively transports bare double-stranded DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:4926–37. 10.1093/nar/gkt204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Salman  H, Zbaida  D, Rabin  Y  et al.  Kinetics and mechanism of DNA uptake into the cell nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:7247–52. 10.1073/pnas.121067698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Brunner  S, Sauer  T, Carotta  S  et al.  Cell cycle dependence of gene transfer by lipoplex, polyplex and recombinant adenovirus. Gene Ther. 2000;7:401–7. 10.1038/sj.gt.3301102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Miller  AM, Dean  DA. Tissue-specific and transcription factor-mediated nuclear entry of DNA. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2009;61:603–13. 10.1016/j.addr.2009.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Mearini  G, Nielsen  PE, Fackelmayer  FO. Localization and dynamics of small circular DNA in live mammalian nuclei. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:2642–51. 10.1093/nar/gkh587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Kass  SU, Landsberger  N, Wolffe  AP. DNA methylation directs a time-dependent repression of transcription initiation. Curr Biol. 1997;7:157–65. 10.1016/S0960-9822(97)70086-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Zabner  J, Fasbender  AJ, Moninger  T  et al.  Cellular and molecular barriers to gene transfer by a cationic lipid. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:18997–9007. 10.1074/jbc.270.32.18997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Dauty  E, Verkman  AS. Actin cytoskeleton as the principal determinant of size-dependent DNA mobility in cytoplasm: a new barrier for non-viral gene delivery. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:7823–8. 10.1074/jbc.M412374200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Ni  R, Feng  R, Chau  Y. Synthetic approaches for nucleic acid delivery: choosing the right carriers. Life (Basel). 2019;9:59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Irobalieva  RN, Fogg  JM, Catanese  DJ  et al.  Structural diversity of supercoiled DNA. Nat Commun. 2015;6:8440. 10.1038/ncomms9440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Hou  H, Jin  Q, Ren  Y  et al.  Structure of the SNAPc-bound RNA polymerase III preinitiation complex. Cell Res. 2023;33:565–8. 10.1038/s41422-023-00819-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Hornstein  BD, Roman  D, Arévalo-Soliz  LM  et al.  Effects of circular DNA length on transfection efficiency by electroporation into HeLa cells. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0167537. 10.1371/journal.pone.0167537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Schakowski  F, Gorschlüter  M, Buttgereit  P  et al.  Minimal size MIDGE vectors improve transgene expression in vivo. In Vivo. 2007;21:17–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Gowers  DM, Wilson  GG, Halford  SE. Measurement of the contributions of 1D and 3D pathways to the translocation of a protein along DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:15883–8. 10.1073/pnas.0505378102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Halford  SE, Marko  JF. How do site-specific DNA-binding proteins find their targets?. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:3040–52. 10.1093/nar/gkh624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Rossi  JJ, Das  S. Small RNAs as therapeutic agents: from catalytic motifs to regulatory pathways. Mol Ther. 2025;33:2238–42. 10.1016/j.ymthe.2025.03.053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Walters  AA, Kinnear  E, Shattock  RJ  et al.  Comparative analysis of enzymatically produced novel linear DNA constructs with plasmids for use as DNA vaccines. Gene Ther. 2014;21:645–52. 10.1038/gt.2014.37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Ma  J, Wang  MD. DNA supercoiling during transcription. Biophys Rev. 2016;8:75–87. 10.1007/s12551-016-0215-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Chen  ZY, He  CY, Ehrhardt  A  et al.  Minicircle DNA vectors devoid of bacterial DNA result in persistent and high-level transgene expression in vivo. Mol Ther. 2003;8:495–500. 10.1016/S1525-0016(03)00168-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Osborn  MJ, McElmurry  RT, Lees  CJ  et al.  Minicircle DNA-based gene therapy coupled with immune modulation permits long-term expression of α-L-iduronidase in mice with mucopolysaccharidosis type I. Mol Ther. 2011;19:450–60. 10.1038/mt.2010.249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Viecelli  HM, Harbottle  RP, Wong  SP  et al.  Treatment of phenylketonuria using minicircle-based naked-DNA gene transfer to murine liver. Hepatology. 2014;60:1035–43. 10.1002/hep.27104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Huang  M, Chen  Z, Hu  S  et al.  Novel minicircle vector for gene therapy in murine myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2009;120:S230–7. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.841155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Stenler  S, Andersson  A, Simonson  OE  et al.  Gene transfer to mouse heart and skeletal muscles using a minicircle expressing human vascular endothelial growth factor. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2009;53:18–23. 10.1097/FJC.0b013e318194234e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Munye  MM, Tagalakis  AD, Barnes  JL  et al.  Minicircle DNA provides enhanced and prolonged transgene expression following airway gene transfer. Sci Rep. 2016;6:23125. 10.1038/srep23125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Chen  ZY, Yant  SR, He  CY  et al.  Linear DNAs concatemerize in vivo and result in sustained transgene expression in mouse liver. Mol Ther. 2001;3:403–10. 10.1006/mthe.2001.0278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Gill  DR, Smyth  SE, Goddard  CA  et al.  Increased persistence of lung gene expression using plasmids containing the ubiquitin C or elongation factor 1alpha promoter. Gene Ther. 2001;8:1539–46. 10.1038/sj.gt.3301561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Hodges  BL, Taylor  KM, Joseph  MF  et al.  Long-term transgene expression from plasmid DNA gene therapy vectors is negatively affected by CpG dinucleotides. Mol Ther. 2004;10:269–78. 10.1016/j.ymthe.2004.04.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Yew  NS, Przybylska  M, Ziegler  RJ  et al.  High and sustained transgene expression in vivo from plasmid vectors containing a hybrid ubiquitin promoter. Mol Ther. 2001;4:75–82. 10.1006/mthe.2001.0415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Bazzani  RP, Pringle  IA, Connolly  MM  et al.  Transgene sequences free of CG dinucleotides lead to high level, long-term expression in the lung independent of plasmid backbone design. Biomaterials. 2016;93:20–6. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.03.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Gracey Maniar  LE, Maniar  JM, Chen  ZY  et al.  Minicircle DNA vectors achieve sustained expression reflected by active chromatin and transcriptional level. Mol Ther. 2013;21:131–8. 10.1038/mt.2012.244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Riu  E, Grimm  D, Huang  Z  et al.  Increased maintenance and persistence of transgenes by excision of expression cassettes from plasmid sequences in vivo. Hum Gene Ther. 2005;16:558–70. 10.1089/hum.2005.16.558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Buchlis  G, Podsakoff  GM, Radu  A  et al.  Factor IX expression in skeletal muscle of a severe hemophilia B patient 10 years after AAV-mediated gene transfer. Blood. 2012;119:3038–41. 10.1182/blood-2011-09-382317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Sehara  Y, Fujimoto  KI, Ikeguchi  K  et al.  Persistent expression of dopamine-synthesizing enzymes 15 years after gene transfer in a primate model of parkinson’s disease. Hum Gene Ther Clin Dev. 2017;28:74–9. 10.1089/humc.2017.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Muhuri  M, Levy  DI, Schulz  M  et al.  Durability of transgene expression after rAAV gene therapy. Mol Ther. 2022;30:1364–80. 10.1016/j.ymthe.2022.03.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. Glover  DJ, Lipps  HJ, Jans  DA. Towards safe, non-viral therapeutic gene expression in humans. Nat Rev Genet. 2005;6:299–310. 10.1038/nrg1577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137. Li  S, Huang  L. Nonviral gene therapy: promises and challenges. Gene Ther. 2000;7:31–4. 10.1038/sj.gt.3301110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138. Catanese  DJ  Jr, Fogg  JM, Schrock  DE  2nd  et al.  Supercoiled minivector DNA resists shear forces associated with gene therapy delivery. Gene Ther. 2012;19:94–100. 10.1038/gt.2011.77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139. Stenler  S, Wiklander  OP, Badal-Tejedor  M  et al.  Micro-minicircle gene therapy: implications of size on fermentation, complexation, shearing resistance, and expression. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2014;3:e140. 10.1038/mtna.2013.67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140. Liang  H, Cavalcanti  AR, Landweber  LF. Conservation of tandem stop codons in yeasts. Genome Biol. 2005;6:R31. 10.1186/gb-2005-6-4-r31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141. Adachi  M, Cavalcanti  AR. Tandem stop codons in ciliates that reassign stop codons. J Mol Evol. 2009;68:424–31. 10.1007/s00239-009-9220-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142. Wangen  JR, Green  R. Stop codon context influences genome-wide stimulation of termination codon readthrough by aminoglycosides. eLife. 2020;9:e52611. 10.7554/eLife.52611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143. Bharti  N, Santos  L, Davyt  M  et al.  Translation velocity determines the efficacy of engineered suppressor tRNAs on pathogenic nonsense mutations. Nat Commun. 2024;15:2957. 10.1038/s41467-024-47258-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144. Wu  C, Roy  B, He  F  et al.  Poly(A)-binding protein regulates the efficiency of translation termination. Cell Rep. 2020;33:108399. 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145. Ivanov  A, Mikhailova  T, Eliseev  B  et al.  PABP enhances release factor recruitment and stop codon recognition during translation termination. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:7766–76. 10.1093/nar/gkw635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146. Arribere  JA, Cenik  ES, Jain  N  et al.  Translation readthrough mitigation. Nature. 2016;534:719–23. 10.1038/nature18308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147. Ito-Harashima  S, Kuroha  K, Tatematsu  T  et al.  Translation of the poly(A) tail plays crucial roles in nonstop mRNA surveillance via translation repression and protein destabilization by proteasome in yeast. Genes Dev. 2007;21:519–24. 10.1101/gad.1490207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148. Tagalakis  AD, McAnulty  RJ, Devaney  J  et al.  A receptor-targeted nanocomplex vector system optimized for respiratory gene transfer. Mol Ther. 2008;16:907–15. 10.1038/mt.2008.38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149. Levacic  AK, Morys  S, Kempter  S  et al.  Minicircle versus plasmid DNA delivery by receptor-targeted polyplexes. Hum Gene Ther. 2017;28:862–74. 10.1089/hum.2017.123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150. Chabot  S, Orio  J, Schmeer  M  et al.  Minicircle DNA electrotransfer for efficient tissue-targeted gene delivery. Gene Ther. 2013;20:62–8. 10.1038/gt.2011.215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151. Kwok  A, Hart  SL. Comparative structural and functional studies of nanoparticle formulations for DNA and siRNA delivery. Nanomedicine. 2011;7:210–9. 10.1016/j.nano.2010.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

gkag082_Supplemental_Files

Data Availability Statement

The data underlying this article are available in the article and in its online supplementary material.


Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES