Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
. 2026 Jan 29;82(Pt 2):221–226. doi: 10.1107/S2056989026000599

Crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis, crystal voids, inter­action energy calculations and energy frameworks of C-anthracen-9-yl-N-methyl aldo­nitrone

Jamal Lasri a,*, Mohamed M Zayed a,b, Yaseen A Almehmadi a,c, Naser E Eltayeb a,d, Tuncer Hökelek e, Aidan P McKay f
Editor: L Van Meerveltg
PMCID: PMC12874247  PMID: 41657508

The title com­pound contains an almost planar anthracene ring system. In the crystal, inter­molecular bifurcated C—H⋯O hy­dro­gen bonds link the mol­ecules into infinite chains along the a-axis direction and π–π stacking inter­actions between the benzene rings of adjacent mol­ecules help to consolidate the three-dimensional architecture.

Keywords: C-anthracen-9-yl-N-methyl aldo­nitrone, crystal structure, hy­dro­gen bond, π-stacking, Hirshfeld surface, energy framework analysis

Abstract

The title com­pound (systematic name: 1-anthracen-9-yl-N-methyl­methanimine oxide), C16H13NO, contains an almost planar anthracene ring system [r.m.s. deviation = 0.021 (1) Å]. In the crystal, inter­molecular bifurcated C—H⋯O hy­dro­gen bonds link the mol­ecules into infinite chains along the a-axis direction. The π–π stacking inter­actions between the benzene rings of adjacent mol­ecules help to consolidate the three-dimensional architecture. The Hirshfeld surface analysis of the crystal structure indicates that the most important contributions for the crystal packing are from H⋯H (54.5%), H⋯C/C⋯H (23.7%), H⋯O/O⋯H (10.6%) and C⋯C (9.8%) inter­actions. The volume of the crystal voids and the percentage of free space were calculated to be 76.07 Å3 and 6.57%, respectively, showing that there is no large cavity in the crystal packing. Evaluation of the electrostatic, dispersion and total energy frameworks indicates that the stabilization largely depends on dispersion energy contributions. Hydrogen bonding, π–π and van der Waals inter­actions, together with the dispersion energy contributions, are the dominant inter­actions in the crystal packing.

1. Chemical context

Nitro­nes have inter­esting applications as buiding blocks in the synthesis of natural products (Padwa & Pearson, 2002) and have found usage as both modifiers in radical polymerization and regulators of mol­ecular weight (Feuer, 2007; Hamer & Macaluso, 1964). Nitro­nes have been broadly used in metal-mediated [2 + 3]-cyclo­addition reactions to furnish N-heterocyclic com­pounds which have shown to be excellent catalysts for Suzuki-Miyaura C—C cross-couplings (Fer­nan­des et al., 2011). Nitro­nes have also been used for therapeutic applications as they are components of the mol­ecular structure of several drugs (Floyd et al., 2008). Currently, our research program focuses on the synthesis, X-ray structure analysis, Hirshfeld surface analysis and density functional theory (DFT) calculations and mol­ecular docking studies of aldo­nitrone-type com­pounds (Lasri et al., 2024). Herein, we report the synthesis, mol­ecular and crystal structures, Hirshfeld surface analysis, crystal voids, inter­action energies and energy frameworks of the title com­pound C-anthracen-9-yl-N-methyl aldo­nitrone, (I).1.

2. Structural commentary

The title com­pound, (I), contains an almost planar [r.m.s. deviation = 0.021 (1) Å] anthracene ring system, consisting of three fused benzene rings, denoted A (C1/C2/C7–C9/C14), B (C2–C7) and C (C9–C14) (Fig. 1). Atom C3 deviates by −0.0419 (14) Å from the least-squares plane through the ring system. The planes of benzene rings A, B and C are oriented at dihedral angles of A/B = 1.95 (4)°, A/C = 1.99 (5)° and B/C = 0.51 (3)°. In the substituent, the C1—C15—N16, C15—N16—C17, C15—N16—O16 and C17—N16—O16 bond angles are 125.01 (13), 119.73 (12), 125.30 (12) and 114.96 (11)°, respectively. On the other hand, the N16—C15—C1—C2, N16—C15—C1—C14, C15—C1—C2—C3 and C15—C1—C14—C13 torsion angles are 56.39 (19), −128.50 (14), −1.4 (2) and 4.96 (19)°, respectively. The dihedral angle between the plane of the anthracene ring and the least-squares plane through its substituent is 54.42 (5)°.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The mol­ecular structure of the title mol­ecule with the atom-numbering scheme and 50% probability displacement ellipsoids.

3. Supra­molecular features

In the crystal, inter­molecular bifurcated C—H⋯O hy­dro­gen bonds (Table 1) link the mol­ecules into infinite chains along the a-axis direction (Fig. 2). The π–π stacking inter­actions between the benzene rings (A, B and C) of adjacent mol­ecules, with inter-centroid distances of 3.8445 (8) [between rings A and B, α = 1.96 (6)° and slippage = 1.592 Å] and 3.8497 (8) Å [between rings A and C, α = 0.51 (7)° and slippage = 1.636 Å] may help to consolidate the three-dimensional architecture, together with C—H⋯O contacts. No C—H⋯π(ring) inter­actions are identified.

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C15—H15⋯O16i 0.95 2.24 3.1267 (18) 154
C17—H17B⋯O16i 0.98 2.28 3.2037 (18) 157

Symmetry code: (i) Inline graphic.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

A partial packing diagram viewed down the c-axis direction. Inter­molecular C—H⋯O hy­dro­gen bonds are shown as dashed lines. Nonbonding H atoms have been omitted for clarity.

A void analysis was performed by adding up the electron densities of the spherically symmetric atoms contained in the asymmetric unit (Turner et al., 2011). The volume of the crystal voids [Figs. 3(a), 3(b) and 3(c)] and the percentage of free space in the unit cell are calculated as 76.07 Å3 and 6.57%, respectively, indicating that the crystal packing is com­pact.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Graphical views of voids in the crystal packing of the title com­pound (a) along the a-axis, (b) along the b-axis and (c) along the c-axis direction.

4. Hirshfeld surface analysis

A Hirshfeld surface (HS) analysis was carried out using CrystalExplorer (Version 17.5; Spackman et al., 2021) for clarifying the inter­molecular inter­actions in the crystal of (I). The HS plotted over dnorm is shown in Fig. 4, where the bright-red spots correspond to donor and/or acceptor sites; they also appear as blue and red regions in Fig. 5, corresponding to positive and negative potentials (Spackman et al., 2008). The shape-index surface can be used for identifying the characteristic packing modes, particularly, the pres­ence of aromatic stacking inter­actions like C—H⋯π(ring) and π–π inter­actions, with the former represented as red π-holes, which are related to the electron–ring inter­actions between the C—H groups with the centroids of the aromatic rings of neighbouring mol­ecules. Fig. 6 clearly suggests that there are no C—H⋯π(ring) inter­actions. A π–π stacking is indicated by the presence of adjacent red and blue triangles, as clearly indicated by Fig. 6. According to the 2D fingerprint plots (McKinnon et al., 2007), inter­molecular H⋯H, H⋯C/C⋯H, H⋯O/O⋯H and C⋯C contacts make important contributions to the HS, with values of 54.5, 23.7, 10.6 and 9.8%, respectively (Fig. 7).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

View of the three-dimensional Hirshfeld surface of the title com­pound plotted over dnorm in the range from −0.3681 to 1.4279 a.u.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

View of the Hirshfeld surface of the title com­pound plotted over electrostatic potential energy in the range from −0.0500 to 0.0500 a.u. using the STO-3G basis set at the Hartree–Fock level of theory. Hydrogen-bond donors and acceptors are shown as blue and red regions around the atoms corresponding to positive and negative potentials, respectively.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Hirshfeld surface of the title com­pound plotted over shape-index.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

The full two-dimensional fingerprint plots for the title com­pound, showing (a) all inter­actions, and delineated into (b) H⋯H, (c) H⋯C/C⋯H, (d) H⋯O/O⋯H, (e) C⋯C, (f) H⋯N/N⋯H and (g) N⋯O/O⋯N inter­actions. The di and de values are the closest inter­nal and external distances (in Å) from given points on the Hirshfeld surface contacts.

5. Database survey

A survey of the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, Version 6.01, November 2025 update; Groom et al., 2016) revealed 3581 C9-substituted anthracene derivatives. Herein, we present 20 of them with structural similarity to the target com­pound C-anthracen-9-yl-N-methyl aldo­nitrone, namely, I (AWUZOI; Kraicheva et al., 2011), II (AXODAS; Wong et al., 2004), III (AZORUD; Geetha et al., 2011), IV (CEJLOT; Horiguchi & Ito, 2006), V (CUBMOC; Jaworska et al., 2009), VI (EDOHIS; Monika et al., 2022), VII (FAXVIK; Howie et al., 2005), VIII (FIBQIT; Spinelli et al., 2018), IX (FOHLOE; Howie & Wardell, 2005), X (GUMLAD; Lohar et al., 2015), XI (KEYJAD; Kakimoto et al., 2023), XII (KOBWAC; Ghosh et al., 2017), XIII (NIJWEK; Banerjee et al., 2013), XIV (NOKMIN; Zheng et al., 2024), XV (OCOLUQ; Faizi et al., 2017), XVI (PIGWOR; Subramanian et al., 1993), XVII (QARBUG; Ihmels et al., 2000), XVIII (TITNES; Junor et al., 2019), XIX (TUPGIV; Villalpando et al., 2010) and XX (YIVQAY; Barwiolek et al., 2019).

6. Inter­action energy calculations and energy frameworks

The CE-B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) energy model available in CrystalExplorer (Version 17.5; Spackman et al., 2021) was used to calculate the inter­molecular inter­action energies. Hydrogen-bonding inter­action energies (in kJ mol−1) were calculated to be −33.9 (Eele), −10.9 (Epol), −62.7 (Edis), 65.8 (Erep) and −57.9 (Etot) for the C15—H15⋯O16, and −23.9 (Eele), −6.4 (Epol), −32.8 (Edis), 18.5 (Erep) and −47.1 (Etot) for the C17—H17B⋯O16 hy­dro­gen-bond inter­action. Energy frameworks combine the calculation of inter­molecular inter­action energies with a graphical representation of their magnitude (Turner et al., 2015). Energy frameworks were constructed for Eele (red cylinders), Edis (green cylinders) and Etot (blue cylinders) [Figs. 8(a), 8(b) and 8(c)], and their evaluation indicates that the stabilization largely depends on dispersion energy contributions in the crystal structure of (I).

Figure 8.

Figure 8

The energy frameworks for a cluster of mol­ecules of the title com­pound viewed down the b axis, showing the (a) electrostatic energy Eele, (b) dispersion energy Edis and (c) total energy Etot diagrams. The cylindrical radius is proportional to the relative strength of the corresponding energies and they were adjusted to the same scale factor of 80 with a cut-off value of 5 kJ mol−1 within 2×2×2 unit cells.

7. Synthesis and crystallization

To a solution of N-methyl­hydroxyl­amine (99.9 mg, 1.20 mmol) in MeOH (50 ml) was added sodium carbonate (63.4 mg, 0.60 mmol) and the reaction mixture was stirred for 10 min followed by the addition of anthracene-9-carbaldehyde (224.4 mg, 1.09 mmol). The mixture was then stirred for 12 h at room tem­per­a­ture. The precipitate which formed was filtered off and MeOH was eliminated in vacuo. In order to remove the NaCl produced, the obtained solid was dissolved in CH2Cl2 and filtered, the filtrate was then evaporated in vacuo. The solid product was ultimately washed with Et2O to give pure C-anthracen-9-yl-N-methyl aldo­nitrone, (I). Yellow crystals suitable for X-ray analysis were obtained by slow evaporation of a CH2Cl2 solution (yield 90%). FT–IR (cm−1): 1637 (C=N), 1566 (C=C). Analysis calculated (%) for C16H13NO: C 81.68, H 5.57, N 5.95; found: C 81.73, H 5.60, N 5.93.

8. Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2. The C-bound H-atom positions were calculated geometrically at distances of 0.95 (for aromatic and methine CH) and 0.98 Å (for CH3), and refined using a riding model by applying the constraints Uiso(H) = kUeq(C), where k = 1.5 for CH3 and 1.2 for the other H atoms.

Table 2. Experimental details.

Crystal data
Chemical formula C16H13NO
M r 235.27
Crystal system, space group Monoclinic, P21/n
Temperature (K) 100
a, b, c (Å) 4.89615 (14), 16.6590 (5), 14.2008 (4)
β (°) 91.240 (3)
V3) 1158.02 (6)
Z 4
Radiation type Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 0.08
Crystal size (mm) 0.26 × 0.02 × 0.01
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Rigaku XtaLAB P200K
Absorption correction Multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Rigaku OD, 2024)
Tmin, Tmax 0.714, 1.000
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 24788, 2788, 1992
R int 0.055
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.682
 
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.043, 0.124, 1.05
No. of reflections 2788
No. of parameters 164
H-atom treatment H-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.30, −0.20

Computer programs: CrysAlis PRO (Rigaku OD, 2024), SHELXT2018 (Sheldrick, 2015a), SHELXL2019 (Sheldrick, 2015b) and OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989026000599/vm2323sup1.cif

e-82-00221-sup1.cif (742.4KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989026000599/vm2323Isup2.hkl

e-82-00221-Isup2.hkl (223.1KB, hkl)

checkcif. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989026000599/vm2323sup3.pdf

e-82-00221-sup3.pdf (73.8KB, pdf)

checkcif. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989026000599/vm2323sup4.pdf

e-82-00221-sup4.pdf (73.8KB, pdf)
e-82-00221-Isup5.cml (4.8KB, cml)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989026000599/vm2323Isup5.cml

CCDC reference: 2524759

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank D. B. Cordes for his fruitful discussion. TH is grateful to Hacettepe University Scientific Research Project Unit.

supplementary crystallographic information

1-Anthracen-9-yl-N-methylmethanimine oxide . Crystal data

C16H13NO F(000) = 496
Mr = 235.27 Dx = 1.349 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/n Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 4.89615 (14) Å Cell parameters from 8143 reflections
b = 16.6590 (5) Å θ = 2.8–29.1°
c = 14.2008 (4) Å µ = 0.08 mm1
β = 91.240 (3)° T = 100 K
V = 1158.02 (6) Å3 Platy-needle, yellow
Z = 4 0.26 × 0.02 × 0.01 mm

1-Anthracen-9-yl-N-methylmethanimine oxide . Data collection

Rigaku XtaLAB P200K diffractometer 2788 independent reflections
Radiation source: Rotating Anode, Rigaku FR-X 1992 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Rigaku Osmic Confocal Optical System monochromator Rint = 0.055
Detector resolution: 5.8140 pixels mm-1 θmax = 29.0°, θmin = 1.9°
shutterless scans h = −6→6
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Rigaku OD, 2024) k = −21→21
Tmin = 0.714, Tmax = 1.000 l = −19→19
24788 measured reflections

1-Anthracen-9-yl-N-methylmethanimine oxide . Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: dual
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.043 H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.124 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0587P)2 + 0.3266P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.05 (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
2788 reflections Δρmax = 0.30 e Å3
164 parameters Δρmin = −0.20 e Å3
0 restraints

1-Anthracen-9-yl-N-methylmethanimine oxide . Special details

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

1-Anthracen-9-yl-N-methylmethanimine oxide . Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
O16 0.2639 (2) 0.47437 (6) 0.60736 (7) 0.0281 (3)
N16 0.5270 (2) 0.47324 (7) 0.61726 (8) 0.0205 (3)
C1 0.5642 (3) 0.60243 (8) 0.70066 (9) 0.0178 (3)
C2 0.3685 (3) 0.60047 (8) 0.77210 (9) 0.0175 (3)
C3 0.2557 (3) 0.52728 (8) 0.80734 (9) 0.0204 (3)
H3 0.315933 0.477410 0.782852 0.025*
C4 0.0635 (3) 0.52796 (8) 0.87536 (9) 0.0229 (3)
H4 −0.009682 0.478649 0.897013 0.028*
C5 −0.0289 (3) 0.60146 (9) 0.91436 (9) 0.0232 (3)
H5 −0.166736 0.601175 0.960406 0.028*
C6 0.0801 (3) 0.67197 (8) 0.88573 (9) 0.0215 (3)
H6 0.021220 0.720677 0.913543 0.026*
C7 0.2818 (3) 0.67444 (8) 0.81452 (9) 0.0183 (3)
C8 0.3977 (3) 0.74681 (8) 0.78584 (9) 0.0192 (3)
H8 0.341342 0.795398 0.814553 0.023*
C9 0.5936 (3) 0.74962 (8) 0.71628 (9) 0.0186 (3)
C10 0.7105 (3) 0.82395 (8) 0.68640 (10) 0.0222 (3)
H10 0.655215 0.872636 0.715162 0.027*
C11 0.8991 (3) 0.82603 (8) 0.61756 (10) 0.0244 (3)
H11 0.973665 0.875937 0.598406 0.029*
C12 0.9852 (3) 0.75359 (9) 0.57416 (10) 0.0243 (3)
H12 1.118288 0.755476 0.526533 0.029*
C13 0.8788 (3) 0.68159 (8) 0.60015 (9) 0.0211 (3)
H13 0.937397 0.633996 0.569781 0.025*
C14 0.6800 (3) 0.67635 (8) 0.67244 (9) 0.0178 (3)
C15 0.6736 (3) 0.52877 (8) 0.65776 (9) 0.0196 (3)
H15 0.866041 0.521447 0.659962 0.024*
C17 0.6620 (3) 0.40225 (8) 0.57657 (10) 0.0228 (3)
H17A 0.608897 0.354042 0.611222 0.034*
H17B 0.860711 0.408976 0.581280 0.034*
H17C 0.606005 0.396676 0.510219 0.034*

1-Anthracen-9-yl-N-methylmethanimine oxide . Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
O16 0.0163 (6) 0.0333 (6) 0.0348 (6) 0.0009 (4) 0.0017 (4) −0.0111 (5)
N16 0.0171 (6) 0.0207 (6) 0.0237 (6) 0.0009 (5) 0.0036 (5) −0.0040 (5)
C1 0.0172 (7) 0.0170 (7) 0.0191 (6) 0.0021 (5) −0.0013 (5) −0.0019 (5)
C2 0.0184 (7) 0.0162 (6) 0.0178 (6) 0.0020 (5) −0.0011 (5) −0.0002 (5)
C3 0.0243 (8) 0.0153 (6) 0.0216 (7) 0.0028 (5) −0.0002 (6) −0.0013 (5)
C4 0.0286 (8) 0.0201 (7) 0.0202 (7) −0.0024 (6) 0.0030 (6) 0.0020 (5)
C5 0.0246 (8) 0.0259 (7) 0.0194 (6) 0.0013 (6) 0.0055 (6) 0.0008 (6)
C6 0.0245 (8) 0.0194 (7) 0.0208 (6) 0.0052 (6) 0.0032 (6) −0.0023 (5)
C7 0.0182 (7) 0.0179 (7) 0.0188 (6) 0.0029 (5) −0.0006 (5) −0.0013 (5)
C8 0.0209 (7) 0.0156 (7) 0.0211 (7) 0.0039 (5) 0.0000 (5) −0.0026 (5)
C9 0.0193 (7) 0.0168 (7) 0.0196 (6) 0.0019 (5) −0.0013 (5) −0.0003 (5)
C10 0.0271 (8) 0.0153 (7) 0.0241 (7) 0.0006 (5) −0.0006 (6) −0.0016 (5)
C11 0.0293 (8) 0.0190 (7) 0.0249 (7) −0.0038 (6) 0.0007 (6) 0.0018 (6)
C12 0.0228 (8) 0.0263 (8) 0.0238 (7) −0.0020 (6) 0.0045 (6) −0.0004 (6)
C13 0.0207 (7) 0.0198 (7) 0.0229 (7) 0.0005 (5) 0.0023 (5) −0.0039 (5)
C14 0.0178 (7) 0.0172 (7) 0.0182 (6) 0.0008 (5) −0.0003 (5) −0.0017 (5)
C15 0.0197 (7) 0.0173 (7) 0.0220 (7) 0.0012 (5) 0.0033 (5) −0.0005 (5)
C17 0.0243 (8) 0.0173 (7) 0.0269 (7) 0.0010 (6) 0.0047 (6) −0.0062 (6)

1-Anthracen-9-yl-N-methylmethanimine oxide . Geometric parameters (Å, º)

O16—N16 1.2932 (15) C8—H8 0.9500
N16—C15 1.2975 (18) C8—C9 1.3924 (19)
N16—C17 1.4785 (16) C9—C10 1.4324 (19)
C1—C2 1.4108 (19) C9—C14 1.4381 (18)
C1—C14 1.4172 (18) C10—H10 0.9500
C1—C15 1.4757 (18) C10—C11 1.360 (2)
C2—C3 1.4332 (18) C11—H11 0.9500
C2—C7 1.4396 (18) C11—C12 1.4229 (19)
C3—H3 0.9500 C12—H12 0.9500
C3—C4 1.3631 (19) C12—C13 1.3618 (19)
C4—H4 0.9500 C13—H13 0.9500
C4—C5 1.4217 (19) C13—C14 1.4323 (19)
C5—H5 0.9500 C15—H15 0.9500
C5—C6 1.356 (2) C17—H17A 0.9800
C6—H6 0.9500 C17—H17B 0.9800
C6—C7 1.4293 (19) C17—H17C 0.9800
C7—C8 1.3968 (18)
O16—N16—C15 125.30 (12) C8—C9—C10 121.67 (12)
O16—N16—C17 114.96 (11) C8—C9—C14 119.50 (12)
C15—N16—C17 119.73 (12) C10—C9—C14 118.84 (12)
C2—C1—C14 120.37 (11) C9—C10—H10 119.4
C2—C1—C15 122.40 (12) C11—C10—C9 121.13 (13)
C14—C1—C15 117.05 (11) C11—C10—H10 119.4
C1—C2—C3 122.93 (11) C10—C11—H11 119.9
C1—C2—C7 119.48 (12) C10—C11—C12 120.11 (13)
C3—C2—C7 117.57 (12) C12—C11—H11 119.9
C2—C3—H3 119.4 C11—C12—H12 119.6
C4—C3—C2 121.17 (12) C13—C12—C11 120.74 (13)
C4—C3—H3 119.4 C13—C12—H12 119.6
C3—C4—H4 119.6 C12—C13—H13 119.4
C3—C4—C5 120.90 (13) C12—C13—C14 121.18 (13)
C5—C4—H4 119.6 C14—C13—H13 119.4
C4—C5—H5 120.0 C1—C14—C9 119.45 (12)
C6—C5—C4 119.91 (13) C1—C14—C13 122.54 (12)
C6—C5—H5 120.0 C13—C14—C9 118.00 (12)
C5—C6—H6 119.4 N16—C15—C1 125.01 (13)
C5—C6—C7 121.29 (12) N16—C15—H15 117.5
C7—C6—H6 119.4 C1—C15—H15 117.5
C6—C7—C2 119.07 (12) N16—C17—H17A 109.5
C8—C7—C2 119.44 (12) N16—C17—H17B 109.5
C8—C7—C6 121.49 (12) N16—C17—H17C 109.5
C7—C8—H8 119.1 H17A—C17—H17B 109.5
C9—C8—C7 121.75 (12) H17A—C17—H17C 109.5
C9—C8—H8 119.1 H17B—C17—H17C 109.5
O16—N16—C15—C1 0.9 (2) C8—C9—C10—C11 −179.17 (13)
C1—C2—C3—C4 −178.89 (12) C8—C9—C14—C1 0.08 (19)
C1—C2—C7—C6 178.96 (12) C8—C9—C14—C13 179.06 (12)
C1—C2—C7—C8 −1.51 (19) C9—C10—C11—C12 −0.4 (2)
C2—C1—C14—C9 −0.90 (19) C10—C9—C14—C1 −179.40 (12)
C2—C1—C14—C13 −179.83 (12) C10—C9—C14—C13 −0.42 (19)
C2—C1—C15—N16 56.39 (19) C10—C11—C12—C13 0.6 (2)
C2—C3—C4—C5 −0.7 (2) C11—C12—C13—C14 −0.7 (2)
C2—C7—C8—C9 0.7 (2) C12—C13—C14—C1 179.59 (13)
C3—C2—C7—C6 −2.96 (19) C12—C13—C14—C9 0.6 (2)
C3—C2—C7—C8 176.56 (12) C14—C1—C2—C3 −176.36 (12)
C3—C4—C5—C6 −1.8 (2) C14—C1—C2—C7 1.61 (19)
C4—C5—C6—C7 1.9 (2) C14—C1—C15—N16 −128.50 (14)
C5—C6—C7—C2 0.5 (2) C14—C9—C10—C11 0.3 (2)
C5—C6—C7—C8 −179.00 (13) C15—C1—C2—C3 −1.4 (2)
C6—C7—C8—C9 −179.77 (12) C15—C1—C2—C7 176.56 (12)
C7—C2—C3—C4 3.1 (2) C15—C1—C14—C9 −176.11 (11)
C7—C8—C9—C10 179.46 (12) C15—C1—C14—C13 4.96 (19)
C7—C8—C9—C14 0.0 (2) C17—N16—C15—C1 179.78 (12)

1-Anthracen-9-yl-N-methylmethanimine oxide . Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
C15—H15···O16i 0.95 2.24 3.1267 (18) 154
C17—H17B···O16i 0.98 2.28 3.2037 (18) 157

Symmetry code: (i) x+1, y, z.

Funding Statement

Funding for this research was provided by: Hacettepe Üniversitesi (grant No. 013 D04 602 004).

References

  1. Banerjee, A., Sahana, A., Das, A., Lohar, S., Sarkar, B., Mukhopadhyay, S. K., Sanmartín Matalobos, J. & Das, D. (2013). Dalton Trans.42, 16387–16395. [DOI] [PubMed]
  2. Barwiolek, M., Wojtczak, A., Kozakiewicz, A., Babinska, M., Tafelska-Kaczmarek, A., Larsen, E. & Szlyk, E. (2019). J. Lumin.211, 88–95.
  3. Dolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst.42, 339–341.
  4. Faizi, M. S. H., Haque, A., Ahmad, M. & Golenya, I. A. (2017). Acta Cryst. E73, 137–140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  5. Fernandes, R. R., Lasri, J., da Silva, M. F. C. G., Palavra, A. M. F., da Silva, J. A. L., da Silva, J. J. R. F. & Pombeiro, A. J. L. (2011). Adv. Synth. Catal.353, 1153–1160.
  6. Feuer, H. (2007). Nitrile oxides, nitrones, and nitronates, in Organic synthesis: novel strategies in synthesis, 2nd ed. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  7. Floyd, R. A., Kopke, R. D., Choi, C.-H., Foster, S. B., Doblas, S. & Towner, R. A. (2008). Free Radic. Biol. Med.45, 1361–1374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  8. Geetha, K., Kumar, D. K. A. P., Lakshmanan, D., Savitha, R. & Murugavel, S. (2011). Acta Cryst. E67, o2577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  9. Ghosh, M., Ghosh, A., Ta, S., Matalobos, J. S. & Das, D. (2017). Chem. Sel.2, 7426–7431.
  10. Groom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  11. Hamer, J. & Macaluso, A. (1964). Chem. Rev.64, 473–495.
  12. Horiguchi, M. & Ito, Y. (2006). J. Org. Chem.71, 3608–3611. [DOI] [PubMed]
  13. Howie, R. A., Kindness, A., McKay, M. G. & Maguire, G. E. M. (2005). Acta Cryst. E61, o52–o54.
  14. Howie, R. A. & Wardell, S. M. S. V. (2005). Acta Cryst. E61, o1686–o1688.
  15. Ihmels, H., Leusser, D., Pfeiffer, M. & Stalke, D. (2000). Tetrahedron56, 6867–6875.
  16. Jaworska, M., Łączkowski, K. Z., Wełniak, M., Welke, M. & Wojtczak, A. (2009). Appl. Catal. Gen.357, 150–158.
  17. Junor, G. P., Romero, E. A., Chen, X., Jazzar, R. & Bertrand, G. (2019). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.58, 2875–2878. [DOI] [PubMed]
  18. Kakimoto, Y., Ikemura, R., Imai, Y., Tohnai, N., Yamazaki, S., Nakata, E. & Takashima, H. (2023). RSC Adv.13, 1914–1922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  19. Kraicheva, I., Tsacheva, I., Vodenicharova, E., Tashev, E. & Troev, K. (2011). Acta Cryst. E67, o1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  20. Lasri, J., Soliman, S. M., Ali, E. M. M., Eltayeb, N. E., Dege, N., Donia, T., Khamis, A. A. & Alzahrani, F. A. (2024). J. Mol. Struct.1312, 138624.
  21. Lohar, S., Safin, D. A., Sengupta, A., Chattopadhyay, A., Matalobos, J. S., Babashkina, M. G., Robeyns, K., Mitoraj, M. P., Kubisiak, P., Garcia, Y. & Das, D. (2015). Chem. Commun.51, 8536–8539. [DOI] [PubMed]
  22. McKinnon, J. J., Jayatilaka, D. & Spackman, M. A. (2007). Chem. Commun. pp. 3814–3816. [DOI] [PubMed]
  23. Monika, Verma, A., Tiwari, M. K., Subba, N. & Saha, S. (2022). J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem.433, 14130.
  24. Padwa, A. & Pearson, W. H. (2002). In Synthetic application of 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition chemistry toward heterocycles and natural products. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  25. Rigaku OD (2024). CrysAlis PRO. Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan
  26. Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8.
  27. Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.
  28. Spackman, M. A., McKinnon, J. J. & Jayatilaka, D. (2008). Cryst­EngComm10, 377–388.
  29. Spackman, P. R., Turner, M. J., McKinnon, J. J., Wolff, S. K., Grimwood, D. J., Jayatilaka, D. & Spackman, M. A. (2021). J. Appl. Cryst.54, 1006–1011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  30. Spinelli, F., d’Agostino, S., Taddei, P., Jones, C. D., Steed, J. W. & Grepioni, F. (2018). Dalton Trans.47, 5725–5733. [DOI] [PubMed]
  31. Subramanian, R., Koch, S. A. & Harbison, G. S. (1993). J. Phys. Chem.97, 8625–8629.
  32. Turner, M. J., McKinnon, J. J., Jayatilaka, D. & Spackman, M. A. (2011). CrystEngComm13, 1804–1813.
  33. Turner, M. J., Thomas, S. P., Shi, M. W., Jayatilaka, D. & Spackman, M. A. (2015). Chem. Commun.51, 3735–3738. [DOI] [PubMed]
  34. Villalpando, A., Fronczek, F. R. & Isovitsch, R. (2010). Acta Cryst. E66, o1353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  35. Wong, W. Y., Lu, G. L., Liu, L., Shi, J. X. & Lin, Z. (2004). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. pp. 2066–2077.
  36. Zheng, Y., Chen, P., Niu, Z. & Wang, E. (2024). Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc.312, 124035. [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989026000599/vm2323sup1.cif

e-82-00221-sup1.cif (742.4KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989026000599/vm2323Isup2.hkl

e-82-00221-Isup2.hkl (223.1KB, hkl)

checkcif. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989026000599/vm2323sup3.pdf

e-82-00221-sup3.pdf (73.8KB, pdf)

checkcif. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989026000599/vm2323sup4.pdf

e-82-00221-sup4.pdf (73.8KB, pdf)
e-82-00221-Isup5.cml (4.8KB, cml)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989026000599/vm2323Isup5.cml

CCDC reference: 2524759

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES