Abstract
Roseobacter strain 27-4 has been isolated from a turbot larval rearing unit and is capable of reducing mortality in turbot egg yolk sac larvae. Here, we demonstrate that the supernatant of Roseobacter 27-4 is lethal to the larval pathogens Vibrio anguillarum and Vibrio splendidus in a buffer system and inhibited their growth in marine broth. Liquid chromatography (LC) with both UV spectral detection and high-resolution mass spectrometry (HR-MS) identified the known antibacterial compound thiotropocin or its closely related precursor tropodithietic acid in the bioactive fractions. Antibacterial activity correlated with the appearance of a brownish pigment and was only formed in marine broth under static growth conditions. A thick biofilm of multicellular star-shaped aggregated cells formed at the air-liquid interface under static growth conditions. Here, the bioactive compound was the base peak in the LC-UV chromatograms of the extracts where it constituted 15% of the total peak area. Aerated conditions results in 10-fold-higher cell yield, however, cultures were nonpigmented, did not produce antibacterial activity, and grew as single cells. Production of antibacterial compounds may be quorum regulated, and we identified the acylated homoserine lactone (3-hydroxy-decanoyl homoserine lactone) from cultures of Roseobacter 27-4 using LC-HR-MS. The signal molecule was primarily detected in stagnant cultures. Roseobacter 27-4 grew between 10 and 30°C but died rapidly at 37°C. Also, the antibacterial compounds was sensitive to heat and was inactivated at 37°C in less than 2 days and at 25°C in 8 days. Using Roseobacter 27-4 as a probiotic culture will require that is be established in stagnant or adhered conditions and, due to the temperature sensitivity of the active compound, constant production must be ensured.
The dramatic growth in the aquaculture sector (an increment of 9 to 10% per year over the last 8 to 10 years) has emphasized the importance of fish disease control. Bacterial diseases are important constraints and may be treated with antibiotics. However, due to the risk of development and transfer of antibiotic resistance, alternative disease control measures must be implemented. Vaccines have been very successful also in fish farming; however, vaccines are not efficient at the larval stages. Several studies have demonstrated that probiotic bacteria may be used to control pathogenic organisms in fish larval rearing (17, 18, 32), and one of several promising candidates are bacteria of the marine Roseobacter clade.
The ability of Roseobacter to inhibit other bacteria was noted already by Ruiz-Ponte et al. (31) who used Roseobacter gallaeciensis strain BS107 as a probiotic treatment of scallop larvae (32). Roseobacter strains have also been isolated from turbot larval farms, and they were selected from this environment due to their strong anti-Vibrio activity (18). These strains appeared to constitute a relatively stable community since the same DNA subtypes were isolated over several months (19). Antagonistic Roseobacter were especially associated with the walls of the rearing tanks, and this probably reflects the fact that Roseobacter strains are excellent biofilm-forming organisms and are among the first and dominant colonizers of surfaces in marine environments (9).
The genus Roseobacter and species affiliated with this group (the Roseobacter clade) are important members of the marine microbiota (14, 33). These aerobic organisms, which may account for as much as 40% of prokaryotic DNA from the ocean, are believed to play an important role in the sulfur cycle of the oceans (27). Several Roseobacter species are inhibitory toward other bacteria and Brinkhoff et al. (3) recently demonstrated that the inhibitory compound produced by the Roseobacter strain T5 is the sulfur containing tropodithietic acid. This is a precursor of the antibacterial compound thiotropocin isolated from a marine isolate of Agrobacterium (37).
Roseobacter are typically associated with algae and dinoflagellates (12, 14, 26), and they may therefore constitute a very suitable probiotic in the rearing of marine fish larvae. Algae are used as live feed for the rotifers and Artemia, which are used as live feed for marine fish larvae. Hence, the algae may be used as a vehicle for the probiotic bacteria.
To facilitate and optimize the use of a probiotic bacterium, it is necessary to understand its ecology, especially how growth conditions and environmental factors influence the antibacterial activity. The production of antibacterial compounds may in some strains be controlled in a quorum-dependent manner (2, 36, 42). The quorum size of the bacterial population is sensed by monitoring the concentration of a signal compound, which the bacteria release into the environment (10, 11, 40). In gram-negative bacteria, these compounds are mainly acylated homoserine lactones (AHLs) and, indeed, Roseobacter produce compounds that induce AHL monitor systems (4, 15, 22). We therefore hypothesized that production of the antibacterial compound of Roseobacter could be AHL regulated.
The present study was undertaken with the purpose of determining the parameters influencing growth and antibacterial activity of a Roseobacter strain suitable for disease control in turbot larval rearing systems.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strains and media.
Roseobacter strain 27-4 was isolated from turbot larval rearing units due to its inhibitory activity against turbot larval pathogenic bacteria (18). In brief, samples from turbot rearing units were plated on marine agar (MA Difco 212185) and subsequently replica plated on an agar cast with Vibrio anguillarum strain 90-11-287 (serotype O1 strain [35]. Inhibitory activity of strains causing “clear zones” in this agar was confirmed against Vibrio anguillarum and Vibrio splendidus strain DMC-1 (18; R. Thomson, H. L. Macpherson, A. Riaza, and T. H. Birkbeck, unpublished data). Pseudomonas fluorescens strain AH2 (16) was used as a positive inhibition control in the well diffusion assays. All strains were stored at −80°C in medium rich in glycerol and dried skim milk (13). Roseobacter strains were identified based on phenotypic tests and 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis (18). All strains were grown in marine broth (MB; Difco 279110) or on marine agar. Roseobacter strain 27-4 was isolated from rotifer feeding on algal.
Assessment of antibacterial activity in a well diffusion assay.
Antibacterial activity was measured in a well diffusion assay using V. anguillarum as the target organism (18). The level of antibacterial activity was determined by using a semiquantitative assay. Sterile-filtered 27-4 supernatants were twofold serially diluted in sterile-filtered MB. A total of 60 μl of each dilution was tested in the assay, and activity was expressed in arbitrary units (the reciprocal of the highest dilution causing an inhibition zone).
Effect of 27-4 antibacterial “compound” on V. anguillarum and V. splendidus. (i) Inactivation.
V. anguillarum 90-11-287 and V. splendidus DMC-1 were precultured in MB at 20°C for 1 to 2 days and reinoculated in MB. Bacteria were harvested after 24 h at 2,500 × g for 5 min, resuspended, and diluted in phosphate-buffered saline (5× PBS; 19.8 g of Na2HPO4·2H2O, 5.6 g of NaH2PO4·1H2O, and 36.6 g of NaCl to 1 liter [pH 7.2]) to 104 to 105 CFU/ml. Vibrio suspensions were mixed with 20, 50, or 80% of supernatants from Roseobacter grown under stagnant conditions in marine broth at 20°C. All vials were incubated at 20°C and Vibrio counts determined at regular intervals by plating on MA.
(ii) Inhibition of growth.
Sterile-filtered 27-4 supernatant (produced as described above) was twofold diluted with sterile-filtered MB (to remove insoluble salts) and pipetted into microtiter plates (TV Microwell p6U; Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark). V. anguillarum and V. splendidus were grown in sterile-filtered MB at 20°C and inoculated at an initial cell density of ca. 102 CFU/ml in the MB-supernatant mixtures. Concentrations of supernatant were 90, 45, 23, 11.3, 5.6, and 2.8%. Plates were incubated at 20°C and growth, followed by determination of the absorbance at 450 nm (Versamax; Molecular Devices).
Conditions influencing growth, antibacterial activity, and pigmentation of Roseobacter strain 27-4.
Roseobacter strain 27-4 was grown in MB at 20 to 25°C until brown pigment was visible (3 to 7 days) and reinoculated in MB. This medium was also used for temperature and aeration experiments. Experiments were conducted at stagnant and aerated (200 rpm) conditions at 20 to 25°C. The influence of salts on growth and activity was investigated in 2 and 3% Instant Ocean salts (IO; Aquarium Systems, Inc., Sarrebourg, France). All experiments were conducted in the dark. Screening for AHLs was done on sterile filtered culture supernatants using the AHL monitor bacteria Agrobacterium tumefaciens NT1(pZLR4) (7) and Chromobacterium violaceum CV026 (25, 36) in a well diffusion assay (29). Since pH increased in aerated cultures to 8.4 and AHLs are unstable at high pH, the MB was buffered with 0.3 M HEPES (H-3375; Sigma) and adjusted to 7.0 to avoid increasing the pH during culturing.
Growth of strain 27-4 was determined by spread plating on MA with concomitant sampling for antibacterial activity, i.e., sterile-filtered supernatants, which were kept at −20°C until analysis in well diffusion assay. Pigment was measured by spectroscopy in sterile-filtered supernatant at 398 nm (UV maximum of the pigment).
Synthesis of N-(3-hydroxydecanoyl)-homoserine lactone.
Ethyl 3-oxodecanoate was synthesized by reaction of octanal with ethyl diazoacetate in the presence of SnCl4. This compound was then reduced with sodium tetraborohydride in ethanol, affording ethyl 3-hydroxydecanoate, which was saponified with potassium hydroxide in methanol. The free acid was reacted with l-homoserine lactone hydrobromide after activation with benzotriazol and dicyclohexylcarbodiimde. The product was purified by chromatography on silica. The product was checked by using nuclear magnetic resonance, gas chromatography, and liquid chromatography combined with photodiode array detection (UV) and high-resolution mass spectrometry (HR-MS; both positive and negative electrospray) as described below, showing that N-(3-hydroxydecanoyl)-homoserine lactone was more than 98% pure.
Scanning electron microscopy.
Roseobacter strain 27-4 grown in MB at 20 to 25°C for 3 to 5 days was prepared by two different methods. In the first (see Fig. 3a), a small drop from the surface layer was placed on a circular glass slide (diameter, 5 mm) and, after the cells were allowed to settle for 5 min, the medium was carefully removed by using filter paper and exposed to osmium vapor for 1 h. Subsequently, the cells were coated with gold-palladium and observed in a Quanta 200 SEM at 20 kV. In the second method (Fig. 3b), 20 to 40 μl of surface layer suspension was carefully filtered through a polycarbonate filter (pore size, 0.2 μm). In the subsequent fixation and dehydration procedure the filters were placed floating on the surface of the liquids with the bacteria on the upper side. The procedure used was fixation in glutaraldehyde and osmium tetroxide, followed by dehydration in a graded series of ethanol and final drying in hexamethyldisilazan. The samples were mounted on aluminum stubs and sputter coated as in the first method.
FIG. 3.
Scanning electron micrographs of Roseobacter strain 27-4 grown in MB under stagnant conditions. (a) Cells were only exposed to osmium vapor and subsequently coated with gold-palladium. (b) Standard fixation and dehydration procedure was used (see Materials and Methods).
Physical and chemical characteristics of Roseobacter antibacterial compound.
Roseobacter strain 27-4 was grown in MB for 3 to 7 days at 20°C, reinoculated in MB, and grown for 2 to 3 days. Supernatants from outgrown cultures were sterile filtered.
(i) Temperature stability.
Aliquots of 1 ml of sterile-filtered culture supernatant were incubated at 5, 20, 25, 30, and 37°C for 30 days. Long-term stability at freezing (−80 and −20°C) was tested for up to 7 months. At regular intervals, samples were tested in agar diffusion assay for antibacterial activity against V. anguillarum. Thawed tubes were discarded. At 100°C aliquots of 1.2 ml were boiled for 12 min before we tested for antibacterial activity.
(ii) Effect of NaCl and pH.
Aliquots (5 ml) of sterile-filtered supernatant were adjusted to pH 1, 3, 5, 7, or 9 with 0.2 or 2 M HCl or NaOH. Sodium chloride was added to a final concentration of 5, 10, 15, or 30% (wt/vol). All suspensions were placed at room temperature for 1 to 1.5 h, and activity was tested in the agar diffusion assay.
(iii) Purification of compound.
Roseobacter 27-4 was grown in 500 ml of MB in a 5-liter volumetric flask at 25°C for 4 days. The cells were removed by centrifugation (10,000 × g for 10 min), and the pH of the supernatant was adjusted to 3.5, followed by extraction with 500 ml of ethyl acetate acidified with 0.1% formic acid (FA) repeated three times, which after phase separation was transferred to a vessel and evaporated to dryness under nitrogen flow. The dry ethyl acetate extract was redissolved in 9 ml of acetonitrile (ACN)-water (1:19) containing 1% FA, and these sequentially applied to two 60-mg Oasis MAX columns (Waters, Milford, MA) coupled in series. These had previously been sequentially conditioned with 4 ml of methanol (high-pressure liquid chromatography grade) and 3 ml of ACN-water (1:19) containing 1% FA. After the samples were loaded by gravity, the columns were washed with 4 ml of PBS buffer (pH 7). Then, 3.5 ml of ACN-water (1:1) was passed through the column and collected (fraction 1), followed by 3.5 ml of ACN-water (9:1; fraction 2), 3.5 ml of ACN-water (1:1) with 2% FA (fraction 3), and finally 3.5 ml of ACN-water (9:1) with 2% FA (fraction 4). The solvents were then removed in vacuo on a SpeedVac (ThermoSavant, Holbrook, NY).
(iv) LC-UV-HR-MS analysis.
Extracts were redissolved in ACN-water (1:1), filtered through a 0.45-μm-pore-size PFTE syringe filter and analyzed by reversed-phase chromatography combined with photodiode array detection (UV) and HR-MS (LC-UV-HR-MS) on an LCT orthogonal time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Waters-Micromass, Manchester, United Kingdom). Samples were separated on a Luna C18 (II) by using an acetonitrile-water gradient system and analyzed in the positive electrospray ionization (ESI+) as described previously (5). The only changes were that two scan functions (1 s each) were used: one with a potential difference of 10 V between the skimmers and one with 30 V (to induce in-source fragmentation). Samples were also analyzed in the negative electrospray ionization (ESI−) mode by using the same LC-UV-HR-MS system. Here, the acetonitrile-water gradient system started 15% acetonitrile, which was increased linearly to 100% in 20 min, holding this for 5 min. Formic acid at 200 μl/liter was added to the water. The MS was tuned to a resolution of 5,000 (at half peak height), and two scan functions (1 s each) were used: one with a potential difference of 10 V between the skimmers and one with 30 V. The capillary was held at −1,800 V, and data were collected as centroid data from m/z 100 to 900. A solution of 3,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid in water-methanol (1:1 [vol/vol]) was infused (10 μl/min) into the lock spray source (second ESI− spray) by using a syringe pump. The [M-H]− ion of 3,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid was subsequently used for online mass correction every 3 s.
RESULTS
Effect of antibacterial compound on V. anguillarum and V. splendidus.
Cells of V. anguillarum or V. splendidus were killed when exposed to sterile-filtered supernatants of Roseobacter strain 27-4 (Fig. 1A). V. anguillarum cells were reduced with 3 log units when exposed to 50 to 80% supernatant for 2 h. V. splendidus was less sensitive, and the same volume of Roseobacter supernatant caused an approximately 1 log unit reduction in cell count. None of the Vibrio spp. were detected after 24 h (<10 CFU/ml).
FIG. 1.
Survival (A) or growth (B) of V. anguillarum when exposed to sterile-filtered supernatant from Roseobacter strain 27-4. Strains were suspended in buffer and incubated at 20°C. The datum points are means of duplicates, and error bars indicate standard variations.
Autoinhibition was tested by exposing Roseobacter cells to Roseobacter supernatant. Cells were harvested prior to stationary phase and diluted 10 times, and 107 CFU/ml were mixed with 80% supernatant. No reduction of Roseobacter cells was observed after 24 h.
V. anguillarum and V. splendidus were exposed to Roseobacter sterile-filtered supernatant mixed in MB, and growth of V. anguillarum was completely inhibited by addition of 23 to 90% supernatant (Fig. 1B). V. splendidus was less sensitive and grew also with the addition of 23% supernatant.
Factors influencing production of antibacterial compound.
Cultures of Roseobacter grown in MB were always characterized by the production of a brownish diffusible pigment when antibacterial activity could be detected. However, this pigmentation was only produced under some cultures conditions.
(i) Aeration.
When Roseobacter 27-4 was grown in MB under static conditions, pigment production always started at the liquid-air interface where a biofilm was formed. The surface-volume ratio influenced pigmentation and the level of antibacterial activity (Table 1). Roseobacter 27-4 grew well under aerated conditions and increased from 104 CFU/ml to approximately 1010 CFU/ml in 24 h, whereas the static grown culture ceased at a cell density of approximately 109 CFU/ml within 48 h. Antibacterial activity, pigmentation, and biofilm formation was only seen under static growth conditions (Fig. 2). Also, the morphology of the cultures differed dramatically between the two growth conditions. In the static cultures, the bacteria did not grow as individual cells but in a multicellular star-forming shape, and the “stars” merged to form a thick biofilm (Fig. 2a). In contrast, the aerated culture was dominated by single, individual cells (Fig. 2b). When observed in a phase-contrast microscope (×1,000 magnification), the cells seem to divide into the star shape rather than single cells attaching to each other to for the star shape. Furthermore, no stars were formed when incubating a full grown aerated culture under static conditions. The scanning electron microscopy of the culture stained directly revealed a clear star-shaped aggregate where salt crystals and a layer of slime covering the cells was visible (Fig. 3a). When the cells were fixed and washed in buffer, salt crystals and slime were removed, and the aggregation of four to ten cells in star-shaped structures was clearly revealed (Fig. 3b). The individual cells were anchored to one another with fibrils.
TABLE 1.
Antibacterial activity and pigmentation of Roseobacter strain 27-4 grown in MB at 20°C under static conditions
| Vol of MB in 400-ml flasks | Pigment, ABS 398 nm | Anti-Vibrio activitya
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Diam in well diffusion assay (mm) | Arbitrary units | ||
| 25 | 1.82 | 29 | 512 |
| 50 | 1.40 | 27 | 256 |
| 100 | 0.97 | 22 | 64 |
| 150 | 0.87 | 22 | 128 |
| 200 | 0.73 | 19 | 32 |
| 250 | 0.48 | 15 | 16 |
| 300 | 0.24 | 9 | 8 |
| 350 | 0.14 | 8 | 2 |
Activity was measured as arbitrary units denoting the reciprocal of the highest twofold dilution causing inhibition of the target organism.
FIG. 2.
Roseobacter strain 27-4 grown in MB at 25°C under static and aerated conditions. Pictures are from phase contrast microscope at ×1,000 magnification. One bacterial cell is approximately 1 by 3 μm.
The star-shaped structure was not stable since vigorous shaking broke up the star shape into individual cells. Therefore, plate counting of CFU/ml in which samples was vortexed does represent the true cell count.
(ii) Temperature.
Roseobacter strain 27-4 grew well in MB at 15, 20, 25, and 30°C under static conditions with generation times of 3, 1.6, 1.4, and 1.3 h, respectively. Growth was slower at 10°C (generation time, 9.4 h) and did not occur at 5°C. Roseobacter cell numbers decreased rapidly at 37°C. The maximum cell density of 108 to 109 CFU/ml was reached at 15, 20, 25 and 30°C. Antibacterial activity was detected above cell concentrations of 3 to 5 × 108 CFU/ml. Activity in broth incubated at 20 and 25°C was detected up to 5 days in stationary phase when the experiment ceased. Activity levels of 64 to 128 arbitrary units were detected in cultures incubated at 15 to 25°C. At 30°C, however, the activity level was much lower, between 1 and 2 arbitrary units, despite cell densities equal to those at 15 to 25°C. No antibacterial activity was detected for cells incubated at 5, 10, and 37°C. Brown pigment was seen in all cultures when antibacterial activity was detected.
(iii) Salts.
The pigment and antibacterial compound production of Roseobacter grown in MB did not appear to be a constant, reproducible feature. MB contains insoluble compounds (salts), and we hypothesized that these were important for pigmentation. If the MB media were sterile filtered, which removed the insoluble salts, significantly less pigment was formed than with unfiltrated MB. Low levels of antibacterial activity (2 to 8 arbitrary units) and no pigmentation were seen when Roseobacter grow to high cell densities (108 CFU/ml) in 2 and 3.3% IO.
(iv) AHL production.
In the aerated cultures, AHL was detected by A. tumefaciens NT1(pZLR4) after 25 and 31 h at a cell density of 8 × 109 CFU/ml, but no AHL was detected thereafter. In static cultures AHL was detected by A. tumefaciens NT1(pZLR4) after 48 h of growth at a cell density of 9 × 108 CFU/g and remained at the same level for several days. No AHL induction of violacin was seen with C. violaceum CV026. The decrease in AHL concentration in the aerated cultures could be due to higher pH (pH 8.4) in the aerated culture compared to pH 6.9 in the static culture. However, AHLs also disappeared from these cultures when MB was buffered to 7.0.
LC-ESI+-HR-MS detected 3-hydroxy-decanoyl homoserine lactone with the same pattern of [M+H]+, [M+Na]+, [M+H-H2O]+ (low in source fragmentation) and protonated acetonitrile adduct of the aminooxohydrofuran moiety (m/z 143) (high in source fragmentation) as the reference standard, also at the correct retention time. The calculated accurate masses were all within the instrumental precision of approximately ±6 mDa.
Physical and chemical characteristics of antibacterial compound.
The antibacterial compound produced by Roseobacter strain 27-4 was not inactivated by exposure to different pH values (1, 3, 5, 7, and 9) for 1 to 1.5 h. In contrast, temperature influenced the antibacterial activity, which declined with increasing temperature (Table 2). For example, no activity was detected after 1 day incubation at 37°C, whereas activity was stable at 5°C for up to 8 days. The compound did not precipitate at sodium chloride concentrations of 5, 10, 15, or 30% (wt/vol).
TABLE 2.
Antibacterial activity of supernatant from Roseobacter strain 27-4 after incubation at different temperatures
| Temp (°C) | Zone (mm) in well diffusion assaya at:
|
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 min | Day
|
|||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 30 | 50 | 90 | 150 | 210 | ||
| −80 | ND | >22b | 28 | 27 | 25 | 27 | 24 | 23 | 21 | 23 |
| −20 | ND | 26 | 28 | 27 | 26 | 25 | 19 | 16 | 18 | 16 |
| 5 | ND | 25 | 25 | 26 | 22 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| 10 | ND | 21 | 21 | 23 | 19 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| 20 | ND | 22 | 20 | 19 | 10 | 0 | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| 25 | ND | 20 | 19 | 17 | 0 | 0 | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| 30 | ND | 19 | 16 | 9 | 0 | 0 | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| 37 | ND | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| 100 | 14 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
Zones were measured in the well diffusion assay. ND, not determined.
A freshly prepared supernatant results in 20- to 26-mm zones.
The compound was extracted from a Roseobacter 27-4 culture grown under static conditions using acidified ethyl acetate extraction. LC-UV showed that the largest peak (Fig. 4) in the chromatogram had a UV spectrum that could be superimposed on the spectrum of tropodithietic acid published in Liang (23), with all four major absorptions matching, along with a valley and four shoulders. However, the UV data also matched the UV data of the related thiotropocin (37). LC-ESI+-HR-MS showed that the accurate mass of the protonated molecular ion was 212.9605 Da. This was 6.4 mDa higher than 212.9669 Da, which is the theoretical mass both protonated thiotropocin and tropodithietic acid (same elementary composition), and within the instrumental precision. The compound also showed loss of CO2, which is common for carboxylic acid and also observed by Liang (23). However, loss of CO2 also appeared likely from thiotropocin and cannot be used to differentiate the two analogues. The isotope ratio between the [M+H+2]+ and [M+H+1]+ was 0.95, which matched the theoretical value of a disulfur compound of 0.96 (1.25 if containing three sulfurs and 0.55 if containing one). The presence of an acidic group was further validated as the compound eluted in the first acidic fraction (fraction 3) from the Oasis MAX column. In the crude extract the sulfur compound was the base peak in LC-UV chromatograms accounting for ca. 15% of the total peak area. After the singe Oasis Max clean-up step, it accounted for ca. 90% of the total peak area (Fig. 5). The sulfur compound could be detected with both ESI+ and ESI−, although compared to other microbial metabolites (28) it had quite poor response in both negative modes.
FIG. 4.
Identification of tropodithietic acid and 3-hydroxy-decanoyl homoserine lactone in extract from Roseobacter strain 27-4 grown in MB. The ESI+ mass spectra at high (A) and low (B) in-source fragmentation of tropodithietic acid/thiotropocin, along with the UV spectrum (C) and structures to the right. (D) UV chromatogram (200 to 700 nm). (E and F) ESI+ total ion chromatograms at high and low in-source fragmentations, respectively. (G and H) ESI+ spectra of 3-hydroxy-decanoyl homoserine lactone at high and low in-source fragmentations, respectively.
FIG. 5.
UV chromatograms of before (lower) and after clean up on a Oasis MAX column of ethyl acetate extract of Roseobacter strain 27-4 grown in MB.
The brown pigment was retained on the Oasis MAX column even after the fraction 4, and we speculate that it could be a polyphenolic polymer. Since almost all bioactivity was found in fraction 3 and accounted for the same activity as the crude extract, it is clear that the pigment is not the active part and thus is only an indicator for activity. Also, it had a UV maximum of 398 nm where tropodithietic acid absorbs at 304 and 356 nm (Fig. 4).
DISCUSSION
Roseobacter species can produce antibacterial compounds (3) and are inhibitory to fish pathogenic bacteria (18, 32). Also, the live bacterial culture may reduce mortality of fish and fish larvae Vibrio species (18, 32). We show here that the antibacterial effect may be lethal since cells of V. anguillarum and V. splendidus were killed when exposed to supernatants of Roseobacter, and growth was strongly inhibited when exposed to supernatant of Roseobacter in MB media. However, the conditions required to induce the antibacterial activity are not known, and we describe here culture conditions required for Roseobacter strain 27-4 to be inhibitory against fish pathogenic bacteria.
The antibacterial compound produced by Roseobacter 27-4 is an extracellular compound as sterile filtered supernatants inhibited the fish pathogenic bacteria. Brinkhoff et al. (3) found that the antibacterial compound produced by Roseobacter T5 was tropodithietic acid and, in our study, LC-HR-MS confirmed the presence of thiotropocin or its precursor tropodithietic acid as the active compound of Roseobacter strain 27-4. The two Roseobacter strains are phylogenetically similar but not identical and have been isolated from quite different environments. Strain T5 has been isolated from an intertidal mud flat in the German Wadden Sea (3), whereas strain 27-4 has been isolated from a Spanish turbot farm just off the Galicean cost (18). Brinkhoff et al. (3) indicated that the activity seemed to be correlated to a brownish pigment since nonpigmented (mutant) colonies were devoid of antibacterial activity. Our Roseobacter strain 27-4 also produced a brownish diffusible compound, and antibacterial activity was only seen in pigmented cultures. However, the brownish pigment was not the primary bioactive compound since the full bioactivity of the extract was found in fractions and the pigment was not eluted from the column.
The sulfur containing compound thiotropocin or tropodithietic acid produced by Roseobacter strain 27-4 constituted as much as 15% of metabolite production, indicating that sulfur metabolism is a major secondary metabolic pathway. Roseobacter and other α-Proteobacteria play an important role in the sulfur cycle in the oceanic environment (27) where they degrade dimethyl sulfoniopropionate (DMSP) to dimethyl sulfide (DMS). DMSP is produced in high concentrations by phytoplankton, and the degradation product, DMS, is emitted to the atmosphere. Thus, Roseobacter species are crucial players in the global sulfur cycle. The substrate for formation of the antibacterial compound is not known but, assuming that DMSP can be used as substrate, it is likely to be produced when Roseobacter colonizes marine dinoflagellates and may be important for the dominance of the organism in this niche (1, 14).
Thiotropocin or tropodithietic acid was stable at different pH, whereas temperature influenced the activity, which declined rapidly with increasing temperature. Therefore, growth conditions ensuring a constant production of the antibacterial compound are needed if Roseobacter 27-4 is to be used as a probiotic bacterium in turbot rearing farms. Roseobacter strain 27-4 grew in a rather narrow temperature interval and did not survive 37°C. This narrow temperature window of growth corresponds to the findings by Selje et al. (33), who did not detect organisms from the Roseobacter clade in tropical and subtropical waters. In contrast, the Roseobacter and SAR11 clade constituted between 16 and 26% of rRNA gene clones retrieved from marine bacterioplankton in temperate to polar regions.
The antibacterial activity of Roseobacter strain 27-4 was only produced under specific conditions and only when grown in MB. The production of antibacterial substances by another Roseobacter strain BS107 was only seen if the culture was supplemented with supernatant of V. anguillarum (32). The antibacterial compound from Roseobacter BS107 was heat stable, indicating that the compound was different from tropodithietic acid or thiotropocin. The production of thiotropocin or tropodithietic acid in Roseobacter 27-4 was very sensitive to aeration since the antibacterial compound was only found under static conditions. Roseobacter BS107 was grown with agitation, which could have influenced the production of antibacterial compounds. In addition, aeration also caused a dramatic chance in the morphology of Roseobacter 27-4.
Static growth conditions caused Roseobacter strain 27-4 to grow in multicellular star-shaped mode, a similar behavior has been described for a marine Rugeria strain (21) and marine Agrobacterium (30) now transferred to the Roseobacter clade (38). The purpose of this behavior, as well as the factors influencing this phenotype, is not known. However, stars were observed under the same conditions where antibacterial activity was detected, and it seems that the star shape is important for the organism to aggregate into a thick biofilm. Roseobacter species are excellent biofilm formers and are the first to colonize surfaces in open waters (9). Roseobacter strain 27-4 is probably also an excellent biofilm-forming bacteria since it has primarily been isolated from tank walls (18) where the same subtype has been persisting over 1 year (19). The attaching and biofilm-forming capacity may be important for survival in the marine environment and may be characteristics that allow the bacterium to colonize algae (1).
The antibacterial compound was only detected at high cell densities, and this could indicate that the production was controlled in a quorum-dependent manner. Indeed, quorum sensing has been shown to control the production of antibacterial compounds in several bacteria (2, 36, 42). The probiotic bacteria P. aureofaciens, which is used to protect wheat against filamentous fungi, produce the quorum-sensing signal molecule N-hexanoyl-homoserine lactone, and this molecule is present and responsible for expression of three antibiotics in situ on plant roots (41). Roseobacter strains isolated from marine snow or dinoflagellates produce compounds that induce AHL reporter systems (4, 15, 22); however, the exact nature of the compounds have not been elucidated. In the present study, we detected N-(3-hydroxydecanoyl)-l-homoserine lactone from Roseobacter strain 27-4. This compound has been previously tentatively identified by its ESI-MS/MS spectrum in the strain P. fluorescens 2-79 (34) and is also produced by Burkholderia pseudomallei (39). It is, however, not known which phenotypes are regulated by the quorum-sensing systems. The production of AHL may also affect the probiotic ability of Roseobacter to prevent infections of fish pathogenic since many fish pathogenic bacteria have also been shown to produce AHL signal molecules (6), and cross talk between different bacteria, which produces signal molecules is expected. Further studies are needed to determine whether the AHL compound is involved in the regulation of the antibacterial activity of Roseobacter strain 27-4. These could be determined by comparing the wild-type strain with luxI/R mutants of Roseobacter 27-4.
One may also hypothesize that the multicellular star-shaped growth behavior of Roseobacter strain 27-4 is influenced by quorum sensing. The cell morphology of the yeast Candida albicans is affected by AHL compounds (20), and the aggregation into mature biofilms is dependent on quorum sensing in several bacteria such as Aeromonas hydrophila (24) and Vibrio anguillarum (8). However, stars were formed during growth at low and high cell densities, which was not expected if the star forming was regulated by a quorum sensing system.
If Roseobacter 27-7 is to be used as a probiotic bacteria in the aquaculture sector, a further understanding of the effects of the antibacterial compound are needed. Especially, it must be determined if the multicellular behavior and the aggregation and biofilm formation are essential for the antibacterial activity. Therefore, the interaction between Roseobacter 27-4 and fish pathogenic bacteria have to be studied under conditions closer to the in vivo situation. Since the Roseobacter both in its natural dinoflagellate niche in the oceans and during production of turbot is mostly found attached to a surface (1, 19, 26), studies of interactions between Roseobacter and other bacteria, including fish pathogenic bacteria, must be carried out in biofilm environments. This would require setup of appropriate model systems and development of methods, allowing specific quantification of Roseobacter and fish pathogenic bacteria during attachment to surfaces and on dinoflagellates.
In conclusion, Roseobacter 27-4 has the ability to be used as a probiotic bacterium in fish farms since it inhibits and kills fish pathogens bacteria. Production of the antibacterial compound was growth specific and was only produced in MB under static conditions. A constant production of thiotropocin or tropodithietic acid must be assured since the compound is unstable, and Roseobacter 27-4 must therefore be established under specific conditions when it is to be used as a probiotic culture. Further studies on the physiology of Roseobacter will also have greater importance due to its role in the oceanic environment.
Acknowledgments
We thank Jette Melchiorsen for excellent technical assistance.
REFERENCES
- 1.Alavi, M., T. Miller, K. Erlandson, R. Schneider, and R. Belas. 2001. Bacterial community associated with Pfiesteria-like dinoflagellate cultures. Environ. Microbiol. 3:380-396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bainton, N. J., P. Steadm, S. R. Chhabra, B. W. Bycroft, G. P. C. Salmond, G. S. A. B. Stewart, and P. Williams. 1992. N-(3-oxohexanoyl)-l-homoserine lactone regulates carbapenem antibiotic production in Erwinia carotovora. Biochem. J. 288:997-1004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Brinkhoff, T., G. Bach, T. Heidorn, L. F. Liang, A. Schlingloff, and M. Simon. 2004. Antibiotic production by a Roseobacter clade-affiliated species from the German Wadden Sea and its antagonistic effects on indigenous isolates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:2560-2565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Brinkmeyer, R., M. Rappé, S. Gallacher, and S. Medlin. 2000. Development of clade- (Roseobacter and Alteromonas) and taxon-specific oligonucleotide probes to study interactions between toxic dinoflagellates and their associate bacteria. Eur. J. Phycol. 35:315-329. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bruhn, J. B., A. B. Christensen, L. R. Flodgaard, K. F. Fog, T. O. Larsen, M. Givskov, and L. Gram. 2004. Presence of acylated homoserine lactones (AHLs) and AHL-producing bacteria in meat and potential role of AHL in spoilage of meat. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:4293-4302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bruhn, J. B., I. Dalsgaard, K. F. Nielsen, C. Buch, J. L. Larsen, and L. Gram. 2005. Quorum sensing signal molecules (acylated homoserine lactones) in gram-negative fish pathogenic bacteria. Dis. Aquat. Org. 65:43-52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cha, C., P. Gao, Y. C. Chen, P. D. Shaw, and S. K. Farrand. 1998. Production of acyl-homoserine lactone quorum-sensing signals by gram-negative plant-associated bacteria. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 11:1119-1129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Croxatto, A., V. J. Chalker, J. Lauritz, J. Jass, A. Hardman, P. Williams, M. Camara, and D. L. Milton. 2002. VanT, a homologue of Vibrio harveyi LuxR, regulates serine, metalloprotease, pigment, and biofilm production in Vibrio anguillarum. J. Bacteriol. 184:1617-1629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Dang, H. Y., and C. R. Lovell. 2000. Bacterial primary colonization and early succession on surfaces in marine waters as determined by amplified rRNA gene restriction analysis and sequence analysis of 16S rRNA genes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:467-475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.de Kievit, T. R., and B. H. Iglewski. 2000. Bacterial quorum sensing in pathogenic relationships. Infect. Immun. 68:4839-4849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Eberl, L. 1999. N-acyl homoserinelactone-mediated gene regulation in gram-negative bacteria. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 22:493-506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Eilers, H., J. Pernthaler, J. Peplies, F. O. Glockner, G. Gerdts, and R. Amann. 2001. Isolation of novel pelagic bacteria from the German bight and their seasonal contributions to surface picoplankton. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:5134-5142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gibson, L. F., and J. T. Khoury. 1986. Storage and survival of bacteria by ultrafeeze. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 3:127-129. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gonzalez, J. M., R. Simo, R. Massana, J. S. Covert, E. O. Casamayor, C. Pedros-Alio, and M. A. Moran. 2000. Bacterial community structure associated with a dimethylsulfoniopropionate-producing North Atlantic algal bloom. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:4237-4246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gram, L., H. P. Grossart, A. Schlingloff, and T. Kiorboe. 2002. Possible quorum sensing in marine snow bacteria: production of acylated homoserine lactones by Roseobacter strains isolated from marine snow. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:4111-4116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gram, L., J. Melchiorsen, B. Spanggaard, I. Huber, and T. F. Nielsen. 1999. Inhibition of Vibrio anguillarum by Pseudomonas fluorescens AH2, a possible probiotic treatment of fish. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:969-973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gram, L., and E. Ringø. 2005. Prospects of fish probiotics, p. 379-417. In W. Holzapfel and P. Naughton (ed.), Microbial ecology of growing animals, vol. 2. Elsevier, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hjelm, M., Ø. Bergh, A. Riaza, J. Nielsen, J. Melchiorsen, S. Jensen, H. Duncan, P. Ahrens, H. Birkbech, and L. Gram. 2004. Selection and identification of autochthonous potential probiotic bacteria from turbot larvae (Scophthalmus maximus) rearing units. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 27:360-371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hjelm, M., A. Riaza, F. Formoso, J. Melchiorsen, and L. Gram. 2004. Seasonal incidence of autochthonous potential probiotic bacteria, Roseobacter spp. and Vibrionaceae, in a turbot larvae (Scophthalmus maximus) rearing system. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:7288-7294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hogan, D. A., A. Vik, and R. Kolter. 2004. A Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum sensing molecule influences Candida albicans morphology. Mol. Microbiol. 54:1212-1223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Jansen, M. 2000. Microbial demethylation of dimethylsulfpropionate and methylthiopropionate. Ph.D. thesis. Rijksuniversitet, Groningen, The Netherlands.
- 22.Johnston, M. P., S. Gallacher, E. A. Smith, and L. A. Glover. 2000. Detection of N-acyl homoserine lactones in marine bacteria associated with production and biotransformation of sodium blocking toxins and the microflora of toxin-producing phytoplankton, p. 375-378. In G. M. Hallegraeff, S. I. Blackburn, C. J. Bolch, and R. J. Lewis (ed.), Harmful algal blooms. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO, New York, N.Y.
- 23.Liang, L. 2003. Investigation of secondary metabolites of North Sea bacteria: fermentation, isolation, and structure elucidation and bioactivity. Ph.D. thesis. University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
- 24.Lynch, M. J., S. Swift, D. F. Kirke, C. W. Keevil, C. E. R. Dodd, and P. Williams. 2002. The regulation of biofilm development by quorum sensing in Aeromonas hydrophila. Environ. Microbiol. 4:18-28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.McClean, K. H., M. K. Winson, L. Fish, A. Taylor, S. R. Chhabra, M. Camara, M. Daykin, J. H. Lamb, S. Swift, B. W. Bycroft, G. S. A. B. Stewart, and P. Williams. 1997. Quorum sensing and Chromobacterium violaceum: exploitation of violacein production and inhibition for the detection of N-acylhomoserine lactones. Microbiol. SGM 143:3703-3711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Miller, T. R., and R. Belas. 2004. Dimethylsulfoniopropionate metabolism by Pfiesteria-associated Roseobacter spp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:3383-3391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Moran, M. A., J. M. Gonzalez, and R. P. Kiene. 2003. Linking a bacterial taxon to sulfur cycling in the sea: studies of the marine Roseobacter group. Geomicrobiol. J. 20:375-388. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nielsen, K. F., and J. Smedsgaard. 2003. Fungal metabolite screening: database of 474 mycotoxins and fungal metabolites for dereplication by standardized liquid chromatography-UV-mass spectrometry methodology. J. Chromatogr. A 1002:111-136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ravn, L., A. B. Christensen, S. Molin, M. Givskov, and L. Gram. 2001. Methods for detecting acylated homoserine lactones produced by gram-negative bacteria and their application in studies of AHL− production kinetics. J. Microbiol. Methods 44:239-251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ruger, H. J., and M. G. Hofle. 1992. Marine star-shaped-aggregate-forming bacteria: Agrobacterium atlanticum sp. nov.; Agrobacterium meteori sp. nov.; Agrobacterium ferrugineum sp. nov., nom. rev.; Agrobacterium gelatinovorum sp. nov., nom. rev.; and Agrobacterium stellulatum sp. nov., nom. rev. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 42:133-143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ruiz-Ponte, C., V. Cilia, C. Lambert, and J. L. Nicolas. 1998. Roseobacter gallaeciensis sp. nov., a new marine bacterium isolated from rearings and collectors of the scallop Pecten maximus. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 48:537-542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ruiz-Ponte, C., J. F. Samain, J. L. Sanchez, and J. L. Nicolas. 1999. The benefit of a Roseobacter species on the survival of scallop larvae. Mar. Biol. 1:52-59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Selje, N., M. Simon, and T. Brinkhoff. 2004. A newly discovered Roseobacter cluster in temperate and polar oceans. Nature 427:445-448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Shaw, P. D., G. Ping, S. L. Daly, C. Cha, J. E. Cronan, K. L. Rinehart, and S. K. Farrand. 1997. Detecting and characterizing N-acyl-homoserine lactone signal molecules by thin-layer chromatography. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:6036-6041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Skov, M. N., K. Pedersen, and J. L. Larsen. 1995. Comparison of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, ribotyping, and plasmid profiling for typing of Vibrio anguillarum serovar O1. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61:1540-1545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Throup, J., N. J. Bainton, B. W. Bycroft, P. Williams, and G. S. A. B. Stewart. 1995. Signalling in bacteria beyond bioluminescence, p. 89-92. In A. K. Cambell, L. F. Kricka, and P. E. Stanley (ed.), Bioluminescence and chemiluminescence: fundamental and applied aspects. Wiley, Chichester, United Kingdom.
- 37.Tsubotani, S., Y. Wada, K. Kamiya, H. Okazaki, and S. Harada. 1984. Structure of thiotropocin, a new sulfur-containing 7-membered antibiotic. Tetrahedron Lett. 25:419-422. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Uchino, Y., A. Hirata, A. Yokota, and J. Sugiyama. 1998. Reclassification of marine Agrobacterium species: proposals of Stappia stellulata gen. nov., comb. nov., Stappia aggregata sp. nov., nom. rev., Ruegeria atlantica gen. nov., comb. nov., Ruegeria gelatinovora comb. nov., Ruegeria algicola comb. nov., and Ahrensia kieliense gen. nov., sp. nov., nom. rev. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 44:201-210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ulrich, R. L., D. DeShazer, H. B. Hines, and J. A. Jeddeloh. 2004. Quorum sensing: a transcriptional regulatory system involved in the pathogenicity of Burkholderia mallei. Infect. Immun. 72:6589-6596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Whitehead, N. A., A. M. L. Barnard, H. Slater, N. J. L. Simpson, and G. P. C. Salmond. 2001. Quorum-sensing in gram-negative bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 25:365-404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wood, D. W., F. C. Gong, M. M. Daykin, P. Williams, and L. S. Pierson. 1997. N-acyl-homoserine lactone-mediated regulation of phenazine gene expression by Pseudomonas aureofaciens 30-84 in the wheat rhizosphere. J. Bacteriol. 179:7663-7670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wood, D. W., and L. S. Pierson. 1996. The phzI gene of Pseudomonas aureofaciens 30-84 is responsible for the production of a diffusible signal required for phenazine antibiotic production. Gene 168:49-53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





