Introduction
Chikungunya fever is an acute mosquito-borne viral disease caused by the chikungunya virus (CHIKV), an alphavirus primarily transmitted by Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (1). It was first identified in Tanzania, Africa, in the 1950s, and historically remained largely confined to parts of Africa and Asia. However, the virus has resurged globally in the past two decades, undergoing a remarkable geographic expansion with explosive outbreaks first noted in the Indian Ocean islands and subsequently sweeping through Asia and the Americas (2). This re-emergence established the virus in vast new populations, transforming it from a localized pathogen into a global public health threat. Characterized by the abrupt onset of high fever, severe arthralgia (joint pain), rash, and often debilitating chronic arthritis, chikungunya is seldom fatal but causes considerable morbidity and socioeconomic disruption, particularly in densely populated urban settings (3, 4).
As of late 2024, the autochthonous (local) transmission of CHIKV has been documented in over 110 countries and territories across the globe, establishing it as a major global health problem (5). The virus is endemic across wide swathes of Africa, Southeast Asia, the Indian subcontinent, the Pacific Region, and the Americas (5, 6). This extensive geographical spread is driven by the presence of the competent vectors A. aegypti and A. albopictus, coupled with factors, like increased global travel and climate change, which expands mosquito habitats (6). While historically confined to the tropics, the movement of infected travelers has led to small, localized outbreaks in temperate regions, such as those reported in Italy (2007) and France (2014), highlighting the persistent risk of importation and local establishment outside traditionally endemic zones (7). The Asian and East–Central–South African lineages are the genotypes predominantly circulating worldwide (6).
The diagnosis of CHIKV infection remains challenging, particularly in cocirculation settings where the virus circulates alongside dengue (DENV) and zika (ZIKV) (8). Although the initial clinical presentations of all three arboviruses substantially overlap, a distinguishing feature of CHIKV is the prominence of severe, symmetrical polyarthralgia and arthritis, which can persist for months to years, a characteristic less common in DENV or ZIKV infections (9). For definitive laboratory confirmation, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction is the primary method for detecting viral RNA in the acute phase (within the first 5–7 days of illness) (10). After this window, serological assays (IgM/IgG ELISA) are employed, although the potential for cross-reactivity with other circulating flaviviruses necessitates further confirmation by specific, albeit resource-intensive, techniques, like the plaque reduction neutralization test (10). Currently, no specific antiviral treatment for chikungunya fever exists; management remains supportive, focusing on pain relief through analgesics and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). However, NSAIDs must be used cautiously and often excluded until DENV coinfection is ruled out (11). Prevention has been revolutionized by the recent introduction of the world's first licensed chikungunya vaccine, IXCHIQ®, with access rapidly expanding in endemic regions through agreements, such as the technology transfer and licensing agreements with the Serum Institute of India, aimed at ensuring priority supply in Asia (12).
Recent events in mainland China underscore the urgency of re-evaluating chikungunya as a regional public health concern. As of early December 2025, the Guangdong Province outbreak has escalated, resulting in over 16,000 confirmed cases, although the rate of new infections has been decreasing. The virus was likely imported via infected travelers and rapidly amplified through local A. albopictus populations, prompting a level 3 emergency response, which indicates that it is a major crisis and requires massive, organization-wide mobilization. These concerns were realized with Hong Kong recording its first locally acquired case of chikungunya fever this year on October 25, 2025, involving an 82-year-old woman in the Wong Tai Sin area. This situation has raised anxieties about the potential for local transmission, especially given Hong Kong's densely populated urban environment and the ongoing outbreak in nearby Guangdong Province, China.
This article presents a viewpoint on the importance of the 2025 China outbreak as a wake-up call for regional governments, particularly Hong Kong, to adopt proactive, evidence-based strategies for chikungunya prevention. By discussing the causes of transmission, gaps in vaccination and mosquito control, and the critical role of public health education, this paper aims to encourage timely surveillance, regional coordination, and targeted vector management efforts before outbreaks become endemic.
Cause and transmission of CHIKV
CHIKV is a single-stranded RNA virus of the genus Alphavirus and family Togaviridae (13). The virus maintains two primary, ecologically distinct transmission cycles: the sylvatic and urban cycles (13). The sylvatic cycle is the ancestral enzootic mechanism in Africa, where the virus is maintained between a non-human primate reservoir (such as monkeys and baboons) and forest-dwelling Aedes mosquitoes, including species like Aedes africanus and Aedes furcifer. Human infection in this cycle is typically an accidental spillover event, occurring when people encroach on forest habitats and are bitten by these bridge vectors (13). By contrast, the urban cycle is responsible for the massive outbreaks seen globally and operates as a human–mosquito–human transmission loop. This cycle is driven primarily by the highly domesticated vectors A. aegypti and A. albopictus. These mosquitoes are day biting, thrive in urban environments, and breed in stagnant water. A. albopictus, which is widely distributed across subtropical Asia, has been particularly instrumental in recent CHIKV outbreaks because of its adaptability to cool climates and urban–rural habitats (14), with viral adaptation (such as the A226V mutation) further enhancing its transmission competence (refer to Figure 1 for the transmission cycle of CHIKV). Beyond the main vector-borne (horizontal) route, non-vectorial modes of transmission include vertical transmission (mother to child), which is most dangerous when the mother is viremic during the perinatal period, as well as rare cases of blood-borne transmission via transfusions and occupational exposure in laboratory settings (15). Furthermore, while its public health importance has not been fully elucidated, CHIKV RNA has also been detected in semen and cervical samples, suggesting potential for sexual transmission (15).
Figure 1.
Transmission cycles of chikungunya virus (CHIKV). CHIKV is maintained through two distinct ecological pathways: the sylvatic (enzootic) cycle and the urban (epidemic) cycle. In the sylvatic cycle, the virus circulates between non-human primate reservoirs and forest-dwelling mosquito vectors (e.g., Aedes furcifer, Ae. africanus). Zoonotic spillover occurs when humans are occasionally infected through forest-related activities, potentially introducing the virus into urban settings. The urban transmission cycle involves a bidirectional exchange between human hosts and urban mosquito vectors, primarily Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus, facilitating rapid spread in densely populated areas [illustration created by the authors using Adobe Illustrator and adapted from “Transmission of Chikungunya Virus” (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) available at: https://www.cdc.gov/chikungunya/php/transmission/index.html].
Infected individuals typically develop symptoms within 3–7 days of being bitten. The clinical presentation includes abrupt fever onset, severe joint pain, muscle pain, rash, and fatigue (16). While mortality is rare, the disease can result in debilitating polyarthritis lasting weeks to months. Asymptomatic infections also occur, complicating case detection and increasing the risk of unnoticed transmission (17).
The potential for rapid transmission is compounded in regions with dense populations, insufficient vector control, and lack of community awareness. Seasonal rainfall and rising temperatures due to climate change further increase vector density and survival, making previously non-endemic regions increasingly vulnerable (18).
Virus replication, viral kinetics, and immunopathogenesis
CHIKV is an enveloped virus with a positive-sense, single-stranded RNA genome (+ssRNA) that functions directly as a messenger RNA upon entry. The replication cycle begins when the viral E2 glycoprotein binds to cellular receptors, such as MXRA8, facilitating clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Once inside the endosome, low pH triggers a conformational change in the E1 glycoprotein, leading to fusion with the endosomal membrane and the release of genomic RNA into the cytoplasm (19). This genomic RNA is first translated into a non-structural polyprotein (P1234), which is subsequently cleaved by the viral protease nsP2 into four individual non-structural proteins (nsP1–nsP4) (20). These proteins assemble on modified intracellular membranes to form the replication complex, which uses the genomic RNA to synthesize a negative-sense RNA intermediate that then serves as the template for creating a new full-length genomic RNA and short subgenomic RNA (21). This subgenomic RNA encodes the structural capsid, E3, E2, 6K, and E1 proteins (22). The capsid protein then encapsidates the new genomic RNA to form the nucleocapsid, which subsequently buds through the plasma membrane, acquiring the envelope (containing the E1/E2 heterodimers) before being released as mature virions (23).
From an epidemiological perspective, the highest concentration of infectious virus and viral RNA (viremia) occurs during the acute phase of infection (Days 0–7 postsymptom onset), which is characterized by explosive viral replication in primary target cells, like fibroblasts and macrophages, making this window crucial for molecular diagnosis (PCR). Post Day 8, viral load typically declines as the adaptive immune response matures (24).
The immunology of CHIKV infection involves a robust response, including the early induction of type I interferons and the later development of neutralizing antibodies and activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells that are essential for viral clearance from circulation and muscle tissue (25). However, the virus utilizes an immune-driven mechanism for chronic disease: while the adaptive system successfully clears the acute infection, it often fails to eliminate viral RNA and antigens from specific immune-privileged sites, particularly joint-associated tissues (e.g., synovial fibroblasts and macrophages). This persistent, low-level viral presence, often alongside persistent immune cell infiltration, acts as a continuous trigger for inflammation (synovitis and arthritis), effectively utilizing the host's own prolonged, dysfunctional adaptive immune response to drive the debilitating chronic polyarthralgia that can last months to years (26, 27).
Recent outbreak dynamics and regional risks
The 2025 outbreak in Guangdong Province is a watershed moment for CHIKV epidemiology in China. What began as isolated imported cases quickly evolved into a large-scale outbreak, particularly concentrated in Foshan and its Shunde District, with thousands of cases confirmed in just weeks. Although regional health authorities responded with emergency surveillance, mosquito control measures, and community engagement, the pace and scale of the outbreak revealed considerable preparedness gaps.
The presence of A. albopictus throughout southern China, including Hong Kong, underscores the risk of cross-border transmission. With high volumes of travel between the Greater Bay Area cities, including Shenzhen, Foshan, and Hong Kong, the likelihood of imported infections remains high. In August 2025, Hong Kong confirmed its first imported case of chikungunya in a 12-year-old boy returning from Shunde. While initial cases were successfully contained, the subsequent confirmation of the first locally acquired case in late October 2025 tragically validates this paper's central argument, that is, is the window for pre-emptive containment is exceedingly limited, necessitating an urgent strengthening of public health measures. The case also raises broad concerns about the under-recognition and underreporting of arboviral infections in regions without active surveillance systems. With DENV and ZKV also circulating in overlapping areas, coinfections and misdiagnoses are possible, further complicating clinical management, and epidemiological tracking may be required.
Vaccination limitations and vector control gaps
Despite the growing global awareness of chikungunya, prevention tools remain limited. Until recently, no licensed vaccine was available. In 2023, the United States approved IXCHIQ®, a live-attenuated single-dose chikungunya vaccine developed by Valneva (28). The vaccine received conditional approval in the European Union in 2024. However, adoption in Asia has been slow because of regulatory delays and concerns about the vaccine's safety profile in older adult populations (29). Clinical trials are ongoing in several countries, but no large-scale deployment has occurred in mainland China or Hong Kong as of October 2025.
The lack of vaccination coverage leaves vector control as the primary preventive strategy. However, traditional vector control efforts face several challenges (30). Urban environments provide abundant breeding sites for Aedes mosquitoes in the form of flower pots, rooftop tanks, drains, and construction sites. The widespread use of insecticides has led to resistance in some mosquito populations, reducing efficacy. Moreover, public engagement in mosquito control tends to decline outside of active outbreak periods, leading to complacency.
Guangdong's 2025 outbreak saw innovative responses, such as the deployment of Toxorhynchites splendens (cannibal mosquitoes), to reduce larval density. While such ecological approaches are promising, they require careful monitoring and integration into broad integrated vector management strategies. Public health messaging must also be tailored to local cultures and languages to ensure community buy-in.
Public health readiness and prevention opportunities
The 2025 chikungunya outbreak offers several lessons for public health authorities in Asia, especially those in cities with high travel volumes and favorable climates for mosquito breeding.
First, cross-border surveillance must be strengthened. The seamless movement of people across the Guangdong, Hong Kong, and Macau borders necessitates real-time data sharing on vector activity and arboviral case detection. A regional early warning system could enhance rapid response to emerging threats (31).
Second, public education campaigns need to be sustained year-round, not just during outbreaks. Raising awareness about the risks of arboviral diseases and the importance of eliminating mosquito breeding sites is essential. This approach includes engaging schools, workplaces, and community organizations in routine cleanup and prevention efforts (32).
Third, travel health advisories should be updated to include chikungunya, especially for outbound travelers to affected areas (33). Returnees with febrile illness should be screened for CHIKV alongside DENV and ZKV, and clinicians should be trained to recognize overlapping symptomatology.
Fourth, vaccination readiness must be prioritized. While the large-scale rollout of the chikungunya vaccine is not yet feasible in Asia, regulatory planning, cold chain logistics, and public communication strategies should be prepared in advance (33). Populations at highest risk, such as the older adult and those in outbreak-prone districts, should be considered in early vaccine access plans once the chikungunya vaccine becomes available locally.
Fifth, community vector control strategies should adopt a whole-of-society approach. Local governments, housing authorities, and district services and community care teams should collaborate on sustained mosquito reduction programs. Digital reporting tools, such as mobile apps to report standing water or mosquito hotspots, can empower communities and support targeted intervention.
Sixth, personal protection must be reinforced as a fundamental pillar of prevention. Given that Aedes mosquitoes are active during the day, continuous vigilance is necessary. Personal protection involves educating the public on three key practices: the use of EPA-registered insect repellents containing active ingredients, such as N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide (commonly known as DEET), picaridin, or IR3535; wearing loose-fitting, light-colored clothing that covers exposed skin; and eliminating all sources of standing water around homes and workplaces (source reduction). Clinicians and travel health advisors must clearly communicate the proper and safe application of the above repellents, including providing guidelines for children and pregnant women (34).
Conclusion
Chikungunya fever, once considered as a sporadic threat, has rapidly evolved into a regional public health crisis. The unprecedented escalation of the outbreak in Mainland China, now surpassing 17,000 confirmed cases in Guangdong Province, coupled with the definitive confirmation of Hong Kong's first locally acquired case in early November 2025, provides urgent evidence that the window for pre-emptive containment has closed. The emergence of CHIKV in proximity to international hubs underscores the immediate necessity for regional health bodies to abandon a reactive stance. The authors reiterate their call for the immediate adoption of aggressive, cross-jurisdictional proactive strategies rooted in evidence-based public health. These strategies must include prioritizing accelerated vaccine rollouts for high-risk groups; implementing innovative large-scale vector control methods; and establishing robust, standardized cross-border surveillance systems to track and manage this re-emerging threat. The current absence of widespread vaccine coverage in Asia must not delay action. Existing tools, including mosquito control, public education, and travel health guidance, must be leveraged immediately.
Hong Kong, by utilizing its strong health infrastructure and central position within the Greater Bay Area, is uniquely positioned to pilot urgent, integrated chikungunya mitigation and response programs. These efforts should serve as a critical model for other Asian cities now facing an established ecological risk. The time to act is no longer simply limited but critically urgent. Failure to invest and coordinate now will allow chikungunya to become a recurring, costly seasonal health burden permanently embedded within the region's densely populated urban ecosystems in the years to come.
Funding Statement
The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.
Footnotes
Edited by: Zhimin Tao, Jiangsu University, China
Reviewed by: Florinda Jimenez Vega, Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez, Mexico
Prince Baffour Tonto, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, United States
Author contributions
SY: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. CC: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. KN: Conceptualization, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. SL: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Resources, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author SL declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
- 1.de Souza WM, Lecuit M, Weaver SC. Chikungunya virus and other emerging arthritogenic alphaviruses. Nat Rev Microbiol. (2025) 23:585–601. doi: 10.1038/s41579-025-01177-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lanciotti RS, Kosoy OL, Laven JJ, Panella AJ, Velez JO, Lambert AJ, et al. Chikungunya virus in US travelers returning from India, 2006. Emerg Infect Dis. (2007) 13:764–7. doi: 10.3201/eid1305.070015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pedí VD, de França GVA, Rodrigues VB, Duailibe FT, Santos MTP, de Oliveira MRF. Burden of chikungunya fever and its economic and social impacts worldwide: a systematic review. Trop Med Int Health. (2025) 30:865–92. doi: 10.1111/tmi.70012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mourad O, Makhani L, Chen LH. Chikungunya: an emerging public health concern. Curr Infect Dis Rep. (2022) 24:217–28. doi: 10.1007/s11908-022-00789-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.World Health Organization. Chikungunya Virus Disease – Global Situation. Geneva: World Health Organization; (2025). [Google Scholar]
- 6.Resck MEB, Câmara DCP, Dos Santos FB, Dos Santos JPC, Alto BW, Honório NA. Spatial-temporal distribution of chikungunya virus in Brazil: a review on the circulating viral genotypes and Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus as a potential vector. Front Public Health. (2024) 12:1496021. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1496021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Historical Data on Local Transmission in the EU/EEA of Chikungunya Virus Disease. (2025). Available online at: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/infectious-disease-topics/chikungunya-virus-disease/surveillance-and-updates/local-transmission-previous-years (Accessed January 10, 2026).
- 8.Roth A, Mercier A, Lepers C, Hoy D, Duituturaga S, Benyon E, et al. Concurrent outbreaks of dengue, chikungunya and Zika virus infections – an unprecedented epidemic wave of mosquito-borne viruses in the Pacific 2012–2014. Euro Surveill. (2014) 19:20929. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES2014.19.41.20929 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Burt FJ, Rolph MS, Rulli NE, Mahalingam S, Heise MT. Chikungunya: a re-emerging virus. Lancet. (2012) 379:662–71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60281-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee. WHO Guidelines for Clinical Management of Arboviral Diseases: Dengue, Chikungunya, Zika and Yellow Fever. Geneva: World Health Organization; (2025). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Halsey E. CDC Yellow Book 2026: Health Information for International Travel. Oxford: Oxford University Press; (2025). doi: 10.1093/oso/9780197788547.001.0001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Maurer G, Buerger V, Larcher-Senn J, Erlsbacher F, Meyer S, Eder-Lingelbach S, et al. Comprehensive assessment of reactogenicity and safety of the live-attenuated chikungunya vaccine (IXCHIQ®). Vaccines. (2025) 13:576. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13060576 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Silva LA, Dermody TS. Chikungunya virus: epidemiology, replication, disease mechanisms, and prospective intervention strategies. J Clin Invest. (2017) 127:737–49. doi: 10.1172/JCI84417 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Abbasi E. Global expansion of aedes mosquitoes and their role in the transboundary spread of emerging arboviral diseases: a comprehensive review. IJID One Health. (2025) 6:100058. doi: 10.1016/j.ijidoh.2025.100058 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tsetsarkin KA, Weaver SC. Sequential adaptive mutations enhance efficient vector switching by Chikungunya virus and its epidemic emergence. PLoS Pathog. (2011) 7:e1002412. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002412 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Thiberville SD, Moyen N, Dupuis-Maguiraga L, Nougairede A, Gould EA, Roques P, et al. Chikungunya fever: epidemiology, clinical syndrome, pathogenesis and therapy. Antiviral Res. (2013) 99:345–70. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2013.06.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sissoko D, Moendandze A, Malvy D, Giry C, Ezzedine K, Solet JL, et al. Seroprevalence and risk factors of chikungunya virus infection in Mayotte, Indian Ocean, 2005-2006: a population-based survey. PLoS ONE. (2008) 3:e3066. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003066 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Fischer D, Thomas SM, Suk JE, Sudre B, Hess A, Tjaden NB, et al. Climate change effects on chikungunya transmission in Europe: geospatial analysis of vector's climatic suitability and virus' temperature requirements. Int J Health Geogr. (2013) 12:51. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-12-51 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhang R, Kim AS, Fox JM, Nair S, Basore K, Klimstra WB, et al. Mxra8 is a receptor for multiple arthritogenic alphaviruses. Nature. (2018) 557:570–4. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0121-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Narwal M, Singh H, Pratap S, Malik A, Kuhn RJ, Kumar P, et al. Crystal structure of chikungunya virus nsP2 cysteine protease reveals a putative flexible loop blocking its active site. Int J Biol Macromol. (2018) 116:451–62. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.05.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tan YB, Chmielewski D, Law MCY, Zhang K, He Y, Chen M, et al. Molecular architecture of the chikungunya virus replication complex. Sci Adv. (2022) 8:eadd2536. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.add2536 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Khongwichit S, Chansaenroj J, Chirathaworn C, Poovorawan Y. Chikungunya virus infection: molecular biology, clinical characteristics, and epidemiology in Asian countries. J Biomed Sci. (2021) 28:84. doi: 10.1186/s12929-021-00778-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sharma R, Kesari P, Kumar P, Tomar S. Structure-function insights into chikungunya virus capsid protein: small molecules targeting capsid hydrophobic pocket. Virology. (2018) 515:223–34. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2017.12.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Powers AM. How chikungunya virus virology affects its epidemiology and transmission: implications for influencing public health. J Infect Dis. (2016) 214:S449–52. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiw382 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Fox JM, Diamond MS. Immune-mediated protection and pathogenesis of chikungunya virus. J Immunol. (2016) 197:4210–8. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1601426 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zarrella KM, Sheridan RM, Ware BC, Davenport BJ, da Silva MOL, Vyshenska D, et al. Chikungunya virus persists in joint-associated macrophages and promotes chronic disease. Res Sq. [Preprint]. (2025). doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6917990/v1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hawman DW, Stoermer KA, Montgomery SA, Pal P, Oko L, Diamond MS, et al. Chronic joint disease caused by persistent chikungunya virus infection is controlled by the adaptive immune response. J Virol. (2013) 87:13878–88. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02666-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ly H. Ixchiq (VLA1553): the first fda-approved vaccine to prevent disease caused by chikungunya virus infection. Virulence. (2024) 15:2301573. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2023.2301573 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pause recommended in use of chikungunya vaccine in elderly. React Wkly. (2025) 2060:4. doi: 10.1007/s40278-025-82925-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kumar G, Baharia R, Singh K, Gupta SK, Joy S, Sharma A, et al. Addressing challenges in vector control: a review of current strategies and the imperative for novel tools in India's combat against vector-borne diseases. BMJ Public Health. (2024) 2:e000342. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000342 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hussain-Alkhateeb L, Rivera Ramírez T, Kroeger A, Gozzer E, Runge-Ranzinger S. Early warning systems (EWSs) for chikungunya, dengue, malaria, yellow fever, and Zika outbreaks: what is the evidence? A scoping review. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. (2021) 15:e0009686. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009686 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Roja C, Seetha Lakshmi A, Anitha Rani M, Eapen A. Effect of school-based educational interventions on the knowledge of malaria and dengue among higher secondary school children in Chennai, India: a pre and post-intervention study. Cureus. (2022) 14:e26536. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26536 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Simon F, Caumes E, Jelinek T, Lopez-Velez R, Steffen R, Chen LH. Chikungunya: risks for travellers. J Travel Med. (2023) 30:taad008. doi: 10.1093/jtm/taad008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Noguera-Gahona M, Peña-Moreno C, Quiñones-Sobarzo N, Weinstein-Oppenheimer C, Guerra-Zúñiga M, Collao-Ferrada X. Repellents against aedes aegypti bites: synthetic and natural origins. Front Insect Sci. (2025) 4:1510857. doi: 10.3389/finsc.2024.1510857 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

