Skip to main content
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience logoLink to Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
. 2026 Jan 23;19:1672317. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1672317

Randomized prenatal and postnatal nutrient supplementation shows no long-term impact on cortical gray matter in Ghanaian children

Fatimah B Ayete Labi 1,2, Ludmila Midrigan-Ciochina 3, Elizabeth L Prado 4,, Seth Adu-Afarwuah 5, Kathryn G Dewey 4, Charles D Arnold 4, Adom Manu 6, Seth Kwadjo Angmorterh 2, John Arko-Mensah 1, Mavis Osipi Mensah 5, Helena Nti 5,7, Lois M Donkor Aryee 5, Yaw Boateng Mensah 8, Becky Amponsaa Appiah 9, David Atawone 9, Norbert Azantilow 9, Brietta M Oaks 10, Benjamin Amponsah 11, Paul D Hastings 3,12, Amanda E Guyer 3,13,*
PMCID: PMC12876235  PMID: 41657360

Abstract

Introduction

Maternal and child undernutrition are linked to atypical brain development in children. Provision of pre- and post-natal small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplements (SQ-LNS) has been shown to positively impact children’s growth and development. It is unknown, however, whether SQ-LNS affects child brain morphology.

Methods

The present study used data from the International Lipid-based Nutrient Supplements randomized controlled trial in Ghana. Participants were 231 children (Mage = 10.6 years; 49.4% female) exposed to maternal iron and folic acid supplements prenatally (n = 113, control group) or maternal SQ-LNS prenatally until 6 mo postpartum and child SQ-LNS from age 6 to 18 months (n = 118, SQ-LNS group). Children underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of brain anatomy. Primary outcomes were total gray matter volume, cortical gray matter thickness, and cortical gray matter volume assessed with whole-brain analyses. Secondary outcomes were thickness and volume of a priori specified cortical and subcortical regions assessed with region-of-interest (ROI) analyses. Basic and full covariate models were tested and corrected for multiple comparisons.

Results

Whole-brain analyses revealed no significant differences between groups in total gray matter volume or cortical gray matter thickness or volume. Cortical ROI analyses showed the SQ-LNS versus control group had greater right caudal anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) thickness [mean (95%CI): 2.78 (2.73, 2.84) vs. 2.72 (2.67, 2.77); effect size = 0.21] and reduced left rostral ACC volume [2575.1 (2477.3, 2672.8) vs. 2678.74 (2568.7, 2788.8); effect size = 0.18]. Subcortical ROI analyses showed the SQ-LNS versus control group had greater volume of the left pallidus [1794.45 (1759.10, 1829.80) vs. 1726.13 (1685.05, 1767.21); effect size = 0.33] and right nucleus accumbens [751.54 (729.83, 773.24) vs. 705.73 (684.21, 727.24); effect size = 0.39]. Significant group differences did not hold after correction for multiple comparisons.

Discussion

In this cohort, pre- and post-natal SQ-LNS supplementation did not significantly alter total or cortical gray matter thickness and volume at 10 years, though secondary ROI analyses indicated subtle, non-robust differences in selected regions.

Keywords: cortical, gray matter thickness, gray matter volume, maternal and child nutrition, nutrient supplementation, SQ-LNS, subcortical

1. Introduction

Adequate nutrition from conception through childhood is critical for brain development given the tremendous growth that occurs over those periods (Black et al., 2013; Guyer and Nordahl, 2025). The first 1,000 days after conception is a particularly vulnerable period for undernutrition because of the lasting negative consequences it can have on children’s development (Black et al., 2013). Inadequate maternal and child nutrition have been linked to atypical brain development in children (Zou et al., 2021) with negative consequences for children’s growth, academic performance, cognitive and socio-emotional development, morbidity and mortality risk, and productivity in adulthood (Boah et al., 2019; Prado and Dewey, 2014; Zou et al., 2021). Poor child outcomes due to inadequate nutrition in early life are of public health concern particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) such as Ghana where diets mainly comprise grains, cereals and tubers (Arimond et al., 2015), increasing likelihood of essential fatty acid (EFA) deficiency.

One approach to reduce children’s risk for inadequate nutrition is the provision of small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplements (SQ-LNS) to pregnant women and their infants during the first 1,000 days of life (Arimond et al., 2015; Dewey et al., 2021; Prado and Dewey, 2014). SQ-LNS were formulated to provide the recommended dietary allowance of multiple micronutrients including iron and folic acid, plus EFAs, all of which are critical for early neurodevelopment (Prado and Dewey, 2014). Folic acid is essential for neural tube formation, cellular proliferation, and facilitating the brain’s structural integrity, which have downstream effects on cognitive and verbal skills (Chen et al., 2023). Iron aids in the early development of neural systems that mediate affect, learning, memory capacity, and information processing (Georgieff, 2023). Fatty acids (FAs) are vital for prenatal gray matter development by influencing neurogenesis, synaptogenesis, and cell function (Huffman et al., 2011; Ogundipe et al., 2018; Zou et al., 2021). With rapid accumulation of FAs in the last trimester and first 2 years of life (Lauritzen et al., 2016), FAs deficiency can cause lasting changes in brain development (Ogundipe et al., 2018). While SQ-LNS includes iron and folic acid, it has a high lipid content because an early trial in Ghana indicated that the EFA omega 3 alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) was promotive of infant linear growth in those given SQ-LNS versus micronutrients only (Adu-Afarwuah et al., 2007). It is unknown, however, whether provision of maternal and infant SQ-LNS affects brain morphology in late childhood.

The iLiNS-DYAD-Ghana randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to understand how SQ-LNS impacts child outcomes across different developmental periods and a range of domains. SQ-LNS versus multiple micronutrient supplementation has been shown to impact children’s general physical growth and development (Dewey et al., 2021; Prado et al., 2021), including among children in the current cohort (Adu-Afarwuah et al., 2016; Bentil et al., 2024; Nti et al., 2024). Prenatal and postnatal SQ-LNS provision was linked to linear growth at age 9–11 years among female children and children whose mothers were not overweight (Bentil et al., 2024). SQ-LNS provision also led to on-time pubertal maturation age 11–13 years among females and for children raised in less resourced homes (Nti et al., 2024). Given that early nutrition supplementation manifests in these indices of physical growth, SQ-LNS effects may also extend to brain growth in late childhood, particularly given evidence of continued growth in cortical thickness, and cortical and subcortical volumes at this age (Lange, 2012; Lenroot and Giedd, 2008; Shaw et al., 2008).

Work using animal models has linked nutrient supplementation to neurogenesis and synaptogenesis, increased levels of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LC-PUFAs) in brain tissue, and larger cortical and subcortical gray matter volume (Cutuli et al., 2014; Cutuli et al., 2016; Su et al., 1999). In humans, most neuroimaging studies of the effects of nutrient supplementation on brain structure have been conducted with adult and elderly samples (McNamara et al., 2018), with a handful of correlational or RCT studies involving infants or children. Among children, prenatal exposure to higher concentrations of maternal omega-3 (ω-3), but not ω-6, LC-PUFAs during gestation exhibited non-linear associations with greater total gray and white matter volumes at age 10 years and was associated with higher academic scores when offspring were age 12 years (Zou et al., 2021). Thus, higher FA concentrations in utero may support children’s subsequent academic performance and brain development; however, without an RCT, causality of effects cannot be determined. Two RCTs have assessed effects of prenatal FA supplementation to mothers in high-income countries on their offsprings’ gray matter development. At age 1 month (adjusted for gestational period), male infants of mothers receiving LC-PUFAs had larger total brain, total gray matter and cortex volumes than male infants in the control group, whereas no group differences were noted for female infants (Ogundipe et al., 2018). Conversely, maternal prenatal fish oil supplementation did not predict any brain volume indices at 10 years in a separate study (Catena et al., 2019). Thus, there is limited and mixed evidence for the associations of early-life lipid-based nutrient supplementation on child brain outcomes.

There are important limitations of the studies conducted to date on whether early-life nutrition supplementation promotes children’s brain development. First, the sample sizes of the existing RCT studies may have been too small to provide sufficient statistical power to detect small-to-moderate effects (Button et al., 2013). Second, participants of the existing studies were from high income countries where rates of nutritional deficiencies are lower than in LMICs (Lemoine and Tounian, 2020). Third, prior studies focused on supplementation provided only in the gestational period, limiting understanding about direct supplementation to the young child. It is important to assess both prenatal and postnatal nutrient supplementation for both mothers and infants given that rapid brain development continues after pregnancy, with the first 2 years of life being a crucial period of brain development (Black et al., 2013). The current study sought to address these issues by examining in an LMIC setting the long-term impact of SQ-LNS provision to both pregnant women and their infants on the child’s later brain development.

Using the iLiNS-DYAD trial in Ghana, we assessed the impact of prenatal and postnatal SQ-LNS exposure versus a control condition on the gray matter of children a decade later, at the cusp of early adolescence. Primary outcomes were total gray matter volume, and cortical gray matter thickness and volume assessed with whole-brain analyses. Secondary outcomes were thickness and volume of a priori specified cortical and subcortical region of interest (ROI) analyses. We chose these ROIs because of their involvement in cognitive and social-emotional functions supported by gray matter development. We selected cortical regions that subserve cognitive control, emotion regulation, working memory and object-recognition functions (i.e., middle and orbital prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), inferior parietal, superior temporal) and subcortical regions involved in decision making, reward seeking, and emotion regulation (i.e., nucleus accumbens, caudate, putamen, globus pallidus, amygdala, and hippocampus) (Baxter and Croxson, 2012; Chan et al., 2017; Cox and Witten, 2019; Etkin et al., 2011; Rolls, 2019; Stevens et al., 2011). We hypothesized that relative to children in the control group, children who had received SQ-LNS prenatally and as infants would have greater total gray matter volume and cortical gray matter thickness and volume. In exploratory analyses of secondary outcomes, we expected the SQ-LNS versus control group to have greater thickness and volume of cortical ROIs and volume of subcortical ROIs.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Participants

Original trial randomization for the iLiNS-DYAD Ghana study was done at the participant level via a simple randomization scheme in blocks of nine (Adu-Afarwuah et al., 2016). Group assignment was stored in opaque envelopes and upon enrollment, the participant would select one envelope from the top nine envelopes to reveal their allocation. Data collectors remained blinded to study group assignment throughout the trial and all subsequent follow-ups. All surviving participants enrolled in the iLiNS-DYAD Ghana study (Adu-Afarwuah et al., 2015) who completed the first follow-up study (n = 1114) at age 4–6 years (Ocansey et al., 2019) were eligible for enrollment into the second follow-up study at age 9–11 years. This included the current 10-year longitudinal follow-up study. Of 979 children enrolled in the second follow-up study, 966 completed the age 9–11-year field laboratory assessments from December 2020 to December 2021.

Of the 966 participants, 240 were randomly selected from the experimental and control groups. The experimental group included mothers who were assigned to receive SQ-LNS during pregnancy until 6 mo postpartum, whose children also received SQ-LNS directly from 6 to 18 mo of age. The control group included mothers assigned to receive iron and folic during pregnancy and placebo (low-dose calcium) from delivery until 6 mo postpartum whose children received no supplementation from 6 to 18 mo of age. Random selection was implemented by contacting participants from a randomly sorted list of participants to maintain enumerator blinding. This was done until the target of 240 participants were screened for MRI scanning eligibility using a standard questionnaire. The list was block randomized by intervention arm to increase the chances of balance by intervention arm. Ultimately 116 were selected from the control arm and 124 from the SQ-LNS arm. MRI technologists and image analysts were blinded to group assignments. MRI exclusion criteria were neurological abnormalities and any MRI contraindications including reported: (a) metal in the body (e.g., shrapnel, implanted devices); (b) pregnancy (females); (c) refusal to participate in the scan; (d) experience of distress or fear regarding the MRI; (e) claustrophobia; or (f) significant illness/disability. All 240 participants who were screened were eligible for MRI scanning and then enrolled after caregiver consent and child assent to undergo the MRI scans. One participant did not attend the scheduled scan. An a priori power analysis indicated that a minimum sample size of 220 participants (110 participants in each group) was required to provide 80% power to detect an effect size > 0.38 SD at p < 0.05 and 240 were targeted to allow for refusals.

2.2. Procedure

Participants were transported in the project van together with a caregiver willing to travel on the day of the MRI assessment on a 64 km journey from study sites to the International Maritime Hospital (IMaH) in Tema, Ghana. Trained research assistants explained the MRI procedure to the participants and their caregivers. Participants were administered an MRI screening form from the ImaH imaging department to check for any MRI contraindications (e.g., metallic implants, pace marker). Participants also went through a metal detector to ascertain that they were metal free after changing into a hospital gown. Participants were then acclimated to the MRI procedures by watching videos of children undergoing MRI scans and given the opportunity to ask questions about the procedures. The videos were in three local languages (Twi, Ewe, and Dangbe) and Ghanaian accent English, which were commonly spoken in the study area.

2.3. Measures

2.3.1. Sample characteristics

Maternal and household baseline characteristics were collected at time of enrollment into the main study. Child characteristics were also collected at birth. Child’s sex, puberty stage, handedness, and number of years in formal education, were collected at the 9–11-year-old follow-up. These four measures were included as covariates in statistical models to mitigate any associations with significant differences in brain structure, function, and developmental trajectories that could confound results. Sex and puberty stage were included because genetic and hormonal differences drive sex-specific patterns of brain maturation during adolescence (Blakemore et al., 2010; Gaillard et al., 2021). Handedness was included because left- and right-handed individuals show differences in brain structure, lateralization, and functional organization (Tejavibulya et al., 2022). Educational attainment may reflect differences in cognitive stimulation, experiences, or socioeconomic factors that influence brain outcomes (van Atteveldt et al., 2018). The primary caregiver reported the number of years of formal education completed by the child as the current grade of the child, which ranged from elementary school grades 1–5. This measure was dichotomized to “below grade 3” and “grade 3 and above.” Children’s pubertal development was measured using the Petersen Pubertal Development Scale (PDS) (Petersen et al., 1988), a 10-item (5 for boys and 5 for girls) questionnaire about children’s physical maturation completed by both the primary caregiver and the child. Participants responded to each item on the PDS using a 4-point Likert scale that described their current stage for 5 pubertal milestones each for boys and girls; responses were summed to create a total score ranging from 5 (puberty not begun) to 20 (puberty complete). The PDS was also used to record the biological sex of the child. Lastly, a modified version of the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (Oldfield, 1971), which included 6 items adapted to the local context in Ghana, and for the appropriate age (e.g., 9–11 years old), was used to calculate a laterality index (handedness) of the child’s dominant hand use.

2.3.2. Neuroimaging data, image acquisition and preprocessing

Structural MRI data were collected using a 3T Philips Ingenia system at the Radiology department of the IMaH at Tema in Ghana, using a standard 16-channel adult-size head coil. A magnetization prepared rapid gradient echo (MPRAGE) sequence was used to create high-resolution T1-weighted images of the brain (see Supplementary Methods for acquisition parameters). The T1-weighted images were screened for quality during and after image acquisition. Raw images (.dcm) were converted to NIFTI format using the “dcm2nii” function from www.nitrc.org.

T1-weighted image preprocessing, reconstruction, and volumetric and cortical parcellation were carried out with the “recon-all” command from the FreeSurfer image analysis suite, version 7.2.0.1 After registration to the common template (freesurfer average-fsaverage), the data were smoothed using a 10 mm 2D Gaussian smoothing kernel (Fischl et al., 1999). Quality control (QC) assessments were performed visually for all 239 participants with a scan after data acquisition and preprocessing steps. The QC led to excluding data of participants with incomplete T1-weighted images from scans shortened due to child’s fear (n = 2), and with excessive image blurring due to motion, or significant mechanical artifacts (n = 2). Additionally, participants’ neuroimaging data were excluded from analysis if any neuropathology was identified in the scan by a radiologist (n = 4). Figure 1 shows the tracking of inclusion and exclusion criteria. No adverse events related to MRI were reported.

FIGURE 1.

Flowchart depicting the enrollment of 1,320 pregnant women and the follow-up process of the women and their offspring, analyzed as non-SQ-LNS (880 women) versus SQ-LNS (440 women) groups. In the non-SQ-LNS group, attrition included one misdiagnosed pregnancy, 25 miscarriages, 22 stillbirths, and 18 child deaths. Of 814 offspring eligible for enrollment at ages 9–11 years, 648 were enrolled, of whom 116 were randomly selected for the MRI study and 113 were included in the MRI analysis. In the SQ-LNS group, attrition included four misdiagnosed pregnancies, 12 miscarriages, seven stillbirths, and 14 child deaths. Of 403 offspring eligible for enrollment at ages 9–11 years, 331 were enrolled, of whom 124 were randomly selected for the MRI study and 118 were included in the MRI analysis.

Flowchart of child’s eligibility, enrollment, and data collection for the small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplements (SQ-LNS) randomized controlled trial in Ghana.

Total intracranial volume (TIV) values for each participant who passed QC were obtained from the FreeSurfer’s automated segmentation pipeline and standardized in Excel to be included in all whole-brain and ROI analyses. Total gray matter volume values were obtained from the FreeSurfer output, which provided an overall measure of gray matter volume including all cortical and subcortical regions. These values were standardized before inclusion in analyses. Cortical gray matter thickness and volume values for ROIs including left and right caudal and rostral middle frontal cortex, medial and lateral orbitofrontal cortex, caudal and rostral ACC, inferior parietal cortex, and superior temporal cortex were obtained from FreeSurfer output (N = 16 ROIs). Subcortical volume values for ROIs, including left and right amygdala, hippocampus, thalamus, caudate, pallidum, putamen, and nucleus accumbens were also obtained from the FreeSurfer output (N = 14 ROIs).

Primary outcomes in this study include total gray matter volume, cortical thickness, and cortical volume. Secondary outcomes include selected ROIs of cortical thickness and volume and ROIs of subcortical volumes.

2.4. Statistical analyses

The statistical analysis plan for this study was preregistered at https://osf.io/bmv9d/.

2.4.1. Baseline characteristics and covariates

Two sample t-tests were used to compare the SQ-LNS and control groups on maternal, child, and household baseline characteristics, as well as sample characteristics selected as covariates due to their putative associations with brain morphology development.

2.4.2. Brain morphology

All whole-brain and ROI-based statistical models predicting brain gray matter indices were initially fitted with standardized total intracranial volume (mm3) as a nuisance covariate (basic model). Second similar models were then fitted with child biological sex (male/female), child’s formal (years) education, age 9–10 pubertal development score, and laterality index (handedness) in addition to standardized total intracranial volume (mm3) to control for them as nuisance covariates (full model). Similarly, basic and full regression models were conducted to test for SQ-LNS and control group differences in total gray matter volume. Our preregistered whole-brain analyses were conducted using FreeSurfer, and all the ad hoc regression analyses were conducted using Stata version 15.0.

2.4.2.1. Cortical thickness and volume

Whole-brain vertex-wise general linear models (basic and full) were conducted to test differences between the SQ-LNS and control groups in primary outcomes of cortical gray matter thickness and volumes. Following standard practice, a cluster-wise correction threshold of 3.0 at p < 0.05 was applied to whole-brain analyses (Greve and Fischl, 2018). Cluster-wise correction thresholding is essential to correct for the multiple statistical comparison that occur at the voxel level in neuroimaging analysis.

ROI regression analyses (basic and full) were conducted to test for differences between the SQ-LNS and control group in the thickness and volume of selected cortical regions, including left and right caudal and rostral middle frontal cortex, medial and lateral orbitofrontal cortex, caudal and rostral ACC, inferior parietal cortex, and superior temporal cortex (secondary outcomes). Multiple comparison correction was performed using the false discovery rate (FDR) correction at p < 0.05 for the 16 selected cortical ROIs.

2.4.2.2. Subcortical volume

ROI regression analyses (basic and full) were conducted to test for differences between the SQ-LNS and control group in the volumes of the left and right amygdala, hippocampus, thalamus, caudate, pallidus, putamen, and nucleus accumbens (secondary outcomes). Multiple comparison correction was performed using the FDR correction at p < 0.05 for the 14 selected subcortical ROIs.

3. Results

3.1. Baseline characteristics

The flow of participation in the current study is represented in Figure 1.

Table 1 shows the maternal, child, and household characteristics of mothers and children selected for MRI assessment. Mothers in the SQ-LNS group had higher pre-pregnancy body mass index than the control group (p = 0.03). Additionally, children in the SQ-LNS group had higher birth weight as compared to the control group (p = 0.03). There were no other significant differences between the SQ-LNS and control groups on other maternal or household measures. Supplementary Table 1 indicates no significant differences in baseline characteristics of participants in the current study and the main study.

TABLE 1.

Maternal, child, and household baseline characteristics.

Characteristics Total sample SQ-LNS
N = 124
Control
N = 116
t-statistic p-value
Maternal
Age at enrollment, y, mean (SD) 26.7(5.5) 26.9(5.0) 26.5(5.0) 0.6 0.6
Educational level, n (%) 0.1
  Below high school 207(86.3) 103(83.1) 104(89.7)
  High school and above 33(13.8) 21(16.9) 12(10.3)
Marital status n (%) 0.6
  With partner 216(90.0) 113(91.1) 103(88.8)
  Without partner 24(10.0) 11(8.9) 13(11.2)
Pre-pregnancy BMI, mean (SD) 24.4(4.3) 24.9(4.6) 23.7(4.0) 2.2 0.03
Primiparous, n (%) 0.8
  No previous child 83(34.5) 42(33.9) 41(35.3)
  Previous child 157(65.4) 82(66.1) 75(64.7)
Hemoglobin level, mean (SD) 111.1(12.0) 110.8(12.3) 111.3(11.8) −0.3 0.8
Child
Child weight at birth, kg, mean (SD) 3.00(0.41) 3.06(0.42) 2.94(0.39) 2.1 0.03
Household
Household asset index, mean (SD) 0.05(0.93) 0.07(0.88) 0.04(0.98) 0.21 0.8
Household food insecurity access score, mean (SD) 2.1(4.0) 1.8(3.5) 2.5(4.4) 1.4 0.2
Household water source, n (%) 1.0
  Improved 238(99.2) 123(99.2) 115(99.1)
  Unimproved 2(0.8) 1(0.8) 1(0.9)
Household toilet facility, n (%) 0.5
  Improved 229(95.8) 119(96.8) 110(94.8)
  Unimproved 10(4.2) 4(3.3) 6(5.2)

SQ-LNS, Small quantity lipid-based nutrient supplementation. Significant p-values are in bold.

3.2. Covariates

There were no significant group differences in child’s total standardized intracranial volume, handedness, pubertal stage, or biological sex (Table 2). More children in the SQ-LNS than the control group had reached a formal education level of at least grade 3 by age 10 years.

TABLE 2.

Means, standard deviations, and group differences in covariates.

Variable SQ-LNS
N = 118
Control
N = 113
t-statistic 95% CI p-values
Total intracranial volume (mm3) 1,275,395 1,253,233 −1.4 1,248,971–1,280,137 0.2
Handedness 90.0 91.4 0.3 85.6–95.8 0.8
Pubertal score 7.4 7.5 −0.6 7.31–7.6 0.6
Biological sex (male) 51.7(61/118) 50(56/112)
Current school grade (Below Grade 3) 18.6(22/118) 22.3(25/112)

SQ-LNS, Small quantity lipid-based nutrient supplementation.

3.3. Brain morphology

Among the brain morphology primary and secondary outcomes, several strong correlations were found among cortical thickness indices, cortical volumes, and subcortical volumes (see Supplementary Tables 24, respectively).

3.3.1. Total gray matter volume

Children in the SQ-LNS and control groups did not differ significantly on total gray matter volume in either the basic (p = 0.6) or full (p = 0.5) model (Table 3).

TABLE 3.

Group differences in total gray matter volume.

Variable SQ-LNS
N = 118
Control
N = 113
Basic model Full model
Mean 95% CI Mean 95% CI p-value p-value
Total gray matter volume, mm3 637181.8 626566.7–647796.9 630989.8 620755.4–641224.2 0.6 0.5

SQ-LNS, Small quantity lipid-based nutrient supplementation; basic model included: Controlling for standardized total intracranial volume; full model included; Controlling for child biological sex (male/female), child’s formal (years) education, pubertal development score, and laterality index (handedness) and standardized total intracranial volume (mm3).

3.3.2. Cortical gray matter thickness and volume

3.3.2.1. Whole-brain analyses

The basic model showed multiple positive (red) and negative (blue) effects of SQ-LNS on cortical thickness in both hemispheres. The SQ-LNS group had thicker cortical gray matter than the control group in multiple regions (red), including the left insula, right caudal middle frontal gyrus, and right caudal anterior cingulate cortex (Figure 2A). After correcting for multiple comparisons at a cluster-wise threshold of 3.0 and cluster-wise p < 0.05, none of these group differences remained significant. Similarly, no group differences were significant when all covariates were included in the full models (Figure 2B).

FIGURE 2.

Brain models of cortical thickness comparing the experimental to control group are shown in two panels. Each panel shows the left and right hemispheres from two angles. Each model is marked with red and blue regions, indicating areas of interest with significant group differences. The left panel shows models that include basic covariates with a prominent blue region and several small red regions. The right panel shows models that include all covariates with several small blue regions and larger red regions.

Results from the (A) basic (left panel) and (B) full (right panel) models for the whole-brain analyses contrasting the SQ-LNS group to the control group on cortical thickness. Multiple positive (red) and negative (blue) effects were found at p < 0.01 (uncorrected). Left (LH) and right (RH) hemispheres are shown. SQ-LNS, small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplements.

The basic model showed multiple negative (blue), and a few positive (red), effects of SQ-LNS on cortical volume in both hemispheres. The SQ-LNS group had smaller volume of cortical gray matter than the control group in multiple regions (blue), including the left and right precuneus, and left rostral ACC (Figure 3A). After correcting for multiple comparisons at a cluster-wise threshold of 3.0 and cluster-wise p < 0.05, none of these group differences remained significant. Similarly, no group differences were significant when all covariates were included in the full models (Figure 3B).

FIGURE 3.

Brain models of cortical volume comparing the experimental to control group are shown in two panels. Each panel shows the left and right hemispheres from two angles. Each model is marked with red and blue regions, indicating areas of interest with significant group differences. The left panel shows models that include basic covariates with a mix of blue and red regions. The right panel shows models that include full covariates with mostly blue regions.

Results from the (A) basic (left panel) and (B) full (right panel) models for the whole-brain analyses contrasting the SQ-LNS group to the control group on cortical volume. Multiple positive (red) and negative (blue) effects were found at p < 0.01 (uncorrected). Left (LH) and right (RH) hemispheres are shown. SQ-LNS, small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplements.

3.3.2.2. Region-of-interest analyses

Regression analyses were performed on the thickness of specific cortical gray matter ROIs (Table 4). The basic model showed that the SQ-LNS group had greater thickness of the right caudal ACC region (2.8, 2.7–2.8) than the control group (2.7, 2.7–2.8) at a trend level of significance (p = 0.05), which remained in the full model (p = 0.05) (see Supplementary Figure 1). However, this group difference was small and no longer significant when the multiple comparisons correction was applied. No group differences in the thickness of any other cortical gray matter ROI were found to be significant.

TABLE 4.

Group differences in gray matter thickness of cortical regions of interest.

Cortical gray matter
thickness
SQ-LNS Control Basic model Full model
Mean 95%CI Mean 95%CI p-value
(uncorrected)
p-value
(corrected)
p-value
(uncorrected)
p-value
(corrected)
Lt. Caudal middle frontal 2.6 2.5–2.6 2.6 2.5–2.6 0.7 0.9 0.6 0.8
Rt. Caudal middle frontal 2.5 2.5–2.6 2.5 2.5–2.5 0.4 0.9 0.4 0.8
Lt. Rostral middle frontal 2.5 2.5–2.5 2.5 2.5–2.5 0.7 0.9 0.7 0.8
Rt. Rostral middle frontal 2.4 2.4–2.4 2.4 2.4–2.4 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lt. Lateral orbitofrontal 3.1 3.1–3.1 3.1 3.1–3.1 0.6 0.9 0.6 0.8
Rt. Lateral orbitofrontal 2.9 2.9–2.9 2.9 2.9–3.0 0.4 0.9 0.4 0.8
Lt. Medial orbitofrontal 2.8 2.8–2.8 2.8 2.7–2.8 0.4 0.9 0.3 0.8
Rt. Medial orbitofrontal 2.8 2.8–2.8 2.8 2.8–2.8 0.4 0.9 0.4 0.8
Lt. Caudal anterior cingulate 2.8 2.8–2.9 2.9 2.9–2.9 0.1 0.5 0.1 0.5
Rt. Caudal anterior cingulate 2.8 2.7–2.8 2.7 2.7–2.8 0.05 0.5 0.05 0.5
Lt. Rostral anterior cingulate 3.2 3.1–3.2 3.2 3.1–3.2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Rt. Rostral anterior cingulate 3.2 3.2–3.3 3.2 3.2–3.3 0.5 0.9 0.5 0.8
Lt. Inferior parietal 2.3 2.3–2.4 2.4 2.3–2.4 0.7 0.9 0.7 0.8
Rt. Inferior parietal 2.5 2.5–2.5 2.5 2.5–2.5 0.7 0.9 0.7 0.8
Lt. Superior temporal 3.1 3.0–3.1 3.1 3.1–3.1 0.5 0.9 0.5 0.8
Rt. Superior temporal 3.1 3.1–3.2 3.2 3.1–3.2 0.4 0.9 0.4 0.8

SQ-LNS, Small quantity lipid-based nutrient supplementation; basic model included: Controlling for standardized total intracranial volume; full model included; Controlling for child biological sex (male/female), child’s formal (years) education, pubertal development score, and laterality index (handedness) and standardized total intracranial volume (mm3); CI, Confidence interval; Lt, Left; Rt, Right. Significant p-values are in bold.

Regression analyses were performed on the gray matter volume of specific cortical ROIs (Table 5). The basic model showed that the SQ-LNS group had significantly smaller volume (2575.1, 2672.8–19240) of the left rostral ACC region than the control group (2678.7. 2568.7–2788.8) (p = 0.03), which remained significant in the full model (p = 0.01) (see Supplementary Figure 2). However, this group difference was small and no longer significant when multiple comparisons correction was applied. No group differences in the volumes of any other cortical gray matter ROIs were found to be significant.

TABLE 5.

Group differences in gray matter volumes of cortical regions of interest.

Cortical gray
matter volume
SQ-LNS Control Basic model Full model
Mean 95%CI Mean 95%CI p-value
(uncorrected)
p-value
(corrected)
p-value
(uncorrected)
p-value
(corrected)
Lt. Caudal middle frontal 5649.5 5485.1–5814.0 5730.8 5529.2–5932.4 0.2 0.8 0.1 0.5
Rt. Caudal middle frontal 5209.5 5044.0–5375.0 5215.7 5034.6–5396.9 0.5 0.9 0.5 0.7
Lt. Rostral middle frontal 15367.8 14873.8–15861.7 15063.9 14615.4–15512.3 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0
Rt. Rostral middle frontal 15514.7 14943.6–16085.9 15374.5 14858.5–15890.4 0.6 0.9 0.4 0.7
Lt. Lateral orbitofrontal 8316.0 8119.9–8512.2 8164.5 7996.8–8332.2 0.7 0.9 0.9 1.0
Rt. Lateral orbitofrontal 7810.9 7611.9–8009.8 7821.6 7634.0–8009.2 0.3 0.8 0.2 0.5
Lt. Medial orbitofrontal 5856.4 5713.7- 5999.0 5788.9 5652.3–5925.5 0.8 0.9 0.8 1.0
Rt. Medial orbitofrontal 6206.0 6068.5–6343.5 6066.7 5944.3–6189.1 0.4 0.9 0.4 0.7
Lt. Caudal anterior cingulate 1800.0 1705.8–1894.3 1865.4 1778.3–1952.5 0.2 0.8 1.0 0.5
Rt. Caudal anterior cingulate 2108.1 2008.8–2207.5 2065.5 1979.0–2152.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0
Lt. Rostral anterior cingulate 2575.1 2477.3–2672.8 2678.7 2568.7–2788.8 0.03 0.4 0.01 0.2
Rt. Rostral anterior cingulate 2020.8 1924.0–2117.5 2016.9 1920.1–2113.6 0.4 0.9 0.4 0.7
Lt. Inferior parietal 11390.7 11064.34–11717.0 11263.4 10936.8–11590.1 0.9 0.9 0.8 1.0
Rt. Inferior parietal 14898.9 14444.2–15353.5 14841.6 14425.6–15257.7 0.4 0.9 0.4 0.7
Lt. Superior temporal 14095.5 13539.4–14198.7 13869.0 13539.4–14198.7 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0
Rt. Superior temporal 13013.3 12703.7–13322.8 13066.4 12764.05–13368.71 0.2 0.8 0.1 0.5

SQ-LNS, Small quantity lipid-based nutrient supplementation; basic model included: Controlling for standardized total intracranial volume; full model included; Controlling for child biological sex (male/female), child’s formal (years) education, pubertal development score, and laterality index (handedness) and standardized total intracranial volume (mm3); CI, Confidence interval; Lt, Left; Rt = Right. Significant p-values are in bold.

3.3.3. Subcortical gray matter volume

3.3.3.1. Region-of-interest analyses

Regression analyses were conducted on the gray matter volume of specific subcortical ROIs (Table 6). The basic model showed that the SQ-LNS group had significantly larger volume of the left pallidus (p = 0.04) and the right nucleus accumbens area (p = 0.01) than the control group (see Supplementary Figures 3, 4). Only the group difference in the volume of the right nucleus accumbens was significant in the full model (p = 0.02). However, these group differences were small and were not robust after multiple comparisons. No group differences in the volumes of any other subcortical gray matter ROIs were found to be significant.

TABLE 6.

Group differences in gray matter volumes of subcortical regions of interest.

Subcortical
volume
SQ-LNS Control Basic model Full model
Mean 95%CI Mean 95%CI p-value
(uncorrected)
p-value
(corrected)
p-value
(uncorrected)
p-value
(corrected)
Lt. Amygdala 1.713.5 1674.7 –1752.3 1689.2 1651.97 –1726.39 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0
Rt. Amygdala 1793.8 1751.1–1836.4 1781.3 1743.98–1818.60 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.8
Lt. Hippocampus 3869.0 3795.1–3942.9 3788.7 3713.50 –3863.86 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.8
Rt. Hippocampus 3921.0 3854.4–3987.7 3852.2 3785.73 –3918.70 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.8
Lt. Thalamus 6969.7 6862.1–7077.2 6856.6 6725.38–6987.83 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.9
Rt. Thalamus 6849.7 6744.5–6954.8 6690.4 6565.65–6815.19 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.5
Lt. Caudate 3726.4 3639.9–3812.9 3582.8 3491.54–3674.06 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.4
Rt. Caudate 3958.2 3866.1–4050.3 3831.1 3739.19–3923.07 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.5
Lt. Pallidus 1794.5 1759.1–1829.8 1726.1 1685.05–1767.21 0.04 0.3 0.1 0.4
Rt. Pallidus 1726.9 1694.2–1759.7 1672.4 1634.24– 1710.61 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.5
Lt. Putamen 5263.1 5167.2–5359.0 5134.8 5026.89–5242.70 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.5
Rt. Putamen 5311.9 5219.8—5404.0 5172.8 5066.38–5279.19 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.5
Lt. Nucleus Accumbens 738.0 715.7–760.35 713.3 691.65–734.89 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.5
Rt. Nucleus Accumbens 751.5 729.8–773.24 705.7 684.21–727.24 0.01 0.1 0.02 0.2

SQ-LNS, Small quantity lipid-based nutrient supplementation; basic model included: Controlling for standardized total intracranial volume; full model included; Controlling for child biological sex (male/female), child’s formal (years) education, pubertal development score, and laterality index (handedness) and standardized total intracranial volume (mm3); CI, Confidence interval; Lt, Left; Rt, Right. Significant p-values are in bold.

4. Discussion

The present study investigated the effects of providing SQ-LNS in early life on the brain morphology of children enrolled in the iLiNS-DYAD-Ghana RCT a decade later. Children whose mothers received SQ-LNS from early pregnancy to 6 months postpartum, and then themselves received SQ-LNS from age 6 to 18 months, differed from the control group on primary outcomes of cortical thickness and volume in multiple regions based on uncorrected whole-brain analyses. However, when correction for multiple comparisons was applied, these group differences were no longer significant. Children in the SQ-LNS also did not differ from the control group in total gray matter volume. Exploratory analyses of secondary cortical ROI outcomes showed that the SQ-LNS group as compared to the control group had marginally greater thickness of the right caudal ACC, but also smaller volume of the left rostral ACC. Analyses of secondary subcortical ROIs outcomes showed that the SQ-LNS group demonstrated greater volume of all subcortical structures of interest, with significant differences in the left pallidus and right nucleus accumbens. The group differences from the ROI analyses also emerged only for the exploratory uncorrected analyses. Nonetheless, these results are still informative, given a small empirical literature from which to guide a narrower selection of ROIs and the conservative nature of the multiple-hypothesis corrections, which assume testing independence, applied to correlated outcomes. Although there were no significant differences after FDR correction, several of the regions of the brain were highly correlated. Consequently, multiple hypothesis corrections that assume independence of outcomes may be overly conservative (Streiner, 2015) resulting in inflated FDR or true effects being missed (Santosa et al., 2017; Winkler et al., 2025). Future research should consider larger harmonized RCT-neuroimaging datasets to help address this (Winkler et al., 2025). In uncorrected comparisons, we did find differences in thickness of the right caudal ACC and volumes of the left rostral ACC and pallidus and right nucleus accumbens that warrant further investigation in future research.

Whole-brain analyses, when uncorrected, showed that early-life SQ-LNS had a small effect, whereby the SQ-LNS group had thicker cortical gray matter than the control group in multiple regions, such as the left insula, right caudal middle frontal, and right caudal ACC. These regions have been implicated in interoception, motor control, executive function, cognitive processing and emotional regulation (Stevens et al., 2011; Uddin et al., 2017). It is possible that SQ-LNS contributes to these functions via gray matter development, however that would need to be empirically tested. Contrary to our predictions, however, SQ-LNS was not significantly associated with cortical thickness or volume across the whole brain after applying the cluster-wise correction to adjust for multiple comparisons. Given these null findings, it is possible that because all mothers received iron and folic acid supplementation, the roles these nutrients play in early brain development obscured the contributions of the EFAs in the lipid-based supplements received only by the SQ-LNS group. It is also possible that gray matter differences would have been more pronounced/detectable earlier in development, but in the nearly decade-long period between completing SQ-LNS supplementation and performing scans, intervening factors may have contributed to brain growth in the control group. Plausible candidates include childhood diet and stimulation through home and school environments. Future studies will be needed to examine the role of such factors in brain development following SQ-LNS supplementation.

The present findings are similar to those from two earlier studies (Catena et al., 2019; Ogundipe et al., 2018). In the RCT conducted by Ogundipe et al. (2018), no significant differences in brain volume, measured 1 month after birth, were found between infants of mothers who received brain specific fatty acid (BSFA) supplements and a control group. However, this was qualified by a sex difference whereby greater total brain, cortex, corpus callosum, and total gray matter volumes, as well as greater birth length and head circumference, were seen for infant boys in the BSFA group compared to boys in the control group. While these sex-related differences were significant at age 1 month, this may have been too early to observe all differences given rapid postnatal brain growth. It also would not have captured the postnatal supplementation effects as per our study design. Thus, the nearly decade-long difference in age at brain volume measurement between our study and Ogundipe et al.’s limits comparability of the respective results. In a different study that examined offspring at a similar age as in our study, no significant differences at age 10 years were reported in cortical or subcortical gray matter volumes between children whose mothers were randomly administered either fish oil, folic acid, a combination of fish oil and folic acid, or a placebo from gestational week 22 until delivery, paralleling our findings (Catena et al., 2019). Notably, both Catena et al.’s (2019) study and the present study found the supplementation group had larger mean total gray matter volume than the comparison group, although in neither study did this reach statistical significance. The non-significant differences could be an indication of only small effects of early-life SQ-LNS supplementation enduring to preadolescence, necessitating further follow-up to detect potentially long-lasting effects.

In the cortical ROI analysis, the uncorrected results indicated that SQ-LNS was inversely associated with volume of left rostral ACC and positively associated with thickness of right caudal ACC, although these associations were not significant after multiple comparison correction. As part of the limbic system, the ACC has long been implicated in cognitive processing and emotional regulation (Stevens et al., 2011), making it a unique area for understanding socio-emotional behaviors as adolescence begins. Due to its anatomical position and connection with other brain structures, the rostral/ventral portion is implicated in emotion processing and regulation of autonomic and endocrine response to emotions, whilst the caudal/dorsal portion is involved in cognitive processing such as reward-based decision making (Stevens et al., 2011; Vogt, 2016). Thus, our study may offer preliminary support for early-life SQ-LNS being associated specifically with increased thickness of caudal ACC and reduced volume of rostral ACC in early adolescence. This possibility should be acknowledged with caution as all significant effects were lost after multiple hypothesis correction. Nonetheless, future work should consider the ACC, and its behavioral correlates, as a brain region potentially affected by SQ-LNS. This recommendation is supported further by work documenting concurrent negative associations between whole blood omega 3 fatty acid levels and caudal ACC volume in adolescents (Darcey et al., 2019, 2020), although these associations were not robust to conservative multiple comparison correction, as in our study. To the best of our knowledge, no prior study has investigated the effect of SQ-LNS on thickness of the ACC, limiting its interpretation, but suggesting another possible feature of the ACC to target with supplementation.

Generally, subcortical structures have been linked to cognitive, affective and social functions, thereby structural alterations in subcortical regions have been associated with psychiatric and behavioral disorders such as depression and schizophrenia (Forbes and Dahl, 2012; Koshiyama et al., 2018; Paus et al., 2008). The uncorrected findings from the current study indicate that SQ-LNS is positively associated with volumes of the left pallidus and right nucleus accumbens. The nucleus accumbens is involved with the regulation of motivation, reward, and positive affect, and has been implicated in several mental health conditions such as depression, bipolar disorders, anxiety disorders, and drug abuse and addictions, among others (Xu et al., 2020). Notably, these mental health problems become more prevalent over the course of adolescence. Similarly, the pallidus communicates with several cortical and subcortical areas that subserve cognition, motor activity and reward motivation (Saga et al., 2017). Previous nutrition-based studies have only examined the association of dietary patterns with total subcortical volume (Boedhoe et al., 2021; Mou et al., 2023), such that it is not clear whether the specific small effects we observed for SQ-LNS predicting nucleus accumbens and pallidus volumes have precedent in literature. Due to the relation of nucleus accumbens and pallidus to cognitive, affective, social and motor functions, nutrition-related alterations in these structures may have implications for multiple aspects of adolescent mental health, particularly those that involve reward motivation. Further nutrition research targeting these subcortical regions may be warranted.

Importantly, this study only considered direct effects of the intervention and did not assess whether life contexts or other characteristics may have made certain children more or less responsive to the intervention. For example, findings from an earlier iLiNS-DYAD-Ghana RCT study showed greater effect of SQ-LNS on behavioral outcomes among children from less resourced homes (Ocansey et al., 2019); whether this may also be the case for brain development has yet to be determined. Likewise, at baseline, higher pre-pregnancy maternal BMI and higher child birthweight in the SQ-LNS group may have facilitated its effectiveness on various child outcomes or have genetic correlates, possibilities that future work should explore. Additionally, as study participants transition into adolescence, future studies should also assess the impact of puberty on brain morphology at a later age such as 11–13 years, as SQ-LNS has been associated with pubertal status of girls at 11–13 years of age (Nti et al., 2024). Also, future studies should investigate how sex differences influence brain development as sex has been shown in previous studies to be associated with differences in brain development (Catena et al., 2019; Darcey et al., 2020; Ogundipe et al., 2018) as well as an effect modifier in previous reports of the impact of SQ-LNS (Bentil et al., 2024; Nti et al., 2024). The group differences found for the uncorrected results suggest a more targeted set of brain regions for which to examine the influence of the home environment, pubertal development, and sex as well as their modification of SQ-LNS effects on these brain regions. Lastly, generalizability of the present findings should be interpreted in populations with similar nutrition-related features (e.g., maternal BMI).

4.1. Strength and limitations

The current study has several strengths and limitations. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first RCT in Africa, and amongst the few in the world, where SQ-LNS was administered prenatally through to 18 months postnatal and then brain structure was assessed 10 years later. The present study had a scan success rate of 99%, high-quality MRI data, and a compliance rate higher than reported in earlier studies (Everts et al., 2020; Sowell et al., 2004). The non-significant results for cortical thickness and volume in whole-brain analysis cannot be attributed to low compliance, or poor data quality. As one of the first MRI studies of a large sample of children in sub-Saharan Africa, this study also demonstrates the viability of MRI for developmental neuroscience research in such settings. Unlike cross-sectional studies which preclude understanding developmental trajectories, the present study employed an RCT study design that reduced bias and balanced participants’ characteristics whilst providing a robust sampling design to examine cause-effect relations. The current study was well-powered with a relatively large sample size. Finally, the current study employed a robust statistical threshold of 3.0 (p = 0.001) to reduce the possibility of attaining false positive results for the whole-brain analyses and an FDR correction across a large set of regions for the ROI analyses.

Despite the strengths of the study, no neuroimaging assessment was performed in early childhood when the impact of SQ-LNS on behavioral measures has been reported (Ocansey et al., 2019). This makes it impossible to ascertain whether there may have been impacts of SQ-LNS on brain structure during children’s early years, which may have become less evident later in development among children in the comparison condition. Children who remained in the cohort a decade later may also have systematic differences, although no differences in baseline characteristics were found between children in the current MRI study and those in the main study (Supplementary Table 1). Additionally, because this study is the first of its kind, there was limited literature to guide more specific selection of ROIs, such that the small effects observed in ROI analyses were not robust to correction for multiple comparisons. Nevertheless, this study may serve to inform more precisely targeted neuroimaging analyses in future studies of the effects of nutrient supplementation on structural brain development in childhood and adolescence.

Acknowledgments

We extend our gratitude to the participants and their caregivers for partaking in the iLiNS-DYAD-G trial. We also thank the whole research team members especially Mary Sackitey, Vivian Abayavor, Helena Nti and Mavis Osipi for their contribution in translating MRI videos into local languages, preparing, explaining and conveying participants to MRI imaging center, and Richard Azumah for his contribution to data management to the staff of the Radiology department of IMaH to data collection.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This study was funded by the United States National Institute of Health (R01HD099811), the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP49817) and the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Hatch project #CA-D-NTR-2493-H, to the University of California, Davis.

Edited by: Douglas Dean, University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States

Reviewed by: Marissa Ann DiPiero, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States

Fatemeh Khajavi Mayvan, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Iran

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the author, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by the ethics review board of the Ghana Health Service and the institutional review board of the University of California, Davis. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin.

Author contributions

FBAL: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. LM-C: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. EP: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. SA-A: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. KD: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. CA: Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AM: Data curation, Investigation, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. SKA: Data curation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JA-M: Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MM: Data curation, Investigation, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. HN: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. LA: Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. YM: Methodology, Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. BAA: Methodology, Resources, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. DA: Methodology, Resources, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. NA: Methodology, Resources, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. BO: Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. BA: Investigation, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. PH: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AG: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2025.1672317/full#supplementary-material

Supplementary_file_1.zip (261.5KB, zip)

References

  1. Adu-Afarwuah S., Lartey A., Brown K., Zlotkin S., Briend A., Dewey K. G. (2007). A fat-based supplement containing essential fatty acids increased plasma α-linolenic acid and linear growth of Ghanaian infants. FASEB J. 21 A99–A99. 10.1096/fasebj.21.5.A99-b [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adu-Afarwuah S., Lartey A., Okronipa H., Ashorn P., Peerson J., Arimond M., et al. (2016). Small-quantity, lipid-based nutrient supplements provided to women during pregnancy and 6 mo postpartum and to their infants from 6 mo of age increase the mean attained length of 18-mo-old children in semi-urban Ghana: A randomized controlled trial. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 104 797–808. 10.3945/ajcn.116.134692 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Adu-Afarwuah S., Lartey A., Okronipa H., Ashorn P., Zeilani M., Peerson J., et al. (2015). Lipid-based nutrient supplement increases the birth size of infants of primiparous women in Ghana. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 101 835–846. 10.3945/ajcn.114.091546 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Arimond M., Zeilani M., Jungjohann S., Brown K., Ashorn P., Allen L., et al. (2015). Considerations in developing lipid-based nutrient supplements for prevention of undernutrition: Experience from the International Lipid-Based Nutrient Supplements (iLiNS) Project. Matern. Child Nutr. 11 31–61. 10.1111/mcn.12049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baxter M., Croxson P. (2012). Facing the role of the amygdala in emotional information processing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 109 21180–21181. 10.1073/pnas.1219167110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bentil H., Adu-Afarwuah S., Prado E., Arnold C., Hastings P., Guyer A., et al. (2024). Sustained effects of small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplements provided during the first 1000 days on child growth at 9-11 y in a randomized controlled trial in Ghana. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 119 425–432. 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2023.10.033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Black R., Victora C., Walker S., Bhutta Z., Christian P., de Onis M., et al. (2013). Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet 382 427–451. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60937-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Blakemore S., Burnett S., Dahl R. (2010). The role of puberty in the developing adolescent brain. Hum. Brain Mapp. 31 926–933. 10.1002/hbm.21052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Boah M., Azupogo F., Amporfro D., Abada L. (2019). The epidemiology of undernutrition and its determinants in children under five years in Ghana. PLoS One 14:e0219665. 10.1371/journal.pone.0219665 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Boedhoe P., van Rooij D., Hoogman M., Twisk J., Schmaal L., Abe Y., et al. (2021). Subcortical brain volume, regional cortical thickness, and cortical surface area across disorders: Findings from the ENIGMA ADHD, ASD, and OCD working groups. Am. J. Psychiatry 177 834–843. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.19030331 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Button K., Ioannidis J., Mokrysz C., Nosek B., Flint J., Robinson E., et al. (2013). Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 14 365–376. 10.1038/nrn3475 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Catena A., Martínez-Zaldívar C., Diaz-Piedra C., Torres-Espínola F., Brandi P., Pérez-García M., et al. (2019). On the relationship between head circumference, brain size, prenatal long-chain PUFA/5-methyltetrahydrofolate supplementation and cognitive abilities during childhood. Br. J. Nutr. 122 S40–S48. 10.1017/S0007114516004281 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chan R., Leong A., Ho L., Gao P., Wong E., Dong C., et al. (2017). Low-frequency hippocampal-cortical activity drives brain-wide resting-state functional MRI connectivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 114 E6972–E6981. 10.1073/pnas.1703309114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen H., Qin L., Gao R., Jin X., Cheng K., Zhang S., et al. (2023). Neurodevelopmental effects of maternal folic acid supplementation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 63 3771–3787. 10.1080/10408398.2021.1993781 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cox J., Witten I. (2019). Striatal circuits for reward learning and decision-making. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 20 482–494. 10.1038/s41583-019-0189-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cutuli D., De Bartolo P., Caporali P., Laricchiuta D., Foti F., Ronci M., et al. (2014). n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids supplementation enhances hippocampal functionality in aged mice. Front. Aging Neurosci. 6:1–53. 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00220 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cutuli D., Pagani M., Caporali P., Galbusera A., Laricchiuta D., Foti F., et al. (2016). Effects of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation on cognitive functions and neural substrates: A voxel-based morphometry study in aged mice. Front. Aging Neurosci. 8:38. 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Darcey V., McQuaid G., Fishbein D., VanMeter J. (2019). Dietary long-chain omega-3 fatty acids are related to impulse control and anterior cingulate function in adolescents. Front. Neurosci. 12:1012. 10.3389/fnins.2018.01012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Darcey V., McQuaid G., Fishbein D., VanMeter J. (2020). Relationship between whole blood omega-3 fatty acid levels and dorsal cingulate gray matter volume: Sex differences and implications for impulse control. Nutr. Neurosci. 23 505–515. 10.1080/1028415X.2018.1525477 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Dewey K., Stewart C., Wessells K., Prado E., Arnold C. (2021). Small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplements for the prevention of child malnutrition and promotion of healthy development: Overview of individual participant data meta-analysis and programmatic implications. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 114 3S–14S. 10.1093/ajcn/nqab279 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Etkin A., Egner T., Kalisch R. (2011). Emotional processing in anterior cingulate and medial prefrontal cortex. Trends Cogn. Sci. 15 85–93. 10.1016/j.tics.2010.11.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Everts R., Muri R., Leibundgut K., Siegwart V., Wiest R., Steinlin M. (2020). Fear and discomfort of children and adolescents during MRI: Ethical consideration on research MRIs in children. Pediatr. Res. 91 720–723. 10.1038/s41390-020-01277-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Fischl B., Sereno M., Tootell R., Dale A. (1999). High-resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface. Hum. Brain Mapp. 8 272–284. 10.1002/(sici)1097-0193(1999)8:4<272::aid-hbm10>3.0.co;2-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Forbes E., Dahl R. (2012). Research review: Altered reward function in adolescent depression: What, when and how? J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 53 3–15. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02477.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Gaillard A., Fehring D., Rossell S. (2021). Sex differences in executive control: A systematic review of functional neuroimaging studies. Eur. J. Neurosci. 53 2592–2611. 10.1111/ejn.15107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Georgieff M. (2023). The importance of iron deficiency in pregnancy on fetal, neonatal, and infant neurodevelopmental outcomes. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 162 83–88. 10.1002/ijgo.14951 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Greve D., Fischl B. (2018). False positive rates in surface-based anatomical analysis. Neuroimage 171 6–14. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.072 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Guyer A., Nordahl C. (2025). “Neurobiology, brain development, and child and adolescent health and well-being,” in Handbook of pediatric psychology, developmental-behavioral pediatrics, and developmental science: Vol 1 developmental science and developmental origins of risk and resilience in childhood and adolescence, (Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; ). [Google Scholar]
  29. Huffman S., Harika R., Eilander A., Osendarp S. (2011). Essential fats: How do they affect growth and development of infants and young children in developing countries? A literature review. Matern. Child Nutr. 7 44–65. 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2011.00356.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Koshiyama D., Fukunaga M., Okada N., Yamashita F., Yamamori H., Yasuda Y., et al. (2018). Role of subcortical structures on cognitive and social function in schizophrenia. Sci. Rep. 8:1183. 10.1038/s41598-017-18950-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lange N. (2012). Total and regional brain volumes in a population-based normative sample from 4 to 18 years: The NIH MRI study of normal brain development brain development cooperative group. Cereb. Cortex 22 1–12. 10.1093/cercor/bhr018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lauritzen L., Brambilla P., Mazzocchi A., Harsløf L., Ciappolino V., Agostoni C. (2016). DHA Effects in Brain Development and Function. Nutrients 8:6. 10.3390/nu8010006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lemoine A., Tounian P. (2020). Childhood anemia and iron deficiency in sub-Saharan Africa - risk factors and prevention: A review. Arch. Pediatr. 27 490–496. 10.1016/j.arcped.2020.08.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lenroot R., Giedd J. (2008). The changing impact of genes and environment on brain development during childhood and adolescence: Initial findings from a neuroimaging study of pediatric twins. Dev. Psychopathol. 20 1161–1175. 10.1017/S0954579408000552 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. McNamara R., Asch R., Lindquist D., Krikorian R. (2018). Role of polyunsaturated fatty acids in human brain structure and function across the lifespan: An update on neuroimaging findings. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 136 23–34. 10.1016/j.plefa.2017.05.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Mou Y., Blok E., Barroso M., Jansen P., White T., Voortman T. (2023). Dietary patterns, brain morphology and cognitive performance in children: Results from a prospective population-based study. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 38 669–687. 10.1007/s10654-023-01012-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Nti H., Adu-Afarwuah S., Oaks B., Prado E., Arnold C., Hastings P., et al. (2024). Impact of small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplements on pubertal status of 9-13-year olds: A follow-up study of the iLiNS-DYAD-ghana trial. Curr. Dev. Nutr. 8:104458. 10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.104458 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Ocansey M., Adu-Afarwuah S., Kumordzie S., Okronipa H., Young R., Tamakloe S., et al. (2019). Prenatal and postnatal lipid-based nutrient supplementation and cognitive, social-emotional, and motor function in preschool-aged children in Ghana: A follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 109 322–334. 10.1093/ajcn/nqy303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Ogundipe E., Tusor N., Wang Y., Johnson M., Edwards A., Crawford M. (2018). Randomized controlled trial of brain specific fatty acid supplementation in pregnant women increases brain volumes on MRI scans of their newborn infants. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent. Fatty Acids 138 6–13. 10.1016/j.plefa.2018.09.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Oldfield R. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9 97–113. 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Paus T., Keshavan M., Giedd J. (2008). Why do many psychiatric disorders emerge during adolescence? Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9 947–957. 10.1038/nrn2513 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Petersen A., Crockett L., Richards M., Boxer A. (1988). A self-report measure of pubertal status: Reliability, validity, and initial norms. J. Youth Adolesc. 17 117–133. 10.1007/BF01537962 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Prado E., Dewey K. (2014). Nutrition and brain development in early life. Nutr. Rev. 72 267–284. 10.1111/nure.12102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Prado E., Arnold C., Wessells K., Stewart C., Abbeddou S., Adu-Afarwuah S., et al. (2021). Small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplements for children age 6-24 months: A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis of effects on developmental outcomes and effect modifiers. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 114 43S–67S. 10.1093/ajcn/nqab277 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Rolls E. (2019). The cingulate cortex and limbic systems for emotion, action, and memory. Brain Struct. Funct. 224 3001–3018. 10.1007/s00429-019-01945-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Saga Y., Hoshi E., Tremblay L. (2017). Roles of multiple globus pallidus territories of monkeys and humans in motivation, cognition and action: An anatomical, physiological and pathophysiological review. Front. Neuroanat. 11:30. 10.3389/fnana.2017.00030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Santosa H., Aarabi A., Perlman S., Huppert T. (2017). Characterization and correction of the false-discovery rates in resting state connectivity using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. J. Biomed. Opt. 22:055002. 10.1117/1.JBO.22.5.055002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Shaw P., Kabani N., Lerch J., Eckstrand K., Lenroot R., Gogtay N., et al. (2008). Neurodevelopmental trajectories of the human cerebral cortex. J. Neurosci. 28 3586–3594. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5309-07.2008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Sowell E., Thompson P., Leonard C., Welcome S., Kan E., Toga A. (2004). Longitudinal mapping of cortical thickness and brain growth in normal children. J. Neurosci. 24 8223–8231. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1798-04.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Stevens F., Hurley R., Taber K. (2011). Anterior cingulate cortex: Unique role in cognition and emotion. J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 23 121–125. 10.1176/jnp.23.2.jnp121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Streiner D. (2015). Best (but oft-forgotten) practices: The multiple problems of multiplicity-whether and how to correct for many statistical tests. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 102 721–728. 10.3945/ajcn.115.113548 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Su H., Bernardo L., Mirmiran M., Ma X., Corso T., Nathanielsz P., et al. (1999). Bioequivalence of dietary alpha-linolenic and docosahexaenoic acids as sources of docosahexaenoate accretion in brain and associated organs of neonatal baboons. Pediatr. Res. 45 87–93. 10.1203/00006450-199901000-00015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Tejavibulya L., Peterson H., Greene A., Gao S., Rolison M., Noble S., et al. (2022). Large-scale differences in functional organization of left- and right-handed individuals using whole-brain, data-driven analysis of connectivity. Neuroimage 252:119040. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Uddin L., Nomi J., Hébert-Seropian B., Ghaziri J., Boucher O. (2017). Structure and function of the human insula. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 34 300–306. 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000377 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. van Atteveldt N., van Kesteren M., Braams B., Krabbendam L. (2018). Neuroimaging of learning and development: Improving ecological validity. Frontline Learn. Res. 6:186–203. 10.14786/flr.v6i3.366 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Vogt B. (2016). Midcingulate cortex: Structure, connections, homologies, functions and diseases. J. Chem. Neuroanat. 74 28–46. 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2016.01.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Winkler A., Taylor P., Nichols T., Rorden C. (2025). False discovery rate and localizing power. arXiv [Preprint] 10.48550/arXiv.2401.03554 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  58. Xu L., Nan J., Lan Y. (2020). The nucleus accumbens: A common target in the comorbidity of depression and addiction. Front. Neural Circuits 14:540293. 10.3389/fncir.2020.00037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Zou R., El Marroun H., Voortman T., Hillegers M., White T., Tiemeier H. (2021). Maternal polyunsaturated fatty acids during pregnancy and offspring brain development in childhood. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 114 124–133. 10.1093/ajcn/nqab049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary_file_1.zip (261.5KB, zip)

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the author, without undue reservation.


Articles from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES