Abstract
Objectives
To investigate the prevalence and the clinical feature of essential tremor (ET) in a community cohort in Beijing.
Methods
Using a door-to-door, two-phase approach, we investigated 2,835 residents aged ≥55 years old from rural, urban, and mountain areas.
Results
The prevalence rate of ET was 4.29%, 2.85%, and 2.29% in rural, urban, and mountain areas, respectively. The overall age- and sex-adjusted prevalence was 3.29%. Among those aged ≥75 years, the prevalence rate in the urban area was higher than those in the rural and mountain areas. The prevalence rate increased with age, and the prevalence was higher among men (6.0%) than among women (3.6%). There was a correlation of ET prevalence with age, sex, and habitation area, but not with alcohol, tea drinking, and occupation. Women (25%) with ET were more likely to have head tremor than men (16.9%).
Conclusions
The ET prevalence in the elderly of Beijing was 3.29% which is higher in the urban area and in men.
Key words: essential tremor, epidemiology, prevalence, population-based, gender
Introduction
Essential tremor (ET) is considered the most prevalent adult movement disorder and is regarded as one of the most common adult neurological disorders (1, 2). Despite the frequently used qualifying term “benign,” ET may cause substantial physical and psycho-social disabilities (3). However, information about its prevalence and distribution is limited because of the difficulty in diagnosing patients with ET in the population.
Several epidemiological studies have been service-based (clinic or record based) and have used hospital records; this method generates data that are not representative. The generally accepted gold standard in an epidemiological study is one that is community-based, wherein subjects from a defined geographical area are identified using personal interviews and examinations (4, 5). The estimates of the crude prevalence of ET across the few worldwide community-based surveys vary specifically, with a prevalence of ET in the elderly population-based surveys ranging from 3.9%–22% (6, 7, 8, 9). This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of physician-diagnosed ET from the three representative communities in Beijing, China. The clinical characteristics and its regional differences were also explored.
Subjects and methods
Cohort description
The study was carried out at the follow up stage of the Beijing Longitudinal Study on Aging (BLSA) in 2000(10). The BLSA cohort was established in 1992 and followed up every 2–3 years since then. A multi-step stratified random sampling method was used to select a cohort whose geographic distribution, age, economic, and education levels were similar to the population from Beijing. Three districts of Xuanwu, Daxing, and Huairou were randomly selected. Xuanwu is a central urban area, Daxing is a rural area, and Huairou is a mountainous area. The baseline population was 3,257 in 1992. In order to maintain a stable size of the cohort, 1,022 subjects randomly selected from the same districts were added in 1994 while another 500 younger subjects between 55 and 60 years old were joined in 2000. All the population was selected with the same principle as 1992. As shown in Figure 1, 2,835 subjects were interviewed for ET, parkinsonism, and dementia in 2000.
Figure 1.

Flow of patients with ET through the study, a. First phase: screening as suspected ET parkinsonism or cognitive disorder; b. Second phase for final diagnosis made by two neurologists individually
Door-to-door, two-phase approach
First phase-initial screening
In the initial screening phase, interviewers who were trained to ask questions in a uniform manner visited the participants at their homes or at nearby clinics for face-to-face interviews. The interview included questions on demographic characteristics, health status, medications, exposures, and lifestyle. Tremor observations were also conducted by the interviewers, wherein the postural and resting tremor was visually examined. People diagnosed with ET previously by doctors or self-reported a history of tremor or detected positive for tremor by the interviewers were further followed up with neurological examination.
Second phase-clinical diagnosis
Subjects who were identified as being positive for tremor and cognitive disorder during the initial screening phase underwent a neurological evaluation by neurologists. Detailed examination for tremor and differential diagnosis for ET were performed. The diagnosis of ET concordance with the criteria of the Essential Tremor Consortium, NIH in 1996 (11). During the neurological examination, only people with a visible tremor were further rated using the tremor rating scale. Tremor was scored separately for different parts of the body as well as different tremor types, such as resting, postural, and kinetic tremor (0–4 scales, total score is 80). Tremor assessment also included rating of the tremors while drawing spirals and tremors during handwriting. Functional performance test included pouring water from one cup to another. Medical records of these participants were also reviewed whenever possible. The final diagnosis was made by two neurologists individually. If a consensus was not reached, a third senior neurologist was asked to give his/her neurological evaluation to establish the final diagnosis.
Table 1.
Age and gender specific crude prevalence of definite ET
| Age | Male | Female | Total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | Case | % | N | Case | % | N | Case | % | |
| 55–64 | 258 | 7 | 2.7 | 269 | 2 | 0.7 | 527 | 9 | 1.7 |
| 65–74 | 590 | 31 | 5.3 | 643 | 14 | 2.2 | 1233 | 45 | 3.7 |
| ≥75 | 534 | 45 | 8.4 | 541 | 36 | 6.7 | 1075 | 81 | 7.4 |
| Total | 1382 | 83 | 6.0 | 1453 | 52 | 3.6 | 2835 | 135 | 4.8 |
Data Analyses
The prevalence of ET was calculated and stratified as per sex and age (55–64 years, 65–74 years, and ≥75 years). Ninety-five percent confidence intervals for each prevalence estimate were derived using exact methods for a binomial parameter. The prevalence estimates were adjusted by age and sex for the population aged ≥55 years in Beijing to estimate the overall prevalence rates in the district. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 11.0.
Results
Of the 2,835 subjects, 1,069 (37.7%) were screened positive in the initial phase for tremor and 1,060 (99.2%) consented to undergo a neurological examination in the clinical diagnosis phase. Of the 1,060 subjects, 354 (33.4%) were observed to have tremor by neurologists and subjected to further consensus diagnosis and assessment using tremor rating scales. Total 135 subjects (52 women and 83 men) fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for definite ET and 120 as probable and possible ET. We found 20 subjects with PD and 9 with parkinsonism. Seventy subjects were diagnosed with physiological tremor or other diseases (Figure 1).
As shown in Table 2, the crude prevalence of definite ET was 4.8 per 100 persons, and the age-adjusted prevalence of definite ET in Beijing was 3.96%. Men had significantly higher prevalence than women in our study (6% vs. 3.6%, x2= 9.199 p = 0.002). The rate of definite ET increased with age in both sexes. Urban areas had slightly higher rate of definite ET than mountainous and rural areas (x2 = 8.673, p =0.013) (Table 2). Similar trends of increased rates of definite ET with age were observed in both urban and mountain areas but not in rural areas.
Table 2.
Residence and age specific prevalence of definite ET
| Age | Mountain area | Rural area | Urban area | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | Case | % | N | Case | % | N | Case | % | |
| 55–64 | 115 | 1 | 0.9 | 84 | 2 | 2.4 | 328 | 6 | 1.8 |
| 65–74 | 229 | 8 | 2.7 | 332 | 11 | 3.3 | 602 | 26 | 4.3 |
| ≥75 | 240 | 16 | 6.7 | 229 | 8 | 3.5 | 606 | 57 | 9.4 |
| Total | 654 | 25 | 3.8(2.3Δ) | 645 | 21 | 3.3(2.9Δ) | 1536 | 89 | 5.8(4.3Δ)* |
Δ Age- and sex-adjusted prevalence; *urban area had slightly higher rate of definite ET as compared to mountain and rural areas, p < 0.05
Among the definite ET patients, 94 subjects (69.9%) were self-reported tremor, and 90.4% developed tremor before they turned 50 years old. With respect to the location of tremor of definite ET, 100% patients had arm tremor, 12.6% had head tremor, 2.2% had trunk tremor, and 1.5% had voice tremor. The severity of tremor was not different between women and men, irrespective of the total tremor scores (7.2 ± 3.4 vs. 6.5 ± 2.5, p = 0.150), or limb tremor scores (6.0 ± 2.2 vs. 6.3 ± 2.4, p = 0.421). However, women (25%) were slightly more likely to have head tremor than men (16.9%) (Χ2 = 1.322 p =0.250). The limb tremor scores were not different between patients with and without head tremor (6.6 ± 4.1 vs. 6.0 ± 1.6, p = 0.506).
17 definite ET patients (12.6%) had resting tremor. Table 3 presents a further comparison of the clinical differences between ET patients who did and did not have resting tremor. It appeared that ET patients without resting tremor were more likely to manifest head tremor and had lower total and limb tremor scores. There were no significant differences in the age, sex, and disease duration in these patients.
Table 3.
Clinical characteristics of ET with or without resting tremor
| Variables | Resting tremor group | Without resting tremor group | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number | 17 | 118 | |
| Mean age | 74.5±4.8 | 76.0±8.3 | p=0.294 |
| Gender | p=0.439 | ||
| Male | 9 | 74 | |
| Female | 8 | 44 | |
| Self-report | 13 | 81 | p=0.512 |
| Disease duration, years (mean ± SD) | 11.5±12.8 | 10.2±10.3 | p=0.675 |
| Head tremor | 7 | 20 | p=0.020* |
| Total tremor score (mean ± SD) | 10.0±5.7 | 6.3±1.8 | p=0.017* |
| Limb tremor score (mean ± SD) | 8.4±3.9 | 5.80±1.73 | p=0.015* |
| Posture tremor (mean ± SD) | 2.41±1.18 | 1.99±0.89 | p=0.084 |
| Kinetic tremor (mean ± SD) | 3.35±1.00 | 3.69±1.06 | p=0.224 |
*compared with the two groups, p < 0.05; Head tremor: Resting tremor vs without resting tremor, p = 0.020; Limb tremor score: Resting tremor vs without resting tremor, p = 0.015
Discussion
In this study, we found that the population of Beijing has an age-adjusted prevalence of 3.6 per 100 persons for ET. The rate of definite ET increases with age, as consistently seen in previous epidemiological studies (2, 4, 12, 13). The frequency of ET in this study is similar to that in other ethnic population (14, 15, 16). However, regional differences have also been reported that may be related to differences in the methods of case ascertainment, diagnostic criteria, and potentially, the ethnic background (Table 4). Another investigation on the population of rural area was conducted in Shanghai in 2014 (24). There was a great difference between us because of the different diagnosis criteria, screening method and population. Different life style and climate might also account for this inconsistency between the north and south population of China (25).
Table 4.
Community based epidemiology survey of ET
| Research | Time | Country | Age (y) | Diagnostic criteria | Prevalence (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benito-Leon et al (14) | 1994 | Spain | ≥65 | Action tremor | 4.8 |
| Laesson Sjogren, et al (17) | 1960 | Sweden | All ages | Postural tremor, enhanced by action | 1.7 |
| Rautakorpi, et al (18) | 1982 | Finnish | >40 | Postural or action tremor | 5.5 |
| Haerer, et al (19) | 1982 | USA | >40 | Action tremor | 0.4 |
| Moghal, et al (20) | 1994 | Canada | ≥65 | Postural or action tremor | 14.0 |
| Lieberman, et al (21) | 1994 | USA | ≥65 | Not mention | 22.0 |
| Louis, et al (15) | 1995 | USA | ≥65 | Postural or action tremor | 4.02 |
| Bergareche, et al (22) | 2001 | Spain | ≥65 | Action tremor | 4.8 |
| Louis CS.Tan. et al (23) | 2001 | Singapore | ≥50 | Postural or action tremor, 3 years history, family history, alcohol effective | 0.237 |
| Hiasen, E.H. et al (13) | 2016 | USA | ≥40 | Postural or action tremor | 3.1 |
| Eung Seok Oh. et al (16) | 2005 | Korea | ≥65 | Bilateral postural or action tremor | 3.64 |
| Wu, et al.et al (24) | 2011 | China, Shanghai | ≥50 | Bilateral postural tremor with or without kinetic tremor, 5 years history | 0.306 |
It was noteworthy that in our study, men were 1.7 times more likely to develop ET than women, like some of the previous studies. However, some studies have suggested opposite results, while others found no sex-based differences (22, 26, 27). The higher rate of ET in men might suggest that male sex (and the related behavior) or environmental factors may play role in the development of ET (23). In addition, we found that women with ET were more likely to have head tremor than men, as demonstrated in another study (28). Whether hormonal factors are involved in the expression of head tremor is unclear.
There was a regional difference in the distribution of ET among the urban, mountain, and rural areas in Beijing. The prevalence of definite ET was higher in urban areas than in the mountain and rural areas, particularly among older subjects (age ≥75, p =0.013). Other studies have not reported similar findings. The higher prevalence in the urban area might be attributable to considerable exposure to environmental risk factors, such as air pollution and pesticides or herbicides. Although specific environmental risk factors for ET have not been identified, exposure to lead (29), pesticides (30), and other toxins is reported to result in action tremor. In addition, people living in mountainous and rural areas are more likely to perform physical labor and exercise daily, protecting them against ET. Our results warrant further investigation on the relationship of environmental and physical factors with ET.
Among subjects with definite ET, 94 (69.6%) themselves reported that they had tremor, while 41 (30.4%) were unaware of any tremor and were diagnosed by interviewers; the diagnosis was confirmed with neurological examination. Head tremor was 3.5 times higher in self-reported subjects (25.5%) than those who were unaware about it, suggesting that head tremor was the main factor affecting the awareness regarding tremor. Most community-living subjects with tremor were only affected mildly and usually did not seek medical attention.
Resting tremor is usually the manifestation of PD; however, ET patients may have both postural and resting tremor (31). To better investigate the relationship of resting tremor with ET, we compared the differences in the clinical features of ET patients with and without resting tremor. The major differences were more head tremor and less severity of tremor in ET patients without resting tremor. Our data support the fact that a small proportion of definite ET patients could have mixed tremor. Recently, the term “Essential Tremor Plus” was proposed by Louis ED (32). ET with tremor at rest is included in this category. Further investigation is necessary in such cases.
There are certain limitations of this study. People aged <55 years were excluded. Videotaped evidence was only available for few cases though the diagnosis was made onsite by neurologists. Since the baseline study of the cohort began in 1992, 8 years ago before our diagnosis, and almost one third of the initial subjects died. We would not know if there were any factors that may selectively affect our results, particularly for the different rate between genders and residence.
Conclusions
The current study found a similar prevalence and increased rate with age of definite ET in the Beijing community as compared to that in other countries. Further research is warranted to understand whether environmental factors or sex-related behavior affects the prevalence of ET.
Ethical Standards
All participants were asked to sign an informed consent form and the project was approved by ethic committees of Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University. Written informed consents were obtained for every subject.
Conflicts of interest
Nothing to report.
References
- 1.Louis ED, Ottman R. How many people in the USA have essential tremor? Deriving a population estimate based on epidemiological data. Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, NY) 2014;4:259. doi: 10.7916/D8TT4P4B. 10.5334/tohm.198 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Louis ED, Ottman R, Hauser WA. How common is the most common adult movement disorder? estimates of the prevalence of essential tremor throughout the world. Movement disorders: official journal of the Movement Disorder Society. 1998;13(1):5–10. doi: 10.1002/mds.870130105. 10.1002/mds.870130105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Heroux ME, Parisi SL, Larocerie-Salgado J, Norman KE. Upper-extremity disability in essential tremor. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2006;87(5):661–670. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.01.017. 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.01.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Findley LJ. Epidemiology and genetics of essential tremor. Neurology. 2000;54(11 Suppl 4):S8–s13. PubMed PMID: 10854346. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.BK KW. Essential tremor. In: Watts RL, Koller WC, editors. Movement disorders Neurological principles and practice. 1997:365–85.
- 6.Gulcher JR, Jonsson P, Kong A, Kristjansson K, Frigge ML, Karason A, et al. Mapping of a familial essential tremor gene, FET1, to chromosome 3q13. Nature genetics. 1997;17(1):84–87. doi: 10.1038/ng0997-84. 10.1038/ng0997-84 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Higgins JJ, Pho LT, Nee LE. A gene (ETM) for essential tremor maps to chromosome 2p22–p25. Movement disorders: official journal of the Movement Disorder Society. 1997;12(6):859–864. doi: 10.1002/mds.870120605. 10.1002/mds.870120605 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lance JW, Schwab RS, Peterson EA. Action tremor and the cogwheel phenomenon in Parkinson's disease. Brain: ajournai of neurology. 1963;86:95–110. doi: 10.1093/brain/86.1.95. 10.1093/brain/86.1.95 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pahwa R, Koller WC. Is there a relationship between Parkinson's disease and essential tremor? Clinical neuropharmacology. 1993;16(1):30–35. doi: 10.1097/00002826-199302000-00003. 10.1097/00002826-199302000-00003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tang Z, Wang HX, Meng C, Wu XG, Ericsson K, Winblad B, et al. The prevalence of functional disability in activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living among elderly Beijing Chinese. Archives of gerontology and geriatrics. 1999;29(2):115–125. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4943(99)00026-6. 10.1016/S0167-4943(99)00026-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jankovic J. Essential tremor: clinical characteristics. Neurology. 2000;54(11 Suppl 4):S21–S25. PubMed PMID: 10854348. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Brin MF, Koller W. Epidemiology and genetics of essential tremor. Movement disorders: official journal of the Movement Disorder Society. 1998;13(Suppl 3):55–63. doi: 10.1002/mds.870131310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Eliasen EH, Ferrer M, Garni S, Louis ED, Petersen MS. Prevalence of Essential Tremor in the Faroe Islands: A Population-Based Study. Neuro epidemiology. 2019;52(3–4):227–236. doi: 10.1159/000499070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Benito-Leon J, Bermejo-Pareja F, Morales JM, Vega S, Molina JA. Prevalence of essential tremor in three elderly populations of central Spain. Movement disorders: official journal of the Movement Disorder Society. 2003;18(4):389–394. doi: 10.1002/mds.10376. 10.1002/mds.10376 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Louis ED, Marder K, Cote L, Pullman S, Ford B, Wilder D, et al. Differences in the prevalence of essential tremor among elderly African Americans, whites, and Hispanics in northern Manhattan, NY. Archives of neurology. 1995;52(12):1201–1205. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1995.00540360079019. 10.1001/archneur.1995.00540360079019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Oh ES, Kim JM, Kim YE, Yun JY, Kim JS, Kim SE, et al. The prevalence of essential tremor in elderly Koreans. Journal of Korean medical science. 2014;29(12):1694–1698. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2014.29.12.1694. 10.3346/jkms.2014.29.12.1694 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Larsson T, Sjogren T. Essential tremor: a clinical and genetic population study. Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica Supplementum. 1960;36(144):1–176. PubMed PMID: 14414307. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Rautakorpi I, Takala J, Marttila RJ, Sievers K, Rinne UK. Essential tremor in a Finnish population. Acta neurologica Scandinavica. 1982;66(1):58–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1982.tb03129.x. 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1982.tb03129.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Haerer AF, Anderson DW, Schoenberg BS. Prevalence of essential tremor. Results from the Copiah County study. Archives of neurology. 1982;39(12):750–751. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1982.00510240012003. 10.1001/archneur.1982.00510240012003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Moghal S, Rajput AH, D'Arcy C, Rajput R. Prevalence of movement disorders in elderly community residents. Neuroepidemiology. 1994;13(4):175–178. doi: 10.1159/000110376. 10.1159/000110376 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lieberman A I B, et al. High prevalence of tremor in a retirement community. Neurology. 1994;44(2):A213. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bergareche A, De La Puente E, Lopez De Munain A, Sarasqueta C, De Arce A, Poza JJ, et al. Prevalence of essential tremor: a door-to-door survey in bidasoa, spain. Neuroepidemiology. 2001;20(2):125–128. doi: 10.1159/000054771. 10.1159/000054771 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Louis ED. Etiology of essential tremor: should we be searching for environmental causes? Movement disorders: official journal of the Movement Disorder Society. 2001;16(5):822–829. doi: 10.1002/mds.1183. 10.1002/mds.1183 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wu Y, Wang X, Wang C, Sun Q, Song N, Zhou Y, et al. Prevalence and clinical features of non-motor symptoms of essential tremor in Shanghai rural area. Parkinsonism & related disorders. 2016;22:15–20. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2015.10.617. 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2015.10.617 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hopfner F, Helmich RC. The etiology of essential tremor: Genes versus environment. Parkinsonism & related disorders. 2018;46(Suppl 1):S92–S96. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2017.07.014. 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2017.07.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bharucha NE, Bharucha EP, Bharucha AE, Bhise AV, Schoenberg BS. Prevalence of essential tremor in the Parsi community of Bombay, India. Archives of neurology. 1988;45(8):907–908. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1988.00520320105023. 10.1001/archneur.1988.00520320105023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Dogu O, Sevim S, Camdeviren H, Sasmaz T, Bugdayci R, Aral M, et al. Prevalence of essential tremor: door-to-door neurologic exams in Mersin Province, Turkey. Neurology. 2003;61(12):1804–1806. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000099075.19951.8c. 10.1212/01.WNL.0000099075.19951.8C [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hardesty DE, Maraganore DM, Matsumoto JY, Louis ED. Increased risk of head tremor in women with essential tremor: longitudinal data from the Rochester Epidemiology Project. Movement disorders: official journal of the Movement Disorder Society. 2004;19(5):529–533. doi: 10.1002/mds.20096. 10.1002/mds.20096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Winegar DA, Levy BS, Andrews JS, Jr., Landrigan PJ, Scruton WH, Krause MJ. Chronic occupational exposure to lead: an evaluation of the health of smelter workers. Journal of occupational medicine: official publication of the Industrial Medical Association. 1977;19(9):603–606. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Guzelian PS. Comparative toxicology of chlordecone (Kepone) in humans and experimental animals. Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology. 1982;22:89–113. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pa.22.040182.000513. 10.1146/annurev.pa.22.040182.000513 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Louis ED, Hernandez N, Michalec M. Prevalence and correlates of rest tremor in essential tremor: cross-sectional survey of 831 patients across four distinct cohorts. European journal of neurology. 2015;22(6):927–932. doi: 10.1111/ene.12683. 10.1111/ene.12683 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Louis ED. “Essential Tremor Plus”: A Problematic Concept: Implications for Clinical and Epidemiological Studies of Essential Tremor. Neuroepidemiology. 2020;54(2):180–184. doi: 10.1159/000502862. 10.1159/000502862 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
