Abstract
Objectives
This paper provides evidence-based and, when appropriate, expert reviewed recommendations for long-stay residents who are prescribed texture-modified diets (TMDs), with the consideration that these residents are at high risk of worsening oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD), malnutrition, dehydration, aspiration pneumonia, and OD-associated mortality, poorer quality of life and high costs.
Design
Nestlé Health Science funded an initial virtual meeting attended by all authors, in which the unmet needs and subsequent recommendations for OD management were discussed. The opinions, results, and recommendations detailed in this paper are those of the authors, and are independent of funding sources.
Setting
OD is common in nursing home (NH) residents, and is defined as the inability to initiate and perform safe swallowing. The long-stay NH resident population has specific characteristics marked by a shorter life expectancy relative to community-dwelling older adults, high prevalence of multimorbidity with a high rate of complications, dementia, frailty, disability, and often polypharmacy. As a result, OD is associated with malnutrition, dehydration, aspiration pneumonia, functional decline, and death. Complications of OD can potentially be prevented with the use of TMDs.
Results
This report presents expert opinion and evidence-informed recommendations for best practice on the nutritional management of OD. It aims to highlight the practice gaps between the evidence-based management of OD and real-world patterns, including inadequate dietary provision and insufficient staff training. In addition, the unmet need for OD screening and improvements in therapeutic diets are explored and discussed.
Conclusion
There is currently limited empirical evidence to guide practice in OD management. Given the complex and heterogeneous population of long-stay NH residents, some ‘best practice' approaches and interventions require extensive efficacy testing before further changes in policy can be implemented.
Key words: Dysphagia, malnutrition, nursing home, texture-modified diet
Introduction
The context of the NH
The long-stay NH resident population has specific characteristics marked by a shorter life expectancy relative to community-dwelling older adults, high prevalence of multimorbidity with a high rate of complications, dementia, frailty, disability, and often polypharmacy. Oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD), defined as the inability to initiate and perform safe swallowing (1, 2), alongside poor coordination and propulsion, may result in aspiration from the passing of food, a liquid bolus, or regurgitated gastric contents into the respiratory tract, and is believed to be common among this population (3). This population also has a significantly greater risk of malnutrition, resulting from a variety of challenges including the oral processing of food (4).
Due to the large heterogeneity within the NH resident population, defined resident-specific care needs, including nutritional goals, are urgently required. Personalized resident-centered care planning needs to focus on the management or care of OD.
The aim of this paper is to present an expert-reviewed report on evidence-based optimal practice and positions on the nutritional management of OD where this evidence is available, and a collective opinion on better practices to manage OD in NH residents where empirical evidence is absent. This paper has a specific focus on the role of texture modified diets (TMDs), and on unmet needs that should be addressed in several areas of care and research concerning OD. TMD will be the term used to describe the therapeutic diet prescription used to manage OD.
Malnutrition and OD in complex residents
Currently, there is a high prevalence of malnutrition in the NH population, with levels ranging from 1.5% to 66.5% depending on how malnutrition is diagnosed (4); OD is associated with a higher risk of malnutrition, which further exacerbates OD (5). Both OD and malnutrition are complex conditions that can result from factors presented in Table 1. Expert recommendations to overcome these unmet needs are presented below.
Table 1.
Challenges meeting the needs of NH* residents with OD†
| Area | Unmet need |
|---|---|
| Staffing | Inadequate NH staffing(6) |
| Lack of nutrition and OD specialistsa | |
| Diet | Inadequate nutritional intake of some macro and micronutrients in TMD (7, 8) |
| Inconsistent daily care provision for eating and drinking assistance (7) | |
| Resident preferences that may be divergent from dietary needs related to one or more chronic conditions (9, 10) | |
| NH resident eating challenges (9) | |
| Inadequate equipment to support interventionsa | |
| Care quality | Insufficient knowledge of the NH staff, and/or training of care providers within the NH care environment to support the accurate assessment of OD and malnutrition |
| Difficulty meeting resident dietary preferences and eating needs in a communal dining environment | |
| Changing resident needs for eating assistancea | |
*NH, nursing home; †OD, oropharyngeal dysphagia; aAuthors' personal opinion based on expert-reviewed recommendation
Nutritional care: Expert-reviewed recommendations and summary of prior guidelines
Based on the authors' personal opinion, optimal nutritional care of the NH population should be considered a high priority, similarly to wound care. Table 2 provides an overview of optimal practice. The nutritional content of diets, amount, and quality of assistance to eat and drink, the dining environment, and the quality of oral hygiene are important factors to consider for analyzing the NH population.
Table 2.
Recommendations to achieve optimal nutritional care in OD* management
| Potential ways to improve nutritional care in nursing home residents |
| Perform screening and periodic reassessments of both dysphagia and the risk of malnutrition, and dehydration (23, 24) |
| Plan and conduct multimodal interventions and rehabilitation (25, 25) |
| Support the communication between the multidisciplinary team and dysphagia clinician regarding the recommendations and nutritional treatment plans (17) |
| Involve a dietitian and food service manager to plan and provide a diet that meets nutritional needs. |
| Assist residents with exercise (e.g. mobility interventions); this is frequently recommended with nutritional interventions with the aim to improve strength and decrease frailty (26, 27) |
| Provide specialized nutrition support as required (28, 29) |
| Perform a regular medication review, with the aim of reducing medications that can negatively impact appetite or alertness. Also perform a periodic training review for emergency situations, such as a case of aspiration and acute dyspnea due to OD |
| Ensure that there is at least one licensed supervisor present during mealtimes to oversee mealtime care quality, monitor symptoms of OD, and respond to acute needs. |
*OD, oropharyngeal dysphagia
Although routine oral hygiene and dental care are necessary to reduce the risk of aspiration pneumonia infections, and improve chewing and oral sensory processing, these aspects of personal care are often not managed adequately (11) (Authors' personal opinion based on expert-reviewed recommendation). It is also important that NH residents who are able to, should leave their bed for most of their meals as this reduces the risk of poor oral intake and swallowing difficulties from poor positioning (12).
Residents receiving medication (either single drugs or polypharmacy) should be carefully monitored as these residents may have reduced appetites that may contribute to malnutrition-associated complications (13, 14) (Authors' personal opinion based on expert-reviewed recommendation). A regular medication review should be performed for these residents to carefully evaluate the necessity of each medication, particularly those that can suppress appetite, lead to mouth dryness, and/or have sedative side effects. Resident-specific goals should be developed with the aim of considering the individual's wishes and the trajectory of their health status, rather than treating the symptoms alone.
The goals for most residents should be to meet fluid, macronutrient, and micronutrient recommendations to maintain the best possible health status and contribute to the prevention of falls, fractures, functional decline, pressure ulcers, and infections. Evidence from previously published guidelines and expert-reviewed recommendations for the nutritional care of NH residents are summarized in Supplementary Tables 1 and 2. However, it should be acknowledged that quality of life must be the priority goal in residents with a short life expectancy, and/or those who otherwise express a preference for quality of life rather than prolonged life. For these residents in particular, management goals should optimize satisfaction from food and their mealtime experience. Consequently, the necessity of dietary restrictions, such as salt and concentrated sugar exclusions, and/or the reduction of fat, should be carefully evaluated among these residents.
As long-stay NH residents tend to suffer from various health conditions that can lead to or exacerbate OD, it is also important to consider the nutritional requirements specific to health conditions that are often present in those with OD (Supplementary Tables 1 and 2). NH residents often suffer from more than one condition, thus, personalized recommendations should be provided that consider residents' specific needs; a comprehensive nutrition assessment is usually applied to determine the optimal treatment/management plan for a given resident.
Gaps in practice between evidence-based management of OD and real-world patterns
The recommended therapeutic approaches for the management of OD include swallowing therapy and training, TMDs, and technical methods, such as peripheral stimulation and transcranial direct-current stimulation (15). Although TMDs are recommended as a management strategy for OD, evidence supporting their benefits on clinical outcomes is lacking due to few studies and small sample sizes (15, 16, 17).
Inadequate dietary provision: Menu planning and recipe development
The current management strategy of NH residents often differs to various guideline recommendations (Supplementary Tables 1 and 2). Although recommended to manage OD, TMDs provided for NH residents when inappropriately prepared, may be lower in key nutrients than regular diets (16, 18). Adequate amounts of protein, fiber, liquid, and key nutrients such as vitamins D, K and E, folate, magnesium, calcium, potassium, and zinc are the most difficult to achieve (19, 20). A nutrient-poor diet poses a risk factor for infections, and insufficient liquid intake may lead to dehydration, which may in turn affect the degree of responsiveness and functioning of the oropharyngeal tract (21). However, research has shown that these issues can be mitigated to some extent by good-quality menus and recipes (18), and hydration protocols (22), yet high-quality intervention studies are lacking.
Insufficient NH staff and staff training
The following recommendations are based on the authors' opinions. A lack of resources often translates into insufficient levels of staffing in the NH setting and the inability to form a multidisciplinary team to prepare and perform appropriate nutritional care plans, and monitor nutrition and hydration statuses. Currently, a knowledge gap often exists among NH staff regarding residents' nutrition and hydration needs, the screening and monitoring of OD, malnutrition, the preparation and use of TMDs, and how to address eating challenges, which complicate unified training approaches. Supplementary Table 3 lists the potentially unmet needs identified by the committee that influence the diagnosis and management of OD. NH staff, professional caregivers, and home helpers should be provided with simple training in the management and detection of OD, malnutrition, and dehydration. Supplementary Table 4 provides recommendations for staff training.
Table 3.
Recommendations for the improvement of TMDs†
| Residents recommended by their dysphagia clinician to follow a TMD should be referred to a nutritional professional (23, 24). |
| TMD/thickened liquids and nutrient-dense, or fortified foods are ‘therapeutic diets' (25). Specially-made, nutritionally-enriched texture-modified foods, and thickened liquids should be recommended for older adults with chronic dysphagia for improving nutritional status, promoting hydration, and minimizing the risk of aspiration (17, 31)a. |
| Foods should be enhanced with energy- and protein-dense ingredients to prevent declines in nutritional and functional status (26, 32, 33). Nutritional analysis of TMDs ensures the comparability of products with regular offerings. Consider ingredient adjustments to increase micronutrient levels (34). |
| When food intake is inadequate, consider ONS* to improve energy and protein intake, preferably offered as 50–125 mL with medication rounds, multiple times/day, between meals and with the encouragement of carers (requires 5–10 minutes/person/offer) (26, 35). ONS provides 400+ kcal/day, including 30+ g protein/day for those at risk or malnourished (36). |
| Adjust portion sizes as per the individual's needs and preferences. Offer a variety of options (flavors, optimal texture and thickness ranges based on the individual's abilities) to the greatest extent possible to decrease rate of refusal. |
| To reduce mealtime fatigue and its associated risk of aspiration, volume of sip or spoon size should be adjusted as per personal requirements. |
| Aim to provide adequate food/fluid according to individual needs and preferences, considering their wishes and safety (28). |
| Increase food attractiveness(15) by presenting in a visually-appealing and dignified way (31, 32, 37). Texture-modified food does not necessarily mimic the appearance of unmodified food, as evidence is lacking for molded foods (38)a. |
| Increase diversity and offer a range of alternative meal choices, and protein- and energy-dense in-between meal snacks to provide adequate nutrition, improve resident autonomy and engagement, and encourage consumption (39). |
| Personalize the ambiance and delivery method to promote appetite and food intake (26, 27, 40). |
| Ensure the use of TMDs and the intake of texture-modified foods, and the resident's nutritional status, are closely monitored and evaluated. |
| Encourage eating but do not force food on residents, as this may take away pleasure from a person's mealtime and lead to reduced food intake, and/or quality of life. Proactively address eating challenges and provide tailored support (e.g. more time to eat, quiet environment, finger foods, etc.). |
| Apply the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative framework in the prescription, preparation, and assessment of TMDs and thickened liquids to facilitate consistent communication between nursing home staff, carers, and professionals, and reduce variability in the preparation, assessment, and prescription of TMDs and thickened liquids (41). |
| Rapidly and thoroughly evaluate the resident when he/she presents anorexia or refusal to eat while treated with a TMD; the use of TMDs should be re-evaluated in the context of end-of-life and palliative care. |
*ONS, oral nutritional supplements; †TMD, texture-modified diet. aAuthors' personal opinion based on expert-reviewed recommendation
Unmet needs: Screening and management
To address the unmet needs in OD screening and management, it is recommended that a multidisciplinary team of professionals is involved, who can ensure optimal nutritional care that prevents aspiration, malnutrition, and dehydration. There are a number of ways in which this can be done, as listed (Table 2).
Unmet need: Improvements to the quality of therapeutic diets
In the absence of strong evidence for TMDs to promote safety and beneficial long-term outcomes (30), it is the collective opinion of the committee that TMDs when managed and developed appropriately, and accepted by the consumer, can benefit the resident. It is also important to note the lack of research and where present, inconsistencies between studies that call for improvements in TMD standardization (30). Based on the opinion of the authors, adherence to nutritionally-enhanced TMDs may have a direct effect on unintentional weight loss, dehydration, skin health, wound healing, and quality of life of NH residents, and may additionally exhibit a positive impact on functional outcomes, such as improved mobility and independence when TMDs are used, combined with other interventions (e.g. mobility interventions or other forms of exercise). Recommendations for the improvement and consistency of nutritional quality, and improved adherence to TMDs for residents with swallowing difficulties are listed in Table 3. Rigorous intervention studies examining the efficacy of the various strategies are required to provide evidence to support these recommendations.
Unmet need: Minimal training requirements
To ensure that NH residents are given the required nutritional support, the minimum training requirements outlined (Supplementary Table 4) are recommended by the committee for NH staff.
Budget resource constraints may account for a large part of the training and staffing resource deficiencies that exist in many NHs. In order to alleviate budget constraints, solutions such as: Cross-training of additional personnel to assist with nutritional care delivery in the NH; sharing of resources (both equipment and specialized personnel) across different NHs, and between NHs and hospitals; and virtual assessment tools may be employed as cost-effective strategies to improve nutrition and OD care quality with existing resources (42). As the rate of death in NHs is high, all staff should be integrated into the process of making recommendations for palliative care for residents. As an optimal measure, staff should also consider patient wishes, and give priority to the quality of life for residents.
Summary
The population of long-stay NH residents is heterogeneous and complex, and is often characterized by the presence of one or more chronic conditions with the addition of a high risk of OD, malnutrition, and/or dehydration. Due to insufficient resources, inadequate staff training and a lack of collective opinion on best practices, there is often a suboptimal approach to nutrition, hydration and OD care in NHs (4). This paper presents, where available, evidence-based recommendations aimed to support NH staff and multidisciplinary teams in the preparation and execution of personalized nutritional care plans for long-stay NH residents prescribed TMDs to manage OD. A list of evidence-informed and expert recommendations on nutritional requirements, improvements to TMDs and their provision, and a checklist of minimal training requirements for NH staff have been provided. However, it should be noted that the research is lacking in this area and a systematic review of the literature was not possible. Some recommendations provided that have been considered as ‘best practices' are yet to be demonstrated as effective for improving the health and quality of life for NH residents. The committee also recommends a concerted effort in the development and testing of efficacious interventions to develop the evidence base for this population.
Implications for practice, policy, and/or research
This report presents expert opinion and evidence-informed recommendations for optimal practice and positions on the nutritional management of OD. In addition, this report provides expert guidance for improved OD management in NH residents. Given the complex and heterogeneous population of long-stay NH residents, some ‘best practice' approaches and interventions will require rigorous efficacy testing before further changes in policy can be implemented.
Acknowledgments
The study was funded by Nestlé Health Science. The authors acknowledge Ananya Das, of imc, for medical writing support.
Conflicts of Interest
Dr. Simmons reports personal fees from Nestlé Health Science, during the conduct of the study. Dr. Ballesteros-Pomar reports personal fees from Nestlé Health Science, during the conduct of the study. Dr. Cherubini reports personal fees from Nestlé Health Science, during the conduct of the study. Dr. Keller reports other from Nestlé Health Science during the conduct of the study; grants and other from Abbott Nutrition, outside the submitted work. Dr. Rolland reports grants from Biophytis, Novartis, outside the submitted work. Mr. Lam reports other from Nestlé Health Science, during the conduct of the study; other from International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative, personal fees from Nestlé Health Science, outside the submitted work; and Co-chair of the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative.
Ethical Standards
All authors declare: 1. That this manuscript is not published elsewhere; 2. Any conflicts of interest; 3. They meet criteria for authorship and ensure appropriate acknowledgments made in the manuscript; 4. Appropriate funding statements in the manuscript; 5. They will inform the journal if any subsequent errors are found in the manuscript.
Disclosures
Nestlé Health Science funded an initial virtual meeting attended by all authors, where the unmet needs and subsequent recommendations were discussed. Members received honoraria for this consultation. All authors were involved in the conception of principal content, and critically reviewed, and edited both the draft manuscript and final text. The opinions, results, and recommendations detailed in this paper are those of the authors, and are independent from funding sources.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary material is available for this article at https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-020-1377-5 and is accessible for authorized users.
Supplementary Material
References
- 1.Rogus-Pulia N, et al. Dysphagia in Frail Older Persons: Making the Most of Current Knowledge. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018;19(9):736–740. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.07.018. 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.07.018 PubMed PMID: 30149842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jukic Peladic N et al. Dysphagia in Nursing Home Residents: Management and Outcomes. J Am Med Dir Assoc, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.07.023 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 3.de Fabrizio M. Contemporary Approaches to Dysphagia Management. J Nurse Pract. 2010;6(8):622–630. 10.1016/j.nurpra.2009.11.010 [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bell CL, et al. Malnutrition in the nursing home. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2015;18:17–23. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000130. 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000130 PubMed PMID: 25394167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Carrion S, et al. Nutritional status of older patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia in a chronic versus an acute clinical situation. Clinical Nutrition. 2017;36(4):1110–1116. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.07.009. 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.07.009 PubMed PMID: 27499393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ilhamto N, et al. In-house pureed food production in long-term care: perspectives of dietary staff and implications for improvement. J Nutr Gerontol Geriatr. 2014;33(3):210–228. doi: 10.1080/21551197.2014.927306. 10.1080/21551197.2014.927306 PubMed PMID: 25105716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Nowson CA, et al. Energy, protein, calcium, vitamin D and fibre intakes from meals in residential care establishments in Australia. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2003;12(2):172–177. PubMed PMID: 12810407. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dahl WJ, et al. Protein content of pureed diets: implications for planning. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2007;68(2):99–102. doi: 10.3148/68.2.2007.99. 10.3148/68.2.2007.99 PubMed PMID: 17553196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wright L, et al. Comparison of energy and protein intakes of older people consuming a texture modified diet with a normal hospital diet. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2005;18(3):213–219. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2005.00605.x. 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2005.00605.x PubMed PMID: 15882384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Adolphe JL, et al. Vitamin fortification of pureed foods for long-term care residents. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2009;70(3):143–150. doi: 10.3148/70.3.2009.143. 10.3148/70.3.2009.143 PubMed PMID: 19709470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yoneyama T, et al. Oral care reduces pneumonia in older patients in nursing homes. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50(3):430–433. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50106.x. 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50106.x PubMed PMID: 11943036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Simmons SF, Schnelle JF. A continuous quality improvement pilot study: impact on nutritional care quality. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2006;7(8):480–485. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2006.03.002. 10.1016/j.jamda.2006.03.002 PubMed PMID: 17027624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Simmons SF, Levy-Storms L. The effect of dining location on nutritional care quality in nursing homes. J Nutr Health Aging. 2005;9(6):434–439. PubMed PMID: 16395515. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Landi F, et al. Prevalence and potentially reversible factors associated with anorexia among older nursing home residents: results from the ULISSE project. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013;14(2):119–124. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2012.10.022. 10.1016/j.jamda.2012.10.022 PubMed PMID: 23218843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hernandez Morante JJ et al. Dietary Factors Associated with Frailty in Old Adults: A Review of Nutritional Interventions to Prevent Frailty Development. Nutrients, 2019; 11 (1). doi: 10.3390/nu11010102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 16.Wirth R, et al. Oropharyngeal dysphagia in older persons — from pathophysiology to adequate intervention: a review and summary of an international expert meeting. Clin Interv Aging. 2016;11:189–208. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S97481. 10.2147/CIA.S97481 PubMed PMID: 26966356, PMCID 4770066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Painter V, et al. Texture-modified food and fluids in dementia and residential aged care facilities. Clin Interv Aging. 2017;12:1193–1203. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S140581. 10.2147/CIA.S140581 PubMed PMID: 28814845, PMCID 5546786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Andersen UT, et al. Systematic review and evidence based recommendations on texture modified foods and thickened fluids for adults (≥18 years) with oropharyngeal dysphagia. e-SPEN Journal. 2013;8(4):e127–e134. 10.1016/j.clnme.2013.05.003 [Google Scholar]
- 19.Vucea V et al. Nutritional quality of regular and pureed menus in Canadian long term care homes: an analysis of the Making the Most of Mealtimes (M3) project. BMC Nutrition, 2017; 3 (1). doi: 10.1186/s40795-017-0198-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 20.Keller HH, et al. Prevalence of inadequate micronutrient intakes of Canadian long-term care residents. Br J Nutr. 2018;119(9):1047–1056. doi: 10.1017/S0007114518000107. 10.1017/S0007114518000107 PubMed PMID: 29444716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Namasivayam-MacDonald AM, et al. Inadequate fluid intake in long term care residents: prevalence and determinants. Geriatr Nurs. 2018;39(3):330–335. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2017.11.004. 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2017.11.004 PubMed PMID: 29310831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cichero JA, et al. The Need for International Terminology and Definitions for Texture-Modified Foods and Thickened Liquids Used in Dysphagia Management: Foundations of a Global Initiative. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep. 2013;1:280–291. doi: 10.1007/s40141-013-0024-z. 10.1007/s40141-013-0024-z PubMed PMID: 24392282, PMCID 3873065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bunn D, et al. Increasing fluid intake and reducing dehydration risk in older people living in long-term care: a systematic review. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015;16(2):101–113. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.10.016. 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.10.016 PubMed PMID: 25499399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Burgos R, et al. ESPEN guideline clinical nutrition in neurology. Clin Nutr. 2018;37(1):354–396. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.09.003. 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.09.003 PubMed PMID: 29274834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Volkert D, et al. ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in dementia. Clin Nutr. 2015;34(6):1052–1073. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2015.09.004. 10.1016/j.clnu.2015.09.004 PubMed PMID: 26522922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cederholm T, et al. ESPEN guidelines on definitions and terminology of clinical nutrition. Clin Nutr. 2017;36(1):49–64. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.09.004. 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.09.004 PubMed PMID: 27642056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Agarwal E, et al. Optimising nutrition in residential aged care: A narrative review. Maturitas. 2016;92:70–78. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2016.06.013. 10.1016/j.maturitas.2016.06.013 PubMed PMID: 27621242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Miles A, et al. Interdisciplinary management of dysphagia. NRC. 2014;16(10):561–567. [Google Scholar]
- 29.van Asselt DZ, et al. Assessment and treatment of malnutrition in Dutch geriatric practice: consensus through a modified Delphi study. Age Ageing. 2012;41(3):399–404. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afs005. 10.1093/ageing/afs005 PubMed PMID: 22334385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Durfee SM, et al. Standards for Specialized Nutrition Support for Adult Residents of Long-Term Care Facilities. Nutrition in Clinical Practice. 2006;21:96–104. doi: 10.1177/011542650602100196. 10.1177/011542650602100196 PubMed PMID: 16439775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Thomas DR, et al. Nutritional Management in Long-Term Care: Development of a Clinical Guideline. Journal of Gerontology. 2000;55A(12):725–734. doi: 10.1093/gerona/55.12.m725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Flynn E, et al. Modifying the consistency of food and fluids for swallowing difficulties in dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;9:CD011077. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011077.pub2. PubMed PMID: 30251253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Forster A, et al. Oropharyngeal dysphagia in older adults: A review. European Geriatric Medicine. 2011;2(6):356–362. 10.1016/j.eurger.2011.08.007 [Google Scholar]
- 34.Erwin A, Brook S Dysphagia: an SLT and dietetic perspective. NRC, 2015; 17 (3)
- 35.Raynaud-Simon A, et al. Clinical practice guidelines from the French Health High Authority: nutritional support strategy in protein-energy malnutrition in the elderly. Clin Nutr. 2011;30(3):312–319. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2010.12.003. 10.1016/j.clnu.2010.12.003 PubMed PMID: 21251732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lam IT, et al. Micronutrients on the Menu: Enhancing the Quality of Food in Long-term Care for Regular, Nontherapeutic Menus. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2015;76(2):86–92. doi: 10.3148/cjdpr-2014-036. 10.3148/cjdpr-2014-036 PubMed PMID: 26067418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Dimant J Delivery of Nutrition and Hydration Care in Nursing Homes: Assessment and Interventions to Prevent and Treat Dehydration, Malnutrition, and Weight Loss. JAMDA, 2001:175-182 [PubMed]
- 38.Volkert D, et al. ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition and hydration in geriatrics. Clin Nutr. 2019;38(1):10–47. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.05.024. 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.05.024 PubMed PMID: 30005900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Germain I, et al. A novel dysphagia diet improves the nutrient intake of institutionalized elders. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006;106(10):1614–1623. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2006.07.008. 10.1016/j.jada.2006.07.008 PubMed PMID: 17000194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Keller HH, Duizer LM. What do consumers think of pureed food. Making the most of the indistinguishable food. J Nutr Gerontol Geriatr. 2014;33(3):139–159. doi: 10.1080/21551197.2014.927302. 10.1080/21551197.2014.927302 PubMed PMID: 25105712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Keller HH, Duizer LM. Keeping consumers safe: food providers’ perspectives on pureed food. J Nutr Gerontol Geriatr. 2014;33(3):160–178. doi: 10.1080/21551197.2014.927303. 10.1080/21551197.2014.927303 PubMed PMID: 25105713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Lepore JR, et al. Acceptability and Identification of Scooped Versus Molded Pureed Foods. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2014;75(3):145–147. doi: 10.3148/cjdpr-2014-004. 10.3148/cjdpr-2014-004 PubMed PMID: 26066819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Uncited references
- 43.Ballou S L, et al. Comparison ratings of pureed versus molded fruits: preliminary results. Dysphagia. 2000;15(1):2–5. doi: 10.1007/s004559910002. 10.1007/s004559910002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Abbey KL, et al. Menu Planning in Residential Aged Care-The Level of Choice and Quality of Planning of Meals Available to Residents. Nutrients. 2015;7(9):7580–7592. doi: 10.3390/nu7095354. 10.3390/nu7095354 PubMed PMID: 26371040, PMCID 4586549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Simmons SF, et al. Cost-Effectiveness of Nutrition Intervention in Long-Term Care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015;63(11):2308–2316. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13709. 10.1111/jgs.13709 PubMed PMID: 26503137, PMCID 5131725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Nijs KAND, et al. Effect of Family-Style Meals on Energy Intake and Risk of Malnutrition in Dutch Nursing Home Residents: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Gerontology. 2006;61A(9):935–942. doi: 10.1093/gerona/61.9.935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Cichero JA, et al. Development of International Terminology and Definitions for Texture-Modified Foods and Thickened Fluids Used in Dysphagia Management: The IDDSI Framework. Dysphagia. 2017;32(2):293–314. doi: 10.1007/s00455-016-9758-y. 10.1007/s00455-016-9758-y PubMed PMID: 27913916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Simmons SF, et al. Training Nonnursing Staff to Assist with Nutritional Care Delivery in Nursing Homes: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017;65(2):313–322. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14488. 10.1111/jgs.14488 PubMed PMID: 28198565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary Material
