Abstract
Autophagy is a conserved degradation process in eukaryotic cells that is regulated by autophagy-related genes. During autophagy, lysosomes break down cytoplasmic proteins and damaged organelles. This process plays a pivotal role in cell growth and development, protection against metabolic stress and oxidative damage, and the maintenance of cellular homeostasis through the recycling of cellular components. Pregnancy encompasses crucial events such as decidualization, embryo implantation, and fetal growth. Abnormal autophagy has been implicated in several pregnancy complications and can significantly impact both maternal and fetal health. Understanding the relationship between autophagy and complicated pregnancies could open new avenues for potential therapeutic interventions to improve maternal and fetal outcomes. In this review, we summarize the intricate relationship between autophagy and pregnancy complications, elucidate the role of autophagy in gestation, and discuss the clinical significance of autophagy in mitigating or preventing pregnancy-related disorders.
Subject terms: Nutrient signalling, Cell death and immune response, Gestational diabetes, Predictive markers, Macroautophagy
Facts
Autophagy, as a conserved lysosome-mediated degradation mechanism, is being intensively investigated by researchers to elucidate its dual role in disease pathogenesis.
Dysregulated autophagy leads to immune dysregulation, vascular injury, and apoptosis.
Recurrent implantation failure, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus, fetal growth restriction, and recurrent spontaneous abortion are common pregnancy complications that can lead to severe adverse pregnancy outcomes, imposing significant burdens on affected individuals and their families.
Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that autophagy is involved in the pathogenesis and progression of several pregnancy-related disorders.
Open questions
What pivotal functions does autophagy serve in preserving homeostatic balance at the maternal–fetal interface?
What are the underlying mechanisms through which autophagy contributes to the pathogenesis of various pregnancy complications?
In what ways can targeting autophagy pathways mitigate adverse pregnancy outcomes?
What are the potential approaches and challenges associated with modulating autophagy as a therapeutic strategy for pregnancy complications?
Introduction
Autophagy is an evolutionarily conserved process that enables the degradation and recycling of cellular components, including macromolecules and damaged organelles [1]. Recently, autophagy has garnered significant attention because of its involvement in the pathology of various diseases [2–4]. For example, defects in autophagy have been implicated in neurodegenerative disorders [5], metabolic diseases [6], infectious diseases [7], and tumors [8]. Macroautophagy, one of the main types of autophagy, involves the formation of double-layered membrane structures called “autophagosomes” [9, 10] (Fig. 1A). These autophagosomes encapsulate cytosolic components such as protein aggregates and damaged or senescent organelles. Eventually, the autophagosomes fuse with lysosomes (called autolysosomes), leading to the degradation and recycling of the enclosed contents [11]. Autophagy is a type of chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA) that directly degrades target proteins mediated by the Lys-Phe-Glu-Arg-Gln (KFERQ) motif with the assistance of the chaperone heat shock cognate 70 (Hsc70). The receptor protein lysosome-associated membrane protein 2A (LAMP2A) on the lysosomal membrane recognizes the exposed KFERQ motif on the binding protein, guiding the target protein into the lysosome for degradation [11] (Fig. 1B). On the other hand, microautophagy occurs through the direct invagination of lysosomes into vesicles. These vesicles encapsulate a portion of the cytoplasm and deliver it to lysosomes for degradation. Unlike macroautophagy, microautophagy does not involve the formation of independent bilayer membrane autophagosomes [12] (Fig. 1C).
Fig. 1. Types of autophagy.
A Macroautophagy: under the stimulation of external signals, the phagophore forms and encloses the cargo to be degraded and then seals to form an autophagosome. The autophagosome fuses with a lysosome to form an autolysosome, where the contents are degraded and the breakdown products are recycled and reused by the cell. B Chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA), in which the cytosolic chaperone Hsc70 recognizes and binds to the specific KFERQ-like motif of the target protein. The resulting complex is then transported to the lysosomal membrane, where it binds to the membrane receptor LAMP-2A. Subsequently, LAMP-2A oligomerizes to form a translocation channel. With the assistance of chaperones, the target protein unfolds and traverses the channel into the lysosomal lumen, where it is ultimately degraded by hydrolytic enzymes, and the breakdown products are recycled by the cell. C In microautophagy, lysosomes engulf cytoplasmic components (such as damaged proteins or organelles) through invagination, budding, and deformation of their own membrane. The engulfed material forms vesicles within the lumen, where it is degraded by hydrolytic enzymes, and the resulting products are recycled for cellular use. LAMP-2A, Lysosome-Associated Membrane Protein 2A.
Pregnancy is a complex physiological process that involves dynamic interactions between the mother and the fetus [13]. Certain pregnancies may be accompanied by severe complications, such as preeclampsia (PE) [14], gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) [15], fetal growth restriction (FGR) [16], and recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA) [17], which pose significant threats to maternal and fetal health. PE is characterized by the onset of new hypertension and proteinuria after 20 weeks of gestation. The pathological mechanisms of PE involve placental hypoperfusion and endothelial dysfunction [18]. PE may lead to maternal liver and kidney damage [19], HELLP syndrome [20], and eclampsia while increasing the risk of fetal preterm birth, FGR, and perinatal mortality [21]. GDM refers to glucose metabolism abnormalities that are first diagnosed during pregnancy and are closely associated with insulin resistance and pancreatic β-cell dysfunction [15]. It may increase the risk of maternal gestational hypertension and PE [22] but also increase the risk of fetal macrosomia, type 2 diabetes [23], obesity, neonatal hypoglycemia [24], and long-term metabolic syndrome [25]. FGR is defined as a condition in which the fetus fails to reach its growth potential because of pathological factors. FGR is commonly associated with placental insufficiency, which can be caused by maternal hypertension, malnutrition, or placental abruption. This condition increases the risk of fetal perinatal death, neurodevelopmental delays, and metabolic syndrome [26]. Miscarriage refers to the spontaneous termination of pregnancy before 20 weeks, with common causes including chromosomal abnormalities [27], maternal endocrine disorders [28], infections [29], and uterine anatomical anomalies [30]. Recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA) is a specific subtype of miscarriage that causes significantly greater psychological and physical harm to women than sporadic miscarriage does [31]. Management strategies for these complications include lifestyle interventions, pharmacological treatments (e.g., insulin and magnesium sulfate), and timely termination of pregnancy. Effectively treating pregnancy complications and improving adverse pregnancy outcomes has become an urgent issue that requires attention.
During pregnancy, autophagy plays a critical role in maintaining the dynamic balance at the maternal–fetal interface. First, autophagy promotes the differentiation and fusion of trophoblast cells, maintains the function of syncytiotrophoblasts, and suppresses excessive apoptosis, thereby supporting placental development [32]. Moreover, autophagy enhances the invasive capacity of trophoblasts, facilitates spiral artery remodeling, and ensures placental perfusion and proper formation [33]. Furthermore, autophagy critically promotes maternal immune tolerance toward semiallogeneic fetuses by enhancing dNK cell function [34, 35], facilitating Treg/Th2-biased immunity, driving M2 macrophage polarization, and suppressing proinflammatory responses, thereby maintaining a homeostatic microenvironment at the maternal–fetal interface [36]. Additionally, during early placentation, autophagy mitigates oxidative stress (OS) by removing damaged mitochondria via mitophagy, reducing excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, and preventing trophoblast dysfunction [37, 38]. Moreover, as a central nutrient sensor in the placenta, mTOR coordinates metabolic adaptation via mTORC1, inhibiting autophagy under nutrient sufficiency and activating it during deprivation to degrade intracellular components for energy and sustain cell survival [39, 40]. Through these multifaceted mechanisms, autophagy plays an essential and integrative role in ensuring normal placental formation and function.
While autophagy plays a critical role in regulating the immune microenvironment at the maternal–fetal interface and in placental OS as well as nutrient sensing, its dysregulation can lead to pregnancy complications. Therefore, in-depth research on the mechanisms of autophagy during pregnancy is crucial for understanding the physiological and pathological processes of gestation.
Autophagy in recurrent implantation failure
A fertilized egg, or zygote, is formed through the fusion of a spermatozoon and an oocyte, initiating mitotic divisions that lead to blastocyst formation [41]. The blastocyst is then implanted into the receptive endometrium, a process regulated by molecular interactions and endometrial decidualization, which are critical for successful pregnancy establishment [42]. Successful embryo implantation requires a synchronous and coordinated interaction between the embryo and the endometrium [43]. Structural and chromosomal abnormalities, as well as impaired endometrial receptivity, contribute to unexplained RIF [44, 45]. However, the systematic characteristics of endometrial dysfunction during the window of implantation in patients with unexplained RIF remain incompletely understood. Although no consensus has been reached regarding changes in the role of autophagy in RIF, evidence has indicated that autophagy plays a crucial role in embryo implantation by maintaining endometrial cellular homeostasis, regulating the immune microenvironment, and participating in the decidualization process (Fig. 2A).
Fig. 2. The function of autophagy in the endometrium.
A Moderate autophagy promotes the decidualization of endometrial stromal cells, contributes to the maintenance of immune homeostasis at the maternal–fetal interface, and thereby improves endometrial receptivity, thus facilitating successful embryo implantation. B Hypoxia or ROS induces excessive autophagy, which compromises endometrial decidualization. Excessive autophagy promotes an inflammatory response at the maternal–fetal interface, which impairs endometrial receptivity and results in embryo implantation failure. C Impaired autophagy induced by mTOR pathway activation under conditions of hypoxia or ROS leads to a reduction in exosome secretion from ECs. A decrease in autophagy attenuates the recruitment of NK cells, thereby disrupting the immunological homeostasis of the endometrial microenvironment. Moreover, the suppression of autophagy hampers ESC decidualization and ultimately triggers apoptotic pathways, resulting in increased cell death and impaired embryo implantation. ROS Reactive Oxygen Species, EC Endometrial Cell, ESC Endometrial Stromal Cell.
Disruptions in progesterone signaling, in conjunction with nutrient excess and dysregulated energy metabolism [46, 47], may reduce the LC3-II/I ratio; downregulate the expression of key autophagy-related proteins such as Beclin-1, ATG5, and ATG7; and lead to the accumulation of the autophagy substrate p62. This autophagy dysregulation contributes to RIF. Dysregulated autophagy may impair exosome biogenesis and secretion—key processes in intercellular communication—thereby attenuating the recruitment of immunomodulatory CD49a+CXCR4+ natural killer (NK) cells. The depletion of these regulatory NK cells disrupts immunological homeostasis within the endometrium, ultimately impairing endometrial receptivity and successful embryo implantation [48, 49]. Taken together, these findings suggest that autophagy regulates RIF by maintaining endometrial cellular homeostasis and modulating the immune microenvironment (Fig. 2B).
OS or hypoxia dysregulates autophagy-related pathways in endometrial cells. This dysregulation leads to an abnormal increase in autophagic flux, which ultimately impairs embryo adhesion and results in implantation failure [50–52]. Furthermore, excessive autophagy disrupts the maternal–fetal immune microenvironment and contributes to impaired endometrial receptivity and unsuccessful embryo implantation [53](Fig. 2C).
These findings highlight the dual role of autophagy—adaptive under physiological conditions but detrimental when dysregulated—which may serve as a therapeutic target for improving implantation outcomes.
Autophagy in preeclampsia
Preeclampsia (PE), a multisystem pregnancy disorder, is defined as new-onset hypertension (SBP ≥ 140 mmHg and/or DBP ≥ 90 mmHg) after 20 weeks of gestation accompanied by proteinuria, end-organ dysfunction, or both [54, 55]. PE can be classified into two subtypes on the basis of the time of onset, namely, early onset (delivery before 34 weeks) and late onset (delivery after 34 weeks) []. Early-onset PE is primarily associated with abnormal placental development, including impaired spiral artery remodeling and reduced placental perfusion. It is often accompanied by FGR and tends to have a more prolonged clinical course. Late-onset PE is linked to excessive placental growth, compression of the intervillous space, and subsequent hypoxia. Late-onset PE is considered a manifestation of placental aging in late pregnancy, is more common clinically, and is often associated with unexplained stillbirth or late-onset FGR. Both types present with maternal hypertension and proteinuria, along with similar biomarker changes, such as elevated sFlt-1 and reduced PlGF levels [56]. Moreover, both early-onset and late-onset PE ultimately manifest as stress responses in the STB, including OS, ERS, mitochondrial dysfunction, apoptosis, and autophagy, which constitute the core mechanism underlying the disease [57]. Autophagy plays a pivotal role in PE. For example, appropriate upregulation of autophagy is observed in first-trimester placentas under physiological hypoxia, where it supports trophoblast invasion and vascular remodeling while protecting trophoblasts from cell death induced by hypoxia or nutrient deficiency [58](Fig. 3A). However, whether insufficient autophagy or excessive autophagy contributes to both early-onset and late-onset PE remains unclear.
Fig. 3. The involvement of autophagy in the pathogenesis of PE.
A Under pathological conditions, moderate autophagy enhances the invasiveness of trophoblast cells and facilitates the remodeling of the spiral artery. B Abnormal changes in hypoxia, OS, ERS, SCFAs, TFEB, and LRP6 trigger autophagy deficiency. On the one hand, this directly impairs trophoblast cell invasion and inhibits spiral artery remodeling. On the other hand, it leads to mitochondrial damage and the accumulation of ROS, both of which collectively activate pyroptosis and apoptosis in trophoblast cells, resulting in placental dysfunction. C In response to hypoxia, severe stress, and ERS, excessive autophagy occurs in cells. This activates caspase-3/7/9 and increases the ratio of the pro-apoptotic protein BAX to the anti-apoptotic protein BCL2, leading to excessive apoptosis in trophoblast cells and inhibition of their invasive and migratory capabilities. Simultaneously, excessive autophagy directly triggers the release of large amounts of inflammatory factors, suppressing placental angiogenesis. OS Oxidative Stress, ERS Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress, SCFAs Short-Chain Fatty Acids, TFEB Transcription Factor EB, LRP6 LDL Receptor Related Protein 6, ROS Reactive Oxygen Species, BAX BCL2-associated X protein, BCL2 B-cell lymphoma 2.
Autophagy suppression is synergistically driven by multiple upstream factors. First, hypoxia/OS impairs mitochondrial function and activates the mTOR pathway through ROS accumulation [59]. Second, transthyretin aggregation induces excessive unfolded protein response activation, causing ERS that disrupts autophagic flux–lysosomal coordination [60]. Third, metabolic disturbances characterized by deficient short-chain fatty acids [61] and dysregulation of key autophagy regulators such as TFEB and LRP6 further exacerbate autophagic defects [62, 63]. The resulting autophagy dysfunction impaired trophoblast invasion and vascular remodeling capabilities alongside failed spiral artery transformation [59]. Critically, inhibition of autophagy triggers a self-amplifying cell death cascade in placental trophoblasts, characterized by the activation of caspase-3-dependent apoptosis and NLRP3-mediated pyroptosis secondary to mitochondrial dysfunction and ROS accumulation. This synergistic induction of multiple cell death pathways collectively accelerates placental dysfunction and compromises trophoblast homeostasis [60, 64, 65] (Fig. 3B). In addition to the relationship between autophagy and cell death pathways, autophagy promotes ferroptosis through ferritinophagy, mitophagy, and lipophagy. However, autophagy also attenuates ferroptosis by clearing ROS and damaged mitochondria [66]. Moreover, ferroptosis feedback regulates autophagic activity via OS and the Nrf2 pathway [67, 68]. These two processes act synergistically in various physiological and pathological contexts, not only serving as cellular stress defense mechanisms but also potentially cooperating to promote cell death.
In the pathogenesis of PE, placental tissues consistently exhibit a state of overactivated autophagy [69, 70]. This abnormal enhancement is driven primarily by key upstream inducers, such as hypoxia [70, 71], ERS [70], and OS [72]. These factors disrupt downstream molecular mechanisms, resulting in activation of the cGAS-STING pathway [73], HIF-1α [74], and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling [75] and inhibition of SIRT1/AMPKα/mTOR signaling [76]. Among the inducers of PE, hypoxia serves as a central trigger, stabilizing factors such as HIF-1α and coordinating multiple signaling cascades to collectively promote excessive autophagy [74]. Moreover, excessive autophagy is not protective but induces apoptosis through activated caspase-3/7/9, mitochondrial membrane potential collapse, and an elevated BAX/BCL-2 ratio [69, 71]. Moreover, hyperactivated autophagy increased the release of inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-8 [71], thereby impairing trophoblast migration, invasion, and placental angiogenesis [72, 77] (Fig. 3C).
Autophagy plays a dual role in PE. Under physiological conditions, moderate autophagy is essential for placental development and cytoprotection. However, under pathological conditions, its dysregulation contributes to the pathogenesis of PE by disrupting trophoblast function, inducing various types of cell death, and triggering inflammatory responses. Owing to the difficulty in clarifying the specific mechanisms of autophagy dysregulation in PE and the lack of in vivo dynamic monitoring methods, determining whether autophagy is a causative factor or merely a secondary phenomenon remains challenging.
Autophagy in gestational diabetes mellitus
GDM, a common complication of pregnancy, is defined as hyperglycemia that is first discovered during gestation and poses risks to maternal and fetal health worldwide [78]. Like other pregnancy complications, autophagy is involved in the pathogenesis of GDM. It primarily functions by inhibiting intracellular ROS accumulation and maintaining cellular homeostasis while degrading damaged proteins and organelles to suppress apoptosis (Fig. 4A).
Fig. 4. The function of autophagy in GDM.
A Hyperglycemia triggers adaptive upregulation of placental autophagy, which serves to mitigate the accumulation of intracellular ROS induced by elevated glucose levels and helps maintain cellular homeostasis. Furthermore, enhanced autophagic activity facilitates the removal of damaged organelles and misfolded proteins, thereby preventing excessive trophoblast apoptosis. B Hyperglycemia induces intracellular OS, placental IR and abnormal epigenetic modifications, all of which collectively contribute to the activation of excessive autophagy. This pathological increase in autophagy leads to intracellular iron accumulation, promoting lipid peroxidation and ultimately resulting in trophoblast ferroptosis. Concurrently, it exacerbates inflammatory responses and stimulates trophoblast apoptosis. Although the precise molecular mechanisms underlying the crosstalk between ferroptosis and apoptosis remain to be fully elucidated, these two forms of regulated cell death synergistically contribute to placental dysfunction. C Hyperglycemia suppresses IGF1R expression levels but increases intracellular DAPK3 levels, promoting abnormal upregulation of the STX17–VAMP8–SNAP29 complex. Both factors collectively inhibit autophagic activity. Autophagy inhibition increases the ratio of the antiapoptotic protein Bcl-xL to the proapoptotic protein Bak, suppresses trophoblast apoptosis, leads to abnormal proliferation of trophoblasts, and simultaneously inhibits their invasive ability, resulting in placental overgrowth. ROS Reactive Oxygen Species, IR Insulin Resistance, IGF1R Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 Receptor, DAPK3 Death-Associated Protein Kinase 3, STX17 Syntaxin 17, VAMP8 Vesicle-associated membrane protein 8, SNAP29 Synaptosome-associated protein 29, Bcl-xL B-cell lymphoma-extra large, Bak BCL2-antagonist/killer.
Hyperglycemia suppresses autophagy through a dual mechanism. On the one hand, it downregulates the insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R), which inhibits ATG7-mediated initiation of autophagy and simultaneously upregulates death-associated protein kinase 3 (DAPK3). DAPK3 promotes the interaction between Synaptosome-associated protein 29 (SNAP29) and Syntaxin 17 (STX17), leading to the formation of an aberrant STX17–SNAP29–Vesicle-associated membrane protein 8 (VAMP8) complex. This pathological complex interferes with the proper fusion of autophagosomes and lysosomes, thereby impairing autophagic flux [79]. Consequently, autophagic activity is impaired, as indicated by a reduced LC3-II/I ratio, decreased Beclin-1 and ATG5 expression, and the accumulation of the autophagy substrate p62 [80]. On the other hand, autophagy suppression elicits pathological effects in a tissue-specific manner. In murine pancreatic β-cells, it leads to increased apoptosis and reduced insulin secretion, thereby aggravating insulin resistance and metabolic dysfunction [81]. In the placenta, compromised autophagy decreases apoptosis through upregulation of the antiapoptotic protein Bcl-xL and downregulation of the proapoptotic factor Bak [80]. This dysregulation promotes aberrant trophoblast proliferation, impairs invasion, and results in placental overgrowth, ultimately contributing to fetal macrosomia or large-for-gestational-age neonates (Fig. 4B).
Hyperglycemic conditions in the context of GDM significantly induce excessive autophagy through multiple mechanisms, including downregulation of the GATA2/FGF21 axis [82], activation of the circCDH2/miR-33b-3p/ULK1 regulatory axis [83], suppression of the miR-193b/IGFBP5 axis [84], and activation of the SIRT3/AMPK/mTOR pathway [85]. The primary upstream triggers stem from hyperglycemia-induced OS, which leads to a significant accumulation of ROS and is further exacerbated by concomitant insulin resistance. Moreover, these effects are also modulated by epigenetic modifications. For example, epigenetic regulation through 5hmC modifications is enriched in the promoter regions of key genes (such as ATG5), modulating autophagy and apoptosis levels in trophoblasts, thereby affecting OS, ROS accumulation, and insulin signaling pathways. [86] (Fig. 4C).
The downstream pathological consequences of GDM play a complex dual role. On the one hand, initial moderate autophagy enhancement may serve as an adaptive response, mitigating OS pressure and suppressing apoptosis by clearing damaged organelles. For instance, this can occur by reducing the expression of the proapoptotic proteins Bax and cleaved caspase-3 and upregulating the antiapoptotic protein Bcl-2 [82]. On the other hand, under specific signaling pathways, such as the SIRT3/AMPK/mTOR-mediated cascade, excessive activation of autophagy can further induce iron accumulation via transferrin receptors and transferrin, lipid peroxidation, and depletion of glutathione, ultimately leading to the induction of ferroptosis [85]. Furthermore, this process may interact with inflammation-associated pyroptosis through mechanisms that remain to be elucidated, thereby synergistically contributing to placental dysfunction and adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Autophagy in fetal growth restriction
FGR is defined as a fetus failing to reach its growth potential because of pathological factors and can be categorized as maternal, fetal, or placental [87]. It is a common complication during pregnancy and is associated with various adverse perinatal outcomes. Estimating fetal growth potential can be challenging, and continuous assessments to monitor a decrease in the fetal weight percentile can be difficult [88]. As a result, doctors often provide a “snapshot” of estimated fetal weight (EFW) at specific points in time.
Small for gestational age (SGA), defined as an estimated fetal weight or abdominal circumference less than the 10th or 3rd percentile for gestational age, is typically used to clinically evaluate FGR [26, 89]. FGR not only results in decreased fetal weight at birth but has also been linked to metabolic syndromes in adulthood, such as obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular illness, and hypertension [90]. Despite differences in pathophysiologic mechanisms, the core issues associated with FGR are impaired uterine–placental perfusion and insufficient fetal nutrition. Autophagy serves as a crucial cellular mechanism for detecting and responding to nutrient deprivation. Given that the placenta functions as a vital organ for nutrient exchange between the mother and fetus [91], placental autophagy is intricately involved in the pathophysiology of FGR (Fig. 5A).
Fig. 5. The function of autophagy in FGR.
A Under physiological conditions, moderate autophagy acts as a nutrient sensor within the body, facilitating the transport of maternal nutrients such as glucose and amino acids to the fetus and thereby promoting fetal growth. B Upon exposure to environmental pollutants and stimulation by inflammatory factors, autophagy is inhibited. This leads to mitochondrial damage and the accumulation of ROS within cells. On the one hand, this activates the caspase-3 and BAX-dependent apoptotic pathways, promoting placental apoptosis. On the other hand, it suppresses the expression of intracellular GPX4, promoting lipid peroxidation and leading to ferroptosis. Both ferroptosis and apoptosis collectively contribute to placental dysfunction, disrupt the placental barrier, and impair nutrient transport. Moreover, placental dysfunction results in reduced progesterone secretion. C Excessive autophagy occurs under conditions such as hypoxia, ERS, OS, and maternal nutrient restriction. This directly causes trophoblast dysfunction and stimulates the same apoptotic and ferroptosis pathways, resulting in placental dysfunction, disruption of the placental barrier, and impairment of nutrient transport and progesterone synthesis. ROS Reactive Oxygen Species, BAX BCL2-associated X protein, GPX4 Glutathione Peroxidase 4, ERS Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress, OS Oxidative Stress.
Alterations in autophagy levels in FGR remain controversial, and no unified conclusion has yet been reached. At one extreme, placental autophagy is generally suppressed, characterized by a reduced LC3-II/I ratio and P62 accumulation [92]. Key etiological factors include exposure to environmental pollutants, such as PM2.5, which inhibits AMPK/mTOR activity [93]; bisphenol A (BPA), which induces OS and ERS [94]; carbon black nanoparticles, which disrupt mitochondrial dynamics [95]; and placenta-specific HMGB1 knockout, which suppresses autophagy via the HMGB1–ERK pathway [92]. This suppression of autophagy leads to the accumulation of intracellular stress, including mitochondrial damage and increased oxidative products, inducing both apoptosis [94], manifested by upregulated caspase-3 and Bax expression, and ferroptosis, characterized by decreased glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) expression and elevated lipid peroxidation [95]. These processes interact synergistically to create an inflammatory microenvironment, which ultimately leads to placental dysfunction. This dysfunction is characterized by impaired nutrient transport, including reduced uptake and transfer of glucose and amino acids, decreased synthesis of essential hormones such as progesterone, and disruption of placental barrier integrity (Fig. 5B).
At the other end of the spectrum, excessive autophagy activation may paradoxically compromise its protective effects and promote the occurrence of apoptosis or ferroptosis [96]. Exposure to environmental pollutants [97, 98], maternal nutrient restriction [99], hypoxia, OS [100], and ERS [101, 102] increase placental autophagy levels in FGR through the suppression of the mTOR signaling pathway [96] or the activation of specific stress-responsive pathways, including the PERK/ATF4 pathway [98], the GCN2/ULK1/FUNDC1 pathway [103], the ERK pathway, and the IRE1α/XBP1 pathway [102]. Enhanced autophagic flux is accompanied by increased degradation of autophagic substrates, particularly mitochondrial components linked to mitophagy, as demonstrated by reduced expression levels of mitochondrial markers, including HSP60, COX IV, and TOM20 [98]. Moreover, excessive autophagy directly impairs trophoblast function by inhibiting proliferation, migration, invasion, and syncytialization [99, 104]. Autophagy further compromises placental barrier integrity and disrupts the transport of essential nutrients such as glucose and amino acids while also suppressing the synthesis of key hormones, notably progesterone [103]. In parallel, excessive autophagy promotes apoptosis through caspase-3 activation and Bax upregulation while also inducing ferroptosis by degrading ferritin, inhibiting GPX4, and enhancing lipid peroxidation. [97]. These concurrent death pathways synergistically exacerbate placental OS and inflammatory microenvironment formation, ultimately severely compromising placental function and fetal development (Fig. 5C).
Autophagy plays a dichotomous role in the pathogenesis of PE and FGR. In PE, diminished autophagic activity compromises vascular function and spiral artery remodeling while concurrently exacerbating inflammatory responses. In contrast, excessive autophagy in FGR contributes to trophoblast dysfunction, increased mitophagy and ferroptosis, and impaired nutrient transport across the placenta. Notably, both conditions are initiated by overlapping upstream stressors, including hypoxia, OS, ERS, and inflammation. These stress signals, however, modulate autophagy in opposing directions. For instance, hypoxia suppresses autophagy in PE through disruption of TFEB signaling [60, 62, 105]. However, in FGR, it promotes mitophagy via activation of the HIF-1α/BNIP3 pathway [96, 104]. Similarly, OS inhibits autophagy in the context of PE but enhances it in FGR, primarily through differential regulation of the AMPK/mTOR signaling cascade [96, 102, 104]. Collectively, these findings suggest that common pathogenic stimuli elicit divergent autophagic responses, ultimately giving rise to distinct clinical phenotypes in PE and FGR. The dual or even opposing roles exhibited by this same biological process across different disease contexts profoundly illustrate the context-dependent nature and regulatory complexity of autophagy in the pathogenesis of diseases.
Autophagy in recurrent spontaneous abortion
RSA, clinically defined as two or more consecutive pregnancy losses prior to the 20th gestational week, affects approximately 1% to 5% of women of reproductive age [106]. The pathogenesis of RSA involves a complex interplay of multifactorial contributors, including genetic abnormalities, uterine anatomical defects, endocrine disorders, infectious agents, and immunological dysregulation across diverse pathological dimensions [107]. Autophagy plays a crucial role in establishing and maintaining pregnancy, primarily by facilitating trophoblast function, decidualization, placental development, and maternal–fetal immune homeostasis through its appropriate activation [36] (Fig. 6A). Current research highlights two divergent viewpoints regarding the relationship between autophagy and RSA.
Fig. 6. The role of autophagy in RSA.
A Under physiological conditions, moderate autophagy facilitates the decidualization process, maintains immune balance at the maternal–fetal interface, and supports placental and trophoblast cell function. B Autophagy deficiency inhibits the expression of intracellular PEG10 protein, thereby suppressing trophoblast proliferation, invasion, and migration. Moreover, impaired autophagy promotes IGF2 secretion by trophoblasts, leading to enhanced cytotoxicity and reduced residency of decidual NK cells. This disrupts the immune microenvironment at the maternal–fetal interface. C Under stimulation by hypoxia, the inflammatory factor HMGB1, and abnormal amino acid metabolism, excessive autophagy occurs, disrupting the endometrial microenvironment, inhibiting endometrial decidualization, and impairing endometrial receptivity. Additionally, excessive autophagy promotes the polarization of macrophages toward the M1 phenotype, triggering sterile inflammation at the maternal–fetal interface and ultimately resulting in RSA. PEG10 Paternally Expressed Gene 10, IGF2 Insulin-like Growth Factor 2, HMGB1 High Mobility Group Box 1 protein.
Autophagy deficiency disrupts pregnancy maintenance through two principal mechanisms. First, it downregulates PEG10 expression and impairs trophoblast proliferation, migration, and invasion, thereby compromising normal embryo implantation [108]. Second, it disrupts maternal–fetal immune homeostasis by upregulating IGF-2 expression in trophoblasts, enhancing the cytotoxic activity of dNK cells while reducing their retention [109] (Fig. 6B).
The abnormal upregulation of autophagy may also lead to RSA. For example, hypoxia triggers the activation of autophagy by activating the HIF-1α pathway, resulting in impaired endometrial decidualization and reduced receptivity [51]. OS and inflammatory factors (such as HMGB1), by binding to RAGE/TLR receptors or inhibiting the HDAC–TFEB axis, activate the AMPK/GCN2 or autophagy–lysosome pathways [110], thereby impairing trophoblast function. This impairment manifests as reduced proliferative and invasive capacities, cell cycle arrest, and impaired placental angiogenesis (Fig. 6C).
Dysregulated autophagy contributes to pregnancy loss by impairing critical processes such as maternal–fetal immune tolerance, embryo implantation, endometrial decidualization and receptivity. Currently, autophagy investigations rely on animal models and in vitro cultured cells, which may not fully reflect the human physiological context. Moreover, a comprehensive exploration of the overall regulatory network of autophagy in RSA, as well as the development of targeted clinical intervention strategies, remains insufficient.
Autophagy in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy
Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP), a pregnancy-specific hepatobiliary condition, is clinically characterized by persistent pruritus in the absence of primary cutaneous disorders and, pathognomonically, marked elevations in maternal serum bile acid concentrations. This disorder primarily manifests in the third trimester of gestation [111] and affects approximately 1.5–4% of pregnancies [112], leading to adverse outcomes for both mothers and fetuses [113]. These outcomes include PE, GDM, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, premature delivery, neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, and intrauterine fetal death [114]. Autophagic flux has been reported to be significantly inhibited, indicating impaired autophagosome formation or degradation [115, 116]. This suppression is driven primarily by two major upstream mechanisms: bile acids downregulate AMPK/ULK1 signaling [115] and upregulate EGFR/p-EGFR in placental tissue, activating the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway [116]. Autophagy inhibition leads to decreased mitochondrial membrane potential and reduced ATP generation, thereby exacerbating cellular energy crisis. Moreover, compromised autophagy enhances the susceptibility of trophoblasts to apoptosis under stress conditions, such as nutrient deprivation, as evidenced by increased expression levels of cleaved caspase-3, PARP, and γ-H2A.X. Using animal models, researchers confirmed that cholestasis combined with starvation synergistically aggravates placental apoptosis. Additionally, autophagy inhibition impedes GPX4 degradation, consequently suppressing ferroptosis and interfering with normal cellular turnover. This dual inhibition of both autophagy and ferroptosis likely contributes to cellular dysfunction and enhanced inflammatory responses [116].
However, the placenta exhibits an enhanced autophagic state in patients with severe ICP, as evidenced by significantly increased LC3 and ATG14 expression levels. Furthermore, these findings reveal that excessive autophagic activation is positively correlated with elevated placental expression of GABRP. These results suggest that GABRP may function as an upstream inducer of enhanced autophagy, potentially contributing to placental dysfunction and ultimately leading to adverse pregnancy outcomes [117].
In the investigation of autophagy in ICP, the animal model, as well as methodological and molecular mechanistic heterogeneity, may affect the reliability of conclusions. For example, by using a comprehensive autophagic flux analysis, the authors provide robust evidence supporting the inhibition of autophagic flux [115]. This approach effectively distinguishes autophagy activation from degradation blockade and is highly reproducible. However, some studies have assessed autophagy activation using only single static markers and have not validated autophagic flux dynamics, thereby reducing the reliability of the conclusions. Moreover, molecular mechanistic heterogeneity may also contribute to these discrepancies, as different regulatory pathways can differentially modulate autophagy.
The dual role of autophagy in pregnancy complications
Given that the literature reports seemingly contradictory findings regarding the role of autophagy in various pregnancy complications, specific explanations for the underlying causes of this dual functionality are often lacking. Here, we reviewed these studies and attempted to systematically analyze disease stage, experimental cell models involved, key signaling pathways, and specific mechanisms of action. Through this analysis, we aim to clarify the precise contexts under which autophagy plays protective or pathological roles, thereby providing a clear explanatory framework for understanding these conflicting observations (Table 1).
Table 1.
Summary of the dual role of autophagy in pregnancy complications.
| Disease | Autophagy function | Disease stage | Upstream signaling pathway | Cell type | Autophagy mechanism | Refs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RIF | protective | mild inflammatory state, during decidualization, embryo implantation stage | HIF-1α, mTOR, Atg9A-mediated mitophagy, FIP200, Wnt | THESCs, EPSC | clearing damaged organelles and abnormal protein aggregates; regulating immune responses and suppressing pro-inflammatory immune activation; sustaining normal progesterone signaling | [49, 51, 53, 121, 122] |
| pathogenic | mid-secretory, advanced stage of RIF | IFN-γ, CXCL12/CXCR4, NOTCH1 | ESCs | impairment of cellular structure and function | [50, 52] | |
| PE | protective | the early stage of PE, mild hypoxia, the early stage of OS | NOS1/NO, JAK2/STAT3, AMPK, IRE1α, TFEB, mTOR, GPR41/AKT, EZH2/mTOR | trophoblast cell lines (JAR, JEG-3, HTR-8/SVneo), placental macrophages | clearance of damaged organelles, abnormal protein aggregates, and oxidative stress products, and inhibition of inflammatory responses; alleviation of ERS; promotion of M2 polarization; inhibition of apoptosis; alleviation of senescence | [60, 61, 65, 123, 124] |
| pathogenic | advanced stage of PE, severe OS, chronic hypoxia | IRE1α, NLR3, NF-κB, TLR4/MyD88/MAPK, PTEN/AKT, PPP3/XPO1/TFEB, mTOR/TFEB, BNIP3/PINK1/LC3, cGAS/STING | HTR-8/SVneo, JEG-3, primary human trophoblasts | causing inflammatory responses, cell pyroptosis, and lysosomal dysfunction; increasing protein aggregation and activation of ERS | [64, 65, 73, 105, 125–127] | |
| GDM | protective | early stage of IR, early stage of GDM, mild high-glucose environment | IGF1R/ATG7 | mouse pancreatic β cells, HTR8/SVneo | clearing intracellular damaged organelles and abnormal proteins; reducing OS, ERS, and apoptosis | [81, 128] |
| pathogenic | advancement of GDM, severe high-glucose environment | DAPK3/SNAP29/STX17/VAMP8, FGF21/PI3K/AKT/mTOR, circCHD2/miR-33b-3p/ULK1, AMPK/mTOR, miR-193b/IGFBP5 | HTR8/SVneo, HUVECs, pTr2 | regulating autophagosome-lysosome fusion; decreased proliferation, migration, and invasion of trophoblast; enhanced OS, inducing cell damage and apoptosis; promoting ferroptosis | [79, 82, 84, 85, 129] | |
| FGR | protective | early pregnancy, early stage of environmental exposure, mild nutrient restriction | AMPK/mTOR, PARKIN-mediated mitophagy, ERK, PI3K/AKT/HIF-1α, NBR1/LC3B-p21, p62-Nrf2 | HTR-8/SVneo, JEG3 | clearing damaged mitochondria; alleviating OS and ERS, and inhibiting apoptosis; promoting the migration, invasion, and proliferation of trophoblasts; attenuation of pyroptosis and cellular senescence | [92, 95, 99, 100, 130, 131] |
| pathogenic | mid-to-late gestation, excessive and sustained OS, severe nutrient restriction | AMPK/mTOR, ERK, 3-MA/PI3K, YAP/TAZ, p62/Keap1/Nrf2, PERK/ATF4, GCN2/ULK1/FUNDC1, NF-κB, PERK/IRE1/ATF6 | OTCs, HTR-8/SVneo, TEV-1, JEG3, human primary placental trophoblast | exacerbating ERS and increasing cell death; induces placental ferroptosis; inhibiting the migration, invasion, and proliferation of trophoblast; exacerbating cellular senescence; impairs trophoblast syncytialization; mitochondrial dysfunction | [94, 95, 97–100, 103, 131] | |
| RSA | protective | embryo implantation stage, initiation stage of decidualization, mild OS | LPA-LPAR1/PPARG, IGF2/TP53/CXCR4, ITGA3/ULK1, MITF/TNFRSF14, MTORC1 | DSCs, DICs, THP-1, HTR-8/SVneo | upregulating adhesion molecules; promoting M2 polarization of dMφ and trophoblast invasion; maintaining immune tolerance; enhancing the residence of dNK cells;enhancing the invasion, migration, and proliferation of trophoblasts | [109, 132–137] |
| pathogenic | embryo implantation stage, chronic OS | IGF2/TP53/CXCR4,YY1/PVT1/mTOR, Shh, TFEB-dependent autophagy‒lysosome | HTR-8/SVneo, NK-92, THP-1, T HESCs, JAR | enhancing local inflammatory response; impairing trophoblast invasion; promoting M1 polarization and triggering inflammatory responses; insufficient endometrial decidualization | [108, 109, 121, 133, 136–138] | |
| ICP | protective | low-concentration bile acids, mild stress | AMPK/ULK1 | HTR8/SVneo | clearing damaged organelles and toxic protein aggregates, providing nutrients and energy, alleviating ERS, and inhibiting apoptosis | [115] |
| pathogenic | high-concentration bile acids, severe stress | EGFR,GABRP | / | exacerbating mitochondrial dysfunction and increasing cell apoptosis | [116, 117] |
FIP200 Focal Adhesion Kinase Family Interacting Protein of 200 kDa, Wnt Wingless-related integration site, NOTCH1 Neurogenic Locus Homolog Protein 1, NOS1 Nitric Oxide Synthase 1, IRE1α Inositol-requiring enzyme 1 alpha, GPR41 G Protein-Coupled Receptor 41, EZH2 Enhancer of Zeste Homolog 2, MyD88 Myeloid Differentiation Primary Response 88, MAPK Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase, PTEN Phosphatase and Tensin Homolog, PPP3 Protein Phosphatase 3, XPO1 Exportin 1, BNIP3 BCL2/adenovirus E1B 19-kDa protein-interacting protein 3, SNAP29 Synaptosome-Associated Protein 29 kDa, STX17 Syntaxin 17, VAMP8 Vesicle-Associated Membrane Protein 8, FGF21 Fibroblast Growth Factor 21, ERK Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase, NBR1 Neighbor of BRCA1 gene 1, 3-MA 3-Methyladenine, YAP Yes-Associated Protein, TAZ Transcriptional Co-activator with PDZ-binding Motif, PERK PKR-like ER Kinase, ATF4 Activating Transcription Factor 4, GCN2 General Control Nonderepressible 2, FUNDC1 FUN14 Domain Containing 1, LPA Lysophosphatidic Acid, LPAR1 Lysophosphatidic Acid Receptor 1, ITGA3 Integrin Subunit Alpha 3, MITF Microphthalmia-Associated Transcription Factor, TNFRSF14 TNF Receptor Superfamily Member 14, Shh Sonic Hedgehog, ESCs endometrium stromal cells, EGFR Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor, GABRP Gamma-Aminobutyric acid A receptor subunit pi, T HESCs human endometrial stromal cells, EPSC Endometrial Progenitor Stem Cells, UPR Unfolded Protein Response, pTr2 porcine Trophoblastic cell line, OTCs Ovine Trophoblast Cells, P4 Progesterone, DSCs Decidual Stromal Cells, DICs Decidual Immune Cells.
The results in the table reveal that autophagy functions as a “double-edged sword” in the context of pregnancy complications. Its effects—whether protective or detrimental—are largely dependent on the stage of disease progression and the degree of external stress. In early stages or under mild stress, autophagy is activated to prevent cellular damage and maintain placental homeostasis, thereby exerting a protective effect. However, with disease progression or increasing stress levels, autophagy may become dysregulated—manifesting as either insufficient or excessive activity—which ultimately contributes to pathological exacerbation. Taken together, therapeutic strategies should not be limited to broadly enhancing or inhibiting autophagy but should instead focus on precise modulation—aiming to restore its physiological balance through targeted regulation of specific pathways at appropriate stages of disease development.
Clinical implications of modulating autophagy
On the basis of the aforementioned evidence, appropriate autophagic activity at the maternal–fetal interface is critical for preventing pregnancy complications. In recent years, numerous researchers have attempted to target autophagic pathways at this interface to improve adverse pregnancy outcomes. To provide clearer insight, we have summarized therapeutic strategies targeting placental autophagy for specific pregnancy complications (Table 2). Taken together, these findings suggest that modulating autophagy provides a new way to treat pregnancy complications.
Table 2.
Modulation of autophagy in patients with gestational complications.
| Complication | Autophagy Modulator | Target | Autophagy | Refs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RIF | NOTCH1 | AKT-mTOR | Inhibition | [52] |
| PE |
Trehalose-like disaccharides 3-MA Esomeprazole Akkermansia muciniphila Resveratrol 4-PBA |
TFEB PI3K SIRT1 AMPK SIRT1 PERK |
Inhibition Inhibition Inhibition Activation Activation Inhibition |
[61, 70, 76, 139–141] |
| GDM |
FABP4 PLGF TXNIP |
PTEN BNIP3-PINK1-Parkin TRX |
Activation Activation Activation |
[142–144] |
| FGR |
Circ_0081343 CircCUL1 Cordycepin |
PI3K-AKT-HIF-1α hsa-miR-30e-3p, ANXA1 GPX4, HSC70, LAMP-2a |
Activation Inhibition Inhibition |
[130, 145, 146] |
| RSA |
BSHXD CREB5 miR-20b-5p ASP |
AMPK ATG5, LC3, SQSTM1/p62 ATG16L1, ATG7 Beclin1 |
Activation Activation Activation Activation |
[132, 137, 147–152] |
|
LPA Rapamycin XBP1 |
LPAR1, PPARγ mTOR TRAF6 |
Activation Activation Activation |
4-PBA 4-Phenylbutyric acid, FABP4 Fatty Acid-Binding Protein 4, PLGF Placental Growth Factor, TXNIP Thioredoxin-Interacting Protein, BSHXD Bushen Huoxue decoction, CREB5 CAMP Responsive Element Binding Protein 5, ASP Angelica sinensis polysaccharide, XBP1 X-Box Binding Protein 1, SIRT1 Sirtuin 1, PINK1 PTEN-induced putative kinase 1, TRX Thioredoxin, ANXA1 Annexin A1, TRAF6 TNF Receptor-Associated Factor 6.
Given the pivotal role of autophagy in pregnancy complications, the risk of manipulating autophagy during gestation should be well understood. To date, no definitive threshold for autophagy has been established in any pathological context, beyond which—either above or below—its role shifts from protective to detrimental. Therefore, placental autophagy must be tightly regulated to maintain normal placental development and function. On the one hand, insufficient autophagy disrupts trophoblast syncytialization by disrupting cellular homeostasis, protein degradation, energy metabolism, and fusion-differentiation processes [118]. On the other hand, excessive autophagy triggers mitochondrial-dependent apoptotic pathways, directly inducing cell death [119, 120] while concurrently suppressing cell migration and invasion capabilities and impairing placental angiogenesis [120]. Therefore, precise manipulation of autophagy is critical for proper placental development and function.
Although extensive studies have demonstrated the crucial role of autophagy in pregnancy, notably, no clinical trials currently target the modulation of autophagy in pregnancy-related conditions. However, we believe it is promising that clinical trials focusing on manipulating autophagy to explore potential therapeutic strategies for improving adverse pregnancy outcomes will be developed in the near future.
Conclusion and further perspective
Autophagy plays a critical role in the development of various diseases, including neurodegenerative diseases, autoimmune diseases, and cancer. Numerous studies have effectively elucidated the mechanisms linking autophagy to these conditions. However, consensus on the relationship between autophagy and pregnancy complications is lacking. Pregnancy complications are numerous, and our research focuses on major issues such as PE, GDM, RSA, and FGR. Other conditions, such as acute fatty liver of pregnancy and obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome, which can have significant adverse effects on both mothers and babies, are occasionally overlooked.
It is crucial to conduct more studies to establish a unified understanding of the link between autophagy and each pregnancy complication. Researchers should broaden their investigations to encompass a wider range of gestational disorders. This holistic approach will help develop a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of the complex interplay between autophagy and challenges during pregnancy.
Acknowledgements
All the figures were created in https://BioRender.com.
Author contributions
WST conceived the structure, drafted the manuscript, and designed the related figures; HYX and YHX revised this manuscript; and all the authors read and approved the final manuscript. WST and HYX contributed equally.
Funding
This work was supported by Noncommunicable Chronic Diseases-National Science and Technology Major Project (2024ZD0532100), National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding (22cz020401-4811009), Beijing Natural Science Foundation (5244036), Clinical Medicine Plus X-Young Scholars Project of Peking University (PKU2025 PKULCXQ034) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFC2700704).
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Edited by Oliana Carnevali
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Deter RL, De Duve C. Influence of glucagon, an inducer of cellular autophagy, on some physical properties of rat liver lysosomes. J Cell Biol. 1967;33:437–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ornatowski W, Lu Q, Yegambaram M, Garcia AE, Zemskov EA, Maltepe E, et al. Complex interplay between autophagy and oxidative stress in the development of pulmonary disease. Redox Biol. 2020;36:101679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Filali-Mouncef Y, Hunter C, Roccio F, Zagkou S, Dupont N, Primard C, et al. The ménage à trois of autophagy, lipid droplets and liver disease. Autophagy. 2022;18:50–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kocak M, Ezazi Erdi S, Jorba G, Maestro I, Farrés J, Kirkin V, et al. Targeting autophagy in disease: established and new strategies. Autophagy. 2022;18:473–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Menzies FM, Fleming A, Caricasole A, Bento CF, Andrews SP, Ashkenazi A, et al. Autophagy and neurodegeneration: pathogenic mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. Neuron. 2017;93:1015–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kitada M, Koya D. Autophagy in metabolic disease and ageing. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2021;17:647–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Deretic V, Saitoh T, Akira S. Autophagy in infection, inflammation and immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13:722–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mizushima N, Longo DL, Levine B. Autophagy in human diseases. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:1564–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Feng Y, He D, Yao Z, Klionsky DJ. The machinery of macroautophagy. Cell Res. 2014;24:24–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nakatogawa H. Mechanisms governing autophagosome biogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020;21:439–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fleming A, Bourdenx M, Fujimaki M, Karabiyik C, Krause GJ, Lopez A, et al. The different autophagy degradation pathways and neurodegeneration. Neuron. 2022;110:935–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wang L, Klionsky DJ, Shen H-M. The emerging mechanisms and functions of microautophagy. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2022;24:186–203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhang Y, Liu Z, Sun H. Fetal-maternal interactions during pregnancy: a ‘three-in-one’ perspective. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1198430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Burton GJ, Redman CW, Roberts JM, Moffett A. Pre-eclampsia: pathophysiology and clinical implications. BMJ. 2019;366:l2381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Johns EC, Denison FC, Norman JE, Reynolds RM. Gestational Diabetes mellitus: mechanisms, treatment, and complications. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2018;29:743–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Burton GJ, Jauniaux E. Pathophysiology of placental-derived fetal growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218:S745–S61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rai R, Regan L. Recurrent miscarriage. Lancet. 2006;368:601–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dimitriadis E, Rolnik DL, Zhou W, Estrada-Gutierrez G, Koga K, Francisco RPV, et al. Pre-eclampsia. Nat Rev Dis Prim. 2023;9:8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Vikse BE, Irgens LM, Leivestad T, Skjaerven R, Iversen BM. Preeclampsia and the risk of end-stage renal disease. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:800–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Petca A, Miron BC, Pacu I, Dumitrașcu MC, Mehedințu C, Șandru F, et al. HELLP Syndrome-holistic insight into pathophysiology. Medicina. 2022;58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 21.Tlaye KG, Endalfer ML, Kassaw MW, Gebremedhin MM, Aynalem YA. Preeclampsia management modalities and perinatal death: a retrospective study in Woldia general hospital. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20:205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Jiang L, Tang K, Magee LA, von Dadelszen P, Ekeroma A, Li X, et al. A global view of hypertensive disorders and diabetes mellitus during pregnancy. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2022;18:760–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Monod C, Kotzaeridi G, Linder T, Yerlikaya-Schatten G, Wegener S, Mosimann B, et al. Maternal overweight and obesity and its association with metabolic changes and fetal overgrowth in the absence of gestational diabetes mellitus: A prospective cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024;103:257–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Andrews C, Maya J, Schulte CCM, Hsu S, Thaweethai T, James KE, et al. Risk of neonatal hypoglycemia in infants of mothers with gestational glucose intolerance. Diab Care. 2024;47:1194–201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) Study: associations with neonatal anthropometrics. Diabetes. 2009;58:453–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 26.Lees CC, Romero R, Stampalija T, Dall’Asta A, DeVore GA, Prefumo F, et al. Clinical Opinion: The diagnosis and management of suspected fetal growth restriction: an evidence-based approach. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;226:366–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Melo P, Dhillon-Smith R, Islam MA, Devall A, Coomarasamy A. Genetic causes of sporadic and recurrent miscarriage. Fertil Steril. 2023;120:940–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yusuf ANM, Amri MF, Ugusman A, Hamid AA, Wahab NA, Mokhtar MH. Hyperandrogenism and its possible effects on endometrial receptivity: a review. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:12026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 29.Rimmer MP, Teh JJ, Mackenzie SC, Al Wattar BH. The risk of miscarriage following COVID-19 vaccination: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2023;38:840–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Carbonnel M, Pirtea P, de Ziegler D, Ayoubi JM. Uterine factors in recurrent pregnancy losses. Fertil Steril. 2021;115:538–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zhang Y, Feng M, Gao Y, Zhang M, Zhang Z. Depression outcome in women with recurrent spontaneous abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2024;300:54–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Costa MA. Scrutinising the regulators of syncytialization and their expression in pregnancy-related conditions. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2016;420:180–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Nakashima A, Yamanaka-Tatematsu M, Fujita N, Koizumi K, Shima T, Yoshida T, et al. Impaired autophagy by soluble endoglin, under physiological hypoxia in early pregnant period, is involved in poor placentation in preeclampsia. Autophagy. 2013;9:303–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hanna J, Goldman-Wohl D, Hamani Y, Avraham I, Greenfield C, Natanson-Yaron S, et al. Decidual NK cells regulate key developmental processes at the human fetal-maternal interface. Nat Med. 2006;12:1065–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Fu B, Li X, Sun R, Tong X, Ling B, Tian Z, et al. Natural killer cells promote immune tolerance by regulating inflammatory TH17 cells at the human maternal-fetal interface. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:E231–E40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Qin X-Y, Shen H-H, Zhou W-J, Mei J, Lu H, Tan X-F, et al. Insight of autophagy in spontaneous miscarriage. Int J Biol Sci. 2022;18:1150–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Voros C, Stavros S, Sapantzoglou I, Mavrogianni D, Daskalaki MA, Theodora M, et al. The role of placental mitochondrial dysfunction in adverse perinatal outcomes: a systematic review. J Clin Med. 2025;14:1422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 38.Marín R, Chiarello DI, Abad C, Rojas D, Toledo F, Sobrevia L. Oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction in early-onset and late-onset preeclampsia. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2020;1866:165961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zhao H, Wong RJ, Stevenson DK. The impact of hypoxia in early pregnancy on placental cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 40.Dossou AS, Basu A. The emerging roles of mTORC1 in macromanaging autophagy. Cancers. 2019;11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 41.Rossant J, Tam PPL. Early human embryonic development: Blastocyst formation to gastrulation. Dev Cell. 2022;57:152–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Muter J, Lynch VJ, McCoy RC, Brosens JJ. Human embryo implantation. Development. 2023;150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 43.Diedrich K, Fauser BCJM, Devroey P, Griesinger G. The role of the endometrium and embryo in human implantation. Hum Reprod Update. 2007;13:365–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Moustafa S, Young SL. Diagnostic and therapeutic options in recurrent implantation failure. F1000Res. 2020;9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 45.Bao H, Wang H. Basic research advances in China on embryo implantation, placentation, and parturition. Matern Fetal Med. 2024;6:37–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Yang D, Liu A, Zhang Y, Nan S, Yin R, Lei Q, et al. Essential role of CRIM1 on endometrial receptivity in goat. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:5323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 47.Oestreich AK, Chadchan SB, Popli P, Medvedeva A, Rowen MN, Stephens CS, et al. The Autophagy Gene Atg16L1 is Necessary for Endometrial Decidualization. Endocrinology. 2020;161:bqz039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 48.Lai Z-Z, Wang Y, Zhou W-J, Liang Z, Shi J-W, Yang H-L, et al. Single-cell transcriptome profiling of the human endometrium of patients with recurrent implantation failure. Theranostics. 2022;12:6527–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Popli P, Tang S, Chadchan SB, Talwar C, Rucker EB, Guan X, et al. Beclin-1-dependent autophagy, but not apoptosis, is critical for stem-cell-mediated endometrial programming and the establishment of pregnancy. Dev Cell. 2023;58:885−897.e4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 50.Huang J, Liu F, Qi T, Gao R, Xie H, Ruan L, et al. Benzo(a)pyrene promotes autophagy to impair endometrial decidualization via inhibiting CXCL12/CXCR4 axis. Chem Biol Interact. 2025;405:111288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zhu Y, Zhang Z, Ma Z, Deng W, Zhang Y, Wu Q. Autophagy markers are dysregulated in the endometrial tissues of patients with unexplained repeated implantation failure. Mol Reprod Dev. 2022;89:655–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Yang Z, Li Q, Yuan F, Wang M, Zhang R, Chen Y, et al. Decreased NOTCH1 signaling activated autophagy in the mid-secretory endometrium of patients with recurrent implantation failure†. Biol Reprod. 2023;108:974–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Wang W-j, Zhang H, Chen Z-q, Zhang W, Liu X-m, Fang J-y, et al. Endometrial TGF-β, IL-10, IL-17 and autophagy are dysregulated in women with recurrent implantation failure with chronic endometritis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2019;17:2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 54.Rana S, Lemoine E, Granger JP, Karumanchi SA. Preeclampsia: Pathophysiology, Challenges, and Perspectives. Circ Res. 2019;124:1094–112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Phipps EA, Thadhani R, Benzing T, Karumanchi SA. Pre-eclampsia: pathogenesis, novel diagnostics and therapies. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2019;15:275−89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 56.Chappell LC, Cluver CA, Kingdom J, Tong S. Pre-eclampsia. Lancet. 2021;398:341–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Redman CWG, Staff AC, Roberts JM. Syncytiotrophoblast stress in preeclampsia: the convergence point for multiple pathways. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;226:S907–S27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Nakashima A, Aoki A, Kusabiraki T, Cheng S-B, Sharma S, Saito S. Autophagy regulation in preeclampsia: Pros and cons. J Reprod Immunol. 2017;123:17–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Zhou M, Guo J, Li S, Li A, Fang Z, Zhao M, et al. Effect of peroxiredoxin 1 on the regulation of trophoblast function by affecting autophagy and oxidative stress in preeclampsia. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023;40:1573–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Cheng S, Huang Z, Banerjee S, Jash S, Buxbaum JN, Sharma S. Evidence From Human Placenta, Endoplasmic Reticulum-Stressed Trophoblasts, and Transgenic Mice Links Transthyretin Proteinopathy to Preeclampsia. Hypertension. 2022;79:1738–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Jin J, Gao L, Zou X, Zhang Y, Zheng Z, Zhang X, et al. Gut dysbiosis promotes preeclampsia by regulating macrophages and trophoblasts. Circ Res. 2022;131:492–506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Nakashima A, Shima T, Aoki A, Kawaguchi M, Yasuda I, Tsuda S, et al. Placental autophagy failure: A risk factor for preeclampsia. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2020;46:2497–504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Li L, Peng W, Zhou Q, Wan J-P, Wang X-T, Qi H-B. LRP6 regulates Rab7-mediated autophagy through the Wnt/β-catenin pathway to modulate trophoblast cell migration and invasion. J Cell Biochem. 2020;121:1599–609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Zhou X, Zhao X, Zhou W, Qi H, Zhang H, Han T-L, et al. Impaired placental mitophagy and oxidative stress are associated with dysregulated BNIP3 in preeclampsia. Sci Rep. 2021;11:20469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Nakashima A, Shima T, Tsuda S, Aoki A, Kawaguchi M, Yoneda S, et al. Disruption of Placental Homeostasis Leads to Preeclampsia. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;2:13298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 66.Qiu L, Liu H, Chen S, Wu Y, Yan J. Ferroptosis contributed to endoplasmic reticulum stress in preterm birth by targeting LHX1 and IRE-1. Cell Signal. 2025;132:111777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Chen H, Chen Y, Zheng Q. The regulated cell death at the maternal-fetal interface: beneficial or detrimental?. Cell Death Discov. 2024;10:100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Liu M, Wu K, Wu Y. The emerging role of ferroptosis in female reproductive disorders. Biomed Pharmacother. 2023;166:115415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Du J, Ji Q, Dong L, Meng Y, Xin G. HDAC4 Knockdown Induces Preeclampsia Cell Autophagy and Apoptosis by miR-29b. Reprod Sci. 2021;28:334–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Li Y, Guo Y, Wu D, Ai L, Wu R, Ping Z, et al. Phenylbutyric acid inhibits hypoxia-induced trophoblast apoptosis and autophagy in preeclampsia via the PERK/ATF-4/CHOP pathway. Mol Reprod Dev. 2024;91:e23742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Vangrieken P, Al-Nasiry S, Bast A, Leermakers PA, Tulen CBM, Janssen GMJ, et al. Hypoxia-induced mitochondrial abnormalities in cells of the placenta. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0245155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Jiang N, Zhou M, Le Y, Xiao L, Zhang C, Li S, et al. The Effect of FPR2 on the Regulation of Trophoblast Autophagy via the PI3K/AKT/mTOR Signaling Pathway in Preeclampsia. FASEB J. 2025;39:e70697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Sun J, Yu M, Du W, Zhu S, Chen Z, Tao J, et al. The cGAS-STING pathway promotes the development of preeclampsia by upregulating autophagy: Mechanisms and implications. Int Immunopharmacol. 2024;128:111531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Alves P, Amaral C, Teixeira N, Correia-da-Silva G. Cannabidiol disrupts apoptosis, autophagy and invasion processes of placental trophoblasts. Arch Toxicol. 2021;95:3393–406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Wu H, Liu K, Zhang J. Excess fibronectin 1 participates in pathogenesis of pre-eclampsia by promoting apoptosis and autophagy in vascular endothelial cells. Mol Hum Reprod. 2021;27:gaab030. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 76.Gu S, Zhou C, Pei J, Wu Y, Wan S, Zhao X, et al. Esomeprazole inhibits hypoxia/endothelial dysfunction-induced autophagy in preeclampsia. Cell Tissue Res. 2022;388:181–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Gao Y, Zhang X, Meng T. Overexpression of let-7b exerts beneficial effects on the functions of human placental trophoblasts by activating the ERK1/2 signaling pathway. Mol Reprod Dev. 2022;89:39–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Ye W, Luo C, Huang J, Li C, Liu Z, Liu F. Gestational diabetes mellitus and adverse pregnancy outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2022;377:e067946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Wang Y, Ji L, Peng Z, Lai R, Zhang X, Xu Y, et al. Silencing DAPK3 blocks the autophagosome-lysosome fusion by mediating SNAP29 in trophoblast cells under high glucose treatment. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2020;502:110674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Hung T-H, Huang S-Y, Chen S-F, Wu C-P, Hsieh. Ts-Ta. Decreased placental apoptosis and autophagy in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes with large-for-gestational age fetuses. Placenta. 2020;90:27–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Liu Q, Han Y, Zhang M, Yang P, Xiang Y, Chen M, et al. IGF1R stimulates autophagy, enhances viability, and promotes insulin secretion in pancreatic β cells in gestational diabetes mellitus by upregulating ATG7. Reprod Biol. 2024;24:100850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Zheng J, Ma X, Zhou Y, Ge S, Sun A, Luo S, et al. GATA2/FGF21 axis regulates the effects of high glucose on the apoptosis, autophagy and oxidative stress of human umbilical vein endothelial cell via PI3K/AKT/mTOR Pathway. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2022;52:278–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Bao Y, Zhang J, Liu Y, Wu L, Yang J. Identification of human placenta-derived circular RNAs and autophagy related circRNA-miRNA-mRNA regulatory network in gestational diabetes mellitus. Front Genet. 2022;13:1050906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Ji Y, Zhang W, Yang J, Li C. MiR-193b inhibits autophagy and apoptosis by targeting IGFBP5 in high glucose-induced trophoblasts. Placenta. 2020;101:185–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Han D, Jiang L, Gu X, Huang S, Pang J, Wu Y, et al. SIRT3 deficiency is resistant to autophagy-dependent ferroptosis by inhibiting the AMPK/mTOR pathway and promoting GPX4 levels. J Cell Physiol. 2020;235:8839–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Ji L, Chen Z, Xu Y, Xiong G, Liu R, Wu C, et al. Systematic characterization of autophagy in gestational diabetes mellitus. Endocrinology. 2017;158:2522–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Fetal Growth Restriction. ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 227. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;137:e16–e28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Kiserud T, Piaggio G, Carroli G, Widmer M, Carvalho J, Neerup Jensen L, et al. The World Health Organization Fetal Growth Charts: a multinational longitudinal study of ultrasound biometric measurements and estimated fetal weight. PLoS Med. 2017;14:e1002220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Melamed N, Baschat A, Yinon Y, Athanasiadis A, Mecacci F, Figueras F, et al. FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) initiative on fetal growth: best practice advice for screening, diagnosis, and management of fetal growth restriction. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021;152:3−57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 90.Devarajan A, Rajasekaran NS, Valburg C, Ganapathy E, Bindra S, Freije WA. Maternal perinatal calorie restriction temporally regulates the hepatic autophagy and redox status in male rats. Free Radic Biol Med. 2019;130:592–600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Chen W, Mehlkop O, Scharn A, Nolte H, Klemm P, Henschke S, et al. Nutrient-sensing AgRP neurons relay control of liver autophagy during energy deprivation. Cell Metab. 2023;35:786−806.e13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 92.Li M-R, Chen E-X, Li Z-H, Song H-L, Zhang Y, Li F-F, et al. HMGB1 regulates autophagy of placental trophoblast through ERK signaling pathway. Biol Reprod. 2024;111:414–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Li R, Peng J, Zhang W, Wu Y, Hu R, Chen R, et al. Ambient fine particulate matter exposure disrupts placental autophagy and fetal development in gestational mice. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2022;239:113680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Zhang H, Zheng Y, Liu X, Zha X, Elsabagh M, Ma Y, et al. Autophagy attenuates placental apoptosis, oxidative stress and fetal growth restriction in pregnant ewes. Environ Int. 2023;173:107806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Li J, Gao H, Xu Z, Gao B, Zhang L, Su B, et al. Gestational exposure to carbon black nanoparticles triggered fetal growth restriction in mice: The mediation of inactivating autophagy-lysosomal degradation system in placental ferroptosis. Sci Total Environ. 2025;959:178167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Goudarzi ST, Vousooghi N, Verdi J, Mehdizadeh A, Aslanian-Kalkhoran L, Yousefi M. Autophagy genes and signaling pathways in endometrial decidualization and pregnancy complications. J Reprod Immunol. 2024;163:104223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Sun Y, Sha M, Qin Y, Xiao J, Li W, Li S, et al. Bisphenol A induces placental ferroptosis and fetal growth restriction via the YAP/TAZ-ferritinophagy axis. Free Radic Biol Med. 2024;213:524–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Zhu H-L, Shi X-T, Xu X-F, Xiong Y-W, Yi S-J, Zhou G-X, et al. Environmental cadmium exposure induces fetal growth restriction via triggering PERK-regulated mitophagy in placental trophoblasts. Environ Int. 2021;147:106319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Fan M, Wu H, Xie Y, Liu M, Yu X, Wang F, et al. Maternal Nutritional Status Governs Fetal Development by Modulating Imprinting Gene GAB1-Mediated Trophoblast Differentiation in the Placenta. Cell Prolif. 2025;58:e70069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 100.Guo Y, Huang C, Xu C, Qiu L, Yang F. Dysfunction of ZNF554 promotes ROS-induced apoptosis and autophagy in Fetal Growth Restriction via the p62-Keap1-Nrf2 pathway. Placenta. 2023;143:34–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Zhang H, Zha X, Zheng Y, Liu X, Elsabagh M, Wang H, et al. Mechanisms underlying the role of endoplasmic reticulum stress in the placental injury and fetal growth restriction in an ovine gestation model. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2023;14:117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Zheng Y, Zha X, Zhang B, Elsabagh M, Wang H, Wang M, et al. The interaction of ER stress and autophagy in trophoblasts: navigating pregnancy outcome†. Biol Reprod. 2024;111:292–311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Li J, Dong X, Liu J-Y, Gao L, Zhang W-W, Huang Y-C, et al. FUNDC1-mediated mitophagy triggered by mitochondrial ROS is partially involved in 1-nitropyrene-evoked placental progesterone synthesis inhibition and intrauterine growth retardation in mice. Sci Total Environ. 2024;908:168383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Zhou H, Zhao C, Wang P, Yang W, Zhu H, Zhang S. Regulators involved in trophoblast syncytialization in the placenta of intrauterine growth restriction. Front Endocrinol. 2023;14:1107182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Nakashima A, Cheng S-B, Ikawa M, Yoshimori T, Huber WJ, Menon R, et al. Evidence for lysosomal biogenesis proteome defect and impaired autophagy in preeclampsia. Autophagy. 2020;16:1771–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Huang J, Wan Z, Li J, Xiong X, Jiang R, Yang B, et al. Downregulation of NNMT affects trophoblast function via inhibiting COMP/CD36/ERK1/2 axis in recurrent spontaneous abortion. Cell Signal. 2025;132:111831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Rezayat F, Esmaeil N, Nikpour P, Feizi A, Rezaei A. Different behavior of NK cells isolated from healthy women and women with recurrent spontaneous abortion after treatment with human amniotic epithelial cells. J Leukoc Biol. 2025;117:qiaf020. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 108.Tan H-X, Yang S-L, Li M-Q, Wang H-Y. Autophagy suppression of trophoblast cells induces pregnancy loss by activating decidual NK cytotoxicity and inhibiting trophoblast invasion. Cell Commun Signal. 2020;18:73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Liu N, Shen H, Wang Z, Qin X, Li M, Zhang X. Autophagy inhibition in trophoblasts induces aberrant shift in CXCR4+ Decidual NK cell phenotype leading to pregnancy loss. J Clin Med. 2023;12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 110.Hong L, Zhu YC, Liu S, Wu T, Li Y, Ye L, et al. Multi-omics reveals a relationship between endometrial amino acid metabolism and autophagy in women with recurrent miscarriage. Biol Reprod. 2021;105:393–402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Girling J, Knight CL, Chappell L. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: Green-top Guideline No. 43 2022. BJOG. 2022;129. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 112.Hobson S, Gandhi S, Sobel M. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. CMAJ. 2022;194:E1650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Kostka L, Hruban L, Morávková P. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. CESKA Gynekol. 2024;89:405–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Ovadia C, Seed PT, Sklavounos A, Geenes V, Di Ilio C, Chambers J, et al. Association of adverse perinatal outcomes of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy with biochemical markers: results of aggregate and individual patient data meta-analyses. Lancet. 2019;393:899–909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Yang X, Zhou Y, Li H, Song F, Li J, Zhang Y, et al. Autophagic flux inhibition, apoptosis, and mitochondrial dysfunction in bile acids-induced impairment of human placental trophoblast. J Cell Physiol. 2022;237:3080–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Fang Y, Fang D. Comprehensive analysis of placental gene-expression profiles and identification of EGFR-mediated autophagy and ferroptosis suppression in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Gene. 2022;834:146594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Dong R, Hu Y, Chen Q, Shan D, Yuxia W. Elevated GABRP expression is correlated to the excessive autophagy in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Heliyon. 2023;9:e13221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Bastida-Ruiz D, Yart L, Wuillemin C, Ribaux P, Morris N, Epiney M, et al. The fine-tuning of endoplasmic reticulum stress response and autophagy activation during trophoblast syncytialization. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10:651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 119.Chen Z, Geng Y, Gao R, Zhong H, Chen J, Mu X, et al. Maternal exposure to CeO2NPs derails placental development through trophoblast dysfunction mediated by excessive autophagy activation. J Nanobiotechnology. 2022;20:131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 120.Wang A, Li Z, Zhang D, Chen C, Zhang H. Excessive ER-phagy mediated by FAM134B contributes to trophoblast cell mitochondrial dysfunction in preeclampsia. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin. 2024;56:1446–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Li J, Zhang S, Zhang Y, Dai Y, Zhang Y, Yang A, et al. Atg9A-mediated mitophagy is required for decidual differentiation of endometrial stromal cells. Reprod Biol. 2022;22:100707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Kommagani R, Moley KH, Jungheim ES, Lydon JP, Medvedeva A, Chadchan SB, et al. The autophagy protein, FIP200 (RB1CC1) mediates progesterone responses governing uterine receptivity and decidualization†. Biol Reprod. 2020;102:843–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Chu Y, Zhu C, Yue C, Peng W, Chen W, He G, et al. Chorionic villus-derived mesenchymal stem cell-mediated autophagy promotes the proliferation and invasiveness of trophoblasts under hypoxia by activating the JAK2/STAT3 signalling pathway. Cell Biosci. 2021;11:182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Lee B, Shin H, Oh J-E, Park J, Park M, Yang SC, et al. An autophagic deficit in the uterine vessel microenvironment provokes hyperpermeability through deregulated VEGFA, NOS1, and CTNNB1. Autophagy. 2021;17:1649–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Weel IC, Ribeiro VR, Romão-Veiga M, Fioratti EG, Peraçoli JC, Peraçoli MTS. Down-regulation of autophagy proteins is associated with higher mTOR expression in the placenta of pregnant women with preeclampsia. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2023;55:e12283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Cheng S, Huang Z, Jash S, Wu K, Saito S, Nakashima A, et al. Hypoxia-Reoxygenation Impairs Autophagy-lysosomal Machinery In Primary Human Trophoblasts Mimicking Placental Pathology Of Early-onset Preeclampsia. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Chu Y, Chen W, Peng W, Liu Y, Xu L, Zuo J, et al. Amnion-derived mesenchymal stem cell exosomes-mediated autophagy promotes the survival of trophoblasts under hypoxia through mTOR pathway by the downregulation of EZH2. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:545852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Lu L, Ma Y, Deng J, Xie J, Huang C. Lower ATG7 levels are associated with a higher risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study. Diab Metab Syndr Obes. 2022;15:2335–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Bao Y, Wu L, Liu Y, Fan C, Zhang J, Yang J. Role of CircCHD2 in the pathogenesis of gestational diabetes mellitus by regulating autophagy via miR-33b-3p/ULK1 axis. Placenta. 2024;145:27–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Zheng L, Tang R, Ahmad F, Fang J, Shi L, Chen X, et al. Circ_0081343 promotes autophagy and alleviates pyroptosis via PI3 K/AKT/HIF-1α axis in hypoxia-induced fetal growth restriction of mice. Anim Cells Syst. 2025;29:312–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Ling Q, Zhang Y-F, Chang W, Liu S-T, Zhu H-L, Wang H. NBR1-dependent autophagy activation protects against environmental cadmium-evoked placental trophoblast senescence. Chemosphere. 2024;358:142138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Yang H-L, Lai Z-Z, Shi J-W, Zhou W-J, Mei J, Ye J-F, et al. A defective lysophosphatidic acid-autophagy axis increases miscarriage risk by restricting decidual macrophage residence. Autophagy. 2022;18:2459–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Tang L, Dai F, Zhang Y, Wang R, Tan W, Gu R, et al. Deletion of BMP4 impairs trophoblast function and decidual macrophage polarization via autophagy leading to recurrent spontaneous abortion. Int Immunopharmacol. 2025;147:114015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Wang RQ, Dai F, Deng Z, Tang L, Liu H, Xia L, et al. ITGA3 participates in the pathogenesis of recurrent spontaneous abortion by downregulating ULK1-mediated autophagy to inhibiting trophoblast function. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2024;328:C1941−C1956. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 135.Lu H, Yang H-L, Zhou W-J, Lai Z-Z, Qiu X-M, Fu Q, et al. Rapamycin prevents spontaneous abortion by triggering decidual stromal cell autophagy-mediated NK cell residence. Autophagy. 2021;17:2511–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Yang D, Ding J, Wang Y, Yuan M, Xian S, Zhang L, et al. YY1-PVT1 affects trophoblast invasion and adhesion by regulating mTOR pathway-mediated autophagy. J Cell Physiol. 2020;235:6637–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Wang P, Zhao C, Zhou H, Huang X, Ying H, Zhang S, et al. Dysregulation of Histone Deacetylases inhibits trophoblast growth during early placental development partially through TFEB-Dependent Autophagy-Lysosomal Pathway. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Pan Y, Yan L, Chen Q, Wei C, Dai Y, Tong X, et al. Dysfunction of Shh signaling activates autophagy to inhibit trophoblast motility in recurrent miscarriage. Exp Mol Med. 2021;53:52–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Huang Z, Cheng S, Jash S, Fierce J, Agudelo A, Higashiyama T, et al. Exploiting sweet relief for preeclampsia by targeting autophagy-lysosomal machinery and proteinopathy. Exp Mol Med. 2024;56:1206–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Ma F, Ding N, Xie L, Zhao X, Ma S, Li G, et al. Inhibition of autophagy via 3-methyladenine alleviates the progression of preeclampsia. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin. 2024;57:356–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Wang P, Huang C-X, Gao J-J, Shi Y, Li H, Yan H, et al. Resveratrol induces SIRT1-dependent autophagy to prevent H2O2-induced oxidative stress and apoptosis in HTR8/SVneo cells. Placenta. 2020;91:11–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Yang F, Mao Y, Tang B, Xu R, Jiang F. Fatty acid binding protein 4 knockdown improves fetal development in rats with gestational diabetes mellitus through modulating autophagy mediated by the PTEN/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. J Mol Histol. 2025;56:124. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 143.Tao J, Rao Y, Wang J, Tan S, Zhao J, Cao Z, et al. Placental growth factor alleviates hyperglycemia-induced trophoblast pyroptosis by regulating mitophagy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2024;50:1813–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Kokkinopoulou I, Papadopoulou A. Thioredoxin-Interacting Protein (TXNIP) in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Metabolites. 2025;15:351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 145.Yang T, Hu J, Zhang L, Liu L, Pan X, Zhou Y, et al. CircCUL1 inhibits trophoblast cell migration and invasion and promotes cell autophagy by sponging hsa-miR-30e-3p in fetal growth restriction via the ANXA1/PI3K/AKT axis. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2024;38:e23759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Mu Y, Wang K, Kang Y, Fang Z, Yu S, Zhou J, et al. TBBPA-BDBPE induces ferroptosis in trophoblasts through chaperone-mediated autophagy of GPX4. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2025;299:118425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Zhao X, Jiang Y, Ren J, Wang Y, Zhao Y, Feng X. Deciphering the mechanism of Bushen Huoxue Decotion on decidualization by intervening autophagy via AMPK/mTOR/ULK1: A Novel Discovery for URSA treatment. Front Pharm. 2022;13:794938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Li Z, Dai F, Zhu R, Zhang Y, Chen J, Chen L, et al. Dysregulation of CREB5 impairs decidualization and maternal–fetal interactions by inhibiting autophagy in recurrent spontaneous abortion. Reprod Sci. 2024;31:1983–2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Lin R-C, Chao Y-Y, Su M-T, Tsai H-L, Tsai P-Y, Wang C-Y. Upregulation of miR-20b-5p inhibits trophoblast invasion by blocking autophagy in recurrent miscarriage. Cell Signal. 2024;113:110934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Sun Y, Li G, Kong M, Li J, Wang S, Tan Y. Angelica sinensis polysaccharide as potential protectants against recurrent spontaneous abortion: focus on autophagy regulation. Front Med. 2025;12:1522503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Li M-Y, Shen H-H, Cao X-Y, Gao X-X, Xu F-Y, Ha S-Y, et al. Targeting a mTOR/autophagy axis: a double-edged sword of rapamycin in spontaneous miscarriage. Biomed Pharmacother. 2024;177:116976. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 152.He W, Zhao Y, Yin L, Du Q, Ren W, Mao L, et al. The transcription factor XBP1 regulates mitochondrial remodel and autophagy in spontaneous abortion. Int Immunopharmacol. 2025;152:114398. [DOI] [PubMed]






