Abstract
The S-layer-encoding genes of 21 Lactobacillus helveticus strains were characterized. Phylogenetic analysis based on the identified S-layer genes revealed two main clusters, one which includes a sequence similar to that of the slpH1 gene of L. helveticus CNRZ 892 and a second cluster which includes genes similar to that of prtY. These results were further confirmed by Southern blot hybridization. This study demonstrates S-layer gene variability in the species L. helveticus.
Lactobacillus helveticus is a homofermentative thermophilic lactic acid microorganism widely used in the manufacture of Italian cheese (15, 20, 21). Large differences in the metabolic activity and technological performance of L. helveticus have often been reported (8, 10, 22). The presence of different L. helveticus biotypes was shown in dairy starter cultures through a variety of genotypic and phenotypic methods (13, 16, 17, 19, 23). It has often been suggested that the selection and prevalence of dominant L. helveticus subpopulations could be linked to their environmental origin and affect the different technological conditions of milk processing (12, 14, 18). Surface protein patterns allowed us to distinguish at least six L. helveticus strains, which were, to some extent, specific to the source of isolation (11-13).
S-layers are two-dimensional crystalline arrays formed by proteinaceous subunits that cover the outer surfaces of many unicellular organisms (3) and represent 10 to 20% of the total cell protein content (6, 20, 27). Thus far the function of Lactobacillus S-layer proteins is largely unknown. However, in Lactobacillus crispatus the S-layer protein is involved in adhesion to collagen (29). Numerous genes encoding S-layer proteins having quite different taxonomic positions have been cloned and sequenced from different organisms (26). Conversely, the amino acid sequences of only a few Lactobacillus S-layer proteins are available (4-7, 26, 29). While two S-protein-encoding genes have been observed (5) in the genomes of a few Lactobacillus species (e.g., L. acidophilus), to date there is still no evidence of S-layer gene variability in the species L. helveticus.
The aim of this work is to investigate the variability of the S-layer gene from different L. helveticus biotypes.
Primer design and PCR amplification.
Different pairs of primers were designed to amplify the S-layer gene from 21 L. helveticus strains used in this study. Six strains (Lh4, Lh5, Lh12, Lh23, Lh28, and FBT9) were isolated from Grana Padano natural whey starters; six strains (SF2, SiS14, SiM3, SiM7, SiO7, and SiS18) were isolated from Parmigiano Reggiano natural whey starters; seven strains (CBT17, DBT16, ABT5, Lh52, Lh59, Lh64, and Lh70) were isolated from Provolone natural whey starters; and two strains (IBT5 and V2BT10) were isolated from semihard Italian cheeses. L. helveticus CNRZ 892 was included as the reference strain because of its well-established ability to express an S-layer protein (7). These strains have already been identified in previous investigations (12, 18, 19).
The whole slpH1 gene of the 21 strains was amplified, using primers 7 FOR and 8 REV (or 6 REV), as reported by Callegari et al. (7) (NCBI accession number X91199), for all strains except Lh4, for which P16 instead of P7 was used as a forward primer (Table 1). Total DNA from different lactobacilli was extracted from 5-ml samples of fresh overnight MRS broth cultures according to an alkaline lysis method used by de los Reyes-Gavilàn et al. (9) The quantity and purity of DNA were assessed by reading optical density at 260 and 280 nm, as described by Sambrook et al. (25).
TABLE 1.
Primer | Sequence (5′→3′) | References |
---|---|---|
P16 FOR | GGAGGAAAGACCACATGAAG | |
7 FOR | CATTATAGGCTCCTTTCTCATG | 7, 33 |
P469 REV | GGGTTACGTGAACCAATAGT | |
P469a REV | TGACTCTTAGTGGTGTAGGC | |
P435 FOR | GCAGGTAAGGAAATTACTAT | |
P435a FOR | GCAGGTGATGACTACACTAT | |
P435b FOR | GCAGGTAAGGAATACACTAT | |
P435c FOR | GCAGGTAAGAAATACACTAT | |
P831 REV | GGAGCCTTGAAGTAACCTAC | |
P850a REV | CCACCTTGATACCAGCCTTT | |
P806 FOR | GGCTCAAAAGATTGAAGTAA | |
8 REV | GCCTTGCCGTTTTCGATTAC | 7, 33 |
6 REV | TTATTCAAAGTTAGCAACCTTAAC | 7, 33 |
The amplification products were observed for all the strains, although the molecular size was not always as expected (data not shown). For 14 strains, PCR amplicons were obtained using primers P7 FOR and P6 REV, and for 7 strains, P8 REV was used as the reverse primer instead of P6 REV (Table 1).
To study sequence polymorphisms in the slpH1 gene, we first used pairs of primers designed for the reported sequence of the gene (Fig. 1). The 5′ end (approximately 550 bp in size) was amplified from 13 strains, using the primer pair P7 FOR (or P16 FOR for Lh4)-P469 REV, and for the other 9 strains, the primer pair P7 FOR-P469a REV was used. The 3′ end (approximately 550 or 320 bp) was amplified from all the strains, using the primer pair P806 FOR-P6 REV (or P8 REV for Lh4). To obtain the complete sequence, internal fragments (approximately 420 bp) were obtained for only 13 strains, using the primer pair P435 FOR-P831 REV, and for the remaining 9 strains, a gene-walking strategy was necessary. Primer walking allowed us to design new primer pairs, P435a FOR-P850a REV for strain CBT17; P435b FOR-P850a REV for strains V2BT10, SF2, Lh28, and SIM7; and P435c FOR-P850a REV for strains IBT5, SIM3, SIO7, and DBT16 (Fig. 1).
The reaction mixtures contained 50 ng template DNA, 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 500 mM KCl, 1.25 U AmpliTaq DNA polymerase (Applera Italia, Monza, Italy), 25 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM deoxynucleoside triphosphate, and 0.4 μM each primer (Biotez, Berlin, Germany) in a final reaction volume of 50 μl. The amplification reactions were performed in a 9700 Perkin Elmer thermal cycler (Applera Italia) with the following conditions: after one cycle at 94°C for 2 min, 25 cycles of 95°C for 60 s, 55°C for 60 s, and 72°C for 2 min were performed. A final extension was carried out at 72°C for 7 min.
Determination of DNA sequences.
Amplified products were purified with Microcon-PCR filter units (Millipore, Milan, Italy) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Forward and reverse sequencing reactions were performed for each amplified product according to the manufacturer's instructions. Nucleotide sequencing on both strands of the PCR amplicons was performed, using an ABI PRISM 310 sequencing machine (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The sequencing data assembly, analysis, and alignment were performed with Sequence Navigator software (version 1.0.1) and MicroSeq software (version 1.36), both from Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA).
The sequences of the hypothetical S-layer slpH1 genes were highly variable among the L. helveticus strains. A phylogenetic analysis based on the 21 sequences revealed two main groups of S-layer genes (Fig. 2). The sequence similarity between the two groups was very low. Group I included S-layer genes obtained using primers based on the published slpH1 gene sequence. Within this group, two subgroups of very similar sequences were detected. After a BLASTN search (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/), the sequences of group I showed a high level of similarity (>94%) with those of the published L. helveticus slpH1 gene (7). The remaining S-layer sequences were included in a second group (group II), which exhibited a high level of sequence variation. BLASTN searches revealed that these sequences were highly homologous to those of a prtY gene (NCBI accession number AB026985) coding for a shorter, inactive extracellular L. helveticus proteinase (34). No relation between the source of isolation and the two groups was observed.
To complement BLASTN analysis, DNA sequences were further analyzed. According to the multiple alignment, the sequences of group I were divided into three stretches: nucleotides (nt) 1 to 209, nt 210 to 799, and nt 800 to1325, and compared to those of the reference slpH1 gene. The 5′ sequence stretch (1 to 209) was highly conserved (99 to 100% similarity) within all the strains with the exception of Lh70 (96% similarity). The internal sequence stretch (210 to 799) was highly conserved for 8 out of 12 strains, whereas for the other 4 strains (ABT5, Lh23, Lh64, and Lh59) its similarity to the corresponding stretch located on the reference slpH1 gene was less marked. Finally, the 3′ sequence stretch (800 to 1325) was the least conserved (89 to 93% similarity) with respect to slpH1 (Fig. 3A).
The same approach was followed for the sequences of group II, which were compared with those of the reference prtY gene. Multiple alignments showed three sequence stretches corresponding to nt 1 to 120, nt 121 to 850, and nt 851 to 1180. As was observed for the sequences belonging to group 1, the central gene region appeared the most variable (77 to 83%), and its similarity with respect to the same stretch located on the slpH1 gene was even lower (<60%). The 5′ (1 to 120) and 3′ (851 to 1180) flanking regions were highly similar (87 to 97%) and more conserved (Fig. 3B).
Analysis of primary amino acid sequences and multiple sequence alignment.
Primary amino acid sequence predictions from the slpH1 gene sequences were performed with the ExPASy (Expert Protein Analysis System) proteomics server of the Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (http://www.expasy.org/). Multiple sequence alignments of amino acid sequences were performed with ClustalW of the EMBL Nucleotide Sequence Database (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/clustalw/).
The deduced amino acid sequences were compared with the surface layer protein of L. helveticus (NCBI protein identification number CAA62606.1) and with the shorter and inactive proteinase PrtY of L. helveticus CP790 (NCBI protein identification number BAA86287) (Fig. 4). Multiple-sequence alignments showed highly conserved N-terminal and C-terminal regions. The previously described signal peptide of 30 amino acids located in the N terminus and the predicted cleavage site located between alanine residues 30 and 31 were observed for all the sequences. The function of this type of signal sequence is to govern the protein transport outside the cell membrane (2, 30). The sequence of the prosequences ranged from position 30 to 57, but the cleavage site was located at positions Ser37 and Thr38 (indicated as a double underline in Fig. 4). Thus, there is a difference between the lengths of the SlpH1 and PrtY prosequences. Moreover, strain SIM3 showed a 3-residue insertion (region 39 to 41) with respect to the other deduced proteins.
Highly variable amino acid composition in the central parts of the protein sequences was shown. The highest variability corresponded to the locations of insertion or deletion events (i.e., regions 39 to 48, 76 to 79, and 162 to 165) between the two groups of proteins. Many point mutations were observed, both within and between the two groups of proteins. Both silent and missense (both conservative and nonconservative) amino acid changes were observed. Examples of nonconservative amino acid changes were common: i.e., strains of group II showed substitutions of Asn-43 and Asn-45 with Ala (or Val) and Glu residues, respectively. Altogether, 99 nonconservative amino acid changes were observed in the most variable zone of the group II (proteinase-like) sequences with respect to the PrtY proteinases of L. helveticus CP790 (34).
DNA hybridization experiments.
EcoRI-generated fragments of total DNA from the 21 L. helveticus strains were separated by electrophoresis on 1% (wt/vol) agarose gels. Restrictions were carried out for 2 h at 37°C in 20-μl volumes of incubation buffer (Life Technologies) containing 10 U of EcoRI restriction enzyme and 0.25 μg of total DNA. The Southern blotting technique was used to transfer DNA fragments to an Hybond N+ membrane (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech Italia, Milan, Italy) under alkaline conditions (0.4 N NaOH).
Two fragments of the putative slpH1 gene of approximately 400 bp were amplified from strains CNRZ 892 and Lh28 by using the primers P435 FOR-P831 REV and P435b FOR-P850a REV, respectively (Fig. 1). Amplification reactions were performed as described above. The two 400-bp amplified fragments were used to probe EcoRI-digested DNAs in different hybridization experiments. DNA hybridization was performed with enhanced chemiluminescence-direct nucleic acid labeling and detection systems (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech Italia) according to the supplier's instructions. Overnight hybridization was carried out at 42°C. After signal generation and detection, autoradiography films (Hyperfilm-ECL, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech Italia) were exposed to generate light according to the manufacturer's instructions. The probe from CNRZ 892 gave positive signals only with EcoRI-generated fragments of total DNA from strains belonging to group I (Fig. 5a). The probe from Lh28 gave positive signals only with EcoRI-generated fragments of total DNA from strains belonging to group II (Fig. 5b).
Conclusion.
The protein structure and function of S-layers have been extensively studied in Lactobacillus acidophilus (31, 32) and L. crispatus (1). Smit et al. (31) found that the N terminus, which encodes two-thirds of the S-layer protein of L. acidophilus ATCC4356, is involved in the self-assembly process of the S-layer protein, while one-third of the C terminus plays an essential role in the binding of the S-layer protein to the cell wall. This structure-function relationship was confirmed for the S-layer protein of L. crispatus, where the self-assembly domain was defined more precisely (1, 28).
We found a high homology to cell wall-anchoring domains within proteins of group I strains (SlpH1-like), which appeared well conserved, and the same motif was still present, although shorter, within proteins of group II strains (PrtY-like).
Intriguingly, the presence of either slpH1 or proteinase was noted in the strains tested, as clearly suggested by hybridization experiments. This indicates that the presence of the slpH1 gene cannot be used as a molecular marker for L. helveticus, as suggested by Ventura et al. (33). In contrast, the prtY gene can also be amplified using the same S-layer primers. A first consequence of the erroneous application of these primers can be found in the work of Saito et al. from 2001 (24), which indicated amplification of the S-layer gene of L. helveticus JCM1003 in human feces, whereas, according to our BLAST analysis, the corresponding sequence reported in NCBI (accession number AB061776) was more similar to that of the prtY gene.
Even if the relationship between the proteinase and the surface layer protein is still not clear, this study shows the existence of heterogeneity within the L. helveticus S-layer sequences and contributes to a better understanding of the possible biological role of the different cell surface proteins in L. helveticus populations.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Marco Ventura and J. G. Kenny (Department of Microbiology, National University of Ireland, Cork) and Diego Mora (DISTAM, University of Milano, Milano, Italy) for critical readings of the manuscript and useful suggestions.
This work was partly supported by the Italian Agricultural Ministry within the Program “Valorizzazione e salvaguardia della microflora autoctona caratteristica delle produzioni casearie Italiane,” article submission number 26.
REFERENCES
- 1.Antikainen, J., L. Anton, J. Sillanpää, and T. K. Korhonen. 2002. Domains in the S-layer protein Cbsa of Lactobacillus cispatus involved in adherence to collagens, laminin and lipoteichoic acids and in self-assembly. Mol. Microbiol. 2:381-394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bahl, H., H. Scholz, N. Bayan, M. Chami, G. Leblon, T. Gulik-Krzywicki, E. Shechter, A. Fouet, S. Mesnage, E. Tosi-Couture, P. Gounon, M. Mock, E. Conway de Macario, A. J. L. Macario, L. A. Fernandez-Herrero, G. Olabarria, J. Berenguer, M. J. Blaser, B. Kuen, W. Lubitz, M. Sara, P. H. Pouwels, C. P. A. M. Kolen, H. J. Boot, A. Palva, M. Truppe, S. Howwrka, G. Schroll, S. Lechleitner, and S. Resch. 1997. Molecular biology of S-layer. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 20:47-98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Beveridge, T. J., P. H. Pouwels, M. Sára, A. Kotiranta, K. Lounatmaa, K. Kari, E. Kerosuo, M. Haapasalo, E. M. Egelseer, I. Schocher, U. B. Sleytr, L. Morelli, M. L. Callegari, J. F. Nomellini, W. H. Bingle, J. Smith, E. Leibovitz, M. Lemaire, I. Miras, S. Salamitou, P. Beguin, H. Ohayon, P. Gounon, M. Matuschek, and S. F. Koval. 1997. Functions of S-layer. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 20:99-149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Boot, H. J., C. P. A. M. Kolen, J. M. van Noort, and P. H. Pouwels. 1993. S-layer protein of Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356: purification, expression in Escherichia coli, and nucleotide sequence of the corresponding gene. J. Bacteriol. 175:6089-6096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Boot, H. J., C. P. A. M. Kolen, B. Pot, K. Kersters, and P. H. Pouwels. 1996. The presence of two S-layer-protein-encoding genes is conserved among species related to Lactobacillus acidophilus. Microbiology 142:2375-2384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Boot, H. J., and P. H. Pouwels. 1996. Expression, secretion and antigenic variation of bacterial S-layer proteins. Mol. Microbiol. 21:117-1123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Callegari, M. L., B. Riboli, J. W. Sanders, P. S. Cocconcelli, J. Kok, G. Venema, and L. Morelli. 1998. The S-layer gene of Lactobacillus helveticus CNRZ 892: cloning, sequence and heterologous expression. Microbiology 144:719-726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Carminati, D., L. Mazzuccotelli, G. Giraffa, and E. Neviani. 1997. Incidence of inducible bacteriophage in Lactobacillus helveticus strains isolated from natural whey starter cultures. J. Dairy Sci. 80:1505-1511. [Google Scholar]
- 9.de los Reyes-Gavilàn, C., G. K. Y. Limsowtin, P. Tailliez, L. Séchaud, and J. P. Accolas. 1992. A Lactobacillus helveticus-specific DNA probe detects restriction fragment length polymorphism in this species. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58:3429-3432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fortina, M. G., G. Nicastro, D. Carminati, E. Neviani, and P. L. Manachini. 1998. Lactobacillus helveticus heterogeneity in natural cheese starters: the diversity in phenotypic characteristics. J. Appl. Microbiol. 84:72-80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gatti, M., E. Fornasari, and E. Neviani. 1997. Cell wall protein profiles of dairy thermophilic lactobacilli. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 25:345-348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gatti, M., G. Contarini, and E. Neviani. 1999. Effectiveness of chemometric techniques in discrimination of Lactobacillus helveticus biotypes from natural dairy starter cultures on the basis of phenotypic characteristics. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:1450-1454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gatti, M., C. Lazzi, L. Rossetti, G. Mucchetti, and E. Neviani. 2003. Biodiversity in Lactobacillus helveticus strains in natural whey starter used for Parmigiano Reggiano cheese. J. Appl. Microbiol. 95:463-470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gatti, M., C. Trivisano, E. Fabrizi, E. Neviani, and F. Gardini. 2004. Biodiversity within Lactobacillus helveticus isolated from different natural whey starter cultures as revealed by classification trees. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:182-190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Giraffa, G., G. Mucchetti, F. Addeo, and E. Neviani. 1997. Evolution of lactic acid microflora during Grana cheese-making and ripening. Microbiol. Aliments Nutr. 15:115-122. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Giraffa, G., P. De Vecchi, P. Rossi, G. Nicastro, and M. G. Fortina. 1998. Genotypic heterogeneity among Lactobacillus helveticus strains isolated from natural cheese starters. J. Appl. Microbiol. 85:411-416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Giraffa, G., and E. Neviani. 1999. Different Lactobacillus helveticus strain populations dominate during Grana Padano cheese-making. Food Microbiol. 16:205-210. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Giraffa, G., M. Gatti, L. Rossetti, L. Senini, and E. Neviani. 2000. Molecular diversity within Lactobacillus helveticus as revealed by genotypic characterization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:1259-1265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lombardi, A., L. Dal Maistro, P. De Dea, M. Gatti, G. Giraffa, and E. Neviani. 2002. A poliphasic approach to highlight genotypic and phenotypic diversities of Lactobacillus helveticus strains isolated from dairy starter cultures and cheeses. J. Dairy Res. 69:139-149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Navarre, W. W., and O. Schneewind. 1999. Surface proteins of gram-positive bacteria and mechanisms of their targeting to cell wall envelope. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63:174-229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Neviani, E., and S. Carini. 1994. Microbiology of Parmesan cheese. Microbiol. Aliments Nutr. 12:1-8. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Neviani, E., R. Divizia, E. Abbiati, and M. Gatti. 1995. Acidification activity of thermophilic lactobacilli under the temperature gradient of Grana cheese making. J. Dairy Sci. 78:1248-1252. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Quiberoni, A., P. Tailliez, P. Quénée, V. Suarez, and J. Reinheimer. 1998. Genetic (RAPD-PCR) and technological diversities among wild Lactobacillus helveticus strains. J. Appl. Microbiol. 85:591-596. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Saito, Y., Y. Hamanaka, S. Takizawa, and Y. Benno. Rapid detection of Lactobacillus helveticus in fecal samples of healthy subjects administered L. helveticus yogurt using s-layer gene-targeted primers. Unpublished data.
- 25.Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed., vol. 3. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
- 26.Sára, M., and U. B. Sleytr. 2000. S-layer proteins. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 182:859-868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Schaer-Zammaretti, P., and J. Ubbink. 2003. Imaging of lactic acid bacteria with AFM—elasticity and adhesion maps and their relationship to biological and structural data. Ultramicroscopy 97:199-208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Siezen, R. J. 1999. Multi-domain, cell-envelope proteinases of lactic acid bacteria. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 76:139-155. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sillanpää, J., B. Martínez, J. Antikainen, T. Toba, N. Kalkkinen, S. Tankka, K. Lounatmaa, J. Keränen, M. Höök, B. Westerlund-Wikström, P. H. Pouwels, and T. K. Korhonen. 2000. Characterization of the collagen-binding S-layer protein CbsA of Lactobacillus crispatus. J. Bacteriol. 182:6440-6450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sleytr, U. B., and T. J. Beveridge. 1999. Bacterial S-layers. Trends Microbiol. 7:253-260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Smit, E., F. Oling, R. Demel, B. Martinez, and P. H. Pouwels. 2001. The S-layer protein of Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356: identification and characterizations of domains responsible for S-protein assembly and cell wall binding. J. Mol. Biol. 305:245-257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Smit, E., D. Jager, B. Martinez, F. J. Tielen, and P. H. Pouwels. 2002. Structural and functional analysis of the S-layer protein crystallisation domain of Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356: evidence for protein-protein interaction of two subdomains. J. Mol. Biol. 324:953-964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ventura, M., M. L. Callegari, and L. Morelli. 2000. S-layer gene as a molecular marker for identification of Lactobacillus helveticus. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 189:275-279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Yamamoto, N., T. Shinoda, and T. Takano,. 2000. Molecular cloning and sequence analysis of a gene encoding an extracellular proteinase from Lactobacillus helveticus CP790. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 64:1217-1222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]