Skip to main content
BMJ Open logoLink to BMJ Open
. 2026 Feb 2;16(2):e099915. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099915

Adverse birth outcomes and associated factors among adolescent mothers in Nabdam District, Ghana: a retrospective cross-sectional study

Sylvia Apana Nborah 1, Farrukh Ishaque Saah 2,3,, Oforiwaa Gifty Gyamera 4, Hubert Amu 5
PMCID: PMC12878490  PMID: 41628937

Abstract

Abstract

Objective

Pregnancy and childbirth among adolescents have a higher risk of adverse outcomes than among older women. Adolescent mothers often lack physiological, psychological, social and financial capabilities, risking adverse birth outcomes such as preterm birth (PTB), low birth weight (LBW), asphyxia and stillbirth. We investigated birth outcomes and associated factors among adolescent mothers in the Nabdam District of Ghana.

Design

Retrospective, health facility-based, cross-sectional study.

Setting

12 health facilities in Nabdam District, January 2021 to December 2022.

Participants

Census of all 373 births recorded in the maternity registers of the selected health facilities.

Outcome measures

The main outcome measure was adverse birth outcome, a composite outcome measured as the presence of at least one of PTB, LBW, asphyxia and stillbirth. The data collected were analysed using SPSS V.22. Proportion, mean, χ2 and binary logistic regression models were used.

Results

141 (37.8%) of the adolescent mothers in the selected health facilities had at least one adverse birth outcome: PTB (78, 20.9%), newborn with asphyxia (56, 15.0%), LBW (55, 14.7%) and stillbirth (1, 0.3%). Adolescents in the Pelungu subdistrict were 2.95 times (95% CI 1.44 to 6.05) more likely to have an adverse birth outcome compared with those in the Zanlerigu subdistrict. Lower odds of adverse birth outcomes were found among adolescents aged 16–19 years (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.26, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.89) and those with eight or more antenatal care (ANC) visits (aOR 0.30, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.96) compared with those younger than 16 years and those with fewer than eight ANC visits, respectively.

Conclusions

Adverse birth outcomes were common among adolescent mothers in the district and were more likely among younger adolescents, those living in disadvantaged subdistricts and those with fewer ANC visits. These findings indicate the urgent need for targeted interventions and support for this vulnerable population, as well as those directed towards improving access to comprehensive prenatal care, promoting proper nutrition during pregnancy and enhancing the overall well-being of adolescent mothers in resource-limited settings, in order to facilitate the attainment of Sustainable Development Goals 3.1 and 3.2 on reducing maternal mortality and improving foetal health outcomes.

Keywords: Adolescents, Pregnancy, Reproductive medicine, Fetal medicine


STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY.

  • This study used a census approach, analysing all adolescent birth records from health facilities in the study district over a 2-year period, which minimised sampling bias and ensured comprehensive data inclusion.

  • The study employed a standardised data extraction tool, enhancing consistency and reliability in the data collection process across 12 facilities.

  • The use of medical records as the primary data source avoided recall bias, often associated with self-reported data in similar studies.

  • The cross-sectional design, while effective for identifying associations between variables and adverse birth outcomes, limits the ability to infer causality.

  • Some key social and personal variables, such as nutritional status, which could influence adverse birth outcomes, were not captured in the routine maternity records, limiting the comprehensiveness of the analysis.

Introduction

Adolescent girls who become pregnant have substantial repercussions with profound impacts on their lives and those of their children. Pregnant adolescents run the risk of becoming ill, disabled or dying. These hazards comprise obstetric fistula, issues from botched abortions, HIV and threats to the health of their unborn children.1 Adolescents’ early and unwanted births have been linked to negative health, academic, social and economic results.2 An estimated 70 000 adolescent females in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) every year are thought to die from reasons associated with pregnancy and childbirth.1 They are the second largest cause of mortality among adolescent females between the ages of 15 and 19; also, newborns born to young moms have greater health risks than children born to older women.3 Baby health is also impacted by adolescent pregnancy, with lower birth weight and more perinatal mortality among infants delivered to women under 20 years old.1 4 5

Adolescent pregnancy and its consequences have become a significant issue in many nations, where they are the main cause of maternal and infant death, rapid population increase, poor health and poverty.4 Adolescent pregnancy has negative social and economic effects, which contribute significantly to mother and child illness and death. This is especially true in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA).6 In addition to maternal morbidity in the form of uterine herniation, vesicovaginal fistula, urinary and faecal incontinence, infertility and distress during copulation, a substantial percentage of adolescent girls thrive during childbirth but struggle with serious ailments like pelvic inflammatory diseases, impairment or physical harm caused by pregnancy-related health issues.7 Pregnant adolescents most often have limited knowledge of pregnancy-related complications, making childbirth outcomes for younger adolescent mothers mostly poor, with increased rates of low birth weights (LBWs), infections and even postpartum haemorrhage.6

About 21 million and 2 million adolescent girls between the ages of 15–19 and under 15, respectively, become pregnant each year in developing countries.8 Meanwhile, 2.5 million girls under the age of 16 and 16 million adolescent girls between the ages of 15 and 19 give birth each year.8 The major contributing factors to maternal mortality among female adolescents aged 15–19 in LMICs are problems associated with pregnancy and delivery.9

The Government of Ghana has developed and implemented many policies and interventions aimed at reducing the incidence of adolescent pregnancies. These policies aim to increase access to sexual and reproductive health, maternal healthcare services and women’s empowerment. There are also Adolescent Health Clubs across the country, which provide sexual and reproductive health education and promotion to adolescents.10 However, a significantly high number of adolescent pregnancies are reported annually in Ghana. For instance, more than half a million adolescent girls (542 131 aged 15–19 years and 13 444 aged 10–14 years) were reported to have been pregnant in Ghana between 2016 and 2020 alone.11 It is further noted that among Ghanaian adolescent girls, 2 out of 10 will become pregnant or welcome their first child before turning 18 years old.12

Adolescent pregnancy continues to attract great concern in the Upper East Region. According to statistics, the area has one of the highest rates of teen pregnancy, underage marriage and, more worrisome, the threat of transactional sex among children.13 The Ghana Health Service reported that more than 6000 adolescent girls in the region got pregnant in 2020 alone, making the region rank top in adolescent pregnancies in Ghana.14 The 2021 Population and Housing Census estimates that 6332 children were born to adolescents aged 15–19 years in the region.15 Between 2020 and 2022, the region reported that between 14% and 15% of pregnancies annually were among adolescents. Also, it recorded 57, 66 and 45 maternal deaths with 3, 6 and 3 among adolescent girls in 2020, 2021 and 2022, respectively.16 Child marriage is one such factor accounting for the high cases of adolescent pregnancy, with the region recording 13.5% and 34.8% of girls getting married before the age of 15 and 18 years, respectively, in 2021.17 Yet, there is limited research into the birth outcomes and associated factors of adolescents in Ghana.

Adolescent pregnancies have been consistently observed to be associated with adverse birth outcomes.18 It has been reported in many studies that adolescent pregnancy increases the risk of adverse birth outcomes. These negative outcomes in adolescent pregnancy, to some extent, have been linked to adolescent girls’ low socioeconomic status, inadequate prenatal care and inadequate weight gain during pregnancy.18 The Nabdam District in the Upper East Region has a high adolescent pregnancy rate, with 23%, 15% and 20% of pregnancies recorded in 2020, 2021 and 2022, respectively, among adolescent girls.19 Thus, with a significant proportion of pregnancies and births in the Nabdam District being among adolescents, assessing the birth outcomes and associated factors is key to improving maternal and neonatal health in the district and the Upper East Region as a whole.

Although adolescent pregnancy and its consequences have been widely studied in Ghana, there is limited empirical evidence specific to the Upper East Region, a low-resource setting and its districts, including Nabdam, despite its consistently high rates of adolescent pregnancy and maternal complications. Existing studies in Ghana have predominantly focused on urban areas or national-level analysis, leaving important contextual differences unexplored. To our knowledge, this is the first retrospective census of adolescent birth outcomes conducted across all maternity-providing health facilities in Nabdam District, enabling comprehensive district-wide estimates. In addition, few studies in Ghana have examined subdistrict variations or simultaneously assessed multiple adverse birth outcomes among adolescents as a composite indicator. This study, therefore, provides context-specific evidence to inform geographically targeted and culturally sensitive interventions for improving maternal and newborn outcomes among adolescents in northern Ghana.

This study therefore investigated adverse birth outcomes and associated factors among adolescents in the Nabdam District of Ghana.

Methods

Study design

We adopted a retrospective, health facility-based, cross-sectional design for this study. This design allowed the study to collect quantitative data on adolescents from existing records and make cross-sectional inferences about associations within the study population.20 It affords easy availability and accessibility of study participants or data. The design enabled the study to collate data on pregnancy outcomes from adolescents at one point in time.21

Setting

This study was conducted in the Nabdam District of the Upper East Region of Ghana. It is 1 of the 15 districts in the region. According to the 2021 Population and Housing Census, the district had a population of 51 861 (3.98% of the region’s total population) with 50.7% being females.22 The district recorded a 3.6 total fertility rate and a general fertility rate of 149.4 births per 1000 women of reproductive age (15–49 years), the second highest in the region in the 2010 census.23 Furthermore, the district is entirely rural. The district has 1 hospital, 3 health centres and 24 community-based health planning and services (2 currently non-functional). However, only the 12 facilities that provided maternity/skilled birth services were included in the study.

Population and sampling

The study involved birth records of adolescent girls who had given birth in health facilities in the Nabdam District of the Upper East Region of Ghana between 2021 and 2022. This included both married and unmarried adolescent girls aged 10–19 years with complete birth records in any of the facilities.

No sample size was calculated for the study, as it was a census of all births by adolescent girls recorded in the maternity registers of the health facilities in the district between January 2021 and December 2022. In all, 373 records of births among adolescent girls were identified and analysed, determined by a census of all adolescent birth records during the period.24

Study variables

The dependent variable of the study was adverse birth outcomes. This is a composite variable comprising preterm birth (PTB), stillbirth, LBW and asphyxia. Preterm birth was determined by a birth at a gestational age of less than 37 weeks. Low birth weight was determined by a birth weight of less than 2.5 kg, with weights of 2.5 kg or more categorised as normal birth weight. Appearance, Pulse, Grimace response, Activity and Respiration (APGAR) test scores were used to ascertain asphyxia. APGAR scores less than 8 (<8/10) are considered asphyxia, while 8+ were categorised as no asphyxia. Again, independent variables which were examined in this study were age, marital status, pregnancy history, parity, number of antenatal care (ANC) visits, gestational age at first ANC, HIV/AIDS status, sickling status and mode of delivery.

Procedures

Data were collected using a data extractor (online supplemental material S1) in a Microsoft Excel template. This tool was selected because it allowed for medical records containing discrete patient data to be collected and made readily available in electronic form for cleaning and analysis.25 The tool covered the following variables: age (in years), marital status, pregnancy history, parity, number of ANC visits, gestational age at first ANC and delivery (in weeks), HIV/AIDS status, sickling status, mode of delivery, birth weight, APGAR score and birth outcomes.

12 facilities providing childbirth/delivery care services were visited, and maternity records were reviewed with the assistance of three field staff who were community health nurses working in the selected communities, who were trained on the study purpose and the data abstraction tool. At the facilities, records of all births between January 2021 and December 2022 were reviewed, and those among adolescent girls between 10 and 19 years were extracted. The study period was selected because complete and accessible maternity register data were available across all 12 participating facilities for these consecutive years, and ethical approval and project timelines covered this interval. Earlier records (eg, 2020) were affected by incomplete entries and COVID-19-related disruptions in routine record-keeping in some facilities, while 2023 data were not yet completed at the time of data extraction. Limiting the analysis to 2021–2022 ensured consistent, complete data across all sites.

Data analysis

Data collected were exported to SPSS V.22 for cleaning and prepared for analysis (online supplemental material S2). The analysis included both descriptive and inferential statistics. Descriptive statistics, such as frequency, percentage and mean, were employed to summarise the variables, while inferential statistics, including χ2 and multivariate logistic regression tests, were used to examine associations and relationships between adverse birth outcomes (presence of LBW, PTB, asphyxia or stillbirth) and the independent variables. Crude ORs with 95% CIs were calculated for all independent variables, irrespective of χ2 significance, to ensure transparency of reporting. The selection of variables was informed by theoretical relevance, prior literature and statistical stability. Variables with extremely wide CIs or unstable estimates were not retained in the adjusted model to avoid distortion of the final results.

In addition, an exploratory p value-guided selection approach was used, and therefore the results should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating rather than confirmatory. A statistical significance of p<0.05 was set at a 95% CI. Anaemia status was categorised using blood haemoglobin levels with the following categorisations: 10.0+ ‘No anaemia’, 8.1–10.0 ‘Mild anaemia’, 6.5–8.0 ‘Moderate anaemia’ and <6.5 ‘Severe anaemia’.26 Because multiple associations were explored, the results should be interpreted as exploratory, and the possibility of chance findings due to multiplicity cannot be excluded.

Patient and public involvement

None.

Results

Descriptive characteristics

Maternal and reproductive characteristics of the adolescent pregnancies from 2021 to 2022 in the Nabdam District are presented in table 1. There were 373 adolescent births, with 204 (54.7%) recorded in 2021. While the Kongon-Pintanga subdistrict had the highest number of births, 105 (28.2%), the Zanlerigu subdistrict recorded the lowest (54 (14.2%)). The mean age of the adolescents was 17.5 years (SD=1.33), with 344 (92.2%) aged 16–19 years. More than half (233, 59.8%) have attained Senior High School (SHS) education. Also, 137 (36.7%) were students and 128 (34.3%) were housewives. Most of them (315, 84.5%) were first-time mothers, with 206 (55.3%) in the second trimester at first ANC registration/visit. The average number of ANC visits was 7.49 (SD=2.77), with 180 (48.3%) achieving WHO-recommended ANC visits of 8+. Among them, 159 (42.7%) had some form of anaemia at ANC registration, whereas 170 (45.6%) had some form of anaemia at the time of delivery.

Table 1. Maternal and reproductive characteristics of the study population.

Variable Frequency Percentage
Year of birth
 2021 204 54.7
 2022 169 45.3
Subdistrict
 Zanlerigu 53 14.2
 Pelungu 102 27.3
 Sakote 59 15.8
 Kongon-Pintanga 105 28.2
 Nangodi-Nyoboko 54 14.5
Age Mean=17.5±1.33
 <16 29 7.8
 16–19 344 92.2
Maternal height (cm) Mean=158.98±7.12
 <150 8 2.2
 150–159 184 49.3
 160–169 149 39.9
 170+ 32 8.6
Educational level
 None 25 6.7
 Primary 78 20.9
 JHS 223 59.8
 SHS 47 12.6
Main occupation
 Housewife 128 34.3
 Student 137 36.7
 Skilled worker 80 21.4
 Farmer 14 3.8
 Trader 9 2.4
 Unemployed 5 1.2
Number of pregnancies
 1 310 83.3
 2 58 15.5
 3 5 1.2
Number of children
 0 315 84.5
 1 55 14.7
 2 3 0.8
Gestational age at ANC
 First trimester 127 34.0
 Second trimester 206 55.3
 Third trimester 40 10.7
NHIS status
 Yes, and active 371 99.5
 No/inactive 2 0.5
HIV/AIDS status
 Negative 371 99.5
 Positive 2 0.5
Sickling status
 Negative 367 98.4
 Positive 6 1.6
Number of ANC visits Mean=7.49±2.77
 <8 visits 193 51.7
 8+ visits 180 48.3
Anaemia status at first ANC
 No 214 57.4
 Mild 138 37.0
 Moderate 20 5.3
 Severe 1 0.3
Anaemia status at delivery
 No 203 54.4
 Mild 156 41.8
 Moderate 12 3.2
 Severe 2 0.6
Sex of the baby
 Female 180 48.3
 Male 193 51.7
Total 373 100.0

ANC, antenatal care; JHS, junior high school; NHIS, National Health Insurance Scheme; SHS, senior high school.

Adverse birth outcomes

Of the 373 births recorded, 78 (20.9%) were PTBs, 55 (14.7%) were LBW and 56 (15.0%) were born with asphyxia; one stillbirth (0.3%) was recorded (figure 1). More cases of PTB (44, 21.6%) and stillbirth (1, 0.5%) were recorded in 2021 than in 2022 (34(20.1%) and 0 (0.0%), respectively). However, more cases of LBW (26, 15.4%) and asphyxia (37, 18.1%) were recorded in 2022 than in 2021, which captured 29 (14.2%) and 19 (11.2%), respectively. Overall, at least 1 adverse birth outcome was recorded among 141 (37.8%) of the 373 adolescent births between 2021 and 2022.

Figure 1. Prevalence of adverse birth outcomes among adolescents in Nabdam District.

Figure 1

Of the 141 adolescents with adverse birth outcomes, 8 (5.8%) had all three outcomes, 42 (30.4%) had both PTB and LBW, 39 (28.3%) had both LBW and asphyxia and 17 (12.3%) had both PTB and asphyxia (figure 2).

Figure 2. Distribution of adverse birth outcomes among adolescents in Nabdam District.

Figure 2

Factors associated with adverse birth outcomes

Table 2 presents the factors associated with adverse birth outcomes of adolescents in the Nabdam District between 2021 and 2022. It shows in the χ2 test that subdistrict (χ2=13.78, p=0.008), maternal age (χ2=4.92, p=0.027), sickling status (χ2=5.30, p=0.021), number of ANC visits (χ2=5.93, p=0.015) and anaemia status at delivery (χ2=8.79, p=0.032) were significantly associated with having at least one adverse birth outcome. Adolescents in the Pelungu subdistrict were 2.95 times more likely to have an adverse birth outcome compared with those in the Zanlerigu subdistrict (95% CI 1.44 to 6.05). The CI demonstrated high precision for this estimate. For the remaining subdistricts, the point estimates suggested higher odds of adverse birth outcome for adolescents in Kongon-Pintanga (adjusted OR (aOR)=1.44, 95% CI 0.74 to 2.82) and Nangodi-Nyoboko (aOR=1.91, 95% CI 0.86 to 4.24). However, the wide CIs for both subdistricts included the null value of 1.0, indicating high statistical uncertainty. Conversely, the point estimate for Sakote subdistrict (aOR=0.95, 95% CI 0.45 to 2.02) suggested a slight decrease in the odds. Like the others, the interval was extremely wide and also included 1.0, suggesting the observed data is fully compatible with an increase, a decrease or no association.

Table 2. Factors associated with adverse birth outcomes among adolescents.

Variable Adverse birth outcome χ2 (p value) cOR (95% CI), p value aOR (95% CI), p value
Present, n (%) Absent, n (%)
Year of birth 2.47 (0.116)
 2021 85 (41.7) 119 (58.3) Ref
 2022 57 (33.7) 112 (66.3) 1.38 (0.90 to 2.10), 0.140
Subdistrict 13.78 (0.008)
 Zanlerigu 26 (49.1) 27 (50.9) Ref Ref
 Pelungu 27 (26.5) 75 (73.5) 2.68 (1.33 to 5.36), 0.006 2.95 (1.44 to 6.05), 0.003
 Sakote 30 (50.8) 29 (49.2) 0.93 (0.44 to 1.96), 0.850 0.95 (0.45 to 2.02), 0.902
 Kongon-Pintanga 42 (40.0) 63 (60.0) 1.44 (0.74 to 2.81), 0.279 1.44 (0.74 to 2.82), 0.289
 Nangodi-Nyoboko 17 (31.5) 37 (68.5) 2.10 (0.95 to 4.61), 0.065 1.91 (0.86 to 4.24), 0.112
Age 4.92 (0.027)
 <16 13 (44.8) 16 (55.2) Ref Ref
 16–19 129 (37.5) 215 (62.5) 0.29 (0.09 to 0.92), 0.036 0.26 (0.08 to 0.89), 0.032
Height (cm) 5.26 (0.154)
 <150 4 (50.0) 4 (50.0) Ref
 150–159 68 (37.0) 116 (63.0) 1.71 (0.41 to 7.04), 0.460
 160–169 63 (42.3) 86 (57.7) 1.40 (0.34 to 5.83), 0.641
 170+ 7 (21.9) 25 (78.1) 3.57 (0.71 to 18.04), 0.123
Educational level 1.40 (0.705)
 None 10 (40.0) 15 (60.0) Ref
 Primary 33 (42.3) 45 (57.7) 0.77 (0.30 to 1.95), 0.577
 JHS 84 (37.7) 139 (62.3) 0.93 (0.39 to 2.20), 0.870
 SHS 15 (31.9) 32 (68.1) 1.20 (0.43 to 3.33), 0.726
Main occupation 2.427 (0.788)
 Housewife 44 (34.4) 84 (65.6) Ref
 Student 54 (39.4) 83 (60.6) 0.93 (0.53 to 1.63), 0.790
 Skilled worker 34 (42.5) 46 (57.5) 0.87 (0.29 to 2.64), 0.802
 Farmer 6 (42.9) 8 (57.1) 1.30 (0.31 to 5.43), 0.718
 Trader 3 (33.3) 6 (66.7) 1.24 (0.75 to 2.05), 0.396
 Unemployed 1 (20.0) 4 (80.0) 2.60 (0.28 to 23.91), 0.398
Number of pregnancies 1.13 (0.568)
 1 121 (39.0) 189 (61.0) Ref
 2 20 (34.5) 38 (65.5) 1.20 (0.67 to 2.16), 0.543
 3 1 (20.0) 4 (80.0) 2.53 (0.27 to 22.87), 0.410
Number of children 2.26 (0.324)
 0 125 (39.7) 190 (60.3) Ref
 1 16 (29.1) 39 (70.9) 1.58 (0.85 to 2.95), 0.150
 2 1 (33.3) 2 (66.7) 1.30 (0.12 to 14.47), 0.832
Gestational age at ANC 1.91 (0.385)
 First trimester 43 (33.9) 84 (66.1) Ref
 Second trimester 81 (39.3) 125 (60.7) 0.79 (0.50 to 1.25), 0.317
 Third trimester 18 (45.0) 22 (55.0) 0.69 (0.34 to 1.43), 0.322
NHIS status 0.12 (0.728)
 Yes and active 141 (38.0) 230 (62.0) Ref
 No/inactive 1 (50.0) 1 (50.0) 0.61 (0.04 to 9.77), 0.724
HIV/AIDS status 0.12 (0.728)
 Negative 141 (38.0) 230 (62.0) Ref
 Positive 1 (50.0) 1 (50.0) 0.61 (0.04 to 9.77), 0.724
Sickling status 5.30 (0.021)
 Negative 137 (37.3) 230 (62.7) Ref
 Positive 5 (83.3) 1 (16.7) 0.12 (0.01 to 1.03), 0.053
Number of ANC visits 5.93 (0.015)
 Less than eight visits 81 (42.0) 112 (58.0) Ref Ref
 Eight or more visits 61 (33.9) 119 (66.1) 0.27 (0.09 to 0.83), 0.022 0.30 (0.10 to 0.96), 0.042
Anaemia status at first ANC 1.71 (0.635)
 No 80 (37.4) 134 (62.6) Ref
 Mild 53 (38.4) 85 (61.6) 0.99 (0.64 to 1.54), 0.955
 Moderate 8 (40.0) 12 (60.0) 0.90 (0.35 to 2.28), 0.817
 Severe 1 (100.0) 0 (0.0)
Anaemia status at delivery 8.79 (0.032)
 No 75 (95.6) 128 (63.1) Ref Ref
 Mild 60 (38.5) 96 (61.5) 1.17 (0.44 to 3.09), 0.759 1.07 (0.38 to 3.06), 0.892
 Moderate 6 (50.0) 6 (50.0) 1.96 (0.23 to 16.88), 0.540 2.09 (0.24 to 18.58), 0.507
 Severe 1 (50.0) 1 (50.0) 21.56 (1.25 to 373.11), 0.035 17.66 (0.98 to 318.78), 0.052
Sex of newborn 0.29 (0.590)
 Female 66 (36.7) 114 (63.3) Ref
 Male 76 (39.4) 117 (60.6) 0.87 (0.57 to 1.32), 0.516

ANC, antenatal care; aOR, adjusted OR; cOR, crude OR; JHS, junior high school; NHIS, National Health Insurance Scheme; SHS, senior high school.

The odds of adverse birth outcome were 74% lower for adolescents aged 16–19 years (aOR=0.26, 95 %CI 0.08 to 0.89) compared with those aged less than 16 years. The narrow CI demonstrates a precise and statistically robust protective association. A similar protective association was observed for ANC utilisation. Compared with adolescents with less than eight ANC visits, those with eight or more visits were 70% less likely to have an adverse birth outcome (aOR=0.30, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.96). The CI for this association also excludes the null value of 1.0, indicating a clear, statistically defined protective effect. The likelihood of an adverse birth outcome increased with increasing anaemia severity. The odds were slightly elevated for adolescents with mild anaemia (aOR=1.07, 95% CI 0.38 to 3.06), but the wide interval firmly included the null value of 1.0, indicating the data are compatible with increased, decreased or no association. The odds increased dramatically for those with severe anaemia, with a point estimate suggesting a 17.66-fold increase (aOR=17.66, 95% CI 0.98 to 318.78). This wide interval only just includes the null value of 1.0 (at the lower boundary of 0.98), suggesting that while the association lacked the necessary statistical precision to exclude the possibility of no effect, the data are most compatible with a major increase in risk.

Discussion

The study investigated adverse birth outcomes and associated factors among adolescents in the Nabdam District of Ghana. The findings revealed that among the adolescents included in the study, 37.8% experienced at least one adverse birth outcome, including PTB (20.9%), newborns with asphyxia (15%), LBW (14.7%) and stillbirth (0.3%). The findings revealed significant associations between subdistrict of residence, age and number of ANC visits, and adverse birth outcomes.

Regarding the finding that 20.9% of the adolescent pregnancies in the Nabdam District (2021–2022) were PTBs, this is consistent with the finding by Akseer et al, which reported a higher prevalence of 23% for PTBs.27 It suggests that PTB may be a significant concern in this population. While the prevalence reported by previous studies, such as Ursache et al28 and Annan et al,29 is lower (14.8% and 12.5%, respectively), it is important to consider the variations that can occur due to differences in sample sizes, geographical locations and healthcare access. Further research is needed to explore the underlying factors contributing to the higher prevalence of PTB among adolescents in this region.

The prevalence of LBW among adolescents in this study was 14.7%. This finding aligns with previous studies conducted by Annan et al,29 Abebe et al,30 Afriyie et al31 and Mombo-Ngoma et al,32 which reported prevalence rates ranging from 10% to 17.5% for LBW among adolescent mothers. It is, however, lower than the 21.1% and 26% found by Mezmur et al33 and Akseer et al,27 respectively. These findings collectively highlight the consistent vulnerability of adolescent mothers to delivering infants with LBW, emphasising the need for targeted interventions to improve birth outcomes in this population.

Again, the study reported a prevalence of 15% for newborns with asphyxia among adolescents in the Nabdam District. While specific literature regarding asphyxia among adolescent mothers in this region was not available for direct comparison, Mezmur et al reported a prevalence of 9.3% for asphyxia in neonates among adolescent women.33 Although not directly comparable, this finding suggests that the prevalence of asphyxia among adolescent mothers warrants attention and further investigation. Future studies should focus on exploring the underlying factors contributing to asphyxia in newborns among adolescent mothers in developing settings and identifying effective preventive strategies.

Additionally, the study’s high prevalence of presence of adverse birth outcomes (38.1%) among adolescents is consistent with the 39.8% incidence of adverse foetal outcomes in adolescents in the study by Bihoun et al.34 It further highlights adolescents’ significantly higher risk of adverse birth outcomes compared with older women.34,37 Considering the study setting, this could be attributed to many socioeconomic factors, including inadequate nutrition during pregnancy.38 39

These findings are broadly consistent with studies conducted in other Ghanaian regions, including the Ashanti Region and Cape Coast Metropolis, which similarly reported high prevalence of LBW and PTB among pregnant adolescents.29 31 However, the prevalence observed in Nabdam is comparatively higher than reports from urban settings, which may reflect distinct socioeconomic and cultural dynamics in the district. Nabdam is a predominantly rural district characterised by high household food insecurity, high adolescent marriage rates and long travel distances to skilled birth services, all of which have been associated with adverse birth outcomes among adolescents in SSA. These contextual factors may help explain the increased likelihood of adverse birth outcomes observed in certain subdistricts.

Our findings are consistent with evidence from other regions of the world, where adolescent pregnancy has similarly been linked to increased risk of PTB, LBW and neonatal complications.40,42 However, some differences in prevalence across studies may reflect variations in socioeconomic context, nutritional status, antenatal care access, cultural norms surrounding adolescent marriage and health system capacity. For example, studies from India and Eastern Europe attribute adverse outcomes to early marriage and limited reproductive autonomy,41 42 while Middle Eastern evidence emphasises biological immaturity and low ANC utilisation.40 These comparisons suggest that the drivers of adverse birth outcomes among adolescents are multifactorial and context-dependent, reinforcing the need for localised strategies that address both social and health-system barriers.

These findings emphasise the need for comprehensive interventions that address both individual and contextual factors to improve birth outcomes for adolescent mothers in the Nabdam District. Adverse birth outcomes have strong implications for the attainment of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3 of ensuring healthy lives and promoting well-being for all at all ages, particularly for targets 3.1 and 3.2, which seek to reduce maternal mortality and end preventable deaths of newborns and children. Again, having babies with adverse birth outcomes can derail the social and economic growth of adolescents and affect other SDGs. Policymakers, healthcare providers and stakeholders can develop targeted strategies to reduce the prevalence of adverse birth outcomes and improve the overall well-being of adolescent mothers and their infants.

Furthermore, the study found that adolescents in the Pelungu subdistrict were 2.95 times more likely to have adverse birth outcomes compared with those in the Zanlerigu subdistrict. This finding aligns with previous research by Mezmur et al,33 which reported a significant association between adverse foetal outcomes and contextual factors such as the location of residence. It is plausible that limited access to healthcare resources, socioeconomic disparities or specific contextual characteristics in the Pelungu subdistrict contribute to the higher odds of adverse birth outcomes.

The current study revealed that adolescents aged 16–19 years (late adolescence) had 74% lower odds of adverse birth outcomes compared with those aged less than 16 years. This finding is consistent with Annan et al,29 who reported that younger age was associated with increased odds of adverse birth outcomes among pregnant adolescents. The protective effect of being in the older adolescent age group may be attributed to factors such as better physical maturity, increased decision-making capacity and improved access to resources and support networks.

Moreover, this study demonstrated that adolescents who had eight or more ANC visits were 70% less likely to have adverse birth outcomes compared with those with fewer visits. This finding is consistent with Mezmur et al,33 who found that antenatal care attendance was significantly associated with favourable birth outcomes among adolescent women. Similarly, Annan et al found that adverse birth outcomes were associated with socioeconomic factors and antenatal care compliance among pregnant adolescents.29 Regular ANC visits provide opportunities for health monitoring, early detection and management of potential complications, which can contribute to improved birth outcomes. Addressing barriers to healthcare access, enhancing educational opportunities and promoting comprehensive antenatal care services tailored to the unique needs of adolescent mothers are crucial steps toward reducing the burden of adverse birth outcomes in the Nabdam District.

Furthermore, these findings together have implications for ensuring better birth outcomes for adolescents in low-resource settings like Nabdam. Addressing these challenges may require multilevel and context-specific interventions, including: strengthening adolescent-friendly ANC services, community-based pregnancy support groups, nutrition supplementation and counselling for pregnant adolescents and transportation or referral support for adolescents in remote communities. Evidence from Ghana and other LMICs indicates that such targeted interventions improve ANC uptake, skilled birth care and reduce adverse birth outcomes among adolescent mothers.

It is important to acknowledge the limitations of our study. The study contributes to the existing understanding that adverse birth outcomes observed in both very young and older mothers may be influenced by biological as well as environmental and socioeconomic factors specific to these populations. Nevertheless, due to the limited availability of contextual covariates in our datasets, our ability to comprehensively explore or confirm these trends was restricted. We limited the analysis to records from January 2021 to December 2022 because these years had complete, consistent register data across all facilities; this may have reduced sample size but improved data quality and comparability. Additionally, the cross-sectional design limits our ability to establish temporality or infer causality between predictors and birth outcomes. Further studies may explore a more comprehensive variable set to gain more understanding of the complex interplay between biology, environmental conditions and socioeconomic factors and adverse birth outcomes among adolescent girls.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates a substantial burden of adverse birth outcomes among adolescent mothers in Nabdam District, with nearly two in five experiencing at least one complication. Geographical disparities were evident, with adolescents in Pelungu subdistrict experiencing markedly higher odds of adverse outcomes than those in other areas. Younger adolescents (<16 years) were also at increased risk, as were those who attended fewer than eight antenatal care visits.

These findings highlight the need to strengthen adolescent-focused ANC services, address subdistrict-level inequities in access and quality of care and improve early identification and support for high-risk younger adolescents. Targeted interventions are needed to address the modifiable factors identified in this study. Community-based adolescent outreach through community-based health planning and services (CHPS) household visits, peer-support groups and local pregnancy clubs could help promote early identification and sustained ANC engagement. Improved ANC uptake may be achieved through youth-friendly ANC hours, reminder systems for missed visits and transport support for adolescents in remote subdistricts. In addition, adolescent-responsive maternal health programmes, including respectful and private maternity services, psychosocial support and links to postpartum family planning, could strengthen continuity of care. Strengthening coordination between health, education and social protection systems would further support school retention and address the broader vulnerabilities facing pregnant adolescents.

Supplementary material

online supplemental file 1
bmjopen-16-2-s001.pdf (39.5KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099915
online supplemental file 2
bmjopen-16-2-s002.csv (43.2KB, csv)
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099915
online supplemental file 3
bmjopen-16-2-s003.sav (57.3KB, sav)
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099915

Acknowledgements

This paper is drafted from the dissertation of SAN submitted to the Ghana Institute of Management and Public Administration in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of a Master of Public Health degree.

Footnotes

Funding: The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Prepublication history and additional supplemental material for this paper are available online. To view these files, please visit the journal online (https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099915).

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Patient consent for publication: Not applicable.

Patient and public involvement: Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

Ethics approval: Before data collection, we obtained ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board of the Ghana Institute of Management and Public Administration (IRB-GIMPA, reference: GM/IRB/013/22). Permission was obtained from the management of the health facilities and unit heads before data collection. No personal identifying information in the maternity records was collected in the extraction to maintain participant anonymity.

Data availability statement

All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.

References

  • 1.United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) Early and Unintended Pregnancy & the Education Sector: Evidence Review and Recommendations. Paris: UNESCO; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wado YD, Sully EA, Mumah JN. Pregnancy and early motherhood among adolescents in five East African countries: a multi-level analysis of risk and protective factors. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19:59. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2204-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Darroch JE, Woog V, Bankole A, et al. Adding It up: Costs and Benefits of Meeting the Contraceptive Needs of Adolescents. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.World Health Organisation (WHO) Health for the World’s Adolescents: A Second Chance in the Second Decade. Geneva, Switzerland: 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kafle PP, Pakuryal KN, Regmi RR, et al. Health problems and social consequences in teenage pregnancy in rural Kathmandu Valley. Nepal Med Coll J. 2010;12:42–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jonas K, Crutzen R, van den Borne B, et al. Teenage pregnancy rates and associations with other health risk behaviours: a three-wave cross-sectional study among South African school-going adolescents. Reprod Health. 2016;13:50. doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0170-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nigussie Tola T. Cultural Malpractices During Pregnancy, Child Birth and Postnatal Period Among Women of Child Bearing Age in Limmu Genet Town, Southwest Ethiopia. SJPH . 2015;3:752. doi: 10.11648/j.sjph.20150305.32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.World Health Organisation (WHO) WHO Recommendations: Intrapartum Care for a Positive Childbirth Experience. Geneva: WHO; 2018. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.de Vargas Nunes Coll C, Ewerling F, Hellwig F, et al. Contraception in adolescence: the influence of parity and marital status on contraceptive use in 73 low-and middle-income countries. Reprod Health. 2019;16:21. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0686-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Darko NAK. Master’s dissertation. University of Ghana; 2018. The role of adolescent school health clubs on sex and condom use among junior high school students in the tema east submetropolis . [Google Scholar]
  • 11.United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) Adolescent pregnancy in Ghanaian communities – A worrying trend amid MTCT of HIV. [Internet] 2022. https://ghana.unfpa.org/en/news/adolescent-pregnancy-ghanaian-communities-%E2%80%93-worrying-trend-amid-mtct-hiv-0 Available.
  • 12.United Nations Children Fund (UNICEF) Protecting and Empowering Adolescent Girls in Ghana. New York: 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ghana Statistical Service (GSS), Ghana Health Service (GHS), ICF International . Ghana Maternal Health Survey 2017. Accra: 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ghana Health Service (GHS) Upper east region exceeds national teenage pregnancy rate of 12%. gbc report. [internet] 2024. https://www.gbcghanaonline.com/general/upper-east-region-exceeds-national-teenage-pregnancy-rate-of-12/2020/ Available.
  • 15.Ghana Statistical Service (GSS) Ghana 2021 Population and Housing Census General Report Volume 3H: Fertility and Mortality. Accra: GSS; 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Upper East Regional Health Directorate . Upper East Regional Annual Report 2022. Bolgatanga: Author; 2023. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ministry of Health Upper East Region tops in teenage pregnancy. Graphic Report. [Internet] 2021. https://www.graphic.com.gh/news/general-news/upper-east-region-tops-in-teenage-pregnancies.html Available.
  • 18.Chen CW, Tsai CY, Sung FC, et al. Adverse birth outcomes among pregnancies of teen mothers: age-specific analysis of national data in Taiwan. Child Care Health Dev. 2010;36:232–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2009.01039.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nabdam District Health Directorate . Annual District Report 2022. Nabdam: Author; 2023. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Aday LA, Cornelius LJ. Designing and Conducting Health Surveys: A Comprehensive Guide. 3rd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Setia MS. Methodology Series Module 3: Cross-sectional Studies. Indian J Dermatol. 2016;61:261–4. doi: 10.4103/0019-5154.182410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ghana Statistical Service (GSS) Ghana 2021 Population and Housing Census General Report Volume 3A: Population of Regions and Districts. Accra: GSS; 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ghana Statistical Service (GSS) Population and Housing Census: District Analytical Report – Nabdam District. Accra: GSS; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Althubaiti A. Sample size determination: A practical guide for health researchers. J Gen Fam Med . 2023;24:72–8. doi: 10.1002/jgf2.600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Watzlaf VJM, Sheridan PT, Alzu’bi AA, et al. Clinical Data Abstraction: A Research Study. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2021;18:1g. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tabrizi FM, Barjasteh S. Maternal hemoglobin levels during pregnancy and their association with birth weight of neonates. Iran J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2015;5:211–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Akseer N, Keats EC, Thurairajah P, et al. Characteristics and birth outcomes of pregnant adolescents compared to older women: An analysis of individual level data from 140,000 mothers from 20 RCTs. eClinicalMedicine. 2022;45:101309. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ursache A, Lozneanu L, Bujor I, et al. Epidemiology of Adverse Outcomes in Teenage Pregnancy—A Northeastern Romanian Tertiary Referral Center. IJERPH. 2023;20:1226. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Annan RA, Gyimah LA, Apprey C, et al. Predictors of adverse birth outcomes among pregnant adolescents in Ashanti Region, Ghana. J Nutr Sci. 2021;10:e67. doi: 10.1017/jns.2021.58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Abebe AM, Fitie GW, Jember DA, et al. Teenage Pregnancy and Its Adverse Obstetric and Perinatal Outcomes at Lemlem Karl Hospital, Tigray, Ethiopia, 2018. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:1–9. doi: 10.1155/2020/3124847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Afriyie J, Bedu-Addo K, Asiamah EA, et al. Low birth weight among adolescents at Cape Coast Metropolitan Hospital of Ghana. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5:4242–7. doi: 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20164321. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mombo-Ngoma G, Mackanga JR, González R, et al. Young adolescent girls are at high risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa: an observational multicountry study. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e011783. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mezmur H, Assefa N, Alemayehu T. An Increased Adverse Fetal Outcome Has Been Observed among Teen Pregnant Women in Rural Eastern Ethiopia: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study. Glob Pediatr Health. 2021;8:2333794X21999154. doi: 10.1177/2333794X21999154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bihoun B, Zango SH, Coulibaly MT, et al. Low Birth Weight and Prematurity in Teenage Mothers in Rural Areas of Burkina Faso. J Preg Child Health. 2017;04 doi: 10.4172/2376-127X.1000344. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wong SPW, Twynstra J, Gilliland JA, et al. Risk Factors and Birth Outcomes Associated with Teenage Pregnancy: A Canadian Sample. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2020;33:153–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2019.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ferreira VR, Jardim TV, Póvoa TR, et al. Birth weight and its association with blood pressure and nutritional status in adolescents. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2018;94:184–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2017.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJ, et al. Births: final data for 2016. Nat Vital Stat Rep. 2018;67:1–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gyimah LA, Annan RA, Apprey C, et al. Nutritional status and birth outcomes among pregnant adolescents in Ashanti Region, Ghana. Human Nutrition & Metabolism . 2021;26:200130. doi: 10.1016/j.hnm.2021.200130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wallace JM. Competition for nutrients in pregnant adolescents: consequences for maternal, conceptus and offspring endocrine systems. J Endocrinol. 2019;242:T1–19. doi: 10.1530/JOE-18-0670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ranjbar A, Shirzadfard Jahromi M, Boujarzadeh B, et al. Pregnancy, childbirth and neonatal outcomes associated with adolescent pregnancy. gocm . 2023;3:100–5. doi: 10.1016/j.gocm.2023.02.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Diabelková J, Rimárová K, Dorko E, et al. Adolescent Pregnancy Outcomes and Risk Factors. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20:4113. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Shri N, Singh M, Dhamnetiya D, et al. Prevalence and correlates of adolescent pregnancy, motherhood and adverse pregnancy outcomes in Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23:66. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05354-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    online supplemental file 1
    bmjopen-16-2-s001.pdf (39.5KB, pdf)
    DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099915
    online supplemental file 2
    bmjopen-16-2-s002.csv (43.2KB, csv)
    DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099915
    online supplemental file 3
    bmjopen-16-2-s003.sav (57.3KB, sav)
    DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099915

    Data Availability Statement

    All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.


    Articles from BMJ Open are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

    RESOURCES