Abstract
Magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) are widely used for nucleic acid (NA) extraction, but their performance strongly depends on the synthesis and surface functionalization. In this work, we applied a design of experiments (DoE) approach to optimize the coprecipitation synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles, identifying NH4OH flow rate and reaction temperature as the key factors. Under optimal conditions (5.5 mL min–1, 65 °C), Fe3O4 nanoparticles were coated with SiO2 and subsequently functionalized with (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane (Fe3O4@SiO2-APTES). The resulting nanoparticles (∼12 nm) were stable and magnetically responsive and provided efficient NA binding. Their performance in NA extraction was validated by RT-qPCR, yielding Ct values (20–25 for S, ORF, and N genes) comparable to those of both silica column and commercial magnetic bead methods. These results demonstrate that DoE is an effective strategy for tailoring nanoparticle synthesis and highlight Fe3O4@SiO2-APTES as a simple, cost-effective, and reliable material for nucleic acid purification in routine laboratory applications.


1. Introduction
The growing demand for rapid, sensitive, and high-throughput molecular diagnostics has intensified the need for efficient nucleic acid (NA) extraction methods. , The purity and integrity of DNA or RNA are critical to the performance of downstream techniques such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), next-generation sequencing (NGS), and nucleic acid–based biosensors. − However, conventional extraction approaches, including phenol-chloroform and column-based protocols, are often time-consuming, involve toxic reagents, and offer limited compatibility with automated platforms.
Recent advances in molecular diagnostics have underscored the importance of NA extraction platforms that are not only efficient but also reproducible, scalable, and compatible with downstream applications, such as PCR, NGS, and biosensing. Functional nanomaterials, particularly magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs), have emerged as enabling tools in this context because their tunable surfaces allow selective binding, rapid separation, and integration into automated diagnostic workflows. , For instance, silica coatings not only provide colloidal stability and biocompatibility but also protect the iron oxide core from oxidation and agglomeration. In addition, the silanol groups on the SiO2 surface enable covalent coupling with silane agents such as APTES, which introduce outward-facing amino groups that strengthen electrostatic interactions with nucleic acids.
Beyond their intrinsic magnetic properties, the surface engineering of MNPs plays a decisive role in diagnostic applicability. − Recent studies have highlighted the versatile biomedical applications of MNP nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery, antimicrobial therapy, and bioimaging due to their excellent magnetic properties and biocompatibility. − Despite extensive development, challenges remain in achieving cost-effective and widely accessible alternatives to commercial extraction kits, which often rely on complex chemistries, high reagent costs, or toxic solvents. In this regard, the optimization of coprecipitated Fe3O4 nanoparticles and their subsequent functionalization with TEOS and APTES represents a promising approach to balance synthetic simplicity, reproducibility, and performance. The SiO2 coating introduced via TEOS thus provides a stable and modifiable interface for APTES functionalization, ensuring both nanoparticle stability and effective nucleic acid capture. This strategy offers an application-driven pathway to develop functional nanomaterials that are not only structurally stable but also highly effective in recovering nucleic acids for diagnostic assays.
In response to these limitations, MPs have emerged as a promising alternative, enabling rapid, selective, and automatable separation of NA from complex samples. − MP-based systems have gained significant attraction in commercial nucleic acid extraction kits due to their scalability, facile operation, and potential for integration into automated workflows. Most commercially available platforms rely on micrometer-sized magnetic beads functionalized with silica or carboxyl groups, which facilitate the adsorption of nucleic acids via electrostatic or chaotropic interactions under optimized binding conditions. ,− Further, to enhance the extraction efficiency of NA, several types of MPs and their modifications have been explored for this purpose, each offering distinct advantages and efficiencies. While these systems generally provide satisfactory recovery rates, limitations related to their surface-to-volume ratio and magnetic responsiveness can impair binding efficiency and elution kinetics, particularly when processing low-concentration or degraded samples. ,
To overcome these constraints, recent studies have focused on synthesizing magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) with different properties, including particle size, surface charge, and coating composition, to enhance extraction performance. Functionalization with ligands such as amines, polyethylene glycol (PEG), or carbohydrate moieties, as well as the incorporation of nanostructured shells like silica or graphene oxide, has been shown to improve selectivity, reduce nonspecific binding, and increase stability across a range of pH and ionic strength conditions. − ,, These design strategies have significantly expanded the applicability of MNP-based platforms, enabling more robust, sensitive, and scalable workflows that meet the demands of modern molecular diagnostics.
Recent advances in material design have demonstrated that the physicochemical properties of MNP, particularly particle size, surface charge, and surface modifications, significantly influence NA extraction efficiency. For instance, Adams et al. (2015) demonstrated that surface coatings such as silica, oligo, and sequence-specific oligonucleotides significantly affect binding specificity and kinetics, with silica-coated beads effectively isolating total RNA, oligo beads selectively enriching mRNA, and sequence-specific beads enabling targeted capture of viral RNA and microRNAs. Moreover, Szymczyk et al. (2022) explored Fe3O4-based MNPs modified with various coatings, including polyethylenimine (PEI), gold, silica, and graphene oxide (GO) derivatives. They found that Fe3O4@PEI nanoparticles exhibit near-complete DNA binding through strong electrostatic interactions, while Fe3O4@GO–COOH coatings facilitate efficient DNA release via hydrophobic and hydrogen bonding mechanisms. Further, Ali et al. (2022) designed core–shell MNPs featuring cationic imidazolium-functionalized silica coatings coupled with triethylene glycol spacers, which synergistically enhance nucleic acid binding efficiency and biocompatibility through combined electrostatic and hydrogen bonding interactions. Complementing these functionalization strategies, Tjoa et al. developed TEOS-modified magnetic nanoparticles (TMNPs) with a crystalline size of 19.8 nm and ferromagnetic properties. The TMNPs demonstrated their effectiveness for DNA extraction from a wide range of bacterial species, including E. coli, Salmonella sp., and M. tuberculosis. By optimizing the binding buffer to 2.5 M guanidine thiocyanate (GuSCN) at pH 6.5, it achieved DNA yields ranging from 2.55 to 12.45 μg with 260/280 purity ratios between 1.58 and 2.27. The extracted DNA showed sufficient quality for downstream applications such as probe-based and intercalating dye-based qPCR, underscoring the critical role of buffer composition in maximizing the performance of functionalized MNPs for diagnostic workflows. Additionally, Prasetya et al. (2025) developed an environmentally friendly synthesis of magnetic-silica particles (MAGSi) by eliminating the washing step during Fe3O4 nanoparticle preparation, reducing waste and time. The unwashed MNPs (∼100 nm) were successfully silica-coated, forming larger MAGSi (∼1700 nm) with lower magnetization due to a thicker SiO2 layer. Despite this, they effectively extracted RNA and DNA from viral and bacterial samples, demonstrating strong performance in PCR and qRT-PCR assays. In this sense, these studies emphasize how advanced surface functionalization combined with process optimization drives the development of highly efficient and versatile MNP platforms tailored for nucleic acid extraction applications.
Despite the promising applications of MNPs, challenges persist in developing homogeneous and stable systems, particularly in controlling the interactions among nanoparticles and between nanoparticles and the carrier fluid. Given that magnetic properties are closely linked to particle composition and morphology, it is essential to carefully select synthetic methods that allow precise control over stability, size distribution, and crystallinity. − Among the chemical methods available, coprecipitation is the most widely employed, relying on the simultaneous precipitation of Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions in an alkaline medium. − However, despite its simplicity and scalability, this method often suffers from poor reproducibility and limited control over nanoparticle uniformity. In this work, we optimized Fe3O4 nanoparticle synthesis via response surface methodology and subsequently functionalized the particles with TEOS and APTES. These engineered nanoparticles were then evaluated for nucleic acid extraction performance, offering a reproducible, simple, and cost-effective alternative to conventional protocols and commercial magnetic bead-based kits.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
Analytical-grade reagents were used in the synthesis of magnetic nanoparticles without further purification. The following chemicals were employed: ferric chloride hexahydrate (FeCl3·6H2O, Sigma-Aldrich, F2877), ferrous chloride tetrahydrate (FeCl2·4H2O, Sigma-Aldrich, 44939), ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH, Sigma-Aldrich), ultrapure water (Milli-Q, Synergy UV), absolute ethanol (VETEC 103), argon (OXIVIT, 99.99%), tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS, Sigma-Aldrich, 86578), and 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES, Sigma-Aldrich, 440140). For comparison, nucleic acids were extracted with the Extracta Kit Fast DNA and RNA Viral (Loccus, São Paulo, Brazil), and PCR amplification was performed with the TaqPath COVID-19 CE-IVD RT-PCR Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). All glassware was cleaned with a mixture of HNO3 and HCl (1:3), rinsed with distilled water, and washed with ultrapure water to eliminate possible contaminants.
2.2. Experimental Design
A systematic experimental design was employed to optimize the synthesis of magnetic nanoparticles, focusing on minimizing particle size distribution (PSD), which correlates with increased surface area and improved nucleic acid extraction efficiency. ,, Initially, a literature survey was conducted to identify the primary variables affecting MNP synthesis, which included reaction time, temperature, Fe2+/Fe3+ molar ratio, stirring speed, and flow rate of ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH) (Table S1, Supporting Information). Based on this preliminary analysis, a fractional factorial design (25–1) was employed to screen the significance of these five variables (Table ). The analysis revealed that the temperature and NH4OH flow rate were the most influential parameters affecting particle formation and dispersion.
1. Variables and Levels of the Fractional Design 2(5–1) .
| levels |
||
|---|---|---|
| variables | (−) | (+) |
| time (min) | 10 | 180 |
| temperature (°C) | 25 | 100 |
| molar ratio (FeCl2/FeCl3) | 1 | 3 |
| stirring speed (RPM) | 200 | 600 |
| NH4OH flow (mL min –1) | 1 | 10 |
Following the screening phase, temperature and NH4OH flow rate were identified as the most significant factors affecting PSD. These two variables were subsequently optimized using a face-centered central composite design (CCD), which allows the estimation of quadratic effects and facilitates response surface modeling (Table ). All statistical modeling and analysis were performed using Statistica 12 (trial version), and model adequacy was evaluated through the analysis of variance (ANOVA), response surface plots, and residual analysis.
2. Variables and Levels of the Fractional (23).
| levels |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| variables | (−) | (0) | (+) |
| temperature (°C) | 30 | 65 | 100 |
| NH4OH flow (mL min–1) | 0.5 | 5.5 | 10.5 |
2.3. Synthesis and Functionalization of Nanoparticles
The synthesis of Fe3O4 nanoparticles was carried out under controlled conditions, in accordance with the experimental levels defined in the factorial design. Aqueous solutions of FeCl2·4H2O (0.03 mol·L–1 or 0.06 mol·L–1; 10 mL) and FeCl3·6H2O (0.03 mol·L–1; 10 mL) were mixed in a three-necked round-bottom flask fitted with a reflux condenser and maintained under continuous heating and stirring. The reaction was conducted under an inert nitrogen atmosphere to prevent premature oxidation of iron species.
Subsequently, 1.0 mL of NH4OH (28%) was added dropwise as a precipitating agent to initiate the coprecipitation of Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions, forming magnetite nanoparticles (Fe3O4). After synthesis, the particles were isolated and dried at 70 °C and then stored in Falcon tubes under dry conditions until further use in the functionalization steps.
2.4. Stabilization of Magnetic Nanoparticles
The magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) were stabilized using a modified Stöber method, adapted from Thangaraj et al. (2019). Initially, 1.766 g of Fe3O4 nanoparticles were resuspended in 88 mL of a 10:1 ethanol-to-water solution and subjected to ultrasonic dispersion for 30 min to ensure uniform suspension. Following this, 0.35 mL of tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) was added and mixed until homogeneity was achieved. To initiate the silica coating, 5.3 mL of NH4OH (28%) was added dropwise under constant stirring. The reaction mixture was maintained at 28 °C and stirred at 250 rpm for 20 h to allow complete hydrolysis and condensation of TEOS, resulting in silica-coated magnetic nanoparticles (Fe3O4@SiO2). The particles were then washed repeatedly with deionized water and ethanol until no detectable TEOS remained in the supernatant and dried at 70 °C.
For surface functionalization, 3.7626 g of Fe3O4@SiO2 were resuspended in a solution of 30 mL ethanol and 2.26 mL of (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane (APTES). The mixture was sonicated for 30 min to promote interaction between APTES and the silica surface, followed by stirring at 180 rpm for 1 h at 30 °C. This procedure yielded APTES-functionalized nanoparticles (Fe3O4@SiO2–APTES), suitable for subsequent nucleic acid extraction assays. After functionalization, the nanoparticles were purified using a neodymium magnet placed against the centrifuge tube wall, which allowed for magnetic separation of the solid phase. The supernatant containing unreacted or excess APTES was carefully removed, and the particles were washed repeatedly to ensure removal of nonbound species.
The stability of APTES-coated magnetic nanoparticles was evaluated through UV/vis spectroscopy and Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) and Zeta Potential (ZP) in different conditions of pH, saltiness, temperature, and shelf life.
2.5. Degree of Functionalization
The degree of functionalization with amino groups was estimated following the acid–based titration protocol proposed by Moaseri et al. (2013) with modifications. Briefly, 120 mg of Fe3O4@SiO2-APTES were added to 60 mL of HCl 0.02 M. The mixture was stirred for 30 min in a sealed container under a N2 atmosphere. After that, the supernatant was separated from magnetic nanoparticles and was titrated with NaOH (0.05 M) as the titrant.
The consumed HCl by Fe3O4@SiO2-APTES was accounted to be equivalent to the amount of amine functions present on the nanoparticle surface. Therefore, the difference between initial moles of HCl and the HCl consumed by NaOH represents the amount of amine functions on MNPs. Consequently, the degree of functionalization was calculated through eq
| 1 |
2.6. Characterization of the Nanoparticles
The synthesized Fe3O4@SiO2-APTES were comprehensively characterized to assess their morphology, size distribution, crystallinity, surface chemistry, and colloidal stability. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) was employed to evaluate the morphology and particle size by using a JEM-1400 microscope (JEOL, USA Inc.), operated at 120 kV with a tungsten filament. The crystalline structure was analyzed via X-ray Diffraction (XRD) using a Philips PW 1710 diffractometer equipped with Cu Kα radiation. The diffraction patterns were recorded over a 2θ range of 30° to 90°, with a step size of 0.01° and a time constant of 2 s.
Optical properties were investigated by using UV–visible (UV–vis) spectroscopy in the 200–800 nm range, employing an Ocean Optics USB 2000 spectrophotometer. Raman spectroscopy was performed using a Metrohm Instant Raman Analyzer (MIRA DS), equipped with a 785 nm excitation source and a spectral range of 400 to 2300 cm–1. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectra were acquired using an Agilent Cary 630 spectrometer to identify functional groups on the nanoparticle surfaces.
Hydrodynamic diameter and colloidal stability were determined via DLS and ZP measurements, respectively, using a Litesizer 500 (Anton Paar) instrument with 2 mL of colloidal suspension per measurement. DLS results were expressed in nanometers (nm), and ZP values in millivolts (mV). All characterization data were analyzed and processed using the OriginPro 8.5 SR1 software.
2.7. Extraction and Quantification of Nucleic Acids
This study evaluated the performance of Fe3O4@SiO2–APTES nanoparticles in extracting RNA from eight anonymized human saliva samples from individuals potentially infected with SARS-CoV-2. The project received approval from the institutional Ethics Committee (CEP), under protocol number 30993920.1.0000.5071.
RNA extraction using the synthesized nanoparticles was compared against two established protocols: manual extraction with a silica membrane column (Bio-Gene DNA/RNA Extraction Kit, Bioclin) and automated extraction with commercial magnetic beads. All reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) measurements were performed in triplicate for each sample and extraction method, minimizing intra-assay variability and ensuring reproducibility. In both protocols, the standard solid-phase material was replaced with the synthesized nanoparticles, while all other extraction conditions remained consistent.
The manual extraction process included cell lysis, nucleic acid binding, washing, and elution. During the binding step, the Fe3O4@SiO2–APTES nanoparticles served as the capture medium for RNA through magnetic separation. The same substitution occurred in the automated method, where the nanoparticles replaced commercial magnetic beads. A detailed description of the nucleic acid extraction protocols, including manual silica column-based and automated magnetic bead-based methods, is provided in the Supporting Information (Table S2).
RT-qPCR analysis was performed using a QuantStudio 5 system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with the TaqPath COVID-19 CE-IVD RT-PCR Kit, following the manufacturer’s protocol. The extraction solution used in these protocols had pH 6. The relative expression of viral gene markers was quantified using DataAssist software (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and the performance of the developed nanoparticles was compared to that of the two reference extraction methods.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Synthesis of Magnetic Nanoparticles and Factorial Experiments
The choice of iron salt significantly influences the synthesis, crystallization, and morphology of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. As discussed by Tanaka et al. (2022), the anionic component of the iron salt, such as sulfate, chloride, or nitrate, affects nucleation, particle growth, and the final nanoparticle structure. For example, sulfate ions strongly coordinate with Fe3+, which can inhibit certain iron oxide phases and lead to needle-like or nonmagnetic structures, whereas nitrate ions exhibit weaker coordination, resulting in less pronounced effects on particle formation. ,
In our work, we selected iron chloride salts (FeCl3 and FeCl2) due to several advantages: the moderate coordination of chloride ions stabilizes Fe3+ in solution without strongly hindering nucleation or growth, enabling controlled formation of uniform nanoparticles; the high solubility of chlorides ensures a homogeneous reaction medium; and precipitation from chlorides generates minimal byproducts, preserving the magnetic properties of the resulting particles. Moreover, the FeCl2/FeCl3 coprecipitation method is a well-established and reproducible route that facilitates particle size and morphology control. ,
Therefore, while the specific choice of iron salt can strongly impact the formation and characteristics of magnetic nanoparticles, the use of chloride salts in our study offered an optimal compromise between solubility, reaction control, and structural integrity, yielding Fe3O4 nanoparticles with high magnetic quality and suitability for nucleic acid extraction.
A preliminary review of the literature identified five synthesis parameters as potential influencers of MNP size: reaction time, temperature, Fe2+/Fe3+ molar ratio, NH4OH addition flow rate, and stirring speed (Table S1, Supporting Information). These variables were systematically evaluated using a 25–1 fractional factorial design, with hydrodynamic diameter (nm), as determined by DLS, serving as the response variable (Tables S3 and S5, Supporting Information).
The Pareto chart from the fractional factorial design (Figure A) identified temperature as the only statistically significant variable influencing the nanoparticle size. However, because the CCD requires at least two variables for effective modeling, the NH4OH flow rate, ranked as the second most influential factor, was also included. This selection enabled a more comprehensive exploration of synthesis conditions and allowed for the assessment of potential interaction effects between temperature and NH4OH flow rate (Figure B,C; Tables S4 and S6, Supporting Information).
1.
(A) Pareto chart from the 25–1 fractional factorial design indicating significant factors influencing particle size. (B) Pareto chart from the CCD. (C) Response surface model illustrating the interaction between temperature and NH4OH flow rate.
The CCD results showed that the NH4OH flow rate was the dominant factor in controlling the particle size, with the optimal value identified at 5.5 mL·min–1. Although temperature exhibited a comparatively smaller effect, it still influenced particle size, with the ideal condition observed at approximately 65 °C. These findings align with previous reports. For instance, Pei et al. (2007) demonstrated that elevated temperatures favor the formation of monodisperse, superparamagnetic nanoparticles with average diameters around 11 nm, attributed to enhanced crystal growth dynamics under thermal activation. Similarly, Mascolo et al. (2013) highlighted that rapid basic solution addition promotes continuous nucleation over particle growth, thereby producing smaller nanoparticles. While the optimal flow rate identified in this study differs slightly from the 1.88 mL·min–1 reported by Ahn et al. (2012), this variation is likely due to differences in experimental setup and reagent concentrations.
Overall, the design of experiments (DoE) approach proved to be effective in optimizing synthesis conditions. By narrowing down the most influential parameters and refining their levels, the study established a reproducible route for obtaining nanoparticles with reduced size and a more uniform distribution. These aspects are key attributes for enhancing surface interactions in downstream applications, such as nucleic acid extraction.
3.2. Characterization of Nanoparticles
Nanoparticles synthesized at the optimal point of the CCD (temperature: 65 °C; NH4OH flow rate: 5.5 mL·min–1) were characterized to confirm their structure, morphology, size distribution, and surface properties.
XRD analysis (Figure A) confirmed the crystalline nature of the Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Distinct diffraction peaks were observed at 2θ values of 30.1°, 35.5°, 42.6°, and 62.8°, corresponding to the (220), (311), (400), and (440) planes, respectively. These values are consistent with the inverse spinel cubic structure of magnetite. ,,, This crystalline pattern confirms that the desired phase was successfully achieved under the selected synthesis conditions.
2.
Physicochemical characterization of the MNPs: (A) XRD pattern (B) UV/vis; (C) TEM micrography of MNPs; (D) Size distribution histogram obtained by measuring the diameters of approximately 200 individual particles from TEM images.
The UV–Vis absorption spectrum (Figure B) shows a broad band between 330 and 450 nm and a strong band around 260 nm. The band at 260 nm is typically related to electronic transitions in magnetite, and the broad band in the visible range is also commonly observed for Fe3O4 due to charge transfer between iron ions. This feature is commonly attributed to plasmonic resonance and interband electronic transitions in Fe3O4, supporting the formation of magnetic nanoparticles. ,
TEM images (Figure C) revealed that the MNPs were predominantly spherical and well-dispersed with an average diameter of 11.49 ± 2.85 nm (Figure D). This value was obtained by measuring the diameters of approximately 200 individual particles within a range of 4 to 18 nm, indicating a relatively narrow size distribution. This feature is highly desirable, particularly in biomedical and analytical applications, where consistency in particle size enhances performance and reproducibility. These findings are consistent with previous studies; for example, Radoń et al. (2017) also reported the synthesis of superparamagnetic nanoparticles with an average size of 12 nm using a similar coprecipitation method.
ZP of naked MNP indicated a surface charge of −31 mV. This high negative charge is likely due to the presence of abundant surface hydroxyl groups (−OH) on the magnetite surface. Typically, nanoparticles with ZP values greater than +25 mV or less than −25 mV are considered stable in suspension. Thus, the synthesized MNPs demonstrate exceptional stability, which is advantageous for their use in environmental and biomedical applications. , After modification with TEOS and APTES, the ZP increases to −16 mV due to the presence of positively charged −NH2 groups which is crucial for DNA extraction. Figure S1 shows the ZP measured at each step of synthesis and functionalization of MNPs.
The results from XRD, UV/vis, TEM, DLS, and ZP analyses confirm the successful synthesis of MNP with desirable structural integrity, monodispersity, and colloidal stability. These properties are critical for ensuring reliable performance in subsequent functionalization steps and practical applications, such as nucleic acid extraction.
To confirm the modification of MNPs with TEOS and APTES, the vibrational profile of MNPs was analyzed through IR and Raman spectroscopy. Figure A presents the IR spectrum of the Fe3O4@Si@APTES nanoparticles. The bands centered at 875 cm–1 and 1040 cm–1, can be assigned to chemical bond vibrations of Si–O–H bending and Si–O–Si stretching, respectively. , Figure B presents the Raman spectrum of Fe3O4@Si@APTES, the 480 cm–1 signal can be related to Fe3O4, and bands at 1330 cm–1, 1480 cm–1, and 1660 cm–1 could be related to the APTES ligand. − Thus, after highly stable magnetite nanoparticles with proven functionalization by TEOS and APTES ligands were obtained, the nanoparticles were applied to extract and purify nucleic acids.
3.
(A) IR spectrum and (B) Raman spectrum of Fe3O4@Si@APTES.
3.3. pH Responsive Surface Charge of Fe3O4@Si@APTES MNPs
The pH-dependent ZP measured at 20 °C is shown in Figure A. The surface charge of MNPs remains negative at pH 8 to 10 due to deprotonated functional groups. The negative charge decreased with decreasing from pH 8 to 4, becoming very positive at pH 4, which is ascribable to protonation of −NH2 groups and free −OH present on the surface of nanoparticles in aqueous suspension.
4.

(A) pH-dependent ZP of Fe3O4@Si@APTES MNPs and (B) UV/vis spectra of aqueous solution of Fe3O4@Si@APTES MNPs after magnetization at different pH conditions.
The colloidal stability of Fe3O4@Si@APTES nanoparticles under different pH conditions was monitored through UV/vis spectroscopy. Upon destabilization in solution, nanoparticles tend to aggregate, reducing mobility under an applied magnetic field and increasing the sedimentation. Figure B shows the UV/vis spectra of the aqueous solution after 5 s of magnetization of the nanoparticles. No significant changes were observed in absorption spectra at the pH range of 8 to 10, indicating relatively stable nanoparticles. However, at lower pH levels, the background of UV/vis spectra enhances, which could be ascribed to the formation of nanoparticle aggregates due to the change from negative to positive surface charge.
The ZP dependence of temperature and ionic strength was also evaluated. It seems that the increasing temperature does not significantly affect the nanoparticle surface charge (Figure A). However, the UV/vis data of the aqueous solution after 5 s of magnetization shows a slight change of spectral profile of Fe3O4@Si-APTES at 60 °C, which indicates fewer magnetized particles and loss of stability or aggregation (Figure C). Figure B shows the effect of the ionic strength on the surface charge of magnetic nanoparticles; two different regimes were observed, and at low salt concentrations (10 mM to 50 mM), the increase of ionic strength decreases the absolute value of ZP due to the screening of the electric double layer and weakens the electrostatic repulsion. From 100 to 200 mM, the magnetic nanoparticles become more negative. However, high salt concentration strongly increases the conductivity of the medium and makes the ZP measurements less reliable. Despite the different behaviors observed in ZP, UV/vis (Figure D) indicates no significant effect of ionic strength over nanoparticle magnetic stability.
5.
(A) Temperature-dependent and (B) ionic strength ZP of Fe3O4@Si-APTES magnetic nanoparticles. UV/vis spectra of aqueous solution of Fe3O4@Si-APTES MNPs after magnetization at (A) different temperatures and (D) ionic strengths.
3.4. Extraction and Purification of Nucleic Acids
In this study, TEOS was primarily employed to generate a uniform silica shell around the iron oxide nanoparticles, acting as a protective and stabilizing layer that improves colloidal stability and prevents aggregation, as previously demonstrated in similar silica-coating strategies. , Although the resulting silica surface exposes silanol (−OH) groups, these functionalities provide only limited affinity toward nucleic acids, since they lack strong specific interactions with the phosphate backbone. To enhance the binding capacity, the nanoparticles were further modified with APTES, which covalently anchors to the silica layer and introduces terminal amino (−NH2) groups, and the −NH2 density obtained from eq was 1.25 mmol of −NH2 per 1 g of MNP. These amine groups establish favorable electrostatic interactions with the negatively charged phosphate backbone of nucleic acids, thereby improving binding affinity and extraction efficiency. , The superior performance of APTES-functionalized nanoparticles compared to TEOS-only coated particles can thus be attributed to the presence of surface amines, which create a more effective chemical interface for nucleic acid adsorption and recovery, in line with reports showing that amino-modified magnetic nanoparticles outperform bare silica coatings in nucleic acid isolation workflows. ,
The applicability of Fe3O4@SiO2-APTES nanoparticles for the extraction and purification of NAs was evaluated by comparing their performance to two widely used methods: (i) manual extraction using a silica column (Bio-Gene DNA/RNA Extraction Kit, Bioclin) and (ii) automated extraction with commercial magnetic beads (Extracta Kit Fast DNA and RNA VIRAL, Loccus Kit). To ensure comparability, the experimental protocol for Fe3O4@SiO2-APTES closely followed the buffer compositions and extraction steps used in the automated kit.
Quantitative assessment of extraction efficiency was performed using RT-qPCR, a gold-standard technique for detecting viral RNA. The cycle threshold (Ct) value was used as the main readout. This value represents the number of amplification cycles required for the fluorescent signal to exceed a predefined threshold above the background level. Because the fluorescence increases with the accumulation of the amplified product, samples with higher initial RNA concentrations reach the threshold in fewer cycles, resulting in lower Ct values. Therefore, a lower Ct indicates more efficient RNA extraction and purification. ,
To confirm the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in clinical saliva samples, RT-qPCR targeted three specific viral genes: N, S, and Orf1ab. These genes were selected because they represent conserved regions of the viral genome and are commonly used in diagnostic kits for SARS-CoV-2 detection. Amplification of multiple genes increases the specificity and reliability of the assay.
As shown in Figure , the amplification curves illustrate the quantification cycles obtained for each gene from RNA extracted by using Fe3O4@SiO2-APTES nanoparticles. The Ct values observed ranged within the expected diagnostic window (typically 17–37 cycles). The relatively low Ct values confirmed the nanoparticles’ capability to efficiently extract and purify RNA, enabling successful downstream amplification. This performance highlights the potential of Fe3O4@SiO2-APTES as an effective alternative to conventional extraction platforms, especially in contexts where cost, scalability, and automation are limiting factors.
6.
Curves corresponding to the quantification cycles of nucleic acids obtained through manual extraction using the nanoparticles of Fe3O4@SiO2-APTES.
A comparison of the Ct values for nucleic acids (NA) extracted using the silica column method and Fe3O4@SiO2-APTES nanoparticles (Figure A) revealed no statistically significant differences, indicating a comparable extraction efficiency between the two approaches. Similarly, the performance of the Fe3O4@SiO2-APTES nanoparticles did not differ significantly from that of the commercial automated kit employing magnetic beads (Figure B). These findings demonstrate the potential of the synthesized nanoparticles as viable alternatives for NA extraction and purification. However, it is important to acknowledge that the experimental protocol was deliberately aligned with the conditions of the commercial kit, including reagent composition and processing steps. While this facilitates a controlled comparison, it may not reflect the full optimization potential of the nanoparticle system. Future studies should focus on tailoring buffer composition and process parameters specifically for the Fe3O4@SiO2-APTES platform to enhance yield, selectivity, and purity. Additionally, broader validation using diverse clinical matrices and target genes is essential to confirm the robustness and applicability of the proposed approach in diagnostic settings.
7.
Comparison of Ct values obtained during RT-qPCR analysis using different RNA extraction methods. (A) Manual extraction using a silica-based spin column versus extraction with Fe3O4@SiO2-APTES nanoparticles. (B) Automated extraction using commercial magnetic beads (Loccus kit) versus extraction with Fe3O4@SiO2-APTES nanoparticles. Differences were assessed by statistical analysis; “ns” indicates nonsignificant differences (p > 0.05). Statistical analysis was performed by comparing the extraction methods (Fe3O4@SiO2@APTES vs Manual Column and Fe3O4@SiO2@APTES vs Automated extraction–Loccus) for each gene (S, ORF, N) using independent-samples t tests. No significant differences were observed (all p > 0.05). The corresponding table with these results has been included in the Supporting Information (Table S8).
Ct values obtained through RT-qPCR serve as a functional metric that simultaneously reflects yield, purity, and amplification compatibility. Comparable to other studies on PEI-, GO-, and imidazolium-modified MNPs that also emphasize Ct-based performance assessment, our findings confirm that Fe3O4@SiO2-APTES nanoparticles perform at a similar level to state-of-the-art extraction platforms.
Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles have long been explored for nucleic acid (NA) extraction due to their unique magnetic responsiveness and surface tunability. Chacón-Torres et al. (2020) reported a scalable and simplified synthesis of MNPs coated with APTES for RNA extraction, confirming functional amine groups but lacking detailed size and stability optimization that our study achieves via DoE. Additionally, Ali et al. (2022) developed sugar-based cationic core–shell silica MNPs functionalized with imidazolium groups demonstrating excellent nucleic acid loading efficiencies, yet with less emphasis on synthesis parameter optimization and performance validation in inhibitor-rich, low-input samples. Ma et al. (2013) demonstrated the use of TEOS-functionalized nanoparticles (∼500 nm) for the successful isolation of DNA from diverse biological matrices, including bacterial, yeast, blood, and viral samples, achieving high yields suitable for downstream applications. Bai et al. (2016) further emphasized the importance of surface chemistry, showing that amine-rich nanoparticles significantly enhanced DNA binding efficiency. These findings align with the results of the present study, wherein Fe3O4@SiO2-APTES nanoparticlesbearing a high density of amine groupsexhibited extraction efficiency comparable to that of commercial kits. The favorable performance observed in this study highlights the critical role of surface functionalization in enabling efficient nucleic acid extraction and demonstrates the feasibility of implementing such nanomaterials in clinical and decentralized molecular diagnostic settings. Importantly, the material also exhibits a very low cost per extraction, approximately USD 0.017, as shown in Table S7, which further strengthens its practical applicability. Taken together, these results validate the design of Fe3O4@SiO2-APTES nanoparticles as a cost-effective, scalable, and high-performance platform for nucleic acid purification with significant potential for future integration into point-of-care and high-throughput diagnostic workflows.
4. Conclusions
This study demonstrated that the synthesis of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles via coprecipitation can be precisely controlled by adjusting the NH4OH flow rate and reaction temperature, with optimal conditions identified at 5.5 mL·min–1 and 65 °C. These parameters led to the formation of monodisperse Fe3O4 nanoparticles with an average diameter of 12 nm. Subsequent functionalization with TEOS and APTES successfully conferred colloidal stability and introduced silane and amine surface groups, which are key features for biomolecular interactions. When applied to NA extraction, the Fe3O4@SiO2–APTES nanoparticles achieved performance comparable to that of established commercial kits, as evidenced by Ct values between 20 and 25 for clinically relevant genes (S, ORF, and N). These findings highlight the potential of this nanomaterial as a cost-effective and scalable alternative to NA purification workflows. Overall, this platform offers a promising foundation for the development of next-generation magnetic supports for molecular diagnostics, particularly in resource-limited and point-of-care settings. In addition to demonstrating diagnostic performance comparable to existing solutions, it distinguishes itself by relying on inexpensive reagents (FeCl2, FeCl3, NH4OH, TEOS, and APTES) and straightforward, scalable synthetic stepsfeatures that reinforce its cost-effectiveness when compared to commercial kits.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This publication was supported by BRAZIL/CNPq/MCTI/FNDCT No. 22/2022, BRAZIL/FAPES No. 20/2022, and MCTI/FINEP/FNDCT Edital Doenças Raras 2022. The authors are thankful for the financial support by the Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education (Capes, number: 001).
The data supporting this article have been included in the main text. Additional raw data required to reproduce these findings can be made available upon reasonable request to the author.
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.5c06432.
ZP measurements at different stages of magnetic nanoparticle functionalization; bibliographic review of synthesis parameters influencing magnetic nanoparticle size; detailed protocols for viral RNA extraction using manual silica columns and automated magnetic bead-based systems; complete results from fractional factorial and central composite experimental designs; ANOVA analyses, response surface data, and hydrodynamic diameter measurements; cost analysis of reagents; and statistical comparisons between nucleic acid extraction methods to assess performance and reproducibility (PDF)
§.
I.G.R. and T.d.A.S. contributed equal in this article as first author. Iuly G. Ribeiro: writingoriginal draft, visualization, formal analysis, and investigation; Thais A. Silva: writingoriginal draft, visualization, formal analysis, and investigation; Ana Carolina L. Barizão: writingreview and editing, formal analysis, and investigation; Giordano T. Paganoto: Writingreview and editing, formal analysis, and investigation; Gabriel F. S. dos Santos: writingreview and editing; formal analysis, and investigation; Sérvio Túlio A. Cassini: writingreview and editing and funding acquisition; Marco C. C. Guimarães: writingreview and editing, formal analysis, and investigation; and Jairo P. Oliveira: conceptualization, writingreview and editing, project administration, and supervision.
The Article Processing Charge for the publication of this research was funded by the Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES), Brazil (ROR identifier: 00x0ma614).
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Published as part of ACS Omega special issue “Chemistry in Brazil: Advancing through Open Science”.
References
- Widen, R. H. ; Silbert, S. . Nucleic Acid Extraction in Diagnostic Virology. Clinical Virology Manual, 5th Ed.; Wiley, 2016; pp 117–128. [Google Scholar]
- Shin, J. H. Nucleic Acid Extraction and Enrichment. Advanced Techniques in Diagnostic Microbiology, 3rd Ed.: Springer, 2018; Vol. 1, pp 273–292. [Google Scholar]
- Li Y., Liu S., Wang Y., Wang Y., Li S., He N., Deng Y., Chen Z.. Research on a Magnetic Separation-Based Rapid Nucleic Acid Extraction System and Its Detection Applications. Biosensors. 2023;13(10):903. doi: 10.3390/bios13100903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Riaz S., Noim J. O., Kakadiya D., Sharma M., Tallur S., Pandey R.. Scaled-Up Paper Dipsticks for Nucleic Acid Extraction from Soil Samples. ACS Agric. Sci. Technol. 2025;5:468. doi: 10.1021/acsagscitech.4c00428. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Di H., Thor S. W., Trujillo A. A., Stark T. J., Marinova-Petkova A., Jones J., Wentworth D. E., Barnes J. R., Davis C. T.. Comparison of Nucleic Acid Extraction Methods for Next-Generation Sequencing of Avian Influenza A Virus from Ferret Respiratory Samples. J. Virol. Methods. 2019;270(March):95–105. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2019.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sun Y., Li Z., Huang X., Zhang D., Zou X., Shi J., Zhai X., Jiang C., Wei X., Liu T.. A Nitrile-Mediated Aptasensor for Optical Anti-Interference Detection of Acetamiprid in Apple Juice by Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019;145(August):111672. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2019.111672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tan S. C., Yiap B. C.. DNA, RNA, and Protein Extraction: The Past and the Present. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2009;2009:574398. doi: 10.1155/2009/574398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhu Q., Sun J., An C., Li X., Xu S., He Y., Zhang X., Liu L., Hu K., Liang M.. Mechanism of LncRNA Gm2044 in Germ Cell Development. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2024;12:1410914. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1410914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Y., Shen Y., Li J., Wang T., Peng J., Shang X.. Enhanced RNA Secondary Structure Prediction through Integrative Deep Learning and Structural Context Analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2025;53(11):gkaf533. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaf533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- He W., Zhu J., Feng Y., Liang F., You K., Chai H., Sui Z., Hao H., Li G., Zhao J., Deng L., Zhao R., Wang W.. Neuromorphic-Enabled Video-Activated Cell Sorting. Nat. Commun. 2024;15(1):10792. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-55094-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mokhosi S. R., Mdlalose W., Nhlapo A., Singh M.. Advances in the Synthesis and Application of Magnetic Ferrite Nanoparticles for Cancer Therapy. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14(5):937. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14050937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hyder F., Manjura Hoque S.. Brain Tumor Diagnostics and Therapeutics with Superparamagnetic Ferrite Nanoparticles. Contrast Media Mol. Imaging. 2017;2017:1–17. doi: 10.1155/2017/6387217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yu S., Zhang H., Zhang S., Zhong M., Fan H.. Ferrite Nanoparticles-Based Reactive Oxygen Species-Mediated Cancer Therapy. Front. Chem. 2021;9:651053. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2021.651053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tamboli Q. Y., Patange S. M., Mohanta Y. K., Sharma R., Zakde K. R.. Green Synthesis of Cobalt Ferrite Nanoparticles: An Emerging Material for Environmental and Biomedical Applications. J. Nanomater. 2023;2023:1–15. doi: 10.1155/2023/9770212. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Piran M. M., Kharaziha M., Sheibani S.. PVA-Assisted Synthesis of Cobalt Ferrite Nanoparticles for Biomedical Applications. Ceram. Int. 2025;51(14):18691–18700. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2025.02.049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Aftabi A., Babakhani A., Khoshlahni R.. Optimized Zn Substituted CoFe2O4 Nanoparticles for High Efficiency Magnetic Hyperthermia in Biomedical Applications. Sci. Rep. 2025;15(1):10039. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94535-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Szymczyk A., Drozd M., Kamińska A., Matczuk M., Trzaskowski M., Mazurkiewicz-Pawlicka M., Ziółkowski R., Malinowska E.. Comparative Evaluation of Different Surface Coatings of Fe3O4-Based Magnetic Nano Sorbent for Applications in the Nucleic Acids Extraction. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23(16):8860. doi: 10.3390/ijms23168860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen Y., Liu Y., Shi Y., Ping J., Wu J., Chen H.. Magnetic Particles for Integrated Nucleic Acid Purification, Amplification and Detection without Pipetting. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 2020;127:115912. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2020.115912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haile S., Nikiforuk A. M., Pandoh P. K., Twa D. D. W., Smailus D. E., Nguyen J., Pleasance S., Wong A., Zhao Y., Eisler D., Moksa M., Cao Q., Wong M., Su E., Krzywinski M., Nelson J., Mungall A. J., Tsang F., Prentice L. M., Jassem A., Manges A. R., Jones S. J. M., Coope R. J., Prystajecky N., Marra M. A., Krajden M., Hirst M.. Optimization of Magnetic Bead-Based Nucleic Acid Extraction for SARS-CoV-2 Testing Using Readily Available Reagents. J. Virol. Methods. 2022;299:114339. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Inoue J., Huber N., Fendel R., Held J.. Automated Total Nucleic Acid Extraction with Magnetic Beads for the Detection of Plasmodium Falciparum in Large Study Cohorts. Malar. J. 2024;23(1):398. doi: 10.1186/s12936-024-05227-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Husakova M., Kralik P., Babak V., Slana I.. Efficiency of DNA Isolation Methods Based on Silica Columns and Magnetic Separation Tested for the Detection of Mycobacterium Avium Subsp. Paratuberculosis in Milk and Faeces. Materials. 2020;13(22):5112. doi: 10.3390/ma13225112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Qi Y., Zheng J., Xie Y., Amin A., Qiao B., Shi C., Li Y., Ma C.. Streptomycin-Modified Magnetic Beads Enable Robust DNA Extraction across Diverse Lysis Conditions. Anal. Biochem. 2025;702(March):115836. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2025.115836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tang C., He Z., Liu H., Xu Y., Huang H., Yang G., Xiao Z., Li S., Liu H., Deng Y., Chen Z., Chen H., He N.. Application of Magnetic Nanoparticles in Nucleic Acid Detection. J. Nanobiotechnology. 2020;18(1):1–19. doi: 10.1186/s12951-020-00613-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ali T. H., Mandal A. M., Heidelberg T., Hussen R. S. D.. Sugar Based Cationic Magnetic Core-Shell Silica Nanoparticles for Nucleic Acid Extraction. RSC Adv. 2022;12(22):13566–13579. doi: 10.1039/D2RA01139E. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fukuchi M., Hanamura M., Otake K., Nakamori M., Toyoda N., Matsuda K.. Silica-Coated Magnetic Beads Containing an Fe-Based Amorphous Alloy Are Applicable for Nucleic Acid Extraction. J. Non. Cryst. Solids. 2023;609(February):122284. doi: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2023.122284. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Firoozeh F., Neshan A., Khaledi A., Zibaei M., Amiri A., Sobhani A., Badmasti F., Nikbin V. S.. Evaluation of the Effect of Magnetic Nanoparticles on Extraction of Genomic DNA of Escherichia Coli. J. Polym. Sci. 2023;80(3):3153–3163. doi: 10.1007/s00289-022-04196-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Adams N. M., Bordelon H., Wang K. K. A., Albert L. E., Wright D. W., Haselton F. R.. Comparison of Three Magnetic Bead Surface Functionalities for RNA Extraction and Detection. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2015;7(11):6062–6069. doi: 10.1021/am506374t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tjoa S. E. E., Mudasir M., Suharyadi E., Daryono B. S.. Binding Buffer Optimization for TEOS-Modified Magnetite Nanoparticle-Based DNA Extraction Method. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2025;337(October 2024):130622. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2025.130622. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Prasetya A. D., Sulungbudi G. T., Muflikhah M., Insani A., Insani A., Lubis W. Z., Saepulloh U., Ayuningsih E. D., Ayuningsih E. D.. Efficient Synthesis of Magnetic-Silica Particles for Nucleic Acid Extraction in Diagnostics Based on Washing-Free Magnetic Fine Nanoparticles. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2025;42:1757–1768. doi: 10.1007/s11814-025-00480-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wu S., Sun A., Zhai F., Wang J., Xu W., Zhang Q., Volinsky A. A.. Fe3O4Magnetic Nanoparticles Synthesis from Tailings by Ultrasonic Chemical Co-Precipitation. Mater. Lett. 2011;65(12):1882–1884. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2011.03.065. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wu W., Wu Z., Yu T., Jiang C., Kim W. S.. Recent Progress on Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Surface Functional Strategies and Biomedical Applications. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2015;16(2):023501. doi: 10.1088/1468-6996/16/2/023501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hasany S. F., Ahmed I., J R., Rehman A.. Systematic Review of the Preparation Techniques of Iron Oxide Magnetic Nanoparticles. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2012;2(6):148–158. doi: 10.5923/j.nn.20120206.01. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Laurent S., Dutz S., Häfeli U. O., Mahmoudi M.. Magnetic Fluid Hyperthermia: Focus on Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011;166(1–2):8–23. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2011.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Akutsu J. I., Tojo Y., Segawa O., Obata K., Okochi M., Tajima H., Yohda M.. Development of an Integrated Automation System with a Magnetic Bead-Mediated Nucleic Acid Purification Device for Genetic Analysis and Gene Manipulation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2004;86(6):667–671. doi: 10.1002/bit.20049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fatmawati T., Shiddiq M., Armynah B., Tahir D.. Synthesis Methods of Fe3O4 Nanoparticles for Biomedical Applications. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2023;46(11):2356–2366. doi: 10.1002/ceat.202200384. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Trifoi A. R., Matei E., Râpă M., Berbecaru A. C., Panaitescu C., Banu I., Doukeh R.. Coprecipitation Nanoarchitectonics for the Synthesis of Magnetite: A Review of Mechanism and Characterization. Reac Kinet Mech Cat. 2023;136:2835–2874. doi: 10.1007/s11144-023-02514-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Majidi S., Sehrig F. Z., Farkhani S. M., Goloujeh M. S., Akbarzadeh A.. Current Methods for Synthesis of Magnetic Nanoparticles. Artif. Cells, Nanomedicine Biotechnol. 2016;44(2):722–734. doi: 10.3109/21691401.2014.982802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- de Lima Barizão A. C., de Oliveira J. P., Gonçalves R. F., Cassini S. T.. Nanomagnetic Approach Applied to Microalgae Biomass Harvesting: Advances, Gaps, and Perspectives. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021;28(33):44795–44811. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15260-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cox L. M., Killgore J. P., Li Z., Zhang Z., Hurley D. C., Xiao J., Ding Y.. Morphing Metal-Polymer Janus Particles. Adv. Mater. 2014;26(6):899–904. doi: 10.1002/adma.201304079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thangaraj B., Jia Z., Dai L., Liu D., Du W.. Effect of Silica Coating on Fe3O4Magnetic Nanoparticles for Lipase Immobilization and Their Application for Biodiesel Production. Arab. J. Chem. 2019;12(8):4694–4706. doi: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2016.09.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Moaseri E., Baniadam M., Maghrebi M., Karimi M. A.. Simple Recoverable Titration Method for Quantitative Characterization of Amine-Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2013;555:164–167. doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2012.10.064. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Tanaka H.. Influence of Anions and Cations on the Formation of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles in Aqueous Media. KONA Powder Part. J. 2022;39:119–129. doi: 10.14356/kona.2022003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Laurent S., Forge D., Port M., Roch A., Robic C., Vander Elst L., Muller R. N.. Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Stabilization, Vectorization, Physicochemical Characterizations, and Biological Applications. Chem. Rev. 2008;108(6):2064–2110. doi: 10.1021/cr068445e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu W., He Q., Jiang C.. Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles: Synthesis and Surface Functionalization Strategies. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2008;3(11):397. doi: 10.1007/s11671-008-9174-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Massart R.. Preparation of Aqueous Magnetic Liquids in Alkaline and Acidic Media. IEEE Trans. Magn. 1981;17(2):1247–1248. doi: 10.1109/TMAG.1981.1061188. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Pei W., Kumada H., Natusme T., Saito H., Ishio S.. Study on Magnetite Nanoparticles Synthesized by Chemical Method. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2007;310(2):2375–2377. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2006.10.837. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Mascolo M. C., Pei Y., Ring T. A.. Room Temperature Co-Precipitation Synthesis of Magnetite Nanoparticles in a Large Ph Window with Different Bases. Materials. 2013;6(12):5549–5567. doi: 10.3390/ma6125549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ahn T., Kim J. H., Yang H. M., Lee J. W., Kim J. D.. Formation Pathways of Magnetite Nanoparticles by Coprecipitation Method. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2012;116(10):6069–6076. doi: 10.1021/jp211843g. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Tuzen M., Sarı A., Saleh T. A.. Response Surface Optimization, Kinetic and Thermodynamic Studies for Effective Removal of Rhodamine B by Magnetic AC/CeO2 Nanocomposite. J. Environ. Manage. 2018;206:170–177. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Van Thuan T., Quynh B. T. P., Nguyen T. D., Ho V. T. T., Bach L. G.. Response Surface Methodology Approach for Optimization of Cu2+, Ni2+ and Pb2+ Adsorption Using KOH-Activated Carbon from Banana Peel. Surf. Interfaces. 2017;6:209–217. doi: 10.1016/j.surfin.2016.10.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Takai Z. I., Mustafa M. K., Asman S., Sekak K. A.. Preparation and Characterization of Magnetite (Fe3O4) Nanoparticles by Sol-Gel Method. Int. J. Nanoelectron. Mater. 2019;12(1):37–46. [Google Scholar]
- Rajan S., Venugopal A., Kozhikkalathil H., Valappil S., Kale M., Mann M., Ahuja P., Munjal S.. Synthesis of ZnO Nanoparticles by Precipitation Method: Characterizations and Applications in Decipherment of Latent Fingerprints. Mater. Today: Proc. 2023:1. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.05.680. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kaushik P., Malik A.. Process Optimization for Efficient Dye Removal by Aspergillus Lentulus FJ172995. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011;185(2–3):837–843. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.09.096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Radoń A., Drygała A., Hawełek Ł., Łukowiec D.. Structure and Optical Properties of Fe3O4 Nanoparticles Synthesized by Co-Precipitation Method with Different Organic Modifiers. Mater. Charact. 2017;131(April):148–156. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2017.06.034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Horie, M. ; Fujita, K. . Toxicity of Metal Oxides Nanoparticles, Elsevier; 2011; pp 145–178. [Google Scholar]
- Patsula V., Kosinová L., Lovrić M., Ferhatovic Hamzić L., Rabyk M., Konefal R., Paruzel A., Šlouf M., Herynek V., Gajović S., Horák D.. Superparamagnetic Fe3O4 Nanoparticles: Synthesis by Thermal Decomposition of Iron(III) Glucuronate and Application in Magnetic Resonance Imaging. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2016;8(11):7238–7247. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b12720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shimizu I., Okabayashi H., Taga K., Yoshino A., Nishio E., O’Connor C. J.. Raman Scattering Study of the Interaction of 3-Aminopropyltriethoxy Silane on Silica Gel. Time-Dependent Conformational Change of Aminopropylsilyl Segments. Vib. Spectrosc. 1997;14(1):125–132. doi: 10.1016/S0924-2031(96)00069-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zeleňáková A., Zeleňák V., Beňová E., Kočíková B., Király N., Hrubovčák P., Szűcsová J., Nagy, Klementová M., Mačák J., Závišová V., Bednarčík J., Kupčík J., Jacková A., Volavka D., Košuth J.. Vilček. The Surface Modification of the Silica-Coated Magnetic Nanoparticles and Their Application in Molecular Diagnostics of Virus Infection. Sci. Rep. 2024;14(1):14427. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64839-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alessi A., Agnello S., Buscarino G., Gelardi F. M.. Raman and IR Investigation of Silica Nanoparticles Structure. J. Non. Cryst. Solids. 2013;362(1):20–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2012.11.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Norizan N. F. I., Hamidon T. S., Hussin M. H.. Corrosion-Resistant Performance of Mild Steel Employing Flavonoids and Phenols-Rich Beta Vulgaris Extract-Doped Hybrid Sol-Gel Coatings. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2023;107(2):347–362. doi: 10.1007/s10971-023-06125-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Shimizu I., Okabayashi H., Taga K., O’Connor C. J.. Raman Scattering Study of Polyaminopropylsiloxane and Its Compounds for Characterization of 3-Aminopropylsilane-Modified Silica Gel. Utility of the CH2 Rock and Skeletal Stretch Modes. Colloid Polym. Sci. 1997;275(6):555–560. doi: 10.1007/s003960050118. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yeap S. P., Lim J., Ooi B. S., Ahmad A. L.. Agglomeration, Colloidal Stability, and Magnetic Separation of Magnetic Nanoparticles: Collective Influences on Environmental Engineering Applications. J. Nanoparticle Res. 2017;19(11):368. doi: 10.1007/s11051-017-4065-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Darwish M. S. A., Nguyen N. H. A., Ševců A., Stibor I.. Functionalized Magnetic Nanoparticles and Their Effect on Escherichia Coli and Staphylococcus Aureus. J. Nanomater. 2015;2015(1):416012. doi: 10.1155/2015/416012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Alsmaeil A. W., Mohammed S., Aldakkan B. S., Chalmpes N., Kouloumpis A., Potsi G., Galvin A., Gadikota G., Kanj M. Y., Giannelis E. P.. Fine-Tuning the Surface and Interfacial Chemistry of Silica Nanoparticles to Control Stability in High Ionic Strength Electrolytes and Modulate Assembly at Oil–Water Interfaces. Chem. Mater. 2023;35(21):9150–9159. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.3c01871. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Elkalla E., AitTouchente Z., Khizar S., Lebaz N., Raffin G., Elaissari A.. Elaboration of Silica-Coated Sub-Micron Magnetic Capsules for DNA Extraction. Chem. Africa. 2025;8(3):1033–1044. doi: 10.1007/s42250-024-01184-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kumari S., Ravlo E., Jayaraman G., Sai V. R., Bjørås M., Madaboosi N., Bandyopadhyay S.. Silica Coating of Thermal Decomposition-Based Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Magnetic Nanoparticles for Nucleic Acid Extraction. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2025;725:137663. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2025.137663. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Park M. E., Chang J. H.. High Throughput Human DNA Purification with Aminosilanes Tailored Silica-Coated Magnetic Nanoparticles. Mater. Sci. Eng., C. 2007;27(5–8):1232–1235. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2006.09.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bai Y., Roncancio D., Suo Y., Shao Y., Zhang D., Zhou C.. A Method Based on Amino-Modified Magnetic Nanoparticles to Extract DNA for PCR-Based Analysis. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces. 2019;179:87–93. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen X.-W., Mao Q.-X., Liu J.-W., Wang J.-H.. Isolation/Separation of Plasmid DNA Using Hemoglobin Modified Magnetic Nanocomposites as Solid-Phase Adsorbent. Talanta. 2012;100:107–112. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2012.07.095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kubista M., Andrade J. M., Bengtsson M., Forootan A., Jonák J., Lind K., Sindelka R., Sjöback R., Sjögreen B., Strömbom L., Ståhlberg A., Zoric N.. The Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction. Mol. Aspects Med. 2006;27(2–3):95–125. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2005.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mao X., Liu C., Tong H., Chen Y., Liu K.. Principles of Digital PCR and Its Applications in Current Obstetrical and Gynecological Diseases. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2019;11(12):7209–7222. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Pelt-Verkuil, E. ; van Belkum, A. ; Hays, J. P. . Principles and Technical Aspects of PCR Amplification; Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Chacón-Torres J. C., Reinoso C., Navas-León D. G., Briceño S., González G.. Optimized and Scalable Synthesis of Magnetic Nanoparticles for RNA Extraction in Response to Developing Countries’ Needs in the Detection and Control of SARS-CoV-2. Sci. Rep. 2020;10(1):19004. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75798-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ma C., Li C., Wang F., Ma N., Li X., Li Z., Deng Y., Wang Z., Xi Z., Tang Y., He N.. Magnetic Nanoparticles-Based Extraction and Verification of Nucleic Acids from Different Sources. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2013;9(4):703–709. doi: 10.1166/jbn.2013.1566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bai Y., Cui Y., Paoli G. C., Shi C., Wang D., Zhou M., Zhang L., Shi X.. Synthesis of Amino-Rich Silica-Coated Magnetic Nanoparticles for the Efficient Capture of DNA for PCR. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces. 2016;145:257–266. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data supporting this article have been included in the main text. Additional raw data required to reproduce these findings can be made available upon reasonable request to the author.






