Skip to main content
The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging logoLink to The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging
. 2023 Oct 4;27(10):797–805. doi: 10.1007/s12603-023-1993-y

Untangling the Complex Interplay between Social Isolation, Anorexia, Sarcopenia, and Mortality: Insights from a Longitudinal Study

H-Y Lin 1, Y-C Lin 1, Liang-Kung Chen 2,3,4, Fei-Yuan Hsiao 1,5,6
PMCID: PMC12880486  PMID: 37960901

Abstract

Background

Social isolation is a pervasive and debilitating condition that has adverse prognostic impacts. This condition often co-occurs with other geriatric syndromes, further exacerbating negative health outcomes. Given these considerations, the present study aims to elucidate the roles of social isolation in older adults with anorexia of aging and/or sarcopenia with respect to long-term mortality using a nationally representative cohort study.

Methods

Data were obtained from the Taiwan Longitudinal Study on Aging (TLSA), with a sample size of 3,762 study participants aged 50 years and older. Data from 1999 (wave 4) to 2015 (wave 9) were analyzed. The TLSA questionnaire was used to define social isolation, anorexia, and sarcopenia. Logistic regressions were employed to explore the associations between social isolation, anorexia, and sarcopenia. The Cox proportional hazard model was utilized to examine the synergistic effects of social isolation and anorexia or sarcopenia on 16-year all-cause mortality.

Results

After controlling for demographic information and comorbidities, older adults with social isolation were significantly associated with anorexia (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.46 [95% confidence interval: 1.00–2.12, p=0.0475]) and sarcopenia (aOR 1.35 [95% CI: 1.12–1.64, p=0.0021]). Furthermore, the synergistic effects of social isolation with anorexia (aOR 1.65 [95% CI: 1.25–2.18, p=0.0004]) or sarcopenia (aOR 1.65 [95% CI: 1.42–1.92, p<0.0001]) were both significantly associated with higher risks of all-cause mortality, while social isolation alone revealed borderline statistical significance.

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that social isolation is closely linked to anorexia and sarcopenia among middle-aged and older adults. Additionally, social isolation significantly exacerbates the long-term mortality risk associated with anorexia of aging and sarcopenia. However, social isolation alone appears to have borderline long-term mortality risk in this cohort. These findings underscore the importance of addressing social isolation in older adults with anorexia and/or sarcopenia to optimize their health outcomes and mitigate long-term mortality risk.

Key words: Social isolation, anorexia, anorexia ofaging, sarcopenia, mortality, Taiwan Longitudinal Study on Aging

Introduction

Social isolation has become a prominent and escalating concern in most developed countries (1), and is typified by limited social engagement and a dearth of familial and social contacts (2). Recent estimates suggest that the global prevalence of social isolation has reached a staggering 25% (3, 4), with the COVID-19 pandemic exacerbating its severity even further (5, 6). Studies have demonstrated that social isolation is linked to a host of adverse health outcomes, including poor psychological well-being, depression (7), cognitive decline (7, 8), and diminished quality of life (9) among middle-aged and older individuals. Epidemiological investigations have also identified associations between social isolation and a range of unfavorable physical outcomes, such as stroke, cardiovascular disease, and dementia (7, 10, 11, 12, 13). Notably, social isolation has been found to significantly increase the risk of hospitalizations and severity of anorexia nervosa among young individuals during the pandemic (14, 15), while people living alone were also reported to be at-risk of anorexia of aging (16). Furthermore, social isolation may synergistically act with other health risks to worsen the outcomes of older adults. In light of these findings, addressing social isolation in vulnerable populations is crucial for promoting health and well-being.

Anorexia of aging is a widely observed phenomenon among older adults, characterized by a decrease in appetite and/or food intake (17, 18, 19, 20), that affects more than 10% of older individuals living in the community (21). The regulation of appetite and dietary intake is a complex process that may be influenced by a range of factors throughout the lifespan (22). Additionally, physiological changes such as gustatory function degeneration or alterations in gastrointestinal motility and metabolic factors (e.g., hormones, inflammatory mediators, and gut dysbiosis) may contribute to reduced food intake (23, 24, 25, 26). Prior research has established a link between anorexia of aging and negative health outcomes, including inferior quality of life, sarcopenia, and reduced survival (17). Moreover, diminished dietary intake may result in decreased physical activity and muscle mass, leading to complications such as sarcopenia, frailty, and mortality (16, 17, 21, 27, 28). On the other hand, sarcopenia, characterized by the loss of skeletal muscle and muscle strength and/or reduced physical performance (29, 30), has emerged as a major public health challenge in rapidly aging societies (31, 32). The prevalence of sarcopenia ranges from 7.3% to 12.0% (29) in different settings, and it significantly increased the risk for mortality (33), falls (34), functional declines, and healthcare utilization (35, 36, 37).

Prior research has highlighted the association between social isolation and all-cause mortality (2, 38); however, given that social isolation frequently co-occurs with other geriatric conditions such as anorexia or sarcopenia, a more comprehensive approach is necessary to disentangle the complex interplay between these factors. To address this gap in knowledge, the present study employs a nationally representative 16-year cohort design to examine the associations between social isolation and anorexia of aging or sarcopenia, as well as the potential synergistic effects of these conditions on the long-term risk of all-cause mortality rates among community-dwelling middle-aged and older adults.

Materials and Methods

Participants

Data of this study were retrieved from the Taiwan Longitudinal Study of Aging (TLSA), an ongoing nationally representative survey initiated by the Health Promotion Administration (HPA), Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW), Taiwan. The TLSA, which was first conducted in 1989 with follow-up interviews every 3–4 years, provides a comprehensive assessment of physical, functional, and mental health, as well as demographic and household information via face-to-face household interviews. Originally designed for adults aged 65 and above, the TLSA expanded its sample to include adults aged 50 and above in 1996 to better capture the aging process. Detailed designs of the TLSA are described on the website of the HPA (39) and in previously published studies (40, 41, 42).

The present study drew its sample from the 1999 survey of the TLSA, comprising both the original and refresh samples of the study initiated in 1989. Participants with incomplete demographic information (n=41), missing data on social isolation (n=48), or inadequate measurements of anorexia of aging or sarcopenia (n=276) were excluded. Additionally, those with alternative respondents (n=313) were also excluded. Following the exclusion criteria, a total of 3,762 participants were included in our final study cohort. A schematic depiction of the study subject selection process is presented in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Study flowchart

Assessment of social isolation

The determination of social isolation status in our study was established based on the Steptoe social isolation index (2, 43), a well-established metric employed in previous studies (2, 38, 43, 44). The Steptoe social isolation index captures five domains of social isolation, including 1) marital status or cohabitation, 2) frequency of contact with children, 3) frequency of contact with other family members, 4) frequency of contact with friends, and 5) participation in social clubs or groups, and the responses were obtained from the TLSA questionnaires. For each item, participants who reported marriage status other than married or cohabiting, contacts with children and grandchildren/family/friends less than 1 time per month, or no participation in any clubs or groups were scored 0, and the remaining participants were scored 1. The total score of social isolation ranged from 0 to 5, and those who scored 2 points or more (the top quintile) were categorized as socially isolated.

Anorexia of aging

Anorexia of aging (17, 18, 19, 20), a prevalent condition affecting older adults, has been defined as a decline in either appetite or food intake. To assess this condition, the nutrition section of the TLSA 1999 questionnaire utilized two self-reported items. To evaluate appetite, participants were asked, “Generally speaking, what do you think about your appetite?” with response options of “good,” “on and off,” or “bad.” Similarly, to evaluate food intake, participants were asked, “Has your food intake increased or decreased significantly recently?” with response options of “no change,” “increase significantly,” or “decrease significantly.” Participants who responded with “bad” for appetite or “decrease significantly” for food intake were classified as having anorexia of aging.

Sarcopenia

The SARC-CalF (≥ 11 points) (45), which combines the SARC-F questionnaire with calf circumference measurements (45, 46), was adopted in this study to define sarcopenia. Each of the five items from SARC-F was rated on a scale of 0, 1, or 2, based on the level of difficulty experienced by the participant. In addition, a calf circumference below the cut-off (female: ≤33 cm, male: ≤34 cm) was scored as 10, whereas a circumference above the cut-off (female: >33 cm, male: >34 cm) was scored as 0. In this study, we replaced two elements in the original SARC-CalF questionnaire with questions available in the TLSA1999. Specifically, for muscle strength, “lifting and carrying 10 pounds (about 4.5 kilograms)” was substituted with “lifting and carrying 1.2 kilograms”, while for climbing stairs, “climbing a flight of 10 stairs” was replaced with “climbing to the 2nd or 3rd floor”. The total score of SARC-CalF ranged from 0 to 20, and a score of ≥11 points was used to identify sarcopenia in this study.

All-cause mortality

The survival status of study subjects was retrieved from the mortality database of TLSA, which was linked to the Household Registration and Conscription Information System of the Ministry of Interiors (MOI) and the death certificate report system of MOHW. All TLSA participants were recorded as 1) alive, 2) deceased, and 3) survival status unknown or emigration in the database and updated concurrently in each follow-up survey. In the event that a subject's survival status was unknown in 2015, the latest record of being alive was considered the censored time.

Sociodemographic variables and comorbidities

Sociodemographic variables including age (stratified as 50–64, 65–74, 75–84, 85+ years), gender, marital status (married/cohabiting, widowed, divorced/separated/never married), education level (illiterate, primary, junior/senior high/college), residence area (large city, small city/township, country/rural area), current smoking, current alcohol use, and physical activity were collected from the questionnaires for each participant. Self-reported chronic conditions, including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, heart disease, stroke, cancer/malignant tumor, arthritis/rheumatism, gastric ulcer/stomach ailment, liver/gallbladder disease, and renal disease, were meticulously recorded, and the cumulative number of self-reported conditions was subsequently calculated. Frailty was also captured and defined according to the Fried criteria. Individuals who exhibited at least three of five traits (i.e. weight loss, exhaustion, low physical activity, slowness, and weakness) were considered frail. Individuals meeting only one or two of the five traits of the Fried frailty criteria were regarded as prefrail (47).

Statistical analysis

In the initial phase of this investigation, the baseline sociodemographic variables and comorbidities were compared between subjects with and without social isolation using the Chi-square test. The study then employed multivariate logistic regression models to explore the associations between social isolation and anorexia of aging or sarcopenia, respectively, after adjusting for relevant confounding factors, such as age, sex, education level, residence area, smoking behavior, drinking behavior, and self-reported chronic conditions. Both unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were presented with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Subsequently, in the second stage, the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank tests was applied to assess the all-cause mortality in the 16-year follow-up period, examining the individual or synergistic effects of social isolation and either anorexia of aging or sarcopenia. This involved examining various combinations of social isolation and anorexia of aging (i.e., social isolation (−)/anorexia of aging (−); social isolation (+)/ anorexia of aging (−); social isolation (−)/anorexia of aging (+); social isolation (+)/anorexia of aging (+)) or sarcopenia (i.e., social isolation (−)/sarcopenia (−); social isolation (+)/sarcopenia (−); social isolation (−)/sarcopenia (+); social isolation (+)/ sarcopenia (+)). Finally, multivariate logistic regression models were utilized to examine these associations while adjusting for the relevant variables. Model 1 only considered age and gender, while model 2 included all covariates except for marital status and physical activity. In addition, we undertaken analyses to look into the impacts of different combinations of social isolation, anorexia of aging, and sarcopenia on mortality.

The study employed a two-tailed p-value <0.05 as the level of statistical significance for all analyses. All the data processing and statistical analysis were carried out using SAS, version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC).

Results

Baseline characteristics

A total of 3,762 study subjects (53.1% males) were included that 1442 (38.3%) of them were categorized as social isolation. Table 1 summarizes the sociodemographic variables and self-reported chronic conditions of our study subjects, stratified by social isolation status. Subjects with social isolation were older than those without social isolation. Compared to those without social isolation, those with social isolation were older (aged 65+, 74.8 vs. 54.7%), more likely to be women (54.6 vs. 42.1%), illiterate (35.0 vs. 26.7%), living in urban communities (35.5 vs. 21.6%), no marriage or cohabiting partners (59.0 vs. 12.7%), having hypertension (35.4 vs. 30.5%), heart disease (19.1 vs. 15.6%), stroke (6.0 vs. 3.3%), or more chronic conditions (3+, 17.8 vs. 13.9%), and more likely to be frail (30.3 vs. 14.6%). Moreover, study subjects with social isolation were less likely to be current smokers (21.2 vs. 26.2%), alcohol users (20.5 vs. 28.1%), and to do physical activities (57.8 vs. 61.9%).

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics; stratified by status of social isolation

Without Social Isolation With Social Isolation p-value
N 2320 (61.67) 1442 (38.33)
Age
50-64 1051 (45.30) 363 (25.17) <.0001
65-74 849 (36.59) 525 (36.41)
75-84 387 (16.68) 469 (32.52)
85+ 33 (1.42) 85 (5.89)
Sex
Male 1344 (57.93) 655 (45.42) <.0001
Female 976 (42.07) 787 (54.58)
Marital
Married or cohabiting 2026 (87.33) 591 (40.98) <.0001
Widowed 280 (12.07) 679 (47.09)
Divorced / separated / never married 14 (0.60) 172 (11.93)
Education
Illiterate 620 (26.72) 505 (35.02) <.0001
Primary 1130 (48.71) 621 (43.07)
Junior / senior high / college 570 (24.57) 316 (21.91)
Residence area
Large city 500 (21.55) 512 (35.51) <.0001
Small city / township 1013 (43.66) 596 (41.33)
Country / rural area 807 (34.78) 334 (23.16)
Lifestyle behaviors
Current smoker 607 (26.16) 305 (21.15) 0.0005
Current alcohol use 652 (28.10) 296 (20.53) <.0001
Physical activity 1437 (61.94) 834 (57.84) 0.0124
Self-reported chronic conditions
Hypertension 708 (30.52) 510 (35.37) 0.0020
Diabetes 293 (12.63) 210 (14.56) 0.0902
Heart disease 362 (15.60) 275 (19.07) 0.0058
Stroke 77 (3.32) 87 (6.03) <.0001
Cancer or malignant tumor 62 (2.67) 39 (2.70) 0.9527
Arthritis or rheumatism 457 (19.70) 277 (19.21) 0.7130
Gastric ulcer or stomach ailment 441 (19.01) 282 (19.56) 0.6786
Liver or gall bladder disease 170 (7.33) 114 (7.91) 0.5140
Renal disease 182 (7.84) 111 (7.70) 0.8699
Number of self-reported chronic conditions
0 817 (35.22) 473 (32.80) 0.0101
1 733 (31.59) 429 (29.75)
2 447 (19.27) 283 (19.63)
3+ 323 (13.92) 257 (17.82)
Frailty
0 (fit) 694 (29.91) 239 (16.57) <.0001
1 (pre-frail) 924 (39.83) 449 (31.14)
2 (pre-frail) 342 (14.74) 300 (20.80)
3+ (frail) 338 (14.57) 437 (30.31)

* Data were shown as number (percentage), and the Chi-square test was used for comparisons between groups

Associations between social isolation and anorexia of aging and sarcopenia

The associations between social isolation and anorexia of aging analyzed by multivariate logistic regressions were presented in Table 2. In the unadjusted model, participants with social isolation were significantly associated with anorexia of aging (OR 1.80 [1.28–2.53]). After adjusting for covariates, both the model 1 (considering only age and gender) and model 2 (all covariates except for marital status and physical activity) indicated that social isolation was associated with a 40% increase in risk of anorexia of aging (aOR 1.44 [1.00–2.06] and 1.46 [1.00–2.12]). Similar results were found in the the associations between social isolation and sarcopenia (Table 2). The logistic regression model revealed social isolation was significantly associated with sarcopenia in the unadjusted model (OR 2.13 [1.81–2.52]), as well as adjusted models (model 1: aOR 1.28 [1.07-1.54], model 2: aOR 1.35 [1.12–1.64]).

Table 2.

The associations of social isolation with anorexia of aging or sarcopenia

Ref.: Without social isolation OR (95% CI) p-value
Anorexia of aging
Unadjusted model 1.80 (1.28–2.53) 0.0008
Adjusted model 1 (age, gender) 1.44 (1.00–2.06) 0.0482
Adjusted model 2 (age, gender, demographic#, comorbidities❡) 1.46 (1.00–2.12) 0.0475
Sarcopenia
Unadjusted model 2.13 (1.81–2.52) <.0001
Adjusted model 1 (age, gender) 1.28 (1.07–1.54) 0.0083
Adjusted model 2 (age, gender, demographic#, comorbidities❡) 1.35 (1.12–1.64) 0.0021

# Education level, residence area, current smoker, current alcohol use; ❡ Hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, stroke, cancer or malignant tumor, arthritis or rheumatism, gastric ulcer or stomach ailment, liver or gall bladder disease, renal disease

Social isolation, and/or anorexia of aging on mortality at 16-year of follow-up

The present study further classified participants into two-by-two groups based on their social isolation and anorexia of aging status. Specifically, among all subjects, 2255 (59.9%) were categorized as «Neither» and were used as the reference group. Additionally, the remaining participants were divided into three other groups: «Only social isolation» (1371, 36.4%), «Only anorexia of aging» (65, 1.7%), and «Both (social isolation (+)/ anorexia of aging (+))» (71, 1.9%). Kaplan-Meier survival curves for each group were presented in Figure 2, and the corresponding odds ratios for all-cause mortality were reported in Table 3.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

16-year survival probability among groups of social isolation and anorexia of aging

Table 3.

16-year all-cause mortality risk among groups of social isolation and anorexia of aging

Ref.: Social isolation (-) / Anorexia of aging (-) (N=2255) OR (95% CI) p-value
Social isolation (+) / Anorexia of aging (−) (N=1371)
Unadjusted model 1.51 (1.38–1.65) <.0001
Adjusted model 1 (age, gender) 1.10 (1.00–1.21) 0.0491
Adjusted model 2 (age, gender, demographic#, comorbidities❡) 1.12 (1.01–1.23) 0.0261
Social isolation (−) / Anorexia of aging (+) (N=65)
Unadjusted model 1.84 (1.35–2.51) 0.0001
Adjusted model 1 (age, gender) 1.73 (1.27–2.37) 0.0006
Adjusted model 2 (age, gender, demographic#, comorbidities❡) 1.77 (1.29–2.42) 0.0004
Social isolation (+) / Anorexia of aging (+) (N=71)
Unadjusted model 2.87 (2.19–3.75) <.0001
Adjusted model 1 (age, gender) 1.87 (1.42–2.46) <.0001
1 Adjusted model 2 (age, gender, demographic#, comorbidities❡) 1.65 (1.25–2.18) 0.0004

# Education level, residence area, current smoker, current alcohol use; ❡ Hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, stroke, cancer or malignant tumor, arthritis or rheumatism, gastric ulcer or stomach ailment, liver or gall bladder disease, renal disease

In comparison to the «Neither» group, all groups exhibited noteworthy correlations with all-cause mortality, both before and after adjustments. Specifically, in Model 2 (as shown in Table 3), the «Only social isolation» group (aOR 1.12 [1.01–1.23]) displayed a higher risk of all-cause mortality than the «Neither» group but a lower risk than the other groups. Moreover, anorexia of aging was significantly associated with increased risks of all-cause mortality, regardless of the presence of social isolation («Only anorexia of aging»: aOR 1.77 [1.29–2.42], «Both social isolation and anorexia of aging»: aOR 1.65 [1.25–2.18]) (Table 3).

Social isolation, and/or sarcopenia on mortality at 16-year of follow-up

Within the study population, 1996 (53.1%) were identified as not having social isolation and sarcopenia, designated as the «Neither» group. Of the remaining participants, 1071 (28.5%) exhibited social isolation without sarcopenia and were categorized as «Only social isolation», while 324 (8.6%) presented with sarcopenia without social isolation and were classified as «Only sarcopenia». The remaining 371 (9.9%) participants exhibited both social isolation and sarcopenia, labeled as the «Both» group. The 16-year all-cause mortality rates for each group were presented in Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

16-year survival probability among groups of social isolation and sarcopenia

Table 4 outlined the associations between each group and all-cause mortality in comparison to the « Neither» group, which served as the reference category. All groups were linked to a higher risk of all-cause mortality prior to adjustments. After adjustments in model 2, participants classified under «Only social isolation» displayed an insignificant effect on the risk of mortality (aOR 1.09 [0.97–1.21]). However, those with sarcopenia only and those with co-existing social isolation and sarcopenia were significantly associated with all-cause mortality (aOR: «Only sarcopenia»: 1.40 [1.20–1.63], «Both»: 1.65 [1.42–1.92]).

Table 4.

16-year all-cause mortality risk among groups of social isolation and sarcopenia

Ref.: Social isolation (−) / Sarcopenia (−) (N=1996) OR (95% CI) p-value
Social isolation (+) /Sarcopenia (−) (N=1071)
Unadjusted model 1.44 (1.30–1.60) <.0001
Adjusted model 1 (age, gender) 1.08 (0.97–1.20) 0.1664
Adjusted model 2 (age, gender, demographic#, comorbidities❡) 1.09 (0.97–1.21) 0.1352
Social isolation (−) / Sarcopenia (+) (N=324)
Unadjusted model 1.93 (1.67–2.24) <.0001
Adjusted model 1 (age, gender) 1.48 (1.27–1.72) <.0001
Adjusted model 2 (age, gender, demographic#, comorbidities❡) 1.40 (1.20–1.63) <.0001
Social isolation (+) / Sarcopenia (+) (N=371)
Unadjusted model 2.73 (2.38–3.12) <.0001
Adjusted model 1 (age, gender) 1.74 (1.50–2.02) <.0001
Adjusted model 2 (age, gender, demographic#, comorbidities❡) 1.65 (1.42–1.92) <.0001

# Education level, residence area, current smoker, current alcohol use; ❡ Hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, stroke, cancer or malignant tumor, arthritis or rheumatism, gastric ulcer or stomach ailment, liver or gall bladder disease, renal disease

Combinations of social isolation, anorexia of aging, and sarcopenia with the impacts on mortality at 16-year of follow-up

We further classified participants into different combinations (Table 5). People with all three conditions have a highly increased risk of mortality (aOR 2.21 [95% CI 1.49–3.28], compared with no such conditions). Those with only sarcopenia (1.32 [1.12–1.55]) have a moderate increase in mortality, while those with only anorexia of aging (1.20 [0.73–1.97]) or only social isolation (1.07 [0.96–1.20]) showed insignificant results. However, those with both anorexia of aging and sarcopenia but without social isolation (3.00 [1.99–4.50]) have the highest mortality risk.

Table 5.

16-year all-cause mortality risk among combinations of social isolation, anorexia of aging, and sarcopenia

Ref.: Without any conditions (N=1965) OR (95% CI) p-value
Social isolation only (N=1031) 1.07 (0.96–1.20) 0.2183
Anorexia of aging only (N=31) 1.20 (0.73–1.97) 0.4754
Sarcopenia only (N=290) 1.32 (1.12–1.55) 0.0009
Social isolation + Anorexia of aging (N=40) 1.56 (1.07–2.27) 0.0209
Social isolation + Sarcopenia (N=340) 1.62 (1.39–1.90) <.0001
Anorexia of aging + Sarcopenia (N=34) 3.00 (1.99–4.50) <.0001
Social isolation + Anorexia of aging + Sarcopenia (N=31) 2.21 (1.49–3.28) <.0001

Adjusted by age, gender, demographic (education level, residence area, current smoker, current alcohol use) and comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, stroke, cancer or malignant tumor, arthritis or rheumatism, gastric ulcer or stomach ailment, liver or gall bladder disease, renal disease)

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study to report significant associations between social isolation and both anorexia of aging and sarcopenia in adults aged 50 and above in Taiwan. Additionally, we have identified potential synergistic effects of social isolation and anorexia of aging or sarcopenia on long-term (16-year) risk of mortality. Overall, our study provides valuable insights into the complex interplay between social isolation, anorexia of aging, sarcopenia, and long-term mortality in older adults, which has not been well explored previously.

Previous studies have reported associations between social isolation and mortality risks, albeit limited to younger population (14, 15). For instance, a study including adults above 50 years in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) (2) indicated that social isolation was associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality (aOR 1.26 [95% CI: 1.07–1.48, p=0.005]), even after adjustments with demographics and comorbidities. A study of older adults aged ≥60 years in the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS) also showed similar results (aOR 1.22 [95% CI: 1.18–1.25, p<0.01]). However, in our study, we found that social isolation was significantly associated with anorexia of aging and sarcopenia, in addition to being a risk factor for long-term mortality among middle-aged and older adults. It is worth noting that in the present study, the mean score of social isolation was 1.32±1.13, which was lower than that from the ELSA (1.6±1.4) (43). In this study, 38.3% of the study subjects were categorized as social isolation, and the high prevalence of social isolation was assumed to be affected by the socio-cultural context of Taiwan. In particular, as high as 51.0% of participants in our study reported no social participation (such as clubs or religious groups) and the distribution of scores thus became positively skewed.

Previous research has demonstrated that anorexia of aging (or poor appetite) is associated with reduced dietary intake and diversity, as well as an increased risk of sarcopenia, frailty (17, 21, 27, 28, 48, 49) or even mortality (50). Identifying anorexia of aging is therefore crucial for healthy aging, but the lack of a standardized tool for evaluation remains a challenge (51). The definition of anorexia of aging (50, 52, 53) currently utilizes the 4-item Simplified Nutritional Appetite Questionnaire (SNAQ) (54), with a score of ≤13 indicating anorexia of aging. The SNAQ was derived from the 8-item Council of Nutrition appetite questionnaire (CNAQ) and designed to identify individuals at high risk of significant weight loss (i.e., at least 5% weight loss within 6 months). A study (55) of healthy, community-dwelling older adults suggested a higher cutoff of SNAQ ≤15 to increase the sensitivity for anorexia detection and proposed a two-factor structure of the SNAQ, including the first two factors of 1) appetite and 2) satiety and intake. In our study, we employed 2 items from the TLSA questionnaires (appetite and food intake) to define anorexia of aging. Notably, the prevalence of anorexia of aging in our study was 3.6%, which was lower compared to a Japanese study among community-dwelling older people (9.8%) (21). This difference may be attributed to distinct algorithms for anorexia of aging definition and differences in the general health status of study participants. Our study defined anorexia of aging as a decrease in either appetite or dietary intake (17, 18, 19, 20) while the Japanese study adopted the algorithm of SNAQ score ≤13 to define anorexia of aging. Nevertheless, the ICFSR task force report (56) summarized distinct tools to assess appetite in older adults that could be useful under different circumstances. Multiple nutritional strategies against malnutrition were also recommended (i.e. modifying diet prescription, nutritional supplements, eating behaviors, culinary nutrition education programs or progressive resistance training) (16, 57, 58, 59, 60).

In our study, we adopted the SARC-Calf to define sarcopenia using calf circumferences to surrogate the measurements of muscle mass (61, 62, 63). A study enrolling community-dwelling older adults in China demonstrated that SARC-Calf had high specificity (94.7%) and acceptable sensitivity (60.7%) when using the AWGS criteria as the reference standard (64). The present study utilized the SARC-CalF to define sarcopenia, revealing a prevalence of 18.5%, which was higher than that observed in healthy community-dwelling older adults (65), but lower than that from daycare centers (66). As the first investigation examining the synergistic effects of social isolation and sarcopenia on adverse health outcomes, the definition of sarcopenia based on SARC-CalF was deemed satisfactory to investigate the associations in this study.

In the current study, it has come to light that individuals with both anorexia of aging and sarcopenia had the most elevated long-term mortality risk. Intriguingly, individuals with these conditions but without social isolation (3.00 [1.99–4.50]) showed higher mortality risks than those with all three conditions (2.21 [1.49–3.28]). One conjecture emanating from this scenario is that the cohort with anorexia of aging and sarcopenia but having social connections might encompass a distinct subgroup of dependent elderly relying on the support of family members, and those dependent individuals may have poorer survivals. This also serves as a reminder and prompts us to pay attention to the potentially divergent prognostic implications of these social connections or isolation across different populations, necessitating further research exploration.

In this study, we have not only illuminated the intricate associations between social isolation, anorexia of aging, and sarcopenia but have also unveiled distinctive risks in all-cause mortality among groups categorized by social isolation and anorexia of aging or sarcopenia. Our approach was strengthened by utilizing a nationally representative population-based cohort, which enabled us to examine long-term outcomes over a follow-up period of 16 years. However, despite our best efforts, some limitations still exist. Firstly, the definitions of anorexia of aging and sarcopenia were modified based on the available items of the TLSA questionnaire, but this remains the most viable approach to investigate the complex interrelationships of these conditions. Similar approaches have been employed in previous studies. Secondly, the assessment of social isolation was based on self-reported items, which could be influenced by psychosocial factors or recall bias. Nevertheless, this is a common limitation in population-based studies that rely on questionnaires and surveys, and our design and results are consistent with those of previous studies. Thirdly, we only focused on all-cause mortality as a longitudinal outcome in this study, and a wider range of outcomes such as incident depressive symptoms, cognitive impairment, and disabilities could be included in future research.

Conclusions

The results of this study demonstrate a significant association between social isolation and both anorexia of aging and sarcopenia in middle-aged and older adults residing in the community. Furthermore, our findings indicate that social isolation synergistically elevates the risk of anorexia of aging and sarcopenia, resulting in an increased risk of long-term mortality. To confirm these associations and explore the potential to modify adverse outcomes, further investigations and intervention studies are necessary.

Contributor Information

Liang-Kung Chen, Email: lkchen2@vghtpe.gov.tw.

Fei-Yuan Hsiao, Email: fyshsiao@ntu.edu.tw.

Conflict of Interest:

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical considerations:

This study was authorized by the institutional review board of the National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH-IRB; No. 202204025RINA), following the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki for research involving human subjects.

Funding Sources:

This research was funded by the Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST 110-2634-F-010-001), the Taiwan National Science and Technology Council (NSTC111-2622-8-A49-019-IE, NSTC112-2923-B-A49-002-MY2), and the Interdisciplinary Research Center for Healthy Longevity of National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University from The Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan. The funding source had no role in conducting this study, including study design, data collection and analysis, manuscript preparation and review, and the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

References


Articles from The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES