Skip to main content
Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics logoLink to Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics
. 2026 Jan 10;29(1):60–64. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_963_25

A cross-sectional metagenomic analysis of the microbial ecology in symptomatic apical periodontitis – An in vivo study

Abhay Shaji 1, Anil Kumar Ramachandran 1, Nirmala Chandrasekaran 1,, Karumaran Chellasamy Savarimalai 1, Rabiathul Adhira 1
PMCID: PMC12880783  PMID: 41660022

Abstract

Background:

Symptomatic apical periodontitis (SAP) is a painful inflammatory disease driven by root canal infection. A detailed understanding of its microbial ecology, compared to a noninfectious baseline, is needed.

Aims:

This study aimed to characterize the microbial ecology of SAP using 16S ribosomal (RNA) 16S rRNA metagenomic sequencing and compare it to control teeth undergoing root canal treatment after trauma.

Materials and Methods:

This cross-sectional study included 10 patients with SAP and 10 control patients. Pulpal samples were collected aseptically. Microbial DNA was extracted, and the full-length 16S rRNA gene was sequenced through Oxford Nanopore Technology. Analysis was performed using QIIME2.

Statistical Analysis Used:

Microbial abundances and diversity indices were compared using an independent samples t-test or Mann–Whitney U-test (P < 0.05 significant).

Results:

The SAP microbiome was dysbiotic and enriched in anaerobes. Veillonella parvula was highly abundant in SAP (mean 13.1%) but absent in controls. Species like Dialister pneumosintes and Prevotella melaninogenica were found almost exclusively in SAP. Commensals including Faecalibacterium prausnitzii were significantly reduced.

Conclusion:

SAP is associated with a distinct microbial signature defined by the enrichment of anaerobic pathobionts and a loss of commensals, revealing a polymicrobial, dysbiotic community.

Keywords: 16S ribosomal RNA, metagenomics, microbiota, periapical periodontitis

INTRODUCTION

Apical periodontitis (AP) is a prevalent inflammatory disease of the periapical tissues, primarily caused by microbial infection of the root canal system.[1,2] It is a frequent sequela of dental caries, pulp necrosis, or trauma and can be classified as symptomatic AP (SAP) or asymptomatic AP based on clinical presentation.[3] SAP is characterized by spontaneous pain, tenderness to percussion, and radiographic evidence of a periapical radiolucency, often reflecting an acute inflammatory response.[4]

The microbiota associated with AP is complex and polymicrobial, dominated by anaerobic bacteria.[5] Traditional culture-based techniques have provided a foundational understanding but fail to capture the full diversity of these communities, particularly fastidious or unculturable species.[6] While molecular methods such as polymerase chain reaction improved detection, they are limited by primer specificity.[7] The advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) has revolutionized this field, enabling comprehensive, culture-independent analysis and revealing unprecedented microbial diversity in endodontic infections.[8,9]

A key concept in understanding these infections is microbial ecology, which emphasizes the complex interactions within the community and with the host, influencing both pathogenesis and treatment outcomes.[10] The root canal, as a necrotic, low-oxygen environment, selects for a specialized anaerobic microbiome where certain “keystone” species can disproportionately drive dysbiosis and inflammation.[11]

While NGS studies have advanced our knowledge, the application of long-read sequencing (e.g., Oxford Nanopore Technology) for high-resolution, species-level profiling of the SAP microbiome remains limited. A detailed characterization of the SAP microbiota is needed to identify the specific microbial drivers of acute symptoms. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the microbial ecology of SAP in adult permanent teeth using Oxford Nanopore-based full-length 16S ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA) sequencing and compare it to a noninfectious control baseline. The scope of this work was to establish baseline data on the microbial diversity and dominant taxa involved in SAP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design

This was a cross-sectional in vivo clinical study.

Ethical considerations

The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the institutional ethics committee. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to their enrollment.

Setting

The study was conducted in a private dental college and hospital. Patient recruitment and sample collection took place between June 2, 2025, and September 30, 2025.

Participants

A total of 20 adult patients were enrolled and divided into two groups:

  • Group I (control, n = 10): Patients with permanent teeth indicated for intentional root canal treatment following acute trauma, representing a noninfectious, baseline state

  • Group II (SAP, n = 10): Patients with permanent teeth clinically and radiographically diagnosed with SAP. Diagnosis was based on spontaneous pain, tenderness to percussion, and radiographic evidence of periapical radiolucency.

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria were adult patients (aged ≥18 years), teeth meeting the above group criteria, and no antibiotic use within the past 3 months.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria included pediatric patients, systemic diseases (e.g., diabetes and immunocompromised conditions), previous endodontic treatment, endo-perio lesions, and pregnant or lactating women. All consecutive patients who met the inclusion criteria and provided informed consent were enrolled.

Variables

The primary outcome variables were the relative abundance and diversity of the root canal microbiome, measured through 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The primary exposure variables were the clinical disease state, categorized as either “control” (trauma) or “SAP.”

Data sources/measurement

Sample collection

Under strict asepsis, teeth were isolated with a rubber dam. The operative field was disinfected with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite. After access opening with a sterile bur (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), pulpal tissue remnants were collected using sterile broaches (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland). The samples were transferred into sterile tubes containing lysis and binding and elution buffers provided in the UltraNucleo Genomic DNA Isolation Kit (Canvax Biotech S.L., Córdoba, Spain) and immediately stored at −80°C.

DNA sequencing and analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted from the clinical samples using the UltraNucleo Genomic DNA Isolation Kit (Canvax Biotech S.L., Córdoba, Spain) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The full-length 16S rRNA gene (~1500 bp) was amplified using universal bacterial primers 27F (5’- AGA GTT TGA TCC TGG CTC AG-3’) and 1492R (5’- ACG GCT ACC TTG TTA CGA CTT-3’). Library preparation was performed using the SQK-LSK114 ligation sequencing kit (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK), and sequencing was carried out on a MinION Mk1C device (Oxford Nanopore Technologies). The resulting sequences were processed and analyzed using the QIIME2 pipeline for taxonomic classification.

Bias

To minimize bias and contamination, stringent aseptic protocols were followed during sample collection, including rubber dam isolation and surface disinfection. To prevent selection bias, consecutive eligible patients were enrolled. To account for confounding, patients with recent antibiotic use or systemic conditions known to alter the microbiome were excluded. The use of a control group (trauma teeth) allowed for a direct comparison to a noninfectious baseline.

Study size

The sample size was calculated a priori using G*Power software (version 3.1.9.7 - developed by Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, 2020). Based on an expected medium effect size (d = 0.8), with an alpha error of 0.05 and a power of 80%, a total sample size of 20 (10 per group) was determined to be sufficient for statistical comparisons.

Quantitative variables

The primary quantitative variables were the relative abundances of microbial taxa (from phylum to species level), expressed as percentages. Alpha diversity indices (e.g., Shannon and Chao1) were treated as continuous variables. These variables were derived directly from the QIIME2 output and were used in subsequent statistical analyses without further transformation or grouping.

Statistical methods

Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 26.0, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The normality of data distribution for continuous variables was assessed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Shapiro–Wilk tests. For comparing microbial abundances and diversity indices between the two groups, the independent samples t-test was used for normally distributed data, and the Mann–Whitney U-test was used for nonnormally distributed data. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant. No data were missing for the primary microbial analysis of the 20 included samples.

RESULTS

Participants

During the recruitment period, a total of 28 patients were assessed for eligibility. Of these, eight were excluded (five did not meet the inclusion criteria, and three traumatized, declined to participate). A final cohort of 20 participants was enrolled and allocated equally into the two groups. All 20 participants completed the study, and all collected samples yielded sufficient DNA for sequencing and were included in the final analysis, resulting in no missing data.

Descriptive data

The study included 20 patients (13 males and 7 females) with a mean age of 40.1 years. Age-wise, two participants were aged 18–27 years (10%), seven were aged 28–37 years (35%), eight were aged 38–47 years (40%), and three were aged 48–57 years (15%).

Microbial composition and diversity

The most abundant classification in the control group was unclassified bacteria (mean –46.47%), followed by commensals such as Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (6.43%) and Lautropia mirabilis (8.18%) [Table 1]. In stark contrast, the SAP microbiome was characterized by a significant enrichment of the anaerobe Veillonella parvula (mean 13.1%), which was entirely absent in controls [Table 2]. Other taxa, such as Dialister pneumosintes, Leptotrichia wadei, and Prevotella melaninogenica, were exclusively or predominantly found in SAP samples. Several commensal species, including Escherichia coli, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Streptococcus agalactiae, were significantly reduced in the SAP group.

Table 1.

The abundance of bacterial species at species level in Group I (control)

Bacterial species Control, mean±SD SAP, mean±SD P Note
Veillonella parvula 0.0±0.0 13.1±2.5 <0.001 Exclusive to SAP
Segatella copri 5.4±2.1 10.9±1.8 0.003 Enriched in SAP
Leptotrichia wadei 0.0±0.0 3.5±0.9 <0.001 Exclusive to SAP
Dialister pneumosintes 0.0±0.0 0.5±0.3 0.012 Exclusive to SAP
Prevotella melaninogenica 0.0±0.0 0.8±0.4 0.008 Exclusive to SAP
Haemophilus parainfluenzae 0.4±0.6 3.3±2.1 0.005 Enriched in SAP
Streptococcus thermophilus 0.1±0.1 2.0±1.1 0.001 Enriched in SAP
Faecalibacterium prausnitzii 6.4±1.8 2.3±1.0 0.005 Depleted in SAP
Lautropia mirabilis 8.2±3.5 1.1±0.2 0.002 Depleted in SAP
Neisseria gonorrhoeae 4.4±1.9 0.5±0.3 0.001 Depleted in SAP
Streptococcus agalactiae 4.3±2.7 1.1±0.3 0.010 Depleted in SAP

SAP: Symptomatic apical periodontitis, SD: Standard deviation

Table 2.

The abundance of bacterial species at species level in Group II (symptomatic apical periodontitis)

Taxonomic level/Group Control, mean±SD SAP, mean±SD P
Phylum: Bacillota 8.8±3.2 43.5±5.1 <0.001
Phylum: Pseudomonadota 25.8±6.1 5.9±2.3 <0.001
Phylum: Fusobacteria 0.0±0.0 6.9±1.8 <0.001
Class: Negativicutes 3.0±1.5 37.9±4.7 <0.001

SAP: Symptomatic apical periodontitis, SD: Standard deviation

Statistical comparisons of key taxa

Multiple species showed statistically significant differences in abundance between the groups (P < 0.05). Species that were significantly enriched in SAP included V. parvula, L. wadei, D. pneumosintes, Haemophilus parainfluenzae, and several Streptococcus species. Species that were significantly depleted in SAP included F. prausnitzii, N. gonorrhoeae, and Agathobacter rectalis.

Community-level shifts

The dysbiotic shift was evident at higher taxonomic levels. SAP samples demonstrated a marked increase in the phylum Bacillota (Firmicutes), which surged to 43.46% compared to 8.82% in controls. Concurrently, the phylum Pseudomonadota declined sharply from 25.81% in controls to 5.94% in SAP. The class Negativicutes was significantly increased in SAP (37.9%) compared to controls (2.98%). Fusobacteriota, absent in controls, emerged in SAP with a mean abundance of 6.89%.

DISCUSSION

This study used full-length 16S rRNA sequencing to provide a high-resolution taxonomic profile of the microbial ecology in SAP. Our findings strongly support the concept that SAP represents a polymicrobial dysbiosis, characterized by a significant shift from a diverse community in controls to one dominated by specific anaerobic pathobionts.

The control group’s microbiota, though not sterile, included species like Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, a commensal with known anti-inflammatory properties,[12] alongside other oral residents. This baseline diversity is consistent with other NGS studies of root canal microbiota.[13,14] In stark contrast, the SAP microbiome was markedly enriched with opportunistic anaerobes. A dominant finding was the profound abundance of V. parvula, which was entirely absent in controls. V. parvula is a lactate-fermenter known for its role in early biofilm formation and metabolic synergy with other bacteria like streptococci, which can exacerbate virulence and sustain periapical inflammation.[15]

Other taxa were exclusively or predominantly detected in SAP, underscoring a community-level shift. D. pneumosintes, detected only in SAP, is a recognized endodontic pathogen noted for its association with symptoms and resistance to intracanal medicaments.[16] Similarly, the significant enrichment of L. wadei and P. melaninogenica, both linked to refractory infections and abscesses, highlights a consortium tailored for persistence in an inflamed, hypoxic environment.[5,9] The detection of such a wide range of taxa, including Actinomyces and Streptococcus species, aligns with the complex communities reported in both primary and persistent endodontic infections.[17,18] Concurrently, commensal species such as L. mirabilis were significantly depleted, completing the picture of a dysbiotic state defined by both pathogen enrichment and commensal loss.

This taxonomic shift implies significant functional consequences. The enriched anaerobic bacteria are metabolically specialized for low-oxygen environments and often produce virulence factors such as proteases and short-chain fatty acids (e.g., butyrate and succinate) that can directly exacerbate tissue destruction and immune evasion.[11,19] The co-detection of typically gut-associated species such as Megasphaera elsdenii and Segatella hominis, albeit in low abundance, hints at possible microbial translocation into the inflammatory root canal niche, a phenomenon warranting further investigation.[20]

Our findings align with a modern ecological understanding of endodontic disease, moving beyond a focus on single pathogens like Enterococcus faecalis.[21,22] While E. faecalis remains a significant pathogen in refractory cases, its role in primary symptomatic infections like those studied here may be less prominent, as demonstrated by its low abundance and the dominance of other taxa such as Veillonella and Dialister. Our results, powered by high-resolution sequencing, contribute to a more nuanced view of the pathogenic consortia in SAP.[23] Instead, SAP appears to be driven by a dynamic, interactive microbial network. The consistent presence of organisms such as D. pneumosintes and V. parvula could serve as potential biomarkers for disease severity. It is important to note that our methodological choices define the scope of our findings. The 16S rRNA sequencing used here excels at taxonomic identification, especially with full-length reads for species-level accuracy, but it provides a functional profile of the community.[24] For a true functional understanding, techniques like Metatranscriptomics, which sequence RNA to reveal actively expressed genes, are required.[25]

This study has limitations. Its cross-sectional design provides only a single snapshot in time. Future research should adopt longitudinal designs and incorporate functional metagenomic approaches. This will help connect the microbial signatures we identified to their active role in disease progression and the host response.

CONCLUSION

This in vivo metagenomic analysis defines a distinct dysbiotic microbiome associated with SAP. The SAP community was characterized by a marked enrichment of anaerobic pathobionts and a significant loss of commensal species. V. parvula emerged as a dominant, potential keystone organism, entirely absent in controls. The exclusive presence of D. pneumosintes and significant enrichment of other inflammation-driving taxa such as L. wadei and P. melaninogenica highlight a pathogenic consortium optimized for persistence in the root canal environment. These findings confirm that SAP is a manifestation of a polymicrobial dysbiotic ecosystem, reinforcing the importance of microbial ecology in understanding endodontic disease pathogenesis.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Funding Statement

Nil.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Mujawar A, Hegde V, Srilatha S. A retrospective three-dimensional assessment of the prevalence of apical periodontitis and quality of root canal treatment in Mid-West Indian population. J Conserv Dent. 2021;24:184–9. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_44_21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tibúrcio-Machado CS, Michelon C, Zanatta FB, Gomes MS, Marin JA, Bier CA. The global prevalence of apical periodontitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Endod J. 2021;54:712–35. doi: 10.1111/iej.13467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gomes BP, Herrera DR. Etiologic role of root canal infection in apical periodontitis and its relationship with clinical symptomatology. Braz Oral Res. 2018;32:e69. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nair RR, Nayak M, Prasada LK, Nair AV, Soman D, Krishnan RH. PCR-based detection of three anaerobic bacteria associated with endodontic-periodontic lesions in type-2 diabetic and nondiabetic subjects. J Conserv Dent. 2019;22:430–5. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_326_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Siqueira JF, Jr, Rôças IN. Present status and future directions: Microbiology of endodontic infections. Int Endod J. 2022;55(Suppl 3):512–30. doi: 10.1111/iej.13677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ordinola-Zapata R, Costalonga M, Nixdorf D, Dietz M, Schuweiler D, Lima BP, et al. Taxonomic abundance in primary and secondary root canal infections. Int Endod J. 2023;56:278–88. doi: 10.1111/iej.13864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pérez-Cobas AE, Gomez-Valero L, Buchrieser C. Metagenomic approaches in microbial ecology: An update on whole-genome and marker gene sequencing analyses. Microb Genom. 2020;6:e000409. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhang L, Chen F, Zeng Z, Xu M, Sun F, Yang L, et al. Advances in metagenomics and its application in environmental microorganisms. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:766364. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.766364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ordinola-Zapata R, Costalonga M, Dietz M, Fares C, Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Jr, et al. The root canal microbiome: Diversity and function. A whole-metagenome shotgun analysis. Int Endod J. 2024;57:872–84. doi: 10.1111/iej.13911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Georgiou AC, Brandt BW, van der Waal SV. Next steps in studying host-microbiome interactions in apical periodontitis. Front Oral Health. 2023;4:1309170. doi: 10.3389/froh.2023.1309170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hajishengallis G, Lamont RJ. Polymicrobial communities in periodontal disease: Their quasi-organismal nature and dialogue with the host. Periodontol 2000. 2021;86:210–30. doi: 10.1111/prd.12371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gupta R, Sharma D, Mathur M, Pooja B, Bishnoi R. Antibacterial activity of root canal sealers against established monospecies biofilm: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent Endod. 2023;26:569–73. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_37_23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.de Brito LC, Doolittle-Hall J, Lee CT, Moss K, Bambirra Júnior W, Tavares WL, et al. The apical root canal system microbial communities determined by next-generation sequencing. Sci Rep. 2020;10:10932. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67828-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Vengerfeldt V, Špilka K, Saag M, Preem JK, Oopkaup K, Truu J, et al. Highly diverse microbiota in dental root canals in cases of apical periodontitis (data of illumina sequencing) J Endod. 2014;40:1778–83. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.06.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Boisen G, Davies JR, Neilands J. Acid tolerance in early colonizers of oral biofilms. BMC Microbiol. 2021;21:45. doi: 10.1186/s12866-021-02089-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nóbrega LM, Montagner F, Ribeiro AC, Mayer MA, Gomes BP. Molecular identification of cultivable bacteria from infected root canals associated with acute apical abscess. Braz Dent J. 2016;27:318–24. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201600715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lee LW, Lee YL, Hsiao SH, Lin HP. Bacteria in the apical root canals of teeth with apical periodontitis. J Formos Med Assoc. 2017;116:448–56. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2016.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sánchez-Sanhueza G, Bello-Toledo H, González-Rocha G, Gonçalves AT, Valenzuela V, Gallardo-Escárate C. Metagenomic study of bacterial microbiota in persistent endodontic infections using next-generation sequencing. Int Endod J. 2018;51:1336–48. doi: 10.1111/iej.12953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nóbrega LM, Montagner F, Ribeiro AC, Mayer MA, Gomes BP. Bacterial diversity of symptomatic primary endodontic infection by clonal analysis. Braz Oral Res. 2016;30:e103. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.0103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sun X, Yang Z, Nie Y, Hou B. Microbial communities in the extraradicular and intraradicular infections associated with persistent apical periodontitis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:798367. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.798367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sharma J, Jhamb S, Mehta M, Bhushan J, Bhardwaj SB, Kaur A. Prevalence of Enterococcus faecalis in refractory endodontic infections: A microbiological study. J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025;28:462–7. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_871_24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Preethee T, Kandaswamy D, Hannah R. Molecular identification of an Enterococcus faecalis endocarditis antigen efaA in root canals of therapy-resistant endodontic infections. J Conserv Dent. 2012;15:319–22. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.101886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sharma J, Jhamb S, Mehta M, Bhushan J, Bhardwaj SB, Kaur A. Characterization of Enterococcus faecalis associated with root canal failures: Virulence and resistance profile. J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025;28:602–6. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_190_25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Anyansi C, Straub TJ, Manson AL, Earl AM, Abeel T. Computational methods for strain-level microbial detection in colony and metagenome sequencing data. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:1925. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Jorth P, Turner KH, Gumus P, Nizam N, Buduneli N, Whiteley M. Metatranscriptomics of the human oral microbiome during health and disease. mBio. 2014;5:e01012–14. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01012-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES