Skip to main content
Environmental Microbiome logoLink to Environmental Microbiome
. 2026 Jan 14;21:25. doi: 10.1186/s40793-026-00852-4

Modern microbialites harbor an undescribed diversity of chromerid algae

Anthony M Bonacolta 1,, Patrick J Keeling 1
PMCID: PMC12888705  PMID: 41530889

Abstract

Background

Chromerid algae are the closest photosynthetic relatives of apicomplexan parasites. While chromerids have been central to understanding the evolutionary transition from free-living algae to parasitism within Apicomplexa, their ecology remains poorly understood. Although often considered coral-associated symbionts, emerging evidence suggests this link is incidental and that chromerids may be more broadly associated with calcium carbonate environments, including microbialites. These microbial structures represent modern analogues of ancient reef-like ecosystems but are difficult to study due to their rarity and protected status as world heritage sites. Prokaryotic members of the microbialite microbiome have been studied at length, while the microeukaryotes associated with these environments have gone mostly ignored. To further investigate the link between microbialites and chromerid algae, we re-analyzed previously published microbialite sequencing data with the aim of investigating chromerid diversity and distribution.

Results

Through a novel plastid-focused metagenomic binning workflow combined with re-analysis of rRNA metabarcoding data, we reveal that chromerid algae are consistent associates of microbialites across diverse marine and freshwater environments worldwide. Most notably, we report the first recovery of plastid genomes from microbialite-associated chromerids: a complete Vitrella brassicaformis plastid genome and a second, partial plastid genome from a previously undescribed Chromera-related lineage in Highborne Cay thrombolites. This partial plastid genome contained photosystem genes, confirming this novel Chromera-related lineage as a photosynthetic chromerid. These findings not only expand the known ecological and biogeographic range of chromerids but also provide evidence for their overlooked diversity.

Conclusions

Our analyses prove that this overlooked algal lineage is not found exclusively associated with corals, but instead occurs across a wide range of microbialite habitats, including those found in freshwater. By extending their known distribution beyond coral hosts and the marine environment, our results not only highlight the diversity and ecological range of the most recently discovered algal lineage but also broaden our understanding of the ancestral lifestyles that may have preceded apicomplexan evolution. This research underscores the value of targeted mining of public sequencing datasets to address specific ecological questions, particularly in rare or hard-to-access environments such as microbialites.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40793-026-00852-4.

Keywords: Algae, Chromerids, Microbialites, Thrombolites, Protists, Coral reefs, Apicomplexa, Phycology

Background

Chromerid algae and the heterotrophic colpodellids together make up the chrompodellids, which are the closest known relatives to apicomplexan parasites. The ancestor of apicomplexans and chromerids is thought to have possessed photosynthetic chloroplast much like those of chromerids, and which has been reduced to a non-photosynthetic apicoplast in apicomplexans. As apicomplexans are prolific parasites of animals, including humans, their adaptation to parasitism from algal ancestors exemplified by their plastid evolution has garnered significant interest, and chromerids were instrumental in elucidating that evolution. But the chromerids were also the first new algal group discovered in 100 years, and because so much attention has focused on comparisons with apicomplexans, the ecology of chromerid algae has remained surprisingly mysterious and unexplored. Since their discovery almost two decades ago, there are still only two described Chromerid algae, Chromera velia [1] and Vitrella brassicaformis [2]. While these two species were both initially isolated from coral in Australia, significant divergence in their morphologies, life histories, and evolution have always been apparent [2]. Nuclear gene phylogenies also support this by showing they are distantly related within the larger chrompodellid lineage: V. brassicaformis branches near the base of the chrompodellids with the mollusk parasite Piridium sociable, whereas C. velia branches with free-living predators Colpodella, Voromonas, and Alphamonas [3, 4]. Their plastid genomes are similarly divergent, with C. velia bearing a linear, 120 kb genome, while V. brassicaformis possesses a circular gene-rich 85 kb genome [5]. Their ecological roles are also seemingly divergent, but here we have much less data to go on: we know almost nothing about their role in natural environments and critical questions, especially their association with coral, are still debated. After first being presumed to be in an intracellular photosymbiotic association with coral [1, 6], the transcriptomic response of coral larvae exposed to C. velia was shown to more resemble parasite invasion, and markedly low colonization levels were observed compared to Symbiodiniaceae [7, 8]. Closer analyses of environmental data also suggested most chromerid sequences are more consistent with growth on coral surfaces, as opposed to being directly associated with coral tissue [9, 10]. Marker gene evidence of chromerid and other apicomplexan-related lineages (ARLs) in environments outside coral reefs further supports a broader ecological range for these algae [9, 11]. For instance, Vitrella-related 18S and plastid 16S rRNA gene sequences (classified as ARL-I), are mostly found on coral reefs, but are also present in a range of calcium carbonate-rich environments like reef sediments and even microbialites [3, 9, 11].

Microbialites are microbially-induced formations of trapped, bound, or precipitated sediment that exhibit a range of mineralogies, although calcium carbonate (CaCO3) is the most widespread [12]. Ancient microbialites offered some of the first evidence for carbonate-based reef communities, and modern microbalites offer fascinating insights into early evolution [1315]. The potential association between Chromerid algae and microbialites is tantalizing given this evolutionary context and compositional similarity between coral and microbialite reef systems; however, microbialites are challenging to sample due to their rarity and the strict regulations surrounding access. To further study this link and to gather additional information on the biogeography of Chromerid algae, we employed new genomic binning approaches to publicly available shotgun metagenomic datasets and re-analyzed existing 18S rRNA gene datasets from microbialite environments, most of which were not previously reported to include chromerids. Furthermore, 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding surveys were also investigated for chromerid signal, showing more limited results, and exemplifying the utility of metagenomics and eukaryotic-specific marker gene surveys for studying the protistan associations of microbialites.

Methods

Data retrieval

Metagenomic reads from Highborne Cay (Bahamas) thrombolites were downloaded from NCBI SRA (BioProject: PRJNA1055967), trimmed using Trimmomatic v0.39 [16], then assembled using MegaHit v1.2.9 [17]. To further assess chromerid diversity and distribution beyond this metagenomic assembly, amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) previously classified as chromerids (and confirmed by evolutionary placement analyses here) were extracted from 18S rRNA gene datasets originating from microbialites found in Pavilion Lake (Canada; freshwater), Kelly Lake (Canada; freshwater) [15], Lake Alichichica (Mexico; saline & alkaline crater lake) [18], Highborne Cay (Bahamas; saline), and Shark Bay (Australia; hypersaline; Fig. 1) [19]. These datasets encompass all publicly available 18S rRNA metabarcoding data from microbialite environments, providing the most comprehensive assessment of chromerid diversity presently possible to our knowledge. These locations are also biographically distant and range in salinity from freshwater to hypersaline, representing both geographically and chemically distinct environments. The Integrated Microbial NGS platform (IMNGS), a continuously updated platform which allows investigation of all available 16S rRNA gene amplicon studies from NCBI’s Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database [20], was also screened for ASVs 90% similar to chromerid plastid 16S rRNA genes.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Maximum-likelihood tree of apicomplexans and chrompodellids based on the nuclear rRNA operon with EPA-placed ASVs recovered from microbialite 18S rRNA gene metabarcoding studies. World map (inset) showing locations of 18S rRNA gene metabarcoding datasets analyzed in this study. The colored dots next to each ASV represents the origin of each sequence. Note that ASV_3680 (red dot) was found in both Canadian microbialite locations

18S rRNA gene extraction and rrn operon phylogenetics

Vitrella-related and Chromera-related 18S rRNA genes were identified and extracted from the Highborne Cay thrombolite metagenomic assembly using Blastn [21], then aligned with other chrompodellid and apicomplexan rRNA operons (18S + 28S rRNA genes) using MAFFT v7 [22]. This alignment was then trimmed using Trimal [23] (-gt 0.3 -st 0.001). A maximum-likelihood backbone tree was constructed using IQ-tree v2.1.0 with the GTR + F + R5 model (as selected by ModelFinder) [24] and 1000 bootstrap replicates. Chromerid ASVs from the 18S rRNA gene metabarcoding datasets were placed using RAxML’s evolutionary placement algorithm (EPA) [25] onto the well-supported backbone tree of the apicomplexan + chrompodellid rRNA operons to assess chromerid biodiversity across biographically distant microbialites (Fig. 1). Blastn was used to generate percent identity similarity scores for each ASV to confirmed chromerids.

Plastid MAG binning and phylogenetics

Plastid MAGs (ptMAGs) were extracted from the Highborne Cay thrombolites metagenomic assembly using Metabat v2.18 [26] optimized for the retrieval of plastid metagenome assembled genomes (ptMAGs; -s 30000 --minContig 1500). Plastid rrn operon (16S + 23S rRNA genes) from both ptMAGs were extracted using barrnap [27] then used to construct a maximum-likelihood tree along with similar NCBI BLAST matches as done before for the nuclear rrn operons. A 500 + bp matching 16S rRNA ASV identified from the IMNGS platform search was also included in the plastid rrn tree. Plastid genes from the recovered ptMAGs were confirmed using hmmsearch and single-gene tree construction with FastTree. A maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree based on 31 plastid genes was generated for the V. brassicaformis ptMAG. For this, single genes were first aligned with MAFFT then trimmed using trimal (-gt 0.8), before concatenation using CONCATENATOR [28]. The concatenated alignment was then used as input for IQ-tree v2.1.0 with the CPREV + I + G4 model (as selected by ModelFinder) [24] and 1000 bootstrap replicates. Plastid diagrams were generated using OGdraw v1.3.1 [29].

Results

The full-length Vitrella-related 18S rRNA gene extracted from the Highborne Cay metagenomic assembly branched within a well-supported (100% bootstrap) clade with other V. brassicaformis sequences recovered from Australian corals and the Arabian Sea coral reef sediments and was 98.652% similar to Vitrella brassicaformis (Supplementary Material 1). These sequences and other environmental sequences in this clade showed minimal divergence, suggesting they all likely belong to the same species. In contrast, other Vitrella-related ASVs from marine microbialites all branch outside this clade and likely represent distinct lineages of Vitrella. The Chromera-related 18S rRNA gene recovered from Highborne Cay branches sister to C. velia but likely represents a different species or possibly even genus based on phylogenetic divergence (Fig. 1) and low similarity (92.349%) to the Chromera velia 18S rRNA gene (Supplementary Material 1).

Using Metabat v2.18 [26] optimized for the retrieval of plastid metagenome assembled genomes (ptMAGs), we recovered two ptMAGs corresponding to chromerid plastids from Highborne Cay thrombolites. This binning approach allowed us to separate the closely related plastid contigs present within the metagenomic assembly into two distinct plastid genomes, further validated with phylogenetics. Extracting the plastid rrn operon (16S + 23S rRNA genes) from both ptMAGs revealed similar patterns to the 18S rRNA genes we retrieved, where one ptMAG rrn operon corresponds to V. brassicaformis and the other corresponds to a chromerid closely related to but distinct from C. velia (Fig. 2). NCBI BLAST matches to the recovered plastid 16S rRNA genes and an IMNGS-identified sequence from Storr’s Lake (Bahamas) microbial mats clustered within the Vitrella lineage, exemplifying the high diversity of this group. The Chromera-related ptMAG was partial, at 15 kb, but nevertheless contained psbE, SecA, psaC, and atpH (Fig. 2b), the phylogenies of which confirmed each to be closely related to C. velia and distinct from Vitrella. The ptMAG corresponding to V. brassicaformis is ~ 82 kb and contained a majority of V. brassicaformis plastid genes (97.44% overall nucleotide similarity; genes were also confirmed by phylogenetic analyses to be closely related to V. brassicaformis homologues), however it could not be assembled into a single contig or circularized (Fig. 2c). A phylogenetic tree based on 31 plastid genes confirmed that this ptMAG is very closely related to V. brassicaformis (Supplementary Material 2), confirming that photosynthetic algae from this lineage live in calcium carbonate habitats beyond coral reefs.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

a Maximum-likelihood tree of apicomplexans and apicomplexan-related lineages based on the plastid rrn operon (16S + 23S rRNA genes). Sequences recovered here from Highborne Cay microbialites are bolded. b Novel C. vela-related plastid genome assembly recovered from a Highborne Cay microbialite MAG (metagenome assembled genome). Recovered genes (bold, fully coloured) are overlayed on the Chromera velia plastid genome. c A V. brassicaformis-related plastid MAG from Highborne Cay microbialites. Recovered Vitrella brassicaformis plastid genes (bold, fully coloured) are overlayed over the V. brassicaformis plastid genome

Discussion

We recovered a full-length V. brassicaformis 18S rRNA and most of its plastid genome from Highborne Cay microbialites. Gene phylogenies show that this lineage is the same as that found in coral reef environments, confirming that V. brassicaformis live in calcium carbonate habitats beyond coral reefs. While Vitrella spp. have been noted in microbialite environments previously [11], they were never observed to be particularly abundant or widely distributed. Furthermore, we found freshwater and marine chromerid ASVs from microbialites cluster with a novel chromerid lineage related to but distinct from C. velia (Fig. 1). Biological support for the freshwater ASV (ASV_3680) is strong considering it is found in multiple samples across two different locations [15]. Its presence amongst marine-associated microbialite ASVs further supports this clade as a likely unexplored, yet widely distributed Chromera-related lineage associated specifically with microbialite environments. The hypersalinity of shark bay microbialites inhibits coral reef growth [30], thus providing additional evidence for a microbialite-specific association, as opposed to contamination from nearby coral reef environments. This is the first definitive evidence of Chromera-related sequences recovered outside of a coral reef habitat. The presence of photosystem genes within the Chromera-related ptMAG also confirms this organism as photosynthetic, altogether demonstrating the presence of uncultured, photosynthetic Chromera-related algae in modern microbialites.

Taken together this work shows that V. brassicaformis and a novel, photosynthetic chromerid alga live within modern microbialites, expanding the known distribution of both subgroups of chromerid algae beyond coral reef environments. Both the current data and previous analyses of environmental ASV data show that chromerids are not normally highly abundant in most environments (with rare exceptions [31]), but their consistent presence in similar but geographically distant environments is evidence of an important ecological niche fulfilled by these algal lineages. Ostreobium quekettii, a coral-associated euendolithic alga [32], is also found consistently within marine microbialites [15], which may offer clues as to the ecological function or tolerances of chromerids in this environment. For example, O. quekettii can thrive in the variable pH, O2, and light environment of the coral skeleton and microbialites. Coral and microbialite-associated chromerids may exhibit similar adaptation strategies as they are also found in both environments. Furthermore, O. qurkettii as an euendolith also plays a major role in remodeling calcium-carbonate habitats [33], which could hint at the possibly significant role of chromerids in structuring microbialite habitats. The consistent association with CaCO3 substrates across aquatic environments observed for chromerids may be explained by a few factors. CaCO3 substrates can buffer local pH levels, reflect light, and provide for trace nutrients, ensuring an ideal environment for photosynthesis and algal growth. Additionally, the complex structure and porous nature of these substrates can be useful for avoiding predation by aquatic grazers.

Conclusions

Twenty years of research on these algae has yielded significant insights but mostly related to the evolution of apicomplexans and their plastids. Only two species of chromerids have been cultured or described thus far, none in the last decade, and very little insight into their ecological roles in nature have been made beyond their initial discovery. We suggest that the cryptic chromerid diversity of modern microbialites should be prioritized in future culturing efforts. In culture, C. velia tends to form a brownish, endophytic layer on the cultivation flask [34] and the morphological form of C. velia is influenced by salinity [6], suggesting that the undescribed chromerids of hypersaline microbialites (i.e. Shark Bay, Australia) may be observed as non-motile occoids. From what we know about the drastic differences in morphology and genome evolution of the two cultured chromerids, a new culture of the novel Chromera-related algae would further expand the diversity of various biological characteristics of the group still more, and a more detailed appraisal of their ecological and physical position within the microbialite community should shed light on these characteristics of the group more broadly in complex reef communities. This research underscores the value of targeted mining of public sequencing datasets to address specific ecological questions, particularly in rare or hard-to-access environments such as microbialites.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

40793_2026_852_MOESM1_ESM.txt (943B, txt)

Supplementary Material 1. Similarity scores of the recovered 18S rRNA Genes to Chromera velia and Vitrella brassicaformis generated using BLASTn

40793_2026_852_MOESM2_ESM.tiff (20.1MB, tiff)

Supplementary Material 2. Maximum-likelihood tree of apicomplexans and apicomplexan-related lineages based on 31 plastid-encoded genes, including genes recovered from the V. brassicaformis-related plastid genome

Acknowledgements

This research was enabled in part by support provided by the Digital Research Alliance of Canada (alliancecan.ca).

Abbreviations

CaCO3

Calcium carbonate

ASV

Amplicon sequence variant

EPA

Evolutionary placement algorithm

ptMAG

Plastid metagenome assembled genome

Author contributions

AMB analyzed the data, prepared figures, and wrote the manuscript. PJK provided financial support, supervised the project, and reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This project was supported by a grant from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (10.37807/GBMF9201).

Data availability

The raw data used for this project was retrieved from the NCBI SRA database. Partial plastid assemblies, SGTs, and raw tree files can be found on GitHub at: https://github.com/Abonacolta/microbialite_chromerids. Recovered 18S rRNA genes have been deposited onto NCBI GenBank under the following accession numbers: PV865597 & PV865598.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Moore RB, Oborník M, Janouškovec J, Chrudimský T, Vancová M, Green DH, et al. A photosynthetic alveolate closely related to apicomplexan parasites. Nature. 2008;451(7181):959–63. 10.1038/nature06635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Oborník M, Modrý D, Lukeš M, Černotíková-Stříbrná E, Cihlář J, Tesařová M, et al. Morphology, ultrastructure and life cycle of Vitrella brassicaformis n. sp., n. gen., a novel chromerid from the Great Barrier Reef. Protist. 2012;163:306–23. 10.1016/J.PROTIS.2011.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Janouškovec J, Tikhonenkov DV, Burki F, Howe AT, Kolísko M, Mylnikov AP, et al. Factors mediating plastid dependency and the origins of parasitism in apicomplexans and their close relatives. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:10200–7. 10.1073/pnas.1423790112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mathur V, Kolísko M, Hehenberger E, Irwin NAT, Leander BS, Kristmundsson Á, et al. Multiple independent origins of apicomplexan-like parasites. Curr Biol. 2019;29:2936-2941.e5. 10.1016/j.cub.2019.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Oborník M, Lukeš J. The organellar genomes of chromera and vitrella, the phototrophic relatives of apicomplexan parasites. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2015;69:129–44. 10.1146/annurev-micro-091014-104449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Oborník M, Vancová M, Lai D-H, Janouškovec J, Keeling PJ, Lukeš J. Morphology and ultrastructure of multiple life cycle stages of the photosynthetic relative of apicomplexa, Chromera velia. Protist. 2011;162:115–30. 10.1016/j.protis.2010.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mohamed AR, Cumbo VR, Harii S, Shinzato C, Chan CX, Ragan MA, et al. Deciphering the nature of the coral–Chromera association. ISME J. 2018;12:776–90. 10.1038/s41396-017-0005-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chakravarti LJ, Negri AP, van Oppen MJH. Thermal and herbicide tolerances of chromerid algae and their ability to form a symbiosis with corals. Front Microbiol. 2019. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Janouškovec J, Horák A, Barott KL, Rohwer FL, Keeling PJ. Environmental distribution of coral-associated relatives of apicomplexan parasites. ISME J. 2013;7:444–7. 10.1038/ismej.2012.129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mathur V, del Campo J, Kolisko M, Keeling PJ. Global diversity and distribution of close relatives of apicomplexan parasites. Environ Microbiol. 2018;20:2824–33. 10.1111/1462-2920.14134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Janouškovec J, Horák A, Barott KL, Rohwer FL, Keeling PJ. Global analysis of plastid diversity reveals apicomplexan-related lineages in coral reefs. Curr Biol. 2012;22:R518–9. 10.1016/j.cub.2012.04.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dupraz C, Reid R, Visscher P. Microbialites, Modern. In: Encyclopedia of Earth sciences series. 2011, pp. 617–635. 10.1007/978-1-4020-9212-1_195.
  • 13.Leinfelder RR, Schmid DU. Mesozoic reefal thrombolites and other microbolites. In: Riding RE, Awramik SM, editors. Microbial sediments. Berlin: Springer; 2000. p. 289–94. 10.1007/978-3-662-04036-2_31. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Knoll AH. Paleobiological perspectives on early eukaryotic evolution. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2014;6:a016121. 10.1101/cshperspect.a016121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bonacolta AM, Visscher PT, del Campo J, White RA III. The eukaryome of modern microbialites reveals distinct colonization across aquatic ecosystems. npj Biofilms Microbiomes. 2024;10:78. 10.1038/s41522-024-00547-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114–20. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Li D, Liu C-M, Luo R, Sadakane K, Lam T-W. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:1674–6. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Couradeau E, Benzerara K, Moreira D, Gérard E, Kaźmierczak J, Tavera R, et al. Prokaryotic and eukaryotic community structure in field and cultured microbialites from the alkaline Lake Alchichica (Mexico). PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e28767. 10.1371/journal.pone.0028767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Edgcomb VP, Bernhard JM, Summons RE, Orsi W, Beaudoin D, Visscher PT. Active eukaryotes in microbialites from Highborne Cay, Bahamas, and Hamelin Pool (Shark Bay), Australia. ISME J. 2014;8:418–29. 10.1038/ismej.2013.130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lagkouvardos I, Joseph D, Kapfhammer M, Giritli S, Horn M, Haller D, et al. IMNGS: a comprehensive open resource of processed 16S rRNA microbial profiles for ecology and diversity studies. Sci Rep. 2016;6:33721. 10.1038/srep33721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, et al. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinform. 2009;10:421. 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:772–80. 10.1093/molbev/mst010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Capella-Gutiérrez S, Silla-Martínez JM, Gabaldón T. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1972–3. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32:268–74. 10.1093/molbev/msu300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1312–3. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kang DD, Li F, Kirton E, Thomas A, Egan R, An H, et al. MetaBAT 2: an adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies. PeerJ. 2019;7:e7359. 10.7717/peerj.7359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Seemann T. Barrnap: BAsic Rapid Ribosomal RNA Predictor. 2018.
  • 28.Vences M, Patmanidis S, Kharchev V, Renner SS. Concatenator, a user-friendly program to concatenate DNA sequences, implementing graphical user interfaces for MAFFT and FastTree. Bioinform Adv. 2022;2:vbac050. 10.1093/bioadv/vbac050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Greiner S, Lehwark P, Bock R. OrganellarGenomeDRAW (OGDRAW) version 1.3.1: expanded toolkit for the graphical visualization of organellar genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:W59–64. 10.1093/nar/gkz238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Marsh LM. Hermatypic corals of Shark Bay, Western Australia. In: Research in Shark Bay Report of the France-Australe Bicentenary Expedition Committee Western Australian Museum, Perth. 1990, pp. 107–114.
  • 31.Kwong WK, del Campo J, Mathur V, Vermeij MJA, Keeling PJ. A widespread coral-infecting apicomplexan with chlorophyll biosynthesis genes. Nature. 2019;568:103–7. 10.1038/s41586-019-1072-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.del Campo J, Pombert J-F, Šlapeta J, Larkum A, Keeling PJ. The ‘other’ coral symbiont: Ostreobium diversity and distribution. ISME J. 2017;11(1):296–9. 10.1038/ismej.2016.101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tribollet A. The boring microflora in modern coral reef ecosystems: a review of its roles. In: Wisshak M, Tapanila L, editors. Current developments in bioerosion. Berlin: Springer; 2008. p. 67–94. 10.1007/978-3-540-77598-0_4. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Oborník M, Lukeš J. Chapter eight—cell biology of chromerids: autotrophic relatives to apicomplexan parasites. In: Jeon KW, editor. International review of cell and molecular biology. Academic Press; 2013. p. 333–69. 10.1016/B978-0-12-407694-5.00008-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

40793_2026_852_MOESM1_ESM.txt (943B, txt)

Supplementary Material 1. Similarity scores of the recovered 18S rRNA Genes to Chromera velia and Vitrella brassicaformis generated using BLASTn

40793_2026_852_MOESM2_ESM.tiff (20.1MB, tiff)

Supplementary Material 2. Maximum-likelihood tree of apicomplexans and apicomplexan-related lineages based on 31 plastid-encoded genes, including genes recovered from the V. brassicaformis-related plastid genome

Data Availability Statement

The raw data used for this project was retrieved from the NCBI SRA database. Partial plastid assemblies, SGTs, and raw tree files can be found on GitHub at: https://github.com/Abonacolta/microbialite_chromerids. Recovered 18S rRNA genes have been deposited onto NCBI GenBank under the following accession numbers: PV865597 & PV865598.


Articles from Environmental Microbiome are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES