Skip to main content
Microbiology Spectrum logoLink to Microbiology Spectrum
. 2025 Dec 23;14(2):e02229-25. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02229-25

Establishment and characterization of a replication-restricted modified African swine fever virus

Tomoya Kitamura 1,#, Kentaro Masujin 1,#, Mitsutaka Ikezawa 1, Takehiro Kokuho 1,
Editor: Biao He2
PMCID: PMC12889021  PMID: 41433306

ABSTRACT

African swine fever is a fatal, febrile, infectious disease that affects pigs and wild boars and is caused by infection with African swine fever virus (ASFV). The current pandemic strain, belonging to genotype II, first emerged in Georgia in 2007 and subsequently spread across Russia, Europe, Asia, and the Caribbean. Developing live attenuated viruses represents the most promising vaccine strategy; however, biosafety and biosecurity concerns due to long-term persistence of attenuated viruses in immunized animals may lead to secondary transmission or reversion to virulence. To address this concern, we developed a replication-restricted ASFV by deleting the S273R gene that encodes an essential factor for core shell formation and viral maturation within host cells. The resulting strain, AQSΔS273R, was unable to replicate in natural host cells because these cells lack a gene that complements the function of S273R. To enable propagation of infectious progeny in vitro, we established S273R gene-complemented immortalized porcine kidney macrophages, which are competent to support virus production. In animal trials, pigs immunized with AQSΔS273R exhibited no clinical signs or viremia. In the challenge study, vaccination with replication-restricted ASFV (AQSΔS273R) conferred approximately 30% protection, with partial reduction of clinical signs compared with controls. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of a novel approach for developing replication-restricted ASFV vaccine candidates with enhanced biological safety.

IMPORTANCE

To date, no reliable African swine fever (ASF) vaccines are available. Although some attenuated African swine fever viruses (ASFVs) have been approved for field applications and have attracted attention as potential vaccine candidates, their long-term persistence in inoculated animals raises concerns about virulence reversion or genetic recombination in field settings. In this study, we developed a novel approach to generate safer vaccines by creating a replication-restricted, S273R gene-deleted virus in combination with genetically modified host cells stably expressing the S273R gene. Not only did this mutant virus fail to induce any clinical signs in immunized pigs, but it also partially protected them against challenge with virulent ASFV. These results demonstrate that this newly developed replication-restricted ASFV strain is expected to be a promising and biologically safe vaccine candidate against ASF.

KEYWORDS: African swine fever virus (ASFV), immortalized porcine kidney macrophage (IPKM), replication-restricted virus, S273R gene, vaccine

INTRODUCTION

African swine fever virus (ASFV) is the causative agent for African swine fever, a febrile and lethal infectious disease affecting pigs and wild boars. ASFV belongs to the nucleocytoplasmic large DNA virus group and is currently the only known member of the genus Asfivirus of the family Asfarviridae. The virion is 175–215 nm in diameter and consists of a five-layered structure: a nucleoid, a core shell, an inner envelope, a capsid, and an outer envelope, in this order from the inside to the outside (1). The genome in the nucleoid, made up of 190 kbp of double-stranded DNA, encodes over 150 genes (2). ASFVs are classified into at least 23 genotypes on the basis of the genetic diversity of the partial sequence of the B646L gene, which encodes the p72 protein (3, 4).

For a long time, ASFV was endemic to the African continent. However, in 2007, genotype II viruses suddenly appeared in Georgia, then subsequently spread into Russia, Eastern Europe, Asia, and the Caribbean countries (58). Note that, following the first report of the outbreak in China in 2018, another distinct outbreak caused by the genotype I strain of ASFV was confirmed in 2021 (9). Even more importantly, further outbreaks of the disease caused by the infection with newly emerging recombinant ASFVs of chimeric genotype (genotype I/II) that show a mosaic pattern of genotype I and II genomes were reported in China (2023), Vietnam, and Russia (2024 [1012]), causing drastic economic losses to the global pig industry.

Until recently, no ASF vaccine has been commercially available since the disease was first reported in East Africa in 1921 (13). However, several live attenuated vaccines (LAVs) have been officially approved for clinical use in Vietnam recently (14, 15). Although these LAVs seem to protect animals from infection with virulent ASFV, the vaccine viruses persist in the bodies of inoculated animals for a month or more after inoculation. The prolonged viral persistence raises concerns about the potential reversion of virulence, and the instability of the ASFV genomic sequence during replication in host cells may increase the risk of virulence reversion. Recent studies have also shown that some attenuated ASFV strains may revert to virulence after in vivo passages, raising further biosafety concerns (1619). These findings underscore the genetic instability of ASFV and emphasize the need for safer, replication-restricted vaccine approaches.

Replication-restricted viruses, which lack the essential gene(s) required for propagation of infectious progeny in infected cells, have been developed as LAVs for various viral diseases, including influenza A, Japanese encephalitis, COVID-19, and Ebola hemorrhagic fever (2025). In these studies, replication-restricted viruses successfully induced protective immunity against challenge infections. Importantly, these viruses are considered safer than their parental strains because of their reduced ability to propagate in host cells. However, replication-restricted ASFV has not yet been engineered. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to create an attenuated ASFV that does not efficiently replicate in host animals under field conditions.

In this study, we targeted the S273R gene to attenuate the replication capacity of ASFV. The S273R protease is responsible for processing the structural polyproteins pp220 and pp62, whose cleavage products are essential for proper core shell formation and viral morphogenesis (2628). Because deletion of S273R severely impairs viral replication while still permitting the formation of non-infectious particles, it represents a promising target for generating replication-restricted ASFV.

RESULTS

Generation of the S273R-deficient ASFV

The S273R gene was selected as a target for designing replication-restricted ASFV because its encoding protein catalyzes two distinct viral structural proteins, pp220 and pp62, that are indispensable for core shell formation during particle maturation (26, 27). To rescue the S273R deletion mutant (AQSΔS273R), we modified the immortalized porcine kidney macrophage (IPKM) cell line and established its transformant stably expressing supplemental S273R gene products. The established IPKM/S273R cell line exhibited a higher level of S273R mRNA expression than its parental cell line (Fig. 1). The method for generating the S273R-deficient ASFV mutant (AQSΔS273R) is illustrated in Fig. 2A. Briefly, AQSΔS273R was created by plasmid-based homologous recombination in IPKM cells. Following isolation, the purity of AQSΔS273R was confirmed by next-generation sequencing. No contamination of the remaining parental virus and unintended nucleotide mutations in the genome sequence was detected.

Fig 1.

Bar graph comparing S273R mRNA expression between IPKM and IPKM/S273R cells. IPKM cells show negligible expression, while IPKM/S273R cells display substantially higher copy numbers per cell.

S273R mRNA expression in IPKM/S273R cells. mRNA expression levels of S273R in IPKM and IPKM/S273R cells were measured using real-time reverse transcription PCR. Copy numbers per cell (mean ± standard deviation) from three independent assays were calculated from a standard curve generated using an S273R-inserted plasmid. IPKM, immortalized porcine kidney macrophage.

Fig 2.

Molecular biology workflow showing replication-restricted ASFV creation. The diagram illustrates IPKM cells transfected and infected with AQS-C-1-22, leading to homologous recombination where mCherry replaces the S273R gene, generating AQS delta S273R.

Schematic depicting the generation of replication-restricted ASFV. (A) For homologous recombination, AQS-C-1-22 was used to infect IPKM cells that had been transfected with pTEΔS273R and pCas-guide S273R. IPKM cells stably expressing S273R were generated through lentiviral transfection and subsequently used to isolate AQSΔS273R by the limiting dilution method. (B) To generate AQSΔS273R, the mCherry gene downstream of the ASFV p72 promoter was inserted into the AQS-C-1-22 genome at the original position of the S273R gene by homologous recombination. ASFV, African swine fever virus.

Replication of AQSΔS273R

To assess the in vitro replication profile of AQSΔS273R, we infected both IPKM and IPKM/S273R cells with the virus at an equal initial multiplicity of infection (MOI). In IPKM/S273R cell cultures, fluorescence signals—indicative of viral replication—increased until 5 dpi, by which time nearly all cells exhibited fluorescence. In contrast, fluorescence-positive cells remained scarce in IPKM cultures throughout the observation period (Fig. 3A). A comparative growth analysis at an MOI of 0.01 further demonstrated that AQSΔS273R replicated efficiently in IPKM/S273R cells but showed minimal propagation in IPKM cells (Fig. 3B). To confirm whether the replication deficiency observed in IPKM cells was directly attributed to the S273R gene deletions, we reintroduced the S273R gene into the AQSΔS273R genome by homologous recombination, replacing the marker gene cassette. The resulting virus, designated the S273R addback virus, was isolated, and its replication profile was evaluated in IPKM cells. The S273R addback virus replicated efficiently in IPKM culture, thereby confirming that the S273R gene is essential for robust viral replication in these host cells (Fig. 3C).

Fig 3.

Microscopic images indicate the enhancement of cytopathic effects and fluorescence signals in ASFV-inoculated cells. AQS delta S273R replicates only in S273R-expressing IPKM cells, while parental and addback viruses grow in both intact and modified cells.

In vitro growth of AQSΔS273R, parental AQS-C-1-22, and addback virus. (A) IPKM or IPKM/S273R cells were inoculated with AQSΔS273R or AQS-C-1-22 at an MOI of 0.05. These cells were observed under a fluorescence microscope at the indicated time points. Red signals indicate mCherry expression. Scale bar: 50 μm.(B) IPKM or IPKM/S273R cells were inoculated with AQSΔS273R at an MOI of 0.01. The supernatants were collected at the indicated time points and titrated using IPKM cells. The data represent virus titers (mean TCID50/mL ± SD) from three independent assays. (C) IPKM cells were inoculated with AQSΔS273R, parental AQS-C-1-22, or the addback virus at an MOI of 0.01. The supernatants were collected daily and titrated. The data represent virus titers (mean TCID50/mL ± SD) from three independent assays. MOI, multiplicity of infection; TCID50, median tissue culture infectious dose.

Morphological analysis of AQSΔS273R particles

The deletion of the S273R gene has previously been reported to be associated with the formation of abnormally shaped particles with a decentralized core shell (27). To investigate whether AQSΔS273R exhibits a similar phenotype, we examined AQS-C-1-22 and AQSΔS273R particles in infected IPKM cells using transmission electron microscopy. As expected, AQS-C-1-22 formed particles with a normal morphology, characterized by a centrally located core shell (Fig. 4A). In contrast, the majority of AQSΔS273R particles displayed a distorted core shape displaced from the center. Notably, when AQSΔS273R was assembled in IPKM/S273R cells, the resulting particles exhibited mixed morphologies, including both normal and decentralized core shells (Fig. 4B and C). The proportion of normal core shells was approximately 40%. These findings suggest that the absence of S273R contributes to the development of an abnormal core shell structure, consistent with previous observations.

Fig 4.

Electron micrographs show S273R deletion displaces cores in AQS-C-1-22 virions: intact particles have central cores, whereas AQS delta S273R shows off-center cores. Adding S273R partially restores normal core positioning, confirmed by quantitative data.

Effect of S273R deficiency on viral particle assembly. (A) IPKM cells were infected with AQS-C-1-22 or AQSΔS273R at an MOI of 5 and fixed with paraformaldehyde and glutaraldehyde after 20 h of incubation. Following osmium fixation and dehydration, the cells were embedded in EPON resin. Ultrathin sections were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. The core shells of AQS-C-1-22 virions (upper panel) were centrally located, whereas the core shells of AQSΔS273R virions (lower panel) appeared off-center. Areas highlighted by red rectangles are shown at higher magnification on the right. The arrows indicate viral particles; the purple and green bars represent 1.0 µm and 200 nm, respectively. (B) Morphology of AQS-C-1-22 and AQSΔS273R virions assembled in IPKM cells (upper) and IPKM/S273R cells (middle), and AQSΔS273R virions assembled in IPKM/S273R cells (bottom). AQS-C-1-22 virions assembled in IPKM cells displayed the typical icosahedral shape of ASFV with centrally located core shells. In contrast, AQSΔS273 virions exhibited off-center core shells. Notably, AQSΔS273 virions assembled in IPKM/S273R cells displayed both centrally and peripherally positioned core shells. (C) Percentage of AQS-C-1-22 and AQSΔS273R virions assembled in IPKM cells and IPKM/S273R cells, and AQSΔS273R virions assembled in IPKM/S273R cells. In each condition, 30 virus particles were counted, and the percentage of those with centrally located cores is shown. The data represent the percentage of centrally located core shells (mean ± SD) from three independent assays.

Virulence of AQSΔS273R in pigs

To assess the virulence of AQSΔS273R in vivo, pigs were intramuscularly inoculated with the virus at a single dose of 103 or 105 median tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50) per animal (n = 3 each). None of the inoculated animals presented clinical signs such as fever and viremia, and all the animals survived for 21 dpi (Fig. 5A and B). Additionally, we tested a double-dose regimen, administering 103 or 105 TCID50 on both day 0 and day 14 (n = 3 each). The results were similar to those obtained after single-dose inoculation, with no clinical signs or mortality.

Fig 5.

Line graphs show rectal temperature and viral load profiles in pigs given to AQS delta S273R immunization once (day 0) or twice (day 0, 14) at different doses, highlighting how dosage affects fever and viral replication.

Virulence of AQSΔS273R in pigs. (A) Rectal temperatures of pigs inoculated with a single or double dose of AQSΔS273R. The green and blue colors indicate groups treated with a lower dose (103 TCID50) and a higher dose (105 TCID50) of the virus per injection. Fever was defined as temperatures above 40℃ (red line). The gray-black colors represent the control group injected with 102 TCID50 of the parental virulent strain. (B) Viral copy numbers in whole blood were measured using quantitative PCR. The dotted lines indicate the detection limit of the assay. Each experimental group is indicated in the same colors. The crosses indicate animals that died or were euthanized; the triangles mark the day of second immunization.

In contrast, the control group (n = 5), inoculated with the parental virulent AQS-C-1-22 at a dose of 102 TCID50 per animal, exhibited severe pyrexia (>40°C) by 5 dpi (Fig. 5A) and developed clear clinical signs such as anorexia and diarrhea. All animals in this group died or were euthanized between 7 and 10 dpi, and viremia was detected from 4 dpi or earlier (Fig. 5B).

Humoral response in AQSΔS273R-inoculated pigs

Antibody responses in pigs inoculated with AQSΔS273R were assessed using the ID Screen African Swine Fever Indirect Kit (IDvet, Grabels, France). ASFV-specific antibodies were scarcely detected in any of the pigs, irrespective of the inoculation dose or the number of administrations (Fig. 6).

Fig 6.

Line graphs show ASFV antibody response in pigs following AQS delta S273R inoculation. None of the treatment groups ultimately surpass the positive S to P ratio threshold of 0.4.

Detection of ASFV-specific antibodies. ASFV-specific serum antibodies in AQSΔS273R-inoculated pigs were detected using an ID Screen African Swine Fever Indirect ELISA kit. The red lines indicate the level deemed “positive” by the assay. Green and blue colors represent the groups treated with 103 and 105 TCID50 of AQSΔS273R, respectively. The left and right panels denote the single-dose- and double-dose-treated groups. The black triangles indicate the day of second immunization. The optical density (OD) was measured at 450 nm on a microplate reader. The sample-to-positive (S/P) ratio was calculated using the following equation: (sample OD − negative control OD) / (positive control OD − negative control OD). The data represent the S/P ratio (mean ± SD) from three independent assays. Samples with an S/P ratio of 0.4 or higher were considered positive for ASFV-specific antibodies.

Protective efficacy of AQSΔS273R against virulent virus challenge

To assess the protective efficacy of AQSΔS273R, pigs previously inoculated with AQSΔS273R were challenged with the parental virulent strain AQS-C-1-22 at a dose of 102 TCID50 per animal. The challenge was administered at 21 dpi for the single-dose group and 28 dpi for the double-dose group. Animals were monitored for 30 days post-challenge (dpc), and the outcomes are summarized in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

Summary of the animal experiment for assessment of pathogenicity and protection efficacy of AQSΔS273R

Virus Dose Pig Survived
or deada
Maximum of rectal temperature (°C) Maximum of viral copy number (10n/mL)
Pre-
challenge
Post-
challenge
Post-mean Pre-
challenge
Post-
challenge
Post-mean
Parental Single, 10² P-1 D 39.2 42 41.8 NDc 9.1 9.3
P-2 D 39.2 41.6 9.4
P-3 D 39.6 42 9.2
P-4 D 40.1 41.8 9.2
P-5 D 39.1 41.6 9.8
AQSΔS273R Single, 10³ 3-1 S 39.7 41.1 41.6 NDc 5.9 7.2 (**P = 0.04)b
3-2 D 39.7 41.3 8.3
3-3 D 39.4 42.3 7.3
Single, 10⁵ 5-1 D 39.7 41.3 41.5 NDc 7.0 7.8 (** P = 0.04)b
5-2 D 40.1 41.6 8.4
5-3 D 39.6 40.7 8.1
Twice, 10³ 3x2-1 D 40.5 41.5 41.2 NDc 7.3 7.0 (**P = 0.04)b
3x2-2 D 39.9 41.8 8.3
3x2-3 S 39.9 41.2 5.5
Twice, 10⁵ 5x2-1 S 39.9 40.9 41.0
(**P = 0.03)b
NDc 5.7 7.2 (**P = 0.04)b
5x2-2 D 39.9 41.1 7.6
5x2-3 D 39.6 41.1 8.4
a

D; dead, S; survived.

b

Mann–Whitney U test.

c

ND, not detected.

Only three out of 12 pigs survived the challenge: one that received a single dose of 103 TCID50 of the AQSΔS273R, one that received a double dose of 103 TCID50 of the AQSΔS273R, and one that received a double dose of 105 TCID50 of the AQSΔS273R. All other pigs succumbed by 12 dpc. While all pigs exhibited high fever (>40°C) and viremia following challenge, these clinical signs were transient in the surviving pigs and resolved by 15 dpc (Fig. 7). ASFV-specific antibodies were detected only in the sera of surviving pigs at 2 weeks post-challenge (data not shown). Notably, fever and viremia were less severe in AQSΔS273R-inoculated pigs compared to naive controls (Fig. 7; Table 1).

Fig 7.

Line graphs show rectal temperature and viral load responses in AQS delta S273R-vaccinated pigs. Vaccinated animals exhibit reduced fever and viremia. Double-dose and higher concentration regimens provide better protection against virus challenges.

Assessment of the protective efficacy of AQSΔS273R in pigs. (A) Rectal temperature after challenge with the parental virus. Fever was defined as a temperature above 40℃ (red line). (B) Viral copy numbers in whole blood after challenge with the parental virus, as measured using quantitative PCR. The dotted lines indicate the detection limit of the assay. Green and blue indicate animal groups immunized with either 103 or 105 TCID50 of AQSΔS273R, respectively. The number of inoculations is displayed above each graph. All inoculated pigs were challenged with 102 TCID50 of the parental virulent strain AQS-C-1-22 at 21 dpi for the single-dose groups (left panels) and 28 dpi for the double-dose groups (right panels). Crosses indicate dead or euthanized pigs.

Gross pathological lesions, including splenomegaly and severe hemorrhage in the gastrohepatic lymph nodes, were observed in all euthanized and deceased pigs but were absent in the survivors.

DISCUSSION

Recent studies have developed several attenuated ASFV strains as promising live vaccine candidates, demonstrating high efficacy against infections with virulent field strains (14, 15, 2931). However, concerns remain regarding biosafety, as some of these vaccine candidate strains have been shown to persist in inoculated animals for unexpectedly long periods. This persistence raises the risk of reversion to virulence through spontaneous molecular events. In this study, we propose a novel approach for generating safer vaccine candidates by deleting essential viral genes to create replication-restricted, genetically modified ASFVs. Ideally, such viruses would be rapidly cleared from immunized hosts while still eliciting robust immunity. To this end, we constructed a replication-deficient ASFV mutant lacking the S273R gene using genetically engineered IPKM cells that stably expressed the deleted gene product, thereby allowing virus replication.

The S273R gene encodes a cysteine proteinase that is essential for processing the viral structural proteins pp220 and pp62 during viral core shell formation (26, 27). Deletion of this gene disrupts virus maturation and replication. In line with previous findings, the resulting AQSΔS273R mutant lacked replication and propagation activities in wild-type IPKM cells (Fig. 3). Moreover, pigs inoculated with 105 TCID50 of AQSΔS273R showed no clinical signs such as pyrexia and viremia (Fig. 5), indicating that viral replication was severely suppressed both in vitro and in vivo.

Following the challenge with the parental virulent ASFV strain, pigs immunized with AQSΔS273R exhibited lower peak body temperatures and reduced viremia compared to unvaccinated controls (Fig. 7; Table 1), indicating partial protective immunity. Although ASFV-specific antibody titers did not significantly increase (Fig. 6), mRNA expression of p30 and p72 (data not shown) suggests that these proteins, along with pp62, were likely synthesized, potentially contributing to immunity despite limited antibody responses. This suggests that protection is likely mediated by cellular immune responses rather than humoral responses, consistent with recent studies (32, 33). Although our results suggest a role for cellular immunity, direct evidence is still lacking; therefore, future work should evaluate these responses by evaluating ASFV-specific CD8+ T-cell proliferation and IFN-γ production to confirm the proposed mechanism of protection. However, due to the lack of direct evidence supporting our interpretation, further elucidation of the protective mechanism mediated by ASFV-specific cellular immunity is necessary.

Our findings reveal that AQSΔS273R exhibits suboptimal immunogenicity, necessitating further efforts to improve its efficacy. This limited efficacy is likely to result from insufficient presentation of viral antigens by antigen-presenting cells (APCs), which impair adaptive immune responses. Dose escalation (e.g., 10⁷ TCID₅₀) and multi-dose prime–boost regimens could be promising strategies to elicit stronger immune responses. Previous studies on inactivated ASFV vaccines have suggested that, while not fully protective due to lacking MHC class I-dependent immune activation, improved antigen-specific responses (32). Co-administration with adjuvants may also enhance the efficacy of AQSΔS273R, as suggested in prior studies (33).

Live attenuated vaccines with deletions of non-essential gene(s) can induce robust immunity through repeated rounds of replication in the host. However, these vaccines inherently carry risks of unintended biological changes in transmissibility and pathogenicity due to accumulation of spontaneous mutations during in vivo passage. Recent reports have suggested such alterations with currently used vaccine strains (16, 17). Replication-restricted viruses are not entirely risk-free, as mutations may still arise during their limited replication in the host. However, because the number of replication cycles in vivo is inherently limited, mutation rates are substantially reduced, conferring a high degree of safety of these viruses when used as vaccines in practical applications. Additionally, unlike viral-vectored or subunit vaccines, replication-restricted virus vaccines express a comprehensive set of ASFV antigenic epitopes, which are processed and presented by APCs in infected hosts. This process may enable broader immune responses, potentially critical for achieving full protection against ASFV while ensuring superior safety compared to conventional live attenuated vaccines.

In conclusion, we have established a novel platform for the generation of replication-restricted ASFVs by utilizing genetically modified IPKM cells that complement essential viral gene deletions. This system enables the efficient development of ASFV mutants with replication-restricted phenotypes, offering valuable tools not only for creating safe vaccines but also for advancing our understanding of ASFV pathogenesis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cells

IPKM cells were established in our institute by immortalizing porcine primary cultures of kidney macrophages with recombinant lentivirus vectors expressing either SV40 large T antigen or porcine telomerase reverse transcriptase, as previously described (34). IPKM cells are highly susceptible to field ASFV isolates and cell-adapted ASFV isolates (3537). These were routinely maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, 08459-35; Nakalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (10270-106; Gibco, Waltham, MA, USA), 10 μg/mL bovine insulin (I0516; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), 25 μM monothioglycerol (195-15791; Wako, Osaka, Japan), and antibiotics (168-23191, Wako). The cells were grown in cell culture plates and flasks for suspension culture (Sumitomo Bakelite, Tokyo, Japan). Lenti-X 293T cells (632180; TaKaRa Bio, Shiga, Japan) were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum.

Virus

The virulent ASFV strain AQS-C-1-22 (genotype II) was isolated from an illegally imported pork product seized by the animal quarantine service of Japan (36, 38). AQS-C-1-22 was propagated in IPKM cells and used for experiments. All experiments involving ASFV strains were performed in the biosafety level 3 facility of the institute accredited by the national authority of Japan.

Establishment of S273R-expressing IPKM cells

The S273R gene of AQS-C-1-22 was amplified using specific primers and cloned into the pLVSIN-CMV Pur lentiviral vector (6183, TaKaRa Bio) between the EcoRI and BamHI digestion sites (pLVSIN-S273R). To generate recombinant lentivirus, pLVSIN-S273R and Lentiviral High Titer Packaging Mix (6194, TaKaRa Bio) were co-transfected into Lenti-X 293T cells. The S273R-expressing lentivirus was inoculated into IPKM cells, and the expressing cells were selected using puromycin selection (2 μg/mL, ant-pr-1; Invivogen, San Diego, CA, USA). The mRNA expression level of S273R was measured using real-time reverse transcription PCR. Briefly, total RNA was extracted from 2 × 105 cells by the CellAmp Direct RNA Prep Kit for RT-PCR (Real Time) (3732, TaKaRa Bio) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The expression level of S273R was quantified using the One Step TB Green PrimeScript RT-PCR Kit II (RR086A, TaKaRa Bio) with specific primer sets to detect S273R. pLVSIN-S273R was used as a standard in the concentration range of 1.0 × 108–1.0 × 101 copies/µL.

Generation of AQSΔS273R and S273R addback virus

AQSΔS273R was generated through plasmid-based homologous recombination in IPKM cells. The upstream region of the S273R gene (approximately 1,000 bp), combined with the p72 gene promoter sequence, the mCherry gene, and the downstream region of the S273R gene (approximately 1,000 bp) in this order, was cloned into the pGEM-T Easy vector (pTE-ΔS273R). We also constructed a vector using pCas-Guide (GE100002; ORiGENE, Rockville, MD, USA) as the backbone encoding the Cas9 nuclease gene and S273R-specific guide RNA (pCas-Guide S273R) (39). After transducing pTE-ΔS273R and pCas-Guide S273R into IPKM cells, the cells were infected with AQS-C-1-22 at an MOI of 0.1. At 5 dpi, the viral supernatant was collected, and limiting dilution was performed in IPKM/S273R cells to isolate AQSΔS273R. Viral DNA was extracted from isolated clones with mCherry fluorescence. The gene replacement of the S273R gene with the mCherry gene was confirmed by PCR using the primer sets described in Fig. S1. To reconstitute the S273R gene in AQSΔS273R, a pGEM-T Easy vector containing the entire S273R gene was introduced into IPKM cells, followed by the inoculation of AQSΔS273R. The addback virus was isolated by the limiting dilution method as described above. The primer sets used for the generation of AQSΔS273R and its addback mutant are described in Fig. S1 and Table 1.

Growth kinetics

AQS-C-1-22, AQSΔS273R, or addback viruses were inoculated into IPKM or IPKM/S273R cells at an MOI of 0.01 and incubated for 60 min at 37°C before being completely removed. The cells were washed and maintained in growth medium. Culture supernatants were collected daily up to 5 dpi. Finally, the TCID50 of all the supernatants was determined using IPKM cells as the host cells.

Next-generation sequencing of the ASFV genome

Genome sequencing was performed as previously described with slight modifications (3537). Briefly, the collected viral supernatant was centrifuged at 180,000 × g at 4°C for 3 h. The resultant pellets were resuspended in 100 µL of phosphate-buffered saline and treated with 250 U of benzonase nuclease (E8263, Merck) at 37°C for 1 h. Viral DNA was extracted using the High Pure Viral Nucleic Acid Kit (11858874001; Roche, Basel, Switzerland) and subjected to next-generation sequencing using the iSEQ 100 Sequencing System (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocols. The viral reads were trimmed using the Trimmomatic tool, v.0.36.3 (40), and mapped to the genome of the AQS-C-1-22 isolate (GenBank accession no. LC659087) using the Bowtie2 tool (41). The data processing and analysis were performed using the Galaxy web platform, v.2.3.0 (42). The accession number for AQSΔS273R is LC896302.

Quantitative PCR

Viral DNA was extracted from whole blood or tissue homogenate using the High Pure Viral Nucleic Acid Kit (Roche). PCR was performed as previously described (43).

Animal experiments

All pigs received weaner/grower feed and had access to water ad libitum throughout the study. The animals were observed daily for clinical signs and/or welfare impairment. All efforts were made to minimize animal suffering and to reduce the number of animals used.

The virulence of AQSΔS273R was assessed using 8-week-old castrated crossbred Landrace × Large White × Duroc male and female pigs, 17 in total, obtained from a commercial health-status herd. All pigs were checked for the absence of ASFV and anti-ASFV antibodies using quantitative PCR (43) and the ID Screen African Swine Fever Indirect Kit (ASFS-2P, IDvet), respectively. The pigs were randomly divided into five groups: four groups of three pigs each and one group of five pigs. The group with five pigs was inoculated intramuscularly with the AQS-C-1-22 strain at a single dose of 102 TCID50. The other four groups were inoculated intramuscularly with AQSΔS273R at either single or double doses of 103 or 105 TCID50. In the double-dose groups, the second inoculation was performed 14 days after the initial inoculation. The pigs’ clinical signs and body temperature were monitored daily up to 21 dpi for the single-dose groups and 28 dpi for the double-dose groups.

After the virulence experiment, the animals inoculated with AQSΔS273R were used for the challenge experiment. The inoculated animals were challenged by intramuscular inoculation with 102 TCID50 of the virulent parental strain AQS-C-1-22, and their clinical signs and body temperature were monitored daily up to 30 dpc.

When pigs markedly reduced their activity and lay down, a humane endpoint was deemed to have been reached, and euthanasia was justified on welfare grounds. Spleens, kidneys, lungs, and gastrohepatic lymph nodes were harvested from dead or euthanized pigs and homogenized in phosphate-buffered saline using a Micro Smash homogenizer (TOMY, Tokyo, Japan).

Detection of ASFV-specific antibodies

ASFV-specific antibodies in the sera of inoculated or challenged pigs were detected at 0, 7, 14, 21, and 28 dpi and 7, 13, 20, and 28 dpc using the ID Screen African Swine Fever Indirect Kit (IDvet), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The optical density (OD) was measured at 450 nm on a Nivo microplate reader (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). The sample-to-positive (S/P) ratio was calculated using the following equation: (sample OD − negative control OD) / (positive control OD − negative control OD). Samples with an S/P ratio of 0.4 or higher were considered positive for ASFV-specific antibodies.

Statistics

The viral growth kinetics, maximum of rectal temperature in pigs, and maximum of viral copy number in pigs were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U test to assess statistical significance. Statistical analysis of core shell localization was performed using the Steel–Dwass test to determine the statistical significance of differences.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank Mr. Ken Ishii, Mr. Masayuki Kanda, Mr. Tatsuo Nakamura, Mr. Yuki Kimura, and Mr. Yuki Takahashi for helping us collect blood samples from pigs and take care of the pigs. The authors acknowledge Ms. Reiko Yamazoe, Mr. DeMar Taylor, Ms. Akiko Takahashi, Mr. Ryoichi Masui, and Ms. Ayumi Yoshimoto for their technical assistance and contribution.

This study was conducted under the research project “Regulatory Research Projects for Food Safety, Animal Health and Plant Protection (JPJ008617. 20319736),” funded by the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan.

Contributor Information

Takehiro Kokuho, Email: kokuho.takehiro756@naro.go.jp.

Biao He, Changchun Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun, China.

DATA AVAILABILITY

The genome sequence of AQSΔS273R (accession no. LC896302) has been deposited in DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank.

ETHICS APPROVAL

Animal experiments were conducted in compliance with the regulations outlined in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals issued by the National Institute of Animal Health, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization; the Guidelines for Proper Conduct of Animal Experiments issued by the Science Council of Japan (44); and the ARRIVE guidelines (45). The animal study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the National Institute of Animal Health (approval number 22-007).

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02229-25.

Figure S1. spectrum.02229-25-s0001.tif.

Schematic representation of the plasmid construction for generating AQSΔS273R or addback viruses.

DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.02229-25.SuF1
Table S1. spectrum.02229-25-s0002.docx.

Primer sets used for AQSΔS273R and addback generation.

DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.02229-25.SuF2

ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Wang N, Zhao D, Wang J, Zhang Y, Wang M, Gao Y, Li F, Wang J, Bu Z, Rao Z, Wang X. 2019. Architecture of African swine fever virus and implications for viral assembly. Science 366:640–644. doi: 10.1126/science.aaz1439 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Dixon LK, Chapman DAG, Netherton CL, Upton C. 2013. African swine fever virus replication and genomics. Virus Res 173:3–14. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2012.10.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Quembo CJ, Jori F, Vosloo W, Heath L. 2018. Genetic characterization of African swine fever virus isolates from soft ticks at the wildlife/domestic interface in Mozambique and identification of a novel genotype. Transbound Emerg Dis 65:420–431. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12700 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Goatley LC, Freimanis GL, Tennakoon C, Bastos A, Heath L, Netherton CL. 2024. African swine fever virus NAM P1/95 is a mixture of genotype I and genotype VIII viruses. Microbiol Resour Announc 13:e0006724. doi: 10.1128/mra.00067-24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Rowlands RJ, Michaud V, Heath L, Hutchings G, Oura C, Vosloo W, Dwarka R, Onashvili T, Albina E, Dixon LK. 2008. African swine fever virus isolate, Georgia, 2007. Emerg Infect Dis 14:1870–1874. doi: 10.3201/eid1412.080591 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Sánchez-Vizcaíno JM, Mur L, Martínez-López B. 2013. African swine fever (ASF): five years around Europe. Vet Microbiol 165:45–50. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.11.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Ge S, Li J, Fan X, Liu F, Li L, Wang Q, Ren W, Bao J, Liu C, Wang H, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Xu T, Wu X, Wang Z. 2018. Molecular characterization of African swine fever virus, China, 2018. Emerg Infect Dis 24:2131–2133. doi: 10.3201/eid2411.181274 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Gonzales W, Moreno C, Duran U, Henao N, Bencosme M, Lora P, Reyes R, Núñez R, De Gracia A, Perez AM. 2021. African swine fever in the Dominican Republic. Transbound Emerg Dis 68:3018–3019. doi: 10.1111/tbed.14341 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Sun E, Huang L, Zhang X, Zhang J, Shen D, Zhang Z, Wang Z, Huo H, Wang W, Huangfu H, Wang W, Li F, Liu R, Sun J, Tian Z, Xia W, Guan Y, He X, Zhu Y, Zhao D, Bu Z. 2021. Genotype I African swine fever viruses emerged in domestic pigs in China and caused chronic infection. Emerg Microbes Infect 10:2183–2193. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2021.1999779 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Zhao D, Sun E, Huang L, Ding L, Zhu Y, Zhang J, Shen D, Zhang X, Zhang Z, Ren T, Wang W, Li F, He X, Bu Z. 2023. Highly lethal genotype I and II recombinant African swine fever viruses detected in pigs. Nat Commun 14:3096. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-38868-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Lee K, Vu TTH, Yeom M, Nguyen VD, Than TT, Nguyen VT, Jeong DG, Ambagala A, Le VP, Song D. 2024. Molecular characterization of emerging recombinant African swine fever virus of genotype I and II in Vietnam, 2023. Emerg Microbes Infect 13:2404156. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2024.2404156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Igolkin A, Mazloum A, Zinyakov N, Chernyshev R, Schalkwyk A van, Shotin A, Lavrentiev I, Gruzdev K, Chvala I. 2024. Detection of the first recombinant African swine fever virus (genotypes I and II) in domestic pigs in Russia. Mol Biol Rep 51:1011. doi: 10.1007/s11033-024-09961-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Eustace Montgomery R. 1921. On a form of swine fever occurring in British East Africa (Kenya Colony). J Comp Pathol Therap 34:159–191. doi: 10.1016/S0368-1742(21)80031-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. O’Donnell V, Holinka LG, Gladue DP, Sanford B, Krug PW, Lu X, Arzt J, Reese B, Carrillo C, Risatti GR, Borca MV. 2015. African swine fever virus Georgia isolate harboring deletions of MGF360 and MGF505 genes is attenuated in swine and confers protection against challenge with virulent parental virus. J Virol 89:6048–6056. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00554-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Borca MV, Ramirez-Medina E, Silva E, Vuono E, Rai A, Pruitt S, Holinka LG, Velazquez-Salinas L, Zhu J, Gladue DP. 2020. Development of a highly effective African swine fever virus vaccine by deletion of the I177L gene results in sterile immunity against the current epidemic Eurasia strain. J Virol 94:e02017-19. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02017-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Ambagala A, Goonewardene K, Kanoa IE, Than TT, Nguyen VT, Lai TNH, Nguyen TL, Erdelyan CNG, Robert E, Tailor N, Onyilagha C, Lamboo L, Handel K, Nebroski M, Vernygora O, Lung O, Le VP. 2024. Characterization of an African swine fever virus field isolate from Vietnam with deletions in the left variable multigene family region. Viruses 16:571. doi: 10.3390/v16040571 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. van den Born E, Olasz F, Mészáros I, Göltl E, Oláh B, Joshi J, van Kilsdonk E, Segers R, Zádori Z. 2025. African swine fever virus vaccine strain Asfv-G-∆I177l reverts to virulence and negatively affects reproductive performance. NPJ Vaccines 10:46. doi: 10.1038/s41541-025-01099-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Nguyen TC, Bui NTT, Nguyen LT, Ngo TNT, Van Nguyen C, Nguyen LM, Nouhin J, Karlsson E, Padungtod P, Pamornchainavakul N, Kesdangsakonwut S, Thanawongnuwech R, Do DT. 2025. An African swine fever vaccine-like variant with multiple gene deletions caused reproductive failure in a Vietnamese breeding herd. Sci Rep 15:14919. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-95641-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Kitamura T, Masujin K, Ikezawa M, Ambagala A, Kokuho T. 2025. Generation of chimeric African swine fever viruses through in vitro and in vivo intergenotypic gene complementation. Vaccines (Basel) 13:462. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13050462 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Guo H, Baker SF, Martínez-Sobrido L, Topham DJ. 2014. Induction of CD8 T cell heterologous protection by a single dose of single-cycle infectious influenza virus. J Virol 88:12006–12016. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01847-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Ishikawa T, Widman DG, Bourne N, Konishi E, Mason PW. 2008. Construction and evaluation of a chimeric pseudoinfectious virus vaccine to prevent Japanese encephalitis. Vaccine (Auckl) 26:2772–2781. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.03.010 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Yahalom-Ronen Y, Tamir H, Melamed S, Politi B, Shifman O, Achdout H, Vitner EB, Israeli O, Milrot E, Stein D, et al. 2020. A single dose of recombinant VSV-∆G-spike vaccine provides protection against SARS-CoV-2 challenge. Nat Commun 11:6402. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20228-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Koonpaew S, Kaewborisuth C, Srisutthisamphan K, Wanitchang A, Thaweerattanasinp T, Saenboonrueng J, Poonsuk S, Jengarn J, Viriyakitkosol R, Kramyu J, Jongkaewwattana A. 2021. A single-cycle influenza A virus-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine elicits potent immune responses in a mouse model. Vaccines (Basel) 9:850. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9080850 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Anguiano-Zarate SS, Matchett WE, Nehete PN, Sastry JK, Marzi A, Barry MA. 2018. A replicating single-cycle adenovirus vaccine against ebola virus. J Infect Dis 218:1883–1889. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiy411 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Marzi A, Ebihara H, Callison J, Groseth A, Williams KJ, Geisbert TW, Feldmann H. 2011. Vesicular stomatitis virus-based Ebola vaccines with improved cross-protective efficacy. J Infect Dis 204:S1066–S1074. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir348 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Andrés G, Alejo A, Simón-Mateo C, Salas ML. 2001. African swine fever virus protease, a new viral member of the SUMO-1-specific protease family. J Biol Chem 276:780–787. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M006844200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Alejo A, Andrés G, Salas ML. 2003. African swine fever virus proteinase is essential for core maturation and infectivity. J Virol 77:5571–5577. doi: 10.1128/jvi.77.10.5571-5577.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Andrés G, Alejo A, Salas J, Salas ML. 2002. African swine fever virus polyproteins pp220 and pp62 assemble into the core shell. J Virol 76:12473–12482. doi: 10.1128/jvi.76.24.12473-12482.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. O’Donnell V, Holinka LG, Krug PW, Gladue DP, Carlson J, Sanford B, Alfano M, Kramer E, Lu Z, Arzt J, Reese B, Carrillo C, Risatti GR, Borca MV. 2015. African swine fever virus Georgia 2007 with a deletion of virulence-associated gene 9GL (B119L), when administered at low doses, leads to virus attenuation in swine and induces an effective protection against homologous challenge. J Virol 89:8556–8566. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00969-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Gladue DP, Ramirez-Medina E, Vuono E, Silva E, Rai A, Pruitt S, Espinoza N, Velazquez-Salinas L, Borca MV. 2021. Deletion of the A137R gene from the pandemic strain of African swine fever virus attenuates the strain and offers protection against the virulent pandemic virus. J Virol 95:e0113921. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01139-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Gallardo C, Soler A, Rodze I, Nieto R, Cano-Gómez C, Fernandez-Pinero J, Arias M. 2019. Attenuated and non-haemadsorbing (non-HAD) genotype II African swine fever virus (ASFV) isolated in Europe, Latvia 2017. Transbound Emerg Dis 66:1399–1404. doi: 10.1111/tbed.13132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Pikalo J, Porfiri L, Akimkin V, Roszyk H, Pannhorst K, Kangethe RT, Wijewardana V, Sehl-Ewert J, Beer M, Cattoli G, Blome S. 2022. Vaccination with a gamma irradiation-inactivated African swine fever virus is safe but does not protect against a challenge. Front Immunol 13:832264. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.832264 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Li X, Galliher-Beckley A, Huang H, Sun X, Shi J. 2013. Peptide nanofiber hydrogel adjuvanted live virus vaccine enhances cross-protective immunity to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. Vaccine (Auckl) 31:4508–4515. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.07.080 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Takenouchi T, Kitani H, Suzuki S, Nakai M, Fuchimoto D-I, Tsukimoto M, Shinkai H, Sato M, Uenishi H. 2017. Immortalization and characterization of porcine macrophages that had been transduced with lentiviral vectors encoding the SV40 large T antigen and porcine telomerase reverse transcriptase. Front Vet Sci 4:132. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Masujin K, Kitamura T, Kameyama K-I, Okadera K, Nishi T, Takenouchi T, Kitani H, Kokuho T. 2021. An immortalized porcine macrophage cell line competent for the isolation of African swine fever virus. Sci Rep 11:4759. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84237-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Kameyama K-I, Kitamura T, Okadera K, Ikezawa M, Masujin K, Kokuho T. 2022. Usability of immortalized porcine kidney macrophage cultures for the isolation of ASFV without affecting virulence. Viruses 14:1794. doi: 10.3390/v14081794 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Kitamura T, Masujin K, Yamazoe R, Kameyama K-I, Watanabe M, Ikezawa M, Yamada M, Kokuho T. 2023. A spontaneously occurring African swine fever virus with 11 gene deletions partially protects pigs challenged with the parental strain. Viruses 15:311. doi: 10.3390/v15020311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Masujin K, Yamazoe R, Kameyama K-I, Yamada M, Kokuho T, Yamakawa M. 2019. The isolaton of infectious African swine fever from pork procucts seized at Japanese animal quarantine stations. Proc Jpn Pig Vet Soc 74:7–14. [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Borca MV, Holinka LG, Berggren KA, Gladue DP. 2018. CRISPR-Cas9, a tool to efficiently increase the development of recombinant African swine fever viruses. Sci Rep 8:3154. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21575-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. 2012. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 9:357–359. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Afgan E, Nekrutenko A, Grüning BA, Blankenberg D, Goecks J, Schatz MC, Ostrovsky AE, Mahmoud A, Lonie AJ, Syme A, et al. 2022. The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2022 update. Nucleic Acids Res 50:W345–W351. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac247 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. King DP, Reid SM, Hutchings GH, Grierson SS, Wilkinson PJ, Dixon LK, Bastos ADS, Drew TW. 2003. Development of a TaqMan PCR assay with internal amplification control for the detection of African swine fever virus. J Virol Methods 107:53–61. doi: 10.1016/s0166-0934(02)00189-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Kanazawa I, Karaki H, Washitani I, Hirohashi S, Asashima M, Osumi N, Taniguchi M, Nomoto A, Miyashita Y, Yano H, Ohno Y, Ozaki H, Kagiyama N, Shinoda Y, Tamaoki N, Yagami K. 2006. Guidelines for proper conduct of animal experiments. Science Council of Japan [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthi I, Emerson M, Altman DG. 2012. Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. Vet Clin Pathol 41:27–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-165X.2012.00418.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1. spectrum.02229-25-s0001.tif.

Schematic representation of the plasmid construction for generating AQSΔS273R or addback viruses.

DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.02229-25.SuF1
Table S1. spectrum.02229-25-s0002.docx.

Primer sets used for AQSΔS273R and addback generation.

DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.02229-25.SuF2

Data Availability Statement

The genome sequence of AQSΔS273R (accession no. LC896302) has been deposited in DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank.


Articles from Microbiology Spectrum are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES