Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Feb 12.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Biotechnol. 2023 Sep 25;42(8):1263–1274. doi: 10.1038/s41587-023-01957-8

Killing tumor-associated bacteria with a liposomal antibiotic generates neoantigens that induce anti-tumor immune responses

Menglin Wang 1, Benoit Rousseau 2, Kunyu Qiu 1, Guannan Huang 3,4,5, Yu Zhang 1, Hang Su 6, Christine Le Bihan-Benjamin 7, Ines Khati 7, Oliver Artz 2, Michael B Foote 2, Yung-Yi Cheng 8, Kuo-Hsiung Lee 8,9, Michael Z Miao 10,11, Yue Sun 12, Philippe-Jean Bousquet 13, Marc Hilmi 14,15, Elise Dumas 16,17,18, Anne-Sophie Hamy 16,19, Fabien Reyal 16,20,21, Lin Lin 22, Paul M Armistead 22,23, Wantong Song 24,25, Ava Vargason 1, Janelle C Arthur 3,5,26, Yun Liu 1, Jianfeng Guo 1, Xuefei Zhou 1, Juliane Nguyen 1, Yongqun He 27,28,29, Jenny P-Y Ting 3,4,5,30, Aaron C Anselmo 1, Leaf Huang 1,
PMCID: PMC12892252  NIHMSID: NIHMS2115238  PMID: 37749267

Abstract

Increasing evidence implicates the tumor microbiota as a factor that can influence cancer progression. In patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), we found that pre-resection antibiotics targeting anaerobic bacteria substantially improved disease-free survival by 25.5%. For mouse studies, we designed an antibiotic silver-tinidazole complex encapsulated in liposomes (LipoAgTNZ) to eliminate tumor-associated bacteria in the primary tumor and liver metastases without causing gut microbiome dysbiosis. Mouse CRC models colonized by tumor-promoting bacteria (Fusobacterium nucleatum spp.) or probiotics (Escherichia coli Nissle spp.) responded to LipoAgTNZ therapy, which enabled more than 70% long-term survival in two F. nucleatum-infected CRC models. The antibiotic treatment generated microbial neoantigens that elicited anti-tumor CD8+ T cells. Heterologous and homologous bacterial epitopes contributed to the immunogenicity, priming T cells to recognize both infected and uninfected tumors. Our strategy targets tumor-associated bacteria to elicit anti-tumoral immunity, paving the way for microbiome–immunotherapy interventions.


Establishing immune responses against cancer-derived epitopes has become the mainstay of cancer immunotherapy1. Unleashing T cell immunity to elicit anti-tumor immune responses has led to important clinical advances against cancer, including checkpoint inhibitors, cancer vaccines and chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapies2. Failures in achieving immunotherapy efficacy in colorectal cancer (CRC) have been attributed to both a low mutation load, resulting in the lack of mutation-derived neoantigens, and the immunosuppressive environment of the tumor. Tumors with low mutational burden pose greater challenges for personalized neoantigen vaccines—for example, in patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) CRC tumors. MSS CRC is typically resistant to immune checkpoint blockade, and innovative immunomodulating strategies are needed3. Recent studies have suggested that intratumoral bacteria are intracellularly present in both cancer and immune cells within the tumor microenvironment4, which may provide an alternative source of neoepitopes for cancer immunotherapy. We hypothesize that killing the intracellular bacteria in the tumor will expose microbial epitopes and yield alternative sources of cancer-associated neoantigens.

Preclinical studies have shown that T cell immunity elicited by bacteria cross-react with major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I)-restricted antigens from cancer cells, suggesting that microbe-specific T cells contribute to anti-tumor immune responses5,6. A commensal Bacteroides species peptide mimic drove the progression of spontaneous autoimmune myocarditis depending on cardiac myosin-specific TH17 cells7. The microbiota elicits microbe-specific T cell responses that are speculated to escape from self-tolerance mechanisms. We hypothesize that homologous epitopes shared by both the bacteria and the host contribute to anti-tumor immunity.

Nanotechnology is a promising tool for the intracellular delivery of small molecules to the tumor site. Drug-loaded nanoparticles can specifically abolish the colonization of intracellular bacteria in the tumor8. In the present study, we tested a strategy by delivering liposomes loaded with a silver-tinidazole complex (LipoAgTNZ) by remote loading technology to bacteria-infected orthotopic CRC tumors in mice. We show here that eliminating bacteria from CRC tumors via liposomal delivery of antibiotics targeting anaerobic bacteria unleashed anti-tumor CD8 T cells. We analyzed the heterologous and homologous epitopes based on genome-wide alignment between the host and the colonizing bacteria. In an oncogenic Fusobacterium nucleatum-infected model, T cells responded to both F. nucleatum and host-shared epitopes. The killing of tumor-associated bacteria improved cancer therapy outcomes by exposing microbial epitopes.

Results

Antibiotics targeting anaerobes improved cancer survival

Microbial cells outnumber host cells nine-to-one in the human distal gut9, which impart both beneficial and detrimental influences on host physiology10. Broad-spectrum antibiotic treatments compromise microbiome diversity and impair the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy11,12; therefore, an important therapeutic opportunity remains through the selective targeting of oncogenic bacteria that are associated with cancer malignancies—for example, gastric (Helicobacter pylori) and colorectal (F. nucleatum and Bacteroides fragilis) cancer13,14. Nitroimidazole and lincomycin are antibiotic classes approved to treat infections associated with anaerobic bacteria. We started our approach by investigating a nationwide pharmaco-epidemiologic database of patients with CRC to determine if resected patients with CRC exposed to these antibiotic classes had improved disease-free survival (DFS) compared to patients receiving other antibiotics or not receiving any antibiotics (Fig. 1a). Between 2012 and 2014, among 36,105 patients who had curative-intent resection of a colorectal tumor, a total of 4,413 patients with CRC, comprising 12% of the cohort, received antibiotic treatment of the nitroimidazole or lincomycin classes within 6 months before resection to 12 months after resection (Supplementary Fig. 1a). To limit time-dependent biases, the exposure to antibiotics was assessed as a time-dependent variable (Supplementary Fig. 1b). To obtain the specific effect of the group of antibiotics targeting F. nucleatum, multivariate Cox models were performed on the group of patients who did not receive antibiotics other than one included in this class.

Fig. 1 |. The class of antibiotics targeting anaerobic bacteria have protective effect on patients with CRC.

Fig. 1 |

a, List of antibiotics that were administered to the cohort and the proportion of the patients who received each drug. b, Multivariate analyses by Cox model representing a summary of the maximum likelihood estimates for each variable included in the model. c, DFS at 3 years (no death or recurrence within 3 years) comparing patients receiving only antibiotics targeting anaerobes or patients receiving other antibiotics before resection of CRC. Dashed lines represent the 95% CI. ICU, intensive care unit.

As we previously reported a prognostic interaction between antibiotic intake and chemotherapy exposure15, we focused our analysis on patients who did not received any cytotoxic treatment. The hazard ratio (HR) was lower for antibiotics targeting anaerobes than without antibiotics administration among patients with CRC. This protective effect occurred in the patients who received antibiotics before resection of the tumor but not after resection (Fig. 1b). After resection, the protective effect of antibiotics targeting anaerobes did not occur, which suggests a specific role of these antibiotics when the tumor has not yet been removed. Taking antibiotics targeting anaerobes when the tumor is a target lesion reduced the risk of recurrence or death by 25.5% (HR = 0.745, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57–0.98, two-sided P = 0.037) (Supplementary Fig. 1c). Colorectal tumors have direct accessibility to gut microbiota and oral availability to antibiotics; therefore, to assess the specific role of tumor primary, we studied an independent cohort of patients with breast cancer (n = 94,484, with 688 patients exposed to nitroimidazole or lincomycin). This protective effect was not found in patients with breast cancer in a multivariate model using the same methodology and adjusted for breast-cancer-relevant prognosis factors (Supplementary Fig. 2a), suggesting that this protective role is specific to CRC and its microbiota. Comparing patients receiving antibiotics targeting anaerobes with patients receiving other antibiotics, we also confirmed that the DFS was improved for antibiotics targeting anaerobes before resection of CRC compared to other antibiotics (P(log rank) = 0.019; Fig. 1c). Again, this effect was not observed for patients with breast cancer (Supplementary Fig. 2b). The results strengthen the hypothesis that specific antibiotics have the potential to reduce the risk of recurrence of CRC with an effect that may be as important as chemotherapy, which usually reduces the risk of recurrence by 32% or death by 26% after resection in combination with adjuvant treatments16. Although the microbiota status of the patients is not known in the database, the encouraging clinical results for specific classes of antibiotics covering anaerobic bacteria have prompted us to establish a well-defined, bacteria-infected murine model for detailed study.

Bacteria invaded tumor cells in response to low oxygen level

Gram-negative and anaerobic bacteria, F. nucleatum, are prevalent in human CRC as well as metastasis1719. To examine whether the infection of F. nucleatum is correlated with tumor hypoxia, we acclimated CT26FL3 (RFP/Luc) cells to either 1% (hypoxia) or 20% oxygen (normoxia) for 24 h (Fig. 2a). CT26FL3 (RFP/Luc) cells were MSS and mismatch repair (MMR) proficient with close mutational signatures to the wild-type CT26 cells (Supplementary Fig. 3ac). F. nucleatum was able to invade hypoxic CT26FL3 (RFP/Luc) tumor cells (Fig. 2b) with 15-fold higher signals in comparison to cells in normoxia (Fig. 2c). Intracellular F. nucleatum was confirmed by stacking images highlighting the co-localization of F. nucleatum and phalloidin-labeled F-actin, which showed that F. nucleatum was able to invade inside the cytoskeleton in response to hypoxia (Fig. 2d). In F. nucleatum-infected CT26FL3 (RFP/Luc) spheroids, bacteria not only adhered to the surface but also translocated into the organoids (Fig. 2e and Supplementary Fig. 5a). The data agree with the clinical observation that F. nucleatum has a stronger correlation with larger tumors with hypoxic regions20. Spontaneous invasion to hypoxic tumor cells was also found in the facultative anaerobic probiotic strain Escherichia coli Nissle, which suggests that bacteria preferentially invade hypoxic tumors (Fig. 2f and Supplementary Fig. 6a).

Fig. 2 |. F. nucleatum invaded CT26FL3(Luc/RFP) tumor cells in response to hypoxia.

Fig. 2 |

a, Illustration of F. nucleatum infection of CT26FL3(Luc/RFP) cells in vitro. b, CFSE-labeled F. nucleatum invaded hypoxic CT26FL3(Luc/RFP) cells within a 4-h co-incubation. Scale bar, 20 μm. c, Quantification of the F. nucleatum-positive area by CFSE fluorescence. n = 5 experiments. Data are the mean ± s.d. ****P < 0.0001. d, Three-dimensional reconstruction of the z projection of stacked images of F. nucleatum-infected CT26FL3(Luc/RFP) cells. The three arrows in assorted colors indicate intracellular F. nucleatum. Scale bar, 5 μm. A video illustrating the spatial distribution of intracellular F. nucleatum is provided in Supplementary Video 1. e, F. nucleatum invaded into three-dimensional spheroids in hypoxia. z-stack image of CT26FL3(Luc/RFP) spheroids co-incubated with F. nucleatum. F. nucleatum covalently labeled by CFSE mostly appeared in intra-spheroid. The left panel is the bright-field optical image of the spheroid. n = 3 experiments. Scale bar, 100 μm. f, CFSE-labeled E. coli Nissle invaded hypoxic CT26FL3(Luc/RFP) cells. n = 2 experiments. Scale bar, 10 μm. g, TEM Images of CRC tumor sections. Yellow arrows indicate intracellular F. nucleatum. n = 3 experiments. Scale bar, 1 μm. h, FISH visualizing F. nucleatum 16S RNA in mouse CRC tumor sections. Scale bar, 20 μm. i, Fitting distribution of the minimum distance of F. nucleatum to the cell nucleus for each pixel. n = 4 experiments.

We established CRC in Balb/C mice infected with F. nucleatum (Supplementary Fig. 4a). F. nucleatum infection led to an over a 30-fold higher tumor growth ratio compared to uninfected controls (Supplementary Fig. 4bd). F. nucleatum infection considerably promoted tumor metastasis in proximal lymph nodes and distal metastasis (Supplementary Fig. 4e). The primary tumors, distal metastases and feces were confirmed to contain F. nucleatum (Supplementary Fig. 4f). There was a considerable increase in anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages and the CD11b+Gr1+ myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC) population compared to uninfected tumors. An important decrease in the CD8+ T cell population, memory T cells and CD11c+MHC-II+ dendritic cells were observed compared to the non-F. nucleatum-infected control group (Supplementary Fig. 4g).

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of F. nucleatum-infected CRC tumors demonstrated that F. nucleatum was intracellular in vivo in the tumor region (Fig. 2g). Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using an RNA probe specific for the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) of F. nucleatum was performed to visualize the bacterium in the CRC tumor sections. The red pixels indicating FISH signals were mapped to the nearest blue pixels indicating DAPI staining, which was calculated by a Euclidean distance map. We further fitted the minimum distance distribution by computing the percentage of FISH pixels versus distances to DAPI21, which was within the range of 3 μm, suggesting that F. nucleatum appeared near the cell nuclei in the CRC tumor (Fig. 2h,i and Supplementary Fig. 5b,c).

Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 (E. coli Nissle) has been widely studied as a probiotic and engineered bacterium that delivers therapeutics to hypoxic tumors22. We established orthotopic E. coli Nissle-colonized CRC tumors in BALB/c mice (Supplementary Fig. 6b). E. coli Nissle colonized in CRC tumors (Supplementary Fig. 6c,d) and fostered an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, which may be caused by colibactin, a genotoxin produced by certain E. coli strains23 (Supplementary Fig. 6e).

Liposomal antibiotics eliminated bacteria in the tumor

Because increasing evidence has shown that administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics potentially induces microbiota dysbiosis2426, a drug delivery system that efficiently delivers narrow-spectrum antibiotics against the anaerobic bacteria residing in the hypoxic tumor region is needed to reduce damage to the commensal microbiota in the gut. Nitroimidazole is part of a class of antimicrobial prodrugs that is inactive until reduced by the ferredoxin oxidoreductase system in obligate anaerobes2729. The reductive activation of the nitro group is proposed to form the cytotoxic nitro and other free radicals, leading to structural fragmentation and cytotoxicity to DNA30. The presence of oxygen tension inhibits the formation of the cytotoxic derivative. Reductive inactivation of the nitro group to the amino group occurs via oxygen-insensitive nitro reductases, rendering nitroimidazole non-toxic30. The intrinsic property of hypoxia activation enabled nitroimidazole to specifically clear the anaerobes residing in the hypoxic tumor. The nitroimidazole coordinates via the ring N3 donor atom with a variety of metal ions, including cobalt (II), copper (II), zinc (II) and silver (I) (Supplementary Fig. 7a). Among these metal ions, Ag+ ions are potent antibacterial agents used in various forms as antibiotics for centuries31. Silver nanoparticles may have the ability to adhere and penetrate the bacterial cell wall32. The silver (I) ions interact with sulfur and phosphorus, thereby causing altered activity of enzymes and DNA33. The formation of the silver-tinidazole complex was confirmed by mass spectrometry3436 (Supplementary Fig. 7b).

Tumor hypoxia directly correlates with tumor acidosis due to the Warburg effect favored by cancer cells that metabolized pyruvate into lactate and ethanol37. The low pH of hypoxic tumors as a result of elevated levels of lactic acid may allow drug release in anerobic bacteria residing in the region of the tumor. Inspired by the established metal gradient used for remote loading of chelate complexes into liposomes38, we hypothesized and demonstrated that the metal ions can be trapping agents for loading nitroimidazole into liposomes (Fig. 3a). The silver-tinidazole complex disassociated in acid, showing the same protonation of both TNZ and AgTNZ as the ring N3 donor atom in acidic medium at pH 4, a condition expected when liposomes enter cellular endosomes and lysosomes (Fig. 3b). The liposomes were spherical with a diameter of ~150 nm and a zeta potential of approximately −13.8 mV as determined by a nanoparticle tracking system (Supplementary Fig. 7c,d). The liposomes were uniform in morphology as imaged by cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) (Fig. 3c). The loading of TNZ into silver-containing liposomes was efficient with more than 80% encapsulation efficiency and more than 5% loading content (Fig. 3d). TNZ showed quick loading kinetics into the liposomes, over 80% of which were entrapped within 5 min (Fig. 3e). The TNZ-to-Ag ratio in the liposomes was 1.54 ± 0.18 (n = 4). This is lower than the theoretical ratio of 2, indicating that the liposomes contained some free Ag (I) and/or one-to-one complex. Copper (II) also formed a complex with tinidazole and encapsulated TNZ (Supplementary Fig. 7e). This liposome platform will provide a versatile approach to load nitroimidazole antibiotics targeting anaerobic bacteria in infected tumors. The liposomes dispersed in PBS at pH 7 were stable in 4 days (Supplementary Fig. 7f), and less than 10% of liposome cargoes were released in 30 h (Supplementary Fig. 7g). The bond between silver and tinidazole readily dissociates in acid, as the ring N3 donor atom (pKa = 4.7) was protonated at pH 4.5 (Fig. 3f). The data suggest that liposomes should be stable in systemic circulation without release of the antibiotic cargo.

Fig. 3 |. Characterization of the pH-sensitive antibiotic liposomes.

Fig. 3 |

a, Illustration of remote loading by a silver nitrate gradient and drug release in response to low pH. b, The 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) characterization in neutral pH and weak acid. n = 2 experiments. c, Cryo-EM images of LipoAg and LipoAgTNZ. n = 3 experiments. Scale bar, 200 nm. d, Summary of loading properties. n = 3 experiments. Data are the mean ± s.d. e, Loading kinetics of LipoAgTNZ. n = 3 experiments. Data are the mean ± s.d. f, pH-sensitive drug release of LipoAgTNZ at pH 4.5 and pH 7. Ag and TNZ were determined by ICP–MS and LC–MS, respectively. n = 2 experiments. g, Intracellular F. nucleatum killing by free AgTNZ and LipoAgTNZ under normoxia and hypoxia. n = 3 experiments. Data are the mean ± s.d. ****P < 0.0001. h, In vitro cell uptake of liposomes and free drug at 1 h, 2 h and 4 h. n = 3 experiments. Data are the mean ± s.d. *P < 0.05; ****P < 0.0001.

Antimicrobial assays were performed to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for F. nucleatum by plating and enumerating viable colony-forming units (CFU). The AgTNZ complex inhibited F. nucleatum with an MIC95 of approximately 100 nM (Supplementary Fig. 7h). CT26FL3(Luc/RFP) cells were infected with F. nucleatum and incubated with different concentrations of free AgTNZ or LipoAgTNZ for 12 h, and intracellular bacteria were quantified by CFU. Both LipoAgTNZ and free AgTNZ showed higher antimicrobial efficacy in hypoxia. The effective clearance concentration of intracellular F. nucleatum in hypoxia was 1.5 μM for LipoAgTNZ versus 7.5 μM for AgTNZ (Fig. 3g) due to the enhanced intracellular accumulation mediated by liposome delivery (Fig. 3h). Therefore, the liposomal formulation has the potential to facilitate intracellular F. nucleatum clearance.

To further profile the pharmacokinetic profiles in vivo, intravenous (i.v.)-injected LipoAgTNZ was analyzed by sampling blood from mice bearing orthotopic tumors at predetermined timepoints. The molar ratio of TNZ and Ag remained consistent (approximately 1.5 to 2) within the first 240 min in blood circulation. Compared to the free drug, liposomal TNZ showed superior pharmacokinetic profiles, as indicated by an increasing area under the curve (AUC) of the drug concentration in circulation (Supplementary Fig. 8a,b). Tinidazole is metabolized mainly by CYP3A4 (ref. 39), which supported the higher level and longer half-life (t1/2) of silver than TNZ in the tissues and blood (Supplementary Fig. 8c). Liposomes were labeled with DiD, a fluorescent dye that labels the lipid membrane of liposomes. The distribution of liposomes was determined by quantifying DiD fluorescence in the organs. The liposomes mainly localized to the tumor and the liver, as shown by ex vivo images (Supplementary Fig. 8d). Liposomes increased TNZ accumulation in the tumor by more than 10-fold (Supplementary Fig. 8e). Mice were killed at 24 h after i.v. injection of free drug and liposomes. All major organs including the tumor were harvested, homogenized and measured for both drug contents for biodistribution. Tinidazole encapsulated in liposomes mainly accumulated in the tumor at 24 h after i.v. injection, which suggests the success of tumor targeting (Supplementary Fig. 8f).

We performed MTT assays to analyze the in vitro cytotoxicity. Free Ag, TNZ and AgTNZ did not affect the viability of CT26FL3 (Luc/RFP) cells within 48 h of incubation at concentrations as high as 40 μM (Supplementary Fig. 9a,b). For the in vivo toxicity study of liposomal metal-imidazole complexes, healthy (non-tumor-bearing) mice were i.v. injected (4 mg kg−1 with respect to TNZ) with either LipoCuTNZ or LipoAgTNZ three times every third day. Treated mice showed no body weight change (Supplementary Fig. 9c). Major organs from tumor-bearing mice were dissected, fixed, embedded in paraffin and examined for tissue histology after treatments. Histological changes related to toxicity were not found among the main organs (Supplementary Fig. 9d). However, metastatic lesions (yellow arrows in the figure) were found in both the control and free TNZ groups. F. nucleatum inoculation by oral gavage increased blood platelets, which decreased in response to the LipoAgTNZ treatment. Interestingly, neutrophils—phagocytes decreased by bacterial infection—were considerably elevated in the blood after LipoAgTNZ treatment (Supplementary Fig. 9e). Toxicity biomarkers were assessed, and no obvious alterations in serum biomarkers were observed compared to the untreated mice (Supplementary Fig. 9f).

Killing intracellular bacteria improved immune surveillance

The infected CRC mouse model was used to test the therapeutic efficacy of the antibiotic liposomes. Balb/C mice orthotopically inoculated with tumors and additionally infected with F. nucleatum or E. coli Nissle received antibiotic liposome treatments (4.0 mg kg−1 TNZ and 1.1 mg kg−1 Ag, i.v.) (Fig. 4a). Although the growth of F. nucleatum-infected tumors was inhibited by both LipoAgTNZ and LipoCuTNZ at day 23 (Fig. 4b and Supplementary Fig. 10a,b), which eradicated the tumor-colonizing bacteria (Fig. 4c), LipoAgTNZ induced long-term survival in six of seven mice (Fig. 4d). We did not observe bacteria colonization in the main organs of mice treated with LipoAgTNZ (Supplementary Fig. 10c). The lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of Gram-negative bacteria was reduced in the tumor after the treatment (Supplementary Fig. 10d). We also tested the approach in the F. nucleatum-infected wild-type CT26 tumor model and observed the same tumor and metastasis inhibition with the CT26FL3(Luc/RFP) model (Supplementary Fig. 10eg). Liposomal AgTNZ was effective in reducing the probiotic E. coli Nissle content and inhibiting the growth of infected tumors (Fig. 4e,f). The survival study was also performed in F. nucleatum-infected wild-type MC38 tumor-bearing C57BL/6J mice, in which LipoAgTNZ achieved a 71% survival rate (Fig. 4l and Supplementary Fig. 10h) compared to infected mice without treatments.

Fig. 4 |. Removing F. nucleatum in the tumor by liposomal antibiotics AgTNZ eradicated CRC.

Fig. 4 |

a, Schematic timeline of the F. nucleatum-infected CT26FL3(Luc/RFP) tumor study followed by three doses of LipoAgTNZ treatment. b, Tumor growth was monitored by IVIS imaging at six predetermined timepoints. n = 5 per group. Data are the mean ± s.d. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01. c, CFU of F. nucleatum in the tumors at day 24. n = 4 per group. Data are the mean ± s.d. **P < 0.01. d, Animal survival curve following the dosing timeline (a) from day 0 to day 60. n = 7 per group. Data are the mean ± s.d. **P < 0.01. e, The growth curve of E. coli Nissle-infected tumors was monitored by IVIS imaging at six predetermined timepoints. n = 5 per group. Data are the mean ± s.d. ****P < 0.0001. f, CFU of E. coli Nissle in the tumors at day 24. n = 4 per group. Data are the mean ± s.d. *P < 0.1. g, FISH assays visualizing F. nucleatum 16S RNA; TUNEL staining showing apoptosis. n = 3 experiments. Scale bar, 20 μm. h, Quantification of fluorescence-positive area of g. i, Analyses of the immune cell population in the tumor microenvironment after treatment. n = 4 per group. Data are the mean ± s.d. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01. j, Tumor growth curve of the rechallenge study. n = 5 per group. Data are the mean ± s.d. *P < 0.05. k, Anti-CD8 and CD4 antibodies were given i.p. after the inoculation of rechallenged tumors as indicated by black arrows. n = 5 per group. Data are the mean ± s.d. *P < 0.05. l, Animal survival curve of F. nucleatum-infected MC38 tumor model following the timeline (a). m, Alpha diversity measuring the microbiome diversity of each sample. n = 4 per group. n, Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LefSe) to determine the differences at the genus level for significance tests. n = 4 per group. Data are the mean ± s.d. NS, not significant. o, Scheme of F. nucleatum-infected liver metastasis model. The CT26FL3(Luc/RFP) cells were pre-infected with F. nucleatum and inoculated into the liver by hemi-splenic injection, followed by three doses of LipoAgTNZ treatment. p, Tumor growth curve of CT26FL3(Luc/RFP) liver metastasis. n = 4 per group. Data are the mean ± s.d. *P < 0.05.

To test the hypothesis that tumor-associated bacteria are independent of gut-colonized F. nucleatum, polymyxin B (pmB) was used to eradicate the Gram-negative bacteria in the gut. pmB is a cyclic peptide with five positive charges and a log(P) of −5.6, rendering it low transmembrane permeability and poor oral bioavailability40. The orally administered pmB affected the bacteria only in the gut but not in the tumor due to low transmembrane partition and distribution (Supplementary Fig. 10i). The mice treated with pmB did not show a reduction in tumor growth (Supplementary Fig. 10j). We concluded that the tumor colonizing F. nucleatum promoted tumor progression, which is independent of the F. nucleatum burden in the gut. Interestingly, the efficacy of LipoAgTNZ was dependent on colonization of F. nucleatum in the tumor, as the uninfected mice did not respond as well as the infected mice (Supplementary Fig. 10k).

On day 24, tumors were excised and sectioned for the FISH assay using an F. nucleatum-specific RNA probe. Consistent with quantification by CFU, FISH signals revealed that LipoAgTNZ effectively reduced the F. nucleatum burden in CRC tumors. A TUNEL assay was performed and showed increased apoptotic cells after treatment (Fig. 4g,h). As AgTNZ did not show cytotoxicity to CT26FL3(Luc/RFP) tumor cells (Supplementary Fig. 9a,b), we hypothesized that the treatment induced anti-tumor immunity in immune-competent mice. Infiltration of CD3+ T cells, CD8+ cytotoxic T cells and CD44+CD62L+ memory T cells was increased in the LipoAgTNZ-treated F. nucleatum-infected tumors (Fig. 4i and Supplementary Fig. 11a,b). CD206+ M2 macrophage polarization was reduced after treatment with LipoAgTNZ (Fig. 4i and Supplementary Fig. 11c,d).

To investigate whether the treatment was able to trigger an immune memory response, the long-term survivors were subcutaneously rechallenged with tumor cells with or without F. nucleatum infection (Fig. 4a). There was no detectable tumor growth in the survivors but rapid growth in the naive mice (Fig. 4j). The therapeutic efficacy was dependent on the host immune system, as depletion of either CD8 or CD4 cells by antibodies (200 μg per mouse) diminished the anti-tumor activity (Fig. 4k). When mice were examined by necropsy after immune compromise by antibody treatment on day 75, there was no detectable primary tumor left in the long-term survivors (Supplementary Fig. 11e), indicating that the gut tumors were eradicated by the immune response that was dependent on both CD8+ and CD4+ T cells. Therefore, through elimination of the tumor-associated bacteria, the immune-suppressive microenvironment has been turned into an anti-tumoral immune-activated state. CD8 and CD4 cell depletion during primary treatments was performed using the infected CT26FL3(Luc/RFP) model, in which LipoAgTNZ induced tumor inhibition but did not induce long-term survival due to compromised T cell function during treatments (Supplementary Fig. 12ac).

The FadA adhesin of F. nucleatum interacts with E-cadherin, leading to activation of the β-catenin pathway41. F. nucleatum induces DNA damage, which promotes the release ofthe cellular tumor suppressor Trp53 (ref. 42). Vimentin is also important in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, which is upregulated in F. nucleatum-infected tumors43. LipoAgTNZ treatment reversed the induction of these metastasis mediators (E-cadherin, Vimentin and β-catenin), Trp53 and the key inflammatory NF-κB pathway in the F. nucleatum-infected tumors (Supplementary Fig. 12d).

The clinical treatment for Fusobacterium infection is the combination antibiotic therapy consisting of both β-lactam and anaerobic antimicrobial agent27. Treatment of the infected CT26FL3(Luc/RFP) tumor with the antibiotic cocktails decreased the tumor; however, cancer relapse occurred after the cocktail treatment (Supplementary Fig. 12ac). Antibiotic cocktails taken by oral administration non-selectively changed the gut microbiota composition and compromised the immune sensitivity44,45. To determine the gut microbiota diversity after LipoAgTNZ treatment, we performed high-throughput gene sequencing analysis of 16S rRNA in fecal bacterial DNA isolated from age-matched control and survivor mice at day 70. Rarefaction analysis comparing bacterial diversity within individual subjects revealed that survivors harbored a similar bacterial community relative to that of controls (Fig. 4m and Supplementary Fig. 13a). These data were further quantified by UniFrac dissimilarity distance analysis (Supplementary Fig. 13b), which was supported by bacterial operational taxonomic composition (Supplementary Fig. 13c). These results support the idea that specific gut microbiota homeostasis was protected by using LipoAgTNZ treatment. To analyze the differentiating bacterial features after antibiotic treatment, linear discriminant analysis effect size (LefSe) was applied to identify the difference in bacterial abundance at the genus level (Fig. 4n and Supplementary Fig. 13d). Interestingly, the enriched bacteria in survivors suggested physiological stress with regard to the abundances of Peptococcaceae, Bacteroidaceae and Clostridium46. The increased Roseburia produced butyrate, which prevented inflammation and maintained homeostasis in the colon47.

Liver metastasis, the most common distant metastasis in CRC, afflicts up to 70% of patients48. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 8df, liposomes predominantly accumulated in the tumor and the liver. We hypothesized that LipoAgTNZ liposomes can efficiently eliminate bacteria in the liver metastasis and induce anti-tumor effects. An F. nucleatum-infected liver metastasis model was established (Fig. 4o). The infected tumor cells were inoculated via the portal vein by hemi-splenic injection, which established uniform metastasis in the liver49. The development of liver metastasis was inhibited by treatment with LipoAgTNZ (4.0 mg kg−1 TNZ and 1.5 mg kg−1 Ag, i.v.), as quantified by luciferase imaging in vivo (Fig. 4p and Supplementary Fig. 14a,b). The tumor burdens were reduced by eight-fold at the endpoint, as quantified by ex vivo luciferase signals (Supplementary Fig. 14c,d). FISH imaging for F. nucleatum 16S RNA revealed a high abundance of bacteria in the untreated liver metastasis, which was importantly reduced after LipoAgTNZ treatment and associated with enhanced infiltration of CD8+ T cells. LipoAgTNZ treatment also reduced anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages, as CD206 expression was much lower than that in the control group (Supplementary Fig. 14e,f).

Unlike chemotherapy or oncogene-specific therapies that induce cytotoxicity to tumor cells, this strategy targeted the tumor-associated bacteria in the primary tumor and distal metastasis. The process of bacterial killing promoted an anti-cancer response, which restored immune surveillance and inhibited both primary tumor growth and metastatic progression. Thus, it was worthwhile to look for the bacterial epitopes that were recognized by the host immune system.

T cells from long-term survivors showed specificity to both infected and unifected tumors

To analyze T cell specificity to bacterial infection, T cells isolated from survivor mice were compared to those isolated from age-matched uninfected naive mice. Splenic pan T cells were labeled with the proliferation dye CFSE and injected into recipient mice with or without F. nucleatum infection. T cell proliferation was found in both infected and uninfected recipient mice that received T cells from survivors but not from naive donors (Fig. 5a,b). Incubating survivor-derived donor T cells with uninfected tumor cells in vitro enhanced CD8+IFN-γ+ cell populations (Fig. 5c and Supplementary Fig. 15a). These data suggest that the T cells from the long-term survivors were primed to infected and uninfected tumor cells.

Fig. 5 |. T cells from survivors suppressed the growth of both infected and uninfected tumors.

Fig. 5 |

a, In vivo T cell proliferation assay. Tumor-infiltrating T cells were isolated from donor splenocytes and labeled with the proliferation dye CFSE before injection into recipient mice. b, Quantification of flow cytometry data in a of the percentage of proliferated T cells by gating the fluorescence of CFSE level. n = 4 per group. Data are the mean ± s.d. *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001. c, Lymphocytes were isolated from survivor or naive mice and incubated with CT26FL3(Luc/RFP) cells for 24 h in vitro. Quantification of data of CD8+IFN-γ+ T cells after incubation. n = 4 per group. Data are the mean ± s.d. **P < 0.01. d, Illustration of the T cell adoptive transfer study. Mice with orthotopic CRC tumors with or without F. nucleatum infection received T cells from either naive mice or long-term survivor mice from LipoAgTNZ treatment as described in Fig. 4a. e, Quantification of CD3+CD8+ T cells; data shown in g. n = 4 per group. Data are the mean ± s.d. **P < 0.01. f, Quantification of CD3+ T cells; data also shown in g. n = 4 per group. Data are the mean ± s.d. *P < 0.05. g, Representative flow cytometry analysis of CD3+CD8+ T cells in tumors of the recipient mice after adoptive T cell transfer. h, Donor T cells inhibited tumor growth in recipient mice. n = 4 per group. Data are the mean ± s.d. *P < 0.05. i, Confocal image of immunofluorescence of calreticulin (red) in F. nucleatum-uninfected and -infected CT 26(FL3) tumor cells. Scale bar, 5 μm. n = 3 experiments. j, Chaperon expression induced by killing intracellular bacteria treatment.

Splenic pan T cells of long-term survivor mice after LipoAgTNZ treatment were adoptively transferred to test the efficacy in recipient mice bearing orthotopic CRC tumors with or without F. nucleatum infection (Fig. 5d). Donor T cells from the long-term survivor mice effectively inhibited the growth of tumors infected with F. nucleatum; unexpectedly, the same donor T cells also inhibited uninfected tumors (Fig. 5h). Substantially increased numbers of CD3+ and CD3+CD8+ T cells were found in the tumors of both infected and uninfected mice (Figs 5eg and Supplementary Fig. 15b,c). The data again suggest that survivor T cells recognized both infected and uninfected tumor cells in vivo in the recipient mice.

F. nucleatum infection decreased the co-localization of calreticulin with the cell membrane, downregulating chaperons (for example, calreticulin) (Fig. 5i). It is likely that this downregulation is a part of the immune suppression mechanism of the infected tumor cells. It is interesting to note that F. nucleatum infection in hypoxia downregulated the stress proteins, which are usually upregulated by cells under hypoxic conditions50,51. Treatment with LipoAgTNZ in hypoxia restored chaperone by killing intracellular bacteria (Fig. 5j). The result suggested that immunogenic cell death may contribute to immune activation of the tumor cells under the treatment of LipoAgTNZ.

Host T cells specifically targeted bacterial epitopes after antibiotic treatment

The data in Figs. 4 and 5 suggest that LipoAgTNZ induced T cell immunity in CRC-bearing mice. It is worthwhile to identify the epitopes generated by bacterial death. According to the identification of transmembrane helices, 1,171 of 2,067 proteins are cytoplasmic at the F. nucleatum subcellular localization in proteome-wide prediction of Vaxign2 (Fig. 6a)52,53. To identify the most abundant protein in cytoplasm, the label-free proteomics of F. nucleatum was mapped to subcellular localization (Fig. 6a). The proteomics data are generated from the data source of reference papers54,55. To estimate the potential neoepitopes, we predicted the MHC-I H-2Kd, H-2Dd and H2Ld binding peptides from the proteins ranking top in the quantitative proteomics of F. nucleatum, followed by selection of the epitopes with high total score and MHC binding affinity (Fig. 6b,d). The top-ranked cytoplasmic proteins in abundance were selected for epitope prediction. Five top-ranked peptides predicted from each protein were selected using the Immune Epitope Database (IEDB) by applying the NetMHCpan algorithm for mouse MHC-I presentation (sequences shown in the upper-right corner of Fig. 6b).

Fig. 6 |. The killing of tumor-associated bacteria promoted immune recognition of bacterial neoepitopes.

Fig. 6 |

a, Topology analysis of the proteome and proteomics of F. nucleatum based on prediction of subcellular localization. The right panel shows label-free quantitative proteomics mapped with predicted subcellular localization. The selected proteins are marked with enlarged black circles. b, Scatter plot showing the rank for total scores and peptide–MHC complex affinity. c, Filters set for alignment of the F. nucleatum and mouse genomes to generate the homologous epitopes. d, Information on the selected peptides predicted by the IEDB database. e, Representative images of IFN-γ ELISpot. f, Quantification of IFN-γ spots. n = 4 per group. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; NS, not significant. g, H2b MHC binding F. nucleatum epitopes of C57BL6 mice filtered by c using the same methods except the selection of MHC haplotypes and reference genome of C57BL6 mice. h, Representative flow cytometry analysis of tetramers loaded with bacterial epitopes listed in g staining the orthotopic-infected MC38-infiltrating T cell tumor. The establishment of MC38 model with C57BL6 mice is described in Supplementary Fig. 10h and Fig. 4l. i, Percentage of tetramer positive CD8+ T cells. n = 3 experiments. *P < 0.05. IC50, half-maximal inhibitory concentration.

To explore the homologous antigens shared by bacteria and mice, we aligned the genome of F. nucleatum with the mouse genome56. Forty-one genes showed similarity, including those in the non-open reading frames. We then selected corresponding proteins from the mice proteome, and 25 proteins were selected, of which only 19 contained potential sequences longer than seven amino acids for the possibility of MHC-I presentation57. Ten of 19 sequences encode proteins based on the F. nucleatum proteome (Fig. 6c). Interestingly, four similar sequences out of 10 come from the HSP70 chaperon protein (DnaK in gene name), which has 65% similarity with mouse HSP70 (Supplementary Table 1). Three epitopes outstand by prediction of the IEDB database according to their likelihood to be presented by H2Kd, H2Dd and H2Ld, the MHC-I haplotype of the Balb/C strain (Fig. 6d). In summary, peptides 1–5 are bacteria-derived neoantigens sharing no sequence similarity with mice. Peptides 6–8 are homologous epitopes that are shared between bacteria and mice.

To confirm the activity of the peptides in vivo, we recovered splenic CD8+ T cells from Balb/c mice that had survived from CRC tumors infected by F. nucleatum after LipoAgTNZ treatment and restimulated them in vitro with the candidate peptides presented by bone-marrow-derived dendritic cells to measure IFN-γ production in an ELISpot assay. Both homologous antigens and neoantigens showed enhanced IFN-γ-secreting T cells after LipoAgTNZ treatment (Fig. 6e,f). Splenic T cells from mice infected with F. nucleatum but not treated with LipoAgTNZ did not show a considerable INF-γ response to the bacterial cytoplasmic peptides. A peptide from chicken ovalbumin (OVA) was used as a negative control.

To explore the targets that the T cell receptors recognized after antibiotic treatment, we performed tetramer–peptide complex staining the tumor-infiltrating T cells. Bacterial peptides were loaded to the corresponding H2 haplotype tetramers, and the complex was incubated with T cells isolated from the MC38 tumor (Fig. 6g). Heterologous (peptide 9 and 10), heterologous epitopes from DnaK protein (peptide 11 and 12) and homologous epitopes (peptide 13 and 14) were selected for tetramer staining. The LipoAgTNZ treatment induced higher T cell population recognizing the bacteria peptides (Fig. 6h,i). Data indicated that peptide 13 (LADDNFSTI) and peptide 14 (RGVPQIEVTF) stood out by showing high positive ratio in CD8+ T cell population. The results indicated that the major tumor-infiltrating T cell specificities are against the bacteria–host shared epitopes in the antibiotics-treated group, which induced important response against infected and uninfected tumor cells.

Overall, these data demonstrate that bacteria epitopes can be presented by host MHC-I after LipoAgTNZ treatment. The tolerance of self-epitopes that are shared with the tumor-associated bacteria is likely reversed by the danger signals induced by the killing of intracellular bacteria.

Bacteria-derived epitopes have been found to elicit anti-cancer immunity. Fecal microbiota transplantation improved the immune microenvironment and improved the checkpoint inhibitor response in immunotherapy-refractory patients with melanoma58. Bacteria-derived HLA-bound peptides were recently identified in tumors from patients with melanoma6. Memory responses by IFN-γ-expressing CD4+ and CD8+ T cells specific for Enterococcus hirae, Bacteroides fragilis and Akkermansia muciniphila have been associated with favorable clinical outcomes in patients with cancer5961.

The data suggest that T cells from survivors established long-term anti-tumor efficacy compared to T cells from naive mice. These LipoAgTNZ-treated mice developed IFN-γ+CD8+ T cells in response to bacteria-derived neoantigens. Interestingly, IFN-γ+ CD8 T cells in response to homologous epitopes also developed after antibiotic treatment, suggesting cellular immunity against the self-epitopes. This result is consistent with the T cell transfer study in which T cells from survivor mice suppressed uninfected tumor growth. We predominantly analyzed bacteria-induced CD8+ T cells in response to class I MHC antigens, which is the cytotoxic T cell phenotype for anti-tumor efficacy, whereas CD4+ T cells in response to class II MHC antigens were reported to generate either cytotoxicity or tolerance62,63.

Discussion

Personalized cancer vaccines under development aim to direct the immune system against the unique neoantigen repertoire of an individual’s tumor. This process is dependent on sufficient neoantigen quantity and quality in addition to adequate immune functionality. Killing of tumor-associated bacteria may contribute a new source of neoantigens to facilitate homologous and neoepitope-mediated cellular immunity against CRC.

Our work stemmed from the observation that antibiotics targeting anaerobic bacteria extended the DFS of patients with CRC and infected mice. In patients with colon cancers, the benefit derived from antibiotics was limited to pre-resection intake, suggesting that the quantity of intratumoral bacteria to prime immunity may be crucial to success. These results pave the way for neoadjuvant clinical interventions with targeted antibiotics specific to the intratumoral microbiota combined with immunotherapy to boost anti-tumor immunity. Dedicated prospective studies categorizing intratumoral bacteria, tumoral stage and the optimal timing and impact of antibiotics are needed before clinical implementation.

Anti-tumoral immune response relies on the ability of immune cells to recognize and eliminate tumor-derived antigens. Mutation-derived neoantigens are recognized as a major determinant to benefit from immunomodulating strategies. The lack of mutation-derived neoantigens, as in most MSS CRCs, associated with an immunosuppressive microenvironment is a major barrier to developing long-term anti-tumoral immunity. To decipher the intertwinement between anti-tumoral immunity, the gut microbiome and antibiotic treatment, we developed liposomes remotely loaded with antibiotics to target the CRC tumors. We showed that intratumoral pro-tumoral bacteria established in an immunosuppressed tumoral milieu can be targeted by antibiotics to induce the release of cancer-specific microbial neoantigens. We performed adoptive T cell transfer and T cell epitope studies to investigate the function of the immune system after bacterial removal. The treatment induced infiltration of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells in the tumor, which has specificity to microbial neoepitopes. Homologous epitopes also showed anti-tumor efficacy, which may result in an immune response to uninfected tumors. Thus, the killing of tumor-associated bacteria can turn an immunologically cold tumor into a hot tumor and prime the immune system to recognize both infected and uninfected tumor cells. The discovery of cancer-associated microbial neoantigens offers exciting possibilities for the development of innovative anti-tumoral therapeutic or preventive vaccine strategies.

Online content

Any methods, additional references, Nature Portfolio reporting summaries, source data, extended data, supplementary information, acknowledgements, peer review information; details of author contributions and competing interests; and statements of data and code availability are available at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-023-01957-8.

Methods

Selection criteria of the clinical cohort

The specific methodology regarding the colorectal cohort and antibiotic consumption was previously reported15. In brief, the present study included all people aged 18 years or older with incident non-metastatic CRC resected between January 2012 and December 2014 in France. To select incident cases, we excluded people with a previous history of cancer (2010–2011) or long-term disease for cancer (diagnosed before 2012). To obtain a homogeneous population with the same study duration, each patient was followed up for 3 years after surgical resection. The 3-DFS is a validated criterion for adjuvant studies and an accepted surrogate for overall survival in CRC.

Measurement of antibiotic therapy in the clinical cohort

All reimbursements for antibiotics were extracted during the perioperative period of 6 months before the surgical resection and until 1 year after. We assumed that each pill delivered was taken by the patient. We used the daily delivery dose of each antibiotic to convert the quantity reimbursed in number of days of treatment. Because drugs dispensed during a hospitalization were not directly traceable in the cancer cohort, the consumption of antibiotics in the hospital has been evaluated by the presence of a diagnostic code (ICD-10) for infectious diseases. Hospital infections occurring after surgery were split into those occurring within 30 d and those occurring more than 30 d after surgery to isolate postoperative infections.

For outpatient consumption of antibiotics targeting anaerobes, we predefined a list of antibiotics approved for the treatment of Fusobacterium nucleatum spp.-related infection using Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical codes as follows: (1) nitroimidazole: metronidazole, tinidazole, nimorazole, ornidazole and secnidazole; and (2) lincosamides: clindamycin and lincomycin.

Covariates used in the multivariate model

Several potentially predictive factors for survival were identified or reconstructed from the available data: sex, age (18–49, 50–69, 70–79 and ≥80 years), laterality of cancer Charlson comorbidity index (none, 1–2 and ≥3), nutritional status during the surgical resection (malnutrition versus no malnutrition), admission to the intensive care unit during the surgical resection length of stay (no admission or <2 d, 2–7 d and >7 d) and time when antibiotics were used along the time axis to account for a potential time-dependent bias.

Identification of recurrences in the clinical cohort

Recurrences were identified by an algorithm looking for the occurrence of an ICD-10 diagnostic code for metastases, a palliative care code, a new cancer-related surgical resection after the first one or treatment with chemotherapy or radiotherapy starting more than 3 months after the surgical resection.

Statistical analysis of clinical data

3-DFS was defined as the time elapsed between the date of surgery (time origin) and the date of recurrence, death or the end of 3-year follow-up, whichever occurred first. The 3-year DFS was modeled using Cox models to study the link with antibiotics intake adjusted for all covariates.

The survival curves are represented using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. HRs were estimated by Cox proportional regression models. As this study was conducted in the overall population (not a sample), statistical tests for descriptive comparisons were not considered relevant. Antibiotic exposure before T0 was considered a fixed variable. Antibiotic exposure after T0 was considered a time-dependent variable64. A multivariate model was carried out to isolate the effect of antibiotics targeting anaerobes by comparing patients who received only these antibiotics to those who did not receive any antibiotics as outpatients.

Cell lines

Metastatic CT26FL3 cells were kindly provided by Maria Marjorette O. Peña at the University of South Carolina. CT26FL3(Luc/RFP) cells stably expressing red fluorescent protein (RFP) and luciferase (Luc) were established by transfection with lentivirus vectors carrying RFP and Luc genes and a puromycin resistance gene. CT26FL3(RFP/luc) cells were cultured in DMEM with 4.5 g L−1 glucose (Gibco) and 10% BCS (HyClone) supplemented with 1 μg ml−1 puromycin (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic (Gibco) at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in a humidified atmosphere. MC38 cells were purchased from Kerafast and cultured in DMEM with 10% BCS, 0.1 mM non-essential amino acids and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic.

Animal models

All animal handling protocols were approved by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Six-to-eight-week-old female BALB/cJ or C57BL/6J mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory. Animals were maintained in a specific pathogen-free facility (12-h light/dark cycle, tempeature 21–23 °C, humidity 30–70%). All mice were used at 6–8 weeks of age and were age and sex matched for the experiment.

The orthotopic and subcutaneous CT26(FL3)-RFP/Luc tumor model was established based on previous work65,66. In brief, female BALB/cJ mice were anesthetized with 2.5% isoflurane in oxygen in the supine position. A midline incision was made to exteriorize the cecum. CT26(FL3)-RFP/Luc cells at a density of 2.0 × 106 in 50 μl of mixture of PBS and Matrigel (1:1) were injected into the cecum wall. The cecum was returned to the peritoneal cavity before the incision was sutured. The tumor burden was monitored by bioluminescent analysis using an IVIS imager (PerkinElmer) with intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of 100 μl of d-luciferin (PerkinElmer, 10 mg ml−1). Each mouse was inoculated with 108 CFU of F. nucleatum in 100 μl of PBS every fifth or fourth day by oral gavage.

The subcutaneous tumor model was established by injection of 1.0 × 106 CT26(FL3)-RFP/Luc cells in 100 μl of PBS into the right flank of the BALB/cJ mice. The rechallenge studies were performed by subcutaneously inoculating 106 tumor cells. CT26(FL3)-RFP/Luc was infected with F. nucleatum before inoculation. Tumor volume (Vt) was calculated as follows:

Vt=0.5×a×b2 (1)

In equation (1), a and b are defined as the major and minor diameter of the tumor.

Liver metastasis model was previously reported49,67. CT26(FL3)-RFP/Luc was infected with F. nucleatum before inoculation. Female BALB/cJ mice were anesthetized with 2.5% isoflurane in oxygen in the supine position. An incision was made to exteriorize the spleen below the left rib cage. The spleen was tied and cut into two parts that contain intact vascular pedicle for each half. The distal section of the spleen was inoculated with 1.0 × 106 CT26(FL3) cells in 150 μl of PBS. The hemi-spleen containing inoculated cells was resected 5 min after inoculation, allowing the cancer cells to enter the liver through the portal vein. The other half of the spleen was returned to the peritoneal cavity, and the incision was sutured. The tumor burden was monitored by bioluminescent analysis using an IVIS imager (PerkinElmer, Living Image version 4.5) with i.p. injection of 100 μl of d-luciferin (PerkinElmer, 10 mg ml−1). For ex vivo imaging, the dissected liver with tumor was quickly rinsed in PBS and placed in diluted luciferin solution (1 mg ml−1) for 1 min. Bioluminescence imaging was applied immediately.

In vitro cell infection

Five milliliters of overnight F. nucleatum or E. coli Nissle culture was harvested and washed in sterile PBS two times by centrifugation at 4,000 r.p.m. for 10 min in an anaerobic chamber. The optical density was adjusted to 1.3 × 109 CFU per milliliter. For intracellular bacterial imaging, the bacteria were then stained with 5 μM CFSE (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The culture medium of CT26FL3(Luc/RFP) cells was changed to DMEM supplemented with 10% BCS without antibiotics before bacterial infection. The cells were then incubated with the stained or unstained bacteria at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 20 in a hypoxic incubator for 4 h, followed by three washes in PBS. The cells were harvested for inoculation. For intracellular bacteria imaging, the cells were stained with phalloidin and antibodies as described below. Antibodies (Supplementary Table 2) were incubated at 4 °C overnight.

Liposome preparation

Distearoyl phosphatidylcholine (16.0 mg, Avanti), cholesterol (10.0 mg, Avanti) and 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-[methoxy (polyethylene glycol)-2000] (5.0 mg, Avanti) were dissolved in chloroform. The solvent was evaporated to form a lipid thin film. Three milliliters of 300 mM silver nitrate solution (adjusted to pH 3.0 with nitric acid) was added to hydrate the film at 65 °C for 15 min, and then the suspension was sequentially extruded through 400-nm, 200-nm and 100-nm membranes for 10 times. Gel filtration (Sephadex G-50) was used to remove the silver ions from the outer aqueous phase of the liposomes and to replace it with 5% sucrose with EDTA (UltraPure, pH 8.0, 1:25 dilution by sucrose solution) and then with 5% glucose without EDTA. The liposomes were incubated with tinidazole (0.4 mg) at 65 °C for 15 min for remote loading. The gel filtration was repeated to remove the unencapsulated tinidazole. For analysis, the drug-loaded liposomes were dissolved in methanol and measured by liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry (LC–MS) and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP–MS) for tinidazole and Ag+, respectively. Liposomal encapsulation efficiency was calculated as the weight of tinidazole entrapped in liposomes versus the total weight of tinidazole added. Liposomal loading efficiency was calculated as the weight of tinidazole entrapped in liposomes versus the weight of gross materials added.

FISH

F. nucleatum in orthotopic CRC tissues was determined using RNA in situ hybridization. The F. nucleatum 16S RNA probe was synthesized by GenScript. The sequence of the F. nucleatum-targeted RNA probe was 5’-CUUGUAGUUCCGCrYUACCUC/3’CY5/-3’ with a CY5 label at the 3’ end, which was based on a previously reported F. nucleatum-targeted probe (S-G-Fuso-0664-a-A-19, https://probebase.csb.univie.ac.at/pb_report/probe/1346)68. Stellaris RNA FISH buffers (Stellaris RNA FISH Wash Buffer A, Stellaris RNA FISH Wash Buffer B and Stellaris RNA FISH Hybridization Buffer) were used according to the Stellaris RNA FISH protocol for frozen tissue. In brief, fresh dissected tumors were quickly embedded in Tissue-Plus O.C.T. Compound and stored at −80 °C. The frozen tumors were sliced at a thickness of 10 μm, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and permeabilized with 70% ethanol. The slices were subsequently immersed in Wash Buffer A for 5 min, dispensed with 200 μl of Hybridization Buffer containing a probe solution of 125 nM, followed by incubation in dark at 37 °C for 16 h. The slides were then incubated with Wash Buffer A in dark for 30 min, stained with 5 μg ml−1 DAPI in Wash Buffer A, immersed in Wash Buffer B for 5 min and mounted with Prolong Diamond Antifade Mountant (Thermo Fisher Scientific). We stained uninfected tumors with the probes as negative controls to verify that the FISH assay specifically detected F. nucleatum. Images were acquired by Zeiss ZEN 2011.

FISH quantification

The distance map indicating the minimum distance between FISH signals and DAPI staining was calculated by the Euclidean distance function:

d(x)=min(xy),xΩF,yΩD (2)

where ΩF and ΩD are the image domains of FISH signals and DAPI staining, respectively. x/y denotes the position of each pixel in the two-dimensional coordinate system. For each x of FISH signals, we computed its minimum distance from the position of DAPI staining by equation (2). x and d(x) were then fitted with a polynomial fourth-order curve to better reflect the correlation of the distance between FISH signals and DAPI staining, by GraphPad Prism 9.0 software.

Fecal DNA isolation and library preparation

Mouse stool samples were collected on day 60 after LipoAgTNZ treatment and immediately stored at −80 °C upon collection. Fecal DNA was isolated using a QIAamp Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Then, 12.5 ng of total DNA was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using primer set (515F-806R)69,70 targeting the V4 region on 16S rRNA genes, and PCR amplicons were sequenced at the V4 region on an Illumina MiSeq (Illumina). Subsequently, each sample was amplified using a limited cycle PCR program, adding Illumina sequencing adapters and dual-index barcodes (index 1(i7) and index 2(i5)) (Illumina) to the amplicon target. The final libraries were purified using AMPure XP reagent (Beckman Coulter), quantified and normalized before pooling. The DNA library pool was then denatured with NaOH, diluted with hybridization buffer and heat denatured before loading on the MiSeq reagent cartridge (Illumina) and on the MiSeq instrument (Illumina). Automated cluster generation and paired-end sequencing with dual reads were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Bioinformatic analysis

Sequencing output from the Illumina MiSeq platform was converted to FASTQ format and demultiplexed using Illumina Bcl2Fastq 2.20.0. The resulting paired-end reads were processed with the Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology (QIIME) 2 2021-2 (ref. 71) wrapper for DADA2 (ref. 72) including merging paired ends, quality filtering, error correction and chimera detection. Amplicon sequencing units from DADA2 were assigned taxonomic identifiers with respect to the Greengenes73 and Silva74 databases; their sequences were aligned using maFFT75 in QIIME 2; and a phylogenetic tree was built with FastTree76 in QIIME 2. A rarefaction curve was generated at a depth of 5,000 sequences per subsample. β-diversity estimates were calculated within QIIME 2 using weighted UniFrac between samples at a subsampling depth of 5,000. The results were summarized and visualized through principal coordinate analysis as implemented in QIIME 2. Microbiota taxonomy was also applied to classify the organism as a representative operational taxonomic unit (OTU). The linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) Galaxy module was used for analysis examining biologic consistency and effect relevance (http://huttenhower.sph.harvard.edu/galaxy)77, which was conducted by coupling standard tests for statistical significance.

T cell isolation and adoptive transfer

The spleens from long-term survivors (pulsed with 2 × 106 CT26FL3 (Luc/RFP) cells subcutaneously in the lower right flank 48 h before T cell isolation) and naive mice were disassociated in PBS with 0.1% BSA and 2 mM EDTA using a syringe plunger and filtered through a 40-μm cell strainer. The splenocytes were centrifuged at 300g for 10 min at 4 °C and washed in 50 ml of PBS with 0.1% BSA and 2 mM EDTA. The cells were resuspended with 10 ml of RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco) with 120 Kunitz units per milliliter of DNase for 15 min at room temperature and filtered through a cell strainer. The cells were washed with 50 ml of PBS with 0.1% BSA and 2 mM EDTA, resuspended in 4 ml of PBS with 0.1% BSA and 2 mM EDTA and purified by 3 ml of Ficoll-Paque PLUS at 400g for 30–40 min at room temperature. The undisturbed lymphocytes at the interface were collected and used for in vivo (CFSE-labeled cells) and in vitro T cell proliferation assays.

Pan T cells were further isolated by negative magnetic labeling using a pan T cell isolation kit (Miltenyi Biotec). T cells were treated with biotin–antibody cocktail and subsequently anti-biotin cocktail and separated by an LS column (Miltenyi Biotec) in elution buffer (PBS with 0.5% BSA and 2 mM EDTA) in the magnetic field of the MACS separator (Miltenyi Biotec). The cells were adjusted to 1 × 106 in 200 μl of PBS and i.v. injected into the recipient mice on day 10 and day 15 after tumor inoculation.

Bacteria epitope prediction

For bacteria-derived neoantigens, cytoplasmic proteins of F. nucleatum were predicted by Vaxign2 (https://violinet.org/vaxign2) and then ranked by the abundance in the quantitative label-free proteomics54,55. The most abundent proteins were selected for T cell epitope prediction. T cell epitopes were predicted using open-source tools based on artificial neural networks supported by IEDB (https://iedb.org/) and NetMHC 4.0 server (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetMHC/). MHC haplotypes corresponding to strain Balb/C and C57BL/6 were used for this exercise. Predicted epitopes were ranked, and potential epitopes were used for T cell study.

For bacteria-derived homologous antigens: To explore the homologous antigens shared by bacteria and mice, the genome of Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. nucleatum ATCC 25586 (GCA_000007325.1) was aligned with the mice genome (GRCm39 reference annotation release 109) by using Nucleotide Blast56. The putative proteins in mouse proteome were selected, among which sequences longer than seven amino acids were further filtered and aligned in F. nucleatum proteome (UP000002521_190304). The homologous peptide sequences were selected for T cell epitope prediction.

ELISpot assay

ELISpot assay was used to test the memory immune response and MHC-restricted peptides on splenic CD8+ T cells. IFN-γ ELISpot assays (R&D Systems, EL485) were performed in 96-well sterile plates. The membrane of plates was precoated with capture IFN-γ antibody and incubated with blocking buffer for 2 h. Bone-marrow-derived dendritic cells (105 per well) were pulsed with peptides (20 μg ml−1) and added to CD8+ T cells (2 × 104 per well) for 24 h at 37 °C, and plate areas were developed with a biotinylated detection antibody specific for IFN-γ for 1 h, followed by streptavidin–alkaline phosphatase for 1 h. Finally, the substrate of alkaline phosphatase (BCIP/NBT buffer) was added for 5–20 min. Spots were imaged by using stereomicroscopy (Olympus BX61).

Tetramer study

After 28 d of orthotopic tumor inoculation, surface immunophenotyping of tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes was performed as follows. Single-cell suspension of solid tumor was obtained by standard Ficoll-Paque density gradient centrifugation. CD8+ T lymphocytes were isolated by negative bead selection (Miltenyi Biotec, 130-104-075). The T cell epitopes were evaluated for the percentage of specific CD8+ T lymphocytes by staining with an H2-Db- or H2-Kb-peptide tetramer (5001-1-20, Eagle Biosciences) and anti-CD8 monoclonal antibody.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis comparing two groups was performed using an unpaired two-tailed t-test. Comparisons between three or more groups were performed using ordinary two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons. For survival analyses, the log-rank test was used for comparison. All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 9.0.1 and 9.5.1 software. Appropriate tests were applied in analyzing these data, meeting assumptions of the statistical methods. A P value less than 0.05 was considered significant. Data are presented as the means ± s.d.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Supplementary Material

Suppl video
Download video file (119.4MB, mp4)
Source Data Fig 1
Supplemental Data
Source Data Fig 5
Supplementary material

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-023-01957-8.

Acknowledgements

K.-H.L. passed away before the submission of the manuscript. The paper is dedicated in memory of him. We thank the University of North Carolina’s Department of Chemistry Mass Spectrometry Core Laboratory, especially E. D. Weatherspoon, for assistance with mass spectrometry analysis. We thank the University of North Carolina’s Department of Microscopy Services Laboratory, especially V. J. Madden, for assistance with TEM imaging. We thank the University of North Carolina’s Animal Histopathology and Laboratory Medicine Core, especially L. Wang, for assistance with histology and toxicity analysis. We thank the University of North Carolina’s Cryo-EM Core, especially J. Peck, for assistance with cryo-EM imaging. We thank the University of North Carolina’s Nanomedicines Characterization Core Facility, especially M. Sokolsky, for assistance with ICP–MS analysis. We thank the University of North Carolina’s Microbiome Core Facility for 16S rRNA gene sequencing, the Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA016086) and the Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease (P30 DK34987). Figures 2a, 3a, 4a, 4o and 5d and Supplementary Figs. 4a, 6b, 10h and 12a were created with BioRender. The work was supported by NIH grant CA198999 (to L.H. and A.A.), the Fred Eshelman Distinguished Professorship (to L.H.), the Institut National du Cancer (InCa), the Nuovo-Soldati Foundation, Swim Across America and, in part, through NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748 (to B.R., M.B.F. and O.A.). M.B.F. is funded by NIH T32-CA009512 and an ASCO Young Investigator Award.

Footnotes

Competing interests

L. Huang: Consultant with PDS Biotechnology and Stemirna Therapeutics. B. Rousseau: Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Bayer; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Roche; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Servier; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Astellas; Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Gilead.

Data availability

The 16S rRNA data are available through the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive (accession numbers SRR23197060SRR23197067, BioProject PRJNA926798). The whole-exome sequencing data are available through the Sequence Read Archive (BioProject PRJNA926643). The genome of Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. nucleatum ATCC 25586 (GCA_000007325.1) is available on KEGG (https://www.genome.jp/kegg-bin/show_organism?org=fnu). Mus musculus genome (GRCm39 reference annotation release 109) is available at the NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/annotation_euk/Mus_musculus/109/). Fusobacterium nucleatum reference proteome (UP000002521_190304) is available at the European Bioinformatics Institute (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/reference_proteomes/). All other data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

The distance map for FISH images analysis is available on Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8200515)78.

References

  • 1.Bodinier M et al. Efficient detection and immunomagnetic sorting of specific T cells using multimers of MHC class I and peptide with reduced CD8 binding. Nat. Med 6, 707–710 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Alard E et al. Advances in anti-cancer immunotherapy: CAR-T cell, checkpoint inhibitors, dendritic cell vaccines, and oncolytic viruses, and emerging cellular and molecular targets. Cancers (Basel) 12, 1826 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Le DT et al. PD-1 blockade in tumors with mismatch-repair deficiency. N. Engl. J. Med 372, 2509–2520 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nejman D et al. The human tumor microbiome is composed of tumor type-specific intracellular bacteria. Science 368, 973–980 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fluckiger A et al. Cross-reactivity between tumor MHC class I-restricted antigens and an enterococcal bacteriophage. Science 369, 936–942 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kalaora S et al. Identification of bacteria-derived HLA-bound peptides in melanoma. Nature 592, 138–143 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yang Y et al. Focused specificity of intestinal TH17 cells towards commensal bacterial antigens. Nature 510, 152–156 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zheng D-W et al. Phage-guided modulation of the gut microbiota of mouse models of colorectal cancer augments their responses to chemotherapy. Nat. Biomed. Eng 3, 717–728 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Goodman AL & Gordon JI Our unindicted coconspirators: human metabolism from a microbial perspective. Cell Metab. 12, 111–116 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kostic AD et al. Genomic analysis identifies association of Fusobacterium with colorectal carcinoma. Genome Res. 22, 292–298 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sepich-Poore GD et al. The microbiome and human cancer. Science 371, eabc4552 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Derosa L et al. Microbiota-centered interventions: the next breakthrough in immuno-oncology? Cancer Discov. 11, 2396–2412 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Song M, Chan AT & Sun J Influence of the gut microbiome, diet, and environment on risk of colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 158, 322–340 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Poore GD et al. Microbiome analyses of blood and tissues suggest cancer diagnostic approach. Nature 579, 567–574 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 15.Rousseau B et al. Impact of antibiotics (ATB) on the recurrence of resected colorectal cancer (CRC): results of EVADER-1 a nation-wide pharmacoepidemiologic study. J. Clin. Oncol 38, 4106 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sargent DJ et al. A pooled analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy for resected colon cancer in elderly patients. N. Engl. J. Med 345, 1091–1097 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Castellarin M et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum infection is prevalent in human colorectal carcinoma. Genome Res. 22, 299–306 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bullman S et al. Analysis of Fusobacterium persistence and antibiotic response in colorectal cancer. Science 358, 1443–1448 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhou Z, Chen J, Yao H & Hu H Fusobacterium and colorectal cancer. Front. Oncol 8, 371 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Brennan CA & Garrett WS Fusobacterium nucleatum—symbiont, opportunist and oncobacterium. Nat. Rev. Microbiol 17, 156–166 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sun Y et al. Adaptive-guided-coupling-probability level set for retinal layer segmentation. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform 24, 3236–3247 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Canale FP et al. Metabolic modulation of tumours with engineered bacteria for immunotherapy. Nature 598, 662–666 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wilson MR et al. The human gut bacterial genotoxin colibactin alkylates DNA. Science 363, eaar7785 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Riquelme E et al. Tumor microbiome diversity and composition influence pancreatic cancer outcomes. Cell 178, 795–8062 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ahn J et al. Human gut microbiome and risk for colorectal cancer. J. Natl Cancer Inst 105, 1907–1911 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Pinato DJ et al. Association of prior antibiotic treatment with survival and response to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in patients with cancer. JAMA Oncol. 5, 1774–1778 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Arane K & Goldman RD Fusobacterium infections in children. Can. Fam. Physician 62, 813–814 (2016). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Leitsch D et al. Pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase and thioredoxin reductase are involved in 5-nitroimidazole activation while flavin metabolism is linked to 5-nitroimidazole resistance in Giardia lamblia. J. Antimicrob. Chemother 66, 1756–1765 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Upcroft P & Upcroft JA Drug targets and mechanisms of resistance in the anaerobic protozoa. Clin. Microbiol. Rev 14, 150–164 (2001). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Dingsdag SA & Hunter N Metronidazole: an update on metabolism, structure–cytotoxicity and resistance mechanisms. J. Antimicrob. Chemother 73, 265–279 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Qiu K, Durham PG & Anselmo AC Inorganic nanoparticles and the microbiome. Nano Res. 11, 4936–4954 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kim D et al. Selective killing of pathogenic bacteria by antimicrobial silver nanoparticle–cell wall binding domain conjugates. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 13317–13324 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Prabhu S & Poulose EK Silver nanoparticles: mechanism of antimicrobial action, synthesis, medical applications, and toxicity effects. Int. Nano Lett 2, 32 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Waszczykowska A, Żyro D, Ochocki J & Jurowski P Clinical application and efficacy of silver drug in ophthalmology: a literature review and new formulation of EYE drops with drug silver (I) complex of metronidazole with improved dosage form. Biomedicines 9, 210 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Starek M, Dabrowska M, Chebda J, Żyro D & Ochocki J Stability of metronidazole and its complexes with silver(I) salts under various stress conditions. Molecules 26, 3582 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Radko L, Stypuła-Trębas S, Posyniak A, Żyro D & Ochocki J Silver(I) complexes of the pharmaceutical agents metronidazole and 4-hydroxymethylpyridine: comparison of cytotoxic profile for potential clinical application. Molecules (Basel) 24, 1949 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC & Thompson CB Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science 324, 1029–1033 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Yu J et al. Remote loading paclitaxel–doxorubicin prodrug into liposomes for cancer combination therapy. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 10, 1730–1740 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Guo G, Guo T & Chang X Effect of CYP3A4 genetic polymorphisms on pharmacokinetics of tinidazole. Journal of Chinese Pharmaceutical Sciences 29, 272–279 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sivanesan S et al. Pharmacokinetics of the individual major components of polymyxin B and colistin in rats. J. Nat. Prod 80, 225–229 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Rubinstein MR et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum promotes colorectal carcinogenesis by modulating E-cadherin/β-catenin signaling via its FadA adhesin. Cell Host Microbe 14, 195–206 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Geng F, Zhang Y, Lu Z, Zhang S & Pan Y Fusobacterium nucleatum caused DNA damage and promoted cell proliferation by the Ku70/p53 pathway in oral cancer cells. DNA Cell Biol. 39, 144–151 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Zhang S et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transiton through regulation of the lncRNA MIR4435-2HG/miR-296-5p/Akt2/SNAI1 signaling pathway. FEBS J. 287, 4032–4047 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Park EM et al. Targeting the gut and tumor microbiota in cancer. Nat. Med 28, 690–703 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Smith M et al. Gut microbiome correlates of response and toxicity following anti-CD19 CAR T cell therapy. Nat. Med 28, 713–723 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lobionda S, Sittipo P, Kwon HY & Lee YK The role of gut microbiota in intestinal inflammation with respect to diet and extrinsic stressors. Microorganisms 7, 271 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Nie K et al. Roseburia intestinalis: a beneficial gut organism from the discoveries in genus and species. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol 11, 757718 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Okano K, Shimoda T & Matsumura Y Clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of early colorectal cancer with liver metastases. J. Gastroenterol 34, 334–340 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Goodwin TJ, Zhou Y, Musetti SN, Liu R & Huang L Local and transient gene expression primes the liver to resist cancer metastasis. Sci. Transl. Med 8, 364ra153 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Han YK et al. Hypoxia induces immunogenic cell death of cancer cells by enhancing the exposure of cell surface calreticulin in an endoplasmic reticulum stress-dependent manner. Oncol Lett. 18, 6269–6274 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Cao J et al. Heat shock protein 70 attenuates hypoxiainduced apoptosis of pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells isolated from neonatal rats. Mol. Med. Rep 24, 690 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.He Y, Xiang Z & Mobley HL Vaxign: the first web-based vaccine design program for reverse vaccinology and applications for vaccine development. J. Biomed. Biotechnol 2010, 297505 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ong E et al. Vaxign2: the second generation of the first Web-based vaccine design program using reverse vaccinology and machine learning. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, W671–W678 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Ali Mohammed MM, Pettersen VK, Nerland AH, Wiker HG & Bakken V Label-free quantitative proteomic analysis of the oral bacteria Fusobacterium nucleatum and Porphyromonas gingivalis to identify protein features relevant in biofilm formation. Anaerobe 72, 102449 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Mohammed MMA, Pettersen VK, Nerland AH, Wiker HG & Bakken V Quantitative proteomic analysis of extracellular matrix extracted from mono- and dual-species biofilms of Fusobacterium nucleatum and Porphyromonas gingivalis. Anaerobe 44, 133–142 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Cameron M & Williams HE Comparing compressed sequences for faster nucleotide BLAST searches. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform 4, 349–364 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Stevens J, Wiesmüller K-H, Walden P & Joly E Peptide length preferences for rat and mouse MHC class I molecules using random peptide libraries. Eur. J. Immunol 28, 1272–1279 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Gil-Cruz C et al. Microbiota-derived peptide mimics drive lethal inflammatory cardiomyopathy. Science 366, 881–886 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Sato T et al. Single Lgr5 stem cells build crypt-villus structures in vitro without a mesenchymal niche. Nature 459, 262–265 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.LeBlanc DJ, Lee LN & Abu-Al-Jaibat A Molecular, genetic, and functional analysis of the basic replicon of pVA380-1, a plasmid of oral streptococcal origin. Plasmid 28, 130–145 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kennedy MJ et al. Rapid blue-light-mediated induction of protein interactions in living cells. Nat. Methods 7, 973–975 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Krienke C et al. A noninflammatory mRNA vaccine for treatment of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Science 371, 145–153 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Hu Z et al. Personal neoantigen vaccines induce persistent memory T cell responses and epitope spreading in patients with melanoma. Nat. Med 27, 515–525 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Munoz-Price LS, Frencken JF, Tarima S & Bonten M Handling time-dependent variables: antibiotics and antibiotic resistance. Clin. Infect. Dis 62, 1558–1563 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Song W et al. Trapping of lipopolysaccharide to promote immunotherapy against colorectal cancer and attenuate liver metastasis. Adv. Mater 30, e1805007 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Song W et al. Synergistic and low adverse effect cancer immunotherapy by immunogenic chemotherapy and locally expressed PD-L1 trap. Nat. Commun 9, 2237 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Hu M et al. Relaxin gene delivery mitigates liver metastasis and synergizes with check point therapy. Nat. Commun 10, 2993 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Gmur R, Wyss C, Xue Y, Thurnheer T & Guggenheim B Gingival crevice microbiota from Chinese patients with gingivitis or necrotizing ulcerative gingivitis. Eur. J. Oral Sci 112, 33–41 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Caporaso JG et al. Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 4516–4522 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Mohsen A, Park J, Chen YA, Kawashima H & Mizuguchi K Impact of quality trimming on the efficiency of reads joining and diversity analysis of Illumina paired-end reads in the context of QIIME1 and QIIME2 microbiome analysis frameworks. BMC Bioinformatics 20, 581 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Caporaso JG et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 7, 335–336 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Callahan BJ et al. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 13, 581–583 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.DeSantis TZ et al. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 72, 5069–5072 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Quast C et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D590–D596 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Katoh K & Standley DM MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol 30, 772–780 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Price MN, Dehal PS & Arkin AP FastTree 2—approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS ONE 5, e9490 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Segata N et al. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 12, R60 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Sun Y et al. Killing tumor-associated bacteria with a liposomal antibiotic generates microbial neoantigens that induce anti-tumor immune responses. (2023). https://zenodo.org/record/8200515 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Suppl video
Download video file (119.4MB, mp4)
Source Data Fig 1
Supplemental Data
Source Data Fig 5
Supplementary material

Data Availability Statement

The 16S rRNA data are available through the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive (accession numbers SRR23197060SRR23197067, BioProject PRJNA926798). The whole-exome sequencing data are available through the Sequence Read Archive (BioProject PRJNA926643). The genome of Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. nucleatum ATCC 25586 (GCA_000007325.1) is available on KEGG (https://www.genome.jp/kegg-bin/show_organism?org=fnu). Mus musculus genome (GRCm39 reference annotation release 109) is available at the NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/annotation_euk/Mus_musculus/109/). Fusobacterium nucleatum reference proteome (UP000002521_190304) is available at the European Bioinformatics Institute (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/reference_proteomes/). All other data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.

The distance map for FISH images analysis is available on Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8200515)78.

RESOURCES