Skip to main content
mBio logoLink to mBio
. 2025 Dec 31;17(2):e03652-25. doi: 10.1128/mbio.03652-25

Reprogramming Listeria monocytogenes flavin metabolism to improve its therapeutic safety profile and broaden innate T-cell activation

Victoria Chevée 1,2,#, Mariya Lobanovska 1,#, Rafael Rivera-Lugo 1,3,#, Leslie Güereca 1,4, Ying Feng 1, Andrea Anaya-Sanchez 2, Jesse Garcia Castillo 1,5, Austin M Huckins 3,6, Edward E Lemmens 4, Chris S Rae 4, Jonathan W Hardy 3, Russell Carrington 4, Jonathan W Kotula 4, Daniel A Portnoy 1,2,
Editor: Michael T Laub5
PMCID: PMC12892937  PMID: 41474325

ABSTRACT

Listeria monocytogenes is a facultative intracellular bacterial pathogen that is a potent inducer of cell-mediated immunity, which has led to the development of attenuated, Listeria-based cancer vaccines. L. monocytogenes strains, such as live-attenuated double-deleted Listeria (LADD), lacking two key virulence factors, ΔactA and ΔinlB, have been used safely in clinical trials and showed promising anti-tumor activity. Despite early clinical success, improving potency and safety by preventing extracellular bacterial growth is paramount for the development of further clinical applications. We describe a quadruple attenuated intracellular Listeria (QUAIL) strain that, in addition to ΔactAΔinlB, lacks ribC and ribF, which encode enzymes required for generating the essential flavin cofactors flavin mononucleotide (FMN) and flavin adenine nucleotide (FAD). QUAIL imported FMN and FAD during intracellular growth but was unable to grow extracellularly in blood or on vascular catheters in mice, which reduced its lethality. Despite its lack of extracellular growth, QUAIL maintained its immunoprotective properties, which were comparable to LADD. Furthermore, we showed that QUAIL can be engineered to synthesize riboflavin, leading to expansion and activation of mucosal-associated invariant T cells. Together, our data support the use of QUAIL as a promising therapeutic platform with an improved safety profile that is amenable to further modifications to expand its immune-activating potential.

IMPORTANCE

Listeria-based live-attenuated cancer vaccines represent a promising therapy in many different pre-clinical tumor models and in clinical trials. Enhancing its anti-cancer immunity and increasing its safety profile will advance the clinical applications of Listeria vaccines. By manipulating Listeria monocytogenes flavin metabolism, we engineered a quadruple attenuated intracellular Listeria (QUAIL) vaccine candidate strain that has limited toxicity associated with extracellular growth in major extracellular niches in vivo, including blood and implanted catheter ports. Furthermore, we showed that QUAIL can be effectively programmed to engage innate-like T cells known as mucosal-associated invariant T cells, which could be harnessed for future cancer immunotherapies. The results presented here lay the foundation for further analysis of QUAIL as a safer, yet immunopotent L. monocytogenes vaccine or therapeutic vector.

KEYWORDS: vaccines, Listeria monocytogenes, flavins, immunotherapeutics, MAIT cells

INTRODUCTION

Listeria monocytogenes is a gram-positive facultative intracellular bacterial pathogen that infects numerous cell types, escapes from phagosomes, and grows in the host cell cytosol. Cytosolic growth of L. monocytogenes leads to activation of an innate immune response that leads to induction of robust CD8+ T-cell-dependent adaptive immunity (1, 2). The immunopotency of L. monocytogenes makes it an ideal vaccine platform, and to date, multiple attenuated L. monocytogenes strains have been tested in clinical trials (3).

One of the most prominent Listeria-based vaccine strains is ΔactAΔinlB, known as live-attenuated double-deleted L. monocytogenes (LADD) (4, 5). LADD is defective in cell-to-cell spread (ΔactA) and fails to enter some nonphagocytic cells, such as hepatocytes (ΔinlB). LADD is over 3-log attenuated in mice largely due to the lack of ActA, while the inlB deletion reduces hepatocyte toxicity. LADD expressing tumor antigens showed remarkable efficacy in pre-clinical models and modest results in clinical trials against multiple cancers (3, 6). However, there have been reports of occasional toxicity associated with Listeria-based cancer vaccines, including patients developing systemic listeriosis due to L. monocytogenes extracellular growth in blood and on catheters, which presents a major limitation to clinical development (7, 8). To improve the safety profile of Listeria-based immunotherapy, other attenuation strategies of existing LADD strains have been tested, including killed but metabolically active (KBMA) LADD (9) and recombinase-induced intracellular death (Lm-RIID) LADD (10). KBMA and Lm-RIID have limited replication ability in vivo; however, their immunopotency was less than LADD.

Exploring auxotrophy as an attenuation strategy has been reported in different bacterial vaccines, including Salmonella, Shigella, and Listeria (1114). L. monocytogenes is auxotrophic for a few amino acids and vitamins, including riboflavin (vitamin B2), which is essential for many metabolic redox reactions (15). L. monocytogenes acquires riboflavin and its essential flavin cofactor derivatives, flavin mononucleotide (FMN) and flavin adenine nucleotide (FAD) via the RibU transporter (16) (Fig. 1A). Additional enzymes involved in L. monocytogenes flavin metabolism are RibC, which mediates the phosphorylation of riboflavin to FMN and the adenylation of FMN to FAD, and RibF, which also catalyzes the adenylation of FMN to FAD (1719) (Fig. 1A). In the absence of RibC and RibF, L. monocytogenes relies solely on exogenous sources of FMN and FAD, which are present at much higher concentrations inside mammalian cells compared to extracellular sources such as blood (20, 21). Consistent with this observation, L. monocytogenes ΔribCΔribF mutants displayed no intracellular growth defect, whereas bacterial growth in extracellular niches, including blood, gallbladder, and gastrointestinal (GI) lumen, was limited (16). FMN and FAD auxotrophies (ΔribCΔribF) lead to L. monocytogenes adopting an obligate intracellular lifestyle in vivo, which we hypothesized would be beneficial for developing safe Listeria-based vaccine strains with limited extracellular replication and dissemination.

Fig 1.

Riboflavin biosynthesis pathway comparing L. monocytogenes and B. subtilis. Growth curves show QUAIL with FMN and FAD supplementation matches LADD growth rates. Bacterial burden data from cells and mice demonstrate comparable growth between strains.

QUAIL and LADD display similar growth in vitro and in vivo. (A) Schematic of the riboflavin biosynthesis operon in B. subtilis (blue) and in L. monocytogenes (purple). L. monocytogenes is a riboflavin auxotroph and relies on extracellular sources of flavins that are imported by RibU (dotted line). L. monocytogenesribCribF is unable to produce FMN and FAD, and exogenous sources of FMN and FAD are required for survival. Intermediates in riboflavin biosynthesis: DHBP 3,4-dihydroxy-2-butanone 4-phosphate; 5-A-RU (5-Amino-6-(D-ribitylamino)uracil), RL-6,7-diMe 6,7-dimethyl-8-(d-ribityl)lumazine. Adapted from references 22, 23. (B) Broth growth curve of WT, LADD (△actAinlB), and QUAIL (△actAinlBribCribF) L. monocytogenes in BHI. QUAIL + flavins was grown in BHI supplemented with 2.5 μM FMN and 2.5 μM FAD. Optical density (OD600) was assessed over 24 h at 37°C with agitation. Mean ± SEM is shown, and data are pooled from two independent experiments. Bacterial doubling time is shown in bold. (C) Intracellular growth in bone-marrow-derived macrophages (BMMs) infected at an MOI = 0.25. Bacterial burdens (colony-forming units [CFUs]) were enumerated at the indicated times, and the results are mean± SEM from two independent experiments. One-way ANOVA, with multiple comparisons to WT, was performed. (D) CD-1 mice were infected intravenously with 105 CFUs of the indicated strains. Spleens and livers were harvested 2 days post-infection, and bacterial burden was assessed by CFUs. Each data point represents an individual mouse, and lines represent medians. The dotted line is the limit of detection. Results are combined from five independent experiments with 17–20 mice per strain. One-way ANOVA, multiple comparisons. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ****P < 0.0001; ns, not significant.

L. monocytogenes riboflavin auxotrophy has in part been attributed to an immune evasion strategy, specifically the avoidance of recognition by mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) cells (16, 24, 25), a subset of evolutionarily conserved innate-like T cells present at various mucosal tissues and blood (26). MAIT cells detect intermediates of microbial riboflavin biosynthesis presented on MR1 molecules on the surface of host cells (2729). Activation of MAIT cells results in cytotoxicity of infected target cells as well as immune cell activation and regulation of tissue homeostasis (3033). A number of potential therapeutic applications of MAIT cells have been proposed for infectious diseases and antitumor therapy, as MAIT cell-dependent antitumor responses have been observed in some types of cancer (34, 35). Interestingly, L. monocytogenes engineered to synthesize riboflavin (ΔactA-ribDEAHT) led to a massive increase in MAIT cells and induced antitumor responses in a mouse cancer model (25), suggesting a potential approach to enhancing the immunopotency of Listeria-based cancer vaccines.

In this study, we examined whether attenuation mediated by the deletion of ribC/ribF improves the safety profile of LADD. We generated a ΔribCΔribFΔactAΔinlB quadruple attenuated intracellular Listeria (QUAIL) strain and compared QUAIL and LADD in mouse infections and immunization models. Our data demonstrated that, unlike LADD, QUAIL displayed accelerated clearance and limited extracellular growth in vitro and in vivo and elicited protective immune responses comparable to LADD. We also showed that engineering QUAIL to express a heterologous riboflavin biosynthetic gene operon triggered the expansion of MAIT cells, which may further increase the potency of L. monocytogenes cancer therapy.

RESULTS

Deletion of ribC and ribF does not affect intracellular growth but reduces toxicity

We previously showed that the deletion of ribC/ribF does not affect intracellular growth of wild-type (WT) L. monocytogenes (16). To determine whether ΔribCΔribF impacts LADD (ΔactAΔinlB) growth and virulence in vitro and in vivo, we constructed LADD with ribC/ribF deletion resulting in a QUAIL strain. QUAIL exhibited a growth defect in rich liquid media compared to LADD, but the growth rates were enhanced by the addition of FMN and FAD to the media (Fig. 1B). The intracellular growth rate of QUAIL and LADD was similar to WT in murine BMMs, but as previously noted in ΔribCΔribF strains, QUAIL grew to slightly higher numbers at 8 h post-infection (Fig. 1C) (16). During intravenous (IV) infection of CD-1 mice, QUAIL was severely attenuated and reached the same CFUs as LADD in spleens and livers at 48 h post-infection (Fig. 1D), indicating that QUAIL and LADD retained the same degree of attenuation.

Next, to characterize the toxicity of LADD and QUAIL, we switched to using BALB/c mice that are more permissive to L. monocytogenes, particularly in extracellular niches (36, 37). Mice were infected IV with different doses of WT, LADD, or QUAIL, and survival probability and corresponding weight change were determined over 14 days (Fig. S1A and B). Mice displayed increased sensitivity and change in body weight in response to WT and LADD doses greater than 8.2 × 103 and 1.1 × 107, respectively. Remarkably, no mortality was observed in mice infected with QUAIL at any dose below 3 × 108 (Fig. S1A). The collected data were used to calculate the median lethal dose (LD50) of WT, LADD, and QUAIL in BALB/c and compared with LD50 in CD-1 mice (Table 1). LD50 of QUAIL exceeded the LD50 of LADD by twofold in CD-1 and at least by threefold in BALB/c mice (Table 1), indicating that QUAIL has reduced lethality compared to LADD.

TABLE 1.

Analysis of median lethality (LD50)

Median lethality (LD50)
Strain CD-1 BALB/c
WT 1.5 × 104 1.76 × 104
LADD 3.7 × 107 8.2 × 107
QUAIL 7.75 × 107 >3 × 108

QUAIL has impaired extracellular growth

During infection, a substantial proportion of L. monocytogenes reside in extracellular niches contributing to infectious burdens (3841). Since our previous observations indicated that the deletion of ribC/ribF reduced the extracellular burden of WT L. monocytogenes during infection (16), we reasoned that the deletion of ribC/ribF would similarly prevent the extracellular growth of QUAIL. We first compared the growth of LADD and QUAIL in sheep blood and human serum. Unlike LADD that displayed increased growth during the first 24 h and maintained steady CFU levels between 24 and 72 h of growth, QUAIL displayed a continuous drop in CFUs in sheep blood and in human serum, suggesting that QUAIL is unable to survive in these conditions (Fig. 2A and B).

Fig 2.

Line graphs depict bacterial growth trajectories with QUAIL strain showing no proliferation compared to WT and LADD. Scatter plots illustrate robust catheter colonization with LADD lux while QUAIL lux exhibits minimal to no colonization at multiple doses.

QUAIL does not grow in blood or on in vivo implanted catheters. Growth of WT, LADD, and QUAIL in 3 mL of sheep blood (A) or human serum (B) over the course of 72 h at 37°C with agitation. Bacterial counts were determined by plating for CFU. Results are the mean and SEM from three independent experiments. One-way ANOVA, multiple comparisons; **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001. (C) Bioluminescence imaging of CD-1 injected with 5 × 106 CFUs of LADD-lux through the jugular vein catheter port (indicated with a white arrow). Mice were imaged using an in vivo bioluminescence imaging system (IVIS). A strong signal was detected on day 6 post-infection around the tip of the catheter below the anterior part of the neck. False-color scale bar indicated bioluminescence in photons/s/cm2/str. (D) Colonization of jugular vein catheters by LADD-lux and QUAIL-lux. CD-1 mice were injected with indicated doses of LADD-lux or QUAIL-lux, and catheters were collected on day 6 for bacterial enumeration by CFUs. Each data point represents an individual mouse. No CFUs were detected on catheters collected from mice injected with 5 × 102 and 5 × 103 of QUAIL-lux and in 4/5 mice injected with 5 × 104 of QUAIL-lux.

In addition to blood infections, data from clinical trials reported the growth of L. monocytogenes in extracellular niches, including implants and catheter ports (7). Considering that ΔribCΔribF eliminates L. monocytogenes in extracellular niches such as blood, GI lumen, and gallbladder (16), we asked whether ribC/ribF deletion can also limit QUAIL growth on in vivo implanted catheters. Bioluminescent QUAIL-lux and LADD-lux were constructed by integration of the lux operon onto the L. monocytogenes chromosome (39). The bioluminescent strains were injected into the jugular vein catheter ports that were surgically implanted on the back of CD-1 mice. Initially, we aimed to directly examine bacterial burdens over time using an in vivo bioluminescence imaging system (IVIS). However, we noted that during extracellular growth, QUAIL-lux produced less signal intensity compared to LADD-lux (Fig. S2A and B). It is likely that QUAIL’s FMN/FAD auxotrophy negatively affected luciferase activity since it is dependent on FMN/FAD. The differences in bioluminescence signal between the two strains made it challenging to accurately compare the colonization of catheters using the IVIS. Instead, we used the IVIS to measure the colonization kinetics in individual animals to determine the optimal day to compare the CFUs of LADD and QUAIL strains in the catheters. Bioluminescence imaging was performed over the course of 6 days following jugular vein catheter injections with 5 × 106 LADD (Fig. 2C). Bioluminescent signal was detected on days 0 and 1 following inoculation, after which the signal subsided on days 2 and 3, reappeared on day 4, and diminished on day 5, suggesting waves of L. monocytogenes replication and clearance as reported previously (39). A robust signal emanated from all catheters on day 6 post-infection, suggesting that day 6 was an appropriate time to examine bacterial growth on catheters (Fig. 2C). Mice were challenged with a range of QUAIL or LADD CFUs, and on day 6 post-inoculation, catheters were collected, vortexed in PBS, and bacterial burdens were examined by measuring CFUs from each individual catheter (Fig. 2D). Strikingly, unlike LADD that was present on catheters at all CFUs tested, QUAIL was undetectable on catheters after infection with 5 × 102 or 5 × 103 CFUs. Furthermore, four out of five mice had no bacteria on catheters when injected with 5 × 104 QUAIL. QUAIL was present on catheters at infection doses above 5 × 105, and the CFUs were comparable to LADD (Fig. 2D). Together, the data indicated that the ribC/ribF deletion reduced extracellular growth of QUAIL in multiple key extracellular niches, including blood and catheters.

QUAIL is rapidly cleared in immunocompromised mice

L. monocytogenes clearance in mouse IV models of listeriosis is mediated initially by host innate immunity during the first few days after infection and adaptive immunity at later times, which results in sterilizing immunity (42, 43). The loss of host immunity may lead to proliferation and subsequent delay of L. monocytogenes clearance in vivo, posing a risk for therapeutic use of live-attenuated cancer vaccines that are often administered to immunocompromised cancer patients. To determine whether the loss of anti-Listeria adaptive immunity compromises bacterial clearance, we measured the bacterial burdens of LADD and QUAIL in Rag1-/- mice infected IV over the course of 14 days. Rag1-/- mice lack B and T cells and have been used to study the role of immunity in mouse models of listeriosis (44). QUAIL was cleared more efficiently than LADD at 4 h and 14 days post-infection in the spleen (Fig. 3A). In the liver, LADD showed persistence, albeit a gradual decline in CFUs throughout the 14-day infection. Unlike LADD, QUAIL displayed rapid clearance in the liver with 4-log attenuation at 3 days post-infection and complete clearance after 7 days post-infection, suggesting that the persistence of LADD in the liver may be associated with extracellular bacteria (Fig. 3B). In addition to primary infection sites such as spleens and livers, L. monocytogenes can spread systemically via blood and lymph nodes and infect many organs including the GI tract, brain, and heart, leading to systemic listeriosis (45). Bacterial burdens of LADD and QUAIL were significantly lower in the systemic organs compared to CFUs detected in spleens and livers and were largely cleared 7 days post-infection (Fig. 3C). The highest detectable bacterial burden was observed soon after inoculation in blood and bone marrow. Accelerated clearance of QUAIL but not LADD occurred later during infection in blood, bone marrow, and the heart (Fig. 3C). Minor differences were detected in feces on day 3 post-infection, and most of QUAIL and LADD were undetectable in feces on day 3 post-infection (Fig. S3). No LADD or QUAIL were detected in the brain on day 7 and day 14 post-infection (Fig. S3). These results further demonstrated the superior safety features of QUAIL over LADD.

Fig 3.

Visualization showing bacterial burden of QUAIL versus LADD strains in spleen, liver, blood, bone marrow, and heart of Rag1 knockout mice. Data reveal QUAIL experiences faster clearance compared to LADD, with increasing statistical significance over time.

Enhanced clearance of QUAIL in Rag1-/- mice. Rag1-/- mice were infected IV with a dose of 106 CFUs. Bacterial burdens of QUAIL and LADD were determined at the indicated time points in spleens (A), livers (B), and blood, bone marrow, and heart (C). Data were collected from at least two independent experiments with 6–12 mice per strain per indicated time point. The dotted line represents a limit of detection. Lines represent medians, and each data point represents an individual mouse. One-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons was used to compare CFUs at each time point between QUAIL and LADD infected groups; ns is not significant; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001.

QUAIL induces adaptive immunity and a potent CD8+ T-cell response

To evaluate the relative capacity to induce protective immunity, we compared QUAIL and LADD using a C57BL/6J immunization model. Mice were immunized IV with either low (103) or moderate (105) doses of QUAIL or LADD. 30 days post-infection, mice were challenged with a lethal dose of WT L. monocytogenes as previously described (14, 46), and the CFUs in livers and spleens were determined 3 days post-challenge. At the moderate dose, both QUAIL and LADD induced better protection compared to lower dose vaccination in both spleens and livers (Fig. 4A). No significant differences were recorded between LADD and QUAIL immunization groups at each dose, and more potent protection was seen in the spleens compared to livers. These results suggest that immunization with QUAIL elicits an equally potent immune response as the well-characterized immunogenic LADD strain.

Fig 4.

Scatter plots show similar bacterial loads in mice vaccinated with QUAIL or LADD. Bar graph indicates equivalent cytokine responses after OVA stimulation, confirming both vaccines provide comparable adaptive immunity against Listeria.

QUAIL and LADD stimulate comparable adaptive immunity. (A) Vaccination of C57BL/6J mice with 103 or 105 CFUs of LADD or QUAIL IV. 30 days post-vaccination, mice were challenged with 5 × 104 of WT L. monocytogenes and spleens and livers were collected 3 days post-challenge. Results are combined from four independent experiments. Lines represent medians, and the dotted line indicates the limit of detection. Each data point represents an individual mouse. “x” represents mice that succumbed to infection. One-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons was used to calculate the significance. Ns is nonsignificant. (B) IV infection of C57BL/6J mice with 103 CFUs of LADD or QUAIL expressing OVA. Splenocytes were collected 7 days post-infection, stimulated with OVA-specific peptide, and stained for intracellular cytokines. Data are combined from three independent experiments, means and SEM are shown. One-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons was used for statistical analysis. ns not significant, ****P < 0.0001.

To further compare immunopotency of QUAIL and LADD, we examined the ability of the strains to induce CD8+ T cells. LADD- or QUAIL-expressing OVA was used to challenge C57BL/6J mice, and 7 days post-infection, splenocytes were collected and stimulated with OVA-specific peptides. The percentage of OVA-specific CD8+ T cells was determined by measuring CD8+ IFN-γ+ TNFα+ splenocytes by flow cytometry (Fig. 4B). QUAIL and LADD elicited comparable numbers of OVA-responsive CD8+ T cells, indicating that QUAIL and LADD are equally efficient at activating a cell-mediated immune response.

Riboflavin-expressing QUAILs trigger expansion of MAIT cells

We recently showed that ΔactA L. monocytogenes expressing a B. subtilis riboflavin biosynthesis operon (ribDEAHT, Fig. 1A) (16, 18) leads to the activation of MAIT cells and can trigger antibacterial and tumor-restricting immunity (25). We hypothesized that the addition of the ribDEAHT operon into QUAIL and LADD can similarly lead to MAIT cell expansion, thereby enhancing immunopotency of the L. monocytogenes vaccine strains. Given that QUAIL is unable to grow extracellularly, we were curious to see whether L. monocytogenes-ribDEAHT-dependent activation of MAIT cells relies on bacterial ligands presented extracellularly, intracellularly, or both. QUAIL and LADD were engineered to express the ribDEAHT operon under the control of a constitutive promoter (Phyper). LADD-ribDEAHT was used as a positive control as we expected LADD to mimic the robust MAIT cell stimulatory properties of the previously reported ΔactA-ribDEAHT (25). First, we examined the growth in vitro and virulence in vivo of ribDEAHT-expressing strains. QUAIL-ribDEAHT and LADD-ribDEAHT showed no difference in growth compared to the corresponding parental strains in liquid media (Fig. S4A). The growth of LADD and LADD-ribDEAHT was indistinguishable in BMMs, and the CFUs of QUAIL and QUAIL-ribDEAHT were only marginally different at later stages of BMM infection (Fig. S4B and C). Together, these results indicated that the presence of the ribDEAHT operon did not have a significant impact on bacterial physiology or virulence in vitro.

We recently reported that an IV infection with a high dose of 107 CFUs of ΔactA-ribDEAHT led to MAIT cell expansion following a 4-day infection in mice (25). To verify that a similar sublethal 107 dose of LADD- or QUAIL-ribDEAHT does not impact bacterial virulence, ribDEAHT-expressing strains were examined in an IV model of listeriosis in CD-1 mice (Fig. 5A). Both QUAIL- and LADD-ribDEAHT showed no virulence defect compared to their respective parental strains at 2 days post-infection. Of note, we did not see a decrease in bacterial burdens at 2 days post-infection with ribDEAHT-expressing strains compared to the parental strains, consistent with the observation that the MAIT cell-dependent reduction in bacterial CFUs was detected after 4 days post-infection (25). Infection with a 107 dose resulted in LADD and LADD-ribDEAHT being 0.5–1-log more virulent in spleens and livers compared to QUAIL and QUAIL-ribDEAHT (Fig. 5A), despite both strains showing comparable virulence at a 105 infection dose (Fig. 1D). The difference in virulence between the strains observed at 107 but not at 105 infection doses could be attributed to higher extracellular LADD burdens. Indeed, following 107 infection doses, LADD and LADD-ribDEAHT burdens in the gallbladder, one of the key extracellular niches, were approximately 106 CFUs 2 days post-infection, whereas QUAIL and QUAIL-ribDEAHT CFUs were below the level of detection (Fig. S4D).

Fig 5.

Graphs showing similar bacterial colonization across L. monocytogenes strains but enhanced MAIT cell expansion with ribDEAHT-expressing QUAIL and LADD strains in both murine tissues and human PBMCs compared to wild-type controls.

ribDEAHT expression in QUAIL and LADD triggers MAIT cell expansion. (A) CD-1 mice were infected with 107 of the corresponding strains, and bacterial burdens were determined 2 days post-infection in spleens and livers. Results are combined from two biological repeats with 9–10 mice per strain. Each data point represents an individual mouse. One-way ANOVA, multiple comparisons. ns is not significant. (B) MAIT cell frequencies expressed as percentage of MR1+CD45+CD3+TCRβ+ from spleens and livers of C57BL/6J mice infected with 107 L. monocytogenes strains for 4 days. Means and SEM are shown, data are pooled from four independent experiments with 9–12 mice per strain. One-way ANOVA was used to perform statistical analysis. (C) Frequencies of MAIT cells presented as percentage of Vα+CD161+ of αβ T cells from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) infected with 2 × 109/mL of L. monocytogenes strains for 1 h. PBMCs were supplemented with IL-2 at 1 h and at 4 days post-infection. 10 donors were used, and each donor sample was divided into replicate plates for infection with the indicated strains or media control. Experiments were performed twice in triplicate, and means and SEM are shown. Statistical analysis between strains for each donor was performed using one-way ANOVA. Ns is not significant, *P < 0.1, **P < 0.01, ****P < 0.0001. A detailed gating strategy is described in Fig. S5, and a detailed list of surface markers used for MAIT cell staining is provided in Table S1.

Next, we examined whether ribDEAHT-expressing strains can trigger MAIT cell accumulation 4 days post-infection in C57BL/6J mice. MAIT cell frequency was determined using flow cytometry with the tissue samples stained with an MR1-restricted-5-OP-RU tetramer (Fig. S5A). The frequency of MAIT cells was less than 1% and 5% of all αβ T cells in spleens and livers following the infection with QUAIL and LADD, respectively. In contrast, infection with QUAIL- or LADD-ribDEAHT resulted in approximately a 5-7% and 14% increase in the frequency of MAIT cells of all αβ T cells in the spleens and livers, respectively (Fig. 5B). Infection with LADD-ribDEAHT led to a minor yet significant increase in MAIT cell accumulation in the spleens compared to QUAIL-ribDEAHT. Both QUAIL- and LADD-ribDEAHT were equally efficient at triggering MAIT cell expansion in the liver (Fig. 5B), suggesting that extracellular bacterial growth may not be required for robust MAIT cell activation in this organ.

Next, we examined the ability of ribDEAHT-expressing L. monocytogenes to expand MAIT cells from human PBMCs of healthy donors. Since QUAIL- and LADD-ribDEAHT exhibited a similar MAIT cell frequency during murine infection in vivo (Fig. 5B), we focused our analysis on QUAIL and QUAIL-ribDEAHT strains. PBMCs from 10 donors were infected with QUAIL or QUAIL-ribDEAHT for 1 h, and the media was supplemented with IL-2 to promote T-cell survival and differentiation. Cells were harvested 7 days post-infection for the analysis of MAIT cell frequency using flow cytometry (Fig. S5B). QUAIL-ribDEAHT triggered robust MAIT cell expansion potency compared to QUAIL-infected or uninfected cells across all donors (Fig. 5C). Collectively, these results suggested that QUAIL engineered to express riboflavin is effective at triggering MAIT cell accumulation both in mice and in human cells.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we presented the construction and characterization of a live-attenuated L. monocytogenes strain referred to as QUAIL that is unable to grow extracellularly in vivo. We demonstrated that additional attenuation of a well-established ΔactAΔinlB vaccine strain (LADD) was achieved by deleting ribC and ribF, rendering the bacteria dependent on host-derived sources of FMN and FAD. Both LADD and QUAIL induced protective immunity, but unlike LADD, QUAIL was unable to grow extracellularly and was rapidly cleared in vivo, offering a new avenue for developing safer vaccines and therapeutics.

The QUAIL vaccine platform presented here addresses the safety limitations associated with the use of LADD (3). QUAIL relies on exogenous FMN and FAD for growth, which limits the growth capacity of these strains in extracellular niches in vivo where FMN/FAD are limiting (47). QUAIL showed reduced toxicity (Fig. S1A; Table 1), enhanced clearance in vivo compared to LADD (Fig. 3), loss of bacterial viability in blood, and impaired colonization of catheters in mice (Fig. 2). The superior safety properties of QUAIL enhanced the safety potential of L. monocytogenes vaccines by several criteria. First, the QUAIL platform presents an opportunity to expand L. monocytogenes cancer vaccine clinical trials to involve patients with implanted medical devices, who were excluded from past and current trials, as they may be at risk of developing listeriosis linked to L. monocytogenes colonization and growth on ports, heart valves, prosthetics, and implants (7, 48). Second, the lack of extracellular growth of QUAIL in vivo may lead to re-evaluation of the current range of possible L. monocytogenes immunization doses that can be safely tolerated in patients (49). Lastly, the lack of growth in feces prevents QUAIL from spreading and potentially growing in the environment.

A number of previously evaluated attenuation strategies reduced bacterial growth but also reduced immune activation, demonstrating that there is a limit of attenuation that can be achieved without compromising vaccine efficacy (9, 10). Importantly, QUAIL and LADD induced similar CD8+ T-cell immune responses in the spleen and were equally effective at generating immune protection in immunization studies (Fig. 4). Despite attenuation through abrogated cell-to-cell spread and limited infection of hepatocytes (ΔactA and ΔinlB, respectively), LADD retains the ability to replicate extracellularly (Fig. 2). WT L. monocytogenes grows extracellularly in vivo in mesenteric lymph nodes, blood, gallbladder, and GI lumen (16, 37, 38, 50) and can also grow extracellularly following host cell lysis. Extracellular L. monocytogenes can activate the immune response locally and systemically (51). Since infection with LADD includes both extracellular and intracellular bacterial populations and QUAIL is predominantly intracellular, our results imply that the extracellular bacteria present during LADD infections do not contribute significantly to the generation of potent immune responses in an IV infection mouse model (Fig. 4). But extracellular bacterial growth contributes to increased toxicity, which was reflected by differences in LD50 (Table 1).

The observation that QUAIL was unable to survive in low FMN/FAD environments, including blood and catheters (Fig. 2), raises a question: what drives the loss of QUAIL viability? We speculate that low FMN/FAD levels lead to dysregulation of one or more bacterial proteins that require FMN/FAD, also known as flavoproteins (52). There are more than 34 flavoproteins in L. monocytogenes (19, 53) that play important roles in redox homeostasis, extracellular electron transfer (18, 54), metabolic regulation (55), and peptidoglycan biosynthesis (56, 57). Disruption of flavoprotein function may lead to bacterial death and possibly bacteriolysis, followed by an altered innate immune response in the extracellular environments (58). However, bacteriolysis may not be the main trigger for the loss of viability of QUAIL, since QUAIL exhibited no toxicity in vivo even at higher infection doses (Fig. S1A), suggesting that the clearance of the extracellular bacteria is not detrimental to the host. In the future, it will be important to define the molecular mechanisms that result in QUAIL loss of viability extracellularly and assess the degree of innate immune activation in response to QUAIL in both in vivo mouse models and in humans.

As well as improving safety, other studies have focused on increasing the potency of L. monocytogenes vaccines (3). Attempts to increase the versatility of Listeria vaccines include using L. monocytogenes as a vehicle for tumor-targeted delivery of radionucleotides or delivery of eukaryotic expression vectors encoding tumor antigens (59, 60). Our results showed that altering the metabolism of QUAIL to synthesize riboflavin led to expansion of MAIT cells in vivo (Fig. 5), as shown for ΔactA-ribDEAHT (25). QUAIL-ribDEAHT resulted in a robust increase in MAIT cell frequency comparable to LADD-ribDEAHT (Fig. 5), suggesting that MAIT cell expansion during L. monocytogenes-ribDEAHT infection may be independent of extracellular bacterial growth. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that during LADD-ribDEAHT infection, extracellular bacteria may also contribute to MAIT cell-specific ligand presentation, as different intracellular and extracellular pathogens have been shown to activate MAIT cells via distinct subsets of ligand-presenting cells (61). Whether the observed MAIT cell expansion induced by QUAIL-ribDEAHT infection translates into efficient anti-cancer immunity (62), as seen with ΔactA-ribDEAHT treatment (25), remains to be determined. L. monocytogenes is known to activate other innate-like T cells, such as γδ-T cells, in vivo and in tumor models (63). Examining the kinetics and functional characteristics of MAIT cells along with other innate-like T cells in different cancer models following QUAIL- and LADD-ribDEAHT treatment may advance our understanding of antitumor immune responses.

In conclusion, in this study, we showed that reprogramming L. monocytogenes flavin metabolism by deleting ribC and ribF limited the toxicity of Listeria-based vaccines by eliminating extracellular growth. In addition, by introducing the capacity to synthesize riboflavin, we expanded the diversity by which Listeria-based strains can activate MAIT cells. This observation presents an opportunity to use similar strategies to design L. monocytogenes vaccines capable of engaging with other unconventional T cells possessing antitumor potential, including γδ-T cells and invariant natural killer T cells.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains construction and growth conditions

L. monocytogenes strains used in this study are listed in Table 2 and were derived from the WT parental strain 10403S. QUAIL strain was constructed by deleting the open reading frame of ribC (lmo1329) and ribF (lmo0728) in the ΔactAΔinlB background (LADD). A detailed description of strain construction is in Supplemental methods.

TABLE 2.

List of L. monocytogenes strains used in the study

Strain number Background Strain name Reference
L. monocytogenes 10403S WT (64)
DP-L7710 L. monocytogenes 10403S LADD (∆actA, ∆inlB) (4)
DP-L7712 L. monocytogenes 10403S QUAIL (∆actA, ∆inlB, ∆ribC, ∆ribF) This study
DP-L7669 L. monocytogenes 10403S LADD-lux (∆actA, ∆inlB, lux/kan) This study
DP-L7670 L. monocytogenes 10403S QUAIL-lux (∆actA, ∆inlB, ∆ribC, ∆ribF, lux/kan) This study
DP-L7666 L. monocytogenes 10403S LADD-OVA (∆actA, ∆inlB, pPL2-OVA) This study
DP-L7667 L. monocytogenes 10403S QUAIL-OVA (∆actA, ∆inlB, ∆ribC, ∆ribF, pPL2-OVA) This study
DP-L7711 L. monocytogenes 10403S LADD-ribDEAHT (∆actA, ∆inlB, pPL2x-Phyper-ribDEAHT) This study
DP-L7713 L. monocytogenes 10403S QUAIL-ribDEAHT (∆actA, ∆inlB, ∆ribC, ∆ribF, pPL2x-Phyper-ribDEAHT) This study

Bacterial strains were cultured in filter-sterilized brain heart infusion (BHI) medium (Becton Dickinson). Unless specified, QUAIL strains were grown in BHI supplemented with 2.5 µM riboflavin 5′-monophosphate (FMN, Millipore Sigma) and 2.5 µM flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD, Millipore Sigma). Bacterial growth curves in BHI were performed using overnight bacterial cultures diluted in fresh media to an OD600 of 0.05. The strains were grown at 37°C with agitation (220 rpm), and growth was measured using a spectrophotometer. Bacterial doubling time was calculated between 2 and 5 h using pooled data from two biological repeats.

Intracellular growth in BMMs

BMMs were collected from 8-week-old female C57BL/6J mice (The Jackson Laboratories) as described previously (65). BMMs were differentiated and cultured in BMM media containing DMEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific), supplemented with 20% FBS (Avantor-Seradigm), 10% macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF), 1% L-glutamine (Corning), 1% sodium pyruvate (Corning), and 14 mM 2-mercaptoethanol (Gibco Thermo Fisher Scientific). 3 × 106 macrophages in BMM media were seeded on 60 mm non-tissue-culture treated dishes (MIDSCI), each containing 14 × 12 mm glass coverslips (Thermo Fischer Scientific), and grown overnight at 37°C. Bacteria were grown overnight without agitation at 30°C, and an MOI of 0.25 was used for infection. 50 μg/mL of gentamicin was added 1 h post-infection to remove extracellular bacteria. Bacteria CFUs were collected from three coverslips at each indicated time point.

Bacterial growth in sheep blood and human serum

Growth in defibrinated sheep blood (HemoStat Laboratories) and sterile human serum (Sigma, H4522) was performed as previously described (16). Prior to experiments, human serum was heat-inactivated and buffered (pH 7 with 5 mM HEPES). Bacteria were grown at 37°C with agitation (220 rpm) until OD600 0.5–1. The cultures were washed in PBS and resuspended in 3 mL of prewarmed blood to a concentration of 106 CFU/mL, and cultures were incubated at 37°C, shaking for 72 h, and CFUs were determined by plating serial dilutions.

Mouse infections

8- to 12-week-old female CD-1 mice (Charles River) were infected IV via the tail vein with 105 CFUs of bacteria in 200 µL PBS. Animals were sacrificed 48 h post-infection, and spleens, livers (without gallbladder), and gallbladders were collected in 5 mL, 10 mL, and 0.2 mL of 0.1% IGEPAL (CA-630, Sigma) in water, respectively. Bacterial burdens were enumerated by plating serial dilutions.

8- to 12-week-old female Rag1-/- mice in the C57BL/6 background (The Jackson Laboratories) were infected IV with 106 CFUs of L. monocytogenes. Animals were sacrificed, and indicated organs were collected at 4 h, 3, 7, and 14 days post-infection. Spleens, livers (no gallbladders), and hearts were homogenized in 5 mL, 10 mL, and 2 mL of 0.1% IGEPAL in water, respectively. 500 μL of blood was collected following cardiac puncture after euthanasia, and 100 μL of 50 mM EDTA was added to prevent coagulation (66). Bone marrow was collected from the left femur and tibia, which were physically disrupted using a mortar and pestle and homogenized in 1 mL of 0.1% IGEPAL in water. Fecal pellets were weighed and homogenized in 1 mL of PBS. Homogenized tissues were plated using either serial dilution or 200 μL of undiluted for CFUs.

Median lethality and body weight measurement

8- to 12-week-old female BALB/c or CD-1 mice were injected IV with gradual doses of the indicated strains, and survival and body weight were monitored over 14 days. A detailed description of the protocol is in Supplemental methods.

Bioluminescence imaging using in vivo imaging system and bacterial collection from the catheters

LADD and QUAIL strains were made bioluminescent by transduction (67). A detailed description of the protocol used for imaging and CFU enumeration is presented in Supplemental methods.

Vaccination of mice

8- to 12-week-old female C57BL/6J mice (The Jackson Laboratories) were immunized by IV injection with either 103 or 105 CFUs of L. monocytogenes in 200 µL PBS. 30 days post-immunization, mice were challenged IV with 5 × 104 CFU of WT L. monocytogenes. Three days post-challenge, mice were sacrificed, and spleens and livers were harvested for homogenization in 0.1% IGEPAL (CA-630, Sigma). CFUs/organ were determined by plating serial dilutions or 200 µL of tissue homogenates.

Analysis of antigen-specific T-cell responses

8- to 12-week-old female C57BL/6J mice (Jackson Laboratories) were injected IV with 103 CFUs of L. monocytogenes in 200 µL of PBS. 7 days post-infection, single-cell splenocyte suspensions were stimulated with OVA 257-264 peptide epitope (SIINFEKL, InvivoGen vac-sin) in the presence of GolgiPlug protein transport inhibitor (BD Bioscience) for 4 h. The splenocytes were stained for viability, CD8 and CD4 markers, and fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde. Cells were permeabilized using Fixation/Permeabilization Solution Kit (BD Bioscience), and IFN-γ and TNF-α intracellular cytokine staining was performed using antibodies from eBioscience, listed in Table S1. Samples were analyzed by flow cytometry on an LSR Fortessa. Gating strategy included FSC-A and SSC-A to exclude cell debris and FSC-H and FSC-A to isolate single cells.

Analysis of MAIT cell frequencies

8- to 12-week-old female C57BL/6 mice (The Jackson Laboratories) were infected IV with 107 CFUs of L. monocytogenes in 200 μL of PBS. Spleens and livers were recovered 4 days post-infection. For in vitro analysis, PBMCs isolated from healthy human donors (STEMCELL Technology, Stanford) were resuspended in RPMI media supplemented with 10% FBS to 5 × 106/mL. 2 × 109 L. monocytogenes was used to infect 100 μL of cells per well in 96 U bottom for 1 h.

The detailed protocol is in Supplemental methods. The detailed gating strategy and surface markers used are described in Fig. S5 and Table S1.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 10.0.1 for MacOS, GraphPad Software, La Jolla California, USA, https://www.graphpad.com/.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (grants 1P01 AI063302 [D.A.P.], 1R01 AI027655 [D.A.P.], 5 R01 CA283604 [D.A.P. and Michel DuPage]), the University of California Dissertation-Year Fellowship (R.R.-L.); the UCSF-UCB SAR Program (M.L.); HHMI Gilliam Fellowship (J.G.C.), CEND fellowship (V. C. and A.A.-S.), and Laguna Biotherapeutics.

We thank the NIH Tetramer Core Facility (NIH Contract 75N93020D00005 and RRID:SCR_026557) for providing the mouse MR1/5-OP-RU Tetramer.

Footnotes

This article is a direct contribution from Daniel A. Portnoy, a Fellow of the American Academy of Microbiology, who arranged for and secured reviews by Nancy Freitag, University of Illinois Chicago, and John Mekalanos, Harvard Medical School.

Contributor Information

Daniel A. Portnoy, Email: portnoy@berkeley.edu.

Michael T. Laub, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

ETHICS APPROVAL

The experiments were completed in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences, and with university regulations. All protocols were reviewed and approved by the University of California, Berkeley Animal Care and Use Committee (AUP-2016-05-8811) and Michigan State University Animal Use Protocol 201800030.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.03652-25.

Supplemental Material. mbio.03652-25-s0001.docx.

Tables S1 and S2, Fig. S1 to S5, and supplemental methods.

mbio.03652-25-s0001.docx (9.8MB, docx)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.03652-25.SuF1

ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Radoshevich L, Cossart P. 2018. Listeria monocytogenes: towards a complete picture of its physiology and pathogenesis. Nat Rev Microbiol 16:32–46. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.126 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Chávez-Arroyo A, Portnoy DA. 2020. Why is Listeria monocytogenes such a potent inducer of CD8+ T-cells? Cell Microbiol 22:e13175. doi: 10.1111/cmi.13175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Oladejo M, Paterson Y, Wood LM. 2021. Clinical experience and recent advances in the development of Listeria-based tumor immunotherapies. Front Immunol 12:642316. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.642316 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Brockstedt DG, Giedlin MA, Leong ML, Bahjat KS, Gao Y, Luckett W, Liu W, Cook DN, Portnoy DA, Dubensky TW Jr. 2004. Listeria-based cancer vaccines that segregate immunogenicity from toxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:13832–13837. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0406035101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Deng W, Lira V, Hudson TE, Lemmens EE, Hanson WG, Flores R, Barajas G, Katibah GE, Desbien AL, Lauer P, Leong ML, Portnoy DA, Dubensky TW Jr. 2018. Recombinant Listeria promotes tumor rejection by CD8(+) T cell-dependent remodeling of the tumor microenvironment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115:8179–8184. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1801910115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Brockstedt D, Le D, Hassan R, Murphy A, Grous J, Dubensky T, Jaffee E. 2013. Clinical experience with live-attenuated, double-deleted (LADD) Listeria. J Immunother Cancer 1:203. doi: 10.1186/2051-1426-1-S1-P203 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Fares E, McCloskey CB, Gutierrez A, Princiotta M, Salinas LJ, Drevets DA. 2019. Vaccine strain Listeria monocytogenes bacteremia occurring 31 months after immunization. Infection 47:489–492. doi: 10.1007/s15010-018-1249-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Sacco JJ, Evans M, Harrington KJ, Man S, Powell N, Shaw RJ, Jones TM. 2016. Systemic listeriosis following vaccination with the attenuated Listeria monocytogenes therapeutic vaccine, ADXS11-001. Hum Vaccin Immunother 12:1085–1086. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2015.1121338 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Brockstedt DG, Bahjat KS, Giedlin MA, Liu W, Leong M, Luckett W, Gao Y, Schnupf P, Kapadia D, Castro G, Lim JYH, Sampson-Johannes A, Herskovits AA, Stassinopoulos A, Bouwer HGA, Hearst JE, Portnoy DA, Cook DN, Dubensky TW. 2005. Killed but metabolically active microbes: a new vaccine paradigm for eliciting effector T-cell responses and protective immunity. Nat Med 11:853–860. doi: 10.1038/nm1276 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Hanson WG, Benanti EL, Lemmens EE, Liu W, Skoble J, Leong ML, Rae CS, Fassò M, Brockstedt DG, Chen C, Portnoy DA, Dubensky TW, Lauer P. 2019. A potent and effective suicidal Listeria Vaccine platform. Infect Immun 87:e00144-19. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00144-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Levine MM, Herrington D, Murphy JR, Morris JG, Losonsky G, Tall B, Lindberg AA, Svenson S, Baqar S, Edwards MF. 1987. Safety, infectivity, immunogenicity, and in vivo stability of two attenuated auxotrophic mutant strains of Salmonella typhi, 541Ty and 543Ty, as live oral vaccines in humans. J Clin Invest 79:888–902. doi: 10.1172/JCI112899 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Lindberg AA, Kärnell A, Stocker BAD, Katakura S, Sweiha H, Reinholt FP. 1988. Development of an auxotrophic oral live Shigella flexneri vaccine. Vaccine (Auckl) 6:146–150. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(88)80018-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Li Z, Zhao X, Higgins DE, Frankel FR. 2005. Conditional lethality yields a new vaccine strain of Listeria monocytogenes for the induction of cell-mediated immunity. Infect Immun 73:5065–5073. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.8.5065-5073.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Feng Y, Lobanovska M, Vickery J, Castillo JG, Güereca L, Chang SK, DuPage M, Portnoy DA. 2025. Listeria monocytogenes adenosine auxotrophs are impaired for intracellular and extracellular growth but retain potent immunogenicity. Infect Immun:e0034325. doi: 10.1128/iai.00343-25:e0034325 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Premaratne RJ, Lin WJ, Johnson EA. 1991. Development of an improved chemically defined minimal medium for Listeria monocytogenes. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:3046–3048. doi: 10.1128/aem.57.10.3046-3048.1991 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Rivera-Lugo R, Light SH, Garelis NE, Portnoy DA. 2022. RibU is an essential determinant of Listeria pathogenesis that mediates acquisition of FMN and FAD during intracellular growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 119:e2122173119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2122173119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Sebastián M, Arilla-Luna S, Bellalou J, Yruela I, Medina M. 2019. The biosynthesis of flavin cofactors in Listeria monocytogenes. J Mol Biol 431:2762–2776. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.05.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Rivera-Lugo R, Huang S, Lee F, Méheust R, Iavarone AT, Sidebottom AM, Oldfield E, Portnoy DA, Light SH. 2023. Distinct energy-coupling factor transporter subunits enable flavin acquisition and extracytosolic trafficking for extracellular electron transfer in Listeria monocytogenes. mBio 14:e0308522. doi: 10.1128/mbio.03085-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Matern A, Pedrolli D, Großhennig S, Johansson J, Mack M. 2016. Uptake and metabolism of antibiotics roseoflavin and 8-demethyl-8-aminoriboflavin in riboflavin-auxotrophic Listeria monocytogenes. J Bacteriol 198:3233–3243. doi: 10.1128/JB.00388-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Aw TY, Jones DP, McCormick DB. 1983. Uptake of riboflavin by isolated rat liver cells. J Nutr 113:1249–1254. doi: 10.1093/jn/113.6.1249 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Hustad S, McKinley MC, McNulty H, Schneede J, Strain JJ, Scott JM, Ueland PM. 2002. Riboflavin, flavin mononucleotide, and flavin adenine dinucleotide in human plasma and erythrocytes at baseline and after low-dose riboflavin supplementation. Clin Chem 48:1571–1577. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Liu Y, Zhang Q, Qi X, Gao H, Wang M, Guan H, Yu B. 2023. Metabolic engineering of Bacillus subtilis for riboflavin production: a review. Microorganisms 11:164. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11010164 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Lin Z, Xu Z, Li Y, Wang Z, Chen T, Zhao X. 2014. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for the production of riboflavin. Microb Cell Fact 13:104. doi: 10.1186/s12934-014-0104-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Germain L, Veloso P, Lantz O, Legoux F. 2025. MAIT cells: conserved watchers on the wall. J Exp Med 222:e20232298. doi: 10.1084/jem.20232298 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Rivera-Lugo R, Castillo JG, Lobanovska M, Tang E, Anaya-Sanchez A, Espich S, Stanley SA, DuPage M, Portnoy DA. 2025. MAIT cells induced by engineered Listeria exhibit antibacterial and antitumor activity. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2025.10.13.682223:2025.10.13.682223 [DOI]
  • 26. Huang S, Martin E, Kim S, Yu L, Soudais C, Fremont DH, Lantz O, Hansen TH. 2009. MR1 antigen presentation to mucosal-associated invariant T cells was highly conserved in evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:8290–8295. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903196106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Gold MC, McLaren JE, Reistetter JA, Smyk-Pearson S, Ladell K, Swarbrick GM, Yu YYL, Hansen TH, Lund O, Nielsen M, Gerritsen B, Kesmir C, Miles JJ, Lewinsohn DA, Price DA, Lewinsohn DM. 2014. MR1-restricted MAIT cells display ligand discrimination and pathogen selectivity through distinct T cell receptor usage. J Exp Med 211:1601–1610. doi: 10.1084/jem.20140507 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Kjer-Nielsen L, Patel O, Corbett AJ, Le Nours J, Meehan B, Liu L, Bhati M, Chen Z, Kostenko L, Reantragoon R, Williamson NA, Purcell AW, Dudek NL, McConville MJ, O’Hair RAJ, Khairallah GN, Godfrey DI, Fairlie DP, Rossjohn J, McCluskey J. 2012. MR1 presents microbial vitamin B metabolites to MAIT cells. Nature 491:717–723. doi: 10.1038/nature11605 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Boudinot P, Mondot S, Jouneau L, Teyton L, Lefranc MP, Lantz O. 2016. Restricting nonclassical MHC genes coevolve with TRAV genes used by innate-like T cells in mammals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:E2983–92. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1600674113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Zhao Z, Wang H, Shi M, Zhu T, Pediongco T, Lim XY, Meehan BS, Nelson AG, Fairlie DP, Mak JYW, Eckle SBG, de Lima Moreira M, Tumpach C, Bramhall M, Williams CG, Lee HJ, Haque A, Evrard M, Rossjohn J, McCluskey J, Corbett AJ, Chen Z. 2021. Francisella tularensis induces Th1 like MAIT cells conferring protection against systemic and local infection. Nat Commun 12:4355. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24570-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Wang H, D’Souza C, Lim XY, Kostenko L, Pediongco TJ, Eckle SBG, Meehan BS, Shi M, Wang N, Li S, Liu L, Mak JYW, Fairlie DP, Iwakura Y, Gunnersen JM, Stent AW, Godfrey DI, Rossjohn J, Westall GP, Kjer-Nielsen L, Strugnell RA, McCluskey J, Corbett AJ, Hinks TSC, Chen Z. 2018. MAIT cells protect against pulmonary Legionella longbeachae infection. Nat Commun 9:3350. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05202-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Corbett AJ, Eckle SBG, Birkinshaw RW, Liu L, Patel O, Mahony J, Chen Z, Reantragoon R, Meehan B, Cao H, Williamson NA, Strugnell RA, Van Sinderen D, Mak JYW, Fairlie DP, Kjer-Nielsen L, Rossjohn J, McCluskey J. 2014. T-cell activation by transitory neo-antigens derived from distinct microbial pathways. Nature 509:361–365. doi: 10.1038/nature13160 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Constantinides MG, Link VM, Tamoutounour S, Wong AC, Perez-Chaparro PJ, Han S-J, Chen YE, Li K, Farhat S, Weckel A, Krishnamurthy SR, Vujkovic-Cvijin I, Linehan JL, Bouladoux N, Merrill ED, Roy S, Cua DJ, Adams EJ, Bhandoola A, Scharschmidt TC, Aubé J, Fischbach MA, Belkaid Y. 2019. MAIT cells are imprinted by the microbiota in early life and promote tissue repair. Science 366:eaax6624. doi: 10.1126/science.aax6624 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Yigit M, Basoglu OF, Unutmaz D. 2024. Mucosal-associated invariant T cells in cancer: dual roles, complex interactions and therapeutic potential. Front Immunol 15:1369236. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1369236 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Ruf B, Catania VV, Wabitsch S, Ma C, Diggs LP, Zhang Q, Heinrich B, Subramanyam V, Cui LL, Pouzolles M, Evans CN, Chari R, Sakai S, Oh S, Barry CE III, Barber DL, Greten TF. 2021. Activating Mucosal-associated invariant T cells induces a broad antitumor response. Cancer Immunol Res 9:1024–1034. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-20-0925 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Bou Ghanem EN, Jones GS, Myers-Morales T, Patil PD, Hidayatullah AN, D’Orazio SEF. 2012. InlA promotes dissemination of Listeria monocytogenes to the mesenteric lymph nodes during food borne infection of mice. PLoS Pathog 8:e1003015. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Schwardt NH, Halsey CR, Sanchez ME, Ngo BM, Reniere ML. 2025. A genome-wide screen in ex vivo gallbladders identifies Listeria monocytogenes factors required for virulence in vivo. PLoS Pathog 21:e1012491. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1012491 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Jones GS, Bussell KM, Myers-Morales T, Fieldhouse AM, Bou Ghanem EN, D’Orazio SEF. 2015. Intracellular Listeria monocytogenes comprises a minimal but vital fraction of the intestinal burden following foodborne infection. Infect Immun 83:3146–3156. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00503-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Hardy J, Francis KP, DeBoer M, Chu P, Gibbs K, Contag CH. 2004. Extracellular replication of Listeria monocytogenes in the murine gall bladder. Science 303:851–853. doi: 10.1126/science.1092712 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Zhang T, Abel S, Abel Zur Wiesch P, Sasabe J, Davis BM, Higgins DE, Waldor MK. 2017. Deciphering the landscape of host barriers to Listeria monocytogenes infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:6334–6339. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1702077114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Louie A, Zhang T, Becattini S, Waldor MK, Portnoy DA. 2019. A multiorgan trafficking circuit provides purifying selection of Listeria monocytogenes virulence genes. mbio 10. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02948-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Archer KA, Durack J, Portnoy DA. 2014. STING-dependent type I IFN production inhibits cell-mediated immunity to Listeria monocytogenes. PLoS Pathog 10:e1003861. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003861 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Shedlock DJ, Whitmire JK, Tan J, MacDonald AS, Ahmed R, Shen H. 2003. Role of CD4 T cell help and costimulation in CD8 T cell responses during Listeria monocytogenes Infection. J Immunol 170:2053–2063. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.4.2053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Chevée V, Hullahalli K, Dailey KG, Güereca L, Zhang C, Waldor MK, Portnoy DA. 2024. Temporal and spatial dynamics of Listeria monocytogenes central nervous system infection in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 121:e2320311121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2320311121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Kypraiou D, Konstantaraki M, Tsantes AG, Ioannou P. 2024. Infective endocarditis by Listeria species—a systematic review. JCM 13:5887. doi: 10.3390/jcm13195887 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Ikonomidis G, Paterson Y, Kos FJ, Portnoy DA. 1994. Delivery of a viral antigen to the class I processing and presentation pathway by Listeria monocytogenes. J Exp Med 180:2209–2218. doi: 10.1084/jem.180.6.2209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Vasilaki AT, McMillan DC, Kinsella J, Duncan A, O’Reilly DSJ, Talwar D. 2010. Relation between riboflavin, flavin mononucleotide and flavin adenine dinucleotide concentrations in plasma and red cells in patients with critical illness. Clinica Chimica Acta 411:1750–1755. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2010.07.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Drake CG, Pachynski RK, Subudhi SK, McNeel DG, Antonarakis ES, Bauer TM, Lauer P, Brockstedt D, Patricia D, Wade M, Zudaire E, Bandyopadhyay N, Parasrampuria DA, Girgis S, Mason GE, Knoblauch RE, Stone N, Infante JR, Gottardis MM, Fong L. 2022. Safety and preliminary immunogenicity of JNJ-64041809, a live-attenuated, double-deleted Listeria monocytogenes-based immunotherapy, in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 25:219–228. doi: 10.1038/s41391-021-00402-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Le DT, Brockstedt DG, Nir-Paz R, Hampl J, Mathur S, Nemunaitis J, Sterman DH, Hassan R, Lutz E, Moyer B, Giedlin M, Louis JL, Sugar EA, Pons A, Cox AL, Levine J, Murphy AL, Illei P, Dubensky TW, Eiden JE, Jaffee EM, Laheru DA. 2012. A live-attenuated Listeria vaccine (ANZ-100) and a live-attenuated Listeria vaccine expressing mesothelin (CRS-207) for advanced cancers: phase I studies of safety and immune induction. Clin Cancer Res 18:858–868. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Jones GS, Smith VC, D’Orazio SEF. 2017. Listeria monocytogenes replicate in bone marrow-derived CD11c(+) cells but not in dendritic cells isolated from the murine gastrointestinal tract. J Immunol 199:3789–3797. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1700970 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. D’Orazio SEF. 2019. Innate and adaptive immune responses during Listeria monocytogenes infection. Microbiol Spectr 7. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.GPP3-0065-2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Macheroux P, Kappes B, Ealick SE. 2011. Flavogenomics--a genomic and structural view of flavin-dependent proteins. FEBS J 278:2625–2634. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2011.08202.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Barthelmes J, Ebeling C, Chang A, Schomburg I, Schomburg D. 2007. BRENDA, AMENDA and FRENDA: the enzyme information system in 2007. Nucleic Acids Res 35:D511–4. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl972 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Light SH, Méheust R, Ferrell JL, Cho J, Deng D, Agostoni M, Iavarone AT, Banfield JF, D’Orazio SEF, Portnoy DA. 2019. Extracellular electron transfer powers flavinylated extracellular reductases in Gram-positive bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116:26892–26899. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1915678116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Mansjö M, Johansson J. 2011. The riboflavin analog roseoflavin targets an FMN-riboswitch and blocks Listeria monocytogenes growth, but also stimulates virulence gene-expression and infection. RNA Biol 8:674–680. doi: 10.4161/rna.8.4.15586 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Gautam A, Vyas R, Tewari R. 2011. Peptidoglycan biosynthesis machinery: a rich source of drug targets. Crit Rev Biotechnol 31:295–336. doi: 10.3109/07388551.2010.525498 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Schulz LM, Rothe P, Halbedel S, Gründling A, Rismondo J. 2022. Imbalance of peptidoglycan biosynthesis alters the cell surface charge of Listeria monocytogenes Cell Surf 8:100085. doi: 10.1016/j.tcsw.2022.100085 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Takeda K, Kaisho T, Akira S. 2003. Toll-like receptors. Annu Rev Immunol 21:335–376. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.21.120601.141126 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Chandra D, Selvanesan BC, Yuan Z, Libutti SK, Koba W, Beck A, Zhu K, Casadevall A, Dadachova E, Gravekamp C. 2017. 32-Phosphorus selectively delivered by listeria to pancreatic cancer demonstrates a strong therapeutic effect. Oncotarget 8:20729–20740. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Souders NC, Verch T, Paterson Y. 2006. In vivo bactofection: listeria can function as a DNA-cancer vaccine. DNA Cell Biol 25:142–151. doi: 10.1089/dna.2006.25.142 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Haas D, Melamed J, LeBlanc G, Arun N, Perkowski AJ, Aubé J, Mack M, Constantinides MG. 2025. MAIT cell responses to intracellular and extracellular pathogens are mediated by distinct antigen presenting cells. Immunology. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.03.652000 [DOI]
  • 62. Sundström P, Szeponik L, Ahlmanner F, Sundquist M, Wong JSB, Lindskog EB, Gustafsson B, Quiding-Järbrink M. 2019. Tumor-infiltrating mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) cells retain expression of cytotoxic effector molecules. Oncotarget 10:2810–2823. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.26866 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Guirnalda PD, Paterson Y. 2012. Vaccination with immunotherapeutic Listeria monocytogenes induces IL-17(+) γδ T cells in a murine model for HPV associated cancer. Oncoimmunology 1:822–828. doi: 10.4161/onci.20491 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Bécavin C, Bouchier C, Lechat P, Archambaud C, Creno S, Gouin E, Wu Z, Kühbacher A, Brisse S, Pucciarelli MG, García-del Portillo F, Hain T, Portnoy DA, Chakraborty T, Lecuit M, Pizarro-Cerdá J, Moszer I, Bierne H, Cossart P. 2014. Comparison of widely used Listeria monocytogenes strains EGD, 10403S, and EGD-e highlights genomic variations underlying differences in pathogenicity. mbio 5:e00969-14. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00969-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Feng Y, Chang SK, Portnoy DA. 2023. The major role of Listeria monocytogenes folic acid metabolism during infection is the generation of N-formylmethionine. mBio 14:e0107423. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01074-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Senay TE, Ferrell JL, Garrett FG, Albrecht TM, Cho J, Alexander KL, Myers-Morales T, Grothaus OF, D’Orazio SEF. 2020. Neurotropic lineage III strains of Listeria monocytogenes disseminate to the brain without reaching high titer in the blood. mSphere 5:e00871-20. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00871-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Hardy J, Margolis JJ, Contag CH. 2006. Induced biliary excretion of Listeria monocytogenes. Infect Immun 74:1819–1827. doi: 10.1128/IAI.74.3.1819-1827.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Material. mbio.03652-25-s0001.docx.

Tables S1 and S2, Fig. S1 to S5, and supplemental methods.

mbio.03652-25-s0001.docx (9.8MB, docx)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.03652-25.SuF1

Articles from mBio are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES