Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Feb 12.
Published in final edited form as: ACS Chem Biol. 2025 Oct 20;20(11):2630–2636. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.5c00473

Molecular prosthetics and CFTR modulators additively increase secretory HCO3 flux in cystic fibrosis airway epithelia

Nohemy Celis 1, Danforth P Miller 2, Thomas E Tarara 2, Jeffry G Weers 2, Ian M Thornell 3, Michael J Welsh 3, Martin D Burke 1,2
PMCID: PMC12893403  NIHMSID: NIHMS2139965  PMID: 41114840

Abstract

Cystic Fibrosis (CF) is caused by loss-of-function mutations in the gene encoding the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR), an anion channel predominantly expressed on the apical membrane of epithelial cells. Reduced Cl and HCO3 secretion due to dysfunctional CFTR results in a decrease in lung function and is the leading cause of morbidity in individuals with CF. Recent therapies, known as highly effective CFTR modulator therapy (HEMT), help improve the lung function in individuals with specific CF-causing mutations by enhancing the folding, trafficking, and gating of CFTR. However, variability in HEMT responsiveness leads to sub-optimal clinical outcomes in some people with CF undergoing modulator therapy. A potential strategy is to complement their function with a CFTR-independent mechanism. One possibility is the use of ion channel-forming small molecules such as amphotericin B, which has shown promise in restoring function and host defenses in CF airway disease models. Amphotericin B functions as a molecular prosthetic for CFTR and may thus complement CFTR modulators. Here we show that co-treatment of CF airway epithelia with HEMT and amphotericin B results in greater increases in both HCO3 secretory flux and ASL pH compared to treatment with either agent alone. These findings suggest that co-administration of CFTR modulators and molecular prosthetics may provide additive therapeutic benefits for individuals with CF.

INTRODUCTION

Cystic Fibrosis (CF) is a genetic disease characterized by severe respiratory complications caused by mutations in the CFTR gene, which encodes the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein1. The CFTR protein is an anion channel primarily located on the apical membrane of epithelial cells and is critical for maintaining hydration, ion balance, and pH of the airway surface liquid (ASL)2. Basolateral pumps such as the Na+/K+-ATPase establish an electrochemical gradient that facilitates HCO3 entry into epithelial cells, providing a driving force for transepithelial HCO3 secretion through CFTR (Figure 1A)3. Loss-of-function mutations in CFTR disrupt this process by reducing HCO3 secretion and lowering ASL pH. The resulting acidic environment impairs host defenses, promotes the accumulation of viscous mucus, and compromises mucociliary clearance leading to persistent infection and inflammation in the lungs (Figure 1B)4,5.

Figure 1:

Figure 1:

Small molecule ion channels complement the function of CFTR modulators in cystic fibrosis airway epithelia. A) The apical anion channel CFTR regulates HCO3 efflux in epithelial cells. B) Mutations in CFTR result in complete or partial loss of HCO3 secretion, impairing the ASL pH, viscosity and antibacterial activity. C) CFTR modulators (Elexacaftor (E), Tezacaftor (T), and Ivacaftor (I)) partially restore CFTR function. D) We hypothesize that co-treatment of CFTR modulator treated airway epithelia with small molecule-based Amphotericin B ion channels will result in more secretory HCO3 flux.

The development of CFTR modulators, such as Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor (ETI), has led to remarkable advances in CF therapy by improving CFTR function in individuals with responsive mutations (Figure 1C)68. However, the improvement in transepithelial Cl and HCO3 secretion and the clinical response to ETI varies across individual patients, even those with the same mutations912. Given that HCO3 secretion plays a key role in airway host defenses1317, we reasoned that an alternative protein-agnostic pathway could increase HCO3 secretion by complementing the function of current CFTR modulators. One promising approach is the use of amphotericin B (AmB), a small molecule that can form non-selective ion channels and functionally complement CFTR as a molecular prosthetic (Figure 1D) 18. Unlike CFTR modulators, molecular prosthetics function independent of CFTR. Pre-clinical studies have demonstrated the potential of molecular prosthetics to restore ion transport, increase ASL pH, improve ASL hydration, decrease ASL viscosity, and increase ASL antibacterial activity in cultured CF airway epithelia18. Additionally, early clinical studies showed that, compared to vehicle control, AmB nasal perfusion in a zero Cl solution caused a more negative nasal potential difference in people with CF not on CFTR modulators19. These potential differences were similar to those observed in early clinical studies with Ivacaftor1921. With these promising results, AmB was formulated as an inhalable dry powder drug-device combination product (CM001) and is currently being evaluated in Phase 1 clinical trials2224. The lead formulation of CM001 (ABCI-003), comprising lipid-coated crystals of the molecular prosthetic, was utilized for the cell-based assays described herein.

In this study, we tested whether co-treatment of CF airway epithelia with ETI and AmB can lead to an additive increase in HCO3 secretory flux. Our findings reveal that co-treatment of CF airway epithelia with ETI and AmB additively increases HCO3 secretory flux to the ASL and thereby increases ASL pH.

RESULTS

A concentration-response analysis with ETI on cultured CF airway epithelia was performed to assess HCO3 secretory flux and ASL pH. Forskolin was included to activate CFTR by elevating intracellular cAMP levels, which initiates a phosphorylation cascade essential for CFTR activation and subsequent anion secretion25. Addition of forskolin alone to CF airway epithelia does not increase ASL pH; rather, it causes a slight acidification (Figure S2), as previously reported26. As expected, ETI (E=1μM, T=1μM, I=0.33μM) increased transepithelial H14CO3 secretion and ASL pH (Fig. 2AC). Notably, there were no further increases in HCO3 secretory flux or ASL pH upon addition of up to 10-fold higher concentrations of CFTR modulators relative to the lowest concentration of ETI used for these experiments (Figure 2AC).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

The ceiling effect of CFTR modulators. A-C) Incubation with increasing concentrations of CFTR-modulators (ETI) (measurements taken 48 hrs. after modulator treatment) does not lead to further increases in secretory H14CO3 flux to the ASL or increases in ASL pH in CF airway epithelia in comparison to the lowest dose of ETI tested here. D) 48-hour treatment with either ETI/forskolin or AmB increases ASL pH in CuFi-1 epithelia; Additive effects are observed when these two treatments are combined. Student T-test used for statistical analysis: ns not significant, *P≤0.05, **P ≤0.01, ***P ≤0.001, **** P ≤0.0001.

To evaluate whether AmB based channels led to further increases in ASL pH in ETI treated airway epithelia, we co-incubated cultured CF airway epithelia with ETI, AmB, or both (Figure 2D). A concentration of 2 μM AmB was selected for the following experiments based on our previous findings18 that low concentrations of AmB effectively increase ASL pH in CF airway epithelia, whereas concentrations at 20 μM result in a loss of efficacy and re-acidification of the ASL. As expected, the addition of CFTR modulators to CuFi-1 (ΔF508/ΔF508) epithelia led to an increase in ASL pH. CuFi-1 epithelia treated with AmB also led to increases in ASL pH, albeit to a somewhat lower extent than CFTR modulators. Notably, treatment with both CFTR modulators and AmB led to a significant increase in ASL pH relative to either treatment alone. Further studies with an Ussing chamber confirmed that AmB-based channels could still form in ETI treated CF airway epithelia (Figure S1AC). This led to the conclusion that the complementary mechanisms of both classes of small molecules resulted in the observed additive increases in ASL pH.

Given that AmB-based channels retain activity in ETI-treated CF airway epithelia and contribute to additive increases in ASL pH, we conducted an extended set of combination studies using ABCI-003. A concentration of 2 μM was utilized for ABCI-003 to match the AmB concentration used in Figure 2D. This allowed direct comparison from the studies with the free compound to be interpreted alongside those from the optimized formulation . We first tested whether AmB ion channels in the form of ABCI-003 increased HCO3 secretory flux in modulator-treated cultured CF airway epithelia. Co-treatment of CuFi-4 (G551D/ΔF508) epithelia with both modulators and ABCI-003 for 48-hours led to a substantial increase in H14CO3 secretory flux (Figure 3AC). In addition, we found that the inhibition of Na+/K+-ATPase with ouabain stopped the secretion of H14CO3. These findings suggest that, similar to CFTR, HCO3 secretion through small molecule ion channels is influenced by the electrochemical gradient maintained by the Na+/K+-ATPase.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

HCO3 secretory flux in CF airway epithelia is powered by the basolateral Na+/K+ ATPase. A-B) H14CO3 secretory flux in CuFi-4 cultured lung epithelial cells post-48 hrs. by treatment with CFTR-modulators or ABCI-003. C) Co-treatment of CFTR modulator treated airway epithelia with ABCI-003 leads to an additive H14CO3 efflux (A-C) Inhibition of the Na+/K+ ATPase with ouabain ceases apical secretory H14CO3 flux through small molecule ion channels (ABCI-003) and rescued CFTR. Student T-test used for statistical analysis: ns not significant, *P≤0.05, **P ≤0.01, ***P ≤0.001, **** P ≤0.0001.

We then exposed cultured CF airway epithelia for 48 hours to different concentrations of CFTR modulators while keeping the ABCI-003 concentration the same to assess ASL pH and secretory H14CO3 flux (Figure 4AH). Notably, ABCI-003 increases ASL pH and promotes H14CO3 secretory flux to a similar extent as CFTR modulators (Figure 4AH). This contrasts with the results observed in Figure 2D, where AmB alone increased ASL pH to a lesser extent than ETI. The improved efficacy of ABCI-003 may be attributed to components of its optimized formulation27. In particular, the inclusion of lipids may contribute to this effect. Our previous work showed that the lipid-based formulation of AmB, AmBisome, had a greater increase in ASL pH compared to AmB alone18. Consistent with this, ABCI-003 had a significant increase in ASL pH compared to AmB and did not lose efficacy at higher concentrations (Figure 5A). In addition, additive effects with ABCI-003 addition were also observed when CF airway epithelia were treated with a low and higher concentration of CFTR modulators, highlighting complementarity between these mechanisms.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Molecular prosthetics and CFTR-modulators work in complement to additively increase ASL pH and H14CO3 efflux in CF airway epithelial cells. (A-B) Effect of ETI and ABCI-003 on ASL pH post-48 hrs. incubation in CuFi-1 and CuFi-4 epithelia. (C-D) Effect of higher ETI concentrations and a fixed ABCI-003 concentration of 2μM on ASL pH in CuFi-1 and CuFi-4 epithelia. (E-F) CuFi-1 and CuFi-4 epithelia H14CO3 secretory flux from basolateral to the ASL post-48hrs. incubation with ETI, and ABCI-003 (G-H) CuFi-1 and CuFi-4 epithelia H14CO3 secretory flux from basolateral to the ASL post-48hrs. incubation with increased ETI concentrations and a fixed ABCI-003 concentration at 2μM . Student T-test used for statistical analysis: ns not significant, *P≤0.05, **P ≤0.01, ***P ≤0.001, ****P ≤0.0001.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

ABCI-003 increases the concentration range for therapeutic efficacy in cultured cystic fibrosis airway epithelia. (A) Effect of AmB and ABCI-003 on ASL pH post-48 hrs. incubation in CuFi-1. Student T-test used for statistical analysis: ns not significant, *P≤0.05, **P ≤0.01, ***P ≤0.001, ****P ≤0.0001.

Cell cytotoxicity tested by alamarBlue showed that prolonged incubation with AmB or ABCI-003 at various concentrations in the presence of ETI did not affect viability under the conditions tested in this study, with only slight cytotoxicity observed at 100 μM of AmB and ABCI-003 (Figure S3AB). Further, the DMSO basolateral concentrations used in this study for ETI treatment also had no effect on cell viability (Figure S3C). However, the potential effects of DMSO on other cellular functions remain unknown and represent a limitation of the study. Another limitation of this study is the absence of experiments using primary airway epithelia, which more accurately capture the complexity of CF and ASL height studies. Future studies will be needed to assess the potential additive effects in primary CF airway epithelia and on ASL height.

DISCUSSION

The effect of pH changes due to altered HCO3 secretion in the ASL has repeatedly been demonstrated to be important for antibacterial activity, mucociliary clearance, and mucin expansion 13,14,1418,2831. We compare for the first time the efficacy of the clinical formulation ABCI-003 to highly effective CFTR modulator therapy. We show that ABCI-003 restores ASL pH and HCO3 efflux in CF preclinical models to a similar capacity as HEMT. These results suggest that ABCI-003 on its own could potentially benefit people with CF who either must discontinue HEMT due to poor tolerability8,32,33 or those who do not have CFTR modulator responsive mutations. Supporting this therapeutic potential, phase 1 clinical studies demonstrated that inhaled ABCI-003 achieves ASL concentrations of 87.7 μM, far exceeding the concentration used in vitro. In addition, ABCI-003 is well tolerated in both healthy volunteers and people with CF, including those on CFTR modulators23,24. Additionally, our data suggests that the mechanisms of CFTR modulators and molecular prosthetics complement one another to increase secretory HCO3 flux to the ASL of CF airway epithelia. This strategy may potentially benefit some individuals currently on HEMT experiencing adverse events8,32,33. Importantly, recent studies have highlighted patient-to-patient variability in CFTR modulator response, even among individuals with the same CFTR mutations, due to differences in genetic background, and environmental influences3437. Such variability underscores the need for complementary approaches like ABCI-003, which may provide benefit across diverse patient populations and enable dose adjustments of CFTR modulators without loss of efficacy. Collectively, these results suggest the potential for additive benefit of molecular prosthetics and CFTR modulators in improving airway host defenses in people with CF.

METHODS

*Small-diameter NuLi, CuFi-1 and CuFi-4 cultured epithelia were used for these experiments (0.33 cm2) *

Cell Lines and Culture Conditions

Human bronchial epithelial cell lines (NuLi, CuFi-1, and CuFi-4) were obtained from the Welsh Laboratory at the University of Iowa. These lines were derived from lung transplant donors and include both non-CF and CF genotypes. Cells were initially thawed from cryostock and expanded in 75 cm2 collagen-coated flasks. Coating was performed using 60 μg/mL human placental collagen type IV (Sigma-Aldrich), applied in 3 mL volumes per flask and incubated at room temperature for at least 18 hours. Flasks were rinsed twice with PBS and air-dried prior to seeding. Seeding density for all cell lines was 1.5 × 104 cells/cm2.

Cells were cultured in Bronchial Epithelial Cell Growth Medium (BEGM) (Lonza CC-3170), which includes a defined supplement mix (SingleQuots). The standard antibiotic-antimycotic included in the kit was omitted, and instead the medium was supplemented with 50 μg/mL penicillin–streptomycin (Corning), 50 μg/mL gentamicin (Sigma-Aldrich), and 2 μg/mL fluconazole (Sigma-Aldrich) to prevent bacterial and fungal contamination. Cell lines were authenticated and confirmed to be free of mycoplasma using the MycoAlert Mycoplasma Detection Kit (Lonza).

Cells were expanded to ~90% confluence at 37 °C in 5% CO2 with media changes every two days. Cells were passaged using 0.25% trypsin-EDTA (Gibco) and neutralized with HEPES-buffered saline containing 1% bovine calf serum. Following centrifugation at 1,500 rpm for 5 minutes, the cell pellet was resuspended in fresh BEGM for further culture or differentiation.

For differentiation at the air–liquid interface (ALI), cells were seeded onto collagen-coated permeable membrane supports. The Membrane format were 0.33 cm2 Transwell polyester inserts (Corning). Inserts were pre-coated with collagen using the same method as described for tissue culture flasks.

After seeding, cells were maintained in a 1:1 DMEM/Ham’s F-12 medium supplemented with 2% Ultroser G (USG)(Crescent Chemical). Cells were cultured at ALI for a minimum of 14 days to promote mucociliary differentiation, with medium changes every other day initially, and once per week after full differentiation. Membranes were used for experiments only when cultures reached full maturity, and membrane age was matched across experimental groups to control for variability.

These culturing conditions were adapted from previously established protocols18,38,39.

Compound preparation and incubation methods:

Amphotericin B:

The natural product amphotericin B was utilized in its purest form as Ampho99 (GoldBio) and utilized for the cell-based assays described.

Constituents of the dry powder formulation of Amphotericin B:

The drug product, CM001 (amphotericin B inhalation powder), is a drug-device combination comprising a dry powder formulation of Amphotericin B that is administered with a portable, unit-dose, capsule-based dry powder inhaler (DPI). The drug constituent part comprises wet-milled crystals of amphotericin B coated with a porous shell of phospholipids, cholesterol, and calcium chloride. The lead formulation (ABCI-003) is spray-dried from an emulsion-based feedstock and contains 15.8% w/w Amphotericin B. The device constituent part is the ultrahigh resistance variant of the RS01 DPI (Plastiape S.p.A., Osnago, Italy). The lead formulation of ABCI-003 was utilized for the cell-based assays described23,24,27,40,41.

ABCI-003 or AmB sample preparation:

A target amount of ABCI-003 or AmB was added into a 1.5 mL HPLC vial and suspended in 100 μL of FC-72 (PFC). The absorbance of the stock was measured using the cuvette function of a NanoDrop OneC at 406 nm. The extinction coefficient of AmB (164000 M−1*cm−1) was further used to calculate the concentration of the stock solution. Then, the desired concentrations of ABCI-003 or AmB were prepared at 2 μM in a final sample volume of 200 μL of PFC. The samples were vortexed and sonicated for 1 minute prior to the apical addition of 20 μL of sample per cultured lung epithelia well. PFC is used since it readily evaporates and leaves behind the ABCI-003 powder or AmB suspension.

Modulator(s) sample preparation:

Elexacaftor (VX-445), Tezacaftor (VX-661), and Ivacaftor (VX-770) were purchased from Selleck Chemicals as a 5 mg powder form and solubilized in DMSO to prepare 10 mM stock concentrations. Forskolin was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich as a 10 mg solid and solubilized to prepare a 10 mM stock solution in DMSO. 1 mM stock solutions were prepared for each compound listed by obtaining 100 μL from the 10 mM stocks and added into 900 μL of DMSO. 550 μL of fresh 1:1 DMEM:Ham’s F-12, supplemented with 2% v/v USG Crescent Chemical) plate media was added to 24 well plates followed by Elexacaftor/Ivacaftor/Tezacaftor and forskolin addition at the desired volume for the experimental modulator concentrations (Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor range: 1 μM-10 μM, Ivacaftor range: 0.33 μM-3.67 μM) and the CFTR activator forskolin range: 0.33 μM-3.67 μM . After the addition of ABCI-003, modulator(s), or both, the cells were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 48-hours.

ASL pH determination-48 hours post compound addition.

At least one hour prior to imaging, the Zeiss LSM880 confocal microscope was turned on and set to 5% CO2 at 37°C. The excitation wavelength was 514 nm and emission wavelengths were set at a range of: 578-608 nm (channel 1) and 633-663 nm (channel 2). One hour prior to imaging, 2.5 μL of SNARF-dextran in Dulbecco’s PBS (DPBS) was added onto the apical side of the cultured lung epithelia. The cell membranes from each experimental group were then imaged using a 40x objective with water immersion for cell line cultures on the objective lens.

H14CO3 efflux 48-hours post compound addition.

14C-labelled sodium bicarbonate was obtained as a sterile 35.7 mM aqueous solution pH 9.5 from PerkinElmer. 5 μL of a 2.8 mM H14CO3 stock solution in USG medium was added to the basolateral medium. The lung epithelial cells were then incubated in 5% CO2 at 37 °C for 1 hr. After 1 hr, the apical membrane was immediately washed with 200 μL of PBS, 150 μL of the wash was collected and added into 3 mL of Opti-Fluor (a high flashpoint LSC-cocktail for aqueous samples, Thermo Scientific). Additionally, 150 μL of PBS and 150 μL of basolateral media were also added into 3 mL of Opti-Fluor and analyzed by scintillation liquid counting.

Statistical Analysis.

All statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism software. Unpaired t-test with Gaussian distribution and multiple comparisons test were used for quantifying statistical differences between sample groups. Statistical designations: NS not significant, *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001, and ****P ≤ 0.0001.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Figures

Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website. Supporting data for Ussing chamber studies.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are grateful for cystetic Medicines (C0673 Studies with Amphotericin B Cystetic for Inhalation) and the NIH (MIRA R35GM118185 to MDB) for funding this work. We thank the NIH funding support for N.C a Predoctoral Fellow (5T32 GM136629-04) who was also partially supported by the UIUC Peixin He and Xiaoming Chen PhD4 Graduate Fellowship.

Footnotes

The University of Illinois has filed patent applications related to the use of amphotericin B as a molecular prosthetic for CFTR, additive effects with CFTR modulators, and the dry powder formulation CM001. These patents have been licensed to cystetic Medicines, a biotech company for which MDB and MJW are scientific founders, consultants, and shareholders.

REFERENCES

  • (1).Stoltz DA; Meyerholz DK; Welsh MJ Origins of Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease. N. Engl. J. Med 2015, 372 (4), 351–362. 10.1056/NEJMra1300109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (2).Riordan JR; Rommens JM; Kerem B-S; Alon N; Rozmahel R; Grzelczak Z; Zielenski J; Lok S; Plavsic N; Chou J-L; Drumm ML; Iannuzzi MC; Collins FS; Tsui L-C Identification of the Cystic Fibrosis Gene: Cloning and Characterization of Complementary DNA. Science 1989, 245 (4922), 1066–1073. 10.1126/science.2475911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (3).Guggino WB; Stanton BA New Insights into Cystic Fibrosis: Molecular Switches That Regulate CFTR. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol 2006, 7 (6), 426–436. 10.1038/nrm1949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (4).Mall MA; Hartl D CFTR: Cystic Fibrosis and Beyond. Eur. Respir. J 2014, 44 (4), 1042–1054. 10.1183/09031936.00228013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (5).Boucher RC An Overview of the Pathogenesis of Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev 2002, 54 (11), 1359–1371. 10.1016/S0169-409X(02)00144-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (6).Ramsey BW; Davies J; McElvaney NG; Tullis E; Bell SC; Dřevínek P; Griese M; McKone EF; Wainwright CE; Konstan MW; Moss R; Ratjen F; Sermet-Gaudelus I; Rowe SM; Dong Q; Rodriguez S; Yen K; Ordoñez C; Elborn JS A CFTR Potentiator in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis and the G551D Mutation. N. Engl. J. Med 2011, 365 (18), 1663–1672. 10.1056/NEJMoa1105185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (7).Keating D; Marigowda G; Burr L; Daines C; Mall MA; McKone EF; Ramsey BW; Rowe SM; Sass LA; Tullis E; McKee CM; Moskowitz SM; Robertson S; Savage J; Simard C; Goor FV; Waltz D; Xuan F; Young T; Taylor-Cousar JL VX-445–Tezacaftor–Ivacaftor in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis and One or Two Phe508del Alleles. N. Engl. J. Med 2018, 379 (17), 1612–1620. 10.1056/NEJMoa1807120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (8).Spoletini G; Gillgrass L; Pollard K; Shaw N; Williams E; Etherington C; Clifton IJ; Peckham DG Dose Adjustments of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor in Response to Mental Health Side Effects in Adults with Cystic Fibrosis. J. Cyst. Fibros. Off. J. Eur. Cyst. Fibros. Soc 2022, 21 (6), 1061–1065. 10.1016/j.jcf.2022.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (9).Graeber SY; Vitzthum C; Pallenberg ST; Naehrlich L; Stahl M; Rohrbach A; Drescher M; Minso R; Ringshausen FC; Rueckes-Nilges C; Klajda J; Berges J; Yu Y; Scheuermann H; Hirtz S; Sommerburg O; Dittrich A-M; Tümmler B; Mall MA Effects of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor Therapy on CFTR Function in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis and One or Two F508del Alleles. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med 2022, 205 (5), 540–549. 10.1164/rccm.202110-2249OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (10).Bihler H; Sivachenko A; Millen L; Bhatt P; Patel AT; Chin J; Bailey V; Musisi I; LaPan A; Allaire NE; Conte J; Simon NR; Magaret AS; Raraigh KS; Cutting GR; Skach WR; Bridges RJ; Thomas PJ; Mense M In Vitro Modulator Responsiveness of 655 CFTR Variants Found in People with Cystic Fibrosis. J. Cyst. Fibros 2024, 23 (4), 664–675. 10.1016/j.jcf.2024.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (11).Van Goor F; Yu H; Burton B; Hoffman BJ Effect of Ivacaftor on CFTR Forms with Missense Mutations Associated with Defects in Protein Processing or Function. J. Cyst. Fibros 2014, 13 (1), 29–36. 10.1016/j.jcf.2013.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (12).Bijvelds MJC; Roos FJM; Meijsen KF; Roest HP; Verstegen MMA; Janssens HM; van der Laan LJW; de Jonge HR Rescue of Chloride and Bicarbonate Transport by Elexacaftor-Ivacaftor-Tezacaftor in Organoid-Derived CF Intestinal and Cholangiocyte Monolayers. J. Cyst. Fibros 2022, 21 (3), 537–543. 10.1016/j.jcf.2021.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (13).Hoegger MJ; Fischer AJ; McMenimen JD; Ostedgaard LS; Tucker AJ; Awadalla MA; Moninger TO; Michalski AS; Hoffman EA; Zabner J; Stoltz DA; Welsh MJ Impaired Mucus Detachment Disrupts Mucociliary Transport in a Piglet Model of Cystic Fibrosis. Science 2014, 345 (6198), 818–822. 10.1126/science.1255825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (14).Tang XX; Ostedgaard LS; Hoegger MJ; Moninger TO; Karp PH; McMenimen JD; Choudhury B; Varki A; Stoltz DA; Welsh MJ Acidic pH Increases Airway Surface Liquid Viscosity in Cystic Fibrosis. J. Clin. Invest 2016, 126 (3), 879–891. 10.1172/JCI83922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (15).Pezzulo AA; Tang XX; Hoegger MJ; Abou Alaiwa MH; Ramachandran S; Moninger TO; Karp PH; Wohlford-Lenane CL; Haagsman HP; van Eijk M; Bánfi B; Horswill AR; Stoltz DA; McCray PB; Welsh MJ; Zabner J Reduced Airway Surface pH Impairs Bacterial Killing in the Porcine Cystic Fibrosis Lung. Nature 2012, 487 (7405), 109–113. 10.1038/nature11130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (16).Abou Alaiwa MH; Reznikov LR; Gansemer ND; Sheets KA; Horswill AR; Stoltz DA; Zabner J; Welsh MJ pH Modulates the Activity and Synergism of the Airway Surface Liquid Antimicrobials β-Defensin-3 and LL-37. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 2014, 111 (52), 18703–18708. 10.1073/pnas.1422091112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (17).Quinton PM The Neglected Ion: HCO3-. Nat. Med 2001, 7 (3), 292–293. 10.1038/85429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (18).Muraglia KA; Chorghade RS; Kim BR; Tang XX; Shah VS; Grillo AS; Daniels PN; Cioffi AG; Karp PH; Zhu L; Welsh MJ; Burke MD Small Molecule Ion Channels Increase Host Defenses in Cystic Fibrosis Airway Epithelia. Nature 2019, 567 (7748), 405–408. 10.1038/s41586-019-1018-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (19).Chorghade RS; Kim BR; Launspach JL; Karp PH; Welsh MJ; Burke MD Amphotericin B Induces Epithelial Voltage Responses in People with Cystic Fibrosis. J. Cyst. Fibros 2021, 20 (3), 540–550. 10.1016/j.jcf.2020.11.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (20).Accurso FJ; Rowe SM; Clancy JP; Boyle MP; Dunitz JM; Durie PR; Sagel SD; Hornick DB; Konstan MW; Donaldson SH; Moss RB; Pilewski JM; Rubenstein RC; Uluer AZ; Aitken ML; Freedman SD; Rose LM; Mayer-Hamblett N; Dong Q; Zha J; Stone AJ; Olson ER; Ordoñez CL; Campbell PW; Ashlock MA; Ramsey BW Effect of VX-770 in Persons with Cystic Fibrosis and the G551D- CFTR Mutation. N. Engl. J. Med 2010, 363 (21), 1991–2003. 10.1056/NEJMoa0909825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (21).Rowe SM; Liu B; Hill A; Hathorne H; Cohen M; Beamer JR; Accurso FJ; Dong Q; Ordoñez CL; Stone AJ; Olson ER; Clancy JP Optimizing Nasal Potential Difference Analysis for CFTR Modulator Development: Assessment of Ivacaftor in CF Subjects with the G551D-CFTR Mutation. PLoS ONE 2013, 8 (7), e66955. 10.1371/journal.pone.0066955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (22).Lewandowska A; Thornell I; Soutar C; Green K; Marin-Toledo J; Shelke Y; Miller D; Tarara T; Pogorelov T; Rienstra C; Welsh M; Weers J; Burke M 282 Understanding the Role of Cholesterol in Optimizing Molecular Prosthetics for Cystic Fibrosis. J. Cyst. Fibros 2023, 22, S142–S143. 10.1016/S1569-1993(23)01210-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (23).Burke M; Welsh M; Weers J; Sellwood C; Reisner C 255 Amphotericin B Cystetic for Inhalation (CM001): A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Single Ascending Dose Study in Healthy Volunteers. J. Cyst. Fibros 2023, 22, S129. 10.1016/S1569-1993(23)01183-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (24).Weers J; Reisner C; Rose E. St.; Pelc C.; Tompkins D; Desai D; Pavlov A; Salinas T; Moll P; Sellwood C; Eldon M; Strader C; Welsh M; Burke M 286 Inhaled Amphotericin Shows Good Safety and Tolerability in Phase 1 Single-Ascending-Dose and Multiple-Ascending-Dose Studies in Healthy Subjects. J. Cyst. Fibros 2024, 23, S152–S153. 10.1016/S1569-1993(24)01126-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (25).Sheppard DN; Welsh MJ Structure and Function of the CFTR Chloride Channel. Physiol. Rev 1999, 79 (1), S23–S45. 10.1152/physrev.1999.79.1.S23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (26).Tang XX; Ostedgaard LS; Hoegger MJ; Moninger TO; Karp PH; McMenimen JD; Choudhury B; Varki A; Stoltz DA; Welsh MJ Acidic pH increases airway surface liquid viscosity in cystic fibrosis. 10.1172/JCI83922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (27).U.S. Patent Application for ION CHANNEL PROSTHETIC COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING LIPID-COATED CRYSTALS OF AMPHOTERICIN B Patent Application (Application #20250009776 issued January 9, 2025) - Justia Patents Search. https://patents.justia.com/patent/20250009776 (accessed 2025-03-13).
  • (28).Berkebile AR; McCray PB Effects of Airway Surface Liquid pH on Host Defense in Cystic Fibrosis. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol 2014, 52, 124–129. 10.1016/j.biocel.2014.02.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (29).Poulsen JH; Fischer H; Illek B; Machen TE Bicarbonate Conductance and pH Regulatory Capability of Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 1994, 91 (12), 5340–5344. 10.1073/pnas.91.12.5340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (30).Kim D; Liao J; Hanrahan JW The Buffer Capacity of Airway Epithelial Secretions. Front. Physiol 2014, 5. 10.3389/fphys.2014.00188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (31).Stoltz DA; Meyerholz DK; Pezzulo AA; Ramachandran S; Rogan MP; Davis GJ; Hanfland RA; Wohlford-Lenane C; Dohrn CL; Bartlett JA; Nelson GA; Chang EH; Taft PJ; Ludwig PS; Estin M; Hornick EE; Launspach JL; Samuel M; Rokhlina T; Karp PH; Ostedgaard LS; Uc A; Starner TD; Horswill AR; Brogden KA; Prather RS; Richter SS; Shilyansky J; McCray PB; Zabner J; Welsh MJ Cystic Fibrosis Pigs Develop Lung Disease and Exhibit Defective Bacterial Eradication at Birth. Sci. Transl. Med 2010, 2 (29), 29ra31. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3000928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (32).Frontiers | Individualized approach to elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor dosing in cystic fibrosis, in response to self-reported anxiety and neurocognitive adverse events: A case series. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/pharmacology/articles/10.3389/fphar.2023.1156621/full (accessed 2025-02-10). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • (33).Shi A; Nguyen H; Kuo CB; Beringer PM Drug-Induced Liver Injury Associated with Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor: A Pharmacovigilance Analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). J. Cyst. Fibros. Off. J. Eur. Cyst. Fibros. Soc 2024, 23 (3), 566–572. 10.1016/j.jcf.2024.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (34).Hanafin PO; Sermet-Gaudelus I; Griese M; Kappler M; Ellemunter H; Schwarz C; Wilson J; Tan M; Velkov T; Rao GG; Schneider-Futschik EK Insights Into Patient Variability During Ivacaftor-Lumacaftor Therapy in Cystic Fibrosis. Front. Pharmacol 2021, 12. 10.3389/fphar.2021.577263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (35).Szczesniak RD; Andrinopoulou E-R; Li H; Jain R; Mayer-Hamblett N; Ostrenga J; Palipana AK; Pasta DJ; Rosenfeld M; Todd J; Cromwell EA;Morgan WJ Real-World Association between Ivacaftor Initiation and Lung Function Variability: A Registry Study. J. Cyst. Fibros 2025. 10.1016/j.jcf.2025.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (36).Rose NR; Chalamalla AR; Garcia BA; Krick S; Bergeron J; Sadeghi H; Schellhase DE; Ryan KJ; Dowell AE; Acosta EP; Guimbellot JS Pharmacokinetic Variability of CFTR Modulators from Standard and Alternative Regimens. Pulm. Pharmacol. Ther 2024, 86, 102301. 10.1016/j.pupt.2024.102301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (37).Allen L; Allen L; Carr SB; Davies G; Downey D; Egan M; Forton JT; Gray R; Haworth C; Horsley A; Smyth AR; Southern KW; Davies JC Future Therapies for Cystic Fibrosis. Nat. Commun 2023, 14 (1), 693. 10.1038/s41467-023-36244-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (38).Karp PH; Moninger TO; Pary Weber S; Nesselhauf TS; Launspach JL; Zabner J; Welsh MJ An In Vitro Model of Differentiated Human Airway Epithelia. In Epithelial Cell Culture Protocols; Wise C, Ed.; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, 2002; pp 115–137. 10.1385/1-59259-185-X.115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (39).Zabner J; Karp P; Seiler M; Phillips SL; Mitchell CJ; Saavedra M; Welsh M; Klingelhutz AJ Development of Cystic Fibrosis and Noncystic Fibrosis Airway Cell Lines. Am. J. Physiol.-Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol 2003, 284 (5), L844–L854. 10.1152/ajplung.00355.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (40).Lewandowska A; Thornell I; Soutar C; Green K; Lange J; Miller D; Tarara T; Pogorelov T; Rienstra C; Welsh M; Weers J; Burke M 607 A Rationally Designed Molecular Prosthetic for Cystic Fibrosis. J. Cyst. Fibros 2022, 21, S337. 10.1016/S1569-1993(22)01297-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (41).Miller D; Tarara T; Lyons S; Burke M; Lewandowska A; Soutar C; Weers J 392 A Dry Powder Aerosol Comprising a Small Molecule Prosthetic Ion-Channel for Treatment of People with Cystic Fibrosis. J. Cyst. Fibros 2022, 21, S229. 10.1016/S1569-1993(22)01082-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Figures

RESOURCES