Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2026 Jan 16;15(2):e00789-25. doi: 10.1128/mra.00789-25

Complete genomes of Phascolarctobacterium faecium isolates obtained from pediatric mucosal-luminal interface aspirate samples

Gillian Tanabe 1,2, David R Mack 3,4, Alain Stintzi 1,2,
Editor: Zhenjiang Zech Xu5
PMCID: PMC12896173  PMID: 41543481

ABSTRACT

The bacterium Phascolarctobacterium faecium frequently colonizes the human gut and has been reported to have reduced abundance in people with Crohn’s disease. Here, we report the complete genome sequences of two P. faecium strains isolated from mucosal-luminal interface samples taken from pediatric participants with/without Crohn’s disease.

KEYWORDS: Phascolarctobacterium faecium, Crohn's disease, mucosal-luminal interface, gut microbiome

ANNOUNCEMENT

Phascolarctobacterium faecium is an anaerobic, gram-negative bacterium that frequently colonizes the human gut and is a key succinate consumer and propionate producer (1). P. faecium has been found in multiple studies to have reduced abundance in people with Crohn’s disease (24). To isolate P. faecium, mucosal-luminal interface aspirates (5) from two pediatric participants were anaerobically cultured on 104c PY + X agar supplemented with 80 mM disodium succinate (taken from MediaDive [6]) at 37°C for 4 days. Participants were enrolled within a Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Review Ethics Board approved study (#09/37X). Single colonies were isolated and re-streaked for purity, resulting in strains AB13 from a participant diagnosed with Crohn’s disease and BR41A from a participant not diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease. Both strains were grown in 104c PY + X broth with 80 mM disodium succinate anaerobically at 37°C for 4 days, followed by centrifugation to pellet the cells. DNA was extracted from the pellets using Quick-DNA HMW MagBead Kits, following the manufacturer’s instructions for microbial lysis, with an additional RNase A treatment and two additional g-DNA Wash Buffer washes (Zymo Research Corp.).

Samples were prepared for Oxford Nanopore sequencing using Rapid Sequencing DNA V14 kits (SQK-RBK114.24) and 200 ng of DNA from each sample. Libraries were size-selected using AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter) using a 1:1 bead:DNA ratio and sequenced on R10.4.1 flow cells (FLO-MIN114) on a MinION Mk1C according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Oxford Nanopore Technologies). An Ion Xpress Plus Fragment Library Kit was used to prepare 1 μg of DNA from each sample for short-read sequencing using enzymatic fragmentation as per the manufacturer (Life Technologies). The constructed libraries were size-selected using AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter) using a 0.7× bead:DNA ratio, followed by a 0.15× bead:DNA ratio. The libraries were templated on an IonChef with 400 base-read templating and sequenced on an Ion GeneStudio S5 System using an Ion 530 chip with the addition of an Ion S5 calibration standard.

Bioinformatic analyses used the following software with the default parameters, except where specified. Long reads were basecalled and demultiplexed and adapters trimmed using Dorado v0.8.3, e8.2_400bps_hac@v5.0.0 model (github.com/nanoporetech/dorado) followed by filtering using Filtlong v0.2.1 (github.com/rrwick/Filtlong) to discard reads <10,00 bp and the worst 10% of reads. Four programs were used to assemble the long reads: Flye v2.9.5 (7), Canu v2.2 (8), NECAT v0.01-update20200803 (9), and Miniasm v0.3 (github.com/lh3/miniasm). Autocycler v0.2.1 (10) was used to create a consensus assembly from the different assembler outputs. The consensus assemblies for both strains were re-oriented with Dnaapler v1.2.0 (11) to start at the dnaA gene and polished with Medaka v2.0.1 (github.com/nanoporetech/medaka). Consensus assemblies were further polished using the short reads with Polypolish v0.6.0 (12) followed by Pypolca v.0.3.1 (12, 13). The genomes were annotated using PGAP v2024-07-18.build7555 (github.com/ncbi/pgap), and completeness of the final assemblies was checked using BUSCO v5.7.0 (14). FastANI v1.1.0 on the Proksee web browser (15, 16) was used to confirm the identity of both strains. Strains AB13 and BR41A both had single circular contigs of lengths 2,260,683 and 2,488,869 bp, respectively (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Isolate information, sequencing summary, genome assembly statistics, and accession numbers for both P. faecium strains (BioProject PRJNA1275019)

Isolate AB13 BR41A
Organism (% average nucleotide identity to NCBI TaxId 1122957) P. faecium (98.96) P. faecium (97.62)
Sample isolation location Ottawa, Canada Ottawa, Canada
Sequencing technology Ion S5 ONT Ion S5 ONT
Total number of raw reads 8,022,157 392,432 23,016,940 414,055
Average raw read length (N50) (bp) 237 4,902 (10,504) 213 5,257 (12,832)
Raw coverage 841× 850× 1,970× 875×
Total number of filtered reads 195,345 184,037
Average filtered read length (N50) (bp) 8,863 (11,807) 10,644 (14,555)
SRA accession number SRR33969888 SRR33969887 SRR33969891 SRR33969890
SRR33969886 SRR33969889
BioSample SAMN49008379 SAMN49008380
GenBank accession number CP195761 CP195918
BUSCO completeness (%) 97.7 97.3
Genome size (bp) 2,360,683 2,488,869
GC content (%) 43.9 43.5
Genes 2,206 2,443
Coding sequences (CDSs) 2,131 2,368
Transfer RNAs (tRNAs) 56 56
Non-coding rRNAs (ncRNAs) 4 4
Ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs) 15 15
Pseudogenes 8 11

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was enabled in part by support provided by the Digital Research Alliance of Canada (alliancecan.ca). This work was supported by the Government of Canada through Genome Canada and the Ontario Genomics Institute (OGI-149), the Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation (project number 13440), and the W. Garfield Weston Foundation.

Contributor Information

Alain Stintzi, Email: astintzi@uottawa.ca.

Zhenjiang Zech Xu, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.

DATA AVAILABILITY

The BioProject for AB13 and BR41A is PRJNA1275019. Raw sequencing reads were deposited in the Sequence Read Archive for AB13 under accessions SRR33969888, SRR33969887, SRR33969886; and for BR41A under accessions SRR33969891, SRR33969890, SRR33969889. The genome assemblies for AB13 and BR41A have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers CP195761 and CP195918.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Wu F, Guo X, Zhang J, Zhang M, Ou Z, Peng Y. 2017. Phascolarctobacterium faecium abundant colonization in human gastrointestinal tract. Exp Ther Med 14:3122–3126. doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.4878 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Anthamatten L, von Bieberstein PR, Menzi C, Zünd JN, Lacroix C, de Wouters T, Leventhal GE. 2024. Stratification of human gut microbiomes by succinotype is associated with inflammatory bowel disease status. Microbiome 12:186. doi: 10.1186/s40168-024-01897-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Dahal RH, Kim S, Kim YK, Kim ES, Kim J. 2023. Insight into gut dysbiosis of patients with inflammatory bowel disease and ischemic colitis. Front Microbiol 14:1174832. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1174832 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Vestergaard MV, Allin KH, Eriksen C, Zakerska-Banaszak O, Arasaradnam RP, Alam MT, Kristiansen K, Brix S, Jess T. 2024. Gut microbiota signatures in inflammatory bowel disease. United European Gastroenterol J 12:22–33. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12485 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Mottawea W, Butcher J, Li J, Abujamel T, Manoogian J, Mack D, Stintzi A. 2019. The mucosal-luminal interface: an ideal sample to study the mucosa-associated microbiota and the intestinal microbial biogeography. Pediatr Res 85:895–903. doi: 10.1038/s41390-019-0326-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Koblitz J, Halama P, Spring S, Thiel V, Baschien C, Hahnke RL, Pester M, Overmann J, Reimer LC. 2023. MediaDive: the expert-curated cultivation media database. Nucleic Acids Res 51:D1531–D1538. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac803 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Kolmogorov M, Bickhart DM, Behsaz B, Gurevich A, Rayko M, Shin SB, Kuhn K, Yuan J, Polevikov E, Smith TPL, Pevzner PA. 2020. metaFlye: scalable long-read metagenome assembly using repeat graphs. Nat Methods 17:1103–1110. doi: 10.1038/s41592-020-00971-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Koren S, Walenz BP, Berlin K, Miller JR, Bergman NH, Phillippy AM. 2017. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res 27:722–736. doi: 10.1101/gr.215087.116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Chen Y, Nie F, Xie S-Q, Zheng Y-F, Dai Q, Bray T, Wang Y-X, Xing J-F, Huang Z-J, Wang D-P, He L-J, Luo F, Wang J-X, Liu Y-Z, Xiao C-L. 2021. Efficient assembly of nanopore reads via highly accurate and intact error correction. Nat Commun 12:60. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20236-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Wick RR, Howden BP, Stinear TP. 2025. Autocycler: long-read consensus assembly for bacterial genomes. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.12.653612 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 11. Bouras G, Grigson SR, Papudeshi B, Mallawaarachchi V, Roach M. 2024. Dnaapler: a tool to reorient circular microbial genomes. J Open Source Softw 9:5968. doi: 10.21105/joss.05968 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Bouras G, Judd LM, Edwards RA, Vreugde S, Stinear TP, Wick RR. 2024. How low can you go? Short-read polishing of Oxford nanopore bacterial genome assemblies. Microb Genom 10:001254. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.001254 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Zimin AV, Salzberg SL. 2020. The genome polishing tool POLCA makes fast and accurate corrections in genome assemblies. PLoS Comput Biol 16:e1007981. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007981 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Manni M, Berkeley MR, Seppey M, Simão FA, Zdobnov EM. 2021. BUSCO update: novel and streamlined workflows along with broader and deeper phylogenetic coverage for scoring of eukaryotic, prokaryotic, and viral genomes. Mol Biol Evol 38:4647–4654. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Grant JR, Enns E, Marinier E, Mandal A, Herman EK, Chen C, Graham M, Van Domselaar G, Stothard P. 2023. Proksee: in-depth characterization and visualization of bacterial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 51:W484–W492. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad326 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. 2018. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun 9:5114. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07641-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The BioProject for AB13 and BR41A is PRJNA1275019. Raw sequencing reads were deposited in the Sequence Read Archive for AB13 under accessions SRR33969888, SRR33969887, SRR33969886; and for BR41A under accessions SRR33969891, SRR33969890, SRR33969889. The genome assemblies for AB13 and BR41A have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers CP195761 and CP195918.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES