Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2025 Dec 23;15(2):e00790-25. doi: 10.1128/mra.00790-25

Genome sequences of a Paenibacillus sp. and two Sporosarcina spp. isolated from New Hampshire soil

Alison K Thurston 1,✉, Anna A Ulanova 1, Christopher CM Baker 1
Editor: Frank J Stewart2
PMCID: PMC12896236  PMID: 41432403

ABSTRACT

We present the genomes of a Paenibacillus sp. and two Sporosarcina spp. isolated from soil samples collected in New Hampshire, USA. Selective culturing targeted bacteria that could perform microbial-induced carbonate precipitation via the urease pathway at 4°C and below.

KEYWORDS: whole genome, sporosarcina, Paenibacillus, microbial induced carbonate precipitation, soil bacteria

ANNOUNCEMENT

Microbial induced carbonate precipitation (MICP) is a biogeochemical process where microbial metabolism facilitates calcium carbonate formation. One mechanism is ureolysis, whereby urease hydrolyzes urea, increasing pH and inducing carbonate precipitation (1). Selective culturing targeted bacteria with MICP potential (2) at cold temperatures (≤4°C). Organisms were isolated from soil collected at the US Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (CRREL) field site in Hanover, NH, USA. A sterilized trowel removed 4 cm of topsoil from a 20×16 cm area; soil was collected in a Whirl-Pak bag and stored at 4°C. A soil sample of 4.533 g was inoculated into 100 mL of filter-sterilized Christensen’s urea broth (CUB) (3, 4), pre-chilled at 4°C. The enrichment was incubated at 4°C on a shaker (100 rpm). During the soil enrichment, the medium turned yellow to pink, indicating increased pH and potential urease activity. After 13 days, 20 mL was transferred into 80 mL of fresh CUB, and incubation continued. After 40 days, 100 µL of a 1:10 dilution was spread onto 2× Reasoner’s 2 agar (R2A) (Difco, 218263) plates and incubated at 4°C for 53 days. Individual colonies were streaked for isolation on 2× R2A at 25°C and Christensen’s urea agar to confirm pH change.

To prepare cell pellets, isolates were revived from glycerol stocks on Luria Broth (LB) (Difco, 244620) agar plates. 25 mL LB cultures were grown at room temperature for 2–3 days, shaking at 175 rpm (early log phase). The equivalent of 8–12 OD600 units was collected, cells were washed with sterile phosphate buffered saline, resuspended in 500 µL DNA/RNA Shield (Zymo Research, R1100-50), and stored at 4°C prior to shipping to Plasmidsaurus (Eugene, OR, USA) for Oxford Nanopore Technology (ONT) and Illumina library preparation, sequencing, and hybrid assembly.

Plasmidsaurus extracted DNA using the Quick-DNA miniprep plus kit (Zymo, D4068) with a lysozyme pre-treatment. Long-read sequencing libraries were constructed using v14 chemistry (ONT rapid sequencing DNA kit, SQK-RBK114.96) with proprietary modifications to the manufacturer’s protocol. Libraries were sequenced on an ONT PromethION P24 using a primer-free protocol on R10.4.1 flow cells. Base calling was conducted using ONT’s Dorado basecaller in super-accurate mode. Short-read sequencing libraries were constructed using the ExpressPlex 96 library prep kit (SeqWell, 301098) and sequenced on an Illumina NextSeq2000 (2×159 bp).

Hybrid assembly was performed by Plasmidsaurus following their standard pipeline. ONT long reads were processed by removing the 5% worst reads using Filtlong v0.2.1 (5), then downsampled to 100× coverage based on a de novo assembly sketch from Miniasm v0.3 (6). Downsampled reads were assembled and overlapping ends trimmed using Flye v2.9.1 (7), followed by polishing using medaka v1.8.0 (8). Circularization was visualized using Bandage v0.8.1 (9). Raw Illumina reads were aligned to the ONT assembly using BWA-MEM (10), and the resulting SAM files were polished with polypolish v0.6.0 (11) to generate the hybrid assembly. Genome completion and contamination were assessed using CheckM2 v1.0.2 (12), and annotation was performed using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (Table 1; 13–15). Genome annotation identified the urease operon in all three isolates. Default parameters were used except where otherwise noted.

TABLE 1.

Summary of assembled genomes

Characteristic FA6 FA9 FA15
Source Soil Soil Soil
Location Hanover, NH, USA Hanover, NH, USA Hanover, NH, USA
ONT total reads 121,062 172,378 177,674
ONT total bases 608,186,242 737,406,775 722,240,319
ONT N50 (bp) 5,978,692 3,707,078 4,622,437
Assembled coverage (%) 95 100 97
Circular Genomes Yes Yes Yes
Illumina total reads 716,056 991,365 1,532,240
Illumina read length (bp) 159 159 159
Illumina total bases 113,852,904 157,627,035 243,626,160
Assembly level Complete genome Complete genome Complete genome
GC content (%) 42 39 41
No. of contigs 1 1 1
Genome size (bp) 5,978,707 3,707,084 4,622,452
Assembled N50 (bp) 5,978,707 3,707,084 4,622,452
Check M2 completeness (%) 99.94 99.99 99.99
Check M2 contamination (%) 0.81 1.66 0.39
Organism Paenibacillus sp. Sporosarcina sp. Sporosarcina sp.
Nearest Match using Extended 16S Analysis from Type (Strain) Genome Server (16, 17) Paenibacillus crassostreae (KU057345) Sporosarcina siberiensis (KF258678) Sporosarcina globispora X68415, Sporosarcina psychrophila X54968
BioSample SAMN47621321 SAMN47621322 SAMN47621323
SRA accession no. (ONT) SRR32921792 SRR32921790 SRR32921788
SRA accession no. (Illumina) SRR32921791 SRR32921789 SRR32921787
GenBank assembly no. GCA_051550225.1 GCA_051550205.1 GCA_051550195.1
CDSs (total) 5,271 3,705 4,320
Genes (coding) 5,177 3,659 4,259
5S rRNA 10 8 11
16S rRNA 10 8 10
23S rRNA 10 8 10
tRNA 86 69 69
CRISPR arrays 3 0 0

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Funding was provided by Installation and Operational Environment Research Development Area, under the leadership of Dr. Elizabeth Ferguson, Lead Technical Director.

Contributor Information

Alison K. Thurston, Email: alison.k.thurston@erdc.dren.mil.

Frank J. Stewart, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA

DATA AVAILABILITY

All sequence data are available under NCBI BioProject PRJNA1243441 and via the accession numbers listed in Table 1.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Wang Y, Konstantinou C, Tang S, Chen H. 2023. Applications of microbial-induced carbonate precipitation: a state-of-the-art review. Biogeotechnics 1:100008. doi: 10.1016/j.bgtech.2023.100008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Mekonnen E, Kebede A, Nigussie A, Kebede G, Tafesse M. 2021. Isolation and characterization of urease-producing soil bacteria. Int J Microbiol 2021:8888641. doi: 10.1155/2021/8888641 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Christensen WB. 1946. Urea decomposition as a means of differentiating proteus and paracolon cultures from each other and from salmonella and shigella types. J Bacteriol 52:461–466. doi: 10.1128/jb.52.4.461-466.1946 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Bacto Urea Agar Base, p 1041. 1984. In Difco Manual Dehydrated Culture Media and Reagents for Microbiology, 10th ed. Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Michigan. [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Wick RR. 2025. GitHub - Rrwick/Filtlong: Quality Filtering Tool for Long Reads . Available from: https://github.com/rrwick/Filtlong
  • 6. Li H. 2016. Minimap and miniasm: fast mapping and de novo assembly for noisy long sequences. Bioinformatics 32:2103–2110. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Kolmogorov M, Yuan J, Lin Y, Pevzner PA. 2019. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat Biotechnol 37:540–546. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0072-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Oxford Nanopore Technologies . 2025. Nanoporetech/Medaka. Oxford Nanopore Technologies. Available from: https://github.com/nanoporetech/medaka [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Wick RR, Schultz MB, Zobel J, Holt KE. 2015. Bandage: interactive visualization of de novo genome assemblies . Bioinformatics 31:3350–3352. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv383 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Li H. 2013. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM [Internet]. arXiv. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1303.3997 [DOI]
  • 11. Bouras G, Judd LM, Edwards RA, Vreugde S, Stinear TP, Wick RR. 2024. How low can you go? Short-read polishing of Oxford Nanopore bacterial genome assemblies. Microb Genom 10:001254. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.001254 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Chklovski A, Parks DH, Woodcroft BJ, Tyson GW. 2023. CheckM2: a rapid, scalable and accurate tool for assessing microbial genome quality using machine learning. Nat Methods 20:1203–1212. doi: 10.1038/s41592-023-01940-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Li W, O’Neill KR, Haft DH, DiCuccio M, Chetvernin V, Badretdin A, Coulouris G, Chitsaz F, Derbyshire MK, Durkin AS, Gonzales NR, Gwadz M, Lanczycki CJ, Song JS, Thanki N, Wang J, Yamashita RA, Yang M, Zheng C, Marchler-Bauer A, Thibaud-Nissen F. 2021. RefSeq: expanding the Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline reach with protein family model curation. Nucleic Acids Res 49:D1020–D1028. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Haft DH, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Brover V, Chetvernin V, O’Neill K, Li W, Chitsaz F, Derbyshire MK, Gonzales NR, Gwadz M, Lu F, Marchler GH, Song JS, Thanki N, Yamashita RA, Zheng C, Thibaud-Nissen F, Geer LY, Marchler-Bauer A, Pruitt KD. 2018. RefSeq: an update on prokaryotic genome annotation and curation. Nucleic Acids Res 46:D851–D860. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. 2019. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 10:2182. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10210-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. 2022. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 50:D801–D807. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab902 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All sequence data are available under NCBI BioProject PRJNA1243441 and via the accession numbers listed in Table 1.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES