Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2026 Jan 27;2(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s44477-026-00019-y

Pretangle tau pathology accrual in the default mode network during the progression of Alzheimer’s disease

Betul Kara 1,2, Ian M Kelly 1, John S Beck 1, Nathan Kuhn 1, Elliott J Mufson 3, Irving E Vega 1,2,4, Nicholas M Kanaan 1,2,4, Scott E Counts 1,2,4,5,6,✉
PMCID: PMC12901210  PMID: 41695614

Abstract

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a secondary tauopathy characterized by the accumulation of aggregated amyloid-beta (Aβ) peptides as extracellular neuritic and diffuse plaques, alongside hyperphosphorylated tau aggregates forming intracellular neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs). Although NFT pathology is strongly linked to neurodegeneration and cognitive decline in AD, growing evidence suggests that soluble “pretangle” aggregates of tau, formed prior to NFT development, are the primary neurotoxic species driving disease progression and cognitive impairment. We quantified pretangle tau moieties in postmortem tissues of the default mode network (DMN), a resting state connectome that mediates episodic memory and falters early in AD, to determine the association between DMN tau pathology and antemortem cognitive status. To accomplish this, we assayed postmortem fixed and frozen tissue from frontal cortex (FC), posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), and precuneus (PreC) DMN hubs obtained from participants of the Rush Religious Orders Study (RROS). Immunohistochemical and biochemical quantification was performed using site-specific tau antibodies recognizing pathological pretangle epitopes pS422 (phosphorylation at tau residue serine 422), TOC1 (tau oligomers), and TNT2 (N-terminal tau misfolding), as well as the mid-stage NFT marker TauC3 (C-terminal tau truncation). Pretangle tau profiles included neuropil threads and neuronal inclusions as early as Braak stage III, with significant increases from Braak stage IV to V across the DMN hubs. There was a step-wise increase in the pretangle markers in subjects who died with no cognitive impairment (NCI) to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to AD. The increase in pretangle tau pathology accrual correlated with poorer antemortem neuropsychological tests, including episodic memory, semantic memory, and a global cognitive z score calculated for each RROS participant. Pretangle tau accrual also correlated with postmortem neuropathological diagnostic measures of AD severity. In addition, we found that the PCC displayed greater tau pathology compared to the PreC, suggesting selective vulnerability within DMN hubs. Collectively, our findings are a first of its kind cellular and protein quantitative analysis to demonstrate neurotoxic pre-tangle tau accumulation within the DMN connectome that highly correlated with cognitive decline in MCI and AD, underscoring pretangle tau as a potential early driver of disease progression and a target for therapeutic intervention.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s44477-026-00019-y.

Keywords: Tau, Alzheimer's disease, Default mode network, Cognition, Pretangle, Oligomer

Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative dementing disorder and the fifth leading cause of death among those aged 65 and older [1]. The postmortem presence of amyloid beta (Aβ) peptide-containing plaques and neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) composed of aberrantly post-translationally modified tau proteins defines AD pathologically. Tau is an intrinsically disordered protein that plays various roles in cellular function in its normal physiological state [2]. However, when aberrant post-translational modifications accumulate, tau undergoes conformational changes that lead to self-aggregation and fibrillization, ultimately coalescing as NFTs in AD and other tauopathies. In AD, NFTs accumulate in the transentorhinal cortex and hippocampus prior to spreading to limbic and neocortical regions, thus guiding the Braak staging system [3]. Historically, research on tau pathology in AD has focused on NFTs as the primary source of toxicity and neuronal death. By contrast, injections of recombinant tau fibrils into the hippocampus did not induce neuron loss or synaptic dysfunction in wild type mice [4], and two-photon imaging in transgenic tau mice revealed that NFT-bearing cortical neurons respond to sensory inputs and remain integrated in local circuits [5]. Whereas turning off tau expression in a transgenic tau mouse model rescued memory and prevented neuronal loss, even as NFT-like inclusions continued to form [6]. Since these data suggest that frank NFTs are less toxic to neuronal function, research has increasingly shifted towards investigating pretangle tau aggregates that arise from early aberrant phosphorylation, protein misfolding events, and oligomer formation.

In contrast to NFTs, soluble tau oligomers can seed tau pathology [7], disrupt mitochondrial homeostasis through impaired energy metabolism, increased reactive oxygen species, and calcium imbalances [4, 8–12], interfere with bidirectional axonal trafficking and microtubule assembly [9, 13–15], and diminish synaptic vesicular signaling and long-term potentiation (LTP) [9, 14, 16–19]. These oligomeric tau insults are postulated to culminate in a toxic cellular environment promoting neurodegeneration, synaptic loss, disconnection, and cognitive decline.

Clinically, cognitive decline in episodic and semantic memory domains is an early phenomenon in AD progression [20–22]. However, the relationship between pathological tau accrual and memory dysfunction might not be linear due to individual differences in cognitive reserve and AD-associated risk factors [23]. Increasing tau burden (measured by PET imaging) correlates with reduced resting-state functional connectivity (measured by functional MRI (fMRI)) and cognitive deterioration [24–32]. Most studies on tau pathology focus on the medial temporal lobe due to its crucial role in episodic memory coding and retrieval [33–35]. However, the default mode network (DMN), a resting-state network that is active by default in the absence of an attention-demanding task, is a key memory connetome that requires investigation to understand the role tau pathology plays in mild cognitive impairment (MCI/prodromal AD) prior to the advanced clinical representation of AD [36].

The DMN consists minimally of three hubs: frontal cortex (FC), posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), and precuneus (PreC) [37, 38]. The onset of Aβ-PET positivity within the DMN is associated with signs of hyperexcitability [39] and hyperconnectivity [40–42]. By contrast, during the onset of tau-PET positivity, DMN functional connectivity shifts towards hypoconnectivity [40], in addition to delayed task deactivation in amnestic MCI patients. [43, 44]. Notably, reductions in DMN connectivity were observed in individuals experiencing subjective cognitive decline (SCD) [41] or newly diagnosed with MCI [45]. Previous studies that combined fMRI and tau PET imaging revealed that tau deposition in DMN regions correlates with aberrant network connectivity [46]. Other studies combining CSF tau and fMRI demonstrated associations between DMN connectivity and CSF ptau levels, suggesting that the accumulation of ptau impairs DMN connectivity [36]. However, imaging and CFS biomarker studies do not elucidate the role that pretangle tau pathology plays in cortical cellular degeneration and protein levels within hubs of the DMN during the progression of AD, which remains a significant knowledge gap. Currently, there is an absence of pretangle-specific PET ligands needed to track prefibrillar tau accumulation in living patients. Moreover, cross-sectional epitope-specific detection of soluble pretangle tau within DMN hubs in subjects with varying antemortem cognitive function and postmortem neuropathological diagnostic assessments has yet to be explored.

This study aimed to quantify pretangle tau in postmortem DMN regions (FC, PCC, and PreC) obtained from Rush Religious Orders Study (RROS) subjects who died with a clinical diagnosis of no cognitive impairment (NCI), MCI, or AD that displayed a full range of Braak NFT stages. Pretangle pathology was identified using epitope-specific tau antibodies that recognize early post-translational modifications related to soluble tau aggregation and toxicity combined with quantitative morphometrics and custom sandwich ELISA analysis of soluble brain fractions. We also tested for associations between the abundance of specific pretangle markers within each DMN region and antemortem neuropsychological test performance and postmortem neuropathological diagnostic criteria. Given the current lack of pretangle tau-specific in vivo probes, this is the first comprehensive analysis of pretangle tau accrual within the DMN during the progression of AD in a well-characterized, clinical pathologic cohort.

Materials and methods

Subjects and clinical pathologic assessments

Case-matched fixed and frozen FC, PCC, and PreC tissue samples were obtained from the RROS, a longitudinal clinical pathological study of aging and dementia in elderly Catholic clergy [47–49] provided to our ongoing Program Project grant (AG014449). Subjects were classified antemortem as NCI (n = 47), MCI (n = 36), or AD (n = 36). Details of RROS clinical and neuropathologic evaluations and diagnostic criteria are published extensively [47, 48, 50, 51]. Briefly, RROS participants undergo an annual neurological examination and a battery of cognitive performance tests that includes the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) and 19 additional neuropsychological tests of five cognitive domains: orientation, attention, memory, language, and perception [48]. Composite scores of episodic memory, semantic memory, working memory, perceptual speed, and visuospatial ability, as well as a composite global cognitive z-score (GCS), were derived from this test battery for each subject within a year of death (Supplementary Table 1). NCI subjects did not exhibit impairment in any of these domains after adjusting for age and education [48, 52]. The MCI subjects exhibited impairment in single or multiple cognitive domains after adjusting for age and education, but did not meet the criteria for AD or dementia [48, 52], which is consistent with criteria used by others in the field [53–55]. The diagnosis of dementia due to AD followed the revised recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for AD [56]. Exclusion criteria included a history of major depressive disorder, chronic alcoholism, and/or neuropathological evidence of Lewy body diseases, extensive TDP-43 proteinopathy, hippocampal sclerosis, and/or large strokes. Apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotyping was performed as reported previously [57].

For postmortem neuropathological analysis, tissue immersion fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde was embedded in paraffin, sectioned at 8 µm and immunostained with antibodies against Aβ (6E10, 1:400 dilution) and phosphorylated tau (AT8, 1:250 dilution). A board-certified neuropathologist evaluated all cases while blinded to clinical diagnosis [51]. Designations of “normal” (with respect to AD or other dementing processes), “possible AD”, “probable AD”, or “definite AD” were based on semi-quantitative estimation of neuritic plaque density, an age-related senile plaque score, and the presence or absence of dementia as established by the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease (CERAD) [58]. Braak scores for the staging of NFT pathology were established for each case [3]. Cases also received an NIA-Reagan Likelihood-of-AD diagnosis based on neuritic plaque and NFT pathology [59]. Semi-quantitative estimates of global NFT, neuritic plaque, and diffuse plaque burden were also derived from summary evaluations of the entorhinal cortex, hippocampus, and midtemporal, inferior parietal, and midfrontal cortices [52]. The “ABC” algorithm for the diagnosis of AD [60] was applied to all cases.

For validation studies, frozen FC, PCC, and PreC tissue blocks from low-Braak/nondemented aged controls (Braak stages I-II), mid-Braak (Braak stages III-IV), and high-Braak (Braak stages V-VI) (n = 12/group, n = 36 total) subjects were obtained postmortem from Michigan AD Center (MADC) clinical cohort [61]. These subjects underwent routine neuropathological diagnostic analysis [61]. MMSE scores were utilized to calculate correlations between pre-tangle tau pathology and global cognition.

Immunohistochemistry

Forty micron-thick free-floating fixed tissue sections from each DMN region were washed in 0.1%Triton X-100 in TBS (TBS-T) buffer, quenched with peroxidase (3% in methanol), blocked using 10% NGS/2% bovine serum albumin in 1xTBS-T, and incubated with the following primary antibodies (Table 1), alone (for brightfield microscopy) or in combination (for confocal microscopy): 1) pS422 rabbit monoclonal antibody (Millipore AB79415, 1:2,500), which recognizes soluble tau phosphorylation at the serine 422 residue, an early event in NFT evolution [62, 63] that facilitates stable tau dimerization and impairs axonal transport [13]; 2) TOC1 mouse monoclonal IgM antibody (1:20,000; RRID: AB_2832939), which recognizes tau oligomers by binding to a continuous epitope within the proline-rich region (amino acids 209–224) formed by tau dimer antigen [64, 65]; or 3) TNT2 mouse monoclonal IgG1 antibody (1:200,000; RRID: AB_2736931), which recognizes the exposed phosphatase-activating domain (PAD) in the N-terminus as an early conformational change linked to axonal transport impairment [66]. Neither TOC1 nor TNT2 epitopes colocalize with thiazine red in neurons displaying pretangle stages of tau accumulation [64, 66]. In addition, sections were also immunostained using TauC3 mouse monoclonal antibody (1:6,000; RRID: AB_2832930), which recognizes a truncation neoepitope at D421 in the C-terminus and serves as a marker for mid-stage NFT development [67, 68]. Finally, the PHF-1 mouse monoclonal antibody (1:20,000; RRID: AB_2315150), which detects phosphorylated serine residues at positions 396 and 404, was used to detect filamentous tau and NFTs [69]. In parallel experiments, we used the MOAB-2 mouse monoclonal antibody (1:5,000; RRID: AB_2313888), which detects oligomeric Aβ and plaque pathology via binding residues 1–4 within the N terminus [70].

Table 1.

Antibodies and working concentrations

Antibody Working concentrations Isotype Epitopes
Ps422

IHC (1:2500)

IF (1:500)

ELISA (1:500)

Rabbit polyclonal pS422
TOCI

IHC (1:20,000)

IF (1:2,000)

ELISA (1:500)

Mouse IgM Amino acids 209–224
TNT2

IHC (1:200,000)

IF (1:20,000)

ELISA (1:100)

Mouse IgG1 Amino acids 2–18 (Phosphatase-activating domain)
TauC3

IHC (1:6,000)

IF (1:500)

ELISA (1:500)

Mouse IgG1 Amino acid 421 (C-terminus truncation)
PHF-1 IHC (1:20,000) Mouse IgG1 Ps396/Ps404
Tau5 ELISA (1:1000) Mouse IgG1 Amino acids 218–225
MOAB-2 IHC (1:5,000) Mouse IgG2b Amino acids 1–4

For brightfield immunohistochemistry (IHC), sections underwent three 10-min TBS-T washes before the secondary incubation with either mouse or rabbit biotinylated secondary antibodies (1:500) for one hour at room temperature. After applying the ABC kit (Vector Laboratories PK-6100) for one hour and three more 10-min TBS-T washes, 3,3′-Diaminobenzidine (Vector Laboratories SK-4105) was used to develop brown reaction products. Sections were then washed, mounted on slides, counterstained with cresyl violet (Sigma Aldrich C5042) and coverslipped for digital imaging as described below.

For immunofluorescence (IF) , sections were first exposed to a light-emitting diode (LED) light source for 16 h to quench autofluorescence. On Day 1, the sections were blocked with normal goat serum and incubated overnight with the TNT2 primary antibody (1:20,000) or TauC3 (1:2,500). The following day, sections were washed and incubated with Alexa568 anti-mouse IgG1-specific secondary antibody (1:500, Invitrogen A21124) for one hour. Before adding the other two primary antibodies TOC1 (1:5,000) and pS422 (1:2,000), the sections were treated with mouse Fab fragments (1:20, Jackson Laboratories, AB-2338476) for one hour to prevent non-specific binding between the two mouse antibodies. On Day 3, sections were washed again and incubated with Alexa-488 anti-mouse IgM-specific (Invitrogen, A21042, 1:500) and Alexa-405 anti-rabbit IgG (Invitrogen, A31556, 1:500) secondary antibodies for one hour before mounting and coverslipping. Sections were imaged using a Nikon A1 laser scanning confocal microscope with a 40 × oil immersion objective.

Whole slide digital imaging and quantitative analysis

Tissue sections were digitally scanned using a Zeiss AxioScan7 with a TL LED lamp and a 20x/0.8 M27 plan-apochromatic objective. The images were then stitched into a single composite using Zen Blue software (version 3.7.97.07000) with a pixel resolution of 0.173 µm × 0.173 µm. Five sections per case per region and per antibody were used for quantification. The entire gray matter was analyzed as the region of interest. After annotations were drawn, thresholds were adjusted for each antibody, and HALO (Area Quantification v2.1.11, Indica Labs) machine learning software was used to quantify the signal intensity and tissue area associated with the signal. For normalization purposes, the percentage of tissue area stained was used as the outcome measure.

Soluble tau extraction

Frozen tissue (150 mg) from RROS and MADC cases was placed in a 10X volume of brain homogenization buffer (50 mM Tris, 275 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl) supplemented with protease inhibitors (10 μg/ml of Pepstatin A, Leupeptin, Bestatin, Aprotinin, and 1 mM PMSF). The tissue was homogenized on ice using a Tissue Tearor rotor–stator probe (Biospec) and centrifuged at 27,000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C to obtain the soluble pretangle tau-enriched fraction for custom sandwich ELISAs. Protein concentrations were determined using the BCA method (Thermo Fisher Scientific, A53226), and all samples were stored at −80 °C.

Custom sandwich ELISAs

Custom sandwich sELISAs were prepared using TOC1 (2 μg/ml), TNT2 (1 μg/ml), TauC3 (2 μg/ml), and Tau5 (total tau, 1 μg/ml) antibodies as capture antibodies [71–73], combined with R1 (1:10,000; RRID: AB_2832929), a pan-tau antibody, for detection [74]. Briefly, 96-well plates were coated with the capture antibodies in borate buffer (100 mM borate acid, 25 mM sodium borate, 75 mM NaCl, 0.25 mM thimerosal) and incubated for one hour at room temperature on a shaker. After two quick washes with wash buffer (100 mM borate acid, 25 mM sodium borate, 75 mM NaCl, 0.25 mM thimerosal, 0.4% (w/v) bovine serum albumin, 0.05% (v/v) Tween-20), the wells were blocked with 5% non-fat dry milk for one hour. Brain lysate samples were then added to the wells and incubated on the shaker for 90 min using predetermined concentrations from previous titration experiments (Samples: TOC1&TauC3: 20ug/well, TNT2&Tau5:10ug/well). Each assay included recombinant tau monomer and aggregate standards (1:3 serial dilution starting from: TOC1:200 nM, TNT2: 100 nM, Tauc3: 100 nM, Tau5:55Nm) generated as previously described [66, 75, 76] to estimate levels of tau species in the lysate samples. Following four additional washes, the R1 detection antibody was added for a 90-min incubation, followed by a one-hour incubation with anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibody (1:5,000). TMB solution (Sigma, T0440) was then added for color development, allowing the reaction to proceed for 4–8 min before terminating with the stop buffer (3.5% sulfuric acid). Finally, plates were read with a plate reader at 450 nm. The readout was transformed into the % light absorbed with the Y = 100-(100*10^(-Y)) formula (Y = absorbance).

Statistical analysis

All datasets were subjected to the Shapiro–Wilk test for normality. Subject demographic, clinical, and pathological variables were compared by either one-way ANOVA or the Kruskal–Wallis test with post hoc corrections for multiple comparisons. Chi-Square testing was used to compare sex and APOE ε4 allele distribution across the groups. Tau marker levels were compared within each region across clinical diagnosis or Braak stage using the Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s correction. The nonparametric Friedman test with Dunn’s correction was applied for interregional comparisons of markers as paired data. Spearman rank correlations were used to test for associations between regional tau levels and antemortem neuropsychological test scores or postmortem variables. Significance was set at α = 0.05.

Results

RROS cohort demographics and clinical neuropathologic characteristics

Detailed demographic, clinical, and neuropathological data for the RROS participants (n = 119) are listed in Table 2. No significant differences were observed in sex, years of education, or postmortem interval (PMI) among the NCI, MCI, and AD clinical groups. APOE ε4 allele was present in 21.8% of the subjects, but its prevalence did not differ across groups. Age was significantly lower in the NCI compared to the MCI and AD subjects (p = 0.0002). However, age was not correlated with select tau marker levels in most of the DMN regions, with the exception of TOC1 in the FC and TNT2 in the PreC in the sELISA analyses (Supplementary Table 2). Global cognitive performance on both the MMSE and GCS was significantly lower in the MCI compared to NCI group (p < 0.0001); these scores were also significantly lower in AD compared to MCI (p < 0.0001). Braak, CERAD, and Reagan neuropathological diagnostic scores were significantly more severe in AD compared to NCI and MCI (Table 2).

Table 2.

Demographic, clinical, and pathological profile of the RROS cohort

Clinical diagnosis Comparison by diagnosis group
NCI MCI AD Total (P value)
(n = 47) (n = 36) (n = 36) (n = 119)
Age at death(years)
Mean ± SD 88.1 ± 5.1 92.2 ± 5.9 92.3 ± 4.5 90.6 ± 5.5 0.0003a
(Range) (70.5, 98.1) (80.7,103.7) (80.7,102.1) (70.5,103.7)
No. (%) Males 18 (37.5%) 13 (36.1%) 7 (19.4%) 38 (31.7%) 0.1535‡
Years of Education
Mean ± SD 18.6 ± 3.3 18.0 ± 2.8 17.6 ± 3.3 18.1 ± 3.2 0.2943a
(Range) (10, 27) (12, 24) (8, 27) (8, 27)
Postmortem Interval (hours)
Mean ± SD 11.5 ± 6.5 9.8 ± 6.7 9.2 ± 7.1 10.3 ± 6.8 0.1062a
(Range) (3.2, 27.3) (0.9, 24.0) (2.7, 34.3) (0.9, 34.3)
No. (%) ApoE4 (≥ 1 allele) 11 (23.4%) 7 (19.4%) 8 (22.2%) 26 (21.8%) 0.9023‡
MMSE
Mean ± SD 28.0 ± 1.8 24.2 ± 3.2 16.3 ± 6.6 23.4 ± 6.4  < 0.0001a
(Range) (21, 30) (19, 30) (0, 26) (0, 30)
Global Cognitive Score
Mean ± SD 0.2 ± 0.4 −0.6 ± 0.4 −2.1 ± 0.9 −0.7 ± 1.1  < 0.0001b
(Range) (−0.7, 1.1) (−1.6, 0.2) (−4.1, −0.4) (−4.1, 1.1)
Braak Scores
I-II 14 5 2 21  < 0.0001a
III-IV 31 25 11 67
V-VI 2 6 23 31
NIA Reagan Diagnosis (likelihood of AD)
No AD 0 0 0 0  < 0.0001a
Low 30 16 5 51
Intermediate 16 15 15 46
High 1 5 16 22
CERAD Diagnosis
No AD 18 11 3 32 0.0003a
Low 4 3 1 8
Intermediate 18 12 14 44
High 7 10 18 35

a Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s correction

b One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s correction

‡Chi-Square test Abbreviations: AD Alzheimer’s disease, MCI Mild cognitive impairment, MMSE Mini-Mental State Examination, NCI No cognitive impairment, SD Standard deviation

Pathological tau accrual in the DMN in the RROS cohort

Fixed free-floating FC, PCC, and PreC tissue sections (NCI = 19, MCI = 16, AD = 16, n = 51 total) were labeled separately with the select site-specific tau antibodies (pS422, TOC1, TNT2, and TauC3) for IHC quantification. PHF-1, a canonical NFT marker, was used in the PCC samples to compare with the other markers listed above. As shown in Fig. 1, pretangle markers of tau pathology were observed only sparsely as neuropil threads (NTs) in Braak stages III/IV, with an appreciable accumulation of NTs and the appearance of NFTs within cortical layers 2/3 and 5/6 by Braak stage V. Qualitatively, pS422 + NTs appeared to accumulate prior to the TOC1 + and TNT2 + NTs, whereas TauC3 appeared more confined to NFTs in later Braak stages (Fig. 1). Multiplexed fluorescence microscopy of the pS422, TOC1, and TNT2 pretangle markers in higher Braak cases revealed co-labeling in the cell bodies of both pretangle and NFT-bearing neurons, as well as within NTs (Fig. 2) and neuritic plaques (Supplementary Fig. 1 A). Interestingly, different distribution patterns of the markers were noted within individual NTs (Fig. 2, Supplementary Fig. 1 A). The mid-stage marker TauC3 [63] did not significantly overlap with earlier pretangle markers within cell bodies, but dual labeled with NTs immunostained by the other pretangle markers (Supplementary Fig. 1B).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Immunolabeling of early tau and amyloid pathology in PCC. Representative photomicrographs showing pS422, TOC1, TNT2, TauC3, and MOAB-2-immunoreactive profiles in layer 3/4 from a (A) Braak stage III/IV and (C) Braak stage V/VI case. Tau pathology was not apparent in the DMN hubs in Braak I/II cases. (B, D) High magnification micrographs showing labeling for each marker within the square boxes outlined in (A, C). Similar qualitative immunolabeling patterns were observed in FC and PreC. Scale bars: Blue = 200 µm, Black = 20 µm. Arrowheads = neuropil threads; Arrows = tau + somal inclusions

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Representative fluorescence micrographs of tau pretangle- immunoreactive profiles in PCC layers 3/4 of an AD case (Braak stage V). A) pS422 + profiles (blue), (B) TNT2 + profiles (red), and (C) TOC1 + profiles (green). D) Overlap of pS422, TNT2, and TOC1. Images were captured with a 40X oil objective. Scale bar: 25 µm. Note the differential expression patterns among the markers within neuropil threads (arrowheads), whereas marker overlap was more prominent in the neuronal soma (arrows)

Quantitative morphometrics of the brightfield immunolabeled sections revealed that pS422 + profile levels were significantly increased from Braak stage IV to V in all three regions (FC, p = 0.0245; PCC, p = 0.0214; PreC, p = 0.0111) (Fig. 3A, C, E; Supplementary Fig. 2A). TOC1 levels also began to rise between Braak stages IV and V in all three DMN hubs but reached statistical significance only at Braak stage VI (FC, p = 0.025; PCC, p = 0.0154, PreC, p = 0.0171, Fig. 3A, C, E; Supplementary Fig. 2 A). TNT2 labeling exhibited a significant increase by Braak stage V in FC and PCC (p = 0.0351 and p = 0.0003, respectively) (Fig. 3A, C, E; Supplementary Fig. 2 A). TauC3, which displayed a lower abundance than the pretangle markers, was significantly increased in Braak V in the FC and Braak VI in PCC (p = 0.0176 and p = 0.0477, respectively, Fig. 3A, C, E; Supplementary Fig. 2A). By contrast, MOAB-2 immunoreactivity revealed increases in amyloid pathology as early as Braak stages II-III, but the increase was significant only in the PreC in Braak stage VI (PreC, p = 0.0144, Fig. 3A, C, E; Supplementary Fig. 2 A).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Pathological tau accumulation in the DMN across Braak stage and correlations with antemortem cognitive performance. A, B) pS422, TOC1, TNT2, TauC3, and MOAB2 levels (A) and correlations of tau marker levels with antemortem cognitive assessments (B) in FC. C, D) Tau and amyloid pathology marker levels (C) and correlations (D) for PCC. E, F) Tau and amyloid pathology marker levels (E) and correlations (F) for PreC. % area values were log-transformed only for visualization purposes and compared via Kruskal–Wallis with Dunn’s correction. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001. Bar graphs show mean ± SD. Spearman correlations tested associations between marker levels and clinical pathologic variables (rho coefficients are shown), *, significant correlations (see Supplementary Tables 3 and 6 for p values). Abbreviations: MMSE, Mini-Mental State Exam; GCS, Global Cognitive Score; EM, Episodic memory; SM, Semantic memory; WM, Working memory; PS, Perceptual speed; VA, Visuospatial ability

When compared among the clinical diagnostic groups, pS422 pathology was significantly increased between NCI and AD in all three regions (FC, p = 0.0245; PCC, p = 0.0049; PreC, p = 0.0042), with increased levels in AD compared to MCI in FC and PCC but not PreC (Supplementary Fig. 3A). TOC1 levels were also significantly higher in AD compared to NCI in FC (p = 0.0022) and PCC (p = 0.0056), but not PreC (Supplementary Fig. 3A). TNT2 and TauC3 levels were also significantly higher in AD compared to NCI; however, TNT2 levels in FC were significantly higher in MCI compared to NCI (p = 0.0271) (Supplementary Fig. 3A). Levels of PHF-1 immunostaining were significantly increased in Braak stage VI and were significantly higher in AD compared to NCI (PCC, p < 0.0001, Supplementary Fig. 4). Finally, MOAB-2 + amyloid load did not differ across diagnostic groups except for a significant increase in PreC in e AD (Supplementary Fig. 3A).

Correlations between DMN pretangle tau markers and clinical pathologic variables

Antemortem neuropsychological test scores assessing various cognitive domains were used to evaluate the relationship between regional DMN tau pathology and cognitive performance within a year of death [52]. Strikingly, increasing levels of pS422, TOC1, TNT2, and TauC3 + profiles in all three regions strongly correlated with poorer antemortem MMSE and GCS scores, as well as poorer performance on measures of episodic memory. By contrast, TNT2 and TauC3 levels, but not pS422 or TOC1 levels, in FC and PreC were associated with working memory, whereas none of the marker levels in PCC were associated with working memory, a cognitive domain less associated with DMN [77] (Fig. 3B, D, F; Supplementary Table 3). By contrast, MOAB2 + amyloid load, correlated with pS422, TOC1, and TNT2 in all regions, but was only associated with lower episodic and semantic memory scores and GCS in the PCC (Fig. 3D, Supplementary Table 3).

Regarding postmortem neuropathological diagnostic criteria, increasing pS422, TNT2, and TauC3 levels were significantly associated with Braak stage, CERAD, and NIA-Reagan scores in the DMN hubs, these associations were weaker for TauC3 (Supplementary Fig. 5 A, C, E; Supplementary Table 6). TOC1 levels followed a similar pattern in PCC and FC, but did not correlate with the pathological diagnostic criteria in the PreC. MOAB-2 levels were significantly associated with CERAD and NIA-Reagan scores in the DMN hubs, but not with Braak stage in FC and PreC. Interestingly, increasing DMN pretangle markers were associated with increasing semi-quantitative estimates of global NFT and neuritic plaque burden, but not diffuse plaque burden (Supplementary Fig. 5 A, C, E; Supplementary Table 6).

Soluble pretangle tau markers in DMN hubs

We performed complementary custom sELISA studies to quantify TOC1, TNT2, and TauC3 in soluble DMN extracts as a complementary approach to measure the accrual of diffusible, presumably toxic tau moieties. Technical issues precluded optimization of a pS422 assay. We also quantified total tau in the fractions using the Tau 5 antibody (see Methods). We found that TOC1 oligomeric tau levels were significantly increased during the transition from Braak stage IV to V in all three hubs (FC, p < 0.0001; PCC, p = 0.003; PreC, p = 0.0006) (Fig. 4A, C, E; Supplementary Fig. 2B). Likewise, TNT2 levels were elevated in Braak V FC and PCC, and in Braak VI PreC (p = 0.0223, p = 0.0001, p = 0.0462, respectively) cases. TauC3 levels were also increased in DMN hubs in Braak stages V in the FC and PCC (p = 0.0545, p = 0.0128, respectively) and in Braak stage VI in PreC (p = 0.031). By contrast, Tau 5 total tau levels were only increased in Braak VI cases (Fig. 4A, C, E; Supplementary Fig. 2B). When comparing these markers across e clinical groups, soluble TOC1 levels were significantly increased in AD compared to MCI in all three hubs and compared to NCI in PCC and PreC and TNT2 showed a similar pattern in the FC and PCC (Supplementary Fig. 3B). TauC3 levels were increased between NCI and AD in PCC, whereas total tau5 levels did not differ significantly between clinical groups (Supplementary Fig. 3B).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Pathological tau accumulation in DMN soluble fractions across Braak stage and correlations with antemortem cognitive measurements. TOC1, TNT2, TauC3, and Tau5 levels and correlations of tau marker levels with antemortem cognitive assessments (B) in FC. C, D) Tau marker levels (C) and correlations (D) for PCC. E, F) Tau marker levels (E) and correlations (F) for PreC. % Light absorbance was compared via Kruskal–Wallis with Dunn’s correction. *, p < 0.05; ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001. Bar graphs show mean ± SD. Spearman correlations tested associations between marker levels and clinical pathologic variables (rho coefficients are shown), *, significant correlations (see Supplementary Tables 4 and 7 for p values). Abbreviations: MMSE, Mini-Mental State Exam; GCS, Global Cognitive Score; EM, Episodic memory; SM, Semantic memory; WM, Working memory; PS, Perceptual speed; VA, Visuospatial ability

Correlations between soluble DMN pretangle tau markers and clinical pathologic variables

Similar to histological results, inverse associations were observed between increasing levels of pretangle tau in soluble DMN fractions and poorer antemortem performance on neuropsychological tests. For example, TOC1 levels were correlated with poorer episodic memory in PCC (r = −0.39; p = 0.00006) and PreC (r = −0.50; p = 0.0000001) but not FC (r = −0.18; p = 0.08). Similarly, they were inversely correlated with semantic memory performance ((PCC (r = −0.37; p = 0.0002), PreC (r = −0.42; p = 0.00002), and FC (r = −0.26; p = 0.009) (Figs. 4B, D, F; Supplementary Tables 3 & 4). TNT2 level associations with cognitive performance were more variable across region and test, neither TOC1 nor TNT2 was associated with working memory. TauC3 correlated with MMSE, GCS, episodic memory, semantic memory, and working memory in PCC and PreC, whereas total tau (Tau5) did not reveal any correlations (Figs. 4B, D, F; Supplementary Table 4).

With respect to postmortem neuropathological diagnostic criteria, increasing TOC1, TNT2, and TauC3 levels, but not Tau5 levels, were significantly associated with Braak stage, CERAD, and NIA-Reagan scores in the DMN hubs (Supplementary Fig. 5B; Supplementary Table 7). TOC1, TNT2, and TauC3 levels were also positively correlated with semi-quantitative estimates of NFT density, neuritic plaque density, and neuritic plaque number. Tau5 levels were not associated with any of the measures (Supplementary Fig. 5B; Supplementary Table 7).

Validation studies in MADC subjects

DMN samples from the MADC clinical cohort were used to validate the soluble tau sELISA finding derived from RROS tissue (Table 3). Subjects were classified as low-Braak/control (Braak stage I-II), mid-Braak (III-IV), and high-Braak (V-VI) and did not differ in age, sex, or PMI across groups. However, MMSE scores were significantly lower in the high Braak group (Table 3). Interestingly, regional soluble tau pathological load was higher for all markers in successive Braak stages in this cohort (Fig. 5A, C, E) compared to the RROS (Fig. 4). Moreover, while soluble TOC1 and TNT2 levels were significantly increased during the transition from Braak stage IV to Braak stage V in the DMN hubs in RROS cases, these markers were increased during the transition from Braak stage III to Braak stage IV in the DMN hubs in the MADC cases (Fig. 5). However, except for TOC1 in PCC, significance was not reached until Braak stage V, similar to the RROS cohort. TauC3 load was minimal in PCC and PreC, yet showed higher abundance in FC. There were no differences in Tau5 + total tau levels across Braak stages. Finally, a strong and statistically significant inverse correlation was observed between soluble TOC1 and TNT2 levels and antemortem MMSE scores across all three DMN regions (Figs. 5B, D; Supplementary Table 5). In contrast, TauC3 levels correlated with MMSE scores only in PreC, similar to the RROS cohort (Fig. 5F).

Table 3.

Demographic, Clinical, and Pathological Profile of the MADC cohort

Clinical diagnosis Comparison by diagnosis group
low-Braak mid-Braak high-Braak Total (P value)
(n = 12) (n = 12) (n = 12) (n = 36)
Age at death (years)
Mean ± SD 67.8 ± 14.9 80.3 ± 10.8 74.3 ± 10.5 74.1 ± 7.6 0.056a
(Range) (39–87) (60–95) (57–92) (39–95)
No. (%) Males 6 (50%) 6 (50%) 6 (50%) 18 (50%)  > 0.9999‡
Education
Mean ± SD 15.25 ± 2.2 15.92 ± 2.4 15.33 ± 2.8 15.6 ± 2.5 0.8376a
(Range) 13–18 12–20 12–20 12–20
Postmortem Interval (hours)
Mean ± SD 12.7 ± 7.6 8.6 ± 5.3 9.6 ± 5.5 10.2 ± 6.3 0.298b
(Range) (4–26) (3–18) (4–21) (3–26)
MMSE
Mean ± SD 27 ± 2 15.3 ± 11.9 8.1 ± 6.9 14.4 ± 10.9 0.0143 b
(Range) (24–28) (1–29) (0–18) (0–29)
Braak Scores
I-II 12 0 0 12  < 0.0001b
III-IV 0 12 0 12
V-VI 0 0 12 12

a One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s correction

b Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s correction

‡Chi-Square test

MMSE Mini-Mental State Exam, SD Standard deviation

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Pathological tau accumulation in DMN soluble fractions in MADRC subjects and correlations with MMSE scores and Braak stage. TOC1, TNT2, TauC3, and Tau5 levels and correlations of tau marker levels with MMSE and Braak stage in (A, B) FC, (C, D) PCC, and (E, F) PreC. % Light absorbance was compared via Kruskal–Wallis with Dunn’s correction. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01. Bar graphs show mean ± SD. Spearman correlations tested associations between marker levels and MMSE score or Braak stage (rho coefficients are shown), *, significant correlations (see Supplementary Table 5 and 8 for p values). Abbreviations: MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; GCS, Global Cognitive Score; EM, Episodic memory; SM, Semantic memory; WM, Working memory; PS, Perceptual speed; VA, Visuospatial ability

Distribution of cognitive scores across Braak stage in the RROS cohort

MMSE and GCS scores were plotted by Braak stage for each RROS subject (Fig. 6). Both scores of antemortem global cognitive performance were significantly decreased between Braak stages IV and V, mirroring the pattern of significant increases in pretangle tau markers across Braak stages (Figs. 3 and 4).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Distribution of global cognitive scores across Braak stage in the RROS cohort. A) Antemortem MMSE scores for RROS subjects distributed across their individual postmortem Braak stage diagnosis, via Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s correction. B) Antemortem GCS for each RROS subject across Braak stage, via one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s correction. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001. Bar graphs show mean ± SD. Abbreviations: GCS, Global Cognitive Score; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Exam

Regional differences in DMN tau pathology in the RROS cohort

When comparing regional distributions of the tau markers within DMN hubs, pS422 was the most abundant marker and its expression levels were significantly higher in the PCC (p = 0.0029) compared to FC and PreC (Fig. 7). Similarly, both total TOC1 and soluble TOC1 were higher in the PCC. Total TNT2 was also higher in the PCC compared to the FC. Soluble TauC3 was slightly higher in the FC compared to the PreC. Finally, MOAB-2 was significantly higher in the PCC and FC compared to PreC. The overall pattern indicated divergence in the posterior DMN hubs, with a higher pre-tangle tau load in the PCC and possible resistance to tau and amyloid pathology in neighboring PreC.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Regional comparisons of soluble and total tau markers. Regional differences in the abundance of selected markers across regions. IHC and ELISA-measured (i.e., sTOC1) markers in the PCC, PreC, and FC were paired for each case via the nonparametric Friedman test with Dunn’s correction. s = measured in the S1 soluble fraction. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0,01; ***, p < 0,001; ****, p < 0.0001

Discussion

Tau epitopes associated with pretangle cellular inclusions are linked to impairment of cellular trafficking, ionic imbalances through disrupting ion-gated calcium channels, and reduced mitochondrial and lysosomal functions [11, 78–80]. These, and likely other cellular disturbances, result in synaptic impairments (e.g., disrupted LTP) leading to neuronal death, synaptic disconnection, and cognitive dysfunction [14, 17, 81, 82]. However, the threshold accumulation of tau toxic pretangle pathology underlying cortical dysfunction required to precipitate cognitive impairment remains unknown. Here, we investigated pretangle cellular and neuropil tau pathology in the FC, PCC, and PreC hubs of the DMN connectome that mediates memory and attention function and is dysregulated in the preclinical and prodromal stage of AD [83–85]. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine pretangle tau pathology across hubs of the DMN using tissue obtained from cases with an antemortem clinical and postmortem neuropathological evaluation. To accomplish this, we used multiple site-specific tau antibodies to reveal pretangle lesions within hubs of the DMN across clinical diagnostic categories and during the onset of Braak stages. We found a step-like increase in DMN tau pathology across clinical diagnostic groups, showing a significant increase in AD compared to NCI, with intermediate levels in MCI. In addition, pretangle tau markers correlated strongly with measures of episodic and semantic memory, global cognitive scores, and Braak, CERAD, and NIA-Reagan scores, as well as semi-quantitative measures of NFT and neuritic plaque burden.

Pathological tau quantification in the DMN

Clinical pathological studies of tau in AD have mainly focused on NFTs in the trans/entorhinal cortex and hippocampal components of the medial temporal lobe memory circuit, which occur prior to the spread of NFT into neocortical hubs of the DMN. Quantification of early pathological pretangle tau phosphorylation and conformational epitopes revealed that pS422 (Serine 422 phosphorylation) was the earliest and the most abundant marker that primarily labeled NTs prior to appearing in the cell soma suggesting an early axonal transport defect similar to seen in association with the cholinergic basal forbrain cortical projection neurons [63, 86, 87], entorhinal cortex pyramidal neurons [64] and in synaptosomes isolated from the angular gyrus [88] during the progression of AD. Phosphorylation of tau at S422 residue is associated with several kinases, including GSK3B, JNK3, and p38 [13, 62, 87, 90], which are associated with tau toxicity through various molecular mechanisms [91–94]. S422 phosphorylation also inhibits anterograde and retrograde fast axonal transport [13], disrupts protein homeostasis [86], and is linked to neurotransmitter abnormalities [95]. Recently, Stefanoska and colleagues investigated Serine/Threonine phosphorylation sites of tau in vitro, identifying S422 as a key residue in the C-terminus of tau, where its phosphorylation modulates the phosphorylation of other tau epitopes interdependently [96],   . In addition to the DMN, oligomeric (TOC1-positive [65]) and N-terminal misfolded (TNT2-positive [75]) tau are present in the entorhinal cortex and medial temporal lobe [66, 97–99] as well as the frontal cortex in other tauopathies [89, 100]. Previously, TOC1-positive tau levels were found to increase in synaptosome-enriched fractions from layer II of the visual cortex in Braak stage III/IV cases [101]. Similar to pS422, TOC1 + and TNT2 + NTs were largely confined within the cortical laminae of the DMN hubs during early Braak stages (Figs. 1, 2) with the gradual appearance of neuronal labeling in layers 2/3 and 5/6 by Braak stage V (Fig. 1) suggesting that these pathological profiles underlie the significant increase in pretangle tau burden that occurs during the transition from Braak stage IV to V in the DMN. The abundance of TOC1 and TNT2 followed a similar pattern; however, their structural localization differed slightly. TNT2 staining was more pronounced than TOC1 in NTs, whereas TOC1 appeared early in the cell soma (Fig. 1, Supplementary Fig. 1A).

Although the origin of these neurites remains unclear, perhaps they arise from corticocortical or thalamocortical projection neurons [102]. Moreover, the DMN hubs also receive extensive innervation from cholinergic basal forebrain [103, 104] and brainstem noradrenergic [105, 106] and serotinergic [107] neurons that modulate memory and attentional behaviors [108]. Although the process(es) underlying the onset of NT pathology remains unknown, the extensive and early development of NTs reported during the evolution of tau pathology within the cholinergic basal forebrain suggests a defect in retrograde axonal transport [63]. Whether this is a unifying concept for the development of NTs during the onset of AD remains a major area of interest.

The midstage marker TauC3 detects the truncation of aspartic acid at residue 421 is achieved by caspase-mediated proteolysis [67, 68], which inhibits axonal transport [109]. In the current study, the appearance of TauC3-labeled profiles was more similar to TOC1, with relatively less prominent immunopositive NTs and more neuronal enrichment within the DMN hubs (Fig. 1). TauC3 pathology was also less abundant compared to the other markers in the early Braak stages, suggesting its later appearance is downstream of potential pretangle-mediated neurodegenerative processes resulting in a pro-apoptotic cellular environment.

DMN tau correlates with episodic and semantic memory

We previously showed that pS422 and TOC1 colocalize within cholinergic nucleus basalis neurons, where their expression levels correlate with GCS and MMSE scores [110]. Consistent with these findings, we found strong inverse correlations between select pathological tau markers in the DMN and GCS and MMSE scores, particularly episodic and semantic memory. Episodic memory is a type of explicit long-term memory that involves recalling past events and experiences and is primarily encoded, stored, and processed within the medial temporal lobe memory circuit and the PCC and PreC hubs of the DMN [111–114]. Episodic memory decline is a clinical hallmark of AD onset [115] but also declines with normal aging [116, 117]. Semantic memory, which involves the acquisition of facts, concepts, and general knowledge throughout life, remains intact with age, but declines during the amnestic MCI prodromal stage ofAD [113, 118, 119]. Semantic memory has been suggested to be a potential clinical marker differentiating AD from pathological aging or other neurodegenerative diseases [22, 120]. Additionally, pretangle tau pathology correlates to varying degrees with perceptual speed and visuospatial ability, which are mediated by the DMN connectome [121, 122]. By contrast, the role of DMN function in working memory is debatable [77, 123]. The lack of association between DMN pretangle tau burden and working memory performance suggests that this cognitive domain is either resilient to tau neurodegeneration or that the DMN plays a limited role in working memory function. However, the present findings underscore potential roles that the accumulation of early pathological tau species plays in episodic and semantic memory during the onset of AD. These data also highlight the potential of the DMN as a model paradigm for studying mechanistic clinical pathologic relationships in the context of this vulnerable connectome in AD.

Oligomeric amyloid pathology in the DMN

The bidirectional interaction between Aβ and tau pathology in AD is well recognized, with evidence of co-pathological exacerbation of proteinopathy and neuronal dysfunction [124–126]. In this regard, previous PET and fMRI studies showed that amyloid plaque positivity in the DMN is associated with hyperconnectivity [40]. However, DMN functional connectivity shifts toward a state of hypoconnectivity once NFT co-pathology is detectable by PET. More recently, combined PET/fMRI studies in two separate cohorts showed that Aβ-associated hyperconnectivity may modulate the accumulation of tau pathology in the same connected brain regions, providing a potential link between Aβ deposition and NFT-associated resting state network failure [127]. We also immunolabeled oligomeric Aβ using the MOAB-2 antibody and examined the correlation between oligomeric Aβ and tau pathology, as well as cognitive scores. Interestingly, MOAB-2 levels were strongly associated with pS422, TOC1, and TNT2 in all three DMN regions, but oligomeric amyloid burden generally did not associate with cognitive deterioration except in the PCC (Fig. 3, Supplementary Table 3) Together, these findings support the prevailing concept that tau pathology more strongly impacts cognitive decline than amyloid pathology, even within the DMN connectome. Further studies are needed to validate these results and explore the complex interplay between these co-pathologies.

Soluble tau pathology within the DMN

Quantitative morphometric assessments were complemented by ELISA evaluations focusing on the accumulation of soluble pretangle tau monomers and oligomers in the DMN. Similar to morphologic pathology, tau levels significantly increased from Braak IV to V. However, weaker associations were found between TOC1, TNT2, and TauC3 levels with antemortem cognitive measures, including MMSE and GCS, in the soluble protein fraction compared to structural assessments, including NT and NFT labeling (Figs. 3B, D, F & 4B, D, F). This observation is reminiscent of studies demonstrating that cognitive deterioration accelerates with the appearance of NFTs in higher association neocortical regions [128], suggesting that a threshold level of soluble toxic tau drives NFT pathology. In support of this concept, we showed that poorer antemortem global cognition was not significantly decreased until the transition from the limbic Braak stage IV to neocortical Braak stage V (Fig. 6) in the cases from the RROS cohort.

Interestingly, our validation cohort using postmortem DMN soluble fractions from MADC subjects revealed a similar abrupt increase in pretangle tau pathology with increasing Braak stage, but this increase occurred between Braak stages III and IV instead of IV and V, as seen in the RROS cases. A possible explanation for this may relate to differences between the cohort subjects and lifestyle factors. The RROS cohort, consisting of retired Catholic clergy, benefited from more years of formal education (Tables 1, 5) and a relatively healthy lifestyle, including a more regulated diet, structured sleep patterns, medical care, and religious activities that may provide cognitive benefits as well as stress reduction [52]. Additionally, the strong sense of community fostered by cloistered living both promotes the beneficial effects of lifelong learning and prevents social isolation, which are modifiable risk factors for dementia [129, 130]. In contrast, the MADC cohort represents a community-dwelling population, with more potential exposures to metabolic, vascular, epigenetic modulation, and transcriptional regulation of the genome [49, 131, 132]. The early accrual of tau pathology despite the MADC subjects having a younger average age (74.1 ± 7.6) at death, suggests that the RROS cohort was enriched for pathological resistance and cognitive resilience [133]. Alternatively, the observed differences could be due to minor differences in neuropathological interpretation or regional brain dissection between the two cohorts.

Regional differences in tau among the DMN hubs

Our findings that tau pathology was highest in the PCC align with previous reports that the PCC is involved very early in AD progression, possibly due to an early decline in its high metabolic baseline determined by FDG-PET [46, 134]. Interestingly, Aβ initiation and accumulation rates were highest in PCC compared to other brain regions, with PreC displaying relatively delayed amyloid and tau pathology, suggesting resistance [135]. The proposed resistance of PreC could be due in part to the preservation of neurotrophic signaling pathways despite accumulating Aβ pathology [136], differences in gene regulation within PreC pyramidal neurons compared to the other DMN hubs [137], or differences in splicing protein mislocalization between the PCC and PreC [138].

Study limitations

The present study has limitations. First, the outcome measures used machine-learning software to quantify the immunolabeled images based on the percentage of labeled tissue, which allowed the normalization of the signal relative to the area of the region of interest. However, this may result in an underestimation of total tau pathology. For instance, the predominance of NTs seen in the current microscopy studies appeared first in early Braak stages in the DMN hubs, but did not coincide with a high densitometric signal per region of interest. Hence, the extent of NT pathology may be more accurately measured using stereological counting techniques [139].

Secondly, PET and fMRI sequences are not performed at the time of annual clinical evaluations in the RROS cohort. This precluded comparing postmortem tau profiles with tau-PET and DMN functional connectivity prior to death. On the other hand, detailed postmortem records of NFT and plaque pathology were available, including plaque density, plaque number, and NFT counts in key regions like the entorhinal cortex, hippocampus, and cortical regions. These data were incorporated into the correlation matrices, providing valuable insights into the relationship between pathologies.

Thirdly, whether the development of novel biofluid or neuroimaging biomarkers for nonfibrillar oligomers will enhance early diagnosis and currently approved amyloid targeting drugs combined with future tau therapies to treat AD remains an ongoing area of research [140]. In this regard, it is possible that the present data describing the involvement of tau and amyloid oligomers during the clinical and pathological onset of AD will contribute to this endeavor.

Finally, as AD has been suggested to be a multi-system disorder [141] affecting various biological systems and processes, NFT pathology often overlaps with other conditions, such as varying degrees of arteriolosclerosis and cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) [142]. In this study, some subjects were positive for CAA, which may have exacerbated cognitive decline in addition to the coexisting tau pathology.

Conclusions

The DMN, which displays hallmark AD pathology early in the onset of the disease, is a excellent candidate to study clinical pathologic correlations and potential mechanisms of tau-mediated neurodegeneration across tauopathies [42, 143, 144]. Increased NFT tracer retention shows strong correlations with inter- and intra-functional connectivity across DMN hubs in combined fMRI/PET studies [24, 40, 134]. However, pretangle tau accumulation within the DMN during AD progression has never been explored systematically. Here, we showed for the first time that pretangle tau markers were present at low Braak stages, predominantly as NTs, and significantly increased at Braak stages IV to V. The markers increased in the DMN in a step-wise manner from NCI to MCI to AD and were strongly correlated with antemortem measures of cognitive deterioration, particularly in episodic and semantic memory, as well as additional cognitive domains mediated by the DMN including perceptual speed and visuospatial attention. These findings contribute to our understanding of the the timeline of AD pathophysiology within a key, vulnerable resting state network, and suggest that therapeutics aimed at pretangle forms of tau may preserve brain connectome functionality in the DMN.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

44477_2026_19_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (139.7KB, pdf)

Supplementary file1 Co-labeling with pS422, TOC1, and TNT2/TauC3 in PCC layers 3 and 4 of an AD case (Braak stage V) A) Immunofluorescence co-labeling of pS422, TNT2, and TOC1. B) Immunofluorescence co-labeling of pS422, TNT2, and TauC3. Note that pS422, TOC1, and TNT2 displayed significant overlap, particularly in the neuronal soma, whereas TauC3 epitopes displayed minimal overlap. Image captured with a 40X oil objective. Scale bar: 25 µm. Arrowheads = neuropil threads; Arrows = tau+ somal inclusions (PDF 140 KB)

44477_2026_19_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (433.1KB, pdf)

Supplementary file2 DMN pretangle tau distribution across RROS cases via Braak staging. A) Tau and amyloid pathology markers quantified via IHC. B) Tau pathology markers quantified in soluble fractions via ELISA, via Kruskal Wallis with Dunn’s correction. *, p < 0.05; ***, p < 0,001; ****, p<0.0001. Abbreviations: FC, frontal cortex; PCC, posterior cingulate cortex; PreC, precuneus (PDF 433 KB)

44477_2026_19_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (449.9KB, pdf)

Supplementary file3 DMN pretangle tau distribution across RROS cases via clinical diagnostic group. A) Tau and amyloid pathology markers quantified via IHC. B) Tau pathology markers quantified in soluble fractions via ELISA, via Kruskal Wallis with Dunn’s correction. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01 ***, p < 0,001. Abbreviations: NCI, no cognitive impairment; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; AD, Alzheimer’s disease; FC, frontal cortex; PCC, posterior cingulate cortex; PreC, precuneus (PDF 450 KB)

44477_2026_19_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (71.6KB, pdf)

Supplementary file4 PHF-1 load in PCC and clinical pathologic correlations in the RROS cohort. A) PHF-1 levels based upon Braak stage (left) or clinical diagnostic group (right), via Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn’s correction. B) PHF-1 associations with antemortem cognitive assessment, via Spearman correlation. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0,01; ****, p < 0.0001 Abbreviations: AD, Alzheimer’s disease; GCS, global cognitive z-score; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; NCI, no cognitive impairment; PCC, posterior cingulate corte; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; GCS, Global Cognitive Score; EM, Episodic memory; SM, Semantic memory; WM, Working memory; PS, Perceptual speed; VA, Visuospatial ability (PDF 72 KB)

44477_2026_19_MOESM5_ESM.pdf (199.8KB, pdf)

Supplementary file5 Correlations between the pretangle DMN tau levels and neuropathological diagnostic scores in the RROS cohort. Correlation coefficients of the Spearman correlations for the IHC (Supplementary Figure 5 A, C, E) and ELISA (Supplementary Figure 5 B, D, F)-measured selected markers and the postmortem neuropathological scores, such as neuritic plaque, diffuse plaque, TDP-43, and CAA scores in each region. TDP-43: TAR DNA-binding protein 43, CAA: Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy. Heat map reflects the strength of correlation (PDF 200 KB)

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Rush Religious Orders Study participants for their altruism and the Rush Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center (National Institutes of Health grant P30 AG072975).

Abbreviations

Aβ

Beta Amyloid

AD

Alzheimer's Disease

ANOVA

Analysis of Variance

APOE

Apolipoprotein E

BCA

Bicinchoninic Acid

CAA

Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy

CERAD

Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease

DMN

Default Mode Network

ELISA

Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSorbent Assay

FC

Frontal Cortex

fMRI

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

GCS

Global Cognitive z-Score

GSK3β

Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3 Beta

HRP

Rabbit Horseradish Peroxidase

IF

Immunofluorescent

IHC

Immunohistochemistry

JNK3

c-Jun N-terminal Kinase 3

LED

Light-Emitting Diode

LTP

Long Term Potentiation

MADC

Michigan Alzheimer’s Disease Center

MCI

Mild Cognitive Impairment

MMSE

Mini-Mental State Examination

NCI

No Cognitive Impairment

NFT

Neurofibrillary Tangle

NT

Neuropil Threads

PAD

Phosphatase Activating Domain

PCC

Posterior Cingulate Cortex

PET

Positron Emission Tomography

PMI

Postmortem Interval

PreC

Precuneus

RROS

Rush Religious Orders Study

SCD

Subjective Cognitive Decline

SD

Standard Deviation

TDP-43

Transactive Response DNA-Binding Protein 4

Author contributions

SEC conceived of and designed the research project with intellectual input from EJM, IEV, NKM, and BK. BK performed the histological and biochemical studies with critical assistance from IMK and JSB. Statistical analysis was performed by BK, NK, and SEC. The manuscript was written by BK and SEC with substantive input from EJM, IEV, and NMK. All authors approved the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by National Institutes of Health grants PO1AG014449, RO1s AG017617, AG072599, AG074004, AG077103, AG081286, P30AG072931 (Michigan Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center), and the Arizona Alzheimer’s Consortium at the Barrow Neurological Institute.

Data availability

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All subjects provided signed informed consents for clinical evaluations and brain donations that were ethically approved by the Rush University Medical Center Institutional Review Board.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. 2024;20(5):3708-821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 2.Mueller RL, Combs B, Alhadidy MM, Brady ST, Morfini GA, Kanaan NM. Tau: A signaling hub protein. Front Mol Neurosci. 2021;14:647054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Braak H, Braak E. Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathol. 1991;82(4):239–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lasagna-Reeves CA, Castillo-Carranza DL, Sengupta U, Clos AL, Jackson GR, Kayed R. Tau oligomers impair memory and induce synaptic and mitochondrial dysfunction in wild-type mice. Mol Neurodegener. 2011;6:39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kuchibhotla KV, Wegmann S, Kopeikina KJ, Hawkes J, Rudinskiy N, Andermann ML, et al. Neurofibrillary tangle-bearing neurons are functionally integrated in cortical circuits in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(1):510–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Santacruz K, Lewis J, Spires T, Paulson J, Kotilinek L, Ingelsson M, et al. Tau suppression in a neurodegenerative mouse model improves memory function. Science. 2005;309(5733):476–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mirbaha H, Holmes BB, Sanders DW, Bieschke J, Diamond MI. Tau trimers are the minimal propagation unit spontaneously internalized to seed intracellular aggregation. J Biol Chem. 2015;290(24):14893–903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fisar Z. Linking the Amyloid, tau, and mitochondrial hypotheses of Alzheimer's disease and identifying promising drug targets. Biomolecules. 2022;12(11). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 9.Reddy PH. Abnormal tau, mitochondrial dysfunction, impaired axonal transport of mitochondria, and synaptic deprivation in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Res. 2011;1415:136–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zheng J, Akbari M, Schirmer C, Reynaert ML, Loyens A, Lefebvre B, et al. Hippocampal tau oligomerization early in tau pathology coincides with a transient alteration of mitochondrial homeostasis and DNA repair in a mouse model of tauopathy. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2020;8(1):25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kravenska Y, Koprowski P, Nieznanska H, Nieznanski K. Prion protein prevents the inhibition of large-conductance calcium-activated potassium channel by Tau peptide K18 oligomers. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2024;734:150793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Crossley CA, Omoluabi T, Torraville SE, Duraid S, Maziar A, Hasan Z, et al. Hippocampal hyperphosphorylated tau-induced deficiency is rescued by L-type calcium channel blockade. Brain Commun. 2024;6(2):fcae096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tiernan CT, Combs B, Cox K, Morfini G, Brady ST, Counts SE, et al. Pseudophosphorylation of tau at S422 enhances SDS-stable dimer formation and impairs both anterograde and retrograde fast axonal transport. Exp Neurol. 2016;283(Pt A):318–29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Niewiadomska G, Niewiadomski W, Steczkowska M, Gasiorowska A. Tau oligomers neurotoxicity. Life. 2021;11(1):28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mueller RL, Kanaan NM, Combs B. Using live-cell imaging to measure the effects of pathological proteins on axonal transport in primary hippocampal neurons. J Vis Exp: JoVE. 2023;22(202):10–3791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Balducci C, Orsini F, Cerovic M, Beeg M, Rocutto B, Dacomo L, et al. Tau oligomers impair memory and synaptic plasticity through the cellular prion protein. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2025;13(1):17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fa M, Puzzo D, Piacentini R, Staniszewski A, Zhang H, Baltrons MA, et al. Extracellular tau oligomers produce an immediate impairment of LTP and memory. Sci Rep. 2016;6:19393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Puzzo D, Argyrousi EK, Staniszewski A, Zhang H, Calcagno E, Zuccarello E, et al. Tau is not necessary for amyloid-beta-induced synaptic and memory impairments. J Clin Invest. 2020;130(9):4831–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Scaduto P, Marcatti M, Bhatt N, Kayed R, Taglialatela G. Calcineurin inhibition prevents synaptic plasticity deficit induced by brain-derived tau oligomers. Brain Commun. 2024;6(5):fcae277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Baudic S, Barba GD, Thibaudet MC, Smagghe A, Remy P, Traykov L. Executive function deficits in early Alzheimer’s disease and their relations with episodic memory. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2006;21(1):15–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Desgranges B, Baron JC, Lalevee C, Giffard B, Viader F, de La Sayette V, et al. The neural substrates of episodic memory impairment in Alzheimer’s disease as revealed by FDG-PET: relationship to degree of deterioration. Brain. 2002;125(Pt 5):1116–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sugarman MA, Woodard JL, Nielson KA, Seidenberg M, Smith JC, Durgerian S, et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of semantic memory as a presymptomatic biomarker of Alzheimer’s disease risk. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1822(3):442–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bocancea DI, Svenningsson AL, van Loenhoud AC, Groot C, Barkhof F, Strandberg O, et al. Determinants of cognitive and brain resilience to tau pathology: a longitudinal analysis. Brain. 2023;146(9):3719–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Biel D, Luan Y, Brendel M, Hager P, Dewenter A, Moscoso A, et al. Combining tau-PET and fMRI meta-analyses for patient-centered prediction of cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2022;14(1):166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Jann K, Boudreau J, Albrecht D, Cen SY, Cabeen RP, Ringman JM, et al. FMRI complexity correlates with Tau-PET and cognitive decline in late-onset and autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2023;95(2):437–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hoenig MC, Bischof GN, Seemiller J, Hammes J, Kukolja J, Onur OA, et al. Networks of tau distribution in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain. 2018;141(2):568–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Green C, Sydow A, Vogel S, Anglada-Huguet M, Wiedermann D, Mandelkow E, et al. Functional networks are impaired by elevated tau-protein but reversible in a regulatable Alzheimer’s disease mouse model. Mol Neurodegener. 2019;14(1):13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Berron D, Vogel JW, Insel PS, Pereira JB, Xie L, Wisse LEM, et al. Early stages of tau pathology and its associations with functional connectivity, atrophy and memory. Brain. 2021;144(9):2771–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Luan Y, Rubinski A, Biel D, Otero Svaldi D, Alonzo Higgins I, Shcherbinin S, et al. Tau-network mapping of domain-specific cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s disease. NeuroImage: Clinical. 2024;44:103699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Nabizadeh F. Local molecular and connectomic contributions of tau-related neurodegeneration. GeroScience. 2025;47(1):227–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Roemer SN, Brendel M, Gnorich J, Malpetti M, Zaganjori M, Quattrone A, et al. Subcortical tau is linked to hypoperfusion in connected cortical regions in 4-repeat tauopathies. Brain. 2024;147(7):2428–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ziontz J, Harrison TM, Fonseca C, Giorgio J, Han F, Lee J, et al. Connectivity, pathology, and ApoE4 interactions predict longitudinal tau spatial progression and memory. Hum Brain Mapp. 2024;45(17):e70083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Spens E, Burgess N. A generative model of memory construction and consolidation. Nat Hum Behav. 2024;8(3):526–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Migliaccio R, Cacciamani F. The temporal lobe in typical and atypical Alzheimer disease. Handb Clin Neurol. 2022;187:449–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kitamura T, Ogawa SK, Roy DS, Okuyama T, Morrissey MD, Smith LM, et al. Engrams and circuits crucial for systems consolidation of a memory. Science. 2017;356(6333):73–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sadeghi M, Azargoonjahromi A, Nasiri H, Yaghoobi A, Sadeghi M, Chavoshi SS, et al. Altered brain connectivity in mild cognitive impairment is linked to elevated tau and phosphorylated tau, but not to GAP-43 and Amyloid-beta measurements: a resting-state fMRI study. Mol Brain. 2024;17(1):60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Raichle ME. The brain’s default mode network. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2015;38:433–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Raichle ME, MacLeod AM, Snyder AZ, Powers WJ, Gusnard DA, Shulman GL. A default mode of brain function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(2):676–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Giorgio J, Adams JN, Maass A, Jagust WJ, Breakspear M. Amyloid induced hyperexcitability in default mode network drives medial temporal hyperactivity and early tau accumulation. Neuron. 2024;112(4):676-86 e4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Schultz AP, Chhatwal JP, Hedden T, Mormino EC, Hanseeuw BJ, Sepulcre J, et al. Phases of hyperconnectivity and hypoconnectivity in the default mode and salience networks track with amyloid and tau in clinically normal individuals. J Neurosci. 2017;37(16):4323–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hahn A, Strandberg TO, Stomrud E, Nilsson M, van Westen D, Palmqvist S, et al. Association between earliest amyloid uptake and functional connectivity in cognitively unimpaired elderly. Cereb Cortex. 2019;29(5):2173–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Guzman-Velez E, Diez I, Schoemaker D, Pardilla-Delgado E, Vila-Castelar C, Fox-Fuller JT, et al. Amyloid-beta and tau pathologies relate to distinctive brain dysconnectomics in preclinical autosomal-dominant Alzheimer’s disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022;119(15):e2113641119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Celone KA, Calhoun VD, Dickerson BC, Atri A, Chua EF, Miller SL, et al. Alterations in memory networks in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease: an independent component analysis. J Neurosci. 2006;26(40):10222–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Threlkeld ZD, Jicha GA, Smith CD, Gold BT. Task deactivation reductions and atrophy within parietal default mode regions are overlapping but only weakly correlated in mild cognitive impairment. J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;27(2):415–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Malotaux V, Dricot L, Quenon L, Lhommel R, Ivanoiu A, Hanseeuw B. Default-mode network connectivity changes during the progression toward Alzheimer’s dementia: a longitudinal functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Brain Connect. 2023;13(5):287–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Putcha D, Eckbo R, Katsumi Y, Dickerson BC, Touroutoglou A, Collins JA. Tau and the fractionated default mode network in atypical Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Commun. 2022;4(2):fcac055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Mufson EJ, Chen EY, Cochran EJ, Beckett LA, Bennett DA, Kordower JH. Entorhinal cortex beta-amyloid load in individuals with mild cognitive impairment. Exp Neurol. 1999;158(2):469–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Bennett DA, Wilson RS, Schneider JA, Evans DA, Beckett LA, Aggarwal NT, et al. Natural history of mild cognitive impairment in older persons. Neurology. 2002;59(2):198–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Counts SE, Beck JS, Maloney B, Malek-Ahmadi M, Ginsberg SD, Mufson EJ, et al. Posterior cingulate cortex microRNA dysregulation differentiates cognitive resilience, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2025;21(2):e70019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Counts SE, Nadeem M, Lad SP, Wuu J, Mufson EJ. Differential expression of synaptic proteins in the frontal and temporal cortex of elderly subjects with mild cognitive impairment. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2006;65(6):592–601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Schneider JA, Arvanitakis Z, Leurgans SE, Bennett DA. The neuropathology of probable Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impairment. Ann Neurol. 2009;66(2):200–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Bennett DA, Buchman AS, Boyle PA, Barnes LL, Wilson RS, Schneider JA. Religious Orders Study and Rush Memory and Aging Project. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;64(s1):S161–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Abner EL, Kryscio RJ, Cooper GE, Fardo DW, Jicha GA, Mendiondo MS, et al. Mild cognitive impairment: statistical models of transition using longitudinal clinical data. Int J Alzheimers Dis. 2012;2012:291920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Morris JC, Storandt M, Miller JP, McKeel DW, Price JL, Rubin EH, et al. Mild cognitive impairment represents early-stage Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 2001;58(3):397–405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Petersen RC. Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity. J Intern Med. 2004;256(3):183–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, Hyman BT, Jack CR Jr., Kawas CH, et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(3):263–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kelley CM, Ginsberg SD, Liang WS, Counts SE, Mufson EJ. Posterior cingulate cortex reveals an expression profile of resilience in cognitively intact elders. Brain Commun. 2022;4(4):fcac162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Mirra SS, Heyman A, McKeel D, Sumi SM, Crain BJ, Brownlee LM, et al. The consortium to establish a registry for Alzheimer’s disease (CERAD). Part II. Standardization of the neuropathologic assessment of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology. 1991;41(4):479–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Hyman BT, Trojanowski JQ. Consensus recommendations for the postmortem diagnosis of Alzheimer disease from the National Institute on Aging and the Reagan Institute Working Group on diagnostic criteria for the neuropathological assessment of Alzheimer disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1997;56(10):1095–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Montine TJ, Phelps CH, Beach TG, Bigio EH, Cairns NJ, Dickson DW, et al. National institute on aging-alzheimer’s association guidelines for the neuropathologic assessment of Alzheimer’s disease: a practical approach. Acta Neuropathol. 2012;123(1):1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.McKay EC, Beck JS, Khoo SK, Dykema KJ, Cottingham SL, Winn ME, et al. Peri-infarct upregulation of the oxytocin receptor in vascular dementia. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2019;78(5):436–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Guillozet-Bongaarts AL, Cahill ME, Cryns VL, Reynolds MR, Berry RW, Binder LI. Pseudophosphorylation of tau at serine 422 inhibits caspase cleavage: in vitro evidence and implications for tangle formation in vivo. J Neurochem. 2006;97(4):1005–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Vana L, Kanaan NM, Ugwu IC, Wuu J, Mufson EJ, Binder LI. Progression of tau pathology in cholinergic basal forebrain neurons in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Pathol. 2011;179(5):2533–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Patterson KR, Remmers C, Fu Y, Brooker S, Kanaan NM, Vana L, et al. Characterization of prefibrillar Tau oligomers in vitro and in Alzheimer disease. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(26):23063–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Ward SM, Himmelstein DS, Lancia JK, Fu Y, Patterson KR, Binder LI. Toc1: characterization of a selective oligomeric tau antibody. J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;37(3):593–602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Combs B, Hamel C, Kanaan NM. Pathological conformations involving the amino terminus of tau occur early in Alzheimer’s disease and are differentially detected by monoclonal antibodies. Neurobiol Dis. 2016;94:18–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Gamblin TC, Chen F, Zambrano A, Abraha A, Lagalwar S, Guillozet AL, et al. Caspase cleavage of tau: linking amyloid and neurofibrillary tangles in Alzheimer’s disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(17):10032–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Guillozet-Bongaarts AL, Garcia-Sierra F, Reynolds MR, Horowitz PM, Fu Y, Wang T, et al. Tau truncation during neurofibrillary tangle evolution in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2005;26(7):1015–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Greenberg SG, Davies P, Schein JD, Binder LI. Hydrofluoric acid-treated tau PHF proteins display the same biochemical properties as normal tau. J Biol Chem. 1992;267(1):564–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Youmans KL, Tai LM, Kanekiyo T, Stine WB Jr, Michon SC, Nwabuisi-Heath E, et al. Intraneuronal Abeta detection in 5xFAD mice by a new Abeta-specific antibody. Mol Neurodegener. 2012;7:8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.LoPresti P, Szuchet S, Papasozomenos SC, Zinkowski RP, Binder LI. Functional implications for the microtubule-associated protein tau: localization in oligodendrocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92(22):10369–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Carmel G, Mager EM, Binder LI, Kuret J. The structural basis of monoclonal antibody Alz50’s selectivity for Alzheimer’s disease pathology. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(51):32789–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Porzig R, Singer D, Hoffmann R. Epitope mapping of mAbs AT8 and Tau5 directed against hyperphosphorylated regions of the human tau protein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;358(2):644–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Berry RW, Sweet AP, Clark FA, Lagalwar S, Lapin BR, Wang T, et al. Tau epitope display in progressive supranuclear palsy and corticobasal degeneration. J Neurocytol. 2004;33(3):287–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Combs B, Tiernan CT, Hamel C, Kanaan NM. Production of recombinant tau oligomers in vitro. Methods Cell Biol. 2017;141:45–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Cox K, Combs B, Abdelmesih B, Morfini G, Brady ST, Kanaan NM. Analysis of isoform-specific tau aggregates suggests a common toxic mechanism involving similar pathological conformations and axonal transport inhibition. Neurobiol Aging. 2016;47:113–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Piccoli T, Valente G, Linden DE, Re M, Esposito F, Sack AT, et al. The default mode network and the working memory network are not anti-correlated during all phases of a working memory task. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(4):e0123354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Durairajan SSK, Selvarasu K, Singh AK, Patnaik S, Iyaswamy A, Jaiswal Y, et al. Unraveling the interplay of kinesin-1, tau, and microtubules in neurodegeneration associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Front Cell Neurosci. 2024;18:1432002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Cheng Y, Bai F. The association of tau with mitochondrial dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Piovesana E, Magrin C, Ciccaldo M, Sola M, Bellotto M, Molinari M, et al. Tau accumulation in degradative organelles is associated to lysosomal stress. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):18024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Princen K, Van Dooren T, van Gorsel M, Louros N, Yang X, Dumbacher M, et al. Pharmacological modulation of septins restores calcium homeostasis and is neuroprotective in models of Alzheimer’s disease. Science. 2024;384(6699):eadd6260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Reiss AB, Gulkarov S, Jacob B, Srivastava A, Pinkhasov A, Gomolin IH, et al. Mitochondria in Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis. Life. 2024. 10.3390/life14020196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.He Y, Wang L, Zang Y, Tian L, Zhang X, Li K, et al. Regional coherence changes in the early stages of Alzheimer’s disease: a combined structural and resting-state functional MRI study. Neuroimage. 2007;35(2):488–500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Wu X, Li R, Fleisher AS, Reiman EM, Guan X, Zhang Y, et al. Altered default mode network connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease–a resting functional MRI and Bayesian network study. Hum Brain Mapp. 2011;32(11):1868–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Grieder M, Wang DJJ, Dierks T, Wahlund LO, Jann K. Default mode network complexity and cognitive decline in mild Alzheimer’s disease. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Mufson EJ, Ward S, Binder L. Prefibrillar tau oligomers in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurodegener Dis. 2014;13(2–3):151–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Tiernan CT, Ginsberg SD, Guillozet-Bongaarts AL, Ward SM, He B, Kanaan NM, et al. Protein homeostasis gene dysregulation in pretangle-bearing nucleus basalis neurons during the progression of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2016;42:80–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Henkins KM, Sokolow S, Miller CA, Vinters HV, Poon WW, Cornwell LB, et al. Extensive p-tau pathology and SDS-stable p-tau oligomers in Alzheimer’s cortical synapses. Brain Pathol. 2012;22(6):826–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Kanaan NM, Cox K, Alvarez VE, Stein TD, Poncil S, McKee AC. Characterization of early pathological tau conformations and phosphorylation in chronic traumatic encephalopathy. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2016;75(1):19–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Yoshida H, Hastie CJ, McLauchlan H, Cohen P, Goedert M. Phosphorylation of microtubule-associated protein tau by isoforms of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK). J Neurochem. 2004;90(2):352–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Sayas CL, Avila J. GSK-3 and Tau: a key duet in Alzheimer’s disease. Cells. 2021. 10.3390/cells10040721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Rankin CA, Sun Q, Gamblin TC. Tau phosphorylation by GSK-3beta promotes tangle-like filament morphology. Mol Neurodegener. 2007;2:12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Solas M, Vela S, Smerdou C, Martisova E, Martinez-Valbuena I, Luquin MR, et al. JNK activation in Alzheimer’s disease is driven by amyloid beta and is associated with tau pathology. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2023;14(8):1524–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Ardanaz CG, Ezkurdia A, Bejarano A, Echarte B, Smerdou C, Martisova E, et al. JNK3 overexpression in the entorhinal cortex impacts on the Hippocampus and induces cognitive deficiencies and Tau misfolding. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2023;14(11):2074–88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Tiernan CT, Ginsberg SD, He B, Ward SM, Guillozet-Bongaarts AL, Kanaan NM, et al. Pretangle pathology within cholinergic nucleus basalis neurons coincides with neurotrophic and neurotransmitter receptor gene dysregulation during the progression of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2018;117:125–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Stefanoska K, Gajwani M, Tan ARP, Ahel HI, Asih PR, Volkerling A, et al. Alzheimer’s disease: Ablating single master site abolishes tau hyperphosphorylation. Sci Adv. 2022;8(27):eabl8809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Mahady LJ, Perez SE, Malek-Ahmadi M, Mufson EJ. Oligomeric, phosphorylated, and truncated tau and spliceosome pathology within the entorhinal-hippocampal connectome across stages of Alzheimer’s disease. J Comp Neurol. 2023;531(18):2080–108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Koss DJ, Dubini M, Buchanan H, Hull C, Platt B. Distinctive temporal profiles of detergent-soluble and -insoluble tau and Abeta species in human Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Res. 2018;1699:121–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Sarkar S, Raymick J, Cuevas E, Rosas-Hernandez H, Hanig J. Modification of methods to use Congo-red stain to simultaneously visualize amyloid plaques and tangles in human and rodent brain tissue sections. Metab Brain Dis. 2020;35(8):1371–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Combs B, Kanaan NM. Exposure of the amino terminus of Tau is a pathological event in multiple tauopathies. Am J Pathol. 2017;187(6):1222–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Taddei RN, Perbet R, de Mate Gerando A, Wiedmer AE, Sanchez-Mico M, Connors Stewart T, et al. Tau oligomer-containing synapse elimination by microglia and astrocytes in Alzheimer disease. JAMA Neurol. 2023;80(11):1209–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Felleman DJ, Van Essen DC. Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex. 1991;1(1):1–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Mesulam MM, Mufson EJ, Levey AI, Wainer BH. Cholinergic innervation of cortex by the basal forebrain: cytochemistry and cortical connections of the septal area, diagonal band nuclei, nucleus basalis (substantia innominata), and hypothalamus in the rhesus monkey. J Comp Neurol. 1983;214(2):170–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Nair J, Klaassen AL, Arato J, Vyssotski AL, Harvey M, Rainer G. Basal forebrain contributes to default mode network regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(6):1352–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Bondareff W, Mountjoy CQ, Roth M, Rossor MN, Iversen LL, Reynolds GP, et al. Neuronal degeneration in locus ceruleus and cortical correlates of Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1987;1(4):256–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Kelly SC, He B, Perez SE, Ginsberg SD, Mufson EJ, Counts SE. Locus coeruleus cellular and molecular pathology during the progression of Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2017;5(1):8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Trillo L, Das D, Hsieh W, Medina B, Moghadam S, Lin B, et al. Ascending monoaminergic systems alterations in Alzheimer’s disease. Translating basic science into clinical care. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013;37(8):1363–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Theofilas P, Dunlop S, Heinsen H, Grinberg LT. Turning on the light within: subcortical nuclei of the isodentritic core and their role in Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis. J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;46(1):17–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Conze C, Rierola M, Trushina NI, Peters M, Janning D, Holzer M, et al. Caspase-cleaved tau is senescence-associated and induces a toxic gain of function by putting a brake on axonal transport. Mol Psychiatry. 2022;27(7):3010–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Tiernan CT, Mufson EJ, Kanaan NM, Counts SE. Tau oligomer pathology in nucleus basalis neurons during the progression of Alzheimer disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2018;77(3):246–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Sestieri C, Corbetta M, Romani GL, Shulman GL. Episodic memory retrieval, parietal cortex, and the default mode network: functional and topographic analyses. J Neurosci. 2011;31(12):4407–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Jeong W, Chung CK, Kim JS. Episodic memory in aspects of large-scale brain networks. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015;9:454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Menon V. 20 years of the default mode network: a review and synthesis. Neuron. 2023;111(16):2469–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Buckner RL, Andrews-Hanna JR, Schacter DL. The brain’s default network: anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1124:1–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Irish M, Lawlor BA, Coen RF, O’Mara SM. Everyday episodic memory in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: a preliminary investigation. BMC Neurosci. 2011;12:80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Tromp D, Dufour A, Lithfous S, Pebayle T, Despres O. Episodic memory in normal aging and Alzheimer disease: Insights from imaging and behavioral studies. Ageing Res Rev. 2015;24(Pt B):232–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Friedman D. The cognitive aging of episodic memory: a view based on the event-related brain potential. Front Behav Neurosci. 2013;7:111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Joubert S, Gardy L, Didic M, Rouleau I, Barbeau EJ. A meta-analysis of semantic memory in mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychol Rev. 2021;31(2):221–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Hirni DI, Kivisaari SL, Monsch AU, Taylor KI. Distinct neuroanatomical bases of episodic and semantic memory performance in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychologia. 2013;51(5):930–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Irish M, Piguet O. The pivotal role of semantic memory in remembering the past and imagining the future. Front Behav Neurosci. 2013;7:27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Staffaroni AM, Brown JA, Casaletto KB, Elahi FM, Deng J, Neuhaus J, et al. The longitudinal trajectory of default mode network connectivity in healthy older adults varies as a function of age and is associated with changes in episodic memory and processing speed. J Neurosci. 2018;38(11):2809–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Gonzalez Alam TRJ, Krieger-Redwood K, Varga D, Gao Z, Horner AJ, Hartley T, et al. A double dissociation between semantic and spatial cognition in visual to default network pathways. Elife. 2025. 10.7554/eLife.94902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Weber S, Aleman A, Hugdahl K. Involvement of the default mode network under varying levels of cognitive effort. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):6303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Castillo-Carranza DL, Guerrero-Munoz MJ, Sengupta U, Hernandez C, Barrett AD, Dineley K, et al. Tau immunotherapy modulates both pathological tau and upstream amyloid pathology in an Alzheimer’s disease mouse model. J Neurosci. 2015;35(12):4857–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Oddo S, Caccamo A, Shepherd JD, Murphy MP, Golde TE, Kayed R, et al. Triple-transgenic model of Alzheimer’s disease with plaques and tangles: intracellular Abeta and synaptic dysfunction. Neuron. 2003;39(3):409–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Zhang H, Wei W, Zhao M, Ma L, Jiang X, Pei H, et al. Interaction between Abeta and Tau in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Biol Sci. 2021;17(9):2181–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Roemer-Cassiano SN, Wagner F, Evangelista L, Rauchmann BS, Dehsarvi A, Steward A, et al. Amyloid-associated hyperconnectivity drives tau spread across connected brain regions in Alzheimer’s disease. Sci Transl Med. 2025;17(782):eadp2564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Nelson PT, Jicha GA, Schmitt FA, Liu H, Davis DG, Mendiondo MS, et al. Clinicopathologic correlations in a large Alzheimer disease center autopsy cohort: neuritic plaques and neurofibrillary tangles “do count” when staging disease severity. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2007;66(12):1136–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Clarke KM, Etemadmoghadam S, Danner B, Corbett C, Ghaseminejad-Bandpey A, Dopler M, et al. The nun study: insights from 30 years of aging and dementia research. Alzheimers Dement. 2025;21(2):e14626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Guarnera J, Yuen E, Macpherson H. The impact of loneliness and social isolation on cognitive aging: a narrative review. J Alzheimers Dis Rep. 2023;7(1):699–714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Agapitova IV. Penetration of cefazolin and methicillin into tissues of rats with aseptic inflammation. Antibiot Khimioter. 1989;34(2):120–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Lahiri DK, Maloney B, Wang R, White FA, Sambamurti K, Greig NH, et al. The seeds of its regulation: natural antisense transcripts as single-gene control switches in neurodegenerative disorders. Ageing Res Rev. 2024;99:102336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Montine TJ, Cholerton BA, Corrada MM, Edland SD, Flanagan ME, Hemmy LS, et al. Concepts for brain aging: resistance, resilience, reserve, and compensation. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2019;11(1):22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Leech R, Sharp DJ. The role of the posterior cingulate cortex in cognition and disease. Brain. 2014;137(Pt 1):12–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Insel PS, Mormino EC, Aisen PS, Thompson WK, Donohue MC. Neuroanatomical spread of amyloid beta and tau in Alzheimer’s disease: implications for primary prevention. Brain Commun. 2020;2(1):fcaa007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Perez SE, He B, Nadeem M, Wuu J, Scheff SW, Abrahamson EE, et al. Resilience of precuneus neurotrophic signaling pathways despite amyloid pathology in prodromal Alzheimer’s disease. Biol Psychiatry. 2015;77(8):693–703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Dharshini SAP, Sanz-Ros J, Pan J, Tang W, Vallejo K, Otero-Garcia M, et al. Molecular Signatures of Resilience to Alzheimer's Disease in Neocortical Layer 4 Neurons. bioRxiv. 2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 138.Perez SE, Nadeem M, He B, Miguel JC, Moreno DG, Moreno-Rodriguez M, et al. Spliceosome protein alterations differentiate hubs of the default mode connectome during the progression of Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Pathol. 2025. 10.1111/bpa.70004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Kneynsberg A, Collier TJ, Manfredsson FP, Kanaan NM. Quantitative and semi-quantitative measurements of axonal degeneration in tissue and primary neuron cultures. J Neurosci Methods. 2016;266:32–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Habashi M, Vutla S, Tripathi K, Senapati S, Chauhan PS, Haviv-Chesner A, et al. Early diagnosis and treatment of Alzheimer’s disease by targeting toxic soluble Abeta oligomers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022;119(49):e2210766119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Eiser AR, Fulop T. Alzheimer’s disease is a multi-organ disorder: it may already be preventable. J Alzheimers Dis. 2023;91(4):1277–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Tsai HH, Liu CJ, Lee BC, Chen YF, Yen RF, Jeng JS, et al. Cerebral tau pathology in cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Brain Commun. 2024;6(2):fcae086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Qu J, Tian M, Zhu R, Song C, Wu Y, Xu G, et al. Aberrant dynamic functional network connectivity in progressive supranuclear palsy. Neurobiol Dis. 2024;195:106493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Johnson B, Neuberger T, Gay M, Hallett M, Slobounov S. Effects of subconcussive head trauma on the default mode network of the brain. J Neurotrauma. 2014;31(23):1907–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

44477_2026_19_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (139.7KB, pdf)

Supplementary file1 Co-labeling with pS422, TOC1, and TNT2/TauC3 in PCC layers 3 and 4 of an AD case (Braak stage V) A) Immunofluorescence co-labeling of pS422, TNT2, and TOC1. B) Immunofluorescence co-labeling of pS422, TNT2, and TauC3. Note that pS422, TOC1, and TNT2 displayed significant overlap, particularly in the neuronal soma, whereas TauC3 epitopes displayed minimal overlap. Image captured with a 40X oil objective. Scale bar: 25 µm. Arrowheads = neuropil threads; Arrows = tau+ somal inclusions (PDF 140 KB)

44477_2026_19_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (433.1KB, pdf)

Supplementary file2 DMN pretangle tau distribution across RROS cases via Braak staging. A) Tau and amyloid pathology markers quantified via IHC. B) Tau pathology markers quantified in soluble fractions via ELISA, via Kruskal Wallis with Dunn’s correction. *, p < 0.05; ***, p < 0,001; ****, p<0.0001. Abbreviations: FC, frontal cortex; PCC, posterior cingulate cortex; PreC, precuneus (PDF 433 KB)

44477_2026_19_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (449.9KB, pdf)

Supplementary file3 DMN pretangle tau distribution across RROS cases via clinical diagnostic group. A) Tau and amyloid pathology markers quantified via IHC. B) Tau pathology markers quantified in soluble fractions via ELISA, via Kruskal Wallis with Dunn’s correction. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01 ***, p < 0,001. Abbreviations: NCI, no cognitive impairment; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; AD, Alzheimer’s disease; FC, frontal cortex; PCC, posterior cingulate cortex; PreC, precuneus (PDF 450 KB)

44477_2026_19_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (71.6KB, pdf)

Supplementary file4 PHF-1 load in PCC and clinical pathologic correlations in the RROS cohort. A) PHF-1 levels based upon Braak stage (left) or clinical diagnostic group (right), via Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn’s correction. B) PHF-1 associations with antemortem cognitive assessment, via Spearman correlation. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0,01; ****, p < 0.0001 Abbreviations: AD, Alzheimer’s disease; GCS, global cognitive z-score; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; NCI, no cognitive impairment; PCC, posterior cingulate corte; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; GCS, Global Cognitive Score; EM, Episodic memory; SM, Semantic memory; WM, Working memory; PS, Perceptual speed; VA, Visuospatial ability (PDF 72 KB)

44477_2026_19_MOESM5_ESM.pdf (199.8KB, pdf)

Supplementary file5 Correlations between the pretangle DMN tau levels and neuropathological diagnostic scores in the RROS cohort. Correlation coefficients of the Spearman correlations for the IHC (Supplementary Figure 5 A, C, E) and ELISA (Supplementary Figure 5 B, D, F)-measured selected markers and the postmortem neuropathological scores, such as neuritic plaque, diffuse plaque, TDP-43, and CAA scores in each region. TDP-43: TAR DNA-binding protein 43, CAA: Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy. Heat map reflects the strength of correlation (PDF 200 KB)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Molecular Neurodegeneration Advances are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES