Skip to main content
Frontiers in Public Health logoLink to Frontiers in Public Health
. 2026 Jan 30;14:1701894. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1701894

Spatial–temporal patterns, seasonality, and age-specific trends of varicella in Hangzhou, China, 2019–2024

Lintao Gu 1, Yan Liu 1,*, Xiaoping Zhang 1, Yuyang Xu 1, Xuechao Zhang 1, Xinren Che 1, Wenwen Gu 1, Yingying Yang 1, Lu Zj 1
PMCID: PMC12901367  PMID: 41694520

Abstract

Background

Varicella has been subject to mandatory reporting to the China Information System for Disease Control and Prevention (CISDCP) by health agencies within 24 h of diagnosis since 2019. However, even if two-dose varicella vaccination has been recommended to be administered to children at 1 and 4 years of age in Hangzhou since 2014, emerging evidence of increasing breakthrough varicella cases in outbreaks challenges the present varicella vaccination schedule and its protective effect. We seek to identify hotspot areas and temporal trends of varicella at the township level in Hangzhou in the recent 6 years by using spatiotemporal analysis.

Methodology

Varicella cases diagnosed by medical practitioners from 2019 to 2024, demographic data, and clinical data were extracted from CISDCP. Township-level population figures were estimated using a constant-share proportional allocation method based on the seventh census data in China. Global I statistics and the local index spatial autocorrelation (LISA) method were used to identify global autocorrelation and local autocorrelation, respectively. Retrospective spatial scan statistics were undertaken to explore potential spatiotemporal clusters of varicella. A harmonic regression model was used to quantify seasonality, and an age-specific trend was evaluated through the Cochrane-Armitage test.

Result

A continuous decline in reported incidence of varicella in Hangzhou from 2019 to 2024 was observed, with 97.95 per 100,000 and 52.23 per 100,000 in 2019 and 2024, respectively. Seasonality of the bimodal peak was observed, with the first peak of varicella cases observed from May to July, whereas the second peak typically occurs from November to February of the following year. A pronounced reduction in varicella incidence among younger children (5–9) and a relatively slower decline in older pediatric and adolescent groups (10–19) were found. The spatial distribution pattern of varicella in Hangzhou at township levels was non-random, and hotspots tend to be more frequent in the suburbs than in downtown areas. A total of 34 significant varicella spatiotemporal clusters were identified by retrospective space–time scan statistics, the vast majority of which were located in suburban areas.

Conclusion

Varicella incidence has dramatically declined over the past 6 years. The 10–19-year-old age band exhibited a slower reduction than the 5–9-year-old age-band. Moreover, the tendency for varicella clusters to appear more frequently in suburban areas reflects disparities in varicella incidence geographically. Specific surveillance and control measures should be undertaken in high-incidence regions in Hangzhou.

Keywords: age-specific trends, harmonic regression model, seasonality, spatial analysis, varicella (chickenpox)

Introduction

Varicella is a respiratory contagious disease caused by the varicella-zoster virus (VZV), clinically manifested as generalized itchy vesicular exanthema, generally accompanied by fever and appetite loss (1), remains a persistent public health concern despite the widespread implementation of effective vaccination programs (2, 3). Although generally self-limiting in children, the disease is highly contagious and can result in severe complications, including encephalitis, pneumonitis, secondary bacterial infections, hospitalization, or even death (4) among adults, pregnant women, and immunocompromised individuals (5). In regions with high vaccine coverage, varicella vaccination has resulted in substantial disease prevention and societal savings (6–8). Varicella has been subject to mandatory reporting to the China Information System for Disease Control and Prevention (CISDCP) by health agencies within 24 h of diagnosis since 2019, as required by the Hangzhou Bureau of Health. However, even if two-dose varicella vaccination has been recommended to be administered to children at 1 and 4 years of age in Hangzhou since 2014, it is still a non-National Immunization Program vaccine, being self-paid and administered voluntarily. Emerging evidence suggests that the actual varicella disease burden in China may be significantly underestimated due to underreporting and heterogeneous vaccine coverage geographically (9). The varicella vaccine administration schedule and its protective effect have been under debate since breakthrough cases in outbreaks have increasingly been identified in previous studies (10, 11). Low varicella vaccine coverage can facilitate the occurrence of an outbreak (12). Previous studies have established that socioeconomic characteristics play a pivotal role in the distribution of coverage for non-National-Immunization-Program vaccines (13, 14). Uneven distribution of healthcare resources may lead to geographically heterogeneous vaccine uptake, resulting in the spatial aggregation of the susceptible population. Consequently, these processes may manifest as spatial clustering of varicella cases or incidences at the town or street level (15). In this context, spatial–temporal analysis of incidence can provide critical insights into transmission dynamics, identify persistent hotspots, and inform a more targeted and effective varicella vaccination strategy (16, 17).

However, while previous studies have widely utilized spatial analysis, applying both global autocorrelation and LISA to identify varicella aggregation patterns in other regions of China, they often rely on district-level administrative surveillance data (15, 18). However, as emphasized by Haque et al. in 2025 (19), finer spatial unit spatial data can improve estimates and spatial statistic inference precision, whereas coarser spatial units may lead to greater uncertainty. Because the aggregation from district-level data may dilute the local spatial autocorrelation and obscure subtle local hotspots due to the aggregation and zoning effects of the Modifiable Areal Unit Problem (MAUP) (19, 20). Besides, although seasonal patterns of varicella have been delineated by previous researchers (18, 21), none of them have attempted to quantify seasonality using harmonic regression. To address these gaps, our study aims to characterize the spatiotemporal distribution of varicella incidence in Hangzhou at town/street granularity from 2019 to 2024, drawing on surveillance data from CISDCP. Through using spatial clustering, seasonality quantifying analysis, and age-specific trend analysis, we seek to identify high-incidence areas and temporal trends, thereby providing empirical evidence to support future vaccine planning and outbreak prevention strategies.

Materials and methodology

Data source and collection

Reporting varicella cases in the database of the China Information System for Disease Control and Prevention (CISDCP) with symptom onset and date from 2019 to 2024 were considered eligible for this study (22). Additionally, demographic data, including occupation, residential address, age, gender, and clinical data, including symptom onset date-time and case classification, were collected for analysis. A varicella case was defined as a patient who has acute symptoms of pruritic papule and vesicular skin rash that forms small, itchy blisters that scab over without any identifiable alternative causes. Patients whose residential address cannot be identified and classified into township levels were excluded from this study. Township-level population data in 2020 were obtained from the seventh Chinese census; population data for the remaining 5 years were estimated using a constant-share proportional allocation method based on population data of the seventh census at town/street granularity and district-level population figures for each respective year, as reported in the Hangzhou Statistical Yearbook, under the assumption that the age structure did not change dramatically at the town/street level in Hangzhou from 2019 to 2024.

Seasonality quantification and age-specific trend assessment

We used a harmonic regression model to estimate the peak timing and strength of varicella cases in each respective town/street, as described by previous studies (23). To obtain robust estimation, an offset term was included for the monthly population to control the long-term temporal trends and changes in surveillance efforts or the size of the population under surveillance over the study period (24). A negative binomial generalized linear model was fitted after we tested both Poisson and negative binomial models, since the mean and variance estimates suggested an over-dispersion of varicella case counts. The model structure allows for simultaneous estimates of both annual and semi-annual periodicity. The negative binomial model accounting for seasonality is given by Equation (1):

Y(t) ~ Negative binominal (𝜆𝑡)

ln(λt)=β0+β1sin(2πt12)+β2cos(2πt12)+β3sin(2πt6)+β4cos(2πt6)+β5t+β6t2+ln(nt)+ε (1)

Where Y(t) is the monthly case count of varicella in each respective township and t is the running time index in months over time. The term ln(𝜆𝑡) is the logarithm of the expected case count of varicella. The log-transformed monthly number of populations ( ln(nt) ) in each town/street is included in the model as an offset term to normalize the case counts, allowing the coefficients in the model to be interpreted as the change in the log incidence rate instead of the absolute case count. The whole-year and half-year periodicity is denoted by the two paired trigonometric terms (where β1 and β2 denote primary annual seasonality, while β3 and β4 denote semiannual cycles.)

Seasonality was then quantified using metrics derived from model coefficients. The amplitude that indicates the annual precocity was computed as the sqrt ( β1 2 + β2 2) and semi-amplitude as the sqrt ( β3 2 + β4 2). The phase angle for the primary peak was calculated as arctan ( β1 / β2 ) and then converted from radians to months using the methods as described by previous researchers (25). We define the semi-periodicity contribution ratio as the ratio between semi-amplitude and the sum of semi and annual amplitude, and a ratio exceeding 0.5 was interpreted as evidence of dominant semiannual (bimodal) seasonality (24). Uncertainty (95% confidence interval) in annual seasonality strength and peak timing was assessed using a seasonal block bootstrap method with 1,000 replicates to retain the inherent autocorrelation structure of time-series data (24, 26). Age-specific trend was tested with the Cochrane-Armitage test, and the annual percent change (APC) was estimated through join-point regression modeling (27), with a p-value threshold of 0.05 used to determine significance.

Spatial autocorrelation analysis

Spatial autocorrelation refers to the relationship between adjacent spatial units, which quantifies the degree to which the interested geographical features and their relevant values tend to be clustered (positively correlated) or dispersed (negatively correlated) or random (28). In this study, the global Moran’s I statistic was used to evaluate global spatial autocorrelation. It is computed by Equation (2):

I=nijwij(ijwij(xix¯)(xjx¯)/i(xix¯)2) (2)

Where n denotes the total number of spatial units, Xi is the observed varicella cases in unit i, xˉ is the overall mean, and wij stands for the elements of a spatial weight matrix defining the spatial relationship between spatial units. The value of Moran’s I ranges from −1 to 1, where values closer to −1 indicate a stronger tendency toward spatial dispersion, while values closer to 1 suggest a stronger tendency toward spatial clustering of the variable of interest (29). The global Moran test was performed to determine the statistical significance of global spatial autocorrelation. The spatial proximity matrix was generated through the k-nearest neighbors algorithm and the spatial empirical Bayesian approach (30). Specifically, we assume the observed number of varicella cases Yi follows a Poisson distribution with mean Ei θi , where Ei denotes the expected number of cases and θi represents the underlying relative risk in spatial unit i. Based on the empirical Bayes framework, the prior distribution of θi follows a Gamma distribution, the parameters of which are estimated from the prior mean and variance from the observed risk within a predefined spatial neighbor unit. The smoothed estimate was then calculated as a weighted average of the observed crude risk and the locally estimated prior mean, with weights determined by the relative magnitude of within-area variance and local prior variance (31). Specific spatial cluster patterns (high-high, high-low, low-high, and low-low) were detected through leveraging local spatial autocorrelation analysis by computing local index spatial autocorrelation (LISA), where the high-high pattern stands for spatial units with a high morbidity rate surrounded by regions that also exhibit a high morbidity rate. The Local Moran’s I can be interpreted as a disaggregation of the global statistic, quantifying the contribution of each spatial unit to the overall measure of spatial autocorrelation. We computed LISA statistics using the Equation (3):

Ii=(xix¯)jwij(xjx¯) (3)

All LISA mapping in this study used empirical Bayes-smoothed rates, determined by Equation (4):

Ri^=Wi·ri+(1Wi)·μi (4)

Where Wi stands for the spatial Bayesian weight calculated by the variability parameters from the crude rate in each spatial unit, μi represents the average incidence rate in the surrounding spatial context of the unit i . All spatial autocorrelation analysis was based on the smoothing incidence rate computed by the above method. The entire analysis was performed in R (version 4.4.3).

Spatial–temporal scan statistics

The spatial–temporal scan statistics proposed by Kulldorff and Nagarwalla (32) along with the rsatscan package (Version 1.0.9) in R were used to detect varicella clusters in both space and time (33). The fundamental principle of scan statistics involves moving a cylinder window dynamically through space and time dimensions, where the circular or elliptical bottom of the cylinder represents geographical spaces, while the height of the cylinder corresponds to the temporal duration of potential clusters (34). The cases observed in each scanning window were compared to the expected counts of cases under the null hypothesis of a random spatiotemporal distribution pattern to generate the relative risk of contracting varicella within the window relative to outside (28). Monte Carlo simulation was used to assess statistical significance, with a p-value threshold of 0.05 used to determine significance. The log likelihood ratio (LLR) was used to identify potential clusters, with the cluster exhibiting the maximum LLR considered the most likely cluster.

To assess the influence of spatial window size, we evaluated maximum spatial cluster sizes from 10 to 50% of the population at risk. Based on sensitivity analysis, a spatial window of 30% was selected, as the largest detected cluster encompassed less than 15% of the total geographic units, balancing cluster detectability and spatial specificity. The maximum temporal cluster size was set at 50% of the total study period. Case data were temporally aggregated at the monthly level, with a minimum of five cases in one cluster, consistent with the definition of a cluster from the varicella surveillance scheme of Zhejiang Province.

Epidemiological characteristics

Between 2019 and 2024, a total of 44,740 varicella cases were reported in Hangzhou, with an average annual incidence rate of varicella of 60.59/100,000, including 23,900 male cases and 20,840 female cases. Epidemiological characteristics of varicella in Hangzhou from 2019 to 2024 are shown in Figures 1, 2. The temporal tendency of varicella morbidity (Figure 2) illustrates that the incidence rate peaked in 2019 at 97.75 per 100,000, fluctuating between 50 and 60 per 100,000 from 2020 to 2022, while the bottom of the incidence rate was observed in 2023 at 47.4 per 100,000, but it slightly bottoms out in 2024 at 52.23 per 100,000.

Figure 1.

Line and bar chart illustrating the number of varicella cases and the reporting incidence from 2019 to 2024. The blue bars represent the number of cases, showing peaks in late 2019 and mid-2022, with fluctuations each year. The orange line indicates the reporting incidence rate, corresponding with the peaks in case numbers.

Reported monthly cases and incidence rate of varicella from 2019 to 2024.

Figure 2.

Line graph showing reported incidence rates per 100,000 by age group from 2019 to 2024. The highest peak occurs in the 10-15 age range in 2019, with declining rates in subsequent years across all age groups. Each year is represented by a different colored line.

Reported varicella incidence rate by the age group.

The exploratory seasonality analysis in the epidemic curve (Figure 1) revealed a bimodal seasonality pattern of varicella incidence in Hangzhou, with the first peak of varicella cases observed from May to July, whereas the second peak typically occurs in the winter months from October of the year to November. Results from harmonic regression analysis provide a more evident and quantitative outcome for the seasonality pattern of varicella incidence in Hangzhou. The regression modeling plot is shown in Figure 3. Specifically, the semi-periodicity contribution ratio (54.8%) from the regression model showed a bimodal pattern of varicella incidence over the study period. The estimated annual seasonality strength was 1.43 (95% CI: 1.294–1.693), indicating that peak incidence was approximately 43% higher than the seasonal mean. The annual amplitude on the log scale was 0.354, reflecting moderate but clearly defined seasonal fluctuation. The timing of the annual peak was estimated to occur at month 9.75, corresponding to late September to early October, with a 95% confidence interval spanning from month 8.946 to 10.334.

Figure 3.

Line graph showing seasonal harmonic regression model fit with 95% confidence interval. Y-axis represents case counts, ranging from 0 to 2000, and x-axis represents time in months, up to 80. Peaks occur around the ninth month. The line is red with shaded confidence intervals. Black dots represent data points.

Seasonality quantification with the harmonic regression model.

The age-specific incidence distribution by year and results of Cochran–Armitage trend tests within each age group (Figure 4) revealed that varicella incidence in Hangzhou over the study period exhibited a pronounced age gradient, with the highest rates consistently observed among young children, particularly those aged 5–9 and 10–14 years, followed by a sharp decline with increasing age. In 2019, the highest incidence rates were concentrated in the youngest three age groups, indicating that early childhood accounted for the most reported cases at the beginning of the study period. From 2020 onward, however, the age distribution of incidence changed markedly; the youngest age groups experienced substantial and statistically significant declines (p < 0.001), while children aged 10–14 and 15–19 years gradually emerged as the dominant incidence groups. This transition reflects both the pronounced reduction in varicella incidence among young children and the relatively slower decline in older pediatric and adolescent groups. This shift is also consistent with results from our joint-point regression modeling, as shown in Figure 5, revealing that children in the younger age band (5–10 years old) experienced a greater incidence decline (APC: 33.01) than those in the 10–19 age band (APC10-14: 24.22, APC 15–19: 13.66). These findings highlight a marked temporal decline in varicella burden concentrated in younger populations, alongside relatively stable and low incidence in older age groups, underscoring the strong age-specific epidemiological pattern of varicella during the study period.

Figure 4.

Heatmap depicting varicella incidence rates per 100,000 from 2019 to 2024 across age bands and trend summaries. Data indicates increasing and decreasing trends, with rates color-coded from yellow (high) to dark purple (low). Key highlights include significant rate differences in younger age bands with decreasing trends.

Heatmap of age-band incidence by year with the Cochran-Armitage trend test.

Figure 5.

Line graph titled "Multiple Joinpoint Models", showing various trends in crude rates from 2019 to 2024. The graph includes multiple colored lines, each representing different joinpoints and average percent changes (APC). The legend on the right lists line colors, joinpoints, and APC values. Crude rates decrease significantly in some models and vary in others.

Temporal trend of age-specific incidence of varicella from joinpoint modeling, 2019–2024.

Spatial pattern

The smoothed annual incidence of varicella map from 2019 to 2024 in Figure 6 revealed a consistent spatial distribution pattern across the years, suggesting that varicella incidence was generally higher in central urban districts and several suburban areas in northeast compared to other peripheral regions except for 2019. Notably, the overall morbidity rate in 2019 was higher than in the subsequent 5 years, suggesting a temporal decline in varicella incidence. No significant differences were observed between the smoothed rates using the SEB method and the raw incidence rates, as shown in Figures 7, 8.

Figure 6.

Maps of smoothed incidence rates from 2019 to 2024 across six panels, showing varying intensity from light yellow to dark red. The color scale indicates incidence levels, with dark red representing the highest rates and light yellow the lowest. Each map shows different areas with changing incidence levels over the years.

Average smoothed incidence rate mapping by calendar year.

Figure 7.

Choropleth map showing average annual raw incidence rates in various regions. Colors range from light yellow for low rates to dark red for high rates. A legend indicates five categories from 0 to 135.1 per 100,000, with gray for missing data.

Average annual raw incidence rate mapping.

Figure 8.

Choropleth map displaying the average annual smoothed incidence rates per 100,000 people in various regions. Color gradient ranges from light yellow indicating the lowest incidence (3.9 to 43.2) to dark red showing the highest (101.6 to 131.9). Some areas are marked as missing data. Legend provided for reference.

Average annual smoothed incidence rate mapping.

Spatial autocorrelation

The results of the global autocorrelation test in Table 1 show a statistically significant positive spatial autocorrelation for varicella morbidity across townships in Hangzhou from 2019 to 2024. Similar results were also observed when the incidence rate was averaged for 6 years at township levels (p-value 0.05), indicating that the spatial distribution pattern of varicella in Hangzhou at township levels was non-random. Specifically, the Local Moran clusters map of varicella incidence revealed that the high-high clusters were mainly concentrated in downtown townships and several suburban towns near the city center in 2019 and 2020, while five LISA clusters were identified in Chunan County in 2020 (Zhongzhou town, Fenkou town, Langchuan town, Jiangjia town, and Zitong town), as shown in Figure 4. High-high clusters had significantly decreased in 2021, and the LISA cluster pattern had shifted from urban areas concentrated to predominantly located in peripheral areas, as only six hotspots of varicella were recognized by LISA analysis in 2021 (Bai Zhang Town & Lu Niao Town in Yuhang district, Dangwan Town & Nan Yang Street in Xiaoshan district, Yipeng Town & Linjiang Town in Qiantang district). However, in 2022, 38 LISA clusters were detected across 9 districts (Linan, Linpin, Xihu, Gongshu, Shangcheng, Xiaoshan, and Qiantang), with a predominant concentration (71%) in suburban townships, including 27 in peripheral areas and 11 in urban townships. Hotspots slightly declined in 2023 and 2024, with 28 and 19 township-level clusters detected, respectively, in 5 districts (Figure 9).

Table 1.

Results of the global Moran test.

Year Moran I Expectation Variance Statistic p-value
2019 0.706374859 −0.005181347 0.001817847 16.6890109 7.878E-63
2020 0.404993617 −0.005181347 0.001809995 9.641185438 2.6783E-22
2021 0.095276993 −0.005181347 0.001307046 2.778693017 0.0027289
2022 0.323192324 −0.005181347 0.001814662 7.708509464 6.3648E-15
2023 0.284099559 −0.005181347 0.001766101 6.883542144 2.9191E-12
2024 0.400626661 −0.005181347 0.001770559 9.644181905 2.6012E-22
Average 0.443151546 −0.005181347 0.001718609 10.81463883 1.4672E-27

Figure 9.

Six maps from 2019 to 2024 illustrate regional clusters using colors to denote significance: red for High-High, dark blue for Low-Low, light blue for Low-High, pink for High-Low, gray for Missing, and white for Not Significant. Patterns of significance change over the years, with notable shifts in clusters and significance levels throughout the regions.

Varicella LISA clusters, 2019–2024.

Spatiotemporal cluster analysis

The retrospective spatiotemporal scan analysis identified a total of 34 statistically significant varicella clusters in Hangzhou from 2019 to 2024 (p < 0.05), indicating a notable spatiotemporal aggregation of varicella cases during the study period, as illustrated in Figure 10. Interestingly, only 3 clusters were identified in the downtown area (cluster 23, cluster 24, and cluster 33) that have been highlighted in bold in Appendix Table 2, whereas all remaining clusters were in suburban regions. The most likely cluster occurred in Huanghu Town, Yuhang District, comprising 83 cases between 1 September and 30 November 2021. This cluster exhibited a relative risk (RR) of 13.01, suggesting that individuals within the specified spatial and temporal window were 13.01 times more likely to contract varicella compared to those outside the cluster (log-likelihood ratio [LLR] = 136.38, p < 0.05). The secondary cluster encompassed 30 contiguous townships/streets across four districts—Shangcheng, Xiaoshan, Binjiang, and Fuyang—located in the southern part of Hangzhou. This cluster spanned the entire year of 2019 (1st January to 31st December), with a relative risk of 1.32 and an LLR of 127.88 (p < 0.05). Detailed information regarding the remaining 36 clusters is provided in Appendix Table 2.

Figure 10.

Satellite map showing a region with several roads and highways marked in red and green. Multiple overlapping red translucent circles highlight specific areas on the map. Lakes and urban areas are visible in the northern and eastern sections.

Cluster mapping detected by space–time scan statistics from 2019 to 2024 in Hangzhou.

Discussion

This is the first study that investigates epidemiological characteristics and reveals the spatiotemporal pattern of varicella at township level since varicella has been mandatory reported to CIDCP since 2019 in Hangzhou. Temporally, our study observed a continuous decline in the reported incidence of varicella in Hangzhou from 2019 to 2024. This trend is especially striking from 2019 (97.75 per 100,000) to 2020 (53.76 per 100,000), which could be ascribed to the non-pharmaceutical intervention undertaken during the COVID-19 pandemic and the increasing coverage of varicella vaccination in Hangzhou (35, 36). This finding was consistent with the temporal trend of varicella reported elsewhere in China (37, 38).

Furthermore, it is worthwhile to note that our study identified a bimodal peak distribution of varicella cases in Hangzhou, which is consistent with results reported by previous studies (39–41). One plausible explanation underlying this phenomenon has been demonstrated by Suzuki et al. (41) and Xu et al. (39), indicating that the existence of preferable metrological temperatures for varicella dynamics and the school terms when the most susceptible population gathers promotes transmission of varicella in spring and winter seasons. These results are similar to findings from previous scholars (38, 42). This current study also found that a dominant age group transition of varicella incidence from the 5–9-year-old to 10–19-year-old age group from 2019 to 2024. Cases in 5–9 age group have declined from 1,394 cases in 2019 to 461 in 2024, whereas both the 10–15 age group and the 15–19 age group have observed a slight increase in varicella cases since 2020. The position paper from WHO for the varicella and herpes zoster vaccine in 2014 argued that when the varicella vaccine coverage remains under 80% for a long duration, although a decrease in overall counts of cases could be observed, it is expected that a shift of varicella cases to an older age group of children (43). It is therefore suggested that future research could be targeted at varicella vaccination coverage and its spatial–temporal distribution, as well as the relationship between varicella vaccine uptake and the incidence of varicella outbreak, to ensure the target population has already constructed sufficient immune barriers (13).

Global autocorrelation in our study confirmed the existence of a positive aggregation pattern of varicella at township level in Hangzhou in every single year from 2019 to 2024. However, insights from our LISA analysis, along with retrospective spatial cluster analysis, have challenged the conventional notion that infectious respiratory disease clusters are prone to occur in densely populated areas with a higher socioeconomic index. Our findings revealed that varicella clusters tend to happen in the relatively underdeveloped regions in Hangzhou, although the cluster area has evolved. However, our findings are supported by evidence from Li et al. (15) and Lee et al. (44), who argued that the socioeconomic status played a pivotal role in the varicella cluster spatial pattern. Specifically, they found that a higher per capita GDP was related to reduced varicella transmission risk and several other social determinants, including per capita residential building area, percentage of rental housing, and spatial features of chickenpox outbreaks. On the other hand, although the varicella vaccine is the most effective way to mitigate varicella transmission, a plethora of evidence has identified an increasing number of breakthrough varicella cases with a one-dose varicella vaccination history; a varicella outbreak analysis by Wang et al. found that 96.6% of breakthrough cases had a history of one-dose vaccination (11), revealing the limited protective effect of a one-dose schedule for varicella. However, previous studies on varicella vaccination coverage in Hangzhou have found that the two-dose coverage rate was lower in suburban areas (52.48%) compared to downtown areas (62.5%) (35). As a matter of fact, some researchers have provided solutions to tackle inequality in vaccine accessibility between different socioeconomic groups. Hu et al. (45) suggested the adoption of 2-dose varicella vaccination as one of the school-entry vaccination requirements. Other researchers have also put forward various recommendations to improve the accessibility of the varicella vaccine, such as incorporating the varicella vaccine into the National Immunization Program (NIP) vaccines (46) and replacing the MMR vaccines with the MMRV vaccine2 11. Therefore, the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the MMRV vaccine schedule and incorporating the MMRV vaccine into NIP in comparison with the present self-paid varicella vaccine strategy in Hangzhou warrant further research.

Limitations and conclusion

Some challenges needed to be noted. First, to explore the township-level spatiotemporal cluster pattern of varicella, cases without an identifiable residential address were excluded from analysis in this study, which may lead to a slight underestimate of varicella morbidity, but this proportion was small (less than 0.5%) and thus will not substantially affect the spatiotemporal pattern and transmission dynamic characteristics of varicella. Second, since varicella has been a legally notifiable disease in Hangzhou since 2019, data were only available for a short duration of 5 years, which hindered us from exploring periodic trends and long-term epidemic characteristics of varicella in Hangzhou. Third, due to the limited socioeconomic data provided by CISDCP surveillance, we were unable to further examine the influence of socioeconomic factors on varicella onset or on the uptake of varicella vaccination. Finally, unlike irregularly shaped administrative boundaries in the real world, spatial scan statistics use a circular or elliptical scanning window to detect the most likely cluster. It may be criticized that several adjacent spatial units without elevated risk are incorporated in the most likely cluster (47). However, unlike undertaking spatial scan statistics at the county-level, township-level analysis diminishes this effect to some extent, since in real-world infectious disease intervention practices, the cost of mistakenly categorizing a county as a high-risk area without actual elevated risk is typically greater than that of misclassifying a township.

In conclusion, this study demonstrates a downward trend in the incidence rate of varicella in Hangzhou over the past 5 years. The reason underlying this phenomenon could be the high varicella coverage rate in Hangzhou. However, the morbidity rate of varicella in young children between 10 and 19 years old has gradually increased, suggesting a potential gap between the current two-dose varicella vaccination coverage in Hangzhou and the threshold required to establish herd immunity barriers, as recommended by the WHO position paper (43). This highlights the need for policymakers and public health professionals to consider disparities in access to non-NIP vaccines when formulating future varicella prevention strategies.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.

Footnotes

Edited by: Cong Sun, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (SYSUCC), China

Reviewed by: Amos Kipkorir Langat, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology College of Pure and Applied Sciences, Kenya

Simon Kojo Appiah, Howard University, United States

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

This study was based on secondary analysis of de-identified routine surveillance data obtained from the China Information System for Disease Control and Prevention (CISDCP). All personal identifiers were encrypted prior to data access, and analyses were conducted on aggregated data only. In accordance with relevant public health regulations, this work did not constitute human subjects research and did not require institutional review board approval or informed consent.

Author contributions

LG: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. YL: Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing. XiZ: Data curation, Investigation, Resources, Writing – review & editing. YX: Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. XuZ: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. XC: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. WG: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. YY: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. LZ: Data curation, Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1701894/full#supplementary-material

Data_Sheet_1.docx (3.9MB, docx)

References

  • 1.Heininger U, Seward JF. Varicella. Lancet. (2006) 368:1365–76. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69561-5, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gershon AA. Is chickenpox so bad, what do we know about immunity to varicella zoster virus, and what does it tell us about the future? J Infect. (2017) 74:S27–33. doi: 10.1016/S0163-4453(17)30188-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chang Z, Li H, Li Y, Qin T, Hu M, Yang X, et al. Comparison of trend analysis of varicella zoster disease burden between China and the world 1990–2021 and disease burden forecast 2030. Front Public Health. (2025) 13:1535977. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1535977, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jaeggi A, Zurbruegg RP, Aebi C. Complications of varicella in a defined central European population. Arch Dis Child. (1998) 79:472–7. doi: 10.1136/adc.79.6.472, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gershon AA, Breuer J, Cohen JI, Cohrs RJ, Gershon MD, Gilden D, et al. Varicella zoster virus infection. Nat Rev Dis Primers. (2015) 1:1–18. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2015.16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhou F, Leung J, Marin M, Dooling KL, Anderson TC, Ortega-Sanchez IR, et al. Health and economic impact of the United States varicella vaccination program, 1996–2020. J Infect Dis. (2022) 226:S463–S69. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiac271 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Guris D, Jumaan AO, Mascola L, Watson BM, Zhang JX, Chaves SS, et al. Changing varicella epidemiology in active surveillance sites—United States, 1995–2005. J Infect Dis. (2008) 197:S71–5. doi: 10.1086/522156 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Davis MM, Patel MS, Gebremariam A. Decline in varicella-related hospitalizations and expenditures for children and adults after introduction of varicella vaccine in the United States. Pediatrics. (2004) 114:786–92. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0012, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Feng H, Zhang H, Ma C, Yin D, Fang H. National and provincial burden of varicella disease and cost-effectiveness of childhood varicella vaccination in China from 2019 to 2049: a modelling analysis. Lancet Reg Health. (2023) 32. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100639, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Xiao-yun DU, Xiao-ning LI, Zhi-cong Y. Epidemiological characteristics and breakthrough cases of 32 varicella outbreaks in 2017, Jiangsu Province. 中华疾病控制杂志. (2018) 22:975–7. doi: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2018.09.025 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wang J, Xu Z, Gao Q. Varicella outbreaks in schools and kindergartens in Shanghai, China from 2011 to 2020. PLoS One. (2022) 17:e0270630. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270630, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fujita DM, da d SNLH, Costa RR, de d AJHF, Albuquerque Luna EJ. Low vaccine coverage and varicella outbreaks in Brazil− 2019-2022. Vaccine. (2024) 42:3384–8. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.04.021, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Li Y, Li J, Zhu Z, Zeng W, Zhu Q, Rong Z, et al. Exposure–response relationship between temperature, relative humidity, and varicella: a multicity study in South China. Environ Sci Pollut Res. (2023) 30:7594–604. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22711-8, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Suzuki A, Nishiura H. Reconstructing the transmission dynamics of varicella in Japan: an elevation of age at infection. PeerJ. (2022) 10:e12767. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12767, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wang L, Wang M, Xu C, Wang PH, You MY, Li ZH, et al. Spatial dynamics of chickenpox outbreaks in rapidly developing regions: implications for global public health. Biomed Environ Sci. (2024) 37:687–97. doi: 10.3967/bes2024.068, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kirby RS, Delmelle E, Eberth JM. Advances in spatial epidemiology and geographic information systems. Ann Epidemiol. (2017) 27:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.12.001, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.de Araújo Morais LR, da Silva Gomes GS. Applying spatio-temporal scan statistics and spatial autocorrelation statistics to identify COVID-19 clusters in the world-a vaccination strategy? Spat Spatiotemp Epidemiol. (2021) 39:100461. doi: 10.1016/j.sste.2021.100461 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Xuan K, Zhang N, Li T, Pang X, Li Q, Zhao T, et al. Epidemiological characteristics of varicella in Anhui Province, China, 2012-2021: surveillance study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. (2024) 10:e50673. doi: 10.2196/50673 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Haque S, Price A, Mengersen K, Hu W. Evaluating the impact of the modifiable areal unit problem on ecological model inference: a case study of COVID-19 data in Queensland, Australia. Infect Dis Model. (2025) 10. doi: 10.1016/j.idm.2025.05.003, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Waller LA, Gotway CA. Applied spatial statistics for public health data. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons; (2004). [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yang L, Yang J, Tian D, Zhao H, Long J, Qi L. A spatial analysis of chickenpox in Chongqing, China, during 2015–2023. Sci Rep. (2025) 15:17413. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01631-w, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wang L, Wang Y, Jin S, Wu Z, Chin DP, Koplan JP, et al. Emergence and control of infectious diseases in China. Lancet. (2008) 372:1598–605. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61365-3, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Deng X, Chen Z, Zhao Z, Chen J, Li M, Yang J, et al. Regional characteristics of influenza seasonality patterns in mainland China, 2005-2017: a statistical modeling study. Int J Infect Dis. (2023) 128:91–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.12.026, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Berry I, Rahman M, Flora MS, Shirin T, Alamgir ASM, Khan MH, et al. Seasonality of influenza and coseasonality with avian influenza in Bangladesh, 2010–19: a retrospective, time-series analysis. Lancet Glob Health. (2022) 10:e1150–8. doi: 10.1016/s2214-109x(22)00212-1, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Naumova EN, MacNeill IB. Seasonality assessment for biosurveillance systems In: Advances in statistical methods for the health sciences: Applications to cancer and AIDS studies, genome sequence analysis, and survival analysis, Eds: Elena N. Naumova, Ian B. Macneill. Birkhäuser, Boston: Springer; (2007). 437–50. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Politis DN. Resampling time series with seasonal components. Frontiers in data mining and bioinformatics: proceedings of the 33rd symposium on the interface of computing science and statistics. California: Orange County 2001.
  • 27.Rezaei B, Shahedi A, Keshtkaran Z, Eidi A, Delam H, Safari K, et al. Changes in incidence and mortality trend due to COVID-19 in southern Iran, from 2020 to 2021: based on Cochran–Armitage trend test. J Public Health. (2024) 32:1153–9. 10.1007/s10389-023-01902-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Getis A. Spatial autocorrelation In: Handbook of applied spatial analysis: Software tools, methods and applications, Eds: Manfred M. Fischer, Arthur Getis. Berlin: Springer; (2009). 255–78. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bivand RS, Wong DWS. Comparing implementations of global and local indicators of spatial association. TEST. (2018) 27:716–48. doi: 10.1007/s11749-018-0599-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kumar VS, Devika S, George S, Saravana Kumar V, Jeyaseelan L. Spatial mapping of acute diarrheal disease using GIS and estimation of relative risk using empirical Bayes approach. Clin Epidemiol Glob Health. (2017) 5:87–96. doi: 10.1016/j.cegh.2016.07.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Meza JL. Empirical Bayes estimation smoothing of relative risks in disease mapping. J Stat Plann Inference. (2003) 112:43–62. doi: 10.1016/s0378-3758(02)00322-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hohl A, Delmelle EM, Desjardins MR, Lan Y. Daily surveillance of COVID-19 using the prospective space-time scan statistic in the United States. Spat Spatiotemp Epidemiol. (2020) 34:100354. doi: 10.1016/j.sste.2020.100354, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wu Y, Wang J. A Web-Based System with Spatial Clustering to Observe the Changes of Emergency Distribution Using Social Big Data. In: Wong, R., Chi, CH., Hung, P. (eds) Behavior Engineering and Applications. International Series on Computer Entertainment and Media Technology. Springer, Cham (2018).
  • 34.Moraga P. Spatial statistics for data science: Theory and practice with R, New York Chapman and Hall/CRC: CRC Press; (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Liu Y, Xu E, Che X, Wang J, Gu WW, Xu YY, et al. Coverage of two doses of varicella attenuated live vaccine in Hangzhou city of Zhejiang province. Chin J Vaccines Immuniz. (2018) 24:453–6. doi: 10.19914/j.cjvi.2018.04.018 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Xu Y, Liu S, Che X, Liu Y, Zhang X, du J, et al. Seroepidemiology of varicella in Hangzhou, China in the vaccine era. Hum Vaccin Immunother. (2018) 14:2464–71. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2018.1477909, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wen T, Fang Q, Fu C, Zheng C, Pan J, Zheng B, et al. The impact of the implementation of the two-dose varicella vaccine immunization strategy in Quzhou: a retrospective birth cohort study. Hum Vaccin Immunother. (2024) 20:2408847. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2408847, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Liu B, Li X, Yuan L, Sun Q, Fan J, Jing Y, et al. Analysis on the epidemiological characteristics of varicella and breakthrough case from 2014 to 2022 in Qingyang City. Hum Vaccin Immunother. (2023) 19:2224075. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2224075, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Xu Y, Liu Y, Zhang X, Zhang X, du J, Cai Y, et al. Epidemiology of varicella and effectiveness of varicella vaccine in Hangzhou, China, 2019. Hum Vaccin Immunother. (2021) 17:211–6. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1769395, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Barrero Guevara LA, Goult E, Rodriguez D, Hernandez LJ, Kaufer B, Kurth T, et al. Delineating the seasonality of varicella and its association with climate in the tropical country of Colombia. J Infect Dis. (2023) 228:674–83. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiad244, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Suzuki A, Nishiura H. Seasonal transmission dynamics of varicella in Japan: the role of temperature and school holidays. Math Biosci Eng. (2023) 20:4069–81. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023190, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Qiu L, Liu S, Zhang M, Zhong G, Peng S, Quan J, et al. The epidemiology of varicella and effectiveness of varicella vaccine in Ganyu, China: a long-term community surveillance study. BMC Public Health. (2023) 23:1875. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16304-4, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Varicella WHO . Herpes zoster vaccines: WHO position paper, June 2014. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. (2014) 89:265–87. Available online at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/who-wer-8925-265-288 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lee YH, Choe YJ, Hwang S, Hwang SS, Cho SI. Spatiotemporal distribution of varicella in the Republic of Korea. J Med Virol. (2022) 94:703–12. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27434, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hu Y, Chen Y, Zhang B, Li Q. An evaluation of voluntary varicella vaccination coverage in Zhejiang Province, East China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2016) 13:560. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13060560, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zhang H, Lai X, Patenaude BN, Jit M, Fang H. Adding new childhood vaccines to China's National Immunization Program: evidence, benefits, and priorities. Lancet Public Health. (2023) 8:e1016–24. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00248-7, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Tango T. Spatial scan statistics can be dangerous. Stat Methods Med Res. (2021) 30:75–86. doi: 10.1177/0962280220930562, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data_Sheet_1.docx (3.9MB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.


Articles from Frontiers in Public Health are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES