Skip to main content
Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology logoLink to Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
. 2026 Feb 13;9(Suppl 1):gwaf042.011. doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwaf042.011

A11 WAIT TIMES FOR COLONOSCOPY ACCORDING TO SUBSEQUENT PATHOLOGY TO IMPROVE A COLONOSCOPY REFERRAL SHEET

S Aprikian 1, C Hansen-Barkun 2, N Milky 3, K Shanahan 4, J Beauchesne-Blanchet 5, M Martel 6, C Menard 7, D Von Renteln 8, A N Barkun 9
PMCID: PMC12901702

Abstract

Background

The use of Quebec’s provincial colonoscopy referral form (FRCQ), which groups clinical indications according to prioritized wait-time categories, aims to optimize access to colonoscopy for patients presenting with clinically significant lesions (CSL), including colorectal cancer (CRC). However, although the prioritization of requests is based on the clinical indication, the actual waiting times observed according to pathological diagnoses remain poorly documented. Such an evaluation would allow a more direct validation of the relevance of the FRCQ as a provincial triage tool.

Aims

To assess wait times from referral to colonoscopy according to findings on pathology, with a focus on CRC and other CSL including and excluding polyps, and considering active colitis.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included consecutive adult patients referred through the Quebec province-wide colonoscopy referral form (PCRF) from two tertiary hospitals. The primary outcome was days from initial referral request to the time of the colonoscopy (wait time) according to corresponding pathology lesions at the index colonoscopy categorized as CRC, CSL (that include cancer, advanced adenomas, serrated lesions, colitis, strictures, other clinically relevant findings), CSL without polyps, and sole active colitis.

Results

Overall, 14,656 patients (mean age 59.2 ± 14.0 years, 50.9% female) were included over a 47-month period; the overall wait times was 126.5 ± 199.5 days. Patients with no CSL (N = 8901) waited less than those with CSL (120.0 ± 185.1 days vs 136.0 ± 219.6, p < 0.01). Patients eventually found to have a colorectal cancer at colonoscopy (N = 127) were endoscoped within the shortest wait times compared to all other individuals referred for colonoscopy (59.0 ± 115.6 vs 127.1 ± 200.0 days, p < 0.01). Wait times were significantly longer for patients found to have polyps (N = 5841) compared to patients without polyps (139.5 ± 226,7 vs 117.9 ± 178.7, p < 0.01). Among CSL subgroups, patients with active colitis (N = 417) had similar wait times compared to those without (139.4 ± 170.9 vs 126.1 ± 200.2 days, p = 0.18).

Conclusions

Overall wait times for colonoscopy in this large sample of patients in the province of Quebec are in keeping with suggested standards. These are appropriately shorter for patients found to have CRC, supporting current referral prioritization strategies. However, among non-cancer CSL findings, delays are not discriminant once patients with polyps, who for the most part are asymptomatic, are excluded. These findings highlight the need for refined predictors to further optimize the colonoscopy provincial referral triage sheet, especially when considering non cancer subgroups, and in particular patients eventually found to have an acute colitis.

Funding Agencies

CPAC


Articles from Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES