Skip to main content
Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health logoLink to Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health
. 2026 Jan 30;13:e23. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2026.10138

The synergistic effects of diet and physical activity on sleep quality among Chinese adolescents: A comprehensive cross-sectional study

Binyang Huang 1, Ning Huang 1, Chen Chen 1, Jing Guo 1,✉
PMCID: PMC12902876  PMID: 41695254

Abstract

This study investigated the independent and interactive effects of dietary behaviors and physical activity on poor sleep quality among 15,059 Chinese adolescents. Using a cross-sectional design, we assessed sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, PSQI), dietary habits, and physical activity. Logistic regression and interaction analysis were performed to examine associations, adjusting for covariates. The prevalence of poor sleep quality (PSQI score ≥ 7) was 9.72%. Seven healthy dietary behaviors were identified as protective (e.g., regular diet, abstaining from alcohol; ORs=0.49–0.56). While physical activity showed no independent association, limiting screen-based sedentary screen time(≤2h/day) reduced poor sleep odds by 31% (OR = 0.69). Two significant interactions emerged: abstaining from alcohol combined with limiting sugary beverages synergistically reduced the odds of poor sleep quality by 42% (OR = 0.58), whereas the combination of healthy dining out and high physical activity was associated with a 181% increased odds of poor sleep quality (OR = 2.81). While healthy dietary patterns are strongly associated with better sleep quality, the interplay between behaviors is complex, demonstrating both synergistic protective association and antagonistic outcomes. Findings highlight the need for integrated lifestyle interventions that account for behavioral interactions in promoting adolescent sleep quality.

Keywords: Chinese adolescents, dietary behaviors, interaction effects, poor sleep quality, physical activity

Impact statements

Adolescent sleep deprivation is a global public health crisis. Our study addresses this gap by analyzing how these behaviors combine to affect sleep in over 15,000 adolescents. We move beyond a simple checklist approach to reveal the complex trade-offs teens make in their packed daily schedules. The key finding is a paradoxical one: combining two “healthy" behaviors” – high-level physical activity and healthy dining out – was associated with a significantly higher risk of poor sleep. This suggests that for many teens, the day becomes a stressful “time crunch.” Intense, late-day exercise, followed by a socially stimulating meal, can leave an adolescent too physiologically and mentally aroused to sleep well, regardless of the health benefits of each individual activity. This finding has broad, practical utility for multiple stakeholders. Public health bodies and governmental organizations can use this evidence to design more effective health campaigns that promote a balanced, 24-h lifestyle rather than just isolated good habits. For schools, this research can inform scheduling policies – for instance, advising against late-evening, high-intensity extracurriculars on school nights to allow for adequate wind-down time. Clinicians and parents can use this insight to provide more nuanced guidance. Finally, while our study was conducted in China, the underlying issue of time pressure and competing lifestyle demands is universal for adolescents in demanding academic environments worldwide. Therefore, our methodology of systematically analyzing behavioral interactions serves as a valuable model for researchers and policymakers seeking to understand and address other complex health challenges in young people globally.

Introduction

Sleep problems are a critical public health concern affecting adolescent development worldwide, with substantial implications for physical function, cognitive function and emotional regulation (St-Onge et al., 2016). According to the American Academy of Sleep Medicine expert panel (Kansagra, 2020), adolescents require 8–10 h of sleep per night to support optimal health and development. Nevertheless, epidemiological studies demonstrate a global prevalence of sleep problems among teenagers (Dohnt et al., 2012), a problem that is particularly acute in East Asian populations, where cultural emphasis on academic achievement often exacerbates sleep deprivation. In mainland China, recent meta-analytic findings (Liang et al., 2021) reveal that the prevalence of sleep disorders in this demographic is significantly higher than that in the general population, reaching as high as 26%. To address the health risks faced by adolescents, it is necessary to design targeted strategies aimed at improving sleep quality.

Lifestyle factors are critical modifiable determinants of sleep health, operating through complex neurobiological mechanisms that primarily interact with the two-process model of sleep regulation: the homeostatic sleep drive (Process S) and the circadian system (Process C) (Borbély, 2022). Physiologically, physical activity acts as a potent regulator of these processes. Ideally, high-intensity activity increases adenosine accumulation and energy expenditure, thereby enhancing homeostatic sleep pressure (Process S) and facilitating deep sleep (Tan et al., 2020). Furthermore, acting as a non-photic “zeitgeber” (time cue), appropriate physical activity entrains the circadian clock through thermoregulation and neuroendocrine modulation (Healy et al., 2021). However, specific behavioral patterns may disrupt this balance. For instance, sedentary behaviors – characterized by prolonged screen time – disrupt sleep continuity through melatonin suppression and increased psychological arousal (Lissak, 2018; Sampasa-Kanyinga et al., 2020). Moreover, emerging evidence suggests that the relationship between physical activity and sleep may not be strictly linear but inverted U-shaped. Recent meta-analyses indicate that while moderate doses benefit sleep, excessive physical exertion – particularly without adequate recovery – may induce physiological hyperarousal that negates sleep benefits (Wang et al., 2025; Zhang et al., 2025a).

Similarly, dietary patterns influence sleep physiology through metabolic and chronobiological pathways. From a circadian perspective, regular meal timing and breakfast consumption serve as critical peripheral zeitgebers, synchronizing metabolic clocks (e.g., the liver clock) with the central pacemaker to promote sleep consistency (Wehrens et al., 2017; Foster, 2020). Metabolically, diet quality directly impacts sleep architecture. High-sugar diets trigger rapid glucose fluctuations and inflammatory responses, which can activate arousal systems and fragment sleep (Kruger et al., 2014; Chaput et al., 2018). Furthermore, substance-specific behaviors like alcohol and caffeine consumption act as direct sleep disruptors by altering neurotransmitter stability and suppressing rapid eye movement (REM) sleep (Smith et al., 2019; Khan et al., 2021). The convergence of physical activity and diet on shared pathways – including inflammatory cytokines, glucose metabolism and circadian entrainment – suggests their effects on sleep are interactive. For instance, the anti-inflammatory effects of physical activity might buffer the sleep-disrupting impact of a pro-inflammatory diet (Krueger, 2008).

While existing epidemiological research establishes discrete associations, the current literature exhibits three key limitations. First, most studies adopt reductionist approaches, examining physical activity and diet in isolation despite their interdependent effects on sleep. Second, research in China, while growing, has often been constrained by smaller sample sizes, limiting generalizability. Third, and most importantly, existing interventions focus on single lifestyle domains, ignoring the complexity of adolescent health behaviors.

Addressing these gaps requires a comprehensive framework that considers not only the direct effects of lifestyle behaviors but also their interactive pathways. Therefore, the present study employs a census survey design in a county of northeastern China to: (1) examine the independent associations of specific dietary and physical activity behaviors with poor sleep quality; (2) investigate the synergistic or antagonistic effects of combined lifestyle factors; and (3) identify nuanced behavioral targets to inform the development of evidence-based, integrated interventions to improve adolescent sleep quality.

Methods

Study design

This cross-sectional survey was conducted in a representative county-level administrative unit in northeastern China between October 12 and November 5, 2023, in collaboration with the local education bureau. A total of 15,398 middle high-school students were recruited from 18 middle schools. School staff received training to standardize the data collection procedures. Under the guidance of their teachers, the students independently completed the electronic questionnaires via a web-based survey platform (https://www.wjx.cn/app/survey.aspx). To ensure data quality, we excluded participants who completed the questionnaire in <600 s or failed logical consistency checks. As a result, 15,059 subjects were included in the final analysis.

All participants, as well as their parents and teachers, gave consent after being informed about the aims of the survey. The study was approved by the Peking University Biomedical Institutional Review Board.

Measurement

Sleep quality

The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) (Buysse et al., 1989) was used to evaluate the sleep quality of the participants over the past month. The PSQI is a self-report questionnaire consisting of 18 items that generate seven component scores: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleep medication and daytime dysfunction. Each component is scored from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating poorer sleep quality. Consistent with established cutoffs used in adolescent populations, a global score above 7 was used to classify participants as having poor sleep quality. The Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for the PSQI in this sample was 0.68. This value aligns with previous large-scale epidemiological studies in adolescents, reflecting the characteristic floor effect of the medication use component in nonclinical populations (Passos et al., 2017; Setyowati and Chung, 2021).

Diet behaviors

Dietary behaviors were assessed using eight dichotomous variables derived from the Dietary Guidelines for Chinese School-aged Children (2022) (Zhang et al., 2022): (1) Regular diet: Daily consumption of three main meals without skipping; (2) Healthy breakfast: Inclusion of cereal, protein and dairy in morning meals; (3) Healthy snack intake: Selection of nutrient-dense snacks (e.g., fruits and nuts) over high-sugar alternatives; (4) Healthy dining out: Selection of balanced meal options (avoiding salty, sweet or oily profiles) during takeout or dining out, assessed by dietary content rather than frequency; (5) Daily milk intake: Consumption of ≥300 mL pasteurized milk daily; (6) Sufficient water intake: Daily water consumption ≥1,500 mL excluding beverages; (7) Limited consumption of sugary beverages: ≤1 serving of sugar-sweetened drinks per week; and (8) Abstaining from alcohol: No consumption of alcoholic beverages.

These variables were measured via self-report questions (e.g., “Have you been eating regularly every day for the past week?” for regular diet) and validated against national dietary guidelines to ensure construct validity.

Physical activity and sedentary behavior

Physical activity and sedentary behavior were measured using items based on the Physical Activity Guidelines for Chinese Children and Adolescents (Zhang et al., 2017). These questions included “How often do you exercise and participate in physical activities per week?” and “What is the intensity of your physical exercise?.” To ensure conceptual precision and align with standardized terminology (Falck et al., 2022), we operationalized our variables to explicitly differentiate between general physical activity and domain-specific screen behaviors.

The variable “Physical activity level” was categorized into three levels according to the following definitions: (1) High-level physical activity: Participants were considered to have a high level of physical activity if they engaged in high-intensity exercise three to five times per week, with each session lasting more than 60 min. (2) Moderate-level physical activity: This level was defined as either engaging in moderate-intensity exercise three to five times per week, with each session lasting more than 30 min, or engaging in high-intensity exercise three to five times per week, with each session lasting between 30 and 60 min. (3) Low-level physical activity: If participants did not meet the criteria for high- or moderate-level physical activity, they were classified as having a low level of physical activity.

It is important to note that while physical education (PE) is mandatory in Chinese schools, recent empirical evidence indicates that the effective duration of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in standard PE classes often falls below our threshold for “Moderate-level” activity (>30 min per session) (Zhou et al., 2025). Consequently, students relying solely on mandatory PE would typically fall into the “Low-level” category, ensuring that our higher categories effectively capture voluntary, discretionary exercise (Wu et al., 2023).

The variable “Screen-based sedentary behavior” was categorized as ≤2 h/day versus >2 h/day. It was defined as the total time spent on activities such as using mobile phones, computers or watching TV, not exceeding 2 h per day. This measurement was also incorporated into the survey through relevant questions to comprehensively evaluate the participants’ lifestyle and its potential impact on sleep health.

These operational definitions of physical activity level and sedentary activities involving electronic devices were established to ensure the consistency and comparability of data analysis in the subsequent sections of this study.

Covariates

Covariates include sociodemographic characteristics, such as gender (male/female), ethnicity (Han/minority), grade (7th/8th/9th grade), self-reported health conditions (healthy/unhealthy) and chronic disease (yes/no). Family conditions include family residence (urban/rural), parental education level (primary school or below/junior high school/senior high school/junior college or above), self-reported family economy (normal/wealthy), only child status (yes/no) and primary caregiver (father/mother or other).

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics are conducted to describe the characteristics of participants with different sleep problems. Categorical variables were represented as frequencies and percentages. The chi-square test is used to assess differences in various sociodemographic characteristics among different sleep quality groups. To examine the association between general healthy dietary behaviors and the sleep problem, a series of logistic regression are conducted using sleep problem as the main outcome variable and each dietary behavior, physical activity as the predictor, while adjusting for covariates such as sex, school grade, residential area and other relevant factors. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were derived.

To explore the interactive effects among lifestyle behaviors, we systematically tested pairwise interactions among the eight dietary behaviors, physical activity level and screen-based sedentary behavior (a total of 45 interaction models). All models were adjusted for the full set of covariates. All analyses were performed using Stata 17.0, with statistical significance defined as a two-sided p-value <0.05.

Results

Descriptive characteristics of the sample

Table 1 shows descriptive analysis results, and 15,059 participants were included. The sample was 54.2% male, and the majority (93.3%) were of Han ethnicity. The majority of the participants (84.49%) are not the only child in their family. Nearly all participants (96.47%) self-reported their health status as “healthy,” while 10.38% reported having chronic diseases. Regarding family situation, 36.93% of the participants live in urban areas, and the remaining 63.07% live in rural areas; 68.09% of participants are primarily cared for by their mother, 21.66% by their fathers and 10.24% by other family members. And the majority of the parents of participants had attained an educational level of middle school (50.33%) or high school (29.44%). The majority of participants (87.67%) described their family economy as “normal,” with the remaining 12.33% indicating it as “rich.”

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics for all variables (N = 15,059)

Sleep problem (threshold: 7 points)
No Yes Total χ 2
N (%) N (%) N (%) Significance
Gender
   Male 7,464 54.9 694 47.4 8,158 54.17 29.932
   Female 6,131 45.1 770 52.6 6,901 45.83 ***
Ethnicity
   Han 12,684 93.3 1,365 93.21 14,049 93.29 0.0079
   Minority 911 6.7 99 6.79 1,010 6.71
Grade
   7th grade 4,695 34.53 349 23.84 5,044 33.49 79.968
   8th grade 4,406 32.41 494 33.74 4,900 32.54 ***
   9th grade 4,494 33.06 621 42.42 5,115 33.97
Family residence
   Urban 5,077 37.35 485 33.13 5,562 36.93 10.0865
   Rural 8,518 62.65 979 66.87 9,497 63.07 **
Only child
   No 11,486 84.49 1,238 84.56 12,724 84.49 0.006
   Yes 2,109 15.51 226 15.44 2,335 15.51 .
Primary caregiver
   Father 2,950 21.7 311 21.24 3,261 21.66 35.265
   Mother 9,315 68.53 938 64.07 10,253 68.1 ***
   Other 1,327 9.76 215 14.69 1,542 10.24
Highest parental education level
   Primary school or below 327 2.41 61 4.17 388 2.58 32.913
   Junior high school 6,791 49.95 788 53.83 7,579 50.33 ***
   Senior high school 4,027 29.62 407 27.8 4,434 29.44
   Junior college or above 2,450 18.02 208 14.21 2,658 17.65
Self-reported family economy
   Normal 11,939 87.82 1,263 86.27 13,202 87.67 2.932
   Rich 1,656 12.18 201 13.73 1,857 12.33 .
Chronic disease
   No 12,401 91.22 1,095 74.8 13,496 89.62 383.194
   Yes 1,194 8.78 369 25.2 1,563 10.38 ***
Self-reported health conditions
   Bad 327 2.41 205 14 532 3.53 521.618
   Health 13,268 97.59 1,259 86 14,527 96.47 ***
Regular diet
   No 4,010 29.5 769 52.53 4,779 31.74 323.608
   Yes 9,585 70.5 695 47.47 10,280 68.26 ***
Healthy breakfast
   No 7,127 52.42 1,074 73.36 8,201 54.46 233.604
   Yes 6,468 47.58 390 26.64 6,858 45.54 ***
Healthy snack intake
   No 6,426 47.27 945 64.55 7,371 48.95 157.963
   Yes 7,169 52.73 519 35.45 7,688 51.05 ***
Healthy dining out
   No 3,021 22.22 593 40.51 3,614 24 242.247
   Yes 10,574 77.78 871 59.49 11,445 76 ***
Daily milk intake
   No 7,635 56.16 1,037 70.83 8,672 57.59 116.503
   Yes 5,960 43.84 427 29.17 6,387 42.41 ***
Sufficient water intake
   No 11,255 82.79 1,240 84.7 12,495 82.97 3.419
   Yes 2,340 17.21 224 15.3 2,564 17.03 .
Limited consumption of sugary beverages
   No 1,191 8.76 316 21.58 1,507 10.01 241.354
   Yes 12,404 91.24 1,148 78.42 13,552 89.99 ***
Abstaining from alcohol
   No 801 5.89 279 19.06 1,080 7.17 344.105
   Yes 12,794 94.11 1,185 80.94 13,979 92.83 ***
Smoking
   No 13,037 95.9 1,272 86.89 14,309 95.02 226.738
   Yes 558 4.1 192 13.11 750 4.98 ***
Physical activity level
   Low level 11,798 86.78 1,331 90.92 13,129 87.18 21.047
   Moderate level 1,216 8.94 84 5.74 1,300 8.63 ***
   High level 581 4.27 49 3.35 630 4.18
Screen-based sedentary behavior (≤2 h)
   No 3,015 22.18 595 40.64 3,610 23.97 247.247
   Yes 10,580 77.82 869 59.36 11,449 76.03 ***
N 13,595 90.28 1,464 9.72 15,059

*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

Having sleep problem is defined as PSQI ≥7.

Model A: Unadjusted for covariates.

Model B: Adjusted for covariates including residential area, gender, grade, ethnicity, smoking status, chronic disease status, self-rated health, primary caregiver and highest parental education level.

As the data collected by applying the PSQI scales, it showed that the prevalence of poor sleep quality (PSQI ≥7) was 9.72%. Regarding the diet behaviors, 68.26% of the participants report eating regularly every day. Of these, a significant portion, amounting to 45.54%, also ensures that they got breakfast, including a variety of nutrients. Among the participants, 51.05% can limit their snack intake, while only 10.01% have consumed an excessive amount of sugary beverages; 42.41% of the participants consume milk daily, yet only 17.03% meet the daily water intake recommendation. Most of the participants (76.00%) can dine out healthily. Most of the participants did not smoke (95.02%) or drink alcohol (92.83%). As for the physical activity, 87.18% reported engaging in low levels of physical activity, compared to 8.63% and 4.18% who kept engaging in moderate and high levels, respectively; 76.03% of the participants can keep their sedentary activities with electronic devices within a 2-h limit.

Associations of dietary behaviors and physical activity with poor sleep quality

As shown in Table 2 and Figure 1, the results show the association of diet and physical activity with poor sleep quality. After controlling for covariates, seven out of the eight healthy dietary behaviors were identified as protective factors against poor sleep quality. It indicated that participants with these behaviors had a lower risk of poor sleep quality compared to those without. The strongest protective factors were maintaining a regular diet (OR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.43–0.55), abstaining from alcohol (OR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.44–0.65) and limiting sugary beverage consumption (OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.48–0.65). Sufficient water intake was the only dietary behavior not significantly associated with sleep quality.

Table 2.

Association between dietary behaviors, physical activity and poor sleep quality (N = 15,059)

Model A
OR (95% CI)
Model B
OR (95% CI)
Regular diet 0.46 [0.41,0.51]*** 0.49 [0.43,0.55]***
Healthy breakfast 0.61 [0.54,0.70]*** 0.65 [0.57,0.74]***
Healthy snack intake 0.69 [0.62,0.78]*** 0.72 [0.64,0.82]***
Healthy dining out 0.58 [0.51,0.65]*** 0.60 [0.53,0.68]***
Daily milk intake 0.72 [0.64,0.82]*** 0.78 [0.69,0.89]***
Sufficient water intake 1.03 [0.88,1.21] 1.03 [0.88,1.22]
Limited consumption of sugary beverages 0.57 [0.49,0.66]*** 0.56 [0.48,0.65]***
Abstaining from alcohol 0.40 [0.34,0.47]*** 0.53 [0.44,0.65]***
Physical activity level (Ref: low level)
Moderate level 0.74 [0.58,0.94]* 0.81 [0.63,1.03]
High level 0.80 [0.59,1.09] 0.94 [0.68,1.30]
Screen-based sedentary behavior (≤2 h) 0.63 [0.56,0.71]*** 0.69 [0.61,0.79]***

*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

Model A: Unadjusted for covariates.

Model B: Adjusted for covariates including residential area, gender, grade, ethnicity, smoking status, chronic disease status, self-rated health, primary caregiver and highest parental education level.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Distribution of odds ratios for poor sleep quality associated with dietary behaviors and physical activity (Model C).

In the unadjusted model, moderate physical activity was associated with lower odds of poor sleep quality (OR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.58–0.94). However, after adjusting for covariates, the associations for both moderate (OR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.63–1.03) and high physical activity (OR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.68–1.30) were no longer statistically significant. In contrast, screen-based sedentary behavior (≤2 h) remained a robust protective factor, associated with a 31% reduction in the odds of poor sleep quality (OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.61–0.79).

Interaction effects of diet and physical activity on poor sleep quality

After adjusting for covariates, two statistically significant interaction effects emerged (Table 3 and Figure 2). First, a synergistic protective interaction was found between abstaining from alcohol and limiting sugary beverage consumption. Compared to adolescents who engaged in neither behavior, those who both abstained from alcohol and limited sugary drinks had a 42% lower odds of poor sleep quality (OR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.39–0.85).

Table 3.

Interaction effects analysis between dietary behavior and levels of physical activity and sedentary behavior (N = 15,059)

Model A (95% CI) Model B (95% CI)
OR (95% CI) P-value OR (95% CI) P-value
Healthy dining out Physical activity level
   No Low level 1.00 1.00
   No Moderate level 0.74 [0.49,1.12] 0.157 0.80 [0.52,1.23] 0.311
   No High level 0.43 [0.22,0.85] 0.014 0.45 [0.23,0.89] 0.022
   Yes Low level 0.46 [0.41,0.52] <0.001 0.58 [0.51.0.66] <0.001
   Yes Moderate level 0.98 [0.59,1.62] 0.942 0.933 [0.61,1.72] 0.933
   Yes High level 2.70 [1.27,5.75] 0.01 2.81 [1.31,6.04] 0.008
Limited consumption of sugary beverages Abstaining from alcohol
   No No 1.00 1.00
   Yes No 0.67 [0.48,0.94] 0.021 0.86 [0.61,1.22] 0.404
   No Yes 0.72 [0.51,1.01] 0.055 0.81 [0.57,1.14] 0.223
   Yes Yes 0.54 [0.37,0.78] 0.001 0.58 [0.39,0.85] 0.005

Model 1: Univariate analysis including only two interaction variables and their product terms.

Model 2: Adjusted for the other eight factors as confounding variables based on Model 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Interaction effect between Physical activity levels and Healthy dining out (A), and interaction between Abstaining from alcohol and Limited consumption of sugary beverages (B).

Second, a paradoxical antagonistic interaction was observed between healthy dining out and physical activity level. Compared to the reference group (low physical activity and not practicing healthy dining out), adolescents who reported both healthy dining-out habits and engaged in high levels of physical activity had a 2.81 times higher odds of poor sleep quality (OR = 2.81, 95% CI: 1.31–6.04).

Discussion

This large-scale study among Chinese adolescents reveals that while individual healthy dietary habits are correlated with better sleep quality, the interplay between different lifestyle behaviors is complex and linked to both synergistic and counterintuitive outcomes. Our findings highlight that an integrated approach, accounting for these interactions, is essential for designing effective public health interventions.

Independent associations: The primacy of diet

Our study demonstrated the independent association between healthy dietary patterns and better sleep quality. Behaviors such as maintaining a regular diet, having a healthy breakfast, and limiting sugary drinks were strongly associated with better sleep outcomes, which align with extensive literature (Versteeg et al., 2015; Otsuka et al., 2019). Regular meal timing helps synchronize the body’s circadian rhythms (Process C), which are fundamental to regulating sleep–wake cycles (Wehrens et al., 2017). Conversely, high intake of sugar and ultra-processed foods is linked to glycemic instability and inflammation, potentially disrupting sleep architecture (Min et al., 2018). Overconsumption of calories may contribute to obesity, which is a significant risk factor for sleep disorders (Rodrigues et al., 2021; Lee and Cho, 2022). Healthy dining out can reduce the risk of poor sleep quality. Several studies (Mancino et al., 2009; Lee et al., 2016; Matsumoto et al., 2021) show that prolonged dining at restaurants is often associated with higher intake of energy and fat, but lower intake of dietary fiber, vitamin C and various micronutrients. With higher energy intake and lower diet quality, it can result in weight gain and obesity (Choi et al., 2019; Zheng et al., 2021).

The lack of a significant independent association of physical activity level, after adjusting for confounders, is noteworthy. This nonsignificant finding may suggest that its relationship with sleep is either mediated by other factors not fully captured in our model, such as psychological well-being, or that the relationship follows a nonlinear pattern where the benefits of moderate activity are offset by the potential arousal of high-intensity exertion in this specific population. Some studies (Paluska and Schwenk, 2000; Verloigne et al., 2021) suggest that physical activity may be linked to sleep quality through its mediating role in psychology. Limiting sedentary screen time emerged as a robust protective factor, aligning with the WHO 2020 Guidelines, positioning sedentary behavior reduction as a core, independent target for health outcomes (Bull et al., 2020). However, the neurobiological impact of this behavior likely depends on its specific qualitative characteristics. As proposed in recent taxonomies of sedentary behavior, “mentally passive” screen time (e.g., passive viewing) is consistently detrimental to cognitive health, whereas “mentally active” behaviors may have distinct neural correlates (Zhang et al., 2025b). Regarding temporal patterns, the lifespan brain health framework (Zou et al., 2024) and recent meta-analyses (Feter et al., 2024) underscore the cognitive necessity of interrupting sedentary bouts. Our findings thus implicate passive recreational screen exposure as a critical target; its characteristically prolonged, uninterrupted nature displaces sleep while precluding the neuroprotective benefits of frequent activity.

Synergistic and antagonistic interactions: A deeper look into adolescent lifestyles

The most striking finding of this study is the paradoxical interaction whereby the combination of high-level physical activity and healthy dining-out habits was associated with a significantly increased risk of poor sleep quality (OR = 2.81). Unlike the additive health benefits typically assumed, this interaction suggests a “High-Load Lifestyle” pattern, where the physiological and temporal costs of maintaining these behaviors compete directly with sleep recovery.

First, interpreted through the 24-h movement behavior framework (Rollo et al., 2020), adolescent time allocation operates within a finite system where behaviors represent a zero-sum trade-off. Unlike isolated behaviors, the co-occurrence of high-load activities mandates a compositional perspective. Consistent with the “whole-day matters” paradigm, increasing time allocation to physical activity or social dining within a finite 24-h cycle necessitates isotemporal substitution, inevitably displacing sleep duration or pre-sleep quiescence. Both high-level physical activity and dining out are time-intensive activities. Their co-occurrence imposes a substantial “time tax” on the evening schedule. In the specific context of Chinese adolescents, where academic demands already saturate evening hours (Yu et al., 2023; Fan et al., 2025), this dual burden inevitably encroaches upon the sleep window via isotemporal substitution (Zhang et al., 2023). Consequently, the sleep disruption is likely a function of schedule compression rather than the biological effects of the behaviors themselves (Semplonius and Willoughby, 2018).

Second, the interaction precipitates a state of heightened arousal incompatible with sleep initiation. Sleep initiation requires the downregulation of the central nervous system. High-intensity exercise, while metabolically beneficial, induces acute physiological stress responses, including elevated core body temperature and cortisol secretion (Perrier et al., 2024). When coupled with dining out, which serves as a primary vector for adolescent social engagement, the physiological arousal of exercise is compounded by the cognitive and emotional stimulation of social interaction (Salvy et al., 2012). This synergistic arousal may delay the circadian phase and fragment sleep, overriding the nutritional advantages of “healthy” food choices.

Furthermore, the self-reported measure of “healthy dining out” may be a limitation. This term is subjective and could be interpreted differently by adolescents. In contemporary China, dining out is a major social activity for youth, ranging from quick, inexpensive meals to elaborate, trendy gatherings. An adolescent might report choosing “healthy” food options (e.g., non-fried items) during a lengthy, socially stimulating dinner with friends. In this case, the negative impact on sleep would stem from the social context and timing of the meal, not the nutritional content itself. This highlights the need for future research to use more granular measures, such as time-use diaries, to disentangle the type, timing and social context of dining behaviors.

In contrast, the synergistic protective association of combining alcohol abstinence with limited sugary drink consumption is more straightforward. Both alcohol and high sugar intake are known to disrupt sleep. Alcohol fragments REM sleep, while sugary drinks can cause blood sugar spikes and subsequent crashes during the night, leading to awakenings (Smith et al., 2019; Khan et al., 2021). Eliminating both of these disruptive inputs provides a compounded benefit for sleep stability.

Limitations and implications

The study had several limitations. First, as a cross-sectional study, it is restricted to identifying the associations rather than establishing a cause-and-effect relationship. Temporal precedence cannot be determined, and more longitudinal studies are therefore needed to provide further evidence of causality. Second, the applications of the self-administered questionnaire introduced an inevitable self-reporting bias and recall bias. Specifically, the internal consistency of the PSQI (α = 0.68), while comparable to similar large-scale adolescent cohorts, suggests future research should integrate objective actigraphy to corroborate subjective sleep reports. Third, measurement constraints limit the interpretation of specific behavioral variables. While our “Screen-based sedentary behavior (≤2 h)” metric effectively captures recreational sedentary behavior, it excludes the extensive educational sitting inherent to the Chinese academic context. Similarly, the operationalization of “healthy dining out” captured dietary quality but failed to quantify social context or temporal duration. Finally, unmeasured confounding remains a substantial constraint. Future research should incorporate these variables to build a more comprehensive explanatory model.

Despite these limitations, this study has several theoretical and practical contributions. From a theoretical perspective, this study contributes to the existing literature by elucidating the complex, nonlinear interactive associations between dietary behaviors and physical activity on sleep quality. From a practical perspective, given the large sample size covering a representative county, this study had a large sample size, which included all middle schools in the northeast county of China. Practically, these findings advocate for holistic interventions that move beyond isolated behavioral promotion. Effective strategies must address the temporal trade-offs adolescents face, guiding them to balance the scheduling of academics, athletics and social dining to mitigate physiological hyperarousal and protect sleep windows.

Conclusion

This study suggests that healthy dietary behaviors are positively associated with sleep quality among adolescents. More significantly, it uncovers the complex, nonlinear interactions between lifestyle factors. The finding that combining two ostensibly healthy behaviors – high physical activity and healthy dining out – can paradoxically be associated with an increase in the risk of poor sleep provides a critical insight for public health. It suggests that interventions should not simply promote individual healthy behaviors in isolation. Instead, a holistic, 24-h approach is needed, guiding adolescents on how to balance and schedule their activities – academics, exercise, socializing and rest – to avoid antagonistic outcomes and protect their sleep. Educators, parents and policymakers must recognize that promoting adolescent health requires an understanding of these intricate behavioral trade-offs.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank all those who kindly volunteered to participate in the study.

Open peer review

To view the open peer review materials for this article, please visit http://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2026.10138.

Data availability statement

The national dataset used in this research contains personal identifiable information, which was used to link test results and is not available to the public. Any data requests should be made to the corresponding author.

Author contribution

B.H.: Conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, data curation, writing – original draft and visualization.

N.H.: Conceptualization, methodology and investigation.

C.C.: Conceptualization, methodology and investigation.

J.G.: Funding acquisition, project administration, supervision, writing – review and editing. All authors contributed to the refinement, proofreading and double-checking of the figures in the final draft. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript for submission.

Financial support

This work was supported by the Beijing Municipal Social Science Foundation (grant number: 22JYA002). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare none.

Ethical consideration

Before data collection, this project received ethical approval from the Peking University Biomedical Institutional Review Board (No. IRB00001052–24064). All participants and their guardians provided written informed consent after being briefed on the study’s purpose.

References

  1. Borbély A (2022) The two-process model of sleep regulation: Beginnings and outlook †. Journal of Sleep Research 31(4), e13598. 10.1111/jsr.13598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bull FC, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S, Borodulin K, Buman MP, Cardon G, Carty C, Chaput J-P, Chastin S, Chou R, Dempsey PC, DiPietro L, Ekelund U, Firth J, Friedenreich CM, Garcia L, Gichu M, Jago R, Katzmarzyk PT, Lambert E, Leitzmann M, Milton K, Ortega FB, Ranasinghe C, Stamatakis E, Tiedemann A, Troiano RP, van der Ploeg HP, Wari V and Willumsen JF (2020) World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  3. Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF, Monk TH, Berman SR and Kupfer DJ (1989) The Pittsburgh sleep quality index: A new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Research 28(2), 193–213. 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chaput J-P, Tremblay MS, Katzmarzyk PT, Fogelholm M, Hu G, Maher C, Maia J, Olds T, Onywera V, Sarmiento OL, Standage M, Tudor-Locke C, Sampasa-Kanyinga H and ISCOLE Research Group (2018) Sleep patterns and sugar-sweetened beverage consumption among children from around the world. Public Health Nutrition 21(13), 2385–2393. 10.1017/S1368980018000976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Choi M-K, Lee Y-K, Heo Y-R, Hyun T, Lyu E-S, Park H, H-K R and Bae YJ (2019) Association between the frequency of dining out and the risk of obesity, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia among Korean adults. Ecology of Food and Nutrition 58(6), 560–574. 10.1080/03670244.2019.1644327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dohnt H, Gradisar M and Short MA (2012) Insomnia and its symptoms in adolescents: Comparing DSM-IV and ICSD-II diagnostic criteria. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine: JCSM: Official Publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine 8(3), 295–299. 10.5664/jcsm.1918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Falck RS, Davis JC, Li L, Stamatakis E and Liu-Ambrose T (2022) Preventing the ‘24-hour Babel’: The need for a consensus on a consistent terminology scheme for physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep. British Journal of Sports Me dicine 56(7), 367–368. 10.1136/bjsports-2021-104487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fan L, Zhang Z and Li X (2025) The influence of after-school tutoring on the mental health of middle school students: A mediating effect test based on sleep deprivation and academic performance. PLoS One 20(4), e0321048. 10.1371/journal.pone.0321048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Feter N, Ligeza TS, Bashir N, Shanmugam RJ, Montero Herrera B, Aldabbagh T, Usman A-F, Yonezawa A, McCarthy S, Herrera D, Vargas D, Mir EM, Syed T, Desai S, Shi H, Kim W, Puhar N, Gowda K, Nowak O, Kuang J, Quiroz F, Caputo EL, Yu Q, Pionke JJ, Zou L, Raine LB, Gratton G, Fabiani M, Lubans DR, Hallal PC and Pindus DM (2024) Effects of reducing sedentary behaviour by increasing physical activity, on cognitive function, brain function and structure across the lifespan: A systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine 58(21), 1295–1306. 10.1136/bjsports-2024-108444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Foster RG (2020) Sleep, circadian rhythms and health. Interface Focus 10(3), 20190098. 10.1098/rsfs.2019.0098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Healy KL, Morris AR and Liu AC (2021) Circadian synchrony: Sleep, nutrition, and physical activity. Frontiers in Network Physiology 1. 10.3389/fnetp.2021.732243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kansagra S (2020) Sleep disorders in adolescents. Pediatrics 145(Supplement_2), S204–S209. 10.1542/peds.2019-2056I. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Khan A, Dix C, Burton NW, Khan SR and Uddin R (2021) Association of carbonated soft drink and fast food intake with stress-related sleep disturbance among adolescents: A global perspective from 64 countries. EClinicalMedicine 31, 100681. 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Krueger JM (2008) The role of cytokines in sleep regulation. Current Pharmaceutical Design 14(32), 3408–3416. 10.2174/138161208786549281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kruger AK, Reither EN, Peppard PE, Krueger PM and Hale L (2014) Do sleep-deprived adolescents make less-healthy food choices? The British Journal of Nutrition 111(10), 1898–1904. 10.1017/S0007114514000130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lee JH and Cho J (2022) Sleep and obesity. Sleep Medicine Clinics 17(1), 111–116. 10.1016/j.jsmc.2021.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lee KW, Song WO and Cho MS (2016) Dietary quality differs by consumption of meals prepared at home vs. outside in Korean adults. Nutrition Research and Practice 10(3), 294–304. 10.4162/nrp.2016.10.3.294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Liang M, Guo L, Huo J and Zhou G (2021) Prevalence of sleep disturbances in Chinese adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 16(3), e0247333. 10.1371/journal.pone.0247333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lissak G (2018) Adverse physiological and psychological effects of screen time on children and adolescents: Literature review and case study. Environmental Research 164, 149–157. 10.1016/j.envres.2018.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mancino L, Todd J and Lin B-H (2009) Separating what we eat from where: Measuring the effect of food away from home on diet quality. Food Policy 34, 557–562. 10.1016/j.foodpol.2009.09.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Matsumoto M, Saito A, Okada C, Okada E, Tajima R and Takimoto H (2021) Consumption of meals prepared away from home is associated with inadequacy of dietary fiber, vitamin C and mineral intake among Japanese adults: Analysis from the 2015 National Health and nutrition survey. Nutrition Journal 20(1), 40. 10.1186/s12937-021-00693-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Min C, Kim H-J, Park I-S, Park B, Kim J-H, Sim S and Choi HG (2018) The association between sleep duration, sleep quality, and food consumption in adolescents: A cross-sectional study using the Korea youth risk behavior web-based survey. BMJ Open 8(7), e022848. 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Otsuka Y, Kaneita Y, Itani O, Osaki Y, Higuchi S, Kanda H, Nakagome S, Jike M and Ohida T (2019) Association between unhealthy dietary behaviors and sleep disturbances among Japanese adolescents: A nationwide representative survey. Sleep and Biological Rhythms 17(1), 93–102. 10.1007/s41105-018-0193-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Paluska SA and Schwenk TL (2000) Physical activity and mental health: Current concepts. Sports Medicine (Auckland, N.Z). 29(3), 167–180. 10.2165/00007256-200029030-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Passos MHP, Silva HA, Pitangui ACR, Oliveira VMA, Lima AS and Araújo RC (2017) Reliability and validity of the Brazilian version of the Pittsburgh sleep quality index in adolescents. Jornal de Pediatria 93(2), 200–206. 10.1016/j.jped.2016.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Perrier J, Langeard A, Ouma CK, Sesboüé B, Clochon P, Prevost J-N, Bertran F, Davenne D and Bessot N (2024) Effects of acute bouts of evening resistance or endurance exercises on sleep EEG and salivary cortisol. Frontiers in Physiology 15, 1313545. 10.3389/fphys.2024.1313545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rodrigues GD, Fiorelli EM, Furlan L, Montano N and Tobaldini E (2021) Obesity and sleep disturbances: The ‘chicken or the egg’ question. European Journal of Internal Medicine 92, 11–16. 10.1016/j.ejim.2021.04.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Rollo S, Antsygina O and Tremblay MS (2020) The whole day matters: Understanding 24-hour movement guideline adherence and relationships with health indicators across the lifespan. Journal of Sport and Health Science 9(6), 493–510. 10.1016/j.jshs.2020.07.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Salvy S-J, de la Haye K, Bowker JC and Hermans RCJ (2012) Influence of peers and friends on children’s and adolescents’ eating and activity behaviors. Physiology & Behavior 106(3), 369–378. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.03.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sampasa-Kanyinga H, Colman I, Goldfield GS, Janssen I, Wang J, Podinic I, Tremblay MS, Saunders TJ, Sampson M and Chaput J-P (2020) Combinations of physical activity, sedentary time, and sleep duration and their associations with depressive symptoms and other mental health problems in children and adolescents: A systematic review. The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 17(1), 72. 10.1186/s12966-020-00976-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Semplonius T and Willoughby T (2018) Long-term links between physical activity and sleep quality. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 50(12), 2418–2424. 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Setyowati A and Chung M-H (2021) Validity and reliability of the Indonesian version of the Pittsburgh sleep quality index in adolescents. International Journal of Nursing Practice 27(5), e12856. 10.1111/ijn.12856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Smith I, Saed K and St-Onge M-P (2019) Chapter 19 - sleep and food intake. In Grandner MA (ed), Sleep and Health. Academic Press, pp. 243–255. 10.1016/B978-0-12-815373-4.00019-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. St-Onge M-P, Grandner MA, Brown D, Conroy MB, Jean-Louis G, Coons M, Bhatt DL and American Heart Association Obesity, Behavior Change, Diabetes, and Nutrition Committees of the Council on Lifestyle and Cardiometabolic Health; Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young; Council on Clinical Cardiology; and Stroke Council (2016) Sleep duration and quality: Impact on lifestyle behaviors and cardiometabolic health. Circulation 134(18), e367–e386. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Tan X, van Egmond LT, Cedernaes J and Benedict C (2020) The role of exercise-induced peripheral factors in sleep regulation. Molecular Metabolism 42, 101096. 10.1016/j.molmet.2020.101096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Verloigne M, Van Oeckel V, Brondeel R and Poppe L (2021) Bidirectional associations between sedentary time and sleep duration among 12- to 14-year-old adolescents. BMC Public Health 21(1), 1673. 10.1186/s12889-021-11694-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Versteeg RI, Serlie MJ, Kalsbeek A and la Fleur SE (2015) Serotonin, a possible intermediate between disturbed circadian rhythms and metabolic disease. Neuroscience 301, 155–167. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.05.067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Wang H, Xin X and Pan Y (2025) The best approaches and doses of exercise for improving sleep quality: A network meta-analysis and dose-response relationship study. BMC Public Health 25(1), 1371. 10.1186/s12889-025-22570-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wehrens SMT, Christou S, Isherwood C, Middleton B, Gibbs MA, Archer SN, Skene DJ and Johnston JD (2017) Meal timing regulates the human circadian system. Current Biology: CB 27(12), 1768–1775.e3. 10.1016/j.cub.2017.04.059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wu Z, Chang G and Ji G (2023) Analysis of exercise density and exercise load in different physical classes for second-year junior high school students from Beijing City. Chinese Journal of School Health 44(12), 1828–1832. 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2023.12.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Yu T, Xu D, Fan J, Hua H, Guo X, Zhang Y, Jiang S, Huang L, Jiang Y, Wang Y, C-H Y and Xu J (2023) Homework, sleep insufficiency and adolescent neurobehavioral problems: Shanghai adolescent cohort. Journal of Affective Disorders 332. 10.1016/j.jad.2023.04.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhang Z, Chen Y, Yu Q, Li J, Zou L, Mavilidi MF, Green CS, Owen N, Hallgren M, Raichlen D, Lu S, Alexander GE, Paas F and Herold F (2025b) A neurobiological taxonomy of sedentary behavior for brain health. Trends in Neurosciences 48(11), 853–864. 10.1016/j.tins.2025.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhang Y, Ma S, Chen C and Liu S (2017) Physical activity guidelines for Chinese children and adolescents. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Pediatrics 12(6), 401. 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5501.2017.06.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Zhang P, Wang Y, Chen X, Yan W, Zhu Y and Peng K (2023) Beyond the bell: Exploring the link between time allocation on extracurricular activities and academic performance in Chinese adolescents. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth. 10.1080/02673843.2023.2277379. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Zhang H, Wang S, Huang Y, Xiu L and Wang Y (2025a) Inverted-U association between daily steps and WHO-5 in university students: Non-linear modeling and robustness checks. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 19, 1693386. 10.3389/fnbeh.2025.1693386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Zhang N, Zhu W, Zhang M and Ma G (2022) Interpretation on dietary guidelines for Chinese school-aged children (2022. Chinese Journal of School Health 43(6), 805–808. 10.16835/j.cnki.1000-9817.2022.06.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Zheng J, Gao L, Xue H, Xue B, Zhao L, Wang Y, Wei J and Wang Y (2021) Eating-out behaviors, associated factors and associations with obesity in Chinese school children: Findings from the childhood obesity study in China mega-cities. European Journal of Nutrition 60(6), 3003–3012. 10.1007/s00394-020-02475-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Zhou Y, Wang L, Chen R and Wang B (2025) Associations between class-level factors and student physical activity during physical education lessons in China. The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 22, 1. 10.1186/s12966-024-01703-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Zou L, Herold F, Cheval B, Wheeler MJ, Pindus DM, Erickson KI, Raichlen DA, Alexander GE, Müller NG, Dunstan DW, Kramer AF, Hillman CH, Hallgren M, Ekelund U, Maltagliati S and Owen N (2024) Sedentary behavior and lifespan brain health. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 28(4), 369–382. 10.1016/j.tics.2024.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Glob Ment Health (Camb). doi: 10.1017/gmh.2026.10138.pr2

Review: The synergistic effects of diet and physical activity on sleep quality among Chinese adolescents: A comprehensive cross-sectional study — R0/PR2

Anonymous

Thank you for the opportunity to review this important and well-executed study. The manuscript presents fascinating findings on a topic of great public health relevance. I commend the authors on their large sample size and sophisticated analysis of interaction effects, which yields truly interesting results.

To further strengthen the manuscript, I would be grateful if the authors could clarify a few points for me:

1.Regarding the measurement of sleep quality, the Cronbach’s alpha for the PSQI in this sample is reported as 0.68. Could the authors please comment on this value, as it is somewhat lower than the thresholds commonly cited for established scales?

2.The operational definition of physical activity intensity is based on the duration and frequency of exercise. Given that nearly all Chinese middle school students participate in mandatory Physical Education (PE) classes, could the authors help me understand how this method distinguishes between students who only participate in PE and those who engage in additional voluntary exercise? I was wondering if this might influence the interpretation of the ‘low activity’ category.

3.The introduction effectively sets the stage for the study. However, I was curious if the authors considered exploring the existing literature on the potential for a non-linear (e.g., inverted U-shape) relationship between physical activity intensity and sleep outcomes? A slightly more detailed synthesis of the established mechanisms and complexities in the PA-sleep relationship might provide an even stronger theoretical foundation for the intriguing interaction effects found later.

4.Similarly, regarding the literature review, I was wondering if a more detailed summary of the key established findings and consensus views on both diet-sleep and PA-sleep relationships could be integrated to further contextualize the study’s hypotheses?

Thank you again for sharing your valuable work. I look forward to seeing the authors' responses.

Glob Ment Health (Camb). doi: 10.1017/gmh.2026.10138.pr3

Review: The synergistic effects of diet and physical activity on sleep quality among Chinese adolescents: A comprehensive cross-sectional study — R0/PR3

Anonymous

Overall, Strength and Significance

The study’s primary strength lies in its very large sample size (N=15,059), which provides high statistical power and enhances the generalizability of findings within the target population (Chinese middle school students). The use of validated instruments like the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) ensures the reliability of the outcome measure. Most significantly, the research moved beyond simple independent associations to explore behavioral interactions, which is critical for developing real-world, integrated public health interventions.

General comment

Methodology

The most critical limitation, inherent to the design, is the cross-sectional nature of the data. While the study suggests associations, it cannot establish causality. For example, poor sleep quality might lead to unhealthy dietary choices, rather than the diet causing the poor sleep. This limitation should be explicitly acknowledged when discussing the protective nature of the identified behaviors.

Result

The finding that the combination of healthy dining-out practices and high physical activity was associated with 181% increased odds of poor sleep quality (OR=2.81) is highly counterintuitive and requires a more rigorous discussion. While the conclusion correctly labels this antagonistic, the mechanism suggested by the term “antagonistic” (counter-productive) is insufficient. Potential concerns include:

1. High physical activity, especially if coupled with frequent dining out, might simply reflect a highly time-constrained lifestyle, leading to later bedtimes or sleep displacement rather than a true biological antagonism between the two behaviors.

2. Adolescents engaged in intense, high-level sports and who need to carefully manage diet/social life might be under higher academic or athletic stress, which is the true driver of poor sleep.

3. Definition of “Healthy Dining-Out”: The scale used for this variable need’s scrutiny. If it measures frequency rather than quality of choices, increased dining-out frequency might simply indicate more late-night social activities that cut into sleep.

Discussion

The Discussion section requires careful revision to maintain consistency with the cross-sectional study design. Specifically, language used in sections, such as Section 4.1 on page 10, must be modified to avoid implying causality. Terms suggesting cause-and-effect should be replaced with language that denotes only association, correlation, or relationship.

Glob Ment Health (Camb). doi: 10.1017/gmh.2026.10138.pr4

Recommendation: The synergistic effects of diet and physical activity on sleep quality among Chinese adolescents: A comprehensive cross-sectional study — R0/PR4

Editor: Liye Zou1

Dear Authors,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health. We appreciate your efforts in addressing an important topic related to lifestyle behaviors and sleep health among adolescents. Your study benefits from a very large sample size and the analysis of behavioral interactions offers valuable potential insights for global mental health promotion. However, after careful evaluation of both the manuscript and the detailed peer review feedback, we believe that major revisions are necessary before the manuscript can be considered for publication.

Below we summarize key issues raised by the reviewers that require your attention:

1.Clarifications in Measurement and Operationalization

Reviewer 1 requests clarification on important methodological points:

• The relatively low Cronbach’s alpha for the PSQI (α = 0.68) should be justified with references to prior research and potential sample-specific characteristics.

• The definition of physical activity intensity may not adequately differentiate mandatory school PE from voluntary exercise, influencing interpretation of the “low activity” category.

Please expand your methodological justification and acknowledge potential limitations.

2.Strengthening the Literature Foundation

Reviewer 1 recommends enhancement of the introduction and rationale:

• Include discussion of potential non-linear relationships (e.g., inverted U-shaped) between physical activity and sleep outcomes.

• Provide a more detailed synthesis of well-established evidence on both diet–sleep and PA–sleep relationships.

This will help ground your hypotheses more robustly in prior theory.

3.Explain the Counterintuitive Interaction Effect

Reviewer 2 highlights that the finding of an antagonistic effect — high PA combined with healthy dining-out behavior associated with increased odds of poor sleep (OR = 2.81) — requires deeper scientific interpretation:

• Consider potential confounding factors such as time pressure, late-night social or sport commitments, or stress from competitive activities.

• Revisit the definition and scoring of “healthy dining-out” given its possible relationship with social/nighttime behavior rather than nutritional quality.

A more comprehensive interpretation will strengthen the credibility of this novel finding.

4. Modify Language to Avoid Implied Causality

Reviewer 2 emphasizes that the cross-sectional design does not support causal inference:

• Please revise all statements suggesting cause-and-effect to use terms such as association, relationship, or correlation.

• Ensure consistency across the Abstract, Discussion, and Conclusion sections.

This adjustment is essential to maintain methodological accuracy.

5.Additional Editorial Recommendations

To further enhance clarity and rigor:

• Expand the Limitations section (measurement constraints, unmeasured stress variables, self-report bias).

• Provide justification for categorizations of physical activity and dietary behaviors.

• Improve focus and flow in the Discussion to highlight the public health implications for adolescent sleep and mental well-being.

Editorial Decision: Major Revision Required

We invite you to revise your manuscript carefully in response to the above points and the detailed reviewer feedback. When resubmitting to Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health, please include:(1) A comprehensive point-by-point response document; (2) A tracked-changes version of the manuscript highlighting all text modifications

We believe that, with these substantial revisions, your work has strong potential to contribute meaningfully to global mental health research and intervention strategies for youth.

Thank you again for choosing Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health. We look forward to receiving your revised submission.

With best regards,

Dr. Liye Zou

Associate Editor

Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health

Glob Ment Health (Camb). doi: 10.1017/gmh.2026.10138.pr5

Decision: The synergistic effects of diet and physical activity on sleep quality among Chinese adolescents: A comprehensive cross-sectional study — R0/PR5

Editor: Judith Bass1

No accompanying comment.

Glob Ment Health (Camb). doi: 10.1017/gmh.2026.10138.pr7

Review: The synergistic effects of diet and physical activity on sleep quality among Chinese adolescents: A comprehensive cross-sectional study — R1/PR7

Anonymous

Regarding the submitted manuscript, the following comments are put forward concerning the reference citation section:

Issue of Unranslated Cited Literatures

There are some cited literatures in the manuscript that have not been translated. It is recommended to supplement and complete the corresponding translation work:

For English cited literatures in a Chinese manuscript, it is necessary to add Chinese translations of the literature titles and Chinese paraphrases of the core contents of the literatures, so as to facilitate Chinese readers to understand the core value of the literatures.

For foreign language literatures cited that are not in Chinese or English, corresponding Chinese translation contents should also be supplemented.

Reminder for Confirming the Format of Literature Contents

Please refer to the literature citation format specifications required by the manuscript (such as GB/T 7714, APA, MLA and other corresponding format standards) and confirm the following contents one by one:

Whether the bibliographic items of the cited literatures are complete, including author(s), literature title, journal name/book name, publication year, volume/issue, page numbers, etc.

Whether the corresponding relationship between citation marks and the list of references at the end of the manuscript is accurate.

Whether the formats of different types of literatures (journal papers, dissertations, monographs, conference papers, etc.) meet the requirements.

Glob Ment Health (Camb). doi: 10.1017/gmh.2026.10138.pr8

Recommendation: The synergistic effects of diet and physical activity on sleep quality among Chinese adolescents: A comprehensive cross-sectional study — R1/PR8

Editor: Liye Zou1

Dear authors,

Thanks for your careful revision. Before accepting this manuscript, Additional editorial comments for the revision. Your manuscript already treats lifestyle factors as interacting and time-competing behaviors (including screen-based sedentary behavior and a “24-hour approach”). However, the Discussion needs a substantially deeper treatment of sedentary behavior and the broader “24-hour movement behavior” framework (physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep as co-dependent parts of a finite day). Please revise the Discussion to include the following:

1.Position sedentary behavior as a core guideline target (not a secondary covariate).

The 2020 WHO Guidelines explicitly recommend reducing sedentary behaviors across age groups, and for children/adolescents emphasize limiting sedentary time (with particular concern for recreational screen time), even though evidence was insufficient to specify a single universal sedentary threshold. In this context, please interpret your “≤2h electronic-device sedentary behavior” measure more carefully (what it captures and what it misses, including total sitting and domain/context). Bull, F. C., Al-Ansari, S. S., Biddle, S., Borodulin, K., Buman, M. P., Cardon, G., Carty, C., Chaput, J. P., Chastin, S., Chou, R., Dempsey, P. C., DiPietro, L., Ekelund, U., Firth, J., Friedenreich, C. M., Garcia, L., Gichu, M., Jago, R., Katzmarzyk, P. T., Lambert, E., … Willumsen, J. F. (2020). World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. British journal of sports medicine, 54(24), 1451–1462. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955

2. Discuss the time-use constraint and “trade-offs” explicitly (24-hour movement behaviors).

Because increasing time in one behavior necessarily displaces time in another, associations with sleep and brain health should be framed as time reallocations (isotemporal substitution/compositional thinking), not independent effects. The “whole-day matters” paradigm and low adherence to integrated 24-hour recommendations should be acknowledged. This framing is also important when interpreting any counterintuitive patterns (for example, physically active adolescents may also have schedules, training times, or stressors that affect sleep). Rollo, S., Antsygina, O., & Tremblay, M. S. (2020). The whole day matters: Understanding 24-hour movement guideline adherence and relationships with health indicators across the lifespan. Journal of sport and health science, 9(6), 493–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2020.07.004

3. Add nuance: not all sedentary behavior is equivalent for brain health.

Emerging work emphasizes that sedentary behavior effects can be context-dependent (mentally passive vs mentally active; content and cognitive engagement), which is directly relevant to interpreting “screen time” measures. Zhang, Z., Chen, Y., Yu, Q., Li, J., Zou, L., Mavilidi, M. F., Green, C. S., Owen, N., Hallgren, M., Raichlen, D., Lu, S., Alexander, G. E., Paas, F., & Herold, F. (2025). A neurobiological taxonomy of sedentary behavior for brain health. Trends in neurosciences, 48(11), 853–864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2025.09.002

Please integrate this nuance to avoid implying that all sedentary time is uniformly harmful or that reducing screen time alone fully captures the sedentary-behavior construct.

4. Integrate evidence on sedentary behavior, activity breaks, and brain outcomes across the lifespan (as context, not as a new aim). Briefly summarize that (i) sedentary behavior has been linked to brain health outcomes across ages (Zou, L., Herold, F., Cheval, B., Wheeler, M. J., Pindus, D. M., Erickson, K. I., Raichlen, D. A., Alexander, G. E., Müller, N. G., Dunstan, D. W., Kramer, A. F., Hillman, C. H., Hallgren, M., Ekelund, U., Maltagliati, S., & Owen, N. (2024). Sedentary behavior and lifespan brain health. Trends in cognitive sciences, 28(4), 369–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2024.02.003), and (ii) interrupting prolonged sitting with physical activity shows measurable cognitive/brain-relevant effects in experimental and synthesis work (Effects of reducing sedentary behaviour by increasing physical activity, on cognitive function, brain function and structure across the lifespan: a systematic review and meta-analysis).

5. Terminology and conceptual clarity.

Please use consistent terminology for the integrated construct (physical activity, sedentary behavior, sleep) and acknowledge ongoing efforts to standardize language in this rapidly growing area. Falck, R. S., Davis, J. C., Li, L., Stamatakis, E., & Liu-Ambrose, T. (2022). Preventing the ‘24-hour Babel’: the need for a consensus on a consistent terminology scheme for physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep. British journal of sports medicine, 56(7), 367–368. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2021-104487

Glob Ment Health (Camb). doi: 10.1017/gmh.2026.10138.pr9

Decision: The synergistic effects of diet and physical activity on sleep quality among Chinese adolescents: A comprehensive cross-sectional study — R1/PR9

Editor: Judith Bass1

No accompanying comment.

Glob Ment Health (Camb). doi: 10.1017/gmh.2026.10138.pr11

Recommendation: The synergistic effects of diet and physical activity on sleep quality among Chinese adolescents: A comprehensive cross-sectional study — R2/PR11

Editor: Liye Zou1

No accompanying comment.

Glob Ment Health (Camb). doi: 10.1017/gmh.2026.10138.pr12

Decision: The synergistic effects of diet and physical activity on sleep quality among Chinese adolescents: A comprehensive cross-sectional study — R2/PR12

Editor: Judith Bass1

No accompanying comment.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Availability Statement

    The national dataset used in this research contains personal identifiable information, which was used to link test results and is not available to the public. Any data requests should be made to the corresponding author.


    Articles from Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

    RESOURCES