Skip to main content
ACS Omega logoLink to ACS Omega
. 2026 Jan 23;11(5):8141–8153. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.5c10549

Vacancy-Mediated Bound Magnetic Polarons as the Driving Mechanism for Ferromagnetism in Fe-Doped SnO2 Nanowires

David Montalvo , Do Minh Hoat ‡,, Virginia Gómez-Vidales §, Wencel José de la Cruz Hernández , Santiago Camacho-López , Karime Carrera , Víctor Orozco , Jonathan Guerrero-Sánchez , Manuel Herrera †,*
PMCID: PMC12903008  PMID: 41696218

Abstract

We report that room-temperature ferromagnetism in Fe-doped SnO2 nanowires arises from the interaction between Fe3+ dopants and singly ionized oxygen vacancies (VO′), mediated through bound magnetic polarons (BMPs). Combining experimental characterization with density functional theory (DFT), we demonstrate that although isolated oxygen vacancies are intrinsically nonmagnetic, their presence between Fe atoms stabilizes ferromagnetic coupling through shared BMP electrons. Raman spectroscopy and XPS confirmed the substitutional incorporation of Fe3+ into the SnO2 lattice, while CL and EPR revealed the presence of oxygen-deficient environments and directly identified the singly ionized oxygen vacancy centers (VO′), whose density increases with Fe incorporation. Magnetic measurements showed enhanced saturation magnetization and coercivity, directly correlated with VO′ signals. DFT calculations further supported these findings by identifying Fe–VO–Fe complexes as the most stable configurations under O-rich conditions. This joint experimental–theoretical study provides microscopic evidence that vacancy–dopant interactions drive ferromagnetism in Fe-doped SnO2 nanowires. The results highlight a defect-mediated mechanism that establishes oxide-based dilute magnetic semiconductors as promising candidates for spintronic applications.


graphic file with name ao5c10549_0020.jpg


graphic file with name ao5c10549_0018.jpg

1. Introduction

Dilute magnetic semiconductors (DMS) have emerged as a compelling class of materials for next-generation spintronic technologies, owing to their ability to combine charge and spin functionalities within a single platform. These materials hold great promise for the development of spin-based devices such as spin transistors, magnetic sensors, and nonvolatile memory, where room-temperature spin polarization and control are essential. ,

Among the various oxide-based DMS candidates, tin dioxide (SnO2) has attracted particular interest due to its inherent n-type conductivity, wide band gap (3.6 eV), chemical stability, and optical transparency. When doped with transition metals such as iron (Fe), SnO2 has been reported to exhibit room-temperature ferromagnetism (RTFM). ,, Fe presents several advantages as a dopant compared with other transition metals: its ionic radius in octahedral coordination (Fe3+: 0.645 Å) is close to that of Sn4+ (0.690 Å), enabling substitution at Sn sites with minimal lattice distortion. In addition, Fe3+ carries a relatively large magnetic moment (∼3 μB per ion), and is abundant and low-cost, making it suitable for large-scale applications. Its abundance and low cost make it ideal for developing technologies in large volumes. Furthermore, doping with Fe maintains the optical transparency of SnO2. The coexistence of magnetic order and transparent-conducting behavior makes Fe-doped SnO2 a promising functional component for oxide-based spintronic devices, where spin-polarized transport, magnetic layers, and transparent contacts are required. Importantly, Fe incorporation preserves the optical transparency of SnO2. The coexistence of magnetic order, transparent conducting behavior, and chemical stability makes Fe-doped SnO2 a promising functional material for oxide-based spintronic devices requiring spin-polarized transport, magnetic layers, and transparent contacts.

Despite substantial experimental and theoretical progress, the fundamental origin of ferromagnetism in Fe-doped SnO2 remains a subject of debate. Various mechanisms have been proposed, including carrier-mediated exchange interactions (e.g., RKKY), double exchange, and defect-induced magnetism. , Among these, the role of point defects, especially oxygen vacancies (VO), has gained significant attention as a decisive factor influencing the observed magnetic properties. Factors such as nanostructure size, lattice strain, dopant oxidation state, and defect concentration have all been shown to critically affect magnetic ordering in DMS.

In particular, the Bound Magnetic Polaron (BMP) model has emerged as a promising framework for explaining defect-driven ferromagnetism in oxide semiconductors. According to this model, electrons localized at point defects, such as single-ionized oxygen vacancies (VO′), interact with the magnetic moments of nearby Fe3+ ions, resulting in the formation of localized ferromagnetic regions (polarons). When these regions overlap sufficiently, they establish long-range ferromagnetic order across the material. ,, In this study, we explore the relationship between structural defects and the ferromagnetic behavior of Fe-doped SnO2 nanowires synthesized by a physical vapor deposition method. Using a combination of cathodoluminescence (CL) and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy, we identify and characterize oxygen vacancies and their role in mediating ferromagnetic interactions. Our findings provide strong experimental support for the BMP model as the primary mechanism behind RTFM in these nanostructures and contribute to a deeper understanding of defect-mediated magnetism in oxide-based DMS materials.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Section

Undoped SnO2 nanostructures were synthesized by thermal evaporation of high-purity SnO2 powder (Aldrich Co., 99.999%) in a horizontal quartz-tube furnace (Lindberg/Blue M). Approximately 50 mg of SnO2 powder was placed in an alumina boat at the center of the tube. SiO2/Si­(100) substrates (Ted Pella, Inc.) were positioned downstream at a distance of 12–15 cm from the source material, where the temperature ranges between 650–750 °C. Before heating, the system was evacuated to 1 × 10–2 Torr and subsequently backfilled with ultrahigh-purity argon (Infra Co., 99.999%) to a working pressure of 130 mTorr. During growth, an Ar flow of 10–20 sccm was maintained using a mass-flow controller. The furnace temperature was then raised to 1300 °C at a ramp rate of 20 °C/min and held for 45 min to promote vapor–solid growth of SnO2 nanowires. Fe-doped SnO2 nanowires were prepared using the same configuration, except that iron­(II) acetate (C4H6O4Fe, Aldrich Co., 99.999%) was uniformly mixed with the SnO2 powder in the source boat at concentrations corresponding to the values listed in Table . The presence of the Fe precursor lowers the local oxygen chemical potential at the evaporation zone, necessitating an adjustment in the growth temperature accordingly (650–720 °C at the substrate position). After the dwell time, the furnace was allowed to cool naturally to room temperature under continuous Ar flow to prevent postgrowth oxidation. All samples were stored in sealed containers under ambient conditions prior to characterization.

1. Growth Parameters and Elemental Composition of Undoped and Fe-Doped SnO2 Nanowires Synthesized at Different Temperatures, Determined by EDS and XPS .

    EDS (at. %)
XPS (at. %)
Sample Growth Temperature (°C) Sn ± 0.3 O ± 0.3 Fe ± 0.1 Sn 3p3/2 ± 2.9 O 1s ± 7.0 Fe 2p3/2 ± 0.2
1 650 33.4 66.6 - - - -
2 720 32.9 66.6 0.5 28.8 69.6 1.6
3 650 32.9 66.4 0.7 28.6 69.5 1.9
a

Fe incorporation into the SnO2 lattice is confirmed.

The elemental composition of the samples was determined using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) equipped with an Oxford X-Max detector. Quantitative analysis was performed using INCA software (Oxford Instruments) following standard calibration procedures. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were carried out using a SPECS system equipped with a PHOIBOS WAL analyzer and an Al Kα source (1486.6 eV). Peak fitting and quantification were conducted using CasaXPS software (Version 2.3.24PR1.0, 1999–2021, Casa Software Ltd.). Quantitative analysis was based on the relative sensitivity factors (RSF) provided by CasaXPS: Sn 3p3/2 = 9.35, O 1s = 2.93, and Fe 2p3/2 = 14.8. The typical uncertainty associated with quantitative XPS analysis is 5–10% (relative). Crystal structure characterization was performed on a Philips X’Pert X-ray diffractometer using Cu–Kα radiation (λ = 0.154 nm). Raman spectra were obtained using a Dimension-P2 λs system with a 532 nm Nd:YAG excitation laser.

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) analyses were carried out using PHI 535 and SPECS systems, respectively, both equipped with aluminum anodes. High-resolution XPS spectra were recorded using 300 scans and calibrated to the C 1s peak at 284.8 eV. All spectra were deconvoluted using CasaXPS (Version 2.3.24PR1.0, 1999–2021, Casa Software Ltd.). AES measurements were performed with a 3 keV electron beam as the excitation source. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectra were acquired using a JEOL JES-TE300 spectrometer operating in X-band mode with a modulation frequency of 100 kHz and a cylindrical TE011 cavity. The external magnetic field was calibrated with a JEOL ES-FC5 gaussmeter, and spectra were recorded in first derivative mode at a microwave frequency of 9.44 GHz and a power of 20 mW. Signal processing and simulations were performed using ES-IPRITS/TE (Data System Version 3) software. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and localized EDS analyses on individual nanowires were carried out using a JEOL JEM-2100F (STEM) operating at 200 keV. Morphology characterization was conducted using a JEOL JSM-7800F scanning electron microscope. Cathodoluminescence (CL) measurements were performed at room temperature over the UV–visible spectral range using a Gatan MonoCL4 system coupled to a JEOL FIB-4500 SEM. All spectral deconvolutions, including Gaussian fitting and extraction of fwhm and correlation coefficients (R ), were performed using the MagicPlot software (Version 2.9.3). The magnetic behavior of the samples was determined using a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) attached to an Evercool-Physical Properties Measurement System from Quantum Design. Magnetization measurements were carried out at room temperature.

It should be noted that techniques such as Raman spectroscopy, CL, TEM, and VSM do not yield statistical data sets for which error bars are typically defined. The structural and spectroscopic features reported in this work were verified by analyzing multiple nanowires in TEM and CL measurements, and by performing repeated measurements on each sample for the VSM technique.

2.2. Theory and Calculations

To gain a deeper understanding of the potential formation of the Bound Magnetic Polaron (BMP) and the way it stabilizes the Fe neighbors, we performed density functional theory calculations considering several scenarios. The calculations were carried out in the Vienna Ab initio Simulation Package, which uses the projector-augmented wave method to sample the ion-electron interaction. , The electronic states were expanded using plane waves with an energy cutoff of 500 eV. The exchange and correlation term in the Kohn–Sham Hamiltonian was treated according to the PBE parametrization. The bulk SnO2 structure crystallized in the rutile structure and space group P42/mnm. Our optimized lattice parameters are a = 4.74 Å and c = 3.21 Å, which agree well with the experimental values. Structural optimization was achieved when the energy differences were lower than 1 × 10–4 and the force components were lower than 0.01 eV/Å. The k-point meshes used in this work were selected based on convergence tests performed for both the bulk and defect-containing supercells. For the rutile SnO2 primitive cell, an 8 × 8 × 12 Monkhorst–Pack grid was found to converge the total energy, forces, and magnetic moments within 1 meV/atom. The defect calculations were performed in a 2 × 2 × 3 supercell, whose enlarged real-space dimensions reduce the size of the Brillouin zone proportionally. Accordingly, a 4 × 4 × 4 mesh provides a k-point density equivalent to the 8 × 8 × 12 grid used in the bulk. This choice ensures fully converged electronic and magnetic properties while maintaining comparable sampling density along each reciprocal-space direction.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure displays the X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of all samples, exhibiting peaks corresponding to the rutile-type tetragonal structure of SnO2 (PDF card #88-0287). No additional peaks related to secondary phases, such as iron oxide compounds, were detected. This confirms that Fe atoms were successfully incorporated into the SnO2 lattice without the formation of segregated phases. The main diffraction peaks, (110), (101), and (211), agree with previously reported patterns for SnO2 nanowires, , supporting both the phase purity and crystallographic orientation of the synthesized materials.

1.

1

XRD patterns of Samples 1–3, indexed to the rutile-type tetragonal SnO2 (PDF #88-0287). The absence of secondary phases confirms phase purity, while weak reflections (*) correspond to metallic Sn traces.

To further probe lattice dynamics and assess possible distortions introduced by Fe incorporation, Raman spectroscopy measurements were employed to evaluate the vibrational modes of SnO2 nanowires. Tetragonal rutile SnO2 crystallizes in the P42/mnm space group (point group D4h), for which group-theory predicts four first-order Raman-active optical phonon modes at the Γ point: A1g, B1g, B2g and Eg. In good agreement with previous experimental studies on bulk crystals and nanostructures, the observed Raman peaks at ∼475 cm–1, ∼632–634 cm–1 and ∼770–774 cm–1 were assigned to the Eg, A1g and B2g modes, respectively. The A1g mode corresponds to symmetric in-plane stretching of Sn–O bonds, the B2g mode also involves in-plane stretching, although it is typically weaker, and the Eg mode is associated with bending of the Sn–O bonds. , Figure presents the Raman spectra of the samples. In the undoped SnO2, distinct peaks at 474, 632, and 774 cm–1 were observed, corresponding to the Eg, A1g, and B2g modes, respectively. In Fe-doped samples, these modes remain clearly visible. The reduced intensity of the Eg and B2g modes in Sample 2 is attributed to the lower nanowire density on the substrate, which decreases the effective Raman scattering volume. , It should be noted that Raman intensity in nanowire ensembles depends strongly on the nanowire surface density and the available interacting volume, rather than solely on crystallinity. A lower density of nanostructures, therefore, yields weaker Raman signals, without implying diminished crystallinity, as confirmed independently by XRD. The vibrational signatures in Figure confirm that the rutile crystal structure is preserved after Fe incorporation, since the Raman-active modes (A1g, Eg, and B2g) appear at the same characteristic positions reported for undoped rutile SnO2. , Moreover, no detectable shifts are observed in these modes upon Fe doping. A slight decrease in intensity and a modest broadening of the Eg and B2g modes are nevertheless observed in the Fe-doped samples. This behavior is commonly attributed to local lattice distortions arising from Fe3+ → Sn4+ substitution and to the increased concentration of oxygen-vacancy-related defects, both of which reduce phonon coherence length. The lower intensity observed in Sample 2 is therefore consistent with its reduced nanowire density rather than with any crystalline degradation.

2.

2

Raman spectra of Samples 1–3, showing the Raman-active Eg, A1g, and B2g modes of rutile SnO2. A peak from the Si substrate is observed in Sample 2. The slight band broadening in Fe-doped samples indicates lattice distortion induced by Fe substitution.

To determine the structural morphology of the samples, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was employed. Figure shows SEM images revealing that both undoped and Fe-doped SnO2 samples consist of elongated nanowires with similar morphology and uniform distribution across the substrate. The reproducibility of these features among all samples indicates that the growth process is stable and well-controlled. As confirmed by TEM measurements (Figures and ), both undoped and Fe-doped SnO2 nanowires exhibit diameters below 200 nm.

3.

3

SEM images of (a) undoped SnO2 nanowires (Sample 1) and (b, c) Fe-doped SnO2 nanowires (Samples 2 and 3). All samples exhibit dense and uniform nanowire networks across the substrate surface.

4.

4

(a) TEM image of a Fe-doped SnO2 nanowire (Sample 3) with corresponding EDS elemental maps of (b) O, (c) Sn, and (d) Fe, confirming the homogeneous spatial distribution of dopants.

5.

5

TEM images of Fe-doped SnO2 nanowires: (a) Sample 2 and (b) Sample 3, both showing an amorphous carbon surface layer (arrows). (c) Higher magnification of Sample 2, revealing a 2–5 nm amorphous carbon coating. (d) HR-TEM close-up of Sample 2, showing high crystallinity with well-resolved (100) lattice fringes (0.236 nm).

To complete the morphological observations, elemental mapping of individual SnO2 nanowires was performed. Figure a presents a TEM micrograph of a Fe-doped SnO2 nanowire (Sample 3), along with EDS elemental distribution maps for oxygen (O), tin (Sn), and iron (Fe) [Figure b–d]. The O and Sn maps confirm the expected uniform distribution of the host lattice elements. The Fe map shows a continuous and homogeneous distribution of dopants across the entire nanowire, with no detectable Fe-rich agglomerates or secondary phases. This nanoscale chemical uniformity supports the substitutional incorporation of Fe into the SnO2 lattice. Although the Fe concentration in Sample 3 is only 0.7 at%, the EDS maps in Figure d clearly show a uniform distribution of Fe along the nanowire. , Previous studies have shown that Fe exhibits high solubility in rutile SnO2, with homogeneous substitutional incorporation reported up to at least 10–15 at%. In contrast, the present work intentionally employs much lower Fe concentrations, since our objective is to synthesize diluted magnetic semiconductors (DMSs) based on SnO2, where the dopant level must remain within the dilute regime and well below the solubility limit in order to avoid the formation of secondary magnetic phases.

To further elucidate the structural quality at the nanoscale, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis was performed. TEM images of Fe-doped SnO2 nanowires (Sample 2) are shown in Figure a–d. An amorphous surface layer was identified in the HRTEM images by the absence of lattice fringes at the nanowire edges, in contrast to the crystalline core, where the SnO2 lattice planes are clearly resolved. The thickness of this layer (∼5 nm) was measured directly from the calibrated HRTEM micrographs. Enhanced carbon signals observed in the Auger spectra, together with the use of iron­(II) acetate as a precursor, indicate that this amorphous shell corresponds to carbon-rich residues formed during precursor decomposition. A close-up [Figure d] reveals a lattice spacing of 2.3 Å, matching the (100) interplanar distance of rutile SnO2.

Figure shows HR-TEM images of Fe-doped nanowires from Samples 2 and 3. Sample 2 exhibits growth along the [010] direction, with lattice spacing of 1.6 Å and 2.3 Å corresponding to the (220) and (100) planes, respectively. Sample 3 exhibits growth along the [100] direction, with interplanar spacings of 2.3 Å and 3.4 Å corresponding to the (100) and (110) planes, respectively. These growth directions are consistent with previous reports, such as the study by Leonardy et al., which used HRTEM and SAED analyses to demonstrate that SnO2 nanowires frequently elongate along the [100] axis under thermal evaporation growth conditions.

6.

6

HR-TEM images of Fe-doped SnO2 nanowires: (a, b) Sample 2 and (c, d) Sample 3. Growth directions along [010] (Sample 2) and [100] (Sample 3) were identified, with corresponding interplanar spacings indicated in the images.

These observations are also consistent with a previous report of Herrera et al. (2013), who studied Mn-doped SnO2 nanowires synthesized by thermal evaporation. Their HRTEM and SAED analyses identified [100] as one of the predominant growth directions, in agreement with our results. ,

While TEM provides direct evidence of lattice order and growth direction, complementary spectroscopy techniques are required to assess surface composition and chemical states. Figure a–c presents Auger spectra. The characteristic Sn (MNN) and O (KVV) peaks, centered at 421, 429, and 510 eV, respectively, appear in all samples. A peak at 274 eV becomes more pronounced in Fe-doped samples, indicating increased carbon presence, consistent with TEM results showing residual from Fe precursor decomposition.

7.

7

Derivative Auger spectra of (a) Sample 1, (b) Sample 2, and (c) Sample 3, showing characteristic Sn (M5N45N45) and O (KVV) features. Fe-doped samples exhibit increased C (KLL) signals attributed to precursor decomposition.

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was employed to investigate the atomic composition and the chemical state of elements present on the surface of the SnO2 nanowires. It should be noted that the Sn/O ratios determined by XPS and EDS are not expected to coincide (Table ), because XPS probes only the outer ∼5 nm of the nanowire surface, whereas EDS reflects the composition of the entire nanowire volume. As shown in the HRTEM images (Figure ), the nanowires possess a ∼5 nm amorphous, oxygen-deficient surface layer. This shell has a strong influence on the XPS signal but a negligible effect on EDS, leading to the observed difference in apparent stoichiometry.

Figure shows the Sn 3d core-level spectra, with two distinct peaks centered at 486.3 eV (3d5/2) and 494.7 eV (3d3/2), corresponding to a spin–orbit splitting of 8.4 eV. This value is consistent with the expected splitting for Sn4+ ions bonded to O2– in the SnO2 lattice. Figure a presents the deconvoluted O 1s core-level spectrum of the undoped SnO2 sample, which reveals three components centered at 530.8, 532.2, and 533.8 eV. The peak at 530.8 eV is attributed to lattice oxygen (Sn–O bonds), while the peaks at 532.2 and 533.8 eV are associated with absorbed hydrocarbon species, , and physisorbed water molecules, respectively. Figure b,c display the O 1s spectra for the Fe-doped samples (Samples 2 and 3), which exhibit the same three components. However, a noticeable increase in the 532.2 eV component is observed, indicating a higher presence of surface carbon species, originated by the decomposition of the acetate-based Fe precursor. Figure a,b present the Sn 3p3/2 core-level XPS spectra for Samples 2 and 3, displaying a main peak centered at 716.6 eV. This peak partially overlaps with the Fe 2p3/2 signal located at 711.5 eV, which is characteristic of Fe3+ ions. The presence of this peak confirms the incorporation of iron in the +3 oxidation state, in agreement with previous reports on Fe-doped SnO2 nanostructures. , However, due to the very low Fe content in our samples (0.3–0.7 at%), the Fe 2p region does not exhibit a sufficiently strong or well-resolved signal to enable reliable quantitative analysis, an expected limitation in dilute transition-metal-doped oxides. For this reason, Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) measurements were additionally performed to unambiguously verify the presence of Fe3+ ions.

8.

8

High-resolution XPS core-level spectra of Sn 3d for Samples 1–3, showing the spin–orbit doublets 3d3/2 characteristic of Sn4+, confirming the rutile SnO2 phase.

9.

9

Deconvoluted O 1s XPS core-level spectra of (a) Sample 1, (b) Sample 2, and (c) Sample 3 with peaks attributed to lattice oxygen (∼530.8 eV), adsorbed hydrocarbons (∼532.2 eV), and physisorbed water (∼533.7 eV).

10.

10

XPS spectra of Sn 3p3/2 overlapping with Fe 2p3/2 for (a) Sample 2 and (b) Sample 3. Deconvolution confirms the presence of Fe3+ ions substituting Sn4+ lattice sites.

Since XPS revealed the incorporation of Fe3+ ions and surface oxygen species, electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) measurements were carried out to probe paramagnetic centers and point defects, providing complementary information. , EPR experimental spectra were analyzed and simulated using the EasySpin toolbox in MATLAB (see Supporting Information), which allowed us to extract the g-tensor values corresponding to distinct paramagnetic species. Figure a presents EPR spectrum of the undoped SnO2 sample (Sample 1), recorded in the magnetic field range of 100–600 mT (curve 1), along with its corresponding simulated spectrum (curve 2). The signal exhibits a g-value of 2.17 and a peak-to-peak width (ΔH p–p) of 210 mT, consistent with an S = 1/2 system attributed to superoxides (O2) species adsorbed on the SnO2 surface. , Figure b shows the EPR spectrum of Sample 3 measured over the same field range. The experimental signal (curve 1) exhibits a broad with ΔH p–p of 230 mT, and the simulated spectrum (curve 2) yields a g-value of 2.07. This value is characteristic of Fe3+ ions incorporated into the SnO2 lattice, , and is consistent with the Fe3+ oxidation state identified in the XPS spectra of Figure .

11.

11

EPR spectra of (a) Sample 1 and (b) Sample 3, showing signals from O2 (g = 2.17 ± 0.0003) and Fe3+ (g = 2.07 ± 0.0003), respectively. Curve 1 corresponds to the experimental spectrum and curve 2 to the simulation.

Figure a,b focus on the narrow spectral region between 335 and 340 mT, where high-resolution EPR scans were obtained from Samples 1 and 3, respectively. Both samples show a sharp signal with ΔH p–p of 0.35 mT (curve 1), accurately reproduced by simulations (curve 2). The extracted g-values are 2.0031 for Sample 1 and 2.0029 for Sample 3. Considering the manufacturer-specified measurement uncertainty (±0.0003), both signals correspond to the same S = 1/2 transition associated with singly ionized oxygen vacancies (VO) . These values are in excellent agreement with those previously reported for centers in SnO2. For example, Popescu et al. (2001) reported a g = 2.003 for defects in SnO2 nanostructures, and similar g-values have been observed in rutile-type oxides such as TiO2, further supporting this assignment.

12.

12

High-resolution EPR spectra showing signals of singly ionized oxygen vacancies (VO′) in (a) Sample 1 and (b) Sample 3. Curve 1 corresponds to the experimental spectrum and curve 2 to the simulation, with g-values of 2.0031 ± 0.0003 and 2.0029 ± 0.0003, corresponding, characteristic of VO′.

The defect states identified by EPR motivated a detailed optical investigation through cathodoluminescence (CL), which is highly sensitive to oxygen-vacancy-related emissions. Figure a displays the CL spectrum of the undoped SnO2 sample, showing a broad emission band that was deconvoluted into three Gaussian components centered at 2.07, 2.50, and 2.80 eV. The fitting analysis, performed using MagicPlot (version 2.9.3), yielded an excellent correlation coefficient (R = 0.9985), with full width at half-maximum (fwhm) values of approximately 0.51 eV for each Gaussian component. The emission centered at 2.07 eV has been consistently reported in the literature; for example, Maestre et al. (2004) studied the cathodoluminescence of SnO2 nanospheres annealed under different temperatures and oxygen atmospheres and identified this feature, commonly referred to as the “orange band”, as originating from oxygen-vacancy-related defect states. Their findings support our assignment of the 2.07 eV component to defect centers involving oxygen vacancies. , First-principles calculations have shown that this emission is specifically associated with surface VO defects located on bridging oxygen atoms that are 6-fold coordinated to Sn atoms. , The 2.50 eV is generally ascribed to in-plane oxygen vacancies at the SnO2 surface, particularly involving oxygen atoms coordinated at distorted angles around 130°. Additionally, this green emission has been linked to electronic transitions between shallow donor levels and surface VO states. , The 2.80 eV component corresponds to the blue luminescence, which is typically observed in the 2.70–2.80 eV range. This emission is attributed to a combination of structural defects, oxygen-related lattice distortions, and the presence of surface VO centers. ,, When examining the effect of Fe incorporation, CL spectra of Fe-doped SnO2 samples [Figure b,c] revealed the same type of emission of VO-related defects are present regardless of doping. However, variations in the relative intensities of these emissions were observed with increasing Fe content. Overall, the CL results suggest that Fe doping does not introduce additional types of luminescent centers, but it does influence the density of existing oxygen vacancy defects involved in the optical emissions. This observation is consistent with the EPR analysis, which also indicated the generation of VO defects induced by Fe3+ incorporation into the SnO2 lattice.

13.

13

Cathodoluminescence spectra of (a) Sample 1, (b) Sample 2, and (c) Sample 3, showing emission bands at 2.07, 2.50, and 2.80 eV, which are attributed to distinct oxygen vacancy states and other structural defects.

Given the presence of VO′ defects revealed by CL and EPR, magnetic measurements were performed to investigate their possible contribution to the magnetic behavior of SnO2 and their interaction with Fe dopants. Figure a shows the magnetization versus magnetic field (MH) curve of undoped SnO2 nanowires (Sample 1) after subtracting the diamagnetic contribution of the Si substrate. To isolate the magnetic signal of the nanowires, the diamagnetic contribution of the Si substrate was removed by fitting the linear high-field portion of the raw MH data with a straight-line baseline using MagicPlot (version 2.9.3). This fitted diamagnetic background was then subtracted from the total magnetization, yielding the curves shown in Figure . The sample exhibits clear ferromagnetic (FM) behavior, with a saturation magnetization (M S) of approximately ±6 × 10–4 emu/g and a coercive field (H C) of 90 Oe. These values are consistent with those reported by Zhang et al. and Montalvo et al. for undoped SnO2 nanowires. , Previous studies have suggested that the intrinsic FM in undoped SnO2 arises from exchange interactions between unpaired electron spins associated with oxygen vacancies, , which we confirmed by EPR measurements as single-ionized oxygen vacancies (VO′) [Figure a]. Upon Fe doping, a clear enhancement of ferromagnetism is observed. The MH curve for Fe-doped SnO2 nanowires containing 0.5 at% Fe (Sample 2) also displays ferromagnetic behavior, with enhanced M S = ±1 × 10–3 emu/g and H C = 400 Oe [Figure b], significantly higher than in the undoped Sample 1. This enhancement is attributed to the incorporation of Fe3+ ions in the SnO2 rutile structure, which promotes the formation of paramagnetic VO′ defects. Similar increases in magnetic saturation due to doping with magnetic impurities have been reported in other dilute magnetic semiconductors (DMS). In our case, the formation of VO′ defects likely result from a charge imbalance induced by the substitution of Sn4+ by Fe3+, as supported by the EPR signal in Sample 2 [Figure b], which is consistent with our previous finding in SnO2:Cr nanowires. This process can be described using the Kröger–Vink notation , as follows:

SnSn×+VO×Fe3+[Fe3+]Sn×+VO 1

where × ,′, and • represent neutral, negatively, and positively charged defects, respectively.

14.

14

Magnetization–field (MH) curves of (a) Sample 1, (b) Sample 2, and (c) Sample 3 after subtracting the diamagnetic contribution of the Si substrate.

Building upon these results, the ferromagnetic behavior can be rationalized within the framework of the Bound Magnetic Polaron (BMP) model. In this model, the magnetic moment of the spin 1/2 system (VO′) couples with that of neighboring Fe3+ ions, forming localized magnetic regions called magnetic polarons. The overlap of these polarons facilitates long-range magnetic exchange interactions across the semiconductor lattice. Figure c shows the MH curve for Sample 3 (0.72 at% Fe), which exhibits further enhanced magnetic properties, with H C = 500 Oe and M s = ± 4 × 10–3 emu/g. This enhancement correlates with the increased EPR signal of VO′ defects in Sample 3, suggesting that these spin-1/2 oxygen vacancies play a central role in the FM behavior of SnO2:Fe nanowires, in agreement with the BMP mechanism. The higher coercivity in Sample 3 is attributed to the formation of Fe–VO complexes and BMPs, which act as magnetic pinning centers and increase the local anisotropy. This defect-mediated mechanism, widely reported in transition-metal-doped SnO2 and other DMS oxides, enhances the resistance to magnetization reversal and explains the larger coercive field observed in the doped sample compared to the undoped sample. We have ruled out the possibility that the observed ferromagnetic response originates from iron-oxide secondary phases, including those present at very low concentrations typically detectable only by Mössbauer spectroscopy. Instead, the combined evidence from Raman, XRD, HRTEM, EDS mapping, XPS, and EPR unambiguously indicates that Fe is incorporated substitutionally into the SnO2 lattice. The slight negative slope of M(H) at high magnetic fields observed in Samples 1 and 2 originates from the strongly diamagnetic Si/SiO2 substrate, whose background contribution dominates when the magnetic moment of the nanowires is extremely small. This behavior is typical for oxide nanostructures measured on diamagnetic substrates. Importantly, no evidence of diamagnetic or nonmagnetic impurity phases is found in XRD, Raman, HRTEM, EDS, XPS, or EPR. The ferromagnetic response of the Fe-doped nanowires is therefore intrinsic and arises from defect-mediated mechanisms involving Fe–VO complexes and BMP formation.

To further validate the BMP mechanism, we performed DFT calculations by modeling Fe dopants in SnO2 with and without oxygen vacancies (VO). Figure shows the atomistic models of Fe-doped SnO2 incorporating VO. All configurations were generated from a 2 × 2 × 3 supercell of rutile SnO2 using the Vienna Ab initio Simulation Package (VASP). Fe dopants were introduced by substituting Sn atoms, and oxygen vacancies were created by removing selected O atoms from the supercell. All structures were fully relaxed prior to visualization. The atomic renderings were produced using the VESTA software based on the relaxed VASP coordinates. Fe dopants were incorporated by substituting Sn atoms, and oxygen vacancies were introduced by removing selected O atoms. All structures were fully relaxed before visualization. The figures were rendered using the VESTA software based on the relaxed atomic coordinates. Four configurations were considered within a 2 × 2 × 3 supercell: (i) a pristine SnO2 system containing an isolated oxygen vacancy (VO) [Figure a], (ii) Fe substitution at Sn sites in the vacancy free lattice (Fe-inc) [Figure b], (iii) Fe substitution at Sn sites located near an oxygen vacancy (Fe-inc, VO near) [Figure c], and (iv) Fe incorporation far from the vacancy (Fe-inc, VO far) [Figure d]. These models allowed us to systematically assess how the relative position of Fe and oxygen vacancies influences defect stability and magnetic interactions in the lattice.

15.

15

Atomistic models of Fe-doped SnO2 incorporating oxygen vacancies (VO). Different Fe–VO–Fe configurations were simulated to evaluate their relative stability and magnetic interactions. (a) Isolated oxygen vacancy (VO), (b) single Fe incorporation (Fe-inc), (c) Fe-inc with VO nearby, (d) Fe-inc with VO farther away, (e) Model A: two Fe atoms substituting Sn without vacancies, (f) Model B: two Fe atoms near a vacancy but interacting through an oxygen atom, (g) Model C: two Fe atoms separated by an oxygen vacancy, (h) Model D: one Fe atom adjacent to the vacancy and the other at a farther site, (i) Model E: one Fe atom adjacent to the vacancy and the other at a distant lattice site. Color code: Sn (violet), O (red), VO (blue).

Guided by our experimental evidence, we further investigate whether oxygen vacancies mediate Fe–Fe interactions in SnO2. To this end, we modeled several configurations incorporating two Fe atoms. Model A, two Fe are connected through a bridging O atom [Figure e]. Model B corresponds to the same Fe–O–Fe linkage but with a nearby oxygen vacancy, a geometry expected to promote superexchange interactions [Figure f]. In Model C, two Fe atoms are directly separated by an oxygen vacancy [Figure g]. Model D represents a variation, with one Fe atom located near the vacancy and the second positioned adjacent to the first Fe but farther from the vacancy, enabling us to evaluate whether this arrangement enhances stability [Figure h]. Finally, Model E places one Fe atom adjacent to the vacancy and the second at a more distant site within the supercell [Figure i].

For the models described above, the total energy cannot be directly used as a reliable criterion for determining the most stable configurations, since the number of atoms differs among them. Instead, we employed the defect formation energy, a well-established stability formalism that is independent of system size and depends only on the chemical potentials of the involved species. To apply this approach, we assume thermal equilibrium between the SnO2 bulk and an external reservoir with which atoms can be exchanged. The growth limits were defined by the formation enthalpy of SnO2, ΔHfSnO2=1.67eV/atom . Under Sn-rich conditions, the chemical potential of Sn is μSn=μSnbulk , whereas under Sn-poor conditions it is given by μSn=μSnbulk+ΔHfSnO2 . Throughout the analysis, the reference zero of energy corresponds to the pristine SnO2 bulk structure.

The defect formation energy trends (Figure ) reveal three dominant stability regimes as the tin chemical potential shifts from Sn-rich (O-poor) to Sn-poor (O-rich) conditions. Under Sn-rich conditions, the isolated oxygen vacancy (VO) is the most stable configuration, with a formation energy as low as −0.26 eV. At intermediate conditions, Fe incorporation into the pristine lattice (Fe-inc) becomes the most favorable defect. Finally, under O-rich and extremely O-rich conditions, Model C, consisting of two Fe atoms separated by an oxygen vacancy, emerges as the most stable configuration. Other configurations, such as Model A (two Fe atoms linked by an oxygen atom without vacancies), and Model B (two Fe atoms near a vacancy but interacting via an oxygen atom), are only slightly less stable. This suggests that, under realistic experimental growth conditions, both VO defects and Fe incorporation are expected to coexist, with oxygen vacancies playing a decisive role in stabilizing Fe–Fe interactions. Among the alternative arrangements, Model D (one Fe atom near the vacancy and the other farther away) is marginally more favorable than Model B, underscoring the importance of vacancy placement in defect stability. Although Model E (one Fe adjacent to the vacancy and the other at a distant site) may form due to its relatively low formation energy, it is less likely. Overall, these results highlight that under O-rich conditions the dominant defect complex is Model C, providing strong theoretical support for our experimental evidence that vacancy-mediated ferromagnetism in Fe-doped SnO2 nanowires originates from bound magnetic polaron formation.

16.

16

Defect formation energies (DFE) of oxygen vacancy complexes in Fe-doped SnO2 as a function of the tin chemical potential (ΔμSn=μSnμSnbulk) . Configurations include isolated oxygen vacancies (VO), single Fe incorporation (Fe-inc), and different Fe–VO–Fe complexes (Models A–E). Results indicate that Fe–VO–Fe complexes are energetically most stable under O-rich conditions, supporting their role in mediating ferromagnetic interactions.

To confirm that ferromagnetism is indeed enhanced through the BMP mechanism, namely, Fe–VO–Fe interactions, we analyze the magnetic characteristics of the most stable models. Within the level of approximation used, no intrinsic magnetic character was detected for isolated oxygen vacancies, consistent with the results of Rahman et al. These authors demonstrated that oxygen vacancies do not directly induce magnetism, since the removal of a neutral oxygen atom leads to the reduction of Sn4+ to Sn2+. In this scenario, no dangling bonds remain because Sn maintains full coordination with the surrounding oxygen atoms, resulting in nonmagnetic insulating behavior. Our stability analysis further supports this conclusion: while oxygen vacancies do not themselves polarize, they play a critical role in modulating the magnetic properties of nearby dopants.

Figure presents the spin density isosurfaces for three representative configurations: (a) Fe incorporation in the pristine lattice (Fe-inc), (b) two Fe atoms near a vacancy but interacting through an oxygen atom (Model B), and (c) two Fe atoms separated by a vacancy (Model C). In Figure a, magnetism originates mainly from the incorporated Fe atom, which couples ferromagnetically with the neighboring O atoms. The calculated magnetic moments are 4.3 μB for Fe and 0.12 μB for O. In contrast, Model B exhibits a clear antiferromagnetic alignment, which is 81 meV more stable than the ferromagnetic ordering. Here, both interactions coexist: antiferromagnetism through p–d superexchange (Fe–O–Fe), and ferromagnetism mediated by the vacancy acting as a spin-polarized ligand. The inset in Figure b (isovalue 0.001 e/Å) reveals lobes with opposite spin polarization at the bridging O atom, confirming p–d superexchange between half-filled Fe-3d orbitals mediated by O-2p states. The corresponding magnetic moments are approximately 4.2/–4.2 μB for Fe and 0.1 μB for O. The most compelling evidence of vacancy-driven ferromagnetism appears in Model C [Figure c], where Fe–VO–Fe interactions dominate. In this case, the direct Fe–O–Fe antiferromagnetism pathway is suppressed, and the energy difference between AFM and FM alignments is only 1.8 meV, well below the thermal energy at room temperature (∼25 meV). Thus, thermal fluctuations favor ferromagnetic ordering, especially in the presence of the vacancy-bound single electron (VO′) observed experimentally. The spin density isosurface shows polarized lobes spanning the vacancy and both Fe atoms, consistent with a shared BMP electron mediating the ferromagnetic coupling. These results demonstrate that while Fe–O–Fe interactions are primarily antiferromagnetic through superexchange, the introduction of an oxygen vacancy between Fe dopants weakens this interaction and promotes BMP-driven ferromagnetism. This finding aligns with our experimental observations and with previous reports showing that single-ionized vacancies, with a localized electron, facilitate ferromagnetic coupling between dopants.

17.

17

Spin density isosurfaces of (a) isolated Fe incorporation, (b) Fe–O–Fe linkage with an oxygen vacancy, and (c) Fe–VO–Fe complex in SnO2. Red and blue regions represent ferro-and antiferromagnetic alignments, while yellow and blue lobes indicate spin-up and down spin polarization, respectively. The isosurface level is set at 0.001 e/Å3. BMP-mediated coupling is clearly evidenced in the Fe–VO–Fe configuration.

In conclusion, our results highlight the fundamental role of oxygen vacancy engineering and controlled transition-metal doping in modifying the magnetic properties of SnO2 nanostructures. This study not only elucidates the microscopic origin of ferromagnetism in Fe-doped SnO2 nanowires but also provides a framework for tailoring magnetic functionality in oxide-based spintronic devices.

4. Conclusions

In this work, we combined structural, spectroscopic, magnetic, and theoretical analyses to unravel the microscopic origin of room-temperature ferromagnetism in Fe-doped SnO2 nanowires synthesized by thermal evaporation. A comprehensive set of characterizations (XRD, Raman, TEM, EDS, XPS, and AES) confirmed the substitutional incorporation of Fe3+ into the rutile SnO2 lattice without the formation of secondary phases. EPR and cathodoluminescence measurements consistently identified single-ionized oxygen vacancies (VO′) as the dominant point defects, whose density scales with Fe concentration. Magnetic measurements revealed a direct correlation between the density of VO′ centers and the systematic enhancement of saturation magnetization and coercivity. DFT calculations provided microscopic validation by demonstrating that isolated oxygen vacancies are intrinsically nonmagnetic but stabilize ferromagnetic coupling when bridging Fe atoms, forming Fe–VO–Fe complexes. Spin-density isosurfaces revealed that the vacancy donates a localized electron, enabling the formation of bound magnetic polarons (BMPs). Theoretical stability analysis further identified Fe–VO–Fe complexes as the most favorable defect configurations under O-rich conditions, in excellent agreement with experimental results. Altogether, these findings establish defect–dopant interactions mediated by VO′ centers as the driving mechanism for ferromagnetism in Fe-doped SnO2 nanowires. Beyond clarifying a long-standing debate, this study provides a framework for tailoring magnetic functionalities in oxide-based dilute magnetic semiconductors, opening avenues for the rational design of nanostructured materials in spintronic applications.

Supplementary Material

ao5c10549_si_001.pdf (81.1KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the grant PAPIIT-UNAM (no. IN104724). D.M. is grateful to CONACYT for a graduate research fellowship (no. CVU 555621). The technical support of E. Aparicio and F. Ruiz is greatly appreciated.

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The dataset includes raw structural and magnetic files that are part of ongoing research and, therefore, cannot be made publicly available at this time.

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.5c10549.

  • MATLAB code used for simulating and fitting the experimental EPR spectra (PDF)

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. D.M. and M.H. performed material preparation and CL measurements. V.G.-V. and D.M. performed EPR measurements and simulations. XPS and Auger spectroscopy studies were performed by D.M. and W.J.d.l.H. S.C.-L. performed Raman spectroscopy measurements. D.M. obtained SEM images and EDS data. Magnetic studies were performed by K.C. and V.O. D.M.H. and J.G.-S. performed DFT calculations. M.H. analyzed all experimental results and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors commented on the previous version of the manuscript. Finally, all authors read and approved the final manuscript.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Manikandan D., Murugan R.. Genesis and Tuning of Ferromagnetism in SnO2 Semiconductor Nanostructures: Comprehensive Review on Size, Morphology, Magnetic Properties and DFT Investigations. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2022;130:100970. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.100970. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Prellier W., Fouchet A., Mercey B.. Oxide-diluted magnetic semiconductors: a review of the experimental status. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 2003;15:R1583–R1601. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/15/37/R01. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Li X., Yang J.. First-Principles Design of Spintronics Materials. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2016;3:365–381. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nww026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Adhikari R., Das A. K., Karmakar D., Rao T. V. C., Ghatak J.. Structure and Magnetism of Fe-Doped SnO2 Nanoparticles. Phys. Rev. B. 2008;78(2):35–38. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.024404. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Coey J. M. D., Douvalis A. P., Fitzgerald C. B., Venkatesan M.. Ferromagnetism in Fe-Doped SnO2 Thin Films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004;84(8):1332–1334. doi: 10.1063/1.1650041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sharma M., Kumar S., Aljawfi R. N., Dalela S., Dolia S. N., Alshoaibi A., Alvi P. A.. Role of Fe-Doping on Structural, Optical and Magnetic Properties of SnO2 Nanoparticles. J. Electron. Mater. 2019;48(12):8181–8192. doi: 10.1007/s11664-019-07649-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Torres C. E. R., Errico L., Golmar F., Navarro A. M. M., Cabrera A. F., Duhalde S., Sánchez F. H., Weissmann M.. The Role of the Dopant in the Magnetism of Fe-Doped SnO2 Films. J. Magn Magn Mater. 2007;316(2):e219–e222. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2007.02.094. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dietl T., Cibert J., Ferrand D., d’Aubigne Y. M.. Carrier-Mediated Ferromagnetic Interactions in Structures of Magnetic Semiconductors. Mater. Sci. Eng.: B. 1999;63(1):103–110. doi: 10.1016/S0921-5107(99)00059-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Guzmán G., Maestre D., Herrera M.. Hole-Mediated Ferromagnetism in GaN Doped with Cu and Mn. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 2020;31(18):15070–15078. doi: 10.1007/s10854-020-04070-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Sundaresan A., Bhargavi R., Rangarajan N., Siddesh U., Rao C. N. R.. Ferromagnetism as a Universal Feature of Nanoparticles of the Otherwise Nonmagnetic Oxides. Phys. Rev. B. 2006;74(16):161306. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.161306. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wang H., Yan Y., Li K., Du X., Lan Z., Jin H.. Role of Intrinsic Defects in Ferromagnetism of SnO2: First-Principles Calculations. Phys. Status Solidi B. 2010;247(2):444–448. doi: 10.1002/pssb.200945481. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hong N. H., Sakai J., Huong N. T., Poirot N., Ruyter A.. Role of Defects in Tuning Ferromagnetism in Diluted Magnetic Oxide Thin Films. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2005;72(4):045336. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.045336. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kaur J., Shah J., Kotnala R. K., Verma K. C.. Raman Spectra, Photoluminescence and Ferromagnetism of Pure, Co and Fe Doped SnO 2 Nanoparticles. Ceram. Int. 2012;38(7):5563–5570. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.03.075. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Coey J. M. D., Venkatesan M., Fitzgerald C. B.. Donor Impurity Band Exchange in Dilute Ferromagnetic Oxides. Nat. Mater. 2005;4(2):173–179. doi: 10.1038/nmat1310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Peter, A. W. Diluted Magnetic Semiconductors Academic Press; 1988. Vol: 25. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kaur P., Kriti, Rahul, Chalotra R., Chalotra S., Kaur H., Kandasami A., Singh D. P.. Role of Bound Magnetic Polaron Model in Sm Doped ZnO: Evidence from Magnetic and Electronic Structures. Appl. Surf. Sci. Adv. 2021;5:100100. doi: 10.1016/j.apsadv.2021.100100. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jaiswar S., Mandal K. D.. Evidence of Enhanced Oxygen Vacancy Defects Inducing Ferromagnetism in Multiferroic CaMn7O12 Manganite with Sintering Time. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2017;121(36):19586–19601. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b05415. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wolff P. A., Warnock J.. Bound Magnetic Polarons in Dilute Magnetic Semiconductors (Invited) J. Appl. Phys. 1984;55(6):2300–2304. doi: 10.1063/1.333642. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Montalvo D., Herrera M.. Cathodoluminescence of N-Doped SnO2 Nanowires and Microcrystals. AIMS Mater. Sci. 2016;3(2):525–537. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2016.2.525. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Seah M. P.. The quantitative analysis of surfaces by XPS: A review. Surf. Interface Anal. 1980;2(6):222–239. doi: 10.1002/sia.740020607. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Fairley N.. et al. Systematic and Collaborative Approach to Problem Solving Using X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy. Appl. Surf. Sci. Adv. 2021;5:100112. doi: 10.1016/j.apsadv.2021.100112. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kresse G., Hafner J. A.. Initio Molecular Dynamics for Liquid Metals. Phys. Rev. B. 1993;47(1):558–561. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kresse G., Furthmüller J.. Efficiency of Ab-Initio Total Energy Calculations for Metals and Semiconductors Using a Plane-Wave Basis Set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 1996;6:15–50. doi: 10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kresse G., Furthmü J.. Efficient Iterative Schemes for Ab Initio Total-Energy Calculations Using a Plane-Wave Basis Set. Phys. Rev. B. 1996;54(16):11169–11186. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Blochl P. E.. Projector Augmented ± rave Method. Phys. Rev. B. 1994;50(24):17953–17979. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kresse G., Joubert D.. From Ultrasoft Pseudopotentials to the Projector Augmented-Wave Method. Phys. Rev. B. 1999;59(3):1758–1775. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Perdew J. P., Burke K., Ernzerhof M.. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996;77(18):3865–3868. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Bolzan A. A., Fong C., Kennedy B. J., Howard C. J.. Structural Studies of Rutile-Type Metal Dioxides. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B: Struct. Sci., Cryst. Eng. Mater. 1997;53(1):373–380. doi: 10.1107/S0108768197001468. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Yang M. R., Chu S. Y., Chang R. C.. Synthesis and Study of the SnO2 Nanowires Growth. Sens. Actuators, B. 2007;122(1):269–273. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2006.05.034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lee J. S., Sim S. K., Min B., Cho K., Kim S. W., Kim S.. Structural and Optoelectronic Properties of SnO2 Nanowires Synthesized from Ball-Milled SnO2 Powders. J. Cryst. Growth. 2004;267(1–2):145–149. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.03.030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ben Haj Othmen W., Sieber B., Elhouichet H., Addad A., Gelloz B., Moreau M., Szunerits S., Boukherroub R.. Effect of High Fe Doping on Raman Modes and Optical Properties of Hydrothermally Prepared SnO2 Nanoparticles. Mater. Sci. Semicond Process. 2018;77:31–39. doi: 10.1016/j.mssp.2017.12.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wang W., Xu C., Wang G., Liu Y., Zheng C.. Synthesis and Raman Scattering Study of Rutile SnO 2 Nanowires. J. Appl. Phys. 2002;92(5):2740–2742. doi: 10.1063/1.1497718. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sun S. H., Meng G. W., Zhang G. X., Gao T., Geng B. Y., Zhang L. D., Zuo J.. Raman Scattering Study of Rutile SnO2 Nanobelts Synthesized by Thermal Evaporation of Sn Powders. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2003;376(1–2):103–107. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2614(03)00965-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Diéguez A., Romano-Rodríguez A., Vilà A., Morante J. R.. The Complete Raman Spectrum of Nanometric SnO2 Particles. J. Appl. Phys. 2001;90(3):1550–1557. doi: 10.1063/1.1385573. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Chen B., Zhou W., Zhao M., Si P.. Tuning Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Activity of Silver Nanowires. Optik. 2021;244:167537. doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.167537. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Adu K. W., Gutiérrez H. R., Kim U. J., Sumanasekera G. U., Eklund P. C.. Confined Phonons in Si Nanowires. Nano Lett. 2005;5(3):409–414. doi: 10.1021/nl0486259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Hwang S. H., Kim C., Jang J.. SnO2 Nanoparticle Embedded TiO2 Nanofibers - Highly Efficient Photocatalyst for the Degradation of Rhodamine B. Catal. Commun. 2011;12(11):1037–1041. doi: 10.1016/j.catcom.2011.02.024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Stuckert E. P., Geiss R. H., Miller C. J., Fisher E. R.. In-Depth View of the Structure and Growth of SnO2 Nanowires and Nanobrushes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2016;8(34):22345–22353. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b06676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Herrera M., Maestre D., Cremades A., Piqueras J.. Growth and Characterization of Mn Doped SnO2 Nanowires, Nanobelts, and Microplates. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2013;117(17):8997–9003. doi: 10.1021/jp4007894. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Leonardy A., Hung W. Z., Tsai D. S., Chou C. C., Huang Y. S.. Structural Features of SnO2 Nanowires and Raman Spectroscopy Analysis. Cryst. Growth Des. 2009;9(9):3958–3963. doi: 10.1021/cg9000957. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Powell R. A.. Auger and Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy of Oxygen Chemisorption on Tin. Appl. Surf. Sci. 1979;2(3):397–415. doi: 10.1016/0378-5963(79)90072-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Caron M., Rothard H., Beuve M., Gervais B.. Shape Analysis of Auger Electron Spectra Induced by Highly Charged Ion Impact on Carbon. Phys. Scr. 2001;2001:281. doi: 10.1238/Physica.Topical.092a00281. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Rao G. T., Babu B., Ravikumar R. V. S. S. N., Shim J., Reddy C. V.. Structural and Optical Properties of Fe-Doped SnO 2 Quantum Dots. Mater. Res. Express. 2017;4(4):125021. doi: 10.1088/2053-1591/aa9de5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Guzmán G., Herrera M., Silva R., Vásquez G. C., Maestre D.. Influence of Oxygen Incorporation on the Defect Structure of GaN Microrods and Nanowires. An XPS and CL Study. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2016;31(5):055006. doi: 10.1088/0268-1242/31/5/055006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Measurement Services Division of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) NIST; 2012. NIST X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Database; p. 20899. [Google Scholar]
  46. Pan S., Bera S., Sen S., Das A.. Insights into the Surface Chemistry Induced Photoreactivity of Fe-Doped SnO2 in Dye Degradation. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2023;152(March):110672. doi: 10.1016/j.inoche.2023.110672. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Zhang J., Ye J., Chen H., Qu Y., Deng Q., Lin Z.. One-Pot Synthesis of Echinus-like Fe-Doped SnO2 with Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity under Simulated Sunlight. J. Alloys Compd. 2017;695:3318–3323. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.11.063. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Rao M. C., Ravindranadh K., Ravikumar R. V. S. S. N.. Optical and EPR Studies of Fe3+ Doped Tin Oxide Thin Films by Spray Pyrolysis. J. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater. 2018;20(3–4):159–162. [Google Scholar]
  49. Chetri P., Choudhury B., Choudhury A.. Room Temperature Ferromagnetism in SnO2 Nanoparticles: An Experimental and Density Functional Study. J. Mater. Chem. C Mater. 2014;2(43):9294–9302. doi: 10.1039/C4TC01070A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Maoz B. M., Tirosh E., Bar Sadan M., Markovich G.. Defect-Induced Magnetism in Chemically Synthesized Nanoscale Sheets of MgO. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2011;83(16):4–7. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.161201. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Misra S. K., Andronenko S. I., Tipikin D., Freed J. H., Somani V., Prakash O.. Study of Paramagnetic Defect Centers in As-Grown and Annealed TiO2 Anatase and Rutile Nanoparticles by a Variableerature X-Band and High-Frequency (236 GHz) EPR. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2016;401:495–505. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.10.072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Toloman D., Pana O., Stefan M., Popa A., Leostean C., Macavei S., Silipas D., Perhaita I., Lazar M. D., Barbu-Tudoran L.. Photocatalytic Activity of SnO 2 -TiO 2 Composite Nanoparticles Modified with PVP. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019;542:296–307. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.02.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Popescu D. A., Herrmann J.-M., Ensuque A., Bozon-Verduraz F.. Nanosized Tin Dioxide: Spectroscopic (UV-VIS, NIR, EPR) and Electrical Conductivity Studies. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2001;3(12):2522–2530. doi: 10.1039/b100553g. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Maestro D., Cremades A., Piqueras J.. Cathodoluminescence of Defects in Sintered Tin Oxide. J. Appl. Phys. 2004;95(6):3027–3030. doi: 10.1063/1.1647267. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Prades J. D., Arbiol J., Cirera A., Morante J. R., Avella M., Zanotti L., Comini E., Faglia G., Sberveglieri G.. Defect Study of SnO2 Nanostructures by Cathodoluminescence Analysis: Application to Nanowires. Sens. Actuators, B. 2007;126(1):6–12. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2006.10.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  56. Choi E., Lee D., Shin H.-J., Kim N., De Los Santos Valladares L., Seo J.. Role of Oxygen Vacancy Sites on the Temperature-Dependent Photoluminescence of SnO2Nanowires. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2021;125(27):14974–14978. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c02937. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  57. Shewale P. S., Ung Sim K., Kim Y. B., Kim J. H., Moholkar A. V., Uplane M. D.. Structural and Photoluminescence Characterization of SnO2: F Thin Films Deposited by Advanced Spray Pyrolysis Technique at Low Substrate Temperature. J. Lumin. 2013;139:113–118. doi: 10.1016/j.jlumin.2013.01.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  58. Gaidi M., Hajjaji A., Smirani R., Bessais B., El Khakani M. A.. Structure and Photoluminescence of Ultrathin Films of SnO2 Nanoparticles Synthesized by Means of Pulsed Laser Deposition. J. Appl. Phys. 2010;108(6):063537. doi: 10.1063/1.3485811. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  59. Jeong J., Choi S. P., Chang C. I., Shin D. C., Park J. S., Lee B. T., Park Y. J., Song H. J.. Photoluminescence Properties of SnO2 Thin Films Grown by Thermal CVD. Solid State Commun. 2003;127(9–10):595–597. doi: 10.1016/S0038-1098(03)00614-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  60. Her Y. C., Wu J. Y., Lin Y. R., Tsai S. Y.. Low-Temperature Growth and Blue Luminescence of SnO2 Nanoblades. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006;89(4):87–90. doi: 10.1063/1.2235925. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  61. Yang J. K., Zhao H. L., Li J., Zhao L. P., Chen J. J., Yu B.. Structural and Optical Properties and Photoluminescence Mechanism of Fluorine-Doped SnO2 Films during the Annealing Process. Acta Mater. 2014;62(1):156–161. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.09.043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  62. Mondal S. P., Ray S. K., Ravichandran J., Manna I.. Temperature Dependent Growth and Optical Properties of SnO 2 Nanowires and Nanobelts. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2010;33(4):357–364. doi: 10.1007/s12034-010-0054-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  63. Montalvo D., Gómez V., de la Cruz W., Camacho-López S., Rivero I., Carrera K., Orozco V., Santillán C., Matutes J., Herrera-Zaldívar M.. Influence of Single-Ionized Oxygen Vacancies on the Generation of Ferromagnetism in SnO2 and SnO2: Cr Nanowires. Appl. Phys. A. 2023;129(8):537. doi: 10.1007/s00339-023-06790-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  64. Zhang F., Lian Y., Gu M., Yu J., Tang T. B., Sun J., Zhang W.. Nanocrystalline Tin Oxide: Possible Origin of Its Weak Ferromagnetism Deduced from Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopies. Phys. Lett. A. 2016;380(38):3138–3143. doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2016.07.037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  65. Ahmed S. A.. Room-Temperature Ferromagnetism in Pure and Mn Doped SnO2 Powders. Solid State Commun. 2010;150(43–44):2190–2193. doi: 10.1016/j.ssc.2010.08.029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  66. Alanko G. A., Thurber A., Hanna C. B., Punnoose A.. Size, surface structure, and doping effects on ferromagnetism in SnO2. J. Appl. Phys. 2012;111:07C321. doi: 10.1063/1.3679455. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  67. Pandimeena K. K., Robert M. C., Saravanakumar S.. Energy Gap Tuning, Ferromagnetic Switching, Visualization of Electron Density and Bonding in Dilute Magnetic Semiconductor Fe-Doped SnO2. Optik. 2023;287(May):171091. doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2023.171091. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  68. Zhang L., Ge S., Zuo Y., Wang J., Qi J.. Ferromagnetic Properties in Undoped and Cr-Doped SnO2 Nanowires. Scr Mater. 2010;63(10):953–956. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.06.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  69. Norby T.. A Kröger-Vink Compatible Notation for Defects in Inherently Defective Sublattices. J. Korean Ceram. Soc. 2010;47(1):19–25. doi: 10.4191/KCERS.2010.47.1.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  70. Kröger F. A., Nachtrieb N. H.. The Chemistry of Imperfect Crystals. Phys. Today. 1964;17(10):66–69. doi: 10.1063/1.3051186. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  71. Rahman G., García-Suárez V. M., Hong S. C.. Vacancy-Induced Magnetism in SnO2: A Density Functional Study. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2008;78(18):184404. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.184404. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  72. Verma K. C., Kotnala R. K.. Defects-Assisted Ferromagnetism Due to Bound Magnetic Polarons in Ce into Fe, Co: ZnO Nanoparticles and First-Principle Calculations. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016;18(7):5647–5657. doi: 10.1039/C5CP06930K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ao5c10549_si_001.pdf (81.1KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The dataset includes raw structural and magnetic files that are part of ongoing research and, therefore, cannot be made publicly available at this time.


Articles from ACS Omega are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES