Skip to main content
NPJ Regenerative Medicine logoLink to NPJ Regenerative Medicine
. 2026 Jan 17;11:12. doi: 10.1038/s41536-026-00456-z

Inhibition of CDK8 rescues impaired ischemic fracture healing

Christina A Capobianco 1,2, Michelle J Song 1,2, Easton C Farrell 1,2, Alexander J Knights 1, Karen Kessell 1, Alexis Donneys 1, Jeanna T Schmanski 1,2, Luke R Schroeder 1,2, Mengqian Chen 3,4, Igor B Roninson 3,4, Yadav Wagley 1, Tristan Maerz 1,2,5,6,, Kurt D Hankenson 1,2,7,
PMCID: PMC12905151  PMID: 41547960

Abstract

Annually, 10% of 15 million bone fractures in the US fail to heal, and fractures with compromised blood flow, i.e., ischemia, are five times more likely to become nonunions. While ischemia is known to impair healing, the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying this deficiency are unclear. Wild-type mice with surgically-induced ischemia underwent tibia fractures, and single-cell RNA-sequencing was performed on calluses at days 4 and 7 post-fracture. We observed delayed chondrogenic differentiation and upregulation of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 8 (Cdk8) by stromal progenitors and fibroblasts in the ischemic callus. Hypoxia induced CDK8 gene expression in human mesenchymal stromal cells (hMSC), and pharmacological CDK8 inhibition promoted hMSC chondrogenic and osteogenic potential. In vivo oral delivery of a CDK8 inhibitor enhanced callus chondrogenesis and mineralization, potentially improving ischemic fracture healing. Our results suggest that CDK8 impedes stromal cell differentiation and that its inhibition may be a clinically translatable approach to enhance ischemic fracture healing.

Subject terms: Translational research, Preclinical research, Experimental models of disease, Trauma, Bone, Regenerative medicine

Introduction

While fracture repair typically results in complete restoration of functional bone, approximately 10% of fractures in the United States result in a nonunion or malunion, requiring further surgical intervention and treatment13. Many factors, including vascular disease, infection, excessive soft tissue damage, advanced age, obesity, nutrition, smoking status, and various endocrine conditions, increase the likelihood of fracture nonunion4. Specifically, trauma, aging, associated inflammatory dysregulation, and/or smoking place patients at increased risk of ischemia (reduced vascular perfusion) upon fracture5. The likelihood of fracture nonunion increases to 46% under ischemic conditions. Despite the clinical recognition of these risk factors, how altered vascularization negatively impacts bone regeneration remains largely unexplored.

Ischemic fracture healing is characterized by reduced chondrocyte and osteoblast differentiation, resulting in smaller and weaker calluses6. The chondrocytes and osteoblasts responsible for forming the eventual bony callus via endochondral and intramembranous ossification, respectively, are derived from mesenchymal stromal/progenitor cells (MSC) of the periosteum and endosteum. Extensive research has focused on the molecular regulators of chondrogenesis and osteogenesis of these progenitors7,8. While it is well established that ischemia results in decreased callus size, inferior mineralization, and exacerbated fibrosis, the exact nature of this phenotype, especially with regard to the mechanisms driving pathological fibrosis as opposed to chondrogenesis and osteogenesis, which are necessary for bone repair, has yet to be described. Thus, there remains a critical knowledge gap with regard to the cellular and molecular mechanisms that underpin impaired fracture healing due to ischemia.

The objective of this study was to identify, describe, and therapeutically target the cellular and molecular perturbations in the early fracture callus during ischemic fracture healing. We utilized a well-characterized mouse model that mimics vascular injury to assess the effect of ischemia on fracture healing. The model surgically disrupts the femoral blood supply to the lower limb at the time of long bone fracture. We used split barcoding single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) to analyze fractures at 4- and 7-days post-fracture (dpf), representing the early phase of stromal progenitor recruitment and differentiation. Consistent with previous histological observations of more fibrotic and smaller calluses under ischemic conditions6, we observed increased fibroblast presence and delayed chondrogenic cell differentiation in ischemic calluses. Associated with these manifestations, we identified the transcription-regulating kinase Cdk8 as highly upregulated by stromal cells under ischemic fracture conditions. While this kinase has been shown to negatively regulate cellular differentiation9,10, its role in chondrogenesis in the context of fracture healing has not been described. Employing 2D monolayer and 3D organoid cultures, we demonstrated that pharmacological CDK8 inhibition promoted both chondrogenesis and osteoblastogenesis in vitro, consistent with CDK8’s role as a negative regulator of cell differentiation. Finally, in two in vivo experiments with different treatment timing, we showed that an orally available CDK8 inhibitor improved fracture healing by enhancing callus chondrogenesis and osteogenesis, establishing a translational therapeutic approach to treating ischemic fractures.

Results

Ischemia results in altered stromal cell composition and cell-cell signaling in the early fracture callus

Our group and others have demonstrated that ischemic fracture conditions lead to impaired callus formation and mineralization6. Specifically, ischemic calluses exhibit reduced bone volume and increased fibrous tissue, suggesting dysregulation of endochondral ossification6. To characterize the cellular and molecular effects associated with this phenotype, we induced distal hindlimb ischemia in mice by surgical ligation and resection of the left femoral artery (“Ischemic”), or kept vasculature intact (“Intact”), followed by tibial fracture induction in all mice using a three-point bending apparatus. At 7 days post fracture (dpf), representing the early phase of stromal expansion after fracture, we observed a pronounced decrease in cartilage in the ischemic calluses compared to intact callus (Fig. 1A). However, consistent with Lu et al.6, there was no difference in callus size, emphasizing the amount of fibrotic tissue that comprises the ischemic fracture callus. scRNAseq of fracture callus under Intact and Ischemic conditions revealed a time-dependent emergence of stromal, immune, neuronal-related (Schwann cells), and endothelial cells in the fracture calluses (Figs. 1B, C and S1, 2). A profound transition occurred between 4 to 7 dpf, during which the dominance of immune cells at 4 dpf (myeloid, osteoclasts, and lymphocytes) gave way to a pronounced stromal expansion at 7 dpf (chondrogenic, fibroblastic, stromal progenitors, and osteoblasts) (Fig. 1B). We also observed an increase in the endothelial cells by 7 dpf (Fig. 1B). Based on their transcriptional profiles, stromal cells were broadly grouped into chondrocytes, osteoblasts, fibroblasts, and a progenitor subset (Fig. S3A). Isolated analysis of only stromal cells, defined as Prrx1+/Runx2+/Cdh11+/Postn+/Fn1hi/Col1a2hi11, revealed eight functionally unique subsets. These encompassed discrete chondrogenic, osteogenic, and fibroblastic populations that varied across timepoints and injury conditions (Figs. 1D and S3A–C). At 4 dpf, the stromal progenitor population (Acta2+/Pdgfrβ+)12, fibroblasts (Col14a1+/Pdzrn4+)13,14, proliferating fibroblasts (Mki67+/Top2a+)15, chondroprogenitors (Col9a1+/Wwp2+)16,17, ribosome-enriched stromal cells (Rps23+/Rps12+), and osteoblasts (Mmp13+/Col22a1+)18,19 were identified (Figs. 1E and S3B), followed by the further emergence of chondrocytes (Fn1+/Col2a1+)20,21 and hypertrophic chondrocytes (Col10a1+/Bmp6+)22,23 at 7 dpf (Figs. 1E and S3B). Consistent with histological results, ischemic callus had 57.6% fewer chondroprogenitors at 4 dpf and 42.4% fewer chondrocytes, 7.5% fewer hypertrophic chondrocytes, 11.1% fewer osteoblasts, and 27.5% more fibroblasts at 7 dpf, further evidencing a more fibrotic and less chondrogenic callus under ischemic conditions (Fig. 1D, E). Ischemic fractures additionally had 45.3% fewer stromal progenitors at 4 dpf, suggestive of potentially decreased stromal recruitment and proliferation at the fracture site (Fig. 1E).

Fig. 1. Ischemia results in altered stromal cell composition and cell-cell signaling in the early fracture callus.

Fig. 1

A Representative Safranin-O histology images of Intact and Ischemic fractured tibias at 7 days post fracture (dpf) (cartilage is red, bone/connective tissue is blue/green, fibrous tissue is purple/white). The fractured bone is outlined in a dashed line. Top panels represent the entire callus (4X stitch, scale bar = 2000 μm), bottom panels represent zoomed in regions depicting cartilage and fibrous tissue (20X stitch, scale bar = 200 μm). Histologic analysis of callus morphology at 7 dpf; % cartilage area, cartilage area, callus area, (mean ± SD, n = 8 mice/condition). Normality was assessed via Shapiro–Wilk. *p < 0.05, two-sided t-test for Callus Area, Mann–Whitney for non-parametric data for Cartilage Area and % Cartilage Area. B UMAP plot and cellular annotation from scRNAseq of cells from all fracture conditions using Seurat71 (v. 4.1.1). Left to right: Intact 4 dpf, Ischemic 4 dpf, Intact 7 dpf, and Ischemic 7 dpf. C Violin plots of marker gene expression across the major cell clusters from B using the R Package ShinyCell88 (v. 2.1.0). D UMAP plot of stromal cell populations combined across timepoints in Intact (right) and Ischemic (left) conditions using Seurat71 (v. 4.1.1). Stromal cells were isolated from the data in (B) (Chondrogenic cells, Fibroblastic cells, Osteoblasts, Stromal Progenitors), reclustered, and annotated. E Proportions of major stromal cell populations in Intact (black) and Ischemic (pink) calluses according to transcriptome-based identification via scRNAseq at 4 dpf and 7 dpf. F River plot from CellChat24 (v. 1.1.3) crosstalk analysis demonstrating outgoing communication pathways by major stromal cell clusters from D at 7 dpf in Intact and Ischemic conditions. The gene pathways comprising each pattern and contribution score are listed to the right for each. This figure was assembled using Adobe Illustrator90 (v. 29.2.1). GraphPad Prism82 (v. 10.3) was used to generate the bar graphs and any associated statistics stated.

We next sought to assess how ischemia alters the signaling patterns of stromal cells using CellChat analysis to quantitatively infer cell-to-cell communication24. The outgoing (Figs. 1F and S4) and incoming (Fig. S5) communication pathways at 7 dpf depicted similar patterns between Intact and Ischemic conditions with disturbances in key signaling pathways indicative of increased fibrosis under Ischemic conditions. Specifically, pathways involved in bone metabolism and matrix development, including Semaphorin 3 (Sema3) and transforming growth factor beta (Tgfβ) outgoing signaling pathways, were exclusive to the Intact chondrocytes and proliferating fibroblasts. However, under Ischemic conditions, fibronectin 1 signaling (Fn1) was upregulated by the chondrogenic populations, emphasizing altered matrix deposition (Fig. 1F). Additionally, in Intact calluses, stromal progenitor cells exhibited significant vascular cell adhesion molecule (Vcam), and Laminin outgoing signaling pathways in addition to Notch and platelet derived growth factor (Pdgf), however Laminin and Vcam were not predicted as significant pathways under Ischemic conditions for this population (Fig. 1F). Incoming signaling pathways were similarly described for key chondrogenic regulators including Tgfβ, heparan sulfate proteoglycans (Hspg), and Thbs signaling to chondrogenic populations, which were not observed under Ischemic conditions (Fig. S5). These findings demonstrate at the single-cell level that ischemia results in a more fibroblast-rich callus, impaired stromal function, and a signaling program of inferior chondrogenesis and ECM production.

Ischemia promotes increased T cell recruitment during the inflammatory phase of fracture healing

Consistent with prior literature, we established that the early fracture callus (4 dpf) is largely comprised of macrophages and neutrophils25. By 7 dpf, the percentage of the immune population within the callus shifts towards an increase in dendritic cells and T cells (Figs. S6 and S7). scRNAseq analysis of immune populations was corroborated by immunophenotyping using flow cytometry to distinguish macrophages (CD45+/F480+/CD11b+), neutrophils (CD45+/F480−/Ly6G+), dendritic cells (CD45+/F480−CD11c+), and T cells (CD45+/CD3+) (Fig. S6C, D). Interestingly, we identified a ribosome-rich immune population that differentially expressed the hematopoietic stem cell marker Cd34, as well as the GO term “positive regulation of hematopoietic progenitor cell differentiation”, these cells are most prevalent at 4 dpf and diminished by 7 dpf, and could represent hematopoietic stem cells (Fig. S7). The greatest observed difference in immune cell populations between Intact and Ischemic calluses was a two-fold increase in T cell content as shown by flow cytometry (Fig. S6D). In addition, gene ontology analysis demonstrated decreased acute inflammatory response, leukocyte aggregation/degranulation, and T cell cytokine production, indicative of immune cell dysregulation at 4 dpf, concordant with decreased terms associated with extracellular matrix organization by 7 dpf (Fig. S8). These results demonstrate that, alongside alterations to stromal cell content, ischemia also perturbs immune cell composition of early fracture callus, marked by an increase in T cells and dysregulated T cell function.

Ischemic calluses exhibit delayed and more fibroblastic stromal progenitor differentiation

The coordinated differentiation of stromal progenitors into chondrogenic and osteoblastic cell populations is an essential prerequisite for fracture healing. Specifically, αSMA+(Acta2+) progenitors expand following fracture and transition into osteoblasts and chondrocytes12. Osteoblasts produce bone directly via intramembranous bone formation, and chondrocytes form a cartilage intermediate that ultimately undergoes endochondral ossification to form bone. To assess whether ischemia negatively altered stromal progenitor differentiation as part of the inferior callus phenotype, we performed scRNAseq-based cellular trajectory analysis using Monocle326. This was conducted in Intact and Ischemic conditions independently, with αSMA+ progenitor cells as the trajectory origin. In both Intact and Ischemic conditions, we observed a trajectory originating in αSMA+ cells, transitioning through multiple stromal lineages, and terminating in hypertrophic chondrocytes (Col10a1+/Bmp6+) (Fig. 2A). We also identified a branching trajectory from αSMA+ cells to ribosome gene-enriched stromal cells. These cells are indicative of metabolically active protein synthesis and a stressed cell state27. In the Intact condition, this trajectory encompassed a direct transition of the αSMA+ progenitor state to chondroprogenitors, which terminated in hypertrophic chondrocytes via a chondrocyte intermediate (Fig. 2A). However, under ischemia, this trajectory involved a fibroblast-like (Col14a1+/Pdzrn4+) intermediate state between the αSMA+ origin and chondrogenic trajectory endpoint (Fig. 2A). To characterize the molecular alterations of the Ischemic trajectory, we extracted all genes with pseudotime-variant expression in the Intact condition, performed unsupervised hierarchical clustering, and compared their profiles to the Ischemic condition. This revealed massive perturbation to the transcriptional dynamics of chondrogenic differentiation (Fig. 2B). Based on area-under-the-curve (AUC) analysis of genes involved in chondrogenesis along pseudotime, Lmod1, Tgm2, Tagln, Myh11, and Adamts4 exhibited the greatest differences in pseudotime-dependent gene expression between Intact and Ischemic conditions (Table S1). Sox9 and Runx2, as well as genes encoding cartilage matrix constituents (Col2a1, Col10a1, and Acan) demonstrated a clearly delayed and diminished pseudotime-dependent expression pattern in Ischemia compared to Intact (Fig. 2C). Targeted analysis of DEGs upregulated in Ischemic calluses at 7 dpf revealed overexpression of fibrosis-relevant genes including Igfbp528, Sfrp129, Sfrp230, Aebp131, Bag332,33, Il31ra34,35, Col3a136, Col5a137, Mmp1438, Hdgf39, and Serpinh140,41 (Fig. 2D). These results support that the more fibroblastic callus observed in ischemic conditions is associated with the failure of stromal progenitors to effectively transition to chondrocytes.

Fig. 2. Ischemic calluses exhibit delayed fibroblastic stromal progenitor differentiation with associated cellular stress and Cdk8 upregulation.

Fig. 2

A Cellular trajectory analysis via Monocle326 (v. 1.0.0)—Intact (left) and Ischemic (right) conditions. Cells are color-coded according to their stromal cluster from Fig. 1D. Red arrowhead denotes the αSMA+ progenitors. B Heatmap of relative expression (depicted by z-score) of the top 138 genes with the greatest pseudotime-dependent expression changes in Intact (left). X-axis is increasing pseudotime, originating at αSMA+ progenitors, ending at hypertrophic chondrocytes. Hierarchical clustering was performed to bin genes in the y-axis. The same genes, same order, were analyzed in Ischemic along pseudotime (right). Heatmap was generated using the R package ComplexHeatmap81 (v. 2.10.0). C Pseudotime regression plots of normalized expression of progenitor- and chondrogenesis-relevant genes in Intact (black) and Ischemic (pink) as a function of increasing pseudotime, along the respective trajectories in (A). Shaded areas represent 95% confidence intervals. % change in the area under the curve (AUC) of expression between Intact and Ischemic is shown on each plot. D Heatmap of relative gene expression of selected fibroblastic genes upregulated in Ischemic calluses at 7 dpf (generated via R package Pheatmap83 (v. 1.0.12)). E Bubble plot of pathway enrichment analysis (GO:Biological Processes via PantherDB74 (v. 19.0) of differentially-expressed genes in all stromal cells between Intact and Ischemic. Positive sign (+) indicates upregulation in Ischemic. Terms are color-coded according to theme. Bubbleplot generated using Ggplot289 (v. 3.5.1). F Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes (padj < 0.05 in red) between Intact and Ischemic at 7 dpf. Positive fold changes indicate upregulation in Ischemic. Top 5 most differentially expressed genes according to padj are labeled; blue star indicates Cdk8. Number of differentially upregulated and downregulated genes according to padj < 0.05 are listed. G Pseudotime regression plot of normalized Cdk8, Cdk19, and Ccnc expression by stromal cells in Intact (black) and Ischemic (pink) as a function of increasing pseudotime, along the respective trajectories in A with 95% confidence intervals and % change in AUC. H CDK8 gene expression by primary hMSCs cultured in normoxia (20% oxygen) or hypoxia (1% oxygen) for 72 h via quantitative RT-PCR (qPCR). N = 5 unique donors. Data represented as mean ± SD. Normality was assessed via Shapiro–Wilk. *p < 0.05, two-tailed paired t-test. This figure was assembled using Adobe Illustrator90 (v. 29.2.1). GraphPad Prism82 (v. 10.3) was used to generate plots and associated statistics in (C, FH).

Cdk8 upregulation is associated with impaired stromal differentiation and cellular stress in ischemic fractures

Since stromal differentiation trajectories in Ischemic conditions were markedly perturbed, we performed unbiased differential gene expression analysis and determined enriched biological pathways of all stromal cells between Intact and Ischemic conditions. There were 563 DEGs at padj < 0.05 (191 up, 372 down) between Intact and Ischemic stromal cells, which were associated with biological pathways related to immune response, vascularization, osteogenesis, chondrogenesis, and stress response. Within the ischemic population we observed diminished T cell regulation, endothelial cell migration, endochondral ossification, and chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation (Fig. 2E). Conversely, functions associated with stress response—protein refolding and cellular response to heat were enriched under ischemia. In Ischemic calluses, we also observed increased response to IL-4, which can play a role in fibrosis42,43 (Fig. 2E).

Among the top upregulated genes in stromal cells under Ischemic conditions was the gene Cdk8, encoding cyclin dependent kinase 8 (CDK8). CDK8 and its paralog CDK19 are enzymatic components of the regulatory CDK module, which associates with the transcriptional Mediator complex, and CDK8 regulates transcription positively or negatively in a context-specific manner44,45. CDK8 has been demonstrated to impede cell reprogramming and differentiation across multiple cell types, including fibroblast differentiation to hepatocytes and adipocytes46. In all stromal cells combined at 7dpf, DEG analysis demonstrated a 2.5-fold increase (padj = 5.90e−303) in Cdk8 expression in Ischemia compared to Intact conditions (Fig. 2F). We also observed the upregulation of multiple heat shock proteins (Hspa1b, Hspa1a, Hsph1, Hsp90aa1), interpretable as indicators of cellular stress47. CDK8 has also been shown to be required for heat shock protein activation during states of cell stress48,49. Analysis of Cdk8 expression along the stromal progenitor trajectory demonstrated markedly greater Cdk8 expression in cells from Ischemic calluses, notably at low pseudotime values (i.e. early progenitor states) (Fig. 2G). AUC analysis further demonstrated markedly higher cumulative Cdk8 expression (% ∆ AUC = 188.3%) by stromal cells under Ischemic conditions (Fig. 2G). In contrast, Cdk19, a paralog of Cdk8 that can substitute for Cdk8 in transcriptional regulation50, was not overexpressed in Ischemia. Cdk19 and Ccnc, an activator of CDK8 activity, were lowly expressed in both Intact and Ischemic conditions (Fig. 2G). Corroborating the potential role of ischemia in modulating Cdk8 expression in stromal progenitors, primary human mesenchymal stromal cells (hMSC) cultured under hypoxic conditions exhibited upregulation of CDK8 expression (Fig. 2H). These findings demonstrate that ischemia results in markedly impaired stromal progenitor differentiation, associated with a signature of cellular stress and the upregulation of CDK8, which may act as a molecular brake of differentiation46.

Inhibition of CDK8 improves chondrogenic and osteogenic differentiation

To probe the potential role of CDK8 in mediating stromal progenitor differentiation, we next employed the CDK8-specific inhibitor Senexin B5153 in the context of in vitro chondrogenesis of murine ATDC5 cells and hMSC. Treatment of ATDC5 cells with Senexin B resulted in dramatic increases in the expression of Acan, Col2a1, and Col10a1 during monolayer differentiation, with minimal effects on Sox9 expression (Fig. 3A). Three-dimensional hMSC chondrogenesis in the presence of Senexin B for 14 days also resulted in greater expression of ACAN and COL2A1, and Senexin B-treated pellets exhibited ~25% greater sulfated glycosaminoglycan (sGAG) content (Fig. 3B, C). Histomorphometrically, Senexin B-treated pellets were larger in size and exhibited more robust and homogeneous sGAG content, with fewer sGAG-devoid regions compared to the control (Fig. 3D). Consistent with the larger pellet size, the DNA content was also increased by Senexin B treatment, suggesting that inhibition of CDK8 may promote hMSC proliferation (Fig. 3C). Although no difference in total sGAG content was observed between Vehicle and Senexin B-treated samples after normalization to total DNA content (Fig. 3C), histomorphometric analysis suggested superior chondrogenesis when CDK8 kinase activity is inhibited. Lastly, we treated hMSCs with Senexin B and confirmed that CDK8 inhibition enhanced in vitro mineralization in osteogenic media (Fig. 3E), corroborating prior findings54. Taken together, these results indicate that CDK8 activity impedes the chondrogenic and osteogenic differentiation capacities of stromal progenitors, and its pharmacological inhibition with Senexin B enhances chondrogenesis and osteoblastogenesis. We further assessed proliferation in basal growth media in the presence of Senexin B and found that this appears to inhibit proliferation (Fig. S9). This supports that blocking CDK8 improves cellular differentiation, however it also suggests that CDK8 expression might promote proliferation in the absence of differentiation cues.

Fig. 3. Inhibition of CDK8 improves chondrogenic and osteogenic differentiation.

Fig. 3

A Gene expression of chondrogenesis-relevant genes, via qPCR, by ATDC5 cells treated with either Vehicle (black) or 400 nM Senexin B (pink) during 14 days of chondrogenic differentiation. Individual data points represent n = 4 technical replicates. BD Gene expression of chondrogenesis-relevant genes via qPCR (B), glycosaminoglycan content via DMMB assay (C), and Alcian blue-stained histologic sections of primary hMSC-based chondrogenic pellets treated with Vehicle or Senexin B during 14 days of chondrogenic differentiation. B Gene expression of chondrogenesis-relevant genes was analyzed from the RNA of 3 pooled pellets for each donor (n = 3 unique donors, n = 2–3 technical replicates per donor). C Two pooled chondrogenic hMSC pellets per unique donor were digested and glycosaminoglycan and DNA content were quantified. sGAG content is expressed as both unnormalized (bottom row) and normalized to the Vehicle control. sGAG content was further normalized to DNA content (n = 3 unique donors). In normalized plots, a one sample t-test is applied. D Chondrogenic hMSC pellets were paraffin processed, sectioned (5 µm), and stained with 1% Alcian Blue in 3% Acetic Acid and Nuclear Fast Red stain. Sections were imaged at 10X using brightfield microscopy. Scalebar = 300 um. (n = 3 unique donors, n = 2–3 technical replicates) Each color represents a unique biologic donor. E Osteogenesis was induced in 2D cultured hMSCs treated with Vehicle and 400 nM Senexin B and analyzed for mineralization with Alizarin red S staining after 10 days (n = 3 unique donors). Graphs were generated and analyzed using Prism82 (v. 10.3). Data represented as mean ± SD. Normality was assessed via Shapiro–Wilk. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001, two-sided t-test, Welch-corrected two-sided t-test for plots with nonequivalent variance in (A), one-sided t-test for normalized plots in (C), Wilcoxon test for non-parametric data in (C), sGAG Content (ug/mL) and (E) Integrated Density Values. This figure was assembled using Adobe Illustrator90 (v. 29.2.1). GraphPad Prism82 (v. 10.3) was used to generate all graphs.

Oral pharmacologic CDK8 inhibition alters ischemic bone healing in vivo

To confirm the functional importance of CDK8 in vivo and to assess whether pharmacological CDK8 inhibition is a viable therapeutic strategy to improve fracture healing, we sought to therapeutically block CDK8 to rescue impaired healing of ischemic fractures. We utilized the CDK8 inhibitor SNX631-6, an orally available pharmaceutical with ~10 times greater potency than Senexin B55. We first confirmed that SNX631-6 recapitulated the beneficial effects of Senexin B on chondrogenesis in vitro. Chondrogenic ATDC5 cells treated with SNX631-6 exhibited similar upregulation of chondrogenic genes, including Collagen 2 (Col2a1), Collagen 10 (Col10a1), Aggrecan (Acan), but not of Sox9 (Fig. S10). Next, we employed two treatment regimens to assess how orally-administered SNX631-6 (25 mg/kg twice daily) impacted the early chondrogenic phase (treatment 5–10 dpf) (Fig. 4A–E) and the chondrogenic-to-osteogenic phase (treatment 5–15 dpf, Fig. 4F–J) in the healing of ischemic murine fractures. Treatment during 5–10 dpf demonstrated a slight increase in µCT-based callus volume but not enhanced callus bone formation (Fig. 4B, C). Interestingly, it appears that bone volume fraction and bone mineral density are reduced when Cdk8 is inhibited during this timeframe (Fig. 4C). This may be due to the increased presence of chondrogenic cues pushing MSCs towards a more pro-chondrogenic fate. Histological analysis corroborated this trend of increased volume and depicted significantly increased callus cartilage content, by both total and proportional area (Fig. 4D, E). These in vivo findings corroborate our observed in vitro effects of CDK8 inhibition to improve chondrogenesis (Fig. 3A–D).

Fig. 4. Oral treatment with SNX631-6 leads to increased callus size and bone content by 15 days post fracture in ischemic tibia fractures.

Fig. 4

A Timeline of oral gavage treatment from 5–10 dpf with 25 mg/kg SNX631-6. B Representative μCT images of fractured tibiae 15 dpf from vehicle (30% Propylene Glycol, 70% PEG-400 twice daily) and SNX631-6 (25 mg/kg twice daily) groups treated from 5–10 dpf. C μCT analysis of callus morphology at 15 dpf from groups treated 5–10 dpf; bone volume, bone mineral density, tissue mineral density, callus volume, bone volume fraction, bone mineral content, tissue mineral content (n = 8 vehicle, n = 9 SNX631-6). D Representative histology images of vehicle and SNX631-6 fractured tibias at 15 dpf from groups treated 5–10 dpf, (4X stitch, scalebar = 3000 μm). E Histologic analysis of callus morphology at 15 dpf from groups treated 5–10 dpf; % cartilage area, cartilage area, callus area (n = 8 vehicle, n = 9 treatment, average of 3 technical replicates/callus). F Timeline of oral gavage treatment from 5–15 dpf with 25 mg/kg SNX631-6. G Representative μCT analysis of callus morphology at 15 dpf from groups treated 5–15 dpf. H μCT analysis of callus morphology at 15 dpf from groups treated 5–10 dpf. I Representative histology images of vehicle and SNX631-6 fractured tibias at 15 dpf from groups treated 5–15 dpf. J Histologic analysis of callus morphology at 15 dpf from groups treated 5–15 dpf, (4X stitch, scalebar = 3000 μm). Data represented as mean ± SD. Normality was assessed via Shapiro–Wilk. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, two-sided t-test. This figure was assembled using Adobe Illustrator90 (v. 29.2.1). GraphPad Prism82 (v. 10.3) was used to generate all graphs.

CDK8 inhibition via SNX631-6 treatment during 5–15 dpf improved fracture healing by increasing µCT-based bone volume, total callus volume, bone mineral content, tissue mineral content, and tissue mineral density, as compared to control (vehicle) treatment (Fig. 4G, H). Histological analysis corroborated significantly larger callus size in SNX631-6-treated mice, with no difference in the proportion of total area of cartilage (Fig. 4I, J). Increased bone volume with treatment during the chondrogenic-to-osteogenic transitionary period is consistent with the findings in Fig. 3E and demonstrates that when osteogenic cues are present, CDK8 inhibition improves bone formation.

Discussion

Insufficient blood supply leads to reduced delivery of oxygen and nutrients to cells, a clinically unfavorable condition that has long been recognized as a cause of nonunion or malunion fractures56. Ample evidence exists showing that the ischemic callus forms less bone and overall tissue volume, an effect that persists throughout the healing process5,6. Despite these observations of impaired callus formation in ischemic fracture healing, the cellular and molecular mechanisms underpinning this phenotype have not been well characterized. We analyzed the cellular milieu underlying impaired ischemic conditions and discovered impaired stromal progenitor differentiation associated with upregulated Cdk8 expression.

Fibrotic healing, rather than chondrogenic and osteogenic healing, is a well-described consequence of multiple impaired fracture conditions, including ischemia6,57,58. Using scRNAseq-based trajectory analysis and unbiased derivation of the transcriptional programs underpinning stromal progenitor differentiation, we observed aberrant stromal differentiation towards a fibroblastic intermediate state in ischemic conditions. Whereas control (Intact) calluses transitioned from aSMA/Acta2+ progenitors to chondroprogenitors and hypertrophic chondrocytes, Ischemic calluses exhibited a clear fibroblastic intermediate cell state characterized by high expression of Matrix metallopeptidase 14, Collagen 3, and Collagen 5 with diminished expression of canonical chondrogenic genes such as Aggrecan, Collagen 2, and Collagen 10. Our study characterized the cellular identity and differentiation trajectory of the cells underpinning fibrotic healing in ischemic fracture calluses, facilitating additional future studies targeting these cells.

We demonstrated that impaired stromal progenitor differentiation during ischemic fracture healing is associated with upregulation of Cdk8, but not of its paralog Cdk19. Trajectory analysis demonstrated that Ischemic calluses have severely reduced and delayed chondrogenic gene expression that coincides with greater expression of Cdk8, notably in early progenitor states. Our findings corroborate the work by other groups that CDK8 inhibits fibroblast reprogramming and differentiation46. Using selective pharmacologic inhibitors of CDK8/19, we demonstrated that CDK8 impedes chondrocyte and osteoblast differentiation, resulting in reduced chondrogenesis and endochondral ossification that comprise impaired healing conditions both in vitro and in vivo. Most importantly, we confirmed that in vivo CDK8 inhibition using an orally-available drug improved callus formation, with enhanced chondrogenesis and callus bone formation, consistent with improved healing. These are clinically relevant results as they suggest that oral treatment with CDK8 inhibitors may be able to modulate impaired fracture healing, addressing a major unmet clinical need.

Prior literature has demonstrated that Cdk8 is upregulated under aging-associated osteoporosis and that genetic inhibition of Cdk8 rescued the impaired senescent MSC phenotype in aged mice59. In accordance with our work, pharmacologic inhibition of CDK8/19 using CDK8/19 inhibitors have both been shown to inhibit osteoclast activity and upregulate osteoblast activity in a mouse model in vitro and in a rat model upon local (intra-bone) administration54. Here, we demonstrated that Cdk8 broadly inhibits both osteogenesis and chondrogenesis and that impaired bone healing can be rescued by systemic administration of an orally available CDK8/19 inhibitor.

Through our two treatment regimens of CDK8 inhibition during the early chondrogenic callus formation and the chondrogenic to osteogenic transition in the ischemic fracture environment, we see definitive increases in cell differentiation to chondrocytes (day 5–10) and enhanced osteogenesis (day 5–15), respective to the cues present in the environment at these timepoints. This is consistent with our in vitro work. While we observed a reduction in bone volume fraction and bone mineral density in the day 5–10 treatment group, there was comparable bone volume overall, suggesting that these decreased proportions are due to increased callus size. We anticipate that if a later time period was studied, that the greater cartilage in this group would undergo mineralization, thus resulting in an overall stronger callus. We additionally observed an increase in bone formation in the longer day 5–15 treatment group, however, it is unclear whether this is due to direct MSC osteogenesis or hypertrophic chondrocytes undergoing endochondral ossification. Either explanation is possible given that our in vitro results support both a direct osteogenic effect of CDK8 inhibition and an expansion of cartilage. We saw increases in hypertrophic chondrocyte marker Col10a1 indicative of expedited chondrocyte differentiation towards hypertrophy. Previous studies have shown that Cdk8 inhibition through Cdk8 RNAi maintains SMAD phosphorylation in the BMP and TGFβ signaling pathways long after removal of the stimuli, potentially driving our observed increase in differentiation60.

CDK8 is a unique pharmacologic target in impaired fracture healing with clinically relevant, orally-bioavailable, non-toxic drugs already in cancer clinical trials6164. Our study demonstrates a translational therapeutic strategy for altering impaired fracture healing outcomes through noninvasive means that would complement surgical measures. Additional in vivo experimentation focused on understanding bone quality at later timepoints through mechanical testing and bony bridging are needed to demonstrate accelerated healing. Further work will elucidate specific transcriptional effects of CDK8 which will be required to assist in understanding its role in callus formation and mineralization. Future in vitro differentiation and crosstalk studies will expand upon and corroborate mechanistic interrogation of how CDK8 functions to promote differentiation.

Methods

Animal studies

The study was designed under the guidance of a university-wide AAALAC-accredited laboratory animal medicine program. Protocols used in this study were reviewed and approved by the University of Michigan Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC), protocol number PRO00011260.

C57 Bl/6 mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). All mice were allowed at least 2 weeks’ time to accommodate to the pathogen-free vivarium on a 12-h light/dark cycle at the University of Michigan prior to studies. All animals were allowed ad libitum access to food and water. Mice were socially housed (3–5 mice per cage) in the same vivarium.

Mice were randomly assigned to control or experimental group. For all surgical and fracture procedures, mice were anesthetized using inhaled isoflurane (4% for induction; 2–4% for maintenance) and given a single dose of Ethiqa XR (extended-release Buprenorphine) subcutaneously (SC) for analgesia (3.25 mg/kg). Animals were humanely euthanized through carbon dioxide inhalation, followed by cervical dislocation for confirmation of death. All procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).

Tibial fractures were performed at 18 (±2) weeks of age. A three-point bend apparatus was utilized to generate bilateral tibia fractures, as previously described. To do so, 30-gauge needles were first inserted into the intramedullary space of both tibiae to stabilize each bone. This was radiographically confirmed prior to clipping the needles flush with the proximal tibia. A 272-gram weight was then dropped onto the tibia inducing a traumatic fracture directly distal to the tibiofibular junction as we have previously described65,66. This was done consecutively in both tibiae, and a transverse fracture pattern was confirmed through radiography.

Alternatively, mice underwent ischemic unilateral left tibia fractures. Prior to incision, 0.5% Bupivacaine was injected locally. Under anesthesia, a 15 mm incision was created proximal to the knee along the length of the femur in the left limb. The femoral artery was isolated and a 2 mm section was ligated using 8-0 nylon sutures. The artery was then resected, leaving a 2 mm gap, inducing ischemia in the distal limb6. Immediately following arterial resection, left tibia are pinned and fractured as described above.

CDK8 inhibitor treatment

Male C57 Bl/6 mice at 18 weeks old underwent ischemic left tibia fractures as described. Mice were gavage fed 25 mg/kg SNX631-6 (Senex Biotechnology, Inc.) in 30% Propylene Glycol and 70% PEG-400 twice a day. Control mice were gavage fed vehicle (30% Propylene Glycol and 70% PEG-400) twice a day. Treatments began on 5 dpf and continued to 10 dpf or 15 dpf. All mice in this experiment were euthanized at 15 days post fracture. The study design included n = 10 mice per group, however this was reduced to 9 Vehicle, 8 SNX631-6 treated for Cohort 1, 8 Vehicle, 8 SNX631-6 for Cohort 2. Exclusion criteria listed in Table S4.

Euthanasia

Mice were euthanized at endpoints of 4 days post fracture, 7 days post fracture or 15 days post fracture. Euthanasia was performed using carbon dioxide overdose followed by a secondary method of cervical dislocation.

Tissue fixation

For micro-computed (μCT) topography and histologic analysis, tibias were immediately removed from the animals and placed into 10% Neutral Buffered Formalin for 48 h at 4 degrees Celsius. Afterwards, formalin was rinsed out of the tissues using distilled water and the limbs were placed in 70% ethanol for downstream processing.

Callus harvest and digestion

For single cell RNA sequencing and flow cytometry, tibias were harvested at 4 and 7 days post fracture. Fracture calluses were manually harvested via stereomicroscope dissection from mice at 4 and 7 dpf and digested using a shaking waterbath at 37 degrees Celsius for 30 min in 5 mL PBS (+Ca/+Mg) supplemented with 2 mg/mL Collagenase P, 2 mg/mL Hyaluronidase, and 200 µg/mL DNase. Isolated cells were filtered through a 40 µm cell strainer.

Micro-computed tomography (μCT)

At 15 dpf, fractured tibias were removed at the knee joint and placed into 10% Neutral buffered formalin for 48 h prior to transfer to 70% ethanol. Intramedullary pins were removed using small nose needle pliers and fractured tibias were μCT scanned using a Bruker SkyScanner and reconstruction was performed in MicroView. Dragonfly analysis software was used to analyze fracture callus volume, bone volume, tissue mineral content, and bone mineral content. The callus region of interest was determined by manually outlining the callus region every ten slides throughout the entire callus. The marrow space and cortical bone are selected and removed from the callus area. These images are then interpolated across sections to generate a callus volume. A bone threshold to classify tissue as bony tissue was determined by outlining the calluses, allowing the software to automatically determine the bone threshold for the vehicle samples, taking the average across vehicle samples and re-applying this threshold to all the samples. Bone volume fraction was manually calculated by dividing bone volume by total callus volume. Bone mineral density was determined by dividing bone mineral content by total callus volume, and tissue mineral density was calculated by dividing the tissue mineral content by the bone volume. Analysis was done blinded to treatment or control. Representative callus images were selected from the Dragonfly software.

Histologic analyses of fracture calluses

For limbs 15 dpf, post μCT scanning, limbs were thoroughly rinsed with distilled water and transferred to Immunocal Decalcifier for 16 h. X-rays taken using the Kubtec X-ray machine confirmed decalcification. Tissues were paraffin embedded using the tissue processor (Leica ASP 300S) and sectioned in the sagittal plane at 5 µm. Serial sections of the callus were placed on different slides with each slide containing 3 sections approximately 50 µm apart generating an average representation of the callus for each sample. Tissues were deparaffinized using a sequence of xylenes and Ethanol from xylene to 100% ethanol, 95% ethanol, 70% ethanol, to distilled water. Limbs were stained with Weigert Hematoxylin followed by 0.05% aqueous Fast Green, and 0.1% Safranin O to label cells bone and cartilage respectively. Fracture calluses were imaged in color brightfield on an inverted microscope (Biotek Lionheart) at 4X stitches. Image files were saved and analyzed in ImageJ67 to assess the average callus area, cartilage area, and percent cartilage across 3 sections, each 50 µm apart for each sample. A region of interest is established by outlining the callus in ImageJ, the brightness range, saturation range, and hue range and determined to allow for cartilage detection and these thresholds are kept constant across all samples within a cohort. The number of pixels that make up each callus region and the number of pixels that make up the cartilage region within each callus is recorded. The cartilage pixels are divided by the total callus pixels to determine % cartilage area.

For limbs from mice 7 dpf, a mix of males and females were used. The study design included n = 8 mice per group, no mice were excluded (Table S4). Tibias underwent fixation as described above, were placed in 70% ethanol, thoroughly rinsed, and transferred to 20% ETDA for 2 weeks. X-rays taken using the Kubtec X-ray machine confirmed decalcification. Tissues were paraffin embedded using the tissue processor (Leica ASP 300S) and sectioned in the sagittal plane at 5 µm at the center of the callus. Sections were deparaffinized, stained with Weigert Hematoxylin followed by 0.05% aqueous Fast Green, and 0.1% Safranin O and analyzed using ImageJ. For all histology analysis, the person performing analysis was blinded to treatment or control.

Flow cytometry

Flow cytometry was employed to identify and quantify immune cell subsets in fracture callus. Single-cell suspensions of fracture callus cells were stained with live/dead stain (Fixable Viability Dye) and blocked with FcX TruStain PLUS. Cells were then washed, stained in the dark with fluorescently conjugated antibodies for 30 min at 4 °C (Table S2), fixed with Fixation/Permeabilization buffer, and passed through a 40 µm filter. A minimum number of 50,000 cells were targeted for each sample. For all flow cytometry experiments, an unstained control, single-stained controls for all targets, and fluorescence-minus-one tubes for all targets were included for robust determination of negative and positive staining in each channel. Experiments were performed in FACS buffer (PBS containing 2% fetal calf serum and 1 mM EDTA). Immune cells were identified by labeling for CD45+ cells. Of the CD45+ cells, macrophages were identified as Ly6G−/F480+/CD11b+; granulocytes were identified as F480−/Ly6G+; dendritic cells were identified as Ly6G−/F480−/CD11c+; T cells were identified as Ly6G−/F480−/CD11c−/CD11b−/CD3+. Samples were analyzed and compensated on the BD LSRFortessa cytometer using FACSDiva (BD Biosciences) software. Data were analyzed using FlowJo68 (v. 10.9) (BD Biosciences).

Single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq)

scRNAseq (Parse Biosciences pipeline) was used to characterize the transcriptomic differences in early response of Intact and Ischemic fracture calluses at 4 and 7 dpf, representing four conditions. For each condition, we sequenced a single biological replicate made up of 8 pooled calluses (equal male/female). Following enzymatic callus digestion, single cell suspensions were fixed using the Parse fixation kit, frozen down to −80 °C in media containing 1.6% DMSO, and subsequently submitted to the University of Michigan Advanced Genomics Core for sequencing using the Parse Biosciences pipeline.

Samples were counted using AO/PI stains on the LunaFx7 automated cell counter (Logos Bio). Samples were prepped according to Parse’s instructions for single-cell whole-transcriptome profiling. Cells were thawed and counted on a hemocytometer prior to barcoding. Samples were loaded into Round 1 Plate, by sample, to receive their initial barcode through an in situ reverse transcription reaction using barcoded primers. Cells were then pooled from all samples and randomly distributed to Round 2 plate, where they received a second barcode through ligation barcoding using a Ligation Mix provided by Parse. This was repeated to generate a unique barcode for each cell. cDNA was quantified by Qubit and assessed on TapeStation 2200 (Agilent). Final libraries were quantified by Qubit and assessed on LabChip GX Touch (Revvity). Sequencing was then performed in a paired-end fashion (150 bp) on a NovaSeq6000. Processing targeted 12,500 cells/sample with a target depth of 50,000 reads/cell. Raw sequencing data was aligned to the GRCm38 reference mouse transcriptome, and all preprocessing, quality control, and bioinformatic analyses were performed using RStudio (v 2024.12.1)69 and R70 (v. 4.1.3). Data were imported into Seurat (v. 4.1.1)71 for quality control, filtering, and bioinformatic analysis.

Quality control, filtering, clustering, and analysis of scRNAseq data

A rigorous quality control pipeline was employed to remove low quality cells, doublets, and debris (Fig. S1). Duplicated genes, empty row names, cells with less than 100 detected genes, and genes expressed in fewer than 10 cells were first removed. Then, low quality cells were removed on the basis of gene/feature expression: 250 < nFeature < 4000, 500 < nCount < 4000. Cells were kept if they contained log10 genes per unique molecular identifier (UMI) > 0.8 and mitochondrial gene ratios <7.5%. A global scaling normalization was then applied to normalize the feature expression for each cell by the total expression, and the top 3000 variable features were calculated. Data was then scaled using a linear transformation so that the mean expression of each gene is set to 0 and variance is 1 to account for highly expressed genes, and a regression was employed to remove variance due to cell cycle and mitochondrial gene expression. Seurat (v. 4.1.1)71,72 was used to perform linear dimensionality reduction via principal component analysis, followed by nonlinear dimensionality reduction via Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) and clustering. Using elbow plots illustrating the proportion of variance in each principal component, dimensions 1-23 were chosen for subsequent nonlinear dimensionality reduction of all cells from all conditions via Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP). Clustering was performed using the Seurat functions FindNeighbors (dims 1:23) and FindClusters (resolution = 0.5), which employ a K-nearest neighbor graph-based approach and the Louvain algorithm71.

Cluster gene markers were then derived using the Seurat function FindAllMarkers to extract the top 50 markers per cluster. Significant (padj < 0.05) gene markers were sorted by pct1/pct2 ratio and the top 10 markers were prioritized in identifying each cluster. For each data object, clustering resolution was iterated across a range of the resolution parameter (0.2–0.7) in the FindClusters function to derive a final resolution setting which yielded at least 10 significant gene markers with high pct1/pc2 ratio. Published data, pathway enrichment analysis via Gene Ontology–Biological Processes (GO:BP) PantherDB73,74 and Cluster Identity Predictor (CIPR)75 were further used to identify and annotate each cluster based on their top gene markers, as defined above.

Subset clustering of immune and stromal cells

Following the identification of broad cell types, we computationally extracted immune cells (clusters 3, 4, and 6) and stromal cells (clusters 1, 5, 8, and 9) from the data object containing all cells from all conditions and all timepoints (Fig. 1B) to identify specific subsets within these populations separately. Clustering parameters were re-established, as described above, to cluster immune cells (dims = 1:19, resolution = 0.7) and stromal cells (dims = 1:19, resolution = 0.5) separately. Cluster gene markers were extracted, and cells were identified by gene marker expression, pathway analysis, and CIPR, as described above. Stromal and immune subsets were named according to prior literature or based on expression of top gene markers. Clusters were identified and labeled according to the expression of top gene markers. Dimensionality reduction and clustering was first performed on all cells from all conditions to identify major cell types, followed by more detailed clustering and annotation of only immune cells (defined as Ptprc+)76 and only stromal cells (defined by Prrx1+/Runx2+/Cdh11+/Postn+/Fn1hi/Col1a2hi)11 separately.

Pathway enrichment analysis

To analyze which biological pathways underpin a set of differentially-expressed genes (DEGs) between two or more conditions, we extracted DEGs using the FindMarkers function in Seurat71 (v. 4.1.1.), with ident1 set as the Intact condition and ident2 set as the Ischemic condition. A csv data file containing gene names and corresponding log2FC values was then uploaded to PantherDB73,74. Statistical overrepresentation analysis was performed utilizing the Mus musculus reference and the Gene Ontology–Biological Processes (GO:BP) annotation. GO:BP results were represented by bubble plots to show the degree of pathway enrichment and the associated padj/FDR value. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was used to unbiasedly analyze GO terms in the immune population at 4 and 7 dpf between Intact and Ischemic conditions77. GSEA input required gene list, p value and log2 fold-change which were all taken into account to generate the top GOs. Top GOs were determined according to normalized enrichment scores (NES). R packages fgsea78 (1.20.0) and clusterProfiler79 (4.2.2) were used for GSEA analysis. Enrichplot80 (v. 1.14.2) were used to make the bubbleplots.

Cell-cell communication analysis

To model cell-cell communication and predict the major cellular signaling pathways from scRNAseq data, we utilized the R package CellChat (v. 1.1.3)24. A CellChat object was created for each condition and time point separately, and the default CellChatDB.mouse database was used to interrogate ligand-receptor interactions. To assess overexpressed pathways, we utilized the functions identifyOverExpressedGenes and identifyOverExpressedInteractions. The triMean method was used to infer ligand receptor pairs. A minimum cell number was set to 10 and the probability of the ligand-receptor interaction was set to p < 0.05. The cutoff for contribution score was set to 0.2. Outgoing and incoming signaling pathways were assessed across all Intact cells at days 4 and 7 post fracture. Cell populations were pseudocolored to match the stromal populations in Fig. 1D. Riverplots were simplified, and columns added manually based on CellChat output in Fig. 1 to show the pathways contributing to each pattern and their contribution score. Full R output of Riverplots are shown in S4 and S5.

Patterns were selected at the peak of the line plot, resulting in 5–6 patterns. The presence/absence of signaling pathways and their corresponding probability values were compared between conditions, utilizing the Intact condition as the control/reference group.

Trajectory analysis

Monocle326 (v. 1.0.0) was employed to perform cellular trajectory analysis and unbiasedly assess differentiation-associated genes across genotypes/conditions. We first isolated and pooled all stromal cells at both timepoints for each condition separately (Intact and Ischemic), parameters found in Table S3. First, linear and nonlinear dimensionality reduction was performed via PCA and UMAP using the Monocle3 functions preprocess_cds and reduce_dimension functions, respectively, followed by clustering using the cluster_cells function, according to Monocle3 guidelines. Dimensionality reduction and clustering parameters were optimized in a supervised fashion to most closely reflect clustering results from Seurat for each condition. The learn_graph function was then used to compute a trajectory within each condition, and the progenitor stromal cells population αSMA+(Acta2+) population was manually selected as the root node in the order_cells function, given prior literature demonstrating that αSMA+ progenitors give rise to osteogenic cells in fracture callus12. We then isolated the trajectory segment from the aSMA+ progenitor towards hypertrophic chondrogenic end state using choose_graph_segments to subset cells involved in this differentiation pathway. To unbiasedly extract the top genes that exhibit pseudotime-dependent expression changes along this trajectory from aSMA+ progenitor towards hypertrophic chondrocytes, gene expression was analyzed across the subset of cells and those with a q-value < 0.05 and a Moran’s I > 0.25 were selected from the intact trajectory, resulting in 138 genes. The same 138 genes were used in a heatmap for the Ischemic condition. Heatmaps were constructed using the R Package ComplexHeatmaps81 (v. 2.10.0). Area under the curve (AUC) as a function of pseudotime was calculated for all 138 genes using the normalized expression in the Intact and Ischemic trajectories. To interrogate the specific undulations in gene expression over pseudotime for the Intact and Ischemic trajectories plot_genes_in_pseudotime was used to extract normalized expression and the 95% CI as a function of pseudotime [using Loess regression]. This was then plotted using GraphPad Prism82 (v. 10.3).

Ischemic fibrosis-associated gene expression analysis

We assessed genes differentially expressed in the Ischemic callus at 7 dpf (p < 0.05) and assessed their known role in the literature; we found several determined to be associated with fibrosis and generated a heatmap using their log2 fold change and the R package Pheatmap83 (v. 1.0.12).

ATDC5 culture and differentiation

ATDC5 cells were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. ATDC5 cells were cultured in growth media consisting of high glucose DMEM with 5% FBS, 1X L-glutamine, 1X antibiotic-antimycotic. To induce chondrogenic differentiation, a standardized protocol was employed84,85. ATDC5 cells were grown to 90% confluency, passaged, and plated at 5 × 104 cells/well in a 12 well plate. After 2 days, the media was replaced with high glucose DMEM (with pyruvate) containing, 1X L-glutamine, 1X antibiotic-antimycotic, 40 ug/mL L-proline, 40 ug/mL L-ascorbic acid 2-phosphate, 10 ng/mL TGFβ1, 1X ITS pre-mix, and 100 nM dexamethasone to induce chondrogenesis. Chondrogenic media was replaced every 2 days for 14 days.

To assess the effect of Cdk8 inhibition on chondrogenic differentiation, cells were treated with either vehicle (PBS) or fresh 400 nM Senexin B (resuspended in PBS) with each media replacement. ATDC5 treated with SNX631-6 at 0, 25, 50, 100, 200, and 400 nM in the presence of TGFβ1 were similarly treated with new media containing SNX631-6 every 2 days for 10 days. At harvest, cells were lysed with TRIzol, RNA was extracted, and chondrogenic gene expression was assessed via quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR). All primer sequences are listed in Table S5. All ATDC5 experiments were repeated three independent times with 3–4 technical replicates each time.

Primary human mesenchymal stromal cell (hMSC) culture and differentiation

Donor hMSC were provided from Case Western University for chondrogenic pellet assays and osteogenic assays through a NIH/NIBIB funded P41:1P41EB021911. hMSC were provided from Texas A & M Health Science Center College of Medicine Institute for Regenerative Medicine at Scott and White through a grant for ORIP of the NIH #P40OD011050 for gene expression analysis in hypoxic conditions86.

For chondrogenic differentiation, hMSC were recovered from liquid nitrogen into low glucose DMEM (Gibco, cat. 11885084) containing 10% FBS, 1X antibiotic-antimycotic, 10 ng/mL fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF-2). Cells were grown to 90% confluency prior to passage and expansion. hMSC underwent trypsinization and were centrifuged at 500 × g for 5 min. Post centrifugation, cells were resuspended in chondrogenic media containing DMEM, 1X antimycotic, 1X non-essential amino acids, 40 ug/mL ascorbic acid 2-phosphate, 10 ng/mL TGFβ1, 1X ITS pre-mix, and 100 nM dexamethasone. To generate three-dimensional pellets, hMSC were plated at 2.5 × 105 cells/well in 96 v-bottom plates, as described85. Plates were spun down at 500 × g for 5 min to condense the cells and allowed to rest for 3 days to form pellets. For the duration of the experiment, pellets were treated with either Vehicle (PBS) or 400 nM Senexin B at each media exchange every second day up to 14 days. Pellets were then harvested for either gene expression analysis, histological analysis, or quantification of sGAGs via the DMMB assay (details below). All experiments were performed in three unique hMSC donor lines, and each assay was conducted in 2–3 technical replicates.

For osteogenesis, hMSCs were cultured in a monolayer in osteogenic media (αMEM, 1% antibiotic antimycotic, 1% l-glutamine, 1X insulin transferrin selenium, 25 µg/mL l-ascorbic acid 2-phosphate, 5 mM beta glycerophosphate) (Table S2) for 10 days. Cells were exposed to osteogenic media containing BMP-2 (200 ng/mL) or 5% FBS for the first 4 days and treated with either vehicle (PBS) or 400 nM Senexin B at each media exchange. Cells were fixed and stained with Alizarin red to assess mineralization.

For hypoxic study, hMSC were cultured in a monolayer in serum free media (αMEM, 1% antibiotic antimycotic, 1% l-glutamine, 1X insulin transferrin selenium, 25 µg/mL l-ascorbic acid 2-phosphate, 5 mM beta glycerophosphate) (Table S2) in a H35 hypoxystation (Don Whitley Scientific) at 1% oxygen tension or under normoxic conditions (20% oxygen) for 72 h. Cells from 5 unique donors were harvested for RNA and analyzed via qPCR for gene expression of CDK8 relative to β2-microglobulin (β2M) housekeeping gene. Primer sequences are listed in Table S5.

Gene expression analysis via qPCR

For ATDC5 cells and monolayer hMSC, TRIzol was added to monolayer cultures to lyse cells. hMSC pellets were flash frozen, stored at −80 °C until analysis, and then homogenized in TRIzol using a manual tissue grinder. Each hMSC pellet condition had 2–3 technical replicates comprised of 3 pellets pooled together to increase RNA quantity. All samples then underwent phenol-chloroform RNA isolation. Spectrophotometry was performed using a Nanodrop (Thermo Fisher) to calculate RNA concentration and assess purity. A standard 500 μg was taken from each sample to perform reverse transcription using a High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems). A QuantStudio5 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) was used to perform qPCR. The housekeeping genes, GAPDH or β2M, was utilized to normalize the genes of interest. Control samples were set to 1 using the 2−∆∆Ct and all samples were normalized to control. All primer sequences are listed in Table S5.

Glycosaminoglycan and DNA quantification

Chondrogenic pellets were harvest by flash freezing in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until analysis. After thawing, samples were immersed in buffer containing papain (0.025 mg/mL), L-cysteine hydrochloride (0.315 mg/mL), EDTA (0.744 mg/mL), and sodium phosphate (0.0071 mg/mL). Samples were then heated at 60 degrees for 16 h. Samples were vortexed and homogenization was visually confirmed. Di-methyl methylene blue dye (containing 1,9 Dimethylene blue, glycine, NaCl) (pH 1.5) was added to each sample at a ratio of 1:20 and absorbance was immediately quantified at 525 nm and 59 5 nm using a spectrophotometer (Synergy HTX, Biotek) as previously described61. Data were calibrated to a chondroitin sulfate standard curve to quantify sulfated glycosaminoglycans. Samples were then normalized to their respective vehicle control for each donor to assess total changes in glycosaminoglycans. The Quant-iT PicoGreen dsDNA assay was utilized to further quantify DNA content in homogenates, utilizing dsDNA standards as a calibration. sGAG data were then normalized by DNA content to control for cell density.

Histological evaluation of chondrogenic pellets

Chondrogenic hMSC pellets were collected into 10% neutral buffered formalin for 16 h, transferred to 70% ethanol, and paraffin processed and embedded. Five micron-thick sections were cut and stained with Alcian Blue (1% in 3% Acetic Acid). In brief, slides were deparaffinized and rehydrated in a series of xylene and ethanol. Slides were rinsed in MilliQ water, placed in 3% acetic acid, and incubated in Alcian Blue staining solution. Slides were then rinsed in MilliQ water and incubated in Nuclear Fast Red Solution. After staining, slides were rinsed in MilliQ water, dehydrated through a series of ethanol to xylene and coverslipped using Cytoseal. Stained sections were imaged by brightfield microscopy (Lionheart, Biotek) at ×10 magnification and stitched together to capture a full pellet.

Proliferation analysis of hMSC

hMSC were plated at 60 K cells/well in a 12 well plate in basal growth media. After 1 day, hMSC were treated with 400 nM Senexin B and left in normoxic conditions (20% oxygen) or moved to hypoxia (1% oxygen). Plates were fixed with 10% neutral buffered formalin at 1, 3, and 5 days post incubation and DAPI stained. A set region was imaged across all plates at 10X and the number of nuclei was quantified using CellProfiler87 (v. 4.2.1).

Quantification and statistical analysis

All group data are presented as mean ± 95% confidence interval and p < 0.05 or padj < 0.05 was considered statistically significant throughout comparisons. For continuous data, normality and equal variance were confirmed via Shapiro–Wilk and Levene’s test, respectively and compared using either independent or paired two-tailed t-tests or ANOVA, as applicable. In cases where normal distribution was not achieved, the non-parametric Mann–Whitney test was used. In cases of nonequivalent variance, a Welch’s corrected t-test was applied. A sample size of 8–10 mice was chosen for uCT and histology based on power analysis of previous published studies performed by our lab. All bioinformatic analyses utilized default statistical approaches integrated into the R packages Seurat (v. 4.1.1), Monocle326 (v. 1.0.0), and CellChat (v. 1.1.3) as well as statistical enrichment or statistical overrepresentation testing in PantherDB73,74 (v. 19.0). All bioinformatic analyses employed statistical adjustments for false discovery rate across factors such as cell and gene numbers, and padj was used throughout. GraphPad Prism82 (v. 10.3) and RStudio69 (v. 2024.12.1) were used to perform statistical analyses and generate figures.

Software for data analysis and figure generation

Single-cell RNA sequencing data was performed using R70 (v. 4.1.3) and RStudio69 (v. 2024.12.1). Seurat71 (v. 4.1.1) was used to generate scRNAseq objects and UMAPs. The R package ShinyCell88 (v 4.1.1) was used to generate the violin plots in Fig. 1C, heatmap in Supplementary Figs. 2B, 3B, 7A. CellChat24 (v. 1.1.3) was used to generate Riverplots and associated plots in Fig. 1 and Supplementary Figs. 4 and 5. Monocle326 (v. 1.0.0) was utilized for trajectory analyses performed in Fig. 2. GraphPad Prism82 (v. 10.3) was used to generate the line plots and volcano plot in Fig. 2 and bar graphs throughout the figures. The R packages Monocle326 (v 1.0.0) and ComplexHeatmap81 (v. 2.10.0) were used to generate the heatmaps in Fig. 2B. The heatmap in Fig. 2D was generated using the R package Pheatmap83 (v. 1.0.12). Ggplot289 (v. 3.5.1) was used to generate the bubbleplot in Fig. 2E and Supplementary Figs. 3C and 7B, and heatmaps in Supplementary Figs. 2A and 3A. GSEA analysis was performed using the R package fgsea78 (1.20.0) and clusterProfiler79 (4.2.2); Enrichplot80 (v. 1.14.2) was used to make the bubbleplot for Supplementary Fig. 8. PantherDB Software73,74 (v. 19.0) was used for Fig. 2E and Supplementary Figs. 3C and 7B. Flowjo68 (v. 10.9) was used to analyze flow cytometry data in Supplementary Fig. 6. Adobe Illustrator90 (v. 29.2.1) was used to assemble Figures and Supplementary Figures.

Supplementary information

41536_2026_456_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (6.3MB, pdf)

Supplemental Figures and Tables Combined

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the assistance of the University of Michigan Advanced Genomics Core, Flow Cytometry Core, Michigan Integrative Musculoskeletal Health Core Center Histology Core, and the Unit for Laboratory Animal Medicine. We would further like to acknowledge the kind support of Parse Biosciences in providing the scRNAseq tools necessary to conduct this study. We would like to thank Salem Wang for her assistance with revisions to the manuscript. We thank Dr. Rhima Coleman and Dr. Gurcharan Kaur for providing hMSC donor lines. Funding sources are as follows: National Institutes of Health R01AR066028 (K.D.H.), National Institutes of Health R01AR055607 (K.D.H.), National Institutes of Health R01AR080035 (T.M.), National Institutes of Health R21AR076487 (T.M.), National Institutes of Health UC2AR082186 (T.M.) National Institutes of Health R21AR082016 (T.M.), National Institutes of Health R21AR080502 (T.M.), Dr. Ralph and Marian Falk Medical Research Trust (Catalyst Award) (T.M.), National Institutes of Health T32TR004371 (C.A.C.), National Institutes of Health F31AR085942 (C.A.C.), National Institutes of Health K99AR081894 (A.J.K.), National Institutes of Health - Michigan Integrative Musculoskeletal Health Core Center P30AR069620, National Institutes of Health - University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center P30CA046592, Single cell RNA sequencing utilized resources provided by Parse Biosciences.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: C.A.C., K.D.H., and T.M.; Study design: C.A.C., K.D.H., A.J.K., and T.M.; Data acquisition: C.A.C., M.J.S., E.C.F., K.K., A.D., Y.W., J.T.S., and L.S.; Interpretation of results: C.A.C., M.J.S., E.C.F., A.J.K., Y.W., K.D.H., T.M., I.B.R., and M.C.; Writing—original draft: C.A.C., M.J.S., K.D.H., and T.M.; Writing—review & editing: C.A.C., M.J.S., E.C.F., A.J.K., K.K., A.D., Y.W., J.T.S., L.S., I.B.R., M.C., K.D.H., and T.M. K.D.H. and T.M. are co-corresponding authors on this work and equally responsible for the overall content as guarantors. K.D.H. and T.M. accept full responsibility for the finished work and/or the study conduct, had access to all data, and controlled the decision to publish.

Data availability

All data and materials information are available upon request. Sequencing data is available through the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) (GSE292578).

Code availability

All code is available upon request.

Competing interests

I.B.R. is the Founder and President, and M.C. is the Director of Research at Senex Biotechnology, Inc. The other authors have nothing to declare.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Tristan Maerz, Email: maerzt@ethz.ch.

Kurt D. Hankenson, Email: kdhank@umich.edu

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41536-026-00456-z.

References

  • 1.Einhorn, T. A. & Gerstenfeld, L. C. Fracture healing: mechanisms and interventions. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol.11, 45–54 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bahney, C. S. et al. Cellular biology of fracture healing. J. Orthop. Res.37, 35–50 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Einhorn, T. A., Majeska, R. J., Rush, E. B., Levine, P. M. & Horowitz, M. C. The expression of cytokine activity by fracture callus. J. Bone Min. Res.10, 1272–1281 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sheen, J. R., Mabrouk, A. & Garla, V. V. Fracture Healing Overview (StatPearls Publishing, 2023). [PubMed]
  • 5.Miclau, K. R. et al. Stimulating fracture healing in ischemic environments: does oxygen direct stem cell fate during fracture healing?. Front. Cell Dev. Biol.5, 45 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lu, C., Miclau, T., Hu, D. & Marcucio, R. S. Ischemia leads to delayed union during fracture healing: a mouse model. J. Orthop. Res.25, 51–61 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Robert, A. W., Marcon, B. H., Dallagiovanna, B. & Shigunov, P. Adipogenesis, osteogenesis, and chondrogenesis of human mesenchymal stem/stromal cells: a comparative transcriptome approach. Front. Cell Dev. Biol.8, 561 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chan, W. C. W., Tan, Z., To, M. K. T. & Chan, D. Regulation and role of transcription factors in osteogenesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci.22, 5445 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Adler, A. S. et al. CDK8 maintains tumor dedifferentiation and embryonic stem cell pluripotency. Cancer Res.72, 2129–2139 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Fukasawa, K. et al. CDK8 maintains stemness and tumorigenicity of glioma stem cells by regulating the c-MYC pathway. Oncogene40, 2803–2815 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fan, C. et al. Single-cell transcriptome integration analysis reveals the correlation between mesenchymal stromal cells and fibroblasts. Front. Genet.13, 798331 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Grcevic, D. et al. In vivo fate mapping identifies mesenchymal progenitor cells. Stem Cells30, 187–196 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ledoult, E. et al. Simple gene signature to assess murine fibroblast polarization. Sci. Rep.12, 11748 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Amani, V. et al. Integration of single-nuclei RNA-sequencing, spatial transcriptomics and histochemistry defines the complex microenvironment of NF1-associated plexiform neurofibromas. Acta Neuropathol. Commun.11, 158 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kalfusova, A. et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors—quantitative detection of the Ki-67, TPX2, TOP2A, and hTERT telomerase subunit mRNA levels to determine proliferation activity and a potential for aggressive biological behavior. Neoplasma63, 484–492 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wu, C.-L. et al. Single cell transcriptomic analysis of human pluripotent stem cell chondrogenesis. Nat. Commun.12, 362 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mokuda, S. et al. Wwp2 maintains cartilage homeostasis through regulation of Adamts5. Nat. Commun.10, 2429 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhang, C., Tang, W. & Li, Y. Matrix metalloproteinase 13 (MMP13) is a direct target of osteoblast-specific transcription factor osterix (Osx) in osteoblasts. PLoS ONE7, e50525 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Paic, F. et al. Identification of differentially expressed genes between osteoblasts and osteocytes. Bone45, 682–692 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Luo, Y. et al. A novel high sensitivity type II collagen blood-based biomarker, PRO-C2, for assessment of cartilage formation. Int. J. Mol. Sci.19, 3485 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhang, H. et al. FN1 promotes chondrocyte differentiation and collagen production via TGF-β/PI3K/Akt pathway in mice with femoral fracture. Gene769, 145253 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dreier, R. Hypertrophic differentiation of chondrocytes in osteoarthritis: the developmental aspect of degenerative joint disorders. Arthritis Res. Ther.12, 216 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ye, F. et al. The role of BMP6 in the proliferation and differentiation of chicken cartilage cells. PLoS ONE14, e0204384 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jin, S. et al. Inference and analysis of cell-cell communication using CellChat. Nat. Commun.12, 1088 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Capobianco, C. A., Hankenson, K. D. & Knights, A. Temporal dynamics of immune-stromal cell interactions in fracture healing. Front. Immunol.15, 1352819 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Trapnell, C. et al. The dynamics and regulators of cell fate decisions are revealed by pseudotemporal ordering of single cells. Nat. Biotechnol.32, 381–386 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kim, T.-H., Leslie, P. & Zhang, Y. Ribosomal proteins as unrevealed caretakers for cellular stress and genomic instability. Oncotarget5, 860–871 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Nguyen, X.-X., Muhammad, L., Nietert, P. J. & Feghali-Bostwick, C. IGFBP-5 promotes fibrosis via increasing its own expression and that of other pro-fibrotic mediators. Front. Endocrinol.9, 601 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 29.Shi, M. et al. MicroRNA-27a targets Sfrp1 to induce renal fibrosis in diabetic nephropathy by activating Wnt/β-Catenin signalling. Biosci. Rep.40, BSR20192794 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Cohen, M. L. et al. A fibroblast-dependent TGF-β1/sFRP2 noncanonical Wnt signaling axis promotes epithelial metaplasia in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. J. Clin. Invest.134, e174598 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhang, W. et al. Fibroblast-specific adipocyte enhancer binding protein 1 is a potential pathological trigger and prognostic marker for liver fibrosis independent of etiology. J. Dig. Dis.24, 550–561 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.De Marco, M. et al. BAG3 induces α-SMA expression in human fibroblasts and its over-expression correlates with poorer survival in fibrotic cancer patients. J. Cell. Biochem.123, 91–101 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chillappagari, S., Guenther, A. & Mahavadi, P. BAG3: an enticing therapeutic target for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. J. Cell Biochem.125, e30446 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Curciarello, R., Docena, G. H. & Macdonald, T. T. The role of cytokines in the fibrotic responses in Crohn’s disease. Front. Med.4, 126 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 35.Yaseen, B. et al. Interleukin-31 promotes pathogenic mechanisms underlying skin and lung fibrosis in scleroderma. Rheumatology59, 2625–2636 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Samokhin, A. O. et al. NEDD9 targets COL3A1 to promote endothelial fibrosis and pulmonary arterial hypertension. Sci. Transl. Med.10, 1126 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Remst, D. F. et al. Gene expression analysis of murine and human osteoarthritis synovium reveals elevation of transforming growth factor β-responsive genes in osteoarthritis-related fibrosis. Arthritis Rheumatol.66, 647–656 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Xiong, Y. et al. NOGO-B promotes EMT in lung fibrosis via MMP14 mediates free TGF-beta1 formation. Oncotarget8, 71024–71037 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kao, Y. H. et al. Upregulation of hepatoma-derived growth factor is involved in murine hepatic fibrogenesis. J. Hepatol.52, 96–105 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Rusu-Nastase, E. G. et al. MiR-29a increase in aging may function as a compensatory mechanism against cardiac fibrosis through SERPINH1 downregulation. Front. Cardiovasc. Med.8, 810241 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kishimoto, Y. et al. Reversal of vocal fold mucosal fibrosis using siRNA against the collagen-specific chaperone Serpinh1. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids16, 616–625 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Huaux, F. O., Liu, T., Mcgarry, B., Ullenbruch, M. & Phan, S. H. Dual Roles of IL-4 in Lung Injury and Fibrosis. J. Immunol.170, 2083–2092 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Nguyen, J. K., Austin, E., Huang, A., Mamalis, A. & Jagdeo, J. The IL-4/IL-13 axis in skin fibrosis and scarring: mechanistic concepts and therapeutic targets. Arch. Dermatol. Res.312, 81–92 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Luyties, O. & Taatjes, D. J. The Mediator kinase module: an interface between cell signaling and transcription. Trends Biochem. Sci.47, 314–327 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Chen, M. et al. CDK8 and CDK19: positive regulators of signal-induced transcription and negative regulators of Mediator complex proteins. Nucleic Acids Res.51, 7288–7313 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Li, J. et al. Transcriptome-based chemical screens identify CDK8 as a common barrier in multiple cell reprogramming systems. Cell Rep.42, 112566 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Pockley, A. G. & Henderson, B. Extracellular cell stress (heat shock) proteins—immune responses and disease: an overview. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci.373, 20160522 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Osman, S. et al. The Cdk8 kinase module regulates interaction of the mediator complex with RNA polymerase II. J. Biol. Chem.296, 100734 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Srivastava, S. & Kulshreshtha, R. Insights into the regulatory role and clinical relevance of mediator subunit, MED12, in human diseases. J. Cell Physiol.236, 3163–3177 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Prieto, S. et al. CDK8 and CDK19 act redundantly to control the CFTR pathway in the intestinal epithelium. EMBO Rep.24, e54261 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 51.Sharko, A. C. et al. The inhibition of CDK8/19 mediator kinases prevents the development of resistance to EGFR-targeting drugs. Cells10, 144 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Zhang, L. et al. A selective and orally bioavailable quinoline-6-carbonitrile-based inhibitor of CDK8/19 mediator kinase with tumor-enriched pharmacokinetics. J. Med. Chem.65, 3420–3433 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Chen, M. et al. Systemic toxicity reported for CDK8/19 inhibitors CCT251921 and MSC2530818 is not due to target inhibition. Cells8, 1413 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Amirhosseini, M. et al. Cyclin-dependent kinase 8/19 inhibition suppresses osteoclastogenesis by downregulating RANK and promotes osteoblast mineralization and cancellous bone healing. J. Cell. Physiol.234, 16503–16516 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Li, J. et al. Mediator kinase inhibition reverses castration resistance of advanced prostate cancer. J. Clin. Invest.134, e176709 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 56.Dickson, K. F., Katzman, S. & Paiement, G. The importance of the blood supply in the healing of tibial fractures. Contemp. Orthop.30, 489–493 (1995). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Menger, M. M. et al. Development of an ischemic fracture healing model in mice. Acta Orthop.93, 466–471 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Garcia, P. et al. Development of a reliable non-union model in mice. J. Surg. Res.147, 84–91 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Yamada, T. et al. The role of CDK8 in mesenchymal stem cells in controlling osteoclastogenesis and bone homeostasis. Stem Cell Rep.17, 1576–1588 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Alarcón, C. et al. Nuclear CDKs drive Smad transcriptional activation and turnover in BMP and TGF-β pathways. Cell139, 757–769 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Biocad. Study of BCD-115 in women with ER(+) HER2(-) local advanced and metastatic breast cancer. Identifier: NCT03065010. Accessed January 30, 2025. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03065010 (2018).
  • 62.Ryvu Therapeutics SA. RVU120 in patients with acute myeloid leukemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome. Identifier: NCT04021368. Accessed January 30, 2025. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04021368 (2024).
  • 63.Ryvu Therapeutics SA. RVU120 (SEL120) in patients with relapse/refractory metastatic or advanced solid tumors. Identifier: NCT05052255. Accessed January 30, 2025. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05052255 (2024).
  • 64.Tyligand Biosciences. Phase I study of TSN084 in patients with advanced malignant tumors. Identifier NCT05300438. Accessed January 30, 2025. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05300438 (2024).
  • 65.Zondervan, R. L. et al. CD47 is required for mesenchymal progenitor proliferation and fracture repair. Bone Res.13, 29 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 66.Zondervan, R. L., Vorce, M., Servadio, N. & Hankenson, K. D. Fracture apparatus design and protocol optimization for closed-stabilized fractures in rodents. J. Vis. Exp.138, 58186 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods9, 676–682 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Becton, Dickinson and Company. FlowJo Software. Version 10.9 (2023).
  • 69.Posit Team. RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R (Posit Software, PBC, 2025).
  • 70.R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2021).
  • 71.Satija, R., Farrell, J. A., Gennert, D., Schier, A. F. & Regev, A. Spatial reconstruction of single-cell gene expression data. Nat. Biotechnol.33, 495–502 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Hao, Y. et al. Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data. Cell184, 3573–3587.e3529 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Mi, H. & Thomas, P. PANTHER pathway: an ontology-based pathway database coupled with data analysis tools. Methods Mol. Biol.563, 123–140 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Mi, H. et al. PANTHER version 16: a revised family classification, tree-based classification tool, enhancer regions and extensive API. Nucleic Acids Res.49, D394–D403 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Ekiz, H. A., Conley, C. J., Stephens, W. Z. & O'Connell, R. M. CIPR: a web-based R/shiny app and R package to annotate cell clusters in single cell RNA sequencing experiments. BMC Bioinform.21, 191 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Hermiston, M. L., Xu, Z. & Weiss, A. CD45: a critical regulator of signaling thresholds in immune cells. Annu. Rev. Immunol.21, 107–137 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA102, 15545–15550 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Korotkevich, G. et al. Fast Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 2016).
  • 79.Wu, T. et al. clusterProfiler 4.0: a universal enrichment tool for interpreting omics data. Innovation2, 100141 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Guangchuang, Y., Erqiang, H. & Chun-Hui, G. Visualization of functional enrichment result. Enrichplot10, B9 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Gu, Z. Complex heatmap visualization. iMeta1, e43 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 82.GraphPad. GraphPad Prism Version 10.3 (2024).
  • 83.Kolde, R. pheatmap: Pretty Heatmaps. R Package Version 1(0), 12 (2025).
  • 84.Kaur, G. et al. Osteoporosis GWAS-implicated DNM3 locus contextually regulates osteoblastic and chondrogenic fate of mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells through oscillating miR-199a-5p levels. JBMR Plus8, ziae051 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Kaur, G., Wu, B., Murali, S., Lanigan, T. & Coleman, R. M. A synthetic, closed-looped gene circuit for the autonomous regulation of RUNX2 activity during chondrogenesis. FASEB J.38, e23484 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Wagley, Y. et al. Canonical Notch signaling is required for bone morphogenetic protein-mediated human osteoblast differentiation. Stem Cells38, 1332–1347 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Stirling, D. R. et al. CellProfiler 4: improvements in speed, utility and usability. BMC Bioinform.22, 433 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 88.Ouyang, J. F., Kamaraj, U. S., Cao, E. Y. & Rackham, O. J. L. ShinyCell: simple and sharable visualization of single-cell gene expression data. Bioinformatics37, 3374–3376 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Williams, H. et al. ggplot2 : Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer Nature, 2016).
  • 90.Adobe Inc. Adobe Illustrator Version 29.2.1 (2025).

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

41536_2026_456_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (6.3MB, pdf)

Supplemental Figures and Tables Combined

Data Availability Statement

All data and materials information are available upon request. Sequencing data is available through the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) (GSE292578).

All code is available upon request.


Articles from NPJ Regenerative Medicine are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES