Skip to main content
EMBO Molecular Medicine logoLink to EMBO Molecular Medicine
. 2025 Dec 11;18(2):381–395. doi: 10.1038/s44321-025-00353-w

Microplastics as environmental modifiers of lung disease

Emmanouela Epeslidou 1, Julia S Scott 1, Bim de Klein 1, Jeremy Tan Cudia 2, Barbro Melgert 2,✉,#, Stefan Prekovic 1,3,✉,#
PMCID: PMC12905266  PMID: 41381807

Abstract

Human-driven environmental change continues to reshape global patterns of disease, as seen in past pollution-related respiratory crises. Microplastics, persistent synthetic polymer particles, have now emerged as a widespread airborne contaminant with growing relevance for lung health. Continuous inhalation exposure, particularly in indoor environments rich in synthetic fibers, raises concern about their contribution to respiratory disease. Epidemiological and experimental studies increasingly link microplastic exposure to lung cancer, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and pulmonary fibrosis, yet the underlying mechanisms remain poorly defined. This review integrates current evidence on how particle properties influence biological outcomes and outlines how different polymer types, sizes, and aging states affect lung cells through inflammation, oxidative stress, ferroptosis, epithelial–mesenchymal transition, and epigenetic change. Together, these findings suggest that microplastics may act as environmental modifiers that exacerbate disease progression. Recognizing their complex and persistent nature highlights the need for standardized exposure metrics, mechanistic research at realistic doses, and coordinated scientific and regulatory action.

Keywords: Microplastics, Lung, Cancer, COPD, Asthma

Subject terms: Evolution & Ecology, Respiratory System


In this Review, S. Prekovic and colleagues discuss the latest research on the impact of microplastic particles on respiratory diseases.

graphic file with name 44321_2025_353_Figa_HTML.jpg

Introduction

History clearly illustrates how human activities can redefine health trajectories through environmental changes. Take, for example, the rapid industrialization of nineteenth-century London; in just a few decades, this urban center transitioned into an industrial powerhouse, fueling growth through unprecedented coal consumption. Yet, this progress came at a severe cost: dense, persistent coal-smoke smog enveloped the city, turning day into twilight, staining buildings black, and profoundly altering the daily lives of Londoners. Respiratory disorders, previously uncommon, surged markedly, signaling a clear connection between environmental pollution and human disease emergence (Hanlon, 2015). This historical example underscores a critical lesson—human-induced environmental changes inevitably shape patterns of health and disease, often with far-reaching and unforeseen consequences. Today, another pervasive, yet less visible anthropogenic threat has emerged in the form of microplastics. These synthetic polymer particles (<5 mm diameter) have infiltrated ecosystems globally, highlighting their omnipresent nature (Cocca et al, 2023). Microplastics originate either from intentional manufacturing (primary microplastics), or from the breakdown of larger plastic debris and fibers shed from synthetic textiles (secondary microplastics). Due to their small size, these particles are readily inhaled or ingested, leading to continuous human exposure (Fig. 1). Recent studies demonstrate the systemic presence of microplastics, with particles detected in human blood, lung, heart, testes, and brain (L Leonard et al, 2024; Amato-Lourenço et al, 2021; Yang et al, 2023b; Zhao et al, 2023; Nihart et al, 2025), underscoring their capacity for widespread bioaccumulation within the human body. While the clinical consequences of this accumulation remain uncertain, their detection across multiple organ systems raises important concerns regarding potential long-term effects on human health.

Figure 1. Schematic overview of microplastic sources, environmental distribution, and human exposure routes.

Figure 1

Synthetic polymers from daily-use products degrade into microplastics, infiltrating ecosystems and accumulating within various environmental compartments. Microplastic particles exhibit distinct physical properties (color, size, and shape) and chemical characteristics (polymer composition and additive leaching), critically determining their environmental fate and potential toxicity. Humans are primarily exposed via inhalation, ingestion, and dermal contact, highlighting the importance of understanding particle properties to assess health risks accurately.

Continuous inhalation exposure makes the lung particularly susceptible to airborne microplastics, especially in indoor settings where synthetic textile fibers dominate airborne particle populations (Amato-Lourenço et al, 2021; Vasse and Melgert, 2024). Concentrations indoors may surpass outdoor levels by at least four-fold, driven by routine activities such as doing laundry and the wearing of synthetic garments, thereby amplifying respiratory exposure given that individuals spend most of their time indoors (Eberhard et al, 2024). Occupational studies further support the clinical significance of inhaled microplastics, associating workplace exposure, particularly to polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and polyamide (nylon) fibers, with severe respiratory conditions, including lung cancer (Fig. 1) (Mastrangelo et al, 2003; Girardi et al, 2022; Özgen Alpaydin et al, 2024; Kern et al, 1998; Turcotte et al, 2013). Despite the emerging epidemiological evidence, the molecular mechanisms underpinning microplastic-induced lung pathology remain poorly defined.

This review integrates epidemiological insights and mechanistic evidence to position inhaled microplastics as environmental modifiers that may be reshaping lung disease trajectories (Table 1), underscoring a critical yet underappreciated public health threat demanding scientific attention.

Table 1.

Summary of microplastics and nanoplastics discussed in this review categorized by size and associated cellular response in the context of health tissue or disease.

Source Particle Polymer class Particle size (diameter) Particle shape Cellular response Disease
Yang et al, 2023a Polyethylene Polyolefin, synthetic 500 nm Irregulara Lysosomal damage and macrophage triggering, affected brain function through gut-brain axis (mouse model)
Wolff et al, 2023 Polystyrene; PMMA Vinyl polymer, synthetic; Acrylic polymer, synthetic 50, 200, 1000 nm; 70, 400, 1100 nm Spherical Affected immune checkpoint marker expression (human immune cells in vitro)
Tavakolpournegari et al, 2024 PET Polyester, synthetic 163–292 nm Irregulara Increased ROS production, macrophage polarization to M1 (murine macrophages in vitro)
Weber et al, 2022 PVC Vinyl polymer, synthetic 50–600 nm Irregulara Inflammatory response (human immune cells in vitro)
Jin et al, 2024 PVC Vinyl polymer, synthetic 6.5–25 μm Sphericala Induced senescence and increased ROS levels in lung epithelium (mouse model and human cells in vitro)
Aloi et al, 2024 Polystyrene (photoaged) Vinyl polymer, synthetic 1–1.4 μm Spherical Reduced cell viability, increased ROS production, elevated DNA damage and inflammation (murine macrophages in vitro)
Merkley et al, 2022 Polystyrene Vinyl polymer, synthetic 10 μm Metabolic shift of macrophages towards glycolysis, reduction of mitochondrial respiration (murine macrophages in vitro)
Adler et al, 2024 Polystyrene Vinyl polymer, synthetic 0.5, 1, 3 μm Sphericala Increased necrosis, ROS production, altered metabolic activity (human macrophages in vitro)
Weber et al, 2022 Polystyrene Vinyl polymer, synthetic 50–600 nm Irregulara Inflammatory response (human immune cells in vitro)
Yang et al, 2021 Polystyrene Vinyl polymer, synthetic 40 nm Sphericala Oxidative stress, inflammatory responses, epithelial barrier destruction, disruption of tight junctions (human lung epithelial cells in vitro)
Wu et al, 2024 Polystyrene Vinyl polymer, synthetic 20 nm, 10 μm Sphericala Apoptosis, ferroptosis, endoplasmic reticulum stress in lung epithelium (mouse model and human cells in vitro)
Lin et al, 2022 Polystyrene Vinyl polymer, synthetic 80 nm Sphericala Induction of mitochondrial dysfunction and metabolic toxicity pathways (human hepatic and human lung cells in vitro)
Yu et al, 2025 Polystyrene Vinyl polymer, synthetic 5 μm Spherical Tight junctions and transcriptional regulation disruption, lung dysplasia, affected lung development (rat offsprings)
Luo et al, 2023 Polystyrene Vinyl polymer, synthetic 100 nm Sphericala Cellular senescence, lung inflammation, lung dysfunction (rat model)
Vlacil et al, 2021 Polystyrene Vinyl polymer, synthetic 1 μm Enhanced inflammatory cytokine release, vascular inflammation, adhesion molecule expression (mouse model, murine myocardial endothelial and murine monocytic cells in vitro)
Song et al, 2024 Nylon Polyamide, synthetic 1–5 μm, 5–10 μm Irregular sphere-shaped fibersa Impaired epithelial differentiation, maturation, regeneration and repair (human and murine alveolar and airway-type organoids in vitro)
Li et al, 2025b PAN Resin polymer, synthetic 200–300 nm Fibersa Airway remodelling, EMT transition, cilia formation (mouse model and human lung cells in vitro) Cancer
Traversa et al, 2024 Polyethylene Polyolefin, synthetic 0.2–9.9 μm Spherical Migration and EMT transition (human lung cells in vitro) Cancer
Rafazi et al, 2024 Polyethylene Polyolefin, synthetic 37–75 μm Polyhedrala Increase cell proliferation and migration (human glioblastoma cells in vitro) Cancer
Brynzak-Schreiber et al, 2024 Polystyrene Vinyl polymer, synthetic 0.25, 1, 10 μm Sphericala Increased cell migration (human colorectal cells in vitro) Cancer
Goodman et al, 2021 Polystyrene Vinyl polymer, synthetic 1, 10 μm Sphericala Enhanced cellular motility, development of filopodia and focal adhesions (human lung cells in vitro) Cancer
Ernhofer et al, 2025 Polystyrene Vinyl polymer, synthetic 0.24, 1 μm Spherical Increased internalization, migration, DNA damage, oxidative stress, and activation of survival pathways- early tumor promotion (human lung cells and organoids in vitro) Cancer
Paplińska-Goryca et al, 2025 Nylon Polyamide, synthetic 80, 160 μm Fibersa

Upregulation of metabolic pathways, intensified inflammatory response, chronic inflammation (asthma patients);

Increased cell motility, inflammatory recruitment, epithelial barrier disruption (in COPD patients)

Obstructive Lung disorders

Wang et al, 2025;

Wei et al, 2024

Polystyrene Vinyl polymer, synthetic 100 nm; 5–5.9 μm

Spherical;

spherical

Pulmonary inflammation, epithelial barrier dysfunction, increased ROS production, ferroptosis and exacerbation of allergic asthma (asthma mouse model) Obstructive Lung disorders

Yang et al, 2024;

Wei et al, 2025

Polystyrene Vinyl polymer, synthetic 40 nm; 2 μm Spherical; sphericala Neutrophilic inflammation, oxidative stress, ferroptosis, autophagy, disruption in alveolar architecture, mitochondrial dysfunction (mouse COPD model) Obstructive Lung disorders
Xu et al, 2025 Polystyrene Vinyl polymer, synthetic 200 nm, 2.5 μm Sphericala Apoptosis in airway epithelial cells, airway hyperresponsiveness and inflammation (asthma mouse model) Obstructive Lung disorders
Han et al, 2023 Polystyrene + DEHP Vinyl polymer, synthetic + plasticizer 0.2–0.5 μm Sphericala Oxidative stress, airway inflammation, exacerbation of allergic asthma (asthma mouse model) Obstructive Lung disorders
Zhang et al, 2024 Polystyrene Vinyl polymer, synthetic 5 μm Sphericala Ferroptosis in alveolar epithelial cells (mouse model and human cells in vitro) Lung fibrosis
Li et al, 2022 Polystyrene Vinyl polymer, synthetic 5 μm Sphericala Enhanced expression of fibrotic markers, oxidative stress, alveolar epithelial injuries (mouse model) Lung fibrosis
Kang et al, 2024 Polystyrene Vinyl polymer, synthetic 5 μm Sphericala Compromised epithelial barrier integrity, imbalance in iron metabolism, ferroptosis, lung injury (mouse model) Lung fibrosis

a Validated by group before use.

What are microplastics?

Microplastics constitute a diverse class of synthetic polymer particles derived primarily from petroleum-based fossil fuels (Geyer et al, 2017). Their prevalence in the environment results from the extensive use of plastics, whose durability, versatility, and low cost underpins their pervasive integration into modern daily life (Andrady and Neal, 2009). However, the same properties make plastics exceptionally resistant to environmental degradation, allowing microplastics to persist in ecosystems for decades or possibly even millennia (Sonke et al, 2022), consistent with model projections showing continued cycling of small microplastics through Earth’s surface reservoirs for several thousand years. Microplastics typically originate via two main pathways: (1) direct release of intentionally manufactured microscale particles (Fendall and Sewell, 2009; Cole et al, 2011) (e.g., microbeads in personal care products and cleaning agents) or (2) indirect formation through the fragmentation and abrasion of larger plastic debris (Andrady, 2011; Cole et al, 2011). Prominent sources include synthetic textile fibers released during laundering, degraded plastic waste, and manufactured microbeads (Cole et al, 2011), collectively contributing to their widespread ecological distribution and impact (Fig. 1). These particles, predominantly fibers and irregular fragments, have been detected across diverse ecosystems, underscoring their widespread presence and potential ecological consequences.

The environmental fate and biological impact of microplastics are determined by their physicochemical properties, notably particle size, density, color, shape, and polymer crystallinity. Particle size is especially influential, with larger microplastics (>10 µm) predominantly remaining in upper environmental compartments (surface waters, soil surfaces, and atmospheric deposition zones) and affecting organisms capable of size-specific ingestion (Cole et al, 2013; Wright et al, 2013), while smaller (<2.5 µm) and ultrafine particles (<0.1 µm) penetrate deeply into biological systems, significantly increasing their toxic potential (Prüst et al, 2020; Yong et al, 2020). However, accurate quantification of these smaller particles remains challenging, complicating exposure and risk assessments. Polymer density further shapes environmental distribution: lower-density polymers such as polypropylene (0.85–0.94 g/cm³) and polyethylene (0.92–0.97 g/cm³) tend to float or remain suspended in aquatic environments, primarily influencing pelagic and surface-dwelling organisms (Zhang et al, 2017; Hidalgo-Ruz et al, 2012), whereas higher-density polymers like polyvinyl chloride (1.38 g/cm³) readily sediment, directly impacting benthic organisms at sediment-water interfaces (Gomiero et al, 2018; Koelmans et al, 2017). Additionally, particle shape significantly modulates environmental mobility and biological interactions. For example, fibers have a high specific surface area, which exhibit enhanced pollutant adsorption capabilities and greater potential to interact with organisms (Zhao et al, 2022a). Conversely, pellets and irregular fragments differ in their behavior, typically displaying higher ingestion rates by aquatic organisms (Mato et al, 2001; Boettcher et al, 2023; Lusher et al, 2013; Li et al, 2016). Lastly, films are thin, with irregularities on the surface and have a tendency to fold, which results in a high maximum adsorption capacity and biofilm growth, potentially facilitating contaminant transfer within ecosystems (Rozman et al, 2023). Polymer crystallinity also substantially affects environmental degradation rates: semicrystalline polymers (e.g., polyamide) exhibit higher mechanical strength and resistance to degradation, whereas amorphous polymers (e.g., PVC) degrade more readily due to structural flexibility and vulnerability to environmental stressors (Li et al, 2025a; Mendez et al, 2025; Shi et al, 2024). Environmental aging preferentially targets amorphous polymer regions, progressively diminishing mechanical integrity, altering surface chemistry, and thereby influencing interactions with environmental contaminants and organisms (Shi et al, 2024). In addition, color provides further insight into microplastic sources and aging status, with brightly colored, sharp-edged particles typically indicating recent introduction, while faded, transparent, or smooth-edged particles reflect prolonged oxidative weathering and photodegradation (Zhao et al, 2022b).

Chemically, microplastics comprise polymer matrices combined with numerous additives such as plasticizers (e.g., phthalates), antioxidants, stabilizers, flame retardants, and dyes, that are integrated during polymer production to support material properties (Wiesinger et al, 2021; Hahladakis et al, 2018; Monclús et al, 2025). These additives can readily leach into surrounding environments, a process influenced by polymer characteristics and environmental conditions. For instance, PVC, characterized by its high chlorine content (Lu et al, 2023), undergoes photodegradation upon prolonged UV exposure, releasing hazardous chlorinated compounds such as dioxins (Kudzin et al, 2023), which are recognized as persistent environmental pollutants known to disrupt hormonal signaling and induce severe potent toxic effects (White and Birnbaum, 2009; Birnbaum, 1995). Additive leaching rates differ significantly depending on chemical structure and polymer type. Plasticizers, particularly bisphenol A (BPA) and phthalates, exhibit notable leachability and have been widely detected in aquatic and terrestrial systems, raising substantial concerns about endocrine disruption and ecological impacts (Kumawat et al, 2022; Martínez-Ibarra et al, 2021). Furthermore, oxidative aging processes alter microplastic surface chemistry, notably through the formation of reactive functional groups (e.g., carbonyl groups), thereby increasing their affinity to bind environmental pollutants such as heavy metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and persistent organic pollutants (Chen et al, 2024; Binda et al, 2023). This enhanced binding capacity positions microplastics as efficient environmental vectors, significantly facilitating pollutant distribution, bioavailability, and toxicological risks across ecosystems.

In view of the abovementioned diversity of microplastics, it has become evident that a wide range of biological responses may arise even from particles that differ only in shape or surface state. Fibrous and elongated microplastic particles are taken up less efficiently by phagocytes than spherical ones, and therefore are more likely to trigger frustrated phagocytosis, leading to cellular responses that differ from those induced by compact particles (Vasse and Melgert, 2024; Wieland et al, 2022). Environmental aging further widens these differences as UV/photo-oxidation introduces oxygenated groups and surface defects, increasing co-contaminant adsorption and reactivity and leading to higher oxidative stress and stronger pro-inflammatory responses in macrophage models compared with pristine particles (Xu et al, 2024; Yu et al, 2024; Aloi et al, 2024). In parallel, mechanistic work indicates that microplastics can engage inflammasome pathways via lysosomal damage and ROS, particularly when surfaces are defect-rich or carry adsorbed pollutants (Alijagic et al, 2023). These observations indicate that microplastics are not a monolithic hazard, as shape and surface state meaningfully shift biological responses, yet only a limited number of studies have examined these physicochemical differences under controlled and comparable conditions, highlighting the need for systematic research to disentangle particle-specific from context-dependent effects.

Together, these distinctive physical and chemical attributes highlight microplastics as a fundamentally different class of pollutants compared to traditional environmental contaminants. Unlike conventional pollutants, which generally dissipate, degrade, or diminish in toxicity over time, microplastics composed of diverse polymeric materials persist for exceptionally long periods due to their inherent resistance to biodegradation. Their particulate nature and chemical complexity enable continuous interaction with biological systems and promote their accumulation, substantially enhancing toxic potential. Furthermore, the dual capacity of microplastics to adsorb and concentrate environmental toxins while simultaneously releasing embedded chemical additives distinguishes them uniquely among pollutants, creating a sustained and multifaceted toxicological threat. This complex mode of action underscores the necessity to approach microplastics not simply as another environmental pollutant, but as a distinct category of environmental hazard requiring dedicated analytical tools, specialized risk assessment frameworks, and targeted regulatory strategies.

What are the exposure routes and how does exposure affect lung function?

Human exposure to microplastics occurs primarily through three distinct routes: ingestion, dermal contact, and inhalation. Among these pathways, dietary ingestion has received considerable attention due to widespread microplastic contamination of foods, particularly driven by bioaccumulation in marine and freshwater organisms (Giri et al, 2024). While dermal contact remains comparatively understudied and is generally mitigated by the skin’s protective barrier, prolonged exposure or compromised skin integrity could facilitate microplastic penetration, especially through frequent use of personal care products containing synthetic microbeads or direct contact with contaminated surfaces (Sun and Wang, 2023). However, inhalation has emerged as a critical exposure route driven by elevated airborne microplastic concentrations in indoor environments, largely attributed to synthetic textiles, household dust, and limited ventilation (Eberhard et al, 2024). In fact, recent estimates suggest adults may inhale up to ~68,000 particles per day in the 1–10 µm size range in indoor settings (Yakovenko et al, 2025). Synthetic fibers dominate indoor microplastic profiles, and human activities such as walking, vacuuming, and use of ventilation systems can resuspend particles (Prata, 2018). Additional inhalation sources include occupational settings (e.g., textile, plastic production, or vinyl factories), which may generate high aerosolized plastic dust burdens (Boccia et al, 2024), and emerging sources such as the shedding of fibers from face masks during breathing (Prada et al, 2023). Given the substantial time individuals spend indoors, the respiratory pathway could prove to be the most relevant when considering cumulative microplastic exposure (Cox et al, 2019).

Upon inhalation, the deposition of airborne microplastics within the respiratory tract is strongly influenced by particle size and aerodynamic properties. Specifically, smaller particles (1–2.5 µm; respirable fraction) readily penetrate into deeper lung compartments, reaching alveolar regions, whereas larger particles (2.5 to 100 µm; inhalable fraction) predominantly deposit within upper conducting airways (Kelly and Fussell, 2012). Furthermore, cellular studies on particles in the nano-scale (i.e., nanoplastics) demonstrate either passive penetration through cell membranes or active uptake via endocytosis and/or phagocytosis. They may also, however, remain suspended in air due to their small size, enabling subsequent inhalation. Of note, certain elongated fibers, despite their larger size, could potentially exhibit aerodynamic behaviors that facilitate deep pulmonary deposition (Amato-Lourenço et al, 2020; Bhattacharjee et al, 2024). Consistent with human occupancy patterns and reduced air turnover, indoor environments typically show higher microplastic concentrations compared to outdoor settings, often surpassing 1500 particles per m³ due to prevalent sources such as synthetic textiles, and furnishings (Liao et al, 2021). The most frequently identified airborne polymers include polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polypropylene, and polyethylene, reflecting their extensive application in textiles, packaging, and domestic products (Bhat, 2024). Although methodological limitations currently impede precise quantification, especially for ultrafine particles (<1 µm), recent inhalation exposure estimates indicate daily intake on the order of thousands of particles (Islam et al, 2024; Eberhard et al, 2024). Additionally, detection of microplastics in human lung tissues and bronchoalveolar lavage samples confirms inhalation and deposition within the respiratory tract (Jenner et al, 2022; Qiu et al, 2023; Chen et al, 2022). Thus, despite persistent gaps in epidemiological data, this evidence underscores the ubiquity of airborne microplastic exposure and the need for standardized, high-sensitivity methodologies to quantify human exposure and evaluate potential pulmonary risks.

How do microplastics affect lung cellular physiology?

The lung represents a dynamic and intricately organized organ, uniquely vulnerable due to its continuous exposure to environmental particulates and pollutants. Upon inhalation, microplastics encounter distinct cellular defenses designed to maintain pulmonary integrity, ranging from frontline immune responders to specialized epithelial barriers and supporting stromal cellular networks. Yet, despite these protective mechanisms, accumulating evidence reveals that microplastics can disrupt lung cellular physiology (Vasse and Melgert, 2024), potentially reshaping respiratory health outcomes and disease trajectories (Fig. 2).

Figure 2. Overview of the impact of inhaled microplastics on lung cellular homeostasis and associated disease outcomes.

Figure 2

Following inhalation, microplastics interact with key lung cell populations including macrophages, epithelial cells, and stromal cells, inducing pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion, oxidative stress, DNA damage, cellular senescence, and fibrotic remodeling. Collectively, these cellular disruptions promote the development and exacerbation of severe respiratory conditions such as lung cancer, asthma/COPD, and pulmonary fibrosis.

Macrophages

In the lung, microplastic particles first encounter alveolar macrophages, which reside in the alveolar space and form the lung’s phagocytic barrier. These cells internalize particles in a size-dependent manner, with peak phagocytic efficiency for particles around 2–3 µm (Hirota et al, 2007). Studies have suggested that exposure to microplastics in this size range may reduce cell viability and impair macrophage function under certain concentrations and exposure durations (Adler et al, 2024; van den Berg et al, 2025; Ahmadi et al, 2025). However, these effects often occur at higher doses than those likely encountered in environmental inhalation, and dose–response dependencies remain weakly characterized. Moreover, evidence is limited in primary alveolar macrophages or chronic low-dose exposures. Concurrently, studies in macrophage in vitro models and animal systems report that microplastic exposure enhances secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, IL-1β, and TNF-α, with limited evidence also suggesting increases in IL-12 or IL-18 under specific experimental conditions (Yang et al, 2023a; Wolff et al, 2023; Ahmadi et al, 2025). This enhanced cytokine release is proposed to be mechanistically driven by activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome (Yazdi et al, 2010; Sharma et al, 2018), which mediates maturation and secretion of IL-1β and IL-18 (Zaki et al, 2010; Swanson et al, 2019). Furthermore, IL-12 and IL-18 have been suggested to act synergistically to amplify IFN-γ production, intensifying Th1-mediated inflammatory responses (Tominaga et al, 2000).

In addition to the changes in cytokine secretion, a recent study has suggested that exposure to microplastics derived from degraded PET water bottles could lead to increased intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and a reduction in mitochondrial membrane potential in mouse alveolar macrophages (Tavakolpournegari et al, 2024). This, interestingly, was accompanied with macrophage polarization towards both M1 (pro-inflammatory) and M2 (anti-inflammatory) phenotypes, with M1 polarization being more pronounced (Tavakolpournegari et al, 2024). Likewise, polystyrene microplastics have been proposed to induce a metabolic shift in macrophages towards glycolysis, accompanied by reduced mitochondrial respiration and upregulation of surface markers CD80 and CD86, consistent with an immunometabolically active state (Merkley et al, 2022). Although most data come from rodent or in vitro models, human macrophages show comparable sensitivity to microplastics exposure, with inter-donor variability in cytokine output (Adler et al, 2024; Weber et al, 2022). Together, these macrophage-driven events create a potent inflammatory environment that could sustain lung inflammation and contribute to long-term respiratory impairment. Yet, the effects of long-term or repeated exposures and responses to environmentally relevant concentrations remain poorly characterized, limiting our understanding of how microplastics impact lung macrophages.

Respiratory epithelium

The respiratory epithelium forms the second major defense barrier, composed of regionally distinct cell types that include basal, club, goblet, and ciliated cells in the airway, and alveolar type I and II cells in the distal lung. Microplastic exposure appears to affect epithelial cells on multiple levels, as demonstrated in bronchial epithelial lines (BEAS-2B and Calu-3), with recent studies showing that polystyrene and polyethylene particles disrupt cellular metabolism and compromise cell adhesion (Yang et al, 2021; Wu et al, 2024; Lin et al, 2022).

Furthermore, in primary airway epithelial cultures grown at an air–liquid interface, exposure to textile microplastic fibers (e.g., polyester and polyamide/nylon) has been shown to impair epithelial differentiation in a composition- and size-dependent manner, partly due to bioactive leachates released from nylon fibers (Song et al, 2024). These alterations are compounded by the downregulation of tight-junction components, including occludin and claudin-1, which weakens barrier integrity and likely increase epithelial permeability (Yu et al, 2025). Interestingly, inhalable fibrous microplastics, in comparison to the irregular ones, have been observed to disrupt airway epithelial homeostasis more severely, supporting a shape- and composition-dependency of fiber toxicity (Li et al, 2025b). Reviews of microplastic respiratory effects place these findings in the broader context of emerging airway vulnerability to textile microplastics (Li et al, 2025b; Vasse and Melgert, 2024).

Microplastic exposure has been proposed to induce DNA damage in epithelial cells, suggesting a genotoxic potential that could contribute to long-term functional decline (reviewed in detail in (Mahmud et al, 2024)). Consistent with this, microplastics induce cellular senescence, characterized by increased expression of p16 and p21, elevated senescence-associated β-galactosidase activity, and enhanced secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines that could reinforce chronic inflammation within lung tissues (Jin et al, 2024; Luo et al, 2023). In parallel, ferroptosis (an iron-dependent form of regulated cell death involving lipid peroxidation) has been implicated in microplastic toxicity, as polystyrene microplastics appear to trigger this process in alveolar epithelial cells through activation of the cGAS/STING signaling pathway (Zhang et al, 2024).

Notably, recent work has demonstrated that microplastics not only damage epithelial structure but alter epithelial cell identity. Exposure to nylon microfibers upregulates multiple HOX genes in airway epithelial organoids, including Hoxa4, Hoxa5, Hoxb3, and Hoxc9 (Song et al, 2024). These transcriptional changes, driven by leaching chemicals, were accompanied by reduced differentiation capacity and were partially reversed upon Hoxa5 inhibition, indicating that HOX dysregulation contributes directly to impaired epithelial maturation (Song et al, 2024). Collectively, these findings suggest that synthetic fibers and their leached chemicals can reprogram epithelial lineage commitment and disrupt the regenerative potential of airway epithelia.

Other lung-resident cell types

Other lung-resident cell types also appear to be affected by microplastic exposure, including fibroblasts and endothelial cells. Fibroblasts, which are central to extracellular matrix maintenance and tissue repair, respond to polystyrene microplastics with increased expression of α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) and collagen I, indicative of myofibroblast activation and early fibrotic remodeling (Li et al, 2022). This profibrotic response involves, at least in part, activation of TGF-β signaling, with recent studies implicating transcription factors such as C/EBPβ in promoting fibrotic gene expression programs (Lu et al, 2022; Wang et al, 2022). Pulmonary endothelial cells likewise display microplastic-induced dysfunction, characterized by endothelial activation, upregulation of adhesion molecules and inflammatory cytokines, and potential compromise of vascular integrity, which might lead to barrier disruption and increased monolayer permeability (Vlacil et al, 2021; Lee et al, 2024). These endothelial alterations appear to be aggravated by particle weathering and the co-adsorption of environmental pollutants, suggesting synergistic toxicity relevant to vascular health. Indirectly, immune cell populations, notably dendritic cells and lymphocytes, are likely affected through altered stromal cell signaling and sustained release of inflammatory mediators from fibroblasts and endothelial cells, potentially perpetuating chronic inflammation and impairing immune surveillance.

Are lung disorders altered by microplastics?

Since microplastics have been shown to functionally affect nearly all major lung cell types, their accumulation could plausibly contribute to the development or progression of pulmonary disease. Notably, the discovery of microplastic particles in human lung tissue emphasises the gravity of this issue, raising concerns about the long-term health impacts of continued exposure (Jenner et al, 2022; Amato-Lourenço et al, 2021). Occupational studies have already documented adverse respiratory conditions among workers in plastic industries, such as those involved in PVC and nylon production. These studies link high concentrations of inhaled microplastics to serious lung diseases, including lung cancer (Eschenbacher et al, 1999; Atis et al, 2005; Wright and Kelly, 2017).

Lung cancer

The World Health Organization projects that global cancer cases will surpass 35 million by 2050, representing a 77% increase from the estimated 20 million cases in 2022 (Sung et al, 2021). This trend is particularly concerning for lung cancer, a disease to which most patients succumb within five years of diagnosis. Notably, patterns of lung cancer incidence are evolving alongside environmental change, with recent evidence indicating a continued global increase despite reductions in smoking prevalence (Shankar et al, 2019; Thandra et al, 2021). Increasing evidence indicates that an increasing proportion of lung cancer cases among non-smokers could be driven by ambient air pollution, with fine particulate matter (PM2.5) specifically linked to a heightened risk of lung adenocarcinoma (Shankar et al, 2019; Hill et al, 2023). Alarmingly, a recent study has uncovered new forms of lung cancer in non-smokers that lack canonical RB1/TP53 alterations and appear to arise through chromothripsis (massive localized chromosome fragmentation and rearrangements), further implicating environmental factors in disease development (Sung et al, 2021; Rekhtman et al, 2025).

Due to the abovementioned findings, it is plausible that microplastics contribute to lung cancer initiation and/or progression, particularly as they have been detected more frequently in (pre)malignant lung tissue than in normal tissue (Jenner et al, 2022; Chen et al, 2022; Amato-Lourenço et al, 2021). Inhaled microplastics appear capable of persisting within lung parenchyma, although it remains uncertain whether they play an active role in initiating or amplifying tumor-promoting processes or instead accumulate secondarily in pre-existing lesions. As outlined earlier, microplastics can trigger inflammation and alter epithelial identity in normal lung cells; these effects could converge to create a permissive environment for cancer development and progression. Nevertheless, the cellular and genomic responses of established cancer cells to microplastics remain poorly defined. A limited number of studies in colorectal, glioblastoma, and lung cancer models, however, consistently report that microplastic exposure promotes a migratory phenotype or epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) (Traversa et al, 2024; Rafazi et al, 2024; Brynzak-Schreiber et al, 2024). For instance, exposure of human A549 lung cancer cells to polystyrene microplastics significantly reduced cell proliferation but led to formation of filopodia and focal adhesions, features indicative of enhanced motility (Goodman et al, 2021). Comparative analyses further show that polystyrene nanoplastics trigger migration, oxidative stress, and DNA damage more prominently in non-malignant lung cells than in cancer lines, suggesting a role in early tumor-promoting events rather than advanced malignant progression (Ernhofer et al, 2025). However, exactly how microplastics reprogram cellular and genetic pathways to produce these effects remains unresolved.

Although the effects of microplastics on the epigenomes of lung cancer cells have not yet been investigated, recent findings raise the possibility that lineage-specific gene regulation could be altered upon exposure. Notably, heightened activity of C2H2 zinc-finger transcription factors such as ZNF280C and ZNF865 has been observed as a conserved molecular response to nanomaterials across species (Del Giudice et al, 2023), making them compelling candidates given their established links to cancer phenotypes. Prior work has shown that ZNF280C maintains epigenetic repression at tumor-suppressor loci, preserving H3K27Me3 domains, recruiting SMCHD1, and antagonizing CTCF/cohesin boundary activity, thereby enforcing chromatin compaction and long-range gene silencing (Ying et al, 2022). In colorectal cancer, this function sustains repression of growth-inhibitory programs and correlates with poor prognosis, highlighting an oncogenic role driven by large-scale chromatin reorganization (Ying et al, 2022). By contrast, ZNF865 promotes DNA replication and cell cycle progression through regulation of transcriptional programs that prevent senescence (Levis et al, 2025, 2023). Loss of ZNF865 impairs replication fidelity and induces growth arrest, suggesting that it preserves an epigenomic landscape permissive to proliferation, although its oncogenic potential appears to be context-dependent (Levis et al, 2025, 2023).

While direct evidence for a causal relationship between microplastic exposure and lung cancer development remains elusive, this gap likely reflects both the recent recognition of microplastics as environmental hazards and the longitudinal nature of establishing causality. Nevertheless, the emerging evidence reviewed here supports the hypothesis that microplastics could influence lung cancer biology through epigenetic alterations and modulation of cellular phenotypes critical to tumor initiation and/or progression. With lung cancer incidence projected to rise alongside increasing environmental pollution, there is a growing need for mechanistic studies that delineate how microplastic exposure affects lung tissue biology. Such work could identify early molecular changes and pathways amenable to preventive or therapeutic intervention.

Obstructive lung disorders

Similar to cancer, the incidence of obstructive lung disorders, particularly asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), continues to rise globally. Curiously, over the past several decades, both disorders have demonstrated shifts in clinical presentations, becoming increasingly severe and resistant to conventional therapies (Bell and Busse, 2013; Chapman and McIvor, 2010; Bollmeier and Hartmann, 2020; Rosenwasser et al, 2022). Asthma phenotypes have diversified, with a growing prevalence of non-atopic forms characterized by neutrophilic inflammation, reduced corticosteroid responsiveness, and heightened symptom severity (Kuruvilla et al, 2019; Xie et al, 2022; Wadhwa et al, 2019; Liu et al, 2024). Similarly, COPD is now increasingly recognized to present with earlier onset and a more aggressive course, featuring accelerated loss of lung function and frequent exacerbations associated with chronic inflammation and epithelial barrier dysfunction (Rehman et al, 2021; Beijers et al, 2022; Liu et al, 2023). These evolving disease trajectories closely parallel increasing exposure to environmental pollutants, implicating airborne contaminants, including microplastics, as potential contributors to these emerging clinical profiles (Gou et al, 2024; Paplińska-Goryca et al, 2025; Aghapour et al, 2022; Cheng et al, 2025).

Consistent with epidemiological observations, murine experimental models have provided evidence that exposure to polystyrene microplastics worsens both asthma and COPD phenotypes, primarily by promoting inflammation. In asthma models, microplastics trigger profound airway inflammation accompanied by eosinophilic infiltration, mucus overproduction, and heightened airway reactivity, leading to distinct histopathological alterations (Wang et al, 2025; Wei et al, 2024). In COPD models, exposure similarly amplifies airway inflammation, characterized by neutrophil-dominated responses, oxidative stress, and alveolar destruction, together with increased susceptibility to ferroptosis and autophagy-related cell injury (Yang et al, 2024; Wei et al, 2025).

Mechanistically, microplastics have been proposed to exacerbate asthma predominantly through augmentation of Th2-mediated inflammation, characterized by elevated expression of cytokines such as IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 (Wei et al, 2024; Wang et al, 2025; Xu et al, 2025). A proposed mechanism underlying this response is the microplastic-induced secretion of extracellular Heat Shock Protein 90α (HSP90α), a molecular chaperone released during cellular stress that contributes to immune activation and epithelial dysfunction. Notably, pharmacological inhibition of HSP90α significantly attenuated microplastic-induced airway inflammation, identifying it as both a potential biomarker and a promising therapeutic target (Xu et al, 2025). In addition, combined exposure to polystyrene microplastics and di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), a commonly used plasticizer, further intensifies allergic airway inflammation, increasing Th2 cytokine expression, eosinophil infiltration, and oxidative stress. These synergistic effects are mediated primarily through activation of the TRPA1-p38 MAPK signaling cascade, highlighting the complex interactions among environmental pollutants that drive severe asthma phenotypes (Han et al, 2023). Transcriptional analyses further reveal that polyamide microplastics reprogram epithelial cells from asthma patients, upregulating genes involved in sterol and cholesterol biosynthesis, secondary alcohol metabolism, and acetyl-CoA pathways - changes consistent with metabolic remodeling that may further perpetuate inflammation (Han et al, 2023; Paplińska-Goryca et al, 2025).

In the context of COPD, emerging evidence positions polystyrene microplastics as potential exacerbators of disease progression through the induction of ferroptosis driven by autophagy-dependent mitochondrial dysfunction (Wei et al, 2025; Liu and Chen, 2017). Mechanistically, microplastic accumulation in lung tissue provokes mitochondrial dysfunction, with excessive ROS production driving lysosomal activation and metabolic stress within epithelial cells (Wei et al, 2025). These impairments subsequently trigger ferritinophagy, leading to iron overload and lipid peroxidation, hallmark events of ferroptotic cell death, which together amplify pulmonary inflammation and worsen COPD pathology. Consistent with these findings, pharmacological inhibition of mitochondrial ROS or ferroptosis effectively alleviates acute microplastic-induced COPD exacerbations, highlighting potential therapeutic avenues. Complementary transcriptional profiling reveals that microplastic exposure reprograms epithelial cells from COPD patients toward a pro-inflammatory state, marked by enhanced chemokine activity and impaired barrier function (Paplińska-Goryca et al, 2025). Markedly, both asthma and COPD display elevated expression of IL-19 and BCL2L15 genes upon microplastic exposure, linking these pollutants to a shared axis of Th2-associated inflammation and potentially carcinogenic signaling (Paplińska-Goryca et al, 2025).

Taken together, accumulating epidemiological and experimental evidence underscores a connection between microplastic exposure and the worsening of obstructive lung disorders such as asthma and COPD. Microplastics appear to promote more severe, therapy-resistant disease phenotypes through overlapping inflammatory and metabolic mechanisms, including Th2-driven cytokine release, mitochondrial dysfunction, and ferroptosis induction. Given these insights, targeted investigation into microplastic-driven molecular pathways is warranted, as such work may help elucidate mechanisms and markers of pollutant-induced respiratory decline.

Lung fibrosis

Pulmonary fibrosis, historically characterized as a chronic disease driven primarily by aging and genetic predispositions, has shown notable shifts in clinical presentation and severity over recent decades (Kolb and Collard, 2014; Wolters et al, 2018). Beyond the rising incidence rates, clinical observations reveal diversification of pulmonary fibrosis phenotypes, including aggressive forms such as rapidly progressive idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and the combined fibrosis–emphysema form (Kaul et al, 2022; Olson et al, 2018; Soares Pires et al, 2013; Papaioannou et al, 2016). These emerging phenotypes frequently present with early respiratory failure, rapid functional decline, and distinctive radiographic features, often unresponsive to conventional anti-fibrotic treatments. Genetic studies have helped clarify some of the underlying mechanisms of these shifts, implicating variants such as the MUC5B promoter polymorphism as a major modifier of disease susceptibility and progression (Seibold et al, 2011; Schwartz et al, 2022). However, genetic factors alone cannot fully explain this diversification. Increasing evidence points to a substantial role for environmental pollutants, particularly inhaled particulates, in reshaping disease trajectories. Epidemiological studies consistently link exposures such as smoking, ambient air pollution, and occupational inhalants with greater disease severity and incidence, highlighting an expanding environmental contribution to pulmonary fibrosis (Sack et al, 2025; Park et al, 2024).

Emerging experimental data implicate inhaled polystyrene microplastics in the initiation and progression of pulmonary fibrosis (Li et al, 2022; Yang et al, 2024). In murine models, long-term intranasal or intratracheal exposure induces fibrotic remodeling characterized by increased collagen deposition and elevated expression of fibrotic markers such as α-SMA, vimentin, and Col1a, alongside epithelial injury, alveolar wall thickening, and inflammatory infiltration (Li et al, 2022; Wei et al, 2024).

Oxidative stress appears central to this process, with reduced antioxidant enzyme activity (SOD and GSH-Px) driving activation of profibrotic pathways, notably Wnt/β-catenin (Li et al, 2022; Wei et al, 2024; Chilosi et al, 2003). Recent work extends these findings by demonstrating that polystyrene microplastics also induce ferroptosis through activation of the cGAS/STING pathway, leading to iron accumulation, lipid peroxidation, and loss of cellular redox balance (Zhang et al, 2024). Pharmacologic inhibition of ferroptosis (e.g., Fer-1) or blockade of cGAS/STING signaling (e.g., G150/H151) markedly attenuates fibrosis, underscoring the therapeutic relevance of these pathways (Zhang et al, 2024) Complementary studies using polystyrene nanoplastics in bronchial epithelial models demonstrate ferroptotic-like cell death mediated by the HIF-1α/HO-1 axis, suggesting that both micro- and nano-sized particles can activate convergent redox and fibrogenic pathways (Zhang et al, 2024; Wang et al, 2025). Moreover, PVC microplastics have been demonstrated to induce epithelial senescence via ROS signaling in lung models, a finding consistent with a shared oxidative stress axis in microplastic-driven pathology (Jin et al, 2024).

Additional mechanistic insights point to broader disruptions of lung cellular and immune homeostasis. Prolonged microplastic exposure compromises epithelial barrier integrity, facilitating deeper penetration of pollutants and pathogens. Altered pulmonary microbiota composition, marked by enrichment of Gram-negative bacteria and elevated lipopolysaccharide (LPS) release, can activate Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) signaling, disturb iron metabolism, and trigger ferroptotic injury (Kang et al, 2024).

In parallel, microplastics also promote EMT-switch, with downregulation of epithelial markers such as E-cadherin and induction of mesenchymal proteins that contribute to tissue scarring (Traversa et al, 2024). Persistent activation of inflammatory pathways, particularly via NF-κB and NLRP3 inflammasome activation, further amplifies injury and promotes collagen deposition (Alijagic et al, 2023).

In summary, emerging evidence suggests that inhaled microplastics contribute to the pathogenesis of pulmonary fibrosis. Through above-discussed interrelated mechanisms, microplastics appear capable of disrupting lung tissue homeostasis and promoting persistent fibrotic remodeling. As evidence accumulates on the rising incidence and heterogeneity of pulmonary fibrosis, ongoing mechanistic and translational research will be important to improve understanding of disease mechanisms and explore potential avenues for intervention.

Discussion

Historically, key developments in public health have hinged on our capacity to identify and address environmental threats in a timely manner. The widespread presence of microplastics in modern environments highlights the importance of maintaining such awareness today. Far from being inert fragments of industrial convenience, microplastics constitute a complex, persistent, and biologically active form of particulate pollution. The distinct physicochemical characteristics of microplastics allow them to interact with pulmonary tissues, potentially eliciting inflammatory signaling, perturbing cellular homeostasis, and modifying cell fate, thereby contributing to respiratory disease processes.

What is notable is not merely the breadth of cellular disruption caused by microplastics, but their potential to influence disease-related pathways. Emerging evidence indicates that microplastics may modulate molecular and inflammatory processes relevant to lung cancer, COPD, asthma, and fibrosis. Experimental studies further suggest that microplastics can induce EMT-like changes, alter cellular metabolism, and affect genomic or epigenomic regulation, raising concern that they could influence disease development and progression. Collectively, these findings call for a reconsideration of how environmental pollutants shape human health, revealing a previously underappreciated dimension of pulmonary vulnerability.

Yet, recognizing microplastics as potential contributors to disease progression offers an important opportunity for advancing environmental health research. The growing body of evidence highlights the need for coordinated scientific innovation and evidence-based regulatory consideration. By addressing this challenge proactively rather than reactively, the scientific community can strengthen understanding of microplastic toxicity and inform preventive strategies. Moving beyond documentation toward mechanistic insight will be key to guiding effective interventions and ensuring that emerging environmental health risks are managed with foresight rather than hindsight.

While establishing biologically meaningful thresholds for microplastic exposure would mark a crucial step forward, the data required to define such relationships remain fragmentary and inconsistent. Reported concentrations of airborne microplastics differ by several orders of magnitude, from fewer than ten to more than 1500 particles per cubic meter depending on sampling strategy, setting, and analytical approach (O’Brien et al, 2023; Zhu et al, 2021; Yakovenko et al, 2025). Modeled inhalation loads are equally variable, ranging from a few dozen to tens of thousands of particles per day when indoor air and fiber-rich environments are considered (Vianello et al, 2019; Yakovenko et al, 2025; Chen et al, 2025; Wardani et al, 2024). Yet, these estimates largely omit the submicron fraction most capable of reaching the alveolar surface, leaving true pulmonary exposure unresolved. In contrast, experimental systems typically rely on exposure levels vastly exceeding plausible environmental concentrations (often tens to hundreds of micrograms per milliliter) selected to provoke measurable oxidative and inflammatory responses. This disparity illustrates the challenge of reconciling environmentally relevant exposures with experimental findings, thereby limiting current attempts to define robust dose–response thresholds. Comparative studies systematically examining how particle size, shape, and polymer chemistry modulate toxicity remain exceedingly rare. In light of this diversity, it is notable that most existing lung studies still employ spherical particles (Table 1), offering only a limited view of the biological effects likely to arise from the more irregular and fibrous forms that dominate real airborne exposure. Bridging these gaps will require coordinated efforts to establish standardized exposure-response frameworks that integrate environmental monitoring, toxicokinetic modeling, and mechanistic experimentation—foundations upon which any credible risk assessment must ultimately rest.

To effectively confront this emerging threat, the scientific community must urgently quantify real-world human exposure, particularly among vulnerable groups such as children, the elderly, and those with pre-existing conditions, while investing in highly sensitive methodologies capable of detecting ultrafine plastic particles in biological tissues. Parallel epidemiological and mechanistic research is needed to establish clear exposure-disease relationships, clarify the long-term consequences of chronic low-dose inhalation, and identify biomarkers that enable early detection and intervention. At the same time, proactive public health measures (i.e., stricter regulation of synthetic microplastic production, improved indoor air quality standards, and broad educational campaigns) are essential to reduce exposure at the population level. Only through coordinated efforts across science, medicine, policy, and public engagement can we begin to address and mitigate the potential respiratory health burden posed by microplastics.

Pending issues

  • True pulmonary exposure to microplastics remains undefined; submicron fractions are largely unquantified.

  • Comparative toxicology across polymer types, shapes, and aged versus pristine particles is missing.

  • Mechanistic integration of oxidative stress, ferroptosis, and cell differentiation is incomplete.

  • Causal contribution of microplastics to lung cancer, COPD, asthma, and fibrosis remains unresolved.

  • Synergistic toxicity with co-pollutants such as PM 2.5, volatile organic compounds, and plasticizers is poorly characterized.

  • Vulnerable groups (children, elderly, patients with pre-existing lung disease or genetic susceptibility) are underrepresented.

  • Lack of chronic low-dose inhalation models and validated biomarkers limits translation to human disease.

  • Standardized exposure–response frameworks are urgently needed to support risk assessment and regulation.

Supplementary information

Peer Review File (335.7KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research NWO OpenCompetition grant 09120242410075. The authors would like to thank Sarah Vahed for proofreading and giving suggestions on the text. Additionally, members of both Prekovic and Melgert labs for their comments on the manuscript.

Glossary

Apoptosis

A regulated form of programmed cell death essential for development and tissue homeostasis, marked by caspase activation, DNA fragmentation, and membrane blebbing.

Autophagy

A conserved cellular process that degrades and recycles damaged organelles and proteins via lysosomal pathways, maintaining cellular homeostasis under stress.

BPA

Bisphenol A. An industrial compound widely used in the production of plastics and resins; functions as a plasticizer that increases flexibility but is also recognized as an endocrine-disrupting chemical.

cGAS/STING Pathway

A cytosolic DNA-sensing pathway composed of cyclic GMP–AMP synthase (cGAS) and stimulator of interferon genes (STING). Activation by cytosolic DNA or oxidative injury triggers type I interferon and inflammatory responses; implicated in microplastic-induced ferroptosis and epithelial damage.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A progressive respiratory disorder characterized by chronic airway inflammation, irreversible airflow obstruction, and loss of pulmonary elasticity.

DEHP

Di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate. A phthalate-based plasticizer used to increase polymer flexibility; known to leach into the environment and disrupt hormonal and metabolic pathways.

EMT

Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition. A biological process in which epithelial cells lose polarity and adhesion, acquiring mesenchymal features that promote motility, invasion, and tissue remodeling; a key event in fibrosis and cancer progression.

Endocytosis/Phagocytosis

Cellular uptake mechanisms by which micro- and nanoplastics are internalized. Endocytosis refers to active engulfment by epithelial cells, while phagocytosis is the process by which macrophages ingest larger particles.

Ferroptosis

An iron-dependent, non-apoptotic form of regulated cell death driven by lipid peroxidation and glutathione depletion; implicated in inflammation and fibrosis.

Glycolysis

The cytosolic pathway that converts glucose into pyruvate, generating ATP and metabolic intermediates; often upregulated in proliferating or activated cells.

GSH

Glutathione. A tripeptide antioxidant essential for cellular redox balance, detoxification, and maintenance of immune and metabolic homeostasis.

GSH-Px

Glutathione peroxidase. A family of selenium-dependent enzymes that catalyze the reduction of hydrogen peroxide and lipid hydroperoxides, protecting cells from oxidative injury.

HSP90α

Heat shock protein 90α. A molecular chaperone involved in protein folding, stabilization, and stress responses; implicated in cancer progression and proposed as a biomarker of tissue injury.

Inflammasome

A multiprotein signaling complex that detects cellular stress or pathogens and activates inflammatory responses through caspase-1-dependent maturation of IL-1β and IL-18. The NLRP3 inflammasome is a key mediator of microplastic-induced cytokine release.

LPS

Lipopolysaccharide. A major component of the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria; acts as an endotoxin that potently activates innate immune signaling through TLR4.

Macrophage polarization

The functional differentiation of macrophages into distinct activation states, typically pro-inflammatory (M1) or anti-inflammatory (M2), in response to environmental cues.

MDA

Malondialdehyde. A reactive aldehyde formed during lipid peroxidation; widely used as a biomarker of oxidative stress and cellular membrane damage.

Microplastics

Synthetic polymer particles smaller than 5 mm originating from degradation of larger plastics or direct manufacturing; they persist in the environment and can interact with biological systems, inducing oxidative stress and inflammation.

Nanoplastics

Plastic particles smaller than 1 µm, often produced through the degradation of larger plastics or direct industrial manufacturing. Due to their nanoscale dimensions, nanoplastics exhibit high surface reactivity, enhanced cellular uptake, and the potential to cross biological barriers such as the alveolar epithelium and the blood–brain barrier.

Necrosis

A form of uncontrolled cell death characterized by loss of membrane integrity and release of intracellular contents that provoke inflammation.

PAN

Polyacrylonitrile. A synthetic, semicrystalline organic polymer resin widely used in textiles, carbon fiber production, filtration membranes, and various industrial applications due to its low density, thermal stability, strength, elasticity and resistance.

PET

Polyethylene terephthalate. A synthetic polyester commonly used in packaging and textiles; degradation of PET contributes to environmental microplastic contamination.

PM2.5

Particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter ≤2.5 µm. Derived from both natural and anthropogenic sources, these particles can penetrate deep into the lung and enter the circulation, posing significant health risks.

PVC

Polyvinyl chloride. A synthetic polymer used in construction, packaging, textiles, and medical devices; notable for its chlorine content and tendency to release toxic degradation products upon aging.

ROS

Reactive oxygen species. Chemically reactive molecules derived from oxygen, including superoxide and hydrogen peroxide; generated during normal metabolism but elevated under stress, contributing to oxidative damage and inflammation.

Senescence

A state of stable cell-cycle arrest accompanied by metabolic activity and secretion of pro-inflammatory factors; contributes to tissue aging and chronic disease.

SOD

Superoxide dismutase. An antioxidant enzyme that catalyzes the dismutation of superoxide radicals into oxygen and hydrogen peroxide, representing a primary defense against oxidative stress.

Th2 Inflammation

A subtype of adaptive immune response dominated by type 2 helper T-cell cytokines (IL-4, IL-5, IL-13), promoting eosinophilic inflammation and mucus production. Often associated with allergic airway diseases such as asthma.

TLR4

Toll-like receptor 4. A pattern-recognition receptor of the innate immune system that detects LPS and other ligands, activating NF-κB signaling and cytokine production.

α-SMA

α-smooth muscle actin. An actin isoform commonly used as a marker of myofibroblast differentiation and fibrotic remodeling.

Author contributions

Emmanouela Epeslidou: Conceptualization; Visualization; Writing—original draft; Writing—review and editing. Julia S Scott: Writing—original draft; Writing—review and editing. Bim de Klein: Writing—review and editing. Jeremy Tan Cudia: Writing—review and editing. Barbro Melgert: Conceptualization; Supervision; Funding acquisition; Writing—original draft; Writing—review and editing. Stefan Prekovic: Conceptualization; Supervision; Funding acquisition; Visualization; Writing—original draft; Writing—review and editing.

Disclosure and competing interests statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

These authors contributed equally as senior authors: Barbro Melgert, Stefan Prekovic.

Contributor Information

Barbro Melgert, Email: b.n.melgert@rug.nl.

Stefan Prekovic, Email: s.prekovic@umcutrecht.nl.

Peer review information

A peer review file is available at 10.1038/s44321-025-00353-w.

References

  1. Adler MY, Issoual I, Rückert M, Deloch L, Meier C, Tschernig T, Alexiou C, Pfister F, Ramsperger AF, Laforsch C et al (2024) Effect of micro- and nanoplastic particles on human macrophages. J Hazard Mater 471:134253 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aghapour M, Ubags ND, Bruder D, Hiemstra PS, Sidhaye V, Rezaee F, Heijink IH (2022) Role of air pollutants in airway epithelial barrier dysfunction in asthma and COPD. Eur Respir Rev 31:210112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  3. Ahmadi P, Doyle D, Mojarad N, Taherkhani S, Janzadeh A, Honardoost M, Gholami M (2025) Effects of micro- and nanoplastic exposure on macrophages: a review of molecular and cellular mechanisms. Toxicol Mech 35:823–846 [DOI] [PubMed]
  4. Alijagic A, Hedbrant A, Persson A, Larsson M, Engwall M, Särndahl E (2023) NLRP3 inflammasome as a sensor of micro- and nanoplastics immunotoxicity. Front Immunol 14:1178434 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Aloi N, Calarco A, Curcuruto G, Di Natale M, Augello G, Carroccio SC, Cerruti P, Cervello M, Cuttitta A, Colombo P et al (2024) Photoaging of polystyrene-based microplastics amplifies inflammatory response in macrophages. Chemosphere 364:143131 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Amato-Lourenço LF, Carvalho-Oliveira R, Júnior GR, Dos Santos Galvão L, Ando RA, Mauad T (2021) Presence of airborne microplastics in human lung tissue. J Hazard Mater 416:126124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Amato-Lourenço LF, Dos Santos Galvão L, de Weger LA, Hiemstra PS, Vijver MG, Mauad T (2020) An emerging class of air pollutants: potential effects of microplastics to respiratory human health?. Sci Total Environ 749:141676 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Andrady AL (2011) Microplastics in the marine environment. Mar Pollut Bull 62:1596–1605 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Andrady AL, Neal MA (2009) Applications and societal benefits of plastics. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 364:1977–1984 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Atis S, Tutluoglu B, Levent E, Ozturk C, Tunaci A, Sahin K, Saral A, Oktay I, Kanik A, Nemery B (2005) The respiratory effects of occupational polypropylene flock exposure. Eur Respir J 25:110–117 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Beijers RJHCG, Franssen FME, Groenen MTJ, Spruit MA, Schols AMWJ (2022) Physical and mental health profile of patients with the early-onset severe COPD phenotype: a cross-sectional analysis. Clin Nutr 41:653–660 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bell MC, Busse WW (2013) Severe asthma: an expanding and mounting clinical challenge. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pr 1:110–121. quiz 122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bhat MA (2024) Airborne microplastic contamination across diverse university indoor environments: a comprehensive ambient analysis. Air Qual Atmos Health 17:1851–1866 [Google Scholar]
  14. Bhattacharjee S, Rathore C, Naik A, Saha M, Tudu P, Dastidar PG, Bhattacharyya S, de Boer J, Chaudhuri P (2024) Do microplastics accumulate in penguin internal organs? Evidence from Svenner Island, Antarctica. Sci Total Environ 951:175361 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Binda G, Zanetti G, Bellasi A, Spanu D, Boldrocchi G, Bettinetti R, Pozzi A, Nizzetto L (2023) Physicochemical and biological ageing processes of (micro)plastics in the environment: a multi-tiered study on polyethylene. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 30:6298–6312 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Birnbaum LS (1995) Developmental effects of dioxins and related endocrine disrupting chemicals. Toxicol Lett 82-83:743–750 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Boccia P, Mondellini S, Mauro S, Zanellato M, Parolini M, Sturchio E (2024) Potential effects of environmental and occupational exposure to microplastics: an overview of air contamination. Toxics 12:320 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  18. Boettcher H, Kukulka T, Cohen JH (2023) Methods for controlled preparation and dosing of microplastic fragments in bioassays. Sci Rep 13:5195 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Bollmeier SG, Hartmann AP (2020) Management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a review focusing on exacerbations. Am J Health Syst Pharm 77:259–268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Brynzak-Schreiber E, Schögl E, Bapp C, Cseh K, Kopatz V, Jakupec MA, Weber A, Lange T, Toca-Herrera JL, Del Favero G et al (2024) Microplastics role in cell migration and distribution during cancer cell division. Chemosphere 353:141463 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Chapman KR, McIvor A (2010) Asthma that is unresponsive to usual care. CMAJ 182:45–52 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Chen C-Y, Chen S-Y, Liao C-M (2025) Regional and population-scale trends in human inhalation exposure to airborne microplastics: Implications for health risk assessment. Environ Pollut 371:125950 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Chen P-W, Hsiao M-N, Xiao L-W, Liu Z-S (2024) Adsorption behavior of heavy metals onto microplastics derived from conventional and biodegradable commercial plastic products. Sci Total Environ 951:175537 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Chen Q, Gao J, Yu H, Su H, Yang Y, Cao Y, Zhang Q, Ren Y, Hollert H, Shi H et al (2022) An emerging role of microplastics in the etiology of lung ground glass nodules. Environ Sci Eur 34:25
  25. Cheng J, Liu Z, Li D, Zhu Y, Luo J, Zhang Y (2025) Associations among air pollution, asthma and lung function: a cross-sectional study. Sci Rep 15:11347 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Chilosi M, Poletti V, Zamò A, Lestani M, Montagna L, Piccoli P, Pedron S, Bertaso M, Scarpa A, Murer B et al (2003) Aberrant Wnt/beta-catenin pathway activation in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Pathol 162:1495–1502 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Cocca M, Ambrogi V, Avolio R, Castaldo R, Errico ME, Gentile G (2023) Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on microplastic pollution in the Mediterranean Sea. Springer Nature
  28. Cole M, Lindeque P, Fileman E, Halsband C, Goodhead R, Moger J, Galloway TS (2013) Microplastic ingestion by zooplankton. Environ Sci Technol 47:6646–6655 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Cole M, Lindeque P, Halsband C, Galloway TS (2011) Microplastics as contaminants in the marine environment: a review. Mar Pollut Bull 62:2588–2597 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Cox KD, Covernton GA, Davies HL, Dower JF, Juanes F, Dudas SE (2019) Human consumption of microplastics. Environ Sci Technol 53:7068–7074 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Del Giudice G, Serra A, Saarimäki LA, Kotsis K, Rouse I, Colibaba SA, Jagiello K, Mikolajczyk A, Fratello M, Papadiamantis AG et al (2023) An ancestral molecular response to nanomaterial particulates. Nat Nanotechnol 18:957–966 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Eberhard T, Casillas G, Zarus GM, Barr DB (2024) Systematic review of microplastics and nanoplastics in indoor and outdoor air: identifying a framework and data needs for quantifying human inhalation exposures. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 34:185–196 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ernhofer B, Spittler A, Ferk F, Mišík M, Zylka MM, Glatt L, Boettiger K, Solta A, Kirchhofer D, Timelthaler G et al (2025) Small Particles, Big Problems: Polystyrene nanoparticles induce DNA damage, oxidative stress, migration, and mitogenic pathways predominantly in non-malignant lung cells. J Hazard Mater 495:139129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Eschenbacher WL, Kreiss K, Lougheed MD, Pransky GS, Day B, Castellan RM (1999) Nylon flock-associated interstitial lung disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 159:2003–2008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Fendall LS, Sewell MA (2009) Contributing to marine pollution by washing your face: microplastics in facial cleansers. Mar Pollut Bull 58:1225–1228 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Geyer R, Jambeck JR, Law KL (2017) Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Sci Adv 3:e1700782 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Girardi P, Barbiero F, Baccini M, Comba P, Pirastu R, Mastrangelo G, Ballarin MN, Biggeri A, Fedeli U (2022) Mortality for lung cancer among PVC baggers employed in the vinyl chloride industry. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19:6246 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  38. Giri S, Lamichhane G, Khadka D, Devkota HP (2024) Microplastics contamination in food products: occurrence, analytical techniques and potential impacts on human health. Curr Res Biotechnol 7:100190 [Google Scholar]
  39. Gomiero A, Strafella P, Pellini G, Salvalaggio V, Fabi G (2018) Comparative effects of ingested PVC micro particles with and without adsorbed benzo(a)pyrene vs. spiked sediments on the cellular and sub cellular processes of the benthic organism Hediste diversicolor. Front Mar Sci 5:351781 [Google Scholar]
  40. Goodman KE, Hare JT, Khamis ZI, Hua T, Sang Q-XA (2021) Exposure of human lung cells to polystyrene microplastics significantly retards cell proliferation and triggers morphological changes. Chem Res Toxicol 34:1069–1081 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Gou Z, Wu H, Li S, Liu Z, Zhang Y (2024) Airborne micro- and nanoplastics: emerging causes of respiratory diseases. Part Fibre Toxicol 21:50 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Hahladakis JN, Velis CA, Weber R, Iacovidou E, Purnell P (2018) An overview of chemical additives present in plastics: Migration, release, fate and environmental impact during their use, disposal and recycling. J Hazard Mater 344:179–199 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Han Q, Gao X, Wang S, Wei Z, Wang Y, Xu K, Chen M (2023) Co-exposure to polystyrene microplastics and di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate aggravates allergic asthma through the TRPA1-p38 MAPK pathway. Toxicol Lett 384:73–85 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Hanlon W (2015) Pollution and Mortality in the 19th Century. UCLA CCPR Population Working Papers.
  45. Hidalgo-Ruz V, Gutow L, Thompson RC, Thiel M (2012) Microplastics in the marine environment: a review of the methods used for identification and quantification. Environ Sci Technol 46:3060–3075 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Hill W, Lim EL, Weeden CE, Lee C, Augustine M, Chen K, Kuan F-C, Marongiu F, Evans JrEJ, Moore DA et al (2023) Lung adenocarcinoma promotion by air pollutants. Nature 616:159–167 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Hirota K, Hasegawa T, Hinata H, Ito F, Inagawa H, Kochi C, Soma G-I, Makino K, Terada H (2007) Optimum conditions for efficient phagocytosis of rifampicin-loaded PLGA microspheres by alveolar macrophages. J Control Release 119:69–76 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Islam MZ, Zaman SU, Sami NI, Roy S, Jeba F, Islam MS, Salam A (2024) Human inhalation exposure assessment of the airborne microplastics from indoor deposited dusts during winter in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Heliyon 10:e36449 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Jenner LC, Rotchell JM, Bennett RT, Cowen M, Tentzeris V, Sadofsky LR (2022) Detection of microplastics in human lung tissue using μFTIR spectroscopy. Sci Total Environ 831:154907 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Jin W, Zhang W, Tang H, Wang P, Zhang Y, Liu S, Qiu J, Chen H, Wang L, Wang R et al (2024) Microplastics exposure causes the senescence of human lung epithelial cells and mouse lungs by inducing ROS signaling. Environ Int 185:108489 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Kang H, Huang D, Zhang W, Wang J, Liu Z, Wang Z, Jiang G, Gao A (2024) Inhaled polystyrene microplastics impaired lung function through pulmonary flora/TLR4-mediated iron homeostasis imbalance. Sci Total Environ 946:174300 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Kaul B, Lee JS, Zhang N, Vittinghoff E, Sarmiento K, Collard HR, Whooley MA (2022) Epidemiology of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis among U.S. Veterans, 2010-2019. Ann Am Thorac Soc 19:196–203 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Kelly FJ, Fussell JC (2012) Size, source and chemical composition as determinants of toxicity attributable to ambient particulate matter. Atmos Environ 60:504–526 [Google Scholar]
  54. Kern DG, Crausman RS, Durand KT, Nayer A, Kuhn 3rdC (1998) Flock worker’s lung: chronic interstitial lung disease in the nylon flocking industry. Ann Intern Med 129:261–272 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Koelmans AA, Kooi M, Law KL, van Sebille E (2017) All is not lost: deriving a top-down mass budget of plastic at sea. Environ Res Lett 12:114028 [Google Scholar]
  56. Kolb M, Collard HR (2014) Staging of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: past, present and future. Eur Respir Rev 23:220–224 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Kudzin MH, Piwowarska D, Festinger N, Chruściel JJ (2023) Risks associated with the presence of polyvinyl chloride in the environment and methods for its disposal and utilization. Materials 17:173 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  58. Kumawat M, Sharma P, Pal N, James MM, Verma V, Tiwari RR, Shubham S, Sarma DK, Kumar M (2022) Occurrence and seasonal disparity of emerging endocrine disrupting chemicals in a drinking water supply system and associated health risk. Sci Rep 12:9252 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Kuruvilla ME, Lee FE-H, Lee GB (2019) Understanding asthma phenotypes, endotypes, and mechanisms of disease. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 56:219–233 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. L Leonard SV, Liddle CR, Atherall CA, Chapman E, Watkins M, D J Calaminus S, Rotchell JM (2024) Microplastics in human blood: Polymer types, concentrations and characterisation using μFTIR. Environ Int 188:108751 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Lee SE, Yoon HK, Kim DY, Jeong TS, Park YS (2024) An emerging role of micro- and nanoplastics in vascular diseases. Life 14:255 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  62. Levis H, Lewis C, Fainor M, Lawal A, Stockham E, Weston J, Farhang N, Gullbrand SE, Bowles RD (2025) Targeted CRISPR regulation of ZNF865 enhances stem cell cartilage deposition, tissue maturation rates, and mechanical properties in engineered intervertebral discs. Acta Biomater 191:276–291 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Levis H, Lewis C, Stockham E, Weston J, Lawal A, Lawrence B, Gullbrand SE, Bowles RD (2023) ZNF865 regulates senescence and cell cycle for applications to cell engineering and gene therapy. Preprint at 10.1101/2023.10.25.563801
  64. Li D, Li P, Shi Y, Sheerin ED, Zhang Z, Yang L, Xiao L, Hill C, Gordon C, Ruether M et al (2025a) Stress-induced phase separation in plastics drives the release of amorphous polymer micropollutants into water. Nat Commun 16:3814 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Li J, Qu X, Su L, Zhang W, Yang D, Kolandhasamy P, Li D, Shi H (2016) Microplastics in mussels along the coastal waters of China. Environ Pollut 214:177–184 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Li X, Zhang T, Lv W, Wang H, Chen H, Xu Q, Cai H, Dai J (2022) Intratracheal administration of polystyrene microplastics induces pulmonary fibrosis by activating oxidative stress and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in mice. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 232:113238 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Li Y, Zhang X, Sun J, Chen H, Han Z, Ji X, Tian S, Liu S, Zheng Y, Li L et al (2025b) Inhalable microplastics of different shapes disrupt airway epithelial homeostasis: a comparative study of fibers and irregular particles. Environ Int 203:109736 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Liao Z, Ji X, Ma Y, Lv B, Huang W, Zhu X, Fang M, Wang Q, Wang X, Dahlgren R et al (2021) Airborne microplastics in indoor and outdoor environments of a coastal city in Eastern China. J Hazard Mater 417:126007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Lin S, Zhang H, Wang C, Su X-L, Song Y, Wu P, Yang Z, Wong M-H, Cai Z, Zheng C (2022) Metabolomics reveal nanoplastic-induced mitochondrial damage in human liver and lung cells. Environ Sci Technol 56:12483–12493 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Liu T, Woodruff PG, Zhou X (2024) Advances in non-type 2 severe asthma: from molecular insights to novel treatment strategies. Eur Respir J 64:2300826 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  71. Liu X, Chen Z (2017) The pathophysiological role of mitochondrial oxidative stress in lung diseases. J Transl Med 15: 207 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Liu Y, Carlson SA, Watson KB, Xu F, Greenlund KJ (2023) Trends in the prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults aged ≥18 years - United States, 2011-2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 72:1250–1256 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Lu K, Zhan D, Fang Y, Li L, Chen G, Chen S, Wang L (2022) Microplastics, potential threat to patients with lung diseases. Front Toxicol 4:958414 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Lu L, Li W, Cheng Y, Liu M (2023) Chemical recycling technologies for PVC waste and PVC-containing plastic waste: a review. Waste Manag 166:245–258 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Luo H, Xiao T, Sun X, Song Y, Shi W, Lu K, Chen D, Sun C, Bian Q (2023) The regulation of circRNA_kif26b on alveolar epithelial cell senescence via miR-346-3p is involved in microplastics-induced lung injuries. Sci Total Environ 882:163512 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Lusher AL, McHugh M, Thompson RC (2013) Occurrence of microplastics in the gastrointestinal tract of pelagic and demersal fish from the English Channel. Mar Pollut Bull 67:94–99 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Mahmud F, Sarker DB, Jocelyn JA, Sang Q-XA (2024) Molecular and cellular effects of microplastics and nanoplastics: focus on inflammation and senescence. Cells 13:1788 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  78. Martínez-Ibarra A, Martínez-Razo LD, MacDonald-Ramos K, Morales-Pacheco M, Vázquez-Martínez ER, López-López M, Rodríguez Dorantes M, Cerbón M (2021) Multisystemic alterations in humans induced by bisphenol A and phthalates: experimental, epidemiological and clinical studies reveal the need to change health policies. Environ Pollut 271:116380 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Mastrangelo G, Fedeli U, Fadda E, Milan G, Turato A, Pavanello S (2003) Lung cancer risk in workers exposed to poly(vinyl chloride) dust: a nested case-referent study. Occup Environ Med 60:423–428 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Mato Y, Isobe T, Takada H, Kanehiro H, Ohtake C, Kaminuma T (2001) Plastic resin pellets as a transport medium for toxic chemicals in the marine environment. Environ Sci Technol 35:318–324 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Mendez NF, Sharma V, Valsecchi M, Pai V, Lee JK, Schadler LS, Müller AJ, Watson-Sanders S, Dadmun M, Kumaraswamy G et al (2025) Mechanism of quiescent nanoplastic formation from semicrystalline polymers. Nat Commun 16:3051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Merkley SD, Moss HC, Goodfellow SM, Ling CL, Meyer-Hagen JL, Weaver J, Campen MJ, Castillo EF (2022) Polystyrene microplastics induce an immunometabolic active state in macrophages. Cell Biol Toxicol 38:31–41 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Monclús L, Arp HPH, Groh KJ, Faltynkova A, Løseth ME, Muncke J, Wang Z, Wolf R, Zimmermann L, Wagner M (2025) Mapping the chemical complexity of plastics. Nature 643:349–355 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Nihart AJ, Garcia MA, El Hayek E, Liu R, Olewine M, Kingston JD, Castillo EF, Gullapalli RR, Howard T, Bleske B et al (2025) Bioaccumulation of microplastics in decedent human brains. Nat Med 31:1114–1119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. O’Brien S, Rauert C, Ribeiro F, Okoffo ED, Burrows SD, O’Brien JW, Wang X, Wright SL, Thomas KV (2023) There’s something in the air: a review of sources, prevalence and behaviour of microplastics in the atmosphere. Sci Total Environ 874:162193 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Olson AL, Gifford AH, Inase N, Fernández Pérez ER, Suda T (2018) The epidemiology of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and interstitial lung diseases at risk of a progressive-fibrosing phenotype. Eur Respir Rev 27:180077 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  87. Özgen Alpaydin A, Uçan ES, Köktürk M, Atamanalp M, Kalyoncu Ç, Yiğit S, Uçar A, Şimşek GÖ, Tertemiz KC, Karaçam V et al (2024) Microplastics, as a risk factor in the development of interstitial lung disease- a preliminary study. Environ Pollut 363:125054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Papaioannou AI, Kostikas K, Manali ED, Papadaki G, Roussou A, Kolilekas L, Borie R, Bouros D, Papiris SA (2016) Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema: The many aspects of a cohabitation contract. Respir Med 117:14–26 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Paplińska-Goryca M, Misiukiewicz-Stępień P, Wróbel M, Mycroft-Rzeszotarska K, Adamska D, Rachowka J, Królikowska M, Goryca K, Krenke R (2025) The impaired response of nasal epithelial cells to microplastic stimulation in asthma and COPD. Sci Rep 15:4242 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Park Y, Kim H-J, Kim YW, Kwon BS, Lee YJ, Cho Y-J, Lee JH, Kim J, Kim J, Lee KH et al (2024) Occupational and environmental risk factors for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a case-control study. Respir Med 231:107738 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Prada FA, Distler A, Cheng S, Scott WJ, Chamorro PL, Subramanian G, Verma V, Turner A (2023) Disposable face masks: a direct source for inhalation of microplastics. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.16295
  92. Prata JC (2018) Airborne microplastics: consequences to human health?. Environ Pollut 234:115–126 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Prüst M, Meijer J, Westerink RHS (2020) The plastic brain: neurotoxicity of micro- and nanoplastics. Part Fibre Toxicol 17:24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Qiu L, Lu W, Tu C, Li X, Zhang H, Wang S, Chen M, Zheng X, Wang Z, Lin M et al (2023) Evidence of microplastics in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid among never-smokers: a prospective case series. Environ Sci Technol 57:2435–2444 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Rafazi P, Bagheri Z, Haghi-Aminjan H, Rahimifard M, Ahvaraki A (2024) Long-term exposure of human U87 glioblastoma cells to polyethylene microplastics: investigating the potential cancer progression. Toxicol Rep 13:101757 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Rehman AU, Shah S, Abbas G, Harun SN, Shakeel S, Hussain R, Hassali MAA, Rasool MF (2021) Assessment of risk factors responsible for rapid deterioration of lung function over a period of one year in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Sci Rep 11:13578 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Rekhtman N, Tischfield SE, Febres-Aldana CA, Lee JJ-K, Chang JC, Herzberg BO, Selenica P, Woo HJ, Vanderbilt CM, Yang S-R et al (2025) Chromothripsis-mediated small cell lung carcinoma. Cancer Discov 15:83–104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Rosenwasser Y, Berger I, Loewy ZG (2022) Therapeutic approaches for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations. Pathogens 11:1513 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  99. Rozman U, Klun B, Kuljanin A, Skalar T, Kalčíková G (2023) Insights into the shape-dependent effects of polyethylene microplastics on interactions with organisms, environmental aging, and adsorption properties. Sci Rep 13:22147 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Sack C, Wojdyla DM, MacMurdo MG, Gassett A, Kaufman JD, Raghu G, Redlich CA, Li P, Olson AL, Leonard TB et al (2025) Long-term air pollution exposure and severity of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: data from the idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis prospective outcomes (IPF-PRO) registry. Ann Am Thorac Soc 22:378–386 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Schwartz DA, Blumhagen RZ, Fingerlin TE (2022) Evolution of the gain-of-function promoter variant. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 206:1189–1191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Seibold MA, Wise AL, Speer MC, Steele MP, Brown KK, Loyd JE, Fingerlin TE, Zhang W, Gudmundsson G, Groshong SD et al (2011) A common MUC5B promoter polymorphism and pulmonary fibrosis. N Engl J Med 364:1503–1512 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Shankar A, Dubey A, Saini D, Singh M, Prasad CP, Roy S, Bharati SJ, Rinki M, Singh N, Seth T et al (2019) Environmental and occupational determinants of lung cancer. Transl Lung Cancer Res 8:S31–S49 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Sharma B, McLeland CB, Potter TM, Stern ST, Adiseshaiah PP (2018) Assessing NLRP3 inflammasome activation by nanoparticles. Methods Mol Biol 1682:135–147 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Shi Y, Shi L, Huang H, Ye K, Yang L, Wang Z, Sun Y, Li D, Shi Y, Xiao L et al (2024) Analysis of aged microplastics: a review. Environ Chem Lett 22:1861–1888 [Google Scholar]
  106. Soares Pires F, Caetano Mota P, Melo N, Costa D, Jesus JM, Cunha R, Guimarães S, Souto-Moura C, Morais A (2013) Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis—clinical presentation, outcome and baseline prognostic factors in a Portuguese cohort. Rev Port Pneumol 19:19–27 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Song S, van Dijk F, Vasse GF, Liu Q, Gosselink IF, Weltjens E, Remels AHV, de Jager MH, Bos S, Li C et al (2024) Inhalable textile microplastic fibers impair airway epithelial differentiation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 209:427–443 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Sonke JE, Koenig AM, Yakovenko N, Hagelskjær O, Margenat H, Hansson SV, De Vleeschouwer F, Magand O, Le Roux G, Thomas JL (2022) A mass budget and box model of global plastics cycling, degradation and dispersal in the land-ocean-atmosphere system. Microplast Nanoplast 2:1–1435005629 [Google Scholar]
  109. Sun A, Wang W-X (2023) Human exposure to microplastics and its associated health risks. Environ Health 1:139–149 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F (2021) Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71:209–249 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Swanson KV, Deng M, Ting JP-Y (2019) The NLRP3 inflammasome: molecular activation and regulation to therapeutics. Nat Rev Immunol 19:477–489 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Tavakolpournegari A, Villacorta A, Morataya-Reyes M, Arribas Arranz J, Banaei G, Pastor S, Velázquez A, Marcos R, Hernández A, Annangi B (2024) Harmful effects of true-to-life nanoplastics derived from PET water bottles in human alveolar macrophages. Environ Pollut 348:123823 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Thandra KC, Barsouk A, Saginala K, Aluru JS, Barsouk A (2021) Epidemiology of lung cancer. Contemp Oncol ((Pozn)) 25:45–52 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Tominaga K, Yoshimoto T, Torigoe K, Kurimoto M, Matsui K, Hada T, Okamura H, Nakanishi K (2000) IL-12 synergizes with IL-18 or IL-1beta for IFN-gamma production from human T cells. Int Immunol 12:151–160 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Traversa A, Mari E, Pontecorvi P, Gerini G, Romano E, Megiorni F, Amedei A, Marchese C, Ranieri D, Ceccarelli S (2024) Polyethylene micro/nanoplastics exposure induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition in human bronchial and alveolar epithelial cells. Int J Mol Sci 25:10168 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  116. Turcotte SE, Chee A, Walsh R, Grant FC, Liss GM, Boag A, Forkert L, Munt PW, Lougheed MD (2013) Flock worker’s lung disease: natural history of cases and exposed workers in Kingston, Ontario. Chest 143:1642–1648 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. van den Berg AET, Adriaans KJ, Parker LA, Höppener EM, Dusza HM, Legler J, Pieters RHH (2025) Top-down generated micro- and nanoplastics reduce macrophage viability without eliciting a pro-inflammatory response. Microplast Nanoplast 5:32 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Vasse GF, Melgert BN (2024) Microplastic and plastic pollution: impact on respiratory disease and health. Eur Respir Rev 33:230226 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  119. Vianello A, Jensen RL, Liu L, Vollertsen J (2019) Simulating human exposure to indoor airborne microplastics using a Breathing Thermal Manikin. Sci Rep 9:8670 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Vlacil A-K, Bänfer S, Jacob R, Trippel N, Kuzu I, Schieffer B, Grote K (2021) Polystyrene microplastic particles induce endothelial activation. PLoS One 16:e0260181 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Wadhwa R, Dua K, Adcock IM, Horvat JC, Kim RY, Hansbro PM (2019) Cellular mechanisms underlying steroid-resistant asthma. Eur Respir Rev 28:190096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  122. Wang L, Feng J, Deng Y, Yang Q, Wei Q, Ye D, Rong X, Guo J (2022) CCAAT/enhancer-binding proteins in fibrosis: complex roles beyond conventional understanding. Research 2022:9891689 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Wang Q, He W, Zhou Y, Feng R, Wang Y, Liu L, Yuan Y, Dai J, Liu Y, Zhang X (2025) Polystyrene nanoplastics aggravate house dust mite induced allergic airway inflammation through EGFR/ERK-dependent lung epithelial barrier dysfunction. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 298:118329 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Wardani I, Hazimah Mohamed Nor N, Wright SL, Kooter IM, Koelmans AA (2024) Nano- and microplastic PBK modeling in the context of human exposure and risk assessment. Environ Int 186:108504 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Weber A, Schwiebs A, Solhaug H, Stenvik J, Nilsen AM, Wagner M, Relja B, Radeke HH (2022) Nanoplastics affect the inflammatory cytokine release by primary human monocytes and dendritic cells. Environ Int 163:107173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Wei H, Lu S, Chen M, Yao R, Yan B, Li Q, Song X, Li M, Wu Y, Yang X et al (2024) Mechanisms of exacerbation of Th2-mediated eosinophilic allergic asthma induced by plastic pollution derivatives (PPD): a molecular toxicological study involving lung cell ferroptosis and metabolomics. Sci Total Environ 946:174482 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Wei YY, Chen TT, Zhang DW, Zhang Y, Li F, Ding YC, Wang MY, Zhang L, Chen KG, Fei GH (2025) Microplastics exacerbate ferroptosis via mitochondrial reactive oxygen species-mediated autophagy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Autophagy 21:1717–1743 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  128. White SS, Birnbaum LS (2009) An overview of the effects of dioxins and dioxin-like compounds on vertebrates, as documented in human and ecological epidemiology. J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev 27:197–211 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Wieland S, Balmes A, Bender J, Kitzinger J, Meyer F, Ramsperger AF, Roeder F, Tengelmann C, Wimmer BH, Laforsch C et al (2022) From properties to toxicity: comparing microplastics to other airborne microparticles. J Hazard Mater 428:128151 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Wiesinger H, Wang Z, Hellweg S (2021) Deep dive into plastic monomers, additives, and processing aids. Environ Sci Technol 55:9339–9351 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Wolff CM, Singer D, Schmidt A, Bekeschus S (2023) Immune and inflammatory responses of human macrophages, dendritic cells, and T-cells in presence of micro- and nanoplastic of different types and sizes. J Hazard Mater 459:132194 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Wolters PJ, Blackwell TS, Eickelberg O, Loyd JE, Kaminski N, Jenkins G, Maher TM, Molina-Molina M, Noble PW, Raghu G et al (2018) Time for a change: is idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis still idiopathic and only fibrotic?. Lancet Respir Med 6:154–160 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Wright SL, Kelly FJ (2017) Plastic and human health: a micro issue?. Environ Sci Technol 51:6634–6647 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Wright SL, Thompson RC, Galloway TS (2013) The physical impacts of microplastics on marine organisms: a review. Environ Pollut 178:483–492 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Wu Q, Liu C, Liu D, Wang Y, Qi H, Liu X, Zhang Y, Chen H, Zeng Y, Li J (2024) Polystyrene nanoplastics-induced lung apoptosis and ferroptosis via ROS-dependent endoplasmic reticulum stress. Sci Total Environ 912:169260 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Xie Y, Abel PW, Casale TB, Tu Y (2022) T17 cells and corticosteroid insensitivity in severe asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 149:467–479 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Xu M, Chen J, Gao L, Cai S, Dong H (2025) Microplastic exposure induces HSP90α secretion and aggravates asthmatic airway remodeling via PI3K-Akt-mTOR pathway. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 291:117828 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Xu Y, Ou Q, van der Hoek JP, Liu G, Lompe KM (2024) Photo-oxidation of micro- and nanoplastics: physical, chemical, and biological effects in environments. Environ Sci Technol 58:991–1009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Yakovenko N, Pérez-Serrano L, Segur T, Hagelskjaer O, Margenat H, Le Roux G, Sonke JE (2025) Human exposure to PM10 microplastics in indoor air. PLoS One 20:e0328011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Yang Q, Dai H, Cheng Y, Wang B, Xu J, Zhang Y, Chen Y, Xu F, Ma Q, Lin F et al (2023a) Oral feeding of nanoplastics affects brain function of mice by inducing macrophage IL-1 signal in the intestine. Cell Rep 42:112346 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Yang S, Cheng Y, Chen Z, Liu T, Yin L, Pu Y, Liang G (2021) In vitro evaluation of nanoplastics using human lung epithelial cells, microarray analysis and co-culture model. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 226:112837 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Yang S, Zhang T, Ge Y, Yin L, Pu Y, Liang G (2024) Inhalation exposure to polystyrene nanoplastics induces chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-like lung injury in mice through multi-dimensional assessment. Environ Pollut 347:123633 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Yang Y, Xie E, Du Z, Peng Z, Han Z, Li L, Zhao R, Qin Y, Xue M, Li F et al (2023b) Detection of various microplastics in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Environ Sci Technol 57:10911–10918 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Yazdi AS, Guarda G, Riteau N, Drexler SK, Tardivel A, Couillin I, Tschopp J (2010) Nanoparticles activate the NLR pyrin domain containing 3 (Nlrp3) inflammasome and cause pulmonary inflammation through release of IL-1α and IL-1β. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:19449–19454 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Ying Y, Wang M, Chen Y, Li M, Ma C, Zhang J, Huang X, Jia M, Zeng J, Wang Y et al (2022) Zinc finger protein 280C contributes to colorectal tumorigenesis by maintaining epigenetic repression at H3K27me3-marked loci. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 119:e2120633119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Yong CQY, Valiyaveettil S, Tang BL (2020) Toxicity of microplastics and nanoplastics in mammalian systems. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17:1509 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  147. Yu F, Qin Q, Zhang X, Ma J (2024) Characteristics and adsorption behavior of typical microplastics in long-term accelerated weathering simulation. Environ Sci Process Impacts 26:882–890 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Yu H-R, Tiao M-M, Huang S-C, Sheu JJ-C, Tain Y-L, Sheen J-M, Lin I-C, Tsai C-C, Huang L-T, Hsu C-N et al (2025) Impact of maternal microplastic exposure on offspring lung structure and function: insights into transcriptional misregulation and the TGF-β/α-SMA pathway. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 299:118397 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Zaki MH, Vogel P, Body-Malapel M, Lamkanfi M, Kanneganti T-D (2010) IL-18 production downstream of the Nlrp3 inflammasome confers protection against colorectal tumor formation. J Immunol 185:4912–4920 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Zhang J, Du J, Liu D, Zhuo J, Chu L, Li Y, Gao L, Xu M, Chen W, Huang W et al (2024) Polystyrene microplastics induce pulmonary fibrosis by promoting alveolar epithelial cell ferroptosis through cGAS/STING signaling. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 277:116357 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Zhang W, Zhang S, Wang J, Wang Y, Mu J, Wang P, Lin X, Ma D (2017) Microplastic pollution in the surface waters of the Bohai Sea, China. Environ Pollut 231:541–548 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Zhao M, Huang L, Arulmani SRB, Yan J, Wu L, Wu T, Zhang H, Xiao T (2022a) Adsorption of different pollutants by using microplastic with different influencing factors and mechanisms in wastewater: a review. Nanomaterials 12:2256 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  153. Zhao Q, Zhu L, Weng J, Jin Z, Cao Y, Jiang H, Zhang Z (2023) Detection and characterization of microplastics in the human testis and semen. Sci Total Environ 877:162713 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Zhao X, Wang J, Yee Leung KM, Wu F (2022b) Color: an important but overlooked factor for plastic photoaging and microplastic formation. Environ Sci Technol 56:9161–9163 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Zhu X, Huang W, Fang M, Liao Z, Wang Y, Xu L, Mu Q, Shi C, Lu C, Deng H et al (2021) Airborne microplastic concentrations in five megacities of northern and southeast China. Environ Sci Technol 55:12871–12881 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Peer Review File (335.7KB, pdf)

Articles from EMBO Molecular Medicine are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES