Abstract
The application of nonresonant electromagnetic fields, a technique known as ’dressing’, provides critical control over the properties of fundamental quantum systems. We investigate the time evolution of a dressed-atom coherent spin ensemble, effectively representing a qubit, driven by a non-resonant electromagnetic field with two components, one along the quantisation static magnetic field and the other one orthogonal to it. While this second component produces a Larmor precession of the spin, the longitudinal dressing modifies the instantaneous field value, leading to a frequency modulated temporal evolution of the spin. This dual-dressing configuration represents an extension of the Landau-Zener multipassage interferometry in the presence of an additional dressing field controlling the tunneling process by its amplitude and phase. Our measurement of the qubit coherence introduces additional features to the transition probability readout of standard interferometry. The coherence time evolution is characterized by oscillations at several frequencies, each of them produced by a different quantum contribution. Such frequency description introduces a new picture of the qubit multipassage evolution. Our tuning-dressed configuration expands the toolbox for quantum state manipulation and quantum control applications. The experiments are performed in rubidium and caesium atomic magnetometers, confined in a magneto-optical trap and in a vapour cell, respectively. Static fields in the
T range and kHz oscillating fields with large Rabi frequencies are applied. Because the present low-frequency dressing operation does not fall within the standard Floquet engineering paradigm based on the high-frequency expansion, we develop an ad-hoc dressing perturbation treatment. Numerical simulations support the adiabatic and non-adiabatic qubit evolution.
Subject terms: Quantum physics, Qubits
Introduction
Floquet engineering is a vital technique for analyzing quantum systems influenced by periodic electromagnetic fields, allowing the generation of unique quantum properties across various domains, including physics, chemistry, and engineering1–5. It captures the dynamics of time-dependent Hamiltonians through effective Hamiltonians that account for the system’s key features, characterized by two distinct time evolutions: a micromotion, which occurs at the frequency of the periodic field, and a slower evolution governed by the effective Hamiltonian.
The experimental approach to a Floquet engineered system typically isolates the slower dynamics by integrating the faster, less relevant one, often eliminating the need for a detailed integration due to the small amplitude of the micromotion. This capability is advantageous for quantum simulation tasks, such as those involving cold atomic gases6–12 and solid state/superconducting ones13–16. There, the intricacies of the micromotion can be neglected to focus on the emergent phenomena captured by the effective Hamiltonian.
We present here experimental and theoretical studies on the strong periodic bi-modal nonresonant drive of a two-level atomic coherent spin ensemble, effectively representing a qubit, which fits within the broader context of two-level systems influenced by virtual/real photons17,18. This concept, initially proposed by Cohen-Tannoudji and Haroche19,20, focuses on an energy splitting that is small relative to the driving field’s frequency. In the Floquet framework, the effective Hamiltonian accounts for an energy splitting modulated by the dressing field amplitude. Previous work21,22 exploring dual-dressing with two electromagnetic fields of different polarizations has provided insight into how these dual interactions can yield new dynamical behaviours and effective Hamiltonians that significantly modify the system’s energy landscape. Several original features are introduced into the present dual dressing study.
In our configuration, an atomic qubit with energy splitting produced by a static magnetic field is dressed by oscillating fields with frequencies lower than the qubit’s Larmor precession frequency and large amplitudes. Here, the dynamics unfolds a fast timescale diverging from the standard Floquet treatment that, unlike previous studies indicating adiabatic behavior in slow driving regimes4, allows us to explore non-adiabatic features. Our focus on quantum control involves direct measurement of the qubit time evolution, revealing a distinct spin evolution that deviates from traditional micromotion patterns.
The XZ dual-dressing setup utilizes the interaction of atomic qubits with two off-resonant magnetic fields, namely an x-axis oscillating field and a z-axis oscillating one periodically adjusting the magnetic energy gap. XZ dual dressing of a two-level system was proposed in refs23,24 within the context of nonadiabatic dynamics acceleration. This configuration implements a periodic multipassage scheme akin to the Landau-Zener-Stückelberg-Majorana (LZSM) interferometer, as reviewed in25, examined in solid state or superconductor experiments, for instance16,26–33, with applications to driven conductance in Dirac materials34, some planned in optical lattice clocks35, and other ones reported in36. Our experimental approach enhances LZSM studies by detecting the transverse oscillating spin component rather than the conventional probability transfer between eigenstates. The relative phase of the driving fields regulating the periodicity of the multipassage tunneling and the continuous monitoring represent additional LZSM handles. The strong nonlinear response of the spin dynamics produces high-order interference oscillations with their collapse and revival at different time periods. The direct detection of the qubit full wave function, including its phase, is important nowadays for quantum control and quantum information, as pointed out in37.
Operating at high electromagnetic field strengths, our system deviates from the rotating-wave approximation, used typically in LZSM analyses. For a two level driven system the electromagnetic field strength is usually measured by the ratio between the Rabi frequency of the electromagnetic drive and the Larmor frequency. While experiments with a pulsed laser excitation hardly account phase relations, continuous-wave experiments mitigate these concerns. This was demonstrated in prior works38–42 exploring Rabi frequencies up to four times the Larmor frequency, with the highest values reached inside a cavity as in43. In this work we employ Rabi frequencies up to seven times larger than the Larmor frequency, significantly enhancing quantum control capabilities.
The experiments, exploiting the setups of the previous investigation of the XY dual dressing on both cesium and rubidium atoms21,44,45, are briefly described within the next Section. Here we present also the basic Hamiltonian and some typical evolutions of the system. The full theoretical description, presented in the following Section, is based on several tools. For the low magnetic fields of our explorations, the atoms are equivalent to an assembly of one-half spins. Owing the reversed role of our dressing/Larmor frequencies, the standard Floquet high-frequency expansion (HFE) approach cannot be applied. Therefore, we present theoretical descriptions based on i) a full adiabatic evolution valid for weak dressing parameters, ii) a quasi-adiabatic evolution leading to an analytical solution for the spin’s time evolution, and iii) a modified Floquet treatment. Numerical simulations describe the strong field dynamics. The connection with the Stückelberg oscillations and other LZSM features is emphasized. The experiments monitor the time dependence of the atomic spin evolution and access the phase of its wavefunction. Several recorded atomic evolutions are presented. Section “LZSM data analysis” discusses the interpretation of our results and the theoretical comparison to the experimental findings. The conclusion Section completes our work.
The qubit system and its detection
Hamiltonian
The time evolution of an assembly of atomic non-interacting qubits in a dual dressing configuration is explored as in Fig.(1), i.e., in the presence of a static magnetic field
parallel to the z-axis and two non-resonant electromagnetic fields oscillating at
angular frequency. For the XZ dressing these fields are oriented along the x and z axes, with
the maximum value for
. Similar results are obtained for the equivalent YZ dressing configuration. At the very weak applied magnetic field
, the atomic structure of rubidium/caesium atoms can be described by a coherent spin ensemble, effectively modeled by a spin one-half system.
Fig. 1.

Schematic of a qubit dressed by the
and
oscillating fields, generated by the radiofrequency coils and in the presence of a
static field. In this figure the
expectation value is monitored by the polarization rotation of a probe beam propagating along the y axis.
The qubit-field coupling is determined by the
constant with g an effective Landé factor and
the Bohr magneton, assuming
. The spin-static field interaction corresponds to the
Larmor frequency. The coupling with the XZ dressing fields is described by the Rabi frequency amplitudes
and
, respectively. Introducing the
the phase difference between x and z dressings, the XZ Hamiltonian is written as
![]() |
1 |
with the effective
field given by
![]() |
2 |
Owing to negligible decoherence processes this Hamiltonian is complete. Starting from the initial
qubit coherence, the time evolution of the
coherence, or of the equivalent one along the y axis, is monitored in the experiment. The theory comparison requires the control of the following parameters: the oscillation frequency
, the bare Larmor angular frequency
, the
, (transverse) and the
(longitudinal) Rabi angular frequencies, all expressed in kHz units in the following, and the
phase. As for our
operational parameters the standard dressed atom HFE approach used in Floquet engineering is not suitable, we rely on various theoretical treatments: 1) an adiabatic one, improved by non-adiabatic corrections, 2) a perturbative approach in a suitable rotating frame owing to the large
ratio, and finally 3) numerical simulations.
We notice that the above XZ bichromatic driving Hamiltonian, which reduces to the LZSM one for
, represents a very rich configuration to explore. A LZSM
scheme with Z-axis bichromatic driving was explored in ref46.
Experimental setup and results
We perform our observations in two experimental setups: a first one where an
Rb atomic sample is laser-cooled and trapped in a magneto-optical trap to a few tens of microKelvins, occupying the single
hyperfine state47, and a second apparatus that employs
Cs atoms contained in a vapor cell and prepared in the
hyperfine state48. In the Rb case, the cold atomic sample is monitored during its 10 ms free-fall and exhibits a damped dynamics with a characteristic time of about 4 ms. In the Cs case, a vapor sample in 23 Torr buffer gas contained in a centimetric cell is interrogated after being optically laser pumped, and the signal damping lasts about 10 ms. Both experiments work in cycles: in a first phase atoms are prepared spin-polarized along the x-axis using a circularly polarized pump laser in the presence of a uniform
static magnetic field. At the conclusion of the polarization phase, two radiofrequency fields, linearly polarized and operating in the 1–10 kHz range with amplitudes varying from 0 to 50
T, are applied to the atoms along the (x, z) or (y, z) directions. The time scale of dressing evolution refers to the zero initial phase choice of the effective field, as described in Eq. (2).
The expectation value of
for Rb and
for Cs is monitored by examining the polarization rotation (Faraday effect) of a probe beam propagating along the y-axis or x-axis, respectively, as depicted in Fig.(1). The time evolution of the
and
components is very similar, differing only by a phase factor, as evidenced by the numerical analyses presented in the following.
The rotation angle, from the initial direction to the final orientation, is analyzed with a balanced polarimeter, whose output enables a precise detection of the amplitude and phase of the magnetization component along the monitored axis. In both cases the measured Faraday rotation signal is renormalized to compensate for the signal decay. The time resolution is limited by the sampling rate which is 250 kHz and 125 kHz in the Rb and in the Cs cases, respectively. The Rb experiment uses crossed laser beams for the pumping and probe purposes, both tuned to the D2 line of Rb (780 nm), while the Cs one uses two co-propagating laser beams tuned to D1 (pump, 895 nm) and D2 (probe, 852 nm) lines of Cs. In the cesium case the pump component is detuned several GHz out of resonance during the measurement and finally filtered away before the polarimeter while it is just cut off in the rubidium experiment.
Some measured time dependencies of the atomic spin evolution are illustrated in Fig. (2), with Rabi frequency values increasing from top to bottom. The balanced polarimeter output is plotted against the reduced time
, where
represents the radiofrequency field period, and
corresponds to the initial preparation state
. The plots of this Figure offer a synthetic overview for all recorded temporal structures. The spin component aligned with the detection axis oscillates quasi-periodically between positive and negative values, produced by spin precession in the (x, y) horizontal plane. The recorded signals exhibit three distinct periodic or quasi-periodic patterns. The first precise periodicity matches the dressing fields’ period T, corresponding to
integer values. The other two patterns are shorter period structures, appearing quasi-regular in (a) and chirped in frequency in (b), that reflect the large amplitude oscillations of the qubit coherence. The amplitude of those oscillations is time modulated with the T period. At high dressing frequencies
or
, the oscillation pattern repeats with a substantial
period, 3.00(1) for the parameters in plot (c). Similar experimental results are presented in Fig.(3a) and compared with the theoretical simulations shown in Fig.(3b).
Fig. 2.
(Color online) Time evolution of the atomic spin. Black lines (left axis) report experimental polarimeter signals, red lines (right axis) the theoretical
of Eq. (3) derived from the applied static and oscillating field values. On the horizontal axis the
reduced time. Parameters (
) all in kHz and
. In (a)
Rb atoms, (3.0, 77.645, 2.06, 2.0) and
, a linearly polarized oscillating field; in (b)
Rb atoms, (3.0, 77.645, 53.1, 146.9) and
; in (c)
Cs atoms, (1.028, 4.42, 6.27, 31.79) and
. For the (c) parameters the large value of the Z dressing amplitude leads to two maxima and minima within each time period of the effective field. Note the different time periodicity.
Fig. 3.
(Color online) In (a) experimental
polarimeter signal. In (b) and (c)
and
probability occupation of the
eigenstate, respectively, derived from numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation. On the horizontal axis the
reduced time. Red line in (c), time dependence of the
Larmor dressed frequency. Cs parameters in kHz:
,
,
,
, and
corresponding to a nonadiabatic regime. As in previous figure 2c for these parameters the large value of the Z dressing amplitude leads to two maxima and minima within each time period of the effective field.
For the parameters in Fig.( 2c), the ratio between Rabi frequency and atomic splitting is 7.4. Experiments with ratios up to 10 showed a comparably long periodicity. For comparison we notice that the continuous-wave, strong-drive experiment in41 applied Rabi frequencies up to four times the Larmor frequency.
Theoretical treatment
Our theoretical analysis of the qubit response follows different action lines. The numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation for the
wavefunction represents the most precise approach. That solution handles also the more general case of an initial
qubit preparation not matching the zero phase of the x-axis driving as in the effective field of Eq. (2). Numerical solutions of the Schrödinger equation are presented in Figs.(3b), and (c) and (6). The numerical solutions, representing the key element for the analysis of the experimental data, point out the high sensitivity of the qubit time evolution to dressing parameters and initial conditions. The theoretical model further predicts that, for a given set of parameters, the atomic response has a non-periodic amplitude despite the temporal periodicity. This was previously illustrated in Fig.(2) and will be further explored in the next section. Both elements limit the accuracy of the experiment-theory comparison. A comparison between experiment and theory for the investigated Cs parameters is shown in Fig.(3a) and (b). Both exhibit a similar alternating sequence of fast and slow oscillations, although the simulation fails to precisely replicate their amplitude due to nonadiabatic atomic evolution. Within an adiabatic approach, the qubit time evolution is determined by the time-periodic
eigenvalues of the XZ Hamiltonian of Eq. (1). These eigenvalues are derived from the h modulus as follows:
![]() |
3a |
![]() |
3b |
with the time-dependent
dressed atom Larmor frequency corresponding to the dressed-atom energy gap at time t.
is equivalent to the Rabi oscillation frequency of LZSM theory/experiment29,49. The time dependence of the
Larmor dressed frequency are represented by continuous red lines in several plots.
Fig. 6.
(Color online) Theoretical simulation of the Rabi-like oscillations with initial
. In (a)
occupation probability and in (b)
. Blue dashed lines are fits of the Rabi-like oscillations with
oscillation period and the
kHz frequency. For the coherence in (b) the Rabi-like oscillations masked by the large amplitude of the Larmor dressed oscillations produce an amplitude modulation of the
oscillations. Parameters in kHz: (1., 4.197, 0.254, 4.189), and
.
In Fig. (2a) where the dressing amplitudes are very low
is almost constant, dominated by the
static contribution. In Fig.(2b), at increased dressing amplitude, the modulated component acquires a larger weight. Here, the time evolution of the eigenenergies is characterized by a sequence of avoided crossings with T periodicity. For the Fig.(2c) plot parameters, corresponding to even larger modulation amplitude, the dual dressing operation leads to two separated avoided crossings within a single T period.
An adiabatic perturbation treatment is valid for a slowly-changing time-dependent Hamiltonian, as recalled in the Supplemental Information50“Adiabatic perturbation theory” It is applied in the Supplemental Information 50“XZ rotating Hamiltonian” to a simplified XZ excitation scheme, denoted as rotating XZ, where
and
. This analysis shows that the evolution of the monitored spin components depends on two parameters: the
orientation angle of the
vector and the LZSM interference phase
given by
![]() |
4 |
A similar geometric approach based on a rotation around an axis in the xy plane followed by a rotation around the z-axis was explored for a standard LZSM evolution in ref25.
As in Eq. (27) of the Supplemental Information50 the time dependence of the
spin mean values is given by
![]() |
5 |
These expressions, verified numerically, evidence the key role played by the
frequency into the time-dependent spin mean values. The qubit oscillation at the
Larmor angular frequency of Eq. (3) produces the
accumulated phase. The
orientation angle determines the amplitude of the qubit oscillations monitored along the experimental detection axis. The observed complex qubit oscillating response is based on the
time dependent fast oscillations combined with a slower scale variations of the amplitude variations. Additional interference oscillations are produced by the multi-passage LZSM avoided crossings, as shown in the following Section.
To describe the nonadiabatic low-frequency regime for our
operation, the standard HFE Floquet approach is not appropriate. Hence, a perturbative dressed atom approach is developed here. The spirit of this approach is to derive a perturbative expansion in the limit of large
. As detailed in the Supplemental Information 50“Low-frequency nonadiabatic regime”, this is achieved by representing the problem in a time-dependent rotating frame where the Fourier components of the Hamiltonian are proportional to
, where
are Bessel functions of the first kind. The small value of the latter for large values of the argument
, as compared to the value of
considered, justifies an expansion of the effective Floquet Hamiltonian
and the Floquet kick operator K(t) (see above quoted Supplemental Information). This provides an approximation of the evolution operator in the form of Floquet’s theorem
![]() |
6 |
As shown in Fig.( 4 a)-(b), this approach succeeds in capturing the key features of the exact dynamics with a second-order description also in the low-frequency, but yet nonadiabatic, regime considered.
Fig. 4.
Comparison between the exact numerical time evolution (black continuous line) and the analytical estimate (blue dashed line) of the spin evolution along the x and y axes [see main text and the Supplemental Information 50 “Low-frequency nonadiabatic regime”] based on the modified Floquet approach. Parameters in kHz:
,
,
, and
, and
corresponding to a nonadiabatic regime.
LZSM data analysis
In a double Landau-Zener tunneling process, with an avoided crossing region passed twice at the same speed, the excitation probability becomes an oscillating function characterized by the so-called Stückelberg oscillations. In a multipassage Landau-Zener passage the quantum-mechanical interference for the amplitudes of quantum states sequentially mixed at separated crossings leads to additional structures in the qubit time-evolution. In the absence of the
dressing the Hamiltonian of Eq. (1) reduces to the LZSM one25,36, with the
driving producing the avoided-crossing sequence. The
coupling presence modifies the LZSM tunneling process owing to the time dependent orientation angle of the periodic magnetic field.
The LZSM tunneling treatment is characterized by different operation regimes, denoted as adiabatic and nonadiabatic ones. For
the LZSM derivation of those regimes requires
smaller or larger than
, respectively25. For
, a modification of that treatment leads to
![]() |
7 |
for adiabatic and nonadiabatic evolutions, respectively.
The nonadiabatic tunneling enhances the interference oscillations in the occupation probabilities of the
states. Those oscillations appear in the
numerical simulation of Fig. (3c) for nonadiabatic parameters. The overall occupation time dependence agrees with previous LZSM work. The probability steps of our simulations correspond to the Landau-Zener crossing processes at the minima of the energy gap, for that figure in the red lines for the adiabatic potentials. Those jumps are followed by Stückelberg oscillations. These oscillations with a quasi regular frequency match the high frequency ones appearing in all the
plots of Fig.(2). Such match of the Stückelberg oscillations applies to all our theoretical plots. These nearly periodic oscillations do not appear in previous Stückelberg results, for instance from atom optics interferometry of refs51–53.. This quasi-periodicity arises because the
rate of the Landau-Zener tunneling is small compared to the Stückelberg oscillation frequency.
Our detection of the qubit coherences leads to time dependencies greatly different from the LZSM transition probabilities. The greater contribution to the coherence oscillation is at the
frequency and this frequency describes also the probability oscillations. As in Fig.(2a) at low dressing values the qubit spin performs a precession on a nearly horizontal plane at a quasi constant
Larmor dressed frequency. In those conditions the transition probability does not contain
frequency components. At larger
values the Landau-Zener tunneling takes place in the presence of a modification of the precession axis leading to
components also into
probabilities.
In order to characterize the qubit response at the
frequency, we measure the
times corresponding to the j-th zero signal values of the polarimeter. For those times the qubit spin orientation is orthogonal to the monitored axis. The time separation between neighbouring zero values represents the period time for a single Larmor precession. From the measured times we derive the experimental dressed Larmor frequency
at the time
given by
![]() |
8 |
Figure 5 reports measured
time evolutions of the dressed qubit frequency for several dressing parameters. The (a) plot evidences the
time periodicity with the dressing period T. Owing to such periodicity, all the
values may be folded back into a single (0, 1) time period. Within the temporal analog of real-space periodic Hamiltonian of ref54, that folding represents a reduction to a single Floquet zone corresponding to the Bloch zone for periodicity in position space for our time periodicity.
folded plots are reported in Fig. (5b) and (c). Fig.( 5d) reports a case where the
vs
is not fully periodic, as examined in the following paragraph. The
measured values are compared to the time dependent
, showing a remarkable agreement limited by the time resolution of the sampling acquisition rate.
Fig. 5.
(Color online) Measured
and predicted
values for time dependent adiabatic frequency versus time. Frequencies in kHz and times
in reduced units.
frequencies (black squares) are derived from the polarimeter zero values as in Eq. (8). The typical error bars, reported for clarity only for one/two points in each plot, are determined by the sampling rate, leading to larger errors at closely spaced time intervals and higher
values. In (b) and (c) plots the
high value data are discrete because of the limited sampling rate. Red lines
report theoretical values calculated from Eq.(3). Notice that no adjustable parameters are introduced in the calculation. Parameters
frequencies in kHz and
: in (a) Cs (1.028, 4.42, 3.85, 20.93), and
as in Fig.(3); in (b) Rb experiment (3.0, 77.645, 51.56, 96.77), and
; in (c) Cs atoms (1.03, 4.66, 4.55, 35.3) and 0; in (d) Cs atoms, (1.028, 4.42, 6.27, 31.79) and
, as in Fig.(2c).
The wavefunction interferences associated to multiple periodic Landau-Zener processes introduce additional periodic oscillating structures, for the
LZSM discussed theoretically in refs25,49 and investigated in solid-state experiments29,55,56. In these works, focused on the occupation probabilities, such periodic structures are denominated Rabi-like oscillations with their
frequency approximated by the
dressing frequency35,49,57. The Rabi-like positive and negative interferences appear also for our Hamiltonian as in the simulation of Fig.(6) with the
occupation probability in (a) and the
coherence in (b). Rabi-like oscillations are clearly visible in the occupation probability. The Larmor dressed frequency oscillations produce the high-frequency modulation of the
envelope. For the coherence the Rabi-like oscillations produce an amplitude modulation of the Larmor dressed frequency oscillations. Their experimental detection is limited by our sampling resolution. The Rabi-like oscillations well resolved in the data of Fig.(2c) produce a periodic large modification of the coherence time dependence. Their presence leads to the absence of data points in the
vs
plot of Fig.(5d) for
in the (0.49, 1.06) interval, with
oscillation period, corresponding to 0.25 kHz. The experimental results for the Rabi-like oscillations are described by numerical simulations. Their dependence on the Hamiltonian parameters appears more complex than the theoretical ones for the standard LZSM single dressing process.
Conclusion
The time evolution of an atomic qubit interacting with two off-resonant dressing fields in a longitudinal/transversal configuration is examined experimentally. The qubit coherence is recorded for long interaction times with negligible relaxation processes on the evolution timescales. The standard Floquet engineering treatment predicts a time evolution with a constant dressed Larmor frequency, not matching these experimental results owing to our dressing parameters. We develop a theoretical analysis relying on numerical simulations combined to an adiabatic treatment and an ad-hoc dressed-atom perturbation treatment. An analytical formula for the frequency of the Rabi-like oscillations would represent an useful tool. The complex mathematical treatment for the
of refs35,49,57 evidences that such a task is hard to complete. Our longitudinal/transversal dressing configuration represents an extended version of the multipassage LZSM tunneling, with the transverse dressing modifying the tunneling probability. An important feature of the present experiment is the continuous monitoring of the qubit coherences, which gives a direct access to the phase wavefunction and opens new perspectives in the LZSM quantum control. In terms of the Bloch vector evolution, the transition probability monitors its z component while the coherences monitor the evolution within the xy plane. The time evolution of the latter shows the presence of several frequency contributions: the dressing one, the dressed Larmor one and the Rabi-like one. Within the time dependent transition probability, the dressed Larmor frequency components produce Stückelberg oscillations, which represent a single component of the total evolution. On the contrary, those oscillations dominate the coherence time evolution. Finally the probability evolution represents a strong probe of the Rabi-like oscillations.
Our work opens a new exploration direction within the broad area of LZSM interferometry. The ability to control the dynamics of the atomic qubit in this dual-dressing regime expands the toolbox for quantum state manipulation. Alternative fast quantum logic gates using nonadiabatic LZSM transitions were introduced in ref58, and similar shortcuts to adiabaticity in refs23,24. Our experimental investigation evidencing the rich dynamics associated to the XZ configuration opens an avenue to quantum control accelerations.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
All authors thank D. Petrucci and A. Barbini for technical assistance.
Author contributions
A. Fr., A. Fi., C. G., C. M. and V. B. performed the experiments. E. A., V. B. and A. Fi. conceived the probe tools. A. Fr., V. B. and A. Fi. analysed the results. E. A., M. A., G. B., S. W. and F. P. performed the theoretical analysis. All the authors prepared the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Funding
E.A. and S. W. acknowledge financial support by: Q-DYNAMO (EU HORIZON-MSCA-2022-SE-01) with project No. 101131418. A. Fr. acknowledges the Italian MUR through the PNRR project “EuPRAXIA Advanced Photon Sources (EuAPS)” contract EuAPS IR0000030 CUP I93C21000160006 for the support. A. Fi. and S.W. acknowledge financial support from the PNRR MUR project PE0000023-NQSTI financed by the European Union - Next Generation EU. F. P. acknowledges funding from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) through the Emmy Noether Programme – project number 555842149.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-026-36403-7.
References
- 1.Shirley, J. H. Solution of the Schrödinger equation with a Hamiltonian periodic in time. Phys. Rev.138, B979–B987. 10.1103/PhysRev.138.B979 (1965). [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sambe, H. Steady states and quasienergies of a quantum-mechanical system in an oscillating field. Phys. Rev. A7, 2203–2213. 10.1103/PhysRevA.7.2203 (1973). [Google Scholar]
- 3.Goldman, N. & Dalibard, J. Periodically driven quantum systems: Effective Hamiltonians and engineered gauge fields. Phys. Rev. X4, 031027. 10.1103/PhysRevX.4.031027 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bukov, M., D’Alessio, L. & Polkovnikov, A. Universal high-frequency behavior of periodically driven systems: from dynamical stabilization to Floquet engineering. Advances in Physics64, 139–226. 10.1080/00018732.2015.1055918 (2015). [Google Scholar]
- 5.Eckardt, A. Colloquium: Atomic quantum gases in periodically driven optical lattices. Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 011004. 10.1103/RevModPhys.89.011004 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- 6.Aidelsburger, M. et al. Realization of the Hofstadter Hamiltonian with ultracold atoms in optical lattices. Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 185301. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.185301 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Meinert, F., Mark, M. J., Lauber, K., Daley, A. J. & Nägerl, H.-C. Floquet engineering of correlated tunneling in the Bose-Hubbard model with ultracold atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 205301. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.205301 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Geier, S. et al. Floquet Hamiltonian engineering of an isolated many-body spin system. Science374, 1149–1152. 10.1126/science.abd9547 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Weitenberg, C. & Simonet, J. Tailoring quantum gases by Floquet engineering. Nature Physics17, 1342–1348. 10.1038/s41567-021-01316-x (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 10.Scholl, P. et al. Microwave engineering of programmable XXZ Hamiltonians in arrays of Rydberg atoms. PRX Quantum3, 020303. 10.1103/PRXQuantum.3.020303 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yin, M.-J. et al. Floquet engineering Hz-level Rabi spectra in shallow optical lattice clock. Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 073603. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.073603 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zhang, J.-Y. et al. Tuning anomalous Floquet topological bands with ultracold atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 043201. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.043201 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Salathé, Y. et al. Digital quantum simulation of spin models with circuit quantum electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. X5, 021027. 10.1103/PhysRevX.5.021027 (2015). [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mahmood, F. et al. Selective scattering between Floquet-Bloch and Volkov states in a topological insulator. Nature Physics12, 306. 10.1038/nphys3609 (2016). [Google Scholar]
- 15.Peng, P., Yin, C., Huang, X., Ramanathan, C. & Cappellaro, P. Floquet prethermalization in dipolar spin chains. Nature Physics17, 444–447. 10.1038/s41567-020-01120-z (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 16.Liul, M. P. et al. Coherent dynamics of a photon-dressed qubit. Phys. Rev. B107, 195441. 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.195441 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 17.Allegrini, M. & Arimondo, E. Atoms dressed by virtual and real photons. Physics6, 60–74. 10.3390/physics6010005 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 18.Passante, R. & Rizzuto, L. Vacuum self-dressing of an atom and its physical effects. Physics7. 10.3390/physics7020020 (2025).
- 19.Haroche, S., Cohen-Tannoudji, C., Audoin, C. & Schermann, J. P. Modified Zeeman hyperfine spectra observed in H and Rb ground states interacting with a nonresonant rf field. Phys. Rev. Lett.24, 861. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.24.861 (1970).
- 20.Haroche, S. & Cohen-Tannoudji, C. Resonant transfer of coherence in nonzero magnetic field between atomic levels of different factors. Phys. Rev. Lett.24, 974–978. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.24.974 (1970).
- 21.Bevilacqua, G., Biancalana, V., Vigilante, A., Zanon-Willette, T. & Arimondo, E. Harmonic fine tuning and triaxial spatial anisotropy of dressed atomic spins. Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 093203. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.093203 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bevilacqua, G., Biancalana, V., Zanon-Willette, T. & Arimondo, E. Harmonic dual dressing of spin-1/2 systems. Phys. Rev. A105, 022619. 10.1103/PhysRevA.105.022619 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 23.Petiziol, F., Dive, B., Mintert, F. & Wimberger, S. Fast adiabatic evolution by oscillating initial Hamiltonians. Phys. Rev. A98, 043436. 10.1103/PhysRevA.98.043436 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- 24.Petiziol, F., Mintert, F. & Wimberger, S. Quantum control by effective counterdiabatic driving. Europhysics Letters145, 15001. 10.1209/0295-5075/ad19e3 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 25.Shevchenko, S., Ashhab, S. & Nori, F. Landau-Zener-Stückelberg interferometry. Physics Reports492, 1–30. 10.1016/j.physrep.2010.03.002 (2010). [Google Scholar]
- 26.Oliver, W. D. et al. Mach-Zehnder interferometry in a strongly driven superconducting qubit. Science310, 1653–1657. 10.1126/science.1119678 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sillanpää, M., Lehtinen, T., Paila, A., Makhlin, Y. & Hakonen, P. Continuous-time monitoring of Landau-Zener interference in a Cooper-pair box. Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 187002. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.187002 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Stehlik, J. et al. Landau-Zener-Stückelberg interferometry of a single electron charge qubit. Phys. Rev. B86, 121303. 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.121303 (2012). [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zhou, J. et al. Observation of time-domain Rabi oscillations in the Landau-Zener regime with a single electronic spin. Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 010503. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.010503 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Satanin, A. M., Denisenko, M. V., Gelman, A. I. & Nori, F. Amplitude and phase effects in Josephson qubits driven by a biharmonic electromagnetic field. Phys. Rev. B90, 104516. 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.104516 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gonzalez-Zalba, M. F. et al. Gate-sensing coherent charge oscillations in a silicon field-effect transistor. Nano Letters16, 1614–1619. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04356 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Chatterjee, A. et al. A silicon-based single-electron interferometer coupled to a fermionic sea. Phys. Rev. B97, 045405. 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.045405 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ono, K., Shevchenko, S. N., Mori, T., Moriyama, S. & Nori, F. Quantum interferometry with a -factor-tunable spin qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 207703. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.207703 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 34.Rodionov, Y. I., Kugel, K. I. & Nori, F. Floquet spectrum and driven conductance in dirac materials: Effects of Landau-Zener-Stückelberg-Majorana interferometry. Phys. Rev. B94, 195108. 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.195108 (2016). [Google Scholar]
- 35.Liu, W.-X., Wang, T., Zhang, X.-F. & Li, W.-D. Time-domain Landau-Zener-Stückelberg-Majorana interference in an optical lattice clock. Phys. Rev. A104, 053318. 10.1103/PhysRevA.104.053318 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ivakhnenko, O. V., Shevchenko, S. N. & Nori, F. Nonadiabatic Landau-Zener-Stückelberg-Majorana transitions, dynamics, and interference. Physics Reports995, 1–89. 10.1016/j.physrep.2022.10.002 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kofman, P. O., Ivakhnenko, O. V., Shevchenko, S. N. & Nori, F. Majorana’s approach to nonadiabatic transitions validates the adiabatic-impulse approximation. Scientific Reports13, 5033. 10.1038/s41598-023-31084-y (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Fuchs, G. D., Dobrovitski, V. V., Toyli, D. M., Heremans, F. J. & Awschalom, D. D. Gigahertz dynamics of a strongly driven single quantum spin. Science326, 1520–1522. 10.1126/science.1181193 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Tuorila, J. et al. Stark effect and generalized Bloch-Siegert shift in a strongly driven two-level system. Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 257003. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.257003 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Scheuer, J. et al. Precise qubit control beyond the rotating wave approximation. New Journal of Physics16, 093022. 10.1088/1367-2630/16/9/093022 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- 41.Avinadav, C., Fischer, R., London, P. & Gershoni, D. Time-optimal universal control of two-level systems under strong driving. Phys. Rev. B89, 245311. 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.245311 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- 42.Deng, C., Orgiazzi, J.-L., Shen, F., Ashhab, S. & Lupascu, A. Observation of Floquet states in a strongly driven artificial atom. Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 133601. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.133601 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Langford, N. K. et al. Experimentally simulating the dynamics of quantum light and matter at deep strong coupling. Nature Communications8, 1715. 10.1038/s41467-017-01061-x (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Fregosi, A. et al. Floquet space exploration for the dual-dressing of a qubit. Scientific Reports13, 15304. 10.1038/s41598-023-41693-2 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Bevilacqua, G., Biancalana, V., Dancheva, Y. & Fregosi, A. Tri-axial time-dependent magnetic field calibrated in-situ by harmonic analysis of adiabatically evolving atomic spins. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics58, 285001. 10.1088/1361-6463/adeb97 (2025). [Google Scholar]
- 46.Forster, F. et al. Landau-Zener interference at bichromatic driving. Phys. Rev. B92, 245422. 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.245422 (2015). [Google Scholar]
- 47.Fregosi, A. et al. Magnetic induction imaging with a cold-atom radio frequency magnetometer. Applied Physics Letters117, 144102. 10.1063/5.0020415 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 48.Bevilacqua, G., Biancalana, V., Dancheva, Y. & Vigilante, A. Sub-millimetric ultra-low-field MRI detected in situ by a dressed atomic magnetometer. Appl. Phys. Lett.115, 174102. 10.1063/1.5123653 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ashhab, S., Johansson, J. R., Zagoskin, A. M. & Nori, F. Two-level systems driven by large-amplitude fields. Phys. Rev. A75, 063414. 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.063414 (2007). [Google Scholar]
- 50.Fregosi, A. et al. Supplemental information. Scientific Reports??, ?? (2025).
- 51.Kling, S., Salger, T., Grossert, C. & Weitz, M. Atomic Bloch-Zener oscillations and Stückelberg interferometry in optical lattices. Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 215301. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.215301 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zenesini, A., Ciampini, D., Morsch, O. & Arimondo, E. Observation of Stückelberg oscillations in accelerated optical lattices. Phys. Rev. A82, 065601. 10.1103/PhysRevA.82.065601 (2010). [Google Scholar]
- 53.Rahman, T. et al. Bloch oscillation phases investigated by multipath Stückelberg atom interferometry. Phys. Rev. Res.6, L022012. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.L022012 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 54.Martin, I., Refael, G. & Halperin, B. Topological frequency conversion in strongly driven quantum systems. Phys. Rev. X7, 041008. 10.1103/PhysRevX.7.041008 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- 55.Berns, D. M. et al. Amplitude spectroscopy of a solid-state artificial atom. Nature455, 51–57. 10.1038/nature07262 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Yang, Z.-X. et al. Phase-sensitive Landau-Zener-Stückelberg interference in superconducting quantum circuit*. Chinese Physics B30, 024212. 10.1088/1674-1056/abd753 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 57.Neilinger, P. et al. Landau-Zener-Stückelberg-Majorana lasing in circuit quantum electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. B94, 094519. 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.094519 (2016). [Google Scholar]
- 58.Ryzhov, A. I., Ivakhnenko, O. V., Shevchenko, S. N., Gonzalez-Zalba, M. F. & Nori, F. Alternative fast quantum logic gates using nonadiabatic Landau-Zener-Stückelberg-Majorana transitions. Phys. Rev. Res.6, 033340. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.033340 (2024). [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.














