Abstract
Molecular information encoded within supramolecular frameworks offers a powerful paradigm for directing emergent function beyond the genetic code, but systematic investigations into alternative spatial configurations and their consequences remain scarce. Here we use metalla-[2]catenanes to probe sequence–function relationships in layered architectures. By combining two or three size-matched N-heterocyclic carbene ligands with Ag(I) nodes, we selectively construct heteroleptic metalla-[2]catenanes through both direct assembly and supramolecular fusion pathways. X-ray crystallographic analysis unambiguously confirms the targeted sequences, while semiempirical and density functional theory calculations reveal their thermodynamic preference over alternative isomers. Photothermal conversion studies further demonstrate that sequence-specific charge-transfer interactions yield distinct macroscopic responses. Collectively, these results identify heteroleptic metalla-[2]catenanes as a robust model for elucidating how spatial arrangement governs system-level behavior and for advancing molecular coding principles in functional supramolecular design.
Subject terms: Ligands, Interlocked molecules, Organic-inorganic nanostructures
Molecular information encoded within supramolecular frameworks offers a powerful paradigm for directing emergent function beyond the genetic code, but systematic investigations into alternative spatial configurations and their consequences remain scarce. Here the authors use metalla-[2]catenanes to probe sequence–function relationships in layered architectures.
Introduction
Molecular information is emerging as a transformative paradigm that extends far beyond the genetic code of nucleic acids1. Information can be encoded within molecular frameworks that have distinct structural and chemical features, redefining how it is stored, processed, and transmitted at the molecular level2,3. In self-assembly, the spatial arrangement of functional motifs acts as a “molecular code” that dictates intermolecular interactions, symmetry, and dynamic response pathways, ultimately directing emergent function4–8. These principles provide a powerful foundation for the bottom-up design of advanced functional materials, with numerous implications for biomimetic manufacturing9,10, energy conversion11, and chiral technologies12,13.
Despite these advancements, establishing precise structure–function relationships between the sequence of functional motifs at the molecular level and the macroscopic properties of assembled systems remains a central challenge14–16. Current research on the controllable design of assemblies with specific motif sequences remains limited. To address this issue, recent efforts have focused on the development of multicomponent self-assembly systems incorporating diverse motifs17–19. In metallosupramolecular assemblies, synthetic chemists have achieved nonstatistical precision8,20–22 in multicomponent architectures—overcoming entropy barriers, avoiding self-sorting, and suppressing statistical mixtures—through strategies such as guest templation23,24, geometric complementarity25,26, coordination-site engineering27–31, hierarchical assembly32,33, and kinetic control34–36. Nevertheless, most studies have focused on cavity-centered functions, arising from the anisotropic radial (Fig. 1a, for metallocages) or circular arrangement (Fig. 1b, for metallacycles) of motifs, particularly in recognition37,38 and confined catalysis33,39–42. In contrast, systematic investigations into alternative spatial organizations—such as layered or planar grid arrangements—and their effect on properties (Fig. 1c), including electron transport, optical behavior, and mechanical performance, remain scarce. There is therefore an urgent need to construct self-assembly systems with spatial configurations beyond radial architectures to determine how specific motif arrangements translate into system-level functions.
Fig. 1. Schematic presentation for three arrangements of different motifs and relative sequences in supramolecular architectures.
a Radial arrangement of different motifs in metallocages. b Circular arrangement of different functional motifs in metallacycles. c Stereoscopic layered arrangement of different motifs in tetranuclear NHC MCAT. d Two-component MCATs based on four NHC ligands with 8 component sequences. e Three-component MCATs based on four NHC ligands with 18 component sequences. x, y, and z were used to denote the numbers of the three NHC ligands. B, G, R, and Y were the capital letters of blue, green, red, and yellow, which were used to denote different building blocks. x, y, and z were used to denote the numbers of the three NHC ligands.
Building on the previous work with metal N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) assemblies43–46, we identified tetranuclear metalla-[2]catenane (MCAT) as an ideal platform for this purpose47,48. Unlike conventional metallocages and metallacycles featuring radial arrangements, the four NHC ligands in MCAT use a distinctive stereoscopic layered configuration. Heteroleptic assembly of two or three size-matched NHC ligands with four Ag(I) nodes can theoretically yield MCATs with 8 and 18 possible outcome sequences (Figs. 1d, e), respectively, providing a versatile platform to probe stereoscopic, layered sequence–function relationships.
In this study, we report the selective construction of three heteroleptic MCATs with integrative self-sorting behavior, including two distinct two-component sequences and one three-component sequence. These assemblies were accessed either via direct assembly of NHC ligands with Ag(I) nodes or structural transformation from homoleptic precursors trough a supramolecular fusion strategy. All the structures were unambiguously confirmed by single-crystal X-ray diffraction and high-resolution mass spectrometry. Complementary theoretical calculation studies that combine semiempirical methods and density functional theory (DFT) calculations revealed that the binding energies of the observed MCATs are significantly lower than those of their respective isomers, supporting the thermodynamic preference for the obtained structures. Furthermore, photothermal conversion experiments demonstrated sequence-dependent differences in performance, which can be attributed to charge-transfer interactions between the distinct functional motifs. Collectively, these findings establish heteroleptic MCATs as a versatile platform for probing the relationship between spatial motif arrangement and macroscopic function in multicomponent assemblies. This approach provides new insights into how molecular coding principles can be applied to the design of functional supramolecular systems.
Results
Synthesis and characterization of homoleptic MCATAAAA and MCBB
Imidazo[1,5-a]pyridinium salts H2A and H2B were prepared in four steps from 2,7-dibromophenazine and 2,6-dibromoanthracene by adjusting the reported procedure49. The complete synthetic route is outlined in the Supplementary Information (Supplementary Figs. 1–26). The imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine-based NHC ligands were strategically chosen to fulfill the structural requirement for optimal interplanar surface-to-surface separation ( ~ 6.6 Å), facilitating the directional assembly of mechanically interlocked supramolecular architectures through precise π-system alignment47–49. The homoleptic MCATAAAA was obtained in 93% yield via the reaction of H2A with excess Ag2O in acetonitrile under the exclusion of light at 65 °C for 12 h (Fig. 2, method a). The formation was verified by two-dimensional (2D) NMR spectroscopy and ESI mass spectrometry (Supplementary Figs. 27–32) as follows: Peaks in the 1H NMR spectrum of MCATAAAA (Supplementary Fig. 27) showed distinct shifts and were split into two sets of signals, revealing the presence of two chemically inequivalent di-NHC ligands within the assembly. As expected for AgI–NHC [2]catenane, two di-NHC ligands are located inside the cavity, and the remaining ligands constitute the outer framework. The formation of MCATAAAA was also evident from 13C{1H} NMR spectroscopy showing the two well-resolved sets of carbon signals (Supplementary Fig. 28). The 1H diffusion-ordered spectroscopy (DOSY) NMR spectrum of MCATAAAA showed a single diffusion coefficient (D = 5.01 × 10-10 m2 s-1) for all of the aromatic proton signals, suggesting that all the resonances belong to a single assembly (Supplementary Fig. 31). ESI mass measurements also indicated the [2]catenane structure of MCATAAAA, with prominent peaks at m/z = 891.5664 (calcd for [MCATAAAA ‒ 3(PF6‒)]3+ 891.5541) and 1409.8347 (calcd for [MCATAAAA ‒ 2(PF6‒)]2+ 1409.8134) (Supplementary Fig. 32), which was consistent with the theoretical distribution.
Fig. 2. Self-assembly of MCATs from di-NHC ligands H2A, H2B and H2C and structural transformations of the assemblies.
a–c Synthesis of MCATAAAA, MRBB and MCATCCCC through the reaction of H2A, H2B and H2C, respectively, with Ag2O in MeCN at 65 °C. d, e Synthesis of MCATCAAC and MCATCBBC through the reaction of H2C and H2A or H2B, respectively, in a 1:1 ratio with Ag2O in acetonitrile at 65 °C. f, g Supramolecular fusion-based transformation of MCATCCCC and MCATAAAA or MRBB at a 1:1 ratio or 1:2 ratio to MCATCAAC and MCATCBBC, respectively, in MeCN at r.t. Preparation of MCATCABC through three alternative routes: h Reaction of MCATCAAC and MCATCBBC in a 1:1 ratio in MeCN at r.t. i Reaction of MCATAAAA, MRBB and MCATCCCC in a 1:2:2 ratio in MeCN at r.t. j Reaction of H2A, H2B and H2C in a 1:1:2 ratio with Ag2O in MeCN at 65 °C.
The single-crystal X-ray diffraction (SCXRD) structure of MCATAAAA is shown in Fig. 3a. The two identical binuclear MRAAs are interlocked, constituting a Hopf link topology. SCXRD analysis revealed efficient π···π stacking interactions between the four phenazine rings, as inferred from the centroid−centroid separations of 3.4, 3.3, and 3.4 Å between adjacent phenazine planes. These interactions are the main driving forces for the formation of the interlocked structure. In addition, there is a crossing angle of ca. 85° between the two “inner” phenazine rings, whereas the “outer” adjacent pairwise phenazine rings are nearly parallel.
Fig. 3. X-ray crystal structures of homoleptic and heteroleptic multicomponent MCATs with one, two or three different ligands.
Molecular structure of MCATAAAA (a), MCATCAAC (b), MCATCBBC (c) and MCATCABC (d). From left to right: stick representation, space-filling representation, stacking of ligand backbones, and components of the monomeric binuclear macrocycle. Hydrogen atoms, anions and solvents are omitted for clarity. Three letters (A, B, and C) in the space-filling representation are used to denote phenazine-, anthracene-, and pyrene-based building blocks, respectively.
However, when H2B (with anthracene replaced by phenazine in H2A) was treated with Ag2O under the same conditions as described for the assembly of MCATAAAA, only the simple binuclear MRBB was isolated rather than an interlocking topology (Fig. 2, method b). The MRBB was identified by NMR spectroscopy and ESI mass (Supplementary Figs. 33–37). The single resonance pattern (rather than the common doublet signals of interlocked topologies47,49) of the 1H (Supplementary Fig. 33) and 13C{1H} (Supplementary Fig. 34) NMR spectra of the resulting assembly suggested a simpler topology. Moreover, the 1H DOSY spectrum (Supplementary Fig. 36) as well as the ESI mass spectrum (Supplementary Fig. 37) also confirm the formation of MRBB (m/z = 630.1871, calcd. for [MRBB ‒ 2(PF6‒)]2+ 630.1832). These results indicate that compared with purely hydrocarbon-based aromatic groups, heteroaromatic groups have greater advantages in the construction of interlocked topologies50.
Synthesis and characterization of heteroleptic MCATs with two different di-NHC ligands
Inspired by previous work51, we realized that the charge-transfer interaction between two NHC ligands with similar sizes and opposite electronic centers facilitates the formation of heteroleptic AgI-NHC assemblies while inhibiting the formation of homoleptic AgI–NHC assemblies. Thus, we employed a similar strategy to construct two-component MCATs.
First, we attempted to assemble the system by reacting imidazo[1,5-a]pyridinium salts H2A and H2B in a 1:1 molar ratio with a slight excess of Ag2O. Subsequent 1H NMR spectroscopy (Supplementary Fig. 38) revealed that assembly in the presence of two imidazo[1,5-a]pyridinium salts and AgI ions failed to yield a single product. Mass spectrometry (Supplementary Fig. 39) indicated the presence of peaks corresponding not only to MRBB but also to a heteroleptic MCAT, where the ratio of NHC ligands A to B was 3:1. Although we obtained single crystals of MCAT via vapor diffusion, X-ray crystallography confirmed that the structure was only an MCAT formed by the catenation of two MRs (Supplementary Fig. 40). Owing to the similar scattering factors of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) atoms, the specific arrangement of the ligands could not be definitively assigned. Consequently, we speculated that the products included MRBB with a mixture of possibly MCATABAA and MCATBAAA. To avoid this issue, we considered introducing the NHC ligand C, which has a similar size but an opposite charge center. This ligand was previously shown to enable the high-yield construction of homoleptic MCATCCCC with AgI (Fig. 2, method c). Considering the electron-donating central core of the proligand H2C, when it is strategically assembled with a di-NHC ligand containing an electron-deficient aromatic scaffold in the presence of Ag2O as a metallic precursor, it may facilitate the creation of a new heteroleptic MACT system. This architecture is anticipated to exhibit increased thermodynamic stability and structural complexity, guided by complementary electronic interactions between the donor–acceptor pair and the directional coordination preferences of the AgI nodes.
To test this hypothesis, heating a mixture of H2A and H2C in a ratio of 1:1 with a slight excess of Ag2O in acetonitrile indeed resulted in the exclusive formation of heteroleptic [2]catenane with a yield of 92% (Fig. 2, method d). With the slow diffusion of diethyl ether into the acetonitrile solution at ambient temperature, yellow block crystals suitable for SCXRD were obtained. Structural analysis of single crystals unambiguously established the composition and molecular structure of this heteroleptic MCAT with a sequence of CAAC (Fig. 3b). Inspection of the structure reveals that every silver(I) ion simultaneously coordinates NHC ligands A and C linearly to create two heteroleptic MRACs, which are further interlocked via mechanical bonds to form heteroleptic MCATCAAC. This arrangement results in extensive π···π stacking between the ligand backbones, which are arranged into pyrene–phenazine–phenazine–pyrene stacks with distances of ca. 3.3–3.4 Å between the mean planes of the stacked rings. Interestingly, the selective formation of this heteroleptic MCAT structure with a donor–acceptor–acceptor–donor stack provides a compelling depiction of intramolecular self-sorting that differs from the commonly accepted self-sorting, in which donor and acceptor aromatic moieties are arranged into complementary alternating stacks that are generally regarded as the most favorable arrangement for providing optimum electronic overlap.
After the solid-state molecular structure of MCATCAAC was determined, relevant NMR spectroscopic experiments performed to further explore its behavior in solution (Supplementary Figs. 41–45). With the 1H NMR spectra of ligand precursors H2A (Fig. 4a) and H2C (Fig. 4c) and the 2D NMR spectra of MCATCAAC, the peaks in the 1H NMR spectrum of MCATCAAC can be clearly identified (Fig. 4d and Supplementary Fig. 41) and are consistent with the characterization of the heteroleptic metalla[2]catenane structure. The 1H NMR spectrum of MCATCAAC (Fig. 4d) shows one set of signals that are equally integrated for each ligand. The total amount of 15 aromatic signals indicated that each ligand maintained its twofold symmetry in the interlocked assembly. Strongly upfield-shifted resonances were observed for the aromatic protons of the phenazine units H9’, H13’ and H10’ (δ = 7.33, 6.74 and 6.66 ppm, respectively), whereas the proton resonances for the pyrene groups H13, H14 and H11 were recorded at δ = 7.81, 7.70 and 7.36 ppm (Fig. 4d), which were attributed to the shielded surroundings inside the cavity of the interlocked architectures. In addition, the 1H DOSY NMR spectrum of MCATCAAC revealed that only one diffusion coefficient D (5.50 × 10-10 m2 s-1) (Supplementary Fig. 45), suggesting that only one stoichiometric group of the assembly formed.
Fig. 4. NMR spectroscopy and ESI mass analysis.
Partial 1H NMR spectra (CD3CN, 400 MHz, 298 K) of (a) H2A, (b) H2B, (c) H2C, (d) MCATCAAC, (e) MCATCBBC and (f) MCATCABC. Experimental (top, blue) and theoretical (bottom, red) ESI mass spectra of [MCATCAAC – 3(PF6)]3+ and [MCATCAAC – 2(PF6)]2+ (g), [MCATCBBC – 3(PF6)]3+ and [MCATCBBC – 2(PF6)]2+ (h), and [MCATCABC – 3(PF6)]3+ and [MCATCABC – 2(PF6)]2+ (i).
Additionally, the assembly of MCATCAAC in solution was further confirmed by ESI mass data (Fig. 4g and Supplementary Fig. 46). Prominent peaks at m/z = 906.2563 (calcd for [MCATCAAC ‒ 3(PF6‒)]3+ 906.2271) and 1431.8179 (calcd for [MCATCAAC ‒ 2(PF6‒)]2+ 1431.8231) were observed, which closely matched the anticipated theoretical distributions.
We subsequently examined the combination of H2B and H2C at a ratio of 1:1 with Ag2O under the same conditions as described for the assembly of MCATCAAC, which resulted in the formation of heteroleptic MCATCBBC with a yield of 90% (Fig. 2, method e). Single crystals of MCATCBBC were obtained by slow diffusion of diethyl ether into an acetonitrile solution of the assembly. SCXRD analysis (Fig. 3c) confirmed that the molecular structure of MCATCBBC closely resembled that of MCATCAAC, where two identical heteroleptic MR interpenetrate to form the heteroleptic MCAT. Moreover, each independent MR is composed of di-NHC ligands B and C, as well as two silver ions. Like the MCATCAAC assembly, the pyrene-bridged ligand C was located at the top and bottom, whereas the anthracene-bridged ligand B was located in the middle of the MCATCBBC assembly. Triple typical π···π stacking interactions were also observed between the ligand backbones, which are arranged into pyrene–anthracene–anthracene–pyrene stacks with distances of approximately 3.5 Å between the mean planes of the stacked rings.
Like assembly MCATCAAC, the structure of the heteroleptic MCATCBBC in solution was also investigated (Supplementary Figs. 51–56). Consistent with expectations, the ¹H NMR analysis of MCATCBBC (Fig. 4e and Supplementary Fig. 51) confirmed the equimolar presence of ligand precursors H2B and H2C (1:1 ratio). In addition, strongly upfield-shifted resonances were also observed for the aromatic protons of the anthracene units H9’, H13’, H10’ and H14’ (δ = 6.91, 6.59, 6.52 and 4.95 ppm, respectively), whereas the proton resonances for the pyrene groups H13, H14, H11 and H10 were recorded at δ = 7.77, 7.69, 7.27 and 6.96 ppm, respectively, consistent with the pyrenyl−anthracene−anthracene−pyrenyl stacking mode in MCATCBBC. The 1H DOSY NMR spectrum (Supplementary Fig. 55) of MCATCBBC revealed that all of the aromatic proton signals had a single diffusion constant (D = 5.11 × 10-10 m2 s-1), indicating the presence of only a unique assembly stoichiometry. Moreover, the formation of heteroleptic MCATCBBC in solution was further confirmed by the ESI mass spectrum, which showed a series of peaks at m/z = 904.9167 (calcd for [MCATCBBC ‒ 3(PF6‒)]3+ 904.9002) and 1429.8345 (calcd for [MCATCBBC ‒ 2(PF6‒)]2+ 1429.8326), which is consistent with the theoretical isotopic distributions (Fig. 4h and Supplementary Fig. 56).
Considering the labile nature of the Ag–CNHC bond and the efficient assembly of two-component MCATs from NHC ligands and AgI ions, we subsequently performed experiments to investigate whether these heteroleptic systems can be formed by the rearrangement of homoleptic assemblies. Indeed, mixing MCATAAAA and MCATCCCC at a ratio of 1:1 resulted in rapid (few seconds) conversion to heteroleptic MCATCAAC (Fig. 2, method f), as suggested by the 1H NMR spectrum (Supplementary Fig. 47). Interestingly, although the reaction of the proligand H2B with Ag2O produced only the binulear MRBB rather than MCAT, MCATCCCC and MRBB could still be rapidly converted to MCATCBBC when it was mixed in CD3CN at a ratio of 1:2 (Fig. 2, method g), as revealed by 1H NMR spectroscopy (Supplementary Fig. 57). These fusion reactions indicate that heteroleptic MCATCAAC and MCATCBBC, which are selectively formed through integrative self-sorting, represent thermodynamically favorable reaction products.
To investigate whether the structures of MCATCAAC and MCATCBBC varied with respect to the concentration and temperature of the solution, concentration dilution and variable-temperature experiments were subsequently performed. Variable-concentration 1H NMR spectra of MCATCAAC (Supplementary Fig. 48) and MCATCBBC (Supplementary Fig. 58) in CD3CN revealed that only the peak intensities gradually decreased as the concentration was diluted from 6.0 to 0.1 mM, while both the peak count and integral ratios remained largely unchanged. Variable-temperature 1H NMR spectra of MCATCAAC (Supplementary Fig. 49) and MCATCBBC (Supplementary Fig. 59) in CD3CN revealed that the number, shape and chemical shifts of signals changed negligibly over the range of −20 ~ 65 °C. These observations indicate that both MCATCAAC and MCATCBBC can be maintained without structural changes in the acetonitrile solution. Furthermore, NMR titration studies of MCATCAAC (Supplementary Fig. 50) and MCATCBBC (Supplementary Fig. 60) revealed that gradually changing the solvent from CD3CN to DMF-d7 resulted exclusively continuous shifts of their characteristic proton resonances. These shifts are consistent with expected solvent effects, indicating that both MCATCAAC and MCATCBBC maintain their structural integrity in the presence of DMF.
Synthesis and characterization of heteroleptic MCATCABC with three different di-NHC ligands
We have shown the construction of heteroleptic MCATs (with two different di-NHC ligands) either by a one-pot strategy with Ag2O and the corresponding individual di-NHC precursors or via catenane–to–catenane transformations from homoleptic precursors. Notably, in contrast to the assembly from the individual ligands, the conversion of homoleptic assemblies to heteroleptic MCATs can be accomplished in a few seconds at room temperature, presumably because no deprotonation step is required in supramolecular fusion.
On the basis of these results, we were interested in whether the structural complexity of the system could be further increased by further fusing two heteroleptic MCATs. We carefully inspected heteroleptic MCATCAAC and MCATCBBC and determined that not only do they have the same pyrene-bridged external ligand, but their internal ligands differ by only two atoms. Considering the similarities in the structure and composition of MCATCAAC and MCATCBBC, we speculated that their fusion can result in heteroleptic MCATs with more sequences. When two heteroleptic MCATCAAC and MCATCBBC were mixed at room temperature at a ratio of 1:1 in CD3CN (Fig. 2, method h), a complex new set of signals could be observed in the NMR spectra (Fig. 4f and Supplementary Figs. 61–64), indicating the formation of a new assembly through self-sorting, denoted MCATCABC. In addition, the 1H DOSY NMR spectrum of the reaction mixture revealed that there was a single diffusion coefficient (D = 5.25 × 10-10 m2 s-1), suggesting that only one stoichiometric group of the assembly formed (Supplementary Fig. 65). The ESI mass data clearly revealed that the product with the formula [Ag4(A)(B)(C)2] formed, and the peaks at m/z = 905.5603 and 1430.8234 could be attributed to the {MCATCABC ‒ 3(PF6‒)}3+ and {MCATCABC ‒ 2(PF6‒)}2+ species (Fig. 4i and Supplementary Fig. 66).
Single crystals of the MCATCABC assembly suitable for SCXRD analysis were obtained by slow diffusion of diethyl ether into the solution (VMeCN/VDMSO = 15:1) of the compound. Notably, SCXRD analysis (Fig. 3d) unambiguously confirmed the MCAT structure of MCATCABC, comprising three distinct di-NHC ligands. We note that this is probably the architecture of MCAT with the highest degree of ligand differentiation and precisely defined structure achieved to date. Moreover, the solid-state structure of the MCATCABC assembly revealed that one MRAC consists of phenazine-bridged di-NHC ligand A and pyrene-bridged di-NHC ligand C connected by two silver(I) ions, whereas the other MRBC is supported by ligand C and anthracene-bridged ligand B connected by two silver ions. Notably, two pyrene units are located outside the cavity of the two interlocked metallacycles, while anthracene and phenazine units are threaded through the second interlocked metallacycle, resulting in a pyrene–anthracene–phenazine–pyrene parallel arrangement. In the solid structure of MCATCABC, π···π stacking interactions are observed between the pyrene and anthracene groups with an interplanar distance of 3.4 Å, in addition to donor‒acceptor interactions between the phenazine unit and the adjacent pyrene or anthracene group, as inferred from the interring distances of 3.3–3.4 Å. These interactions are the main driving forces for the formation of the interlocked structure.
Further experiments were performed to investigate the stability of heteroleptic MCATCABC relative to those of the homoleptic MCATAAAA, MCATCCCC, and MRBB. A mixture of MCATAAAA (1 equiv), MRBB (2 equiv) and MCATCCCC (2 equiv) was allowed to equilibrate in CD3CN at room temperature (Fig. 2, method i). Analyses of the reaction mixture by 1H NMR were consistent with the presence of MCATCABC as the unique product in solution (Supplementary Fig. 67b). Alternatively, treating the H2A, H2B and H2C ligands at a ratio of 1:1:2 with Ag2O in acetonitrile at 65 °C for 12 h (Fig. 2, method j) resulted in the formation of MCATCABC, as revealed by 1H NMR spectroscopy (Supplementary Fig. 67c). These observations indicate that heteroleptic assembly MCATCABC is the thermodynamically favored reaction product. The stability of the formed heteroleptic MCATCABC was further investigated. Notably, the number, shapes and chemical shifts of the signals changed negligibly in the 1H NMR spectra of MCATCABC either at different concentrations (6.0 − 0.1 mM) (Supplementary Fig. 68) or at a range of temperatures ( − 20 − 65 °C) (Supplementary Fig. 69), revealing the stability of the heteroleptic MCAT structure in acetonitrile solution. Moerever, NMR titration studies (Supplementary Fig. 70) indicate that MCATCABC can also maintained without structural changes in the presence of DMF.
Furthermore, with the visual molecular dynamics (VMD) program52 and wavefunction software Multifwn 3.853, an independent gradient model based on Hirshfeld partition (IGMH) analysis54,55 revealed three IGMH δginter isosurfaces corresponding to van der Waals interactions within three heteroleptic MCATs (Supplementary Fig. 71). Both pyrene and phenazine moieties contain π electrons (prerequisite for π···π stacking), the interaction itself stems from dispersion forces between parallel π electron clouds, and the nearly flat shape of the δginter isosurfaces between π-conjugated fragments is a hallmark feature of π···π stacking56,57.
Theoretical study
Unlike MCATs that bear a single type of NHC ligand, those incorporating two or more distinct NHC ligands have different component sequences defined by the arrangement of their ligands. Notably, dimerization of either two identical or two different heteroleptic MRs should yield MCATs with numerous possible sequences. However, the abovementioned experimental results revealed only three specific sequences. To elucidate this selective self-assembly, we conducted theoretical investigations employing semiempirical and DFT calculations.
Beginning with MCATCAAC, we focused on its heteroleptic metalla-rectangle building unit, MRAC. As shown in Fig. 5a, statistical analysis indicated that dimerization of two MRAC units could yield not only MCATCAAC but also other sequence isomers (MCATAACC and MCATACCA). Structures of MRAC and three MCATs were optimized via the semiempirical GFN2-xTB method58, followed by DFT calculations for single-point energy calculations via the ωB97X-D hybrid functional59 (Fig. 5c and Supplementary Table 1). The calculated binding energies (EBEs) for the dimerization of the two MRACs to the MCATs were –387.5 kJ mol⁻¹ (for MCATAACC), –306.0 kJ mol⁻¹ (for MCATACCA), and –417.5 kJ mol⁻¹ (for MCATCAAC). Comparisons reveal that MCATCAAC is significantly more stable than MCATAACC and MCATACCA by approximately 30.0 and 111.5 kJ mol⁻¹, respectively. This stability of MCATCAAC is consistent with experimental observations, indicating that the CAAC component sequence is highly favored during the assembly of MCATs. Similarly, the binding energy EBE (–380.0 kJ mol⁻¹) of MCATCBBC was substantially greater than that of MCATBBCC (EBE = –358.0 kJ mol⁻¹) and MCATBCCB (EBE = –290.1 kJ mol⁻¹), confirming the increased stability of the CBBC component sequence isomer that was observed experimentally (Supplementary Fig. 72 and Table 2).
Fig. 5. Schematic presentation for the formation of MCATs from two MRs, and semiempirical and DFT calculations analysis.
a Statistical outcome of three MCATs with different component sequences (AACC, ACCA, and CAAC) via the dimerization of two identical heteroleptic MRs. b Statistical outcome (excluding the narcissistic self-sorting) of four MCATs with different component sequences (ABCC, BACC, ACCB, and CABC) via the assembly of two distinct heteroleptic MRs. c Computational study of the relative stabilities of seven feasible MCATs via the GFN2-xTB method (for optimized structures of MCATAACC, MCATACCA, MCATCAAC, MCATABCC, MCATBACC, MCATACCB, and MCATCABC) with DFT calculations for single-point calculations of seven optimized structures using ωB97X-D hybrid functional with the 6-31 G(d,p) basis set for non-metal atoms (C, H, N) atoms and the LANL2DZ basis set for metal atoms (Ag).
Next, we extended the theoretical analysis to explain the exclusive experimental observation of MCATCABC among possible MCATs incorporating three distinct NHC ligands. Unlike the abovementioned cases, MCATCABC arises from the dimerization of two different heteroleptic metalla-rectangles (MRAC and MRBC). Statistical analysis revealed three other possible sequence isomers, excluding homodimers: MCATABCC, MCATBACC, and MCATACCB (Fig. 5b). Semiempirical optimization and DFT single-point energy calculations (Fig. 5c and Supplementary Table 3) revealed that compared with MCATABCC (EBE = –372.6 kJ mol⁻¹), MCATBACC (EBE = –376.1 kJ mol⁻¹), and MCATACCB (EBE = –298.3 kJ mol⁻¹), MCATCABC has a significantly higher binding energy EBE (–400.3 kJ mol⁻¹). This finding indicates the excellent stability of the CABC component sequence, which is consistent with its exclusive experimental formation.
Near-infrared photothermal conversion study
Although the prevalence of π···π stacking interactions in supramolecular assemblies constitutes a key stabilization mechanism, it further facilitates nonradiative energy migration and photothermal conversion processes. We have demonstrated that different conjugate planes can be integrated into a single discrete supramolecular assembly by a metal‒carbon bond-mediated supramolecular fusion strategy. To reliably determine the effect of different conjugate planes and stacking modes on the photothermal conversion efficiency, the near-infrared photothermal conversion properties of MRBB and five MCATs with different component sequences (AAAA, CCCC, CAAC, CBBC, and CABC) were investigated.
As shown in Figs. 6a, b, the three heteroleptic MCATs experienced different and obvious warming processes. Specifically, a solution of MCATCBBC (1.0 mM in CH3CN, 1.0 mL) experienced a notable increase in temperature from 22.8 to 37.3 °C at 808 nm at 1.5 W cm−2. Intriguingly, a greater temperature increase was detected for MCATCABC (ΔT = 30.1 °C, from 22.4 to 52.5 °C) than for MCATCBBC (ΔT = 14.5 °C, from 22.8 to 37.3 °C). A 39.7% photothermal conversion efficiency was calculated for MCATCBBC (Supplementary Fig. 78), and a 46.5% efficiency was calculated for MCATCABC (Supplementary Fig. 79). Compared with MCATCBBC and MCATCABC, MCATCAAC resulted in greater temperature differences (ΔT = 49.3 °C, from 23.4 to 72.7 °C). According to the equations shown in the ESI, a 79.6% efficiency was calculated for MCATCAAC (Supplementary Fig. 77). Analysis of the solid-state structures reveals that although all three heteroleptic MCATs have the same number of π···π stacking interactions, compared with MCATCBBC, MCATCAAC and MCATCABC exhibit stronger stacking strengths. In addition, in the structure of MCATCAAC, two electron-deficient phenazine skeletons are adjacent to the electron-rich pyrene conjugated groups and arranged in parallel, which is more conducive to electron transport, resulting in a higher photothermal conversion efficiency for MCATCAAC.
Fig. 6. NIR photothermal conversion analysis.
a NIR thermal images of five MCATs with different component sequences (AAAA, CCCC, CAAC, CBBC, and CABC) and MRBB under 808 nm laser irradiation. b Photothermal conversion curves of the six topologies. c Absorption in the near-infrared region of the six topologies (λ = 700 to 900 nm), the UV−vis absorption spectra (λ = 300 to 900 nm) was shown in Supplementary Fig. 73.
In contrast, the solution temperatures of the homoleptic assemblies MCATAAAA, MRBB and MCATCCCC increased by 28.1 °C, 8.6 °C, and 13.9 °C, respectively (Figs. 6a, b and Supplementary Figs. 74–76), which were significantly lower than the temperature increases of the corresponding heteroleptic MCATs. This result further confirms that the near-infrared photothermal conversion performance of the materials can be effectively regulated by changing the ratio and arrangement of different π-conjugated skeletons in the metalla[2]catenane structure. Furthermore, we recorded the electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectra of MRBB and MCATs. The strong signals indicate the presence of unpaired electrons, which is consistent with the charge-transfer interaction in the ground state. After irradiation, the EPR signals of MCATAAAA, MRBB, MCATCCCC, MCATCAAC, MCATCBBC and MCATCABC increased by 12.9, 1.2, 2.4, 16.3, 2.4 and 13.9 times, respectively (Supplementary Figs. 80–85). This observation is consistent with the established conclusion that under 808 nm laser irradiation, the difference in the strong EPR signal with 808 nm laser irradiation of MCATCAAC indicates its excellent NIR photothermal conversion efficiency.
Discussion
We have demonstrated that heteroleptic metalla-[2]catenanes with stereoscopic layered arrangements provide a versatile platform for exploring how spatial molecular coding guides emergent functions. By selectively constructing sequence-defined assemblies and correlating their structures with thermodynamic stability and photothermal performance, this work establishes a direct link between motif arrangement and system-level properties. In addition to revealing sequence–function relationships in multicomponent assemblies, our findings highlight molecular coding as a guiding principle for the bottom-up design of supramolecular materials.
Extending this strategy to other spatial organizations and functional motifs could enable systematic decoding of molecular information in increasingly complex assemblies. These efforts may uncover new modes of emergent behavior, from electron transport and photonic activity to adaptive mechanical responses. Moreover, embedding coding principles into supramolecular design could reshape how we conceive and engineer functional matter, bridging molecular information with next-generation materials, devices, and energy technologies.
Methods
Synthesis
The ligands H2A, H2B and H2C were synthesized from 2,7-dibromophenazine, 2,6-dibromoanthracene, and 1,6-dibromopyrene, respectively; detailed methods and characterizations of H2A, H2B and H2C are provided in the Supplementary Information. The homoleptic assemblies MCATAAAA, MRBB and MCATCCCC were synthesized using Ag2O and ligands H2A, H2B and H2C, respectively; the heteroleptic assemblies MCATCAAC, MCATCBBC and MCATCABC were synthesized either via direct assembly of NHC ligands with Ag(I) nodes or structural transformation from homoleptic precursors trough a supramolecular fusion strategy; detailed methods and characterizations of MCATAAAA, MRBB, MCATCCCC, MCATCAAC, MCATCBBC and MCATCABC are provided in the Supplementary Information.
X-ray crystallography
Single crystals of MCATAAAA, MCATCAAC, MCATCBBC and MCATCABC suitable for X-ray diffraction were obtained at room temperature. X-ray intensity data for MCATAAAA, MCATCBBC, and MCATCABC were collected at T = 240 K and those for MCATCAAC at T = 180 K on a Bruker D8 Venture system and used Mo Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å). Using Olex260, the structures were solved with the SHELXT-199761,62 structure solution program using direct methods and refined with the SHELXL63 refinement package using least-squares minimization. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined with anisotropic displacement parameters, and hydrogen atoms were placed in geometrically calculated positions. With these data, the disordered solvent molecules that could not be restrained properly were removed using the SQUEEZE method. The ORTEP-style illustration of four structures can be seen in Supplementary Figs. 86 (for MCATAAAA), 87 (for MCATCAAC), 88 (for MCATCBBC) and 89 (for MCATCABC), with probability ellipsoids. Details of the X-ray crystallographic refinement of MCATAAAA, MCATCAAC, MCATCBBC and MCATCABC can be found in Supplementary Tables 4, 5, 6 and 7, respectively.
Computational details
The computational study using the combination of self-consistent tight-binding (GFN2-xTB)58, and density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed with the Guassian09 quantum chemistry package64. The geometries of MRs and MCATs were optimized using semi-empirical GFN2-xTB method implemented with D4 model65. The relative stability of feasible supramolecular structures was investigated through single-point calculations using ωB97X-D hybrid functional59 with the 6-31 G(d,p)66 basis set for non-metal atoms (C, H, N) atoms and the LANL2DZ67 basis set for metal atoms (Ag). Acetonitrile was used as a solvent for calculations (SMD model)68.
Near-infrared photothermal conversion research
To guarantee same amount of conjugated-π area, the applied molar ratio of the six topologies MCATAAAA / MRBB / MCATCCCC / MCATCAAC / MCATCBBC / MCATCABC was 1:2:1:1:1:1. Compound MCATAAAA (9.33 mg, 0.003 mmol) was added into a solvent of CH3CN (3 mL). After the solid dissolved absolutely, 1.0 mL of this solution was taken into a 2.0 mL sample vessel and put into the bright spot of a laser with 808 nm wavelength at 1.5 W/cm2. Temperature variation of the solution was detected by an infrared camera. Compound MRBB (9.29 mg, 0.006 mmol), compound MCATCCCC (9.59 mg, 0.003 mmol), compound MCATCAAC (9.46 mg, 0.003 mmol), compound MCATCBBC (9.45 mg, 0.003 mmol) and compound MCATCABC (9.45 mg, 0.003 mmol) were detected with the same procedure as compound MCATAAAA.
Supplementary information
Source data
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22025107 (Y.-F.H.), 92461302 (Y.-F.H.), 22305190 (X.L.), 22301040 (H.-N.Z.)), the National Youth Topnotch Talent Support Program of China (Y.-F.H.), the China Postdoctoral Fellowship Program Grade A (BX20240288 (Y.-W.Z.)), the Shaanxi Postdoctoral Science Foundation Project (2024BSHSDZZ057 (Y.-W.Z.)), the Xi’an Key Laboratory of Functional Supramolecular Structure and Materials, and the FM&EM International Joint Laboratory of Northwest University.
Author contributions
Y.-F.H. conceived and supervised the project. Y.-W.Z. and H.-N.Z. performed the synthesis of ligands and silver(I)-N-heterocyclic carbene assemblies. Y.-W.Z., H.-N.Z., M.-X.W., and X.L. performed NMR analyses, X-ray crystallographic analysis, electrospray ionization mass spectrometry, theoretical study and near-infrared photothermal conversion study. Y.-W.Z., H.-N.Z. and Y.-F.H. wrote the paper. All authors contributed to the data analysis and discussion.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Mandeep Chahal, Jun-Hua Wan and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Data availability
The authors declare that all data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and Supplementary Information files, and are also available from the corresponding author upon request. The X-ray crystallographic coordinates for structures have been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center (CCDC) under deposition numbers CCDC-2483191 (MCATAAAA), CCDC-2483192 (MCATCAAC), CCDC-2483193 (MCATCABC), CCDC-2483194 (MCATCBBC), respectively. These data can be obtained free of charge via http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif. Source data are provided with this paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Ya-Wen Zhang, Hai-Ning Zhang.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-026-68348-w.
References
- 1.Lehn, J.-M. Toward complex matter: supramolecular chemistry and self-organization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.99, 4763–4768 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Konar, M. & Govindaraju, T. Molecular Architectonics and Nanoarchitectonics Ch. 1 (Springer Press., Singapore, 2022).
- 3.Lee, J. M. et al. Semiautomated synthesis of sequence-defined polymers for information storage. Sci. Adv.8, eabl8614 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bielecki, A. & Schmittel, M. The information encoded in structures: theory and application to molecular cybernetics. Found. Sci.27, 1327–1345 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wu, K. et al. Systematic construction of progressively larger capsules from a fivefold linking pyrrole-based subcomponent. Nat. Synth.2, 789–797 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 6.Qi, H. et al. Steric complementarity drives strong co-assembly of short peptide stereoisomers. J. Am. Chem. Soc.147, 14231–14243 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Benchimol, E., Nguyen, B.-N. T., Ronson, T. K. & Nitschke, J. R. Transformation networks of metal–organic cages controlled by chemical stimuli. Chem. Soc. Rev.51, 5101–5135 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.McTernan, C. T., Davies, J. A. & Nitschke, J. R. Beyond platonic: how to build metal-organic polyhedra capable of binding low-symmetry, information-rich molecular cargoes. Chem. Rev.122, 10393–10437 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Levin, A. et al. Biomimetic peptide self-assembly for functional materials. Nat. Rev. Chem.4, 615–634 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhu, Y. et al. A general strategy for synthesizing biomacromolecular ionogel membranes via solvent-induced self-assembly. Nat. Synth.2, 864–872 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wu, H. et al. Photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical systems: similarities and differences. Adv. Mater.32, 1904717 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ma, B. & Bianco, A. Regulation of biological processes by intrinsically chiral engineered materials. Nat. Rev. Mater.8, 403–413 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dong, J., Liu, Y. & Cui, Y. Emerging chiral two-dimensional materials. Nat. Chem.16, 1398–1407 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Raymond, D. M. & Nilsson, B. L. Multicomponent peptide assemblies. Chem. Soc. Rev.47, 3659–3720 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zhu, J. et al. Protein assembly by design. Chem. Rev.121, 13701–13796 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Li, L., Zheng, R. & Sun, R. Understanding multicomponent low molecular weight gels from gelators to networks. J. Adv. Res.69, 91–106 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jin, T. et al. Exploring self-sorting in metallacycles: toward advanced supramolecular systems and materials. Supramol. Mater.4, 100117 (2025). [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dong, X. Y., Domayer, M., Hudalla, G. A. & Hall, C. K. Modulating peptide co-assembly via macromolecular crowding: recipes for co-assembled structures. Nanoscale17, 15478–15492 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cui, H. & Tirrell, M. Self-assembling peptides, conjugates, and mimics: a versatile platform for materials and beyond. Acc. Chem. Res.58, 163–164 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.He, Z., Jiang, W. & Schalley, C. A. Integrative self-sorting: a versatile strategy for the construction of complex supramolecular architecture. Chem. Soc. Rev.44, 779–789 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pullen, S. & Clever, G. H. Mixed-ligand metal-organic frameworks and heteroleptic coordination cages as multifunctional scaffolds—a comparison. Acc. Chem. Res.51, 3052–3064 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wu, K., Benchimol, E., Baksi, A. & Clever, G. H. Non-statistical assembly of multicomponent [Pd2ABCD] cages. Nat. Chem.16, 584–591 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fujita, M., Tominaga, M., Hori, A. & Therrien, B. Coordination assemblies from a Pd(II)-cornered square complex. Acc. Chem. Res.38, 369–378 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yamashina, M., Yuki, T., Sei, Y., Akita, M. & Yoshizawa, M. Anisotropic expansion of an M2L4 coordination capsule: host capability and frame rearrangement. Chem. Eur. J.21, 4200–4204 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Davies, J. A., Ronson, T. K. & Nitschke, J. R. Triamine and tetramine edge-length matching drives heteroleptic triangular and tetragonal prism assembly. J. Am. Chem. Soc.146, 5215–5223 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hou, Y., Zhang, Z. & Zhang, M. Multicomponent metallacages via the integrative self-assembly of Pt(II) nodes with multiple pyridyl and carboxylate ligands. Acc. Chem. Res.58, 1644–1656 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Northrop, B. H., Zheng, Y.-R., Chi, K.-W. & Stang, P. J. Self-organization in coordination-driven self-assembly. Acc. Chem. Res.42, 1554–1563 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Han, Y.-F. & Jin, G.-X. Half-sandwich iridium- and rhodium-based organometallic architectures: rational design, synthesis, characterization, and applications. Acc. Chem. Res.47, 3571–3579 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sinha, N. & Hahn, F. E. Metallosupramolecular architectures obtained from poly-N-heterocyclic carbene ligands. Acc. Chem. Res.50, 2167–2184 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lescop, C. Coordination-driven syntheses of compact supramolecular metallacycles toward extended metallo-organic stacked supramolecular assemblies. Acc. Chem. Res.50, 885–894 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zhang, Y.-Y., Gao, W.-X., Lin, L. & Jin, G.-X. Recent advances in the construction and applications of heterometallic macrocycles and cages. Coord. Chem. Rev.344, 323–344 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jayamurugan, G., Roberts, D. A., Ronson, T. K. & Nitschke, J. R. Selective endo and exo binding of mono- and ditopic ligands to a rhomboidal diporphyrin prism. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.54, 7539–7543 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.García-Simón, C. et al. Enantioselective hydroformylation by a Rh-catalyst entrapped in a supramolecular metallocage. J. Am. Chem. Soc.137, 2680–2687 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Chepelin, O., Ujma, J., Barran, P. E. & Lusby, P. J. Sequential, kinetically controlled synthesis of multicomponent stereoisomeric assemblies. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.51, 4194–4197 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Preston, D., Barnsley, J. E., Gordon, K. C. & Crowley, J. D. Controlled formation of heteroleptic [Pd2(La)2(Lb)2]4+ cages. J. Am. Chem. Soc.138, 10578–10585 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Abe, T., Sanada, N., Takeuchi, K., Okazawa, A. & Hiraoka, S. Assembly of six types of heteroleptic Pd2L4 cages under kinetic control. J. Am. Chem. Soc.145, 28061–28074 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zhang, D., Ronson, T. K., Zou, Y.-Q. & Nitschke, J. R. Metal–organic cages for molecular separations. Nat. Rev. Chem.5, 168–182 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Banerjee, R., Chakraborty, D. & Mukherjee, P. S. Molecular barrels as potential hosts: from synthesis to applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc.145, 7692–7711 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Howlader, P., Das, P., Zangrando, E. & Mukherjee, P. S. Urea-functionalized self-assembled molecular prism for heterogeneous catalysis in water. J. Am. Chem. Soc.138, 1668–1676 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Jiao, J. et al. Design and assembly of chiral coordination cages for asymmetric sequential reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc.140, 2251–2259 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gao, W.-X., Zhang, H.-N. & Jin, G.-X. Supramolecular catalysis based on discrete heterometallic coordination-driven metallacycles and metallacages. Coord. Chem. Rev.386, 69–84 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 42.Liu, D. et al. Molecular co-catalyst confined within a etallacage for enhanced photocatalytic CO2 reduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc.146, 2275–2285 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Gan, M.-M. et al. Preparation and post-assembly modification of metallosupramolecular assemblies from poly(N-heterocyclic carbene) ligands. Chem. Rev.118, 9587–9641 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Bai, S. & Han, Y.-F. Metal-N-heterocyclic carbene chemistry directed toward metallosupramolecular synthesis and beyond. Acc. Chem. Res.56, 1213–1227 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.López-Moreno, A. et al. Single-walled carbon nanotubes encapsulated within metallacycles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.61, e202208189 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ibáñez, S., Poyatos, M. & Peris, E. N-heterocyclic carbenes: a door open to supramolecular organometallic chemistry. Acc. Chem. Res.53, 1401–1413 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Zhang, Y.-W. et al. Unravelling the roles of solvophobic effects and π···π stacking interactions in the formation of [2]catenanes featuring di-(N heterocyclic carbene) building blocks. An. gew. Chem. Int. Ed.62, e202312323 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Chang, J.-P. et al. Synthesis of a metalla[2]catenane, metallarectangles and polynuclear assemblies from di(N-heterocyclic carbene) ligands. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.63, e202409664 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Zhang, Y.-W., Bai, S., Wang, Y.-Y. & Han, Y.-F. A strategy for the construction of triply interlocked organometallic cages by rational design of poly-NHC precursor. J. Am. Chem. Soc.142, 13614–13621 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Gao, X. et al. Synthesis and near-infrared photothermal conversion of discrete supramolecular topologies featuring half-sandwich [Cp*Rh] units. J. Am. Chem. Soc.143, 17833–17842 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Wang, Y.-S., Feng, T., Wang, Y.-Y., Hahn, F. E. & Han, Y.-F. Homo- and heteroligand poly-NHC metal assemblies: synthesis by narcissistic and social self-sorting. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.57, 15767–15771 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Humphrey, W., Dalke, K. & Schulten, A. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graphics14, 33–38 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Lu, T. & Chen, F. Multiwfn: A multifunctional wavefunction analyzer. J. Comput. Chem.33, 580–592 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Lu, T. & Chen, Q. Independent gradient model based on hirshfeld partition: a new method for visual study of interactions in chemical systems. J. Comput. Chem.43, 539–555 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Lu, T. & Chen, Q. Comprehensive Computational Chemistry Vol. 2 (Elsevier Press, Oxford, 2024).
- 56.Liu, Z. et al. Molecular assembly with a figure-of-eight nanohoop as a strategy for the collection and stabilization of cyclo[18]carbon. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.25, 16707–16711 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Liu, Z., Lu, T. & Chen, Q. Intermolecular interaction characteristics of the all-carboatomic ring, cyclo[18]carbon: focusing on molecular adsorption and stacking. Carbon171, 514–523 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 58.Bannwarth, C., Ehlert, S. & Grimme, S. GFN2-xTB—an accurate and broadly parametrized self-consistent tight-binding quantum chemical method with multipole electrostatics and density-dependent dispersion contributions. J. Chem. Theory Comput.15, 1652–1671 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Chai, J.-D. & Head-Gordon, M. Long-range corrected hybrid density functionals with damped atom–atom dispersion corrections. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.10, 6615–6620 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Dolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. OLEX2: a complete structure solution, refinement and analysis program. J. Appl. Crystallogr.42, 339–341 (2009). [Google Scholar]
- 61.Sheldrick, G. Phase annealing in SHELX-90: direct methods for larger structures. Acta Crystallogr. A46, 467–473 (1990). [Google Scholar]
- 62.Sheldrick, G. A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallogr. A64, 112–122 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Sheldrick, G. SHELXT—integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. A71, 3–8 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Gaussian 09 rev. E01 (Gaussian, Inc., 2009). http://www.gaussian.com.
- 65.Caldeweyher, E. et al. A generally applicable atomic-charge dependent London dispersion correction. J. Chem. Phys.150, 154122 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Hariharan, P. C. & Pople, J. A. The influence of polarization functions on molecular orbital hydrogenation energies. Theor. Chim. Acta.28, 213–222 (1973). [Google Scholar]
- 67.Hay, P. J. & Wadt, W. R. Ab initio effective core potentials for molecular calculations. Potentials for K to Au including the outermost core orbitals. J. Chem. Phys.82, 299–310 (1985). [Google Scholar]
- 68.Marenich, A. V., Cramer, C. J. & Truhlar, D. G. Universal solvation model based on solute electron density and on a continuum model of the solvent defined by the bulk Dielectric constant and atomic surface tensions. J. Phys. Chem. B113, 6378–6396 (2009). 6620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The authors declare that all data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and Supplementary Information files, and are also available from the corresponding author upon request. The X-ray crystallographic coordinates for structures have been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center (CCDC) under deposition numbers CCDC-2483191 (MCATAAAA), CCDC-2483192 (MCATCAAC), CCDC-2483193 (MCATCABC), CCDC-2483194 (MCATCBBC), respectively. These data can be obtained free of charge via http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif. Source data are provided with this paper.






