Skip to main content
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2026 Feb 12;17:1645. doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-69424-x

Lack of MDA5 delays hematopoietic aging by modulating inflammaging and proteostasis in mice

Veronica Bergo 1,2,3,✉,#, Pavlos Bousounis 1,2,#, Giang To Vu 4,#, Mélodie Douté 5, Aikaterini Polyzou 1,2,4, Maria-Eleni Lalioti 6, Bogdan B Grigorash 4, Lyudmila Tsurkan 5, Nicholas Morchel 5, Ward Deboutte 1, Frédéric Brau 4, Thomas Manke 1,7, Sagar 8, Hind Medyouf 9,10, Dmitry V Bulavin 4, Nina Cabezas-Wallscheid 6, Marta Derecka 5,, Eirini Trompouki 1,4,
PMCID: PMC12905429  PMID: 41680183

Abstract

“Inflammaging”, the chronic increase in inflammatory signaling with age, remains poorly understood in hematopoietic aging. Here, we identify the innate immune RNA sensor melanoma differentiation–associated protein 5 (MDA5) as an important factor of hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) aging. Aged Mda5-/- mice exhibit reduced HSC accumulation and myeloid bias. Importantly, aged Mda5-/- HSCs retain greater quiescence and superior repopulation capacity in noncompetitive transplants compared to wild-type counterparts. Multiomic analyses— including chromatin accessibility, transcriptomics, and metabolomics—reveal decreased inflammatory signaling, a youthful metabolic profile, and improved proteostasis in Mda5-/- HSCs, through regulation of HSF1 and phospho-EIF2A, key proteostasis regulators. Activation of HSF1 in aged wild-type HSCs partially restores youthful features, supporting a causal role for proteostasis maintenance. Collectively, our findings demonstrate that attenuating MDA5-dependent inflammation preserves HSC function during aging by maintaining metabolic fitness and proteostasis and provide insight into potential therapeutic strategies for mitigating hematopoietic aging.

Subject terms: Haematopoietic stem cells, Quiescence, Inflammation, Ageing


Exposure to inflammation drives hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) aging, limiting their self-renewal capacity and differentiation. Here, the authors explore the mechanistic link between inflammation and HSC aging. Using mouse models, they identify the innate immune RNA sensor MDA5 as a key mediator of HSC aging and show that MDA5 loss ameliorates the aging phenotype by improving proteostasis in aged HSCs.

Introduction

Hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) lie at the top of the hematopoietic hierarchy and give rise to most of the differentiated hematopoietic cells. HSCs are normally quiescent within the bone marrow and can only be activated by external stimuli to exit quiescence and enter the cell cycle1. Inflammation holds a prominent role throughout the lifespan of HSCs. Indeed, it has been shown that IFNα (interferon a), IFNγ, TNF (tumor necrosis factor), and IL-1β (interleukin 1β) are responsible for the exit of HSCs from quiescence26. IL-1 mediates microbiome-induced inflammaging of HSCs in mice7. It has been shown that inflammatory signaling promotes clonal expansion in cases of clonal hematopoiesis (CH)8,9. At the same time, it was recently proposed that the mutant clones are resistant to the detrimental effects of the inflammatory milieu, thus leading to their expansion10. During aging, several features of HSCs become compromised. Aged HSCs exhibit reduced self-renewal and repopulation capacity, a myeloid bias, and an increase in their frequency, while proteostatic mechanisms are compromised concomitant with chronic low-grade inflammation1113. “Inflammaging” refers to the low-grade, sterile chronic inflammation affecting the aged hematopoietic system and HSC function, including metabolic capacity, differentiation, and self-renewal capacity in aged organisms, leading to various diseases11,12,14. Indeed, it has been shown that continuous exposure to inflammation in the form of the viral mimic PolyI:C leads to impairment of HSC self-renewal capacity and premature aging15. However, how inflammation drives hematopoietic aging and the mechanisms through which the two phenomena are linked remain understudied.

An inflammatory pathway whose role in “inflammaging” has not been studied before is the RIG-I-like receptor (RLR) pathway16. RLRs are a group of three intracellular innate immune receptors: RIG-I (retinoic acid-inducible gene I) like receptor, MDA5 (melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5), and LGP2 (laboratory of genetics and physiology 2). Upon viral RNA recognition, RIG-I and MDA5 form filaments and interact with the downstream adapter protein MAVS (mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein), thus creating a signaling platform that permits the recruitment and activation of multiple signaling molecules. Ultimately, activation of the RLR signaling pathway leads to induction of a type-I IFN response and the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines16,17. We have previously shown that RLRs play a key role in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) formation during development18, and that MDA5 modulates adult HSC activation after chemotherapy19. Whether RLRs are involved in hematopoietic aging remains unknown. Recently, it was reported by us and others that not only viral RNA, but also other types of RNA, including mitochondrial and transposable element RNA, can also be a stimulus for RLR receptors2025. Since transposable element expression in HSCs increases with age26, MDA5 may play a role in HSC aging.

Protein homeostasis, or proteostasis, encompasses all the processes that work together to maintain the proper levels, structure, and function of proteins within living organisms27. Although inflammaging and impaired proteostasis are both hallmarks of aging HSCs, a link between them remains unexplored. Young adult HSCs have lower protein synthesis rates compared to downstream progenitors28,29. Heat shock transcription factor 1 (HSF1) is a master regulator of proteostasis3032 which was recently reported to promote proteostasis and the regenerative activity of HSCs in response to culture stress and aging33. HSF1 protein levels decline with age in many tissues34. Protein translation inhibition through PKR (protein kinase R) or PERK (protein kinase R-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase)-induced phospho-EIF2a (eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2a) is also important for proteostasis and the induction of autophagy35. Autophagy helps to remove cytosolic protein aggregates and damaged organelles inside cells36. Loss of autophagy in HSCs leads to metabolic stress and altered functionality. While most HSCs lose autophagic capacity with age, a fraction maintains high autophagy and resembles young HSCs37. Chronic low-grade inflammation is the signal that leads to autophagy maintenance through metabolic adaptations38. Finally, aggrephagy has been shown as the preferred method of protein degradation by HSCs39.

Here, we show that, in the absence of MDA5, HSCs are protected from age-associated functional decline. Loss of MDA5 preserves stem cell quiescence, limits myeloid bias, and maintains repopulation capacity during aging by restraining inflammatory signaling and sustaining metabolic fitness and proteostasis. These findings establish innate RNA sensing as an intrinsic driver of hematopoietic stem cell aging and highlight modulation of MDA5-dependent pathways as a potential strategy to mitigate age-related hematopoietic dysfunction.

Results

Reduced inflammation in Mda5-/- HSCs and bone marrow serum

Since activation of MDA5 induces a type-I IFN response and the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines, we isolated bone marrow serum from aged (18 to 24 months old) wild-type WT (or Mda5+/+ hereafter WT) and Ifih1-knockout mice (also known as Mda5; hereafter Mda5-/-; B6.Cg-Ifih1tm1.1Cln/J)40, to measure secreted cytokines. Indeed, IFN-β concentration was significantly lower in the bone marrow of aged Mda5-/- mice (Fig. 1A). Concomitantly, other cytokines such as IL-1α and β, IL-10, IL-6, and others exhibited lower concentrations in Mda5-/- bone marrow serum, while other cytokines like TNF and IFNγ showed no differences (Fig. 1B and Supplementary Fig. 1A, B). We repeated the experiment with young (2–3 months old) and middle-aged (10–14 months old) mice and observed various cytokines that had lower concentrations in the bone marrow serum of young and middle-aged Mda5-/- animals compared to controls (Supplementary Fig. 1C, D). When comparing these results at different ages, we noticed that cytokine concentration was increasing with age, with IL-1α, IL-10, IFNβ, and TNF being the most highly secreted in the bone marrow. This effect was dampened in aged Mda5-/- bone marrow serum (Fig. 1C).

Fig. 1. Reduced inflammation in Mda5-/- HSCs and bone marrow serum.

Fig. 1

A IFNβ concentration (pg/ml) in the bone marrow serum of aged WT or Mda5-/- mice. N = 6 biologically independent samples in n = 2 independent experiment. Each dot represents one mouse. Data are presented as mean values ± SD. Two-tailed unpaired t-test (P = 0.000002). B Fold change of cytokine concentrations in the bone marrow serum of aged WT or Mda5-/-, normalized to the corresponding WT control. N = 9 WT or Mda5-/- for IL-1α, N = 6 WT or N = 7 Mda5-/- for IL-1β, N = 8 WT or Ν = 7 Mda5-/- for IL-10, N = 7 WT or Ν = 9 Mda5-/- for IL-6, N = 5 WT or Ν = 4 Mda5-/- for IL-27, N = 4 WT or Ν = 6 Mda5-/- for IL-17α, N = 7 WT or Ν = 10 Mda5-/- for IL-23 biologically independent samples in n = 4 independent experiments. Each dot represents one mouse. Data are presented as mean values ± SD. Two-tailed unpaired t-tests, P (IL-6 = 0.000004; P (IL-17a) = 0.000032; P (IL-23) = 0.000099. C Cytokine concentration in bone marrow serum of young (Ν = 3 WT and 5 Mda5-/-for IFNβ, Ν = 3 WT and 5 Mda5-/-for IL-1α, Ν = 4 WT and 3 Mda5-/-for IL-10, Ν = 3 WT and 4 Mda5-/-for TNF), middle-aged (Ν = 4 WT and 3 Mda5-/- for IFNβ, Ν = 2 WT and 3 Mda5-/-for IL-1α, Ν = 3 WT and 3 Mda5-/-for IL-10, Ν = 4 WT and 3 Mda5-/-for TNF), and aged (Ν = 5 WT and 5 Mda5-/- for IFNβ, Ν = 5 WT and 4 Mda5-/-for IL-1α, Ν = 4 WT and 4 Mda5-/-for IL-10, Ν = 3 WT and 2 Mda5-/- for TNF), WT or Mda5-/- mice biologically independent samples in n = 2 independent experiment. Data are presented as mean values. Two-way ANOVA, normalized to young WT. Heatmaps (left) of the differentially accessible regions in young WT and young Mda5-/- HSCs (D), aged WT and aged Mda5-/- HSCs (E), WT young versus aged (F) and Mda5-/- young versus aged (G) ±2, 5 kb from the center of the peak (CoP). Pie charts representing the genomic distribution (right) of gained and lost regions in (DG). TSS: transcriptional start site. H Upset plot showing the number of intersections between narrow peaks from young WT, young Mda5-/-, aged WT and aged Mda5-/-, HSCs. I Known motif analysis in induced or reduced regions of chromatin accessibility of the indicated comparisons.

We then wanted to check whether chromatin accessibility for inflammatory motifs is different in Mda5-/- HSCs. To explore the chromatin accessibility landscape of aged WT and Mda5-/- HSCs, we performed an assay for transposase-accessible chromatin followed by sequencing (ATAC-seq). We isolated HSCs using EPCR (endothelial protein C receptor) SLAM markers (EPCR + CD150 + CD48−), as EPCR has been proven to be a stable marker that is insensitive to stress signals41,42. Indeed, more than 97% of the EPCR SLAM HSCs are also Lin-cKit + Sca+ (LSK) CD150 + CD48− (LSK SLAM) (Supplementary Fig. 1E). Similar results were obtained for middle-aged and young HSCs (Supplementary Fig. 1F, G). Therefore, in this text, “HSC” will henceforth refer to EPCR SLAM HSCs, unless stated otherwise. Clustering of samples by age was observed (Supplementary Fig. 1H). We compared the accessible chromatin regions between young or aged WT and Mda5-/- HSCs. In the comparison of the young WT and Mda5-/- HSCs, we found 1.723 regions that were mostly accessible in WT (reduced peaks), and 10.694 mostly accessible in Mda5-/- HSCs (induced peaks) (Fig. 1D and Supplementary Data 14). Aged Mda5-/- HSCs on the other hand have less accessible chromatin than the WT, with 11.904 sites induced in WT and 5.336 sites induced in Mda5-/- HSCs (Fig. 1E and Supplementary Data 14). Both induced and reduced peaks were distributed in similar proportions across transcription start sites (TSS), exons, introns, and intergenic regions (Fig. 1D, E). Only the reduced peaks in young Mda5-/- HSCs were found mostly around the TSS (Fig. 1D). Additionally, when we compared young and aged WT or Mda5-/- HSCs, we observed an opening of chromatin in the aged populations that was distributed similarly in different genomic regions (Fig. 1F, G). Comparison of young and aged samples together revealed that most of the common induced regions were between the aged WT and Mda5-/- HSCs, and thus the aged Mda5-/- HSCs do not resemble younger WT HSCs (Fig. 1H).

Known motif analysis revealed that inflammatory motifs like IRF3 (IFN regulatory factor 3) were mainly enriched in aged Mda5-/- reduced peaks (p-value 1e-21 in reduced and 1e-05 in induced sites), but not young WT or Mda5-/- regions (Fig. 1I). In detail, in the young WT versus Mda5-/- regions, we found NFY (nuclear transcription factor Y,1e-49), KLF1 (Krueppel-like factor 1, 1e-47), SP1 (specificity protein 1, 1e-38), FLI1 (friend leukemia integration 1,1e-21) in the reduced regions and ZSCAN1 (zinc finger and SCAN domain containing 1), P53 (both 1e-02) in the induced regions (Fig. 1I). In aged WT versus Mda5-/- regions we found CTCF (CCCTC-binding factor, 1e-911), ETV2 (Ets variant 2, 1e-248), ERG (ETS transcription factor ERG, 1e-232), IRF3 (1e-21), PU1 (1e-133), JUN-AP1(1e-72) in the reduced regions and CTCF (1e-139), ETV2 (1e-69), ETS1 (1e-55), PU1 (1-36), RUNX (1e-31), IRF3 (1e-05) in the induced regions (Fig. 1I). Thus, the inflammatory IRF3 motif is less present in induced Mda5-/- regions. The young WT HSCs harbor motifs for Pax7 (1e-2) while the induced regions in the aged WT HSCs harbor CTCF (1e-1965), ETV2 (1e-1063), ERG (1e-1032), FLI1 (1e-993), PU1 (1e-577), AP1 (activating protein-1, 1e-300), and IRF3 motifs (1e-131) (Fig. 1I). In contrast young Mda5-/- HSCs harbor ZSCAN (1e-02) motifs while for the induced regions in aged Mda5-/- HSCs we observed CTCF (1e-1177), ETV2 (1e-1057), ERG (1e-1003), FLI1 (1e-1015), PU1 (1e-552), AP1 (1e-211), IRF3 (1e-86) motifs (Fig. 1I).

We performed digital footprinting analysis to identify motif occupancy for transcription factors IRF3, NF-κB (p65), and STAT1 in aged compared to young WT and Mda5-/- HSCs. We observed a substantial increase in occupancy between young and aged WT or Mda5-/- footprints, although the total number of footprints was lower in the knockout. Additionally, we did not detect many footprints for inflammatory factors in young HSCs (Supplementary Fig. 1I). To further investigate this, we compared aged WT and Mda5-/- footprints, and we observed less occupancy of the WT footprints in the Mda5-/-samples (Supplementary Fig. 1J).

Taken together, these results further support that inflammatory signaling activation, a hallmark of aging, is significantly dampened in Mda5-/- HSCs and bone marrow.

Reduced HSC accumulation and myeloid bias in aged Mda5-/- animals

We reasoned that changes in cytokine concentrations and inflammatory signaling activation could impact HSC functionality and maintenance during aging. We did not detect changes in bone marrow cellularity in young, middle-aged, or aged WT and Mda5-/- animals (Supplementary Fig. 2A). When evaluating the HSC compartment in middle-aged and aged WT animals, we observed an increased frequency of EPCR SLAM, LSK SLAM, and LT-HSCs, indicative of HSC expansion, an established hallmark of aging, that was more prominent in aged compared to the young or middle-aged animals. However, this accumulation was significantly reduced in Mda5-/- animals (Fig. 2A–C and Supplementary Fig. 2B–D). Concomitantly, metabolomic analysis showed significant differences between aged WT and Mda5-/- HSCs. The concentration of glutathione disulfide (GSSG), which is known to increase during aging43, was lower in the aged Mda5-/- HSCs (Fig. 2D). The nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) concentration has been shown to decline upon aging. Similarly, a decline in NADP+ is also expected during aging, since it is exclusively synthesized from NAD+ by cytoplasmic and mitochondrial NAD+ kinases44. The concentration of these two metabolites, and especially NADP+, was higher in aged Mda5-/- HSCs (Fig. 2D). Minimal differences were observed in the nucleotide metabolism and the TCA cycle between aged Mda5-/- and WT HSCs (Supplementary Fig. 2E, F). Additionally, we measured HSC mitochondrial mass and membrane potential using MitoTracker green dye (MTG) and tetramethylrhodamine methyl ester (TMRM), respectively, in the presence of verapamil45,46, a known blocker of xenobiotic efflux pumps, which fosters dye retention in the organelles. This allowed us to observe a higher mitochondrial mass and membrane potential in aged Mda5-/- HSCs, a characteristic of young HSCs4749, albeit in studies utilizing verapamil (Fig. 2E, F).

Fig. 2. Reduced HSC accumulation and myeloid bias in aged Mda5-/- animals.

Fig. 2

Frequency of EPCR SLAM (A), LSK SLAM (B), and LT-HSC (C) populations in young (Ν = 7 WT and 6 Mda5-/- for EPCR SLAM, Ν = 11 WT and 11 Mda5-/- for LSK SLAM, Ν = 9 WT and 8 Mda5-/- for LT HSCs) middle-aged (Ν = 9 WT and 11 Mda5-/- for EPCR SLAM, Ν = 8 WT and 12 Mda5-/- for LSK SLAM, Ν = 10 WT and 8 Mda5-/- for LT HSCs) and aged (Ν = 11 WT and 11 Mda5-/- for EPCR SLAM, Ν = 11 WT and 10 Mda5-/- for LSK SLAM WT, Ν = 9 WT and 8 Mda5-/-for LT HSCs) biologically independent samples in n = 3 independent experiments. Each dot represents one mouse. Data are presented as mean values ± SD. One-way ANOVA. For A: P (middle-aged WT vs. aged WT) = 0.0000000004; P (young WT vs. middle-aged WT) = 0.9997836098; P (young WT vs. aged WT) = 0.0000000055; P (young Mda5-/- vs. middle-aged Mda5-/-) = 0.9999911871. For B: P (young WT vs. young Mda5-/-) = 0.99999999475; P (middle-aged WT vs. middle-aged Mda5-/-) = 0.00000351753; P (middle-aged WT vs. aged WT) = 0.00000000001; P (young WT vs. aged WT) = 0.00000000001; P (aged WT vs. aged Mda5-/-) = 0.00002793280; P (middle-aged Mda5-/- vs. aged Mda5-/-) = 0.00002727944; P (young Mda5-/- vs. aged Mda5-/-) = 0.00000992713. For C: P (young WT vs. young Mda5-/-) = 0.999999997476817; P (aged WT vs. aged Mda5-/-) = 0.000000053123669; P (middle-aged WT vs. aged WT) < 0.000000000000001; P (young WT vs. aged WT) < 0.000000000000001; P (young Mda5-/- vs. aged Mda5-/-) < 0.000000000000001. D Fold change of intracellular redox-metabolite concentrations of aged WT or Mda5-/- HSCs, relative to WT control. Ν = 6 WT and Ν = 6 Mda5-/- for GSSG, Ν = 8 WT and Ν = 7 Mda5-/- for NAD+, Ν = 6 WT and Ν = 4 Mda5-/- for NAPD+ biologically independent samples in n = 3 independent experiments. Data are presented as mean values ± SD. Two-tailed unpaired t-tests ± SD. Relative mitochondrial mass (E) and membrane potential (F) of aged WT or Mda5-/- HSCs. Ν = 8 WT and Ν = 8 Mda5-/- for (E), Ν = 9 WT and Ν = 10 for (F) biologically independent samples in n = 3 independent experiments. Each dot represents one mouse. Data are presented as mean values ± SD. Two-tailed unpaired t-test. Frequency of committed progenitor populations in the bone marrow of young WT or Mda5-/- mice (G Ν = 4 WT and 3 Mda5-/-biologically independent samples in n = 1 independent experiments, middle-aged WT or Mda5-/- mice (H Ν = 3 WT and 3 Mda5-/-biologically independent samples in n = 1 independent experiments) or aged WT or Mda5-/- mice (I Ν = 9 WT and 11 Mda5-/- for CMPs, Ν = 10 WT and 11 Mda5-/- for GMPs, Ν = 9 WT and 9 Mda5-/- for CLPs and MEPs biologically independent samples in n = 3 independent experiments). CMPs common myeloid progenitors,CLPs common lymphoid progenitors, GMPs granulocyte-macrophages progenitors, MEPs megakaryocytic-erythroid progenitors. Each dot represents one mouse. Data are presented as mean values ± SD. Two-tailed unpaired t-tests. Lineage population distribution in the bone marrow of young (J Ν = 10 WT and 9 Mda5-/-), middle-aged (K Ν = 11) aged (L Ν = 8 WT and 11 Mda5-/- biologically independent samples in n = 3 independent experiments.). Each dot represents one mouse. Data are presented as mean values ± SD. Two-tailed unpaired t-tests.

Next, we evaluated the MPP (multipotent progenitor) composition in the bone marrow of young, middle-aged and aged mice. We observed an expansion of the MPP1 population in both aged WT and Mda5-/- animals, but to a lesser degree in the aged Mda5-/- (Supplementary Fig. 2G). MPP2 cells also accumulated with age, to a similar extent between WT and Mda5-/- animals (Supplementary Fig. 2H). The frequency of MPP3 cells, which represent myeloid-biased progenitor cells50, increased in aged WT mice compared to aged Mda5-/- animals (Supplementary Fig. 2I). Lastly, the MPP4 population, comprised of the lymphoid-prone progenitor cells50, equally declined with age in WT and Mda5-/- animals (Supplementary Fig. 2J). Taken together, these results indicate a myeloid bias within the WT progenitor compartment during aging, which is ameliorated by Mda5 deficiency.

We also assessed the frequency of committed progenitors, including common myeloid progenitors (CMP), granulocytic monocytic progenitors (GMP), megakaryocytic-erythroid progenitors (MEP) and common lymphoid progenitors (CLP), as well as differentiated lineage populations in the bone marrow. While all the population frequencies were comparable in young animals, CMPs and MEPs were decreased while CLPs were increased in middle-aged and aged Mda5-/- compared to age-matched WT mice (Fig. 2G–L).

In conclusion, HSCs tend to accumulate less, and there is less myeloid bias during aging in Mda5-/- animals.

Aged Mda5-/- HSCs are more quiescent and have better repopulation capacity

To functionally investigate the effects of the lack of Mda5 in aging, we first asked whether their quiescent status differs from that of the aged WT HSCs. We isolated HSCs from young, middle-aged, and aged WT and Mda5-/- animals, and we counted the number of cell divisions after 24 and 48 h in culture. The percentage of WT HSCs undergoing at least one division increased during aging, but overall, Mda5-/- HSCs divided less than their WT counterparts at all ages (Fig. 3A and Supplementary Fig. 3A). Similarly, more Mda5-/- HSCs remained in G0 phase at all ages when comparing the cell cycle status of the WT to the Mda5-/- HSCs (Fig. 3B and Supplementary Fig. 3B).

Fig. 3. Aged Mda5-/- HSCs are more quiescent.

Fig. 3

A Percentage of young (N = 6 WT and 7 Mda5-/-), middle-aged (N = 6 WT and 7 Mda5-/-), and aged (N = 14 WT and 14 Mda5-/-), WT or Mda5-/- HSCs that had undergone at least one division or no divisions after 48 h. n = 3 independent experiments. Data are presented as mean values ± SD. Two-tailed Fisher’s exact test. P (aged WT vs. aged Mda5-/-) = 0.000000000009. B Cell cycle status of young (N = 5 WT and 7 Mda5-/-), middle-aged (N = 4 WT and 8 Mda5-/-), and aged (N = 7 WT and 6 Mda5-/-), HSCs. n = 3 independent experiments. Two-way ANOVA. Data are presented as mean values ± SD. P (aged WT vs. aged Mda5-/-) = 0.0000002962; P (young WT vs. middle-aged WT) = 0.0000320493; P (middle-aged WT vs. aged WT) = 0.0000000532; P (young Mda5-/- vs. middle-aged Mda5-/-) = 0.0000000006; P (young WT vs. aged WT) = 0.0000000005; P (young Mda5-/- vs. aged Mda5-/-) = 0.0000000005. Long-term donor hematopoietic (C), myeloid (D), B (E), and T (F) cell chimerism in the peripheral blood of recipient mice from primary non-competitive transplantations. (N = 16 WT and 15 Mda5-/-), biologically independent samples in n = 3 independent experiments. Each dot represents one mouse. Data are presented as mean values ± SD. Two-tailed unpaired t-tests. Long-term donor hematopoietic (G), myeloid (H), B (I), and T (J) cell chimerism in the peripheral blood of recipient mice from secondary non-competitive transplantations. (N = 15 WT and 14 Mda5-/-), biologically independent samples in n = 3 independent experiments. Each dot represents one mouse. Data are presented as mean values ± SD. Two-tailed unpaired t-tests. Competitive HSC transplant of aged WT and Mda5-/- HSCs. Long-term donor hematopoietic (K), granulocytic (L), monocytic (M), B-cell (N), and T-cell (O) chimerism in the peripheral blood of recipient mice from primary-HSC and secondary-bone marrow competitive transplantations. N = 14 for aged WT primary transplantation and N = 7 for secondary aged WT transplantation. N = 12 for aged Mda5-/- primary transplantation and N = 9 for secondary aged Mda5-/- transplantation. Two-tailed t-tests mean ± SD.

Next, we assessed the repopulation capacity in non-competitive transplantations. In these experiments, we transplanted the volume of whole bone marrow containing 300 HSCs from aged WT or Mda5-/- animals (CD45.2) into lethally irradiated recipients (CD45.1). The overall chimerism of Mda5-/- HSCs was significantly higher compared to their WT counterparts, both in primary and secondary transplantations (Fig. 3C–J). However, this reconstitution advantage was lost in competitive transplantations, where the volume of whole bone marrow containing 300 HSCs of either aged WT or Mda5-/- animals (CD45.2) was transplanted with 0.5 million bone marrow cells from a young donor (CD45.1) into lethally irradiated recipients (CD45.1/.2) (Supplementary Fig. 3C–J). Thus, aged Mda5-/- HSCs have better repopulation capacity in a non-competitive setting, but they lose this advantage when competing with young HSCs.

To examine the capacity of WT and Mda5-/- HSCs to repopulate lethally irradiated recipients, we sorted and transplanted 100 LSK-SLAM HSCs from young or aged WT or Mda5-/- mice together with aged-matched CD45.1 competitors into CD45.1 lethally irradiated recipients, followed by whole bone marrow competitive secondary transplantations. Overall, we observed similar total chimerism in the primary competitive transplantations of young and aged WT and Mda5-/- HSCs (Fig. 3K–O and Supplementary Fig. 3K–O). However, the chimerism of young Mda5-/- HSCs was higher in the secondary competitive transplantations when compared to young WT HSCs (Supplementary Fig. 3K), with a significantly higher contribution of CD45.2 donor-derived cells to B cell, T cell, monocyte, and granulocyte populations (Supplementary Fig. 3L–O). One potential explanation for the significantly increased chimerism of the secondary transplants of the young Mda5-/- is the increase in the frequency of the LSKs and HSCs in the primary transplant (not significant due to the transplanted animals with very low chimerism). In contrast, the total and lineage-specific chimerism of aged Mda5-/- HSCs was comparable to the WT counterpart (Fig. 3K–P).

In line with these results, analysis of the bone marrow of primary recipients revealed no significant differences between WT and Mda5-/- in the overall chimerism and the chimerism of lineage-specific and hematopoietic progenitor populations (Supplementary Fig. 4A, C). Yet, the contribution of CD45.2 donor-derived cells in the bone marrow of secondary recipients was higher for young and aged Mda5-/- HSCs (Supplementary Fig. 4B, D). This confirms that both have better reconstitution capacity upon secondary transplantations and indicates that Mda5-/- HSCs show diminished differentiation, potentially due to their more quiescent nature.

Taken together, these results show that aged Mda5-/- are more quiescent and have a better reconstitution capacity in a non-competitive setting, as well as in the bone marrow of secondary competitive transplantations.

Proteostatic pathways are deregulated in middle-aged and aged Mda5-/- HSCs

To investigate the molecular mechanism underlying the youthful phenotype of Mda5-/- HSCs, we performed bulk RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) to compare young, middle-aged, and aged WT and Mda5-/- HSC transcriptomes. Multiple genes were deregulated (fold change 1.5 and FDR < 0.05) in all comparisons, but only ifih1 was significantly deregulated in the comparison between young and ifih1 and another gene were significantly deregulated in middle-aged WT and Mda5-/- HSCs (Supplementary Data Set 5). Concomitantly, principal component analysis (PCA) showed a clear separation of the WT and Mda5-/- HSC aged transcriptomes from the other transcriptomes, while Mda5-/- middle-aged and young HSC transcriptomes clustered together with the WT (Fig. 4A). In detail, one WT and one Mda5-/- young transcriptome clustered closer to the aged transcriptomes (Fig. 4A). We next depicted the top 500 most differentially expressed genes clustered by age, where the aged Mda5-/- HSCs clustered next to the young Mda5-/- HSCs (Fig. 4A). Of note, Ifih1 alias Mda5 was not transcriptionally upregulated during aging in our datasets (Supplementary Data 5) nor in an examined, publicly available, human dataset51. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) showed enrichment for the dormant HSC signature52,53 in young, middle-aged, and aged Mda5-/- HSCs in comparison to the respective WT (Fig. 4B–D), verifying our single-cell division and cell cycle assays. Additionally, the aging signature of Svendsen54 (aging signature 1) and the aging signature hub (https://agingsignature.webhosting.rug.nl/agingsignature) (aging signature 2) were enriched in middle-aged and aged WT in comparison to middle-aged and aged Mda5-/- HSCs (Fig. 4B–D). Ingenuity pathway analysis55 of genes deregulated between aged WT and Mda5-/- HSCs showed enrichment for “eukaryotic translation elongation” and “EIF2 signaling” (Fig. 4E). Of note, we observed that a significant number of deregulated genes (247 genes) were close to induced peaks upon aging (Fig. 4F), suggesting that they experience changes in chromatin accessibility. Both aging signatures were enriched in the middle-aged or aged WT populations when compared to young WT (Fig. 4G). Interestingly, these signatures were enriched in middle-aged Mda5-/- when compared not only with young, but surprisingly also with aged Mda5-/- HSCs (Fig. 4H, I). Collectively, this comprehensive molecular analysis supports our functional analysis and shows that aged Mda5-/- HSCs are transcriptionally younger than their aged WT counterpart.

Fig. 4. HSF1 and EIF2 signaling are deregulated in Mda5-/- HSCs.

Fig. 4

A Principal component analysis of expressed genes from young, middle-aged, and aged WT and Mda5-/- HSCs (BCV: biological coefficient of variation) (left). Heatmap of young, middle-aged, and aged WT versus Mda5-/- HSC top 500 most variably expressed genes, represented as z-scores from log-normalized counts per million (logCPM). (2500 cells per replicate, n = 3 replicates per sample-right). Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of young (B), middle-aged (C), and aged (D) Mda5-/- (left) versus the respective WT (right) RNA-seq data using the indicated gene signatures. E Ingenuity pathway analysis of canonical pathways of aged Mda5-/- versus WT HSCs. F Venn diagram depicting the overlap between the deregulated genes in aged WT versus Mda5-/- HSC and the induced peaks in aged Mda5-/- HSC ATACseq. The hypergeometric test shows the significance of the overlap. GJ Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of the indicated transcriptomes using the indicated gene signatures. K Ingenuity pathway upstream regulator analysis for HSF1 at the indicated transcriptomes.

The master regulator of heat shock response and proteostasis is the transcription factor HSF1, which has been found to increase its concentration in the nucleus of aged and middle-aged HSCs33. We performed GSEA analysis using the transcriptomic signature from the study by Kruta et al.33 (HSF1 signature), and we observed enrichment in middle-aged WT HSCs when compared to young WT or middle-aged Mda5-/- HSCs (Fig. 4J). Additionally, upstream regulator analysis from Ingenuity pathway analysis revealed HSF1 as an upstream regulator in all ages in WT and Mda5-/- HSCs (Fig. 4K), suggesting that it is an important regulator of HSC aging. We then performed Ingenuity pathway analysis for all the different comparisons. The categories for “eukaryotic translation elongation” or “EIF2 signaling” were enriched especially in Mda5-/- transcriptomes and at advanced ages. Finally, we observed enrichment of PKR signaling in middle-aged Mda5-/- HSCs (Supplementary Fig. 5A).

Thus, translation and cellular response to heat stress, both maintaining proteostasis, are important in Mda5-/- HSCs.

Transposable elements are upregulated during aging

Since transposable elements (TE) are deregulated during aging26, and we and others have previously shown that they can act as ligands for MDA519,20,22,23, we next analyzed our RNA-seq data for TE expression (Fig. 5A). We found that TE families were upregulated when comparing aged to young or to middle-aged HSCs. We observed 165 up and 3 downregulated TE families in aged WT HSCs compared to young HSCs, and 622 up and 2 down when comparing aged versus middle-aged WT HSCs (fold change 1.5, FDR < 0.05) (Supplementary Data 6). Interestingly, more TEs were upregulated in Mda5-/- HSCs. Indeed, 631 TE families were up, and 6 were downregulated in aged versus young Mda5-/- HSCs, and 764 TE families were up and 2 downregulated when we compared aged to middle-aged Mda5-/- HSCs. Very few or no differentially expressed TEs were detected between young (0), middle-aged (0), or aged (1) WT and Mda5-/- HSCs (Supplementary Data 6). Lastly, to verify the presence of double-stranded RNA in the cytoplasm of young, middle-aged, and aged WT and Mda5-/- HSCs, we performed a staining with anti-double-stranded RNA antibody. Indeed, we observed an increase in mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) in both WT and Mda5-/- HSCs upon aging (Fig. 5B–D).

Fig. 5. Transposable elements are increased during aging.

Fig. 5

A Heatmap depicting the z-score of expression of transposable elements from bulk RNA seq for young, middle-aged, and aged Mda5-/- and WT HSCs. Double-stranded RNA staining in young (B), middle-aged (C), and aged (D) HSCs (scale bar 10 μm). Quantification of mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of dsRNA in HSCs in middle age C (N = 11 WT and 12 Mda5-/-HSCs) and aged D (N = 26 WT and 26 Mda5-/- HSCs) WT or Mda5-/- HSCs, n = 2 and n = 3 independent experiments respectively, each dot represents one cell. Two-tailed t-tests, median.

Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals a link between Mda5 and translation

To understand the cellular and molecular heterogeneity, we performed single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) in LSK cells isolated from young and aged WT and Mda5-/- animals. We applied known gene signatures to assign the cells to HSCs and MPP1–5 populations in both young and aged WT and Mda5-/- datasets5658 (Fig. 6A, B, and Supplementary Fig. 6A, B). Cells were then ordered by slingshot59 pseudotime. The HSC population was placed at the top of the pseudotime ordering, followed by the MPP5/MPP1 or MPP5 populations, in agreement with previous findings that placed these populations in close proximity to HSCs both molecularly and biologically56 (Fig. 6C, D and Supplementary Fig. 6C, D). Additionally, we performed pseudobulk analysis on the HSC/MPP1 cluster on young and aged Mda5-/- versus WT datasets, detecting 214 upregulated and 21 downregulated in the young and 57 upregulated and 25 downregulated in the aged HSCs (Fig. 6E and Supplementary Data 7, cut-offs: Log2FC 0.5 and FDR < 0.05). Concomitantly, analysis of aged WT and Mda5-/- versus young HSC/MPP1 populations revealed numerous deregulated genes (Fig. 6E and Supplementary Data 7).

Fig. 6. scRNA-seq of LSK WT and Mda5-/- cells.

Fig. 6

Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) projections of WT and Mda5-/- LSK single-cell transcriptomes from three young (A) and two aged (B) donors, respectively, highlighting the different hematopoietic populations. Differentiation trajectory of cell type clusters represented in pseudotime ordering inferred by slingshot for integrated young (C) and aged (D) datasets. E Heatmap top 500 most variably expressed genes, represented as z-scores from log-normalized counts per million (logCPM) detected by pseudobulk analysis on the HSC/MPP1 cluster for young and aged Mda5-/- and WT HSCs. F Ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) of canonical pathways for the indicated comparisons.

To assess whether we could observe similar results in the multipotent progenitor populations, we clustered the MPP3 and MPP4 top 500 genes (Supplementary Fig. 6E, F and Supplementary Data 812). We observed 23 upregulated genes in aged Mda5-/- versus WT, while 276 were up and 49 were downregulated when comparing young Mda5-/- and WT MPP3 populations. Similarly, 20 genes were up, and 12 were downregulated in aged Mda5-/- versus WT, and 162 were up, and 66 were downregulated in young Mda5-/- and WT MPP4 populations (Supplementary Data 812). Ingenuity pathway analysis revealed an enrichment of “EIF2 signaling”, “PKR-mediated signaling”, and “unfolded protein response” categories in both HSC/MMP1 and MPP3, but not MPP4, aged populations. Additionally, “aggrephagy” and “cell cycle checkpoints” were enriched in young HSC/MPP1, MPP3, and MPP4 populations. Lastly, HSF1 was identified as an upstream regulator of deregulated genes in young HSC/MPP1, MPP3, and MPP4 and aged MPP3 (Fig. 6F).

Taken together, these results are in line with our bulk RNA-seq analysis and further show that the MPP3 population may undergo transcriptional changes similar to the HSC population, especially in terms of proteostasis and protein translation.

Aged Mda5-/- HSCs exhibit enhanced PERK signaling

We have previously observed that EIF2 signaling is transcriptionally enriched in Mda5-/- HSCs. Stress in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) leads to the unfolded protein response (UPR). The PERK-induced branch of the UPR is responsible for the phosphorylation of the EIF2a, which is in turn is responsible for blocking translation60. To delineate the order of events in our datasets, we performed GSEA analysis and observed that the endoplasmic-reticulum-associated protein degradation (ERAD pathway) is enriched both in the middle-aged and aged WT and Mda5-/- HSCs (Fig. 7A, B). However, the PERK branch was enriched only in the middle-aged and aged Mda5-/- HSCs (Fig. 7C). To assess EIF2a phosphorylation status downstream of the PERK pathway, we performed phospho-EIF2a staining in young, middle-aged aged and aged WT and Mda5-/- HSCs. Interestingly, phospho-EIF2a levels were comparable in young and middle-aged WT and Mda5-/- HSCs, but we detected an increased signal in aged Mda5-/- HSCs, verifying that this signaling is activated primarily in Mda5-/- HSCs (Fig. 7D).

Fig. 7. EIF2 is deregulated in Mda5-/- HSCs.

Fig. 7

Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of WT (A) middle-aged versus young and aged versus young and Mda5-/- (B, C) middle-aged versus young and aged versus young RNA-seq data using the indicated gene signatures. D Phospho-EIF2a staining in young, middle-aged, and aged WT and Mda5-/- HSCs (scale bar 10 μm). Quantification of mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of phospho-EIF2a in HSCs in young (Ν = 7 WT and 10 Mda5-/-HSCs in n = 1 independent experiment), middle-aged (Ν = 19 WT and 21 Mda5-/-HSCs in n = 3 independent experiment), and aged WT or Mda5-/- HSCs, (Ν = 34 WT and 31 Mda5-/-HSCs in n = 3 independent experiment), each dot represents one cell. Two-tailed t-tests, median.

Aged Mda5-/- HSCs exhibit enhanced proteostasis

Since HSF1 and EIF2a are involved in the maintenance of protein homeostasis, we next assessed proteostasis in aged Mda5-/- and WT HSCs. We exploited two previously established assays to evaluate the abundance of misfolded and unfolded proteins, by quantifying ubiquitinated proteins and tetraphenylethene maleimide (TPE-MI)39,61 labeled proteins by flow cytometry, respectively. Aged Mda5-/- HSCs exhibited a significantly lower amount of misfolded and unfolded proteins compared to the WT counterparts (Fig. 8A, B). We detected a similar trend in middle-aged Mda5-/- HSCs compared to WT (Supplementary Fig. 7A, B). The protein levels in young and aged WT and Mda5-/- HSCs were similar, albeit a bit more in the Mda5-/- HSCs (Supplementary Fig. 7C). To investigate whether the enhanced quiescence of Mda5-/- HSCs leads to fewer misfolded proteins, we combined the misfolded protein assay with the cell cycle staining. Interestingly, we observed reduced accumulation of misfolded proteins in G0 aged Mda5-/- HSCs compared to the WT counterpart (Supplementary Fig. 7D). Additionally, protein synthesis rate, measured using O-propargyl-puromycin (OP-Puro) incorporation, was significantly lower in aged Mda5-/- HSCs compared to aged WT HSCs (Fig. 8C). We hypothesized that these translational changes might have an impact on intracellular amino acid availability. Indeed, our intracellular metabolomic analysis on aged WT and Mda5-/- HSCs showed an increased concentration of amino acids in Mda5-/- HSCs (Fig. 8D). Collectively, these results align with the increased phospho-EIF2a observed in aged Mda5-/- HSCs (Fig. 7D) and support the hypothesis that amino acid accumulation in Mda5-/- HSCs is due to a reduced protein synthesis rate.

Fig. 8. Aged Mda5-/- HSCs exhibit enhanced proteostasis.

Fig. 8

Relative accumulation of misfolded (A N = 8 WT and 9 aged Mda5-/-HSCs in n = 3 independent experiment) and unfolded (B Ν = 9 WT and 8 aged Mda5-/-HSCs in n = 3 independent experiment) proteins in aged WT or Mda5-/-, normalized to the corresponding WT mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). Each dot represents one mouse. Data are presented as mean values ± SD. Two-tailed unpaired t-tests. For A: P (aged WT vs. aged Mda5-/-) = 0.0000007. C Relative protein synthesis in aged WT or Mda5-/-, normalized to the corresponding WT mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). Ν = 7 WT and 6 aged Mda5-/-HSCs biologically independent samples in n = 2 independent experiments. Each dot represents one mouse. Data are presented as mean values ± SD. Two-tailed unpaired t-tests. D Fold change of intracellular amino acid concentrations of aged WT or Mda5-/- HSCs, relative to WT control. Ν = 4 WT and 4 aged Mda5-/- for arginine, isoleucine, N = 7 WT and 6 aged Mda5-/-for lysine, N = 4 WT and 5 aged Mda5-/-for methionine and ornithine, N = 5 WT and 6 aged Mda5-/-for phenylalanine, N = 5 WT and 5 aged Mda5-/-for proline, N = 4 WT and 7 aged Mda5-/-for serine, N = 5 WT and 6 aged Mda5-/-for threonine, N = 3 WT and 7 aged Mda5-/-for tryptophan, N = 3 WT and 3 aged Mda5-/-for tyrosine, and N = 6 WT and 6 aged Mda5-/-for valine in n = 3 independent experiments. Data are presented as mean values ± SD. Two-tailed unpaired t-tests. E Relative autophagic flux in aged WT or Mda5-/-, normalized to the corresponding WT mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). N = 10 WT and N = 9 Mda5-/- biologically independent samples in n = 3 independent experiments. Each dot represents one mouse. Data are presented as mean values ± SD. Two-tailed unpaired t-tests. F Representative immunofluorescence staining showing HSF1 expression in young, middle-aged, and aged WT or Mda5-/- HSCs (Scale bar 10 μm). G Quantification of mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of HSF1 in HSCs in young (Ν = 14 WT and 21 Mda5-/- HSCs), middle-aged (Ν = 19 WT and 12 Mda5-/- HSCs), and aged (Ν = 31 WT and 33 Mda5-/- HSCs), n = 3 independent experiments, each dot represents one cell. Two-tailed t-tests, median. H Proximity ligation assay for MDA5 and HSF1. PLA spots can be detected in red. The nucleus is stained with DAPI, and the cytoplasm with Mitotracker in yellow. Scale bar = 50 μm. Representative figures from one of the three experiments done. I Percentage of DMSO (Ν = 5 WT and 6 Mda5-/-) or HSF1A-treated (Ν = 5 WT and 5 Mda5-/-) aged WT or Mda5-/- HSCs that had undergone at least one division or no divisions after 48 h. n = 2 independent experiments. Data are presented as mean values ± SD. Two-tailed Fisher’s exact test. P (aged WT DMSO vs. aged WT HSF1A) = 0.000007. J Fold change of colonies formed by either aged WT or Mda5-/- HSCs, cultured in Methocult treated with either DMSO or HSF1A. Normalized to DMSO-treated WT HSCs. N = 11 biologically independent samples in n = 4 independent experiments. Data are presented as mean values ± SD. Two-way ANOVA. P (aged WT DMSO vs. aged WT HSF1A) < 0.000000000000001; P (aged Mda5-/- DMSO vs. aged Mda5-/- HSF1A) = 0.000000000001341.

Autophagy has been implicated in the maintenance of protein homeostasis in response to stress62,63. Additionally, PERK signaling has been shown to lead to an induction of autophagy35. Recently, it has been shown that quiescent HSCs have a high autophagic flux, while aging has also been associated with impaired autophagy37,39,64. Consistent with these results, we observed a significant increase in the autophagic flux in aged Mda5-/- HSCs compared to WT (Fig. 8E). Taken together, these data indicate that aged Mda5-/- HSCs retain enhanced proteostasis and autophagic activity.

As a master regulator of protein homeostasis, HSF1 is activated under stress conditions and translocates into the nucleus to trigger a transcriptional response30,31. To evaluate HSF1 localization and abundance, we performed immunofluorescence staining on isolated young, middle-aged, and aged WT and Mda5-/- HSCs. HSF1 levels were similar in young WT and Mda5-/- HSCs, increased in middle-aged WT but not Mda5-/- HSCs, and significantly increased in aged Mda5-/- HSCs compared to age-matched WT counterparts (Fig. 8F, G). As we did not observe changes in HSF1 transcript levels upon aging (Supplementary Data 5), our results agree with Kruta et al.33, in which they described HSF1 upregulation, at least at the protein level, upon aging and already in middle-aged cells. To further strengthen these results, we performed a similar staining using an antibody against phosphorylated HSF1 (pSer326), which marks HSF1 activation. Similarly, we observed reduced accumulation of phospho-HSF1 in middle-aged Mda5-/- HSCs. Increased levels of phospho-HSF1 were detected in aged Mda5-/- HSCs, albeit this result was not significant (Supplementary Fig. 6E, F).

To investigate whether MDA5 can retain HSF1 in the cytoplasm, we overexpressed MDA5 in HEK293T cells and stained for HSF1 to assess its localization. In HEK293T cells, HSF1 is localized in the nucleus. We observed that overexpression of full-length MDA5 was enough to keep a portion of HSF1 in the cytoplasm (Supplementary Fig. 7G, H). However, HSF1 was not tethered in the cytoplasm upon overexpression of a mutant that lacks both CARD domains (Supplementary Fig. 7G, H). Lastly, proximity ligation assay revealed that MDA5 and HSF1 are found in proximity (Fig. 8H), suggesting a potential interaction between these two proteins. To our surprise, we observed both nuclear and cytoplasmic staining for the proximity ligation assay, hinting at the fact that MDA5 may also be in the nucleus.

Because HSF1 protein levels were increased and localized in the nucleus in Mda5-/- HSCs, we reasoned that HSF1 activation could lead to the alteration of Mda5-/- and WT phenotypes, respectively. HSF1A is a small molecule inhibitor of TRiC chaperonin (chaperonin that keeps HSF1 in the cytoplasm) and functions as HSF1 activator (HSF1A), by preventing TRiC binding to HSF1, thus permitting its trimerization and translocation to the nucleus33,65. Therefore, we reasoned that the HSF1A inhibitor could induce aged WT HSCs to behave like aged Mda5-/- HSCs. Indeed, HSF1A treatment enhanced aged WT HSC quiescence by decreasing their ability to divide in culture (Fig. 8I). In addition, we performed serial colony-forming unit (CFU) assays by plating HSCs in methylcellulose and replating a similar number of cells every week. This assay evaluates the in vitro repopulation capacity of HSCs. Indeed, the inhibitor of HSF1 that made the cells more quiescent led to the enhanced capacity of aged WT HSCs to produce colonies after the third replating, suggesting that they can keep their in vitro self-renewal capacity (Fig. 8J).

These data suggest that a lack of Mda5 can delay the aging process in the HSC compartment by retaining effective proteostasis through HSF1 engagement and reduction of protein translation.

Discussion

Increased inflammatory signaling is a hallmark of aging, and manipulation of inflammaging has been proposed as a strategy to alleviate symptoms of aging66. DNA sensors like cGAS (GMP-AMP (cGAMP) synthase) and the cGAS/STING (stimulator of interferon genes) pathway have been implicated in age-related senescence67 and inflammation, especially in the brain in conjunction with neurodegeneration6870. However, the role of RNA sensors and the causal relation between inflammaging and tissue dysfunction in aging remains largely unknown. Here, we examined the function of the innate immune sensor MDA5 in delaying hematopoietic aging. Since TEs and mitochondrial RNA can activate MDA519,20,22,23,71,72, it is therefore possible that the accumulation of TEs observed during aging by this and other studies26,73 or mitochondrial RNA, leads to activation of MDA5 signaling. This activation is evidenced by the decrease in multiple inflammatory cytokines in the absence of MDA5. However, the function of inflammation in blood rejuvenation is currently understudied. Parabiosis experiments have implicated inflammatory signals indirectly since rejuvenation of multiple tissues can be achieved with the transfusion of young blood74, while aging features can be induced in young animals by old blood7578. Other studies showed that aged HSCs are refractory to systemic rejuvenation intervention delivered via the blood stream79. In another study, the microbiome/IL-1/IL-1R1 axis was proven to be key for hematopoietic aging, and manipulation of this axis could lead to better repopulation capacity and reversal of myeloid bias7. However, constant treatment with PolyI:C, which activates MDA5, has been shown to lead to hematopoietic aging15. Here, we provide evidence that a lack of MDA5 delays HSC aging, enhances the repopulation capacity, and counteracts myeloid bias, but also improves various metabolic aspects of HSCs isolated from aged mice. Although we primarily focused on the intrinsic properties of HSCs, we anticipate that low-grade inflammation will lead to the amelioration of aging phenotypes in other cell populations in the bone marrow and the bone marrow niche. Collectively, this could contribute to the retention of a youthful phenotype as seen in Mda5-/- animals.

HSC metabolism has key differences between development and aging80,81. Decreased autophagy37 and proteasomal degradation82, enhanced mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and increased ROS production83,84 are characteristics of younger HSCs. Additionally, mitochondrial potentiation ameliorates age-related heterogeneity in HSC function48. Here we see increased mitochondrial mass and TMRM, with additional increased autophagy and reduced translation. Specific metabolites that have been associated with youthful phenotypes, like decreased GSSG43 and increased NAD+ and NADP+44, attest to a younger phenotype of HSPCs. Amino acids that are usually in excess in MPPs rather than in HSCs85 are elevated in Mda5-/- HSCs that also show low translational output, usually attributed to HSCs rather than MPPs28,86.

Overall, transcriptional changes observed in aged Mda5-/- HSCs versus WT pointed to HSF1 as an upstream regulator and the UPR being deregulated in Mda5-/- HSCs. Indeed, HSF1 has been instrumental in HSCs upon stress or aging33. Here we show that HSF1 activation can induce quiescence and improve in vitro repopulation capacity in WT HSCs, in line with the in vivo results described by Kruta et al.33. Proximity ligation assay showed that MDA5 is proximal to HSF1, and chaperones of HSF1, like HSP40, have been previously found to interact with MDA587. It is possible that these interactions keep HSF1 away from chromatin. This is also in agreement with our experiment, in which we observed partial retention of HSF1 in the cytoplasm upon MDA5 overexpression. An alternative scenario could be that HSF1 is activated in middle-aged animals, as previously shown33, and is retained in Mda5-/- HSCs due to their quiescent phenotype and the consequent decreased divisional history. However, in this case, any manipulation that retains HSCs in quiescence should lead to increased proteostasis. Indeed, very few data exist on the transcriptional signature of aged HSCs with deficiency of inflammatory factors that usually remain more quiescent than their WT counterparts. The transcriptional signature of aged IL1R1-KO HSCs does not contain any proteostatic terms7. These results do not preclude that a non-cell-autonomous mechanism exists, and it would be interesting to examine whether youthfulness of other tissues besides the hematopoietic system happens in the absence of MDA5. Additionally, our results show that proteostasis is maintained by phosphorylation of EIF2a in the aged Mda5-/- HSCs. This could be due to the higher activation of PERK signaling, as we see in our transcriptomic signatures, but it could also be due to the activation of PKR by TEs, since we see significantly more activation of PKR in middle-aged Mda5-/- HSCs.

A caveat of our manuscript is the inability to say if the function of MDA5 in aging starts during aging or much earlier, when the organism is young. Our experiments point to many changes in middle-aged and aged Mda5-/- HSCs that should contribute to a scenario where the function of MDA5, at least in proteostasis, starts at middle age. However, the transplantation experiments argue for better function of Mda5-/- HSCs from a young age.

Mutations in IFIH1/MDA5 in humans are associated with Singleton-Merten Syndrome and Aicardi–Goutières syndrome. Moreover, IFIH1 SNPs (single-nucleotide polymorphisms) are associated with an increased risk of type 1 diabetes. Antibodies against MDA5 are associated with amyopathic dermatomyositis with rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease. Most of the diseases were associated with mutations that enhance the function of MDA5. Here, we propose that the absence of MDA5 leads to delayed aging. A recent preprint describes the whole-body delayed aging of Mda5-/- animals and shows improved motor functions and longer lifespan in aged Mda5-/- mice. Indeed, in this study, the frailty test showed that Mda5-/- mice are less frail and perform better in a grip test. They also have a longer lifespan88. It is difficult to mimic an aging study in human cells. As previously stated, Mda5 is not induced during aging in either mouse or human. However, we could envision a situation in which MDA5 absence, low inflammation, induced proteostasis, low translation, and higher autophagy would be beneficial for human health and life span.

Altogether, our data point to an interplay between the innate immune sensing pathways and protein homeostasis mechanisms in HSCs. This is common in long-lived animals like bats, which exhibit low inflammation, higher autophagy, and increased expression of heat shock proteins to maintain proteostasis89. In agreement with these observations, we show that the absence of MDA5 leads to delayed aging, and this is at least partly due to retained proteostasis.

Method

Mice

All mouse experiments were carried out in accordance with the guidelines of the Federation of European Laboratory Animal Science Association and following legal approval of the Regierungspräsidium Freiburg and the Animal Care and Use Committee of the French authorities-Ciepal Azur (35-9185.81/G-18/127, 35-9185.81/G-22/058, PEA845 or apafis 2022062916507603_v5). All of the animals were maintained at the animal facility of the Max Planck Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics or at the IRCAN facility under specific pathogen-free conditions in individually ventilated cages with a light-dark cycle of 12–12 h at 20–24 °C under 45–65% humidity. For all genotypes, gender matched female or male mice were used in the experiments, and experimental and control mice were co-housed in the same facility rooms. Mice were euthanized with cervical dislocation or CO2 followed by cervical dislocation. HSC transplantations were performed at St. Jude Children’s Hospital. The transplantation procedure was performed according to protocols approved by the St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, under animal protocol #3096.

Mda5-/- mice or B6.129X1(C)-Ifih1tm1.1Cln/J were purchased from Jackson Laboratory Strain #:015812. CD45.1 BL6 mice were bred in MPI-IE unless otherwise stated (Jax Strain #:002014). CD45.1 JAXBoy mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratory (C57BL/6J-Ptprcem6Lutzy/J, JAX stock #033076).

Antibodies

The following antibodies were purchased from BioLegend and used at a dilution 1:500 dilution unless stated otherwise: anti-CD45.2/Ly5.2 (Pacific Blue or FITC, 104); anti-CD45.1/Ly5.1 (Alexa Fluor 700 or Pe/Cy7, A20); anti-CD45 (FITC, 1:1000, 30-F11); anti-CD45R/B220 (BV650 or Alexa Fluor 700 or FITC or PE/Cy7 or biotin, RA3-6B2); anti-Ly6G/Ly6C (Gr1, BV650 or PE/Cy7 or APC, 1:1000, FITC or biotin, 1:1600, RB6-8C5); anti-CD11b (BV650 or PE/Cy7 or APC/Cy7, 1:1000, FITC or biotin, 1:1600, M1/70); anti-TER119 (BV650 or PE/Cy7, 1:1000, FITC or biotin, 1:1600, TER119); anti-CD3ε (BV650 or PE/Cy7, 1:1000, FITC or biotin, 1:1600, 145-2C11); anti-NK-1.1 (FITC, PK136); anti-CD19 (FITC, 1D3/CD19; anti-CD4 (PE/Cy5 or FITC, 1:1000, RM4-5); anti-CD8a (PE/Cy5 or FITC, 1:2000, 53-6.7); anti-CD117 (cKit, BV711, 1:1000, 2B8); anti-Ly-6A/E (Sca1, PE/Cy7 or APC/Cy7, 1:400, E13-161.7); anti-CD201 (EPCR, PE or APC, 1:200, RCR-16); anti-CD150 (SLAM, PE/Dazzle™ 594 or BV421, 1:400, TC15-12F12.2); anti-CD48 (PE/Cy7 or APC/Cy7, 1:400, or BV421, 1:1000, HM48-1); anti-CD34 (FITC, 1:50, SA376A4); anti-CD135/Flk2 (PE or APC, 1:200, A2F10); anti-Ki67 (FITC or PE, 1:100, 16A8); anti-CD16/32 (APC or PE, 1:1000, 93); anti-CD127 (IL-7Rα, APC or PE, 1:1000, A7R34); goat anti-mouse IgG, IgM (H + L) secondary (1:2500, Alexa Fluor 488, A-10680, Invitrogen) See also Supplementary Table 1.

Sorting strategy

Throughout the text, HSCs refer to EPCR SLAM cells (LinEPCR+CD150+CD48 unless otherwise stated. LSK SLAM: LinSca1+cKit+(LSK) CD150+CD48; LT-HSCs: LSKCD150+CD48CD34CD135; MPP1: LSKCD150+CD48CD34+CD135; MPP2: LSKCD150+CD48+CD34+CD135; MPP3: LSKCD150CD48+CD34+CD135; MPP4: LSKCD150CD48+CD34+CD135+.

HSC isolation, flow cytometry and cell sorting

Tibiae, femurs, and hip bones were isolated and crushed in PBS. Cells were washed with FACS buffer (PBS, 2% FCS, 1 mM EDTA) and counted Vi-cell XR counter (Beckman Coulter).

-For lineage quantification, HSPC characterization, 3 × 106 cells were stained with antibody mix in FACS buffer for 30 min at 4 °C. Sample acquisition was performed using a Fortessa FACS analyzer (BD Biosciences). All data were analyzed using FlowJo (BD) software.

-For sorting, samples were enriched by lineage depletion using a biotin-conjugated lineage antibodies cocktail (CD3ε, CD11b, CD45R/B220, Ly6G/Ly6C, TER-119) for 20 min at 4 °C. Streptavidin nanobeads (MojoSort, 480016, BioLegend) were added for 20 min at 4 °C, with subsequent magnetic separation for 5 min at room temperature. Enriched samples were stained with an antibody mix in FACS buffer against EPCR, CD150, and CD48 for 30 min at 4 °C. Cells were washed and resuspended in 1 ml FACS buffer, and sorting was performed on a BD FACSAriaIII or a BD FACSAriaFusion (BD Biosciences).

Ex vivo HSC culture

HSCs or lineage-depleted cells were cultured in StemPro-34 SFM medium with 2.5% StemPro-34 Supplement (Gibco), 50 ng/ml mSCF, 25 ng/ml mTPO, 30 ng/ml mFlt3L, 1% penicillin-streptomycin, and 2 mM l-glutamine.

Single-cell division assay

HSCs were single sorted on Terasaki microtest plates (654102, Greiner) in the medium described above. For HSF1 treatment, DMSO or HSF1A (8 μM final concentration, Axon 1890, Axon MedChem) was added to the medium before sorting. The frequencies presented in the single cell division assay plots were calculated for each Terasaki plate separately and independently as follows:

  • Frequency of HSCs that did not divide = number of wells with one sorted HSC that did not divide/total number of wells in the Terasaki plate with live sorted HSCs

  • Frequency of HSCs that divided at least once = number of wells with sorted HSC that did divide/total number of wells in the Terasaki plate with live sorted HSCs

Empty wells or wells containing dead cells were not included in the frequency calculations. Fisher’s exact test was performed considering the total number of wells across all different independent experiments.

Cell cycle staining

Samples were isolated and enriched as described above. 3 × 106 lineage-negative cells were stained with the antibody mix in FACS buffer for 30 min at 4 °C to identify HSCs. Then, cells were washed and resuspended in fixed intracellular Fixation Buffer (00-8222-49, ThermoFisher Scientific) for 10 min at 4 °C. Samples were then washed and resuspended in permeabilization buffer (00-8333-56, ThermoFisher Scientific) with anti-Ki67 antibodies for 2 h at 4 °C. Lastly, cells were washed and resuspended in PBS with Hoechst 33258 (H3569, Life Technologies) at room temperature for at least 15 min before acquisition. Sample acquisition was performed using a Fortessa FACS analyzer (BD Biosciences). All data were analyzed using FlowJo (BD) software.

Colony-forming unit assay

Two hundred HSCs were sorted in 1 ml Mouse MethoCult GF medium (M3434, StemCell Technologies) and plated in 35 mm petri dishes. DMSO, HSF1A (8 μM final concentration, Axon 1890, Axon MedChem) was added to the medium before each plating. Colonies were counted after 5–7 days at 37 °C and 5% CO2. For replating, cells were washed with PBS, counted, and replated (10,000 cells of each replicate) in MethoCult GF (M3434, StemCell Technologies). Colonies were quantified after 4–5 days, after the second and third replating.

Whole bone marrow transplantations

Aged WT and Mda5-/- mice (CD45.2+/Ly5.2) were used as donors, young WT mice (CD45.1+/Ly5.1) were used as competitors in competitive transplantations and as recipients in non-competitive transplantations. Young WT mice (CD45.1+/CD45.2+) were used as recipients in competitive transplantations. We calculated the HSC frequency of the donors and intravenously injected the volume of bone marrow containing 300 HSCs into lethally irradiated (9.5 Gy) recipients. In competitive transplantations, we additionally injected 500,000 competitor-derived bone marrow cells. Peripheral blood chimerism was checked every 4 weeks after transplantation for 16 weeks. Briefly, 20 μl of blood was obtained from the submandibular vein using a lancet. Erythroid cells were lysed in ammonium-chloride-potassium (ACK, BP10-548E, Lonza Bioscience) for 5 min at room temperature. Cells were washed with PBS and stained for 30 min at 4 °C with anti-CD45.1/Ly5.1, anti-CD45.2/Ly5.2, anti-CD4, anti-CD8a, anti-CD11b, anti-Ly6G/Ly6C, anti-CD45R/B220, and anti-Ter119 antibodies. After washing and resuspending in FACS buffer, samples were acquired on a Fortessa FACS analyzer (BD Biosciences). All data were analyzed using FlowJo (BD) software.

HSC transplantations

Transplantations were performed using the CD45.1/CD45.2 congenic system. Recipient CD45.1 JAXBoy mice (C57BL/6J-Ptprcem6Lutzy/J, JAX stock #033076) (10 weeks old) were lethally irradiated with 11 Gy delivered in a split dose of 5.5 Gy each, at least 3 h apart, using a gamma irradiator with a 137Cs source. Recipients were treated with Sulfamethoxazole/Trimethoprim in drinking water for 7 days before the transplant and for 21 days post-transplant. On the day of the transplant, 100 FACS-sorted donor HSCs (Lin-Sca1+c-kit+CD135CD48CD150+) were injected into the tail vein along with 2 × 105 of whole bone marrow cells isolated from age-matched CD45.1 JAXBoy mice. Hematopoietic reconstitution in peripheral blood was monitored by flow cytometry every 4 weeks, and the primary recipients were euthanized 16 weeks post-transplant. For the secondary transplantation, bone marrow of primary recipients injected with HSCs from the same donor mice was pooled, and 3 × 106 of pooled whole bone marrow cells were delivered via tail vein injections into lethally irradiated CD45.1 JAXBoy secondary recipients. Hematopoietic reconstitution in peripheral blood was monitored by flow cytometry every 4 weeks. The secondary recipients were euthanized 16 weeks post-transplant. The following cell populations were analyzed in the peripheral blood and bone marrow of transplant recipients using flow cytometry: granulocytes (Mac1+Grihi), monocytes (Mac1+Grilo), B cells (CD19+), T cells (CD3+), LSK (LinSca1+c-kit+), SLAM LSK (LinSca1+c-kit+CD135CD48CD150+), MPP2 (LinSca1+c-kit+CD135CD48+CD150+), MPP3 (LinSca1+c-kit+CD135CD48+CD150), MPP4 (LinSca1+c-kit+CD135+CD150). Lineage (Lin) cocktail contained the following antibodies: CD19, B220, CD3, Mac1 (CD11b), Gr1 (Ly-6G/Ly-6C), CD11c, and Ter119. The following antibodies were used for flow cytometry: APC anti-mouse/human CD11b (Biolegend, 101212, M1/70, 1/250), APC anti-mouse Ly-6A/E (Sca-1) (Biolegend, 108112, D7, 1/250), APC/cyanine7 anti-mouse CD19 (Biolegend, 115529, 6D5, 1/250), brilliant violet 421 anti-mouse CD117 (c-Kit) (Biolegend, 105828, 2B8, 1/250), brilliant violet 421 anti-mouse CD3ε (Biolegend, 100341, 145-2C11, 1/250), brilliant Violet 605 anti-mouse CD150 (SLAM) (Biolegend, 115927, TC15-12F12.2, 1/1000), brilliant violet 605 anti-mouse CD19 (Biolegend, 115539, 6D5, 1/250), brilliant violet 605 anti-mouse CD45.1 (Biolegend, 110737, A20, 1/1000), brilliant violet 605 anti-mouse CD45.2 (Biolegend, 109841, 104, 1/250), eBioscience Fixable Viability Dye eFluor 780 (Thermofisher, 65-0865-14, 1/2000), FITC anti-mouse CD11c (Biolegend, 117306, N418, 1/250), FITC anti-mouse CD19 (Biolegend, 152404, 1D3/CD19, 1/250), FITC anti-mouse CD3ε (Biolegend, 100306, 145-2C11, 1/250), FITC anti-mouse CD45.2 (Biolegend, 109806, 104, 1/250), FITC anti-mouse Ly-6G/Ly-6C (Gr-1) (Biolegend, 108406, RBC6-8C5, 1/500), FITC anti-mouse TER-119 (Biolegend, 116206, TER-119, 1/250), FITC anti-mouse/human CD11b (Biolegend, 101206, M1/70, 1/250), FITC anti-mouse/human CD45R/B220 (Biolegend, 103206, RA3-6B2, 1/250), PE anti-mouse CD135 (Biolegend, 135306, A2F10, 1/500), PE anti-mouse Ly-6G/Ly-6C (Gr-1) (Biolegend, 108408, RBC6-8C5, 1/2000), PE/cyanine7 anti-mouse CD45.2 (Biolegend, 109830, 104, 1/250), and PerCP/cyanine5.5 anti-mouse CD48 (Biolegend, 103422, HM48-1, 1/500). See also Supplementary Table 1.

Cytokine quantification

The LEGENDplex mouse inflammation panel (740150, BioLegend) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, after crushing the bones, the cell suspension was centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 5 min at 4 °C. The bone marrow supernatant was then collected in a separate tube and stored at −80 °C until further use. Samples were diluted 1:1 in PBS, incubated with beads conjugated with the respective antibodies, and analyzed on a Fortessa FACS analyzer (BD Biosciences). All data were analyzed using FlowJo (BD) software.

Misfolded (polyubiquitinated) protein quantification

2 × 106 lineage-depleted cells were stained with the antibody mix in FACS buffer for 30 min at 4 °C to identify HSCs. Cells were washed and resuspended in 1% PFA for 10 min at room temperature. Samples were then washed and incubated overnight with 1:500 primary pan-ubiquitin antibody (clone FK2, 04-262, Sigma) in permeabilization buffer (00-8333-56, ThermoFisher Scientific). Then, cells were washed and resuspended with 1:2500 goat anti-mouse IgG1 secondary antibody in permeabilization buffer at 4 °C for at least 2 h. After washing and resuspending in FACS buffer, samples were acquired on a Fortessa FACS analyzer (BD Biosciences). All data were analyzed using FlowJo (BD) software. For measurement of misfolded proteins in G0 HSCs cells were washed and resuspended with 1:2500 goat anti-mouse IgG1 secondary antibody in permeabilization buffer at 4 °C for 2 h, along with anti-Ki67 antibody at 4 °C for at least 2 h (H3569, Life Technologies). After washing and resuspending in FACS buffer, samples were acquired on a Fortessa FACS analyzer (BD Biosciences). All data were analyzed using FlowJo (BD) software.

Measurement of protein concentration

For total protein concentration measurement, 1000 EPCR SLAM cells were sorted from young and aged WT and Mda5-/- mice. Cells were lysed in RIPA buffer (89900, ThermoFisher) with protease inhibitor (1x) for 10 min at 4 °C. Samples were centrifuged at 13,000 × g for 15 min to pellet the cell debris. The protein concentration in the supernatant was measured by Qubit 3.

Unfolded protein quantification

Tetraphenylethene maleimide39,61 (TPE-MI, HY-143218, MedChemExpress) was reconstituted according to the manufacturer’s instructions, diluted in PBS (50 mM final concentration), and added to each sample. 2 × 106 lineage-depleted cells were incubated for 45 min at 37 °C. Samples were washed and stained with the antibody mix in FACS buffer for 30 min at 4 °C to identify HSCs. Cells were washed and acquired on a Fortessa FACS analyzer (BD Biosciences). All data were analyzed using FlowJo (BD) software.

Mitochondrial mass and membrane potential quantification

2 × 106 lineage-depleted cells were resuspended in complete StemPro-34 SFM medium with either MitoTracker Green (MTG, 50 nM final concentration, M7514, ThermoFisher Scientific) or tetramethylrhodamine methyl ester perchlorate (TMRM, 100 nM final concentration, I34361, ThermoFisher Scientific), supplemented with verapamil (V4629, Sigma Aldrich). After 30 min incubation at 37 °C, samples were washed and stained with the antibody mix in FACS buffer with verapamil for 30 min at 4 °C to identify HSCs. Cells were washed and acquired on a Fortessa FACS analyzer (BD Biosciences). All data were analyzed using FlowJo (BD) software.

Measurement of protein synthesis

2 × 106 lineage-depleted cells were stained with the antibody mix in FACS buffer for 30 min at 4 °C to identify HSCs. Then, cells were resuspended in complete StemPro-34 SFM medium (10639011ThermoFisher) with OP-Puro at 50 μM and incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. Samples were then washed, fixed with 1% PFA in PBS for 10 min at 4 °C, and permeabilized with permeabilization buffer (00-8333-56, ThermoFisher Scientific) for 20 min at 4 °C. The azide-alkyne cycloaddition was performed using the Click-iT Plus OPP Alexa Fluor 488 Kit (C10456, ThermoFisher Scientific), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After the 30 min reaction, the cells were washed with PBS and acquired on a Fortessa FACS analyzer (BD Biosciences). All data were analyzed using FlowJo (BD) software.

Autophagic flux detection

This assay was performed using the CYTO-ID autophagy detection kit (ENZ-KIT175-0050, ENZO Life Sciences) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 2 × 106 lineage-depleted cells were resuspended with CYTO-ID green detection reagent diluted in assay buffer and incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. Samples were then stained with the antibody mix in FACS buffer for 30 min at 4 °C to identify HSCs. After washing, cells were resuspended in FACS buffer and acquired on a Fortessa FACS analyzer (BD Biosciences). All data were analyzed using FlowJo (BD) software.

Targeted metabolomics

For low-input targeted metabolomics (of polar metabolites), 5000 HSCs were isolated as described above. Samples were then washed with 1 mL of 9 g/L NaCl and filtered through a 30 mM cell strainer before proceeding immediately with sorting using 2 g/L NaCl in deionized water as sheath liquid. Cells were sorted directly into a 96-well plate containing 25 μL of extraction solution, which consisted of 0.1% 13C internal standard stock (1 aliquot of U-13C yeast extract (Isotopic solutions, Cat# ISO-1) in 10 mL of 25% v/v methanol in water) in acetonitrile (LC-MS grade). To assess background levels, 5000 cell debris (low light-scattering signals) were collected. Targeted metabolite quantification by LC-MS was carried out as previously described90, and data processing was performed using the R package automRm91. Metabolites were only included if they were detected above the cell debris detection levels, and the retention time was identical to the 13C yeast standard qualifier peak. The metabolic differences were calculated by determining the area under the curve (AUC). Data were normalized to the mean of every detected metabolite in the aged WT population per experiment.

HSF1, phospho-HSF1, phospho-eIF2α, and dsRNA staining

HSCs were isolated and sorted as previous described. Cells were loaded into cytospin (700 rpm, 5 min) to allow them to adhere to glass slides. Fixation was performed with 4% PFA in PBS for 10 min at room temperature, slides were air-dried and kept at +4 °C until the next step. Permeabilization and blocking steps were done with 0.1% Triton X-100 and 10% goat serum (Sigma G9023), respectively. Indirect immunofluorescent analysis was conducted using primary anti-HSF1 antibodies (Enzo Life Sciences ADI-SPA-901-D, 1:500 or StressMarq SMC-118D for Rat Ab 1:500), anti-dsRNA (Sigma Aldrich MABE1134, 1:500), phosphorylated HSF1 (Enzo Life Sciences [pSer326]HSF1 ADI-SPA-902-D 1:500) and phosphorylated EIF2a (cell signaling phospho-EIF2a (Ser51) 9721S 1:500) and secondary anti-rabbit or anti-mouse antibodies conjugated with AlexaFluor-488 dye (ThermoFisher Scientific,1:1000). Samples were mounted with Fluroshield mounting solution containing DAPI (Sigma F6057). Images were acquired using an LSM880 confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany).

HSF1 staining in HEK293T cells

HEK293T cells are cultured in IMDM (10% FBS, 2% penicillin, streptomycin, and glutamine). 20.000 cells were plated in each well of 12-well plates, on coverslips. pFLAG_WT MDA5 (pFLAG_WT MDA5 was a gift from Sun Hur (Addgene plasmid # 216798; http://n2t.net/addgene:216798; RRID:Addgene_216798) and pFLAG_MDA5∆2CARD (pFLAG_MDA5∆2CARD was a gift from Sun Hur (Addgene plasmid # 216800; http://n2t.net/addgene:216800; RRID:Addgene_216800) were transfected using Lipofectamine overnight according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Fixation was performed with 4% PFA in PBS for 20 min at room temperature. Permeabilization and blocking steps were done with 0.1% Triton X-100 and 1% BSA, respectively. Indirect immunofluorescent analysis was conducted using primary anti-HSF1 antibodies (Enzo Life Sciences ADI-SPA-901-D,1:1000) and AlexaFluor-488 dye (ThermoFisher Scientific,1:1000). Samples were mounted with Fluroshield mounting solution with DAPI (Sigma F6057). Images were acquired using an LSM880 confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany).

Proximity ligation assay

Human BJ fibroblasts, untreated or treated with 24 h at 10 μg/mL PolyI:C, were fixed with 4% PFA for 20 min at 37 °C and permeabilized with 2% Triton X-100 for 10 min at room temperature. PLA was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Sigma Aldrich DUO94104). Primary antibodies were used at the following dilutions: anti-HSF1 (Santa Cruz sc-17757, 1:100), anti-MDA5 (Abcam ab79055, 1:200). Cells were mounted with DAPI-containing mounting medium (Sigma Aldrich DUO82040). Interaction between HSF1 and MDA5 was visualized in situ using a Carl Zeiss LSM880 confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss). Presented images represent the maximum intensity projection of the z-stack.

RNA-seq library preparation

Two thousand five hundred EPCR SLAM cells were sorted from young, middle-aged, and aged WT and Mda5-/- mice. RNA was then isolated using the Arcturus PicoPure RNA isolation Kit (KIT0204, Applied Biosystems). Low-input RNA-seq libraries were prepared using SMART-Seq Stranded Kit (634442, Takara Bio). First, random priming allowed the generation of cDNA from all RNA fragments in the sample. Next, a first round of PCR amplification (5 cycles) added full-length Illumina adapters (Indexing Primer Set HT for Illumina v2), including barcodes. Then, the ribosomal cDNA (originating from rRNA) was cleaved. The cDNA fragments were enriched via a second round of PCR amplification (14 cycles) using primers universal to all libraries. Libraries were cleaned up using AMPure XP beads (A63881) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Libraries were sequenced at Vanderbilt.

RNA-seq analysis of genes

Paired-end 300 bp reads were generated using the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 system and sequenced at a depth of 48–70 M. Raw fastq read files were assessed for quality with FastQC v0.11.9 (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/) and trimmed of Illumina sequencing adapters with Trim Galore v0.3.7 (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore/). Alignment to the reference mouse genome (GENCODE GRCm38.p6 release M23) was done using STAR v2.7.10a92 with default parameters. Aligned bam files were indexed with samtools v1.1293, and gene count matrices for each sample were generated from the alignment bam files using HTSeq-count v0.12.494 with the parameter –intersection-non-empty, and –stranded = “reverse” was specified for RNA libraries prepared with the Takara directional kit. Samples were hierarchically and PCA clustered to determine sample congruence. Normalization, scaling, and differential expression analysis were performed in R v4.1.3 (R Core Team, 2022) using the edgeR v3.34.195 qlf test for each pair-wise comparison. Genes were considered significantly and differentially expressed between conditions if they met FDR and fold-change cutoffs of 0.05 and 1.5, respectively. Plotting of results was performed using heatmap.2 function of the gplots package v3.1.1 and ggplot2 v3.3.596 packages in R.

RNA-seq analysis of transposable element families

Read generation and data pre-processing were performed as described above for RNA-seq analysis of genes. Alignment to the reference mouse genome (GENCODE GRCm38.p6 release M23) was done using STAR v2.7.10a92 with the following parameters to retain multi-mapping reads: --outFilterMultimapNmax 100 --winAnchorMultimapNmax 100 --outMultimapperOrder Random --outSAMmultNmax 1. Alignment BAM files were indexed with samtools index93. Expression of transposable element families was quantified by sample using TECounts v2.0.397 with parameter –mode = multi to estimate transposable element abundances from multimapped alignments, and –stranded reverse to properly process the stranded reads, using the pre-generated GENCODE GRCm38 TE GTF RepeatMasker file from the Hammel lab FTP site (https://labshare.cshl.edu/shares/mhammelllab/www-data/TEtranscripts/TE_GTF) and the GENCODE GRCm38 v23 annotation GTF. Counts were assembled into a single table in R, were normalized to counts per million (CPM), and differential expression was assessed in R v3.1.4 (R Core Team, 2022) on the combined transposable element /gene counts using the edgeR qlf test, as described above, determining TEs to be differentially expressed if they met the cutoffs of FC 1.5 and FDR 0.05.

Functional enrichment and upstream regulator analysis

Ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) for upstream regulators and canonical pathways was performed on log-transformed differential expression values for genes found to be significantly differentially expressed in edgeR, using the default settings of IPA v.24.0.255.

Gene set enrichment analysis

Normalized logCPM (counts per million) matrices for all genes of each comparison were extracted from the edgeR DGE object in R, generated as described above, and saved as a tab-separated text file for input into GSEA (v4.4.0 build 18)98,99. GSEA was run using the gene_set permutation with the max and min set sizes specified at 1000 and 1, respectively. Gene sets tested were obtained from MSigDB (https://www.gsea-msigdb.org/gsea/msigdb)100 and85,101,102.

Single-cell RNA-seq

100,000 LSK cells from young and aged WT or Mda5-/- mice were isolated and sorted as previously described. Samples were then barcoded using the 10x Genomics 3′ CellPlex Kit. Cell multiplexing was performed before sorting. Pooled gene expression and feature barcoding fastq files obtained via NovaSeq 6000 sequencing platform were de-multiplexed and aligned to the GRCm38/mm10 reference genome using cellranger count103. The resulting gene expression, barcode, and hashtag matrices were imported into R v4.1.3, and analysis was performed using the Seurat package v4.1.0104. Cells were filtered for nFeature_RNA > 1000 and a mitochondrial gene percentage of at most 5%. Hashtag data was used to trace pooled cells of a sample back to individual mice via the HMOdemux function in Seurat. Of 38,137 WT aged cells output by cellranger count, 21,241 were singlets, and 12,616 cells were retained after filtering for further analysis. Of 34,017 Mda5-/- aged cells output by cellranger count, 18,248 were singlets, and 12,084 cells were retained after filtering for further analysis. Of 32,441 WT young cells output by cellranger, 18,788 were singlets, and 9986 cells were retained after filtering for further analysis. Of 34,636 Mda5-/- young cells output by cellranger count, 14,007 were singlets, and 8178 cells were retained after filtering for further analysis. Samples were individually regularized using SCTransform V2 before Seurat anchor-based integration using 2000 anchors. Based on individual gene expression results, aged sample replicates CMO303 (WT) and CMO306 (Mda5-/-) were found to be unfit for further analysis and were excluded. After PCA dimensionality reduction, an elbow plot was used to determine the optimal number of dimensions to proceed with (30), and SNN clustering was performed at several resolutions (0.1–1, increment of 0.1) for input into clustree105 to determine the optimal clustering resolution. Differential expression between clusters was performed with the FindAllMarkers function, and cell populations were determined based on the expression of HSC and MPP markers56. To perform a comparison at the sample level, pseudobulk analysis was carried out by collapsing cell population clusters by condition and differential expression analysis in edgeR qlf test95. Functional enrichment, GSEA, and IPA analysis were performed on the results as described for RNA-seq analysis above.

ATAC-seq library preparation

For ATAC-seq (3000–5000 cells per sample, 3 biological replicates per condition), HSCs were sorted in FACS buffer. HSCs were spun down at 500 g, 4 °C for 10 min, and incubated with Illumina TAGMENT DNA enzyme and buffer (20034210, Illumina) or with tagmentase (Diagenode, C01070012) and the respective buffer (Diagenode C01019043) and Digitonin (0.01%) for 30 min at 37 °C on a thermomixer shaking at 700 rpm. Transposed DNA was purified using MinElute Cleanup (28004, QIAGEN). Adapter indices were ligated using the Nextera XT Index Kit (15055289, Illumina), and libraries were amplified using NEBNext High-Fidelity 2X PCR Master Mix (M0541S, NEB).

ATAC-seq differential accessibility analysis

Paired-end 100 bp reads were generated using the Illumina Hiseq 3000 system and sequenced at a depth of 60–96 M. Fastq read files were trimmed of Nextera adapters with Trim Galore v0.6.7 (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore/) and aligned to GRCm38/mm10 with Bowtie2 v2.4.4106. The resulting BAM files had PCR duplicates, mitochondrial reads, and ENCODE blacklist107 features removed before further analysis using Picard v3.4.0 (Broad Institute, 2019), samtools v1.1393, and bedtools v2.30.0108, respectively. For differential accessibility analysis, BAM files were merged by sample using Samtools before calling peaks with MACS v2.2.9.1109. Induced/reduced peaks were determined by overlapping peaksets with bedtools intersect108, after which gene TSSs overlapping peaks (−100 kb, +50 kb) were determined with bedtools closest108, and motif enrichment was obtained with findMotifsGenome.pl script from the HOMER v5.1 package110. For visualization, filtered BAM files were converted to bigwig format via a bedgraph intermediate with bamCoverage and bedtobigwig, using scaling factors obtained from deeptools v3.5.6111 multiBamSummary. These bigwigs, along with the previously obtained induced and reduced peaks in bed format, were input into deeptools computeMatrix, and the output was plotted using deeptools plotHeatmap reference-point.

ATAC-seq digital genomic footprinting

Footprinting analysis to determine TF occupancy was performed on sample-merged bam files (samtools merge93) and sample-merged narrowpeak output from MACS2 using the Wellington algorithm from the pyDNase package v0.3.0112. Output bed regions were merged, then intersected among samples in order to plot profiles with dnase_average_profile.py.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Supplementary information

Reporting Summary (98.8KB, pdf)
Supplementary Data 1 (3.9MB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 2 (4MB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 3 (1.5MB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 4 (1.1MB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 5 (1.4MB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 6 (176.7KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 7 (706.4KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 8 (372.3KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 9 (254.2KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 10 (321.3KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 11 (468.9KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 12 (70.7KB, xlsx)

Source data

Source Data (246.9KB, xlsx)

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the French Government (National Research Agency, ANR) through the “investments for the future” programs LABEX SIGNALIFE ANR-11-LABX-0028-01 and IDEX UCAJedi ANR-15-IDEX-01 to ET, but also the Project ANR-23-CE14-0017 heTEro. The German Research Foundation, grant nos. 322977937/GRK2344-MeInBio and GZ TR 1478/2-1 (to E.T., P.B., and A.K.), the grant no. Fondation Recherche Médicale (FRM) AJE202010012488 (to E.T.) and an EHA bilateral collaborative grant 2022, and from Programmes labellisés - Fondation ARC 2025 (ARCPGA2024120009098_9649) to E.T. The work was also supported by the Leukemia Research Foundation (to M.D.), When Everyone Survives Foundation (to M.D.), P30 CA021765 (National Cancer Institute) (to M.D.). This work was supported by the Max Planck Society, the ERC-Stg-2017 (VitASTEM, 759206), the German Research Foundation (DFG) under the German Excellence Strategy (CIBSS-EXC-2189, Project #390939984), SFB1425 (Project #422681845; P09), SFB992 (Project #192904750; B07), SFB1479 (Project #441891347; P05), the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions Grant (ARCH; Project #813091) and the José Carreras Leukämie-Stiftung, DFG Research Training Group MeInBio (Project #322977937/GRK2344) all awarded to N.C-W. The authors acknowledge PICMI and Cytomed, the IRCAN’s Imaging facility core part of the «Microscopie Imagerie Cytométrie Azur» (MICA) GIS IBiSA labeled platform. PICMI AND/OR Cytomed was supported by the Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer (ARC), by the national research infrastructures in biology and health (GIS IBiSA) as part of MICA and by the Conseil Départemental 06 et Région Sud». PICMI, IRCAN animal core facility and Cytomed was supported by FEDER, Contrat Plan Etat Région (CPER), Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche, Région Sud, Conseil Départemental 06, ITMO Cancer Aviesan (Plan Cancer), Cancéropole PACA, INCa, CNRS and Inserm. This work is part of V.B. and P.B.’s PhD thesis project at Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg and G.T.V. thesis at the University of Côte d’Azur conducted toward the Doctor of Biology degree. The authors would like to thank all the facilities at MPI-IE and IRCAN.

Author contributions

V.B. and G.T.V. designed and performed the majority of experiments. P.B. and A.P. developed and performed the computational analysis (bulk and single cell RNA-seq for P.B. and ATAC-seq for A.P.). M.D., L.T., and N.M. performed the HSC competitive transplants. M.-E.L. helped with the metabolomics experiments. B.G. did the PLA experiments. W.D. and T.M. helped with bioinformatic analysis. F.B. gave microscopy advice. S. performed the scRNA-seq experiments. H.M. provided cells for the study. D.V.B., N.C.W., M.D., and E.T. supervised the study and gave suggestions to the experimentalists. E.T. wrote the manuscript with input from all the authors. All the authors have read and approved this manuscript.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Mitsutoshi Yoneyama and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Data availability

The BioProject PRJNA1290859 and associated SRA metadata are available [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/?term=PRJNA1290859]. All data are included in the Supplementary Information or available from the authors, as are unique reagents used in this Article. The raw numbers for charts and graphs are available in the Source Data file whenever possible. Source data are provided with this paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Veronica Bergo, Pavlos Bousounis, Giang To Vu.

Contributor Information

Veronica Bergo, Email: bergo95veronica@gmail.com.

Marta Derecka, Email: Marta.Derecka@stjude.org.

Eirini Trompouki, Email: Eirini.TROMPOUKI@univ-cotedazur.fr.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-026-69424-x.

References

  • 1.Trumpp, A., Essers, M. & Wilson, A. Awakening dormant haematopoietic stem cells. Nat. Rev. Immunol.10, 201–209 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Baldridge, M. T., King, K. Y., Boles, N. C., Weksberg, D. C. & Goodell, M. A. Quiescent haematopoietic stem cells are activated by IFN-gamma in response to chronic infection. Nature465, 793–797 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Essers, M. A. et al. IFNalpha activates dormant haematopoietic stem cells in vivo. Nature458, 904–908 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Takizawa, H. et al. Pathogen-induced TLR4-TRIF innate immune signaling in hematopoietic stem cells promotes proliferation but reduces competitive fitness. Cell Stem Cell21, 225–240 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pietras, E. M. et al. Chronic interleukin-1 exposure drives haematopoietic stem cells towards precocious myeloid differentiation at the expense of self-renewal. Nat. Cell Biol.18, 607–618 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pietras, E. M. et al. Re-entry into quiescence protects hematopoietic stem cells from the killing effect of chronic exposure to type I interferons. J. Exp. Med.211, 245–262 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kovtonyuk, L. V. et al. IL-1 mediates microbiome-induced inflammaging of hematopoietic stem cells in mice. Blood139, 44–58 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cai, Z. et al. Inhibition of inflammatory signaling in Tet2 mutant preleukemic cells mitigates stress-induced abnormalities and clonal hematopoiesis. Cell Stem Cell23, 833–849 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hormaechea-Agulla, D. et al. Chronic infection drives Dnmt3a-loss-of-function clonal hematopoiesis via IFNgamma signaling. Cell Stem Cell10.1016/j.stem.2021.03.002 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 10.Jakobsen, N. A. et al. Selective advantage of mutant stem cells in human clonal hematopoiesis is associated with attenuated response to inflammation and aging. Cell Stem Cell.31, 1127–1144.e17 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 11.Bousounis, P., Bergo, V. & Trompouki, E. Inflammation, aging and hematopoiesis: a complex relationship. Cells10, 10.3390/cells10061386 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 12.Verovskaya, E. V., Dellorusso, P. V. & Passegue, E. Losing sense of self and surroundings: hematopoietic stem cell aging and leukemic transformation. Trends Mol. Med.25, 494–515 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kovtonyuk, L. V., Fritsch, K., Feng, X. M., Manz, M. G. & Takizawa, H. Inflamm-aging of hematopoiesis, hematopoietic stem cells, and the bone marrow microenvironment. Front. Immunol.7, 502 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 14.de Haan, G. & Lazare, S. S. Aging of hematopoietic stem cells. Blood131, 479–487 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bogeska, R. et al. Inflammatory exposure drives long-lived impairment of hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal activity and accelerated aging. Cell Stem Cell29, 1273–1284.e8 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Rehwinkel, J. & Gack, M. U. RIG-I-like receptors: their regulation and roles in RNA sensing. Nat. Rev. Immunol.20, 537–551 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Loo, Y. M. & Gale, M. Immune signaling by RIG-I-like receptors. Immunity34, 680–692 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lefkopoulos, S. et al. Repetitive elements trigger RIG-I-like receptor signaling that regulates the emergence of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Immunity53, 934–951 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Clapes et al. Chemotherapy-induced transposable elements activate MDA5 to enhance haematopoietic regeneration. Nat. Cell Biol.23, 704–717 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ahmad, S. et al. Breaching self-tolerance to Alu duplex RNA underlies MDA5-mediated inflammation. Cell172, 797–810 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mu, X., Ahmad, S. & Hur, S. Endogenous retroelements and the host innate immune sensors. Adv. Immunol.132, 47–69 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Roulois, D. et al. DNA-demethylating agents target colorectal cancer cells by inducing viral mimicry by endogenous transcripts. Cell162, 961–973 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chiappinelli, K. B. et al. Inhibiting DNA methylation causes an interferon response in cancer via dsRNA including endogenous retroviruses. Cell162, 974–986 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Avgustinova, A. et al. Repression of endogenous retroviruses prevents antiviral immune response and is required for mammary gland development. Cell Stem Cell10.1016/j.stem.2021.04.030 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 25.Daskalakis, M. et al. Reactivation of endogenous retroviral elements via treatment with DNMT- and HDAC-inhibitors. Cell Cycle17, 811–822 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sun, D. et al. Epigenomic profiling of young and aged HSCs reveals concerted changes during aging that reinforce self-renewal. Cell Stem Cell14, 673–688 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wyatt, A. R., Yerbury, J. J., Dabbs, R. A. & Wilson, M. R. Roles of extracellular chaperones in amyloidosis. J. Mol. Biol.421, 499–516 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Signer, R. A. J., Magee, J. A., Salic, A. & Morrison, S. J. Haematopoietic stem cells require a highly regulated protein synthesis rate. Nature509, 49–54 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Signer, R. A. J. et al. The rate of protein synthesis in hematopoietic stem cells is limited partly by 4E-BPs. Genes Dev.30, 1698–1703 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Anckar, J. & Sistonen, L. Regulation of HSF1 function in the heat stress response: implications in aging and disease. Annu. Rev. Biochem.80, 1089–1115 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lazaro-Pena, M. I. et al. HSF-1: guardian of the proteome through integration of longevity signals to the proteostatic network. Front. Aging3, 861686 (2022) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 32.Liu, A. Y., Minetti, C. A., Remeta, D. P., Breslauer, K. J. & Chen, K. Y. HSF1, aging, and neurodegeneration. In Cell Biology and Translational MedicineVolume 18: Tissue Differentiation, Repair in Health and Disease, Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology (ed Turksen, K.) 23–49 (Springer Nature, 2023). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 33.Kruta, M. et al. Hsf1 promotes hematopoietic stem cell fitness and proteostasis in response to ex vivo culture stress and aging. Cell Stem Cell28, 1950–1965 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Trivedi, R. & Jurivich, D. A. A molecular perspective on age-dependent changes to the heat shock axis. Exp. Gerontol.137, 110969 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.B’chir, W. et al. The eIF2α/ATF4 pathway is essential for stress-induced autophagy gene expression. Nucleic Acids Res.41, 7683–7699 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Aman, Y. et al. Autophagy in healthy aging and disease. Nat. Aging1, 634–650 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ho, T. T. et al. Autophagy maintains the metabolism and function of young and old stem cells. Nature543, 205 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Dellorusso, P. V. et al. Autophagy counters inflammation-driven glycolytic impairment in aging hematopoietic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell.31, 1020-1037.e9 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 39.Chua, B. A. et al. Hematopoietic stem cells preferentially traffic misfolded proteins to aggresomes and depend on aggrephagy to maintain protein homeostasis. Cell Stem Cell30, 460–472 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Gitlin, L. et al. Essential role of mda-5 in type I IFN responses to polyriboinosinic:polyribocytidylic acid and encephalomyocarditis picornavirus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA103, 8459–8464 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Umemoto, T., Hashimoto, M., Matsumura, T., Nakamura-Ishizu, A. & Suda, T. Ca(2+)-mitochondria axis drives cell division in hematopoietic stem cells. J. Exp. Med.215, 2097–2113 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Rabe, J. L. et al. CD34 and EPCR coordinately enrich functional murine hematopoietic stem cells under normal and inflammatory conditions. Exp. Hematol.81, 1–15 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Erden-İnal, M., Sunal, E. & Kanbak, G. Age-related changes in the glutathione redox system. Cell Biochem. Funct.20, 61–66 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bradshaw, P. C. Cytoplasmic and mitochondrial NADPH-coupled redox systems in the regulation of aging. Nutrients11, 504 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Chaudhary, P. M. & Roninson, I. B. Expression and activity of P-glycoprotein, a multidrug efflux pump, in human hematopoietic stem cells. Cell66, 85–94 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Morganti, C., Bonora, M. & Ito, K. Improving the accuracy of flow cytometric assessment of mitochondrial membrane potential in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells through the inhibition of efflux pumps. J. Vis. Exp. 10.3791/60057 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 47.Almeida, M. J. et al. Dye-independent methods reveal elevated mitochondrial mass in hematopoietic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell21, 725–729 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Mansell, E. et al. Mitochondrial potentiation ameliorates age-related heterogeneity in hematopoietic stem cell function. Cell Stem Cell28, 241–256 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Takihara, Y. et al. High mitochondrial mass is associated with reconstitution capacity and quiescence of hematopoietic stem cells. Blood Adv.3, 2323–2327 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Pietras, E. M. et al. Functionally distinct subsets of lineage-biased multipotent progenitors control blood production in normal and regenerative conditions. Cell Stem Cell17, 35–46 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Adelman, E. R. et al. Aging human hematopoietic stem cells manifest profound epigenetic reprogramming of enhancers that may predispose to leukemia. Cancer Discov.9, 1080–1101 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Cabezas-Wallscheid, N. et al. Identification of regulatory networks in HSCs and their immediate progeny via integrated proteome, transcriptome, and DNA methylome analysis. Cell Stem Cell15, 507–522 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Cabezas-Wallscheid, N. et al. Vitamin A-retinoic acid signaling regulates hematopoietic stem cell dormancy. Cell169, 807–823 e19 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Flohr Svendsen, A. et al. A comprehensive transcriptome signature of murine hematopoietic stem cell aging. Blood138, 439–451 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Krämer, A. et al. Causal analysis approaches in ingenuity pathway analysis. Bioinformatics30, 523–530 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Sommerkamp, P. et al. Mouse multipotent progenitor 5 cells are located at the interphase between hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Blood137, 3218–3224 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Sommerkamp, P. et al. Differential alternative polyadenylation landscapes mediate hematopoietic stem cell activation and regulate glutamine metabolism. Cell Stem Cell26, 722–738 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Wilson, N. K. et al. Combined single-cell functional and gene expression analysis resolves heterogeneity within stem cell populations. Cell Stem Cell16, 712–724 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Street, K. et al. Slingshot: cell lineage and pseudotime inference for single-cell transcriptomics. BMC Genom.19, 477 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Rozpędek, W. et al. The role of the PERK/eIF2α/ATF4/CHOP signaling pathway in tumor progression during endoplasmic reticulum stress. Curr. Mol. Med.16, 533–544 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Chen, M. Z. et al. A thiol probe for measuring unfolded protein load and proteostasis in cells. Nat. Commun.8, 474 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Aggresomes: A Cellular Response to Misfolded Proteins-PMC https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2175217/. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 63.Rock, K. L. et al. Inhibitors of the proteasome block the degradation of most cell proteins and the generation of peptides presented on MHC class I molecules. Cell78, 761–771 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Dong, S. et al. Chaperone-mediated autophagy sustains haematopoietic stem-cell function. Nature591, 117–123 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Neef, D. W., Turski, M. L. & Thiele, D. J. Modulation of heat shock transcription factor 1 as a therapeutic target for small molecule intervention in neurodegenerative disease. PLOS Biol.8,.e1000291 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Li, X. et al. Inflammation and aging: signaling pathways and intervention therapies. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther.8, 1–29 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Gluck, S. et al. Innate immune sensing of cytosolic chromatin fragments through cGAS promotes senescence. Nat. Cell Biol.19, 1061 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Zheng, W. et al. The role of cGAS-STING in age-related diseases from mechanisms to therapies. Aging Dis.14, 1145–1165 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Gulen, M. F. et al. cGAS–STING drives ageing-related inflammation and neurodegeneration. Nature620, 374–380 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Paul, B. D., Snyder, S. H. & Bohr, V. A. Signaling by cGAS–STING in neurodegeneration, neuroinflammation, and aging. Trends Neurosci.44, 83–96 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Dhir, A. et al. Mitochondrial double-stranded RNA triggers antiviral signalling in humans. Nature560, 238–242 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Liddicoat, B. J. et al. RNA EDITING RNA editing by ADAR1 prevents MDA5 sensing of endogenous dsRNA as nonself. Science349, 1115–1120 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Barbieri, D. et al. Thrombopoietin protects hematopoietic stem cells from retrotransposon-mediated damage by promoting an antiviral response. J. Exp. Med.215, 1463–1480 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Katsimpardi, L. et al. Vascular and neurogenic rejuvenation of the aging mouse brain by young systemic factors. Science344, 630–634 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Conboy, I. M. et al. Rejuvenation of aged progenitor cells by exposure to a young systemic environment. Nature433, 760–764 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Rebo, J. et al. A single heterochronic blood exchange reveals rapid inhibition of multiple tissues by old blood. Nat. Commun.7, 13363 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Villeda, S. A. et al. The ageing systemic milieu negatively regulates neurogenesis and cognitive function. Nature477, 90–94 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Loffredo, F. S. et al. Growth differentiation factor 11 is a circulating factor that reverses age-related cardiac hypertrophy. Cell153, 828–839 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Ho, T. T. et al. Aged hematopoietic stem cells are refractory to bloodborne systemic rejuvenation interventions. J. Exp. Med.218, e20210223 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Nakamura-Ishizu, A., Ito, K. & Suda, T. Hematopoietic stem cell metabolism during development and aging. Dev. Cell54, 239–255 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Zhang, Y. W., Schönberger, K. & Cabezas-Wallscheid, N. Bidirectional interplay between metabolism and epigenetics in hematopoietic stem cells and leukemia. EMBO J.42, e112348 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Chua, B. A. & Signer, R. A. J. Hematopoietic stem cell regulation by the proteostasis network. Curr. Opin. Hematol.27, 254 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Mohrin, M. et al. Stem cell aging. A mitochondrial UPR-mediated metabolic checkpoint regulates hematopoietic stem cell aging. Science347, 1374–1377 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Ito, K. et al. Reactive oxygen species act through p38 MAPK to limit the lifespan of hematopoietic stem cells. Nat. Med12, 446–451 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Schonberger, K. et al. Multilayer omics analysis reveals a non-classical retinoic acid signaling axis that regulates hematopoietic stem cell identity. Cell Stem Cell10.1016/j.stem.2021.10.002 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 86.Signer, R. A. J. & Morrison, S. J. Mechanisms that regulate stem cell aging and life span. Cell Stem Cell12, 152–165 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Takashima, K., Oshiumi, H., Matsumoto, M. & Seya, T. DNAJB1/HSP40 suppresses melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5-mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein function in conjunction with HSP70. J. Innate Immun.10, 44–55 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Triana-Martinez, F. et al. p16High immune cell-controlled disease tolerance as a broad defense and healthspan extending strategy. Preprint at bioRxiv10.1101/2024.07.15.603540 (2024).
  • 89.Gorbunova, V., Seluanov, A. & Kennedy, B. K. The world goes bats: living longer and tolerating viruses. Cell Metab.32, 31–43 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Schönberger, K. et al. LC-MS-based targeted metabolomics for FACS-purified rare cells. Anal. Chem.95, 4325–4334 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Eilertz, D., Mitterer, M. & Buescher, J. M. automRm: an R package for fully automatic LC-QQQ-MS data preprocessing powered by machine learning. Anal. Chem.94, 6163–6171 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics29, 15–21 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Li, H. et al. 1000 Genome Project Data Proc. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics25, 2078–2079 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 94.Anders, S., Pyl, P. T. & Huber, W. HTSeq-a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics31, 166–169 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. edgeR: a bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics26, 139–140 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Wickham, H. ggplot2 Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis Introduction. Use R, 1-+ 10.1007/978-0-387-98141-3_1 (2009).
  • 97.Jin, Y., Tam, O. H., Paniagua, E. & Hammell, M. TEtranscripts: a package for including transposable elements in differential expression analysis of RNA-seq datasets. Bioinformatics31, 3593–3599 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA102, 15545–15550 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Mootha, V. K. et al. PGC-1alpha-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes. Nat. Genet.34, 267–273 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Liberzon, A. et al. The molecular signatures database hallmark gene set collection. Cels1, 417–425 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Sommerkamp P. et al. Mouse multipotent progenitor 5 cells are located at the interphase between hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Blood.137, 3218–3224 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 102.Renders, S. et al. Niche derived netrin-1 regulates hematopoietic stem cell dormancy via its receptor neogenin-1. Nat. Commun.12, 608 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Zheng, G. X. Y. et al. Massively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cells. Nat. Commun.8, 14049 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Hao, Y. et al. Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data. Cell184, 3573–3587 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Zappia, L. & Oshlack, A. Clustering trees: a visualization for evaluating clusterings at multiple resolutions. GigaScience7, giy083 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods9, 357 (2012). U54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Amemiya, H. M., Kundaje, A. & Boyle, A. P. The ENCODE blacklist: identification of problematic regions of the genome. Sci. Rep.9, 9354 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Quinlan, A. R. & Hall, I. M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics26, 841–842 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Zhang, Y. et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol.9, 10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r137 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 110.Heinz, S. et al. Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol. Cell38, 576–589 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Ramirez, F. et al. deepTools2: a next generation web server for deep-sequencing data analysis. Nucleic Acids Res.44, W160–W165 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Piper, J. et al. Wellington: a novel method for the accurate identification of digital genomic footprints from DNase-seq data. Nucleic Acids Res.41, e201 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Reporting Summary (98.8KB, pdf)
Supplementary Data 1 (3.9MB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 2 (4MB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 3 (1.5MB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 4 (1.1MB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 5 (1.4MB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 6 (176.7KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 7 (706.4KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 8 (372.3KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 9 (254.2KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 10 (321.3KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 11 (468.9KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 12 (70.7KB, xlsx)
Source Data (246.9KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

The BioProject PRJNA1290859 and associated SRA metadata are available [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/?term=PRJNA1290859]. All data are included in the Supplementary Information or available from the authors, as are unique reagents used in this Article. The raw numbers for charts and graphs are available in the Source Data file whenever possible. Source data are provided with this paper.


Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES