Abstract
This cross-sectional study evaluates telehealth medication abortion rates among adolescents and young adults after the Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision by state-level restrictions and parental involvement laws.
Introduction
Adolescents in the US experience many logistical and policy barriers to abortion care.1,2 Although most live in states with abortion restrictions,3 adolescents are often excluded from reproductive health research.4 To address this gap, we compared demand for online medication abortion among adolescents and young adults5 vs adults before and after the Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision, examining how demand varied across different state-level gestational bans and parental involvement laws.
Methods
The University of Texas at Austin institutional review board approved this study. At the time of request, individuals consented to the use of anonymized data for research purposes. We followed the STROBE reporting guideline.
This cross-sectional study analyzed requests made to a high-volume online medication abortion telemedicine service, one of only a few services supporting all 50 states and Washington, DC, without any age restrictions (eMethods in Supplement 1).6 We compared request rates before (September 1, 2021-June 23, 2022) and after the Dobbs decision (June 24, 2022-October 31, 2023). For each period, we calculated the average weekly request rate per 100 000 female residents in 3 age groups: adolescents 15 to 17 years, young adults 18 to 24 years, and adults 25 to 49 years. We compared request rates across age groups, overall, and by type of state-level abortion restrictions in effect at the time of request. Rates were weighted by the population of female residents in each age group within the state ban type. Categories included overall; no ban or parental involvement law; no ban, parental involvement law; 12- to 24-week ban; 6-week ban; and total or near-total ban. For adolescents, we compared request rates across categories of parental involvement requirements at the time of request, including no parental involvement law, required parental notification, required parental consent, and required parental consent and notification.
We used 2-tailed t tests to examine differences, with statistical significance set at P < .05. We used R, version 4.5.1 (R Project for Statistical Computing) for analysis.
Results
During the study period, the service received requests from all 50 states and Washington, DC, including 13 716 requests (6.0%) from adolescents, 97 768 requests (42.8%) from young adults, and 116 981 requests (51.2%) from adults. The mean weekly request rate per 100 000 female residents increased for all age groups baseline to post-Dobbs: for adolescents, 2.8 (95% CI, 2.5-3.0) to 8.6 (95% CI, 7.9-9.2), increasing 5.8 (95% CI, 5.1-6.5; P < .001); for young adults, 8.8 (95% CI, 8.2-9.4) to 25.0 (95% CI, 23.5-26.6), increasing 16.2 (95% CI, 14.6-17.9; P < .001); for adults, 2.5 (95% CI, 2.3-2.7) to 7.4 (95% CI, 7.0-7.8), increasing 4.9 (95% CI, 4.4-5.3; P < .001) (Figure). States with the most restrictions had the highest increase post-Dobbs. Among adolescents, the pre-Dobbs rate was highest in states with parental consent and notification at 5.8 (95% CI, 5.1-6.5), vs 2.5 (95% CI, 2.2-2.7) in states without parental involvement, a difference of 3.4 (95% CI, 2.6-4.1; P < .001) (Table). Post-Dobbs, this gap widened to 11.2 (95% CI, 9.3-13.0; P < .001), with rates rising to 17.6 (95% CI, 15.8-19.4) in states with parental consent and notification, and 6.4 (95% CI, 6.0-6.9) in states without parental involvement.
Figure. Weekly Request Rates for Medication Abortion via Telehealth Service by Age and Type of State-Level Abortion Policy Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Decision.

The dashed line indicates the Dobbs decision.
aAll states with bans have a parental involvement law.
Table. Weekly Request Rates for Medication Abortion via Telehealth Service Among Adolescents Aged 15 to 17 Years by Parental Involvement Law Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Decision.
| Parental involvement law and time period | Mean weekly request rate per 100 000 female residents aged 15-17 y (95% CI) | Difference (95% CI) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Before Dobbs decision (September 1, 2021, to May 1, 2022) | |||
| None | 2.5 (2.2 to 2.7) | 0 [Reference] | |
| Notification | 2.6 (2.2 to 3.0) | 0.1 (−0.3 to 0.6) | .58 |
| Consent | 2.2 (1.9 to 2.4) | −0.3 (−0.7 to 0.0) | .09 |
| Consent and notification | 5.8 (5.1 to 6.5) | 3.4 (2.6 to 4.1) | <.001 |
| After Dobbs decision (June 24, 2022, to October 30, 2023) | |||
| None | 6.4 (6.0 to 6.9) | 0 [Reference] | |
| Notification | 8.3 (7.5 to 9.2) | 1.9 (0.9 to 2.9) | <.001 |
| Consent | 8.1 (7.3 to 8.9) | 1.7 (0.8 to 2.6) | <.001 |
| Consent and notification | 17.6 (15.8 to 19.4) | 11.2 (9.3 to 13.0) | <.001 |
Discussion
Prior research finds abortion restrictions are associated with increased demand for telehealth medication abortion.6 However, whether this trend extended to adolescents was previously unknown, a population facing the unique legal burden of mandatory parental involvement, in addition to gestation bans. We found that post-Dobbs increases in requests were highest among young adults, especially in states with restrictive abortion laws, and among adolescents, in states with gestational bans and parental consent and notification requirements. This study’s limitations included analysis of only one service, thus not representative of all people seeking medication abortion online. However, these findings highlight growing demand among adolescents and young adults in legally constrained environments. Young people appear to increasingly rely on online telemedicine services for abortion care, with compounding legal restrictions driving higher demand.
eMethods
eReferences
Data Sharing Statement
References
- 1.Hoopes AJ, Maslowsky J, Baca MA, et al. Elevating the needs of minor adolescents in a landscape of reduced abortion access in the United States. J Adolesc Health. 2022;71(5):530-532. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.08.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ralph L, Hasselbacher L. Adolescents and abortion restrictions: disproportionate burdens and critical warnings. J Adolesc Health. 2023;73(2):221-223. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2023.05.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lindberg LD, Maslowsky J, Baum P. Implications of abortion restrictions for adolescents. JAMA Pediatr. 2025;179(6):675-676. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2025.0226 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Baldwin MK, Bell AJ, Hoopes AJ, Narasimhan S, Ott MA. Society of Family Planning Research Practice Support: researcher and institutional review board considerations for sexual and reproductive health research with minor adolescents. Contraception. 2025;148:110935. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2025.110935 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sawyer SM, Azzopardi PS, Wickremarathne D, Patton GC. The age of adolescence. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2018;2(3):223-228. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30022-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Aiken ARA, Wells ES, Gomperts R, Scott JG. Provision of medications for self-managed abortion before and after the Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision. JAMA. 2024;331(18):1558-1564. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.4266 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
eMethods
eReferences
Data Sharing Statement
