Skip to main content
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology logoLink to Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
. 2026 Feb 2;16:1753328. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2026.1753328

Biofilm-related characteristics of Candida parapsilosis in postoperative ocular infections

Yuxuan Wu 1, Min Kang 2, Zhiqun Wang 2, Yang Zhang 2, Kexin Chen 2, Qingfeng Liang 2, Xinxin Lu 2,*
PMCID: PMC12907338  PMID: 41704958

Abstract

Objective

The research aims to elucidate the pathogenic mechanisms of Candida parapsilosis infection after keratoplasty and provide evidence-based guidance for the clinical management of Candida infections in ophthalmic practice.

Method

Biofilms were cultured from 45 strains of Candida. The total biomass of the biofilms was measured using the crystal violet staining method, and the biofilm activity was assessed via the XTT reduction assay. Cell surface hydrophobicity and adhesion were evaluated for all Candida strains. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of planktonic Candida was determined using the colorimetric microbroth dilution method, while the MIC of biofilm-embedded Candida was measured via the XTT reduction assay. The release of 1, 3-β-D-glucan was detected using the G-test, and the chemotactic ability of 1, 3-β-D-glucan on neutrophils was evaluated via the Transwell assay. Molecular typing of Candida parapsilosis was performed using microsatellite genotyping. Statistical analysis was conducted using the Kruskal-Wallis (K-W) test.

Results

In 45 postoperative ocular Candida isolates, Candida parapsilosis accounted for 48.9% (22/45), Candida albicans 35.6% (16/45), Candida tropicalis 11.1% (5/45), and Candida glabrata 4.4% (2/45). The total biofilm biomass and metabolic activity of Candida parapsilosis at 4°C were significantly higher than those of the other Candida species. In the cell surface hydrophobicity assay, Candida parapsilosis was more hydrophobic than Candida albicans and Candida glabrata, but less hydrophobic than Candida tropicalis. Among Candida parapsilosis isolates, 77.3% (17/22) showed strong adhesion ability and 81.8% (18/22) showed strong biofilm-forming ability (OD450>0.16). Candida colony and spore morphology were found to correlate with biofilm-forming ability. Strains with strong biofilm-forming ability had wrinkled, dry colonies; Gram-stained spores appeared as pseudohyphae; and lactophenol cotton blue staining showed spores that were uniformly and deeply stained. In the biofilm-antigenicity analysis, the non-biofilm-forming group’s 1, 3-β-D-glucan release was significantly higher than that of the strong biofilm group, thereby attracting more neutrophils. In antifungal susceptibility tests, except for C. tropicalis, biofilm-grown Candida showed higher minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) than planktonic cells for all antifungal drugs. Caspofungin was active against all isolates in both states.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that C. parapsilosis has greater adhesion ability and a stronger capacity to form biofilms at 4°C (with higher metabolic activity) than other Candida species. When laboratory findings reveal a Candida isolate with a rough colony morphology, its biofilm-forming ability should be tested and antifungal susceptibility should be assessed under biofilm-growing conditions rather than in planktonic culture.Clinically, we recommend shifting antifungal therapy to caspofungin for such infections.

Keywords: 1,3-β-D-glucan; biofilm; Candida keratitis; Candida parapsilosis; postoperative ocular infection

1. Introduction

In recent years, the incidence of Candida keratitis has been rising (Fontana et al., 2019; Song et al., 2021; Masoumi et al., 2024). Fernanda M. Bezerra et al. reported that 84.6% of patients with Candida keratitis had a history of ocular surgery, and 76.9% of those patients had C. parapsilosis isolated (Bezerra et al., 2023). Tarika Thareja et al. proposed that postoperative corneal Candida infections are due to donor corneas being contaminated during storage; donor corneas are typically stored at 4°Cin Optisol-GS preservation solution for 10–14 days (Lau et al., 2019; Thareja et al., 2020). Branchini, Pfaller et al. found that C. parapsilosis can proliferate in storage media and adhere to prosthetic materials to form biofilms, with the extracellular polymeric matrix helping it to firmly attach (Deogaonkar and Roy, 2023; Asogan et al., 2024). After local colonization, C. parapsilosis can further recruit planktonic cells and mature the biofilm, providing a favorable three-dimensional structure for persistent survival. However, due to the small number of post-corneal transplant Candida infection cases, laboratory data on biofilms in this context are very limited, and the role of biofilm in postoperative C. parapsilosis infections remains inconclusive.

Beijing Tongren Hospital of Capital Medical University, the largest ophthalmic center in Northern China, maintains a comprehensive strain collection. In this study, we collected 45 Candida strains from postoperative ocular infections over a 15-year period. Through assays of adhesion, biofilm-forming ability, antigenicity, antifungal susceptibility, and microsatellite typing, we investigated possible factors contributing to C. parapsilosis infections following ophthalmic surgery. The study aims to elucidate the pathogenesis of Candida parapsilosis infection after corneal transplantation and guide the clinical rationality of antifungal therapy.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Strain source

We collected 45 Candida isolates from postoperative ocular infections between January 2010 and December 2024, including 22 C. parapsilosis, 16 C. albicans, 5 C. tropicalis, and 2 C. glabrata. C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019 was used as a reference control strain. It is used as a quality control strain for mass spectrometry identification and biofilm formation assays. In this study, all C. parapsilosis isolates were identified to the species level, not merely as part of the complex. Each isolate was identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). A small amount of colony material from a fresh culture was picked with a sterile swab and smeared evenly onto a MALDI-TOF target plate, then air-dried at room temperature. After drying, 1μL of 70% formic acid was added to the spot, followed by 1μL of matrix solution (saturated α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid in 50% acetonitrile + 47.5% ultrapure water + 2.5% trifluoroacetic acid). After the sample dried again, identification was performed using a Smart MS 5020 automated microbial MALDI-TOF MS system (Zhuhai DL Biotech). A score≥2.0 was considered a reliable species-level identification (Xie et al., 2019; Rodríguez-Temporal et al., 2023).

2.2. Biofilm assay

Each Candida isolate was inoculated on Sabouraud dextrose agar and grown at 35°C for 48 h, then washed twice with sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (10, 000 g, 5 min). The cells were resuspended in Sabouraud dextrose broth and adjusted to 2×106 cells/mL. Then, 100μL of this suspension was added to each well of a sterile 96-well plate (three replicate wells per strain) and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. After incubation, the medium was discarded and the wells were gently washed three times with PBS. Biofilm formation was quantified by measuring the absorbance at 450 nm (OD450) after crystal violet staining (described below). According to Tavanti et al., biofilm-forming ability was categorized as follows: OD450 < 0.03, no biofilm; 0.03 ≤ OD450 < 0.08, weak biofilm; 0.08 ≤ OD450 < 0.16, moderate biofilm; OD450 ≥ 0.16, strong biofilm (Tavanti et al., 2010).

To assess biofilm biomass and metabolic activity at different temperatures, 100μL of the same cell suspension was added to each well of a 96-well plate (three replicates per strain) and incubated either at 37°C for 24 h or at 4°C for 14 days. Two different methods were then used to evaluate biofilm production (Pierce et al., 2008). For biomass quantification, 100 μL of 10% formaldehyde was added to each well to fix the biofilm at room temperature for 2 min. Then, 100μL of 20 mg/mL crystal violet solution was added to each well and incubated for 30 min. The wells were washed with 95% ethanol (100μL) to destain, and absorbance was measured at 620 nm using a spectrophotometer. For metabolic activity, an XTT reduction assay was performed: a solution of 0.5 mg/mL XTT and 1 mmol/L menadione was freshly prepared and 100μL of this mixture was added to each well, followed by incubation at 37°C for 2 h. The absorbance of the XTT formazan product was measured at 450 nm with a microplate reader.

2.3. Cell surface hydrophobicity test

The microbial adhesion to hydrocarbons (MATH) assay was used to evaluate cell surface hydrophobicity (CSH). Candida cells were cultured in Sabouraud dextrose broth at 37°C for 24 h and washed twice with PBS. The cells were resuspended in PBS and adjusted to an optical density (OD600) of 0.4–0.5 (initial OD, A0). Then 0.4 mL of n-hexadecane was gently layered over 3 mL of the cell suspension. The two-phase system was vortexed vigorously and allowed to separate, after which the OD600 of the aqueous phase was measured (A1). The percentage of cell surface hydrophobicity was calculated as: Hydrophobicity (%) = [1–(A1/A0)]×100% (Harjai et al., 2014). Each strain was tested in at least three independent experiments.

2.4. Adhesion assay

Candida isolates were grown on Sabouraud agar at 35°C for 48 h and washed twice with sterile PBS (10, 000 g, 5 min). The cells were resuspended in sterile PBS and adjusted to 2×106 cells/mL. For the adhesion assay (Silva-Dias et al., 2015), 300μL of the yeast suspension was mixed with 300μL of fluorescent microspheres (2×108 microspheres/mL) in a sterile tube and incubated on a shaker at 150 rpm at room temperature for 30 min. The mixture was then analyzed by flow cytometry, collecting 50, 000 yeast cell events per sample. According to Silva-Dias et al., the percentage of yeast cells with bound fluorescent microspheres (gated as population P2) was used as an indicator of adhesion ability. Adhesion was categorized as weak (P2 ≤ 20%), moderate (20% < P2 ≤ 30%), strong (30% < P2 ≤ 50%), or very strong (P2 > 50%). Additionally, the adhesion patterns were classified as homogenic or heterogenic based on the distribution of microspheres per cell: a homogenic distribution (single peak in flow cytometry) indicates each yeast cell is bound to only one microsphere, whereas a heterogenic distribution (multiple peaks) indicates individual yeast cells have more than one microsphere attached. All adhesion experiments were performed at least three times.

2.5. Colony and spore morphology observation

Each Candida isolate, after identification, was streaked for isolation on CHROMagar Candida medium and incubated at 35°C for 5 days to observe colony morphology. Smears of the colonies were then prepared and stained with Gram stain, lactophenol cotton blue, and a fungal fluorescence stain, to observe and record spore morphology.

2.6. Biofilm 1, 3-β-D-glucan release test

1, 3-β-D-glucan is a polysaccharide component widely present in fungal cell walls. The G-test (β-glucan test) uses a kinetic chromogenic assay to detect 1, 3-β-D-glucan. Given that serum 1, 3-β-D-glucan is an early indicator of invasive fungal infection, we explored the relationship between biofilm formation and 1, 3-β-D-glucan release by Candida isolates (Giacobbe et al., 2017). Each Candida strain was inoculated into five replicate wells of a 96-well plate (100μL of suspension per well at 2×106 cells/mL) and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. The culture supernatants from the five wells were pooled and centrifuged (3000 rpm, 10 min). The samples were processed using a Fungitell 1, 3-β-D-glucan detection kit, and 1, 3-β-D-glucan concentrations were measured with a kinetic microplate reader at 75 minutes into the assay.

2.7. Neutrophil migration assay (transwell assay)

A Transwell chamber system was used to evaluate neutrophil chemotaxis. Neutrophils were isolated from fresh human whole blood using a neutrophil isolation kit and diluted in RPMI 1640 medium. Based on preliminary tests, we found that a neutrophil concentration of 5×105/mL in the upper chamber and a Candida suspension of 5×104 cells/mL in the lower chamber allowed clear observation of neutrophil migration through the membrane. Therefore, 200μL of the neutrophil suspension (5×105/mL) was added to the upper chamber, and 500μL of a Candida culture (5×104 cells/mL, grown for 24 h in RPMI 1640) was added to the lower chamber. After incubating at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 5 h, the Transwell insert was removed, and neutrophils that had migrated into the lower chamber were counted (Justus et al., 2023).

2.8. Antifungal susceptibility testing

Susceptibility to nine antifungal agents commonly used in ophthalmology was tested for each Candida isolate in both planktonic (free-living) and biofilm-forming states. The antifungal agents and concentration ranges were: amphotericin B (AMB, 0.125–16μg/mL), chlorhexidine (CDI, 0.03–16μg/mL), natamycin (NAT, 0.12–128μg/mL), terbinafine (TDN, 0.015–16μg/mL), voriconazole (VOR, 0.015–16μg/mL), posaconazole (POS, 0.015–16 μg/mL), itraconazole (ITR, 0.03–16μg/mL), and caspofungin (CAS, 0.016–16μg/mL). The MIC values of planktonic Candida were determined according to the CLSI standard protocols M27-S4 and M27-A3 (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. (CLSI), 2008; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. (CLSI), 2012). According to the experiment by Fernanda M. Bezerra et al (Bezerra et al., 2023), the Candida suspension concentration was adjusted to 0.5 McFarland and inoculated into 96-well cell culture plates (100μL/well), followed by incubation at 37°C for 24 h. A negative control group without antifungal drugs and a blank control group without Candida were established. The wells were rinsed three times with 200 μL PBS to remove non-adherent fungal cells. Antifungal drugs with serial two-fold dilutions were added and incubated at 35°C for 24 h, followed by three additional PBS washes (200 μL each) to eliminate non-adherent cells. Biofilm MICs (BMIC) were defined as the drug concentrations that reduced metabolic activity by 50% compared to drug-free controls. The metabolic activity of biofilms was assessed using the XTT reduction assay as previously described. Each drug-isolate combination was tested in triplicate, and mean values were calculated.

2.9. Microsatellite typing

Genomic DNA of C. parapsilosis isolates was extracted using a bacterial DNA extraction kit (Vazyme, Nanjing). Four polymorphic microsatellite loci (CP1, CP4, CP6, and B5) with high discriminatory power were selected based on the method of Sabino et al (Sabino et al., 2010). The primer sequences and fluorescent labels for these loci are shown in Table 1 (Sabino et al., 2010). PCR amplification was performed in a 25 μL reaction containing 0.5 μL forward primer (10 μmol/L), 0.5 μL reverse primer (10 μmol/L), 1 μL DNA template, 0.5 μL dNTP mix (each 5 μmol/L), 2.5 μL 10× Taq buffer (with MgCl2), 0.2 μL Taq DNA polymerase (5 U/μL), and sterile water to 25 μL. The PCR cycling program was: 95°C for 5 min; 30 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, 72°C for 30 s; and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. PCR products were analyzed by high-resolution capillary electrophoresis (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai). Allele sizes were determined for each locus, and multilocus genotypes were assigned based on the combination of alleles at the four loci. Allele and genotype frequencies were calculated using GeneMapper software.

Table 1.

Microsatellite DNA sequences selected and primers used for PCR amplification.

Microsatellite designation Primer sequencea Size range size (bp) Dye label
CP1 FWD:5’-AAAGTGCTACACACGCATCG-3’
REV: 5’-GGCTTGCAATTTCATTTCCT-3’
107-145 FAM
CP4 FWD:5’-CAAATCATCCAGCTTCAAACC-3’
REV:5’-CATCAAACAAGAATTCGATATCAC-3’
225-249 FAM
CP6 FWD: 5’-CAGGAACAGGACAATGGTGA-3’
REV: 5’-TCTGGAGCCTCTAGGACGTTT-3’
304-449 HEX
B5 FWD:5’-AGGTTTGTAGTAGTGTCCCTATGG-3’
REV: 5’-TATCTCTCTCGCCATTTGAACG-3’
228-303 HEX
a

FWD, forward primer; REV, reverse primer.

2.10. Data analysis

GraphPad Prism 10 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA) was used for statistical analyses and graphing. Quantitative data are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (Mean ± SEM). For non-normally distributed data, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare groups, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Correlations were analyzed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient or Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, as appropriate. For microsatellite data, cluster analysis of C. parapsilosis genotypes was performed using the UPGMA method in MVSP (v3.13n) software, and genetic distances between isolates were calculated.

3. Result

3.1. Strain distribution

A total of 45 Candida isolates from postoperative ocular infections were identified by MALDI-TOF MS. These included 22 C. parapsilosis (48.9%), 16 C. albicans (35.6%), 5 C. tropicalis (11.1%), and 2 C. glabrata (4.4%). All identification scores were ≥ 2.000, indicating reliable species-level identification.

3.2. Epidemiological characteristics of infected patients

Among the 45 patients with postoperative ocular Candida infection, 26 (57.8%) were male and 19 (42.2%) were female. The mean age was 51.1 ± 14.8 years. Fourteen patients (31.1%) were from Northeast China, 27 (60.0%) were from North China, and 4 (8.9%) were from other regions. The most common underlying systemic disease was type 2 diabetes mellitus (22.2%, 10/45), followed by hypertension (13.3%, 6/45). The most frequent ophthalmic surgery associated with Candida infection was corneal transplantation (33.3%, 15/45), followed by cataract surgery (24.4%, 11/45) and vitrectomy (15.6%, 7/45). We grouped the patients by the infecting Candida species (C. parapsilosis group, C. albicans group, C. tropicalis group, C. glabrata group) and analyzed the types of prior ocular surgery in each group. Corneal transplantation was the most common surgery in the C. parapsilosis group (54.5%, 12/22), while cataract surgery was most common in the C. albicans group (31.3%, 5/16). Due to the small case numbers, the predominant surgery type in the C. tropicalis and C. glabrata groups was not clearly determined. In terms of clinical outcomes, 25 patients (55.6%) had their infections controlled with medication alone, whereas 20 patients (44.4%) required therapeutic corneal transplantation. Notably, in the C. parapsilosis group, 72.7% (16/22) of patients ultimately required surgical intervention, and 3 patients (13.6%) underwent a repeat corneal transplant (Table 2).

Table 2.

Population characteristics of Candida keratitis cases.

Variate Candida parapsilosis (n=22) Candida albicans (n=16) Candida tropicalis (n=5) Candida glabrata (n=2)
Age, years 53.2 ± 15.2 57.4 ± 15.7 56.8 ± 10.6 57 ± 12.7
Male 13 (59.1) 10 (62.5) 3 (60) -
Systemic disease
Diabetes 6 (27.3) 3 (18.8) 1 (20) -
High blood pressur 2 (9.1) 4 (25) - -
Renal insufficiency - - 1 (20)
Autoimmune diseases 1 (4.5) - - 1 (50)
Neoplastic diseases 1 (4.5) - - -
Types of Ocular surgery
Keratoplasty 12 (54.5) 2 (12.5) 1 (20) -
Cataract surgery 5 (22.7) 5 (31.3) 1 (20) -
Vitrectomy 2 (9.1) 4 (25) 1 (20) -
Glaucoma surgery 1 (4.5) 2 (12.5) - -
Amnioplasty 1 (4.5) - - -
Other ocular surgery 2 (9.1) 4 (25) 2 (40) 2 (100)
Management
Medicine 6 (27.3) 13 (81.3) 4 (80) 2 (100)
Surgery 16 (72.7) 3 (18.8) 1 (20) -

3.3. Biofilm formation ability, biomass, and metabolic activity at different temperatures

C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis exhibited significantly higher biofilm-forming ability than C. albicans and C. glabrata (p < 0.001). Among all 45 isolates, 18 (40.0%) were classified as strong biofilm formers (OD450 ≥ 0.16), 6 (13.3%) as weak biofilm formers (OD450 < 0.08), and 21 (46.7%) as non-biofilm-forming. As shown in Figure 1, at both 37°C and 4°C, the total biofilm biomass and metabolic activity of C. parapsilosis biofilms were significantly higher than those of C. albicans(p<0.001, p<0.0001)(p<0.001, p<0.01). At 37°C, the biofilm biomass of C. parapsilosis was positively correlated with its biofilm metabolic activity (r=0.807**), whereas no such correlation was observed for the other species. At 4°C, there was no correlation between biofilm biomass and metabolic activity for any of the Candida species.

Figure 1.

Bar charts displaying Total Biomass and Metabolic Activity of four Candida species at two temperatures: 37°C and 4°C. Chart A shows total biomass with C. tropicalis highest at 37°C, and C. parapsilosis highest at 4°C. Chart B shows metabolic activity with C. tropicalis highest at 37°C, and C. parapsilosis highest at 4°C. Statistical significance is indicated with asterisks above the bars.

Biofilm Formation Ability, Biomass, and Metabolic Activity at Different Temperatures. (A) Crystal violet staining assay measures different Candida species’ biomass at 37°Cand 4°C. (B) XTT assay measures different Candida species’ biofilm metabolic activity at 37°Cand 4°C. Error bars represent the standard deviation among results for different isolates.Each isolate was tested for its ability to form biofilm at least 3 times. ****p < 0.0001; ***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01.

3.4. Cell surface hydrophobicity

Candida parapsilosis and C. tropicalis showed significantly higher cell surface hydrophobicity percentages than C. albicans and C. glabrata (p < 0.001) (Figure 2). In C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis, the cell surface hydrophobicity was positively correlated with biofilm biomass (r=0.48* and r=0.90*), whereas no correlation was observed for C. albicans or C. glabrata.

Figure 2.

Bar chart showing the percentage of hydrophobicity for four species: C. parapsilosis, C. albicans, C. tropicalis, and C. glabrata. C. parapsilosis has approximately 40%, C. tropicalis around 60%, C. albicans about 10%, and C. glabrata almost 0%. Error bars indicate variability, and an asterisk denotes significance for C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis.

Candida hydrophobicity was measured according MATH test. Results are representative of the mean results of each species. Each strain was tested three times.There was no significant comparison among other strains. ***p < 0.001.

3.5. Adhesion assay

C. parapsilosis demonstrated the strongest adhesion ability among the species, with an adhesion percentage of (38.54 ± 3.97)%, and 73.7% of C. parapsilosis isolates were classified as having strong or very strong adhesion. C. tropicalis had the second highest adhesion (19.98 ± 7.50%), with 20% of isolates classified as strong/very strong. C. albicans and C. glabrata exhibited weak adhesion, with adhesion percentages below 10%. The adhesion of C. parapsilosis was significantly higher than that of C. albicans (p < 0.0001). A heterogeneous adhesion distribution pattern (multiple peaks in flow cytometry) was observed in 63.2% of C. parapsilosis isolates, which was significantly higher than in the other species (Figure 3). Additionally, C. parapsilosis adhesion was positively correlated with biofilm biomass (r=0.60**), a correlation significantly stronger than that of the other species. C. albicans also showed a positive correlation between adhesion and biofilm biomass (r=0.56*), as did C. tropicalis (r=0.90*).

Figure 3.

Graph A shows a scatter plot comparing the percentage of cells with adherent microspheres across four Candida species. C. parapsilosis exhibits the highest adhesion, followed by C. albicans, C. tropicalis, and C. glabrata. Graph B presents histograms illustrating adhesion profiles for each species, categorized as low, intermediate, high, and very high adhesion, highlighting heterogeneity in adhesion patterns.

Representation of Candida adhesion profiles. (A) The species with higher percentage of cells with adherent microspheres are C. parapsilosis. Results represent the mean of at least 3 independent experiments, performed in triplicate. ****p < 0.0001. (B) Homogenic (a homogenous distribution pattern characterizes a population of yeast cells bound to the same number of microspheres, frequently binding to a single microsphere) and Heterogenic (a heterogeneous pattern displays the presence of different peaks beyond the third logarithmic decade and indicates that more than a single microsphere is attached to each yeast cell) distribution patterns.P3:Percentage of cell with adherent microspheres.

3.6. Colony and spore morphology records

In preliminary microscopic examinations of clinical corneal exudate smears, we observed that Candida could appear in two forms. In one form (non-biofilm-forming Candida), fungal spores were distributed sparsely and could be phagocytosed by neutrophils; in the other form (biofilm-producing Candida), fungal spores appeared in sheets that neutrophils could not phagocytose (Figure 4). This finding corroborated that some Candida can form biofilms upon infecting donor corneas.

Figure 4.

Two microscopic slides: Image A depicts a dense aggregation of small, dark-stained cells, while Image B shows larger, more scattered cells with distinct nuclei, all in shades of pink and purple.

Differences under the microscope (Gram stain, 1000×) between corneal exudates infected with biofilm-producing vs. non-biofilm-producing C. parapsilosis. (A) Corneal surface exudate with a biofilm-producing strain: numerous fungal spores (purple) attached to the surfaces of apoptotic cells and in the intercellular spaces. (B) Corneal surface exudate with a non-biofilm-producing strain: few extracellular fungal spores are observed; most spores have been phagocytosed by neutrophils and mononuclear phagocytes.

After 5 days of culture on CHROMagar, the colony and spore morphologies of the Candida isolates were recorded and compared based on their biofilm-forming abilities (Figure 5). We found that isolates with strong biofilm-forming ability had rough, wrinkled and dry colonies. On Gram staining, these isolates showed spores in pseudohyphal form, and on lactophenol cotton blue staining their spores were uniformly and deeply stained. In contrast, isolates with weak biofilm-forming ability had smooth, moist colonies; on Gram stain their spores appeared as oval yeasts, and on lactophenol cotton blue their spores showed uneven staining intensity.

Figure 5.

Panel of twelve images labeled A to L, depicting bacterial cultures and microscopic images. Panels A, E, and I show bacterial growth on Petri dishes with varying colony sizes and colors. Panels B, F, and J display histological sections of tissue with different structural patterns. Panels C, G, and K show bacteria stained in pink on a light background, with differing densities. Panels D, H, and L exhibit bacteria stained in blue, scattered across a light background. Each set, A-D, E-H, and I-L, presents variations in morphology and density.

Relationship of biofilm-forming ability with colony morphology, spore morphology, and staining characteristics. (A) Colony of a strong biofilm-forming strain (C. parapsilosis, rough morphotype). (B) Robust biofilm formed by a strong biofilm-forming strain. (C) Gram-stained spores of a strong biofilm-forming Candida showing pseudohyphal morphology. (D) Lactophenol cotton blue-stained spores of a strong biofilm-forming Candida showing uniform, deep staining. (E) Colony of a weak biofilm-forming strain (C. albicans, smooth morphotype). (F) Weak biofilm formed by a weak biofilm-forming strain. (G) Gram-stained spores of a weak biofilm-forming Candida showing ovoid yeast morphology. (H) Lactophenol cotton blue-stained spores of a weak biofilm-forming Candida showing variable staining intensity. (I) Colony of a non-biofilm-forming strain (C. glabrata, smooth morphotype). (J) Microscopic appearance of a non-biofilm-forming strain (no biofilm observed). (K) Gram-stained spores of a non-biofilm-forming Candida. (L) Lactophenol cotton blue-stained spores of a non-biofilm-forming Candida. Biofilm images 400×; Gram stain 1000×; lactophenol cotton blue 1000×.

3.7. Relationship between biofilm formation and 1, 3-β-D-glucan release

Our results showed that Candida strains with strong biofilm formation released 1, 3-β-D-glucan at 374.2 ± 295.8 pg/mL, whereas non-biofilm-forming strains released 714.3 ± 447.0 pg/mL (Figure 6). The non-biofilm group released significantly more 1, 3-β-D-glucan than the strong biofilm group (p < 0.05), indicating that non-biofilm-forming Candida strains exhibit higher antigenicity. Moreover, the amount of 1, 3-β-D-glucan released was negatively correlated with the biofilm’s metabolic activity (r = –0.64*).

Figure 6.

Bar chart comparing the release amount of 1,3-beta-D-glucan between biofilm-producing and non-biofilm-producing Candida. The bar for non-biofilm-producing Candida is higher, with a significant difference indicated by an asterisk.

Relationship between biofilm formation and 1, 3-β-D-glucan release. Non-biofilm-forming Candida strains released significantly more 1, 3-β-D-glucan than strong biofilm-forming strains. Each experiment was performed in triplicate. *p < 0.05.

3.8. Neutrophil migration experiment

In the Transwell chemotaxis assay, the control group (no Candida) induced the migration of 4.8×104 ± 8.4×103 neutrophils. The high biofilm-producing group induced 7.8×105 ± 1.1×105 neutrophils to migrate, while the non-biofilm-producing group induced 8.76×105 ± 3.7×105 neutrophils (Figure 7). In the non-biofilm group, one C. parapsilosis isolate attracted as many as 1.49×106 neutrophils; this strain’s 1, 3-β-D-glucan level was 410.2 pg/mL, without a notably elevated antigenic response.

Figure 7.

Bar chart comparing migration cell numbers among control, biofilm-producing Candida, and non-biofilm-producing Candida. Control shows minimal migration, while both Candida groups show significantly higher numbers. Asterisks indicate statistical significance.

Neutrophil migration (Transwell) assay for Candida strains with different biofilm-forming abilities. Non-biofilm-forming strains (which release higher levels of 1, 3-β-D-glucan) attracted more neutrophils than biofilm-forming strains. Each experiment was performed in triplicate. ***p < 0.001.

3.9. Antifungal susceptibility of biofilm and planktonic Candida

Planktonic antifungal susceptibility tests were successfully performed on all 45 Candida isolates. However, due to disruption of biofilms during the washing steps for weak biofilm producers, only 18 strong biofilm-forming isolates (15 C. parapsilosis and 3 C. tropicalis) were evaluated for antifungal susceptibility in the biofilm state. Except for C. tropicalis (which had terbinafine, voriconazole, posaconazole, and itraconazole MICs > 16 μg/mL in both planktonic and biofilm states), all Candida species showed markedly higher MICs in the biofilm state than in the planktonic state. Across all isolates, caspofungin maintained low MIC values in both states with no significant differences. The planktonic MIC results for all isolates are presented in Table 3, and the biofilm MIC (BMIC) results for the 18 strong biofilm-forming isolates are presented in Table 4.

Table 3.

Antifungal susceptibilities of different Candida strains under planktonic growth conditions.

Candida species Planktonic MIC (μg/mL) of: CASi
AMBa CDIb NATc TDNd VORe POSf ITRg FLUh
C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019 2 1 8 4 0.015, S 0.25 0.25 0.5 0.5, S
C. parapsilosis 2407 1 1 8 4 0.015, S 0.03, S 0.06 0.25 0.5, S
C. parapsilosis 1951 0.25 2 8 4 0.03, S 0.03, S 0.06 0.5 0.25, S
C. parapsilosis 2699 0.25 2 8 2 0.03, S 0.03, S 0.03 0.5 0.25, S
C. parapsilosis 2132 0.5 1 4 2 0.015, S 0.03, S 0.03 0.25 0.5, S
C. parapsilosis 1167 0.5 2 8 4 0.015, S 0.03, S 0.06 0.25 0.5, S
C. parapsilosis 1277 0.25 2 8 2 0.03, S 0.03, S 0.03 0.5 0.25, S
C. parapsilosis 1354 0.5 2 4 2 0.015, S 0.03, S 0.06 0.25 0.5, S
C. parapsilosis 1513 0.5 2 8 4 0.03, S 0.03, S 0.06 0.25 0.5, S
C. parapsilosis 1514 0.25 1 4 2 0.015, S 0.03, S 0.03 0.25 0.5, S
C. parapsilosis 389 0.25 1 8 4 0.06, S 0.06, S 0.125 0.5 0.25, S
C. parapsilosis 1037 0.5 1 8 2 0.03, S 0.06, S 0.125 0.25 0.5, S
C. parapsilosis 1348 0.5 2 8 4 0.015, S 0.03, S 0.06 0.25 0.5, S
C. parapsilosis 1350 0.5 2 8 4 0.03, S 0.03, S 0.06 0.25 0.5, S
C. parapsilosis 2478 0.5 2 8 4 0.015, S 0.03, S 0.06 0.25 0.5, S
C. parapsilosis 2581 0.5 2 4 2 0.015, S 0.03, S 0.06 0.25 0.5, S
C. parapsilosis 2591 0.5 2 8 4 0.03, S 0.03, S 0.06 0.25 0.5, S
C. parapsilosis 2229 0.5 2 8 4 0.03, S 0.03, S 0.06 0.25 0.5, S
C. parapsilosis 2766 0.25 1 4 2 0.015, S 0.03, S 0.03 0.25 0.5, S
C. parapsilosis 1194 0.5 2 8 4 0.015, S 0.03, S 0.06 0.25 0.5, S
C. parapsilosis 1192 0.25 2 8 2 0.03, S 0.03, S 0.03 0.5 0.25, S
C. parapsilosis 1207 0.5 2 8 4 0.015, S 0.03, S 0.06 0.25 0.5, S
C. albicans 1115 0.25 2 4 >16 0.125, S 0.06, S 0.125 4 0.064, S
C. albicans 1862 0.5 2 4 >16 0.015, S 0.03, S 0.03 0.5 0.25, S
C. albicans 1868 0.125 2 4 >16 0.015, S 0.03, S 0.03 0.5 0.064, S
C. albicans 1928 0.125 1 8 >16 0.015, S 0.015, S 0.03 0.05 0.125, S
C. albicans 2611 0.25 1 4 >16 0.03, S 0.06, S 0.06 0.05 0.125, S
C. albicans 1480 0.125 1 8 >16 0.015, S 0.015, S 0.03 0.25 0.064, S
C. albicans 2695 0.25 1 8 >16 0.015, S 0.015, S 0.03 0.25 0.125, S
C. albicans 1213 0.25 2 4 >16 0.015, S 0.015, S 0.03 0.25 0.064, S
C. albicans 1297 0.25 2 8 >16 0.015, S 0.015, S 0.06 0.25 0.125, S
C. albicans 1372 0.125 1 8 >16 0.03, S 0.06, S 0.06 1 0.064, S
C. albicans 1519 0.25 1 4 >16 0.015, S 0.06, S 0.06 1 0.125, S
C. albicans 1549 0.25 2 4 >16 0.03, S 0.015, S 0.06 0.25 0.064, S
C. albicans 1770 0.125 1 8 >16 0.03, S 0.06, S 0.03 0.25 0.064, S
C. albicans 3137 0.25 1 8 >16 0.015, S 0.015, S 0.03 1 0.064, S
C. albicans 1966 0.25 1 8 >16 0.03, S 0.06, S 0.03 0.25 0.064, S
C. albicans 1503 0.125 2 4 >16 0.015, S 0.06, S 0.06 0.25 0.064, S
C. tropicalis 2099 0.25 1 4 >16 >16, R >16, R >16 4 0.25, S
C. tropicalis 2098 0.25 1 4 >16 >16, R >16, R >16 4 0.25, S
C. tropicalis 2491 0.25 1 8 >16 >16, R >16, R >16 4 0.25, S
C. tropicalis 2379 0.25 1 4 >16 >16, R >16, R >16 4 0.25, S
C. tropicalis 2800 0.25 1 4 >16 >16, R >16, R >16 4 0.25, S
C. glabrata 2555 0.25 1 4 2 0.015, S 0.015, S 0.03 0.25 0.064, S
C. glabrata 2105 0.25 1 4 2 0.015, S 0.015, S 0.03 0.25 0.064, S
a

AMB, amphotericinB;

b

CDI, Chlorhexidine;

c

NAT, natamycin;

d

TDN, terbinafine;

e

VOR, Voriconazole;

f

POS, Posaconazole;

g

ITR, Itraconazole;

h

FLU, Fluconazole;

i

CAS, Caspofungin

Table 4.

Antifungal susceptibilities of different Candida strains under biofilm(BMIC) growth conditions.

Candida species BMIC50 MIC (μg/mL) of: CAS
AMB CDI NAT TDN VOR POS ITR FLU
C. parapsilosis 2407 >16 >16 >128 >16 >16 >16 >16 >128 2
C. parapsilosis 1951 >16 >16 >128 >16 >16 >16 >16 >128 0.125
C. parapsilosis 2699 >16 >16 >128 >16 >16 >16 >16 >128 0.25
C. parapsilosis 2132 >16 >16 >128 >16 >16 >16 >16 >128 0.125
C. parapsilosis 389 8 >16 64 8 8 >16 >16 >128 0.016
C. parapsilosis 1037 >16 >16 >128 >16 >16 >16 >16 >128 0.125
C. parapsilosis 1348 16 >16 >128 >16 >16 >16 >16 >128 0.016
C. parapsilosis 1350 8 16 32 >16 >16 >16 >16 >128 0.5
C. parapsilosis 2478 >16 >16 128 >16 >16 >16 >16 >128 0.016
C. parapsilosis 2581 >16 >16 >128 >16 >16 >16 >16 >128 0.5
C. parapsilosis 2591 8 4 32 >16 >16 >16 8 >128 0.032
C. parapsilosis 2766 >16 >16 >128 >16 >16 >16 >16 >128 0.125
C. parapsilosis 1194 >16 >16 >128 >16 >16 >16 >16 >128 0.125
C. parapsilosis 1192 >16 >16 128 >16 >16 >16 >16 >128 0.016
C. parapsilosis 1207 >16 >16 >128 >16 >16 >16 >16 >128 0.5
C. tropicalis 2099 >16 >16 >128 >16 >16 >16 >16 >128 0.064
C. tropicalis 2098 >16 >16 >128 >16 >16 >16 >16 >128 0.5
C. tropicalis 2491 >16 >16 >128 >16 >16 >16 >16 >128 0.125

3.10. Microsatellite genotyping

Microsatellite multilocus typing results for the 22 C. parapsilosis isolates are shown in Table 5. The 22 isolates were resolved into 18 distinct genotypes. Types I, II, III, and IV each contained two isolates with identical allele profiles, while each of the remaining genotypes was represented by a single isolate, indicating a high genetic diversity among the isolates(Figure 8). Notably, all isolates from the year 2024 were grouped into genotype III or IV, and all of these were high biofilm-producing strains. This suggests a potential clustering trend for C. parapsilosis genotypes in 2024.

Table 5.

Microsatellite multilocus analysis of Candida parapsilosis isolates obtained from eye surgery.

Candida species Typing Date Multilocus genotype
CP1 CP4 CP6 B5
2699 I 2014 129 129 243 243 448 448 231 270
2407 2010 129 129 243 243 448 448 231 270
1037 II 2018 113 129 240 249 406 406 264 288
1277 2016 113 129 243 243 358 406 264 288
1194 III 2024 129 129 242 242 473 473 230 271
1207 2024 129 129 242 242 473 473 230 271
2766 IV 2024 129 129 243 243 358 445 246 270
1129 2024 129 129 243 243 358 445 246 270
1951 V 2012 113 113 225 240 364 364 267 270
2681 VI 2012 143 145 240 240 304 304 276 279
2132 VII 2014 129 129 243 243 358 358 231 270
1167 VIII 2014 113 127 243 243 358 406 264 288
1354 IX 2016 107 119 237 237 304 319 285 288
1513 X 2016 119 119 237 237 304 304 285 288
1514 XI 2018 127 127 237 237 304 415 234 234
389 XII 2018 127 127 237 237 415 454 276 291
1348 XIII 2019 129 129 240 240 364 367 300 303
1350 XIV 2019 113 129 240 243 364 364 267 270
2478 XV 2022 129 129 243 243 364 364 268 270
2581 XVI 2023 129 129 243 243 373 445 231 270
2591 XVII 2023 127 127 240 240 322 406 228 270
2229 XVIII 2023 107 107 237 237 322 322 270 270

Figure 8.

Dendrogram showing hierarchical clustering of various samples. X-axis represents the distance or similarity scale. Samples labeled numerically and with “ATCC 22019” are along the right side, highlighting their relatedness.

Dendrogram showing clustering of Candida parapsilosis isolates obtained from corneal transplant status, based on microsatellite multilocus genotyping. Genetic distances were calculated by using MVSP (v3.13n) software program and clustering performed by using UPGMA method. Candida parapsilosis ATCC 22019 belongs to type II.

4. Discussion

1. Despite many reports on C. parapsilosis causing bloodstream and other infections, studies on its ocular pathogenic risk factors are relatively few. Our study showed that C. parapsilosis is the most prevalent Candida species in postoperative ocular infections, and the rate of infection after corneal transplantation is significantly higher for C. parapsilosis than for the other three Candida species, similar to the findings of Tanya Trinh et al (Thareja et al., 2020). Corneal transplantation provides C. parapsilosis a route to infect ocular tissue, making postoperative infection more likely. Donor corneas share many properties with indwelling medical devices – for example, a smooth surface, tensile strength, supportiveness, and good biocompatibility – which also make them conducive to C. parapsilosis colonization. Our study also found that a high proportion of patients with postoperative ocular Candida infection had type 2 diabetes, a condition that impairs immune function and creates a hyperglycemic environment in which C. parapsilosis can more readily form biofilms, leading to pan-corneal infection and dissemination (Dorko et al., 2005; Hernández-Pabón et al., 2024). In our series, 72.7% of patients with C. parapsilosis infections required surgical intervention (e.g., therapeutic keratoplasty), a rate markedly higher than for the other Candida species. This may be because biofilm formation by C. parapsilosis renders medical (drug) therapy less effective, necessitating surgical management.

2. A greater proportion of C. parapsilosis isolates produced biofilm compared to C. tropicalis, C. albicans, and C. glabrata. Nearly half of the high biofilm-producing isolates in post-corneal transplant infections were C. parapsilosis. Although at 37°C C. parapsilosis biofilms did not have as high a biomass or metabolic activity as those of C. tropicalis, the biofilm production among C. tropicalis isolates varied widely. At 4°C, C. parapsilosis had a significantly greater ability to form biofilm than the other species. These characteristics indicate that C. parapsilosis not only generally has a stronger capacity to form biofilms, but is also better adapted to low-temperature environments. Donor corneas are stored at 4°C in Optisol-GS for 10–14 days; low temperature favors C. parapsilosis biofilm formation, which may be one reason C. parapsilosis infection rates after corneal transplantation are higher than with other species. C. tropicalis also showed a high biofilm-forming ability at 37°C, but did not have an advantage at 4°C.

3. Adhesion is a crucial initial step in Candida pathogenesis and is considered an important virulence factor (de Souza et al., 2023). Studies have shown that C. parapsilosis has a higher adhesion to biomaterials than other Candida species (Silva et al., 2011; Borges et al., 2018). This is closely related to the cell wall composition; in the yeast form, C. parapsilosis can express more adhesin proteins such as Als1, Als3, Als6, Als7, and Hwp1 (Cuéllar-Cruz et al., 2012). Although some research suggests that adhesion and biofilm production are not directly correlated (Silva et al., 2010), our findings indicate that in postoperative corneal Candida infections, biofilm biomass is positively correlated with adhesion strength for most species (except C. glabrata). Specifically, only C. parapsilosis showed a strong correlation between biofilm biomass and metabolic activity at 37°C, perhaps because each Candida species has its own metabolic rate that may not directly reflect biofilm mass. We also found that C. parapsilosis had relatively high cell surface hydrophobicity. Considering its strong adhesion, robust biofilm formation at 4°C, and high metabolic activity, C. parapsilosis is well-equipped to attach to and form biofilms on cold, abiotic surfaces (like stored corneas). We additionally observed that C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis hydrophobicity was positively correlated with biofilm biomass, suggesting that cell surface hydrophobicity could serve as another indicator of biofilm-forming capability.

4. The results of corneal secretion smears from patients with postoperative Candida keratitis in this study showed that some Candida can form biofilms upon infecting donor corneas. In recording colony and spore morphology, we found these characteristics to be associated with biofilm-forming ability, consistent with the findings of Emilia Gómez-Molero et al (Gómez-Molero et al., 2021). Our study showed that C. parapsilosis colonies grow more slowly than other Candida – non-smooth (rough) colony morphology could only be observed after 48 hours of growth, and became more pronounced by 96 hours, which is different from other Candida species. When laboratory conditions limit immediate biofilm testing, one should preliminarily infer biofilm formation ability based on colony morphology and spore microscopic characteristics. For C. parapsilosis, the incubation time should be extended to observe colony texture changes. This approach can guide subsequent choice of antifungal agents and dosing.

5. We found that 1, 3-β-D-glucan levels were inversely correlated with biofilm metabolic activity – in other words, faster biofilm formation was associated with weaker antigen expression. Thus, in clinical practice, a low 1, 3-β-D-glucan level (or a negative serum G-test) cannot completely rule out Candida infection; clinical judgment should consider risk factors, symptoms, and signs in combination. Early identification of contaminated donor corneas is critical for the prognosis of corneal transplants. Because postoperative ocular infections can be caused by a variety of microbes (not limited to Candida), performing metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) on corneal storage solution prior to transplantation is very important to detect any contamination of the donor cornea. Our study also showed a certain relationship between 1, 3-β-D-glucan release and neutrophil chemotaxis: non-biofilm-forming strains released higher levels of 1, 3-β-D-glucan and attracted more neutrophils than biofilm-forming strains, although the difference was not statistically significant. This suggests that non-biofilm strains, which express higher levels of antigens (mainly 1, 3-β-D-glucan and mannan), can recruit more neutrophils to the infection site. In contrast, biofilm-forming strains attract fewer neutrophils, potentially impairing the host’s ability to fight the infection and leading to prolonged disease.

6. Natamycin and voriconazole are first-line topical antifungals for fungal keratitis. Chlorhexidine is a cationic biguanide disinfectant/antiseptic that exerts broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity mainly by binding to and disrupting fungal cell membranes (Hiom et al., 1996; McDonnell and Russell, 1999; Lima de Sousa et al., 2024). Chlorhexidine can bind to keratin in the corneal epithelium and persist, and studies have confirmed that repeated use has a cumulative effect (Mullany et al., 2006; Abbood et al., 2023). We found that 16 C. albicans and 3 C. tropicalis isolates had high terbinafine MICs (>16 μg/mL) in planktonic tests, consistent with the findings of Pashootan et al. that this resistance is related to mutations in the squalene epoxidase (SQLE) gene (Pashootan et al., 2022). Research on Candida from skin infections also showed that 88.05% of C. albicans and 82.14% of C. tropicalis isolates are non-wild-type (suggesting potential resistance) to terbinafine (Yang et al., 2022). In the treatment of Candida keratitis, oral terbinafine is sometimes used empirically, but our findings indicate that this therapy may be ineffective and could even promote resistance under drug pressure; hence, routine use of terbinafine for ocular Candida is not recommended.

Our study showed that Candida in biofilm form has substantially reduced susceptibility to antifungal drugs compared to planktonic Candida. The MICs of all commonly used antifungal agents reached levels indicative of resistance in the biofilm state. Except for caspofungin, the biofilm MICs of all other antifungal drugs were at resistant or much higher concentrations than their planktonic MICs, consistent with related studies (Ramage et al., 2001; Ruiz de Alegría Puig et al., 2023; Przybek-Skrzypecka et al., 2024). Most antifungal agents target ergosterol in the cell membrane, whereas caspofungin inhibits 1, 3-β-D-glucan synthase, disrupting cell wall synthesis. It also suppresses biofilm formation and reduces the metabolic activity of biofilms (Katragkou et al., 2008). Topical natamycin and other agents may not achieve therapeutic concentrations within a mature biofilm, leading to poor clinical outcomes in post-corneal transplant Candida infections and the need for surgical intervention in some patients (Tobudic et al., 2012; Das et al., 2022). Moreover, since Candida can form biofilms on corneas during cold storage, the low-temperature environment slows fungal metabolism, and most antifungal drugs are more effective against actively growing cells. Thus, low temperatures induce an increase in biofilm-related drug resistance, rendering many standard antifungals ineffective (Hall and Mah, 2017).

7. Microsatellite genotyping revealed a sporadic distribution of C. parapsilosis genotypes, with no closely related cluster of strains identified. This sporadic pattern may be due to patients having undergone ophthalmic surgeries at different hospitals and geographic locations. However, interestingly, all C. parapsilosis isolates from 2024 fell into only two genotypes (III and IV), and all were high biofilm-producing strains. This finding suggests that we should monitor the microsatellite genotypes of C. parapsilosis isolates in the post-2024 period for any emerging clustering trends, in order to prevent the occurrence of nosocomial outbreaks.

8. We also noted one C. tropicalis strain that produced a much greater biofilm at 37°C (far exceeding other Candida in biomass) but had poor biofilm formation at 4°C, below most C. parapsilosis strains. Although C. tropicalis infections should not be underestimated—especially in high-risk settings like ICUs where its incidence exceeds that of C. parapsilosis and it shows resistance to some antifungals—this particular observation underscores a key difference: C. tropicalis is less adept at forming biofilms at low temperatures compared to C. parapsilosis. Thus, while C. tropicalis can be highly virulent in certain contexts, in the scenario of cold-stored corneal grafts, C. parapsilosis has a distinct advantage and warrants heightened attention (Negri et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2021; Ahmad et al., 2022).

5. Conclusion

C. parapsilosis is the leading Candida species isolated after corneal transplantation, and it exhibits significantly greater adhesion ability and biofilm-forming capacity at 4°C (with higher metabolic activity) than other Candida species. This propensity likely contributes to its higher post-transplant infection rate. When a laboratory encounters a Candida isolate with rough colony morphology, antifungal susceptibility testing should be performed under biofilm-growing conditions rather than only in the planktonic state. High biofilm-producing strains may yield false-negative results in the G-test (serum 1, 3-β-D-glucan assay), so early identification of biofilm-producing Candida strains is critical. If resources for biofilm testing are limited, clinicians managing post-corneal transplant infections should still account for the possibility of biofilm. When all other antifungal agents prove ineffective, caspofungin should be appropriately considered for treatment.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank AiMi Academic Services (www.aimieditor.com) for English language editing and review services.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.

Footnotes

Edited by: Keke Zhang, Wenzhou Medical University, China

Reviewed by: Ayse Kalkanci, Gazi University, Türkiye

Penghao Guo, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, China

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

YW: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. MK: Writing – review & editing. ZW: Writing – review & editing. YZ: Writing – review & editing. KC: Writing – review & editing. QL: Writing – review & editing. XL: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  1. Abbood H. M., Hijazi K., Gould I. M. (2023). Chlorhexidine resistance or cross-resistance, that is the question. Antibiotics (Basel). 12, 798. doi:  10.3390/antibiotics12050798, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahmad S., Kumar S., Rajpal K., Sinha R., Kumar R., Muni S., et al. (2022). Candidemia among ICU patients: species characterisation, resistance pattern and association with candida score: A prospective study. Cureus 14, e24612. doi:  10.7759/cureus.24612, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Asogan M., Kim H. Y., Kidd S., Alastruey-Izquierdo A., Govender N. P., Dao A., et al. (2024). Candida parapsilosis: A systematic review to inform the World Health Organization fungal priority pathogens list. Med. Mycol 62, myad131., PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bezerra F. M., Rocchetti T. T., Lima S. L., Yu M. C. Z., da Matta D. A., Höfling-Lima A. L., et al. (2023). Candida species causing fungal keratitis: molecular identification, antifungal susceptibility, biofilm formation, and clinical aspects. Braz. J. Microbiol. 54, 629–636. doi:  10.1007/s42770-023-00964-w, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Borges K. R. A., Pimentel I. V., Lucena L. C. L. D. S., Silva M. A. C. N. D., Monteiro S. G., Monteiro C. A., et al. (2018). Adhesion and biofilm formation of Candida parapsilosis isolated from vaginal secretions to copper intrauterine devices. Rev. Inst Med. Trop. Sao Paulo. 60, e59. doi:  10.1590/s1678-9946201860059, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. (CLSI) (2008). Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts. 3rd ed (Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; ). [Google Scholar]
  7. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. (CLSI) (2012). Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts; fourth informational supplement (Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; ). [Google Scholar]
  8. Cuéllar-Cruz M., Vega-González A., Mendoza-Novelo B., López-Romero E., Ruiz-Baca E., Quintanar-Escorza M. A., et al. (2012). The effect of biomaterials and antifungals on biofilm formation by Candida species: a review. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 31, 2513–2527. doi:  10.1007/s10096-012-1634-6, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Das S., Chaurasia S., Sharma S., Das S. (2022). Early postoperative infection following lamellar keratoplasty: a review. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 106, 741–754. doi:  10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-318305, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Deogaonkar K., Roy A. (2023). Donor related corneal graft infection: a review of literature and preventive strategies. Semin. Ophthalmol. 38, 219–225. doi:  10.1080/08820538.2022.2095873, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. de Souza C. M., Dos Santos M. M., Furlaneto-Maia L., Furlaneto M. C. (2023). Adhesion and biofilm formation by the opportunistic pathogen Candida tropicalis: what do we know? Can. J. Microbiol. 69, 207–218. doi:  10.1139/cjm-2022-0195, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dorko E., Baranová Z., Jenca A., Kizek P., Pilipcinec E., Tkáciková L. (2005). Diabetes mellitus and candidiases. Folia Microbiol. (Praha). 50, 255–261. doi:  10.1007/BF02931574, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fontana L., Moramarco A., Mandarà E., Russello G., Iovieno A. (2019). Interface infectious keratitis after anterior and posterior lamellar keratoplasty. Clinical features and treatment strategies. A review. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 103, 307–314. doi:  10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-312938, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Giacobbe D. R., Del Bono V., Viscoli C., Mikulska M. (2017). Use of 1, 3-β-D-glucan in invasive fungal diseases in hematology patients. Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 15, 1101–1112. doi:  10.1080/14787210.2017.1401467, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gómez-Molero E., De-la-Pinta I., Fernández-Pereira J., Groß U., Weig M., Quindós G., et al. (2021). Candida parapsilosis colony morphotype forecasts biofilm formation of clinical isolates. J. Fungi (Basel). 7, 33. doi:  10.3390/jof7010033, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hall C. W., Mah T. F. (2017). Molecular mechanisms of biofilm-based antibiotic resistance and tolerance in pathogenic bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 41, 276–301. doi:  10.1093/femsre/fux010, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Harjai K., Gupta R. K., Sehgal H. (2014). Attenuation of quorum sensing controlled virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by cranberry. Indian J. Med. Res. 139, 446–453., PMID: [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hernández-Pabón J. C., Tabares B., Gil Ó., Lugo-Sánchez C., Santana A., Barón A., et al. (2024). CandidaNon-albicans and non-auris causing invasive candidiasis in a fourth-level hospital in Colombia: epidemiology, antifungal susceptibility, and genetic diversity. J. Fungi (Basel). 10, 326. doi:  10.3390/jof10050326, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hiom S. J., Furr J. R., Russell A. D., Hann A. C. (1996). The possible role of yeast cell walls in modifying cellular response to chlorhexidine diacetate. Cytobios 86, 123–135., PMID: [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Justus C. R., Marie M. A., Sanderlin E. J., Yang L. V. (2023). Transwell in vitro cell migration and invasion assays. Methods Mol. Biol. 2644, 349–359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Katragkou A., Chatzimoschou A., Simitsopoulou M., Dalakiouridou M., Diza-Mataftsi E., Tsantali C., et al. (2008). Differential activities of newer antifungal agents against Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis biofilms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52, 357–360. doi:  10.1128/AAC.00856-07, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lau N., Hajjar Sesé A., Augustin V. A., Kuit G., Wilkins M. R., Tourtas T., et al. (2019). Fungal infection after endothelial keratoplasty: association with hypothermic corneal storage. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 103, 1487–1490. doi:  10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-312709, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lima de Sousa T., Dourado D., Rodrigues J. S., de Souza Rebouças J., Montes M. A. J. R., Formiga F. R. (2024). Treatment of periodontal disease: does drug delivery matter? Front. Bioeng Biotechnol. 12, 1427758. doi:  10.3389/fbioe.2024.1427758, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Masoumi A., Soleimani M., Azizkhani M., Izadi A., Cheraqpour K., Tabatabaei S. A., et al. (2024). Clinical features, risk factors, and management of candida keratitis. Ocul Immunol. Inflamm. 32, 1169–1174. doi:  10.1080/09273948.2023.2203752, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. McDonnell G., Russell A. D. (1999). Antiseptics and disinfectants: activity, action, and resistance [published correction appears in Clin Microbiol Rev 2001 Jan;14(1):227. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 12, 147–179. doi:  10.1128/CMR.12.1.147, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mullany L. C., Darmstadt G. L., Khatry S. K., Katz J., LeClerq S. C., Shrestha S., et al. (2006). Topical applications of chlorhexidine to the umbilical cord for prevention of omphalitis and neonatal mortality in southern Nepal: a community-based, cluster-randomised trial. Lancet 367, 910–918. doi:  10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68381-5, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Negri M., Silva S., Henriques M., Oliveira R. (2012). Insights into Candida tropicalis nosocomial infections and virulence factors. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 31, 1399–1412. doi:  10.1007/s10096-011-1455-z, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Pashootan N., Shams-Ghahfarokhi M., Chaichi Nusrati A., Salehi Z., Asmar M., Razzaghi-Abyaneh M. (2022). Phylogeny, antifungal susceptibility, and point mutations of SQLE gene in major pathogenic dermatophytes isolated from clinical dermatophytosis. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 12, 851769. doi:  10.3389/fcimb.2022.851769, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Pierce C. G., Uppuluri P., Tristan A. R., Wormley F. L., Mowat E., Ramage G., et al. (2008). A simple and reproducible 96-well plate-based method for the formation of fungal biofilms and its application to antifungal susceptibility testing. Nat. Protoc. 3, 1494–1500. doi:  10.1038/nprot.2008.141, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Przybek-Skrzypecka J., Samelska K., Ordon A. J., Skrzypecki J., Izdebska J., Kołątaj M., et al. (2024). Post-keratoplasty microbial keratitis in the era of lamellar transplants-A comprehensive review. J. Clin. Med. 13, 2326. doi:  10.3390/jcm13082326, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ramage G., Vande Walle K., Wickes B. L., López-Ribot J. L. (2001). Standardized method for in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida albicans biofilms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45, 2475–2479. doi:  10.1128/AAC.45.9.2475-2479.2001, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rodríguez-Temporal D., Díez R., Díaz-Navarro M., Escribano P., Guinea J., Muñoz P., et al. (2023). Determination of the ability of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry to identify high-biofilm-producing strains. Front. Microbiol. 13, 1104405. doi:  10.3389/fmicb.2022.1104405, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ruiz de Alegría Puig C., García Merino M. D. S., De Malet Pintos-Fonseca A., Agüero Balbín J. (2023). Characterization, antifungal susceptibility and virulence of Candida parapsilosis complex isolates in a tertiary hospital in Cantabria, Northern Spain. Enferm Infecc Microbiol. Clin. (Engl Ed). 41, 99–102., PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sabino R., Sampaio P., Rosado L., Stevens D. A., Clemons K. V., Pais C. (2010). New polymorphic microsatellite markers able to distinguish among Candida parapsilosis sensu stricto isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 48, 1677–1682. doi:  10.1128/JCM.02151-09, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Silva S., Henriques M., Oliveira R., Williams D., Azeredo J. (2010). In vitro biofilm activity of non-Candida albicans Candida species. Curr. Microbiol. 61, 534–540. doi:  10.1007/s00284-010-9649-7, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Silva S., Negri M., Henriques M., Oliveira R., Williams D. W., Azeredo J. (2011). Adherence and biofilm formation of non-Candida albicans Candida species. Trends Microbiol. 19, 241–247. doi:  10.1016/j.tim.2011.02.003, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Silva-Dias A., Miranda I. M., Branco J., Monteiro-Soares M., Pina-Vaz C., Rodrigues A. G. (2015). Adhesion, biofilm formation, cell surface hydrophobicity, and antifungal planktonic susceptibility: relationship among Candida spp. Front. Microbiol. 6, 205. doi:  10.3389/fmicb.2015.00205, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Song A., Deshmukh R., Lin H., Ang M., Mehta J. S., Chodosh J., et al. (2021). Post-keratoplasty infectious keratitis: epidemiology, risk factors, management, and outcomes. Front. Med. (Lausanne). 8, 707242. doi:  10.3389/fmed.2021.707242, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Tavanti A., Hensgens L. A., Mogavero S., Majoros L., Senesi S., Campa M. (2010). Genotypic and phenotypic properties of Candida parapsilosis sensu strictu strains isolated from different geographic regions and body sites. BMC Microbiol. 10, 203. doi:  10.1186/1471-2180-10-203, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Thareja T., Kowalski R., Kamyar R., Dhaliwal D., Jeng B. H., Tu E., et al. (2020). Fungal infection after keratoplasty and the role of antifungal supplementation to storage solution: a review. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 104, 1036. doi:  10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-314664, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Tobudic S., Kratzer C., Lassnigg A., Presterl E. (2012). Antifungal susceptibility of Candida albicans in biofilms. Mycoses 55, 199–204. doi:  10.1111/j.1439-0507.2011.02076.x, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wang B., He X., Lu F., Li Y., Wang Y., Zhang M., et al. (2021). Candida isolates from blood and other normally sterile foci from ICU patients: determination of epidemiology, antifungal susceptibility profile and evaluation of associated risk factors. Front. Public Health 9, 779590. doi:  10.3389/fpubh.2021.779590, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Xie T. A., Liu Y. L., Liang C., Huang Y. Y., Li J. W., Li Z. W., et al. (2019). Accuracy of matrix-assisted LASER desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry for identification of Candida. Biosci. Rep. 39, BSR20190859. doi:  10.1042/BSR20190859, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Yang Z., Zhang F., Li D., Wang S., Pang Z., Chen L., et al. (2022). Correlation between drug resistance and virulence of candida isolates from patients with candidiasis. Infect. Drug Resist. 15, 7459–7473. doi:  10.2147/IDR.S387675, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.


Articles from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES