Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Feb 17.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Res. 2025 Sep 17;137(9):1185–1206. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.124.326042

Dysregulated Protein s-Nitrosylation Promotes Nitrosative Stress and Disease Progression in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Zhen Li 1,2, Kyle B LaPenna 3, Natalie D Gehred 4, Xiaoman Yu 5,6, WH Wilson Tang 7,8, Jake E Doiron 9, Huijing Xia 10, Jingshu Chen 11, Ian H Driver 12, Frank B Sachse 13, Naoto Muraoka 14, Antonia Katsouda 15,16, Paraskevas Zampas 17,18, Amelia G Haydel 19, Heather Quiriarte 20, Timothy D Allerton 21, Alexia Zagouras 22,23, Jennifer Wilcox 24, Tatiana Gromova 25, Yueqin Zheng 26, Andreas Papapetropoulos 27,28, Sanjiv J Shah 29, Traci T Goodchild 30, Martin B Jensen 31, Thomas E Sharp III 32, Thomas M Vondriska 33, David J Lefer 34
PMCID: PMC12908239  NIHMSID: NIHMS2138552  PMID: 40959880

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Recent studies suggest aberrant elevation of iNOS (inducible NO synthase) expression and excessive protein s-nitrosylation promote the pathogenesis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, the interplay between NO bioavailability, enzymatic regulation of protein s-nitrosylation by transnitrosylase and denitrosylase, and HFpEF progression remains poorly defined. We investigated the molecular basis of nitrosative stress in HFpEF, focusing on alterations in NO signaling and regulation of protein s-nitrosylation.

METHODS:

Circulating nitrite (NO bioavailability) and nitrosothiols were quantified in patients with HFpEF. Parallel studies using rodent models of cardiometabolic HFpEF were performed to evaluate cardiac function, NO signaling, and total nitroso species during disease progression. Single-nucleus RNA sequencing and proteomic analysis were conducted to identify regulatory genes and cellular targets of pathological s-nitrosylation.

RESULTS:

In patients with HFpEF, circulating nitrosothiols were significantly elevated, indicating heightened nitrosative stress, whereas nitrite levels remained unchanged. In ZSF1 Obese (ob) rats, NO bioavailability declined with age, whereas total nitroso species progressively increased as HFpEF worsened. Transcriptomic analysis revealed marked upregulation of a transnitrosylase HBb (hemoglobin-β subunit), validated in both rat and human HFpEF hearts. Enzymatic assays demonstrated aberrant functions of Trx2 (thioredoxin 2) and GSNOR (S-nitrosoglutathione reductase) in ZSF1 Ob hearts. Cell-based experiments confirmed that altered expression or function of HBb, Trx2, and GSNOR resulted in elevated cellular RxNO. Additionally, similar dysregulation of s-nitrosylation dynamics was observed in the peripheral organs, such as the kidneys and liver, in HFpEF.

CONCLUSIONS:

These data demonstrate that nitrosative stress, evidenced by dysregulated protein s-nitrosylation occurs in the heart and peripheral organs in cardiometabolic HFpEF. Pathological alterations in NO bioavailability resulting from alterations in NOS expression or function alone do not account for this phenotype. Instead, pathological protein s-nitrosylation results in part from the imbalance between transnitrosylase and denitrosylase function. Restoration of physiological levels of protein s-nitrosylation and NO signaling may represent an effective therapeutic target for HFpEF.

Keywords: beta-globins, heart failure, heart failure, diastolic, hemoglobins, nitric oxide, nitrosative stress, protein processing, post-translational

GRAPHIC ABSTRACT:

A graphic abstract is available for this article.


Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is among the most complex cardiovascular diseases. Over the past decade, the prevalence of HFpEF has surpassed heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and has become the most common form of heart failure in the United States.14 Patients with HFpEF exhibit a combination of comorbidities, including obesity, diabetes, liver and renal dysfunction, aging, and hypertension. Due to its heterogeneous nature and lack of effective therapies, clinical management of HFpEF is exceedingly challenging. Additionally, despite intense efforts in recent years, the pathophysiological, cellular, and molecular factors that contribute to HFpEF have yet to be precisely identified.1 As a result, very few therapies have achieved clinical efficacy, with SGLT2 (sodium-glucose co-transporter 2) inhibitors, angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ie, LCZ696), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (ie, spironolactone) as the only pharmacological agents approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the use in HFpEF.58 Yet, no treatment regimen (medication or device) has been shown to reduce all-cause or cardiovascular mortality in HFpEF. Discovery of novel drug targets and development of new therapeutics for the treatment of HFpEF are urgently needed.

Nitric oxide (NO) is an endogenously produced gaseous signaling molecule crucial to cardiovascular homeostasis. In HFpEF, as with many other cardiovascular diseases, NO bioavailability and signaling are impaired913; however, therapies aimed either to replenish NO bioavailability (ie, inhaled nitrite and isosorbide mononitrate) or to facilitate NO downstream signaling (ie, soluble guanylyl cyclase [sGC] stimulators and activators, phosphodiesterase inhibitors) have yielded disappointing results.1418 Preclinical studies in rodent models of HFpEF reported that myocardial nitrosative stress, characterized by elevated total nitroso species (RxNO), which result from overproduction of NO by iNOS (inducible NO synthase) or nNOS (neuronal NO synthase), plays a causative role in the pathogenesis and progression of HFpEF.19,20

S-nitrosylation is a protein posttranslational modification characterized by the reversible, covalent addition of a NO moiety to the thiol group of the cysteine residues of proteins. Such posttranslational modification is considered a vital process for NO to elicit its bioactivity. Although NO generated via NOS activity within cells is essential to protein s-nitrosylation, this posttranslational modification is tightly regulated by the dynamic addition and removal of nitroso groups from cystine residues through enzymatic reactions to ensure appropriate protein function.21,22 More specifically, transnitrosylases mediate the addition of the NO moiety onto the cysteine residue, whereas denitrosylases remove the NO moiety to effectively regulate the extent of protein s-nitrosylation.21,22 Common transnitrosylases include hemoglobin, GAPDH, and caspase-3, whereas common denitrosylases consist of GSNOR (S-nitrosoglutathione reductase), Trx (thioredoxin), and AKR1a1 (α-keto reductase family 1–member 1).21,2325 Interestingly, depending on the target proteins, certain enzymes such as Trx, exert dual enzymatic effects as either denitrosylase or transnitrosylase.26 Impaired function of s-nitrosylation by the transnitrosylase and denitrosylase enzymes contributes to a broad spectrum of human diseases, including but not limited to neurodegenerative disease, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, type-2 diabetes, myocardial infarction, pulmonary arterial hypertension, and preeclampsia.24,25,2735 However, the roles of transnitrosylase and denitrosylase have not been elucidated in the setting of HFpEF, despite their potential involvement in excessive protein s-nitrosylation that has previously been reported.19,20

In the present study, we sought to verify the previous findings of excessive cardiac nitrosative stress and accumulated protein s-nitrosylation in clinical HFpEF. Moreover, we studied the regulation of transnitrosylase and denitrosylase to improve our understanding of the regulation of s-nitrosylation in HFpEF using 2 well-established rodent models of HFpEF, the Zucker fatty (ZSF1) obese rat model and the 2-hit mouse model.3638

METHODS

Data Availability

A detailed description of the materials used for the studies included in the current article can be found in the Major Resources Table in the Supplemental Material. Data and analytic methods will be made available from the first author (zli@cpu.edu.cn) or the corresponding author (david.lefer@cshs.org) on reasonable request.

Human Plasma Samples

Plasma samples were collected from either ambulatory patients with HFpEF prospectively enrolled in the outpatient clinic (with symptoms of heart failure and echocardiogram showing left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%) or age- and sex-matched control subjects recruited from the community without existing cardiovascular diseases (confirmed by echocardiography, pulmonary function testing, and cardiac biomarkers) under protocols approved by the institutional review board (No. 06–805 and No. 10–727, respectively) at the Cleveland Clinic. All participants were provided with written informed consent. Baseline characteristics of all participants were described previously.39 Briefly, a total of 96 patients (controls, n=48; HFpEF, n=48) with similar age, sex, and race distribution were included. Significant differences were observed in multiple clinical parameters, with patients with HFpEF displaying higher NTproBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide), body mass index, prevalence of hypertension, coronary artery disease, and atrial fibrillation, along with greater use of ACE inhibitors and β-blockers.39

Experimental Animal Models of HFpEF

ZSF1 Obese Rat Model of Cardiometabolic HFpEF

Both male Wistar Kyoto rats (WKY) and ZSF1 obese rats (Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, MA) were used in the present study. ZSF1 obese rats spontaneously developed severe cardiometabolic HFpEF as previously characterized.36,37,3944 Due to the drastic phenotypic difference between WKY and ZSF1 obese strains, randomization was not feasible. Both ZSF1 obese rats and WKY controls were evaluated at 2 time points (14 and 26 weeks of age). Group sizes of 6 to 8 animals per group were estimated through power analysis. With a significance level of 5% and a power of 80%, assuming the mean left ventricular end-diastolic pressure for WKY control rats is 7±9 mm Hg as suggested by preliminary data, this sample size was sufficient to detect a minimum 1.8- to 2-fold increase in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, which was designated as one of the primary end points for validating the successful establishment of the HFpEF model. Rats were housed at an Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC)-accredited animal facility of Cedars-Sinai Medical Center or Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center (LSUHSC) in a temperature-controlled and 12-hour light/dark cycle.

Two-Hit Mouse Model of HFpEF

Starting at the age of 9 weeks, male C57BL/6 N (Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, MA) were randomized into 2 groups, and treated with either L-NG-nitro arginine methyl ester in drinking water (0.5 g/L) and a high-fat diet to induce HFpEF or normal drinking water and normal diet for 10 weeks.19,45 Both groups were evaluated at 2 time points (5- and 10-weeks following initiation of 2-hit). Group sizes of 9 to 11 animals per group were estimated through power analysis. With a significance level of 5% and a power of 80%, assuming the mean left ventricular end-diastolic pressure for control mice is 6±9 mm Hg as suggested by preliminary data, this sample size was sufficient to detect a minimum 1.8- to 2-fold increase in mean left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, which was designated as one of the primary end points for validating the successful establishment of the HFpEF model. Mice were housed at an AALAC-accredited animal facility of Cedars-Sinai Medical Center or LSUHSC in a temperature-controlled and 12-hour light/dark cycle.

Only male rats and mice were used in the current article, as female patients with HFpEF are more likely to display lower body mass index as compared with their male counterparts,46 which differs from the cardiometabolic phenotypes of the ZSF1 obese rat and 2-hit mouse models of HFpEF. Additionally, previous studies have highlighted the cardiovascular protective effects of estrogen in female sex47,48; thereby, studies using ovariectomized or postmenopausal aging female rodents are warranted in the future to fully investigate the dynamic controls of protein s-nitrosylation/nitrosative stress in HFpEF for both sexes.

All studies were Cedars-Sinai Medical Center or the LSUHSC Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approved and received care according to AALAC guidelines.

Nitrite Measurements

Both plasma and tissue homogenate nitrite quantification were performed using a high-performance liquid chromatography system (ENO30 Analyzer; Amuza Inc, San Diego) specifically designed for nitrite determination as described previously.19,4951 Briefly, biological fluid samples, such as plasma or tissue homogenates, were subjected to methanol precipitation to remove lipids and proteins. Then the supernatants were analyzed for nitrite content. Varying concentrations of pure sodium nitrite solutions between 0.039 to 5 μmol/L were used to generate the standard curve for the quantification of the nitrite concentration in the samples.

RxNO Measurements

The levels of total RxNO (nitrosothiols in the plasma and RxNO in the tissue homogenates) were quantified using an ion chromatography device coupled with gas-phase chemiluminescence (nCLD88; Echo Physics, Duernten, Switzerland) as previously described.12 Briefly, biological fluid samples, such as plasma or tissue homogenates, were incubated with 2.0% mercuric chloride, followed by acidified sulfanilamide, then the reaction mixture was subjected to a reductive denitrozation reaction by iodine–iodide. The denitration reaction detaches the nitroso group from the RxNO, which then is released as gas-phase NO with a one-to-one ratio. Finally, the amount of gas-phase NO was analyzed through the nCLD88 system.

Exercise Capacity Testing

Treadmill exercise capacity of ZSF1 obese or WKY rats, as well as control or HFpEF mice, were measured using an IITC Life Science 800 Series rodent-specific treadmill (IITC Life Science, Woodland Hills, CA). Rats were first allowed to acclimate to the treadmill environment for a period of 5 minutes. Following acclimation, rats were carried through a warm-up phase of initially 6 meters per minute with gradual increase to 12 meters per minute during a 4-minute ramp-up time for a total of 5 minutes. The animals were then running at a rate of 12 meters per minute with no ramp incline until a state of exhaustion. Both duration and calculated distance were plotted along with work (kg×m).

Systemic and Left Ventricular Hemodynamic Measurements

At each time point, animals were anesthetized using isoflurane at 3% to 4% for induction and 2 to 2.5% for maintenance during the procedure. The right common carotid was cannulated with a high-fidelity pressure catheter (SP200 Pressure Control Unit, Transonic, NY) which measured the systemic pressures at systole and diastole. The pressure catheter was then introduced into the left ventricle of the heart. Left ventricular end diastolic pressures and ventricular relaxation time constant were measured as previously described.52,53

Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assays

The levels of 3-nitrotyrosine (3-NT) were measured with commercially available ELISA assay kits in plasma samples from control or patients with HFpEF (No. STA-305; Cell Biolabs, San Diego, CA), and from control or HFpEF rodent models (No. NBP2–66363; Novus Biologicals, Toronto, Canada). Circulating cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) levels in plasma samples from control or ZSF1 obese rats were measured with a commercially available ELISA kit (No. 581021, Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI).

Single-Nuclei RNA Sequencing

Left ventricle of the heart tissue was collected from WKY and ZSF1 obese rats at 14 or 26 weeks of age and immediately snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Heart nuclei were isolated using a lysis buffer consisting of 0.25 mol/L sucrose, 10 mmol/L Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 25 mmol/L KCl, 5 mmol/L MgCl2, 45 μmol/L actinomycin D, supplemented with 1X protease inhibitor (G6521, Promega), 0.4 U/μL RNasin ribonuclease inhibitor (N2515, Promega), 0.2 U/μL SuperaseIn (AM2694, Thermo Fisher). Briefly, heart tissue samples were minced into smaller pieces with scissors in a 1 mL lysis buffer. The minced tissue was then homogenized in a Dounce homogenizer on ice with 10 strokes of pestle A, followed by 10 strokes of pestle B. The homogenates were then filtered through a 40 μm cell strainer and centrifuged at 400g for 5 minutes at 4 °C. The nuclei pellet was resuspended in 2% BSA in PBS supplemented with protector RNase inhibitor (03335402001; Sigma-Aldrich, Burlington, MA) at 0.2 U/μL. Heart nuclei were stained with Sytox red (S34859; Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA) and sorted and purified through fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Eight thousand to ten thousand nuclei from each rat heart were processed using a 10× Genomics microfluidics chip to generate barcoded Gel Bead-In Emulsions according to manufacturers’ protocols. Indexed single-cell libraries were then created according to 10× Genomics specifications (Chromium Next GEM Single Cell 5′ v2.1-Dual Index Libraries). Samples were multiplexed and sequenced in pairs on an Illumina Novaseq X (Illumina, San Diego, CA). The sequenced data were processed into expression matrices with the cell ranger single-cell software 9.0.0 obtained at the following website (https://www.10xgenomics.com/support/software/cell-ranger/latest/release-notes/cr-release-notes). FASTQ files were then obtained from the base-call files from Novaseq X sequencer and subsequently aligned to the rat genome NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) Rnor6.0, with a read length of 26 bp for cell barcode and unique molecule identifier (read 1), 8 bp i7 index read (sample barcode), and 98 bp for actual RNA read (read 2). Each rat sample yielded ≈300 mol/L reads.

For targeted analysis, Anndata54 and Scanpy55 were used to load and preprocess h5ad files for each sample for import into Seurat. Scrublet56 was used to identify and remove putative doublets before AnnData objects were concatenated by week. Barcodes, features, matrix files, and metadata were extracted into a folder for import into R with the Seurat Read10× function.57 The 14-week and 26-week Seurat objects were created with CreateSeuratObject. Mitochondrial gene percentage was calculated for each cell in each Seurat object before removing cells containing >5% mitochondrial reads. Mitochondrial genes and genes with <10 reads across all cells in each object were also removed. Lastly, any cells with <500 reads were removed. The 14- and 26-week Seurat objects were merged by time point, and layers joined. Subsets of cardiomyocyte compartments were selected based on cell_type_leiden0.6 column. Samples were split by week and log-normalized with NormalizeData. FindVariableFeatures was used to identify the top 2000 variable features per week, and the features were centered and scaled with ScaleData. Principal Component Analysis (RunPCA function) was run on the split objects with default parameters before layers were integrated back together (IntegrateLayers function) with method=RPCA (reciprocal PCA) Integration. A shared nearest-neighbor graph was created with FindNeighbors (using 15 RPCA dimensions) and clustered with FindClusters (with a resolution of 0.5). Clusters were assigned cell types based on known marker genes. To create the heatmaps, the integrated Seurat object was subset into separate endothelial, myocyte, fibroblast, and pericyte objects. Seurat FindMarkers function with the Wilcoxon rank-sum test option was used to identify differentially expressed genes in ZSF1 obese cells in each cell type, with a Bonferroni-corrected P value cutoff of 0.05. Results were intersected with a list of genes involved in NO signaling and regulation of protein s-nitrosylation. Then the average Log2fold-change was plotted with ggplot2 geom_tile function.58

Proteomic Analysis of s-Nitrosylated Cardiac Proteins

s-nitrosylated proteins were labeled and isolated using a Pierce S-nitrosylation Labeling Kit (Thermo Scientific 90105) following the instructions from the manufacturer with modifications. Briefly, 100 μg of proteins isolated from either the 26-week-old WKY or ZSF1 obese rat heart tissue was resuspended and lysed in 4 volumes of HENS buffer. For positive and negative controls, samples were optionally incubated with 200 μmol/L s-nitrosoglutathione or reduced glutathione, respectively, for 30 minutes at room temperature, and excess reagents were removed using Zeba Spin Desalting Columns equilibrated with HENS buffer. Protein concentration was determined using the BCA assay, and equal amounts of protein (100 μg per condition, 1–2 mg/mL) were adjusted to 100 μL in HENS buffer. To block free thiols, 2 μL of 1 mol/L MMTS (20 mmol/L final) was added, followed by vigorous vortexing and incubation for 30 minutes at room temperature. Proteins were precipitated by adding 6 volumes of prechilled (−20 °C) acetone and incubating at −20 °C for ≥1 hour. After centrifugation (10 000g, 10 minutes, 4 °C), supernatants were discarded and pellets air-dried for 10 minutes. Then, pellets were resuspended in 100 μL HENS buffer and labeled with 1 μL iodoTMT (iodoacetyl tandem mass tag) reagent and 2 μL of 1 mol/L sodium ascorbate. Then the labeled s-nitrosylated proteins were isolated using immunoprecipitation technique with anti-TMT antibody (Thermo Scientific 90075) and subjected to downstream proteomic analysis as previously described.59 Additionally, normalization and differential analysis were conducted on bioladder.cn platform, whereas pathway enrichment analysis were performed on metascape. org gene annotation and analysis platform.

Gene Expression

mRNA expression profiles were assayed from heart, liver, and kidney tissue. Following RNA extraction using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, 15596026), incubation and chloroform (FisherScientific, AA32614k2)–mediated phase separation, cDNA was synthesized using iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad, 1708890). Subsequently, quantitative real time PCR was performed to probe for the mRNA expression using iTaq Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad, 1725122) through CFX Duet Real-Time PCR system (Bio-Rad, 12016265) following manufacturer’s instructions (30 seconds of polymerase activation and DNA denaturation at 95 °C, followed by 40 cycles of 5 second denaturation at 95 °C and 30 second annealing/extension at 60 °C).

For eNOS (endothelial nitric oxide synthase; No. 4453320; Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA), iNOS (No. 4331382; Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA), nNOS (No. 4351372; Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA), and housekeeping 18S ribosomal RNA (No. 4333760; Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA), commercially available probes were used. Primer sequence for other tested genes (HBb [hemoglobin subunit-β], Trx2, and GSNOR) genes are listed below. 2^delta-deltaCT values corrected to 18S rRNA were used for data analysis.

HBb: F-ACCTTGGCAGCCTCAGTG; R-GTGAATTCTTTGCCCAGGTGG; amplicon size 119 bp.

Trx2:F-TCACACAGACCTTGCCATTGAG;R-CCTGCTTGTCAGCCAATTAG; amplicon size 150 bp.

GSNOR: F-ACAGTGTGGAGAATGCAAG; R-GCTGGTTCCCATGAAGTG; amplicon size 148 bp.

Western Blot Analysis

Tissue were lyophilized with mortar and pestle and then homogenized in lysis buffer 150 mmol/L NaCl (Calbiochem, 7760), 1% NP-40 (Sigma-Aldrich, 74385), 0.5% Na-deoxycholate (AppliChem, A1531,0025), 0.1% SDS (PanReac AppliChem, A2572), 50 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH=7,4 (Sigma-Aldrich, T1503), 2 mmol/L EDTA (Merck, 4005) supplemented with a cocktail of protease (PI, Roche, 5892970001), and phosphatase inhibitors (PhoI, Roche, 4906837001). Lysates were centrifuged (13.000 rpm, 15 minutes, 4 °C), and the protein concentration in the supernatants was quantified using the DC protein assay (BIO-RAD, 5000116). Concentration was normalized before Western blot analysis. Samples were separated on 10% or 12% SDS–PAGE and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (Macherey-Nagel; Düren, Germany), after Laemmli buffer containing 4% SDS, 10% β-mercaptoethanol (Sigma-Aldrich, M6250), 20% glycerol (Melford, GI345), 0.004% blue bromophenol (AppliChem, A2331,0025), and 0.125M Tris-HCl was added. The membranes were blocked (5% milk [PanReac AppliChem, A0830]) and probed with the following antibodies: anti-β-tubulin (Abcam, ab15568), anti-GAPDH (Proteintech, 10494–1-AP or Cell Signaling 2118S), anti-eNOS (Cell Signaling, 32027s), anti-peNOSs1177 (Cell Signaling, 9571), anti-pVASP (Cell Signaling, 3114S), anti-HBb (Abcam, ab214049), anti-Trx2 (Abcam, ab185544), anti-GSNOR (Proteintech, 11051–1-AP), and anti-iNOS (Proteintech, 18985–1-AP). Immunoblots were next processed with anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Merck, AP132P; MedChemExpress, HY-P8001; Jackson ImmunoResearch, 111–005-003) and visualized using the HRP substrate. In a subset of Western blot experiments, membranes were incubated with No-Stain Protein Labeling Reagent (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA) to visualize total protein as a loading control. Quantification and normalization of Western blots were performed using ImageJ software (NIH Image, National Institutes of Health). In the subset that used total protein as a loading control, target proteins were normalized to the signal from the entire lane; however, only a portion of the membrane around the same molecular weight as the target proteins was shown due to limited space allowed.

Thioredoxin Activity Measurements

Oxidoreductase activity of Trx in tissue were measured using a commercially available fluorometric activity assay kit (No. 500228; Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI) following the instructions by the manufacturer in combination with a Synergy LX multimode microplate reader (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA).

GSNOR Activity Measurements

GSNOR activity in tissue was measured as previously described.34,60 Briefly, tissue samples were homogenized in a buffer of 50 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 150 mmol/L NaCl, 1 mmol/L EDTA, 0.1% Triton, and 1:100 protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma Aldrich, P8340). The samples were then centrifuged at 10 000 RCF for 10 minutes at 4 °C and brought to a concentration of 0.1 mg/mL in a reaction buffer of 20 mmol/L Tris-HCl, 0.5 mmol/L EDTA. Samples were then added 75 μmol/L NADH with or without 100 μmol/L of GSNO. Samples were measured using fluorescence at 350 nm excitation/460 nm emission. Every minute for 1 hour, where the rate is determined by NADH consumption with and without the GSNO substrate.

Ex Vivo Aortic Ring Vascular Reactivity

Thoracic aortas of the rats were removed for vascular reactivity testing at sacrifice as previously described.51,52 The rings were first equilibrated in Krebs-Henseleit solution and provided a tension of 0.5 g for 60 minutes to reach equilibration. They were then pretreated with phenylephrine for maximal constriction and then followed with challenges of titrated acetylcholine and subsequently sodium nitroprusside, and measured relaxation as compared with phenylephrine maximal contraction.

HL-1 Cell Culture

HL-1 cardiac muscle cell line was purchased (Sigma Aldrich, SCC065) and maintain as previously described.61 All cells were cultured in DMEM (Sigma Aldrich, D5030) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Sigma Aldrich, F0392), 100 U/mL penicillin (Sigma Aldrich, P3032), and 100 U/mL streptomycin (Sigma Aldrich, S9137), 100 μmol/L norepinephrine (Sigma Aldrich, A7257), and 2 mmol/L glutamine (Sigma Aldrich, G8540). Cells were then plated and divided into the following groups: control, HBb overexpression, HBb overexpression+DETA NONOate (5 μmol/L; Cayman Chemical); control, Trx2 overexpression, Trx2 overexpression+DETA NONOate; control, HBb overexpression, and HBb overexpression+N6022 (50 μmol/L; MedchemExpress, NJ). pCMV6 vector carrying HBb (Origene, MR227259) or Trx2 (Origene, MR201355) overexpression were transfected into HL-1 cells with Lipofectamine 3000 (Sigma) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and incubated 48 hours for optimal protein overexpression. Following an additional 24 hours of treatment, cellular RxNO content were analyzed using an ion chromatography device coupled with gas-phase chemiluminescence (nCLD88, Eco Physics, Duernten, Switzerland) as previously described.12

Statistical Analysis

Experimental data in this study were analyzed by personnel blinded to the group assignments. Except for data generated through snRNA sequencing and proteomic analysis, statistical analysis was conducted using the Prism 10 software (GraphPad, San Diego, California) and presented as mean±SEM. Normal distribution was tested by the D’Agostino and Pearson test. Differences in data among 2 groups were compared using an unpaired Student t test or a Mann-Whitney U test if the data did not follow a normal distribution or violated the assumption of equal variance. For multiple group comparison over time, 2-way ANOVA was used. For a data set involving multiple factors, such as timepoints or concentrations, 2-way ANOVA analysis followed by a Bonferroni multiple comparison test was used. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. The presented data may have different numbers of animals per group as only a subset of the rats or mice from each group were used for certain experiments. Additionally, no animal/data point was excluded unless a technical failure occurred in procedures such as invasive hemodynamics measurement, sample collection (ie, plasma volume), and treadmill running (lack of voluntary participation) or was deemed an outlier through outlier tests performed using the ROUT (Robust Outlier detection Test) method developed by Prism 10.

RESULTS

Increased Nitrosothiols and 3-NT in Plasma Samples of Patients With HFpEF

To evaluate NO bioavailability as well as protein s-nitrosylation, and nitrosative stress, we measured plasma nitrite, nitrosothiols, and 3-NT in 48 patients with HFpEF and 48 control subjects. Nitrite is an established biomarker of biologically active NO, whereas nitrosothiols and 3-NT are biomarkers for protein s-nitrosylation and nitrosative stress, respectively.6264 We did not observe any significant change in circulating nitrite levels in patients with HFpEF (Figure 1A). Despite a lack of increased NO bioavailability, circulating nitrosothiol levels were significantly elevated (P=0.031) in patients with HFpEF, indicating increased protein nitrosylation (Figure 1B). Importantly, 3-NT, a well-recognized biomarker for nitrosative stress, was increased by >2-fold in HFpEF patients as compared with control subjects (Figure S1). These data provide strong evidence for pathological protein s-nitrosylation and nitrosative stress in patients with HFpEF despite relatively normal levels of circulating NO.

Figure 1. Dysregulated nitric oxide (NO) metabolites in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and ZSF1 obese (Ob) rat model of HFpEF.

Figure 1.

Nitrite (A) and RsNO (s-nitrosothiols; B) levels in plasma samples collected from control vs patients with HFpEF. Study timeline of the 12-week study in ZSF1 Ob rat model of HFpEF (C). Vasorelaxation response curves to endothelium-dependent vasodilator acetylcholine (ACh) or endothelium-independent vasodilator sodium nitroprusside (SNP) in aorta isolated from Wistar Kyoto rat (WKY) control vs ZSF1 Ob rats at 14 (D) and 26 (E) weeks of age. Nitrite levels in plasma (F) and cardiac tissue (G) from ZSF1 Ob vs WKY rats at 14- or 26-weeks of age. Representative Western blot as well as protein expression quantification for total eNOS (endothelial nitric oxide synthase) and P-Ser1177 eNOS (H) in cardiac tissues of 26-week-old WKY vs ZSF1 Ob rats. Circulating cGMP (I) level in 26-week-old WKY vs ZSF1 Ob rats. Cardiac phosphorylated VASP (vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein; J) in cardiac tissues of 26-week-old WKY vs ZSF1 Ob rats. mRNA levels of eNOS (K), nNOS (neuronal nitric oxide synthase; L), and iNOS (inducible NO synthase; M) in the cardiac tissue from WKY control vs ZSF1 Ob rats. In A, B, and HJ, data were analyzed with a unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. In D and E, data were analyzed with 2-way ANOVA. In F, G, and KM, data were analyzed with 1-way ANOVA. Data were presented as mean±SEM. Circled numbers indicate sample size (biological replicates). LV indicates left ventricle.

ZSF1 Obese Rats Develop Severe Cardiometabolic HFpEF

Male WKY control and ZSF1 obese rats were monitored for a period of 12 weeks starting at the 14 weeks of age to evaluate the progression of HFpEF in ZSF1 obese rats. At 14 and 26 weeks of age, body weight, echocardiographic parameters, and treadmill exercise performance were measured (Figure S2). A subset of rats was assessed for LV and systemic hemodynamics and aortic vascular reactivity, followed by sacrifice for other molecular determinations. An illustrative protocol is depicted in Figure 1C.

Throughout the 12-week study, ZSF1 obese rats displayed markedly higher body weight as compared with WKY control rats (Figure S2A), accompanied by significantly impaired glucose handling ability and reduced insulin sensitivity (data not shown), as depicted previously.40,42 Invasive hemodynamic measurements revealed that ZSF1 obese rats exhibited severe hypertension with significantly elevated systolic and diastolic blood pressures throughout the study (Figure S2B; P=0.0006 at 14 weeks and P=0.02 at 26 weeks of age for systolic BP; P=0.0006 at 14 weeks and P=0.02 at 26 weeks of age for diastolic BP). Importantly, we observed significant elevations in LV end-diastolic pressure (Figure S2C; P=0.001 at 14 weeks and P=0.001 at 26 weeks of age) and Tau (Figure S2D; P=0.001 at 14 weeks and P=0.002 at 26 weeks of age) in ZSF1 obese rats, indicating severe cardiac diastolic dysfunction, one of the hallmarks of HFpEF. Severe exercise intolerance was also observed in ZSF1 obese rats as measured in treadmill running distance during exercise (Figure S2E; P=0.0006 at 14 weeks and P=0.0012 at 26 weeks of age).

ZSF1 Obese Rat Exhibited Dysregulated eNOS Activity and Signaling and Reduced NO Bioavailability

Endothelial function and eNOS–derived NO signaling have long been considered crucial for cardiovascular hemostasis, and reduced NO signaling has been linked to diastolic dysfunction.65 To assess the extent of dysregulation in NO signaling, we first measured the eNOS-dependent vascular function in isolated, thoracic aortic ring segments. Throughout the 12-week study, thoracic aortic rings from ZSF1 obese rats displayed significantly blunted responses to the endothelial-dependent vasodilator, acetylcholine (P<0.05 or 0.01 at multiple concentrations) as compared with the WKY control group (Figure 1D and 1E). In contrast, vascular reactivity to the direct nitro-vasodilator, sodium nitroprusside, remained unchanged. Endothelial dysfunction and attenuated NO bioavailability were further corroborated by markedly reduced nitrite levels in the circulation and myocardial tissue (Figure 1F and 1G; P=0.007 at 14 weeks and P=0.001 at 26 weeks of age for plasma nitrite; P=0.007 at 14 weeks and P=0.06 at 26 weeks of age for cardiac nitrite). Further, we observed no difference between ZSF1 rats versus WKY control rats in total cardiac eNOS expression but a significant reduction (P=0.004) in phosphorylation on the serine 1177 residues of cardiac eNOS, an eNOS activation site, at 26 weeks of age, confirming the disruption in eNOS activity (Figure 1H). Downstream effectors of eNOS activation, circulating cGMP and PKG-mediated pVASP (phosphorylation of vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein) were also significantly reduced (P=0.037 for cGMP; P=0.0006 for pVASP) in ZSF1 obese rats (Figure 1I and 1J). Taken together, these results indicate profound endothelial dysfunction and eNOS dysregulation accompanied by significant reductions in NO bioavailability. Additionally, we measured the mRNA levels of eNOS, iNOS, and nNOS isoforms. There was no difference observed in eNOS and nNOS mRNA levels throughout the study (Figure 1K and 1L). Interestingly, iNOS mRNA levels were reduced in ZSF1 rats throughout the study, although its protein expression was reduced at 14 weeks of age, but remained unchanged at 26 weeks of age (Figure 1M; Figure S3A and S3B).

ZSF1 Obese Rats Displayed Systemic Elevation in Nitrosative Stress and Protein s-Nitrosylation

To evaluate the extent of nitrosative stress in ZSF1 obese rats, we measured nitrosothiols in the plasma as well as RxNO in the heart. Additionally, we also measured circulating 3-NT given its value as a well-recognized nitrosative stress biomarker. Starting at 14 weeks of age ZSF1 obese HFpEF rats exhibited age-dependent increases in both the nitrosothiols and 3-NT levels compared with WKY control rats (Figures 2A; Figure S2F). In contrast, there was no difference in cardiac RxNO levels at the early stage of HFpEF development (ie, 14 weeks of age); however, at 26 weeks of age, ZSF1 obese rats displayed significantly elevated levels of RxNO in the heart, indicating a significant increase in myocardial protein s-nitrosylation (Figure 2B; P=0.002). Given the systemic nature of HFpEF pathology, we next assessed total RxNO levels in the liver, kidney, and lung—organs frequently implicated in HFpEF-associated comorbidities and complications. Similar to the heart, hepatic, renal, and lung RxNO levels were elevated during the HFpEF manifestation in ZSF1 obese rat model (Figure 2C through 2E).

Figure 2. Dysregulated protein s-nitrosylation in ZSF1 obese (Ob) cardiometabolic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).

Figure 2.

RsNO (nitrosothiols) level in the plasma (A) and total nitroso species (RxNO) levels in the cardiac (B), hepatic (C), renal (D), and lung (E) tissue in 14-week-old and 26-week-old ZSF1 Ob rats vs Wistar Kyoto rat (WKY) controls. Number of s-nitrosylated proteins identified (F), the number of commonly or uniquely s-nitrosylated proteins (G), volcano plots (H), and top 5 pathways affected (I) obtained through proteomic analysis of purified s-nitrosylated proteins from 26-week-old ZSF1 Ob rats (n=5) vs WKY controls (n=5). In AE, data were analyzed with 1-way ANOVA. Data were presented as mean±SEM. Circled numbers indicate sample size (biological replicates). AMPK indicates AMP-activated protein kinase; and PCoA, principal coordinate analysis.

To elucidate the molecular landscape of protein s-nitrosylation in cardiometabolic HFpEF, we performed proteomic profiling of s-nitrosylated proteins in cardiac tissue from 26-week-old WKY rats and HFpEF ZSF1 obese rats. A total of 261 s-nitrosylated proteins were identified in WKY hearts, although a markedly higher number, 473 s-nitrosylated proteins, were detected in ZSF1 obese hearts (Figure 2F). Notably, 271 proteins were uniquely s-nitrosylated in ZSF1 obese hearts, compared with only 9 unique proteins in WKY hearts (Figure 2G). Despite 252 proteins being commonly s-nitrosylated across both groups, principal coordinate analysis demonstrated a clear segregation between the s-nitrosylated proteomes of ZSF1 obese and WKY hearts, indicating a marked global shift in nitrosylation patterns in the HFpEF context (Figure 2H). Further differential analysis revealed that 336 proteins exhibited significantly increased (P<0.05) s-nitrosylation in ZSF1 obese hearts, 100 remained unchanged (P≥0.05), and 37 showed significantly reduced (P<0.05) s-nitrosylation compared with WKY controls (Figure 2I). Pathway enrichment analysis of the differentially s-nitrosylated proteins highlighted the top 20 most enriched pathways, prominently featuring key metabolic processes such as carboxylic acid metabolism, carbon metabolism, branched-chain amino acid catabolism, sulfur metabolism, the tricarboxylic acid cycle, and pyruvate metabolism (Figure 2J). In addition to metabolic pathways, enrichment was also observed in pathways related to cellular stress responses, mitochondrial protein quality control, and AMPK (AMP-activated protein kinase) signaling, underscoring a multifaceted disruption in metabolic and stress-adaptive networks in HFpEF hearts. A list of all s-nitrosylated proteins identified is included in Table S1.

Imbalance of Transnitrosylase and Denitrosylase Drives Cardiac Nitrosative Stress in ZSF1 Obese Rat

Next, we performed snRNA Seq to acquire molecular insights into the development of elevated cardiac nitrosative stress despite the reduction in NO bioavailability and signaling. Various cell types were evaluated using snRNA Seq, including cardiomyocyte, fibroblast, endothelial, and pericytes identified as major cardiac resident cell types (Figure 3A). A substantial amount of differentially expressed genes were also identified either over time (Figure 3B) or between different genotypes (Figure 3C). Targeted analysis revealed changes in the expression of a variety of genes related to NO generation and signaling in 4 cardiac resident cell types. No change was observed in eNOS or nNOS expression, and iNOS was significantly downregulated (P<0.05) in myocardial endothelial cells in early HFpEF (ie, 14 weeks of age; Figure 3D and 3E). Notably, expression of HBb, a well-characterized transnitrosylase,66,67 was markedly elevated in all 4 resident cardiac cell types at both the early and late stages of HFpEF (Figure 3D and 3E). In contrast, expression of common denitrosylases, such as thioredoxins, GSNOR, AKR1a1, remained relatively stable as the only change observed was a mildly increased Trx2 expression in cardiomyocytes in 14-week-old ZSF1 obese rats (Figure 3D and 3E). Importantly, we confirmed that our observations made in ZSF1 obese rat model of cardiometabolic HFpEF were true in human HFpEF patients.68 Targeted analysis of the transcriptome of cardiac biopsies from patients with HFpEF68 demonstrated a marked upregulation of HBb when compared with either control or HFrEF (Figure 3F). Taken together, our data reveal a crucial imbalance in transnitrosylase and denitrosylase expression, particularly in HBb expression, suggesting that this imbalance may be the primary culprit responsible for elevated cardiac protein s-nitrosylation and subsequent nitrosative stress.

Figure 3. Differentially expressed transnitrosylase and denitrosylation in cardiometabolic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) heart.

Figure 3.

Various cell types identified through snRNA seq analysis and visualized by uniform manifold approximation and projection technique (UMAP) on cardiac tissue from 14- (n=5 per group) or 26-week-old (n=5 per group) ZSF1 obese (Ob) vs Wistar Kyoto rat (WKY) control rats (A). Distribution of differentially expressed genes over time (B) and from different genotypes (C). Heat map of average Log2fold-change (FC) for nitric oxide (NO) synthase, selected downstream effectors, and common transnitrosylase and denitrosylase acquired via targeted analysis (D and E). Heat map of Log2FC for NO synthase, selected downstream effectors, and common transnitrosylase and denitrosylase acquired via targeted analysis of bulk RNA sequencing of cardiac biopsies of right ventricular septal tissue (RVS) collected from HFpEF (n=41), heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; n=30), and control patients (n=24) (F). Data were analyzed with 1-way ANOVA. CM indicates cardiomyocyte; EC, endothelial cell; and FB, fibroblast.

To further examine this hypothesis, we performed real time PCR, Western blot, and activity assay experiments to measure HBb, Trx2, and GSNOR in cardiac tissue homogenates. Associated with substantial formation of cardiac interstitial and perivascular fibrosis (Figure 4A and 4B), and consistent with the snRNA Seq analysis, striking increases in cardiac HBb mRNA and protein levels were observed in ZSF1 obese rats at both 14 and 26 weeks of age (Figure 4C and 4D). mRNA and protein levels of Trx2 remained unaltered in ZSF1 obese hearts at 14 weeks of age but significantly increased (P=0.05 and 0.0286, respectively) at 26 weeks of age; however, Trx enzyme activity was downregulated in ZSF1 obese hearts at both 14 and 26 weeks of age (Figure 4E and 4F). Similarly, despite no change in mRNA and protein levels, cardiac GSNOR activity was significantly reduced (P=0.0411) in the ZSF1 obese heart at 26 weeks of age as compared with WKY control (Figure 4G and 4H). Interestingly, HBb, Trx2, and GSNOR were all among the s-nitrosylated proteins that were upregulated in ZSF1 obese hearts as revealed by proteomic analysis (Table S1).

Figure 4. Imbalance of transnitrosylase (HBb [hemoglobin subunit β] expression) and denitrosylase in ZSF1 obese (Ob) heart.

Figure 4.

Representative microphotography of cardiac fibrosis in the interstitial area and perivascular area from ZSF1 Ob vs Wistar Kyoto rat (WKY) hearts at 14 (A) or 26 (B) weeks of age; scale bar denotes 20 μm. mRNA levels, representative Western blot image, and quantified protein expression of HBb in cardiac tissues collected from 14-week-old (C) and 26-week-old (D) WKY controls vs ZSF1 obese rats. mRNA, representative Western blot image, and quantified protein expression, and enzymatic activity of Trx2 (thioredoxin) in cardiac tissues collected from 14-week-old (E) and 26-week-old (F) WKY controls vs ZSF1 obese rats. mRNA, representative Western blot image, and quantified protein expression, and enzymatic activity of GSNOR in cardiac tissues collected from </p>14-week-old (G) and 26-week-old (H) WKY controls vs ZSF1 obese rats. HL-1 cardiomyocytes cellular total nitroso species (RxNO) content under conditions of HBb overexpression (I), Trx overexpression (J), or GSNOR (S-nitrosoglutathione reductase) inhibition (K). Data in CH were analyzed with a Mann-Whitney U test; data in IK were analyzed with 1-way ANOVA and presented as mean±SEM. Circled numbers indicate sample size (biological replicates).

To further investigate the effects of modulating HBb, Trx2, and GSNOR expression/activity on cellular nitrosative status, we performed complementary experiments using HL-1 cardiomyocytes. Overexpression of HBb alone led to a significant increase (P=0.03) in intracellular RxNO levels, which was further amplified by cotreatment with DETA NONOate, a potent NO donor (Figure 4I). In contrast, Trx2 overexpression alone did not significantly alter RxNO levels; however, in the presence of DETA NONOate, a modest but significant increase (P=0.003) in RxNO was observed, though substantially lower than that induced by HBb overexpression (Figure 4J). Furthermore, pharmacological inhibition of GSNOR using N6022 in HBb-overexpressing cells resulted in an additional elevation of RxNO levels (Figure 4K), supporting the role of GSNOR in regulating denitrosylation under conditions of heightened nitrosative stress.

Imbalance of Transnitrosylases and Denitrosylases Contributed to Elevated RxNO in Peripheral Organs of ZSF1 Obese Rat

Given that HFpEF comorbidities (ie, hypertension, obesity, and diabetes) impact multiple organ systems and the pathophysiology of HFpEF involves organs beyond the heart and circulation, we evaluated the involvement of transnitrosylase and denitrosylase (ie, HBb, Trx2, and GSNOR) in the liver and kidney in ZSF1 obese rats. Associated with extensive hepatic steatosis found in ZSF1 obese liver (Figure 5A and 5B), we observed markedly elevated hepatic HBb mRNA and protein levels throughout the 12-week study (Figure 5C and 5D). Hepatic Trx2 mRNA level was downregulated at 14 weeks of age, but protein expression and enzymatic activity was unaffected. Although at 26 weeks of age, hepatic Trx2 protein increased but the enzymatic activity was reduced in ZSF1 obese rats (Figure 5E and 5F). Conversely, GSNOR mRNA, protein, and enzymatic activity were all reduced in ZSF1 obese hepatic tissue at both 14 and 26 weeks of age (Figure 5G and 5H).

Figure 5. Imbalance of transnitrosylase (HBb [hemoglobin subunit β] expression) and denitrosylase in ZSF1 obese (Ob) liver.

Figure 5.

Representative microphotography of hepatic lipid deposition from ZSF1 Ob vs Wistar Kyoto rat (WKY) livers at 14 (A) or 26 weeks (B) of age; scale bar denotes 20 μm. mRNA, representative Western blot image, and quantified protein expression of HBb in hepatic tissues collected from 14-week-old (C) and 26-week-old (D) WKY controls vs ZSF1 obese rats. mRNA, representative Western blot image, and quantified protein expression, and enzymatic activity of Trx2 (thioredoxin) in hepatic tissues collected from 14-week-old (E) and 26-week-old (F) WKY controls vs ZSF1 obese rats. mRNA, representative Western blot image, and quantified protein expression, and enzymatic activity of GSNOR in hepatic tissues collected from 14-week-old (G) and 26-week-old (H) WKY controls vs ZSF1 obese rats. Data were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U test and presented as mean±SEM. Circled numbers indicate sample size (biological replicates).

In association with the age-dependent formation of tubulointerstitial and perivascular fibrosis in ZSF1 obese kidneys (Figure 6A and 6B), a profound increase in HBb mRNA and protein levels was observed in ZSF1 obese kidneys at both 14 and 26 weeks of age, consistent with those demonstrated in the cardiac and hepatic tissue (Figure 6C and 6D). Renal Trx2 mRNA was reduced in ZSF1 obese rats at 26 but not 14 weeks of age; however, renal Trx2 protein was increased significantly (P=0.0286) at 26- but not 14-week-old ZSF1 obese rats. In contrast, renal Trx2 enzymatic activity was reduced in both 14- and 26-week-old ZSF1 obese HFpEF rats (Figure 6E and 6F). Conversely, renal GSNOR mRNA and protein levels were reduced at both 14 and 26 (significantly, P=0.0286) weeks of age, whereas GSNOR activity was reduced only in 26-week-old ZSF1 obese rats (Figure 6G and 6H).

Figure 6. Imbalance of transnitrosylase (HBb [hemoglobin subunit β] expression) and denitrosylase in ZSF1 obese (Ob) kidney.

Figure 6.

Representative microphotography of renal fibrosis in the tubulointerstitial area and perivascular area from ZSF1 Ob vs Wistar Kyoto rat (WKY) kidneys at 14 (A) or 26 weeks (B) of age; scale bar denotes 20 μm. mRNA, representative Western blot image, and quantified protein expression of HBb in renal tissues collected from 14-week-old (C) and 26-week-old (D) WKY controls vs ZSF1 obese rats. mRNA, representative Western blot image, and quantified protein expression, and enzymatic activity of Trx2 in renal tissues collected from 14-week-old (E) and 26-week-old (F) WKY controls vs ZSF1 obese rats. mRNA, representative Western blot image, and quantified protein expression, and enzymatic activity of GSNOR (S-nitrosoglutathione reductase) in renal tissues collected from 14-week-old (G) and 26-week-old (H) WKY controls vs ZSF1 obese rats. Data were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U test and presented as mean±SEM. Circled numbers indicate sample size (biological replicates).

Alterations in Transnitrosylase and Denitrosylases Leads to Dysregulated NO and RxNO Dynamic in the 2-Hit Murine HFpEF Model

To further examine the dysregulated dynamic of NO and RxNO, and the role of transnitrosylase and denitrosylase in the setting of HFpEF, we performed additional experiments in another well-established rodent model of cardiometabolic HFpEF, the 2-hit murine model induced by L-NG-nitro arginine methyl ester and high-fat diet treatment (Figure 7A).19,44,45,69 Mice treated with L-NG-nitro arginine methyl ester and high fat diet displayed significantly lowered plasma (P=0.03) and cardiac tissue (P=0.0006) levels of nitrite, indicating a pathological reduction in NO bioavailability (Figure 7B and 7C), similar to observations in the ZSF1 obese rat. Interestingly, plasma 3-NT and nitrosothiols, were significantly elevated (P=0.006 or <0.0001, respectively) in the 2-hit mouse model of HFpEF (Figure 7D and 7E). Following 10 weeks of 2-hit, RxNO levels were also markedly elevated in the heart and various peripheral organs, including the liver, kidney, and lung (Figure 7F), highlighting the paradoxical systemic imbalance of NO bioavailability and excessive nitrosative stress. Correspondingly, HBb protein expression was upregulated in the heart, liver, and kidney of 2-hit HFpEF mice (Figure 7G through 7J). Conversely, GSNOR protein expression was not altered in the heart and kidney, although significantly increased (P=0.0159) in the liver of the 2-hit HFpEF mice (Figure 7K through 7N). Despite unchanged protein levels, the enzymatic activity of GSNOR was reduced in the heart, liver, kidney, and lung of the 2-hit HFpEF mice when compared with the control (Figure 7O).

Figure 7. Nitric oxide (NO)/total nitroso species (RxNO) imbalance and dysregulated transnitrosylase and denitrosylase in the 2-hit murine model of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).

Figure 7.

Study timeline of N(ω)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME)+HFD 2-hit murine model of HFpEF (A). Circulating (B), cardiac (C) nitrite levels from control vs 2-hit HFpEF mice following 10 weeks of 2-hit treatment. Circulating 3-nitrotyrosine (3-NT; D) and nitrosothiols (RsNO; E) levels control vs 2-hit HFpEF mice. RxNO levels in a variety of tissues, including the heart, liver, kidney, and lung (F) in control vs 2-hit HFpEF mice following 10 weeks of 2-hit treatment. Representative Western blot images of HBb in the heart, liver, and kidney (G) as well as </p>the quantification (HJ) in control vs 2-hit HFpEF mice. Representative Western blot images of GSNOR (S-nitrosoglutathione reductase) in the heart, liver, and kidney (K) as well as the quantification (LN) in control vs 2-hit HFpEF mice. GSNOR enzymatic activity (O) in heart, liver, kidney, and lung tissue from control vs 2-hit HFpEF mice. Data from (HJ) and (LO) were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U test, whereas the other data were analyzed with the unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. Data were presented as mean±SEM. Circled numbers indicate sample size (biological replicates).

DISCUSSION

HFpEF is a heterogenous, multiorgan disease associated with high morbidity and mortality.1,4,70 The prevalence of HFpEF has increased significantly in recent years and has now eclipsed HFrEF in terms of new HF diagnoses. There are multiple classes of effective therapeutic treatments accessible for patients with HFrEF, yet these treatments are largely ineffective for treating HFpEF.71 Thus, despite similar symptoms, there are likely very distinct underlying cellular and molecular pathological mechanisms that distinguish HFrEF from HFpEF.71 Elucidation of these divergent mechanisms is necessary to identify effective therapeutic targets to aid in the development of effective therapies for the treatment of HFpEF.

Given the well-established role of NO signaling in the regulation of cardiovascular health and the numerous reports demonstrating reduced NO bioavailability in CV diseases, NO-based therapies have been tested in HFpEF.1518 However, this therapeutic approach has failed to result in meaningful clinical efficacy in patients with HFpEF. Clinical studies using nitrite, nitrate, or organic nitrates to replenish NO bioavailability, or sGC stimulators and phosphodiesterase inhibitors to amplify NO-mediated cellular signaling have produced neutral results, despite the plethora of evidence suggesting that depleted NO bioavailability as a hallmark feature of HFpEF.10 However, it is possible that increased levels of superoxide radical anions that occur in HFpEF conjugates with the supplemental NO to form peroxynitrite, significantly suppressing the therapeutic action of NO-based therapy. Indeed, we have previously reported that NO-based therapy (ie, sodium nitrite), when combined with a powerful antioxidant and peroxynitrite scavenger, hydralazine, was highly effective in reducing the severity of HFpEF in the 2-hit mouse model.45 Such an approach warrants further exploration in both basic and clinical research settings.

Additionally, recent preclinical studies have suggested that excessive nitrosative stress and accumulation of RxNO, such as s-nitrosylated proteins, play a causative role in the pathogenesis and progression of HFpEF.19,20 Schiattarella et al19 described an increase in iNOS levels coupled with observation of increased cardiac protein s-nitrosylation (in particular cardiac IRE1α [serine/threonine-protein kinase/endoribonuclease inositol-requiring enzyme 1α]), which in turn, participated in the pathogenesis of HFpEF in the 2-hit mouse model of HFpEF. Moreover, using a different animal model, the salty drinking water/unilateral nephrectomy/aldosterone rat model of HFpEF, Yoon et al20 demonstrated that upregulation of nNOS, instead of iNOS, was responsible for increased s-nitrosylation of histone deacetylase 2, which in turn, induced cardiac diastolic dysfunction. These landmark studies established the possible link between nitrosative stress as well as pathological accumulation of RxNO in HFpEF, providing an alternative explanation for the neutral results produced by NO-based therapies for the treatment of HFpEF. In the present study, we sought to confirm the previous findings of elevated NO production by NOS and excessive nitrosative stress in the setting of HFpEF. Our initial studies in patients with HFpEF revealed for the first time that plasma nitrosothiols and 3-NT are significantly elevated in patients with HFpEF as compared with controls, which is indicative of excessive nitrosative stress in agreement with previous reports19,20; however, we did not observe significant changes in circulating nitrite, a well-established biomarker and sink of systemic NO bioavailability. These findings support the potential utility of circulating nitrosothiols and 3-NT as diagnostic biomarkers for HFpEF, pending validation in large and diverse patient cohorts. In contrast, circulating nitrite appears to have limited biomarker value due to its susceptibility to dietary and lifestyle-related fluctuations which can be challenging to control in human studies. Subsequently, we evaluated nitrite and RxNO bioavailability in 2 well-established rodent models of cardiometabolic HFpEF, the ZSF1 obese rat model and the 2-hit mouse model.19,38,41 In concert with our observations in clinical samples, ZSF1 obese rats displayed significantly increased levels of s-nitrosylated proteins in both the circulation and other organs during the progression of HFpEF. Increased RxNO levels observed in the heart as well as peripheral organs, such as the liver, kidney, and the lung (mouse), suggest that nitrosative stress is a systemic pathological component of HFpEF. However, in both ZSF1 obese rat and 2-hit mouse model, we observed profound reductions in nitrite levels in the circulation, cardiac and other tissues (data not shown). Together with the observations of impaired endothelial-dependent vasodilation in response to acetylcholine treatment, reduced phosphorylated eNOS (serine 1177), decreased circulating cGMP, and lower cardiac pVASP, these findings conclusively demonstrate that NO bioavailability and signaling are severely impaired in these models of HFpEF. Taken together, these data identified a paradoxical dysregulation of NO–RxNO dynamic characterized by impaired NO production and signaling coupled with excessive circulating and tissue protein s-nitrosylation. Notably, such phenomenon is contradictory to what was observed in the context of other cardiovascular diseases, including myocardial infarction and HFrEF, in which NO availability and signaling is similarly reduced while overall protein s-nitrosylation is largely insufficient.12,34,7278 Our findings suggest that increased production of NO may not be the cause of nitrosative stress in HFpEF, but an alternative cellular process (ie, trans nitrosylation and denitrosylation processes) are responsible for the excess accumulation of RxNO/nitrosative stress.

Indeed, the levels of these RxNO are also delicately regulated by the transnitrosylases, enzymes that transfer NO onto the cysteine residues of proteins, and by the denitrosylases, enzymes that remove the NO moiety from the cysteine residues.24,25,31,79,80 Similar to other posttranslational protein modifications, such as phosphorylation and sulfhydration, hyper- or hypo- s-nitrosylation of specific proteins resulted in altered function, which could lead to a wide range of effects that impact disease progression.24,30,31 To better understand the spectrum of such elevations in RxNO levels in HFpEF hearts, we performed iodoTMT-based purification and subsequent proteomic analysis in 26-week-old WKY and ZSF1 obese hearts to identify cardiac s-nitrosylated proteins. Our data provide compelling evidence for a significant alteration in the s-nitrosylation landscape in the context of HFpEF. The marked increase in the number of s-nitrosylated proteins in ZSF1 obese hearts compared with WKY controls highlights the profound dysregulation of protein nitrosylation in HFpEF. The identification of 271 uniquely s-nitrosylated proteins in the ZSF1 obese hearts suggests that these proteins may play critical roles in the pathophysiology of HFpEF. The global shift in the s-nitrosylated proteome, as revealed by principal coordinate analysis, further underscores the complexity of the nitrosylation modifications in the disease context. Notably, the enriched metabolic pathways in differentially s-nitrosylated proteins, including carboxylic acid metabolism, branched-chain amino acid catabolism, and the tricarboxylic acid cycle, align well with the HFpEF phenotype, where metabolic derangements are heightened. Branched-chain amino acid catabolic pathways and sulfur metabolism have been previously reported to be linked to HFpEF severity.39,81 Our data revealed that s-nitrosylation of key proteins in these pathways may produce functional consequences that influence HFpEF disease progression and further emphasize their importance in disease progression. Additionally, pathways related to cellular stress responses and mitochondrial protein quality control suggest that nitrosative stress exacerbates mitochondrial dysfunction and metabolic abnormalities in HFpEF. These findings highlight the critical role of s-nitrosylation as a key posttranslational modification contributing to the pathogenesis of HFpEF. Future experiments are needed to verify the functional consequences of s-nitrosylation on these proteins and further elucidate their roles in HFpEF progression.

Given the elevation of Rx(s)NO and 3-NT levels in multiple organs of animal models and in patients with HFpEF, our findings indicate that excessive protein s-nitrosylation likely contributes to HFpEF disease progression. However, the roles of transnitrosylase and denitrosylase, and their intricate interplay with bioactive NO, have not been investigated in the context of HFpEF. Using snRNA seq in an unbiased manner, we unexpectedly discovered that hemoglobin (subunit beta), a protein that is normally expressed mainly in erythrocytes, was shown to be markedly upregulated in all 4 major resident cardiac cell types: cardiomyocytes, endothelial cells, fibroblasts, and pericytes. Corroborating the snRNA seq analysis, we also observed striking upregulation of HBb in mRNA and protein levels in cardiac, hepatic, and renal tissues. To determine whether HBb was upregulated in human HFpEF hearts, we examined the data from a landmark study by Hahn et al investigating the myocardial gene expression signature in human HFpEF and found that cardiac biopsies from patients with HFpEF displayed an over 256-fold increase in HBb when compared with control subjects, and an over 64-fold increase when compared with patients with HFrEF.69 Notably, iNOS expression was also significantly upregulated in patients with HFpEF; however, the magnitude of this increase was substantially lower than that observed in HBb.19,69 It is well-established that hemoglobin is not normally expressed in appreciable levels in the myocardium and other peripheral organs.66,72,8285 We are aware of only a few studies describing elevated hemoglobin expression in nonerythrocytes, such as cardiac and hepatic tissues, triggered by a pro-oxidative and inflammatory cellular environment, features that are commonly observed in organs affected by HFpEF.8688 Importantly, cell culture-based experiments confirmed that HBb upregulation alone is sufficient to increase overall cellular RxNO content, which can be further magnified with the presence of exogenous NO (ie, NO donor). A previous study reported that HBb exerts SNO synthase in addition to transnitrosylase activity, which may account for the abrupt increase of de novo s-nitrosylation.89 Taken together, our findings provide novel insights into the potential deleterious roles of hemoglobin in cardiometabolic HFpEF. Specifically, we proposed that elevated HBb across multiple organs substantially enhanced overall trans-nitrosylation processes in the heart, liver, and kidney, thereby contributing to the excessive RxNO observed in these key organs and driving the pathogenesis and progression of cardiometabolic HFpEF. Interestingly, although previous studies have attributed transnitrosylase activity to tetrameric hemoglobin,66,72,90 our findings demonstrate for the first time that HBb monomer alone is sufficient to mediate protein trans-nitrosylation.

Other key factors responsible for the dynamic control of protein s-nitrosylation include Trx and GSNOR, which are among the most ubiquitously expressed and well-characterized denitrosylases and are responsible for denitrosylating a wide range of protein targets.23,28,79,91,92 Trx, primarily recognized for antioxidant properties, is a bifunctional nitrosylase as it has recently been shown to either de-nitrosylate or trans-nitrosylate a wide range of protein targets in mammalian cells in a context-dependent manner.26,91,92 snRNA seq analysis revealed that both Trx isoforms (Trx 1 in the cytosol and Trx 2 in the mitochondria) remained relatively stable, except a mild increase in Trx2 in ZSF1 obese cardiomyocytes at 14 weeks of age (snRNA seq analysis showed Trx2 to be the predominant isoform in the heart). As a result, we further examined Trx2 mRNA, protein expression, and enzymatic activity levels in ZSF1 obese rats. Significantly reduced Trx enzymatic activity as an oxidoreductase was observed in the cardiac, hepatic, and renal tissues, despite unaltered or increased protein expression. As a previous study reported, when oxidized, Trx loses its oxidoreductase activity but exhibits an increased propensity to function as a transnitrosylase.26 We hypothesize that during the pathogenesis of cardiometabolic HFpEF, substantial oxidative stress suppresses the oxidoreductase activity of Trx, as supported by our data, potentially leading to enhanced transnitrosylase activity. Additional cell-culture-based experiment showed that Trx2 overexpression in HL-1 cells alone does not alter overall cellular RxNO levels, whereas together with treatment of NO donor, Trx2 overexpression led to a modest but significant increase of cellular RxNO, but not to the extent of HBb overexpression. Taken together, these data suggest that despite altered expression and activity of Trx2, HBb may be the more predominant transnitrosylase that drives the pathological accumulation of RxNO in the pathogenesis and progression of cardiometabolic HFpEF.

Conversely, GSNOR is a well-established denitrosylase, and previous studies of GSNOR had focused on the therapeutic benefits of GSNOR inhibition. It has been shown that reduced GSNOR activity exerts beneficial effects in animal models of hypertension, atherosclerosis, and myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury by promoting angiogenesis, inhibiting apoptosis, and reducing inflammation and oxidative stress.24,28,7578 However, recently emerged evidence suggests otherwise: deficiency in GSNOR resulted in excessive nitrosative stress, leading to cellular senescence, improper mitochondrial turnover, hepatic insulin resistance in diabetes and obesity, aberrant placental s-nitrosylation and preeclampsia, as well as cardiac hypertrophy and dysfunction.32,9395 In the present study, we also observed reduced GSNOR protein expression and enzymatic activity in an age-dependent manner, which were associated with increased RxNO/nitrosative stress levels in multiple organs, including the heart, liver, kidney, and lung. Cell culture-based experiment revealed that in the context of HBb overexpression, GSNOR inhibition by N6022 resulted in further elevation of cellular RxNO content, informing possible therapeutic benefits of GSNOR activation instead of inhibition in the context of cardiometabolic HFpEF.

Taken together, we revealed for the first time that circulating markers of protein s-nitrosylation and nitrosative stress were increased in patients with HFpEF, and that the equilibrium between endogenous NO production and signaling (ie, NOS expression, activity, and downstream effectors) and enzymatic modulation of s-nitrosylation by transnitrosylase and denitrosylases pathways (eg, HBb expression, Trx2, and GSNOR expression and activity) is disrupted in the pathogenesis of cardiometabolic HFpEF. We also demonstrate for the first time that such deranged protein s-nitrosylation and nitrosative stress are present systemically (heart, liver, kidney, and lung) in cardiometabolic HFpEF in 2 well-characterized rodent models. Our findings are the first evidence that dysregulated transnitrosylase or denitrosylases, instead of overproduction of NO by NOS, contribute to the pathological systemic accumulation of RxNO during the pathogenesis and progression of HFpEF, potentially leading to comorbidities in peripheral organs, including the liver and kidney. Our findings also support the emerging paradigm that HFpEF is a systemic syndrome rather than a disease condition that is restricted to the heart. Restoration of the balance between transnitrosylase and denitrosylase expression and activity represents a new therapeutic approach to combat the heightened nitrosative stress seen in cardiometabolic HFpEF patients and may prove beneficial in conjunction with therapies that enhance physiological NO production and signaling.

Study Limitations and Future Directions

The current study used the ZSF1 obese rat and the 2-hit mouse models of HFpEF, both of which are well-established models that replicate key features of cardiometabolic HFpEF, including obesity, hypertension, and diastolic dysfunction. However, these models represent only a subset of the heterogeneous HFpEF patient population. As such, our findings may not fully capture the spectrum of molecular alterations, particularly in the trans- and de-nitrosylation machinery (eg, HBb, Trx2, GSNOR), that may be present in other HFpEF phenogroups, such as inflammation-driven or aging-related HFpEF. Development of additional animal models that more fully reflect the diverse causes of HFpEF will be essential for advancing mechanistic understanding and therapeutic development.

Moreover, although our proteomic analysis identified numerous proteins that are hyper-nitrosylated in the HFpEF heart, the functional consequences of these modifications remain to be determined. Additionally, future studies using targeted loss-of-function approaches such as tissue- or cell-type–specific knockout of HBb in the heart, liver, or kidney are warranted to directly test the mechanistic role of HBb-mediated trans-nitrosylation in HFpEF pathogenesis and multiorgan involvement.

Lastly, our study included only male rats and mice, in part due to reports that female patients with HFpEF more frequently present with lower body mass index, which differs from the cardiometabolic phenotypes modeled here. Importantly, previous studies have also demonstrated sex-specific differences in GSNOR expression and activity.34,35 Taken together, these key differences suggest that our findings in the current study may not directly translate to females. Therefore, future research incorporating female HFpEF models, including post-menopausal or ovariectomized animals, will be critical to determine whether the dysregulation of trans-/de-nitrosylation dynamics exhibits sex-specific patterns or responses.

Supplementary Material

Supp 1
Supp 2

Supplemental Material

Table S1 Figures S1S3

Major Resources Table ARRIVE Guidelines

Supplemental Material is available at https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/suppl/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.124.326042.

Novelty and Significance.

What Is Known?

  • Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a major public health problem characterized by high morbidity and mortality and lacks effective targeted therapies.

  • Dysregulated nitric oxide (NO) signaling and excessive protein s-nitrosylation have been implicated in HFpEF pathogenesis, but the enzymatic regulators and mechanistic basis remain poorly defined.

What New Information Does This Article Contribute?

  • Provides the first integrative analysis of s-nitrosylation dynamics in HFpEF by combining human plasma biomarker profiling, in vivo rodent model assessments, single-nucleus RNA-sequencing, and proteomic analysis of s-nitrosylated proteins, demonstrating the vital role of transnitrosylase and denitrosylase in regulating protein s-nitrosylation.

  • Demonstrates that severe HFpEF is associated with substantial upregulation of HBb (hemoglobin beta), dysfunctional thioredoxin 2, and GSNOR (s-nitrosoglutathione reductase), promoting an abrupt increase of protein s-nitrosylation in multiple diseased organs, including the heart, liver, and kidney.

Our study is the first to show that circulating RsNO (nitrosothiols) and 3-nitrotyrosine are significantly elevated in patients with HFpEF, indicating systemic nitrosative stress. We reveal a marked disconnect between reduced physiological NO signaling and heightened pathological nitrosative stress in HFpEF, contrasting with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, where both NO bioavailability and protein S-nitrosylation are diminished. This fundamental difference may underlie the limited success of NO-based therapies in HFpEF clinical trials. We further identify a key molecular feature in both human and animal HFpEF: nitrosative stress stems from an imbalance between transnitrosylases and denitrosylases, leading to reduced NO bioavailability alongside increased protein s-nitrosylation. This dysregulation extends beyond the heart to the kidney and liver, reinforcing HFpEF as a multiorgan syndrome with systemic disruption of nitrosylation homeostasis. These findings suggest that, in addition to enhancing NO signaling, restoring transnitrosylase and denitrosylase balance could represent a novel therapeutic strategy to reduce symptoms and mortality in HFpEF.

Sources of Funding

These studies were supported by the following grants from the National Institutes of Health (HL146098, HL146514, and HL151398 to D.J. Lefer), (HL159086 and HL105699 to T.M. Vondriska), (HL159428 to T.T. Goodchild), (AA029984 to T.E. Sharp), (P20GM135002 and U54GM104940 to T.D. Allerton), University of Alabama (TL1TR003106 to J.E. Doiron), the American Heart Association (20POST35200075 to Z. Li), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22377147 to Y. Zheng). We thank the Cell Biology and Bioimaging Core at Pennington Biomedical Research Center, supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (P20GM135002, P20GM103528, and P30DK072476), for the technical support.

Nonstandard Abbreviations and Acronyms

3-NT

3-nitrotyrosine

AKR1a1

α-keto reductase family 1–member 1

AMPK

AMP-activated protein kinase

eNOS

endothelial nitric oxide synthase

GSNOR

S-nitrosoglutathione reductase

HBb

hemoglobin subunit β

HFpEF

heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

HFrEF

heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

iNOS

inducible NO synthase

nNOS

neuronal nitric oxide synthase

NO

nitric oxide

NTproBNP

N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide

pVASP

phosphorylation of vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein

RxNO

total nitroso species

Trx

thioredoxin

WKY

Wistar Kyoto rat

Footnotes

Disclosures

D.J. Lefer is a coinventor on US Patents for the use of nitrite salts to treat cardiovascular diseases. The other authors report no conflicts.

Contributor Information

Zhen Li, School of Traditional Chinese Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.; Department of Cardiac Surgery, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA

Kyle B. LaPenna, Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Cardiovascular Center of Excellence, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans

Natalie D. Gehred, Departments of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Medicine and Physiology, Molecular Biology Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles

Xiaoman Yu, School of Traditional Chinese Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.; Department of Cardiac Surgery, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA

W.H. Wilson Tang, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH.; Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Center of Microbiome and Human Health, Cleveland Clinic, OH.

Jake E. Doiron, Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Cardiovascular Center of Excellence, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans

Huijing Xia, Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Cardiovascular Center of Excellence, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans.

Jingshu Chen, Gordian Biotechnology, South San Francisco, CA.

Ian H. Driver, Gordian Biotechnology, South San Francisco, CA

Frank B. Sachse, Gordian Biotechnology, South San Francisco, CA

Naoto Muraoka, Gordian Biotechnology, South San Francisco, CA.

Antonia Katsouda, Laboratory of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece; Center of Clinical, Experimental Surgery & Translational Research, Biomedical Research Foundation of the Academy of Athens, Greece.

Paraskevas Zampas, Laboratory of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece; Center of Clinical, Experimental Surgery & Translational Research, Biomedical Research Foundation of the Academy of Athens, Greece.

Amelia G. Haydel, Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Cardiovascular Center of Excellence, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans

Heather Quiriarte, Vascular Metabolism Laboratory, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA.

Timothy D. Allerton, Vascular Metabolism Laboratory, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA

Alexia Zagouras, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH.; Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Center of Microbiome and Human Health, Cleveland Clinic, OH.

Jennifer Wilcox, Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Center of Microbiome and Human Health, Cleveland Clinic, OH..

Tatiana Gromova, Departments of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Medicine and Physiology, Molecular Biology Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles.

Yueqin Zheng, State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicine, Center of Drug Discovery, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China..

Andreas Papapetropoulos, Laboratory of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece; Center of Clinical, Experimental Surgery & Translational Research, Biomedical Research Foundation of the Academy of Athens, Greece.

Sanjiv J. Shah, Northwestern University Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL

Traci T. Goodchild, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA

Martin B. Jensen, Gordian Biotechnology, South San Francisco, CA

Thomas E. Sharp, III, Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Physiology, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.

Thomas M. Vondriska, Departments of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Medicine and Physiology, Molecular Biology Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles

David J. Lefer, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA

REFERENCES

  • 1.Oktay AA, Rich JD, Shah SJ. The emerging epidemic of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2013;10:401–410. doi: 10.1007/s11897-013-0155-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.van Riet EES, Hoes AW, Wagenaar KP, Limburg A, Landman MAJ, Rutten FH. Epidemiology of heart failure: the prevalence of heart failure and ventricular dysfunction in older adults over time. A systematic review. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016;18:242–252. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.483 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nair N. Epidemiology and pathogenesis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2020;21:531–540. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm.2020.04.154 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dunlay SM, Roger VL, Redfield MM. Epidemiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2017;14:591–602. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2017.65 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Packer M, Butler J, Zannad F, Filippatos G, Ferreira JP, Pocock SJ, Carson P, Anand I, Doehner W, Haass M, et al. Effect of empagliflozin on worsening heart failure events in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: EMPEROR-preserved trial. Circulation. 2021;144:1284–1294. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.056824 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Anker SD, Butler J, Filippatos G, Ferreira JP, Bocchi E, Bohm M, Brunner-La Rocca HP, Choi DJ, Chopra V, Chuquiure-Valenzuela E, et al. ; EMPEROR-Preserved Trial Investigators. Empagliflozin in heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:1451–1461. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2107038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Solomon SD, McMurray JJV, Anand IS, Ge J, Lam CSP, Maggioni AP, Martinez F, Packer M, Pfeffer MA, Pieske B, et al. ; PARAGON-HF Investigators and Committees. Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:1609–1620. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1908655 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pitt B, Pfeffer MA, Assmann SF, Boineau R, Anand IS, Claggett B, Clausell N, Desai AS, Diaz R, Fleg JL, et al. ; TOPCAT Investigators. Spironolactone for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1383–1392. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1313731 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chirinos JA, Akers SR, Trieu L, Ischiropoulos H, Doulias P-T, Tariq A, Vasim I, Koppula MR, Syed AA, Soto-Calderon H, et al. Heart failure, left ventricular remodeling, and circulating nitric oxide metabolites. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5:e004133. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chirinos JA, Zamani P. The nitrate-nitrite-NO pathway and its implications for heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2016;13:47–59. doi: 10.1007/s11897-016-0277-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bradley JM, Islam KN, Polhemus DJ, Donnarumma E, Brewster LP, Tao YX, Goodchild TT, Lefer DJ. Sustained release nitrite therapy results in myocardial protection in a porcine model of metabolic syndrome with peripheral vascular disease. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2015;309:H305–H317. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00163.2015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bhushan S, Kondo K, Polhemus DJ, Otsuka H, Nicholson CK, Tao YX, Huang H, Georgiopoulou VV, Murohara T, Calvert JW, et al. Nitrite therapy improves left ventricular function during heart failure via restoration of nitric oxide-mediated cytoprotective signaling. Circ Res. 2014;114:1281–1291. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.301475 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lefer DJ. Emerging role of nitrite in myocardial protection. Arch Pharm Res. 2009;32:1127–1138. doi: 10.1007/s12272-009-1804-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Redfield MM, Chen HH, Borlaug BA, Semigran MJ, Lee KL, Lewis G, LeWinter MM, Rouleau JL, Bull DA, Mann DL, et al. ; RELAX Trial. Effect of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibition on exercise capacity and clinical status in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2013;309:1268–1277. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.2024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Reddy YNV, Lewis GD, Shah SJ, LeWinter M, Semigran M, Davila-Roman VG, Anstrom K, Hernandez A, Braunwald E, Redfield MM, et al. INDIE-HFpEF (inorganic nitrite delivery to improve exercise capacity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction): rationale and design. Circ Heart Fail. 2017;10:1–11. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.117.003862 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Borlaug BA, Anstrom KJ, Lewis GD, Shah SJ, Levine JA, Koepp GA, Givertz MM, Felker GM, Lewinter MM, Mann DL, et al. ; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Heart Failure Clinical Research Network. Effect of inorganic nitrite vs placebo on exercise capacity among patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the INDIE-HFpEF randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;320:1764–1773. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.14852 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Borlaug BA, Koepp KE, Melenovsky V. Sodium nitrite improves exercise hemodynamics and ventricular performance in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:1672–1682. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.07.067 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Redfield MM, Anstrom KJ, Levine JA, Koepp GA, Borlaug BA, Chen HH, LeWinter MM, Joseph SM, Shah SJ, Semigran MJ, et al. ; NHLBI Heart Failure Clinical Research Network. Isosorbide mononitrate in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2314–2324. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1510774 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Schiattarella GG, Altamirano F, Tong D, French KM, Villalobos E, Kim SY, Luo X, Jiang N, May HI, Wang ZV, et al. Nitrosative stress drives heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Nature. 2019;568:351–356. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1100-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yoon S, Kim M, Lee H, Kang G, Bedi K, Margulies KB, Jain R, Nam K-I, Kook H, Eom GH. S-nitrosylation of histone deacetylase 2 by neuronal nitric oxide synthase as a mechanism of diastolic dysfunction. Circulation. 2021;143:1912–1925. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.043578 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Liu L, Hausladen A, Zeng M, Que L, Heitman J, Stamler JS. A metabolic enzyme for S-nitrosothiol conserved from bacteria to humans. Nature. 2001;410:490–494. doi: 10.1038/35068596 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lai TS, Hausladen A, Slaughter TF, Eu JP, Stamler JS, Greenberg CS. Calcium regulates S-nitrosylation, denitrosylation, and activity of tissue transglutaminase. Biochemistry. 2001;40:4904–4910. doi: 10.1021/bi002321t [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Beigi F, Gonzalez DR, Minhas KM, Sun QA, Foster MW, Khan SA, Treuer AV, Dulce RA, Harrison RW, Saraiva RM, et al. Dynamic denitrosylation via S-nitrosoglutathione reductase regulates cardiovascular function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:4314–4319. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1113319109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Foster MW, Hess DT, Stamler JS. Protein S-nitrosylation in health and disease: a current perspective. Trends Mol Med. 2009;15:391–404. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2009.06.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lima B,Forrester MT,Hess DT,Stamler JS.S-nitrosylationincardiovascularsignaling. Circ Res. 2010;106:633–646. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.207381 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nagarajan N, Oka SI, Nah J, Wu C, Zhai P, Mukai R, Xu X, Kashyap S, Huang CY, Sung EA, et al. Thioredoxin 1 promotes autophagy through transnitrosylation of Atg7 during myocardial ischemia. J Clin Invest. 2023;133:e162326. doi: 10.1172/JCI162326 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hess DT, Matsumoto A, Kim SO, Marshall HE, Stamler JS. Protein S-nitrosylation: purview and parameters. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005;6:150–166. doi: 10.1038/nrm1569 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Barnett SD, Buxton ILO. The role of S-nitrosoglutathione reductase (GSNOR) in human disease and therapy. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2017;52:340–354. doi: 10.1080/10409238.2017.1304353 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chatterji A, Banerjee D, Billiar TR, Sengupta R. Understanding the role of S-nitrosylation/nitrosative stress in inflammation and the role of cellular denitrosylases in inflammation modulation: implications in health and diseases. Free Radic Biol Med. 2021;172:604–621. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2021.07.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Montagna C, Cirotti C, Rizza S, Filomeni G. When S-nitrosylation gets to mitochondria: from signaling to age-related diseases. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2020;32:884–905. doi: 10.1089/ars.2019.7872 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Anand P, Stamler JS. Enzymatic mechanisms regulating protein S-nitrosylation: implications in health and disease. J Mol Med (Berl). 2012;90:233–244. doi: 10.1007/s00109-012-0878-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kulandavelu S, Dulce RA, Murray CI, Bellio MA, Fritsch J, Kanashiro-Takeuchi R, Arora H, Paulino E, Soetkamp D, Balkan W, et al. S-nitrosoglutathione reductase deficiency causes aberrant placental S-nitrosylation and preeclampsia. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11:e024008. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zoltan Ungvari SAG, Recchia FA, Batkai S, Pacher P. Role of oxidative-nitrosative stress and downstream pathways in various forms of cardiomyopathy and heart failure. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2005;3:221–229. doi: 10.2174/1570161054368607 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Casin KM, Fallica J, Mackowski N, Veenema RJ, Chan A, St Paul A, Zhu G, Bedja D, Biswal S, Kohr MJ. S-nitrosoglutathione reductase is essential for protecting the female heart from ischemia-reperfusion injury. Circ Res. 2018;123:1232–1243. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.313956 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Casin KM, Kohr MJ. An emerging perspective on sex differences: intersecting S-nitrosothiol and aldehyde signaling in the heart. Redox Biol. 2020;31:101441. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2020.101441 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Leite S, Moreira-Costa L, Cerqueira R, Sousa-Mendes C, Angelico-Goncalves A, Fontoura D, Vasques-Novoa F, Leite-Moreira AF, Lourenco AP. Chronic sildenafil therapy in the ZSF1 obese rat model of metabolic syndrome and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2021;26:690–701. doi: 10.1177/10742484211034253 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.van Dijk CG, Oosterhuis NR, Xu YJ, Brandt M, Paulus WJ, van Heerebeek L, Duncker DJ, Verhaar MC, Fontoura D, Lourenco AP, et al. Distinct endothelial cell responses in the heart and kidney microvasculature characterize the progression of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in the obese ZSF1 rat with cardiorenal metabolic syndrome. Circ Heart Fail. 2016;9:e002760. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002760 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.van Ham WB, Kessler EL, Oerlemans M, Handoko ML, Sluijter JPG, van Veen TAB, den Ruijter HM, de Jager SCA. Clinical phenotypes of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction to select preclinical animal models. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2022;7:844–857. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2021.12.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Doiron JE, Elbatreek MH, Xia H, Yu X, Gehred ND, Gromova T, Chen J, Driver IH, Muraoka N, Jensen M, et al. Hydrogen sulfide deficiency and therapeutic targeting in cardiometabolic HFpEF: evidence for synergistic benefit with GLP-1/glucagon agonism. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2025;101297:101297. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2025.04.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Nguyen ITN, Brandt MM, van de Wouw J, van Drie RWA, Wesseling M, Cramer MJ, de Jager SCA, Merkus D, Duncker DJ, Cheng C, et al. Both male and female obese ZSF1 rats develop cardiac dysfunction in obesity-induced heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0232399. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232399 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Schauer A, Draskowski R, Jannasch A, Kirchhoff V, Goto K, Männel A, Barthel P, Augstein A, Winzer E, Tugtekin M, et al. ZSF1 rat as animal model for HFpEF: development of reduced diastolic function and skeletal muscle dysfunction. ESC Heart Fail. 2020;7:2123–2134. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12915 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Stolina M, Luo X, Dwyer D, Han CY, Chen R, Zhang Y, Xiong Y, Chen Y, Yin J, Shkumatov A, et al. The evolving systemic biomarker milieu in obese ZSF1 rat model of human cardiometabolic syndrome: characterization of the model and cardioprotective effect of GDF15. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0231234. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231234 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Doiron JE, Li Z, Yu X, LaPenna KB, Quiriarte H, Allerton TD, Koul K, Malek A, Shah SJ, Sharp TE, et al. Early renal denervation attenuates cardiac dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. J Am Heart Assoc. 2024;13:e032646. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032646 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Doiron JE, Xia H, Yu X, Nevins AR, LaPenna KB, Sharp TE III, Goodchild TT, Allerton TD, Elgazzaz M, Lazartigues E, et al. Adjunctive therapy with an oral H(2)S donor provides additional therapeutic benefit beyond SGLT2 inhibition in cardiometabolic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Br J Pharmacol. 2024;181:4294–4310. doi: 10.1111/bph.16493 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.LaPenna KB, Li Z, Doiron JE, Sharp TE III, Xia H, Moles K, Koul K, Wang JS, Polhemus DJ, Goodchild TT, et al. Combination sodium nitrite and hydralazine therapy attenuates heart failure with preserved ejection fraction severity in a “2-hit” murine model. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023;12:e028480. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.028480 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hedman AK, Hage C, Sharma A, Brosnan MJ, Buckbinder L, Gan LM, Shah SJ, Linde CM, Donal E, Daubert JC, et al. Identification of novel phenogroups in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction using machine learning. Heart. 2020;106:342–349. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-315481 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Knowlton AA, Lee AR. Estrogen and the cardiovascular system. Pharmacol Ther. 2012;135:54–70. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2012.03.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Stice JP, Lee JS, Pechenino AS, Knowlton AA. Estrogen, aging and the cardiovascular system. Future Cardiol. 2009;5:93–103. doi: 10.2217/14796678.5.1.93 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Li Z, Organ CL, Kang J, Polhemus DJ, Trivedi RK, Sharp TE, Jenkins JS, Tao Y, Xian M, Lefer DJ. Hydrogen sulfide attenuates renin angiotensin and aldosterone pathological signaling to preserve kidney function and improve exercise tolerance in heart failure. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2018;3:796–809. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2018.08.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Polhemus DJ, Bradley JM, Islam KN, Brewster LP, Calvert JW, Tao YX, Chang CC, Pipinos II, Goodchild TT, Lefer DJ. Therapeutic potential of sustained-release sodium nitrite for critical limb ischemia in the setting of metabolic syndrome. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2015;309:H82–H92. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00115.2015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Trivedi RK, Polhemus DJ, Li Z, Yoo D, Koiwaya H, Scarborough A, Goodchild TT, Lefer DJ. Combined angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors improve cardiac and vascular function via increased NO bioavailability in heart failure. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7:e008268. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.008268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Polhemus DJ, Trivedi RK, Gao J, Li Z, Scarborough AL, Goodchild TT, Varner KJ, Xia H, Smart FW, Kapusta DR, et al. Renal sympathetic denervation protects the failing heart via inhibition of neprilysin activity in the kidney. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:2139–2153. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.08.056 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Polhemus DJ, Trivedi RK, Sharp TE, Li Z, Goodchild TT, Scarborough A, de Couto G, Marban E, Lefer DJ. Repeated cell transplantation and adjunct renal denervation in ischemic heart failure: exploring modalities for improving cell therapy efficacy. Basic Res Cardiol. 2019;114:9. doi: 10.1007/s00395-019-0718-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Virshup IRS, Theis FJ, Angerer P, Wolf FA. Access and store annotated data matrices. J Open Source Softw. 2024;9:4371. doi: 10.21105/joss.04371 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Wolf FA, Angerer P, Theis FJ. SCANPY: large-scale single-cell gene expression data analysis. Genome Biol. 2018;19:15. doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1382-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Wolock SL, Lopez R, Klein AM. Scrublet: computational identification of cell doublets in single-cell transcriptomic data. Cell Syst. 2019;8:281.e9–291. e9. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2018.11.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Hao Y, Stuart T, Kowalski MH, Choudhary S, Hoffman P, Hartman A, Srivastava A, Molla G, Madad S, Fernandez-Granda C, et al. Dictionary learning for integrative, multimodal and scalable single-cell analysis. Nat Biotechnol. 2024;42:293–304. doi: 10.1038/s41587-023-01767-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Wickham H ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. 2016. New York:Springer-Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Jiang L, Yin X, Chen YH, Chen Y, Jiang W, Zheng H, Huang FQ, Liu B, Zhou W, Qi LW, et al. Proteomic analysis reveals ginsenoside Rb1 attenuates myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury through inhibiting ROS production from mitochondrial complex I. Theranostics. 2021;11:1703–1720. doi: 10.7150/thno.43895 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Hayashida K, Bagchi A, Miyazaki Y, Hirai S, Seth D, Silverman MG, Rezoagli E, Marutani E, Mori N, Magliocca A, et al. Improvement in outcomes after cardiac arrest and resuscitation by inhibition of s-nitrosoglutathione reductase. Circulation. 2019;139:815–827. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032488 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Van Linthout S, Savvatis K, Miteva K, Peng J, Ringe J, Warstat K, Schmidt-Lucke C, Sittinger M, Schultheiss HP, Tschope C. Mesenchymal stem cells improve murine acute coxsackievirus B3-induced myocarditis. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:2168–2178. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq467 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Wei C, Vanhatalo A, Black MI, Blackwell JR, Rajaram R, Kadach S, Jones AM. Relationships between nitric oxide biomarkers and physiological outcomes following dietary nitrate supplementation. Nitric Oxide. 2024;148:23–33. doi: 10.1016/j.niox.2024.04.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Polhemus DJ, Li Z, Pattillo CB, Gojon G Sr, Gojon G Jr, Giordano T, Krum H. A novel hydrogen sulfide prodrug, SG1002, promotes hydrogen sulfide and nitric oxide bioavailability in heart failure patients. Cardiovasc Ther. 2015;33:216–226. doi: 10.1111/1755-5922.12128 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Yi D, Ingelse BA, Duncan MW, Smythe GA. Quantification of 3-nitrotyrosine in biological tissues and fluids: generating valid results by eliminating artifactual formation. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2000;11:578–586. doi: 10.1016/S1044-0305(00)00113-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Paulus WJ. Beneficial effects of nitric oxide on cardiac diastolic function: ‘the flip side of the coin’. Heart Fail Rev. 2000;5:337–344. doi: 10.1023/a:1026511229882 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Premont RT, Reynolds JD, Zhang R, Stamler JS. Role of nitric oxide carried by hemoglobin in cardiovascular physiology: developments on a three-gas respiratory cycle. Circ Res. 2020;126:129–158. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.119.315626 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Premont RT, Singel DJ, Stamler JS. The enzymatic function of the honorary enzyme: S-nitrosylation of hemoglobin in physiology and medicine. Mol Aspects Med. 2022;84:101056. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2021.101056 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Hahn VS, Knutsdottir H, Luo X, Bedi K, Margulies KB, Haldar SM, Stolina M, Yin J, Khakoo AY, Vaishnav J, et al. Myocardial gene expression signatures in human heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circulation. 2021;143:120–134. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050498 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Tong D, Schiattarella GG, Jiang N, May HI, Lavandero S, Gillette TG, Hill JA. Female sex is protective in a preclinical model of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circulation. 2019;140:1769–1771. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.042267 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Adamczak DM, Oduah M-T, Kiebalo T, Nartowicz S, Bęben M, Pochylski M, Ciepłucha A, Gwizdała A, Lesiak M, Straburzyńska-Migaj E. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction-a concise review. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2020;22:82–82. doi: 10.1007/s11886-020-01349-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Gazewood JD, Turner PL. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician. 2017;96:582–588. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Zhang R, Hess DT, Reynolds JD, Stamler JS. Hemoglobin S-nitrosylation plays an essential role in cardioprotection. J Clin Invest. 2016;126:4654–4658. doi: 10.1172/JCI90425 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Stomberski CT, Venetos NM, Zhou HL, Qian Z, Collison BR, Field SJ, Premont RT, Stamler JS. A multienzyme S-nitrosylation cascade regulates cholesterol homeostasis. Cell Rep. 2022;41:111538. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111538 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Irie T, Sips PY, Kai S, Kida K, Ikeda K, Hirai S, Moazzami K, Jiramongkolchai P, Bloch DB, Doulias PT, et al. S-nitrosylation of calcium-handling proteins in cardiac adrenergic signaling and hypertrophy. Circ Res. 2015;117:793–803. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.307157 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Murphy E, Kohr M, Sun J, Nguyen T, Steenbergen C. S-nitrosylation. a radical way to protect the heart. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2012;52:568–577. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2011.08.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Kohr MJ, Evangelista AM, Ferlito M, Steenbergen C, Murphy E. S-nitrosylation of TRIM72 at cysteine 144 is critical for protection against oxidation-induced protein degradation and cell death. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2014;69:67–74. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2014.01.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Murphy E, Kohr M, Menazza S, Nguyen T, Evangelista A, Sun J, Steenbergen C. Signaling by S-nitrosylation in the heart. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2014;73:18–25. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2014.01.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Shao Q, Casin KM, Mackowski N, Murphy E, Steenbergen C, Kohr MJ. Adenosine A1 receptor activation increases myocardial protein S-nitrosothiols and elicits protection from ischemia-reperfusion injury in male and female hearts. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0177315. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177315 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Benhar M, Forrester MT, Stamler JS. Protein denitrosylation: enzymatic mechanisms and cellular functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009;10:721–732. doi: 10.1038/nrm2764 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Seth D, Hess DT, Hausladen A, Wang L, Wang YJ, Stamler JS. A multiplex enzymatic machinery for cellular protein S-nitrosylation. Mol Cell. 2018;69:451–464.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.12.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Hahn VS, Petucci C, Kim MS, Bedi KC Jr, Wang H, Mishra S, Koleini N, Yoo EJ, Margulies KB, Arany Z, et al. Myocardial metabolomics of human heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circulation. 2023;147:1147–1161. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.061846 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Piantadosi CA. Cardioprotective role of S-nitrosylated hemoglobin from RBC. J Clin Invest. 2016;126:4402–4403. doi: 10.1172/JCI91303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Saha D, Patgaonkar M, Shroff A, Ayyar K, Bashir T, Reddy KV. Hemoglobin expression in nonerythroid cells: novel or ubiquitous? Int J Inflam. 2014;2014:803237. doi: 10.1155/2014/803237 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Samaja M, Malavalli A, Vandegriff KD. How nitric oxide hindered the search for hemoglobin-based oxygen carriers as human blood substitutes. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:14902. doi: 10.3390/ijms241914902 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Stamler JS, Jia L, Eu JP, McMahon TJ, Demchenko IT, Bonaventura J, Gernert K, Piantadosi CA. Blood flow regulation by S-nitrosohemoglobin in the physiological oxygen gradient. Science. 1997;276:2034–2037. doi: 10.1126/science.276.5321.2034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Liu W, Baker SS, Baker RD, Nowak NJ, Zhu L. Upregulation of hemoglobin expression by oxidative stress in hepatocytes and its implication in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. PLoS One. 2011;6:e24363. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024363 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Manzoor S, Kane MS, Grenett M, Oh JY, Pat B, Lewis C, Davies JE, Steele C, Patel RP, Dell’Italia LJ. Elevated cardiac hemoglobin expression is associated with a pro-oxidative and inflammatory environment in primary mitral regurgitation. Free Radic Biol Med. 2023;208:126–133. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2023.08.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Saadatmand AR, Sramek V, Weber S, Finke D, Dewenter M, Sticht C, Gretz N, Wustemann T, Hagenmueller M, Kuenzel SR, et al. CaM kinase II regulates cardiac hemoglobin expression through histone phosphorylation upon sympathetic activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019;116:22282–22287. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1816521116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Angelo M, Singel DJ, Stamler JS. An S-nitrosothiol (SNO) synthase function of hemoglobin that utilizes nitrite as a substrate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:8366–8371. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0600942103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Nazemian R, Matta M, Aldamouk A, Zhu L, Awad M, Pophal M, Palmer NR, Armes T, Hausladen A, Stamler JS, et al. S-Nitrosylated hemoglobin predicts organ yield in neurologically-deceased human donors. Sci Rep. 2022;12:6639. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09933-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Benhar M, Forrester MT, Hess DT, Stamler JS. Regulated protein denitrosylation by cytosolic and mitochondrial thioredoxins. Science. 2008;320:1050–1054. doi: 10.1126/science.1158265 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Forrester MT, Seth D, Hausladen A, Eyler CE, Foster MW, Matsumoto A, Benhar M, Marshall HE, Stamler JS. Thioredoxin-interacting protein (Txnip) is a feedback regulator of S-nitrosylation. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:36160–36166. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.057729 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Rizza S, Cardaci S, Montagna C, Di Giacomo G, De Zio D, Bordi M, Maiani E, Campello S, Borreca A, Puca AA, et al. S-nitrosylation drives cell senescence and aging in mammals by controlling mitochondrial dynamics and mitophagy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115:E3388–E3397. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1722452115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Qian Q, Zhang Z, Orwig A, Chen S, Ding WX, Xu Y, Kunz RC, Lind NRL, Stamler JS, Yang L. S-Nitrosoglutathione reductase dysfunction contributes to obesity-associated hepatic insulin resistance via regulating autophagy. Diabetes. 2018;67:193–207. doi: 10.2337/db17-0223 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Xin Tang XL, Xinqi S, Yan Z, Yan Z, Qiyao F, Lulu H, Shixiu S, Zhiren Z, Feng C, Chenghui Y, et al. NEDD4–mediated GSNOR degradation aggravates cardiac hypertrophy and dysfunction. Circ Res. 2025;136:422–438. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.124.324872 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supp 1
Supp 2

Data Availability Statement

A detailed description of the materials used for the studies included in the current article can be found in the Major Resources Table in the Supplemental Material. Data and analytic methods will be made available from the first author (zli@cpu.edu.cn) or the corresponding author (david.lefer@cshs.org) on reasonable request.

RESOURCES