Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Feb 17.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2025 Nov 14;147(47):43424–43437. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5c11236

Chemical Tagging of N-Alkylamine-Containing Natural Products and Pharmaceuticals through C(sp3)–H Functionalization

Yuankai Wang 1,, Cunyuan Zhao 1,, Tenghui Wang 1,5, Andrew Steele 1,2, Manas Joshi 4, Soichiro Mori 1,5, Abhishek Chatterjee 4, Ben Shen 1,2,3,5, Matthew D Disney 1,5, Masayuki Wasa 1,5,*
PMCID: PMC12908569  NIHMSID: NIHMS2130028  PMID: 41238215

Abstract

The ability to introduce functional groups suitable for bioconjugation into natural products and pharmaceuticals in an efficient, chemo- and site-selective manner is critical for advancing drug discovery, biological chemistry, and targeted therapy. Late-stage C–H functionalization enables direct structural diversification of lead compounds, but broader application is constrained by the scarcity of catalysts that selectively activate relatively inert C–H bonds in polyfunctional drug compounds. Here, we report a photoinduced, flavin-catalyzed method that installs bioconjugation handles on a broad range of bioactive N-alkylamines. The transformation proceeds under mild, aerobic conditions with blue-light irradiation: flavin analogues mediate sequential α- and β-amino C–H bond scission to generate enamines, which undergo inverse electron-demand Diels-Alder reactions with tetrazine- or nitroalkene-based tagging agents. We assessed biological consequences by cytotoxicity and ligand-binding assays, revealing examples in which tagging either preserves or alters bioactivity. The method’s versatility is demonstrated by the efficient synthesis of antibody–drug conjugates derived from the anticancer agent irinotecan.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-2130028-f0001.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

Incorporating bioconjugation handles into natural products and pharmaceuticals is an essential strategy in drug discovery and biological chemistry, enabling the construction of antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs), bifunctional drugs, and molecular probes.114 Representative examples include the arming of DM1, a semi-synthetic maytansinoid analogue bearing a thiol, with an N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) ester by thiol-Michael addition en route to trastuzumab emtansine (1a, Figure 1A),6 and a dasatinib–diazirine–alkyne probe for photoaffinity chemoproteomics (1b), assembled through carbamate formation from an alcohol unit within dasatinib.7 Such derivatizations expand therapeutic modalities by permitting covalent attachment of small molecules to proteins, nucleic acids, or other ligands, thereby enhancing target specificity or enabling identification of drug-binding proteins.2,47,14

Fig. 1. Chemical tagging of bioactive N-alkylamines by late-stage functionalization.

Fig. 1.

(A) Chemical tagging of bioactive compounds by transformations of polar functional groups. (B) (C) State-of-the-art chemical tagging methods through transformations of C–H bonds positioned α- to a heteroatom (N, S). (D) Chemical tagging of bioactive amines by transformations of α- and/or β-amino C(sp3)–H bonds.

However, conventional tagging strategies, despite their widespread application, predominantly exploit native functional groups (e.g., alcohols, thiols, amines, carboxylic acids).4,17 This constrains conjugation sites and often requires synthesis of new analogues when those handles are absent in the lead compounds (e.g., DM1, Figure 1A).6 Late-stage functionalization of ubiquitous, otherwise-inert C–H bonds in lead compounds offers a complementary solution: it enables direct introduction of bioconjugation handles at positions inaccessible to classical functional-group interconversion (Figure 1B1D).820 Key advances include triazolinedione-mediated, tyrosine-selective peptide tagging and Minisci-type modification of N-heteroarenes.810 Notable methods targeting C(sp3)–H bonds are LnRh–nitrenoid insertion for α-amino C–H functionalization of alkaloids (2a + 3a4a, Figure 1B), and Giese-type radical addition for methionine-selective peptide modification (2b + 3b4b, Figure 1C).11,12 These approaches exploit the electronic and steric accessibility of α-to-heteroatom C–H bonds: electron donation from nitrogen or sulfur stabilizes intermediates such as a carbon with partial positive charge (I) or an α-thioradical (II).11,12,2137 Despite these advances, extending tagging to more remote, less-activated methylene C(sp3)–H bonds remains a major challenge.2153

To expand the range of taggable drugs and accessible arming sites, we sought to develop a catalyst/tagging-agent combination capable of functionalizing α- and/or β-C(sp3)–H bonds within saturated, nitrogen-containing heterocycles (Figure 1D). Cyclic tertiary amines are common in FDA-approved small-molecule drugs: among 321 approvals from 2013–2023, 40 contain piperidine, 40 pyrrolidine, and 13 morpholine.54 Despite this prevalence, few catalyst systems can efficiently cleave α- or β-amino C(sp3)–H bonds under mild conditions (i.e., without strong oxidants, acids, bases, or elevated temperatures) while tolerating diverse functional groups. This balance is crucial, as most bioactive molecules contain multiple Lewis acid- or base-sensitive functionalities (e.g., alcohols, carboxylic acids, amines, heteroarenes) that can deactivate catalysts or undergo side reactions under harsher conditions.5559 In chemical tagging, the added requirement that the catalyst tolerate bioconjugation handles within the tagging agent further compounds this challenge. A particularly demanding aspect is the identification of tagging agents that react selectively with intermediates generated in situ by amino C(sp3)–H bond scission while avoiding undesired reactions with native nucleophilic or electrophilic sites. For example, we previously developed an (F5C6)3B/Brønsted-base catalyst system that converts bioactive amines into enamines; however, this method was limited to amine substrates lacking protic functional groups and was therefore incompatible with introducing bioconjugation handles through α- and/or β-C(sp3)–H bonds in saturated, nitrogen-containing heterocycles.4244 These limitations underscore the need for a milder and more broadly functional-group-tolerant approach.

We therefore envisioned a robust platform for chemical tagging of α- and/or β-amino C(sp3)–H bonds in bioactive amines using 1.0–2.5 mol% flavin (FAD) analogues (C1) under blue-LED irradiation, paired with tetrazines (6) or nitroalkenes (8) as selective tagging agents (Figure 1D). Tagging of amine 5 likely proceeds as follows (Figure 2). Photoexcitation of the FAD analogue (e.g., C1) furnishes the corresponding excited state species (C1IV). A single-electron transfer (SET) from the tertiary amine to the triplet-state flavin generates a nitrogen-centered radical cation,6063 which upon deprotonation and a second SET delivers an iminium species.6265 Subsequent deprotonation of the iminium by an anionic form of the catalyst affords the enamine and a reduced FADH2 analogue (VIVII + VIII), and reoxidation of the reduced flavin by aerobic O2 regenerates C1 to close the catalytic cycle. The resulting enamines can undergo selective reactions with different tagging agents: 1,2,4,5-tetrazines (6) engage in inverse-electron-demand Diels-Alder reactions with the enamines (VIIIIX),6670 furnishing fused intermediates that extrude N2 (IXX) and ring-open to give 1,2-diazines (7a) suitable for bioconjugation. Alternatively, nitroalkenes (8) may add to the enamines (VIIIXIXII) and, after reduction, deliver tagged analogues (9) while preserving the N-heterocyclic core.47,71

Fig. 2. Plausible reaction mechanisms.

Fig. 2.

Photoactivated flavin catalyzes the oxidation of bioactive N-alkylamines. The ensuing union of the resulting enamine with a tetrazine or a nitroalkene affords the tagged products.

Flavin derivatives are known to oxidize N,N-dialkylamines to electrophilic imines (e.g., proline → 1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate) through cleavage of a hydridic α-amino C–H bond and a protic N–H bond.62,63 However, the use of flavin catalysis to convert tertiary amines into nucleophilic enamines (5VIII) has not been demonstrated, particularly in the context of polyfunctional drug molecules. A further practical advantage of our FAD-catalyzed approach is that aerobic O2 serves as the terminal oxidant to regenerate the catalyst (used in 1.0–2.5 mol %), in contrast to other photoactivated FAD systems that require inert conditions to prevent undesired reactions with O2-derived species (e.g., Figure 1C; see the Supporting Information).12,13,2225,72 Moreover, while seminal studies by Sauer, Boger, and others have established the reactivity of tetrazines with enamines formed via amine–carbonyl condensation,66,67 our strategy uniquely extends tetrazine chemistry to enamines generated by the oxidation of bioactive, polyfunctional N-alkylamines. Thus, we introduce a photoexcited flavin-based chemical tagging platform that chemoselectively transforms α- and/or β-amino C(sp3)–H bonds in pharmaceuticals and natural products containing other oxidation-prone moieties.

2. RESULTS and DISCUSSION

We describe the development of a catalytic method for C–H functionalization of bioactive N-alkylamines, exemplified by irinotecan (5c), an essential medication for colon and small-cell lung cancers (Table 1).73 To identify an effective catalyst, we evaluated various candidates using 5c and a N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS)-ester-substituted tetrazine (6c) to obtain the tagged product (7c). Naturally occurring flavin analogues, such as lumiflavin (C2) and riboflavin (C3), proved ineffective mainly due to their limited solubility in CH2Cl2. In contrast, the N-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethyl-substituted flavin (C4) successfully catalyzed the reaction, affording 7c in 46% yield. Further enhancements were achieved with catalysts containing more electron-deficient arene moieties. Halo-substituted catalysts such as Cl-(C5), Br-(C6), and I-(C7) provided 7c in 60%, 75%, and 50% yields, respectively. These yield improvements likely stem from the heavy atom effect and the increased oxidation potentials of these catalysts (C5C7: E1/2(PC*/PC) = 1.88–1.89 V vs. C4: E1/2(PC*/PC) = 1.65 V).74 The beneficial role of electron-withdrawing groups is further supported by the stark contrast in yields of 7c between the para-methoxyphenyl-substituted catalyst (C8, <3% yield) and the para-cyanophenyl-substituted catalyst (C9, 37% yield). Control experiments demonstrated that both photoirradiation and the catalyst were essential for the reaction, as the absence of either resulted in the complete recovery of 5c (see the Supporting Information).

Table 1.

Screening Studies to Identify an Effective Catalysta

graphic file with name nihms-2130028-t0007.jpg
a

Conditions: irinotecan (5c, 0.05 mmol), tetrazine (6c, 0.10 mmol), catalyst (C2–C9, 1.0 mol %), CH2Cl2 (7 mL), under irradiation with blue LED strip lights (465 nm), under air, 22 °C, 24 h. See the Supporting Information for details on the determination of redox potential values.

The abovementioned catalytic process can be performed with 6-methyl-3-aryl tetrazines (6c6i) featuring a wide variety of bioconjugation handles as the tagging agent (Table 2). This includes compounds bearing a N-hydroxysuccinimide ester or N-Boc-amine, applicable to amine-selective crosslinking (7c, 75% yield; 7i, 51% yield), a ketone that can be utilized for oxime ligation (7d, 70% yield), an azide or an alkyne for CuAAC (7e, 64% yield; 7f, 54% yield), as well as an aryl–boronic ester and an aryl–iodide suitable for cross-coupling (7g, 55% yield; 7h, 58% yield). Notably, C–H functionalization of 5c occurred exclusively at the N-alkyl piperidine unit, leaving intact the aryl piperidine-1-carboxylate group, which is prone to oxidation in other photocatalytic systems.25,30,32,39 This selectivity aligns with the exclusive engagement of 1,2,4,5-tetrazine (6) in inverse electron demand Diels-Alder cycloadditions with the electron-rich enamine derived from 5c. The reaction proceeds efficiently in air and under ambient temperature. Under such milder conditions, the reaction demonstrated broad functional group tolerance, accommodating alcohol, ester, amide, and pyridine moieties present in 5c, as well as various bioconjugation handles that constitute the tagging agents (6c6i), underscoring the robustness and versatility of the catalytic system.

Table 2.

Incorporation of Different Bioconjugation Handlesa

graphic file with name nihms-2130028-t0008.jpg
a

Conditions: irinotecan (5c, 0.05 mmol), tetrazine (6c–6i, 0.10 mmol), C6 (1.0 mol %), CH2Cl2 (7 mL), under irradiation with blue LED strip lights (465 nm), under air, 22 °C, 24 h.

We sought an alternative class of tagging agents capable of retaining the piperidine ring of irinotecan (5c) after chemical tagging (Table 3). Nitroalkenes bearing a ketone, an azide, a silyl ether, or a maleimide group (8a8d) reacted exclusively with the enamine intermediate derived from 5c. With riboflavin 2’,3’,4’,5’-tetraacetate (C10, RFTA; 2.5 mol %) as the photocatalyst, the reactions of 5c with 8a8d afforded enamine adducts (XIIaXIId), which were isolated after silica gel chromatography in 32–52 % yield (see the Supporting Information for details). Subsequent borohydride reduction of XIIaXIId furnished the corresponding tagged analogues 9a9d.

Table 3.

Arming of Irinotecan with Nitroalkene-Based Tagging Agentsa,b

graphic file with name nihms-2130028-t0009.jpg
a

Conditions: irinotecan (5c, 0.05 mmol), nitroalkene (8a—8d, 0.10 mmol), C10 (2.5 mol %), CH2Cl2 (1 mL), under irradiation with blue LED strip lights (465 nm), under air, 22 °C, 3 h. Resulting enamine (XIIa—XIId) was purified by flash silica gel column chromatography.

b

Conditions for reduction: enamine (XIIa—XIId), ZnCl2 (1.0 equiv.), NaCNBH3 (1.5 equiv.), methanol (0.5 mL), under air, 22 °C, 4 h.

The applicability of our strategy is highlighted by the efficient synthesis of antibody–drug conjugates from irinotecan (5c; Figure 3). As shown in Table 2, our tagging protocol enables incorporation of diverse modifiable units into irinotecan (5c7c7i), facilitating rapid evaluation and selection of chemo- and site-selective bioconjugation methods. Using a photoactivated flavin-catalyzed reaction, we directly tagged 5c with β-lactam (6j) to afford linker–payload 7j in 63 % yield (Figure 3). The resulting 7j is primed for site-specific conjugation via a dual-variable–domain (DVD) monoclonal antibody (mAb) platform, enabling modular “plug-and-play” targeting.7579 As a proof-of-concept, HER2- and CD79b-targeting DVDs were each conjugated to 7j, yielding ADCs 10j and 11j with drug-to-antibody ratios of 1.9 and 2.0, respectively, as determined by catalytic-methodol assay.80 Their identities were confirmed by intact mass spectrometry (see Figures S7–2, S7–3, and S8–3 in the Supporting Information for details regarding the characterization and preliminary biological evaluation of the ADCs). The latter single-step conversion of 5c to 7j exemplifies our chemical tagging strategy’s efficiency and functional-group tolerance, offering a robust route to ADCs against diverse antigens and laying the groundwork for future biological evaluation and development.

Fig. 3. Synthesis of an antibody–drug conjugate through sequential chemical tagging and bioconjugation.

Fig. 3.

Various bioactive N-alkylamine-based natural products and pharmaceuticals (5k5y; Tables 45, and Figure 4) were efficiently modified by the C6-catalyzed process, affording tagged analogues 7k7z. Saturated N-heterocyclic fragments, including piperidines (5k, 5l, 5o5q, 5u5w, 5y), pyrrolidines (5m, 5n, 5t), and morpholines (5r, 5s, 5w), served as suitable attachment sites. In addition to trialkylamines (5k5s), we prepared tagged derivatives arising from oxidation of N-aryl pyrrolidine and piperidine moieties (7t7v, 7x7z).

Table 4.

Tagging of Different Bioactive N-Alkylaminesa

graphic file with name nihms-2130028-t0010.jpg
a

Conditions: amine (5k-5p, 0.05 mmol), tetrazine (6c, 6e, 6l, 6n, 0.10–0.15 mmol), catalyst (C6, 1.0–2.5 mol %), CH2Cl2 (5–7 mL), under irradiation with blue LED strip lights (465 nm), under air, 22 °C, 12–36 h. See the Supporting Information for details.

Table 5.

Tagging of Different Bioactive Tertiary Aminesa

graphic file with name nihms-2130028-t0011.jpg
a

Conditions: amine (5q-5v, 0.05 mmol), tetrazine (6l, 6q, 6u, 0.10–0.15 mmol), catalyst (C6, 1.0–2.5 mol %), CH2Cl2 (5–7 mL), under irradiation with blue LED strip lights (465 nm), under air, 22 °C, 12–36 h. See the Supporting Information for details.

Fig. 4. Chemical Tagging of Y-320 and c-Fms-In-13.

Fig. 4.

Conditions: amine (5w, 5y, 0.05 mmol), tetrazine (6q, 6u, 0.10 mmol), catalyst (C6, 2.5 mol %), 10% DMSO in CH2Cl2 (5 mL) or CH2Cl2 (5 mL), under irradiation with blue LED strip lights (465 nm), under air, 22 °C, 24 h. See the Supporting Information for details.

For bemcentinib (5n), a diazirine–alkyne tag, widely used as a photoaffinity label in proteomics, was readily incorporated to give 7n in 88% yield.7 For the tagging of 5l and 5o5y, we employed pyridin-2-yl-substituted tetrazines, which undergo particularly facile cycloaddition relative to phenyl-substituted tetrazines; this enhanced reactivity reflects the electron-withdrawing character of the heteroaryl substituent and an intramolecular N–N repulsion.69,70 Reaction of elcubragistat (5t) with silyl-ether-containing 3,6-di(pyridin-2-yl)-1,2,4,5-tetrazine (6q) furnished an analogue that retained its cyclic amine unit (7t). This product is likely formed through oxidation of a 4,5-dihydropyridazine intermediate (see X7b, Figures 2 and 4B).

Notably, protic functional groups within the drugs, such as an alcohol (7m, 7r, 7u), a secondary amine (7q), and a carboxylic acid (7o, 7u, 7v), remained intact. Various heteroarenes were also well tolerated, including pyridazine and 1,2,4-triazole (7n), benzo[d]imidazole (7o), pyrimidin-4(3H)-one and benzo[d]isoxazole (7p), pyrazole (7w), and furan (7y). For modification of trifarotene (5u), where the drug or tagging agent had limited solubility in CH2Cl2, we used more polar or protic co-solvents (e.g., 10% DMSO or 50% MeOH in CH2Cl2).

Reactions of N-alkyl-substituted piperidine- and pyrrolidine-based drugs (5c, 5k5q) furnished products 7c7q in 21–75% yield, with >95% consumption of the amine substrates. Derivatization of morpholine-based drugs (5r, 5s) gave 7r (27% yield) and 7s (21% yield), with recovery of starting materials in 24% and 56%, respectively (see the Supporting Information for details). The material loss likely arises from competing photoactivated, flavin-mediated side reactions of the drug-derived enamine intermediates, processes that may include conversion to radical-cation species81,82 and reaction with singlet oxygen (1O2) generated under aerobic conditions.72,83 The formation of the amino-alcohol product 7r indicates that, after cycloaddition and N2 extrusion, the morpholine-derived intermediate (X, Figure 2) can undergo ring-opening through C–O bond rupture as opposed to the C–N bond cleavage that occurs en route to 7s.67

Alteration of Y-320 (5w, Figure 4A), which caused the enamine derived from its N-alkyl morpholine (5wXIII) or N-aryl piperidine (5wXIV) moieties to react with tetrazine 6u, afforded 7w and 7x in 20% and 33% yield, respectively. The arming of c-Fms-In-13 5y which possesses two N-aryl piperidine moieties (Figure 4B) was found to occur exclusively at the less sterically hindered N-heterocycle to give 7y (23% yield) and 7z (34% yield). The formation of the two products indicates that intermediate XVI generated by [4+2] cycloaddition between 5y-derived enamine and 6q (1yXVXVI) can either engage in amine elimination to give the ring-opening product (XVI7y), or oxidation to afford the 1,2-diazine (XVI7z). Notably, these regioisomers (7w and 7x, or 7y and 7z) could be isolated and purified by flash silica gel chromatography.

These results highlight the unique ability of the C6-based catalyst system to selectively oxidize tertiary amine–based drugs in different solvents, despite containing Lewis acidic, basic, and/or oxidation-sensitive moieties, including those especially prone to oxidation (e.g., the primary alcohol in 5u, the secondary amine in 5q). Furthermore, we find that tetrazines can react exclusively with the amine-derived enamine intermediates of varying sizes and electronic profiles. Such an attribute allows for rapid generation of a considerable range of desirable analogues.

3. BIOLOGICAL ASSAYS

We first set out to assess how arming irinotecan (5c) with tetrazine- or nitroalkene-based tagging agents might impact its anti-cancer bioactivity. We treated the parent compound 5c along with its tetrazine-derived analogue 7d and nitroalkene-derived analogue 9b (Figure 5A), in the human breast cancer cell line SK-BR-3 and the cell viability was measured. In regard to tetrazine derivatives, ketone-tagged 7d (IC50 = 0.84 ± 0.25 μM) exhibited potency identical to that of the lead compound 5c (IC50 = 0.86 ± 0.36 μM). In regard to nitroalkene derivatives, the azide-tagged 9b showed an IC50 of 1.8 ± 0.4 μM. These results demonstrate that both tetrazine- and nitroalkene-based tagging leads to irinotecan analogues with bioactivities that are comparable to that of the original entities. It is not surprising that modifications to [1,4’-bipiperidine]-1’-carboxylate unit minimally impact bioactivity. In the context of irinotecan, the latter fragment releases SN-38, the active metabolite of 5c, through hydrolysis of its carbamate linker, an event catalyzed by human carboxylesterase 2.73

Fig. 5. Biological Assay.

Fig. 5.

(A) IC50 values for SK-BR-3 cell line with irinotecan 5c and analogues 7d, 9b; (B) IC50 values for cancer cell lines with harrintonine 5m, bemcentinib 5n, gefitinib 5s, and analogues 7m, 7n, 7s. The 7m-treated cells did not reach 0% viability; thus, an IC50 value was estimated from the data; (C) Determination of IC50 values for EGFR kinase with 5s and 7s by the use of ADP-Glo luminescent kinase assay. See the Supporting Information for details on the determination of IC50 values.

We next evaluated the bioactivity of non-prodrug anticancer compounds harringtonine (5m), bemcentinib (5n), and gefitinib (5s), along with their tagged analogues (7m, 7n, 7s), in human breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 or SK-BR-3 cells (Figure 5B). These compounds were selected based on structural analyses and literature docking studies, which allowed us to estimate the likelihood of retaining binding activity after functionalization (See the Supporting Information).8487 The mechanism of action of these compounds varies. Harringtonine inhibits protein synthesis by binding to the ribosome83 while bemcentinib inhibits the AXL receptor tyrosine kinase,84,85 and gefitnib inhibits the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase.86 The SK-BR-3 and MCF-7 cell lines were chosen since they both express EGFR and AXL. In SK-BR-3 cells, tagging harringtonine (5m, IC50 = 0.36 ± 0.03 μM) produced 7m, which exhibited substantially reduced activity (estimated IC50 ≈ 42 μM). These findings are consistent with the role of harringtonine’s tertiary amine, protonated at physiological pH, in anchoring the drug within the ribosomal A-site cleft through H-bonding and electrostatic interactions.84 In MCF-7 cells, the bemcentinib analogue 7n showed an IC50 of 35.5 ± 2.2 μM (vs 14.6 ± 1.2 μM for 5n), indicating decrease of potency upon pyrrolidine modification.85,86 By contrast, modification of the morpholine ring in gefitinib, which is believed to have primarily a metabolic function (vs directly interacting with the EGFR kinase ATP-binding pocket)87 had limited influence on cellular potency (IC50 = 52.5 ± 4.9 μM for 5s vs 64.0 ± 3.3 μM for 7s in MCF-7 cells). To confirm that 7s retains on-target activity, an activity assay for kinase inhibition (Figure 5C) was applied to measure the EGFR kinase activity with compound treatment, both 5s and 7s inhibited EGFR kinase activity in the system and yielded comparable IC50 values (3.4 ± 0.5 nM for 5s and 8.3 ± 2.3 nM for 7s). Collectively, these findings illustrate that our tagging method can preserve lead compound bioactivity when a cyclic amine is inessential to target binding or, in the case of a prodrug, the amine is cleaved prior to target engagement.

4. CONCLUSIONS

We have developed a catalytic strategy for the chemical tagging of bioactive N-alkylamines through chemo- and site-selective transformation of C(sp3)–H bonds. We demonstrate that, through the use of photoactivated flavin analogues, it is possible to effect sequential cleavage of α- and β-amino C–H bonds with assorted bioactive compounds, enabling their conjugation with tetrazine- and nitroalkene-based tagging agents. The catalytic reactions proceed under mild conditions without strong oxidants, acids, or bases; a wide array of functional groups can therefore be tolerated, including Lewis acid- and base-sensitive moieties and heteroarenes. The tagged derivatives serve as versatile intermediates for the rapid synthesis of drug conjugates, as demonstrated by synthesis of two irinotecan-based antibody–drug conjugates; this is a workflow that can be extended to other payloads and adapted to multiple cancer types. Current efforts are directed toward developing an improved tagging strategy that introduces a cleavable linker and tag to potent cytotoxic payloads while minimizing the impact of tagging on their intrinsic activity.

The present study serves as a foundation for the site-selective functionalization of small-molecule amine-containing natural products and drugs, providing a rational framework for transforming complex substrates into α- and β-substituted analogues. Ongoing efforts are focused on expanding the scope of electrophiles that can capture the drug-derived enamines, thereby broadening the chemical space and therapeutic potential accessible through this late-stage functionalization platform.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information

ASSOCIATED CONTENT

Supporting Information The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/XXXXXXXXXX.

Full experimental procedures including compound characterization data (PDF)

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are grateful for financial supports from the NIH (R35GM128695 to MW, R35GM134954 and R01CA204484 to BS, R35GM136437 to AC, R01CA249180 to M.D.D., and S10OD021550 to NMR Core Facility), and The Wertheim UF Scripps Institute. A.S. is supported in part by an NIH postdoctoral fellowship F32GM133114. We are thankful to Professor Amir H. Hoveyda for helpful discussions. We are grateful to Dr. George Tsaprailis (The Wertheim UF Scripps Institute, Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics Core Facility, RRID:SCR_023576) for the HRMS analysis and Dr. Bo Li (Boston College, NIH Award S10OD030360) for the X-ray crystallographic analysis.

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Kolb HC; Finn MG; Sharpless KB Click Chemistry: Diverse Chemical Function from a Few Good Reactions. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2004–2021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sletten EM; Bertozzi CR Bioorthogonal Chemistry: Fishing for Selectivity in a Sea of Functionality. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 6974–6998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zhang C; Vinogradova EV; Spokoyny AM; Buchwald SL; Pentelute BL Arylation Chemistry for Bioconjugation. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 4810–4839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nicolaou KC; Rigol S The Role of Organic Synthesis in the Emergence and Development of Antibody–Drug Conjugates as Targeted Cancer Therapies. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 11206–11241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Scinto SL; Bilodeau DA; Hincapie R; Lee W; Nguyen SS; Xu M; am Ende CW; Finn MG; Lang K; Lin Q; Pezacki JP; Prescher JA; Robillard MS; Fox JM Bioorthogonal Chemistry. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 2021, 1, 30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lambert JM; Chari RVJ Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine (T-DM1): An Antibody–Drug Conjugate (ADC) for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 6949–6964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Trowbridge AD; Seath CP; Rodriguez-Rivera FP; Li BX; Dul BE; Schwaid AG; Buksh BF; Geri JB; Oakley JV; Fadeyi OO; Oslund RC; Ryu KA; White C; Reyes-Robles T; Tawa P; Parker DL; MacMillan DWC Small Molecule Photocatalysis Enables Drug Target Identification via Energy Transfer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2022, 119, e2208077119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ban H; Gavrilyuk J; Barbas CF Tyrosine Bioconjugation through Aqueous Ene-Type Reactions: A Click-like Reaction for Tyrosine. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 1523–1525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ban H; Nagano M; Gavrilyuk J; Hakamata W; Inokuma T; Barbas CF Facile and Stabile Linkages through Tyrosine: Bioconjugation Strategies with the Tyrosine-Click Reaction. Bioconjug. Chem. 2013, 24, 520–532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhou Q; Gui J; Pan CM; Albone E; Cheng X; Suh EM; Grasso L; Ishihara Y; Baran PS Bioconjugation by Native Chemical Tagging of C–H Bonds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 12994–12997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Li J; Cisar JS; Zhou CY; Vera B; Williams H; Rodríguez AD; Cravatt BF; Romo D Simultaneous Structure-Activity Studies and Arming of Natural Products by C–H Amination Reveal Cellular Targets of Eupalmerin Acetate. Nat. Chem. 2013, 5, 510–517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kim J; Li BX; Huang RYC; Qiao JX; Ewing WR; Macmillan DWC Site-Selective Functionalization of Methionine Residues via Photoredox Catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 21260–21266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Li BX; Kim DK; Bloom S; Huang RYC; Qiao JX; Ewing WR; Oblinsky DG; Scholes GD; MacMillan DW C. Site-Selective Tyrosine Bioconjugation via Photoredox Catalysis for Native-to-Bioorthogonal Protein Transformation. Nat. Chem. 2021, 13, 902–908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Loynd C; Singha Roy SJ; Ovalle VJ; Canarelli SE; Mondal A; Jewel D; Ficaretta ED; Weerapana E; Chatterjee A Electrochemical Labelling of Hydroxyindoles with Chemoselectivity for Site-Specific Protein Bioconjugation. Nat. Chem. 2024, 16, 389–397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Börgel J; Ritter T Late-Stage Functionalization. Chem 2020, 6, 1877–1887. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bellotti P; Huang HM; Faber T; Glorius F Photocatalytic Late-Stage C–H Functionalization. Chem. Rev. 2023, 123, 4237–4352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Robles O; Romo D Chemo- and Site-Selective Derivatizations of Natural Products Enabling Biological Studies. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2014, 31, 318–334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.White MC; Zhao J Aliphatic C–H Oxidations for Late-Stage Functionalization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 13988–14009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Campos KR; Coleman PJ; Alvarez JC; Dreher SD; Garbaccio RM; Terrett NK; Tillyer RD; Truppo MD; Parmee ER The Importance of Synthetic Chemistry in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Science 2019, 363, eaat0805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wang Y; Dana S; Long H; Xu Y; Li Y; Kaplaneris N; Ackermann L Electrochemical Late-Stage Functionalization. Chem. Rev. 2023, 123, 11269–11335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Herlem D; Hubert-Brierre Y; Khuong-Huu F; Goutarel R Reactions Photochimiques d’amines Tertiaires et d’alcaloides—III. Tetrahedron 1973, 29, 2195–2202. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cocquet G; Rool P; Ferroud C A Catalytic versus Stoichiometric Photoinduced Electron Transfer Promoted Selective C16–C21 Bond Cleavage of Catharanthine. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 839–841. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Knowles OJ; Johannissen LO; Crisenza GEM; Hay S; Leys D; Procter DJ A Vitamin B2-Photocatalysed Approach to Methionine Analogues. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202212158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Soro DM; Roque JB; Rackl JW; Park B; Payer S; Shi Y; Ruble JC; Kaledin AL; Baik MH; Musaev DG; Sarpong R Photo- and Metal-Mediated Deconstructive Approaches to Cyclic Aliphatic Amine Diversification. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 11245–11257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rackl JW; Müller AF; Profyllidou A; Wennemers H Regiodivergent α- and β-Functionalization of Saturated N-Heterocycles by Photocatalytic Oxidation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025, 147, 23381–23386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.McNally A; Prier CK; MacMillan DWC Discovery of an α-Amino C–H Arylation Reaction Using the Strategy of Accelerated Serendipity. Science 2011, 334, 1114–1117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Loh YY; Nagao K; Hoover AJ; Hesk D; Rivera NR; Colletti SL; Davies IW; MacMillan DWC Photoredox-Catalyzed Deuteration and Tritiation of Pharmaceutical Compounds. Science 2017, 358, 1182–1187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Shen Y; Funez-Ardoiz I; Schoenebeck F; Rovis T Site-Selective α-C–H Functionalization of Trialkylamines via Reversible Hydrogen Atom Transfer Catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 18952–18959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Narayanam JMR; Stephenson CRJ Visible Light Photoredox Catalysis: Applications in Organic Synthesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 102–113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Holmberg-Douglas N; Nicewicz DA Photoredox-Catalyzed C–H Functionalization Reactions. Chem. Rev. 2022, 122, 1925–2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Uraguchi D; Kinoshita N; Kizu T; Ooi T Synergistic Catalysis of Ionic Brønsted Acid and Photosensitizer for a Redox Neutral Asymmetric α-Coupling of N-Arylaminomethanes with Aldimines. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 13768–13771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zuo Z; Ahneman DT; Chu L; Terrett JA; Doyle AG; MacMillan DWC Merging Photoredox with Nickel Catalysis: Coupling of α-Carboxyl sp3-Carbons with Aryl Halides. Science 2014, 345, 437–440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.He J; Hamann LG; Davies HML; Beckwith REJ Late-Stage C–H Functionalization of Complex Alkaloids and Drug Molecules via Intermolecular Rhodium-Carbenoid Insertion. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 5943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Li Z; Li C-J Catalytic Enantioselective Alkynylation of Prochiral sp3 C–H Bonds Adjacent to a Nitrogen Atom. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 4997–4999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Campos KR; Klapars A; Waldman JH; Dormer PG; Chen CY Enantioselective, Palladium-Catalyzed α-Arylation of N-Boc-Pyrrolidine. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 3538–3539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Cordier CJ; Lundgren RJ; Fu GC Enantioconvergent Cross-Couplings of Racemic Alkylmetal Reagents with Unactivated Secondary Alkyl Electrophiles: Catalytic Asymmetric Negishi α-Alkylations of N-Boc-Pyrrolidine. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 10946–10949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Osberger TJ; Rogness DC; Kohrt JT; Stepan AF; White MC Oxidative Diversification of Amino Acids and Peptides by Small-molecule Iron Catalysis. Nature 2016, 537, 214–219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sarver PJ; Bacauanu V; Schultz DM; DiRocco DA; Lam Y Sherer hong, MacMillan EC, D. W. C. The Merger of Decatungstate and Copper Catalysis to Enable Aliphatic C(sp3)–H Trifluoromethylation. Nat. Chem. 2020, 12, 459–467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Holmberg-Douglas N; Choi Y; Aquila B; Huynh H; Nicewicz DA β-Functionalization of Saturated Aza-Heterocycles Enabled by Organic Photoredox Catalysis. ACS Catal. 2021, 11, 3153–3158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Schultz DM; Lévesque F; DiRocco DA; Reibarkh M; Ji Y; Joyce LA; Dropinski JF; Sheng H; Sherry BD; Davies IW Oxyfunctionalization of the Remote C–H Bonds of Aliphatic Amines by Decatungstate Photocatalysis. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 15274–15278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Das Ritu, Tian S, Karl YM, Jain T, König N, B. Photocatalyzed Dehydrogenation of Aliphatic N-Heterocycles Releasing Dihydrogen. ACS Catal. 2022, 12, 10326–10332. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Chang Y; Yesilcimen A; Cao M; Zhang Y; Zhang B; Chan JZ; Wasa M Catalytic Deuterium Incorporation within Metabolically Stable β-Amino C–H Bonds of Drug Molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 14570–14575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Chang Y; Cao M; Chan JZ; Zhao C; Wang Y; Yang R; Wasa M Enantioselective Synthesis of N-Alkylamines through β-Amino C–H Functionalization Promoted by Cooperative Actions of B(C6F5)3 and a Chiral Lewis Acid Co-Catalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 2441–2455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zhou XY; Liu L; Lyu H; Wang XC Modular Alkyl Growth in Amines via the Selective Insertion of Alkynes into C–C Bonds. Nat. Chem. 2025, 17, 1323–1330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Topczewski JJ; Cabrera PJ; Saper NI; Sanford MS Palladium-Catalysed Transannular C–H Functionalization of Alicyclic Amines. Nature 2016, 531, 220–224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ishii Y; Chatani N; Kakiuchi F; Murai S Rhodium-Catalyzed Reaction of N-(2-Pyridinyl)Piperazines with CO and Ethylene. A Novel Carbonylation at α C–H Bond in the Piperazine Ring. Organometallics 1997, 16, 3615–3622. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Takasu N; Oisaki K; Kanai M Iron-Catalyzed Oxidative C(3)–H Functionalization of Amines. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 1918–1921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.McNally A; Haffemayer B; Collins BSL; Gaunt MJ Palladium-Catalysed C–H Activation of Aliphatic Amines to Give Strained Nitrogen Heterocycles. Nature 2014, 510, 129–133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Daugulis O; Roane J; Tran LD Bidentate, Monoanionic Auxiliary-Directed Functionalization of Carbon–Hydrogen Bonds. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015, 48, 1053–1064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Su B; Lee T; Hartwig JF Iridium-Catalyzed, β-Selective C(sp3)–H Silylation of Aliphatic Amines To Form Silapyrrolidines and 1,2-Amino Alcohols. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 18032–18038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Chen W; Paul A; Abboud KA; Seidel D Rapid Functionalization of Multiple C–H Bonds in Unprotected Alicyclic Amines. Nat. Chem. 2020, 12, 545–550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Shono T; Hamaguchi H; Matsumura Y Electroorganic Chemistry. XX. Anodic Oxidation of Carbamates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 4264–4268. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Novaes LFT; Ho JSK; Mao K; Villemure E; Terrett JA; Lin S α,β-Desaturation and Formal β-C(sp3)-H Fluorination of N-Substituted Amines: A Late-Stage Functionalization Strategy Enabled by Electrochemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024, 146, 22982–22992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Marshall CM; Federice JG; Bell CN; Cox PB; Njardarson JT An Update on the Nitrogen Heterocycle Compositions and Properties of U.S. FDA-Approved Pharmaceuticals (2013–2023). J. Med. Chem. 2024, 67, 11622–11655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Taylor MS; Jacobsen EN Asymmetric Catalysis by Chiral Hydrogen-Bond Donors. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 1520–1543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Allen AE; MacMillan DWC Synergistic Catalysis: A Powerful Synthetic Strategy for New Reaction Development. Chem. Sci. 2012, 3, 633–658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Shibasaki M; Kumagai N Lewis Acid-Brønsted Base Catalysis. In Cooperative Catalysis: Designing Efficient Catalysts for Synthesis; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2015; pp 1–34. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Stephan DW; Erker G Frustrated Lewis pair chemistry: Development and perspectives. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 6400–6441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Romiti F; Del Pozo J; Paioti PHS; Gonsales SA; Li X; Hartrampf FWW; Hoveyda AH Different Strategies for Designing Dual-Catalytic Enantioselective Processes: From Fully Cooperative to Non-Cooperative Systems. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 17952–17961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Armstrong JS; Hemmerich P; Traber R Flavin Sensitized Photooxidation of (Poly)amino Acids: Fate of the Photosubstrate. Photochem. Photobiol. 1982, 35, 747–751. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Simpson JT; Lewis FD; Krantz A; Kokel B Photochemical and Photophysical Studies of Amines with Excited Flavins. Relevance to the Mechanism of Action of the Flavin-Dependent Monoamine Oxidase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 7155–7161. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Fagan RL; Palfey BA Flavin-Dependent Enzymes. In Comprehensive Natural Products II: Chemistry and Biology; Elsevier, 2010; Vol. 7, pp 37–113. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Cibulka Radek, Fraaije Marco. Flavin-Based Catalysis: Principles and Applications; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Lechner R; König B Oxidation and Deprotection of Primary Benzylamines by Visible Light Flavin Photocatalysis. Synthesis 2010, 10, 1712–1718. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Xie L; Yang X; Wang R; Cheng H; Li Z-Y; Liu L; Mao L; Wang M; Cheng L Identification of Flavin Mononucleotide as a Cell-Active Artificial N6-Methyladenosine RNA Demethylase. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 5028–5032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Sauer J; Mielert A; Lang D; Peter D Eine Studie Der Diels-Alder-Reaktion, III: Umsetzungen von 1.2.4.5-Tetrazinen Mit Olefinen. Zur Struktur von Dihydropyridazinen. Chem. Ber. 1965, 98, 1435–1445. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Zhang J; Shukla V; Boger DL Inverse Electron Demand Diels-Alder Reactions of Heterocyclic Azadienes, 1-Aza-1,3-Butadienes, Cyclopropenone Ketals, and Related Systems. A Retrospective. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 84, 9397–9445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Devaraj NK; Weissleder R; Hilderbrand SA Tetrazine-Based Cycloadditions: Application to Pretargeted Live Cell Imaging. Bioconjug. Chem. 2008, 19, 2297–2299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Eising S; Engwerda AHJ; Riedijk X; Bickelhaupt FM; Bonger KM Highly Stable and Selective Tetrazines for the Coordination-Assisted Bioorthogonal Ligation with Vinylboronic Acids. Bioconjug. Chem. 2018, 29, 3054–3059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Svatunek D; Wilkovitsch M; Hartmann L; Houk KN; Mikula H Uncovering the Key Role of Distortion in Bioorthogonal Tetrazine Tools That Defy the Reactivity/Stability Trade-Off. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 8171–8177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Seebach D; Sun X; Ebert MO; Schweizer WB; Purkayastha N; Beck AK; Duschmalé J; Wennemers H; Mukaiyama T; Benohoud M; Hayashi Y; Reiher M Stoichiometric Reactions of Enamines Derived from Diphenylprolinol Silyl Ethers with Nitro Olefins and Lessons for the Corresponding Organocatalytic Conversions – a Survey. Helv. Chim. Acta 2013, 96, 799–852. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Song PS; Moore TA Mechanism of the Photodephosphorylation of Menadiol Diphosphate. A Model for Bioquantum Conversion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 6507–6514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Bailly C Irinotecan: 25 Years of Cancer Treatment. Pharmacol. Res. 2019, 148, 104398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Korvinson KA; Hargenrader GN; Stevanovic J; Xie Y; Joseph J; Maslak V; Hadad CM; Glusac KD Improved Flavin-Based Catalytic Photooxidation of Alcohols through Intersystem Crossing Rate Enhancement. J. Phys. Chem. A 2016, 120, 7294–7300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Nanna AR; Li X; Walseng E; Pedzisa L; Goydel RS; Hymel D; Burke TR; Roush WR; Rader C Harnessing a Catalytic Lysine Residue for the One-Step Preparation of Homogeneous Antibody–Drug Conjugates. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Steele AD; Kiefer AF; Hwang D; Yang D; Teijaro CN; Adhikari A; Rader C; Shen B Application of a Biocatalytic Strategy for the Preparation of Tiancimycin-Based Antibody–Drug Conjugates Revealing Key Insights into Structure-Activity Relationships. J. Med. Chem. 2023, 66, 1562–1573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Kiefer AF; Thirugnanasambantham P; Jin Y; Steele A; Hwang D; Jiang Y; Adhikari A; Yang D; Chang J; Tafesse R; Radar C; Muthusamy N; Shen B Second Generation Tiancimycin-Based Antibody–Drug Conjugates Enabled by Highly Efficient Semi-synthetic Approach Specifically Targeting B Cell Malignancies. JACS Au 2025, 5, 3171–3181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Nanna AR; Rader C Engineering Dual Variable Domains for the Generation of Site-Specific Antibody–Drug Conjugates. In Methods in Molecular Biology; Humana Press Inc., 2019; Vol. 2033, pp 39–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Rader C; Turner JM; Heine A; Shabat D; Sinha SC; Wilson IA; Lerner RA; Barbas CF A Humanized Aldolase Antibody for Selective Chemotherapy and Adaptor Immunotherapy. J. Mol. Biol. 2003, 332, 889–899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Zhu X; Tanaka F; Lerner RA; Barbas CF; Wilson IA Direct Observation of an Enamine Intermediate in Amine Catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 18206–18207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Pirnot MT; Rankic DA; Martin DBC; MacMillan DWC Photoredox Activation for the Direct β-Arylation of Ketones and Aldehydes. Science 2013, 340, 1593–1596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Silvi M; Arceo E; Jurberg ID; Cassani C; Melchiorre P Enantioselective Organocatalytic Alkylation of Aldehydes and Enals Driven by the Direct Photoexcitation of Enamines. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 6120–6123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Zhou J; Wang S; Duan W; Lian Q; Wei W Catalyst-Free Photoinduced Selective Oxidative C(sp3)-C(sp3) Bond Cleavage in Arylamines. Green Chem. 2021, 23, 3261–3267. [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Gürel G; Blaha G; Moore PB; Steitz TA U2504 Determines the Species Specificity of the A-Site Cleft Antibiotics:. The Structures of Tiamulin, Homoharringtonine, and Bruceantin Bound to the Ribosome. J. Mol. Biol. 2009, 389, 146–156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Myers SH; Brunton VG; Unciti-Broceta A AXL Inhibitors in Cancer: A Medicinal Chemistry Perspective. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 59, 3593–3608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Shi W; Feng Z; Chi F; Zhou J; Qiu Q; Jiang Y; Chen S; Zhong Y; Jia H; Huang W; Qian H Structure-Based Discovery of Receptor Tyrosine Kinase AXL Degraders with Excellent Anti-Tumor Activity by Selectively Degrading AXL and Inducing Methuosis. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2022, 234, 114253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Antypenko LM; Kovalenko SI; Antypenko OM; Katsev AM; Achkasova OM Design and Evaluation of Novel Antimicrobial and Anticancer Agents Among Tetrazolo[1,5-c]Quinazoline-5-Thione S-Derivatives. Sci. Pharm. 2013, 81, 15–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

RESOURCES