Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2026 Feb 16;20(1):261. doi: 10.1007/s11701-026-03184-0

Correction to: Expert consensus on best content of a robotic surgical curriculum: a systematic review

Anna K Kieslich 1,, Ruari Jardine 1, Hussain Ibrahim 1, Areeg Calvert 1, Kenneth G Walker 1, Kim A Walker 2, Angus J M Watson 2
PMCID: PMC12909402  PMID: 41697491

In the original version of this article, abbreviations in front of the explanatory text in the footnote j and w were incorrectly mentioned as superscript.

Footnote j and w, which previously read as

j ESTSEuropean Society of Thoracic Surgeons, EACTS European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

w OKT Open Kidney Transplantation, RAKT Robotic Kidney Transplantation

but should have read.

j ESTSEuropean Society of Thoracic Surgeons, EACTS European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.

w OKT Open Kidney Transplantation, RAKT Robotic Kidney Transplantation.

The original version of the article has been corrected.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


Articles from Journal of Robotic Surgery are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES