Abstract
Rodents serve as hosts for many species of parasites, including cestodes, but the taxonomy of rodent-infecting tapeworms, especially in Central Europe, is still understudied. Therefore, the current study was conducted to identify larval and adult cestodes in free-living rodents from Northeastern Poland. The fieldwork was conducted between 2014 and 2023 in three forest sites. Cestodes were collected from five rodent species (Clethrionomys glareolus, Alexandromys oeconomus, Microtus agrestis, Apodemus agrarius and A. flavicollis, and were identified through morphology and by several genetic markers (12S rDNA, cox1, nad 1, 28S rDNA, 12S-16S rDNA) using phylogenetic analyses. A total of 58 cestode specimens were analyzed using molecular and phylogenetic analyses. Species identified included Catenotaenia henttoneni, Spasskijela kratochvili, Mesocestoides litteratus, Mesocestoides melesi, and others. Three Paranoplocephala specimens were identified as P. kalelai based on nad1 sequences. Morphological and genetic analyses indicated that the dominant adult cestode in bank vole was C. henttoneni and Mesocestoides spp. were the dominant larval cestodes. This study combined genetic and morphological methods to identify the cestodes infecting rodents in Poland. It confirmed the existence of P. kalelai in Poland, suggesting that previously reported Paranoplocephala spp., identified by morphological characters, may have corresponded to this molecularly identified species. Our study also highlighted gaps in genetic databases that currently still do not allow precise species identification.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00436-026-08629-x.
Keywords: Paranoplocephala, Catenotaenia, Skrjabinotaenia, Spasskijela, Mesocestoides, Phylogenetic analysis
Background
The structure of intestinal parasite communities of rodents has been well studied in Europe in recent years (Behnke et al. 1999; 2001; 2022; 2024). Identification of helminths was historically primarily based on morphological features and until recently, genetic data have been limited for rodent-infecting helminths, i.e. nematodes (Stewart et al. 2018; Behnke et al. 2022) or cestodes (Haukisalmi and Tenora 1993; Haukisalmi et al. 2014; Bajer et al. 2020). The availability of modern genotyping tools, encompassing a range of genetic markers, including mitochondrial (mt) and nuclear genes/regions (i.e. 12S and 28S rDNA, mt cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 [cox1] or NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1 [nad1]) and genetic databases allows an improved understanding of parasite phylogeny/evolution. Moreover, molecular tools also provide a means for the identification of cryptic species, that cannot be easily distinguished by conventional morphology. Progress in this area has resulted in numerous changes in our understanding of parasite taxonomy and consequently to the keys used for identification of species. A good example is the recent description of 12 new genera of tapeworms from the so called ‘Paranoplocephala complex’ (Haukisalmi et al. 2014). We have also recently reported on two species of Mesocestoides larvae parasitizing small rodents in NE Poland: Mesocestoides litteratus and Mesocestoides melesi (Bajer et al. 2020).
The main aim of our study was to determine the genetic identity of larval and adult cestodes parasitizing free-living rodents in the Mazury Lake District region of Poland. In our study we combined the phylogenetic analyses of several genetic markers with morphological features for cestode identification. Particular focus was on 1) genotyping of tapeworms from the Paranoplocephala complex parasitizing bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus) and 2) on the genetic identification of catenotaeniid cestodes, following the recent update of the molecular systematics of this cestode family (Haukisalmi et al. 2018, 2014).
Material and methods
Study sites
Larval and adult cestodes were acquired between 2014 and 2023, during our long-term studies on rodent helminths in the Mazury Lake District in the Northeastern corner of Poland, in three forest areas in the vicinity of Jezioro (Lake) Śniardwy. Site 1 is referred to as Urwitałt (N 53 × 48.153, EO 21 × 39.784), Site 2 as Tałty (N 53 × 53.644, EO 21 × 33.049) and Site 3 as Pilchy (N 53 × 42.228, EO 21 × 48.499) after nearby settlements (Additional file 2: Table S1). Additionally, Microtus spp. were trapped in fallow lands near the field station in Urwitałt. The study sites have been described comprehensively by Behnke et al. (2008a, b; 2001) and Tołkacz et al. (2017).
The methods used for trapping rodents, and for sampling and processing trapped animals, including the lists of appropriate permits, have all been provided in our previous papers (Behnke et al. 2001; 2008a, b; Grzybek et al. 2015; Tołkacz et al. 2017). Briefly, animals were live-trapped, transported to a laboratory in field station (Urwitałt), sacrificed by overexposure to Isofluran anaesthetic and subsequent cervical dislocation. Autopsies were carried out within 1–2 h following the death of an animal. Larval cestodes were collected from body and pleural cavities, and also after dissection of the liver. Adult tapeworms were collected either immediately after extraction from a section of the small intestine or after 2 h of incubation in 0.9% saline in Petri dishes. Dish content was examined under a stereo microscope. The collected specimens (larvae and adults) were kept in saline until fixation: distal parts of larvae (large larvae) or whole specimen (Mescocestoides) and several mature proglottids of adult tapeworms were placed in 70% ethanol for molecular study, while other parts of tapeworms were fixed in AFA solution (100 ml 40% formaldehyde, 250 ml 95% ethanol, 100 ml glycerine, 50 ml glacial acetic acid, 500 ml distilled water) after flattening between two slides. Following incubation in AFA for 24 h, specimens were carefully transferred to 70% ethanol filled vials and transported to our laboratory in Warsaw.
Nomenclature
In this paper we refer to Clethrionomys glareolus (as recommended by the Mammal Diversity Database, Tesakov et al. 2010 and Kryštufek et al. 2020), rather than Myodes glareolus (see Carleton et al. 2014), following several recent revisions of the generic attribution of bank voles and to Craseomys rufocanus Sundevall, 1846 rather than Clethrionomys or Myodes rufocanus (See Abramson and Lissovsky 2012).
We refer also to Spasskijela kratochvili rather than Skrjabinotaenia lobata following Haukisalmi et al. (2018) and Haukisalmi and Elmahy (2025). Although Haukisalmi et al (2018) restored Spasskijela lobata (Baer 1925) Tenora 1959 for Skrjabinotaenia lobata-like species A, B and C, in clade 11 of the phylogenetic tree based on concatenated sequences of 18S, 23S-16S rDNA, these authors then suggested that isolates from European rodents (Species C) should be referred to as Spasskijela kratochvili Tenora 1959.
Morphological examination of larval and adult tapeworms
Larval and adult tapeworms were stained using borax carmine, dehydrated in an ethanol series and mounted in Canada balsam for microscopical examination. Specimens were inspected carefully, using a Zeiss STEMI 508 stereo microscope (Germany) equipped with a camera and identified initially based on morphologic characters (Additional file 1: Supplementary Fig. 1).
DNA extraction and amplification
Genomic DNA was extracted from specimens fixed in 70% EtOH using about 20 mg of tissue, with the DNAeasy Blood & Tissue kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and stored at a temperature of −20°C.
Molecular typing of tapeworms was performed by amplification and sequencing of several genetic markers. A 350 bp-fragment of mitochondrial (mt) 12S rDNA was amplified using the primers P60 for (5′-TTA AGA TAT ATG TGG TAC AGG ATT AGA TAC CC – 3′) and P375 rev (5′-AAC CGA GGG TGA CGG GCG GTG TGT ACC – 3′) (Von Nickisch-Rosenegk et al. 1999). A 400 bp fragment of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (cox1) was amplified using the primers JB3 (5′-TTT TTT GGG CAT CCT GAG GTT TAT—3′) and JB45 (5′-TAA AGA AAG AAC ATA ATG AAA ATG-3′) (Kumar et al. 2018).
To identify new species of the Paranoplocephala complex, an 850 bp fragment of the dehydrogenase subunit 1 (nad1) was amplified using the primers NAD1F (5′- GGN TAT TST CAR TNT CGT AAG GG −3 ′) and trnNR (5′- TTC YTG AAG TTA ACA GCA TCA - 3′) (Haukisalmi et al. 2014).
For molecular typing of Catenotaenia and Spasskijela, the partial 28S rDNA (1,500 bp) and mitochondrial 12S–16S rRNA (820 bp) genes were amplified (Haukisalmi et al. 2018). The 12S–16S rDNA region encompasses three genes: regions coding for the large subunit ribosomal RNA (400 bp), tRNA-Cys gene (76 bp) and small subunit ribosomal RNA (345 bp) (Haukisalmi et al. 2018). A 28S rDNA fragment was amplified using the primers XZ-1 F (5′ ACCCGCTGAATTTAAGCATAT 3′) ((Waeschenbach et al. 2007) and 1500R (5′ GCTATCCTGAGGGAAACTTCG 3′) (Littlewood et al. 2008). The 12S–16S fragment was amplified using the primers Hym-16S-F (5′ TTATAAATGGCCGCAGTATATTGAC 3′) and Hym-12S-R (5′ ATCGTCCTTTATAACACACCTTCCC 3′) (Von Nickisch-Rosenegk et al. 2001).
The PCR reactions were performed in a volume of 20 μl, including 10 × PCR Dream Taq Green buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA), 5U Dream Taq polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 0.33 mM dNTPs, 1 μM of each primer and 2 μl of the extracted DNA sample. Negative controls were performed with nuclease-free distilled water, in the absence of template DNA.
PCR reactions for 12S rDNA and cox1 were carried out under identical cycling conditions: primary denaturation at 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 56 °C for 1 min, and elongation at 72 °C for 1 min, followed by a final elongation step at 72 °C for 7 min and a hold step at 4 °C.
PCR reactions for nad1 were carried out under the following cycling conditions: primary denaturation at 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 55 °C for 30 s, and elongation at 72 °C for 1.5 min, followed by a final elongation step at 72 °C for 7 min and a hold step at 4 °C.
PCR reactions for 28S rDNA and mitochondrial 12S–16S rDNA were: primary denaturation at 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 45 s, annealing at 55 °C for 45 s, and elongation at 72 °C for 45 s, followed by a final elongation step at 72 °C for 7 min and a hold step at 4 °C.
PCR products were subjected to electrophoresis on a 1.5% agarose gel and stained with Midori Green stain (Nippon Genetics, Düren, Germany). PCR products were sequenced in both directions using Sanger method by a private company (Genomed S.A., Warsaw, Poland) with the primers used for DNA amplification. The obtained sequences of each sample were quality checked, trimmed, and then the consensus sequence was constructed using Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 11 (MEGA v. 11) (Tamura et al. 2001).
Phylogenetic analyses
All sequences for each marker were checked in BLAST to identify the donor species. For each marker all obtained sequences were aligned with reference sequences from GenBank using the ClustalW in MEGA v.11, and AliView (Larsson 2014). Phylogenetic relationships among the 12S rDNA, cox1 and nad1 genes sequences were performed separately. Representative samples of cestodes were assessed using Bayesian Inference, implemented in MrBayes v3.2.6. (Ronquist et al. 2012). Due to the large size of the dataset, we fitted a GTR + G model with all six rate parameters free and with variation in the rate of evolution among sites in the alignment. Four independent runs of 10 000 000 generations were sampled every 1000 generations and 25% of the initial samples were discarded as a burn-in phase. The convergence of runs and effective sample sizes for the model’s parameters were checked using Tracer v. 1.7 (Rambaut et al. 2018).
For the phylogenetic analysis of catenotaeniids two genetic markers were analysed: a ~ 950 bp fragment of the 12S-16S rDNA and a 1600 bp fragment of the 28S rDNA (Additional file 3: Table S2). All obtained DNA sequences were submitted to GenBank (Additional file 2: Table S1). For each cestode, the sequences of the two genes were merged into a single ~ 2600 bp long sequence.
Results
In total 58 cestode specimens were examined initially by morphological characters and then molecular methods based on a combination of several genetic markers (cox1, 12S rDNA, nad1, 28S rDNA, 12S-16S rDNA) from five rodent species: 49 specimens from C. glareolus, one from M. oeconomus, one from M. agrestis, one from A. agrarius and six from A. flavicollis (Additional file 2: Table S1). Twenty specimens represented larval cestodes, derived from the body cavities or livers of their hosts, while 38 were adult tapeworms.
Preliminary microscopical examination of morphological features evident on stained slides (Additional file 1: Fig. S1), followed by molecular typing revealed that among the 58 specimens, 31 obtained from bank voles were C. henttoneni (Additional file 2: Table S1, Figs. 1, 2, 3 and 4) and the remaining specimens were Taenia polyacantha larvae (3 specimens), Versteria mustelae larvae (2 specimens), Spasskijela kratochvili adults (3 specimens), Mesocestoides litteratus larvae (7 specimens), T. martis larvae (5 specimens), M. melesi larvae (3 specimens), Paranoplocephala kalelai adults (3 specimens) and Kontrimavichusia asymetrica adult (1 specimen) (Additional file 2: Table S1, Figs. 1, 2, 3 and 4).
Fig. 1.
The phylogenetic tree of cestodes inferred from sequence variation of ~ 370 bp cox1 gene fragment (n = 61). The tree is 50%-majority rule consensus obtained using MrBayes (Bayesian Inference). Numbers along nodes represent a posteriori probability. The DNA sequences obtained in this study are coloured in blue and bolded (n = 33)
Fig. 2.
The phylogenetic tree of cestodes inferred from sequence variation of ~ 270 bp 12S rDNA gene fragment (n = 42). The tree is 50%-majority rule consensus obtained using MrBayes (Bayesian Inference). Numbers along nodes represent a posteriori probability. The DNA sequences obtained in this study are coloured in blue and bolded (n = 22)
Fig. 3.
The phylogenetic tree of cestodes inferred from sequence variation of ~ 720 bp nad1 gene fragment (n = 20). The tree is 50%-majority rule consensus obtained using MrBayes (Bayesian Inference). Numbers along nodes represent a posteriori probability. The DNA sequences obtained in this study are coloured in blue and bolded (n = 3)
Fig. 4.
The phylogenetic tree of cestodes inferred from sequence variation of ~ 2900 bp concenated 12S-16S and 28S rDNA fragments (n = 31). The tree is 50%-majority rule consensus obtained using MrBayes (Bayesian Inference). Numbers along nodes represent a posteriori probability. The DNA sequences obtained in this study are coloured in blue and bolded (n = 10)
Larvae of T. polyacantha, collected from the pleural and peritoneal cavities of A. agrarius, M. oeconomus and C. glareolus showed 100% identity of cox1 sequence with T. polyacantha sequences deposited in GenBank (T. polyacantha from Vulpes vulpes, Italy, MT806362) and 100% identity of 12S rDNA with several sequences of T. polyacantha (for example T. polyacantha from V. vulpes, Zürich, MZ414196). Our sequences clustered on one branch with T. polyacantha sequences obtained from red foxes in Italy (Fig. 1).
Larvae of V. mustelae from the livers of C. glareolus were identified based on 99.1% similarity of the cox1 sequence with the V. mustelae sequence from the GenBank (V. mustelae from Neovison vison, Poland, MW476516). On the phylogenetic tree, our V. mustelae sequences grouped with V. mustelae sequences from the American mink from Spain and Poland (Fig. 1).
The larvae of Mesocestoides spp. cannot be distinguished morphologically but the three species of the Mesocestoides spp. known to infect rodents in Europe live in the peritoneal and pleural cavities, and liver surfaces of C. glareolus. Among 10 samples of Mesocestoides larvae, seven cox1 sequences showed 100% identity to M. litteratus sequences from our previous study (M. litteratus from A. flavicollis, Poland, MN514033) (Bajer et al. 2020). On the phylogenetic tree, our seven M. litteratus sequences clustered with the M. litteratus sequences obtained from a golden jackal from Croatia and a dog from Germany (12S rDNA, Fig. 2). The remaining three Mesocestoides sequences showed 100% similarity to M. melesi from C. glareolus from Poland (MN514025).
Larvae of T. martis were collected from the pleural and peritoneal cavities of A. flavicollis and were identified based on 100% sequence identity of three markers with sequences from GenBank: including 12S rDNA (T. martis from Homo sapiens, Germany, LT837855), cox1 (T. martis from C. glareolus, Denmark, EU544553) and nad1 (T. martis, Croatia, NC020153). Sequences of T. martis from this study grouped with T. martis sequences from C. glareolus, A. flavicollis and H. sapiens from Germany (Fig. 2).
For C. henttoneni the highest percentage similarity of the cox 1 gene was only 92%, and this to an unidentified Catenotaenia sp. (Catenotaenia sp. from Craseomys rufocanus, Japan, LC535283). More specific identification based on the cox 1 gene was not possible because unfortunately, as of to-date no C. henttoneni cox1 sequences have been deposited in the GenBank database. Our phylogenetic analyses based on two genetic markers, cox1 and 12S rDNA, showed that our specimens, formed a well-defined clade, closely related to S. cf. lobata (Figs. 1 and 2). In the phylogenetic tree based on combined 28S rDNA and 12S-16S rDNA (Fig. 4) our C. henttoneni sequences formed a well-supported sister clade to C. henttoneni isolated from Clethrionomys rutilus (northern red-backed voles), Finland (GU254054 + MG049995), and differed from this sequence by 1–2 SNPs, hence most likely representing a C. henttoneni genotype/variant adapted to bank voles, rather than northern red-backed voles, or a geographical variant of this species.
Our S. kratochvili 12S rDNA sequences displayed the highest similarity of 96% to Catenotaenia (Skrjabinotaenia) lobata from M. arvalis, Germany (L49462). Phylogenetic analysis of 12S rDNA revealed that S. kratochvili from A. flavicollis formed a separate branch on the tree with Catenotaenia (Skjabinotaenia) lobata from M. arvalis from Germany (Von Nickisch-Rosenegk et al. 1999) (Fig. 2). In the phylogenetic tree for catenotaeniids based on combined 28S rDNA and 12S-16S rDNA (Fig. 4) our S. kratochvili sequences formed a well-supported clade with S. kratochvili (= Skrjabinotaenia cf. lobata (C)) sequence (GU254058 + MG049969) from A. flavicollis, Bosnia and Herzegovina, but differed from this sequence by 2 SNPs.
One adult cestode from M. agrestis was initially identified microscopically as Rodentolepis assymetrica (formerly: Hymenolepis assymetrica). In 2022 this species was redescribed as Kontrimavichusia assymetrica (Makarikov and Binkienė, 2022), and therefore this species name has been assigned to our isolate. The 12S rDNA sequence of K. assymetrica grouped with a Hymenolepis sp. sequence from M. arvalis from Germany (Fig. 2) and displayed 98% similarity to it.
Three adult Paranoplocephala spp. cestodes from bank voles were genotyped, including also the nad1 gene fragment, used for the delineation of new species from the Paranoplocephala complex by (Haukisalmi et al. 2014). In total four sequences were obtained, three for cox1 and one for nad1. The nad1 gene sequence showed the highest similarity (97%) to the sequence of P. kalelai from C. rufocanus from Russia (ON548176). On the phylogenetic tree this Paranoplocephala sequence grouped with a P. kalelai sequence from C. rufocanus from Finland (KJ778953) and constituted a sister group to Paranoplocephala (formerly: Aprostatandrya) macrocephala (Fig. 3). Three cox1 gene sequences displaying the highest similarity (97%) to the sequence of P. kalelai from the small intestine of C. glareolus, grouped on one branch with P. kalelai from C. rufocanus from Japan, reflecting also the close relationship to P. omphalodes (Fig. 1).
Discussion
In the present study, several genetic markers were used for identification of cestode species recovered from wild rodents inhabiting the forests and open grasslands located in NE Poland. Genotyping and phylogenetic analyses allowed the identification of tapeworm species occurring in C. glareolus, A. flavicollis, M. oeconomus and M. agrestis from the Mazury Lake District. We demonstrated that among adult tapeworms, C. henttoneni is the dominant species in bank vole in this region of Poland, while among the larval forms Mesocestoides spp. dominated.
One of the main goals of our study was to identify cestodes from the Paranoplocephala complex based on a fragment of the mitochondrial nad1 gene. Our results indicated the occurrence of only one species, P. kalelai, previously described from Finland, but known to exist in the North Western Palearctic (Haukisalmi et al 2007a). In Central and Eastern Siberia P. buryatiensis dominates in C. rufucanus (Haukislami et al. 2007b). Our isolate did not show any similarity to the newly described genera from the ‘Paranoplocephala complex’, i.e. Tenoraia or Eurotaenia g. n. (Haukisalmi et al. 2014). Therefore, since previous reports of species of the genus Paranoplocephala (P. blanchardi but now emended to Microticola blanchardi) (Behnke et al. 2001) (P. omphalodes) in Bajer et al. 2005; Behnke et al. 2008a, b; Grzybek et al. 2015 from bank voles from the Mazury Lake District were based entirely on morphological features, it is likely that some of these isolates could actually have been the currently molecularly identified species, P. kalelai. Paranoplocephala kalelai is also a significant member of the helminth community of C. rufocanus in Russia (Krivopalov et al. 2022). Phylogenetic analyses based on nad1 and 12S rDNA clearly separated our sequences from the P. omphalodes sequences in GenBank. Paranoplocephala kalelai used to be common in bank voles in the Mazury lake district, with prevalence of 8.0% in 2000 (Bajer et al. 2005), although its prevalence has dropped significantly in recent years (Grzybek et al. 2015).
The prevalence of C. henttoneni in bank voles differed between our three study sites (highest at Urwitałt [24.3%] and Tałty (14.5%) but was relatively rare in Pilchy (6.7%) with four surveys at 3–4 year intervals combined). With sites combined, prevalence varied between the years with a peak prevalence in 2002 (25.1%) and lowest in 1999 (7.9%). For further breakdown by study site, year, host age and sex see (Behnke et al. 2001; 2008a, b; Grzybek et al. 2015). A recent complex genetic and phylogenetic study reported on the systematic position of C. henttoneni in the Catenotaeniid family (Haukisalmi et al. 2018). Both morphological and phylogenetic analyses of our isolates allowed for unambiguous identification of C. henttoneni in bank voles, which formed a separate, well-defined branch on phylogenetic trees. In the phylogenetic tree based on combined 28S rDNA and 12S-16S rDNA our C. henttoneni sequences formed a well-supported sister clade to C. henttoneni from C. rutilus. This cestode species has been regularly recorded in bank voles at our three forest study sites in the Mazury Lake District, ever since the beginning of our research in these locations in 1997 (Behnke et al. 2001, 2008a, b; Bajer et al. 2005; Grzybek et al. 2015). Morphological features of this species accord entirely with the description of C. henttoneni (Haukisalmi and Tenora 1993; Haukisalmi et al. 2010- redescription]. Moreover, in the original description by Haukisalmi and Tenora (1993), C. glareolus was referred to as the type host for C. henttoneni, while C. rutilus was considered as an ‘other’ or incidental host. These authors recorded also some relatively small differences between the morphometrics of cestodes originating from bank voles and those from red backed voles, perhaps providing a basis for the minor difference we detected between our genetic sequences of worms from bank voles and the C. henttoneni sequence in GenBank of a Finnish isolate from C. rutilus. There is clearly a need for deeper molecular analyses building on the work of Haukisalmi et al (2018) who included 12S-16S sequences of C. henttoneni from Croatia, England and Sweden in their study. More sequences from bank voles and red backed voles from other European countries would help to establish whether C. henttoneni exists as host-related, or locally prevalent geography-related variants/subspecies.
The original description of S. lobata was from Africa (Baer 1925) and there exist also redescriptions of this species among African as well as European cestodes (Baylis 1927; Genov 1984). Tenora (1959) described the European form of S. lobata as Catenotaenia (Spasskijela) kratochvili Tenora 1959. In their comprehensive study of the molecular systematics and evolutionary history of the catentaeniids Haukisalmi et al (2018) proposed the existence of three distinct Skrjabinotaenia lobata-like species (A–C), of which one parasitizes mice of the genus Apodemus in Europe (S. cf. lobata C) and two (S. cf. lobata A and B) parasitize other murids in Africa. Accordingly, our combined 28S and 12S-16S rDNA sequences formed a separate clade from the African isolates, corresponding to S. cf. lobata species/genotype C (Fig. 4) The name Spasskijela kratochvili Tenora 1959 has been proposed for this European genotype of S. lobata (Haukisalmi et al. 2018). Based on their preliminary phylogenetic analyses Haukisalmi et al. (2018) reported that the genetic distances among European S. lobata-like isolates (sp. C/S. kratochvili) were minimal compared with interspecific distances, supporting the idea that there is a single wide-spread species (Spasskijela kratochvili) in Europe, parasitizing primarily mice of the genus Apodemus. However, no comparative morphological studies of these species have been conducted, and to-date no formal redescription has been published. Cestodes of this species have been regularly found in Apodemus spp. from the Mazury Lake District, constituting the dominant component of the helminth community with a prevalence of 27.4% (Bajer 2002 unpublished).
Based on morphology, one tapeworm from M. agrestis was identified as Rodentolepis assymetrica (formerly: Hymenolepis assymetrica). In 2022, this species was redescribed as Kontrimavichusia assymetrica (Makarikov and Binkienė, 2022), so this species name has been assigned to the tapeworm in the present study. Kontrimavichusia assymetrica has been previously found in Microtus spp. from the Mazury Lake District but was generally a rare species (prevalence < 1%) (Bajer 2002 unpublished).
Our previous studies were based on morphological identification of tapeworms (Behnke et al. 2001). However, molecular and phylogenetic analysis has enabled a more accurate identification of cestode species and genera, especially for larval cestodes. To the best of our knowledge, our data represent the first genetic identification of the species P. kalelai and C. henttoneni occurring in the bank vole in Poland and the first molecular typing of S. cf. lobata from A. flavicollis. The current study shows that the use of genetic and phylogenetic analysis allows for better, more accurate identification of tapeworms found in rodents, compared to the conventional methods based on morphological characters.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary file1 Cestodes: Catenotaenia henttoneni a. scolex; b. mature proglottids; c. uterus; Spasskijela kratochvili (=Skrjabinotaenia cf. lobata (C)) d. scolex; e. mature proglottids; f. uterus; Paranoplocephala kalelai g. scolex; h. mature proglottids; i. uterus; Kontrimavichusia assymetrica j. mature proglottids; k. uterus development; l. uterus; Taenia polyacantha m. larvae scolex; n. larvae hooks; Mesocestoides melesi o. larva; p. larval suckers; Mesocestoides litteratus r. larva; s. larval suckers (JPG 2627 KB)
Supplementary file3 Summary of tapeworm species, their geographical distribution, host species, genotyped gene fragments, and corresponding GenBank accession numbers (XLSX 13 KB)
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Marek Woźniak for professional help with figure formatting.
Authors’ contributions
WR wrote the original draft. AB and JMB edited the manuscript. All authors collected material for the study. WR and AB conducted molecular studies. WR and AB were responsible for the morphological identification. WR and MA performed phylogenetic analysis of the samples. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
We would like to thank the Universities of Nottingham and Warsaw for enabling this study through financial support for travel and consumables. The study was supported by National Science Centre (NCN) Sonata Bis gran no. 2014/14/E/NZ7/00153 (AB). MG, JG and AG were supported by the National Science Centre, Poland (NCN), under the BiodivERsA3 programme (2019/31/Z/NZ8/04028). The work was also supported by POSTDOC PW no. 2, funded by Excellence Initiative – Research University - Warsaw University of Technology (1820/8/201/Z10/2022) (MA).
Data availability
All relevant data is presented within manuscript files (text, tables, supplementary material); The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available in the UW research data repository, 10.58132/YKN7IQ.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the Polish National Ethics Committee on Animal Experimentation, and according to the Polish national law for field work involving the trapping and culling of wild unprotected vertebrates for scientific purposes (Resolution No. 12/2022 of the Polish National Ethics Committee on Animal Experimentation, 11 March 2022). The study was performed according to the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0. All procedures in 2014 were carried out in accordance with the approval granted by the Local Ethical Committee for Animal Experiments in Warsaw (Resolution No. 706/2015), in compliance with the principles governing experimental conditions and the care of laboratory animals as required by the European Union and the Polish Law on Animal Protection.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Author details (optional)
Not applicable.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- Abramson NI, Lissovsky AA (2012) Subfamily Arvicolinae. In: Pavlinov IY, Lissovsky AA (eds) The mammals of Russia: a taxonomic and geographic reference. KMK Scientific Press, Moscow, pp 220–276
- Baer JG (1925) Sur quelques cestodes du Congo Belge. Rev Suisse Zool 18:239–251 [Google Scholar]
- Bajer A, Behnke JM, Pawelczyk A, Kuliś K, Sereda MJ, Siński E (2005) Medium-term temporal stability of the helminth component community structure in bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus) from the Mazury Lake District region of Poland. Parasitology 130:213–228. 10.1017/S0031182004006389 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bajer A, Alsarraf M, Dwużnik D, Mierzejewska EJ, Kołodziej-Sobocińska M, Behnke-Borowczyk J et al (2020) Rodents as intermediate hosts of cestode parasites of mammalian carnivores and birds of prey in Poland, with the first data on the life-cycle of Mesocestoides melesi. Parasit Vectors 13:95. 10.1186/s13071-020-3961-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bajer A (2002) Gryzonie różnych siedlisk jako źródło zarażeń Cryptosporidium: biologiczna i molekularna charakterystyka izolatów. PhD thesis, faculty of biology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw (in Polish)
- Baylis HA (1927) The cestode genus Catenotaenia. Ann Mag Nat Hist 9:433–439 [Google Scholar]
- Behnke JM, Lewis JW, Zain SN, Gilbert FS (1999) Helminth infections in Apodemus sylvaticus in southern England: interactive effects of host age, sex and year on the prevalence and abundance of infections. J Helminthol 73:31–44 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Behnke JM, Barnard CJ, Bajer A, Bray D, Dinmore J, Frake K et al (2001) Variation in the helminth community structure in bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus) from three comparable localities in the Mazury Lake District region of Poland. Parasitology 123:401–414. 10.1017/S0031182001008605 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Behnke JM, Bajer A, Harris PD, Newington L, Pidgeon E, Rowlands G et al (2008a) Temporal and between-site variation in helminth communities of bank voles (Myodes glareolus) from NE Poland. 1. Regional fauna and component community levels. Parasitology 135:985–997. 10.1017/S0031182008004393 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Behnke JM, Bajer A, Harris PD, Newington L, Pidgeon E, Rowlands G et al (2008b) Temporal and between-site variation in helminth communities of bank voles (Myodes glareolus) from NE Poland. 2. The infracommunity level. Parasitology 135:999–1018. 10.1017/S0031182008004484 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Behnke JM, Stewart A, Smales L, Cooper G, Lowe A, Kinsella JM et al (2022) Parasitic nematodes of the genus Syphacia Seurat, 1916 infecting Cricetidae in the British Isles: the enigmatic status of Syphacia nigeriana. Parasitology 149:76–94. 10.1017/S0031182021001578 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Behnke JM, Jackson JA, Gilbert F, Mohallal EME, Bajer A (2024) Large-bodied gastric spirurids (Nematoda, Spirurida) predict structure in the downstream gastrointestinal helminth community of wild spiny mice (Acomys dimidiatus). Parasitology 151:808–820. 10.1017/S0031182024000891 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carleton MD, Gardner AL, Pavlinov IY, Musser GG (2014) The valid generic name for red-backed voles (Muroidea: Cricetidae: Arvicolinae): restatement of the case for Myodes Pallas, 1811. J Mammal 95:943–959 [Google Scholar]
- Genov T (1984) Helminths of insectivorous mammals and rodents in Bulgaria. Sofia, izdatelstvo na Bulgarskata akademiya na naukite
- Grzybek M, Bajer A, Bednarska M, Alsarraf M, Behnke-Borowczyk J, Harris PD et al (2015) Long-term spatiotemporal stability and dynamic changes in helminth infracommunities of bank voles (Myodes glareolus) in NE Poland. Parasitology 142:1722–1743. 10.1017/S0031182015001225 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haukisalmi V, Tenora F (1993) Catenotaenia henttoneni sp. n. (Cestoda: Catenotaeniidae), a parasite of voles Clethrionomys glareolus and C. rutilus (Rodentia). Folia Parasitol (Praha) 40:29–33 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haukisalmi V, Hardman LM, Foronda P, Niemimaa J, Henttonen H (2007a) Taxonomy and genetic divergence of Paranoplocephala kalelai (Tenora, Haukisalmi et Henttonen, 1985) (Cestoda, Anoplocephalidae) in the grey-sided vole Myodes rufocanus in northern Fennoscandia. Acta Parasitol 52:335–341 [Google Scholar]
- Haukisalmi V, Hardman LM, Hardman M, Laakkonen J, Niemimaa J, Henttonen H (2007b) Morphological and molecular characterisation of Paranoplocephala buryatiensis n. sp. and P. longivaginata Chechulin & Gulyaev, 1998 (Cestoda: Anoplocephalidae) in voles of the genus Clethrionomys. Syst Parasitol 66:55–71 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haukisalmi V, Hardman LM, Henttonen H (2010) Taxonomic review of cestodes of the genus Catenotaenia Janicki, 1904 in Eurasia and molecular phylogeny of the Catenotaeniidae (Cyclophyllidea). Zootaxa 2489:1–33 [Google Scholar]
- Haukisalmi V, Hardman LM, Hoberg EP, Henttonen H (2014) Phylogenetic relationships and taxonomic revision of Paranoplocephala Lühe, 1910 sensu lato (Cestoda, Cyclophyllidea, Anoplocephalidae). Zootaxa 3873:371–415. 10.11646/zootaxa.3873.4.3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haukisalmi V, Ribas A, Junker K, Spickett A, Matthee S, Henttonen H et al (2018) Molecular systematics and evolutionary history of catenotaeniid cestodes (Cyclophyllidea). Zool Scr 47:221–230 [Google Scholar]
- Haukisalmi V, Elmahy RA (2025) Gerbillitaenia psammomi (Mikhail & Fahmy, 1968) n. comb. Taxonomic treatment, version v1
- Krivopalov T, Vlasenko P, Abramov S, Akimova L, Barkhatova A, Dokuchaev N et al (2022) Distribution and molecular diversity of Paranoplocephala kalelai (Tenora, Haukisalmi & Henttonen, 1985) Tenora, Murai & Vaucher, 1986 in voles (Rodentia: Myodes) in Eurasia. Diversity 14:472. 10.3390/d14060472 [Google Scholar]
- Kryštufek B, Tesakov AS, Lebedev VS, Bannikova AA, Abramson NI, Shenbrot G (2020) Back to the future: the proper name for red-backed voles is Clethrionomys Tilesius and not Myodes Pallas. Mammalia 84:214–217. 10.1515/mammalia-2019-0067 [Google Scholar]
- Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K (2018) Mega X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 35:1547–1559. 10.1093/molbev/msy096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Larsson A (2014) Aliview: a fast and lightweight alignment viewer and editor for large datasets. Bioinformatics 30:3276–3278 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Littlewood DTJ, Waeschenbach A, Nikolov PN (2008) In search of mitochondrial markers for resolving the phylogeny of cyclophyllidean tapeworms (Platyhelminthes, Cestoda)—a test study with Davaineidae. Acta Parasitol 53:133–144 [Google Scholar]
- Makarikov AA, Binkienė R (2022) Redescription and taxonomic position of Rodentolepis (sensu lato) asymmetrica (Janicki, 1904), with the erection of Kontrimavichusia n. g. (Eucestoda: Hymenolepididae) from arvicoline rodents (Rodentia: Cricetidae). J Helminthol 96:e63. 10.1017/S0022149X22000505 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Xie D, Baele G, Suchard MA (2018) Posterior summarization in Bayesian phylogenetics using tracer 1.7. Syst Biol 67:901–904 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ronquist F et al (2012) MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol 61:539–542 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stewart A, Lowe A, Smales L, Bajer A, Bradley J, Dwużnik D et al (2018) Parasitic nematodes of the genus Syphacia Seurat, 1916 infecting Muridae in the British Isles, and the peculiar case of Syphacia frederici. Parasitology 145:269–280. 10.1017/S0031182017001470 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S (2021) MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol Biol Evol 38:3022–3027. 10.1093/molbev/msab120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tenora F (1959) Revision of the classification of platyhelminths of the family Catenotaeniidae Spassky, 1950. Zool Zh 38:1322–1334 [Google Scholar]
- Tesakov AS, Lebedev VS, Bannikova AA, Abramson NI (2010) Clethrionomys Tilesius, 1850 is the valid generic name for red-backed voles and Myodes Pallas, 1811 is a junior synonym of Lemmus Link, 1795. Russ J Theriol 9:83–86 [Google Scholar]
- Tołkacz K, Bednarska M, Alsarraf M, Dwużnik D, Grzybek M, Welc-Falęciak R et al (2017) Prevalence, genetic identity and vertical transmission of Babesia microti in three naturally infected species of vole, Microtus spp. (Cricetidae). Parasit Vectors 10:66. 10.1186/s13071-017-2007-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Von Nickisch-Rosenegk M, Lucius R, Loos-Frank B (1999) Contributions to the phylogeny of the Cyclophyllidea (Cestoda) inferred from mitochondrial 12S rDNA. J Mol Evol 48:586–595. 10.1007/pl00006501 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Von Nickisch-Rosenegk M, Brown WM, Boore JL (2001) Complete sequence of the mitochondrial genome of the tapeworm Hymenolepis diminuta: gene arrangements indicate that platyhelminths are eutrochozoans. Mol Biol Evol 18:721–734. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003854 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Waeschenbach A, Webster BL, Bray RA, Littlewood DTJ (2007) Added resolution among ordinal level relationships of tapeworms (Platyhelminthes: Cestoda) with complete small and large subunit nuclear ribosomal RNA genes. Mol Phylogenet Evol 45:311–322. 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.03.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary file1 Cestodes: Catenotaenia henttoneni a. scolex; b. mature proglottids; c. uterus; Spasskijela kratochvili (=Skrjabinotaenia cf. lobata (C)) d. scolex; e. mature proglottids; f. uterus; Paranoplocephala kalelai g. scolex; h. mature proglottids; i. uterus; Kontrimavichusia assymetrica j. mature proglottids; k. uterus development; l. uterus; Taenia polyacantha m. larvae scolex; n. larvae hooks; Mesocestoides melesi o. larva; p. larval suckers; Mesocestoides litteratus r. larva; s. larval suckers (JPG 2627 KB)
Supplementary file3 Summary of tapeworm species, their geographical distribution, host species, genotyped gene fragments, and corresponding GenBank accession numbers (XLSX 13 KB)
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data is presented within manuscript files (text, tables, supplementary material); The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available in the UW research data repository, 10.58132/YKN7IQ.




