Skip to main content
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine logoLink to Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
. 1987 Sep;80(9):549–555. doi: 10.1177/014107688708000906

Five-year follow up of patients treated with inpatient psychotherapy at the Cassel Hospital for Nervous Diseases.

R M Rosser 1, S Birch 1, H Bond 1, J Denford 1, J Schachter 1
PMCID: PMC1290997  PMID: 3681868

Abstract

Twenty-eight patients who were admitted consecutively to a single-adult unit of the Cassel Hospital in 1977/8 were followed up 5 years after discharge. Those who were found to have improved at the end of treatment remained well 5 years later. These could be distinguished by their combination of neurotic psychopathology, considerable depression, superior intelligence, and lack of a chronic outpatient history. Patients who had improved 5 years after discharge did not show these characteristics, but had all spent at least 9 weeks on the waiting list and had the capacity to form close and helpful relationships. Patients who were judged to have improved were less dependent on the Health Service and their economic productivity was improved, often as a consequence of returning to education or training. Those who did not improve clinically continued to be admitted to hospital and tended to become less economically productive.

Full text

PDF
549

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bassett D. L., Pilowsky I. A study of brief psychotherapy for chronic pain. J Psychosom Res. 1985;29(3):259–264. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(85)90052-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Candy J., Balfour F. H., Cawley R. H., Hildebrand H. P., Malan D. H., Marks I. M., Wilson J. A feasibility study for a controlled trial of formal psychotherapy. Psychol Med. 1972 Nov;2(4):345–362. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700045165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Denford J., Schachter J., Temple N., Kind P., Rosser R. Selection and outcome in in-patient psychotherapy. Br J Med Psychol. 1983 Sep;56(Pt 3):225–243. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1983.tb01551.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. EYSENCK H. J. The effects of psychotherapy: an evaluation. J Consult Psychol. 1952 Oct;16(5):319–324. doi: 10.1037/h0063633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Meyer A. E., Bolz W. The Hamburg short psychotherapy comparison experiment. Foreward and introduction. Psychother Psychosom. 1981;35(2-3):81–84. doi: 10.1159/000287483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Montgomery S. A., Asberg M. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry. 1979 Apr;134:382–389. doi: 10.1192/bjp.134.4.382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rosser R., Denford J., Heslop A., Kinston W., Macklin D., Minty K., Moynihan C., Muir B., Rein L., Guz A. Breathlessness and psychiatric morbidity in chronic bronchitis and emphysema: a study of psychotherapeutic management. Psychol Med. 1983 Feb;13(1):93–110. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700050108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Senf W., Kordy H., von Rad M., Bräutigam W. Indication in psychotherapy on the basis of a follow-up study. Psychother Psychosom. 1984;42(1-4):37–47. doi: 10.1159/000287822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Snaith R. P., Constantopoulos A. A., Jardine M. Y., McGuffin P. A clinical scale for the self-assessment of irritability. Br J Psychiatry. 1978 Feb;132:164–171. doi: 10.1192/bjp.132.2.164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine are provided here courtesy of Royal Society of Medicine Press

RESOURCES