Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2025 Dec 24;32(7):e02658. doi: 10.1002/chem.202502658

Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction Coupled to Formate Fermentation: An Electro‐Bio Cascade Approach in Biocompatible Electrolytes

Luciana Vieira 1, Jonathan Thomas Fabarius 1, Gabriela Rizzo Piton 1,2, Barbara Bohlen 1,2, Dhananjai Pangotra 1, Melanie Speck 1, Carina Sagstetter 1, Volker Sieber 1,2, Arne Roth 1,
PMCID: PMC12910421  PMID: 41441814

ABSTRACT

Integration of electrochemical CO2 reduction with microbial fermentation enables conversion of CO2 into valuable chemicals but poses challenges at the electrolysis‐fermentation interface. The electrolyte must ensure efficient CO2 reduction while remaining compatible with microbial growth. We investigated various electrolytes for coupling CO2 electroreduction to formate with formate fermentation by Methylorubrum extorquens TK 0001. Electrolyte performance was evaluated by formate production and microbial growth. A phosphate‐based buffer demonstrated the best overall compatibility. Optimal microbial growth occurred at 0.1 mol L−1 KPi, with tolerance of up to 111 mmol L−1 formate. Continuous CO2 electrolysis in 1.0 mol L−1 KPi produced 2.0 mol L−1 formate in 48 h. Formate fermentation with M. extorquens showed biomass yield of 107 mg CDW gformate −1 and a growth rate of 0.10 h−1. These results highlight the crucial role of buffer composition and concentration in balancing efficient CO2 electroreduction with stable fermentation. Optimizing this electrochemical–biological interface enables direct utilization of CO2‐derived formate as a substrate for sustainable microbial production, offering a promising scalable route for industrial biotechnology.

Keywords: biomass growth, carbon dioxide, electrochemical CO2 reduction, formic acid, microbial C1 fermentation


CO2 utilization in industrial biotechnology: Rational design of a process cascade for electrochemical CO2 reduction linked with formate fermentation, supporting robust cell growth and high biomass yields.

graphic file with name CHEM-32-e02658-g004.jpg

1. Introduction

The rising levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere are the primary contributor to global warming and among the most pressing modern challenges [1, 2]. In reply to this challenge, there is an urgent need to transition away from our conventional linear economy model. This current model relies on extracting fossil carbon feedstock from the ground, which is emitted as CO2 into the atmosphere. Instead, a circular and sustainable carbon economy based on renewable resources has to be implemented to achieve a closed carbon cycle and to stop adding fossil carbon into the environment. The urgency for this transition has driven the development of various sustainable processes targeting net‐zero carbon emissions [3, 4]. In this context, CO2 capture and utilization (CCU) approaches emerge as an essential technology pillar, enabling a circular carbon economy by transforming CO2 from a climate‐damaging waste stream into a valuable raw material for the sustainable production of chemicals and fuels [2, 5].

Among several catalytic methods for CO2 utilization, electrocatalytic CO2 reduction (eCO2R) is particularly promising [2, 6]. Powered by renewable electricity, this process enables CO2 activation under mild conditions and allows direct hydrogenation of CO2 on electrode surfaces without requiring the application of pressurized hydrogen gas [7, 8]. By adjusting the reaction parameters, such as electrode material, electrolyte composition, and pH, eCO2R can selectively produce industrially relevant C1 and C2 compounds, including carbon monoxide (CO), formic acid (HCOOH), and ethylene (C2H4), with high production rates [9, 10]. While the sole application of eCO2R at high conversion rates remains challenging for synthesizing complex chemical compounds (i.e., C3+), it is possible to explore whole‐cell biocatalysis and their broad product spectrum to upgrade eCO2R products to high value‐added compounds [11, 12, 13].

In this context, particularly the microbial utilization of C1 compounds like methanol and formic acid/formate received attention as appealing option to utilize CO2‐derived substrates in biotechnology [11, 14]. Microorganisms capable of valorizing such substrates are classified as methylotrophs and formatotrophs, respectively [15]. Compared to conventional host microbes in industrial biotechnology, consuming glucose, methylo‐/formatotrophic microorganisms provide a highly specialized metabolism to utilize and deal with harsh substrates like formate/formic acid and their corresponding toxic metabolites like formaldehyde [16]. Thus, integrating eCO2R with subsequent biochemical or chemical steps in cascade processes opens pathways to more complex and valuable chemicals.

Among the various products of CO2 electroreduction, formic acid emerges as a promising liquid intermediate for integration with biochemical processes. Compared to gases, such as CO2 and CO, its easy handling and high solubility in aqueous media provide a significant advantage when used as substrate in fermentation [17]. With formic acid as CO2‐derived liquid and water‐soluble substrate, several challenges associated with traditional gas fermentation, such as low gas‐to‐liquid mass transport rates and highly specialized equipment required for handling gaseous (and, in case of hydrogen present, explosive) feed streams, are solved [12, 13]. Moreover, the chemical stability of formate makes it an ideal platform chemical for biological transformations.

Formate is metabolized by native formate‐utilizing microorganisms and metabolically engineered synthetic formatotrophs [11, 18]. Synthetic biology and metabolic engineering significantly enabled the application of synthetic formatotrophs for selective formate conversion into biomass with respectable yields of up to 100 mgcell dry weight gformate −1 and also into high‐value chemicals [11, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22].

Various microbial metabolic pathways are connected to C1 assimilation. The C1 pathway architecture generally depends on the host but is limited to six main pathways. In the case of formic acid, direct utilization is possible by the Wood–Ljungdahl pathway, the reductive glycine pathway, or the Serine cycle. We selected a major Serine‐cycle model methylotroph, that is, Methylorubrum extorquens TK 0001, due to its well‐understood metabolism, established cultivation techniques, known fermentation strategies, and broad availability of genetic engineering tools for this strain [23, 24].

Several approaches have been suggested for integrating eCO2R with biological transformations. Described are conventional approaches integrating bio‐electrochemical reactors, that is, the electrochemical and the biochemical reactions taking place in a single reactor, and the spatial decoupled approach with two independent reactors [25, 26, 27, 28]. Conventional approaches, often referred to as microbial electrosynthesis (MES) or electro‐fermentation, rely primarily on anaerobic microbes directly attached to the cathode or anode surface or submerged cells to harvest or discharge electrons, respectively [25, 29]. Significant challenges arise, such as low current densities, low media concentrations, and low conductivity. Furthermore, only a limited number of electro‐active microbial strains are available. Therefore, MES studies are often restricted to acetate production as electro‐active microbes have a limited product spectrum [30].

On the other hand, spatial decoupling of eCO2R and biological transformation has emerged as a more efficient alternative to tackle the previously described challenges. It can achieve higher conversion rates and take advantage of high substrate concentration in electrolytes [31]. Furthermore, it opens new opportunities for aerobic fermentation and the broad product portfolio usually associated with O2‐dependent microorganisms [32].

Following this direction, Stöckl et al. proposed a decoupled semi‐automated fed‐batch reactor, reaching higher current densities (150 mA cm−2) and employing high‐concentration electrolytes (0.2 mol L−1). In their work, formate electrosynthesis was evaluated at different phosphate‐buffer systems containing only Na+ or K+ ions or a mixture of them. The phosphate buffer system containing only K+ ions yielded higher formate concentrations and stable faradaic efficiency (FE) over 22 h of electrolysis. The authors attributed the improved performance to the higher conductivity of the potassium‐based phosphate buffer solution. However, when the buffer systems were inoculated with Cupriavidus necator (wildtype, resting cells) targeting polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) production, the higher PHB concentration was achieved with Na+/K+ mixture phosphate‐buffer, reaching up to 43.8 ± 3.0 mg L−1 OD−1[33].

In another work, Lim et al. [26]. attempted to integrate eCO2R to formate with microbial fermentation of C. necator to PHB in a so‐called biohybrid reactor. Initially, a flow cell reactor for converting CO2 to formate was inoculated with C. necator and an MR medium as the electrolyte solution. However, cells did not survive due to interaction with the cathode and possible reactive species generated at the anode. Therefore, a two‐reactor system was proposed. In the new design, electrolyte solution and fermentation broth were circulated between the electrolytic and the fermentation reactors with an intermediate filtration step to retain the cells in the fermentation tank. Further challenges were the low electric conductivity of the medium and electrode poisoning by the presence of trace metals in the buffer, as, at negative potentials, metal deposition at the cathode occurred. Such limitations were addressed by electrolyte optimization. First, electrolyte conductivity was addressed by increasing phosphate salt concentration (30 g L−1 of KH2PO4 was added); second, since metal ions from the trace metal solution (TMS) were being deposited at the cathode, the TMS was removed from the medium. Precipitates at the cathode surface were identified by XRD analysis as struvite (MgNH4PO4.6H2O) and KMgPO4·6H2O. Therefore, nitrogen salt was removed from the medium, and Mg2+ concentration was limited to 0.1 g L−1. Additionally, PHB accumulation increases under nitrogen‐limited conditions [34].

A recent study by Zhang and coworkers [35] demonstrated an integrated and continuous electro‐microbial conversion with C2 intermediates for the biosynthesis of PHA (polyhydroxyalkanoates) using Pseudomonas putida. Electrolyte compatibility was investigated with carbonate buffer, widely used in electrosynthesis, and a “basal” solution containing mainly phosphate buffer. Even though pH was controlled and maintained at 7.2, P. putida showed only minimal growth in carbonate buffer, demonstrating the preference of the strain for a phosphate‐containing medium. Although copper catalysts are broadly investigated for CO2 conversion to C2 products and these are preferred microbial substrates [36], they still lack selectivity toward a single product. In the work by Zhang et al., ethanol and total soluble C2+ FE did not exceed 25 %. The lower efficiency of eCO2R to C2+ products inspires synthetic biologists to improve microbial C1 uptake, as these feedstocks are produced with higher efficiency from eCO2R.

Despite the advances achieved in the reported studies, a systematic understanding of the relationship between buffer composition, electrochemical performance, and robustness of microbial fermentation remains unexplored. In this study, we address this gap by examining the electrochemical performance of eCO2R to formate in various biological buffers and their biocompatibility with M. extorquens. We explored parameters such as pH stability, current density, electrode stability, and formate productivity for five buffer compositions, with the target to optimize conditions for integration with biocatalytic processes.

Furthermore, we demonstrated the viability of using electrochemically produced formate to enable M. extorquens growth in a phosphate buffer system without any intermediate purification steps. This study highlights the potential of using CO2‐derived formate as a feedstock for biotechnological applications and thus contributes significantly to the development of process cascades combining CO2 utilization and biotechnology.

2. Results and Discussion

The successful integration of electrochemical CO2 reduction with microbial fermentation requires careful consideration of medium conditions that can support both processes. We evaluated five biological buffers as potential electrolytes for eCO2R: potassium phosphate (KPi), sodium carbonate/bicarbonate (NaCBi), tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (TRIS), citrate (CPi), and potassium bicarbonate (KHCO3). Each buffer was prepared at a concentration of 1 mol L−1 to ensure sufficient conductivity, minimize cell resistance, and overall cell voltage. To reduce other effects of present compounds that may interact with the growth of M. extorquens to a minimum, a mineral salts medium without any supplied vitamins or complex components was used as the basic growth medium. CO2 electrolysis in different buffers was conducted under galvanostatic conditions at −100 mA cm−2 using a flow cell setup.

2.1. Biologic Buffers Enable eCO2R Integration With Microbial Fermentation

The electrochemical performance revealed a clear distinction between inorganic and organic buffers (Figure 1 A,B), which led to different formate concentrations, FEs, and conductivities. The inorganic electrolytes (KHCO3, NaCBi, and KPi) demonstrated superior performance, with KHCO3 achieving the highest formate concentrations of 190 mmol L−1 and FE of nearly 80 % over a 2‐hour electrolysis period. In contrast, the organic buffers TRIS and CPi showed limited productivity, with formate concentrations remaining below 50 mmol L−1 and FE of 17 % for both electrolytes. These results align with the reported suitability of KHCO3 as an effective electrolyte in eCO2R [6, 37, 38, 39], while NaCBi also shows promising performance.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Buffer electrolyte screening for electrochemical and biological applications. (A) Formate concentration, (B) Faradaic efficiency, (C) Optical density (OD600) measured at 600 nm using samples of grown cells in MO media supplemented with 0.1 mol L−1 of different buffer solutions at 0 h, 24 h, and 48 h, (D) Optical density (OD600) measured at 600 nm using samples of grown cells in MO medium supplemented with varying KPi buffer concentrations. Electrolysis experiments were conducted in two independent replicates, biological experiments in triplicates; error bars reflect standard deviations.

The superior performance of inorganic buffers correlates strongly with the electrical conductivity of their respective solutions. At concentrations of 1.0 mol L−1, KHCO3, NaCBi, and KPi solutions exhibited electric conductivities above 50 mS cm−1, with KPi reaching the highest value of 100 mS cm−1. In contrast, at the same concentration, TRIS and CPi solutions showed significantly reduced conductivities below 40 mS cm−1. This difference in conductivity directly impacts the system's ability to efficiently carry current during electrolysis, affecting both the overall cell voltage and energy efficiency (see Supplementary Information Figure S1) of the process [40]. In addition, the advantageous effect of cations such as Na+ and K+ on eCO2R is an aspect missing in organic buffers. In particular, K+ cations have been reported to play a role in stabilizing a key intermediate species (*COO) during CO2 conversion to formate [41, 42].

The biological compatibility of these electrolytes was assessed by evaluating M. extorquens cell growth in minimal media supplemented with each buffer at 0.1 mol L−1. Our results revealed an interesting trade‐off between electrochemical and biological performance (Figure 1C). Despite their superior electrochemical performance with FE of 80 % and 65 %, respectively, KHCO3 and NaCBi significantly inhibited cell growth, as evidenced by the low optical density measurements at 600 nm, maintaining constant over 48 h. Conversely, TRIS and CPi, which showed modest electrochemical performance (FE of 17 % and 15 %), supported cell growth comparable to or exceeding the control medium without buffer addition. Notably, TRIS demonstrated exceptionally high cell growth after 24 h, but cell density decreased after 48 h. On the other hand, on KPi solution, final optical density of 0.67 was achieved. Hence, KPi emerged as the optimal compromise, maintaining reasonable electrochemical performance (60 % FE at 100 mA cm−2 for 2 h) while supporting the highest cell growth among all evaluated conditions.

Given KPi's outperformance, we conducted a detailed investigation of M. extorquens growth response to varying the buffer concentrations, ranging from 0 (minimal medium only) to 1.0 mol L−1, with growth monitored at 0, 24, and 48 hours (Figure 1D). The results revealed optimal cell growth at 0.1 mol L−1 KPi, with higher concentrations showing progressive growth inhibition, with complete growth suppression observed at concentrations above 0.5 mol L−1. These findings establish clear operational boundaries for our integrated system: the electrochemical phase requires 1.0 mol L−1 KPi for optimal performance, necessitating a subsequent 10‐fold dilution for the biological optimum operation at 0.1 mol L−1 KPi. This dilution requirement prompted the investigation of two critical aspects: the maximum achievable formate concentration in long‐term electrolysis using 1.0 mol L−1 KPi and the upper limits of microbial formate tolerance.

2.2. Enhanced Formate Concentration via eCO2R in Potassium Phosphate Buffer

Having identified KPi as the optimal buffer, we investigated the long‐term performance for formate production. Therefore, extended electrolysis experiments were conducted in quadruplicates at an optimized current density of 100 mA cm−2 (refer to Figure S2) in 1.0 mol L−1 KPi to evaluate maximum achievable formate concentrations (Figure 2A). The system demonstrated remarkable productivity and high reproducibility, surpassing formate concentrations of 2.0 mol L−1 (100 g L−1) over 48 h of continuous operation under recirculation mode. This represents the highest formate concentration reported using biological buffers for CO2 electroreduction (see Table S3 in the Supplementary Information). Despite this impressive productivity, we observed a gradual decline in system performance, with FE decreasing from initial values of 80 % in the first 10 h to approximately 30 % by the end of the experiment (Figure S3). Similarly, the formate production rate decreased from an initial 1.8 mmol h−1 cm−2 to below 0.8 mmol h−1 cm−2 after 48 h.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Long‐term CO2 electrolysis. (A) Continuous eCO2R in 1 mol L−1 KPi buffer at 100 mA cm−2 for 48 h (n = 4). (B) Cyclic operation involving sequential cycles of 2 and 4 h in 1 mol L−1 KPi buffer at 100 mA cm−2. The experiments were performed in a flow cell with recirculation mode with an electrolyte flow rate of 100 mL min−1. CO2 was supplied to the gas diffusion Sn‐coated cathode with a flow rate of 100 mL min−1. Data were acquired in quadruplicates (error bars reflect standard deviation) (A) and individual experiments (B and C).

Considering the integration with the biosynthesis process, we also monitored the catholyte's and anolyte's pH during the 48 h electrolysis (Figure S4). Overall, the catholyte pH increased to almost 9.0 over the first 4 h, but with the accumulation of formate in the solution, the pH steadily decreased to approximately 6.5 after 48 h. The solution pH plays a crucial role in biosynthesis, and specifically for M. extorquens, growth is inhibited at pH values higher than 8.0 [20]. Considering that the pH of the media also increased with formate consumption due to uptake of the protonated form (i.e., formic acid) by M. extorquens (Figure 3A), external pH control during the fermentation is necessary to maintain optimal conditions.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Formate tolerance of M. extorquens TK 0001 in microbioreactor cultivations. (A) Overview of the metabolic C1 assimilation routes in M. extorquens. Formate/methanol is oxidized to generate redox power (e.g., red cyt c and NAD(P)H by dissimilation via formate dehydrogenase into CO2). It is assimilated into biomass from the M‐THF pool. Abbreviations: red cyt c, reduced cytochrome‐c; nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (phosphate)‐reduced, NAD(P)H; M‐THF, methylenetetrahydrofolate. (B) Growth profiles of M. extorquens biomass measured at 620 nm backscatter in the pH‐stat BioLector experiments applying formate concentrations from 0 to 10 g L−1 and pH titration using 2 mol L−1 H2SO4 and 3 mol L−1 NaOH. (C) Correlation between obtained OD600 after 48 h of cultivation with supplied (0 h) and residual (48 h) formate concentration. The cultivations were carried out in biological triplicates; error bars reflect standard deviations.

The decrease in process performance, reflected in the loss of FE, is often associated with the failure of the GDE [43]. Although the GDE structure contains a hydrophobic component, over time, water tends to infiltrate through the GDE structure, limiting its efficiency due to flooding of the gas compartment. Another common factor is the increased local pH at the electrode/electrolyte interface during the eCO2R reaction, favoring carbonate species formation. Finally, the carbonate concentration will exceed its maximum solubility in water, and carbonate salts will deposit at the electrode surface, completely blocking active catalytic sites and leading to electrode inactivation. Reasons leading to GDE failure due to carbonate deposits were investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) coupled with energy‐dispersed X‐ray spectroscopy (EDX) of the working electrode before and after electrolysis. Before electrolysis, SEM images exhibited a homogeneous coverage of the catalyst layer on the GDE surface (Figure S5A). However, after 24 h electrolysis, the electrode surface was observed to be covered by crystals (Figure S5B), explaining the FE loss observed after prolonged electrolysis. Further EDX analysis (Figure S6 A,B) indicates the composition of the salt deposits as potassium and phosphorus‐based, in agreement with the composition of the electrolyte solution. The partial recovery of FE in the CO2 electrolyzer has been reported by flushing the cathode compartment with water to resolubilize the carbonate deposited at the electrode surface [44, 45]. To overcome the limitations of GDE flooding and local pH increase, we developed a cyclic operation strategy (Figure 2B–C) involving sequential electrolysis cycles. The cathode compartment was circulated with pure water between cycles, and a fresh electrolyte solution was used at each cycle. This approach maintained the FE above 70 %, with each 2‐hour cycle producing approximately 0.650 mol L−1 formate and the 4‐hour cycle achieving 1.4 mol L−1, a considerable improvement in time compared to the continuous 48‐hour electrolysis shown in Figure 2A.

2.3. Evaluating Formate Toxicity on M. extorquens TK 0001

The high formate concentrations achieved with the optimized system demonstrate its potential for scalable electrochemical formate production. Yet, successful integration with biological processes, for example, the development of a feeding strategy to avoid substrate inhibition, requires careful consideration of microbial substrate tolerance and rate compatibility of the two processes.

Therefore, we examined the formate toxicity in the BioLector using pH‐stat conditions and neutralized potassium formate solutions. In particular, cell growth response to varying initial formate concentrations in batch fermentations ranging from 0 to 10 g L−1 was examined (Figure 3B–C).

As expected, no growth was observed when no carbon source (0 g L−1 formate) was added to the growth media (Figure 3B–C). The growth kinetic was similar when supplying 1 or 2.5 g L−1 of formate and showed only differing final biomass concentrations (Figure 3B). After 48 h, a final OD600 value of 0.27 and 0.55 matched the roughly doubled carbon available when 2.5 g L−1 formate was supplied (Figure 3C). The growth plots for both conditions indicate formate depletion after 16 and 20 h (Figure 3B), as was confirmed by HPLC measurements (Figure 3C). However, when supplying 5 g L−1 of formate, a lag phase of about 20 h was observed. This lag phase indicates adaptation of the strain toward the increased initial formate concentration as a sign of reaching a critical concentration range, starting to become toxic. Interestingly, the final biomass concentration after 48 h was again almost doubled compared to the 2.5 g L−1 formate condition (OD600 of 0.95 vs. 0.55), with the supplied formate completely consumed after 48 h in both cases (Figure 3C). These data suggest a specific biomass yield of about 55 mgCDW per gram of supplied formate, using the OD600‐Cell Dry Weight (CDW) correlation used in our laboratory [19].

Finally, no cell growth was observed above 5 g L−1 of supplied formate, and offline measurements showed no change in the inoculation OD600 and the supplied formate concentration (Figure 3C). This finding clearly indicates a growth‐inhibiting effect of formate on M. extorquens TK0001 at concentrations exceeding 5 g L−1 under pH‐stat conditions in a microbioreactor.

The toxicity of formate on microbial growth has been reported before [11]. Previously, we have shown that pH titration significantly improves formate utilization of M. extorquens [20]. In summary, the formate tolerance of M. extorquens and its native capability to grow on formate render this strain suitable for integration with eCO2R. However, the tolerance compared to yeast is limited and only comparable to E. coli. To overcome this limitation, the M. extorquens formate tolerance can be enhanced by using Adaptive Laboratory Evolution in future studies [46]. The obtained titers of about 100 g L−1 achieved with our eCO2R system, together with the required buffer dilution, enable direct use of formate from eCO2R in M. extorquens batch fermentation or usage of the electrolyte as feed solution in fed‐batch processes. This integration in lab‐scale bioreactors was addressed as a next step.

2.4. Rational Process Integration of eCO2R With Formate Fermentation

With the selected buffer and the knowledge about formate tolerance, we established a bioprocess at 2 L scale using commercial (Figures 4A and S7A) or electrochemically (through eCO2R) derived formate in 1.0 mol L−1 KPi (Figures 4B and S7B) as the sole carbon sources.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Formate fermentation process development with M. extorquens TK 0001. Comparison of 2 L scale fed‐batch fermentations in minimal media with commercial potassium formate (A) and potassium formate generated electrochemically from CO2 (B). Data acquired in individual experiments.

When commercial formate was supplied, the cells grew early in the batch phase and rapidly consumed the substrate. Thereby, a remarkably high substrate uptake rate of 1.55 gformate gCDW −1 h−1 was observed and the feed was already started to avoid carbon depletion. In batch phase, a YX/S of 54 mgCDW gformate −1 was calculated, matching perfectly the previously derived YX/S from the BioLector experiments, which was almost doubled to 101 mgCDW gformate −1 in the feed phase (Figure S5A). Therefore, the applied limited carbon availability improved clearly the substrate to biomass conversion efficiency.

When eCO2R‐formate was used for fermentation, again a rapid consumption of the carbon source in batch phase was observed (Figure 4B). Remarkably, the growth rate was increased by 12 % compared to commercial formate. The YX/S,batch was with 52 mgCDW gformate −1 in a similar range compared to the process using commercial formate (Figure S5B). In contrast, the biomass yield in the feed phase was reduced by 22 % when using electrochemically produced formate.

Overall, the performance of the fermentation process utilizing commercial and electrochemically derived formate was found to be quite similar. Only the final maximum achieved biomass concentration was reduced by 27 % when eCO2R formate was used (0.73 gCDW L−1). This is in line with the likewise reduced biomass yield in the feed phase. Moreover, a drop of the OD was observed in this process (Figure 4B), possibly due to cell lysis or biofilm formation (cells sticking at the reactor wall and thus reducing biomass concentration in solution) as a consequence of high phosphate concentrations introduced with the eCO2R‐formate feed. The effect of phosphate on the fermentation performance is examined further below.

Clearly, the conversion efficiency of the carbon into biomass was increased by applying a feed phase. When both substrates were juxtaposed, it was found that the application of eCO2R‐derived formate led to a reduced YX/S in the feeding phase. The similar YX/S in both batch phases and the reduced YX/S in the fed‐batch phase on eCO2R formate suggest the presence of a growth inhibiting compounds in the eCO2R formate feeding solution. Since both feeding solutions should have similar compositions, the hypothesis was drawn that deviations in the phosphate concentrations or particles from the electrode (e.g., Sn) mainly influence the growth. Such deviations may occur from the conditions in the electrochemical process (e.g. liquid evaporation and electrode leaching). This hypothesis is supported by recent findings, i.a., for M. extorquens AM1, that increased phosphate concentrations inhibit growth significantly [47] and is in accordance with our observation regarding strong detrimental effect of KPi concentration on the biomass yield (Figure 1D).

2.5. Reducing Phosphate Concentration Improves Formate Fermentation

To study the effect of phosphate salts on growth in more detail in a controlled environment, a new set of fed‐batch experiments was carried out in a 10 L bioreactor. Two feeding solutions were compared to identify the influence of phosphate concentration on the process performance. The first feeding solution was composed of 1.0 mol L−1 KPi catholyte with 50 g L−1 of commercial formate in MO medium solution A (Figures 5A and S5C). Subsequently, fermentation was run with a feeding solution of 50 g L−1 of commercial formate in MO medium solution A (phosphate‐depleted conditions; see Table S2 for MO medium composition) (Figures 5B and S5 D). In both cases, sulfuric acid was used for pH titration instead of phosphoric acid.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Formate fermentation process development with M. extorquens TK 0001. Upscaling of formate fermentation to a 10 L scale fed‐batch process in minimal media with (A) formate in 1 mol L−1 KPi buffer and (B) formate in water (phosphate‐depleted conditions). In both processes shown in A and B, the pH was titrated with H2SO4. Data acquired in individual experiments.

Again, the cells grew from early on in the batch phases and consumed formate rapidly. The feeding rate was controlled to maintain a stable formate concentration in the fermentation media below 1 g L−1 throughout the whole process time. The determined YX/S in the batch phase was in a similar range compared to the 2 L scale fermentations (44–46 mgCDW gformate −1). Again, an improved YX/S was observed in the feed phases of both experiments. However, a sudden drop in OD was found after about 50 h in the experiment with a feed of phosphate‐containing substrate solution (Figure 5A), consistent with the 2 L fermentation of eCO2R‐derived formate solution (Figure 4B). Consequently, biomass yield YX/S was improved to 107 mgCDW gformate −1 when the phosphate‐depleted condition was used (Figure S5B). This means an improvement by about 5 % compared to the phosphate‐containing catholyte.

In addition, the process with phosphate‐depleted formate solutions showed a positive scale‐up behavior, with achieved biomass yields YX/S in the 10 L fermentation substantially enhanced by 35 % compared to the corresponding 2 L experiment, indicating good applicability for further scale‐up (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Comparison of performance indicators from fermentation experiments in 2 L and 10 L bioreactors.

2 L scale 10 L scale
Commercial formate

eCO2R

formate

Standard conditions Phosphate‐depletion
μbatch [h−1] 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.10
YX/S, batch [mgCDW gformate −1] 54.00 52.00 44.00 46.00
qS, batch [gformate gCDW −1 h−1] 1.55 1.80 2.14 2.17
μfed‐batch [h−1] 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04
YX/S, fed‐batch [mgCDW gformate −1] 101.00 79.00 101.00 107.00
qS, fed‐batch [gformate gCDW −1 h−1] 0.33 0.37 0.34 0.36
Final CDW concentration [gCDW L−1] 0.73 1.00 1.19 1.40

Legend: μ; specific growth rate, YX/S; biomass‐substrate yield, qS; specific substrate uptake rate, CDW; cell dry weight.

Our results show clearly a negative effect of increasing phosphate concentrations on M. extorquens growth and YX/S. This is reflected by the reduced OD600 after 30 h of fermentation and the drop in the optical density (from 4.6 to 3.9) at the end of the process in the fed‐batch fermentation using the phosphate‐containing catholyte (Figure 5A). In comparison, the phosphate‐depleted condition showed a more stable growth until the end of the process with a final optical density of 4.7 (Figure 5B). Finally, the process using phosphate‐depleted conditions can be maintained for a prolonged time indicating that even higher biomass concentrations are achievable when phosphate concentration is kept at low level (Figure 5B). This has to be balanced with a minimum phosphate concentration in the electrolyte to facilitate sufficient conductivity in the electrochemical CO2 reduction.

2.6. Evaluation of Energy Efficiency

To comprehensively compare the effect of the KPi electrolyte solution during M. extorquens fermentation, we assessed the energetic efficiency for substrate conversion into biomass (Eaer / %), as per Equation 1 [36]. Energy efficiency was evaluated across both batch and fed‐batch phases under 2 and 10 L scale bioreactors. Required values of combustion energy were retrieved ref. [34], that is –20 kJ gCDW −1 for biomass combustion and –245 kJ mol−1 for formic acid (substrate) combustion. For more detailed information regarding the calculation (Equation 1) and underlying assumptions and parameters, the reader is referred to ref. [34].

Eaer=YbiomassxΔGcombbiomassΔGcombbiomass/ΔGcombsubstrateΔGcombsubstrate (1)

The bioprocess in the 2 L scale bioreactor revealed a negative impact of feeding electrochemically derived formate during the fed‐batch phase, with a 40 % decrease in efficiency compared to the process on commercial potassium formate (Figure 6A). Those results suggest an inhibitory component formed during electrolysis that impacts microbial performance [48].

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

Estimated process energy efficiency of the developed bioprocess with M. extorquens TK 0001. Calculated energetic efficiency at (A) 2 L scale bioreactor and (B) 10 L scale bioreactor.

The individual effect of phosphate‐containing electrolyte was further evaluated in a 10 L bioreactor (Figure 6B). Our results revealed that limiting phosphate concentration by, for example, pH adjustment with a phosphate‐free acid improves process efficiency. In the fed‐batch operation mode, Eaer was around 40 % for formate in water and in 1.0 M KPi. Furthermore, considering that organic acids are taken up by microbial cells in the protonated form, formate ions assimilation by the cells leads to proton removal from the medium, resulting in a pH increase (Figure 3A). Thus, the presence of 1.0 M KPi creates a buffer system controlling the pH and reducing external pH adjustments. These findings align with our group's recent work comparing M. extorquens growth on formate in phosphate buffer versus pure formic acid feedstocks [20]. Our previous studies demonstrated optimal growth when formic acid served as both carbon source and pH titration agent, achieving an Eaer of 30 % during fed‐batch operation [20]. Finally, the similar energy efficiencies calculated for both 2 and 10 L scales demonstrated the process robustness for scale‐up.

3. Conclusions

We successfully demonstrated the integration of electrochemical CO2 reduction to formate with microbial fermentation using Methylorubrum extorquens TK 0001. Our strategy was grounded in a rational design of the two‐step process cascade, with particular emphasis on selecting a buffer system that not only functions as an electrolyte during CO2 reduction but is also compatible with the fermentation process. In this setup, the electrolyte containing dissolved formate serves as the feed stream for fermentation. Through systematic screening and optimization, potassium phosphate was identified as the optimal buffer for M. extorquens, supporting both robust electrochemical CO2 reduction to formate and effective microbial growth. High formate concentrations were attainable either through extended electrolysis (48 h) or by employing electrode reactivation with electrolyte refreshment cycles lasting 2 to 4 h. Upon transferring the electrochemically generated formate to the bioreactor, meticulous control of phosphate concentration in the reactor medium proved critical; phosphate concentration had to be limited to a maximum of 0.1 M to achieve high biomass yields.

Remarkably, by precisely regulating the medium's phosphate concentration, we increased the biomass yield of M. extorquens on formate in fed‐batch fermentation by over 94 % compared to pure batch processes, reaching up to 107 mgCDW gformate −1. This yield exceeds the values reported for engineered, state‐of‐the‐art synthetic formatotrophs [21, 22, 47]. Furthermore, the developed process was successfully scaled up from 2 L to a 10 L bioreactor using eCO2R‐derived formate, while maintaining comparable performance parameters.

To the best of our knowledge, this study constitutes the first rational development of a combined process involving (a) the electrosynthesis of formate from CO2 and (b) formatotrophic fermentation (here with M. extorquens) using solely electrochemically generated, formate‐rich electrolyte solutions. While previous studies have established the feasibility of using electrochemically derived formate as a substrate for formatotrophic fermentation, our work distinguishes itself through the targeted optimization of the integrated process cascade, particularly at the interface between the two steps. In this context, the selection of the electrolyte for efficient electrochemical formate production substantially influences downstream fermentation performance. Fine‐tuning the electro‐biochemical process interface is essential for establishing a high‐performing, integrated production system and is demonstrably more effective than the independent optimization of each step, as is commonly practiced in research. Thus, our findings provide a practical framework for the design of integrated electro‐biochemical cascade processes aimed at sustainable CO2 utilization. Looking ahead, the advancement of compatible and robust electrochemical and fermentation processes will unlock versatile opportunities for producing value‐added chemicals using CO2 as a feedstock.

4. Experimental Section

4.1. Materials and Solutions Preparation

Dipotassium phosphate (K2HPO4, 99 %, Th. Geyer), monopotassium phosphate (KH2PO4, ≥99 %, Roth), tris‐(hydroxymethyl)‐amino methane (TRIS, C4H11NO3, ≥99.3 %, Roth), sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3, ≥99 %, Roth), sodium carbonate (Na2CO3, ≥99.5 %, Roth), citric acid (C6H8O7, ≥99.5 %, Roth), potassium bicarbonate (KHCO3, 99.7 %, Sigma–Aldrich), hydrochloric acid (HCl, 37 %, Sigma–Aldrich), and 5 % Nafion (Sigma–Aldrich) were used as received. CO2 gas (99.995 %) was supplied by Linde (Germany). The composition of the biological buffers used throughout this work is detailed in Table 2.

TABLE 2.

List of biological buffers used in this work.

Buffers Abbreviation Composition Conductivity [mS cm−1]

pH (initial) [‐]

Potassium hydrogen carbonate KHCO3 72.6 8.06
Carbonate buffer NaCBi Na2CO3/NaHCO3 52.9 8.54
Phosphate Buffer KPi K2HPO4/KH2PO4 99.7 7.56
Citrate buffer CPi C6H8O7 40.4 3.32
Trisaminomethane TRIS C2H11NO3 35.7 7.43

4.2. Electrode Preparation

A suspension of Sn nanoparticles (<150 nm, Sigma–Aldrich) and activated carbon prepared in a mixture of distilled water, isopropanol, and 5 % Nafion was sonicated for 30 min. This catalyst ink was drop‐coated onto a gas diffusion layer (GDL, 10 cm2, Freudenberg H23C6) at 80 °C and stored overnight in air. The final catalyst load was 10 mg cm−2.

4.3. Electrochemical Measurements

Electrochemical experiments were conducted in a custom‐designed 2‐compartment flow cell (Electrocell, Denmark) using Sn gas diffusion electrode (GDE) as the working electrode, Ir‐MMO (Iridium Mixed Metal Oxide) as the counter electrode, and Ag/AgCl (eDAQ, Denmark) as the reference at room temperature. A cation exchange membrane (CEM, Fumasep, Fumatech, Germany) separated the anodic and cathodic cell compartments. Electrolyte flow was maintained at 100 mL min−1 (Watson–Marlow 323 pump) with CO2 gas supplied at 50 mL min−1 (Brooks Instrument mass flow controller). The potentiostat (PGSTAT204, Metrohm, Switzerland) was controlled by NOVA 2.1 software (Metrohm, Switzerland). pH and conductivity were monitored using VWR pH 3210 and pHenomenal CO 3100H meters.

4.4. Bacterial Strains and Cultivation Routines

Methylorubrum extorquens TK 0001 DSM 1337 (DSMZ, www.dsmz.de) was grown in MO medium prepared from sterile stock solutions. For strain maintenance, exponentially growing cells from liquid cultures were harvested, mixed with sterile glycerol (final glycerol concentration of 40 % (v/v), frozen, and stored at −80 °C (Revco CxF ‐86C Chest Freezers, Thermo Fisher Scientific, United States). MO medium recipe and preparation was conducted as described previously [49]. Strain propagation was carried out in MO medium mixed with 18 g L−1 Agar–Agar Kobe I.

To obtain viable cells for cultivation in shake flasks (e.g. to determine buffer effects or phosphate toxicity on growth) or parallelized microbioreactors, a first preculture of M. extorquens was inoculated in 50 mL MO medium containing 0.5 % methanol (v/v) in 250 mL baffled shake flasks using a single colony from a MO agar plate before incubation at 30 °C, 150 rpm for 72 h (New Brunswick Innova 44, Eppendorf SE, Germany). Subsequently, a second preculture of 50 mL MO medium containing 0.5 % methanol (v/v) in 250 mL baffled shake flasks was inoculated to an initial OD600 of about 0.05 (Ultrospec 10, Biochrom Ltd, United Kingdom) using viable cells from the first preculture before incubation at 30 °C, 150 rpm for 24 h. For fermentation in bioreactors, precultures were prepared as described, using MO medium with 1 g L−1 of potassium formate and 1 % (v/v) methanol.

Main cultures, either for shake flask, parallelized microbioreactor or lab‐scale bioreactor experiments, were inoculated and handled as described in the following sections. In the case of buffer effect and phosphate tolerance screening cultivations in shake flasks, the pH was titrated at 24 h to pH ∼7 using 1 M HCl.

To examine the influence of the electrochemical buffers on growth of M. extorquens, the minimal medium was supplied with 100 mM of either KHCO3, NaCBi, KPi, TRIS, or CPi buffers (pH 6.8). The same was done when the KPi buffer or formate concentration effect on growth of M. extorquens was determined: Increasing concentrations of up to 1 M of KPi (pH 6.8) were used.

All cultivations (shake flasks or lab‐scale bioreactors) were handled using the same procedure: On a regular basis, cultivation broth samples were withdrawn from the cultivation vessels and the OD600 was measured. Next, the samples were centrifuged (Multifuge X3R, Thermo Fisher Scientific, 4200 x g, 5 min, 20 °C) and the supernatants were separated and stored for following analytical procedures.

4.5. Batch Cultivation in Parallelized Microbioreactors

Substrate tolerance of Methylorubrum extorquens TK0001 was investigated by cultivating the strain with increasing formate concentrations in a high‐throughput experiment using a parallelized and miniaturized microbioreactor system (1‐2 mL scale) (BioLector XT, Beckman Coulter GmbH, Germany).

The main cultures were inoculated in 800 µL MO media to an initial OD600 of 0.05 using washed exponentially growing cells from the second preculture. To remove methanol residues, the second preculture was treated as follows. First, centrifugation was performed at 4200 g for 5 min at 20 °C (High speed centrifuge Avanti J‐E Series, Beckman Coulter GmbH, Germany). The supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was resuspended in 50 mL sterile MilliQ water. The washing step was carried out twice.

To determine the tolerance limit, the media contained varying formate concentrations (g L−1). Potassium formate was added from a pH neutralized stock solution of 336.48 g L−1. Standard conditions without formate were applied as the negative control.

Cultivation was conducted at 1200 rpm and 30 °C under atmospheric air composition (20.95 % O2) and humidity set to 85 %. Cell density was recorded by acquisition of the backscatter signal at 620 nm. The pH was adjusted to 6.8 using microfluidics with 2 mol L−1 H2SO4 and 3 mol L−1 NaOH. Following the end of fermentation, the offline OD600 of broths representing the respective individual process conditions was measured for correlation with backscatter measurements. All main cultivations were performed in biological duplicates.

4.6. Fed‐Batch Cultivation in Stirred Tank Bioreactors

Formate fed‐batch cultures were cultivated in 2 and 10 L stirred tank bioreactors (BIOSTAT B plus 2 L and BIOSTAT C plus 10 L, Sartorius AG, Germany) with minimal medium. Exponentially growing precultures were used for inoculation at OD600 = 0.1. A linear formate feeding was initiated when formate depletion approached, with pH (pH, EasyFerm Bio HB K8 120, Hamilton, Swiss) kept at 6.8 ± 0.1 by automatic phosphoric acid or sulfuric acid titration. Dissolved oxygen (pO2, OxyFerm FDA 120, Hamilton, Swiss) was controlled by stirrer speed and aeration rate adjustments.

To start the fermentation process, a calculated volume of exponentially growing preculture broth was directly taken to inoculate the fermentation to an initial OD600 of 0.1. The initial volume of the process was 700 mL (2 L fermentation) or 6 L (10 L fermentation). The standard minimal medium was used as the initial batch medium, supplemented with 5 g L−1 potassium formate or 5 g L−1 electrochemically derived formate in 1 mol L−1 potassium phosphate buffer. During fermentation, samples were collected regularly for measuring OD600, pH, and substrate quantification. When depletion of initially supplied formate was approaching, the feed phase in 2 L scale was initiated by feeding a solution of 65 g L−1 potassium formate (commercial or electrochemically derived) in 1 mol L−1 potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) (i.e., the electrolyte in case of electrochemically produced formate). To avoid carbon depletion during the feed phase and maintain carbon limitation, a linear feed was set, calculated to satisfy cellular substrate demand, and keep formate concentration well below 1 g L−1. In 10 L scale the influence of phosphate in the feed solution on growth of M. extorquens was examined by using 50 g L−1 commercial potassium formate in 1 M phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) or 50 g L−1 potassium formate. During the process, the temperature was kept at 30 °C ± 0.2 °C, and a pO2 of 20 % was maintained by applying a cascaded control at first increased stirrer speed followed by an increase of aeration rate. In detail, the initial stirrer speed was set to 250 rpm (maximum 1000 rpm) with an initial aeration rate of 0.06 sL h−1 (maximum 3 sL h−1). Data acquisition and process control were carried out by BIOSTAT software.

4.7. Analytical Methods

Formate and phosphate concentrations in catholyte and fermentation broths were analyzed by HPLC with a UV‐Vis detector (λ = 210 nm) and RI detector (Shimadzu, Japan), equipped with a Rezex ROA‐Organic Acid H+ (8 %) column (Phenomenex, Germany). The isocratic method was performed with 0.005 N H2SO4 as eluent at 65 °C and 0.5 mL min−1 flow rate. Data were used to calculate Faradaic efficiency (FE), formation rate, and microbial substrate uptake rates. A summary of the calculations is available as Supporting Information.

4.8. Characterization Techniques

Surface morphology of the working electrode before and after electrolysis was analyzed with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) coupled with an energy‐dispersive X‐ray using a Zeiss DSM 940 A microscope.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Supporting information

Supporting File 1: The Supporting Information includes additional data and more detailed information on electrochemical CO2 reduction, electrode characterization, fermentation, experimental procedures, and calculations, as well as a tabular comparison of our study to previously published studies with respect to various performance indicators.

Supporting File: chem70581‐sup‐0001‐SuppMat.docx.

CHEM-32-e02658-s001.docx (928.2KB, docx)

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the Fraunhofer Lighthouse Project ShaPID (Shaping the future of green chemistry by Process Intensification and Digitalization), funded by the Fraunhofer–Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. and the Project CELBICON in the EU Framework Program Horizon 2020 (GA Nr. 679050). GRP was supported by German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) under the funding program Promotionen in Deutschland – 2022/23 (57588370). The authors thank Manuela Kaiser and Monika Mückl (Fraunhofer IGB) for assistance in the laboratory and Dr. Fabian Steffler (Fraunhofer CBP) for insightful discussions.

Open access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Vieira L., Fabarius J. T., Piton G. R., et al. “Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction Coupled to Formate Fermentation: An Electro‐Bio Cascade Approach in Biocompatible Electrolytes.” Chemistry – A European Journal 32, no. 7 (2026): e02658. 10.1002/chem.202502658

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • 1. Jouny M., Luc W., and Jiao F., “General Techno‐Economic Analysis of CO2 Electrolysis Systems,” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 57 (2018): 2165–2177, 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b03514. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Senocrate A. and Battaglia C., “Electrochemical CO2 Reduction At Room Temperature: Status and Perspectives,” Journal of Energy Storage 36 (2021): 102373, 10.1016/j.est.2021.102373. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Kraaijenbrink P. D. A., Bierkens M. F. P., Lutz A. F., and Immerzeel W. W., “Impact of a Global Temperature Rise of 1.5 degrees Celsius on Asia's Glaciers,” Nature 549 (2017): 257–260, 10.1038/nature23878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Jackson L. P., Grinsted A., and Jevrejeva S., “21st Century Sea‐Level Rise in Line With the Paris Accord,” Earth's Future 6 (2018): 213–229, 10.1002/2017EF000688. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Osman M. B., Tierney J. E., Zhu J., et al., “Globally resolved surface temperatures Since the Last Glacial Maximum,” Nature 599 (2021): 239–244, 10.1038/s41586-021-03984-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Merino‐Garcia I., Tinat L., Albo J., et al., “Continuous Electroconversion of CO2 Into Formate Using 2 nm Tin Oxide Nanoparticles,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 297 (2021): 120447, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120447. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Rodrigues Pinto M., Vos R. E., Nagao R., and Koper M. T. M., “Electrolyte Effects on Electrochemical CO2 Reduction Reaction at Sn Metallic Electrode,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 128 (2024): 21421–21429, 10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c06361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Yu F., Deng K., Du M., Wang W., Liu F., and Liang D., “Electrochemical CO2 Reduction: From Catalysts to Reactive Thermodynamics and Kinetics,” Carbon Capture Science & Technology 6 (2023): 100081, 10.1016/j.ccst.2022.100081. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. De Luna P., Hahn C., Higgins D., Jaffer S. A., Jaramillo T. F., and Sargent E. H., “What Would It Take For Renewably Powered Electrosynthesis To Displace Petrochemical Processes?,” Science 364 (2019): eaav3506, 10.1126/science.aav3506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Ding P., Zhao H., Li T., et al., “Metal‐based Electrocatalytic Conversion Of CO2 to Formic Acid/formate,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A 8 (2020): 21947–21960, 10.1039/D0TA08393C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Yishai O., Lindner S. N., Gonzalez de la Cruz J., Tenenboim H., and Bar‐Even A., “The Formate Bio‐Economy,” Current Opinion in Chemical Biology 35 (2016): 1–9, 10.1016/j.cbpa.2016.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Abubackar H. N., Veiga M. C., and Kennes C., “Biological Conversion Of Carbon Monoxide: Rich syngas Or Waste Gases To Bioethanol,” Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 5 (2011): 93–114, 10.1002/bbb.256. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Fabarius J. T., Wegat V., Roth A., and Sieber V., “Synthetic Methylotrophy in Yeasts: Towards a Circular Bioeconomy,” Trends in Biotechnology 39 (2021): 348–358, 10.1016/j.tibtech.2020.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Pfeifenschneider J., Brautaset T., and Wendisch V. F., “Methanol as Carbon Substrate in the Bio‐economy: Metabolic Engineering of Aerobic Methylotrophic Bacteria for Production of Value‐Added Chemicals,” Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 11 (2017): 719–731, 10.1002/bbb.1773. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Chistoserdova L. and Kalyuzhnaya M. G., “Current Trends in Methylotrophy,” Trends in Microbiology 26 (2018): 703–714, 10.1016/j.tim.2018.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Sarwar A. and Lee E. Y., “Methanol‐based Biomanufacturing Of Fuels And Chemicals Using Native And Synthetic Methylotrophs,” Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology 8 (2023): 396–415, 10.1016/j.synbio.2023.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Takors R., Kopf M., Mampel J., et al., “Using gas mixtures of CO, CO2 and H2 as Microbial Substrates: The do's and don'ts of Successful Technology Transfer From Laboratory to Production Scale,” Microbial Biotechnology 11 (2018): 606–625, 10.1111/1751-7915.13270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Collas F., Dronsella B. B., Kubis A., et al., “Engineering The Biological Conversion Of Formate Into Crotonate In Cupriavidus Necator,” Metabolic Engineering 79 (2023): 49–65, 10.1016/j.ymben.2023.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Dietz K., Sagstetter C., Speck M., Roth A., Klamt S., and Fabarius J. T., “A Novel Engineered Strain of Methylorubrum Extorquens for Methylotrophic Production of Glycolic acid,” Microbial Cell Factories 23 (2024): 344, 10.1186/s12934-024-02583-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Fabarius J. T., Pietzka C., Pangotra D., et al., “Process Cascade for the Production of Green Polymers From CO2 and Electric Energy,” Chemie Ingenieur Technik 96 (2024): 698–712, 10.1002/cite.202400002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Dronsella B., Orsi E., Schulz‐Mirbach H., et al., “One‐Carbon Fixation Via the Synthetic Reductive Glycine Pathway Exceeds Yield of the Calvin cycle,” Nature Microbiology 10 (2025): 646–653, 10.1038/s41564-025-01941-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Cowan A. E., Hillers M., Rainaldi V., et al., “Fast Growth And High‐Titer Bioproduction From Renewable Formate Via Metal‐Dependent Formate Dehydrogenase In Escherichia Coli,” Nature Communications 16 (2025): 5908, 10.1038/s41467-025-61001-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Baumschabl M., Ata Ö., and Mattanovich D., “Single Carbon Metabolism—A New Paradigm For Microbial Bioprocesses?,” Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology 9 (2024): 322–329, 10.1016/j.synbio.2024.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Cotton C. A. R., Claassens N. J., Benito‐Vaquerizo S., and Bar‐Even A., “Renewable Methanol And Formate As Microbial Feedstocks,” Current Opinion in Biotechnology 62 (2020): 168–180, 10.1016/j.copbio.2019.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Vassilev I., Gießelmann G., Schwechheimer S. K., Wittmann C., Virdis B., and Krömer J. O., “Anodic Electro‐Fermentation: Anaerobic Production of L‐Lysine by Recombinant Corynebacterium Glutamicum,” Biotechnology and Bioengineering 115 (2018): 1499–1508, 10.1002/bit.26562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Lim J., Choi S. Y., Lee J. W., Lee S. Y., and Lee H., “Biohybrid CO2 Electrolysis For The Direct Synthesis Of Polyesters From CO2 ,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120 (2023): e2221438120, 10.1073/pnas.2221438120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Al Rowaihi I. S., Paillier A., Rasul S., et al., “Poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate) Production In An Integrated Electromicrobial Setup: Investigation Under Stress‐Inducing Conditions,” PLoS ONE 13 (2018): e0196079, 10.1371/journal.pone.0196079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Hegner R., Neubert K., Kroner C., Holtmann D., and Harnisch F., “Coupled Electrochemical and Microbial Catalysis for the Production of Polymer Bricks,” Chemsuschem 13 (2020): 5295–5300, 10.1002/cssc.202001272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Jourdin L. and Burdyny T., “Microbial Electrosynthesis: Where Do We Go From Here?,” Trends in Biotechnology 39 (2021): 359–369, 10.1016/j.tibtech.2020.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Aryal N., Tremblay P.‐L., Lizak D. M., and Zhang T., “Performance Of Different Sporomusa Species For The Microbial Electrosynthesis Of Acetate From Carbon Dioxide,” Bioresource Technology 233 (2017): 184–190, 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.02.128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Crandall B. S., Overa S., Shin H., and Jiao F., “Turning Carbon Dioxide Into Sustainable Food and Chemicals: How Electrosynthesized Acetate Is Paving the Way for Fermentation Innovation,” Accounts of Chemical Research 56 (2023): 1505–1516, 10.1021/acs.accounts.3c00098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Becker J., Lange A., Fabarius J., and Wittmann C., “Top Value Platform Chemicals: Bio‐Based Production Of Organic Acids,” Current Opinion in Biotechnology 36 (2015): 168–175, 10.1016/j.copbio.2015.08.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Dinges I., Depentori I., Gans L., Holtmann D., Waldvogel S. R., and Stöckl M., “Coupling of CO2 Electrolysis with Parallel and Semi‐Automated Biopolymer Synthesis – Ex‐Cell and without Downstream Processing,” Chemsuschem 17 (2024): e202301721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Liu C., Colón B. C., Ziesack M., Silver P. A., and Nocera D. G., “Water Splitting–Biosynthetic System With CO 2 Reduction Efficiencies Exceeding Photosynthesis,” Science 352 (2016): 1210–1213, 10.1126/science.aaf5039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Zhang P., Chen K., Xu B., et al., “Chem‐bio Interface Design for Rapid Conversion of CO2 to Bioplastics in an Integrated System,” Chemistry (Weinheim An Der Bergstrasse, Germany) 8 (2022): 3363–3381, 10.1016/j.chempr.2022.09.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Claassens N. J., Cotton C. A. R., Kopljar D., and Bar‐Even A., “Making Quantitative Sense Of Electromicrobial Production,” Nature Catalysis 2 (2019): 437–447, 10.1038/s41929-019-0272-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Wang J., Ning S., Luo M., et al., “In‐Sn Alloy Core‐Shell Nanoparticles: In‐Doped Snox Shell Enables High Stability And Activity Towards Selective Formate Production From Electrochemical Reduction Of Co2,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 288 (2021): 119979, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.119979. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Bohlen B., Wastl D., Radomski J., Sieber V., and Vieira L., “Electrochemical CO2 Reduction To Formate On Indium Catalysts Prepared By Electrodeposition In Deep Eutectic Solvents,” Electrochemistry Communications 110 (2020): 106597, 10.1016/j.elecom.2019.106597. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Chen Z., Fan T., Zhang Y.‐Q., et al., “Wavy SnO2 Catalyzed Simultaneous Reinforcement Of Carbon Dioxide Adsorption And Activation Towards Electrochemical Conversion of CO2 to HCOOH,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 261 (2020): 118243, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118243. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Nilles C. K., Borkowski A. K., Bartlett E. R., et al., “Mechanistic Basis of Conductivity in Carbon Dioxide‐Expanded Electrolytes: A Joint Experimental–Theoretical Study,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 146 (2024): 2398–2410, 10.1021/jacs.3c08145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Wu J., Li W., Liu K., et al., “Cation Effects on Electrochemical CO2 Reduction Reaction,” Next Energy 1 (2023): 100032, 10.1016/j.nxener.2023.100032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Marcandalli G., Monteiro M. C. O., Goyal A., and Koper M. T. M., “Electrolyte Effects on CO2 Electrochemical Reduction to CO,” Accounts of Chemical Research 55 (2022): 1900–1911, 10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Álvarez‐Gómez J. M. and Varela A. S., “Review on Long‐Term Stability of Electrochemical CO2 Reduction,” Energy & Fuels 37 (2023): 15283–15308, 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c01847. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Mardle P., Cassegrain S., Habibzadeh F., Shi Z., and Holdcroft S., “Carbonate Ion Crossover in Zero‐Gap, KOH Anolyte CO2 Electrolysis,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C 125 (2021): 25446–25454, 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c08430. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Endrődi B., Samu A., Kecsenovity E., Halmágyi T., Sebők D., and Janáky C., “Operando Cathode Activation With Alkali Metal Cations For High Current Density Operation Of Water‐Fed Zero‐Gap Carbon Dioxide Electrolysers,” Nature Energy 6 (2021): 439–448, 10.1038/s41560-021-00813-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Wenk S., Rainaldi V., Schann K., et al., “Evolution‐Assisted Engineering of E. Coli Enables Growth on Formic Acid at Ambient CO2 via the Serine Threonine Cycle,” Metabolic Engineering 88 (2025): 14–24, 10.1016/j.ymben.2024.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Kim P., Kim J.‐H., and Oh D.‐K., “Improvement in Cell Yield of Methylobacterium sp. By Reducing the Inhibition of Medium Components For Poly‐β‐Hydroxybutyrate Production,” World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 19 (2003): 357–361, 10.1023/A:1023969629568. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Li H., Opgenorth P. H., Wernick D. G., et al., “Integrated Electromicrobial Conversion of CO2 to Higher Alcohols,” Science 335 (2012): 1596–1596, 10.1126/science.1217643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Cui L.‐Y., Liang W.‐F., Zhu W.‐L., Sun M.‐Y., Zhang C., and Xing X.‐H., “Medium Redesign For Stable Cultivation And High Production Of Mevalonate By Recombinant Methtylobacterium Extorquens AM1 With Mevalonate Synthetic Pathway,” Biochemical Engineering Journal 119 (2017): 67–73, 10.1016/j.bej.2016.12.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting File 1: The Supporting Information includes additional data and more detailed information on electrochemical CO2 reduction, electrode characterization, fermentation, experimental procedures, and calculations, as well as a tabular comparison of our study to previously published studies with respect to various performance indicators.

Supporting File: chem70581‐sup‐0001‐SuppMat.docx.

CHEM-32-e02658-s001.docx (928.2KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Chemistry (Weinheim an Der Bergstrasse, Germany) are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES