Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Feb 18.
Published in final edited form as: Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2009 Jan 1;14(7):2413–2431. doi: 10.2741/3387

Regulation of monocytes and macrophages cell fate

M Elba Gonzalez-Mejia 1,2, Andrea I Doseff 1,2
PMCID: PMC12911425  NIHMSID: NIHMS164311  PMID: 19273209

Abstract

Monocytes and macrophages are central cells of the innate immune system, responding to a diverse repertoire of pathogens. These cells originate from a common myeloid precursor in the bone marrow and while sharing responsibilities during innate immunity, differ greatly in their lifespan. Normally, blood monocytes live for just few days before undergoing apoptosis. Macrophages, in contrast, live up for months. Monocytes’ lifespan can switch dramatically, from prolonged survival during inflammation to apoptosis as inflammation resolves. Interestingly, many of the mechanisms mediating survival during inflammation and cancer also operate in monocyte/macrophage differentiation. Differentiation and inflammatory stimuli determine monocyte/macrophage lifespan, by blocking the apoptotic pathway and activating a myriad of survival pathways. How these complicated networks of survival and apoptotic regulators are integrated remains yet to be fully elucidated. The present review summarizes the different monocytes’ subpopulations and their function during pathogen recognition. We discuss the role of the caspases and the mechanisms that determine monocytes/macrophages fate highlighting their significance in the regulation of inflammatory diseases.

Keywords: Apoptosis, Caspases, Monocytes, Macrophages, Hsp27, inflammation, survival, PKCΔ, CD14+, CD16+, REVIEW

2. INTRODUCTION

The blood consists of a suspension of plasma and cells, corresponding to 1/12th of the body weight of an adult (approximately 5–6 L) (1). Blood cells originate from pluripotent hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) in the bone marrow, which give rise to two progenitors cell lineages, the lymphoid and myeloid stem cells. The myeloid stem cell can differentiate towards megakaryocyte, pre-erythrocytes, myeloblasts, and monoblasts (see in the same issue Droin et al. and (2)). In addition, leukocytes (or white cells) are classified based on the presence of granules in granulocytes and agranulocytes. The granulocytes are composed of neutrophils (50–70%), eosinophils (2–4%), and basophils (0.5–1%) totaling normally between 5,000–10,000 cells/mm3. The agranulocytes are composed of lymphocytes (20–40%) and monocytes (3–8%), totaling 300–700 cells/mm3. The leukocytes play a fundamental role in the immune system by responding to a diverse repertoire of pathogens including bacteria, viruses, parasitic, fungal infections, and in some pathological conditions against the host cells (3). Several steps control the number of hematopoietic cells. In one hand, stem cells proliferate giving rise to different cell lineages in the presence of the appropriate differentiation factors. Moreover, once cellular identity is achieved, a well-coordinated balance between survival and cell death pathways determines leukocyte’s fate.

Monocytes and macrophages are central components of the innate immune system, that are responsible for the recognition of the inflammatory stimuli, the initiation of the inflammatory response that is characterized by the production of proinflammatory cytokines, and the clearance of the insult allowing the resolution of inflammation. Similarly to other hematopoietic cells, monocytes and macrophages’ lifespan is determined by the homeostatic balance between survival and apoptotic pathways. Intense investigation in this area in the last decade revealed a complex network, far from being completely understood. But, with new tools available, a more detailed characterization has identified different subpopulation of monocytes and macrophage that seem to have distinct functional patterns of activity. In this review we will focus on the complex networks and molecules that control monocyte/macrophage cell fate and the regulation of the major pathways.

3. MONOCYTES

Monocytes and macrophages originate in the bone marrow from a common progenitor, the colony-forming unit macrophage (CFU-M). The colony-stimulating factor-1 (CSF-1) promotes the differentiation of the CFU-M into an intermediate stage named “monoblast”, which in turn differentiates into a “promonocyte”. What determines a promonocyte stage has not yet being fully characterized but this cell will give origin to monocytes (4). These different stages were characterized based on their size, nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio, granularity, and shape (5). The life span of the cells in the bone marrow has not been defined, but once they reach the bloodstream they live for a short period of time. Pioneer work from van Furth determined, using radiolabeled cells in vivo, that the majority of the monocytes circulate in the bloodstream for 48 hr and only a small fraction (15%) remained alive for up to 168 hr (6). After this period of time, circulating monocytes undergo spontaneous apoptosis or programmed cell death (PCD) (7). Monocytes can escape their apoptotic fate, by migrating to different organs and differentiating into tissue macrophages, processes that will be described in detail in the following sections.

Monocytes express specific receptors responsible for pathogen recognition (8). Recently, Auffray and others demonstrated using mice expressing GFP-labeled-monocytes that circulating monocytes present a “patrolling behavior”, allowing the fast recognition of pathogens and rapid recruitment to damage tissue (9, 10). In addition, their rapid response is accompanied by their ability to produce inflammatory cytokines including between others interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β), IL-8, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interferon gamma (IFN-γ), and growth factors like macrophage-colony stimulation factor (M-CSF) and granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulation factor (GM-CSF) (11). These cytokines act in autocrine and paracrine fashion increasing monocyte life span by blocking PCD prolonging their survival and their accumulation in tissues (1215). In addition, the persistence of activated monocytes at sites of inflammation is mediated by the formation of immune complexes (IC) triggering secretion of several inflammatory cytokines that also contribute to monocyte accumulation (16). Monocytes exposed to ICs, showed the activation of the PI3K/AKT survival pathway and the inhibition of spontaneous apoptosis (16). In chronic inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and atherosclerosis, the persistent high levels of inflammatory cytokines and the presence of ICs constitute critical factors mediating the excessive infiltration of monocyte/macrophages contributing to the persistence of inflammation (17).

3.1. Subpopulations of monocytes

In the early sixties, van Furth and colleagues described the presence of two pools of monocytes (6). Studying the kinetics of monocytes’ fate in mice, they found that the majority of the monocytes remained in circulation, whereas a small pool of monocytes was randomly able to leave the circulation and migrate to specific tissues becoming macrophages (18). Based on the expression of the cluster of differentiation (CD) known also as the human leukocyte differentiation antigens (HLDA), monocytes are referred as CD14+ cells due to their ability to express the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) binding protein receptor CD14 (19). With the use of flow cytometry analysis (FACS) and two-color immunofluorescence, a new subpopulation of monocytes was identified due to the expression of the low affinity Fcγ receptor (FcγRIII) or CD16 (20, 21). Based on these findings, monocytes are currently classified into two groups the “classical” or CD14+CD16 and the “non-classical” or CD14+CD16+. The classical subpopulation represents 95% of the circulating monocytes in healthy individuals, whereas the non-classical comprised the remaining 5% (20). Experiments in human and mouse cells stimulated with LPS showed that both populations produced similar levels of IL-1β, TNFα, and IL-6, but the CD14+CD16 produce higher levels of IL-10 (2224).

Two subpopulations can be also characterized within the non-classical depending on the level of CD14 expression, the CD14high CD16+ and the CD14dim CD16+ comprising 4.7% and 0.8% respectively of total circulating monocytes. These two groups differ in their size, CD14high CD16+ are larger than the CD14dim CD16+ (18.4 and 13.4 μm respectively) (20). In addition, they share the same repertoire of cell surface expression molecules (CSEM) but differ in the expression level of some of them (Table 1) (20, 22, 2427). The CD14high CD16+ express high levels of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 (20). On the other hand, CD14dim CD16+ express low levels of TLR2, producing high levels of TNFα but low IL-10 upon LPS stimulation (24). These characteristics suggest that CD14dim CD16+ are the major producers of TNFα during inflammation (24, 28). Studies in sepsis patients revealed increased numbers of CD14+CD16+ in PBM and high levels of IL-10, IL-6, and TNFα (25). Similarly increased in the CD14dim CD16+ was reported in patients with lung injury (29). Further analysis from chronic colitis, atherosclerosis, and sepsis patients showed that the increased number of CD14+CD16+ corresponded just to an elevated level of the CD14dim CD16+ subpopulation (25, 30, 31). Together, these data support the importance of this small subpopulation in the physiopathology of inflammatory diseases. While the mechanisms mediating such response are not yet fully understood, it may suggest different migratory properties of these subpopulations.

Table 1.

Cell Surface Expression Molecules (CSEM) and their function

FUNCTION CSEM CD14+CD16 CD14highCD16+ CD14dimCD16+ Macrophages
Activation CD14 high high low
CD16 + + +
TLR 4 + + + +
TLR 2 low high low +
MHC-I high high high +
MHC-II +
HLA-DR low high high +
FcγRI + high
FcγRIII + + high
CD86 low high high low
MR +
ScR +
Adhesion CD11a low high
ICAM-1 + + low
VCAM-1 + + low
Migration CCR2 +
CD62L +
CX3CR1 low high high low
+

Constitutively expressed;

Absent;

high Highly expressed;

low Lowly expressed

3.2. Properties of monocytes

The central function of monocytes is innate immune-surveillance. Circulating monocytes can migrate to tissues differentiating into macrophages. The migration is a multi-step mechanism that involves adhesion and extravasation, mediating the localization of monocytes to the specific tissues, and culminating with their differentiation into macrophages. Initially, it was proposed that the migration of monocytes from the peripheral blood to the tissues was random (6). However, it is by now well accepted that monocytes present migratory properties depending on the expression of leukocyte adhesion molecules on their surface and their ability to move upon a gradient of chemoattractant factors (13, 32). The mechanisms involved in adhesion, were initially analyzed in vitro in isolated venous and arterial endothelial cells (EC) co-cultured with monocytes. Pretreatment with different cytokines, showed that monocytes’ attachment is cytokine-dependent and clearly mediated by the expression of numerous members of the LAM (leukocyte adhesion molecules) family (33). CD14+CD16+ monocytes express ICAM-1 or CD11b (intracellular adhesion molecule 1) and VCAM-1 or CD49 (vascular cell adhesion molecule-1), which mediate their interaction with the vascular endothelium (33) (Figure 1). Treatment with IL-4 or IL-1β induces increased expression of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 in monocytes, promoting their interaction with EC (34). Furthermore, blocking antibodies for ICAM-1, LFA-1 (lymphocyte function-associate antigen) or CD11a prevented their adhesion (35). Thus, cytokines facilitate the adherence of monocytes to EC by regulating the expression of these receptors. In the case of the classical CD14+CD16, the interaction with EC is facilitated by the expression of CCR2 and CD62L (the chemokine receptor and leukocyte adhesion molecule respectively (36) and Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Model of monocyte migration and differentiation into macrophages

During inflammation, a complex network of cytokines elicited by the monocytes and the damaged tissues contribute to their migratory process. Monocytes induce MCP-1 (monocyte chemoattractant protein-1) which mediates their recruitment to the tissues (37). On the other hand, tissues produce fractalkine (FNK) (38), attracting the monocytes expressing the fractalkine receptor (CX3CR1) (12, 39). The second step in migration is extravasation, which involves the trafficking of the monocytes from the blood vessel to the tissue. CD14+CD16 express low level of the fractalkine receptor, CX3CR1low. In contrast, CD14+CD16+ express high level of fractalkine receptor, CX3CR1high (10, 40). Hence, it is recognized that specific subpopulations of monocytes characterized by defined surface expression molecules, will provide the source for resident or recruited tissue macrophages found at sites of inflammation (Figure 1).

The mouse and human CD14 share high level of sequence homology (41). In addition, mouse monocytes express Gr-1, a cell surface protein belonging to the Ly-6G “lineage-restricted proteins on lymphoid cells”. Based on the expression level of Gr-1 mouse monocytes can be also divided in two populations: CD14+Gr-l+ and CD14+Gr-l- (42). Like human monocytes, these populations express the fractalkine receptor CX3CR1. Thus, it has been suggested that the human CD14+CD16CX3CR1low are equivalent to the mouse CD14+Gr-l+CX3CR1low and the CD14+CD16+CX3CR1high to the mouse CD14+Gr-lCX3CR1high (10, 43). With the used of adoptive transfer techniques and GFP-labeled cells, it was showed that CD14+Gr-l+CX3CR1low have a shorter life span and migrate faster under inflammatory conditions so they have been recognized as the “inflammatory subset”, whereas the CD14+Gr-1CX3CR1high are considered the “resident” monocytes (10). Therefore, the migratory properties have been suggested to be most likely due to the different expression of CX3CR1 (9, 38, 43).

4. MACROPHAGES

The realization that macrophages originate from monocytes was described first by van Furth (5). However, the term macrophage was defined almost 100 years ago by Aschoff (44) to describe a large phagocytic mononuclear cell. Macrophages have been classified as the most specialized cell in the phagocytic system and take their named depending on their tissue localization (4547). They are called Kupffer cells in the liver, alveolar macrophages in the lungs, histiocytes in the connective tissues, osteoclast in the bones, microglia in the brain, and Langerhans cells in the skin (48). Sometimes their named is based on the organ where they are found such as lymph node, thymus, gastrointestinal, genitor urinary, red pulp, endocrine, pleural, epithelial or peritoneal macrophages. Macrophages are highly heterogeneous and can express different cell surface receptors, even within the same organ, making the understanding of these cells even more challenging (47). Regardless of their localization, macrophages are markedly different from monocytes in their longer life span, ranging from months to years (7, 48). The pathways and proteins that confer this longer survival are not fully characterized, but their identification and recognition will evidently provide important tools to potentially manipulate macrophage accumulation.

4.1. Monocyte to macrophage differentiation

The process of monocyte to macrophage differentiation is initiated once monocytes reach the target tissue. Monocytes can differentiate into tissue macrophages, dendritic cells, and osteoclast (49). This review will focus only on monocyte to macrophage differentiation. GM-CSF, M-CSF, and CSF-1 can meditate the differentiation process. These differentiation stimuli activate survival pathways leading to changes in gene expression, which ultimately determine phenotypic changes and specify the expression of macrophage-associated cell surface antigens. Animal models have been instrumental to study the differentiation process. GM-CSF deficient mice for example develop normally and have normal hematocrite and leukocyte numbers but develop lymphoid hyperplasia in the lungs (50). On the other hand, M-CSF deficient mice are smaller, have a lower body weight, and show extensive skeletal deformities due to a reduction in the number osteoclasts. Interestingly, these animals have severely reduced number of blood monocytes, peritoneal macrophages, and tissue macrophages but present normal hematocrite’s numbers. In addition, M-CSF deficient mice develop osteoporosis. Thus, these findings suggest that M-CSF has a fundamental effect on the myeloid progenitor cells that give raise to monocytes and macrophages (51, 52).

In vitro studies with primary monocytes and human myelomonocytic leukemia cell lines such as U937, HL-60, and THP-1 have been extensively used to study differentiation. These cell lines in the presence of M-CSF, GM-CSF, or retinoic acid (ATRA) differentiate into macrophages (26, 53, 54). Human monocytes and bone marrow macrophages cultured in the presence of M-CSF can live up to 28 days, increasing in size from 11.6 to 22.4 μm and developing the classical macrophage phenotype (5557). The complete morphological characteristics of a mature macrophage are acquired during the first 5–7 days of differentiation. After 48 hr GM-CSF-treated monocytes and bone marrow macrophages show a decrease in CD14 expression and an increase in CD11b, scavenger receptor (ScR), and mannose receptor (MR or CD206) (26, 58). In fact, MR is the best characterized marker of all mature monocyte-derived macrophages showing high sequence homology in vertebrates (5962).

M-CSF and GM-CSF binding to their receptors induce the activation of survival signaling pathways (see Hunter et al. in this issue for a comprehensive review). One of the most extensively studied kinases activated during this process, is Protein Kinase B (PKB or AKT) (see Rane and Klein in the same issue). M-CSF stimulation of monocytes activates the PI-3K/PDK1 pathway promoting the phosphorylation/activation of AKT. Treatment of monocytes with the PI3K inhibitor LY294002, results in an inhibition of AKT and monocyte/macrophage differentiation (54). GM-CSF or ATRA treatment of monocytes and myelomonocytic cells, results in the activation of the MAPK/ERK/MEK signaling pathway by promoting the phosphorylation of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK), Extracellular signal-Regulated Kinase (ERK1/2), and MAP-ERK-kinase (MEK1) and the activation of the transcription factors such as NF-κβ and signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) family members (53, 63).

Gene expression analysis of M-CSF or GM-CSF-differentiated monocytes showed an increase in the expression of several genes (6466) such as the transcription factor PU.1, a member of the transformation-specific genes ets family and surface receptors such as MHC-II, FcγR and ScR, between others (65, 67). Consistent with its role in differentiation, PU.1−/− mice show decrease lymphoid and myeloid precursors (68). ScR expression is regulated by PU.1 so it is conceivable that ScR expression increases accompanying the increase of PU.1 expression during differentiation (27). Microarray analysis of monocytes and myelomonocytic cells stimulated with TPA show a dramatic increase of Hsp27 (66). In agreement with these results we found a forty-time increase in the expression of Hsp27 protein during monocyte/macrophage differentiation (69). In contrast, the expression of genes involved in signal transduction and apoptosis, such as calreticulin and PKCδ were downregulated during differentiation (64). Thus, the differential gene and protein profiles help to identify the similarities and differences of monocytes and macrophages (64, 65).

Comparative proteomics analysis of monocytes and alveolar macrophages show that monocytes express high levels of cytoskeleton proteins related with phagocytes and chemotaxis, such as serine protease, leukocyte elastase inhibitor, cofilin, F-actin capping protein β (70). Whereas the alveolar macrophages express high levels of cathepsin B, Hsp27, aldehyde dehydrogenase, pyruvate kinase, aldolase A, phosphoglycerate mutase I, superoxide dismutase and peroxiredoxin. These findings suggest the specialized function of alveolar macrophages in phagocytic functions (70). Interestingly, comparative analysis between healthy mammary macrophages and TAMs (Tumor Associated Macrophages) found in the mammary tumor, show different cell surface protein expression and changes in the morphology including size, density and tumoricidal effect distribution (71). Thus, these findings suggest that gene profile in tissue specific macrophages is determined by the combination of cytokines, adrenergic, and cholinergic agonists, hormones and immunoglobulins found in the tumor microenvironment (47, 71, 72).

An important regulator of monocyte to macrophage differentiation is the cyclin inhibitor p21 which is known to control cell proliferation. Myelomonocytic cells induced to differentiate with TPA show increased p21 mRNA (73). Furthermore, p21 stably transfected myelomonocytic cells arrest at G0/G1, resulting in a more differentiated stage and express higher levels of CD11b (74). In the other hand, myelomonocytic cells stably transfected with antisense-p21 have reduced levels of differentiation when treated with ATRA (74). Interestingly, p21 knockout mice have normal numbers of monocytes and macrophages, This effect may be due to the fact of redundancy of p21 with other cell cycle dependent regulators (75). However, when challenged intraperitoneally with serum from RA mice the p21 deficient mice failed to develop RA, lacked monocyte accumulation in synovial fluids and had no cartilage or bone erosion (76). Interestingly, cytometry analysis of monocyte subpopulation, showed that only the CD14+Gr-1+ CX3R1low (inflammatory subset) was decreased, whereas the resident subset of CD14+Gr-1 CX3R1high was not altered (76). Thus, these findings suggest that while in vitro p21 has a role in cell-cycle arrest facilitating monocyte/macrophage differentiation, while in vivo p21 seems to be responsible in their migratory properties during inflammation (74, 76).

4.2. Functions of macrophages

Initially macrophages were described as large phagocytic cells able to “eat” (77). Currently, is well known that their function also includes antigen presentation, mainly due to the MHC responsible for recognition of self and non-self molecules. This property allows macrophages to initiate the primary inflammatory response and their participation in tissue remodeling. In addition, macrophages are also responsible in the phagocytosis of apoptotic cells, a process clearly non-inflammatory (78). The phagocytic functions are mediated by an extensive repertoire of receptors, which identity and mechanisms of function continue to be an area of intense investigation (61).

4.2.1. Antigen presentation

Macrophages initiate cell-mediated immune response against pathogens. The pathogen recognition pattern is mediated by the MHC chains, leading to the formation of the “MHC-peptide complex” that initiates the inflammatory response (79). The MHC are classified in class I and II, based on the structure of their extracellular chains, also referred as C1a or HLA-DR and CD38 or HLA-DQ respectively (80). MHC-II presents two extracellular chains α and β forming a four-domain structure (α1, α2, β1, and β2) (81). Monocytes express MHC-I, but during differentiation MHC-I expression is inhibited while MHC-II is induced (82). MHC-II expression is regulated by the coactivator class II transactivator (CIITA). The expression of this transactivator is regulated by a complex mechanism. The expression of the CIITA gene can be controlled by three independent promoters (pI, pIII, pIV). While pI and pIII drive CIITA expression in dendritic and B cells respectively, pIV is responsible for regulating its expression in macrophages. Consistently, deletion of pIV resulted in selective depletion of MHC-II in macrophages (83). Moreover, pIV conditional knockout mice develop various inflammatory and autoimmune syndromes, due the loss of MHC-II-mediated antigen presentation (83).

4.2.2. Phagocytosis

Macrophages are the most specialized cells of the phagocytic system, representing a major defense mechanisms against a wide variety of microorganism, including virus, fungi, protozoa, and bacteria. Furthermore, they are also able to phagocytose apoptotic cells contributing to the clearance of defective cells promoting tissue repair and remodeling. The recognition of pathogens and cells is mediated by specific macrophage surface receptors (84). During apoptosis, dying cells change membrane symmetry exhibiting a new range of extracellular molecules (85). Probably the best characterized is the exposure of the phosphatidyl serine (86), in a process that depends on caspase-3 activation (87). The recognition of apoptotic bodies by macrophages is mediated by specific receptors including the phosphatidylserine receptor (PSR), the scavenger receptors, the ATPase membrane transporter ABC1 and one of the tyrosine kinase receptor Tyro3 (see Curtis et al., in this issue and (8790)). Mice lacking ABC1 accumulate apoptotic bodies during development (90). Thus, these molecules allow the macrophage to differentiate between alive and death cells.

Lipopolysaccharide and polysaccharides present in pathogens’ cell walls are recognized by macrophages by the MHC-II, the TLR, MR, ScR and FcγR (9193). These specific signals once recognized allow the formation of the “peptide-complex”. The receptor-peptide complex coordinates the reorganization of the cytoskeleton and recruitment of several molecules such as lectins, N-acetylglucosamine, and the integrins receptor vitronectin (94, 95). Following the internalization, the target-peptide is enclosed in the phagosome, a plasma membrane-surrounded-vesicle (96). Soon after its formation, the phagosome modifies its phospholipids composition, acquiring hydrolases and lysosomal proteins that contain N-acetylglucosamine-1-phosphate (GlcNAc-1-P) linked to serine residues (97). In the phagosome, apoptotic bodies are opsonized suppressing the transcription and translation of inflammatory cytokines (78). The phagosome-containing pathogens acidified (lower pH) and lysosome proteins are recruited onto the phagosomes inducing the production of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) that act as a killing mechanism (98). In turn, H2O2 induces the release of macrophage-inflammatory protein (MIP-1α and -β), and monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1), cytokines that contribute to the inflammatory process (99). Once phagocytosis is finished, the phagosome moves and re-integrates into the cellular membrane (100) (see Curtis et al. in the same issue for an extensive review in phagocytosis). Interestingly, while many parasites are clear rapidly by phagocytosis, others such as in the case of Chagas’s disease in this case the Trypanosome cruzi, remains inside the phagosome for a long time (101). These intracellular parasites inhibit the apoptotic mechanism, contributing to development of chronic inflammation (101, 102).

4.2.3. Repair and remodeling

The initial evaluation of the role of macrophages was conducted in mechanically-damage tissue. Mice exposed to abdominal-tissue damaged, repaired tissue faster inhibiting the formation of peritoneal adhesion, when peritoneal macrophages were applied intraperitoneally (103). After abdominal surgeries there is a high incidence of “peritoneal adhesion” contributing to post-surgery complications. Interestingly, animal models are extensively utilized to study this mechanism. The “macrophage Fas-induced apoptosis” or MAFIA model carries two copies of the FasR linked to a myristylated-targeting peptide able to induce, when the cells are exposed to AP29187, the trimerization of the intracellularly tail of the death receptor (104). Upon trimerization cells undergo apoptosis due to the activation of caspase-3. In the MAFIA mice the FasR-chimera was clone under the control of the macrophage specific receptor c-fms (CSF-1). Hence, this model provides a system to conditionally ablate macrophages when exposed to the AP29187 compound. In contrast to wild-type animals, MAFIA mice treated with AP20187 show peritoneal adhesions post-surgery (61). These findings support the important role of macrophages during tissue repair and remodeling. Hence, understanding the role of macrophages in more detail can be a great tool in developing new approaches for tissue repair.

5. MONOCYTE AND MACROPHAGE CELL FATE

Cell fate is determined by the balance between survival and apoptotic pathways. In monocytes, a constitutively activated cell death program seems to support their short life span. Notably, monocytes’ life span has great plasticity, as mentioned in above sections, prolonged survival is triggered by malignant transformation or during inflammation (105), but survival is promptly reverted as inflammation resolves. In contrast, macrophages have acquired mechanisms that inhibit the apoptotic program and activate survival pathways responsible for promoting a longer live span. The distinct molecules that regulate the changes in cell fate have been much studied in the last decade providing a complex repertoire of proteins responsible for cell fate determination. In this section, we will discuss general mechanisms that control monocytes and macrophages life span.

Programmed cell death (PCD) or apoptosis is an evolutionary conserved mechanism essential for normal development and provides a cellular defense against pathogens (106). Importantly, apoptosis participates in the control of cell number during maturation of the immune system and in the resolution of the immune response (107). Apoptosis was originally recognized by a group of distinct morphological changes, such as nuclear fragmentation, cytoskeleton disruption, cell shrinkage, and membrane blebbing which then lead to the fragmentation of the dying cell into apoptotic bodies that are recognized and engulfed by macrophages (88, 105). In addition, apoptosis involves the biochemical activation of the apoptotic machinery composed by a well-conserved group of cysteine-proteases, the caspases (108). Fourteen caspases have been so far identified (109). These proteins are constitutively expressed as inactive precursors that become proteolytically active upon apoptosis. The founder member of the family, caspase-1, was identified in monocytes being responsible for cleaving the inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-18 (110). Caspase-1 knockout mice show decrease inflammation when infected with bacteria or LPS (110, 111). By now the role of caspase-1 in regulation of inflammation is well recognized. In addition, caspase-4 and −5 have also been involved in inflammation (112).

Based on their position in the apoptotic cascade, the caspases are classified in “initiators” (caspase-1, -2, -8, -9, and -10) and “executioners” (caspase-3, -7, -6). Initiator caspases possess a long N-terminal prodomain containing protein-protein interaction motifs; caspase-1, 2, 4, 5, and 9 contain the caspase recruitment domain (CARD). Whereas caspase-8 and −10, contain the death effector domains (DEDs) (113). These domains participate in the activation of the caspases by providing protein-protein interaction. In contrast, the executioners or effector caspases have a short amino-terminal prodomain that is not evolutionary conserved. As the role of this domain remains unclear, the regulation of the executioner caspases by interacting proteins is still elusive. Recently, we show that Hsp27 binds to the amino-terminal domain of caspase-3, inhibiting its second proteolytic cleavage (69). Whether the prodomains of the other executioner caspases are able to provide docking sites for inhibitors remains to be proven.

Apoptosis can be activated by two main pathways, the death receptor or “extrinsic” and the mitochondria-mediated or “intrinsic” pathways. The extrinsic pathway is triggered by the binding of ligands to the death cell surface receptors belonging to the TNF-receptor family (114). In monocytes the extrinsic pathway is modulated by two major receptors belonging to the TNF family, the CD95 or Fas receptor (FasR) and the Tumor Necrosis (TNF)-Related Apoptosis-Inducing receptors TRAIL-R1 and TRAIL-R2 also named DR4 and DR5 respectively (115, 116). Activation of these receptors promotes the recruitment of the cytoplasmic adaptor proteins TRADD and FADD that in turn, activate caspase-8 (117). In the intrinsic pathway, apoptotic stimuli induce changes in the mitochondria membrane permeabilization, allowing caspase-9 activation (118). Different molecules are involved in the regulation of mitochondrial permeabilization, providing a homeostatic balance that contributes in cell fate determination. Importantly, independently of how apoptosis is initiated all pathways converge en the activation of the executioner caspases, which are responsible for cleaving proteins of diverse biological function from transcription factors to kinases and phosphatases. The caspase-mediated proteolysis is essential for the formation of apoptotic bodies. As the apoptotic process must be tightly regulated, it is postulated that multiple checkpoints contribute to the proper regulation of the caspase cascade.

5.1. Pro-apoptotic regulators

In monocytes, the trimerization of the death receptors leads to the recruitment of adaptor proteins. FasR recruits the cytoplasmic adaptor protein “Fas Associated Protein with Death Domain” (FADD) and TRAIL-R1/2 the cytoplasmic adaptor protein TNF receptor-associated protein (TRADD) (117). Recruitment of these proteins forms the “DISC complex”, composed by FasR/FADD/caspase-8 or TRAIL/TRADD/capase-8 respectively (116, 119) (Figure 2). FADD and TRADD contain two Death Domains (DED) able to recruit other DED-containing proteins (117). For example, caspase-8 and caspase-10 interaction with FADD and TRADD through DED–DED domains leads to their autoproteolytic activation (113, 120). Activated caspase-8 can either directly or indirectly activate caspase-3 (116, 121).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Signal pathways involve in monocytes and macrophages cell fate

The inhibition of the cognate FasR/FasL in monocytes’ cultures results in the inhibition of monocyte spontaneous apoptosis (122). The functional role of Fas in vivo was evaluated using the FasR (lpr/lpr) and FasL (lpr/gid) knockout mice. Both mice have increased numbers of inflammatory and resident subsets of monocytes (CD14+Gr-1+CX3CR1low and CD14+Gr1CX3CR1high respectively), resulting in lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly, and in accumulation of macrophages in the tissues including lung, liver and spleen (115, 123). Together, these findings highlight the importance of the Fas-mediated pathway in monocyte/macrophage cell fate.

The role of caspases in vivo has been more difficult to study, caspase-8 and caspase-9 knockout homozygous embryos mice are non-viable showing neural tube defects, while heterozygous embryos, can survive up to 4–5 weeks but present phenotypes that vary in severity (124, 125). Caspase-3 knockout mice, has severe development defects and die early in life, suggesting that caspase-3 is an essential caspase in apoptosis and has also functional roles in development (126). Future work in conditional knockouts may provide specific knowledge in the role of these caspases in monocyte/macrophage life span.

The intrinsic pathway is activated normally in response to stress or death stimuli, such as DNA-damaging agents (127). Upon stress cytochrome c and Smac/Diablo are released from the mitochondria. Cytochrome c in the presence of ATP binds to the apoptotic protease activating factor 1 (Apaf-1) and caspase-9 forming the “apoptosome”. The apoptosome, was first identified in monocytic leukemia cells, induces caspase-9 activation followed by cleavage of caspase-3 (128, 129). Smac/Diablo forms a complex with XIAP relieving caspase-3 form the inhibition of XIAP (130, 131) (Figure 2). The Bcl-2 (B-cell lymphoma 2) family is composed by a large number of homologues which act as pro- or antiapoptotic regulators, which modulate release of cytochrome c and Smac/Diablo release from the mitochondria to the cytoplasm (118, 132) (Figure 2). This family includes, the anti-apoptotic proteins Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, A1, Bcl-w, Mcl-1 and pro-apoptotic members. The pro-apoptotic family members are classified based on the number of conserved Bcl-2 homology (BH) domains. One group composed by the Bax family includes Bak, Bax, and Box, have three BH3 domains. The second group corresponds to the BH3-only domain proteins. This group includes Bad, Bid, Bik, Bmf, Bim, Hrk, Noxa, and Puma (133). Thus, Bcl-2-proteins act as “guardians” regulating in pairs cellular fate. The function of the Bcl-2-like proteins can be regulated through phosphorylation, dimerization, transcriptional regulation, proteolytic cleavage, and cellular localization (134).

In myelomonocytic leukemia cells, the presence of Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, and Mcl-1 was showed to contribute to cell survival. Overexpression of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL in monocytic cells increases the protection against apoptotic stimuli. Bcl-2 protective activity is mediated by phosphorylation via AKT. Bcl-2 phospho-negative mutants show a dramatic decrease in the ability to protect myelomocytic cells during flavopiridol or TRAIL-induced apoptosis (135, 136). The presence of Bik, Bak, Bax, Bad, and Bid has also been reported in the monocytic lineage. Subcellular localization of these proteins, from the cytoplasm to mitochondrial membrane, seems to promote apoptosis (137, 138). Mcl-1 expression decreases in cells treated with flavopiridol, resulting in an increase of cell death in myelomonocytic leukemia cells (141). In addition, Mcl-1is overexpressed in tissue macrophages isolated from RA patients whereas the silencing of Mcl-1 resulted in the induction of apoptosis (141, 142). The expression levels of some of the Bcl-2 family members can be transcriptionally regulated by NF-κB (133, 139). In agreement with this, blocking of NF-κB with the specific inhibitor PDTC (pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate) in primary macrophages or a macrophage-like cell line (RAW), resulted in lost of mitochondrial homeostasis and cell death (140). Activation of survival pathways mediated by JNK and STAT1, results in an increase of Mcl-1 in monocyte-derived macrophages and tissue macrophages (143). Mycobacterium infection of THP-1 cells induces transcriptional downregulation of Bak and Bax but upregulation of Mcl-1 (144). Bad is regulated by AKT-dependent phosphorylation of Ser112 and Ser136, inhibition of PI3K/PDK1/AKT signal pathway, results in its translocation to mitochondria promoting apoptosis (145). In addition, dimerization of the Bcl-2-members is other important regulatory mechanism. The direct interaction of homo- and hetero-dimers results in pore formation allowing the release of apoptogenic factors to the cytoplasm (146). In monocytes, Bax/Bak and Bim/Bcl-2 associate with the VDAC1 (Voltage Dependent Activation Channel 1) in the outer mitochondrial membrane contributing to activation of apoptosis by facilitating pore formation (147, 148). Bid is the only member of the family, whose activity is regulated by cleavage. Monocytic cells treated with TRAIL show caspase-8 activation leading to the cleavage of Bid (tBid). tBid translocation to the mitochondria, promotes the oligomerization of Bax/Bak helping to induce cell death (149).

Another important regulator of cell fate are the serine/threonine kinases belonging to the Protein kinases C family (150). The PKC family consists of 11 isoforms that is divided in classical (α, β, and γ), novel (δ, ε, η, and θ) and atypical (ζ, λ and τ) (151). The classical and atypical have anti-apoptotic properties, whereas the novels have been described as pro-apoptotic (150). The isoforms are differentially expressed in monocytes and macrophages, suggesting their possible role in monocyte differentiation and life span (152). Classical members of this family such as PKCα and β increase during PMA-stimulation and monocyte/macrophage induced-differentiation (153). Microarray analysis of myelomonocytic cells induce to differentiate with TPA show an increase in PKCα and a decrease in PKCδ expression (65). PKCε is highly activated during tumorigenesis and can also be activated in LPS-stimulated macrophages (154). Some the PKC isoforms: PKCδ, ε, and ζ are cleaved by caspase-3 suggesting the existence of a feedback loop that may regulate the activity of these enzymes (155157). Tyrosine phosphorylation of PKCδ correlates with its translocation to the nucleus followed by apoptosis (158). Consistently, treatment of cells with the caspase-3 inhibitor DEVDFMK, show a decrease in its cleavage and apoptotic activity (159). Our group recently found that PKCδ associates and phosphorylates caspase-3 (Figure 2). The phosphorylation of caspase-3 increases its apoptotic activity (160). This effect is specific of PKCδ, as other isoforms failed to phosphorylate caspase-3 (160). It will be interesting to know how the phosphorylation affects the ability of caspase-3 to interact with other pro- and antiapoptotic mediators.

5.2. Anti-apoptotic regulators

Monocytes evade the apoptotic fate during inflammation, differentiation and malignant transformation. This is achieved by the contribution of survival pathways that in turn block the apoptotic cascade. While the details of this crosstalk are far from being understood, it has become clear that the inhibition of apoptosis acts at multiple levels. Monocyte/macrophage prolonged survival is mediated by the increased expression of anti-apoptotic proteins like IAPs, Bcl-2 family members, and heat shock proteins. In addition, inflammatory cytokines and chemokines stimulate monocyte migration and promote their accumulation and differentiation. Thus, chronic inflammatory diseases and cancer are characterized by an increase in monocyte/macrophage populations (161).

IAPs or “inhibitor of apoptosis” constitute a conserved family first characterized in baculovirus (162). IAPs have a common zinc-binding domain named Baculovirus IAP Repeat (BIR) (162). Eight human orthologues have been described so far including: XIAP (ILP-1, MIHA), ILP-2 (Ts-IAP), cIAP-1 (HIAP2, MIHB), cIAP-2 (HIAP1, MIHC), ML-IAP (Livin, KIAP), NAIP, Survivin (TIAP) and Apollon (Bruce). Some of the IAPs contain a second zinc-binding motif named RING that binds to the caspase-recruitment domains (CARD) (163165). The X-linked IAP (XIAP) is the best-characterized member of this family. XIAP binds directly to caspase-3 inhibiting its activation (166). During Fas-induced apoptosis, XIAP is cleaved in two fragments, one containing two BIR domains (BIR-1 and −2) and the other containing the RING domain. BIR1–2 and the RING bind differentially to the caspases. Immunoprecipitations using recombinant proteins XIAP show that BIR 1–2 binds to caspase-3 and −7, whereas the RING motif is able to bind to caspase-9 (167). Moreover, in a cell free system approach using recombinant proteins and THP-1 cell lyses shown that, XIAP associates with caspase-9 halting the activation of the apoptosome-dependent activation of caspase-3 (164). In monocytes and myelomonocytic leukemia cells, four members of this family have been described: XIAP, c-IAP1, c-IAP2, Survivin (168, 169). Survivin has been found highly expressed in circulation and in synovial fluids of RA patients. Overexpression of recombinant survivin in monocytes has been associated with an increase on ICAM-1 expression (170). These results can suggest that survivin is related with the physiopathology of bone destruction mediated by monocyte/macrophage in RA (170). LPS or PMA stimulated monocyte-derived macrophages, show downregulation of cIAP2 mRNA correlating with an increase in the caspase-3 activity (169). XIAP is also highly expressed during monocyte/differentiation differentiation and malignant myelopoiesis, and has been proposed as a marker of poor prognosis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), suggesting that uncontrolled survival mechanisms may impair AML therapies (171).

Heat-shock proteins (Hsps) especially Hsp27, Hsp70, and Hsp90 have been implicated in defense mechanisms against apoptosis (172). Hsp70 has a protective effect during heat shock in myelomonocytic cells (172). In addition, an increase in the expression of Hsp70 has been observed during monocyte to dendritic cell differentiation (173). Increase expression of Hsp27 has been correlated with survival in response to stress and cytotoxic stimuli (174). Ex-vivo experiments showed that Hsp27 expression interferes with the accumulation of cytosolic cytochrome c in cancer cells (172). Hsp27 can bind to Bcl-2 family members and its expression markedly decreases Bax activation (175). Hsp27 sequestration of cytochrome c inhibits the activation of caspase-9 (176). In addition, we showed recently that Hsp27, in sharp contrast with Hsp70 is constitutively expressed in monocytes. Moreover, αβ-crystalline, the closest Hsp27 homologue is not present in primary human monocytes (69). Interestingly we found that Hsp27 interacts with the prodomain of caspase-3 inhibiting its proteolytic activation (69). Whether this inhibitory function of Hsp27 is conserved in other executioner caspases will need to be determined. Interestingly, we found that during monocyte/macrophage differentiation the level of Hsp27 increases dramatically. Consistent with its role as an antiapoptotic regulator, silencing of Hsp27 increases the number of apoptotic macrophages (69). Thus, it will be interesting to see whether Hsp27 contributes to monocyte/macrophage differentiation.

6. MONOCYTES AND MACROPHAGES IN INFLAMMATION

The patrolling behavior of monocytes and tissue macrophages is essential in the initial host response to infection. The initiation and resolution of acute and chronic inflammation are mediated by the activation of monocytes and macrophages, which are triggered by the recognition and phagocytosis of pathogen through specialized receptors (84, 177). Active macrophages surrounding tissue damage or malignant tissues produce inflammatory cytokines that diffuse toward veins, which increase the level of inflammatory cytokines in the monocyte microenvironment (32). Monocytes become activated migrating to the tissues where they participate in tissue damage or repair and remodeling depending on the cytokines available at sites of inflammation (Figure 1). The activation of monocyte and macrophages is mediated by specialized receptors, such as MHC (see section 4.2) and the Toll-like receptor (TLR) family (84). The highly conserved TLR family is composed of nine members involved in pathogen recognition (178). TLRs are type I integral membrane glycoproteins, containing an extracellular domain with leucine-rich-repeat (LRR) motifs and a cytoplasmic domain homologous to IL-1R (TIR) (179). TLRs can be found in the cellular membrane, like in the case of TLR1, TLR2, TLR4, TLR5, and TLR6 whereas TLR3, TLR7, TLR8, and TLR9 are localized in intracellular membranes (180). Activation of TLRs triggers two signaling pathways, one mediated by the myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88) and the other mediated by interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3) (179). TLR2, TLR4, TLR7, TLR9 activate the MyD88 multi-step signaling pathway, resulting in activation and translocation of NF-κβ and IRF3 to the nucleus promoting the production of cytokines, IL-1β and TNFα (Figure 2) (84). TLR3 activates IRF3 signal pathway, resulting in the activation and translocation of IRF3 to the nucleus promoting the production of IL-1β (181). In monocytes and macrophages TLR1, TLR2, TLR4, TLR5 and TLR6 have been identified in the plasma membrane (182). Macrophages express the TLR3, TLR7, and TLR9 intracellulary the endosome membranes, whereas only TLR9 is found in the endosome membranes in monocytes (8, 181, 182). LPS purified form Gram bacteria and lipopeptide (BLP) from Gram+ have been excellent tools to study the processes of monocyte/macrophage activation (183). For example, the signal transduction pathway activated by these pathogens was studied in bone marrow macrophages (BMM) derived form the MyD88 knockout mice. Microarray analysis of BMM treated with the Gram+ L. Monocytogenes show that MyD88−/− macrophages fail to produce inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β, IL-6 and TNFα and also NO (184). The activation of the IRF3 signaling pathway was evaluated in RAW macrophages treated with poly (I:C), a synthetic TLR3 ligand. These experiments showed the activation NF-κβ and the increased production of IL-1β (181). Ex-vivo experiments using BMM obtained from TLR2+/+TLR4−/− or TLR2−/−TLR4+/+ mice treated with the M. Lipomannan, a Gram bacteria, demonstrated that TNFα and NO production are mediated by TLR4 (185). These findings are in agreement with results obtained using purified BLP or LPS in the same animals (185). Together these data show that TNFα production is TLR-dependent, with BLP activating the pathway via TLR2 and LPS via TLR4 (185). As we previously described (section 3.1 Subpopulation of Monocytes), different subpopulations of monocytes are able to induce inflammatory cytokines upon LPS stimulation. Notably, CD14highCD16+ are the main producers of IL-10, whereas CD14dimCD16+ produce TNFα (28). Comparative studies in monocytes and monocyte-derived macrophages showed that TLR agonists induce similar levels of inflammatory cytokines except in the case of poly (I:C), which induces a major induction of TNFα in macrophages (182). TAMs can also recognize pathogens trough the TLR contributing to the inflammatory milieu of the tumor (186).

The resolution of inflammation is initiated when the stimuli has been eliminated, resulting in the downregulation of inflammatory cytokines and the upregulation of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) (187) and leukotrienes (LTs). PGE2 helps decreasing the exudation and blood flow into the inflammatory tissue (188). Administration of LTs in the local exudates of inflammation results in a decrease of TNFα (189). In addition, reactivation of the apoptotic machinery contributes to tissue repair and to the clearance of activated monocytes and other leukocytes (190). The resolution process can be short or acute taking just few days. Otherwise, it can be longer up to years constituting a chronic condition. The mechanisms causing the persistence of inflammation are not yet fully understood but it is clear that high levels of inflammatory cytokines in circulation are key elements in chronic inflammation in RA and chronic colitis (43, 191).

Based on these findings therapeutic approaches to target inflammation has been based on the ability to reduce inflammatory cytokines. In this context, current use of anti-TNFα as an anti-inflammatory therapy is used in patients with chronic inflammation that has negative results with the conventional therapies (191). TNFα and IL-6, IL8 and IL-10 inhibitors have been used as alternative therapies in patients with inflammatory conditions, such as RA and chronic colitis (192194). However, these studies have reported only 50–60% success (191, 194). In line with these results it could be of great significance to define new additional therapeutic approaches targeting activated monocytes to undergo apoptosis. This approach could help reducing inflammatory cytokines at the same time that contributes to the clearance of activated monocytes at sites of inflammation.

7. CONCLUSIONS

Monocytes and macrophages act as key guardians mediating innate immunity and participating in the acquired immunity. Moreover, different subpopulations of monocytes have being recently characterized and are being recognized to have a very different contribution to innate immunity and differentiation. Monocytes and macrophages originate from a shared progenitor, express similar receptors, and activate a comparable cascade of inflammatory mediators. However, they differ dramatically in their cellular life span. Monocytes can switch from being short live undergoing apoptosis in a day to presenting a prolonged survival during inflammation and quickly then to a short live as the inflammation resolves. Macrophages’ life span has less plasticity they live longer and are quite resistant to apoptotic stimuli. While much is known about the apoptotic and survival pathways it is noteworthy how little is known about the cross-talk of this complex network and its unique regulation in different lineages. More understanding of these regulatory pathways will potentially allow control inflammation by us to manipulating monocyte/macrophage lifespan.

8. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Work in Dr. Doseff’s lab is supported by grants NIH (R01 HL075040-01) and NSF-MCB (0542244). We apologize to our colleagues whom made important contributions but were omitted due to space limitation. We would like to thank Dr. T. Eubank for his help with the illustrations.

Abbreviations:

CD

Cluster of differentiation

PCD

programmed cell death

HLDA

Human Leukocyte Differentiation Antigens

MHC

Major Histocompatibility Complex

FcγR

Fcγ receptor

IL-1β

interleukine-1 beta

TNF-α

IL-8, tumor necrosis factor alpha

IFN-γ

interferon gamma

IL-4

Interleukine 4

TLR

Toll-like receptor

LPS

lipopolysaccharide binding protein

ICAM-1 or CD11b

intracellular adhesion molecule 1

VCAM-1 or CD49

vascular cell adhesion molecule-l

GM-CSF

granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor

GM-CSF

macrophage colony stimulating factor

CSF-1

colony stimulating factor 1

CARD

caspase-recruitment domain

RING

second zinc-binding motif RING

BIR

Baculovirus IAP repeat

PKCδ

Protein Kinase C δ

PKB/AKT

Protein Kinase B

PS

phosphatidylserine

PSR

phosphatidylserine receptor

RA

rheumatoid arthritis

FAC

Flow Cytometry Analysis

ScR

Scavenger Receptor

MR

Mannose Receptor

9. REFERENCES

  • 1.Shields J: Mononuclear cells, hyaline bodies and the plasma: an analytic review. Blood 17, 235–251 (1961) [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Grove JE, Bruscia E, Krause DS: Plasticity of bone marrow-derived stem cells. Stem Cells 22, 487–500 (2004) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Weisbart RH, Gasson JC, Golde DW: Colony-stimulating factors and host defense. Ann Intern Med 110, 297–303 (1989) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tushinski RJ, Oliver IT, Guilbert LJ, Tynan PW, Warner JR, Stanley ER: Survival of mononuclear phagocytes depends on a lineage-specific growth factor that the differentiated cells selectively destroy. Cell 28, 71–81 (1982) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.van Furth R, Cohn ZA, Hirsch JG, Humphrey JH, Spector WG, Langevoort HL: The mononuclear phagocyte system: a new classification of macrophages, monocytes, and their precursor cells. Bull World Health Organ 46, 845–852 (1972) [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.van Furth R, Cohn ZA: The origin and kinetics of mononuclear phagocytes. J Exp Med 128, 415–435 (1968) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fahy RJ, Doseff AI, Wewers MD: Spontaneous human monocyte apoptosis utilizes a caspase-3-dependent pathway that is blocked by endotoxin and is independent of caspase-1. J Immunol 163, 1755–1762 (1999) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.O’Mahony DS, Pham U, Iyer R, Hawn TR, Liles WC: Differential constitutive and cytokine-modulated expression of human Toll-like receptors in primary neutrophils, monocytes, and macrophages. Int J Med Sci 5, 1–8 (2008) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Auffray C, Fogg D, Garfa M, Elain G, Join-Lambert O, Kayal S, Sarnacki S, Cumano A, Lauvau G, Geissmann F: Monitoring of blood vessels and tissues by a population of monocytes with patrolling behavior. Science 317, 666–670 (2007) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Geissmann F, Jung S, Littman DR: Blood monocytes consist of two principal subsets with distinct migratory properties. Immunity 19, 71–82 (2003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.van Furth R: Human monocytes and cytokines. Res Immunol 149, 719–720 (1998) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ancuta P, Rao R, Moses A, Mehle A, Shaw SK, Luscinskas FW, Gabuzda D: Fractalkine preferentially mediates arrest and migration of CD16+ monocytes. J Exp Med 197, 1701–1707 (2003) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Charo IF, Taubman MB: Chemokines in the pathogenesis of vascular disease. Circ Res 95, 858–866 (2004) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mangan DF, Wahl SM: Differential regulation of human monocyte programmed cell death (apoptosis) by chemotactic factors and pro-inflammatory cytokines. J Immunol 147, 3408–3412 (1991) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Goyal A, Wang Y, Graham MM, Doseff AI, Bhatt NY, Marsh CB: Monocyte survival factors induce Akt activation and suppress caspase-3. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 26, 224–230 (2002) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bianchi G, Montecucco F, Bertolotto M, Dallegri F, Ottonello L: Immune complexes induce monocyte survival through defined intracellular pathways. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1095, 209–219 (2007) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Blom AB, Radstake TR, Holthuysen AE, Sloetjes AW, Pesman GJ, Sweep FG, van de Loo FA, Joosten LA, Barrera P, van Lent PL, van den Berg WB: Increased expression of Fcγ receptors II and III on macrophages of rheumatoid arthritis patients results in higher production of tumor necrosis factor alpha and matrix metalloproteinase. Arthritis Rheum 48, 1002–1014 (2003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.van Furth R, Sluiter W: Distribution of blood monocytes between a marginating and a circulating pool. J Exp Med 163, 474–479 (1986) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Goyert SM, Ferrero E, Rettig WJ, Yenamandra AK, Obata F, Le Beau MM: The CD14 monocyte differentiation antigen maps to a region encoding growth factors and receptors. Science 239, 497–500 (1988) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Passlick B, Flieger D, Ziegler-Heitbrock HW: Identification and characterization of a novel monocyte subpopulation in human peripheral blood. Blood 74, 2527–2534 (1989) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.O’Doherty U, Peng M, Gezelter S, Swiggard WJ, Betjes M, Bhardwaj N, Steinman RM: Human blood contains two subsets of dendritic cells, one immunologically mature and the other immature. Immunology 82, 487–493 (1994) [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Frankenberger M, Sternsdorf T, Pechumer H, Pforte A, Ziegler-Heitbrock HW: Differential cytokine expression in human blood monocyte subpopulations: a polymerase chain reaction analysis. Blood 87, 373–377 (1996) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mizuno K, Toma T, Tsukiji H, Okamoto H, Yamazaki H, Ohta K, Ohta K, Kasahara Y, Koizumi S, Yachie A: Selective expansion of CD16highCCR2- subpopulation of circulating monocytes with preferential production of haem oxygenase (HO)-1 in response to acute inflammation. Clin Exp Immunol 142, 461–470 (2005) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Skrzeczynska-Moncznik J, Bzowska M, Loseke S, Grage-Griebenow E, Zembala M, Pryjma J: Peripheral blood CD14high CD16+ monocytes are main producers of IL-10. Scand J Immunol 67, 152–159 (2008) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Fingerle G, Pforte A, Passlick B, Blumenstein M, Strobel M, Ziegler-Heitbrock HW: The novel subset of CD14+CD16+ blood monocytes is expanded in sepsis patients. Blood 82, 3170–3176 (1993) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kruger M, Van de Winkel JG, De Wit TP, Coorevits L, Ceuppens JL: Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor down-regulates CD14 expression on monocytes. Immunology 89, 89–95 (1996) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wu H, Moulton K, Horvai A, Parik S, Glass CK: Combinatorial interactions between AP-1 and ets domain proteins contribute to the developmental regulation of the macrophage scavenger receptor gene. Mol Cell Biol 14, 2129–2139 (1994) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kanai T, Makita S, Kawamura T, Nemoto Y, Kubota D, Nagayama K, Totsuka T, Watanabe M: Extracorporeal elimination of TNFα-producing CD14dullCD16+ monocytes in leukocytapheresis therapy for ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 13, 284–290 (2007) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yoshioka Y, Ohwada A, Harada N, Satoh N, Sakuraba S, Dambara T, Fukuchi Y: Increased circulating CD14dimCD16+ monocytes in a patient with pulmonary alveolar proteinosis. Respirology 7, 273–279 (2002) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Skinner NA, MacIsaac CM, Hamilton JA, Visvanathan K: Regulation of Toll-like receptor TLR2 and TLR4 on CD14dimCD16+ monocytes in response to sepsis-related antigens. Clin Exp Immunol 141, 270–278 (2005) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ulrich C, Heine GH, Gerhart MK, Kohler H, Girndt M: Proinflammatory CD14+CD16+ monocytes are associated with subclinical atherosclerosis in renal transplant patients. Am J Transplant 8, 103–110 (2008) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Schober A, Weber C: Mechanisms of monocyte recruitment in vascular repair after injury. Antioxid Redox Signal 7, 1249–1257 (2005) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Beekhuizen H, Corsel-Van Tilburg AJ, Blokland I, Van Furth R: Characterization of the adherence of human monocytes to cytokine-stimulated human macrovascular endothelial cells. Immunology 74, 661–669 (1991) [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Beekhuizen H, Verdegaal EM, Blokland I, van Furth R: Contribution of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 to the morphological changes in monocytes bound to human venous endothelial cells stimulated with recombinant interleukin-4 (rIL-4) or rIL-1α. Immunology 77, 469–472 (1992) [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Beekhuizen H, Van Furth R: Monocyte adherence to human vascular endothelium. Behring Inst Mitt 63–86 (1993) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Xu H, Manivannan A, Dawson R, Crane IJ, Mack M, Sharp P, Liversidge J: Differentiation to the CCR2+ inflammatory phenotype in vivo is a constitutive, time-limited property of blood monocytes and is independent of local inflammatory mediators. J Immunol 175, 6915–6923 (2005) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Charo IF, Myers SJ, Herman A, Franci C, Connolly AJ, Coughlin SR: Molecular cloning and functional expression of two monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 receptors reveals alternative splicing of the carboxyl-terminal tails. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91, 2752–2756 (1994) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Jung S, Aliberti J, Graemmel P, Sunshine MJ, Kreutzberg GW, Sher A, Littman DR: Analysis of fractalkine receptor CX3CR1 function by targeted deletion and green fluorescent protein reporter gene insertion. Mol Cell Biol 20, 4106–4114 (2000) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Schulz C, Schafer A, Stolla M, Kerstan S, Lorenz M, von Bruhl ML, Schiemann M, Bauersachs J, Gloe T, Busch DH, Gawaz M, Massberg S: Chemokine fractalkine mediates leukocyte recruitment to inflammatory endothelial cells in flowing whole blood: a critical role for P-selectin expressed on activated platelets. Circulation 116, 764–773 (2007) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ziegler-Heitbrock HW, Fingerle G, Strobel M, Schraut W, Stelter F, Schutt C, Passlick B, Pforte A: The novel subset of CD14+/CD16+ blood monocytes exhibits features of tissue macrophages. Eur J Immunol 23, 2053–2058 (1993) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Nasu N, Yoshida S, Akizuki S, Higuchi Y, Setoguchi M, Yamamoto S: Molecular and physiological properties of murine CD14. Int Immunol 3, 205–213 (1991) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Fleming TJ, Fleming ML, Malek TR: Selective expression of Ly-6G on myeloid lineage cells in mouse bone marrow. RB6–8C5 mAb to granulocyte-differentiation antigen (Gr-1) detects members of the Ly-6 family. J Immunol 151, 2399–2408 (1993) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Tacke F, Alvarez D, Kaplan TJ, Jakubzick C, Spanbroek R, Llodra J, Garin A, Liu J, Mack M, van Rooijen N, Lira SA, Habenicht AJ, Randolph GJ: Monocyte subsets differentially employ CCR2, CCR5, and CX3CR1 to accumulate within atherosclerotic plaques. J Clin Invest 117, 185–194 (2007) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Aschoff L: Das reticulo-endotheliale system. Ergeb Inn Med Kinderheilkd 26, 1–118 (1924) [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Laskin DL, Weinberger B, Laskin JD: Functional heterogeneity in liver and lung macrophages. J Leukoc Biol 70, 163–170 (2001) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Guillemin GJ, Brew BJ: Microglia, macrophages, perivascular macrophages, and pericytes: a review of function and identification. J Leukoc Biol 75, 388–397 (2004) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Stout RD, Jiang C, Matta B, Tietzel I, Watkins SK, Suttles J: Macrophages sequentially change their functional phenotype in response to changes in microenvironmental influences. J Immunol 175, 342–349 (2005) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Roos J, Auger M: The biology of the macrophage. In: The macrophage. Eds: Burke B, Lewis C, US. 1–72 (2002) [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Cecchini MG, Hofstetter W, Halasy J, Wetterwald A, Felix R: Role of CSF-1 in bone and bone marrow development. Mol Reprod Dev 46, 75–84 (1997) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Stanley E, Lieschke GJ, Grail D, Metcalf D, Hodgson G, Gall JA, Maher DW, Cebon J, Sinickas V, Dunn AR: Granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor-deficient mice show no major perturbation of hematopoiesis but develop a characteristic pulmonary pathology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91, 5592–5596 (1994) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wiktor-Jedrzejczak W, Bartocci A, Ferrante AW Jr., Ahmed-Ansari A, Sell KW, Pollard JW, Stanley ER: Total absence of colony-stimulating factor 1 in the macrophage-deficient osteopetrotic (op/op) mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 87, 4828–4832 (1990) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Begg SK, Radley JM, Pollard JW, Chisholm OT, Stanley ER, Bertoncello I: Delayed hematopoietic development in osteopetrotic (op/op) mice. J Exp Med 177, 237–242 (1993) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Glasow A, Prodromou N, Xu K, von Lindern M, Zelent A: Retinoids and myelomonocytic growth factors cooperatively activate RARA and induce human myeloid leukemia cell differentiation via MAP kinase pathways. Blood 105, 341–349 (2005) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kelley TW, Graham MM, Doseff AI, Pomerantz RW, Lau SM, Ostrowski MC, Franke TF, Marsh CB: Macrophage colony-stimulating factor promotes cell survival through Akt/protein kinase B. J Biol Chem 274, 26393–26398 (1999) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.van der Meer JW, van de Gevel J, van Furth R: In vitro proliferation of mononuclear phagocytes from murine and human bone marrow. Immunobiology 161, 212–218 (1982) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.van der Meer JW, van de Gevel JS, Beelen RH, Fluitsma D, Hoefsmit EC, van Furth R: Culture of human bone marrow in the teflon culture bag: identification of the human monoblast. J Reticuloendothel Soc 32, 355–369 (1982) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.van der Meer JW, van de Gevel JS, van Oud Alblas A. Blusse, Kramps JA, van Zwet TL, Leijh PC, van Furth R: Characteristics of human monocytes cultured in the Teflon culture bag. Immunology 47, 617–625 (1982) [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Fischer HG, Frosch S, Reske K, Reske-Kunz AB: Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor activates macrophages derived from bone marrow cultures to synthesis of MHC class II molecules and to augmented antigen presentation function. J Immunol 141, 3882–3888 (1988) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Longoni D, Piemonti L, Bernasconi S, Mantovani A. Allavena P: Interleukin-10 increases mannose receptor expression and endocytic activity in monocyte-derived dendritic cells. Int J Clin Lab Res 28, 162–169 (1998) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Morishima S, Morita I, Tokushima T, Kawashima H, Miyasaka M, Omura K, Murota S: Expression and role of mannose receptor/terminal high-mannose type oligosaccharide on osteoclast precursors during osteoclast formation. J Endocrinol 176, 285–292 (2003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Taylor PR, Martinez-Pomares L, Stacey M, Lin HH, Brown GD, Gordon S: Macrophage receptors and immune recognition. Annu Rev Immunol 23, 901–944 (2005) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Blum JS, Stahl PD, Diaz R, Fiani ML: Purification and characterization of the D-mannose receptor from J774 mouse macrophage cells. Carbohydr Res 213, 145–153 (1991) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Lendemans S, Rani M, Selbach C, Kreuzfelder E, Schade FU, Flohe S: GM-CSF priming of human monocytes is dependent on ERK1/2 activation. J Endotoxin Res 12, 10–20 (2006) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Hashimoto S, Suzuki T, Dong HY, Yamazaki N, Matsushima K: Serial analysis of gene expression in human monocytes and macrophages. Blood 94, 837–844 (1999) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Juan HF, Lin JY, Chang WH, Wu CY, Pan TL, Tseng MJ, Khoo KH, Chen ST: Biomic study of human myeloid leukemia cells differentiation to macrophages using DNA array, proteomic, and bioinformatic analytical methods. Electrophoresis 23, 2490–2504 (2002) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Kohro T, Tanaka T, Murakami T, Wada Y, Aburatani H, Hamakubo T, Kodama T: A comparison of differences in the gene expression profiles of phorbol 12myristate 13-acetate differentiated THP-1 cells and human monocyte-derived macrophage. J Atheroscler Thromb 11, 8–97 (2004) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Liu H, Shi B, Huang CC, Eksarko P, Pope RM: Transcriptional diversity during monocyte to macrophage differentiation. Immunol Lett 117, 70–80 (2008) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Scott EW, Simon MC, Anastasi J, Singh H: Requirement of transcription factor PU.1 in the development of multiple hematopoietic lineages. Science 265, 1573–1577 (1994) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Voss OH, Batra S, Kolattukudy SJ, Gonzalez-Mejia ME, Smith JB, Doseff AI: Binding of caspase-3 prodomain to heat shock protein 27 regulates monocyte apoptosis by inhibiting caspase-3 proteolytic activation. J Biol Chem 282, 25088–25099 (2007) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Jin M, Opalek JM, Marsh CB, Wu HM: Proteome comparison of alveolar macrophages with monocytes reveals distinct protein characteristics. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 31, 322–329 (2004) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Lewis CE, Pollard JW: Distinct role of macrophages in different tumor microenvironments. Cancer Res 66, 605–612 (2006) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Chen L, Willis SN, Wei A, Smith BJ, Fletcher JI, Hinds MG, Colman PM, Day CL, Adams JM, Huang DC: Differential targeting of prosurvival Bcl-2 proteins by their BH3-only ligands allows complementary apoptotic function. Mol Cell 17, 393–403 (2005) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Matsumoto E, Hatanaka M, Bohgaki M, Maeda S: PKC pathway and ERK/MAPK pathway are required for induction of cyclin D1 and p21Waf1 during 12-otetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate-induced differentiation of myeloleukemia cells. Kobe J Med Sci 52, 181–194 (2006) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Asada M, Yamada T, Fukumuro K, Mizutani S: p21Cip1/WAF1 is important for differentiation and survival of U937 cells. Leukemia 12, 1944–1950 (1998) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Brugarolas J, Chandrasekaran C, Gordon JI, Beach D, Jacks T, Hannon GJ: Radiation-induced cell cycle arrest compromised by p21 deficiency. Nature 377, 552–557 (1995) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Scatizzi JC, Hutcheson J, Bickel E, Woods JM, Klosowska K, Moore TL, Haines GK 3rd, Perlman H: p21Cip1 is required for the development of monocytes and their response to serum transfer-induced arthritis. Am J Pathol 168, 1531–1541 (2006) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Leibovich SJ, Ross R: The role of the macrophage in wound repair. A study with hydrocortisone and antimacrophage serum. Am J Pathol 78, 71–100 (1975) [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Fadok VA, Bratton DL, Konowal A, Freed PW, Westcott JY, Henson PM: Macrophages that have ingested apoptotic cells in vitro inhibit proinflammatory cytokine production through autocrine/paracrine mechanisms involving TGF-β, PGE2, and PAF. J Clin Invest 101, 890–898 (1998) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Trautmann A, Valitutti S.: The diversity of immunological synapses. Current Opinion in Immunology 15, 249–254 (2003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Shackelford DA, Kaufman JF, Korman AJ, Strominger JL: HLA-DR antigens: structure, separation of subpopulations, gene cloning and function. Immunol Rev 66, 133–187 (1982) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Cresswell P: Assembly, transport, and function of MHC class II molecules. Annu Rev Immunol 12, 259–293 (1994) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Santin AD, Hermonat PL, Ravaggi A, Chiriva-Internati M, Cannon MJ, Hiserodt JC, Pecorelli S, Parham GP: Expression of surface antigens during the differentiation of human dendritic cells vs macrophages from blood monocytes in vitro. Immunobiology 200, 187–204 (1999) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Waldburger JM, Suter T, Fontana A, Acha-Orbea H, Reith W: Selective abrogation of major histocompatibility complex class II expression on extrahematopoietic cells in mice lacking promoter IV of the class II transactivator gene. J Exp Med 194, 393–406 (2001) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Akira S, Uematsu S, Takeuchi O: Pathogen recognition and innate immunity. Cell 124, 783–801 (2006) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.de Almeida CJ, Linden R: Phagocytosis of apoptotic cells: a matter of balance. Cell Mol Life Sci 62, 1532–1546 (2005) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Callahan MK, Williamson P, Schlegel RA: Surface expression of phosphatidylserine on macrophages is required for phagocytosis of apoptotic thymocytes. Cell Death Differ 7, 645–653 (2000) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Arur S, Uche UE, Rezaul K, Fong M, Scranton V, Cowan AE, Mohler W, Han DK: Annexin I is an endogenous ligand that mediates apoptotic cell engulfment. Dev Cell 4, 587–598 (2003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Fadok VA, Bratton DL, Frasch SC, Warner ML, Henson PM: The role of phosphatidylserine in recognition of apoptotic cells by phagocytes. Cell Death Differ 5, 551–562 (1998) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Platt N, Suzuki H, Kurihara Y, Kodama T, Gordon S: Role for the class A macrophage scavenger receptor in the phagocytosis of apoptotic thymocytes in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93, 12456–12460 (1996) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Luciani MF, Chimini G: The ATP binding cassette transporter ABC1, is required for the engulfment of corpses generated by apoptotic cell death. Embo J 15, 226–235 (1996) [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Underhill DM, Gantner B: Integration of Toll-like receptor and phagocytic signaling for tailored immunity. Microbes Infect 6, 1368–1373 (2004) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Underhill DM, Ozinsky A: Toll-like receptors: key mediators of microbe detection. Curr Opin Immunol 14, 103–110 (2002) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Underhill DM, Ozinsky A: Phagocytosis of microbes: complexity in action. Annu Rev Immunol 20, 825–852 (2002) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Duvall E, Wyllie AH, Morris RG: Macrophage recognition of cells undergoing programmed cell death (apoptosis). Immunology 56, 351–358 (1985) [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Savill J, Dransfield I, Hogg N, Haslett C: Vitronectin receptor-mediated phagocytosis of cells undergoing apoptosis. Nature 343, 170–173 (1990) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Metchnikoff E: Immunity in infective diseases. Eds: Cambridge University Press, London, Glasgow. 1–168 (1905) [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Souza GM, Mehta DP, Lammertz M, Rodriguez-Paris J, Wu R, Cardelli JA, Freeze HH: Dictyostelium lysosomal proteins with different sugar modifications sort to functionally distinct compartments. J Cell Sci 110 (Pt 18), 2239–2248 (1997) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Melo RC, Fabrino DL, D’Avila H, Teixeira HC, Ferreira AP: Production of hydrogen peroxide by peripheral blood monocytes and specific macrophages during experimental infection with Trypanosoma cruzi in vivo. Cell Biol Int 27, 853–861 (2003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Jaramillo M, Olivier M: Hydrogen peroxide induces murine macrophage chemokine gene transcription via extracellular signal-regulated kinase- and cyclic adenosine 5’-monophosphate (cAMP)-dependent pathways: involvement of NF-κB, activator protein 1, and cAMP response element binding protein. J Immunol 169, 7026–7038 (2002) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Tilney LG, Portnoy DA: Actin filaments and the growth, movement, and spread of the intracellular bacterial parasite, Listeria monocytogenes. J Cell Biol 109, 1597–1608 (1989) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Waghabi MC, Coutinho CM, Soeiro MN, Pereira MC, Feige JJ, Keramidas M, Cosson A, Minoprio P, Van Leuven F, Araujo-Jorge TC: Increased Trypanosoma cruzi invasion and heart fibrosis associated with high transforming growth factor β levels in mice deficient in α(2)-macroglobulin. Infect Immun 70, 5115–5123 (2002) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Perez-Fuentes R, Lopez-Colombo A, Ordonez-Toquero G, Gomez-Albino I, Ramos J, Torres-Rasgado E, Salgado-Rosas H, Romero-Diaz M, Pulido-Perez P, Sanchez-Guillen MC: Correlation of the serum concentrations of tumour necrosis factor and nitric oxide with disease severity in chronic Chagas disease (American trypanosomiasis). Ann Trop Med Parasitol 101, 123–132 (2007) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Burnett SH, Beus BJ, Avdiushko R, Qualls J, Kaplan AM, Cohen DA: Development of peritoneal adhesions in macrophage depleted mice. J Surg Res 131, 296–301 (2006) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Burnett SH, Kershen EJ, Zhang J, Zeng L, Straley SC, Kaplan AM, Cohen DA: Conditional macrophage ablation in transgenic mice expressing a Fas-based suicide gene. J Leukoc Biol 75, 612–623 (2004) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Doseff AI: Apoptosis: the sculptor of development. Stem Cells Dev 13, 473–483 (2004) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.White E: Life, death, and the pursuit of apoptosis. Genes Dev 10, 1–15 (1996) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Thornberry NA, Lazebnik Y: Caspases: enemies within. Science 281, 1312–1316 (1998) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Creagh EM, Conroy H, Martin SJ: Caspase-activation pathways in apoptosis and immunity. Immunol Rev 193, 10–21 (2003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Fan TJ, Han LH, Cong RS, Liang J: Caspase family proteases and apoptosis. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin 37, 719–727 (2005) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Sansonetti PJ, Phalipon A, Arondel J, Thirumalai K, Banerjee S, Akira S, Takeda K, Zychlinsky A: Caspase-1 activation of IL-1β and IL-18 are essential for Shigella flexneri-induced inflammation. Immunity 12, 581–590 (2000) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Rowe SJ, Allen L, Ridger VC, Hellewell PG, Whyte MK: Caspase-1-deficient mice have delayed neutrophil apoptosis and a prolonged inflammatory response to lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury. J Immunol 169, 6401–6407 (2002) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Martinon F, Tschopp J: Inflammatory caspases and inflammasomes: master switches of inflammation. Cell Death Differ 14, 10–22 (2007) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Alcivar A, Hu S, Tang J, Yang X: DEDD and DEDD2 associate with caspase-8/10 and signal cell death. Oncogene 22, 291–297 (2003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Ashkenazi A, Dixit VM: Death receptors: signaling and modulation. Science 281, 1305–1308 (1998) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Brown NJ, Hutcheson J, Bickel E, Scatizzi JC, Albee LD, Haines GK 3rd, Eslick J, Bradley K, Taricone E, Perlman H: Fas death receptor signaling represses monocyte numbers and macrophage activation in vivo. J Immunol 173, 7584–7593 (2004) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Suliman A, Lam A, Datta R, Srivastava RK: Intracellular mechanisms of TRAIL: apoptosis through mitochondrial-dependent and -independent pathways. Oncogene 20, 2122–2133 (2001) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Schwandner R, Wiegmann K, Bernardo K, Kreder D, Kronke M: TNF receptor death domain-associated proteins TRADD and FADD signal activation of acid sphingomyelinase. J Biol Chem 273, 5916–5922 (1998) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Green DR, Kroemer G: The pathophysiology of mitochondrial cell death. Science 305, 626–629 (2004) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Scaffidi C, Medema JP, Krammer PH, Peter ME: FLICE is predominantly expressed as two functionally active isoforms, caspase-8/a and caspase-8/b. J Biol Chem 72, 26953–26958 (1997) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Barnhart BC, Lee JC, Alappat EC, Peter ME: The death effector domain protein family. Oncogene 22, 8634–8644 (2003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Medema JP, Scaffidi C, Kischkel FC, Shevchenko A, Mann M, Krammer PH, Peter ME: FLICE is activated by association with the CD95 death-inducing signaling complex (DISC). Embo J 16, 2794–2804 (1997) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Kiener PA, Davis PM, Starling GC, Mehlin C, Klebanoff SJ, Ledbetter JA, Liles WC: Differential induction of apoptosis by Fas-Fas ligand interactions in human monocytes and macrophages. J Exp Med 185, 1511–1516 (1997) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Nagata S, Suda T: Fas and Fas ligand: lpr and gld mutations. Immunol Today 16, 39–43 (1995) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Varfolomeev EE, Schuchmann M, Luria V, Chiannilkulchai N, Beckmann JS, Mett IL, Rebrikov D, Brodianski VM, Kemper OC, Kollet O, Lapidot T, Soffer D, Sobe T, Avraham KB, Goncharov T, Holtmann H, Lonai P, Wallach D: Targeted disruption of the mouse caspase-8 gene ablates cell death induction by the TNF receptors, Fas/Apo1, and DR3 and is lethal prenatally. Immunity 9, 267–276 (1998) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Kuida K, Haydar TF, Kuan CY, Gu Y, Taya C, Karasuyama H, Su MS, Rakic P, Flavell RA: Reduced apoptosis and cytochrome c-mediated caspase activation in mice lacking caspase-9. Cell 94, 325–337 (1998) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Kuida K, Zheng TS, Na S, Kuan C, Yang D, Karasuyama H, Rakic P, Flavell RA: Decreased apoptosis in the brain and premature lethality in CPP32-deficient mice. Nature 384, 368–372 (1996) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Cui H, Schroering A, Ding HF: p53 mediates DNA damaging drug-induced apoptosis through a caspase-9dependent pathway in SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells. Mol Cancer Ther 1, 679–686 (2002) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Li P, Nijhawan D, Budihardjo I, Srinivasula SM, Ahmad M, Alnemri ES, Wang X: Cytochrome c and dATP-dependent formation of Apaf-1/caspase-9 complex initiates an apoptotic protease cascade. Cell 91, 479–489 (1997) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Cain K, Brown DG, Langlais C, Cohen GM: Caspase activation involves the formation of the apoptosome, a large (approximately 700 kDa) caspase-activating complex. J Biol Chem 274, 22686–22692 (1999) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Gao Z, Tian Y, Wang J, Yin Q, Wu H, Li YM, Jiang X: A dimeric Smac/diablo peptide directly relieves caspase-3 inhibition by XIAP. Dynamic and cooperative regulation of XIAP by Smac/Diablo. J Biol Chem 282, 30718–30727 (2007) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Sordet O, Rebe C, Leroy I, Bruey JM, Garrido C, Miguet C, Lizard G, Plenchette S, Corcos L, Solary E: Mitochondria-targeting drugs arsenic trioxide and lonidamine bypass the resistance of TPA-differentiated leukemic cells to apoptosis. Blood 97, 3931–3940 (2001) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Vaux DL, Cory S, Adams JM: Bcl-2 gene promotes haemopoietic cell survival and cooperates with cmyc to immortalize pre-B cells. Nature 335, 440–442 (1988) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Cory S, Adams JM: The Bcl2 family: regulators of the cellular life-or-death switch. Nat Rev Cancer 2, 647–656 (2002) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Burlacu A: Regulation of apoptosis by Bcl-2 family proteins. J Cell Mol Med 7, 249–257 (2003) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Dasmahapatra G, Almenara JA, Grant S: Flavopiridol and histone deacetylase inhibitors promote mitochondrial injury and cell death in human leukemia cells that overexpress Bcl-2. Mol Pharmacol 69, 288–298 (2006) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Dai Y, Dent P, Grant S: Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) promotes mitochondrial dysfunction and apoptosis induced by 7hydroxystaurosporine and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase inhibitors in human leukemia cells that ectopically express Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL. Mol Pharmacol 64, 1402–1409 (2003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Berthier A, Lemaire-Ewing S, Prunet C, Monier S, Athias A, Bessede G, Pais de Barros JP, Laubriet A, Gambert P, Lizard G, Neel D: Involvement of a calcium-dependent dephosphorylation of BAD associated with the localization of Trpc-1 within lipid rafts in 7ketocholesterol-induced THP-1 cell apoptosis. Cell Death Differ 11, 897–905 (2004) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Chatterjee D, Pantazis P, Li G, Bremner TA, Hendrickson EA, Wyche JH: Susceptibility to apoptosis is restored in human leukemia HCW-2 cells following induction and stabilization of the apoptotic effector Bak. Oncogene 19, 4108–4116 (2000) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Aggarwal BB: Nuclear factor-kappaB: the enemy within. Cancer Cell 6, 203–208 (2004) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Pagliari LJ, Perlman H, Liu H, Pope RM: Macrophages require constitutive NF-κB activation to maintain A1 expression and mitochondrial homeostasis. Mol Cell Biol 20, 8855–8865 (2000) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Rosato RR, Almenara JA, Kolla SS, Maggio SC, Coe S, Gimenez MS, Dent P, Grant S: Mechanism and functional role of XIAP and Mcl-1 down-regulation in flavopiridol/vorinostat antileukemic interactions. Mol Cancer Ther 6, 692–702 (2007) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Liu H, Huang Q, Shi B, Eksarko P, Temkin V, Pope RM: Regulation of Mcl-1 expression in rheumatoid arthritis synovial macrophages. Arthritis Rheum 54, 3174–3181 (2006) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Liu H, Ma Y, Cole SM, Zander C, Chen KH, Karras J, Pope RM: Serine phosphorylation of STAT3 is essential for Mcl-1 expression and macrophage survival. Blood 102, 344–352 (2003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Hasan Z, Ashraf M, Tayyebi A, Hussain R: M. leprae inhibits apoptosis in THP-1 cells by downregulation of Bad and Bak and upregulation of Mcl-1 gene expression. BMC Microbiol 6, 78 (2006) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.She QB, Solit DB, Ye Q, O’Reilly KE, Lobo J, Rosen N: The BAD protein integrates survival signaling by EGFR/MAPK and PI3K/Akt kinase pathways in PTEN-deficient tumor cells. Cancer Cell 8, 287–297 (2005) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Antignani A, Youle RJ: How do Bax and Bak lead to permeabilization of the outer mitochondrial membrane? Curr Opin Cell Biol 18, 685–689 (2006) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Baines CP, Kaiser RA, Sheiko T, Craigen WJ, Molkentin JD: Voltage-dependent anion channels are dispensable for mitochondrial-dependent cell death. Nat Cell Biol 9, 550–555 (2007) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Paquet C, Schmitt E, Beauchemin M, Bertrand R: Activation of multidomain and BH3-only pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family members in p53-defective cells. Apoptosis 9, 815–831 (2004) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Li H, Zhu H, Xu CJ, Yuan J: Cleavage of BID by caspase-8 mediates the mitochondrial damage in the Fas pathway of apoptosis. Cell 94, 491–501 (1998) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Reyland ME: Protein Kinase C and apoptosis. In: Apoptosis, Cell signaling and Human Diseases. Ed: Srivastava R, Totowa, NJ. 2, 31–55 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Mellor H, Parker PJ: The extended protein kinase C superfamily. Biochem J 332 (Pt 2), 281–292 (1998) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Monick MM, Carter AB, Gudmundsson G, Geist LJ, Hunninghake GW: Changes in PKC isoforms in human alveolar macrophages compared with blood monocytes. Am J Physiol 275, L389–397 (1998) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Lin YF, Lee HM, Leu SJ, Tsai YH: The essentiality of PKCα and PKCβ translocation for CD14+ monocyte differentiation towards macrophages and dendritic cells, respectively. J Cell Biochem 102, 429–441 (2007) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Aksoy E, Goldman M, Willems F: Protein kinase Cε: a new target to control inflammation and immune-mediated disorders. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 36, 183–188 (2004) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Brodie C, Blumberg PM: Regulation of cell apoptosis by Protein Kinase Cδ. Apoptosis 8, 19–27 (2003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Garin G, Abe J, Mohan A, Lu W, Yan C, Newby AC, Rhaman A, Berk BC: Flow antagonizes TNFα signaling in endothelial cells by inhibiting caspase-dependent PKCζ processing. Circ Res 101, 97–105 (2007) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Basu A, Lu D, Sun B, Moor AN, Akkaraju GR, Huang J: Proteolytic activation of protein kinase Cε by caspase-mediated processing and transduction of antiapoptotic signals. J Biol Chem 277, 41850–41856 (2002) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Gomel R, Xiang C, Finniss S, Lee HK, Lu W, Okhrimenko H, Brodie C: The localization of Protein Kinase Cδ in different subcellular sites affects its proapoptotic and antiapoptotic functions and the activation of distinct downstream signaling pathways. Mol Cancer Res 5, 627–639 (2007) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Blass M, Kronfeld I, Kazimirsky G, Blumberg PM, Brodie C: Tyrosine phosphorylation of protein kinase Cδ is essential for its apoptotic effect in response to etoposide. Mol Cell Biol 22, 182–195 (2002) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Voss OH, Kim S, Wewers MD, Doseff AI: Regulation of monocyte apoptosis by the protein kinase Cδ-dependent phosphorylation of caspase-3. J Biol Chem 280, 17371–17379 (2005) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Ross R: Atherosclerosis an inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med 340, 115–126 (1999) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Crook NE, Clem RJ, Miller LK: An apoptosis-inhibiting baculovirus gene with a zinc finger-like motif. J Virol 67, 2168–2174 (1993) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Joazeiro CA, Weissman AM: RING finger proteins: mediators of ubiquitin ligase activity. Cell 102, 549–552 (2000) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Bratton SB, Walker G, Srinivasula SM, Sun XM, Butterworth M, Alnemri ES, Cohen GM: Recruitment, activation and retention of caspases-9 and −3 by Apaf-1 apoptosome and associated XIAP complexes. Embo J 20, 998–1009 (2001) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Riedl SJ, Renatus M, Schwarzenbacher R, Zhou Q, Sun C, Fesik SW, Liddington RC, Salvesen GS: Structural basis for the inhibition of caspase-3 by XIAP. Cell 104, 791–800 (2001) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Deveraux QL, Takahashi R, Salvesen GS, Reed JC: X-linked IAP is a direct inhibitor of cell-death proteases. Nature 388, 300–304 (1997) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Deveraux QL, Leo E, Stennicke HR, Welsh K, Salvesen GS, Reed JC: Cleavage of human inhibitor of apoptosis protein XIAP results in fragments with distinct specificities for caspases. Embo J 18, 5242–5251 (1999) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Partheniou F, Kelsey SM, Srinivasula SM, Newland AC, Alnemri ES, Jia L: c-IAP1 blocks TNFα-mediated cytotoxicity upstream of caspase-dependent and independent mitochondrial events in human leukemic cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 287, 181–189 (2001) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Cui X, Imaizumi T, Yoshida H, Tanji K, Matsumiya T, Satoh K: Lipopolysaccharide induces the expression of cellular inhibitor of apoptosis protein-2 in human macrophages. Biochim Biophys Acta 1524, 178–182 (2000) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Mera S, Magnusson M, Tarkowski A, Bokarewa M: Extracellular survivin up-regulates adhesion molecules on the surface of leukocytes changing their reactivity pattern. J Leukoc Biol 83, 149–155 (2008) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Tamm I, Richter S, Scholz F, Schmelz K, Oltersdorf D, Karawajew L, Schoch C, Haferlach T, Ludwig WD, Wuchter C: XIAP expression correlates with monocytic differentiation in adult de novo AML: impact on prognosis. Hematol J 5, 489–495 (2004) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Lanneau D, Brunet M, Frisan E, Solary E, Fontenay M, Garrido C: Heat shock proteins: essential proteins for apoptosis regulation. J Cell Mol Med (2008) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Kuppner MC, Gastpar R, Gelwer S, Nossner E, Ochmann O, Scharner A, Issels RD: The role of heat shock protein (hsp70) in dendritic cell maturation: hsp70 induces the maturation of immature dendritic cells but reduces DC differentiation from monocyte precursors. Eur J Immunol 31, 1602–1609 (2001) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Paul C, Manero F, Gonin S, Kretz-Remy C, Virot S, Arrigo AP: Hsp27 as a negative regulator of cytochrome C release. Mol Cell Biol 22, 816–834 (2002) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Havasi A, Li Z, Wang Z, Martin JL, Botla V, Ruchalski K, Schwartz JH, Borkan SC: Hsp27 inhibits Bax activation and apoptosis via a PI3 kinase-dependent mechanism. J Biol Chem (2008) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Garrido C, Bruey JM, Fromentin A, Hammann A, Arrigo AP, Solary E: HSP27 inhibits cytochrome c-dependent activation of procaspase-9. Faseb J 13, 2061–2070 (1999) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Moreno-Altamirano MM, Aguilar-Carmona I, Sanchez-Garcia FJ: Expression of GM1, a marker of lipid rafts, defines two subsets of human monocytes with differential endocytic capacity and lipopolysaccharide responsiveness. Immunology 120, 536–543 (2007) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Kawai T, Akira S: Pathogen recognition with Toll-like receptors. Curr Opin Immunol 17, 338–344 (2005) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Gay NJ, Gangloff M: Structure and function of Toll receptors and their ligands. Annu Rev Biochem 76, 141–165 (2007) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Means TK, Golenbock DT, Fenton MJ: The biology of Toll-like receptors. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 11, 219–232 (2000) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Alexopoulou L, Holt AC, Medzhitov R, Flavell RA: Recognition of double-stranded RNA and activation of NF-κB by Toll-like receptor 3. Nature 413, 732–738 (2001) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Remer KA, Brcic M, Sauter KS, Jungi TW: Human monocytoid cells as a model to study Toll-like receptor-mediated activation. J Immunol Methods 313, 1–10 (2006) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Bosshart H, Heinzelmann M: Lipopolysaccharide-mediated cell activation without rapid mobilization of cytosolic free calcium. Mol Immunol 41, 1023–1028 (2004) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Leber JH, Crimmins GT, Raghavan S, Meyer-Morse NP, Cox JS, Portnoy DA: Distinct TLR- and NLR-mediated transcriptional responses to an intracellular pathogen. PLoS Pathog 4, e6 (2008) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Doz E, Rose S, Nigou J, Gilleron M, Puzo G, Erard F, Ryffel B, Quesniaux VF: Acylation determines the toll-like receptor (TLR)-dependent positive versus TLR2-, mannose receptor-, and SIGNR1- independent negative regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines by mycobacterial lipomannan. J Biol Chem 282, 26014–26025 (2007) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Nakagawa J, Saio M, Tamakawa N, Suwa T, Frey AB, Nonaka K, Umemura N, Imai H, Ouyang GF, Ohe N, Yano H, Yoshimura S, Iwama T, Takami T: TNF expressed by tumor-associated macrophages, but not microglia, can eliminate glioma. Int J Oncol 30, 803–811 (2007) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Andreakos ET, Foxwell BM, Brennan FM, Maini RN, Feldmann M: Cytokines and anti-cytokine biologicals in autoimmunity: present and future. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 13, 299–313 (2002) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Williams TJ, Peck MJ: Role of prostaglandin-mediated vasodilatation in inflammation. Nature 270, 530–532 (1977) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Levy BD, Clish CB, Schmidt B, Gronert K, Serhan CN: Lipid mediator class switching during acute inflammation: signals in resolution. Nat Immunol 2, 612–619 (2001) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Savill J, Fadok V: Corpse clearance defines the meaning of cell death. Nature 407, 784–788 (2000) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Bhavsar MD, Amiji MM: Oral IL-10 gene delivery in a microsphere-based formulation for local transfection and therapeutic efficacy in inflammatory bowel disease. Gene Ther 1–10 (2008) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Takeuchi T: Treatment of Inflammatory Immunologic Disease 3. Anti-TNF Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Internal Medicine 46, 1311–13112 (2007) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Isaacs KL, Lewis JD, Sandborn WJ, Sands BE, Targan SR: State of the art: IBD therapy and clinical trials in IBD. Inflamm Bowel Dis 11 Suppl 1, S3–12 (2005) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Wijbrandts CA, Dijkgraaf MG, Kraan MC, Vinkenoog M, Smeets TJ, Dinant H, Vos K, Lems WF, Wolbink GJ, Sijpkens DE, Dijkmans BA, Tak P: The clinical response to infliximab in rheumatoid arthritis is in part dependent on pre-treatment TNFα expression in the synovium. Ann Rheum Dis (2007) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES