Skip to main content
BMJ Open logoLink to BMJ Open
. 2026 Feb 12;16(2):e103989. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103989

Assessment of health-related quality of life and treatment satisfaction and their associated factors among older adults with heart failure: a prospective observational study in selected hospitals in Northwest Ethiopia

Getachew Yitayew Tarekegn 1,, Fisseha Nigussie Dagnew 2, Samuel Agegnew Wondm 3, Sisay Sitotaw Anberbr 4, Fasil Bayafers Tamene 3, Sintayehu Simie Tsega 5, Zufan Alamrie Asmare 6, Tirsit Ketsela Zeleke 7, Samuel Berihun Dagnew 2, Tigabu Eskeziya Zerihun 2, Abel Temeche Kassaw 2, Desalegn Addis Mussie 8, Teferi Bihonegn Melese 8, Tilaye Arega Moges 9
PMCID: PMC12911690  PMID: 41689221

Abstract

Abstract

Objectives

To assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL), treatment satisfaction and associated factors among older adults with acute heart failure in Northwest Ethiopia.

Design

Prospective, multicentre observational study.

Setting

Three tertiary hospitals in Northwest Ethiopia provide secondary and tertiary care services.

Participants

A total of 422 patients aged ≥60 years with a confirmed diagnosis of acute heart failure were consecutively enrolled between December 2024 and April 2025. Patients with unstable psychiatric conditions or advanced kidney disease were excluded.

Outcome measures

HRQoL was assessed using the WHO Quality of Life – Brief Version questionnaire, and treatment satisfaction was measured using the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM). Multiple linear regression identified factors associated with HRQoL and treatment satisfaction.

Results

95% of participants reported moderate HRQoL, and 3% reported poor HRQoL. Weight loss was positively associated with HRQoL (β=1.52; 95% CI 0.04 to 3.07; p=0.021), whereas asthma was negatively associated with HRQoL (β = –3.28; 95% CI 6.94 to 0.37; p=0.001). Regarding treatment satisfaction, 65% of patients were moderately satisfied, with notable concerns regarding medication safety and overall experience. Rural residents reported lower satisfaction than urban residents (β = –0.20; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.05; p=0.007). Patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III had higher satisfaction (β=0.25; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.45; p=0.016). Effective hypertension management was linked to increased satisfaction (β=0.20; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.37; p=0.026), whereas coronary heart disease was associated with lower satisfaction (β = –0.40; 95% CI 0.64 to 0.88; p=0.012).

Conclusions

Among older adults with heart failure in Northwest Ethiopia, 98% reported moderate to low HRQoL. Asthma and polypharmacy negatively affected HRQoL, whereas weight loss was positively associated with HRQoL. An NYHA class III status and well-managed hypertension improved treatment satisfaction, whereas rural residency and coronary heart disease were associated with lower satisfaction. These findings underscore the need for targeted interventions to enhance outcomes and QoL in this vulnerable population.

Keywords: Heart failure, Ethiopia, Adult cardiology


STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY.

  • (1) The prospective multicentre design across three tertiary hospitals improved methodological rigour.

  • The use of validated instruments (WHO Quality of Life – Brief Version and Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication) allowed standardised assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and treatment satisfaction.

  • Rigorous training and quality control minimised measurement bias.

  • Lack of heart failure–specific HRQoL tools and validated multimorbidity assessment may have affected measurement precision.

  • The observational design precludes the establishment of causal relationships between variables.

Introduction

Heart failure (HF) is a significant global health concern, affecting approximately 64 million individuals worldwide and ranking among the leading causes of morbidity and mortality, particularly in older adults.1 In Africa, HF prevalence is rising, affecting 1%–2% of adults2, and in sub-Saharan Africa, it accounts for about 10% of adult hospital admissions.3 HF affects nearly 6% of adults in Ethiopia, imposing substantial strain on an already resource-limited healthcare system.4

HF not only compromises physical health but also significantly diminishes health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and treatment satisfaction. Older adults with HF frequently report lower HRQoL scores than younger populations, reflecting substantial limitations in physical, emotional and social well-being.5,7 Treatment satisfaction is a key component of effective HF management, as higher satisfaction is associated with better medication adherence and improved clinical outcomes.8,10 Nevertheless, a considerable proportion of elderly patients with HF report dissatisfaction with their treatment experience.11

Despite the recognised importance of HRQoL and treatment satisfaction, there is a paucity of data specifically examining older adults with acute HF (AHF) in Ethiopia. Existing studies tend to focus on clinical parameters while overlooking patients’ subjective experiences, which are critical for designing effective, patient-centred interventions. This gap limits healthcare providers’ ability to deliver tailored care to this vulnerable population. To address this gap, this study assessed HRQoL, treatment satisfaction and associated factors among older patients with AHF in selected hospitals in Northwest Ethiopia. Insights from this research aim to inform the development of policies and interventions that enhance patient-centred care, improve treatment outcomes and increase the QoL for older patients living with HF.

Methods

Study setting, period and design

A multicentre prospective observational study was conducted from January to July 2024 at three tertiary hospitals in Northwest Ethiopia: Debre Tabor, Tibebe Ghion and Felege Hiwot Comprehensive Specialised Hospitals. Participants were enrolled based on predefined inclusion criteria, with a response rate of 92.1%. These hospitals serve populations of approximately 3, 7 and 7 million, respectively, in the Amhara region.

Population and inclusion and exclusion criteria

The source population comprised all patients diagnosed with AHF at the study sites. The study population included patients who met the following inclusion criteria: aged ≥60 years, confirmed diagnosis of HF and currently treated for the condition.

Sample size and sampling technique

The sample size was calculated using the single proportion formula:

n=Z² × P (1 − P) / W²,

where:

  • n is the sample size.

  • Z is the standard normal value of 95% CI (1.96)

  • P is the estimated proportion (assumed to be 50% due to the absence of prior data)

  • W is the margin of error (0.05).

Substituting the value:

n = (1.96) ² × 0.5 (1–0.5) / (0.05) ² = 384

To account for a 10% non-response rate, the final sample size was adjusted to 422.

Participants were proportionally allocated to each hospital patient load over the past 5 months using the following formula:

Ni = (Ni / N) × n,

where ni is the sample from each hospital, Ni is the number of eligible patients in each hospital and N is the total number of patients, as depicted in figure 1. A consecutive sampling method was used to select patients, with unique identification numbers ensuring no duplicates.

Figure 1. Schematic of the proportional allocation of the sample population across study sites in selected comprehensive hospitals in the Amhara region from June to November (n=422). CSH, Comprehensive Specialised Hospital.

Figure 1

Study variables

This study examined factors associated with HRQoL and treatment satisfaction among elderly patients with HF. The dependent outcome measures consisted of HRQoL and patients’ satisfaction with treatment. The independent variables, however, ranged from sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, marital status, place of residence, religion, education level, occupation status and insurance coverage. Clinic variables such as the HF type (acute decompensated HF or chronic HF), chronic diseases (hypertension and diabetes), substance use (alcohol, smoking and khat), duration of diagnosis, depression and anxiety levels, thyroid function test result, history of thyroid surgery, family history of HF and dietary habit (salt intake) were assessed. Weight loss was defined as unintentional loss exceeding 5% of the patient’s body weight over the previous 6 months.

Additionally, clinical indicators include the length of hospital stay, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and various clinical signs such as pulmonary rales, shortness of breath during exertion, ankle swelling, weight loss, liver enlargement and night-time coughing. The study also looked at treatment-related variables, such as the current treatment regimen and medication history. Furthermore, khat, a psychoactive plant chewed for its stimulant effects in Ethiopia and nearby areas, may have cardiovascular implications and affect medication adherence. Its consumption was examined as a variable for potential health outcomes in patients with HF.

Classification of heart failure phenotypes

Participants’ HF phenotypes were classified according to the LVEF from echocardiographic evaluations. HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) was defined as LVEF <40%, whereas HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) was defined as LVEF ≥50%. Patients with LVEF between 40% and 49% were categorised as having HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF). The study revealed a mean LVEF of 43%, indicating a significant prevalence of patients in the HFpEF and HFmrEF categories. This classification was essential for analysing the treatment differences, symptom profiles and HRQoL outcomes, impacting the clinical management and patient-reported results in the study design and analysis.

Operational definitions and definitions of terms

Health-related quality measures

  • HRQoL: based on the 26-item WHO Quality of Life – Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire, an individual with a score approaching 100 indicates the best possible QoL, and individuals with a score approaching 0 indicate the poorest QoL.12

  • Treatment satisfaction: a comprehensive evaluation of a patient’s contentment with the overall healthcare experience, including the effectiveness of treatment, quality of communication with healthcare providers and perceived adequacy of care received, assessed through standardised satisfaction surveys.

Behavioural and sociodemographic factors

  • Substance use: using at least one specific substance (alcohol, khat and cigarette) for non-medical purposes within the last 3 months according to alcohol, smoking and substance involvement screening tools.

  • Sociodemographic characteristics: key attributes such as age, sex, marital status, residence (urban/rural), religion, educational status, occupation and health insurance status can influence health outcomes and access to care.

Clinical and chronic disease measures

  • Chronic diseases: long-term health conditions such as hypertension and diabetes that persist over time and affect a patient’s QoL and treatment efficacy.13

  • LVEF: a measurement of the percentage of blood ejected from the heart during contraction, which indicates cardiac function.14 15

  • NYHA class: a system categorising HF severity based on physical activity limitations, from class I (no limitations) to class IV (severe limitations).16

  • Weight loss: unintentional loss exceeding 5% of the patient’s body weight over the previous 6 months.

Data collection, tools, instruments and procedures

A structured questionnaire adapted from previous studies and translated into Amharic was used.6 9 17 18 It was prepared in English and translated into the local Amharic language. Data were collected by interviewing patients using a tool consisting of four parts. The first part covered sociodemographic variables such as age, sex, marital status, residence, educational status, occupation, substance use and health insurance status. The second part included variables such as the presence of chronic disease, diagnostic types, illness and treatment duration and treatment modality. The third part assessed HRQoL using the WHOQOL–BREF with a 26-item questionnaire measuring four domains, namely, physical, psychological, social and environmental health, along with two items on overall QoL and health perception. Domain scores were calculated by the average item response for the domain. The fourth section assessed treatment satisfaction using the Treatment Satisfaction with Medicines Questionnaire (TSQM), a validated instrument consisting of 17 items across six dimensions: treatment effectiveness, convenience, side effects, medical care, impact on daily activities and global satisfaction.19 Responses were recorded on a 5-point Likert scale, and total raw scores (ranging from 0 to 68) were transformed to a 0–100 scale using the formula: Y’ = [(Yobs-Ymin) / (Ymax-Ymin)] ×100= Yobs × 1.471, where Ymax=68 (maximum total score), Ymin=0 (minimum total score), Yobs=total score obtained by the patient and Y’ = transformed score.

The WHOQOL-BREF, a generic QoL instrument, was used to assess the HRQoL in this study. It evaluates multiple domains but may not fully address HF-specific symptoms, such as fatigue and dyspnoea, which are better captured by instruments such as the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire20 and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire.21 The lack of validated multi-morbidity assessment tools, especially those tailored to local contexts, further affects HRQoL measurement sensitivity and specificity. Nevertheless, the WHOQOL-BREF was preferred for its feasibility and low resource needs. Treatment satisfaction was assessed using the TSQM questionnaire, a validated instrument that provides a standardised evaluation of patients’ perceptions of their treatment.22 These tools facilitated a broad assessment of HRQoL and treatment satisfaction while recognising the potential underestimations of HF challenges.

The HRQoL and TSQM cut-off values were classified as poor (<60%), moderate (60%–80%) and good (>80%). The percentage obtained from the mean score and SD was used to categorise treatment satisfaction. Because the interviewer-administered questionnaire was structured, inter-rater reliability was not applicable. Nevertheless, uniform interviewer training and data-gathering practices preserved the quality of the data. Cronbach’s alpha was used to evaluate the measurement tool’s internal consistency; the result was α=0.82, which indicates good reliability.

Outcome measures and validation

Primary outcomes were HRQoL and treatment satisfaction. WHOQOL-BREF assessed HRQoL across physical, psychological, social and environmental domains. Treatment satisfaction was evaluated using the TSQM, a structured and validated instrument assessing provider communication, perceived effectiveness, accessibility and responsiveness of services. Both instruments were culturally adapted and pretested for content validity.

Missing data handling

The study employed a rigorous data handling technique, including structured questionnaires and thorough quality control procedures. This involved interviewer training, methodical completeness checks and instrument pretesting. Statistical analysis was performed using tools such as STATA, and data entry and cleaning were handled using specialised software. Missing data were filled using maximum likelihood estimation or multiple imputations. Missing data were handled using multiple imputation techniques, which reduce bias and improve statistical efficiency under the assumption of missing at random.23

Data entry, analysis and quality control

The study used Epi-Data version 4.6.0 software to code and clean the data, which were then analysed using STATA version 17. Summary statistics were used to report patient characteristics. The study used P-Plot, scatter plot, Shapiro–Wilk test and variance inflation factor test to assess linearity, heteroscedasticity, normality and multicollinearity. Simple and multiple linear regression analyses were performed to identify the independent variables associated with HRQoL and treatment satisfaction. Variables with a p value<0.25 in the simple linear regression analysis were included in the multiple linear regression model to control for potential confounding.24 Variables with a p value<0.05 in this analysis were deemed statistically significant, with associations quantified by beta coefficients (β) at a 95% CI. Additionally, data collectors underwent rigorous training on the questionnaire content, methods and ethical concerns. The questionnaires were regularly checked for completeness by the supervisors and principal investigators. Pre-test results were used to modify the tool, and the principal investigator provided feedback and corrections.

Results

Participant flow diagram

Of 500 patients assessed for eligibility between December 2024 and April 2025, 78 were excluded: 50 did not meet the inclusion criteria, and 28 declined participation. A total of 422 participants provided informed consent, including 277 (65.6%) admitted to the cardiac unit and 139 (32.9%) admitted to the internal medicine unit (figure 2.

Figure 2. : Participant flow diagram showing recruitment, exclusion and final inclusion in the study.

Figure 2

Characteristics and treatment of patients with acute heart failure

Patients with AHF admitted to selected hospitals in Northwest Ethiopia were included. The mean age was 71.9±9.5 years, with 55.2% males and 77.5% residing in rural areas. Acute decompensated HF (ADHF) was the most common presentation (72.5%), and the majority had NYHA class III (85.8%), with a mean LVEF of 43%. Comorbidities included ischaemic heart disease (33.4%) and chronic rheumatic valvular heart disease (30%). Treatment predominantly involved diuretics (50%) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (41.5%), reflecting partial guideline adherence (table 1).

Table 1. Sociodemographic, clinical, comorbidities and medication use among admitted patients with AHF in selected hospitals in Northwest Ethiopia, December 2024–April 2025 (n=422).

Domain Variable Frequency/mean±SD Key notes/implications
Sociodemographics Age (years) 71.9±9.5 Older adult predominance
Male sex 233 (55.2%) Slight male predominance
Rural residence 327 (77.5%) Majority from rural areas
Clinical ADHF 306 (72.5%) Most cases are acutely decompensated
NYHA III 362 (85.8%) Severe functional limitation
LVEF (%) 43±15 Moderate to reduced EF
Comorbidities IHD 138 (33.4%) Common comorbidity
CRVDH 124 (30%) Chronic structural heart disease
Medication Diuretics 211 (50%) Most commonly prescribed medications
ACEI/ARB 175 (41.5%) Guideline-directed therapy

A full detailed breakdown of all variables is available in online supplemental tables S1–S4.

ACEI/ARB, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker; ADHF, acute decompensated heart failure; CRVDH, chronic rheumatic valvular heart disease; EF, ejection fraction; IHD, ischemic heart disease; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; NYHA, New York Heart Association.

Domain and classification of health-related quality of life

HRQoL scores varied across domains. Mean scores were the lowest for physical health (51.62±11.27) and psychological health (56.11±10.65), indicating greater challenges. Social health (73.33±14.02) and environmental health (67.93±7.97) scores were higher, reflecting relatively better patient experiences. The overall HRQoL score averaged 78.68±21.30, with a wide range highlighting substantial variability among participants (figure 3).

Figure 3. Distribution of health-related quality of life across WHO Quality of Life-Brief Version mean, among admitted patients with chronic conditions in comprehensive hospitals in Northwest Ethiopia, from June to November (n=422).

Figure 3

Most respondents (401; 95%) were classified as having moderate HRQoL, whereas only 13 (3%) were categorised as having poor HRQoL. These findings highlight that although the majority maintained a moderate level of well-being, a small subset experienced significant challenges, underscoring the need for targeted interventions, particularly to improve physical and psychological health domains (figure 4).

Figure 4. Quality of life classification of acute heart failure in selected hospitals in Northwest Ethiopia, from December 2024 to April 2025 (n=422).

Figure 4

Treatment satisfaction domain and level

Most patients (274; 65%) reported moderate satisfaction with their treatment. Although many found medication regimens easy to follow, unmet needs remained, particularly regarding medication safety and overall treatment experience (table 2, figure 5).

Table 2. Summary of treatment satisfaction questionnaire for medication domain scores and patient satisfaction levels among older patients with chronic heart failure from June to November 2024 (n=170).

Domain Mean±SD Minimum Maximum Low satisfaction (%) Moderate satisfaction (%) High satisfaction (%)
Effectiveness 61.3±13.4 30 90 18 70 12
Convenience 70.2±11.7 40 94 10 65 25
Safety 55.1±14.8 20 85 33 55 12
Medical care/support 65.3±12.3 35 95 15 72 13
Impact on daily activities 61.4±13.9 25 88 19 68 11
Global satisfaction 59.8±15.0 15 92 25 60 15

Figure 5. Average patient satisfaction scores across six domains of the treatment satisfaction questionnaire for medication among older adult patients with heart failure: effectiveness, convenience, safety, medical care/support, impact on daily activities and global satisfaction.

Figure 5

Correlation between treatment satisfaction and health-related quality of life

Pearson correlation analysis showed significant positive relationships among treatment satisfaction domains and HRQoL. Treatment effectiveness correlated positively with convenience (r=0.063, p<0.001) and safety (r=0.167, p<0.001). Convenience also correlated positively with safety (r=0.222, p<0.001). Safety was positively associated with global satisfaction (r=0.227, p<0.001), indicating that higher perceived treatment safety corresponded to greater overall satisfaction (table 3).

Table 3. Pearson correlation coefficient between overall treatment satisfaction and HRQoL among hospitalised patients with acute heart failure (n=422).

HRQoL Effectiveness Convenience Safety Global satisfaction
HRQoL Coefficient −0.059 −0.015 0.60 0.063
p-value 0.228 0.764 0.218 0.200
Effectiveness Coefficient 0.063 0.167 0.188
p-value <0.001 <0.001 0.198
Convenience Coefficient 0.222 0.027
p-value <0.001 0.582
Safety Coefficient 0.227
p-value <0.001
Global satisfaction Coefficient
p-value

HRQoL, health-related quality of life.

Factors influencing treatment satisfaction

Several factors significantly influenced treatment satisfaction. Rural residents reported lower satisfaction than urban participants (β= –0.20, p=0.007), reflecting possible disparities in healthcare access. Patients with NYHA class III reported higher satisfaction (β=0.25, p=0.016), possibly indicating better coping with effective treatments. Coronary heart disease was associated with lower satisfaction (β=–0.40, p=0.012), whereas effective hypertension management increased satisfaction (β=0.20, p=0.026), suggesting that symptom control enhances perceived treatment quality (table 4).

Table 4. Multivariate linear regression for overall treatment satisfaction and associated factors among hospitalised patients with heart failure (n=422).

Variable Category SLR: β (95% CI) MLR: β (95% CI) P value
Address Rural −0.07 (−0.14 to 0.003) −0.20 (−0.34 to −0.05) 0.007*
Urban 1 1
NYHA class II 1 1
III 0.10 (0.01 to 0.19) 0.25 (0.05 to 0.45) 0.016*
IV −0.05 (−0.25 to 0.16) 0.13 (−0.20 to 0.44) 0.436
Ventricular tachycardia Yes 0.10 (−0.06 to 0.25) 0.08 (−0.20 to 0.36) 0.556
No 1
IHD Yes 0.04 (−0.02 to 0.10) 0.07 (−0.10 to 0.23) 0.431
No 1 1
DCMP Yes −0.14 (−0.25 to −0.02) 0.18 (−0.05 to 0.41) 0.130
No 1 1
Cause of heart failure Yes −0.07 (−0.01 to 0.003) 0.01 (−0.02.03) 0.538
No 1 1
Comorbidity Yes −0.14 (−0.31 to 0.04) 0.17 (−0.08 to 0.41) 0.188
No 1 1
Coronary heart disease Yes −0.15 (−0.31 to 0.04) −0.40 (−0.64 to −0.08) 0.012*
No 1 1
COPD Yes 0.08 (−0.03 to 0.19) 0.17 (−0.10 to 0.44) 0.225
No 1 1
Myocardial infarction Yes 0.16 (−0.06 to 0.38) 0.31 (−0.08 to 0.71) 0.120
No 1 1
Cardiomyopathy Yes −0.10 (−0.20 to 0.0) −0.11 (−0.32 to 0.09) 0.278
No 1 1
Hypertension Yes 0.11 (0.03 to 0.20) 0.20 (0.02 to 0.37) 0.026*
No 1 1
Asthma Yes −0.16 (−0.33 to 0.02) −0.24 (−0.60 to 0.12) 0.190
No 1 1
Degenerative valve Yes −0.06 (−0.15 to 0.03) −0.03 (−0.33 to 0.26) 0.812
No 1
CRVDH Yes −0.05 (−0.13 to 0.04) −0.14 (−0.48 to 0.20) 0.417
No 1 1
Previous admission to the hospital Yes 0.04 (−0.002 to 0.09) −0.08 (−0.34 to 0.17) 0.518
No 1 1
Since the last admission in months 0–12 1 1
13–24 0.02 (−0.05 to 0.10) −0.02 (−0.12 to 0.07) 0.622
>24 0.07 (−0.03 to 0.17) −0.10 (−0.30 to 0.08) 0.255
*

Significant

.COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CRVDH, chronic respiratory and vascular disease of the heart; DCMP, dilated cardiomyopathy; IHD, ischaemic heart disease; MLR, multiple linear regression, β - beta coefficient; SLR, simple linear regression.

Factors associated with the health-related quality of life

Unintentional weight loss was positively associated with overall HRQoL (β=1.52, p=0.021) but corresponded with poorer physical and psychological scores, highlighting nutritional cqooncerns. Asthma was associated with lower HRQoL (β=–3.28, p=0.01), with affected patients scoring approximately 3.3 points lower. Chronic HF was modestly associated with improved HRQoL (β=0.02, p=0.042), indicating adaptation over time. These findings underscore the importance of monitoring nutrition, managing asthma and considering disease duration when evaluating HRQoL in this population (table 5).

Table 5. Multivariate linear regression for overall quality of life and associated factors among admitted patients with AHF in selected hospitals in Northwest Ethiopia, from December 2024 to April 2025 (n=422).

Variable Category SLR: β (95% CI) MLR: β (95% CI) P value
Primary payer Insurance −1.36 (−3.17 to 0.44) −1.25 (−3.51 to 1.01) 0.280
Out of pocket −0.48 (−2.43 to 1.48) −0.67 (−3.16 to 1.83) 0.599
Others* 1 1
Weight loss Yes 1.12 (−0.09 to 2.35) 1.52 (0.04 to 3.07) 0.021*
No 1 1
Pleural effusion Yes 0.77 (−0.19 to 1.74) 0.40 (−0.69 to 1.49) 0.470
No 1 1
Ventricular fibrillation Yes −1.78 (−4.75 to 1.20) −1.65 (−4.70 to 1.41) 0.290
No 1 1
Asthma Yes 1.85 (−1.00 to 4.69) −3.28 (−0.37 to 6.94) 0.01*
No 1
CRVDH Yes 0.68 (−0.46 to 1.81) 0.75 (−0.52 to 2.02) 0.247
No 1 1
Pulmonary hypertension Yes −1.51 (−3.78 to 0.77) −0.82 (−2.40 to 0.78) 0.315
No
Duration of heart failure in months 0.13 (−0.002 to 0.03) 0.02 (0.008 to 0.04) 0.042*
Drug history Yes −0.90 (−2.00 to 0.18) −1.29 (−2.65 to 0.07) 0.064
No 1 1
Use of spironolactone Yes −0.77 (−1.80 to 0.23) −0.30 (−1.52 to 0.98) 0.666
No 1 1
Use of metoprolol succinate Yes −0.58 (−1.53 to 0.36) −0.56 (−1.69 to 0.58) 0.338
No 1 1
Use of warfarin Yes 0.93 (−0.31 to 2.17) 0.38 (−1.20 to 1.96) 0.638
No 1 1
Losartan Yes 2.70 (0.24 to 5.16) 2.65 (−0.76 to 6.06) 0.127
No 1 1
Aspirin Yes −0.61 (−1.620.41) 0.44 (−1.62 to 0.73) 0.456
No 1 1
SGLTI Yes 1.06 (−0.25 to 2.38) 1.15 (−0.33 to 2.63) 0.128
No 1 1

β=regression coefficient.

P values<0.05 are considered statistically significant and are indicated with an asterisk (*).

Reference categories for categorical variables are indicated as ‘1’.

Weight loss refers to clinically significant unintentional weight loss in patients, which may indicate frailty or poor health status; coded as yes (weight loss present) and no (no weight loss).

Primary payer ‘Others’ includes government or charity coverage not classified as insurance or out-of-pocket.

Drug use variables (spironolactone, metoprolol succinate, warfarin, losartan, aspirin and SGLTI) are coded as yes (use of the drug) and no (no use of the drug).

Duration of heart failure is measured in months.

MLR, multiple linear regression; SGLTI, sodium-glucose linked transporter inhibitor; SLR, simple linear regression.

Discussion

This study examined older adults admitted with AHF in Northwest Ethiopia, revealing a predominantly older, rural population with low educational attainment and frequent reliance on governmental insurance, factors that likely influence healthcare access and outcomes. Clinically, patients commonly presented with acute decompensation, dyspnoea, pulmonary rales and reduced LV function. HRQoL was moderately impaired, with unintentional weight loss associated with higher overall HRQoL and asthma linked to lower HRQoL. Rural patients reported lower treatment satisfaction, reflecting barriers to care. These findings highlight the need for individualised, comprehensive care that addresses both clinical and sociodemographic determinants.

Sociodemographic and lifestyle factors

Participants had a mean age of 72 years, consistent with the high prevalence of HF in older adults. Age-related cardiovascular changes, such as reduced cardiac reserve and increased vascular stiffness, along with higher rates of comorbidities such as hypertension and diabetes, increase susceptibility to severe manifestations of HF.1 15 16

Approximately 75% of participants resided in rural areas, where limited access to specialised care, transportation barriers and resource shortages likely contributed to poorer health outcomes, delayed diagnoses and reduced emergency care use. Systematic reviews indicate that rural patients with HF experience worse prognoses due to these structural and socioeconomic challenges.25,29

Khat use and cardiovascular implications

Khat (Catha edulis) use is common in Ethiopia and has cardiovascular implications relevant to HF. Its active compounds, cathinone and cathine, increase heart rate and blood pressure, potentially worsening HF and arrhythmia risk.30 31 Chronic use may reduce HRQoL, impair exercise tolerance and disrupt adherence to medications,32 33 along with a decline in HRQoL, fatigue and reduced exercise capacity.34 Additionally, frequent use may lead to poorer medication adherence by disrupting sleep and daily routines.35 36 These findings underscore the importance of assessing khat use and providing culturally appropriate counselling in clinical practice.

Most participants (67%) relied on governmental insurance, whereas 25% paid out-of-pocket, highlighting financial vulnerabilities among older adults with fixed incomes. The burden of chronic disease management may delay care-seeking and worsen outcomes. Policies to improve access to affordable healthcare could mitigate these disparities.32 37 38

Additionally, 36% of participants had no formal education, reflecting limited health literacy, which can hinder understanding of disease and adherence to treatment. Educational interventions and community-based programmes for older adults may enhance knowledge, self-care and overall QoL.39 40 This text discusses the importance of educational initiatives to improve health literacy among older patients, particularly in managing conditions such as HF. It highlights that community health programmes aimed at educating seniors can enhance their health outcomes and overall QoL.41

Clinical picture

ADHF was present in 73% of patients, with 87% experiencing dyspnoea and 85% demonstrating pulmonary rales. The mean LVEF was 43%, indicating moderate-to-severe LV dysfunction, which is associated with higher mortality in older adults.42 Comorbidities, such as pneumonia (16%), atrial fibrillation (16%) and chronic respiratory diseases, complicate HF management in older adults. This can intensify symptoms and decrease the treatment efficacy. A holistic management approach is essential, highlighting the need for screening and treatment of comorbid conditions in the elderly.

Comorbidities, including pneumonia (16%), atrial fibrillation (16%) and chronic respiratory diseases, complicate management, intensify symptoms and reduce treatment efficacy. Dyspnoea and ankle oedema were prevalent and significantly impaired physical function and HRQoL, contributing to frailty and dependence. Symptom management and tailored rehabilitation programmes may improve functional capacity, reduce readmissions and enhance outcomes.43 44

Health-related quality of life

This study revealed that 95% of older participants perceived their QoL as moderate, emphasising the significant effect of AHF on daily activities and psychosocial health. Additionally, 92% reported moderate-to-poor HRQoL, reflecting a notable decline in health status. Conversely, some older adults in other studies reported good or excellent HRQoL, indicating that a minority adapt better to HF, leading to lower 1-year mortality and hospitalisation rates.645,48 The HRQoL observed in this study aligns with findings from other low-income and middle-income settings for patients with HF.49

Most participants (95%) reported moderate overall QoL, reflecting the substantial impact of AHF on daily functioning and psychosocial well-being. Unintentional weight loss was positively associated with overall HRQoL (β=1.52, p=0.021) but indicated frailty and nutritional concerns rather than fluid removal. Although diuretics relieve oedema and dyspnoea, they do not address functional capacity or overall well-being. Monitoring weight trajectories helps distinguish fluid changes from frailty, guiding nutritional interventions and patient-centred care.50 51 Frailty significantly affects HRQoL in older adults with HF, compromising both physical and emotional aspects. It mediates the relationship between higher NYHA functional class and reduced QoL. The prevalence of frailty complicates clinical management and decreases self-care, highlighting the importance of early geriatric assessments and personalised care. Meta-analyses indicate that frail older patients with HF have higher risks of mortality and hospitalisation, underscoring the necessity for routine frailty screening in HF management.52,54

Frailty itself adversely affects HRQoL, mediating the relationship between higher NYHA class and reduced QoL. Asthma also reduced HRQoL (β=–3.28, p=0.001), limiting physical activity and complicating HF management.55 56 These findings underscore the need for comprehensive assessments of comorbidities and frailty in older adults with HF.

Clinical characteristics and impact of heart failure phenotypes

Preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction HF (HFpEF and HFmrEF) was common, consistent with global trends. Patients with HFpEF often have comorbidities such as hypertension, obesity and diabetes, which worsen HRQoL, particularly in physical and psychological domains. In contrast, patients with HFrEF may benefit more from pharmacological interventions. Understanding HF phenotypes is essential for tailoring treatment and improving HRQoL and treatment satisfaction, especially in resource-limited settings.57 58

Treatment satisfaction

Approximately 65% of participants reported moderate treatment satisfaction, consistent with studies in low-resource settings where medication safety and communication issues are common.9 10 Rural patients reported lower satisfaction because of limited access to healthcare resources, long travel distances and lower health literacy.8 10 39 45 59 Interventions such as patient education, improved pharmaceutical safety and enhanced accessibility are essential to improve satisfaction and adherence.

This study highlights that rural older adult patients with AHF report significantly lower treatment satisfaction than their urban counterparts. The findings align with previous research indicating systemic barriers in rural areas, such as limited access to speciality care, fewer healthcare resources, long travel distances and medication shortages, alongside factors such as lower health literacy and adverse social determinants, including poverty and education.9 25 39 41 60 61 Multifaceted interventions are essential to address healthcare inequities, such as enhancing rural healthcare infrastructure, implementing mobile clinics, utilising telemedicine, strengthening the workforce and providing culturally sensitive, patient-centred care to improve treatment adherence and satisfaction.

Patients with NYHA class III reported higher satisfaction, possibly reflecting more intensive symptom management, frequent healthcare interactions and participation in multidisciplinary care programmes. Psychological adaptation may also contribute, as patients with more severe illness adjust expectations over time, improving perceived care quality.61,68 Effective hypertension management was linked to higher satisfaction, emphasising the importance of symptom relief, patient education and communication between healthcare providers and older adults.69

Implications for healthcare and future research directions

These findings underscore the need for personalised healthcare strategies for older adults with AHF in Northwest Ethiopia. Improved infrastructure, mobile clinics, telemedicine, culturally sensitive community education and integrated multidisciplinary care may enhance treatment satisfaction. Future research should explore social determinants, community resources and interventions targeting HRQoL and medication adherence.

Although primarily set in sub-Saharan Africa, the findings of this prospective study have significant global implications for managing older adults with HF.70 Multi-morbidity is a crucial independent predictor of poor HRQoL, a finding consistent with studies from Europe and North America.61 71 This finding underscores the challenges in managing patients with complex HF and non-cardiac conditions such as chronic kidney disease and diabetes. It advocates for multidisciplinary heart teams to tackle these interconnected health issues, following recommendations from organisations such as the American College of Cardiology / American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC)17 . Additionally, lower physical HRQoL scores in older adults reflect widespread quality-of-care deficits, highlighting the need for improved patient-centred care. The study contributes data towards the formation of globally relevant clinical guidelines that factor in diverse socioeconomic and cultural aspects while promoting geriatric care.72,76

International context and relevance

Findings from Ethiopia provide insights into HRQoL and treatment satisfaction among older adults with HF, particularly HFpEF, and reflect global patterns of comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes and obesity. Regional factors, such as khat use, may uniquely affect cardiovascular health and adherence. Although validated generic tools were used, disease-specific sensitivity and multimorbidity assessment were limited. As an observational study, causal inference is restricted.

Strengths and limitations of the study

Study strengths include its multicentre observational design, representative sample and use of validated instruments (WHOQOL-BREF and TSQM) with rigorous quality control. Limitations include the observational design, recruitment from tertiary centres limiting generalisability, use of generic rather than HF-specific instruments and lack of standardised multimorbidity assessment. Socio-economic and healthcare access factors were incompletely explored. Despite these limitations, this study provides valuable insights into patient-centred outcomes in resource-limited settings, informing future research and interventions.

Conclusion

In this multicentre study of older adults with HF, most participants reported moderate-to-low HRQoL and moderate treatment satisfaction. Asthma and polypharmacy were associated with poorer outcomes, whereas unintentional weight loss correlated with better perceived QoL. These findings underscore the need for patient-centred HF care that optimises the management of comorbid conditions and ensures access to guideline-directed medical therapy. Additionally, interventions tailored to context-specific factors, such as socioeconomic barriers, healthcare access limitations and lifestyle behaviours, may further enhance HRQoL and treatment satisfaction, particularly in resource-limited settings.

Supplementary material

online supplemental file 1
bmjopen-16-2-s001.docx (25.2KB, docx)
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103989

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge all participating research sites and study participants.

Footnotes

Funding: The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Prepublication history and additional supplemental material for this paper are available online. To view these files, please visit the journal online (https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103989).

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Patient consent for publication: Not applicable.

Ethics approval: This study involves human participants and was approved by the Ethical Review Committee of Debre Tabor University, College of Health Sciences (Approval No. DTU/ERC/345/2024). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants after explaining the purpose, procedures, potential risks and benefits of the study. Participation was voluntary, and confidentiality was maintained using anonymised identifiers. The study was conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki. Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part.

Data availability free text: Data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Patient and public involvement: Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

Data availability statement

All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.

References

  • 1.Savarese G, Becher PM, Lund LH, et al. Global burden of heart failure: a comprehensive and updated review of epidemiology. Cardiovasc Res. 2023;118:3272–87. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvac013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Angaw DA, Ali R, Tadele A, et al. The prevalence of cardiovascular disease in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of institutional and community-based studies. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021;21:1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01828-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mandi DG, Bamouni J, Yaméogo RA, et al. Spectrum of heart failure in sub-Saharan Africa: data from a tertiary hospital-based registry in the eastern center of Burkina Faso. Pan Afr Med J. 36 doi: 10.11604/pamj.2020.36.30.19321. n.d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bekele F, Tafese L, Garbessa B, et al. Burden and predictors of heart failure treatment outcomes in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. PLoS ONE. 2023;18:e0291686. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lam CL, Lauder IJ. The impact of chronic diseases on the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of Chinese patients in primary care. Fam Pract. 2000;17:159–66. doi: 10.1093/fampra/17.2.159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mulugeta H, Sinclair PM, Wilson A. Health-related quality of life and its influencing factors among people with heart failure in Ethiopia: using the revised Wilson and Cleary model. Sci Rep. 2023;13:20241. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47567-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Molla S, Yitayal M, Amare G. Health-Related Quality of Life and Associated Factors Among Adult Patients with Heart Failure in Wolaita Zone Governmental Hospitals, Southern Ethiopia. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021;14:263–71. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S288326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ventoulis I, Kamperidis V, Abraham MR, et al. Differences in Health-Related Quality of Life among Patients with Heart Failure. Med Bogota Colomb. 2024;60:109. doi: 10.3390/medicina60010109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tito K, Gebremariam GT, Beyene K, et al. Health-related quality of life and treatment satisfaction of patients with cardiovascular disease in Ethiopia. Front Public Health. 2022;10 doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.972378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tsige AW, Endalifer BL, Habteweld HA, et al. Treatment satisfaction and medication adherence and predictors among patients with heart failure in Ethiopia: a hospital-based cross-sectional study. Front Pharmacol. 2024;15:1399177. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1399177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lo SY, Reeve E, Page AT, et al. Attitudes to Drug Use in Residential Aged Care Facilities: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Nurses and Care Staff. Drugs Aging. 2021;38:697–711. doi: 10.1007/s40266-021-00874-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.World Health Organization . The Whoqol-Bref. 2020. pp. 100–2. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Brauer M, Roth GA, Aravkin AY, et al. Global burden and strength of evidence for 88 risk factors in 204 countries and 811 subnational locations, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. The Lancet. 2024;403:2162–203. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00933-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Virani SS, Newby LK, Arnold SV, et al. 2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2023;148:e9–119. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, et al. Focused update of the 2021 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: Developed by the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2023;44:3627–39. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, et al. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022;145:e895–1032. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tarekegn TB, Gebrie D, Kassaw AT, et al. Evaluating health-related quality of life in Ethiopia: systematic review and meta-analysis of EQ-5D-based studies. Front Epidemiol. 2024;4:1455822. doi: 10.3389/fepid.2024.1455822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.WHO . WHOQOL-BREF: Introduction, Administration, Scoring, and Generic Version of the Assessment: Field Trial Version. 1996. pp. 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Atkinson MJ, Sinha A, Hass SL, et al. Validation of a general measure of treatment satisfaction, the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM), using a national panel study of chronic disease. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004;2:12. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-2-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Green CP, Porter CB, Bresnahan DR, et al. Development and evaluation of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire: a new health status measure for heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:1245–55. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00531-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Rector TS, Cohn JN. Assessment of patient outcome with the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire: Reliability and validity during a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pimobendan. Am Heart J. 1992;124:1017–25. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(92)90986-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Atkinson MJ, Kumar R, Cappelleri JC, et al. Hierarchical Construct Validity of the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM Version II) among Outpatient Pharmacy Consumers. Value Health. 2005;8:S9–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.00066.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rubin DB. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1987. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bursac Z, Gauss CH, Williams DK, et al. Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression. Source Code Biol Med. 2008;3:17. doi: 10.1186/1751-0473-3-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bragazzi NL, Zhong W, Shu J, et al. Burden of heart failure and underlying causes in 195 countries and territories from 1990 to 2017. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2021;28:1682–90. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwaa147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gu J, Zheng Z, Li J, et al. Global burden of heart failure in older adults: trends, socioeconomic inequalities, and future projections from 1990 to 2035. European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes. 2025;11:1123–36. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaf047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Parsons K, Gaudine A, Swab M. Experiences of older adults accessing specialized health care services in rural and remote areas: a qualitative systematic review. JBI Evid Synth . 2021;19:1328–43. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Manemann SM, St Sauver J, Henning-Smith C, et al. Rurality, Death, and Healthcare Utilization in Heart Failure in the Community. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10:e018026. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.018026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Faridi B, Davies S, Narendrula R, et al. Rural-urban disparities in mortality of patients with acute myocardial infarction and heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2025;32:327–35. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwae351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mega TA, Dabe NE. Khat (Catha Edulis) as a Risk Factor for Cardiovascular Disorders: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Open Cardiovasc Med J. 2017;11:146–55. doi: 10.2174/1874192401711010146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Al-Motarreb A, Al-Habori M, Broadley KJ. Khat chewing, cardiovascular diseases and other internal medical problems: the current situation and directions for future research. J Ethnopharmacol. 2010;132:540–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2010.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Getahun W, Gedif T, Tesfaye F. Regular Khat (Catha edulis) chewing is associated with elevated diastolic blood pressure among adults in Butajira, Ethiopia: a comparative study. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:390. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Moloro AH, Seid AA, Mehari MG, et al. Does regular Khat (Catha edulis) chewing in adults increase the risk of hypertension compared to non-use? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025;25:755. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-05160-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sheikh KA, El-Setouhy M, Yagoub U, et al. Khat chewing and health related quality of life: cross-sectional study in Jazan region, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12:44. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lifson AR, Workneh S, Shenie T, et al. Frequent Use of Khat, an Amphetamine-Like Substance, as a Risk Factor for Poor Adherence and Lost to Follow-Up Among Patients New to HIV Care in Ethiopia. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2017;33:995–8. doi: 10.1089/AID.2016.0274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Soboka M, Tesfaye M, Adorjan K, et al. Substance use disorders and adherence to antituberculosis medications in Southwest Ethiopia: a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2021;11:e043050. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Martin SS, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, et al. 2024 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2024;149:e347–913. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Chen J, Zhao M, Zhou R, et al. How heavy is the medical expense burden among the older adults and what are the contributing factors? A literature review and problem-based analysis. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1165381. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1165381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Schönfeld MS, Pfisterer-Heise S, Bergelt C. Self-reported health literacy and medication adherence in older adults: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2021;11:e056307. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Tao S, Sun S, Wu S, et al. Current status and influencing factors of health literacy among older adults in combined medical and nursing care institutions: a cross-sectional study. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1323335. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1323335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ghodeshwar GK, Dube A, Khobragade D. Impact of Lifestyle Modifications on Cardiovascular Health: A Narrative Review. Cureus. 2023;15:e42616. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Alhakak AS, Sengeløv M, Jørgensen PG, et al. Left ventricular systolic ejection time is an independent predictor of all-cause mortality in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail. 2021;23:240–9. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Jiang Y, Wang W. Health promotion and self-management among patients with chronic heart failure BT - health promotion in health care – vital theories and research. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021. pp. 269–85. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lambe K, Guerra S, Salazar de Pablo G, et al. Effect of inpatient rehabilitation treatment ingredients on functioning, quality of life, length of stay, discharge destination, and mortality among older adults with unplanned admission: an overview review. BMC Geriatr. 2022;22:501. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03169-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Bujang MA, Lai WH, Tiong XT, et al. A generic and dynamic measure of health-related quality of life across a variety of health and disease conditions: insights from healthy individuals and patients with a variety of diagnoses. BMC Res Notes. 2025;18:2. doi: 10.1186/s13104-024-07037-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Luiso D, Herrero-Torrus M, Badosa N, et al. Quality of Life in Older Patients after a Heart Failure Hospitalization: Results from the SENECOR Study. J Clin Med. 2022;11:3035. doi: 10.3390/jcm11113035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Religioni U, Sawicka A, Niegowska W, et al. Sociodemographic, disease-related and lifestyle determinants of health-related quality of life among older patients hospitalized with heart failure. Sci Rep. 2025;15:31040. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13881-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wang N, Hales S, Gallagher R, et al. Predictors and outcomes of quality of life in elderly patients with heart failure. American Heart Journal Plus: Cardiology Research and Practice . 2022;19:100188. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2022.100188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Mulugeta H, Sinclair PM, Wilson A. Health-related quality of life of people with heart failure in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Qual Life Res . 2024;33:1175–89. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03563-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Bo M. Association among basal metabolic rate, body composition and pulmonary function in university students. Chulalongkorn Medical Journal. 2021;65:129–35. doi: 10.58837/CHULA.CMJ.65.2.4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Maryam TP, Varghese T, Tazneem B, et al. Emerging Role of Weight-Loss Medications in the Management of Heart Failure: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2025;25:593–600. doi: 10.1007/s40256-025-00735-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Vilela de Sousa T, Cavalcante AMRZ, Lima NX, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors in the elderly: a 10-year follow-up survival analysis. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2023;22:43–52. doi: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvac040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Huang J, Liu X, Wang D, et al. NYHA classification and quality of life in older heart failure inpatients: the mediation effects of social frailty and physical frailty. BMC Public Health. 2025;25:3984. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-25377-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Liu S, Xiong X, Guo T, et al. Understanding frailty: a qualitative study of older heart failure patients’ frail experience and perceptions of healthcare professionals with frailty. BMC Geriatr. 2024;24:1012. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05602-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Plaza-González S, Zabala-Baños MDC, Astasio-Picado Á, et al. Psychological and Sociocultural Determinants in Childhood Asthma Disease: Impact on Quality of Life. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:2652. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Choi HG, Kwon MJ, Kim JH, et al. Association between asthma and cardiovascular diseases: A longitudinal follow-up study using a national health screening cohort. World Allergy Organ J. 2024;17:100907. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2024.100907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Li P, Zhao H, Zhang J, et al. Similarities and Differences Between HFmrEF and HFpEF. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8:678614. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.678614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Zafeiropoulos S, Farmakis IT, Milioglou I, et al. Pharmacological Treatments in Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced and Preserved Ejection Fraction: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. JACC Heart Fail. 2024;12:616–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2023.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Hou Q, Zhao Y, Wu Y. Medication adherence trajectories and clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Glob Health. 2025;15:04145. doi: 10.7189/jogh.15.04145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Qin VM, McPake B, Raban MZ, et al. Rural and urban differences in health system performance among older Chinese adults: cross-sectional analysis of a national sample. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20:372. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05194-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Screever EM, van der Wal MHL, van Veldhuisen DJ, et al. Comorbidities complicating heart failure: changes over the last 15 years. Clin Res Cardiol. 2023;112:123–33. doi: 10.1007/s00392-022-02076-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Sandhu AT, Zheng J, Kalwani NM, et al. Impact of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement in Heart Failure Clinic on Clinician Health Status Assessment and Patient Experience: A Substudy of the PRO-HF Trial. Circ Heart Fail. 2023;16:e010280. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.122.010280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Wu X, Li Z, Tian Q, et al. Effectiveness of nurse-led heart failure clinic: A systematic review. Int J Nurs Sci . 2024;11:315–29. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2024.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Ivynian SE, Ferguson C, Newton PJ, et al. The role of illness perceptions in delayed care-seeking in heart failure: A mixed-methods study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2024;150:104644. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Anusha D, Keingadarane S. Introducing a holistic model of oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) for individuals with disabilities. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2025;26:403–4. doi: 10.1007/s40368-024-00985-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Batchelor WB, Anwaruddin S, Wang DD, et al. The Multidisciplinary Heart Team in Cardiovascular Medicine. JACC: Advances. 2023;2:100160. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2022.100160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Aboumatar H, Pitts S, Sharma R, et al. Patient engagement strategies for adults with chronic conditions: an evidence map. Syst Rev. 2022;11:39. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01873-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Meyering C, Hickmann E. Association for Information Systems AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) Advancing Patient-Centered Healthcare : A Systematic Review of Patient Engagement Strategies and Opportunities Advancing Patient-Centered Healthcare : A Systematic Review of Patient Enga. 2024.
  • 69.Čelutkienė J, Čerlinskaitė-Bajorė K, Cotter G, et al. Impact of Rapid Up-Titration of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapies on Quality of Life: Insights From the STRONG-HF Trial. Circ: Heart Failure . 2024;17:e011221. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.123.011221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Tsao CW, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2022 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2022;145:e153–639. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Dixon T, Lim LLY, Oldridge NB. The MacNew heart disease health-related quality of life instrument: Reference data for users. Qual Life Res . 2002;11:173–83. doi: 10.1023/A:1015005109731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.McDonagh T, et al. ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: Developed by the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Eur J Heart Fail. 2021;24:4–131. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Gerhardt T, Gerhardt LMS, Ouwerkerk W, et al. Multimorbidity in patients with acute heart failure across world regions and country income levels (REPORT-HF): a prospective, multicentre, global cohort study. Lancet Glob Health. 2023;11:e1874–84. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00408-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Gracia Gutiérrez A, Moreno-Juste A, Laguna-Berna C, et al. Multimorbidity in Incident Heart Failure: Characterisation and Impact on 1-Year Outcomes. J Clin Med. 2024;13:3979. doi: 10.3390/jcm13133979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Palumbo P, Cannizzaro E, Palumbo MM, et al. Heart Failure and Cardiomyopathies: CT and MR from Basics to Advanced Imaging. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022;12:2298. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12102298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Okoye C, Mazzarone T, Finazzi A, et al. Outcomes of early post-discharge cardio-geriatric care in frail patients after acute heart failure: a before-and-after study. BMC Geriatr. 2025;25:236. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05883-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    online supplemental file 1
    bmjopen-16-2-s001.docx (25.2KB, docx)
    DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103989

    Data Availability Statement

    All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.


    Articles from BMJ Open are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

    RESOURCES