Skip to main content
Nature Portfolio logoLink to Nature Portfolio
. 2025 Nov 24;50(2):386–396. doi: 10.1038/s41366-025-01946-8

Optimizing adipogenic cocktail composition to enhance beige adipogenesis and evaluate thermogenic potential in primary mouse subcutaneous fat cell cultures

Yujie Ma 1,2, Zijie Zhang 1, Erika Thalia Ramos 1, Elias Martin 3, Rahul Gunukula 3, Kara Sprabary 1,3, Heejin Jun 1,2,✉
PMCID: PMC12912031  NIHMSID: NIHMS2143232  PMID: 41286427

Abstract

Background

Subcutaneous white adipose tissue (WAT) is crucial for systemic metabolic homeostasis, with beige adipocytes in this depot contributing to energy metabolism through inducible thermogenesis. Differentiated adipocyte cultures derived from mouse inguinal WAT are a widely used system to study beige adipose biology and identify therapeutic targets, as they retain the genetic and epigenetic traits of native adipocytes while providing experimental flexibility. However, variability during the adipocyte induction and differentiation poses a challenge, impacting beige adipogenesis and experimental outcomes.

Methods

This study conducted an unbiased analysis of four distinct adipogenic cocktails to evaluate their effects on beige adipogenesis in inguinal stromal vascular fraction cells from wild-type and genetically modified mice, as well as on the thermogenic activation of differentiated adipocytes.

Results

Different combinations of adipogenic inducers, including dexamethasone, 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine, insulin, triiodothyronine, indomethacin, and rosiglitazone (Rosi), recruited beige adipocytes with varying levels of thermogenic characteristics. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonist, Rosi, emerged as a key inducer, maximizing beige adipocyte biogenesis during the differentiation phase rather than the induction phase. However, Rosi-enhanced beige adipocyte differentiation exhibited limited thermogenic activation at the transcriptional level but not at the rapid signal transduction and real-time functional level in response to a β-adrenergic receptor agonist.

Conclusions

These findings underscore the importance of optimizing adipogenic cocktails, as they significantly influence experimental outcomes. This study offers valuable guidance for selecting effective combinations of adipogenic inducers tailored to specific research objectives and relevant in vitro models of beige adipose biology.

Subject terms: Biological techniques, Cell biology

Introduction

Adipose tissue is a key endocrine organ composed of diverse cell types, including adipocytes, immune cells, endothelial cells, and stromal stem cells, that collectively regulate energy storage, heat generation, hormone secretion, and systemic energy homeostasis [1–4]. Depending on their distribution across various depots, adipose tissues contain three distinct adipocyte types—white, beige, and brown—each characterized by unique functions and regulatory mechanisms [5]. Understanding the unique roles and regulation of these adipocyte types is essential for elucidating adipose tissue function in both health and disease.

White adipocytes, located in subcutaneous and visceral white adipose tissue (WAT) in both rodents and humans, are unilocular cells with sparse mitochondria. These cells primarily function as energy storage units, and their expansion is associated with inflammation and obesity [6]. Brown adipocytes, predominantly found in the interscapular region of rodents within brown adipose tissue (BAT), originate from progenitors expressing somite markers, such as myogenic factor 5 and paired-box protein 3 [7, 8]. In humans, brown adipocytes are most abundant during infancy [9]. These multilocular cells are rich in mitochondria and uncoupling protein 1 (UCP1), a thermogenic marker in the inner mitochondrial membrane that drives non-shivering thermogenesis by dissipating energy into heat rather than ATP [9]. Another type of thermogenic fat cell, beige adipocytes, is highly inducible and predominantly found in subcutaneous WAT in both humans and rodents [10, 11]. Beige adipocytes emerge through a process known as “beiging” or “browning” in response to various stimuli, such as cold temperature [12]. In adult humans, functional thermogenic BAT, composed of brown and/or beige adipocytes, has been identified in regions such as the axillary, supraclavicular, cervical, paravertebral, and gluteofemoral areas [13]. The prevalence and distribution of BAT are influenced by factors including age, sex, body mass index, environmental temperature, and pharmaceutical interventions [14].

Both brown and beige adipocytes play crucial roles in energy metabolism beyond just heat production and maintaining body temperature. They contribute to systemic glucose and lipid homeostasis and enhance insulin sensitivity by acting as metabolic sinks for excess energy while secreting batokines [4]. These functions highlight their therapeutic potential for obesity, type 2 diabetes, and other cardiometabolic disorders. Recent studies also show that BAT activation can reduce glucose availability to tumors and slow their growth in both rodents and humans, paving the way for new health interventions leveraging these tissues [15]. Thus, enhancing the thermogenic capacity of adipose tissue may offer considerable health benefits. Beige adipocytes are particularly attractive due to their high inducibility in subcutaneous WAT, the most abundant adipose depot in humans, and their remarkable plasticity in response to genetic and external factors [16–19]. Understanding the autonomous biogenesis and regulatory mechanisms of beige adipocytes, as well as identifying small molecules that enhance their activity and abundance, is therefore of great interest.

The stromal vascular fraction (SVF) of rat and human adipose tissue was first recognized for its adipogenic potential in the 1970s, attributed to the presence of preadipocytes [20–22]. Accordingly, adipocytes differentiated from the SVF cells of murine subcutaneous inguinal WAT (IWAT) under adipogenic conditions are widely used as an in vitro model alongside in vivo animal study in beige adipose research. However, generating adipocytes from inguinal SVF cells poses challenges, including inconsistent or suboptimal differentiation, which can lead to variability in the molecular and functional characteristics of the resulting beige adipocytes and their responses to stimuli.

This study aims to evaluate various adipogenic cocktails for in vitro beige adipocyte differentiation from primary mouse IWAT SVF cells. It provides guidance for optimized protocols tailored to specific experimental objectives, including thermogenic activation for therapeutic target discovery and modeling beige adipose biology.

Material and methods

Animals

All experimental procedures involving animals were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Texas Tech University (PRO22015-02). Wild-type C57BL/6J (Stock #000664), PR/SET domain 16 floxed (Prdm16fl/fl) (Stock #024992), Adiponectin (Adipoq)-Cre (Stock #028020), CByB6F1/J (Stock # 100009), C3D2F1/J (Stock #100004), and fibroblast growth factor 21 (Fgf21) knockout (KO) (Stock #033846) mice were obtained from Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, MN, USA). Fat-specific Prdm16 KO mice were produced by crossing Prdm16fl/fl and Adipoq-Cre mice. UM-HET3 mice were generated by breeding CByB6F1/J females and C3D2F1/J males. Mice were maintained in a specific pathogen-free facility in a 12-h light/dark cycle (7 a.m.–7 p.m.) with free access to a standard chow diet and water.

Primary mouse inguinal SVF isolation and culture

SVF cells from IWAT of 7–10-week-old male and female mice were isolated and cultured as previously reported with minor modification [23]. Briefly, IWAT was pooled, minced using surgical scissors, and digested in PBS (Millipore Sigma, #D8537, St. Louis, MO, USA) containing 1.5 U/mL collagenase D (Roche, #11088882001, Indianapolis, IN, USA), 2.4 U/mL dispase II (Roche, #4942078001, Indianapolis, IN, USA), and 10 mM CaCl2 at 37 °C with agitation (300 rpm). Digested tissues were suspended in wash medium [DMEM/F-12 GlutaMAX (Gibco, #10565018, Grand Island, NY, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (MilliporeSigma, #F0926, St. Louis, MO, USA) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin], filtered through a 100-µm cell strainer (Corning, #431752, Tewksbury, MA, USA), and centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 3 min. The obtained cell pellet was suspended in wash medium, filtered with a 40-µm cell strainer (Corning, #431750, Tewksbury, MA, USA), and centrifuged as above. Isolated SVF cells were suspended in culture medium [DMEM/F-12 GlutaMAX supplemented with 10% FBS (MilliporeSigma, #F2442, Burlington, MA, USA) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin] and plated onto a 10 cm collagen-coated cell culture dish. Cells were grown at 37 °C with 5% CO2 and subcultured once with a split ratio of 1:2 or 1:3 when they reached 90% confluence. The same batch of FBS was used consistently for both cell isolation and culture throughout the study. The absence of mycoplasma contamination was routinely confirmed using the MycAway Plus-Color One-Step Mycoplasma Detection Kit (Yeasen Biotech, Gaithersburg, MD, USA).

Induction and differentiation of primary mouse inguinal preadipocytes

The cultured primary mouse inguinal preadipocytes were seeded into 12-well collagen-coated plates at a cell density of approximately 12,500 cells per well. Confluent cells were induced and differentiated in the culture medium used for SVF cell culture following the four different recipes of the adipogenic cocktail provided in Tables 1 and S1. For induction, cells were stimulated for 2.5 days using the following agents from MilliporeSigma (St. Louis, MO, USA): dexamethasone (#D4902), 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX) (#I7018), triiodothyronine (T3) (#T5516), insulin (#I5500), indomethacin (#I8250), or rosiglitazone (Rosi) (#R2408), refreshing the induction medium once. Induced SVF cells were maintained in a differentiation medium containing insulin, Rosi, or T3 for 4 days, refreshing the medium at the 2-day mark. Both induction and differentiation media were prepared fresh. At the end of the differentiation period, isoproterenol (Iso; 10 µM final concentration) was added for the designated experiments.

Table 1.

Adipogenic cocktail recipes for differentiating primary mouse inguinal preadipocytes.

Recipe Phase Chemical Working concentration
R1 [29–31] Induction Dexamethasone 1 µM
IBMX 0.5 mM
Insulin 850 nM
Differentiation Insulin 850 nM
R2 [33, 34, 36] Induction Dexamethasone 5 µM
IBMX 0.5 mM
Insulin 850 nM
T3 1 nM
Indomethacin 125 nM
Differentiation Insulin 850 nM
T3 1 nM
R3 [17, 30, 31, 37] Induction Dexamethasone 5 µM
IBMX 0.5 mM
Insulin 85 nM
Rosi 0.5 µM
Differentiation Insulin 85 nM
Rosi 0.5 µM
R4 [38–41] Induction Dexamethasone 5 µM
IBMX 0.5 mM
Insulin 850 nM
T3 1 nM
Indomethacin 125 nM
Rosi 0.5 µM
Differentiation Insulin 850 nM
T3 1 nM
Rosi 0.5 µM

Oil Red O staining

Mature adipocytes differentiated from mouse inguinal preadipocytes in a 12-well plate were gently washed twice with PBS and fixed with 10% buffered formalin phosphate for 1 h at room temperature. Fixed cells were rinsed twice with filtered water, incubated with 60% isopropanol for 1 min and left dry at room temperature. Dried adipocytes were stained at a 3:2 ratio of Oil Red O solution (MilliporeSigma, #O1391, St. Louis, MO, USA) in filtered water at room temperature for 10 min and washed with filtered water until the water coloration was clear. Oil Red O-stained adipocytes were imaged using the BioTek Cytation 5 (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) imager. The Oil Red O dye extracted from stained lipid droplets with isopropanol was quantified by measuring absorbance at 492 nm using the BioTek Synergy H1 Multimode Reader (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) [24].

4,4-difluoro-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene (BODIPY) 493/503 staining

Primary mouse IWAT preadipocytes were seeded into collagen-coated coverslips and differentiated to mature adipocytes. Fully differentiated adipocytes were washed twice with PBS and fixed with 4% buffered formalin phosphate for 10 min. After washing twice with PBS, fixed cells were incubated with 2 µM of BODIPY 493/503 (Invitrogen, #D3922, Carlsbad, CA, USA) in PBS and 1 µg/mL DAPI (Thermo Scientific, #62247, Rockford, IL, USA) to stain neutral lipids and nuclei, respectively, for 15 min at room temperature in the dark. Stained adipocytes were washed with PBS twice and mounted using ProLong Gold Antifade Mountant (Invitrogen, #P10144, Eugene, OR, USA) and allowed to cure for 24 h. Images of BODIPY and DAPI-stained adipocytes were taken using the EVOS FL Inverted Fluorescence Microscope (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA).

Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR)

Total RNA was extracted using TRI reagent (MilliporeSigma, #T9424, Burlington, MA, USA). cDNA was synthesized using 1–2 µg of RNA according to the manufacturer’s protocol for M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase (Life Technologies, #28025021, Carlsbad, CA, USA). qPCR was performed using SYBR Green (Life Technologies, #A25742, Carlsbad, CA, USA) in the QuantStudio 6 384-well system (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA). Relative gene expression levels were calculated by the 2−ΔΔCt method and normalized to TATA box-binding protein (Tbp), which serves as a stable reference gene during adipogenesis and drug treatments [25, 26]. Primers sequences are listed in Table S2.

Western blotting

Fully differentiated adipocytes were washed twice with cold PBS and lysed in cold RIPA buffer (1% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.5, 0.1% SDS) supplemented with protease (Roche, #11836153001, Indianapolis, IN, USA) and phosphatase (Thermo Scientific, #J61022AA, Carlsbad, CA, USA) inhibitor cocktails. Equal amounts of protein were loaded and separated onto SDS-PAGE and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were incubated with primary antibodies against phospho-PKA substrateS/T (1:1000, Cell Signaling, #9621S, Danvers, MA, USA), phospho-HSLS563 (1:2000, Cell Signaling, #4139S, Danvers, MA, USA), UCP1 (1:3000, Abcam, #ab10983, Cambridge, MA, USA), Total OXPHOS Rodent WB Antibody Cocktail (1:2000, Abcam, #ab110413, Cambridge, MA, USA), PPARG (1:2000, Cell Signaling, #2435S, Danvers, MA, USA), HSP90 (1:5000, Cell Signaling, #4874S, Danvers, MA, USA) or β-actin (1:5000, Cell Signaling, #8457S, Danvers, MA, USA). Proteins were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence substrate reagents (Thermo Scientific, #32106, Carlsbad, CA, USA; Bio-Rad, #1705062, Hercules, CA, USA) and ChemiDoc system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Band intensities were quantified using ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA).

Oxygen consumption rate (OCR)

Primary mouse IWAT preadipocytes were seeded and fully differentiated in a 96-well plate. The OCR of mature adipocytes was measured in culture medium for 2 h using the Extracellular Oxygen Consumption Assay Kit (Abcam, #ab197243, Cambridge, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Data were expressed as changes relative to the control average for comparative analysis.

Statistical analysis

GraphPad Prism 10 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) was used for generating figures and statistical analysis. Data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Sample sizes were determined on the basis of preliminary data and prior publications. Results were replicated in at least two independent experiments. Normality was assessed with the Shapiro–Wilk test for 3 ≤ n ≤ 7 and the D’Agostino–Pearson omnibus test for n ≥ 8. Two-group comparisons were performed using a two-tailed Student’s t test for normally distributed data and Mann–Whitney U test otherwise. For comparisons among four groups with one factor, parametric analyses used one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test (equal variances) or Welch’s ANOVA with Dunnett’s T3 (unequal variances). For nonparametric data, Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s post hoc test was used. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Beige adipogenesis with different adipogenic cocktails

Beige adipocytes predominantly arise in subcutaneous WAT, with IWAT being the largest subcutaneous adipose depot in mice [10, 27]. In this study, mouse beige adipocytes were generated through a three-step process: adipose SVF isolation, culture, and differentiation (Fig. 1) [23]. IWAT from 5–6 mice were dissected, pooled, minced, and enzymatically digested with collagenase D and dispase II, followed by centrifugation to precipitate SVF cells. The isolated cells were cultured and expanded on culture dishes. Once seeded and grown to confluence in 12-well plates, the SVF cells were differentiated into mature adipocytes (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Flow scheme illustrating the generation of beige adipocytes from mouse primary subcutaneous white adipose stromal vascular fraction (SVF) through a standard three-step process.

Fig. 1

a Inguinal white adipose tissues (IWAT) were collected from mice (i), pooled (ii), and enzymatically digested (iii) to isolate SVF via centrifugation-based precipitation. b The isolated IWAT SVF cells were plated (iv) and subcultured in cell culture dishes to allow preadipocyte proliferation (v). c IWAT preadipocytes were seeded into well plates (vi), cultured to confluence, and induced to differentiate (vii and viii) into mature adipocytes (x) using four distinct adipogenic cocktails (R1, R2, R3, and R4) tested in this study. Created with BioRender.com.

Adipogenesis from preadipocytes is achieved through two sequential phases: the induction phase, which promotes growth arrest and commitment to the adipocyte lineage, and the differentiation phase, which supports the morphological and metabolic maturation of adipocytes [28]. This process relies on exogenous adipogenic inducers. In addition to FBS, compounds such as IBMX, dexamethasone, insulin, Rosi, T3, and indomethacin are commonly included in adipogenic cocktails to drive the complex gene expression program required for adipogenesis. The combinations of these compounds in adipogenic cocktails for beige adipocyte biogenesis from murine subcutaneous preadipocytes vary considerably across studies.

To evaluate how this variability affects beige adipogenic efficacy, we conducted an unbiased comparison of four adipogenic cocktails previously used in studies (recipes R1, R2, R3, and R4) in cultured IWAT SVF cells from wild-type C57BL/6J mice (Tables 1 and S1). The R1 adipogenic cocktail represents the minimal combination of chemicals required for complete adipocyte differentiation. It consists of dexamethasone, a synthetic glucocorticoid agonist; IBMX, a phosphodiesterase inhibitor that increases intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and activates protein kinase A (PKA); and insulin, which facilitates glucose uptake and lipogenesis [29–31]. Commonly referred to as MDI [Methylisobutylxanthine (IBMX), Dexamethasone, and Insulin], this cocktail is widely accepted as the standard method for inducing differentiation in the 3T3-L1 murine preadipocyte cell line but is not commonly used for promoting beige adipogenesis in murine primary inguinal preadipocytes [28, 32]. R2 included dexamethasone, IBMX, insulin, indomethacin—an activator of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ)—and T3, which promotes adipogenic and lipogenic gene transcription via thyroid hormone receptor α [33–36]. R3 consisted of IBMX, dexamethasone, insulin, and Rosi, a potent PPARγ agonist [17, 30, 31, 37]. Finally, R4 incorporated all of the adipogenic inducers: IBMX, dexamethasone, insulin, indomethacin, T3, and Rosi [38–41].

All four recipes significantly induced Ucp1, a key thermogenic fat marker, alongside adipogenic genes such as adiponectin (Adipoq) and fatty acid-binding protein 4 (Fabp4) during beige adipogenesis of primary inguinal preadipocytes (Fig. 2a). However, recipes R3 and R4 exhibited greater adipogenic efficacy compared to R1 and R2, as indicated by higher mRNA levels of Adipoq, Fabp4, and Pparg (Fig. 2b). Consistently, Oil Red O staining confirmed differentiation across all recipes, with R3 and R4 showing greater adipogenesis (Figs. 2c and S1a). Additionally, the expression of thermogenic markers, including peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha (Ppargc1a), cytochrome c oxidase subunit 8B (Cox8b), and Ucp1, was significantly higher in R3 and R4 than in R1 and R2 (Fig. 2b). Among the four adipogenic cocktails, R4 demonstrated the highest overall adipogenic and thermogenic effectiveness (Fig. 2b). R1 and R2 yielded comparable adipogenesis, but R2 showed modestly higher thermogenic transcription than R1. Despite robust Ucp1 mRNA induction across all cocktails, UCP1 protein was undetectable in R1- and R2-derived adipocytes and readily detected in R3 and R4, with the strongest signal in R4 (Figs. 2d and S1b). Consistent with mitochondrial enrichment as a hallmark of thermogenic adipocytes, R3 and R4 showed higher expression of mitochondrial respiratory chain complex proteins than R1 and R2 (Fig. S1c) [4]. Functional readouts based on OCR supported the molecular data but revealed more modest differences among recipes (Fig. 2e). These findings highlight that varying combinations of adipogenic inducers result in distinct adipogenic and thermogenic outcomes.

Fig. 2. Beige adipogenesis in primary inguinal preadipocytes from wild-type C57BL/6J mice under four distinct adipogenic cocktails.

Fig. 2

a qPCR analysis of thermogenic (Ucp1) and adipogenic (Adipoq and Fabp4) markers at 0, 3, and 6.5 (endpoint) days of differentiation using adipogenic recipes R1 (n = 5–6/group), R2 (n = 6–8/group), R3 (n = 6/group), and R4 (n = 6/group) in primary inguinal preadipocyte cultures. b qPCR analysis of thermogenic (Ucp1, Ppargc1a, and Cox8b) and adipogenic (Adipoq, Fabp4, and Pparg) gene expression in fully differentiated mature inguinal adipocytes derived with different adipogenic recipes (R1, n = 6; R2, n = 5; R3, n = 6; R4, n = 6). c Representative images of Oil Red O-stained mature inguinal adipocytes differentiated using the four adipogenic cocktails. Scale bar: 200 µm. d Immunoblot analysis of UCP1 and PPARG in mature adipocytes differentiated with the four adipogenic recipes, with HSP90 used as a loading control (n = 3/group). Brown adipose tissue (BAT) was included as a positive control for UCP1, indicated by the arrow. e Oxygen consumption rate (OCR) in mature adipocytes differentiated with different adipogenic recipes (R1 and R2, n = 5; R3 and R4, n = 4). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Four-group comparisons were assessed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test, Welch’s ANOVA with Dunnett’s T3, or Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc test. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences at p < 0.05.

The critical role of rosiglitazone in maximizing beige adipogenesis

We aimed to identify the adipogenic inducer primarily responsible for the observed differences in thermogenic efficacy. Recipes R1 and R3 share a similar chemical composition, with the key distinction being the inclusion of Rosi in R3. Similarly, recipes R2 and R4 differ only by the addition of Rosi in R4. Rosi, a synthetic PPARγ agonist belonging to the thiazolidinedione (TZD) class, was initially developed as an insulin sensitizer for type 2 diabetes. Identified in the mid-1990s, PPARγ is adipose-enriched and essential for adipogenesis [42]. Accordingly, PPARγ agonists are used to promote adipogenesis in cell culture systems. Furthermore, chronic treatment with Rosi during adipogenesis of murine primary inguinal preadipocytes and mesenchymal stromal cells has been shown to robustly activate the thermogenic molecular program [36, 43]. Consistent with these observations, our data indicate that Rosi significantly enhances beige adipogenesis when included as part of the adipogenic cocktail.

To pinpoint the specific phases of in vitro beige adipogenesis—induction or differentiation—where Rosi exerts its most critical effects, we conducted further investigations. We supplemented Rosi into recipes R1 and R2, which lack Rosi, during either the induction or differentiation phase of adipogenesis in cultured IWAT preadipocytes from C57BL/6J mice. Supplementing Rosi during either phase enhanced beige adipogenesis overall after full differentiation, as indicated by increased mRNA expression of thermogenic (Ucp1, Ppargc1a, and Cox8b) and general adipogenic (Adipoq, Fabp4, and Pparg) markers (Fig. 3a, b). Notably, thermogenic enhancement was significantly more pronounced when Rosi was added during the differentiation phase, rather than the induction phase, as evidenced by a marked elevation in Ucp1 expression (Fig. 3a, b). Morphological assessment using BODIPY staining revealed a noticeable increase in multilocular lipid droplets in mature adipocytes, characteristic of thermogenic adipocytes, when Rosi was present during the differentiation phase in recipes R1 or R2 (Fig. 3c). OCR was also higher with differentiation-phase Rosi, indicating greater thermogenic capacity at the functional level (Fig. 3d). Conversely, removing Rosi from R3 and R4 during the differentiation phase led to a greater suppression of adipogenic and thermogenic gene programs than its removal during the induction phase and yielded undetectable UCP1, as observed in fully differentiated adipocytes (Figs. 3e, f and S2). BODIPY staining revealed larger lipid droplets in mature adipocytes developed without Rosi during the differentiation phase (Fig. 3g). Consistently, OCR-based functional assessment demonstrated markedly reduced respiration in the absence of Rosi (Fig. 3h). These findings underscore Rosi’s critical role in enhancing beige adipogenesis by promoting both adipogenic and thermogenic gene programs, with its impact being particularly significant during the differentiation phase.

Fig. 3. The critical role of rosiglitazone (Rosi) in enhancing beige adipogenesis in primary inguinal preadipocytes from wild-type C57BL/6J mice.

Fig. 3

a, b qPCR analysis of thermogenic (Ucp1, Ppargc1a, and Cox8b) and adipogenic (Adipoq, Fabp4, and Pparg) gene expression in inguinal adipocytes differentiated under adipogenic recipes R1 and R2, with or without Rosi supplementation during the a induction phase (n = 3/group), or b differentiation phase (n = 6/group). c Representative images of inguinal adipocytes stained with BODIPY (green, neutral lipids) and DAPI (blue, nuclei) after differentiation using adipogenic cocktails R1 and R2 with or without Rosi supplementation during the differentiation phase. Scale bar: 150 µm. d Oxygen consumption rate (OCR) in mature adipocytes differentiated with adipogenic recipes R1 and R2 with or without Rosi supplementation during the differentiation phase (n = 5/group). qPCR analysis of thermogenic and adipogenic gene expression in inguinal adipocytes differentiated under adipogenic recipes R3 and R4, as well as R3 and R4 without Rosi, during the e induction phase (n = 6/group), or f differentiation phase (n = 3/group). g Representative images of BODIPY and DAPI-stained inguinal adipocytes differentiated using adipogenic cocktails R3 and R4, as well as R3 and R4 without Rosi, during the differentiation phase. Scale bar: 150 µm. h OCR in mature adipocytes differentiated with adipogenic recipes R3 and R4 with Rosi either retained or removed during the differentiation phase (n = 3/group). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Two-group differences were assessed using two-tailed Student’s t test or Mann–Whitney U test. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; n.s., non-significant difference.

Thermogenic activation in mature inguinal adipocytes differentiated with different adipogenic cocktails

Differentiated murine subcutaneous adipocytes are widely used as an in vitro platform to screen and evaluate the thermogenic activation potential of small molecules. To investigate how different adipogenic recipes influence the thermogenic characteristics of beige adipocytes in response to external stimuli, we examined β-adrenergic receptor (β-AR)-mediated responses in mature adipocytes differentiated with the four cocktails. β-ARs, which include three subtypes—β1, β2, and β3—play essential roles in regulating thermogenesis and associated lipolysis, with β3 being the predominant subtype expressed in thermogenic adipocytes [44].

We treated fully differentiated inguinal mature adipocytes from C57BL/6J mice with isoproterenol (Iso), a pan β-AR agonist, for 4 h and evaluated thermogenic gene activation. Adipocytes differentiated using recipes R1 and R2 exhibited greater induction of thermogenic genes (Ucp1 and Ppargc1a) in response to Iso compared to those differentiated under R3 and R4 (Fig. 4a). This effect was likely due to the lower basal thermogenic activity in adipocytes differentiated with R1 and R2, which lacked Rosi. In contrast, adipocytes differentiated with recipes R3 and R4, which included Rosi, exhibited high or maximized basal thermogenic activity, thereby limiting their capacity for further thermogenic activation in response to Iso (Figs. 2c and 4a). When Rosi was added during the differentiation phase in recipes R1 and R2 to enhance thermogenic adipogenesis, Iso-induced thermogenic gene induction was less pronounced compared to the original recipes without Rosi (Fig. 4b). Conversely, recipes R3 and R4, modified to exclude Rosi during the differentiation phase and suppress basal thermogenic activity, showed improved thermogenic gene induction in response to Iso (Fig. 4c). It is of note that short-term activation of thermogenic adipocytes via β-AR signaling was insufficient to upregulate the mitochondrial gene Cox8b (Fig. 4a–c).

Fig. 4. β-adrenergic signaling-mediated thermogenic activation in mature adipocytes differentiated from primary inguinal preadipocytes of wild-type C57BL/6J mice under distinct adipogenic cocktails.

Fig. 4

a qPCR analysis of thermogenic markers following vehicle (Ctrl) or 10 µM Iso treatment for 4 h in inguinal adipocytes differentiated with four different adipogenic cocktails: R1 (n = 6/group), R2 (n = 5–6/group), R3 (n = 6/group), and R4 (n = 4–6/group), after treatment with control (Ctrl) or 10 µM isoproterenol (Iso) for 4 h. qPCR analysis of thermogenic gene expression in mature inguinal adipocytes differentiated under adipogenic recipes: b R1 and R2 supplemented with rosiglitazone (Rosi) at the differentiation phase (n = 6/group), or c R3 and R4 without Rosi during the differentiation phase (R3, n = 4–5/group; R4, n = 6/group). d Immunoblot analysis of phosphorylated PKA and HSL protein levels in inguinal adipocytes differentiated with adipogenic cocktails R3 and R4, with or without Rosi, following treatment with Ctrl or 10 µM Iso for 15 min. β-actin was used as a reference protein. Oxygen consumption rate (OCR) changes in response to 10 µM Iso in mature adipocytes differentiated with e R3 and f R4, with Rosi either retained or removed during the differentiation phase (R3 and R4, n = 3–4/group; R3 and R4 without Rosi, n = 5–9/group). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Two-group differences were assessed using two-tailed Student’s t test or Mann–Whitney U test. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.

The functional consequence of β-AR activation involves elevated levels of the second messenger cAMP in thermogenic adipocytes, which leads to the phosphorylation of PKA and the key lipolysis protein, hormone-sensitive lipase (HSL). Iso-induced thermogenic activation, measured by PKA and HSL phosphorylation, was significant in mature beige adipocytes differentiated using recipes R3 and R4, irrespective of Rosi’s presence during the differentiation phase (Fig. 4d). We also quantified the real-time response to Iso using the OCR assay. R3- and R4-derived mature adipocytes exhibited significantly larger Iso-induced OCR increases than cells generated without Rosi during the differentiation phase (Fig. 4e, f). These data indicate that potent cocktails such as R3 and R4 prime cells for rapid thermogenic activation with minimal reliance on slower transcriptional remodeling. Accordingly, integrating acute signaling and real-time functional readouts with gene expression analyses enables a more comprehensive, less cocktail-dependent assessment.

Plasticity of beige adipogenesis with different adipogenic cocktails

One of the key characteristics of beige adipogenesis is its remarkable plasticity and adaptability, resulting in the generation of diverse subtypes of beige adipocytes with alternative thermogenic mechanisms in subcutaneous WAT, even under genetic modifications. In the absence of UCP1, beige adipogenesis can still occur, producing noncanonical beige adipocytes that generate heat through ATP hydrolysis via calcium cycling mediated by sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase 2B and through creatine phosphorylation facilitated by mitochondrial creatine kinases [17, 45]. Additionally, β-less mice, which lack all three β-AR subtypes (β1, β2, and β3), can recruit glycolytic beige adipocytes derived from myogenic progenitors via GA-binding protein alpha [16]. Therefore, we evaluated the effects of four different adipogenic cocktails on beige adipogenesis in primary mouse inguinal preadipocytes lacking key thermogenic regulators, such as fibroblast growth factor 21 (Fgf21) and PR/SET domain 16 (Prdm16).

FGF21 is one of the most well-known batokines, with its secretion increasing in response to cold exposure or β3-AR stimulation. It functions as an autocrine factor to promote thermogenesis in beige adipocytes [46, 47]. Consistent with observations in primary IWAT SVF cells from wild-type mice (Fig. 2a), those from Fgf21 KO mice were also capable of differentiating into beige adipocytes under all four adipogenic cocktails (Fig. 5a, b). Interestingly, while mature adipocytes differentiated from Fgf21 KO IWAT preadipocytes using recipes R3 and R4 exhibited a higher thermogenic gene program compared to those differentiated with R1 and R2, the inductions were less pronounced than those in wild-type cells (Figs. 2b and 5c). UCP1 protein was undetectable even in R3- and R4-derived adipocytes, consistent with reduced beige adipocyte abundance and/or activity due to disruption of key regulatory pathways relative to wild-type (Fig. S3a) [46, 48]. However, a significant rise in mitochondrial respiratory complex proteins confirmed recruitment of thermogenic beige adipocytes (Fig. S3a). Unlike wild-type adipocytes, Fgf21 KO adipocytes showed comparable overall adipogenic gene expression levels across all tested adipogenic cocktails (Figs. 2b and 5c). Our findings support that beige adipocytes with Fgf21-independent thermogenic mechanisms can be recruited, highlighting the potential for exploring alternative thermogenic pathways. The influence of cocktail formulation on adipogenesis was less pronounced in inguinal preadipocytes lacking Fgf21 than in wild-type cells. We further validated the emergence of beige adipocytes using recipes R3 and R4 in a separate set of primary IWAT SVF cells from mice with a defective thermogenic program caused by adipocyte-specific loss of Prdm16, a critical cell-autonomous activator of beige adipocyte biogenesis (Figs. 5d, e and S3b) [48].

Fig. 5. Beige adipogenesis with different adipogenic cocktails in primary inguinal preadipocytes from genetically modified and diverse mouse models.

Fig. 5

a–c Analysis in whole-body Fgf21 KO mice. a qPCR analysis of Fgf21 mRNA levels in inguinal white adipose tissue (IWAT) from wild-type (WT) control and Fgf21 KO mice (n = 6/genotype). b qPCR analysis of thermogenic (Ucp1) and adipogenic markers (Adipoq and Fabp4) in inguinal preadipocytes and mature adipocytes differentiated using adipogenic recipes R1, R2, R3, and R4 (n = 6–8/group). c qPCR analysis of thermogenic (Ucp1, Ppargc1a, and Cox8b) and adipogenic (Adipoq, Fabp4, and Pparg) gene expression in fully differentiated inguinal mature adipocytes using different adipogenic recipes (R1, n = 5–6; R2, n = 6; R3, n = 5–6; R4, n = 6). d, e Analysis in fat-specific Prdm16 KO mice. d Top: Schematic representation of fat-specific Prdm16 KO generation by crossing Prdm16fl/fl and Adipoq-Cre mice (created with BioRender.com). Bottom: qPCR analysis of Prdm16 gene expression in IWAT from floxed control and KO mice (n = 6/genotype). e qPCR analysis of thermogenic and adipogenic markers in inguinal preadipocytes and mature adipocytes differentiated using adipogenic recipes R3 (n = 8–10/group) and R4 (n = 8–12/group). f, g Analysis in UM-HET3 mice. f Left: Schematic of UM-HET3 mouse generation via a four-way cross, achieved by mating CByB6F1/J hybrid females with C3D2F1/J hybrid males (created with BioRender.com). Right: qPCR analysis of thermogenic and adipogenic markers in inguinal preadipocytes and mature adipocytes differentiated using adipogenic recipes R3 (n = 4–8/group) and R4 (n = 6–8/group). g Representative images of (top) Oil Red O and (bottom) BODIPY and DAPI-stained mature inguinal adipocytes differentiated using adipogenic recipes R3 and R4. Scale bar: 500 µm. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Four-group comparisons were assessed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test, Welch’s ANOVA with Dunnett’s T3, or Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc test. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences at p < 0.05. n.s., not significant.

Throughout this study, primary IWAT SVF cells tested with the adipogenic cocktails were derived from mice with a C57BL/6J genetic background. To evaluate the broader applicability of our findings, we employed UM-HET3 mice as a model for human genetic diversity. These mice, generated by crossing CByB6F1/J hybrid females with C3D2F1/J hybrid males, possess a genetically heterogeneous background derived from four widely used wild-type strains: C57BL/6J, BALB/cByJ, C3H/HeJ, and DBA/2J (Fig. 5f) [49]. Recipes R3 and R4 effectively induced beige adipocyte biogenesis at both transcriptional and morphological levels, as demonstrated by increased thermogenic gene expression and lipid droplet formation visualized through BODIPY staining in differentiated mature inguinal adipocytes from UM-HET3 mice (Fig. 5f, g). These findings indicate that the adipogenic cocktails tested in this study can successfully induce beige adipogenesis, with R3 and R4 emerging as the most effective for enhancing thermogenesis, even in models with impaired thermogenic capacity and a genetically diverse background.

Discussion

Murine primary subcutaneous adipocytes provide a valuable model for studying beige fat biology, facilitating research on cell-autonomous beige adipogenesis, thermogenic mechanisms, and functional roles of beige adipocytes. This system also serves as a platform for screening small molecules that stimulate beige fat thermogenic activation and recruitment. Key advantages include flexibility in experimental design and the ability to make direct comparisons across models under identical culture conditions. These cells closely mimic the native adipocyte phenotype of specific subcutaneous depots and retain the genetic and epigenetic characteristics of the donor organism, features often lost in immortalized cell lines. While primary mature adipocytes offer the highest in vivo relevance, their fragility and buoyancy limit their use in culture-based assays, making differentiated primary adipocytes a more practical and versatile alternative.

However, culturing and differentiating primary preadipocytes present several challenges. These include variability introduced by the enzyme digestion-based SVF isolation process, which can impact preadipocyte viability and surface marker expression, the heterogeneity of the SVF population, and the limited proliferative capacity of preadipocytes. Additionally, primary preadipocytes are highly sensitive to culture conditions, and their differentiation capacity can vary significantly even under optimized protocols due to factors such as the precise composition of the culture medium and individual mouse characteristics (e.g., sex, age) [50]. Consequently, these variables can impact experimental outcomes.

Among these challenges, the induction and differentiation of preadipocytes remain the most critical steps in this system. In this study, we conducted an unbiased evaluation of adipogenic cocktails currently used for the induction and differentiation of primary mouse inguinal preadipocytes. Our findings demonstrate that the composition of adipogenic inducers significantly affects both adipogenic and thermogenic efficacy. Rosi emerged as a key component during the differentiation phase for maximizing beige adipocyte biogenesis. However, the resulting mature adipocyte cultures had limitations in fully representing thermogenic activation at the transcriptional level in response to external stimuli, such as β-AR agonists, while acute signal transduction and real-time functional responses remained strong.

For screenings to identify compounds that enhance beige adipocyte activation or biogenesis at the transcriptional level, primary inguinal preadipocytes could be differentiated in adipogenic medium with limited Rosi exposure to avoid masking thermogenic activation by saturated basal activity. Among the adipogenic inducers used, T3 and indomethacin may be dispensable for promoting beige adipogenesis in primary mouse inguinal preadipocytes. Furthermore, selecting suitable FBS containing essential growth factors and hormones is critical for achieving effective differentiation.

The most commonly used cell lines for thermogenic research are 3T3-L1 and C3H/10T1/2 cells, both established from murine embryos. Over the years, adipocyte differentiation protocols for these cells have been well refined. The 3T3-L1 cell line is the most widely used preadipocyte model for studying adipocyte development and biology [51]. It has enabled breakthrough advances in understanding adipogenesis by facilitating the identification of pro-adipogenic compounds, such as insulin, IBMX, dexamethasone, and PPARγ agonists, as well as key transcription factors, including C/EBPβ and PPARγ [52]. Although differentiated 3T3-L1 preadipocytes express thermogenic adipose markers and exhibit increased mitochondrial respiration in response to catecholamines and various compounds [53–55], it should be noted that even upon stimulation, UCP1 expression remains low [56]. Therefore, 3T3-L1 cells may not be considered a bona fide thermogenic adipose model. In contrast, murine mesenchymal multipotent C3H/10T1/2 cells have been particularly useful for investigating beige adipocyte thermogenic activity. Notably, PPARγ agonists have been shown to be essential during the differentiation phase for driving the adipogenic conversion of C3H/10T1/2 cells [51].

Previous studies have demonstrated that Rosi promotes beige thermogenesis across multiple cell culture models, including murine 3T3-L1 and C3H/10T1/2 cell lines, as well as primary mouse and human subcutaneous adipose SVF cultures. These studies consistently reported increased thermogenic gene expression (e.g., Ucp1), enhanced mitochondrial biogenesis, increased glucose uptake, and/or elevated oxygen consumption [19, 36, 57, 58]. Many studies used Rosi throughout the entire adipogenic process, whereas others restricted exposure to the early stages (induction and the first few days of differentiation) or applied it to fully differentiated mature adipocytes to activate thermogenesis. Notably, Ohno et al. showed that chronic Rosi exposure (≥3 days) is necessary for effective browning [36]. In their study, when Rosi was limited to 2 days of induction and the first 2 days of differentiation within an 8-day adipogenic timeline (i.e., 4-day treatment followed by 4-day withdrawal), activation of thermogenic molecular programs was not sustained or robustly induced [36]. These findings suggest that Rosi exerts a critical effect during the differentiation phase or that continuous exposure throughout adipogenesis is required to achieve maximal thermogenic activation—consistent with our findings.

As a PPARγ agonist, Rosi binds to and activates PPARγ, enhancing transcription at PPAR response elements in the promoters or enhancers of thermogenic genes [59, 60]. Although the precise mechanisms underlying Rosi-induced beige thermogenesis are not fully defined, evidence indicates that SIRT1-dependent deacetylation of PPARγ facilitates PRDM16 recruitment and that post-translational pathways can stabilize PRDM16 [36, 41, 61]. However, these do not fully account for Rosi-induced beiging, as beige adipocytes can arise without PRDM16, including in our study, and additional pathways such as NRF2-mediated inhibition of autophagy have been reported [36, 62, 63]. TZDs, including Rosi, have also been suggested to influence mesenchymal stem cell lineage allocation toward adipogenesis; however, subsequent work indicates that TZDs enhance adipogenesis without directly altering lineage commitment [64, 65]. Overall, our findings are consistent with Rosi primarily augmenting beige adipogenesis rather than determining lineage commitment, as induction-phase–limited exposure yielded modest recruitment of thermogenic adipocytes.

In conclusion, differentiating beige adipocytes from mouse subcutaneous adipose SVF cells using a conventional culture system remains one of the most popular and practical approaches, balancing technical feasibility with physiological relevance. However, variability in beige adipogenesis and the characteristics of beige adipocytes, determined by different combinations of adipogenic inducers, highlight the importance of carefully selecting or optimizing these cocktails to align with specific experimental objectives and accurately represent beige adipose biology and functional responses.

Supplementary information

Supplementary materials (1.3MB, docx)

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (R15AA031123) to HJ.

Author contributions

YM designed and performed experiments, analyzed data, and drafted the manuscript. ZZ and ETR performed experiments and contributed to data analysis. EM, RG, and KS assisted with experiments. HJ conceived and supervised the project, secured funding, interpreted the results, and wrote, revised, and finalized the manuscript.

Data availability

The datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

All experimental procedures involving animals were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Texas Tech University (IACUC protocol PRO22015-02) and carried out in compliance with the approved protocol, institutional guidelines, and relevant regulations.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41366-025-01946-8.

References

  • 1.Rahman MS, Jun H. The adipose tissue macrophages central to adaptive thermoregulation. Front Immunol. 2022;13:884126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lee HJ, Lee J, Yang MJ, Kim YC, Hong SP, Kim JM, et al. Endothelial cell-derived stem cell factor promotes lipid accumulation through c-Kit-mediated increase of lipogenic enzymes in brown adipocytes. Nat Commun. 2023;14:2754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Monelli E, Villacampa P, Zabala-Letona A, Martinez-Romero A, Llena J, Beiroa D, et al. Angiocrine polyamine production regulates adiposity. Nat Metab. 2022;4:327–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cohen P, Kajimura S. The cellular and functional complexity of thermogenic fat. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2021;22:393–409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sakers A, De Siqueira MK, Seale P, Villanueva CJ. Adipose-tissue plasticity in health and disease. Cell. 2022;185:419–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kawai T, Autieri MV, Scalia R. Adipose tissue inflammation and metabolic dysfunction in obesity. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2021;320:C375–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sanchez-Gurmaches J, Guertin DA. Adipocytes arise from multiple lineages that are heterogeneously and dynamically distributed. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sebo ZL, Jeffery E, Holtrup B, Rodeheffer MS. A mesodermal fate map for adipose tissue. Development. 2018;145:dev166801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lidell ME, Betz MJ, Dahlqvist Leinhard O, Heglind M, Elander L, Slawik M, et al. Evidence for two types of brown adipose tissue in humans. Nat Med. 2013;19:631–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wu J, Bostrom P, Sparks LM, Ye L, Choi JH, Giang AH, et al. Beige adipocytes are a distinct type of thermogenic fat cell in mouse and human. Cell. 2012;150:366–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shinoda K, Luijten IH, Hasegawa Y, Hong H, Sonne SB, Kim M, et al. Genetic and functional characterization of clonally derived adult human brown adipocytes. Nat Med. 2015;21:389–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wu J, Cohen P, Spiegelman BM. Adaptive thermogenesis in adipocytes: is beige the new brown?. Genes Dev. 2013;27:234–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Leitner BP, Huang S, Brychta RJ, Duckworth CJ, Baskin AS, McGehee S, et al. Mapping of human brown adipose tissue in lean and obese young men. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114:8649–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Becher T, Palanisamy S, Kramer DJ, Eljalby M, Marx SJ, Wibmer AG, et al. Brown adipose tissue is associated with cardiometabolic health. Nat Med. 2021;27:58–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Seki T, Yang Y, Sun X, Lim S, Xie S, Guo Z, et al. Brown-fat-mediated tumour suppression by cold-altered global metabolism. Nature. 2022;608:421–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chen Y, Ikeda K, Yoneshiro T, Scaramozza A, Tajima K, Wang Q, et al. Thermal stress induces glycolytic beige fat formation via a myogenic state. Nature. 2019;565:180–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kazak L, Chouchani ET, Jedrychowski MP, Erickson BK, Shinoda K, Cohen P, et al. A creatine-driven substrate cycle enhances energy expenditure and thermogenesis in beige fat. Cell. 2015;163:643–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Patsouris D, Qi P, Abdullahi A, Stanojcic M, Chen P, Parousis A, et al. Burn induces browning of the subcutaneous white adipose tissue in mice and humans. Cell Rep. 2015;13:1538–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Merlin J, Sato M, Nowell C, Pakzad M, Fahey R, Gao J, et al. The PPARgamma agonist rosiglitazone promotes the induction of brite adipocytes, increasing beta-adrenoceptor-mediated mitochondrial function and glucose uptake. Cell Signal. 2018;42:54–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hollenberg CH, Vost A. Regulation of DNA synthesis in fat cells and stromal elements from rat adipose tissue. J Clin Invest. 1969;47:2485–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bjorntorp P, Karlsson M, Pertoft H, Pettersson P, Sjostrom L, Smith U. Isolation and characterization of cells from rat adipose tissue developing into adipocytes. J Lipid Res. 1978;19:316–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ng CW, Poznanski WJ, Borowiecki M, Reimer G. Differences in growth in vitro of adipose cells from normal and obese patients. Nature. 1971;231:445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yu H, Emont M, Jun H, Wu J. Isolation and differentiation of murine primary brown/beige preadipocytes. Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1773:273–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Du J, Zhao L, Kang Q, He Y, Bi Y. An optimized method for Oil Red O staining with the salicylic acid ethanol solution. Adipocyte. 2023;12:2179334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cahyadi DD, Warita T, Irie N, Mizoguchi K, Tashiro J, Hosaka YZ, et al. Housekeeping gene expression variability in differentiating and non-differentiating 3T3-L1 cells. Adipocyte. 2023;12:2235081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lai TH, Hwang JS, Ngo QN, Lee DK, Kim HJ, Kim DR. A comparative assessment of reference genes in mouse brown adipocyte differentiation and thermogenesis in vitro. Adipocyte. 2024;13:2330355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jun H, Yu H, Gong J, Jiang J, Qiao X, Perkey E, et al. An immune-beige adipocyte communication via nicotinic acetylcholine receptor signaling. Nat Med. 2018;24:814–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ntambi JM, Young-Cheul K. Adipocyte differentiation and gene expression. J Nutr. 2000;130:3122S–6S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhang X, Chen X, Qi T, Kong Q, Cheng H, Cao X, et al. HSPA12A is required for adipocyte differentiation and diet-induced obesity through a positive feedback regulation with PPARgamma. Cell Death Differ. 2019;26:2253–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Deis JA, Guo H, Wu Y, Liu C, Bernlohr DA, Chen X. Lipocalin 2 regulates retinoic acid-induced activation of beige adipocytes. J Mol Endocrinol. 2018;61:115–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Liu Y, Maekawa T, Yoshida K, Muratani M, Chatton B, Ishii S. The transcription factor ATF7 controls adipocyte differentiation and thermogenic gene programming. iScience. 2019;13:98–112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Scott MA, Nguyen VT, Levi B, James AW. Current methods of adipogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2011;20:1793–804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Liu T, Mi L, Xiong J, Orchard P, Yu Q, Yu L, et al. BAF60a deficiency uncouples chromatin accessibility and cold sensitivity from white fat browning. Nat Commun. 2020;11:2379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Oguri Y, Shinoda K, Kim H, Alba DL, Bolus WR, Wang Q, et al. CD81 controls beige fat progenitor cell growth and energy balance via FAK signaling. Cell. 2020;182:563–77.e20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Obregon MJ. Adipose tissues and thyroid hormones. Front Physiol. 2014;5:479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ohno H, Shinoda K, Spiegelman BM, Kajimura S. PPARgamma agonists induce a white-to-brown fat conversion through stabilization of PRDM16 protein. Cell Metab. 2012;15:395–404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Svensson KJ, Long JZ, Jedrychowski MP, Cohen P, Lo JC, Serag S, et al. A secreted Slit2 fragment regulates adipose tissue thermogenesis and metabolic function. Cell Metab. 2016;23:454–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Altshuler-Keylin S, Shinoda K, Hasegawa Y, Ikeda K, Hong H, Kang Q, et al. Beige adipocyte maintenance is regulated by autophagy-induced mitochondrial clearance. Cell Metab. 2016;24:402–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wu R, Chen Y, Liu Y, Zhuang L, Chen W, Zeng B, et al. m6A methylation promotes white-to-beige fat transition by facilitating Hif1a translation. EMBO Rep. 2021;22:e52348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ding H, Zheng S, Garcia-Ruiz D, Hou D, Wei Z, Liao Z, et al. Fasting induces a subcutaneous-to-visceral fat switch mediated by microRNA-149-3p and suppression of PRDM16. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wang Q, Li H, Tajima K, Verkerke ARP, Taxin ZH, Hou Z, et al. Post-translational control of beige fat biogenesis by PRDM16 stabilization. Nature. 2022;609:151–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Albrektsen T, Frederiksen KS, Holmes WE, Boel E, Taylor K, Fleckner J. Novel genes regulated by the insulin sensitizer rosiglitazone during adipocyte differentiation. Diabetes. 2002;51:1042–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Fayyad AM, Khan AA, Abdallah SH, Alomran SS, Bajou K, Khattak MNK. Rosiglitazone enhances browning adipocytes in association with MAPK and PI3-K pathways during the differentiation of telomerase-transformed mesenchymal stromal cells into adipocytes. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:1618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zhao J, Unelius L, Bengtsson T, Cannon B, Nedergaard J. Coexisting beta-adrenoceptor subtypes: significance for thermogenic process in brown fat cells. Am J Physiol. 1994;267:C969–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ikeda K, Kang Q, Yoneshiro T, Camporez JP, Maki H, Homma M, et al. UCP1-independent signaling involving SERCA2b-mediated calcium cycling regulates beige fat thermogenesis and systemic glucose homeostasis. Nat Med. 2017;23:1454–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Fisher FM, Kleiner S, Douris N, Fox EC, Mepani RJ, Verdeguer F, et al. FGF21 regulates PGC-1alpha and browning of white adipose tissues in adaptive thermogenesis. Genes Dev. 2012;26:271–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Abu-Odeh M, Zhang Y, Reilly SM, Ebadat N, Keinan O, Valentine JM, et al. FGF21 promotes thermogenic gene expression as an autocrine factor in adipocytes. Cell Rep. 2021;35:109331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Seale P, Conroe HM, Estall J, Kajimura S, Frontini A, Ishibashi J, et al. Prdm16 determines the thermogenic program of subcutaneous white adipose tissue in mice. J Clin Invest. 2011;121:96–105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Bou Sleiman M, Roy S, Gao AW, Sadler MC, von Alvensleben GVG, Li H, et al. Sex- and age-dependent genetics of longevity in a heterogeneous mouse population. Science. 2022;377:eabo3191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Maniyadath B, Zhang Q, Gupta RK, Mandrup S. Adipose tissue at single-cell resolution. Cell Metab. 2023;35:386–413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Alexander DL, Ganem LG, Fernandez-Salguero P, Gonzalez F, Jefcoate CR. Aryl-hydrocarbon receptor is an inhibitory regulator of lipid synthesis and of commitment to adipogenesis. J Cell Sci. 1998;111:3311–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Dufau J, Shen JX, Couchet M, De Castro Barbosa T, Mejhert N, Massier L, et al. In vitro and ex vivo models of adipocytes. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2021;320:C822–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Morrison S, McGee SL. 3T3-L1 adipocytes display phenotypic characteristics of multiple adipocyte lineages. Adipocyte. 2015;4:295–302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Nueda ML, Gonzalez-Gomez MJ, Rodriguez-Cano MM, Monsalve EM, Diaz-Guerra MJM, Sanchez-Solana B, et al. DLK proteins modulate NOTCH signaling to influence a brown or white 3T3-L1 adipocyte fate. Sci Rep. 2018;8:16923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Lee K, Lee YJ, Kim KJ, Chei S, Jin H, Oh HJ, et al. Gomisin N from Schisandra chinensis ameliorates lipid accumulation and induces a brown fat-like phenotype through AMP-activated protein kinase in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:2153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Asano H, Kanamori Y, Higurashi S, Nara T, Kato K, Matsui T, et al. Induction of beige-like adipocytes in 3T3-L1 cells. J Vet Med Sci. 2014;76:57–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Rong JX, Klein JL, Qiu Y, Xie M, Johnson JH, Waters KM, et al. Rosiglitazone induces mitochondrial biogenesis in differentiated murine 3T3-L1 and C3H/10T1/2 adipocytes. PPAR Res. 2011;2011:179454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Bartesaghi S, Hallen S, Huang L, Svensson PA, Momo RA, Wallin S, et al. Thermogenic activity of UCP1 in human white fat-derived beige adipocytes. Mol Endocrinol. 2015;29:130–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Tai TA, Jennermann C, Brown KK, Oliver BB, MacGinnitie MA, Wilkison WO, et al. Activation of the nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma promotes brown adipocyte differentiation. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:29909–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Viswakarma N, Yu S, Naik S, Kashireddy P, Matsumoto K, Sarkar J, et al. Transcriptional regulation of Cidea, mitochondrial cell death-inducing DNA fragmentation factor alpha-like effector A, in mouse liver by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha and gamma. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:18613–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Qiang L, Wang L, Kon N, Zhao W, Lee S, Zhang Y, et al. Brown remodeling of white adipose tissue by SirT1-dependent deacetylation of Ppargamma. Cell. 2012;150:620–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Kissig M, Ishibashi J, Harms MJ, Lim HW, Stine RR, Won KJ, et al. PRDM16 represses the type I interferon response in adipocytes to promote mitochondrial and thermogenic programing. EMBO J. 2017;36:1528–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Li Y, Zheng W, Li X, Lue Z, Liu Y, Wu J, et al. The autophagic regulation of rosiglitazone-promoted adipocyte browning. Front Pharm. 2024;15:1412520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.van de Vyver M, Andrag E, Cockburn IL, Ferris WF. Thiazolidinedione-induced lipid droplet formation during osteogenic differentiation. J Endocrinol. 2014;223:119–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Beck GR Jr, Khazai NB, Bouloux GF, Camalier CE, Lin Y, Garneys LM, et al. The effects of thiazolidinediones on human bone marrow stromal cell differentiation in vitro and in thiazolidinedione-treated patients with type 2 diabetes. Transl Res. 2013;161:145–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials (1.3MB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from International Journal of Obesity (2005) are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES