Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2026 Feb 17;52(2):e70202. doi: 10.1111/jog.70202

Placental Insufficiency and Neonatal Vulnerability: Organ‐Specific Mechanisms Shaping Early‐Life Health

Mari Ichinose 1,, Takayuki Iriyama 1, Yasushi Hirota 1
PMCID: PMC12912813  PMID: 41702376

ABSTRACT

Placental insufficiency is a central pathological condition underlying fetal growth restriction and is strongly associated with adverse outcomes during the neonatal period. Although epidemiological and clinical studies have consistently linked compromised placental function to neonatal respiratory, neurological, gastrointestinal, and infectious morbidity, the mechanisms through which placental insufficiency translates into organ‐specific neonatal vulnerability remain unclear. Increasing evidence from human observations and experimental animal models indicates that placental insufficiency disrupts coordinated fetal development through alterations in perfusion, vascular patterning, cellular differentiation, barrier maturation, and immune responsiveness, rather than through uniform growth failure. This review summarizes current progress in the understanding of organ‐specific mechanisms by which placental insufficiency shapes neonatal vulnerability, with a focus on the lung, brain, intestine, and immune system. We further discuss how these developmental perturbations interact with postnatal environmental exposures and highlight future perspectives for identifying at‐risk infants and developing targeted strategies to mitigate adverse neonatal outcomes.

Keywords: fetal growth restriction, intrauterine environment, placental insufficiency, preeclampsia

1. Introduction

Pre‐eclampsia (PE) and fetal growth restriction (FGR) are associated conditions that share a common underlying pathology, which is placental dysfunction. Placental dysfunction is a leading medical cause of preterm birth [1], and despite advancements in neonatal intensive care, the long‐term health of an affected offspring remains a growing concern [2]. Given the global trend of delayed childbearing, the incidence of PE is increasing [3], and appropriate medical interventions for offspring exposed to this intrauterine environment are expected to contribute to improved long‐term health outcomes.

Extensive pathological studies have characterized placental dysfunction by reduced uteroplacental perfusion, chronic inflammation, and abnormal trophoblast differentiation and invasion [4]. Intrauterine inflammation and ischemia are considered principal factors affecting fetuses, and such placental pathology is presumed to exert molecular‐level effects on fetal development. Placental pathology is associated with neonatal adverse outcomes [5, 6]. Accumulating evidence suggests that placental insufficiency compromises fetal growth and short‐term survival, with lasting effects on organ development, immune system programming, and metabolic regulation. Later in life, these intrauterine injuries may predispose individuals to numerous health disorders, although the precise molecular mechanisms remain unclear.

FGR diagnosed near or at term typically requires less intensive neonatal support than those diagnosed at early‐onset. Multiple cohort studies have shown that FGR carries increased risks of neurocognitive and cardiometabolic sequelae later in life [7], which is consistent with the developmental origins of health and disease (DOHaD) paradigm [8]. In contrast, FGR, identified during the preterm period, is more frequently accompanied by abnormal umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry and oligohydramnios [9]. These fetuses face a double burden: prematurity due to preterm birth and in utero stress due to chronic hypoxia and malnutrition. Increasing evidence supports the clinical burden encountered by these infants in multiple organs during the neonatal period, thereby affecting their general development.

In this review, we focused on FGR due to placental dysfunction, excluding cases associated with chromosomal abnormalities, structural malformations, or maternal–fetal infections. FGR due to twin pregnancies is beyond the scope of this review. We summarized clinical and mechanistic insights into how placental dysfunction affects offspring health, encompassing neonatal, childhood, and adult outcomes associated with PE and FGR. Additionally, we examined maternal and placental pathways, including angiogenic imbalance, hypoxia signaling, immune dysregulation, and endocrine and metabolic perturbations, which connect this maternal syndrome with fetal exposure. Next, organ‐specific responses that plausibly mediate long‐term disease risk were outlined. Finally, we discussed translational opportunities for biomarker‐guided stratification and preventive interventions aimed at altering life‐course risk (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Placental insufficiency‐driven developmental perturbations underlying neonatal vulnerability. Placental insufficiency disrupts coordinated fetal development through impaired perfusion, hypoxia, and altered stress responses, leading to organ‐specific structural and functional immaturity. These alterations differentially affect the lung, brain, intestine, and immune system and manifest as increased vulnerability to adverse outcomes during the neonatal period, which may be further modified by postnatal environmental factors.

2. Health Risks in Offspring Exposed to Placental Dysfunction

Epidemiological studies have demonstrated that offspring exposed to maternal PE or born as FGR are at increased risk of various morbidities (Table 1). We reviewed these morbidities from the neonatal period through childhood, highlighting how placental dysfunction shapes postnatal health trajectories.

TABLE 1.

Organ‐specific neonatal outcomes and structural–cellular alterations in placental insufficiency.

Organ Adverse outcomes during the neonatal period Structural/cellular alterations
Lung
  • Bronchopulmonary dysplasia

  • Type II alveolar epithelial cells: preserved surfactant production with delayed structural maturation

  • Pulmonary hemorrhage

  • Alveolar epithelial and mesenchymal cells: reduced secondary septation and simplified distal airspaces

  • Ventilator support

  • Primary surfactant deficiencynot consistently observed

  • Pulmonary endothelial cells: reduced capillary density and decreased capillary–alveolar apposition

Brain
  • Increased risk of later neurodevelopmental impairment

  • Endothelial cells and pericytes: altered microvascular organization within the neurovascular unit

  • Microglia: altered activation states and inflammatory priming

  • Oligodendrocyte lineage cells: delayed maturation and reduced myelin formation

  • Major brain injuries (IVH, PVL)not consistently observed

  • Neurons: increased vulnerability to cell loss and impaired circuit development

Intestine
  • Feeding intolerance

  • Goblet cells: reduced mucus production

  • Paneth cells: decreased antimicrobial peptide expression

  • Tight junction–forming epithelial cells: increased epithelial permeability

  • Necrotizing enterocolitis

  • Meconium related ileus

  • Spontaneous intestinal perforationnot consistently observed

Immune system
  • Sepsis

  • Innate immune cells (monocytes, neutrophils): altered activation thresholds and cytokine responsiveness

  • Increased susceptibility to infection

  • T lymphocytes: biased inflammatory and regulatory responses

  • Consistent immune cell depletionnot observed

Note: This table summarizes adverse outcomes during the neonatal period and corresponding structural, cellular, and mechanistic features observed in major organs affected by placental insufficiency. Rather than uniform growth failure, placental insufficiency induces organ‐specific patterns of developmental immaturity that predispose growth‐restricted infants to neonatal morbidity.

2.1. Neonatal Outcomes

In the neonatal period, outcomes include higher incidences of complications such as respiratory distress, gastrointestinal dysfunction, feeding intolerance, and neurological complications. Part of this burden is attributable to prematurity because maternal disease or fetal compromise often necessitates early delivery. However, growth‐restricted infants exhibit distinct vulnerability profiles that reflect the biology of placental insufficiency, even after matching for gestational age.

2.2. Respiratory System

According to a review on the association between FGR and respiratory disorders, there was a similar number of data stratifications supporting either decreased or increased risk of respiratory distress syndrome morbidity, indicating no consistent trend [10]. Preterm infants, particularly those with small for gestational age (SGA), are reported to have a high risk of pulmonary hemorrhage, a severe condition associated with early postnatal death, although hypocoagulability is also thought to play a contributory role [11]. Additionally, there is a greater propensity for bronchopulmonary dysplasia among extremely preterm infants [1, 12, 13]. Therefore, respiratory morbidity is strongly affected by gestational age at birth, and FGR serves as an additional stressor. Reduced lung volume and aberrant main pulmonary artery Doppler profiles identify growth‐restricted fetuses at increased risk of early neonatal respiratory morbidity [14].

2.3. Neurological System

The association between FGR and intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) or periventricular leukomalacia (PVL) remains inconsistent across studies. In the ACTION cohort study focusing on neonatal outcomes after preterm birth [1], placentation‐related disorders (hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and FGR) were associated with lower incidences of IVH and PVL than cases with presumed infection/inflammation (spontaneous preterm labor and premature rupture of membranes), after adjustment for gestational age. In contrast, another retrospective study reported that FGR infants with abnormal umbilical artery Doppler findings had a significantly higher incidence of severe IVH or PVL compared with non‐FGR infants, whereas FGR infants with normal Doppler waveforms showed a non‐significant or lower risk [15]. Therefore, it is impractical to assume that FGR uniformly increases the risk of IVH or PVL, and clinical interpretation should consider the composite effect of placental dysfunction, inflammation, and hemodynamic instability in each case. Term neonates with FGR do not carry increased risk of hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy [16]. Importantly, neuroimaging studies demonstrate that adverse effects extend beyond overt lesions: fetuses with late‐onset FGR at 37 weeks of gestation had a different pattern of cortical development assessed on magnetic resonance imaging [17], supporting the existence of in utero brain reorganization, even in clinically stable infants, foreshadowing later cognitive and motor difficulties.

2.4. Gastrointestinal System

Gastrointestinal morbidity is another hallmark of the growth‐restricted phenotype. Preterm infants with FGR encounter feeding intolerance and a higher risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) [18] and meconium related ileus (MRI) [19]. Although a clear association between spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) and FGR has not been established, preterm infants born to mothers with PE exhibit a significantly higher incidence of SIP compared with those born to normotensive mothers [20]. These features explain the frequent need for prolonged parenteral nutrition, which in turn increases infectious and metabolic complications. It delays the establishment of enteral nutrition. Among preterm infants diagnosed with FGR, absent or reversed end‐diastolic flow in the umbilical artery and in the ductus venosus had significantly higher feeding intolerance, NEC, and SIP rates and achieved full enteral feeds later compared to normal Doppler controls [21]. Additionally, median time from the onset of Doppler abnormalities in the umbilical artery, middle cerebral artery, or ductus venosus to delivery was significantly longer in patients with intestinal disorders than in those without [22]. Collectively, these findings suggest that fetal Doppler abnormalities among preterm infants with FGR serve as a clinical parameter reflecting the effect of placental insufficiency on intestinal vulnerability.

2.5. Immune System

Although the risk of sepsis in infants with FGR decreases with advancing gestational age, it remains higher compared with normally grown infants. However, this increased risk may in part reflect the need for intensive medical interventions, such as prolonged use of central venous catheters, after birth. Additionally, infants with FGR tend to have smaller thymic size, and reduced thymic size has been associated with a higher incidence of postnatal sepsis [23, 24]. Infants with FGR are more likely to exhibit a low‐grade fetal inflammatory response (based on elevated umbilical cord CRP), and are at increased risk of early‐onset sepsis within 72 h after birth [25]. In fetuses with FGR, several studies have shown alterations in leukocyte count and composition, reflecting impaired immune development [26, 27].

Together, the respiratory, neurologic, gastrointestinal, and immunologic vulnerabilities create a complex postnatal course that requires multidisciplinary neonatal care and tailored follow‐up.

2.6. Childhood Outcomes

Neurodevelopmental diagnoses reflect central nervous system vulnerability. Evidence linking SGA with cerebral palsy (CP) is more consistent at term than that among preterm populations. Large registry studies show that term SGA, particularly severe SGA, is robustly associated with higher risk of CP [28, 29]. In contrast, association varies and appears strongly dependent on gestational age in preterm cohorts; some studies show little or no excess risk at very low gestational ages [1, 29], whereas others have reported an increased risk of CP among preterm infants with SGA [30]. These findings may in part reflect the effect of associated neonatal morbidities and mortality among the most immature infants, as well as other etiologies for preterm birth, such as chorioamnionitis or inflammation‐related causes in the control groups. Nevertheless, in moderate‐to‐late preterm (32–36 weeks) infants, a meta‐analysis of seven studies demonstrated that SGA confers an approximately two‐fold higher risk of CP (pooled odds ratio [OR], 2.34; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.43–3.82) [31]. Beyond motor disability, there was an increased likelihood of learning disorders, language delay, and social communication difficulties. In very preterm infants born with gestational age ≤ 32 weeks, FGR was associated with a significantly increased risk of poor neurodevelopmental outcome at 24 months of corrected age compared with age‐matched appropriate for gestational age (AGA) infants [32]. Follow‐up studies later in childhood also reported psychomotor developmental delay and impairment of language abilities [33, 34]. School‐age assessments consistently demonstrate cognitive and behavioral difficulties, including lower full‐scale IQ and deficits in executive functions (e.g., working memory, cognitive flexibility), particularly among preterm FGR children [35, 36, 37]. However, increased rates of attention problems and autism spectrum conditions are observed in term and preterm FGR groups [38].

Large population‐based studies have examined the relationship between FGR and later respiratory or allergic morbidity while stratifying according to gestational age. Preterm and term FGR children show increased risks of asthma, wheezing, and lower lung function; however, the association tends to be more pronounced among term‐born FGR children, whereas in preterm infants, the contribution of FGR is often masked by the dominant effects of prematurity and bronchopulmonary dysplasia [39, 40]. Additionally, term‐born FGR has been linked with a higher incidence of allergic diseases such as atopic dermatitis [41]. These findings suggest that prenatal growth impairment alters airway and immune development, with gestational age modifying the magnitude of postnatal respiratory and allergic vulnerability.

Cardiometabolic health trajectories begin to diverge in middle childhood. Children with a history of SGA show higher systolic blood pressure percentiles and blunted nocturnal dipping on ambulatory monitoring, consistent with early vascular programming, with particularly elevated systolic pressures after very preterm birth due to early‐onset FGR [42, 43].

Although children born with SGA often show elevated insulin resistance indices and an adverse lipid profile (higher triglycerides and lower high density lipoprotein cholesterol), even among those with normal body mass index, implying prenatal programming beyond postnatal lifestyle [44]. Studies stratified by gestational age (term vs. preterm) remain limited. Therefore, further studies are needed to clarify how this programming differs between term and preterm SGA groups.

Although gastrointestinal morbidities are more common in the neonatal period among infants with FGR, no clear or consistent association has been reported between FGR and gastrointestinal diseases, such as inflammatory bowel disease or chronic constipation during school age.

These early‐life alterations are thought to persist into adulthood, contributing to increased risks of cardiovascular, metabolic, and neuropsychiatric disorders, as postulated by the DOHaD hypothesis [45, 46].

3. Molecular Mechanisms Linking Placental Dysfunction to Developmental Programming

The placenta plays a central role in shaping the fetal environment through oxygen and nutrient supply regulation, endocrine signaling, and immunological tolerance. When placental function is impaired, fetuses are exposed to a constellation of stressors, including chronic hypoxia, oxidative stress, systemic inflammation, nutrient restriction, and altered endocrine and growth factor signaling, often during critical periods of rapid growth and functional maturation.

The placental pathology of maternal phenotype of PE has been extensively studied and should be referred to in other review articles. Briefly, the mechanism of angiogenic imbalance includes: elevated circulating soluble fms‐like tyrosine kinase‐1 antagonizes vascular endothelial and placental growth factors, neutralizing their pro‐angiogenic and cytoprotective actions, and resulting in the systemic endothelial injury. Hypoxic conditions and inflammatory cytokines within placental tissues can serve as factors shaping the intrauterine environment [47, 48, 49, 50]. Additionally, immune maladaptation bridges maternal and placental pathology. Normal pregnancy requires finely tuned tolerance toward a semi‐allogeneic fetus, mediated by regulatory T cells, specialized uterine natural killer cells, and tolerogenic dendritic cells at the maternal‐fetal interface. In PE, this equilibrium is perturbed: T‐helper 1 and T‐helper 17 responses expand, decidual regulatory T cells decline, and innate immune cells adopt pro‐inflammatory programs [51]. Cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor family members and interferons, impair trophoblast invasion and spiral artery remodeling, while circulating autoantibodies, including those targeting the angiotensin II type‐1 receptor, further potentiate vasoconstrictive and anti‐angiogenic signaling [48].

These stressors exert systemic effects that indirectly shape fetal development through the placenta, while the fetoplacental barrier limits direct exposure to maternal immune or anti‐angiogenic factors. Epigenetic reprogramming, including altered DNA methylation and histone modification, creates long‐lasting transcriptional memory [52, 53]. In parallel, disruption of developmental signaling pathways, such as the wingless‐related integration site (Wnt), bone morphogenetic protein, insulin‐like growth factor, and mechanistic target of rapamycin, within organ‐specific microenvironments mediates tissue‐level maladaptation, can link systemic stress to localized growth, and cause differentiation defects [54, 55, 56].

4. Organ‐Specific Responses

To date, direct cellular or molecular analyses of fetal organs in growth‐restricted pregnancies using human tissue remain extremely limited, owing to substantial technical and ethical constraints on sampling. Therefore, experimental animal studies have provided important clues to the molecular and cellular processes by which placental insufficiency perturbs coordinated fetal organ development. In the following sections, we focused on organs most consistently implicated in adverse outcomes during the neonatal period (the lung, brain, intestine, and immune system) and summarized organ‐specific molecular and cellular pathways through which placental insufficiency disrupts coordinated fetal development and programs postnatal disease vulnerability (Table 1).

4.1. Lung

Morphometric and experimental studies indicate that FGR does not uniformly reduce total lung volume or lung weight relative to body weight, suggesting that global lung hypoplasia is not the dominant phenotype. Similarly, surfactant protein expression and biochemical maturation of type II alveolar epithelial cells are often preserved at birth in FGR models, indicating that primary surfactant deficiency is not a consistent feature. Instead, the dominant abnormalities are histological and architectural: the lungs in FGR exhibit simplified distal airspaces, increased alveolar wall thickness, reduced radial alveolar counts, and impaired secondary septation, reflecting disrupted alveolarization rather than delayed canalicular–saccular maturation [57].

At the tissue level, these structural abnormalities are accompanied by impaired pulmonary microvascular development, characterized by reduced capillary density and decreased expression of angiogenic markers such as vascular endothelial growth factor and the von Willebrand factor. Experimental inhibition of angiogenesis during critical windows of lung development is sufficient to reproduce defective alveolarization [58], thereby underscoring the tight coupling between vascular growth and alveolar formation. Additionally, alterations in alveolar wall composition, including reduced cartilage and epithelial components in proximal airways and persistent abnormalities in mucus‐producing elements, have been described, suggesting long‐lasting effects on airway structure and defense mechanisms, even when gross airway dimensions normalize postnatally.

Mechanistically, beyond disruption of angiogenic signaling through placental insufficiency‐driven hypoxia and nutrient deprivation, emerging evidence implicates dysregulated metabolic and inflammatory signaling pathways, including reduced leptin signaling, altered cytokine networks (such as interleukin (IL)‐6–STAT3), and impaired fibroblast–myofibroblast function, all of which are critical for secondary septation and extracellular matrix remodeling during alveolarization [59, 60]. Collectively, these processes result in a structurally immature lung with reduced gas‐exchange surface area, thereby providing a mechanistic substrate for increased susceptibility to postnatal respiratory morbidity observed in FGR offspring.

4.2. Brain

Breakdown of the neurovascular unit—with reduced capillary density, increased blood–brain barrier permeability, and disturbed astrocyte–endothelial–pericyte coupling—marks the initial step of cerebral maladaptation and compromises nutrient and oxygen delivery [61]. This vascular dysfunction promotes activation of resident microglia through hypoxia and impaired barrier integrity. In turn, activated microglia amplify neurovascular unit disruption by generating a pro‐inflammatory milieu that further destabilizes endothelial–pericyte interactions and blood–brain barrier function [62]. These microglia release cytokines, such as IL‐1β, tumor necrosis factor alpha, and IL‐6, and undergo proteomic reprogramming, thereby contributing to secondary neuronal injury and white‐matter damage [63, 64]. In turn, sustained glial inflammation disrupts oligodendrocyte lineage maturation, leading to delayed myelination and reduced white‐matter integrity, a hallmark feature recapitulating the preterm‐like phenotype of FGR offspring. Consequently, neuronal populations exhibit diminished proliferation, impaired dendritic and axonal outgrowth, linking to aberrant synaptogenesis and long‐term neurodevelopmental deficits [65, 66].

Together, these studies delineate a cascading pathway in which placental insufficiency initiates vascular maladaptation, propagates glial and inflammatory activation, and culminates in disrupted myelin formation and neuronal maturation, thereby providing a mechanistic framework for the structural and functional brain abnormalities observed in growth‐restricted offspring.

4.3. Intestine

In FGR mouse models, a reduction in secretory epithelial lineages, including goblet and Paneth cells, has been consistently reported, suggesting impaired maturation of the intestinal mucosal barrier through diminished mucus and antimicrobial peptide production. Notably, Paneth cells are decreased in intestinal tissues from human FGR neonates, indicating that the cellular alterations observed in animal models may reflect clinically relevant features of the human disease [67]. Additionally, studies using porcine fetal growth restriction models have demonstrated increased intestinal permeability (“leaky gut”) accompanied by abnormalities in tight junction‐associated molecules, further supporting the contribution of structural barrier dysfunction to postnatal intestinal vulnerability [68].

Beyond the clinically recognized hemodynamic component, namely chronic intrauterine hypoperfusion [22], accumulating evidence indicates that coordinated intratissue stress responses are elicited within the growth‐restricted intestine. These include oxidative stress [68] and activation of stress‐adaptive programs, such as autophagy [31], which occur at the tissue level and may act upstream of the cellular phenotypes described above, contributing to loss of secretory epithelial lineages and impaired barrier maturation.

Epithelial lineage specification during intestinal development is governed by the Notch and Wnt signaling pathways, which establish the stage‐specific microenvironment of the crypt–villus unit [55]. However, whether and how Notch and Wnt signaling disruption directly mediates the intestinal phenotype associated with FGR has not yet been conclusively demonstrated.

4.4. Immune System

FGR is increasingly recognized to have effects on postnatal immune function; however, direct evidence in humans remains limited compared with the extensive literature on maternal and placental immunity. Most human studies relied on cord blood or early postnatal peripheral blood analyses, demonstrating alterations in cytokine and chemokine profiles and immune cell activation rather than consistent changes in immune cell composition. In term infants with SGA, cord blood biomarker analyses have shown selective reductions in inflammatory mediators, such as IL‐1β, suggesting an altered or hypo‐responsive innate immune state rather than generalized immune activation [69]. In preterm infants with FGR, longitudinal studies have reported sustained elevations in the level of chemokines, including IL‐8 and monocyte chemoattractant protein‐1, and increased proportions of activated monocytes and cytotoxic T cells during the neonatal period, indicating persistent immune activation despite relatively preserved overall leukocyte distributions [70]. Recent analyses of umbilical cord blood from growth‐restricted pregnancies have revealed shifts in circulating immune cell profiles, including expansion of central memory CD4+ and CD8+ T‐cell subsets, suggesting that altered T‐cell responsiveness is already established in utero [71].

Insights from large animal models provide complementary evidence that FGR primarily reprograms immune responsiveness rather than immune cell numbers. In porcine models of FGR, peripheral blood mononuclear cells exhibit blunted IL‐1β responses to lipopolysaccharide stimulation, impaired neutrophil phagocytic capacity, and increased regulatory T‐cell proportions, collectively pointing toward attenuated early innate immune defense and altered immune regulation [71, 72]. These functional immune deficits are associated with increased susceptibility to systemic infection, supporting the concept that FGR confers a state of immune vulnerability in the early postnatal period.

The clinical effect of this immune reprogramming is likely shaped by interactions between circulating immune activation and organ‐specific microenvironments, particularly at barrier organs that undergo rapid postnatal adaptation such as the intestine and lung. Local cues derived from epithelial integrity, microbial colonization, and tissue inflammation can modulate the phenotype and function of resident immune cells, thereby translating systemic immune bias into organ‐specific immune dysregulation [73]. In this context, FGR‐associated barrier immaturity and altered inflammatory signaling may predispose local immune compartments to maladaptive responses under postnatal stress.

Consequently, current evidence supports a functional immune bias in FGR, manifesting as altered inflammatory signaling and responsiveness, while the upstream drivers and cell‐type‐specific developmental pathways linking the intrauterine environment to postnatal immune phenotypes remain key unresolved questions.

5. Discussion

Placental dysfunction reframes perinatal complications not as isolated obstetric events, but as the starting point of disease susceptibility across the life course. The body of evidence summarized in this review demonstrates that the effects of PE and FGR do not end at birth; rather, they sequentially induce organ‐specific developmental adaptations.

From a mechanistic perspective, this review emphasizes how placental dysfunction is translated into organ‐specific molecular programs through shared upstream stressors, including hypoxia, oxidative stress, and inflammatory signaling. Experimental animal studies have played a central role in elucidating these pathways. Disruption of vascular–epithelial crosstalk in the lung, neurovascular unit impairment and microglial activation in the brain, imbalance of epithelial lineage specification and barrier dysfunction in the intestine, and functional immune reprogramming collectively suggest that multiple factors interact across organs via systemic and local signaling loops.

Nevertheless, substantial knowledge gaps remain. Cellular and molecular analyses of human fetal organs are intrinsically limited by ethical and technical constraints, necessitating cautious interpretation of findings derived from experimental models. Additionally, postnatal modifiers, including prematurity, neonatal intensive care exposures, nutrition, infection, and intestinal microbial colonization, interact dynamically with prenatal programming, complicating causal inference in clinical cohorts. These limitations underscore the need for long‐term, longitudinally designed, and deeply phenotyped human studies that integrate prenatal exposures with postnatal environments.

One of the major clinical challenges is risk stratification. Conventional ultrasonographic indices, such as umbilical artery Doppler, ductus venosus flow, and the cerebroplacental ratio, are indispensable for fetal surveillance and timing of delivery, and as described above, are associated with the incidence of neurodevelopmental, respiratory, and gastrointestinal morbidities. However, their resolution for predicting long‐term outcomes remains limited. Future risk prediction models are expected to incorporate biomarkers grounded in molecular mechanisms in addition to imaging data. Umbilical cord blood, which can be obtained non‐invasively at birth, represents a practical window into fetal immune and metabolic programming. Furthermore, advances in single‐cell analyses and spatial transcriptomics are increasingly enabling detailed interrogation of cellular heterogeneity and intercellular communication from limited samples, including placental tissue and neonatal specimens obtained for clinical indications. These approaches are expected to contribute to the identification of early biomarkers that define vulnerability and resilience.

Another important implication of this review is the potential for maternal or antenatal interventions aimed at modifying fetal programming pathways. Current management strategies for PE and FGR primarily focus on maternal stabilization and timing of delivery. However, there is growing interest in interventions targeting placental function, oxidative stress, inflammation, or epigenetic regulation. Although evidence for direct fetal benefit remains limited, appropriately timed maternal interventions may attenuate maladaptive developmental programming and improve postnatal outcomes. Careful evaluation of safety, timing, and long‐term efficacy will be essential for clinical translation of these strategies.

In conclusion, placental dysfunction represents an integrated biological foundation that links adverse intrauterine environments with organ‐specific developmental trajectories and lifelong disease risk. By integrating epidemiological evidence with molecular and experimental insights, this review highlights the need to shift perinatal care beyond a survival‐centered paradigm toward comprehensive care frameworks that incorporate biology‐informed risk stratification and preventive perspectives. Advancing this paradigm will require close collaboration across obstetrics, neonatology, developmental biology, and systems medicine to translate mechanistic understanding into improvements in lifelong health.

Author Contributions

Mari Ichinose: conceptualization, investigation, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing. Takayuki Iriyama: writing – review and editing, funding acquisition, supervision. Yasushi Hirota: funding acquisition, writing – review and editing, supervision.

Funding

This work was supported by Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (JP25gn0110097) and JAOG Ogyaa Donation Foundation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by AMED under Grant Number JP25gn0110097 and JAOG Ogyaa Donation Foundation Research Grant.

Ichinose M., Iriyama T., and Hirota Y., “Placental Insufficiency and Neonatal Vulnerability: Organ‐Specific Mechanisms Shaping Early‐Life Health,” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 52, no. 2 (2026): e70202, 10.1111/jog.70202.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this review.

References

  • 1. Gagliardi L., Rusconi F., Da Fre M., et al., “Pregnancy Disorders Leading to Very Preterm Birth Influence Neonatal Outcomes: Results of the Population‐Based ACTION Cohort Study,” Pediatric Research 73, no. 6 (2013): 794–801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Turbeville H. R. and Sasser J. M., “Preeclampsia Beyond Pregnancy: Long‐Term Consequences for Mother and Child,” American Journal of Physiology. Renal Physiology 318, no. 6 (2020): F1315–F1326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Ananth C. V., Keyes K. M., and Wapner R. J., “Pre‐Eclampsia Rates in the United States, 1980‐2010: Age‐Period‐Cohort Analysis,” BMJ 347 (2013): f6564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Staff, AC , Fjeldstad H. E., Fosheim I. K., et al., “Failure of Physiological Transformation and Spiral Artery Atherosis: Their Roles in Preeclampsia,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 226, no. 2S (2022): S895–S906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Vinnars M. T., Nasiell J., Holmstrom G., Norman M., Westgren M., and Papadogiannakis N., “Association Between Placental Pathology and Neonatal Outcome in Preeclampsia: A Large Cohort Study,” Hypertension in Pregnancy 33, no. 2 (2014): 145–158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Spinillo A., Meroni A., Melito C., et al., “Clinical Correlates of Placental Pathologic Features in Early‐Onset Fetal Growth Restriction,” Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy 49, no. 5–6 (2022): 215–224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Shah D. K., Pereira S., and Lodygensky G. A., “Long‐Term Neurologic Consequences Following Fetal Growth Restriction: The Impact on Brain Reserve,” Developmental Neuroscience 47, no. 2 (2025): 139–146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Barker D. J., “The Developmental Origins of Adult Disease,” Journal of the American College of Nutrition 23, no. 6 Suppl (2004): 588S–595S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Figueras F. and Gratacos E., “Update on the Diagnosis and Classification of Fetal Growth Restriction and Proposal of a Stage‐Based Management Protocol,” Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy 36, no. 2 (2014): 86–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. McGillick E. V., Orgeig S., Williams M. T., and Morrison J. L., “Risk of Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Efficacy of Glucocorticoids: Are They the Same in the Normally Grown and Growth‐Restricted Infant?,” Reproductive Sciences 23, no. 11 (2016): 1459–1472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. De Carolis M. P., Romagnoli C., Cafforio C., et al., “Pulmonary Haemorrhage in Infants With Gestational Age of Less Than 30 Weeks,” European Journal of Pediatrics 157, no. 12 (1998): 1037–1038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Ariyoshi Y., Iriyama T., Sayama S., et al., “Ischemic Placental Disease as a Risk Factor for Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Extremely Preterm Infants,” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 51, no. 5 (2025): e16315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Tedyanto C. P., Prasetyadi F. O. H., Dewi S., and Noorlaksmiatmo H., “Maternal Factors and Perinatal Outcomes Associated With Early‐Onset Versus Late‐Onset Fetal Growth Restriction: A Meta‐Analysis,” Journal of Maternal‐Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 38, no. 1 (2025): 2505774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Duygulu Bulan D., Dayanan R., Kahraman N. C., Kunt S., and Celen S., “Pulmonary Vascular Doppler and Fetal Lung Biometry as Predictors of Neonatal Respiratory Complications in Early‐ and Late‐Onset Fetal Growth Restriction,” Pediatric Pulmonology 60, no. 10 (2025): e71333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Kim F., Bateman D. A., Goldshtrom N., Sheen J. J., and Garey D., “Intracranial Ultrasound Abnormalities and Mortality in Preterm Infants With and Without Fetal Growth Restriction Stratified by Fetal Doppler Study Results,” Journal of Perinatology 43, no. 5 (2023): 560–567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Roto S., Nupponen I., Kalliala I., and Kaijomaa M., “Risk Factors for Neonatal Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy and Therapeutic Hypothermia: A Matched Case‐Control Study,” BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 24, no. 1 (2024): 421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Egana‐Ugrinovic G., Sanz‐Cortes M., Figueras F., Bargallo N., and Gratacos E., “Differences in Cortical Development Assessed by Fetal MRI in Late‐Onset Intrauterine Growth Restriction,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 209, no. 2 (2013): 126.e1–126.e8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Cetinkaya M., Ozkan H., and Koksal N., “Maternal Preeclampsia Is Associated With Increased Risk of Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Preterm Infants,” Early Human Development 88, no. 11 (2012): 893–898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Yamoto M., Nakazawa Y., Fukumoto K., et al., “Risk Factors and Prevention for Surgical Intestinal Disorders in Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants,” Pediatric Surgery International 32, no. 9 (2016): 887–893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Yilmaz Y., Kutman H. G., Ulu H. O., et al., “Preeclampsia Is an Independent Risk Factor for Spontaneous Intestinal Perforation in Very Preterm Infants,” Journal of Maternal‐Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 27, no. 12 (2014): 1248–1251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Martini S., Annunziata M., Della Gatta A. N., et al., “Association Between Abnormal Antenatal Doppler Characteristics and Gastrointestinal Outcomes in Preterm Infants,” Nutrients 14, no. 23 (2022): 5121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Ohtani T., Ichinose M., Ariyoshi Y., et al., “Doppler Abnormality Predisposes Preterm Infants With Fetal Growth Restriction to Postnatal Intestinal Disorder,” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 51, no. 9 (2025): e70075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Damodaram M., Story L., Kulinskaya E., Rutherford M., and Kumar S., “Early Adverse Perinatal Complications in Preterm Growth‐Restricted Fetuses,” Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 51, no. 3 (2011): 204–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Ekin A., Gezer C., Taner C. E., Solmaz U., Gezer N. S., and Ozeren M., “Prognostic Value of Fetal Thymus Size in Intrauterine Growth Restriction,” Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 35, no. 3 (2016): 511–517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Moon K. C., Park C. W., Park J. S., and Jun J. K., “Fetal Growth Restriction and Subsequent Low Grade Fetal Inflammatory Response Are Associated With Early‐Onset Neonatal Sepsis in the Context of Early Preterm Sterile Intrauterine Environment,” Journal of Clinical Medicine 10, no. 9 (2021): 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Thomas R. M. and Linch D. C., “Identification of Lymphocyte Subsets in the Newborn Using a Variety of Monoclonal Antibodies,” Archives of Disease in Childhood 58, no. 1 (1983): 34–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Wirbelauer J., Thomas W., Rieger L., and Speer C. P., “Intrauterine Growth Retardation in Preterm Infants ≤32 Weeks of Gestation Is Associated With Low White Blood Cell Counts,” American Journal of Perinatology 27, no. 10 (2010): 819–824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Stoknes M., Andersen G. L., Dahlseng M. O., et al., “Cerebral Palsy and Neonatal Death in Term Singletons Born Small for Gestational Age,” Pediatrics 130, no. 6 (2012): e1629–e1635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Jacobsson B., Ahlin K., Francis A., Hagberg G., Hagberg H., and Gardosi J., “Cerebral Palsy and Restricted Growth Status at Birth: Population‐Based Case‐Control Study,” BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 115, no. 10 (2008): 1250–1255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Spinillo A., Gardella B., Preti E., Zanchi S., Stronati M., and Fazzi E., “Rates of Neonatal Death and Cerebral Palsy Associated With Fetal Growth Restriction Among Very Low Birthweight Infants. A Temporal Analysis,” BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 113, no. 7 (2006): 775–780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Zhao M., Dai H., Deng Y., and Zhao L., “SGA as a Risk Factor for Cerebral Palsy in Moderate to Late Preterm Infants: A System Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Scientific Reports 6 (2016): 38853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Cortez Ferreira M., Mafra J., Dias A., Santos Silva I., and Taborda A., “Impact of Early‐Onset Fetal Growth Restriction on the Neurodevelopmental Outcome of Very Preterm Infants at 24 Months: A Retrospective Cohort Study,” BMC Pediatrics 23, no. 1 (2023): 533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Jensen A., Rochow N., Voigt M., and Neuhauser G., “Differential Effects of Growth Restriction and Immaturity on Predicted Psychomotor Development at 4 Years of Age in Preterm Infants,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Global Reports 4, no. 1 (2024): 100305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Kallankari H., Taskila H. L., Heikkinen M., Hallman M., Saunavaara V., and Kaukola T., “Microstructural Alterations in Association Tracts and Language Abilities in Schoolchildren Born Very Preterm and With Poor Fetal Growth,” Pediatric Radiology 53, no. 1 (2023): 94–103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Lees C. C., Marlow N., van Wassenaer‐Leemhuis A., et al., “2 Year Neurodevelopmental and Intermediate Perinatal Outcomes in Infants With Very Preterm Fetal Growth Restriction (TRUFFLE): A Randomised Trial,” Lancet 385, no. 9983 (2015): 2162–2172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Leitner Y., Fattal‐Valevski A., Geva R., et al., “Neurodevelopmental Outcome of Children With Intrauterine Growth Retardation: A Longitudinal, 10‐Year Prospective Study,” Journal of Child Neurology 22, no. 5 (2007): 580–587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Marret S., Marchand‐Martin L., Picaud J. C., et al., “Brain Injury in Very Preterm Children and Neurosensory and Cognitive Disabilities During Childhood: The EPIPAGE Cohort Study,” PLoS One 8, no. 5 (2013): e62683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Vollmer B. and Edmonds C. J., “School Age Neurological and Cognitive Outcomes of Fetal Growth Retardation or Small for Gestational Age Birth Weight,” Frontiers in Endocrinology 10 (2019): 186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Liu X., Olsen J., Agerbo E., et al., “Birth Weight, Gestational Age, Fetal Growth and Childhood Asthma Hospitalization,” Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology 10, no. 1 (2014): 13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Kallen B., Finnstrom O., Nygren K. G., and Otterblad Olausson P., “Association Between Preterm Birth and Intrauterine Growth Retardation and Child Asthma,” European Respiratory Journal 41, no. 3 (2013): 671–676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Logan C. A., Weiss J. M., Reister F., Rothenbacher D., and Genuneit J., “Fetal Growth and Incidence of Atopic Dermatitis in Early Childhood: Results of the Ulm SPATZ Health Study,” Scientific Reports 8, no. 1 (2018): 8041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Wolfenstetter A., Simonetti G. D., Poschl J., Schaefer F., and Wuhl E., “Altered Cardiovascular Rhythmicity in Children Born Small for Gestational Age,” Hypertension 60, no. 3 (2012): 865–870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Liefke J., Steding‐Ehrenborg K., Sjoberg P., et al., “Higher Blood Pressure in Adolescent Boys After Very Preterm Birth and Fetal Growth Restriction,” Pediatric Research 93, no. 7 (2023): 2019–2027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Wang X., Cui Y., Tong X., Ye H., and Li S., “Glucose and Lipid Metabolism in Small‐For‐Gestational‐Age Infants at 72 Hours of Age,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 92, no. 2 (2007): 681–684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Barker D. J., “The Origins of the Developmental Origins Theory,” Journal of Internal Medicine 261, no. 5 (2007): 412–417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Gluckman P. D., Hanson M. A., Cooper C., and Thornburg K. L., “Effect of In Utero and Early‐Life Conditions on Adult Health and Disease,” New England Journal of Medicine 359, no. 1 (2008): 61–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Wang W., Parchim N. F., Iriyama T., et al., “Excess LIGHT Contributes to Placental Impairment, Increased Secretion of Vasoactive Factors, Hypertension, and Proteinuria in Preeclampsia,” Hypertension 63, no. 3 (2014): 595–606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Iriyama T., Wang W., Parchim N. F., et al., “Hypoxia‐Independent Upregulation of Placental Hypoxia Inducible Factor‐1α Gene Expression Contributes to the Pathogenesis of Preeclampsia,” Hypertension 65, no. 6 (2015): 1307–1315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Iriyama T., Wang W., Parchim N. F., et al., “Reciprocal Upregulation of Hypoxia‐Inducible Factor‐1alpha and Persistently Enhanced Placental Adenosine Signaling Contribute to the Pathogenesis of Preeclampsia,” FASEB Journal 34, no. 3 (2020): 4041–4054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Wang X., Zhu H., Lei L., et al., “Integrated Analysis of Key Genes and Pathways Involved in Fetal Growth Restriction and Their Associations With the Dysregulation of the Maternal Immune System,” Frontiers in Genetics 11 (2020): 581789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Saito S., Nakashima A., Shima T., and Ito M., “Th1/Th2/Th17 and Regulatory T‐Cell Paradigm in Pregnancy,” American Journal of Reproductive Immunology 63, no. 6 (2010): 601–610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Tarry‐Adkins J. L. and Ozanne S. E., “Mechanisms of Early Life Programming: Current Knowledge and Future Directions,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 94, no. 6 Suppl (2011): 1765S–1771S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Merid S. K., Novoloaca A., Sharp G. C., et al., “Epigenome‐Wide Meta‐Analysis of Blood DNA Methylation in Newborns and Children Identifies Numerous Loci Related to Gestational Age,” Genome Medicine 12, no. 1 (2020): 25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Risato G., Celeghin R., Branas Casas R., et al., “Hyperactivation of Wnt/Beta‐Catenin and Jak/Stat3 Pathways in Human and Zebrafish Foetal Growth Restriction Models: Implications for Pharmacological Rescue,” Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology 10 (2022): 943127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Ichinose M., Suzuki N., Wang T., et al., “Stromal DLK1 Promotes Proliferation and Inhibits Differentiation of the Intestinal Epithelium During Development,” American Journal of Physiology. Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology 320, no. 4 (2021): G506–G520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Ichinose M., Suzuki N., Wang T., et al., “The BMP Antagonist Gremlin 1 Contributes to the Development of Cortical Excitatory Neurons, Motor Balance and Fear Responses,” Development 148, no. 14 (2021): dev195883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Wignarajah D., Cock M. L., Pinkerton K. E., and Harding R., “Influence of Intrauterine Growth Restriction on Airway Development in Fetal and Postnatal Sheep,” Pediatric Research 51, no. 6 (2002): 681–688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Jakkula M., Le Cras T. D., Gebb S., et al., “Inhibition of Angiogenesis Decreases Alveolarization in the Developing Rat Lung,” American Journal of Physiology. Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology 279, no. 3 (2000): L600–L607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Yuliana M. E., Chou H. C., Su E. C., Chuang H. C., Huang L. T., and Chen C. M., “Uteroplacental Insufficiency Decreases Leptin Expression and Impairs Lung Development in Growth‐Restricted Newborn Rats,” Pediatric Research 95, no. 6 (2024): 1503–1509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Thangaratnarajah C., Dinger K., Vohlen C., et al., “Novel Role of NPY in Neuroimmune Interaction and Lung Growth After Intrauterine Growth Restriction,” American Journal of Physiology. Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology 313, no. 3 (2017): L491–L506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Wu B. A., Chand K. K., Bell A., et al., “Effects of Fetal Growth Restriction on the Perinatal Neurovascular Unit and Possible Treatment Targets,” Pediatric Research 95, no. 1 (2024): 59–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Haruwaka K., Ikegami A., Tachibana Y., et al., “Dual Microglia Effects on Blood Brain Barrier Permeability Induced by Systemic Inflammation,” Nature Communications 10, no. 1 (2019): 5816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Bremer A. S., Henschel N., Burkard H., Bernis M. E., Ulas T., and Sabir H., “Transcriptomic Profile of Microglia Following Inflammation‐Sensitized Hypoxic‐Ischemic Brain Injury in Neonatal Rats Suggests Strong Contribution to Neutrophil Chemotaxis and Activation,” Journal of Neuroinflammation 22, no. 1 (2025): 189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Katoh Y., Iriyama T., Yano E., et al., “Increased Production of Inflammatory Cytokines and Activation of Microglia in the Fetal Brain of Preeclamptic Mice Induced by Angiotensin II,” Journal of Reproductive Immunology 154 (2022): 103752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Volpe J. J., “Brain Injury in Premature Infants: A Complex Amalgam of Destructive and Developmental Disturbances,” Lancet Neurology 8, no. 1 (2009): 110–124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Miller S. L., Huppi P. S., and Mallard C., “The Consequences of Fetal Growth Restriction on Brain Structure and Neurodevelopmental Outcome,” Journal of Physiology 594, no. 4 (2016): 807–823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Fung C. M., White J. R., Brown A. S., et al., “Intrauterine Growth Restriction Alters Mouse Intestinal Architecture During Development,” PLoS One 11, no. 1 (2016): e0146542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Tang X. and Xiong K., “Intrauterine Growth Retardation Affects Intestinal Health of Suckling Piglets via Altering Intestinal Antioxidant Capacity, Glucose Uptake, Tight Junction, and Immune Responses,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity 2022 (2022): 2644205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Matoba N., Ouyang F., Mestan K. K., et al., “Cord Blood Immune Biomarkers in Small for Gestational Age Births,” Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease 2, no. 2 (2011): 89–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Lorenger L. E., Boly T. J., Hyland R. M., and Bermick J. R., “Longitudinal Inflammatory Biomarker Profiling in Intrauterine Growth Restricted Preterm Infants,” Cytokine 190 (2025): 156916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Ting J., Min W., Rui M., et al., “Altered Immune Cell Profiles in Maternal and Umbilical Cord Blood and Fetal Growth Restriction: A Flow Cytometric Analysis,” Journal of Reproductive Immunology 172 (2025): 104740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Amdi C., Lynegaard J. C., Thymann T., and Williams A. R., “Intrauterine Growth Restriction in Piglets Alters Blood Cell Counts and Impairs Cytokine Responses in Peripheral Mononuclear Cells 24 Days Post‐Partum,” Scientific Reports 10, no. 1 (2020): 4683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Baek O., Ren S., Brunse A., Sangild P. T., and Nguyen D. N., “Impaired Neonatal Immunity and Infection Resistance Following Fetal Growth Restriction in Preterm Pigs,” Frontiers in Immunology 11 (2020): 1808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this review.


Articles from The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES