Skip to main content
Thieme Open Access logoLink to Thieme Open Access
. 2026 Feb 17;58(Suppl 1):E246–E247. doi: 10.1055/a-2779-3430

Full aspiration technique using a 7-Fr double-pigtail stent for endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic fluid drainage of a pancreatic pseudocyst

Shunsuke Omoto 1, Mamoru Takenaka 1,, Akihiro Yoshida 1, Kae Fukunishi 1, Hidekazu Tanaka 1, Yoriaki Komeda 1, Masatoshi Kudo 1
PMCID: PMC12912851  PMID: 41702571

Endoscopic ultrasound–guided pancreatic fluid drainage (EUS-PFD) is an established treatment for pancreatic pseudocysts 1 . To prevent pseudocyst infection caused by stent occlusion, multiple plastic stents are often placed 2 . However, when fistula dilation is difficult, placing two stents is technically challenging, and a single 7-Fr stent has been associated with an increased risk of stent occlusion 3 . Large pseudocysts have also been associated with stent migration, especially when fluid drainage is insufficient 4 5 . Achieving reliable drainage with fewer plastic stents remains challenging. We developed a “full aspiration technique” to place a single 7-Fr double-pigtail stent after aspirating all cystic fluid before stent release ( Video 1 ).

Download video file (79.8MB, mp4)

EUS-guided drainage of a postoperative pancreatic pseudocyst using the “full aspiration technique,” involving complete cystic fluid aspiration before stent deployment to prevent occlusion and migration. EUS, endoscopic ultrasound.

Video 1

A 54-year-old man, who had undergone distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer, presented with epigastric pain. Laboratory tests showed elevated white blood cell count and C-reactive protein. MDCT revealed a 66-mm cystic lesion in the pancreatic head, diagnosed as a pancreatic pseudocyst ( Fig. 1 ).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

a and b Pre-procedural CT showing a 66-mm postoperative pancreatic pseudocyst (yellow arrowhead) in the pancreatic head. CT, computed tomography.

EUS-PFD was performed. After puncture with a 19G EZ Shot 3 needle (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), bloody fluid was aspirated. As the cyst partially shrank and shifted, tract dilation became difficult. A drill dilator (Tornus ES, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) was used, but tract dilation remained challenging. The cavity was re-expanded by injecting 20 mL of saline through a catheter and then dilated with a 4-mm REN balloon (Kaneka Medix, Osaka, Japan). A 7-Fr/7-cm double-pigtail stent (Through & Pass, Gadelius Medical, Tokyo, Japan) was deployed halfway, the guidewire was removed, and 85 mL of fluid was aspirated ( Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 ). The stent was then released into the stomach. The procedure was completed without adverse events, and post-procedural computed tomography confirmed complete resolution ( Fig. 4 ). This novel technique allows complete aspiration of the cystic fluid before stent release, reducing the risk of stent occlusion and migration by shrinking the cyst.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

a Placement of a double-pigtail catheter into the cyst cavity. b After the partial withdrawal of the inner sheath, the guidewire is removed, and the cystic fluid is fully aspirated through the inner guiding catheter lumen (full aspiration technique).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

A fluoroscopic image a showing the partial deployment of a 7-Fr double-pigtail stent, and a procedural field image b demonstrating the aspiration of 85 mL of cystic fluid through the inner guiding catheter lumen.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

a and b Post-procedural CT demonstrating the complete resolution of the pancreatic pseudocyst (yellow arrowhead). CT, computed tomography.

Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AS_2AJ

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Contributorsʼ Statement Shunsuke Omoto: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft. Mamoru Takenaka: Conceptualization, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. Akihiro Yoshida: Data curation, Methodology. Kae Fukunishi: Data curation, Funding acquisition. Hidekazu Tanaka: Writing – review & editing. Yoriaki Komeda: Writing – review & editing. Masatoshi Kudo: Conceptualization, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing.

References

  • 1.Varadarajulu S, Bang JY, Phadnis MA et al. Endoscopic transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9:748–753. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bang JY, Navaneethan U, Hasan MK et al. Multiple plastic stents versus metal stents for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88:730–738. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pausawasdi N, Kongkam P, Khemnark S et al. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic drainage for pancreatic pseudocysts using single plastic stents. Endosc Ultrasound. 2021;10:42–48. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Alzeerelhouseini HIA, Madi M, Azzam A et al. Endoscopic drainage of giant pancreatic pseudocysts. Cureus. 2021;13:e14077. doi: 10.1155/2021/6610610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Arvanitakis M, Dumonceau JM, Albert J et al. Endoscopic management of pancreatic fluid collections: ESGE evidence-based guidelines. Endoscopy. 2018;50:843–856. doi: 10.1055/a-0588-5365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Endoscopy are provided here courtesy of Thieme Medical Publishers

RESOURCES