Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Ecology and Evolution logoLink to Ecology and Evolution
. 2026 Feb 17;16(2):e73134. doi: 10.1002/ece3.73134

Genetic Adaptation of Mesorhizobium Symbionts Associated With Caragana in Northern China Deserts

Xiaoxia Yuan 1,2,3, Hua Li 1, Xiumin Yu 1,3, Zhaojun Ji 1,2,3,✉
PMCID: PMC12912947  PMID: 41716576

ABSTRACT

Caragana, a keystone leguminous species dominating arid semi‐fixed deserts in northern China, forms specialized symbiotic nitrogen‐fixing partnerships with Mesorhizobium, which are indispensable for sustaining ecosystem function globally. However, the roles of membrane transporters and nucleotide repair genes in conferring survival advantages to desert‐dwelling Mesorhizobium across desert environments remained poorly elucidated. Therefore, a total of 68 representative Mesorhizobium strains associated with Caragana, isolated from five geographically distant areas (A to E) in the desert belt of northern China, were investigated to elucidate the pivotal roles of three membrane transporters (cysW, exoY, idhA) and two nucleotide repair genes (mutS, uvrC) in microbial adaptation to environmental stress. Phylogenetic analysis results revealed that strains assigned to the same genospecies primarily clustered by genetic lineage rather than geographic origin, with stronger intralineage sequence cohesion observed relative to interregional divergence. Notably, phylogenetic trees of membrane transporter genes, nucleotide repair genes, and core genes showed high topological congruence, underscoring their concerted evolutionary dynamics and shared selective pressures. Furthermore, consistent nucleotide diversity (π), low πN/πS ratios (<< 1.0) and genetic distance (Dxy) across populations indicated that purifying selection predominated in membrane transporters and nucleotide repair genes. Elevated recombination impact (r/m) and frequency (ρ/θ) revealed that homogenizing gene flow, rather than mutation, was the primary driver of population differentiation enabling rapid adaptation to desert environments.

Keywords: Caragana, environmental adaptation, membrane transporters, Mesorhizobium, nucleotide repair genes, recombination

This study investigates the genetic adaptation of Caragana‐associated Mesorhizobiumin northwest China's semi‐fixed deserts, focusing on membrane transporters and nucleotide repair genes. Despite geographic isolation, populations exhibited striking genetic congruence, driven by homogeneously harsh environments that weakened the distance‐decay relationship. Recombination (rather than mutation) dominated genetic divergence, with the horizontal transfer of adaptive loci (e.g., cysW, uvrC) enabling rapid trait dissemination, underscoring these genes' roles in desert symbiotic adaptation.

graphic file with name ECE3-16-e73134-g005.jpg

1. Introduction

Caragana species, pivotal leguminous plants in barren semi‐fixed deserts of northern China, serve dual ecological roles in windbreak/sand fixation and watershed protection. Dominating the arid landscapes of Inner Mongolia, these areas were characterized by strong winds and extreme temperature fluctuations (−30°C to 50°C; Wu et al. 2015). Caragana's remarkable tolerance to the low‐nutrient conditions positioned it as a keystone species for desert ecosystem restoration (He et al. 2024; Li et al. 2014). This keystone role is owing to its symbiotic association with rhizosphere microbes, which enhance soil fertility and nutrient bioavailability, thereby bolstering Caragana's growth and survival while underpinning broader ecological recovery in degraded desert ecosystems (Liu et al. 2022). Among these microbes, Mesorhizobium stood out as the primary symbiotic microsymbiont, forming mutualistic relationships with Caragana to secure sufficient nitrogen nutrition (Ji et al. 2015). Notably, Mesorhizobium exhibited superior alkaline tolerance compared to other rhizobia, a trait attributed to its capacity to secrete organic acids, enabling colonization and N2 fixation in the alkaline soils typical of Caragana habitats (Chen et al. 2010). This adaptation was pivotal, enabling Mesorhizobium to thrive in Caragana's root zone and establish a robust symbiosis that enhanced plant resilience in harsh environments.

The Caragana‐Mesorhizobium symbiosis balanced mutual benefits (Caragana gains nitrogen, Mesorhizobium gains carbon) with energetic costs to the plant. Nevertheless, the fitness gains for both organisms justified this mutualism as the evolutionarily stable strategy (Carlson and Frederickson 2023; Mathesius 2022). Various Mesorhizobium species, including M. amorphae , M. septentrionale , M. caraganae , M. gobiense , M. temperatum , M. mediterraneum , M. shangrilense , M. tianshanense , M. huakuii , and M. metallidurans , have been documented to nodulate Caragana in extreme arid/semi‐arid deserts with fluctuating temperatures (Liu et al. 2022; Yan et al. 2017).

The ecological persistence and environmental adaptation of Mesorhizobium symbionts associated with Caragana in northern China deserts depend on pivotal genetic systems. Specifically, membrane transporter genes such as cysW (encoding a cysteine ABC transporter subunit, critical for sulfur assimilation and cysteine uptake to support redox balance; Chakraborty et al. 2021; Li et al. 2025), exoY (involved in exopolysaccharide biosynthesis, facilitating biofilm formation and adhesion to root surfaces; Jiang et al. 2001; Sakthivel et al. 2025), and idhA (encoding isocitrate dehydrogenase, a key enzyme in the tricarboxylic acid cycle that sustains energy production under nutrient limitation; Yang et al. 2022) were essential for adapting to nutrient‐poor and alkaline soils. Concurrently, nucleotide repair genes like mutS (mediating mismatch repair to correct replication errors and maintain genomic integrity; Margara et al. 2016; Martín‐Blecua et al. 2025) and uvrC (participating in nucleotide excision repair to counteract DNA damage from UV radiation or reactive oxygen species; Najjari et al. 2023; Santoyo et al. 2005) ensured genetic stability in harsh environments. Together, these genes underpinned the adaptive plasticity of Mesorhizobium, enabling it to thrive in extreme desert conditions and sustain its symbiotic relationship with Caragana. Therefore, adaptive strategies in Caragana‐nodulating Mesorhizobium would be investigated in this study, with a focus on genetic diversity, recombination, and gene flow mediated by membrane transporter genes (cysW, exoY, idhA) and nucleotide repair genes (mutS, uvrC) for clarifying the adaptation of symbiotic rhizobia to extreme environments.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Rhizobial Strains and Gene Sequencing

A total of 708 mesorhizobial strains isolated from the roots of Caragana distributed across five desert areas (Areas A–E, three sampling sites in Areas A, C, D; four in Area B; and six in Area E) along the semi‐fixed desert belt in northern China (data not shown). And 68 representatives were selected based on the phylogenetic tree of the recA gene for analysis (Table S1). Nine type strains including Mesorhizobium septentrionale SDW 014T, M. gobiense CCBAU 83330T, M. amorphae ACCC 19665T, M. mediterraneum USDA 3392T, M. tianshanense CCBAU 3306T, M. metallidurans LMG 24485T, M. temperatum SDW018T and M. huakuii CCBAU 2609T and M. caraganae CCBAU 11299T were employed as references to establish the phylogenetic relationship of these Caragana‐nodulating mesorhizobia. All strains were cultured in YMA medium at 28°C and preserved in 30% glycerol at −80°C following established protocols.

2.2. DNA Extraction and Gene Sequencing

The total template DNA of these Caragana mesorhizobia was extracted using the method as described previously (Terefework et al. 2001). The biological function and PCR amplification protocols were shown in Table S2 for nine genes, including three membrane transporter genes cysW (Sirko et al. 1995), exoY (Reed et al. 1991), idhA (Jiang et al. 2001), and two nucleotide repair genes mutS (Martínez‐Salazar et al. 2009), uvrC (Cubo et al. 1992), two core genes recA, rpoB, and two nodulation genes nodC, nodD. The primers were designed by using Premier 5.0 software based on conserved regions of cysW, exoY, idhA, mutS and uvrC, identified from whole‐genome sequences of the reference Mesorhizobium strains (CCBAU01583, CCBAU01570, CCBAU01502, CCBAU01399), as detailed in Table S2. And the PCR products were purified and commercially sequenced by ABI 3730xl sequenator in Beijing, China. Then, the sequences were manually checked using Chromas Pro (Ver. 2.1.3) and edited manually using DNAMAN (Ver. 9.0). Total 340 nucleotide sequences of 5 genes cysW, exoY, idhA, mutS and uvrC were newly obtained in this study which were deposited in the GenBank database under accession numbers MK252304 through MK252643 (Table S4).

2.3. Phylogenetic Analyses

These nucleotide sequences were aligned and the redundant bases removed using the ClustalW program. MEGA11.0 program was used for constructing the Neighbor‐Joining (NJ) phylogenetic trees for membrane transporters, nucleotide repair, core, and nodulation genes with the Kimura‐2‐parameter model (1000 bootstrap replicates) (Tamura et al. 2011), respectively. Then, reticulate evolutionary events, including potential hybridization and recombination, were inferred by quantifying phylogenetic network complexity using SPLITSTREE 4.0 software with the Neighbor‐Net algorithm (1000 bootstrap replicates; Huson and Bryant 2006).

2.4. Nucleotide Polymorphism and Population Genetics Analyses

Nucleotide polymorphisms including the haplotype diversity (Hd), number of haplotypes (h), nucleotide diversity (π), the π N /π S ratios (where πS denotes synonymous substitutions per synonymous site and πN denotes non‐synonymous substitutions per non‐synonymous site) (Nei and Gojobori 1986), and two additional metrics: Dxy (average nucleotide divergence) and Nm (gene flow estimated as migrants) were estimated using DnaSP v5 software (Librado and Rozas 2009). STRUCTURE software was employed to analyze admixture levels in Mesorhizobium genospecies under the LOCPRIOR model (100,000 burn‐in and 1,000,000 iterations), with K (number of ancestral subpopulations) estimated separately for membrane transporters and nucleotide repair genes (Hubisz et al. 2009; Jakobsson and Rosenberg 2007).

2.5. Recombination Estimation

The minimal recombination events (Rm) within the populations were estimated using the DnaSP v5 (Hudson and Kaplan 1985). Two recombination rates—r/m (the relative impact of recombination compared with that of point mutation in lineage genetic diversification) and ρ/θ (the relative frequency of recombination occurrence compared with that of point mutation in lineage history), were calculated. The effect of recombination on evolutionary history was deduced using CLONALFRAME with proper parameters (100,000 burn‐in iterations plus 1,000,000 sampling iterations per run) for three independent runs (Didelot and Falush 2007).

3. Results

3.1. Phylogenies and Nucleotide Polymorphisms of Caragana Mesorhizobia

These representative Caragana‐associated mesorhizobia, isolated from different areas (A–E), were distributed across different branches, without geographical isolation across five distinct areas of the semi‐fixed desert belt in northern China. The dominant mesorhizobial communities of areas (A–E) comprised genospecies M. amorphae and M. septentrionale , which also exhibited a closely genetic relationship on the phylogenetic trees of membrane transporters (Figure 1), nucleotide repair genes (Figure 2), and core genes (Figure S1). Notably, the genospecies M. amorphae encompassed representative strains of Mesorhizobium sampled from all five desert areas (A–E) with an extensive genetic admixture and cross‐regional dispersal. This adaptation was primarily mediated by the convergent evolution of key genes, including membrane transporters (cysW, exoY, idhA) and nucleotide repair genes (mutS, uvrC), which overcame geographic barriers. In addition, the topological structures of the phylogenetic trees were similar to each other based on the concatenated sequences of membrane transporters, nucleotide repair genes, and core genes, although some variations were observed in specific cases (e.g., CCBAU 01790, CCBAU 01655, CCBAU 11226, and CCBAU 01731). However, the phylogenetic tree based on nodulation genes (nodC, nodD) exhibited a markedly different topological structure (Figure S2), although these mesorhizobial strains cross‐dispersed across five areas branched into multiple clades.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Open in a new tab

Neighbor‐Joining (NJ) tree constructed based upon the concatenated sequences of membrane transporters. Three membrane transporter genes (cysW, exoY, idhA) were used. Bootstrap values greater than 70% are indicated at the branch points. The type strains (Bold Fonts) are shown in parentheses after the strain numbers. The scale bar represents 1% nucleotide substitutions.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Open in a new tab

Neighbor‐Joining (NJ) tree constructed based upon the concatenated sequences of nucleotide repair genes. Two nucleotide repair genes (mutS, uvrC) were used. Bootstrap values greater than 70% are indicated at the branch points. The type strains (Bold Fonts) are shown in parentheses after the strain numbers. The scale bar represents 1% nucleotide substitutions.

Nucleotide polymorphisms for each gene were presented in Table 3. No significant differences were detected in haplotype number (h) and haplotype diversity (Hd) values across the tested genes. Notably, the average nucleotide diversity (π) value of nodulation genes (0.03501) was markedly lower than that of membrane transporters (0.06797), nucleotide repair genes (0.07449), and core genes (0.05498), highlighting the particularity of symbiotic adaptation. It is noted that the πS values (synonymous substitutions per site) were significantly higher than πN values (non‐synonymous substitutions per site) for all tested genes. The πN/πS values were significantly higher for nodC and nodD than for other genes. In addition, π and πN/πS values of these strains from all five areas (A–E) were consistent for core, membrane transporter, and nucleotide repair genes, respectively (Table 4).

TABLE 3.

Molecular diversity for these genes of Caragana‐associated Mesorhizobium.

Genes Length (bp) S Eta h/Hd π π S π N π N /π S
Membrane transporters
cysW 327 100 129 35/0.944 0.06547 0.23925 0.01569 0.06558
exoY 300 99 141 40/0.970 0.09122 0.47662 0.01149 0.02411
idhA 210 52 69 35/0.942 0.04722 0.20279 0.00921 0.04542
Avg. 279 83.67 113.0 36.7/0.952 0.06797 0.30622 0.01213 0.04503
Nucleotide repair genes
mutS 144 54 68 36/0.935 0.08291 0.35343 0.01814 0.05133
uvrC 561 173 227 45/0.974 0.06607 0.25698 0.01782 0.06934
Avg. 352.5 113.5 147.5 40.5/0.955 0.07449 0.30521 0.01798 0.06033
Core genes
recA 288 75 98 49/0.983 0.05502 0.23468 0.00154 0.00656
rpoB 591 179 219 46/0.958 0.05494 0.19047 0.02090 0.10973
Avg. 439.5 127 158.5 47.5/0.971 0.05498 0.21258 0.01122 0.05815
Nodulation genes
nodC 507 131 149 30/0.912 0.02718 0.07595 0.01185 0.15602
nodD 492 119 132 71/1.000 0.04283 0.10580 0.02666 0.25198
Avg. 499.5 125 140.5 50.5/0.956 0.03501 0.09088 0.01926 0.20400
Open in a new tab

Note: S, segregating sites or number of polymorphic (segregating) sites; Eta, total number of mutations. h, haplotype number; Hd, haplotype diversity; π, average number of nucleotide differences per site between two sequences; π S , nucleotide diversity for synonymous substitutions; π N , nucleotide diversity for nonsynonymous substitutions.

TABLE 4.

Nucleotide polymorphism of five areas (A–E) for these genes of Caragana‐associated Mesorhizobium.

Area (No. of strains) Length (bp) S Eta h/Hd π π S π N π N /π S
Concatenated membrane transporters
A (3) 837 102 106 3/1.000 0.08284 0.37023 0.01139 0.03076
B (44) 837 184 224 29/0.964 0.05559 0.23325 0.00926 0.03970
C (4) 837 119 131 4/1.000 0.08224 0.34824 0.01523 0.04373
D (4) 837 116 127 4/1.000 0.08084 0.35292 0.01457 0.04128
E (13) 837 196 243 12/0.987 0.08668 0.38097 0.01543 0.04050
Average — 143.4 166.2 10.4/0.990 0.07764 0.33712 0.01318 0.03920
Concatenated nucleotide repair genes
A (3) 705 83 87 3/1.000 0.08038 0.30316 0.02337 0.07709
B (44) 705 171 206 30/0.952 0.05612 0.21654 0.01412 0.06521
C (4) 705 107 114 4/1.000 0.08629 0.34927 0.02238 0.06408
D (4) 705 102 114 4/1.000 0.08534 0.35791 0.02154 0.06018
E (13) 705 168 204 12/0.987 0.08887 0.35717 0.02370 0.06635
Average — 126.2 145 10.6/0.988 0.07940 0.31681 0.02102 0.06658
Concatenated core genes
A (3) 879 79 83 3/1.000 0.06143 0.18865 0.01897 0.10055
B (44) 879 174 199 34/0.978 0.04729 0.17233 0.01297 0.07526
C (4) 879 96 101 4/1.000 0.06238 0.19755 0.01709 0.08651
D (4) 879 75 98 49/0.983 0.05502 0.17007 0.01436 0.08443
E (13) 879 174 193 13/1.000 0.06167 0.19369 0.01737 0.08967
Average — 119.6 134.8 20.6/0.992 0.05756 0.18446 0.01615 0.08728
Concatenated nodulation genes
A (3) 999 74 75 3/1.000 0.03313 0.08849 0.03634 0.41066
B (44) 999 182 196 44/1.000 0.02718 0.07962 0.01712 0.21502
C (4) 999 46 46 4/1.000 0.02536 0.05962 0.01348 0.22609
D (4) 999 20 20 4/1.000 0.01118 0.02938 0.00493 0.16780
E (13) 999 124 130 13.1/1.000 0.03722 0.08425 0.02106 0.24997
Average — 89.2 93.4 13.62/1.000 0.02681 0.06827 0.01859 0.25391
Open in a new tab

Note: S, segregating sites or number of polymorphic (segregating) sites; Eta, total number of mutations. h, haplotype number; Hd, haplotype diversity; π, average number of nucleotide differences per site between two sequences; π S , nucleotide diversity for synonymous substitutions; π N , nucleotide diversity for nonsynonymous substitutions. —, null.

3.2. Gene Flow and Genetic Divergence of Caragana‐Associated Mesorhizobia

NeighborNet phylogenetic network analysis revealed a complex, reticulate recombination network architecture in both membrane transporter and nucleotide repair gene datasets (Figures 3 and 4), indicative of pervasive recombination‐driven gene flow and genetic exchange among Caragana‐associated mesorhizobia across the five desert areas (A–E) in northern China. In addition, four distinct genetic lineages (I, II, III, and IV) were identified by STRUCTURE analysis (Figure 5). Notably, lineage I was ubiquitously distributed across all five areas and served as the primary ancestral source in Area B. Lineages II–IV, by contrast, displayed irregular, patchy distributions, likely reflecting localized adaptation or stochastic recombination events. Critically, most strains (e.g., CCBAU 75063 and CCBAU 01764) showed evidence of mixed ancestry, inheriting genetic material from two or more lineages (Figure 5).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Open in a new tab

The Neighbor‐Nets generated using SplitsTree4 with the Hamming distance option. The trees are constructed based upon the concatenated membrane transporter genes (cysW, exoY, idhA). The scale bar represents 1% nucleotide substitutions.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Open in a new tab

The Neighbor‐Nets generated using SplitsTree4 with the Hamming distance option. The trees are constructed based upon the concatenated nucleotide repair genes (mutS, uvrC). The scale bar represents 1% nucleotide substitutions.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Open in a new tab

STRUCTURE analyses of Caragana‐associated Mesorhizobium populations from different areas. Concatenated core (a), nodulation (b), membrane transporter (c) and nucleotide repair (d) genes were analyzed. The inferred ancestries are designated sequentially as I, II, III, and IV, shown in bars and filled with different grayness or dots. The horizontal axis represents current Mesorhizobium individuals (in the same order in all panels), and the bar for each individual is filled according to the inferred proportions of single‐nucleotide alleles that were derived from each of the ancestries. The vertical axis represents the percentage of the strains.

Genetic differentiation (quantified as pairwise Dxy) among rhizobial populations isolated from the five desert areas (A–E) exhibited no statistically significant variation (Table 1). Notably, both the mean genetic distance (Dxy) and nucleotide diversity (π) values remained comparable across all areas (Tables 1 and 4), reflecting consistent levels of intra‐population genetic variation despite geographic dispersion. Dxy values, calculated from the concatenated membrane transporter genes, ranged from a minimum of 0.06215 (between areas B and C) to a maximum of 0.09687 (between areas A and D).

TABLE 1.

Genetic divergence (presented as Dxy) and gene flow (presented as Nm) of Caragana‐associated Mesorhizobium isolated from five areas (A–E).

Nm

Dxy

A B C D E
Concatenated membrane transporters
A 22.07 4.02 2.72 7.35
B 0.07078e 5.10 1.89 2.81
C 0.07228e 0.06215e 0.82 11.21
D 0.09687e 0.08627e 0.09222e 9.92
E 0.09052e 0.08380e 0.08823e 0.07954e
Concatenated nucleotide repair genes
A 18.17 4.10 8.55 18.84
B 0.07013e 6.76 4.30 3.82
C 0.07317e 0.06594e 0.02 36.76
D 0.08771e 0.07896e 0.08582e 16.93
E 0.08238e 0.08199e 0.08639e 0.08453e
Concatenated core genes
A 96.64 −5.53 3.47 27.05
B 0.05465e −7.09 2.87 6.68
C 0.05631e 0.05097e 9.63 −22.15
D 0.06627e 0.05970e 0.06143e −32.35
E 0.06269e 0.05856e 0.06062e 0.05715e
Concatenated nodulation genes
A 94.64 −5.53 3.47 27.05
B 0.00029e −7.09 2.87 6.68
C 0.05631e 0.05097e 9.63 −22.15
D 0.06627e 0.05970e 0.06143e −32.35
E 0.06269e 0.05970e 0.06062e 0.05715e
Open in a new tab

Note: Number of gene flow (Nm) and average nucleotide divergence between groups (Dxy) are shown in the upper and lower triangular of the table. Statistical difference letter is marked as superscript after each number in the lower triangular of the table: e, non‐significant.

3.3. Recombination Events Among the Caragana Mesorhizobial Lineages

A total of 61 and 57 minimal recombination events (Rm) were inferred using DnaSP v5 software for the concatenated membrane transporter and nucleotide repair genes, respectively (Table 2). Subsequent analysis with CLONALFRAME revealed contrasting evolutionary dynamics: membrane transporter genes exhibited a higher recombination impact (r/m = 2.48) and a higher frequency (ρ/θ = 0.72) compared to nucleotide repair genes (r/m = 1.15; ρ/θ = 0.33). Notably, r/m values were > 1.0 for both gene categories, showing that recombination, not mutation, was the dominant driver of genetic diversification. This evolutionary process was also corroborated by SH tests, which showed significant topological incongruence between gene trees of membrane transporter/nucleotide repair loci and the core gene‐derived species tree (p < 0.05; Table S3).

TABLE 2.

Recombination analysis of Caragana‐associated Mesorhizobium.

Genes Length (bp) Rm r/m ρ/θ
Concatenated membrane transport genes 837 61 2.48 0.72
Concatenated nucleotide repair genes 705 57 1.15 0.33
Concatenated core genes 879 57 21.46 6.78
Concatenated nodulation genes 999 62 171.39 63.22
Open in a new tab

Note: Rm, observed minimum number of recombination events; r/m, the relative impact of recombination compared with that of point mutation in the genetic diversification of the lineage; ρ/θ, the relative frequency of the occurrence of recombination compared with that of point mutation in the history of the lineage.

4. Discussion

4.1. Phylogenies and Genetic Divergence of Caragana Mesorhizobia Based on Membrane Transporters and Nucleotide Repair Genes

The phylogenetic congruence observed across membrane transporters and nucleotide repair genes (Figures 1 and 2) revealed an evolutionary conservatism pattern of Caragana‐symbiotic Mesorhizobium, with parallel adaptive trajectories in response to shared environmental pressures (Ament‐Velásquez et al. 2022; Yamamoto et al. 2021), despite geographic isolation across northern China's semi‐fixed deserts (spanning > 1000 km). The intertwined phylogenetic patterns indicated that environmental selection pressures likely dominated the genetic adaptation of these strains (Ji et al. 2020). The contrasting topologies observed in nodulation gene trees highlighted the divergent evolutionary trajectories of symbiosis‐related traits, which are likely shaped by host‐specific selection pressures (Provorov et al. 2022). In contrast, the conserved topologies of membrane‐transporter and nucleotide repair gene trees (Figures 1 and 2) suggested that these loci were under strong purifying selection to maintain basal physiological functions critical for desert survival (Karasev et al. 2023). This phylogenetic cohesion contrasted sharply with the divergence observed in nodulation genes (nodC, nodD), suggesting that membrane transporters and DNA repair enzymes operated under distinct selective regimes (Karasev et al. 2023; Liu et al. 2023). Therefore, the strong selection pressure (pH > 8.0, K+ content shown in Table S1) in the semi‐fixed desert belt enhanced the compositional similarity index of these Mesorhizobium strains and greatly weakened their distance‐decay relationship, one of the most well‐documented universal biogeographic patterns in natural ecosystems (Chen et al. 2016; Ji et al. 2015; Zhang et al. 2020). Therefore, in the dynamic environmental conditions of northern China's semi‐fixed deserts, Mesorhizobium strains exhibit a striking evolutionary signature characterized by strong purifying selection alongside rapid adaptive evolution, reflecting their dual response to abiotic stress homogenization and niche‐specific innovation (Teng et al. 2023).

The uniform nucleotide diversity (π) and low πN/πS ratios (< 1.0) across all populations (Table 4) indicated that pervasive purifying selection might act on membrane transporters and nucleotide repair genes. These genes encode critical functions for desert survival: cysW mediates sulfate uptake for osmotic regulation (Srivastava et al. 2025), uvrC repairs UV‐induced DNA lesions (Selby 2017), while idhA modulates carbon flux under nutrient limitation (Lin et al. 2022). No significant difference in genetic divergence (Dxy) values among Caragana‐symbiotic Mesorhizobium from geographically distinct areas (Table 1) was observed, inferring that these strains might be canalized by abiotic stressors, such as extreme temperatures (−30°C to 50°C) (Peters et al. 2026; Rychel et al. 2025), alkaline soils (pH 8.5–10.2) (Shah et al. 2022), and saline‐alkali gradients (Fall et al. 2019), to maintain physiological homeostasis, and environmental selection might be the dominant driver.

In contrast to the divergence observed in nodulation genes (Wendlandt et al. 2021), the high gene flow and recombination rates among membrane transporter genes (Table 2) indicated that these genes were subject to host selection for desert‐adapted Mesorhizobium. This was exemplified by lineage I, which dominated in all five areas (Figure 5) and carried a suite of broadly adaptive genes. Such genomic fluidity, driven by recombination, allowed rapid dissemination of beneficial mutations, and ensured metabolic robustness across fragmented desert habitats, confirming that recombination was an essential agent of adaptive homogenization for Caragana‐symbiotic Mesorhizobium (Good et al. 2025; Mazzamurro et al. 2025).

While symbiosis‐related genes (nodC, nodD) exhibited elevated πN/πS ratios, reflecting host‐driven diversification (Singh and Valdés‐López 2023), the stoichiometric stability of membrane transporters and DNA repair enzymes underscored their role as evolutionary “buffer zones”(Moger‐Reischer et al. 2023). By maintaining core physiological functions, these genes relieved selective constraints on symbiosis loci, allowing niche‐specific innovations to evolve independently (Forni et al. 2025). This modular evolutionary architecture, where housekeeping (core) genes prioritized environmental adaptation and symbiosis genes prioritized host specialization, might underpin the resilience of desert rhizobia‐legume mutualisms, reflecting the implications for symbiosis‐environment coevolution.

4.2. Gene Flow, Recombination, and Environmental Adaptation of Caragana Mesorhizobia

The gene flow among all mesorhizobia, especially between the dominant genospecies M. septentrionale and M. amorphae associated with Caragana, was frequent for all tested genes (Figures S1 and S2), indicating that genetic diversity between coexisting strains of the same genospecies or closely related genospecies is an important ecological mechanism explaining the diversity of Caragana mesorhizobia (Fields et al. 2022). Extensive gene flow, characterized by elevated Nm values (Table 1), was observed across Caragana‐associated Mesorhizobium populations. Notably, membrane transporters exhibited particularly high gene flow between areas A and B (Nm = 22.07), whereas nucleotide repair genes showed pronounced gene flow between areas C and E (Nm = 36.76). These patterns underscored the dominant role of gene recombination in shaping the evolutionary trajectories of these symbionts. Complex gene interweaving, clearly found among many strains isolated from areas A to E (Figure 5), also indicated that Caragana‐associated Mesorhizobium populations experienced similar selection pressures, although they alternated between semi‐fixed desert soil and host environments (Burghardt et al. 2019). The high relative impact (r/m) and frequency (ρ/θ) of recombination for concatenated membrane transporter genes (Table 2) also indicated that gene recombination had played an important role in the evolutionary history. The strains tended to acquire special transporters in membranes for nutrient acquisition via recombination in various hostile environments, enhancing the evolutionary stability of nodulation on their hosts (de Faria et al. 2022). This pattern was particularly evident in membrane transporters (cysW, exoY, idhA), which exhibited the highest recombination frequencies (r/m = 2.48), underscoring their adaptive function across desert landscapes. In contrast, nucleotide repair genes (mutS, uvrC) maintained stricter purifying selection (πN/πS < 1), ensuring genome integrity under extreme abiotic stress (Lin et al. 2007). A selection‐driven recombination paradigm revealed that membrane transporters prioritized functional stability over sequence divergence. For example, recombination hotspots in the cysW gene spanned substrate‐binding domains, optimizing sulfate uptake efficiency under fluctuating salinity (Xamxidin et al. 2025), and nucleotide repair genes preserved symbiotic fidelity by suppressing non‐synonymous substitutions, enabling host‐specific nodulation traits to evolve independently, such as uvrC assisting in the adaptive piecing‐together of UV repair modules (Springall et al. 2018). This dual strategy, functional optimization via recombination for membrane genes and functional optimization via purifying selection for repair genes, enabled simultaneous adaptation to abiotic stress and maintenance of symbiotic precision. The congruent phylogenetic patterns of membrane transporters and nucleotide repair genes (Figures 1 and 2) further contrasted with the divergence of symbiosis‐related loci (nodC, nodD), revealing a modular evolutionary architecture where core genes buffer physiological stress.

Collectively, these findings established that recombination, rather than geographic isolation, represented the predominant evolutionary force shaping the adaptive trajectories of membrane transporters and nucleotide repair genes, thereby conferring ecological resilience to Caragana‐associated Mesorhizobium across heterogeneous desert landscapes. However, quantitative integration of environmental variables (e.g., soil pH, salinity) with genetic data lacked here. Future studies should employ systematic sampling and eco‐genomic approaches to disentangle abiotic drivers of adaptation.

5. Conclusion

The evolutionary trajectories of Caragana‐associated Mesorhizobium populations exhibited striking congruence in membrane transporters and nucleotide repair genes, reflecting adaptive convergence shaped by the harsh desert environment. Despite originating from geographically distinct areas (A–E) across the semi‐fixed desert belt in northern China, these rhizobia demonstrated synchronized evolutionary patterns, likely driven by homogenizing selective pressures, highlighting the dominance of environmental homogeneity over geographic isolation in structuring microbial communities. Genetic divergence among populations arose primarily via recombination, rather than mutation, with extensive recombination disseminating adaptive loci. Our findings illuminated the concerted evolutionary dynamics and shared selective pressures of microbial resilience in extreme ecosystems. Future studies should integrate functional genomics to unravel the adaptive roles of these genes and explore synthetic biology approaches to engineer stress‐resilient microbial populations.

Author Contributions

Xiaoxia Yuan: investigation (lead), writing – original draft (lead). Hua Li: funding acquisition (supporting), project administration (supporting). Xiumin Yu: data curation (equal). Zhaojun Ji: funding acquisition (supporting), project administration (equal), writing – review and editing (lead).

Funding

This study was financially supported by Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region of China (2024JQ12), National Natural Science Foundation of China (32170020), and Key Research and Development Program of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region of China (2025YFDZ0116).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Supporting information

FIGURE S1: Neighbor‐Joining (NJ) tree constructed based upon the concatenated sequences of core.

FIGURE S2: Neighbor‐Joining (NJ) tree constructed based upon the concatenated sequences of nodulation genes.

TABLE S1: A total of 68 representative strains isolated from Caragana‐associated Mesorhizobium used in this study.

TABLE S2: Primers designed for the genes and the annealing temperature of them (Tm, °C) in PCR amplification.

TABLE S3: Shimodaira‐Hasegaewa (SH) test of each test gene locus in comparison with the concatenated core genes.

TABLE S4: Accession numbers of the genes obtained in this study and deposited in GenBank.

ECE3-16-e73134-s001.pdf (698.1KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all contributors (including Mao Li, Yangli Lu, Xuerui Yan) who assisted in the collection of root nodules and the isolation of Caragana‐symbiotic mesorhizobia from the semi‐fixed desert belt in northern China. Special thanks are extended to Wenfeng Chen (China Agricultural University) for his invaluable guidance in establishing the data analysis framework.

Yuan, X. , Li H., Yu X., and Ji Z.. 2026. “Genetic Adaptation of Mesorhizobium Symbionts Associated With Caragana in Northern China Deserts.” Ecology and Evolution 16, no. 2: e73134. 10.1002/ece3.73134.

Data Availability Statement

The DNA sequences generated in this study have been deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database. The accession numbers are available in the Table S4. All required data have been uploaded as Supporting Information S1.

References

  1. Ament‐Velásquez, S. L. , Gilchrist C., Rêgo A., et al. 2022. “The Dynamics of Adaptation to Stress From Standing Genetic Variation and de Novo Mutations.” Molecular Biology and Evolution 39, no. 11: msac242. 10.1093/molbev/msac242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burghardt, L. T. , Epstein B., and Tiffin P.. 2019. “Legacy of Prior Host and Soil Selection on Rhizobial Fitness in Planta.” Evolution 73, no. 9: 2013–2023. 10.1111/evo.13807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carlson, C. , and Frederickson M. E.. 2023. “An Emerging View of Coevolution in the Legume‐Rhizobium Mutualism.” Molecular Ecology 32, no. 14: 3793–3797. 10.1111/mec.17055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chakraborty, S. , Driscoll H. E., Abrahante J. E., Zhang F., Fisher R. F., and Harris J. M.. 2021. “Salt Stress Enhances Early Symbiotic Gene Expression in Medicago Truncatula and Induces a Stress‐Specific Set of Rhizobium‐Responsive Genes.” Molecular Plant‐Microbe Interactions (MPMI) 34, no. 8: 904–921. 10.1094/mpmi-01-21-0019-r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen, J. , Hu M., Ma H., et al. 2016. “Genetic Diversity and Distribution of Bradyrhizobia Nodulating Peanut in Acid‐Neutral Soils in Guangdong Province.” Systematic and Applied Microbiology 39, no. 6: 418–427. 10.1016/j.syapm.2016.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen, W. M. , Zhu W. F., Bontemps C., Young J. P., and Wei G. H.. 2010. “ Mesorhizobium alhagi sp. Nov., Isolated From Wild Alhagi sparsifolia in North‐Western China.” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 60, no. Pt 4: 958–962. 10.1099/ijs.0.014043-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cubo, M. T. , Economou A., Murphy G., Johnston A. W., and Downie J. A.. 1992. “Molecular Characterization and Regulation of the Rhizosphere‐Expressed Genes Rhiabcr That Can Influence Nodulation by Rhizobium leguminosarum Biovar Viciae .” Journal of Bacteriology 174, no. 12: 4026–4035. 10.1128/jb.174.12.4026-4035.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. de Faria, S. M. , Ringelberg J. J., Gross E., et al. 2022. “The Innovation of the Symbiosome Has Enhanced the Evolutionary Stability of Nitrogen Fixation in Legumes.” New Phytologist 235, no. 6: 2365–2377. 10.1111/nph.18321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Didelot, X. , and Falush D.. 2007. “Inference of Bacterial Microevolution Using Multilocus Sequence Data.” Genetics 175, no. 3: 1251–1266. 10.1534/genetics.106.063305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fall, F. , Le Roux C., Bâ A. M., et al. 2019. “The Rhizosphere of the Halophytic Grass Sporobolus robustus Kunth Hosts Rhizobium Genospecies That Are Efficient on Prosopis juliflora (Sw.) dc and Vachellia seyal (Del.) P.J.H. Hurter Seedlings.” Systematic and Applied Microbiology 42, no. 2: 232–239. 10.1016/j.syapm.2018.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fields, B. , Moffat E. K., Harrison E., Andersen S. U., Young J. P. W., and Friman V. P.. 2022. “Genetic Variation Is Associated With Differences in Facilitative and Competitive Interactions in the Rhizobium leguminosarum Species Complex.” Environmental Microbiology 24, no. 8: 3463–3485. 10.1111/1462-2920.15720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Forni, D. , Sivertsen A., Cagliani R., et al. 2025. “Positive Selection at Core Genes May Underlie Niche Adaptation in Fusobacterium animalis .” Gut Pathogens 17, no. 1: 61. 10.1186/s13099-025-00740-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Good, B. H. , Bhatt A. S., and McDonald M. J.. 2025. “Unraveling the Tempo and Mode of Horizontal Gene Transfer in Bacteria.” Trends in Microbiology 33, no. 8: 853–865. 10.1016/j.tim.2025.03.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. He, M. , Han Y., Gao Y., Han M., and Duan L.. 2024. “Decoding the Metabolomic Responses of Caragana tibetica to Livestock Grazing in Fragile Ecosystems.” Frontiers in Plant Science 15: 1339424. 10.3389/fpls.2024.1339424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hubisz, M. J. , Falush D., Stephens M., and Pritchard J. K.. 2009. “Inferring Weak Population Structure With the Assistance of Sample Group Information.” Molecular Ecology Resources 9, no. 5: 1322–1332. 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02591.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hudson, R. R. , and Kaplan N. L.. 1985. “Statistical Properties of the Number of Recombination Events in the History of a Sample of DNA Sequences.” Genetics 111, no. 1: 147–164. 10.1093/genetics/111.1.147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Huson, D. H. , and Bryant D.. 2006. “Application of Phylogenetic Networks in Evolutionary Studies.” Molecular Biology and Evolution 23, no. 2: 254–267. 10.1093/molbev/msj030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jakobsson, M. , and Rosenberg N. A.. 2007. “CLUMPP: A Cluster Matching and Permutation Program for Dealing With Label Switching and Multimodality in Analysis of Population Structure.” Bioinformatics 23, no. 14: 1801–1806. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ji, Z. J. , Wu Z. Y., Chen W. F., et al. 2020. “Physiological and Symbiotic Variation of a Long‐Term Evolved Rhizobium Strain Under Alkaline Condition.” Systematic and Applied Microbiology 43, no. 5: 126125. 10.1016/j.syapm.2020.126125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ji, Z. J. , Yan H., Cui Q. G., Wang E. T., Chen W. X., and Chen W. F.. 2015. “Genetic Divergence and Gene Flow Among Mesorhizobium Strains Nodulating the Shrub Legume Caragana .” Systematic and Applied Microbiology 38, no. 3: 176–183. 10.1016/j.syapm.2015.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jiang, G. , Krishnan A. H., Kim Y. W., Wacek T. J., and Krishnan H. B.. 2001. “A Functional Myo‐Inositol Dehydrogenase Gene Is Required for Efficient Nitrogen Fixation and Competitiveness of Sinorhizobium fredii Usda191 to Nodulate Soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.).” Journal of Bacteriology 183, no. 8: 2595–2604. 10.1128/jb.183.8.2595-2604.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Karasev, E. S. , Hosid S. L., Aksenova T. S., et al. 2023. “Impacts of Natural Selection on Evolution of Core and Symbiotically Specialized (Sym) Genes in the Polytypic Species Neorhizobium galegae .” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 23: 16696. 10.3390/ijms242316696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Li, L. , He P., Liu Y., et al. 2025. “Mechanistic Insights Into the Impact of Multi‐Dimensional Microplastic Stress on Nitrogen Removal by Heterotrophic Nitrifying‐Aerobic Denitrifying Bacteria: A Meta‐Transcriptomic Analysis.” Journal of Environmental Management 392: 126780. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Li, W. , Wang C., Wang H., et al. 2014. “Distribution of Atmospheric Particulate Matter (PM) in Rural Field, Rural Village and Urban Areas of Northern China.” Environmental Pollution 185: 134–140. 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.10.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Librado, P. , and Rozas J.. 2009. “DnaSP v5: A Software for Comprehensive Analysis of DNA Polymorphism Data.” Bioinformatics 25, no. 11: 1451–1452. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lin, Z. G. , Nei M., and Ma H.. 2007. “The Origins and Early Evolution of DNA Mismatch Repair Genes‐Multiple Horizontal Gene Transfers and co‐Evolution.” Nucleic Acids Research 35, no. 22: 7591–7603. 10.1093/nar/gkm921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lin, Z. H. , Chang S. Y., Shen W. C., et al. 2022. “Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Alpha‐1 Modulates Lifespan and Oxidative Stress Tolerance in Caenorhabditis elegans .” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 1: 612. 10.3390/ijms24010612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Liu, S. , Jiao J., and Tian C. F.. 2023. “Adaptive Evolution of Rhizobial Symbiosis Beyond Horizontal Gene Transfer: From Genome Innovation to Regulation Reconstruction.” Genes (Basel) 14, no. 2: 274. 10.3390/genes14020274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Liu, W. , Qiu K., Xie Y., et al. 2022. “Years of Sand Fixation With Caragana korshinskii Drive the Enrichment of Its Rhizosphere Functional Microbes by Accumulating Soil N.” PeerJ 10: e14271. 10.7717/peerj.14271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Margara, L. M. , Fernández M. M., Malchiodi E. L., Argaraña C. E., and Monti M. R.. 2016. “Muts Regulates Access of the Error‐Prone DNA Polymerase Pol IV to Replication Sites: A Novel Mechanism for Maintaining Replication Fidelity.” Nucleic Acids Research 44, no. 16: 7700–7713. 10.1093/nar/gkw494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Martín‐Blecua, I. , Valverde J. R., García‐Bravo P., et al. 2025. “The Unique Role of nucS ‐Mediated Non‐Canonical Mismatch Repair in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Resistance Evolution.” MBio 06, no. 19: e0331025. 10.1128/mbio.03310-25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Martínez‐Salazar, J. M. , Zuñiga‐Castillo J., and Romero D.. 2009. “Differential Roles of Proteins Involved in Migration of Holliday Junctions on Recombination and Tolerance to DNA Damaging Agents in Rhizobium etli .” Gene 432, no. 1: 26–32. 10.1016/j.gene.2008.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Mathesius, U. 2022. “Are Legumes Different? Origins and Consequences of Evolving Nitrogen Fixing Symbioses.” Journal of Plant Physiology 276: 153765. 10.1016/j.jplph.2022.153765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Mazzamurro, F. , Touchon M., Charpentier X., and Rocha E. P. C.. 2025. “Impact of Natural Transformation on the Acquisition of Novel Genes in Bacteria.” Molecular Biology and Evolution 42, no. 8: msaf192. 10.1093/molbev/msaf192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Moger‐Reischer, R. Z. , Glass J. I., Wise K. S., et al. 2023. “Evolution of a Minimal Cell.” Nature 620, no. 7972: 122–127. 10.1038/s41586-023-06288-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Najjari, A. , Boussetta A., Youssef N., et al. 2023. “Physiological and Genomic Insights Onto Abiotic Stress of Halophilic Archaeon Natrinema altunense 4.1r Isolated From a Saline Ecosystem of Tunisian Desert.” Genetica 151, no. 2: 133–152. 10.1007/s10709-023-00182-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Nei, M. , and Gojobori T.. 1986. “Simple Methods for Estimating the Numbers of Synonymous and Nonsynonymous Nucleotide Substitutions.” Molecular Biology and Evolution 3, no. 5: 418–426. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Peters, J. , LoRicco J. G., Saracco M., Caliò A., and Oger P.. 2026. “Stability and Adaptation of Proteins, Membranes and Cells to Extreme Temperature and Pressure.” Journal of Molecular Biology 438, no. 4: 169477. 10.1016/j.jmb.2025.169477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Provorov, N. A. , Andronov E. E., Kimeklis A. K., Onishchuk O. P., Igolkina A. A., and Karasev E. S.. 2022. “Microevolution, Speciation and Macroevolution in Rhizobia: Genomic Mechanisms and Selective Patterns.” Frontiers in Plant Science 13: 1026943. 10.3389/fpls.2022.1026943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Reed, J. W. , Capage M., and Walker G. C.. 1991. “ Rhizobium meliloti exoG and exoJ Mutations Affect the exoX‐exoY System for Modulation of Exopolysaccharide Production.” Journal of Bacteriology 173, no. 12: 3776–3788. 10.1128/jb.173.12.3776-3788.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Rychel, K. , Chen K., Catoiu E. A., et al. 2025. “Laboratory Evolution Reveals Transcriptional Mechanisms Underlying Thermal Adaptation of Escherichia coli .” Genome Biology and Evolution 17, no. 10: evaf171. 10.1093/gbe/evaf171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Sakthivel, I. , Rangaswamy B., Rajagopal B., and Shanmugam L.. 2025. “Integrating Kinetic Models, Gene Circuits, and Biofilm Dynamics for Enhanced Exopolysaccharide Production in Nitrifying Bacterial Consortia.” Journal of Microbiological Methods 237: 107237. 10.1016/j.mimet.2025.107237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Santoyo, G. , Martínez‐Salazar J. M., Rodríguez C., and Romero D.. 2005. “Gene Conversion Tracts Associated With Crossovers in Rhizobium etli .” Journal of Bacteriology 187, no. 12: 4116–4126. 10.1128/jb.187.12.4116-4126.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Selby, C. P. 2017. “Mfd Protein and Transcription‐Repair Coupling in Escherichia coli .” Photochemistry and Photobiology 93, no. 1: 280–295. 10.1111/php.12675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Shah, A. S. , Wakelin S. A., Moot D. J., Blond C., Noble A., and Ridgway H. J.. 2022. “High Throughput pH Bioassay Demonstrates pH Adaptation of Rhizobium Strains Isolated From the Nodules of Trifolium subterraneum and T. repens .” Journal of Microbiological Methods 195: 106455. 10.1016/j.mimet.2022.106455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Singh, J. , and Valdés‐López O.. 2023. “Discovering the Genetic Modules Controlling Root Nodule Symbiosis Under Abiotic Stresses: Salinity as a Case Study.” New Phytologist 237, no. 4: 1082–1085. 10.1111/nph.18627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Sirko, A. , Zatyka M., Sadowy E., and Hulanicka D.. 1995. “Sulfate and Thiosulfate Transport in Escherichia coli K‐12: Evidence for a Functional Overlapping of Sulfate‐ and Thiosulfate‐Binding Proteins.” Journal of Bacteriology 177, no. 14: 4134–4136. 10.1128/jb.177.14.4134-4136.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Springall, L. , Hughes C. D., Simons M., Azinas S., Van Houten B., and Kad N. M.. 2018. “Recruitment of Uvrbc Complexes to Uv‐Induced Damage in the Absence of Uvra Increases Cell Survival.” Nucleic Acids Research 46, no. 3: 1256–1265. 10.1093/nar/gkx1244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Srivastava, A. , Parida A., Bhattacharjee S., Gupta N., Singh S. S., and Mishra A. K.. 2025. “Harnessing SDS as a Source of Sulfur: A Bioremediation Strategy of Fischerella sp. lmga1.” Biodegradation 36, no. 4: 61. 10.1007/s10532-025-10158-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Tamura, K. , Peterson D., Peterson N., Stecher G., Nei M., and Kumar S.. 2011. “MEGA5: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Using Maximum Likelihood, Evolutionary Distance, and Maximum Parsimony Methods.” Molecular Biology and Evolution 28, no. 10: 2279–2731. 10.1093/molbev/msr121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Teng, W. , Liao B., Chen M., and Shu W.. 2023. “Genomic Legacies of Ancient Adaptation Illuminate GC‐Content Evolution in Bacteria.” Microbiology Spectrum 11, no. 1: e0214522. 10.1128/spectrum.02145-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Terefework, Z. , Kaijalainen S., and Lindstrom K.. 2001. “AFLP Fingerprinting as a Tool to Study the Genetic Diversity of Rhizobium galegae Isolated From Galega orientalis and Galega officinalis .” Journal of Biotechnology 91, no. 2–3: 169–180. 10.1016/s0168-1656(01)00338-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Wendlandt, C. E. , Helliwell E., Roberts M., et al. 2021. “Decreased Coevolutionary Potential and Increased Symbiont Fecundity During the Biological Invasion of a Legume‐Rhizobium Mutualism.” Evolution 75, no. 3: 731–747. 10.1111/evo.14164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Wu, J. , Zhang Q., Li A., and Liang C.. 2015. “Historical Landscape Dynamics of Inner Mongolia: Patterns, Drivers, and Impacts.” Landscape Ecology 30, no. 9: 1579–1598. 10.1007/s10980-015-0209-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Xamxidin, M. , Zhang X., Zheng G., Chen C., and Wu M.. 2025. “Metagenomics Assembled Genomes Reveal Microbial Metabolic Adaptation to Athalassohaline Environment, the Case Lake Barkol, China.” Frontiers in Microbiology 16: 1550346. 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1550346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Yamamoto, K. , Kusada H., Kamagata Y., and Tamaki H.. 2021. “Parallel Evolution of Enhanced Biofilm Formation and Phage‐Resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa During Adaptation Process in Spatially Heterogeneous Environments.” Microorganisms 9, no. 3: 569. 10.3390/microorganisms9030569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Yan, H. , Xie J. B., Ji Z. J., et al. 2017. “Evolutionarily Conserved nodE, nodO, T1SS, and Hydrogenase System in Rhizobia of Astragalus membranaceus and Caragana intermedia .” Frontiers in Microbiology 8: 2282. 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Yang, R. , Li Y., Wang Y., et al. 2022. “NHR‐80 Senses the Mitochondrial UPR to Rewire Citrate Metabolism for Lipid Accumulation in Caenorhabditis elegans .” Cell Reports 38, no. 2: 110206. 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Zhang, Z. , Liu W., Shao S., Wang E. T., and Li Y.. 2020. “Diverse Genomic Backgrounds vs. Highly Conserved Symbiotic Genes in Sesbania‐Nodulating Bacteria: Shaping of the Rhizobial Community by Host and Soil Properties.” Microbial Ecology 80, no. 1: 158–168. 10.1007/s00248-020-01489-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

FIGURE S1: Neighbor‐Joining (NJ) tree constructed based upon the concatenated sequences of core.

FIGURE S2: Neighbor‐Joining (NJ) tree constructed based upon the concatenated sequences of nodulation genes.

TABLE S1: A total of 68 representative strains isolated from Caragana‐associated Mesorhizobium used in this study.

TABLE S2: Primers designed for the genes and the annealing temperature of them (Tm, °C) in PCR amplification.

TABLE S3: Shimodaira‐Hasegaewa (SH) test of each test gene locus in comparison with the concatenated core genes.

TABLE S4: Accession numbers of the genes obtained in this study and deposited in GenBank.

ECE3-16-e73134-s001.pdf (698.1KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The DNA sequences generated in this study have been deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database. The accession numbers are available in the Table S4. All required data have been uploaded as Supporting Information S1.

Articles from Ecology and Evolution are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES